A c b, devastates ill prepared, Democrats, Nancy Blowsy, loses add: ons unions, Wolf Blitzer, for asking her a basic question and a coherent Jones has a rather revealing meltdown. I'm bench purposes the venture Russia then Shapiro Show is sponsored by Express Vps your data is your business protected and Express Bbn dotcom. Slash ban. Well yesterday was another good day for me, Coney buried. It turns out that she's very good at her job jeez also very good at defending herself in defending her judicial philosophy. Democrats, however, are not particularly good at their job, which was to somehow paint any Coney bear it as a deplorable painter as a crazy right winger, whose basically using the constitution, is a guy's for her own political, you point, they did not succeed in this, and so, as for our usual arrangement, they decided to change the terms of the debate itself. We are

living in a world where terms randomly shift definition in commuting onyx ashen? It's really impressive court packing over last week turn from a very clear and concise term, referring to adding seats to a court in order to change the political constituency of that court into filling seeds that are open and that that should happen and Democrats when they started it and in the media, went along with it and suddenly became wrote to suggest that it is core packing if you fill open seats or if you hold open seat, because you do not wish to confirm somebody of the opposite political party, that is not in fact core packing will now as whereabouts see. The Democrats are starting to trot out a new narrative and their new narrative, is that the term sexual preference is homophobic, sexual preference itself? That term is homophobic and trying this one when you are losing the argument, used, simply change the rules of the game. This is why Honestly, what we

This is how you got drunk too often, but it is true to say he got from people get so angry at the Calvin Ball. The Democrats in the media are constantly playing that, like were sick of the bs, just bring the guy's gonna break everything just just the guy who's gonna bring that guy, because there is nothing quite as irritating as watching people change the rules of the game in real time and then declaring that they are the defenders of fairness, decency and light, so explain how all of that happened as this show develops. But let's begin with Amy Tony Blair herself, so Coney there is an excellent judicial candidate has very clear and concise judicial philosophy. She understands original, isn't really well and she expresses it really well here was Judge Amy, contrary to the Second Circuit Court of appeals. Yesterday explaining the role of a judge in a democracy card of the rationale for courts, adhering to the rule of law and for judges taken great care to wait imposing their policy preferences. Is that its inconsistent with democracy? Nobody wants to live in

the love Amy tree. My children Don't even want to do that, so I can't as a judge Gary on the bench and say, you're, gonna live by my policy preferences, because I have life tenure and you can't kill me out if you dont like them. So she understands the rule of a judge. What a judge is supposed to do, unlike democrats and democratic pointy, who believed that judges job is simply to define the universe For everybody else, Emmi Connie Bert continued along these lines is not up to me to update the constitution. We have an amendment process. If you wish to update the constitution, that is up to Congress, it is up to the state they can do. All of this. There is any Coney Bert saying she is not in fact the ruler of the universe. You said you were in a richer list as a true. What does that mean in English? Ok, so in English means that I interpret the constitution as a law that I interpret its text is taxed I understand it to have the meaning that it had at the time people ratified it

meaning doesn't change over time, and it's not up to me to update it or infuse my own policy views into it. Ok, this kind of stuff takes them across off to no end because, of course, they want justices to impose their own policy views on the constitution so long as they are from the left and in order to justify that they have to openly state or imply that originals are actually just liars. They don't have to care about. The original meaning of the constitution are just using that as a guys in order to forward their own political agenda sort of like having six thousand and nineteen projects you just the declaration of independence, was a bunch of wise written in design in order to protect slavery, which of course, is untrue. People are left pretend that original wisdom is about somehow shoehorning in your right wing policy preferences into law. Via this document, the constitution will that's alarm, projection because it is the Democrats, it is democratic point ease of historically shoehorn, their own policy preferences into law. In fact, you can see this statistically Alia, Shapiro of Cato Institute. Pointed out during the two thousand nineteen Supreme Court term. There are

Seven decisions before justice is appointed by Democrats voted together fifty one times out of sixty seven republican appointees only voted together, thirty seven times. In other words, there is a lot of difference between how Republican appointed justices vote. People are heterodox in how they approach these issues. If their original US or textual us on a fundamental level, republican appointees, don't see their job as policy preference. They see their job as interpreted Moi faithfully, but Democrats only celebrate the court when the court is doing their policy preference. This is why they love rovers is way too much This is why it is a terrible case. Legally, even its own advocates will admit it has nothing to do with the constitution. It's why some of the most celebrated positions in constitutional law, our positions left, loves specifically because they have nothing to do with the constitution and some of their favourite quotes. Are things like this from plan Parenthood versus Casey, where they say that every person in the United States Court has the right to quote: define one's own concept of existence of meaning

the universe and of the mystery of human life, what they really believe that than presumably you'll be able to decide that on the level of their workers or a stable. What they really mean is that the Supreme Court is to get going to define for everybody there. Their specific definition of the concept of exists meaning the universe and the mystery of human life. What the hell does that have to do what the constitution Democrats see nothing, but wonder in Supreme Court justices declaring that you, the judiciary, has been delegated enforcement of a quote charter. Protecting the right of persons to enjoy liberty as we learn its meeting. In other words, the Supreme Court gets to be the evolving standard. Decency, by which we are all judged another Supreme Court court, evolving standards of decency, don't say that We have voting standards of decency. We need to vote on those involving standards of decency that just called Democratic Republic. They did they get to crack down on all of us, their own evolving standard of decency? They believe that they get

make Loggia emanations and penumbra from the constitution, its Kosovars, Connecticut of nineteen. Sixty five on that Slim read that Rovers Wade is based this. What Democrats want from the court, but does not work journalists do and this. Why democratic so angry it originally like a c b because number one they don't like original is an original, isn't defeats their definition of the court and who original wasn't gives the lie to their cynical viewpoint, which are the judges ought to basically impose their own vision of the law on the rest of the kind So easy be continued along these lines. She explicitly rebuked, essentially the Brok Obama Vision Judge a Obama infamously stated that he wanted judges with empathy and life experiences, because their life experiences would help them define how they may judgment. Acb be said. I have interesting life experiences. They have nothing whatsoever to do with how I dropped case. While my life experience is, I think you know I hope have given me.

