As states begin to certify their votes in courts begin to wrong came from legal challenges. Rutulian in Sydney Powell hold their big pressure, but did they actually release the crack and I'm bench paralyses. The bench Barroso today show is founded by expressing deep. He and my savvy can secure their internet joined them. Expressly peons outcome, Slash man we're here to all the news and plenty there is of it in just one moment. First, why would you spend a lot of money and herself humble? Why? no reason. Instead, bicycle get here, talk you us have been talking about it for a while. Here you have, the same coverage is any big mobile companies. Instead of being a fortune, you are now paying not less money. Why? Well, because those big companies they charge you, Unlimited data, the you're, not using here's. What you need unlimited talk text in two eggs of data for just twenty bucks. But if you go round usage and I'm in charge you for switching to peer talk is the easy justice easiest decision you will make today. And keep your phone enter number or get Gregg deals on the latest iphones an android rubber, mobile phone thou pound to fifty say it.

Ben Shapiro. There is no reason to be spending too much money on your cell phone bill when you do when you down to fifty and say Ben Shapiro, you say fifty percent off your first month, Thou pound to five zero, say: Keyword, Ben Shapiro, what a phone company intentionally. Try to confuse you when you ask them to describe the billing plan. They give you like a bunch of jargon. That's not the case. A pure talk, USA, because they're not overcharging, you go check them out. Now you're talking, simply smarter wireless style pound to fifty say Ben Shapiro to get started when you do. You say that fifty percent of that very first months have a bunch of money with pure USA, S, eight five, zero sake, you Ben Shapiro, ok, so there is big pressure. Yesterday is the Big NEWS today: pressure. Yesterday, Rudy Giuliani, Jenna Ellis Sidney power. This is the team Trump legal team. They described themselves as the Elite defence squad, or something like that

so they are alleging massive vote or fraud and massive vote irregularity wouldn't go through their claims in detail. When I tell you what has been backtracked and what is not, what is true and what is not? What requires more evidence and what is sufficient, but we have to set the ground rules here. First, what people say in a press conference is of zero, not just a little zero consequence to the actual outcome of the elections. What happens in court is an outcome of the election that has an impact on the outcome of the elections. So, if I say there's, none of evidence at a press conference better mean that not enough evidence will be brought be provided in court, and I know what's provided in court. Conversely, if somebody makes an outlandish claim at a press conference that is not in and of itself evident sufficient to overturn results of elections in which millions of people have voted you're going to have to provide heavy evidence is so here is my job, and my job is the same as my job is every day and that is to try and sets out the difference between speculation and evidence is

try and tell you the difference between claims that I've been verified and claims that have not been verified, and it's you asked for more evidence in this is true for any large scale claim when people on the left talk about systemic risks, the evils of the american system. I always a need specific governance and I need a specific claims that I can tell you whether it is true or false when people on the left point to a specific instance of a white cop shooting a black man and they say This is evidence that America is systemically racist. I've asked this a thousand times. Also, ok, you have evidence that that is a racist shooting job. Evan that. It can broader theme of racism in Amerika. What is your data? What is your specific evidence right? We go through all of that asking for evidence, not mean that I am not concerned about racism. It means that I am concerned about racism, maybe is that before we label an entire system racist or an entire system, corrupt or even an individual, corrupt or racist, we need to make sure that we have evidence for the claim. The same thing holds true in from a voter fraud involving regularity. If I'm asking for evidence of a claims, mission to overturn an election. That's because there is here this issue is a play and when you're talking about a legal strategy,

It is largely design at getting millions of votes thrown out or re done in certain particular states or electors selected by the state legislatures. You need to provide outside evidence of those claims. Evidence should be the sign standard, irrational people, it should be anywhere. Who tries to sell you so if they try to sell your product without evidence, should doubt them if they try to tell you that I have a big claim to make about the universe that any evidence should out If you are talking about something as large scale as a claim that tete that may tens of millions votes, but certainly millions of votes, were shifted, for example, or that across the land, huge swathes of votes were discarded them properly or counted improperly. Well, then, you should be asking for the evidence that that seems like the baseline bottom line to meet wouldn't go through the claims There are often for sites out. There is no evidence. Is it it's that, we'll see whether there is evident sufficient support. The large scale claims that are being made now again. Jurists denote the press conference that happened with Giuliani and Alice and Polly. Yesterday it has

no actual legal bearing, and the time frame here is short for hearing a lot from from team trumpet and Giuliani, Alison and power, legal team, that this is just to begin it can be laying off is out in the coming days there now at a time here. Ok, then the clock is running. If you want to, see the election results change from what they currently are, Right is it you want to see the election result change, because, leave their theories, Vodafone, voter irregularity. You need You bring the evidence. Now you don't have time to wait three weeks, you don't have time to wait three months, and that is why, if we are going to look at what team from his actual instead of seeing what they are doing, a press conference as we should actually be looking at what they are doing in court and here is where things start to get kind of dicey, fourteen trump, because the fact is that states are starting to certify those notes with me. Your best, but I do stuff, if you're going to release the crack, and there can be a lot of talk at a press conference actually has to be a lot of evidence that you bring forth in a forum likely to change the outcome, because, no matter what you think or when I think of the election, the matter what anybody thinks of the

it is going to be certified unless something factually changes on the ground and a lot of evidence is brought in order to change the legal outcome of various elections where that is just the fact. So here is where things stand as of right now in terms of court filings and recounts and everything else in Georgia. Georgia now completed its hand, tally of the presidential race in Georgia, Gabriel Sterling really The information, the Associated Press on Thursday in hand, recount of nearly five million votes the state has, till today to certify the results that have been certified and submitted by the counties the results are certified the losing campaign and then request another recounts if they, if they want one. Ok, the fact is that the election numbers have not changed their or thereabouts thousand votes that shifted over the course of the recast, because bunch of ultra found that a thousand votes shifted in the hand recount over into the Trump camp, or at least, were added to that from camp, which means that right now, the deficit for Trump is

Thirteen thousand votes- where was about fourteen thousand bucks? That's not enough, obviously, to overturn the results of the election, and the high likelihood is that this data Georgia is going to certify those election results, barring some sort of last minute shooting in of massive evidence of voter fraud. Meanwhile, it is enough to note that in pencil, then in Michigan, the trunk campaign with through its Michigan election lawsuit. Any Mccarthy writing at National Reviewing says the Washington Times reports. The trunk campaign is now draw a federal lawsuit Michigan. I would challenge over a million male imbalance in the hope of preventing stay government from certifying the election result. He says it is clear. If they saving measure Masood had no chance of success. The rationale the campaign is given for dropping the case is inaccurate. We talked about this little bee yesterday that it had a little bit of a mix up. Confusion makes him She brought to bear in the wind bored cancers and which you Republicans into Democrats and Republicans initially voted not to certify the election results from Land County

Then they shifted over and voting with the Democrats to certify the results, then they filed affidavits suggesting that they are pressured into certifying the result. All of this was because the pole books, didn't! Why not pull back to where you sign in to vote and then the number of votes to match the public's. Now the grand total number of discrepancies there, was not in the thousands who was not in the hundreds of thousands, apparently including all of the discrepancies in Nepal books. You are talking about hundreds of votes, and they were talking about the possibility of filing lawsuit on that basis to overturn one point four million votes in when county that obviously is not going to the proper remedy. You can't disenfranchised one point: four million people, because the public's didn't line up for three hundred fifty votes, the discrepancy there is just too large and you're talking about a state in which trumpet our trails and account by about a hundred and fifty thousand vote? According to any Mccarthy the campaign claimed, the loss was being withdrawn as a direct result of achieving the relief they sought with Wayne County, not certifying vote, but of course, when county did certify the vote. So that, obviously, is not even true: ok, so trim Trump withdrawing the lawsuit in Michigan.

