On Thursday Baltimore Circuit Judge, Barry Williams announced a not guilty verdict on all. Charges against officer Caesar Goodson in the death of twenty six year old arrestee, Freddie Gray last April Goodson had been, charged with second degree, murder, manslaughter second degree, assault manslaughter by vehicle and reckless endangerment among a bunch of other trumped up charges base, I'm driving a van in which grade I'd. This particular verdict makes goods in the third officer set free. In the case, the judge, in the case here He said that the prosecution didn't show anything bad. They didn't show the good sit in the driver meant for anything bad to happen to grey they. The only thing that stated shown according to the judge, was a failure of duty and not buckling gray in at the fourth stop along the route that wasn't criminal negligence just didn't buckle the guy up. He said there was No evidence Goodson was aware or should have been aware, that gray was hurt in the first place. This, of course, is totally right. According to the evidence, despite judge's ruling Mayor Stephanie, Rawlings Blake she's, the nasty piece of goods who said last,

are they allowed protesters in Baltimore room to riot when they set the se. On fire after gray died. She issued a stay it meant, announcing administrative review against Goodson, because that's how things work now you get a second bite at the apple. She said quote now that the criminal cases come to an an officer. Goodson will face an administrative review by the police department. I am proud that we, as a can we have come together to move our city forward over the past year, yeah. No, that didn't happen. The Freddie Gray case was another excuse for the left to be, is horrible to our police officers, as they always are prosecutor Marilyn Mosby, who pushed these ridiculous charges forward. If you remember she held this, really ballyhooed press conference at the time in which he pledged to the people of cause more in demonstrators across America. I heard your call for no justice, no peace, her office. Then repeatedly hit evidence from the defense to cover up the fact that she didn't have a case. The left immediately began talking her up as a possible senator or governor

President Obama, if you recall, jumped into the act too. He said this is not new. We shouldn't pretend to snoop. The good news is perhaps there some newfound awareness because of social media and video cameras and so forth that there are problems and challenges when it comes to help police and our laws are applied in certain communities and we have to pay attention to it. No, it isn't new for Democrats to turn a non crime into a racial conflict conflagration for political gain. What would be new will be watching Mosby in Rawlings Blake and Obama pay a political and legal price. Where available. Until that happens, officers will simply stop policing. There's a reason. The Baltimore murder rate rose sixty three percent last year. Tell the cops not to do their jobs. Tell them that if they do, their jobs are going to process get them turns out, they won't do their jobs and some more Americans die, but Americans don't matter and those we care about those Americans also don't matter so long as cops get dragged through a railroading so that those politicians can find success. I'm Ben Shapiro! This is the Ben Shapiro Show,

even as people don't care about your feelings, if all righty, so we live in a in a post, racial America. That is completely races. The Baltimore verdict comes down today and that's just one piece of the other piece of news on the race front is that there are are few but the other piece of news on the race front is that the Supreme Court has determined that affirmative action is mandated by the constitution, essentially that affirmative action is ok with the constitution. In any case, the equal protection clause of the constitution, which says explicit Lee, that everyone must have equal protection under the law's meaning. You can't say that there's a law for blacks in a law for white and the punishment for each are different. You can when it comes to racial admissions on the Supreme Court level. So that was the big NEWS at the Supreme Court today. The other big news, the Supreme Court, will get to this in in just a minute I will in in what we get back to. It is there's a prima court ruling today about President Obama's executive amnesty effectively. It strikes down President Obama's

executive amnesty, which is quasi good news, I'll explain why it's good news and why it doesn't really matter that much in a little while, but the big who's over the course of the night. Was the Democrats had decided that they were going to sit in on the house floor on the floor of Congress in order to protest Republicans not turning the no fly list into a no gun by list, meaning that if you no fly list, they want it to be that you can't buy a gun for five years or some such nonsense, and this was rejected in the Senate. As you recall, this bill was rejected in the Senate at two days ago. The house Democrats didn't really want to push the bill, but they did want to make a big grandstanding move about it. So yesterday, sometime in the morning. They just decide. Ok, you know we're going to we're going to sit down right here on the floor of Congress as you mentioned yesterday, the conversation apparently was supposed to go something like this we're going to sit here. If you don't destroy due process right, we want you to take the secret list that you can't off of the secret list. We want people on this list not to be able to buy guns, and if you don't give that to us, we're going to sit here and we were like ok

You can sit there and say no. No, you understand we're going to sit right here like right now here are butts here. Ok, alright! So no like we're going to sit here, you understand like here we're going to sit like we're not going to move like ok, you can sit there until you grow into the carpet like we don't care, that's ok! You know, but we're sitting do one. This went on for twenty five intimately twenty five hours. They just broke it up now. My favorite thing about that is that they using the hashtag. It was something like no bill no break well, they did get a bill, but they did break So, what exactly drove the break? Well number one they may have run out of depends, that's a possibility, two it's also a possibility that they were getting food shipped to them. On the house floor I mean these: are these people really sacrificing their really sacrificed,

sitting in an air conditioned climate controls, room and richly apportioned climate controlled room where they could get up and go out and come back anytime. They pleased and bringing in pillows and bring in blankets and Elizabeth Warren, bringing a tp to house herself an there. It was really it was. They had. A buffet read actually had a buffet, they brought in full food, they they called it the, but the buffet rule or the buffet rule, but they they they brought an about face. They could really enjoy themselves. It was real sacrifice in this for twenty five hours and then they they stopped. Maybe the reason they stopped is because someone gave them the bill and just like all Democrats, they decided they couldn't pay. So they skipped out on the check and stuck Paul Ryan with it. But in any case they went on for over a day with this nonsense and provided all sorts of fun video and water for us to make fun of, and so will be doing a lot of that right now, because the Democrats, the theme of today's shows that the Democrats really want to destroy every aspect of the constitution? President Obama wants to disk.