Wisdom and compassion. They dont dictate how I decide cases because, as we discuss before, and I've discussed a couple of times Sometimes you have to decide cases and ways where you dont, like the result, so I hope that my family made me a better person and my children definitely have given me new perspectives on life. I still and applying the law deciding cases dont, let those experiences dictate the outcome can show normally the waited the Democrats fight. This sort of thing is by claiming that the person doesn't have empathy that the judicial Domini is cruel and vicious for not using their own life. Experience is not looking into their hearts before interpret unconstitutional authors on one problem: Amy Cunning Bear. It is a particular sympathetically she is not only a very brilliant legal mine. She also happens to be a mom of seven and as she's very personal, and this came across very well in the hearings

today, there was any bunnybury talking about her adoption of two children from Haiti. When Jesse and I were engaged, we met another couple who had adopted in this instance. It was a couple had adopted a child with special needs, and then we also matter Couple of it adopted a few children internationally, and we decided at that point. While we were engaged that at some point in the future, we wanted to do that ourselves. and I guess we had imagined initially that we would have whatever biological kids that we have decided to have then adopt at the end, but after we had our first daughter Emma without why wait well. That does not seem like an unsympathetic, terrible person to me, which is what Democrats would prefer to painter, as there are also preferred a painter as racist in May difficult when she's, obviously not a restless, so here is He be yesterday talking about the George Floyd Video and watching it with her two black children.

I was there and my seventeen year old, daughter, Vivian, whose adopted from Haiti. All of this. As a rapporteur, and it was very difficult for her. We wept together in my room and then it was also difficult for my daughter, Julia, whose ten I had to try to explain. Some of this to them I mean my children to this point and their lives have had the benefit of growing up. a cocoon where they have not yet experienced hatred. Or violence and for Vivian. You know too understand that there would be a risk to her brother or the son. She might have one day of that kind of brutality. has been an ongoing conversation in a difficult one for us like it is for me, cons all over the country. The other Brom bore them as it turns out.

and Amy go anywhere. It does represent a lot of viewpoints from the middle of the country's lives. Lifestyle that many in the middle of the country can identify the people on the coast sometimes have trouble. Identify I until very recently lived in LOS Angeles with my parents lived very closely nearby. My mom worked in Hollywood and at her office. Sometimes she asked him in a kid should she had, and she said I have for kids and people look at her across I'd for kids that so many children in the religious community, as I wanna children were orthodox Jews and in the orthodox jewish community. If you say you have forecast circuit what happened together three because the fact is that Europe, an extra comment community, like the catholic community is, is very fertile, will that there are certain cultural things about living in the middle of the country or living in a religious community that people find it absolutely natural in the middle of the country, but people on our coasts really don't, and you can tell by the media coverage yesterday, Emmy Coney there, it was asked whether her family owns a gun, and she said yes and the media are like. Oh my, she owns a gun

and a hundred million dollars in America like ok, so a good she should honour done. It's good to be able to defend yourself. Here is aiming Tony Blair yesterday when it comes to your personal views about this topic, but the octagon regale on again or I do you think you could fairly decided case, even though your gun, yes, judges, can't just wake up today and say I have an agenda like guns, I hate guns, I like abortion. I hate abortion and walk in like a royal queen and impose their will on the world day. Then, of course accept Megan, she's saying my own per our views on these issues. Dont have any relevance, interpreting law, which of course is right. I mean that is what a judge is supposed to do. It's your job is to judge right. It is not to impose it God. There is a certain irony to the fact that if Amy Coney Baron who gone in there and I've had three abortions democratic be cheering. But if she says that her we have gone. The Democrats are scared beyond all measure

say something about the relative moral viewpoint of the various political side was viral moment for me, Coney. Bearing yesterday happen when she was ass, specifically by John Corner of Texas. Show the notes that she was using during the hearing. So all of the democratic senders they they brought like big binders of notes, defraying question, Amy, Coney, bare and icon about was asked. So what Candidates. Are you using in order to respond to all of this, and she had a response. You know most of us have multiple notebooks notes looks and things like that in front of us. Can you hold up what you're been referring to an answering our questions, is there anything on it? That letter that says state Senate Brickbats, impressive, well sleigh queen, but actually likes lately, that's kind of arson rather have asked. The fact is, as we'll see when it came to her running circles around the Democrats. Intellectually, it was, it was fairly obvious and Democrats tried tried to get their viral moments, but they

completely failed, and so they have now been relegated to rewriting the english language we'll get to that end in just one second. First, we need to talk about the fact that when you are running a business hr issues actually matter, HR issues can absolutely kill you wrongful terminations. It's me The wage requirements, labour regulations, nature managers, salaries, they're, not cheap, the average seventy thousand dollars year Bambi its Bell, Ba I'm be- was greed specifically for small businesses, because you don't actually want to spend your time doing hr. All you want to do is create products and services for others, but you're gonna media coverage. Or could cost your hundreds of thousands of millions of dollars. You can get a dedicated hr manager from Bambi Craft. Hr policy. Maintain your complaints offer just ninety nine bucks a month with Bambi. You can change hr from your biggest liability to your biggest strength. You're dedicated Atra manager is available by phone email

a real time, chat from on boarding, determinations, customize your policies to fit your business and help you manage employees day to all four. Just ninety nine bucks a month Monti month are no hidden fees, cancel anytime. You didn't start your business because you feel like spending time an eight hour. Compliance Superfund, there's a reason that everybody hates Toby on the office, in fact, is what you need is HR, any need each are done quickly and easily. And inexpensively and Bambi can get it done for you right now go to Bambi dot com, slash if you're right now schedule your free age are on it. That is Bambi. Dotcom, slash apparel spell Bam, so the bp dot com, Slash Shapiro, go check them out right now. Ok, so the Democrats spent the entire time trying to do gotcha against Amy Coney there. I was there big thing: they're, gonna, gotcha, Amy Coney there over and over and over well there's one problem, which is that back and ninety ninety three Democrats established a rule was called the Ginsburg rule. It was named for with their Ginsburg, because Ruth Better Ginsburg wasn't ACL. You litigator, who had argued in favour of legalizing prostitution against separate

and for men and women and she'd speculated that there was a constitutional right. The polygamy goes back a ninety. Ninety three and Republicans were preparing to ask all of these difficult questions, and so Democrats came up with a rule rules actually crafted handcrafted by one centre from Delaware named Joseph Biden. He came up with the Ginsburg rule. You rule was that you could not actually ask a question or allow judges to answer questions on issues likely to come before the courts or make any statement. I create the appearance that they are not impartial, so Senator Biden said the between nineteen that that basically nominees never testified during confirmation. Her inspired nineteen, fifty five and in nine forty nine there's a nominee whose called to testify and refuse and was No confirm is all going to heritage foundation Biden, warned senator, is not to ask questions about how Ginsburg will decide any specific case that may come before her Ginsburg followed Joe Biden Roadmap. Senator Platt lay he, whose army