That was a face? Saving measures Andy Mccarthy's as it was not because they actually got what they wanted. Michelin. They didn't get what they wanted in Michigan, so the boat certified wing county ballot still under state law is, is going forward. Geraghty explained for the Michigan County certifications to be transmitted to the state canvas where there is the next step for full certification. The trunk campaign use the purported decisions as an opportunity to to declare an optical victory and then drop the Michigan loss. It now they're, not they're, not claiming that Motor irregularities they're just sort of recognising that they want gonna, get the relief that they sought from the court's into they caught they quietly drop. The Washington then claim victory, which of course, is not going to be effected in actually changing the owl of every thing happening in Michigan now me in Pennsylvania. Something similar has been happening. So, as any Mccarthy says, the the lawsuit those filed biting from in Pennsylvania was dependent on large scale. Claims

that voter fraud had basically taken place and then, in the middle of the court hearing, they actually dropped the charge of voter fraud from the lawsuit itself. Doesn't mean they say, the remoter fraud they still say, there's motor Are they just say that their claim a border fraud is not enough to sustain the relief they are seeking, namely to put aside the result of the elect, as currently constituted in pencil Dania. They realise that they couldn't meet the high burden of proof that voter fraud would require and they drop that came from the pencil being a loss of their out their claiming voter fraud, not in court and they're doing it publicly. That's not actually change the outcome of the election in may change. Public opinion on border fraud is going to change the outcome of the election in Pennsylvania, which means the window continues to narrow when we get to more of this in just one second. First, let's talk about the fact that there is a significant problem out there. If you are a law, abiding citizen and God forbid, you have to use your gun, you could end up in jail. You could- and this is why you, The legal service, as you know, when you can use your gun in how to use your gun. This is where the? U S, You see a comes in Legal system is not always fair responsibly and Americans often become political targets, and it's not right for good responsible.

Begins to wind up in jail, embroiled in a lawsuit for defending yourself in your family. In this day and age. You need two hundred yourself, and you need to know how to use it. You need to have the legal defence resources available. This is where you are she's here comes in the: U concealed Carry association right now in get a copy of the complete concealed, carry and defence. It died from the US. You see a one hundred percent free in that died. You will learn how to detect attackers before this you how to survive him ass, shooting the safer and most dangerous places to sit in a restaurant. Our response, we own and stored on, even if you have little kitchen, especially if you have little kids a whole lot more. It's one hundred sixty four page guide loaded with valuable information, Jack just text. having been to eighty seven to do to get instant access and just when a thousand, but she can biogas to protect your family again. Text bend to eighty seven to judge Would you get started six main inventor, eighty seven to teach you get instant access to that complete concealed carrion, family defence guy and a chance when a thousand bucks you can buy a gun to protect your family, it's a pretty and has it ok. So again, all this is giving the legal background for where we currently stand

because, whatever is said in a press conference is of no impact in a court. What is set in court is an impact in a court so, according to any Mccarthy, the washing Pennsylvania cannot conceivably change the result in Pennsylvania The court will probably not even rule on the was it the campaign has forgotten about wraps, has any Mccarthy for dropping its main counts, which there a gross improprieties amounting to fraud in pencil them the population of the boat abandoned. the count it seemed inexplicable on Sunday, given the campaign was simultaneously alleging massive fraud on tv, but there is an explanation on Friday, the Us Court of appeals for the circuit, issued a ruling that destroyed the viability of those counts. The campaign it showed the fraud related council responds to the Third Circuit Court of appeals ruling. The fault lies in pressing ahead with a narrower sense. That can't change the outcome of the race in Pennsylvania, even in the unlikely event that campaign prevails so here is the here is the problem. The claims that are still alive in Pennsylvania are talking about again. Hundreds

or maybe load thousands about they're, not talking about the number of votes, significant enough to actually call for in overturning of the election and basically team from acknowledges that at this point The third circuit brings us news of how negligible is the number of votes involves when you're talking about, for example, the claim by team from that a bunch of people have been posted marking there there ballots after the actual election date a pair. This is a very low number of ballots out of seven million total ballots cast in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The Secretary of state reports of the court, only nine thousand three hundred eighty three votes- received state wide in the three days after November. Third, even if all those were Biden, votes which they weren't and if the court voided, all of them, which it won't because some of them were in fact postmark before November third from- would still be. Seventy three thousand votes short in Pennsylvania. Only six hundred fifty five total lack illegible postmark, which of course not going to shift the outcome of the election. Also there's a problem between sort of fate, state and federal.

The third circuits explains: there's no judicially, Coggan, visible federal right to force state or federal government to comply with the law normally have to claim that there is a federal right there's been violated if, in fact, the state law allows for something to happen. It's hard to make an equal protection claim on the federal. As I said, that there is no equal protection violation because of the states three day extension: the court, Did that, in addition, a Pennsylvania, nineteen states anti see permit the receipt of votes post election voters don't suffer, a cognitive will harm they somewhat, for them is a formalistic difference between whether post election receipt is authorized by statute or by a ruling of the state's highest courts. There saying it's not equal protection case either. Ok, that doesn't mean that's a good ruling. It does me but the Trump legal teams chances in Pennsylvania are basically down to nothing. Most. They actually come out with serious, robust evidence of serious large scale. Waterfront, and that is just the reality of the situation- that's not me. That's law

Understand the people can be angry the law they can feel like the law should allow for the overturning of large scale, voting based on the possibility of fraud or based on proof of small scale. Border problems that theoretically could be larger scale voter problems, we don't have evidence to prove its hundreds of thousands of votes but the reality remains that that is not how this is going to work. Ok in the end, if you make outside seems like we need you disenfranchise. Seven million voters in Pennsylvania orientated disenfranchised five million voters in Michigan or needs it enfranchise five million voters in Georgia. You're going to need more than a few hundred votes were shifted here or there is a possibility that hundreds of thousands of votes for shifted, but we don't actually have proved that these votes were shifted right claimed outside large claims, require large levels. Approve a shell if we can release the crack and now is when you need. The tsunami of evidence demonstrates that hundreds of thousands of votes were shifted way across the country, at the very least that some thirteen thousand votes were shifted inshore adrift from his

when Georgia and thirteen thousand votes were shipped in Arizona or went missing or fraudulently counted in Arizona, or that a hundred and fifty thousand votes or fraudulent counted or shifted in Michigan, or that eighty thousand votes were shifted or fortunately, counted in Pennsylvania right. That is what you're going to need to prove in court. So that is the predicate read. It would have to be a crack and right. You would need to action have an extraordinary level of evidence. Now, I'm not saying at him from doesn't have that extraordinary level about, and I'm just saying that need a presented, no need presented to me. You need to present your court, but you kicked coming out publicly and send you have presented the evidence when you have not yet presented the evidence publicly and then, ok, worlds in court and the court will see all day. Heavens, ok will now you were, I am, which is course gonna ruin. The process is gonna move forward now, sort of pre emptive panic, act that is happening in the media, that the election is gonna, be stolen or that this is really horrible for our democracy. There is a legal process, as I've been saying. Since the beginning, the legal process will move forward. Legal process will require evidence. There will be if the legal process

not find massive evidence of border fraud or border regularity and does not overturn the current vote. There will be in integration and there will be peace, will transfer of power, which Macao has said that every state legislature has said this and I will say that I don't think that is a great look that president from has, for example, called up people in the Michigan Legislature and ask them to come visit the White House in the middle of all of this right, the implications radically people are speculating, is the trumpets calling them up, because he wants them to come visit and then he's going to convince them to elect a slate of electors as opposed simply going along with certifying the vote, a machine, later is already set. We're not going to do that. We're not going to ignore the votes of our millions of people and just put up a slate of electors based on vague allegations of voter fraud or even specific, but very closely enumerated allegations of voter fraud that don't amount to the difference between Joe Biden's vote and your vote still. It is not a particularly good luck. So, once again, it's on saying, there's a predicate. What happens in court matter? What happens in a pressure doesn't even an oppressor if your

robust claims, the american public, a serious voter, frighten series, voter irregularity, that requires robust evidence not just of occasional motor occasional voter irregularity, or even the possibility of a broader voter, regularity and in their lives possibilities out there and I will take under advisement all those possibilities. I think there's plenty of ways we The systematic mail and voting is a full scale. Mail and voting has been proved at this time round. As always to be a disaster. It is much harder to check favour a voter edgy in person on the day of voting, except for people literally require an absence ebola because for health reasons or any other The reason they cannot get to the polling place then turns out millions of people could vote and then spread covert everywhere. So this was a bad idea. Is a bad idea beginning to end. That does not mean that the the proof has been reached. There is indeed a burden of proven allegations alone enough unable to attesting to specific acts, do not imply that hundreds of thousands of vote were shifted now, sending when something different Sidney Palace, claiming that the system really was hacked and millions of votes were shifted, we'll get to all of you