was stolen. This ended at that time centre lay. He has been in the Senate since the establishment of romance as a state in seventeen. Seventy. He asked about the religion clauses of the first moment and Ginsburg set. I prefer not to address a question like that way. He pressed her for interpretation of Supreme Court precedent and Ginsburg set out virtual laid particular case and then lay he said. I understand just trying judge just trying Ginsburg refused answer over and over and over she refused use your request to address gay rights should anything I say could be taken as a hint or a forecast and how we treat classification. That is going to be a question before the court. Again. This was called the Ginsburg rule at meets a former. Yes attorney general right about this here was Ruth, Better Ginsburg. Ninety ninety three helping to establish the so called Ginsburg rule, I want to decide impartially can offer no forecast. No heads for that would show not

need disregard for the specifics of the particular case it would displayed. Disdain but the entire judicial power says, engaged so Jimmy France now are angry. Ginsburg will again. This is how it works is all Calvin ball from the Cabinet Hobbs cartoons in which the rules are constantly changing is just Calvin Ball there. There is a famous baseball medical bang, the drum slowly in which baseball players win money from suspect, from unsuspecting people in I sort of bars in and hotels. They understand the kind of commoners one played play cards with them, and so they set up a game and the game is literally all the fun and exciting game with no rules- and I just randomly change the rules understand the commoners want to play with them. This is what Democrats do what Democrats do? Is they sit around and established rules that they then break as soon

rules are no longer convenient, do them so yesterday, every Democrat, all of whom most of these Democrats were, were there in nineteen eighty three all of them know about the so called Ginsburg Rural, ok then decided. It was very bad for me, Coney, there are not violate the Ginsburg rule. So here is thy info sign, trying to press Amy, Coney Barrett about Rovers weighed and Amy Coney balancing listen. I can't speech you how I will adjudicate on a case that has yet to come before me and if I give you my specific opinion on how rovers Wade decided. Then you may take that as an indicator of how I'm going to rule on a case in which Rovers wages the precedent and I'm not going to do that now. Let me be frank about this item begins programme, stupid. I think the Ginsburg rules, idiotic. I think you should fail to ask a judicial now, many that anything under the sun, but unfortunately, because democratic politicized, the court. This would become impossible. And were girl was a natural reaction to the barking of Robert Bork in the nineteen

He's robber Borg was brought up before the Senate and Joe Biden was involved in this. Then too, he was involved in going after Bork and calling him a racist and suggesting that he was a benighted refugee from eighteen. Fifty four! three and then Republicans said: ok, fine organ asked group arrogance, but the same questions of Democrats up the Ginsburg Rural Anatomy. That's gonna violate, begins programme, because again, there's republican Domini before them so here is here, was dying fine, I'm going after Amy Coney bear it do I agree with Justice Scully as view that row was wrongly decided senator I come lately understand, why you are asking the question. But again I can't pre comment or say yes, I'm going in with some agenda because I'm not do you agree with justice squeeze view that road can and should be overturned. By the Supreme Court, but I think

My answer is the same because you know that's a case. That's litigated. Ok and you can see fine Feinstein is very angry. The churn answer, a question on robbers weighed: the goal here is to get aid. The can overturn row which, by the way rose not gonna, get overturned, of any kind of their. What about over her role? I think there are best three votes on the Supreme Court. Certainly not five to overturn Rovers wait, Robert thinking about for it, Cavanaugh is now going to vote for it. I endorse it would vote for it setting at best, you have three votes on the Supreme Court to overturn row. Verses way then bear it. Reply Diane finds analysing you keep wanted me to say political things, I'm not gonna, say political things. If you aren't you something. Like all you know, you're sitting in a body called the United States any can do at any time Jews. Any issue that would arise under the affordable care actor. Any other statue should be deterred, and by the law by looking at the text of the statue by looking at precedent, this way that it would for anyone and if there were policy, differences or policy

consequences. Those are for this body for the court. It's really a question. Hearing to the law going where the law leads and leaving the policy decisions up to you, then, of course, is exactly right so now the Democrats start to get more and more desperate to any club ajar tries to ask a c b about row in a different way. She asked whether it constitutes cornfield super precedent. Super precedent is a case that is so well established in the american political system that would be imposed. Well to overturn it, regardless as to whether their legal flaws in the reasoning of the case, so Brown versus board is a clear and obvious example of what Supreme Court Scholars called Super press. An unprecedented will never be overturned simply because it has been so deeply embedded in the life of our nation. Re Marbury versus medicine is super precedent. Rovers weight is clearly not super precedent, because super precedent is something that is so well established. There is no debate over it any longer like there is no debate over radiation in United States. There is no debate of whether it is legal there's not a bit over whether it is good. There's no debate,

or whether the fourteenth amendment allows it right. It is super precedent, there's debate every single day, every single day over Rovers weight, because Rovers Wade was not only precipitously decided, it was wrongly decided. So it is certainly not super precedent himself and the second we'll get to any Coney berets answer on that particular question for let us talk about the fact that you're putting off a lot of time in itself a lately and if you do not have enough worm sofa. I honestly don't know what you're doing with your life. I mean this is like an incredible incredible sofa because not gonna cost you a fortune. It incredibly durable. It is super comfortable, so comfortable in fact than when I have relatives come over people sort of fight on who gets to sleep on the often so fuck the sofa we're comfortable than men, have the beds in our house. If even listening to the chauffeur, while you hurt me talk up my helix sleep mattress, while the same people make all form sofas, offer makes premium. Customizable, sofas and chairs, shipped directly to your door,

What makes it off himself a really cool off? For starters, it's the easiest way can customize it simply using premium materials at a fraction of the cost of traditional stores. You can pick your fabricated spill stained scratch resistant, the sofa color, the color of the Weggs sofa size and shape to make sure it's perfect for you and your home, they ve got arm chairs and loves each other. To an eighty sectional so there's something for everyone. You can always start small and by more seats later on, if you're, you're, all from sofa to grow and change with you. When you move off from sofas, there also deliver directly to your home with fast free shipping in the past. If you wanted to order a sofa could take weeks even more to arrive. You need somebody to common assembly in your home. All form will take you just three or seven days to arrive and mail. You can assembly yourself in

A few minutes, no tools needed. I know, because I have done this- is getting itself without trying in store sounds risky. Don't worry, get a hundred days who decide if you want to keep it, which is more than three months if you'll love it they'll pick it up for free if they full refund and they have a forever warranties what you have to lose, but often dot com, Slash Ben right now there are four and twenty percent off all orders for our listeners at all form dot com, Slash Ben again, that is all form dotcom. Slash ban, as I say, are often so far- is tremendous. We have the sectional with its cheese, is three seats over with changing the sand code of the special legs attend task but he wasn't go check it out. Right now all form dot com, slash! Then ok, so the Democrats grow increasingly desperate during his hearing with AC, be so any club which are conferred herself by asking any Coney Barrett about Super precedent, and it doesn't go great for our initial avatar is row a super precedent. Allergy defined super precedent. I've. I actually,

yeah my bought some day be sitting in that chair. I'm not I'm up here. So I mass of NATO will be all use super precedent differently. Ok, the way that its use and the scholarship and the way that I was using it and the article that you're reading from was to define says that are so well settled that no political actors and people seriously push for their overruling and am answering a lot of questions about row, which I think indicates that road as a fall in that category owned with facts and logic, Amy Coney Bert, for the win. This way, don't leave open, ended, gunning, quality somewhere. Don't ask questions, you don't know the answer. So if you have definition of Super President way it out their men ask Amy. Coney Merriweather fulfils the definition. If you allow, any Coney bear it to set the definition of super precedent. Of course, she's going to define it in the way that she has defined it before chemicals, which are did not look good in the exchange rate. Progressively worse for democratic Durban, whose an idiot started berating, Amy Connie,

over Indiana Gun laws which, like I, was unaware that she sat Indiana Gun laws or that you as a legislature, she's legislator in the Indiana State Assembly, or anything here is center insect urban being an idiot? We know how it works. Where you live, you know how it works, traffic between Chicago Northern Vienna, Michigan, going on constantly gun shows are held and Gary Indiana and other places and when they are selling these firearms without background checks. Unfortunately, these bangers and thugs fill up the trunks of their cars with firearms head into the city Chicago and everyone from infants to older people it just to horrific situation. Ok, so what does that have to do? Amy going about exactly the answer, is that nothing Corey Booker, MR potato? Head? The worst, during the United States Senate.

put out his angry eyes to question Amy Coney, bear it and blinked very seriously, and then he articulated all of his words, because he is the worst a mouth man here is yours, Senator Corey, Booker from New Jersey, questioning, Amy Pony and whether she supports a wide supremacy. Yes, I'm sure she I'm sure that she is a member of the KKK. With her two adopted black children go Senator Booker. Want to just ass. You very simply. I imagine you'll get me a very short, resolute answer, but you can white supremacy. Correct, yes Thank you said that you said TAT. I wish our President Jean can happily would say that so resolutely unequivocally as well and she's like what, in the effort talking about quite book our unity at any answers? Yes, Corey, Bulgaria is, in fact an idiot, though it literally the looks it. I mean I'm old enough trauma, that vice presidential debate calmly Harris was was doing me fake, laugh and the weird smirk Amy Coney berets. Facial expressions are so

more likely than commonly Harris's is not even close she's. Looking at him like are you dumb ass, and the answer of course is the is. He is in fact a dumb ass. It got even worse than that. So, safety, the very the very best for last, but maybe Corona asked a couple of questions. One of them was so beyond the pale stupid that it is merely empty. swell to describe how stupid it ass. It was immediately picked up by the media and turned into a bizarre narrative. They, they literally shifted dictionary definitions to meet democratic, talking point we'll get to that in a second, but she also asked this is her less dumb question? Ok, let's get you are less so amazing, Ronald Stupid, is personally in the United States and achieves a moron. I mean a pure full scale. Moron iq of a potato and only when me like a big potato, mythical raw potato, pull directly from the ground, a full on tube or pull directly from a field that is the brain power of Maisie Herodium, the demographic Hawaii. She asked AC, be read What if she had ever committed sexual assault? I'm gonna go no, I'm not one. So we,

now been asked whether ac be like went supremacy and also, if she has a rapist, was, did just have this one left over from the capital ignorance or what there's Maisie Verona. I ask each nominee these two. Questions- and I will ask some of you since became illegal adult. Have you ever made unwanted requests for show favours. Are committed any verbal or physical this meant or assault of a sexual nature. Now senator who have you ever faced. The plan or entered into settlement related to This kind of conduct now Senator drags offered National brightened up is what help you literally just spent time in a Supreme court hearing asking a catholic mother of seven whether as engaged in sexual harassment or assault yeah man yeah, we'll get back to that in just a second. But first, if you have a car that state

space sitting in a rabbi, a car you not using that you're paying insurance on. I have one question for you: why? Why would you do they get rid of it donated to cars for kids? Many of you third there jingle at such an airport, Mina one, eight seven: seven cars for kids K, a r s cars for kids, yet not stuck in your, it'll be stuck there until you actually done it. Your car to cars for kids get attacks. Option invocation voucher here is how it works. Cars for kids makes the process of donating your car, quick and easy. It takes just about two minutes. They handle all the details. All the people, All you need to do is schedule a pick up inside the title. Aircars donation is fast and free. It's usually picked up within twenty four hours, often even the same day and cars for kids will take your car. Even if it's not running donating This tax deductible, their tax deduction, is based on a sale price of your car. Cars for kids works hard to sell your confidence price. That means more funds for their charity and a bigger tax deduction for you.

A special thank you for donating your car kars4kids gives you a vacation voucher, look for a three day. Two night hotel stay as well right way to be rewarded for helping people with cars for kids to get professional service, convenient pick up maximum tax deduction, a vacation down to end a good deed, donate today at cars for kids org. Slash men as cars with a k k, a r s, the number for kids at key ideas, dot, Org lifespan, I'll, give you the donation experience. You deserve cars for kids, dot, Org, slash, ban that cars for kids go check them out. Right now already has shrunk back into it, and then we got Sheldon Whitehouse, meaning visit these. Are there WWW lacked folks. I have a question you wanna give any of these people more power like it. You can say that the Republicans in the sun R, R idiot. You can say that the democratic senator it it's ok, they're already at twenty, want to give them more power understand. I really do not understand Americans keep saying how much they hate Congress and how much they hate the president, how much they hate the federal government and then the like, but what if we gave them more power? Ok here is brilliant. Brilliant

Sherlock Holmes, Ian sleuth Sheldon Whitehouse from Rhode, island this guy is just that this is this is me trying to explain Munich injunctions about how to set up in a room to people who don't even know what a Jew as this isn't like. What is he even doing right here? I don't I don't know he takes the charge to explain how this is all driven by my name, my name Sheldon will hit it takes out a chart. He first forget it I have to say to get a big sign. It had the scheme as though One of those act breaks in italian Tino film in public a placard to the scheme, and then you sort of expected. You know, like Tom, Sizemore, to walk out and start speaking in jargon to Harvey Kite Heller. Somebody did this Game. They then here he takes out a sign that has on a bunch of words that have very little to do that. Other a bunch of money signs and he starts explaining this thing. Like

early day and it's always it's always in Philadelphia Harry Go Sheldon White House and by the way, the point that he's making is the conservative groups want conservative justices appointed. That's his point. Any any starts like taking yard using it like carry on homeland, said to make one of these giant FBI Boards Sheldon. Why has Genius Sherlock Holmes Ian sleuth can ok, says: there's big anonymous money behind various lane. of activity, one line activities through the conduit of the Federalist Society, its managed by a guy, managed by Guy named Leonard LEO and it's taken over the selection? of judicial nominees. All the same, under its over and over again bringing the cases and providing this orchestrated, orchestrated chorus of amity. Then the same group also funds.