allegations in just one second, because the press conference, on the one hand, is being taken by some, as this is the crack in the press. Conferences alone is enough: trust to overturn the election, which is which correct and then, on the other hand, you people, saying everything in the press, conferences, bull, crap and was just ignore all of it. We should not investigate any of these crimes, and that, of course, is silly as well. All claims about or abroad an irregularity that only judge should be investigated. There are credible, should be investigated. Also, a burden of proof has to be reached at just the waistcoat election outcome: ain't, gonna change, based on your opinion or my opinion. It's gonna change based on what is proved in court end of story, industry. Ok, so we can get to the pressure in just one second, and we will see whether thee there the crack and was indeed release. First, let's talk about protecting your online safety and security is. The fact is that a lot of the Silicon Valley companies that hate your guts? I don't want you to see information. There are currently downgrading everything they don't like all talk, even about what front voter irregularity, those same people survive.

In your abilities, information are actually making money off of you because you them permission, assent, by using their site to use your data will want your revoke that permission and instead use express Vps, big tech companies and use your ip address matter. Internet active eat, your identity or location. When I use express vps search engines and media sites can't see my ip address at all. My identities, mast and anonymize expressly can has the added benefit of encrypting one hundred percent of your data to keep you say from people you don't want having it expressly. Peons offer take just a minute to set up on your computer or phone. It's happened button. Your now operates

So, if you like me- and you believe, your internet data belongs to you and not to take a giant or not friendly to concerns expressed bbn is the answer. You have been seeking protect your online activity today with the GPS. I trust to keep my data safe visit, express Vps outcome, Slash bend to claim an exclusive offer for my fans. That is expressly peons outcomes lifeline for three months, free with one you're package. Is it expressive, gps, dot, com, Slash Ben to get started? Ok, so, finally, we got to the crack and releasing press conference right. We have been promised this Sidney power had said she was gonna release the crack and vast amounts of evidence that she was going to really demonstrate full scale does legend was stolen, and so the press conference leads off with Rudy, Giuliani and Rudy Serve lays out the preliminary case. He says that you know it's very here than on election night. Tromp was leading by all of you, and then by the end of the election, is not leading in in a variety of these states. Now, in call that weird, the reality is that that was rather expected because

The democratic really really pushing. I mean you remember this: their pushing super hard mail in voting romanian voting with their thing from posing mile melon voting as that which is correct, but that did just wait a lot publicans from voting mail and instead they they heavily outweigh them crash on day of voting, expect it right and then, when the mail and votes we tabulated at the end of the night tabulated after the in person, bosnian person votes are tabulated, basically on the spot. Election happens within our you know what has been tabulated in person and in places like Pennsylvania, the rashly not only allowed to tabulate email and vote as those came in he starts to see this growing wave for forbidden in places like Pennsylvania, Rudy says that the timing was weird. A of people did find it weird yours, Rudy. The president way ahead on election night, similar hundred thousand in Pennsylvania. Somehow was Pennsylvania. We have, a willing to testify. That's almost too,

equally impossible to have happened in a period of time that happen, but, of course that's your speculation, and yet that is just speculation. So then he gets to the actual specifics. Ok say he says in Pennsylvania we have affidavits. That suggests that there was a melon voter fraud. Here's the allegation again remember important thing: Giuliani represented Jim Trump in court in Pennsylvania, specifically asked if there are making allegations emotive rod, he said we are not actually going to demonstrate go allegations voter fraud, because that is high bar for us to clear, but doesn't mean that vote affront could not have occurred, but it means that not a claim is actually making in court. Here is ready Giuliani. So, let's start with the specifics pencil. in Pennsylvania, the margin of victory now for Biden, which is a not a victory it a fraud sixty nine thousand one hundred and forty votes The reality is that

We are now at account of six hundred two thousand seven hundred and seventy ballots for which we have affidavits there was no inspection of that valid. the time that it was entered in the vote is a male ballot. Male ballads are particularly prone to fraud, so he is not actually making allegation that fraud happen. He is saying that there weren't observers, who are close enough to the bank to be able to see the mail and balanced when they were tabulated, and so theoretically, all of those could be fraud that that is a pretty you want to get some per thousand votes thrown out. You can have to show their some fraud in the seven hundred thousand votes meant a lot of people. Remember each one of those people he person voting. So you have to assume a lot in order to in order to get there again. Is there a possibility of fraud? Yet it's what you have election observers, but is that enough to three hundred thousand votes you can have proven court and again he didn't claim voter fraud in court

aids important recognised that what you women court is what action can be rolled upon now it gets claimed in press conferences. Ok, then Giuliani suggested that The recast being done in Georgia is a legitimate reason. Its legitimate is because he says that the signature that there was no signature, verification that happened in Georgia was inaccurate. There, a signal matching and signature matching was was done poorly in Georgia, because if you haven't absentee ballot, then you will you put in and what you sign, the envelope, the envelopes Nature is then matched up to these signature book right when you for you absentee ballot application there matched up. Then you throw away the envelope and then you count the ballot. His suggestion is that there are a bunch of people. In Georgia, who basically were not matching up the the ballot envelope with the actual signature in the book. so they were counting naked ballots in those naked balance could have been fraudulent. There is Giuliani trying to make a claim. So, for example, the recount being done in Georgia, will tell us nothing because Fraudulent backwards

the count again because they would supply the signatures to match the ballot. It will get to need sort of fat check on that in just second, how the process works in first. Let us talk about an amazing. It gives the net for somebody this holiday. he's really is an amazing that its quick, it is easy and looks, fanned, talking about my photo, it's a game changer in a bunch of photos on your phone you're, not doing anything with them right. You thought you were gonna like in parliament, will look took too time consuming you're, just not gonna. Do it. What you need to be able to do, take that photo immediately, send it to my photo and then within. Like five days. You get back this stunning give box, and in that give box is the picture on a metal glass or would creation is beautiful? We have one we had several. Actually in our home. From my photo that beautiful photo of me and my wife on the beach, I literally just took phone. I sent it into my photo and then five years, arrived this acrylic, beautiful, followed, beautiful and its. It shines like the light comes through its roots. We really pretty. I have won a mere my wife. My kid. My photos, dot com, they make a quick

It easy you shouldn't, go, try it right now. What am I photo dot com? You can easily see your photo on all their products and then simply purchase. You can use the practical Ben twenty five today for twenty five years After my followed outcome, right now use the code Ben Twenty five get twenty five percent off you'll see how easy on it as it can actually be adopting. It is very easy. It is very fast. Anybody can do it. If I can take a lot more time in it looks beautiful ass if you put a lot of thought into something that actually is gonna really beautiful life go check it out right now, my photos are coming to the founders of the company. There super honest, their wonderful people go check out. My photo dotcom use, Promo code Ben twenty five today for twenty five percent off. Ok, so when Giuliani suggests that The real recount in Georgia is an effective because you are actually just tabulating ballots, that beyond was thrown away on the outside world was disconnected and therefore it was never. It was never actually signature verified, he's correct. You can't signature verified, ballots, Romena part is true. Once you have thrown away the part that was the thing for verification, then, theoretically, if you didn't wrong, the first time you are