Federalist society over here it was an eighty two, zero five to four partisan route. Ransacking that club and then there's a cut away to Lindsey Grasp and grams, like what were they put in the skies gothic, why in the world is going on, it did not go great for Sheldon White House. By the way crews, then blowtorch the White House he pointed out. You know who spends an awful lot of money on on legal issues. Everyone, including the left, is sometimes for good, sometimes for bad in the fact is that these, Court system in the United States is routinely been used in order to make certain laws illegal in order to strike down certain laws in the entire Rosa parks heroic. story was orchestrated by the end of a lazy pay. I mean it was not. It was not. The Rosa part spontaneously does incidentally, back and bus, was well plan with other local leaders like this sort of stuff has been done for years on end red Brown versus board.

Illegal strategy that was undertaken by the end of a lazy beat that this notion that that political groups don't spend money in the in the realm of law is bizarre. Here is crucial, going after Sheldon White House and blow torturing and the Senator from Royal and talked about big corporate powers. Without acknowledging that the contributions from the fortune, five hundred in this presidential election overwhelmingly favour Joe Biden and the Democrats, so all of the great umbrage about the corporate interests are spending dark money is wildly in conflict with the act. facts at the corporate interests that are spending dark money are funding. The Democrats cannot, of course, exactly true okay, so this brings us to the the key,

the moment of the entire day. They had nothing. Do they mean going America's Coney Bartleby confirm what had to do with is again this absurd move to redefine basic terms of language in order to drive narratives. It's incredible. We watch should happen again with court packing and last two weeks now watching it happen with the term sexual preference. So some time yesterday, there's a producer forlorn Saddam who got angry at Connie there, because she used the term sexual preference, which they widely used. Hermits been used by the Gay advocacy magazine. The advocate Joe Biden use it less than five months ago during a debate, I believe, or at least during rally and and judge amicably, bear it used it when she was speaking about sexual preference, meaning like our you straight or are you gay or are you bisexual, there's nothing discriminatory about the term sexual preference. Nothing gather this. This. Did they try, so this guy got angry that sexual preference suggests that we have a choice in how we choose to prefer things

Well, no! Actually that doesnt suggest that, at all, we have lots of preferences in our daily life that are biologically driven many of them ready that the term sexual preferences has been widely used for decades. At this point, in fact, sexual preference was a term that was widely used in the gay community for very many years. It's used right now. But the and the Burmese you Rona pick this up and then decided Amy Coney there. It was a hair, a noxious hetero normative homophobia because she used the term sexual preference, which is it credible and introduced absurd. So here's Maisie Orono saying something incredibly done and, as we will see, I mean this is stalinist, really a stalinist stuff, be dictionary. Webster's dictionary went in and revised their definition of the term sexual preference to flecked, this new found umbrage taken by Democrats. So within thirty seconds of Democrats redefining the term sexual preference to be offensive, Webster's dictionary redefined

own definition, canvasses stolen disappearing people from the photos. There is major Orono origin laying out this idiocy, not once but twice you use the term sexual preference. describe those in the algae Bt Q community. Let me make Their sexual preference is an offensive and outdated term It is used by anti algae betake. You activists to suggest the sick, orientation is a choice. It is not so orientation is a key part of a person's identity that sexual attention is both a normal expression of human.

Sexuality and immutable again and again, coiners look more like what are you talking about. I haven't suggested anything to the contrary there. What are you what what in the world so Webster's dictionary mean? This is how fast these they this is when we say that the institutions are stacked against not only consumers but against reason. This is this is why our cultural institutions are stacked and their stacked on behalf of the left. They are willing to redefine dictionary terms in order to meet with democratic and woke fifty approval Kate. Literally yesterday, yesterday they went in and redefine Webster's dictionary redefine the definition of preference. Okay, so be fifth definition of preference in Webster's dictionary up until yesterday was orientation as in sexual preference. He they went in there, redefine the charm yesterday. As soon as this narrative started to take root to say, offensive see, usage blow orientation, sexual preference, its offensive

Ok, they they. They literally changed the dictionary definition of the term. In order to meet with the approval of Democrats, it's incredible that there were really impressive. Stop its impressive stuff that the democratic machine immediate democratic, complex is so well oiled that, within thirty seconds of a bull bleed nonsensical rhetorical moved redefine long held american term. Do it no problem? This is gas lighting. Its deconstruction, its AIDS deconstruction is, at its height, is a shock dare their driving everybody up a wall in the name of leftist politics, if you don't have a common language, we can't have a common conversation, and maybe that's the bull, no common conversation we will just will just shifty literal definition of human terminology in order to meet with particular political preferences preferences by the way is meant not offensively. There

He said that than the Democrats tried to come up with. Finally, some sort of semblance of a narrative, the ticket pick up from all of this. They they try to say the camel hair ass did a good job with Amy Pony barricaded up Judy terrible job. She spent the first twenty minutes of her thirty minutes, basically giving a campaign speech. From her basement. It was not particularly inspiring heroes, Kamel Harris talking directly. She she was supposed to question OECD instead, you like, I many use this time to talk directly to the american people. God, please, please don't. If ever somebody comes up to you and I say I want to talk to lead. You turn around and run turn around and run. If you aren't carefully if this sort of stuff doesn't buggy, then Yemen watching politics long enough before again, one second to talk directly to the american people where we are and how we got here so we are in the middle of a deadly pandemic that has hit our country partner than any other. My friend in the world

more than two hundred and fifteen thousand of our fellow Americans who died and no including the president Republican members of this committee and war one one line workers here, the capital complex I've been infected, get more. What does that have to do then? Consider the answer is: nothing, of course, is just Harris. Posturing and grandstanding, so Democrats tried to say there was one moment wish I M going about it, except she didn't choose inexact in her language and bury picker apart. There was here is Harris asking if it's important for these Supreme Court to be impartial. Why don't you refuse yourself an icy, be saying like look you that set up the Ginsburg rule? You can't do this Do you think it is important for the american people to believe a supreme court? Justices are independent and fair and impartial on. It is a yes or no answer. Please. Yes, senator gas!

my colleagues have asked you today whether you would refuse yourself from cases on the affordable care ass. You did not directly answer their questions and instead you described a process. I can't have you elicit a commitment from me about high like make that decision in advance. That would be wrong, and that was the moment for a couple years. It was not a big moment. You can tell how bad This one for Democrats, because embassy of MSNBC absolutely melted down. What gets it that in just one? Second, first, let us talk about the fact that you dont want to spending any time at the auto body, Store We wouldn't want you in the middle of a covered pandemic, but you better I would not want to like ever, and the reason is Why would you stand in line to get up to the front requests apart, get a generic part that doesnt work right or have them order it online and it takes a week for its ride. Your car still doesn't work instead lying just go online. You yourself go rock auto dotcom record

I'm always offers the lowest prices possible rather than changing prices based on what the market will bear like airlines, you, where have you spend twice as much for the same part like say happen, either: Delphi FC fourteen fifty six fuel pump assembly for two thousand five budget as a ten hundred odyssey accosted, three and fifty four bucks had been changed or making it a rock Otto for two hundred seventeen box recorded outcome. It's a family business serving auto parts. Customers online for twenty years, had an open Iraq, auto dot com to shop for ATO and body parts from hundreds of manufacturers. Again those prices reliably low the same for professionals into your suffers. Why would you spend twice as much for the same parts had on over to rock auto dot com right now see all the parts of able for your car truck Rachel Piero in their house here about its box? So they know,

We sent you again that Rock Otto DOT Comradeship Euro, that how did you hear about his box? So they know that we sent you ok in just a second we'll get you MSNBC melting under their Nancy Pelosi, melting down, so Nancy policy. It's amazing Nancy Pelosi is Trump she's, just female and Democrat re as much as the press, love to talk about trumpets, the media and how his thin skin and all this cancelling Nancy policy makes Trump look like a look like an island of calm in a river of crazy. I mean it that that's how bad Nancy policy as we get an answer closely in just one. Second. First, if you haven't heard already daily words, all lorry daily wire baseball bat is back this. Our limited edition handcrafted custom painted baseball bat emblazoned without magical daily wire logo, which means that the super powerful since we re launch on Monday, there almost also

today is the last day they will be available. You can still get yours if you hurry text. The cure baseball to eighty three four hundred to purchase your bad today, if you haven't already had in our daily work outcomes, lush subscribe, become a member. Today, members get articles had free access to our lie: broadcasts ensure library, the full three hours of the men Shapiro show exclusive readers pass content available. Only today where members, if you're, considering in all access membership, yet to join us on all like every night for online and live stream discussions else again, not one but two leftist year, assembler with EU membership as well as early, sometimes exclusive access to new daily, where products so go check us out over a daily wire dot com right now and get your all access membership listen the largest fastest growing conservative Pakistan radio shown the nation so the wig. Hell that Amy Coney bear it generally well. Last night is because all of the media talking heads were super superannuated, so Ellemus style whose lost it is now, comparing abies AC, be too the proud boys and Emerson. We say this:

ass for intelligent commentary over on MSNBC the land of of crazy, and they hit carousel histologist, losing it it's. like dogs is destroying our stand back and stand by right, We understand what this woman is being set to do has already told us. He wants the Supreme Court to look at the balance. It would be the easiest thing in the world say you know what I'm not gonna. Do that the fact that she won't do it tells you all. You need to know about our character and all you need to know about what she intends to do if she is confirmed before the arch. She literally said I can't education, so it comes up before him. Is like she's gonna stop the ballot box. She is like the proud boys. Ok, I'm sorry you're crazy person, joy, red, another crazy person. On that same so she said Amy Cunning, but it doesn't know. Ah, yes, I am sure the legal experts Irene will inform us of the lawyers joy rate, informing us of the law. This way

is a minister for minorities of sitting job right now, so she. theoretically knows the law Amy Clover targets. This was a very effective questioner today asked her pretty simple, straightforward question: is voter intimidation, illegal, ok sheet, you know the law. I am barely certain that she knows law as it as it turns out. Ok, what, then, the need true melt of the day, it was not a run MSNBC. It was over on CNN, so Nancy plus he's been holding up. The stimulus package Republicans proposed one point: eight trillion dollars and new spending to stimulate people who have been heard by the lockdown. Because, again, when the government forces you not to do your business well, then the government has taken something from you in there to compensate you. This is the fifth them

the takings was even Democrats have been slamming Nancy blowsy for her unwillingness to take any sort of deal Andrew Yang over the weekend tweeted at her, and he told blows you to take the deal or risk. Political parties have put politics side. People are hurting from former Obama Administration official down Pfeiffer agreed telling closely to ignore potential risk, and just in he'll to democratic resolutely, pursue a covered relief deal with Trump scorn, Emily's naughty over at daily why're. You said it's the right thing to do, but the politics can also work in our food even represent, are broke. Hannah was very far left, like Bernie Sanders. Leftist suggested that a stimulus package would be a good idea. He. So She was asked about this by Wolf. What's her on CNN, how unused to criticism is Nancy Policy when she has asked a simple. Questioned by Wolf Blitzer, she loses her damned mine. She starts to look like the bad guys at the

the operators of the lost out where their faces mount affirmation just lost it? She called she called him. A republican apologist mean this was a crazy off the rails interview and if she were a democrat but important visually. Brilliant strategies we have all been told is the is the mistress of our imagination here was Nancy. as you meltdown and Wolf, woods are of all people, that's good river at her up its go bankrupt, I was thinking that they really need the money right now and even members, and I am sure that better, but even members of European Cross, again even members of your own caucus, Madam Speaker, want to accept this deal. One point two. trillion dollars. So what do you say to Roca? What I say to you is, I don't know why you're always an apologist and many colleagues apologies for the republican position Roxana that's nice that isn't what we're going to do. What Blitzer is you're an apology for them,

workings really worth lesser and CNN. These are there. You know how wildly leftist in inner bubble, you have to believe you have to be to believe the Wolf Blitzer is an apologist, for there are public and it got worse by the way Nancy Just like it's a trumpet done this to any member the media, be. This is a threat of a free press. How Jeremy We treat a member of our beloved journalistic establishment like this. This is just terrible pressure. He wants his name on a check to go out before election day and for the market to go up. Is that This is all about, does not allow the president to take credit. The deal them or how. I know he has every right now he's not that but let me say this with all due respect: all due respect, and you know we ve known each other a long time. You really don't know what you're talking about.