Tabulating, a bunch of balance that were originally Miss checked, but Brennan Keith, the chief investing edit glances at W Ex CIA. He says: where's our verified before ballots are counted. It can't be checked again in a recount the Erika under the Georgia constitution, because that would betray the secrecy of able. identity. You then know how the border voted and you'd be checking their idea. At the same time, he says these. These votes actually work verified, and a hundred and fifty nine Georgia counties overseen by the Republican Georgia Secretary of State, any disputes are questionable. Signatures went to a three person adjudication team republican one Democrat one staffer day. So apparently, they wore checked Giuliani, claiming that they weren't properly checked he's gonna have to provide the evidence of that allegation. Obviously, in Georgia court. Ok, the next allegation is removed, Pennsylvania and he says in Pennsylvania. This is a claim that is still part of that Pennsylvania, lawsuit when the idea is that in certain areas your logic cure your ballot more easily than if you can. ballot. In other areas, so you came in, he cast a ballot,

realized. My mistake on the ballot you went over and now you re allowed to. About recent in an absence he ballot and then you came into check it and you realize you screwed up and you're allowed to cure the ballot, and he says well, the ballot curing period for different areas was different. and so that's an equal protection violation, meaning that you have two different standards in two different counties: number one: the number votes in Pennsylvania that this happened to is probably not the seventy or eighty now, probably not almost. Certainly not the eighty thousand boat discrepancy that you're talking about in Pennsylvania and be that the allegation, presumably is that during the swelling securing about a week out, is babies violet statute, it's another to say that the during the ballot standard at the actual pulling place was a little loser in one place and a little less loose in another place, and this disenfranchise people. You need evidence that people who republican we're disenfranchised and that people who are improperly voting were enfranchise. That evidence has not yet

I did presumably that will be provided in court. Raymond asking have me the court cases Giuliani, for example, if you made a mistake in that bout, you lived in Philadelphia or in Pittsburgh You were allowed to fix the mistake, but if you lived in what would be considered more republican or Trump, part of the state. You were given no such right. So again. That is a claim that is being made in Pennsylvania Court and that will be a he continues.

Talks about provisional, balanced and here again he's now alleging voter fraud, but he does not actually legs voter frightened court that keep pointing out this disc. This discrepancy between what he alleges in court in what he alleges in oppressor, because what you alleging oppressor, is of no legal consequence. What you alleging courts is what is of legal consequence if you actually care about the outcome of the election. If we care about the the these are a pr of this. If you care about you know the image that Trump didn't lose, then the pressure but if you actually are one of people, was invested in the outcome of the election and in voter regularity and non voter fraud. Then what happens in court is significantly more impact for what have in court matters significantly more. So here's Giuliani suggesting that people went in and fraudulently cast provisional ballots now That is not allegation that is made in court in Pennsylvania. Again, that is important and it is important to note the stuff I dont mean

what blanket and only has been wet blanket to say that I would love to see now. I'd love, nothing better than to see Donald Trump inaugurated again on January twentieth. In order for that to happen, this stuff has to happen in cork. It can just be Giuliani, throwing things out in a press conference that he then does not I can Giuliani what're. You haven't fifteen thousand times that people in Pittsburgh walked again to vote and they had already voted according to the democratic election machine. Did they forget that many p with bad memories in Pittsburgh, or is the following correct that as witnesses will testify, they were instructed by the democratic bosses? when they had a ballot in which there was no one register just signed at the summit decided to rejoice in Asia

Now. The idea is that you have random people basically told by the democratic bosses walking into Pennsylvania, pulling places and just taking out fraudulently ballots that have not assigned to anybody. Yet right, there is an and he sent out, nobody turn it back and she walked in and he basically said you were that part. And then you voted as an allegation about fraud again he's not making that allegation in court cases as affidavits to prove it. Ok seriously, good, let once let's investigate all those affidavit, let's see all those affidavits abbe that we got nothing. I need to see them What certainly is gonna need, Jesse them. Eventually, Ani makes the case that the observers were. Rivers we're not allowed in the room nor to see what was going on now, what the courts have found that republic observers in places like Pennsylvania were allowed in the room, but that they were being put too far in certain cases- and there was this temporary injunction- those put in place to get the observers a little bit closer here is Giuliani. Tie about this, and then I invoking my cousin Benny. This Where's. The media only want to focus on a couple things from this press conference because they do not actually want to cover a lot of substance. The press conference it focused on two particular

one July enjoying an entire seen from my cousin Benny, which actually that and to the fact that We Ani who dies his hair had his hair thy, whose wedding lot is hereby running down his face in the middle of the press conference, which of course is optical Google, but has no impact on the on what the man is actually saying. There was a was Giuliani there. Oranges dumb not allowed to do it. They were pushed few cases. They were assaulted, all cases they were put in the corral. So far away. Probably the closest they got is from here to the fact that room. We could do like. I did you all Watch my cousin Vinnie did you know the movie then he did a whole scene from my cousin Veni about the two fingers versus the three fingers. They couldn't see exactly what was going on again, that is a voter irregularity, and that is bad and there should be lost each on that basis are gonna, get the entire state of Pennsylvania, their vote toss. Probably

red men, the remedy, just there is not, is neither legally go get Michigan and at once I can because there he makes most shocking allegation, which is literally the dry it bustling about shipped in Fort Joe Biden or sort of dumped into the into the vast balloting and we'll get to that in just one second plus we'll get to Sydney power who made him some very significant allegations about. dominion, voting systems and suggest that that no literally millions votes were shifted from one side to the other, will go through that evidence, there would be necessary. Ok, we're gonna get to that just one second, first, let us talk about the fact that if your business owner very often you ve been operating through email you, ring for phone calls. The reality is it a business, send you an e mail, you probably trash it. If it's a business called you out of the blue, he probably let it go to voicemail. people do tend to enter text messages right text messages tend to be in

excellent way of ensuring that people text you Baxter takes literally one second to open the text and then to respond to the tax tax, get open. Ninety seven percent of times or customers will get your message. You can text back and forth. It gives you the freedom from being tethered. You found this podium comes in podium and they serve that allows you to integrate texting into your bidding model podium work even better. Now the business is being done remotely car dealers are selling cars only through tax furniture stores are sending order, updates to keep their customers informed, and now I'm teaming up with podium for a special offer for a limited time sign up with podium for twenty percent of your plan. Again they helped convert a lot of your business to text. They are so confident that of podium does not make your business better within ninety days will send you a one hundred and fifty dollars Amazon gift card for the holidays, goto podium, Dotcom, slash, appear to get started a great way to make our business more efficient as twenty,

sent off. If you go to p o d- I, u am proteome dot com, slasher, bureau, gotta, podium, Dotcom, Slash Shapiro today, go check them out and make your business more efficient, podium, dot com, slash appear to get started. That's twenty percent off podium, dot com, slash appear to get started today. Can we can get to more of this press conference? We have you done to Sydney PAL and her crack and release in just one second, we'll get to that it is a glorious terminal, weakening of a shot out to a daily. Why remember today, it is came on twitter who understands the valuable, unwavering consistency in this picture. The world's greatest beverage vessel rests outside in front of an american flag and Rob, if a blue sky, the capture rates during these ambiguous days, left to still angry their upset, even other man, one they want to throw it. four tantrums and yellow anyone who does resident while things makes him on certain one truth remains this leftist years. Tumblr will stand the test of time. Sure words whenever spoken Thank you for the picture and thank you for being a daily. Why remember also would note you should be dominated by remember why? Because we have to replace the legacy.

legacy. Media are awful legacy. Media were ten points in this election to Joe Biden and Kamel heresy. They continue to trot out. Narrative lies about the wonders of Joe Biden and the continued I doubt lies about president trumpeters covert handling their future. Give credit where credit is due on operation warp speed, but they continue to claim the Joe Biden shouting, mass is gonna fix everything that they're just a joke there, their job and you need to replace them, and we would. We would like to compete to be their replacement, and that means that you need to subscribe with us to join the crew Plans for the next four years it starts today can sell. It is joining the daily. Where should be launching a brandy showed us early next year Ross, it can be launching an entertainment channel, a new investigative journalism, team building partnerships with like minded content creators like Prager you, whose entire show library will be available to daily wired outcome members by the end of the year or going after the legacy media. We need your help to do it. Right now to show you where serious or offering twenty five percent of all memberships code. Election a daily wired com, slash subscribe today is

did the last aiming at this year also sign up while you can members get our articles had free access to all of our live broadcasting? Show library, the full three hours of the Ben Shapiro show exclusive readers pass content available only to daily where members we are considering, and all access membership yet to join us on Alex like every night for wide stream discussions with our house. and an amazing online community. We also get not one but two leftist yours tumblers with EU membership, was early, sometimes exclusive access to New Delhi where products or remember that is twenty five percent of all memberships of code election bread, Delaware, dot com, slash Subscribe, replaced the legacy media with daily, where you will not regret it. Also. Also you're gonna want to check out this week's Sunday. Special with Abigail Schreyer. Abigail is, of course, the author of a book about rapid onset, generous fora, move by the left to censor anybody who talked about pressure from the medical community and from the political community. allow children to transition before they even know what the hell they are doing. Abigail has really bothersome slings and arrows to talk truth about transgender