There's a lot of you respect there. I thought I felt the respect you feel all the respecter. With all due respect of algae, respect, your and ask you lost your mind. Right did as migrant as this is a but this is forty minutes. Long is forty minutes of pure vein. In the de God, she got even more unhinged there. She was do have the idea of hell, Is precisely why buildings like their concern? That's where so several important right now. Yesterday I spoke to Hadrian who says the same thing: it's everything you weren't, you know like there's a lot of their understood. he really I've. Can I can't get over it? I didn't come over here too, had so you're the apologist for the Obama and appeasement For that matter, the speaker, I'm asking you serious questions are so many people are, as has to you if we right now. Let me ask you: this was the last driving it. Let me respond. Fuller, unbelievable

many concluded with her sayings Wurlitzer I feed poor people what, from your twenty thousand dollars of zero, Frederick thirteen dollar pints of job of custom, made gelato Nancy, that's area for the poor. Here's Nancy Blowsy time out. I feed the poor people. Let them eat cake, literally talking about how you're not feeding the poor people is literally. The topic of conversation is: why won't you sign it? One pointing trillion dollar deal to give people money in the middle of the greatest lockdown in modern american history and you, like, I feel poor people. I feed poor B Oh nothing. There is Nancy plus concluding this brilliant interviewed, Wolf letter remember this is most brilliant strategist of our time we ve been told. No you are them and adjust saying reserved. Then we know them as recent oh then we represent an outlet for if it be the enemy of the good, as they say you're. Nowhere near Paris, Madam Speaker is always the case, but we're not even close to the good. Let's see what happens because every day is critically

important thanks. So much I joining sensitivity to our constituents needs. I am sensitive to them because I see them on the street begging for food begging for money, not a speaker effect. for them. We feed them. We feed them. Well, not you don't. I feel, and here's a here's, a thirteen at thirteen dollars pint screaming poor person at incredible stuff. How do you know somebody's been the bubbles

long, as I know, somebody's been in the bubble, who I'm a Wolf Windsor is owning you in an exchange you ve been in the bubble. Oh wait a little bit too long. Wild sap, but that media bubble is extraordinary. Let me go is incredible. How bad is the media bubble here is how bad the media bubble is. So the sixteen nineteen project is garbage. I've talked to you about how to sixteen nineteen project is garbage, and sixteen nineteen project posits that the american experiment is rooted in slavery. That America is a deeply racist, horrible Mogador about place that every problem in America is traceable. Sliver every good in America is traceable to slavery. Historians, Pulitzer Prize Winning historians have defunct

one thousand six hundred and nineteen project. It is a bad piece of photojournalism. It was crap from the beginning. It is crap now so Brett Stevens over the weekend wrote a column about how is crap and how they rent on the 69th and project again, there's so much gas lighting and stalinesque retconning of history. Here it's amazing in the original sixty nine project literally had a graphic of the of the term, one thousand seven hundred and seventy six crossed out and over it imposed. Sixteen nineteen, it literally said what would it mean to consider sixteen nineteen, the true founding of America rather than seventeen? Seventy six, when this came up Nicole Hannah Johns and from which always metaphorical. We never meant that seventeen seventy six dead matter you You brought your original less aid. The revolutionary war was fought, at least in part, to preserve slavery, which they lie. It is not true. Ok up, it was a is bad piece of journalism. Then your tensions defended its bad piece of journalism, but the fact that the EU

Random he's my bread Stevens criticising the sixteen nineteen project in their rewriting of their own history. Cosmical Hannah Jones, two absolutely meltdown. Remember Nicole Hannah Jones is one of the prized Nicole headed Jones. She had said images of victim of discrimination in America while writing absolute horse for when the most prestigious paper in America and then kill and winning a Pulitzer Prize ready stuff? That is blatantly untrue. When even to basic backtracking on her own peace, european surprise for that, and then she claims that she's, the of racism against black women by exactly the people who pay her, give her job and defend her bull crap. It's amazing is an amazing

maize. In being so how bad a person is Nicole drones, so bread Stevens put out this column right and then the New York Times leadership put out a bunch of statement about how they love the sixteen nineteen project where they would. They want to make her happy deemed a cat put out a notice to the entire newsroom about these. Sixty nineteen projects in the wake of bread, Stevens Column quote. Sixteen nineteen is one of the most important pieces of journals. The times has produced under my tenure as executive editor? It changed the way the country talked about race and our history. It has given millions of Americans a new framework and a critical new date. Sixteen nineteen for understanding the nations past weekend. First of all, Nicole having drones, has said it wasn't journalism and she said that checks. We said that it was a piece of a historic we think

it wasn't really journalism. So much said it is also generated a lot of debate. This is a Democrat. That's no surprise worked at boldly challenges. Prevailing views, usually don't usually does a column. This weekend, in our opinion, section take issue with the sixteen nineteen project as the editor who runs the news from Itunes. oversee opinion or the views of its colonists. I do welcome opinions role in hosting a wide range of issues, including those that challenge our work. This I am, however, raised questions about the journalistic ethics and standards, and sixteen nineteen and the work of Nicole Hannah Jones inspired and drove the project that criticism. I firmly reject. oh sure we can have like an open, ended debate on sixteen nineteen project and whether Nicole headed Jones, full crap, but we can't do that. Sorry, actually as it turns out. We don't want to do that, because an open debate with it would mean that that new Offend Nicolet Jones and we're never allowed never ever offend nickel hundred

she is one of the holy she's one of the sink it she can speak. What ever nonsense comes into her mind. She can pretend that she is speaking truth about american history, but a vertically pushing lies after being told that their lives and we will defend her. This isn't your terms journalist. She says the project fell fully within our standards. As a news organization- yes, this, I believe, I believe that the New York Times is news organization standards to include promoting overtly false material. By the way, when you ever see the fact trackers on Facebook or on Twitter faction, right wing sites and claiming that they're doing things out of context when they ever gonna fact check the sixteen nineteen project. At any point, of course, not. Then your time, spinning millions of dollars to promote these sixty nineteen project on on Facebook really. I believe three million dollars on like three ads for the sixteen nineteen project on Facebook, according to outside estimates, but

Cats has, in fact sixteen nineteen, especially the work of nickel, fill me with pride, our readers. I believe our country have benefited immensely from the principle that rigorous groundbreaking journalism of nickel in the fulcrum of writers and editors who brought us this transformative work, but there's a little problem. It's it's garbage, it's just its garbage, but then your terms defended it. That was not enough guys. You understand: that's not enough for Nicole Hannah Jones, they were deemed a cat, proud of full statement talking about how much he wished. to lend his body to the mercies of Nicole Hannah Jones? How much he wished to let his institutional in his, institutional integrity to the predictions Nicole Hannah Jones, how you, that he could lie down on puddles Nicole Hannah Jones could walk over him and a coherent Jones was not having any of it. She is Damn of oh yes, according to the Washington Post Hannah Joneses limit,

She led opinions and recalling kings, berry and bread. Stevens know it and I had a publication on the day the National Association of Scholars called for the revocation of appeal is her. She treated that efforts to discredit her work quote a long tradition of black women who failed to know their places. She changed for twitter, biotech, slanderous and nasty minded Water is a tribute to trailblazing journalist. I d be wells whom the times with those same words in eighteen. Ninety four ok number one this in eighteen. Ninety four to Jane I to be wells, ivy, wells, reporting, true things, you're gonna Jones overtly route is overtly reporting all things are to be well was slandered for her race. Nicole Hannah Jones is being granted extra credit because of hers if Nicole Hannah Jones we're not of diverse ancestry, if Nicole headphones or just a white lady Workin for the New York Times, writings, that turned out to be overtly force should be on suspension right now, especially she'd been worn prior at the stuff that she was. Writing was not true Hannah Jones

now acknowledges that she should have been more careful with how she wrote certain passages, but, my goodness, everything everything fervour, nickel. It must be wonderful to be able to simply reply to all of your mistakes and people pointing them out by claiming that it is an act of racism to point. Oh, at out that this is a wonderful thing about our woke culture is that there are no limits to the Woke culture. Couple more examples on the work culture. This one is is fully insane. So there is a group called w net groups, the parent company of noort public television stations. They ve now call for the resignation of the long term chief executive at meal Shapiro, they say he's not enough to improve working conditions for employees, especially those of color. So what exactly did he do? Well, the big problems, then you'll Shapiro, is that not a person of color he's a former presidents of NBC News has led w net since two thousand seven here he apparently he apparently so much

been written is inaccurate, misleading or out of context W that has workforce of three hundred and eighty people. Seventy percent for my justify his white, which, by the way, is about the same constituency as the country the country is in the mid sixties in terms of a percentage white. Apparently, people are very angry at Shapiro. Why? Why are they angry at your peril, not really because what he has done with his personnel, but because of this ready for this this? How crazy people are this? How crazy are woke race viciously are on June. First, six days after George Flagstaff Shapiro released a statement and w net that Org quote. Racism is a cancer in the soul of this nation this has been an agonising painful week. Our hearts go out to so many, especially so far african american colleagues

at the same time, it is a reminder of what drew many of us to public media to help build a more informed country with equal justice for every one, based on understanding and mutual respect. Yet sounds pretty woke statement right. Racism is a cancer in the soul of the nation, and we have to show that equal justice is still a reality for black Americans raised buying into the systemic american racism narrative. Of course, this is that the statement it was not good enough, so let's eat Wallis platelets way racial jeopardy. Can you woke jeopardy Harrigan? Can you name for four hundred dollars? What, in that statement, is the problem don't balloon doo doo Doo Baby time's up? Ok! So what is the problem and statement? According to the inclusion in Diversity council? They objected to Shapiro likening racism to cancer quote it is our view that this represents your profound misunderstanding of our nations history and its current reality, racism

Not an anomaly separate from us rather is woven into the fabric of this country and in fact, our own institution. Amazing amazing, amazing, ok, also it's in the office back So first of all you got a lot of racism is a cancer. It's an inherent part of you, it's not something that you can remove from it can never be removed. It is inextricably intertwined with your identity. Racism, which means, of course, is never he'll, because part of what you are all you can do is shop I can do is shut up and listen. My goodness, under another point of contention between the inclusion and Diversity Council, which again these these institutions, when the Taliban, inclusion and diversities doesn't sound like the very inclusive like of anything? These are all orwellian terms. The inclusion and Diversity Council got mad because there is a thirty six. Thirty six second video, the company posted. on its social media accounts, hunter and third set to a plaintive pianos according to the New York Times, video presented images of harmony between New York, city police officers and citizens in one photo album

man in a hoodie is enforced, bumping, a white police officer in rigour in another, a white police officer, marches and protests next to a black. And wearing a blacklist net or t shirt, montage all should a black woman embracing a police officer. The inclusion and Diversity Council said the video displayed quote: biased in favour of the police and w net removed. It removed it by the way how crazy this council, so the company appointed woman in Eugenia Harvey in executive producer, going w net and twenty eighteen to a new position. Chief diversity, equity and inclusion officer diversity. Council criticized Harvey's promotion. Why what Harvey is black but they haven't been salted before the move it being a black woman, is not enough, no qualification that had diversity and a company like ours. This is a big deal, is not treated with proper respect. We fear Neil Shapiro? Is creating a shield for himself using a black woman? Is the shield? Ok, I'm sorry! If you choose to, if you choose to kowtow to disorder stuff, you get, you deserve every single thing.

Get and frankly, I am experiencing nothing but Trident bread for people who came to the seven then are getting a good and hard they deserve. It speak of you're, getting a good heart Meredith are who is a in the NBC top on scripted executive? She is now out she and embassies, former entertainment president have been accused of fostering a toxic workplace. The inquiry sprang from a Hollywood report report on allegations of homophobic, misogynistic and racist behaviour, Especially within networks reality division source, Say the investigator intervene more than sixty current informer network employees and found that our behaviour- is not in line with the standards the company expects, especially from its senior leaders. Hilariously enough who is Meredith are well according to Dublin, Hollywood go away back in May two thousand nineteen. in any ongoing advocacy for representation and keep production rules. They ve launched the networks below the line initiatives. The two new and creative, blind programmes focus on they representation among production, coordinators and production assistance. The new annual initiatives are spearheaded by NBC scripted probe

in CO presidency, two cats and Tracy Bokassa, alternative and reality group. Meredith r O, so they made her queen of diversity. and and then turns out. You created a toxic work culture in enforcing diversities, up everything going great in diversity, land yup. The woke come for all You can feed the alligator, hoping only last, but you'll still beaten and probably not last already will be back here later today, with two additional hours of content we'll get you Mitt Romney statements about Donald Trump, we'll get to Donald Trump tweeting out about Joe Biden. He treated oddly enough that that agenda. Morally enough, the Joe Biden was a resident of an old age from which is level, hilarious and on a political level into balls. energy when need when people above sixty five. You call your opponent a member of an old age home, but you know that the president will get it out a little later and a new proposal to reach heard immunity that has the left an immediate being driven up while will talk to a high ranking epidemiologist about it. This.

To make sure that you stick around for that. Otherwise was here tomorrow and then share. This is the bench Barroso. If you enjoyed this episode, don't forget to subscribe and if you want to help spread. The word please give us STAR review and tell your friends to subscribe to were available on Apple podcast, Spotify, wherever you listen to pod gases, also be sure to check out the other daily wire podcast, including Andrew Craven, show the microbial show and the mat walls Thanks for listening to venture Piero show is produced by coltan. Hearts are technical director Austin Stevens executive Jeremy boring our Superman in producers are math is clever and Robert Sterling assistants era. How the white asking ourselves producer is next year shows edited by Adam Silence, audio mixed by my comments here and make up its mind. You could you need Eventually, Russia is a daily where production, copyright daily wire. Twenty twenty

why, then, is having guys arrogant as God, why haven't guards hurricanes donate your mood? Servants? Urban cars arose cars Ricky one maid servant servant cars, but is don't make your car to day about our programme? Put a kind were keeping kinds with it now take up his queen and easy to get a vacation other names when tax deduction guys stars why cars donate your also accepting boats, motorcycles, our views and real estate donations.