Engendered is for you. You can watch the show tomorrow, J early by becoming a member of our daily wire dotcom illnesses and largest fastest growing conservative podcasting radiation nation, ok, so Rudy than can use the allegations and any talks about. I think the most shocking allegation, He alleges that there are four people who gave affidavits for You say that at four hundred and thirty in the morning a truck pulled up to Detroit Center, where they were counting to start unloading boxes of ballots marks for Joe Biden seems like that should be fairly easy for the media to check in on and then I can read those affidavits, presumably if those have been filed with the court, if you're China, that that's that's like a real allegation of Oda Fraud right

and there's only one problem, you have to file that in Michigan court. I am not clear on whether the Trump team is actually file that Michigan Cork. That's like it that a serious real allegation, you're talking now about like J F K, dead people voting in Chicago style, stuff from nineteen sixty years, Giuliani alleging that for affianced here, don't you, people give every David reporting shouldn't that, under any circumstances, what about on the front page of all your newspapers, if it didn't, involve the hatred that you have national pathological hatred that you have for the present. What they swear to is that at four thirty in the morning, a truck pulled up to the Detroit Centre, where they were kept, counting bout and here's what they jointly swear to that every ballot that they could see every thing they could hear these were ballot for by. I do see that I dont know

but for the fact that three american- citizens are willing to swear to me. Ok We need the names of the citizens, we can talk to them. We need to know who exactly is counting balance of these places. Right I mean this. This is stuff that the media should be able to check into, and certainly stuff that should be able to be invest. I, these rational criminal charges. What he's now alleging wide scale border fraud? So good, that's all allegation presented with real names on that. That is something that can be checked right. There which is a real allegation with with an affidavit, are in fact evident, right, affidavits our somebody testifying that they saw a thing. It is not just an allegation, adapt what your wearing under penalty of perjury, that you saw. it's a mean that all affidavits are. It does mean that those are Alex since that ought to be investigated. So good, ok, there's only problem, which is, I am not sure that all those affidavits had actually been filed in an ongoing case in Michigan, because the other day you Trump team, as I mentioned, pulled out of their case in Michigan Trumpery suspension. And Giuliani said they dismissed it because the case was attempting to get the Wing County Board of Supervisors City certified in they did, but they didn't write me. That's the problem is that they should vote at you

Forty and they came back out. They said, while we challenge on certification, but there's no provision in Michigan LAW to do that. So herein lies the problem again theirs. France between what really on his alleging under public stage and what is actually being filed in court. If you want the election, Tang Ass do be filed and it doesn't matter what he says in front of microphone isn't settled. It doesn't or what Giuliani says in front of cameras. It isn't This has an interviews in matters what gets filed in court. It matters what gets filed in court. That is all that is all ok, so Alan Court. Again, this obscure he's making serious allegations and apparently got affidavits tobacco. This would be a great time very loss in Michigan, suggesting that all of this needs to be postponed. The certification is a book was born until the investigation is completed. Juliana concluded saying that somebody had a plan to shift the election, and I and he sort of concluded with his with his big wrap up. This would be Giuliani, clip twelve, isn't the logical conclusion that,

take. Any jury would accept if they heard this evidence that somebody had this plant. Maybe that was always plan. Extra reason why Hillary Clinton said don't conceit even if you're losing that's the reason. We had a forty and slip by the candidate, and he said he had the best voter fraud team in the country, That's the reason why he probably didn't have to go on campaign he had to have known what they were going to do. Ok, so bends anyway, comes up and incentive. How of course was the lawyer in them? One case she's been well respected. She she gets up. And she starts talking about the crack and right, this is the release the cracking moment, she's the one who originally started using that phrase that she was going to reveal evidence that literally millions votes were shifted, the elections. This is the biggest out Asian Giuliani is talking about specific voter frightened.

a regular the allegations. Some of them have been alleged in court. Others have not been election court some. He says he has affidavits for others. He he has had. He does not have affidavit for all that. It can get hash and courts Power is the one who is making the biggest claimed here. So she claims that the voting system of the United States was here. As a massive claimed that there is a possibility of hack but that there as I have that, in fact, the voting system of the United States or compromised which, is that you can trust any election result I mean not just the presidential election result any place there the dominion voting system, presumably would now be in question and, in fact, really does say that in this press conference, so here is Sidney POW laying forth her theory. What happened here with two voting systems and smart matic technology. What we are really dealing here in uncovering more above a day, is the massive influence of commune money through Venezuela, Cuba, likely China in the interval

parents, with our elections here in the United States, the dominion, systems the smart, Matic technology, software and thus where the goes in other computerized voting systems here as well, not just dominion were created in volumes. Venezuela at the direction Hugo Chavez, to make sure he never lost an election after one constitutional right random came out the way he did not want it to come out. Ok, so she is essentially saying that's more. American dominion are the same that goods more matic is a subsidiary of dominion. Voting systems and that Smart Matic was developed in Venezuela offers dealt in Venezuela, the direction of Hugo Chavez, who, of course been dead since twenty thirteen, but the idea is that good jobs Venezuelan voting system has been sort of taken up into american voting system and is still significantly vulnerable to hack

She continues along these lines, suggesting that the software itself has backdoors that allow people to hack it and then change votes from one party to get these are. These are the sorts of the that, if true completely blow up voting in the country, a large. These allegations are if your alleging. but the dominion voting system, which is used in twenty four states, that in voting system is short and not just that there is a possibility of compromise, but that it was so heavily compromise and millions of boats were shifted. Then you are talking reviewing the entire election. Essentially I mean it's. The end is the end of this process in elections period and nine states, if what any passing through so here she is explaining what she thinks happened with the software found. The software itself was created so many variables and so many back doors that can be hooked up to the internet or thumb DR stuck in it or whatever, but one of its most characteristic features. Its is its ability to flip votes.

It can set and run an algorithm that probably all over the country to take a certain percentage of votes from President tromp and flip them to President Biden, which we might never have uncovered, had the votes for president Tromp, been so overwhelming in so many of these states that it broke the algorithm that had been plugged into the system and that's what caused them to have to shut down in the states they shut down on. That's when they came in the back door with all the mail in malian ballots. Ok, so what she's alleging right now is that there's an algorithm that was used in the software from dominion and that this algorithm was was designed to create from home life boat for Joe Biden to outweigh the from Donald Trump, and that trumps vote was so heavy in a lot of the states where you Meanwhile, early in the night, like Georgia in Arizona, Wisconsin, Michigan Pennsylvania that these shut down was not, in fact a shut down, but the

shut down. What was the algorithm shut down the machine, and now all the people came in the back door with all the bit in the face, that lines up with what Giuliani is saying about these affidavit, suggesting that there are all these printed out fake ballot for Joe Biden, we're just pretty sophisticated, but also not supremely hard to evidence. Conspiracy regiment, if that, if that is true, you should be able to get a hold of one of the many in voting systems machines and it should be able to For the algorithm should be able to identify the algorithm, also, I'm not sure how an algorithm gets broken leg- honest, I'm, not software person, so I dont know if that is a pie possible allegation, or if that is not a plausible allegation. Hell suggests that the that these machine, were essentially preset right. She says that they were pre set too change. The ratio of abiden vote to a trump vote here, continuing along these lines, there's a algorithm that runs that automatically flips all the votes and then

operator. Has the ability to go in override settings? Second ignore signature? They can ignore the top line of the ballot. They can go down ballot and select who, if they want to change the results for Mr Margie the gentleman who Smart Matic, there's video of him on the internet, explaining that yes said at least one occasion here Have they changed a million folks with no problem? Ok, so the basic idea here is that The algorithm was in the computer. It was already being gained trumps, those overwhelming abroad, the algorithm they brought in a bunch of balance through the back door and that Smart Matic was once again as well in technology and what was designed exactly for this sort of thing, and that is the allegation as an extraordinary allegation that allegation

where extraordinarily evidence, because you are talking about the wrecking of the entire american system by dominion- is what you're talking about right here now, maybe it's true. Maybe it is seriously, but you'd actually have to provide some evidence of that. They were asked in this press do you actually have you know like access to a dominion, voting system and they basically said not really, and then they were asked to have evidence of how the algorithm work and they said- You know we have like people talking about it. All the time, if delegation, is real, been investigated down again. Trust in the american system requires. That allegations be investigated it down to the route in the nations not sufficient overturned the election, however, and it has to be done in court right, that's what you have a system for- and so you know now is- can be the time for the actual crack and to be really so. Jenna Ellis came up and she sort of acknowledged they're not been a lot of evidence presented in this press conference specifically says this is the opening argument. So what you ve heard now is basically an opening statement. This is what you

and expect to see when we get to court to actually have a full the trial on the merits: actually show this evidence in court and prove our case. Ok, that's fine! and I'm hearing a lot of people today saying you know you interpret Carlsson and other people. You keep saying that you want more evidence and the evidence ok, that's fine with me, show the evidence in court by all means, whereby all me show the like. That's what I'm saying show the evidence in court, but also getting wet people who say same the fact that the allegations are made that demonstrates that this election is completely illegitimate, topped by gay. It's not going be that way. Almost the same actually goes to court. I am repeating myself water to be extremely clear on a political level. Nothing would make me, fewer than four Donald Trump retain the oval office. I voted for him. I supported him in order for that to happen. All these allegations are gonna need to be supported in court extraordinary allegations that, like the Venezuelans created a voting system that was then ingested into dominion used in twenty four states and

people were literally paying off people in order to gain the system that can require some evidence by the way. That's what's any power suggested Sidney upheld, injure, suggest that Joe Biden had been system she suggested the candidates Oliver America had games. The system Reggie actually share claimed. That Republicans and Democrats is put twenty one Republicans and Democrats pay. Jimmy, and this is how dominion apparently makes its money is by people taking bribes in dominion. In order for them to inert for them to be voted for the others. This corrupt algorithm come. I speak in terms of the level of corruption we are hang out here. We have no idea how many republican or democratic candidates in any state across the country. Pay to have system rigged to work for them? people didn't do this just to take control. They make one heck of a lot of money off of it, so that is, it is suggestion now the dominion doesn't make its money, often being paid by. Stating

to use a voting system hundred millions dollars. They make their money off a direct bribes from particular part mean, visited extraordinary, legation its extraordinary allegation and requires extraordinary evidence. It does ok, then it is important to note that at this point, dominion used in Georgia, the allegation are being made about dominion. The hand counts in Georgia, matches. Dominion bore tabulation in Georgia. You're gonna have to explain how that happen. Giuliani theory is that a bunch of absentee ballots were fraudulently kind of put into the system that match up directly with in voting system that essential, so it wasn't really the algorithm did. It was the was the fraudulent balance, the Jenin evidence in any case is going to need to be presented here as far as dominion and weather when it actually has at these sorts of voter fraud. Backdoor possibilities, as in any system, can be hat. But beyond that the quest whether dominion actually is just an offshoot of venezuelan technology. Dominion means actually owned twenty, eighteen by staples three capital and your private equity from according to the UK, independent both dominion, asthma,

I can really statements saying: no ownership relationship exists between the two competing firms; in fact they are in competitions. Aromatic makes voting machines so does dominion. They both make their own voting software. Smart Matic is an internet no company, incorporated in Florida by venezuelan founders. Dominion does not have any direct eyes too as well as they dont have any systematic partnership with Smart Matic, some automatic technology is used in venezuelan elections, accusations by government opponents, company rigged elections. There were unsubstantiated and twenty seventeen, the company itself more Matic, accused Venezuelans government of electoral fraud. Here's how this works more per, the voting Machine Company Sequoia Voting systems in two thousand five then sold it years later after objections were raised over its partnership with the company in which Venezuela's government had invested, and then three years after smart man extolled Sequoia Dominion acquired Sequoia, so there Innovation is that Sequoia had a bunch of venezuelan technology in Sequoia, and then Dominion acquired Sequoia until all of the smart Matic technology supposedly

corrupted by the Venezuelans was taken up into Sequoia and then Dominion acquired Sequoia Election security experts, aid stiffly in over certain whether some Sequoia called maybe using dominions software because of the industry's limited transparency. Ultimately, this barbaric say they do not use the same software dominion put out a statement on its website, whether its true or not almost domain has no company ownership relationships with any member of the blowsy family, the Feinstein family, the current global initiatives, mathematic civil or any ties to Venezuela and it also says they ve never owned any shares or had any financial stake in Dominion Voting systems more Matic is never provided. Minion voting systems that any software hardware or other technology, the two companies our competitors in the marketplace, because that is what the company's claim at the very least all of this should be susceptible to investigation and will have to be proved in court. Obviously, so that is that that is where things currently stand. Ok, so was the crack and released well inoffensive, wait, wait, member crack and if the allegory

hence our extraordinary, then ya. If what you mean is a wave of evidence sufficient to overturn election results that something can be done in court, it hasn't been done yet and it is not easy for people to ask for that evidence to be shown in the corner public opinion before I make up my mind on the veracity of the claims themselves. When you make an extraordinary claim, I require extraordinary evidence is just what does what everybody should do, so that is where things currently stand at a baby of allegations that have been put forward. The dominion ones are particularly stunning if they can be sustained she anyway in any, then that will undermine not only public. since in our elections, will undermine elections, have been held using dominion systems for last several years, be it ask area for the country. Of course, more of a disaster area would be moving forward with a fraudulent liking. If that could be proved but evidence evidence evidence now. Tucker Karlsson said the same thing last night We asked on any pelvis. Wigs anyhow did not get back to us on appearing on the show. I Tucker apparently also asked Sidney Power this week and he said palamedes to show us the evidence, and in fact

As for the evidence, you got mad and then cut off communications. What you never sent us any evidence, despite a lot of requests, polite requests, not a page when we kept pressing. She got angry and told us to stop contacting when we checked with others around the Trump campaign. go and positions of authority. They told us TAT was never given them any evidence either in order to provide any today at the press, conference held did say that electronic voting is dangerous and she's right with their, but she never demonstrate that a single actual vote was moved a legitimately by software from one Canada to another. One. Ok- and this is correct. Re tuckers went wrong, request. Evidence you're, not wrong to request evidence. Everybody should be requesting evidence at this point, and this is what the whole show some forty six percent of American say that they think that from should concede right away, which means four percent of Americans Don a great and others fifty four percent of Americans.

Eighty two percent of Americans came up with regret. The answer to this question, which is it depends on what the evidence shows evidence, is these standard evident, should always be the standard in every case, for her of her parts anyhow responded to Tucker by saying I'm not can present all the evidence, because we're gonna do that in court and I'm not busy doing interviews, I mean she kind of is busy doing interviews, obviously Reggie. She she came out yesterday and an interview. I believe who Dobbs suggesting that the election results in all this when states should be overturned you're going to an interview suggesting that than you going to have to provide the evidence to back out that's a pretty extra. Re. Ask no. I mean we are talking about millions of boats across the United States, which does matter regardless of your democratic republic. Anyone on both counted for years, Lou, the entire election. Frankly and all the things they should be

returned and the legislators should make sure that the electors are selected for tromp and it's gonna have to follow the constitutional provisions. Set. It go, be decided, according to the amendment. Ok, while unfortunately Sidney Palestine when it came she'll do an interview with with with Blue Dobbs, was gonna, do undertook Karlsson, and hurt her team, apparently very angry at Tucker, for suggesting that evidence be presented Apparently, the in House counsel four Sidney, Powerpc Molly Mccann responded to Carlson's demand for transparency by saying that he sounded like a spoiled brat. She said the million dollar question, isn't why, Sidney who barely has time to sleep or eat text Tucker the evidence he wants. The question is: why won't talk? texture and say whenever you're ready and if you choose my platform, is at your disposal to prevent your case in the nation. Until then, good luck in the fight! Ok, but you actually said that on a shall, he literally said I will offer you. The full weak today

I shall present the evidence. So that's on Tucker assigns hunger. Guys out that that is present the evidence that he's crazy said Johnny earned the senator from Iowa- is she he was commenting on pals, common repelled pals. Most outrageous comment was that candidates Republican and Democrat all over the United States are paying dominion, voting systems or recollections, which is extraordinary claim again and Johnny Earths was like that's kind of crazy. I mean you shouldn't be claiming that candidates are rigging since all over the place, Willy nilly I mean my goodness senator I mean did you or any of your republican colleagues in the Senate? to have their elections rigged.

Now and that that is an offensive com and for those of us that do stand up and represent, are our states in a dignified manner. We believe and honesty we believe in the integrity of our election system. Okay, so again more than one million time, big allegations require big evidence. no story. That evidence is not provided. It can be very hard for anything, be proved four allegations that are very large to be taken seriously in two thousand for Denmark. climate double voting machines have been hacked, they could not provide any evidence of that. I bought voting machines. Machines haven't been hacked, and so we rightly said we're not gonna pay any attention to that. Now we're going to need evidence that this happened, because is the biggest voting scandal in the history of the United States bar none. If what Sidney POW is saying is true, same thing is true, if regionally on his claims, Arturo and now yesterday this outcome

aided in media members who want media member states instead of saying, ok, we'd like to see the evidence, can we see the evidence instead of saying what's the problem play out, which is what I'm saying is what Tucker saying we're all seeing something every one saying this, instead of that, your main remedial members decided at Sunday Yellow people right, that's really what's important, so my pants was doing a pressure uncovered and nineteen which, by the way, some good news. Visor, has not requested emergency authorization to start distributing as vaccine by the end of this month, which is actual real good news. I told pens does oppressor when the media members, Wooster, Bleep, right as pensions walking off it just shows you what journalism has basically become, which is performative nonsense for the cameras, so pence didn't take questions he's walking off, and media members just are shouting at the top of their lungs at him. and they always leaving right he's on turning rise, not answering the questions it just. If I, if I'm caught on camera shouting at him, then I my scene in the movie to be made about the evils of the Trump Administration, back wit and and with an upshot, you shall heroism her media membership yelling. It might pens randomly about

it's going on with the election show. Is that what you're getting honestly there is Another point to be made here in all of this, regardless what the alley, genes and being or when at what evidence it in the treaty. There is a systemic distrust of the system is now set in for tens of millions of Americans, tens of millions of them who say that they don't trust election outcomes is right and left. You don't know who to trust when it comes to the stuff, because it seems like nobody is telling the truth, and that is because they believe that everybody is badly motivated and in a lot of cases there right now, one from supporters look at your. The journalistic entities force

just dismissing out of hand, Julie on his claims or or palace claims when they see that and these people not saying. Ok, we need to see the evidence there just immediately dismissing it when they say. Voter fraud has never happened anywhere or they say but the poles are absolutely correct, or on these AIDS that. Russian collusion happen from voters. I'm going to respond by saying we're, not gonna, listen to anything that you have to say, scorn does Bree retaliatory, scorn and distrust, and that is just the way that human being behave in there's a reason for that. So does make a difference. It does make a difference when you have columns like one from which our hot Ali in the New York Times Trusting that reaching out for transport is a bad idea. Isn't it article in the New York Times yesterday, he talks about how he, after twenty sixteen, who's going to travel the country and talk it from supporters, but isn't here Nicholas Valley went around you talk from supporters in they didn't change their minds and therefore they are bad and able and horrible and racist. He said

as you know how I spent ninety minutes on a drive to the airport, with retired from supporter we're a cordial to each other. We may jokes: we shared stories about our families. Neither US change our outlook, they'll, never My guns, ever he told me explaining his facebook feed, was filled with articles about how Heller, couldn't and Democrats would kill. The second amendment instills guns, although you didn't like someone, MR drums tones and comments, I believe racist in his heart, I'm not a cartel Just why wasn't qualified to challenge? That means I did my part. Was my reward. Listening to MR transmit can't send her back. We cannot help people who refuse to help themselves. Mr Trump is in There is their culture, their values, there, greed he's there defender and Savior he's there blunt instrument he's their destructive drug of joy. The first thing from has ever said: is they don't hate him? there they don't hate you because they hate him. Because they hate you and so people respond to the media. Simply dismissing all claims out of hand with regard to trumpet the election they regarded

just an extension of the media's scorn for them and honestly it's hard to blame people for that. It may not be correct, but it certainly just viable. We, when you see the way that the Democrats on Twitter react to Trump supporters. It's insane, for example, if, when you democratic regional director tweeted out this no serious How do you d programme? Seventy five million people? Where do you start Fox Facebook? We start thinking in terms of post, world war to Germany or Japan, or the failures of reconstruction in the south. It's crazy he's, as this is not your standard, partisan policy disagreement is a conspiracy theory you'll, belligerent, Deaf called against reality and basic decency Yoni A policy debate of note are happening within them when a collision between the left and the centre left where this is, what Democrats think of you. he says. I know conservatives are upset by some of the responses here and yet many are out of line. What you expect people to do in self preservation threat has been running, for you

on bleep your feelings. My conspiracy theories are valid opinions and we have more guns, but no the right has been acknowledging that the left has cultural scorn for them: And that is going to breed retaliatory scorn. It's going to read a level of distrust that is endemic to the system and every time you tweet crap like this, you are you're creating more distrust in the systems that are required. clear. The Brok Obama is the arbiter of truth, and then everybody Ok! Well, I don't trust you any more. What do you think is going to happen? Joyce Karel Oats was a aid, another writer famous writer and a far lefty between pictures of her. Feed that that is a thing she treated out the other day for many pro Trump Americans and she she believes out Trump because two downward from any programme Americans. The pandemic is like the Holocaust too many Germans. They knew what was happening but adjusted to living with. in an indifference or in some cases, profiting from it only affected. Personally, you people seem to care, and so, if you are a trump supporter and you are disagreeing with Joyce Karel Oats,

uncovered response is because you're like a German, ignoring the holocaust and then were expected to trust these people order were expected to trust They have a good hearted search for truth at heart. I think not, I think, not, that that is what is driving a lot this I've been saying on a wide variety of issues. There should be bipartisan agreement on how we handle a lot of these issues when it comes to vote or fraud. Evidence evidence about a problem comes shoot covered policy, although the evidence don't make it up, don't follow political incentive. follow the evident when it comes to racism in America. Follow the evidence it's all the same standard, but when people pretend they arbiters of truth, and they only examine evidence the one with GM evidence, and then they sneer people who disagree with them. He predictable result The people are going to react by disregarding everything they have to say and single. Here you don't. You don't requirements were Stacy Abrams, you know acquire evidence for four years of russian collusion. Bull crappy in require five minutes of explanation of evidence for that sort of stuff, and we are put through four years of that and now you expect me

Two to respect your demands- revenant, I think not, you know, there's going be one standard or there's going to be no standard. There is not going to be a double standard for most Americans, either evidences recur for claims or evidence is not required for claims. So side. Are you on the evidence I during the? Are you on the not evident side and that that is the real question? That's true for everything, for everything from covered policy to election fraud to raise policy when it whatever it is, require evidence for claims. That is the side of truth is the side that cares about evidence. Ok, before we break for the weekend, it's time for a little bit of a Bible talk because let's have some uplift going into the weekend. So this week the Jews reedy portion of the five books of Moses called no doubt this is the This is the portion of the Bible that deals with the selling of the birthright, from from e sought to Jacob and also a blessing that eyes it gives to Jacob instead of E saw the so called stealing the birthright and serve common biblical accounts as a forum for functional another story.

basically Isaac who of course, is Abraham son, and he now has kid and has twins ACE of ISA and Jacob. I and II saw is sort of a man of the fields he's a wild man he's a hunter he's, not a man of soul. Jacob is ISM and men of soul who It was described his dwelling, intense ISA and Jacob Sort battle for primacy. That's that sort of the threats to the book of Genesis is them battling for privacy in various ways he saw the first born Jacob grabs onto his heel right. That's. Why he's called Yakov? Because the word echoed in Hebrew means Healy grabs onto a subs heel? He grows on associate myself now to grow up. as they get older. It becomes very clear that you saw spoke. The birthright heat he doesn't, she wants, responsibilities are being the first born, and so for literally a bowl of lentils soup. He sells his birthright to Jacob. What they're really means that, for any rational whatsoever

he was to give away the responsibility of being the first born, but I think he's not Greenland, that's right. Their father has not actually green. Let this switch route and you saw it, turns out, actually he kind of spurns it, but at the same time he still wants the benefits of the birthright without actually the responsibilities of the birthright. So this brings us to the critical seen in question one: it must sort of puzzling parts of the Bible. So this is genesis. After twenty seven, it came to pass when Isaac was old and his eyes or to them to see it. He called Esau his eldest son and he sent him my son, and he said- and here I am- I said Before- now I been told I do not know the day of my death so now sharpen your implement your sword and your and go forth to the field and hunt game for me, and make for me tasty foods I like and bring them to me and I will eat in order that I saw a bless you before I die. A Rebecca was as Ex wife overheard when I spoke to you saw his son and he's. I went to the field on game and bring it and Rebecca De Jacob. Her son saying behold, I've heard your father speaking to you saw your brother saying, bring me game in making tasty foods, and I will eat now, bless you before the war before my death and now my

how my boy to my voice I am commanding you go down to the flock take from for me from there to choice. Kids, I will make them hasty food for your father as he likes, and you shall bring them to your father, may eat in order that he bless you before his death. When Jacobs Rebecca his mother. Behold, my brother s, eyes a hairy man, whereas I am a smooth man. Perhaps my father will touch me and I will time as it is ever and I'll bring upon myself a curse, not a blessing and his mother sent him on me as your curse. My son only Harkin's my voice and go take them for me, so I went and he took it them to his mother S. Mother may tasty, This is father liked and Rebecca, took the costly garments of AW her elders on which were with her in the house, and she dressed shake up her younger son and the high the kids you put on his hands and on smoothness of his neck righteous. She actually takes hair and puts it on on Jacob so that he feels more like zebra he came his father. He said my father and he said here I am who are you my son and Jacob Sedgwick I'm Esau your first born I've done. As you have spoken to me, please I sit down into my games that are sold, bless me and I extend my son. How was it

found it so quickly, my son, he said because the Lord, your God prepared for me and I succeeded, shake up. Please him closer said. I feel you, my son, whether you are really my son S are not so obviously Isaac suspects. Something at this point Jacob draws near to ask his father. He fell to me said: the voice is the voice of Jacob, but the hands are the hands of ISAF I hear how cultural Yakov, hey Diamond ACE of in the Hebrew didn't recognize him, because his hands were Harry, like the hands was brother ISA and he blessed him says. Again. Are you indeed my son ISA, and he said I am, he said server to me, eight of the game of my sons. My soul will bless you, he served him, he ate you brought a mine and he drank and his fathers had come closer and kiss me right he's constantly like something. As you know, something is up right, he's losing his sight, but you know something's up, you can so he custom. He smells like the fragrance of his garments. He blessed him. He said before fragrance of my son is like the fragrance of a field which the Lord has blessed. Ok and then the story continues with Jacob receiving the blessing, and he saw turns and when he saw returns here he explains to Isaac. What has happened and Isaac Shudder

and he says who then is the one who hunt game and brought it to me and I ate of everything while you had not yet come and blessed him, he too shall be blessed when he saw her. Does those words he cried out. A great American said was father bless me too. Oh my father's had your brother came with cunning and took your blessing and I, and so he doesn't reversed the blessing. So it's a really puzzling story right, because why, when you're worth a blessing- and if I give you a gift- but I do so under the false premise that your another person I can take that give back as it turns out, the Bible makes a town like Isaacs on his death bed, as in the Bible, lives another two decades. At no point does your verse his judgment and actually remove the blessing from Jacob lied to him and give it back to you. who did not lie to him. So what exactly is going on here? So the answer I think wise in the characters

You saw in Jacob analyzing what we should strive for as human beings, so you saw is described in the Bible again as a ruddy managements, men of violence is described as a as a person who is who is very capable in the fields where he can use a sword and he can use a bow but he's not a person who is described as anything but sort of selfish. He respects his parents somewhat, but that's pretty much is big quality. I think he's a man who is capable of survival, but he is not a moral man Jacob, Contrast is a moral man but he's sort of perceives as soft he's. Not a survivor he's, not somebody who can survive until Isaac has a choice to make, because now going to hand on his birthright, which means the future of the Hebrews that the future of the jewish people and, in his view of his family and his symbols, who's going to hand out birthright you to preserve the civilization the survivor now morality or the moral without a survival. Instinct. I'd, that's the real question. So what happens he tells you saw? I want you you're the survivor. I think you can learn morality. Glass,

if you do something for me and senators, killing an animal and in eating yourself or coming, often go do something that demonstrates honour for apparent and then I will bless you because you will have merited the blessing because you're, both person capable of survival and your person was capable of higher moral thinking and Rob guy his wife, here's this and she says it. While I don't in that's right, I mean, I know is, I know he saw no Jacob. I know ISA is not a moral man and I don't think he's going to develop a moral instinct, but I do think the Jacob is capable of developing a survival instinct and so Jacob Downs, his brothers clothes he puts on need the hair on his hands and on his neck, and he goes any meets with with Isaac and eyes. It knows something is wrong right now. That's it where he says how call call Yok over the voice of the voice of Jacob but the hands are the hands of a visa and he suspects that something is up. He sang it doesn't matter which one of my sons visits. Where does actually as it turns out what is happening, it doesn't

ETA, which one of my sons and blessing this is the sun reserves the blessing because either this is so who's, gonna soul or this is Jacob who's gonna spine is either Esau, whose determined how to become a moral person, because you speaking respect ways to manage doing what I wanted him to do- or this is Jacob, who is actually become a survivor right, is capable of doing things necessary for survival in a cruel and unjust world right dad is the dead, and so he decides that the few sure of of his family wine is better placed in the hands of the person who actually did all the things that were needed. to be done and that's what you doesn't reversed the blessing. Even he realizes what has happened at that point. Right, he's eyes are open and he realizes what has happened here. You want, to be issued his eyes his first born, but ISA already given away the birthright ones, because you have you didn't want the responsibility. Jacob wanted the responsibility and Jacob was willing to do what it took in order to gain

responsibility, including an act of deception in order to demonstrate to his father, and he was in fact capable of survival and that's all it takes to live in the world. It does doesn't mean that you have to act deceptively when you don't have to. It does mean that you need to be able to survive in Google ACT. Resolutely need to be able to act in defence of your own family and of your own values? But you have to have the values too, and it is easier to grow. An aggressive streak from me I'll centre and it is to grow moral strength from an aggressive centre. That's the message of the of the selling of the birthright, as well as the blessing that has given by easy to Jake up rather than to Aesop's. Why Jake it's? Why ice? It doesn't revoke, is unpleasant already we'll be back here next week with much more will be the updates, if the crack in the adventure crack in Israel is not just the allegations crack and you have an entry cracking is released, will bring you all of it next week have a wonderful. We can stay safe out there.

Here's the venture garage up. If you enjoyed this episode, don't forget to subscribe and if you want to help spread. The word. Please give us a five star review and tell your friends to subscribe to were available on Apple podcast, Spotify and wherever you listen upon. Gases also be sure to check out the other daily where podcast, including reclaiming show it Michael Marshal and the mat Walsh thanks. The listening dimension of Euro show is produced by Coltan Hoss, executive power Sir Jeremy boring our supervised, producers are math is clever and Robert Sterling production may you're, probably asking ourselves Producers are next. She had and Rebecca Doyle issue ended by Adam. Sigh of audio is mixed. By make poor Mina parent make up its mind, you could you need the bench of Euro Show is a daily where production, copyright daily wire, twenty twenty, those are my show Not just another show about about, I think there are enough of those already there. We talk about culture, because culture drives politics and drives everything else.

My main focus is our life family faith. those are fundamental and that's what this shows about Help Europe giving to listen.