Why the limit an article to power, the Supreme Court in the leftist there in want to destroy the limits on the equal protection clause. The Democrats wanted to the second amendment they wanted to the fifth amendment and what they threaten us with. President Obama threatens us Yelling he's going yell at us and that's really, I feel very threatened. I feel very scared of President Obama telling me to get him on the wrong side of history and that the arc of history bends toward justice or whatever. I know I know I'm scared. I know that I'm ready to burn copies the constitution, because President Obama says I should and then, on the other hand, I'm being threatened by Democrats that if I don't give up my right to due process before they take away my ability to buy a gun, then they're going to sit there and I I gotta tell you I'm if not you. I am deeply disturbed by the prospect of a bunch of useless people whose job literally consists of sitting there doing nothing sitting there and doing nothing. I'm really concerned about this, so it started with John LU. John Lewis is a representative from Georgia. He was

alright smarter was actually a civil rights hero back in the 1960s like he did sit inns at counters at segregated stores like risk life and limb. To do that to protest government regulation- Jim Crow regulations. Now he was sitting on the floor of the house to protest. The government should have secret list so that they can take away guns from people which is just spectacular by the way. The other part of this that ironic is he's protesting in favor of the no fly list being used to prohibit people from buying guns, you know, is on the no fly list, John Lewis, John Moses, on the no fly list who's put on there by accident and he's been struggling to get off of it, for I believe, more than two years he's been pulled over at airports. Thirty five to forty times on the no fly list is the no fly list is so good that you should be able to be barred from the I can meet right. Well, is that good? John? Then? Maybe, if you're on the no fly list you shouldn't be eligible for election to Congress about that, but if you're on the no fly list you just don't get to be in Congress, I mean hell, it seems dangerous to have them

on the no fly list. Buying guns seems more dangerous to me. If they're voting on american policy, for God sake and being being exposed to american intelligence information, I mean, banner risk is not a real risk. Anyway, John Lewis gets up with a bunch of weird looking people from his congressional caucus and and you have to see the footage folks. This is one of those days where you really should subscribe to daily wire, because the footage today is truly spectacular and thanks to Matheson his crazy haircut for for cutting all of it- and so John here is Here- is John Lewis saying that they're going continue to fight. We lost too many about children. Are babies, two many of our mothers and Father's and brothers and sisters, and we will continue to fight little more than fifty years ago across the bridge. Not just one time

but it took us three times to make it all away from Selma to Montgomery. We have other bridges to crows and when come back in July was stored all over again an american people. They want us to act, want to do something. No, they actually don't. We promised them. They actually don't want them to do anything. The ACLU, the leftist organization, the ACA You is on my side of this argument. They know the no fly list is garbage and they are on my side that he can't use the no fly list to take away peoples due process of law is so insulting his own. History, it's insulting. He knows better than this. It's so insulting for Joe I'm Luis to set to equate his march against leg, translation that removed rights for people based on case for no reason to equate that

with him now wanting to remove rights from people based on no evidence not the same thing at all, but I guess you can grandstand if you're, if you're John Lewis, that wasn't the worst grandstanding lords grandstanding yesterday was last night around nine hundred o'clock, I don't know if they have got drunk or what they're taking selfies from the floor of the House and Elizabeth Warren was smoking. Peace pipe she was chief warrant, was big. Keeping very over boom boom stick and she was sitting there getting very upset over over the over the tons of guns in America now remember folks. This was just voted down in the Senate two days ago, so they didn't have a proposal like they were asked people. So what law do you want to pass? And they said we don't really have a lot so you doing here. We're sitting here come on what we do, they weren't just sitting there last night, they began to sing like they're sitting there on the floor, and they start singing. No, really they started singing.

It is helpful, for example, what they're doing is singing. We shall overcome on the house floor and changing some of the words can't pick out exactly what they're saying for my nerves. Maybe the folks at home can but and singing we shall overcome, which was awesome. Many times are during the civil rights movement and is also son during black history month, at a celebrations and at churches, and of course this is all being led by civil rights icon, so these idiots are sitting there singing. We shall overcome literally sitting there singing we shall overcome like this is Martin Luther kings, wonder something ironic. Martin Luther king was on a secret government watch list from the FBI by J Edgar Hoover and he owned a gun.

So, according to John Lewis, and according to these people singing we shall overcome, I guess Martin Luther king should have lost his license to have weapon. They should have taken away his ability to have weapon. After all. Who is on the FBI Watch list as a possible subversive. So there they are singing. We shall overcome really making a difference really making a difference. It's pretty amazing, Bernie Sanders apparently came down to the floor for all of this, and he say get down on the floor and then immediately shouted I've fallen, and I can't get up the media, of course, lapped all of this up, like the lap dogs, they are they just they love this. This is their favorite thing now back in two thousand and eight Republicans did the same thing Republicans took to the floor and they basically filibustered and they wouldn't wouldn't get off the floor in order to protest Democrats, fracking ability, I will say this. I think the Republicans should take note out of the Democrat Playbook and they should do this on abortion and they should do the sound on defunding planned parenthood as long as we're going to be grandstanding full time now, as long as our politics is just grandstanding, do it on things that

better, not not stupidity's like getting rid of due process. Well, this is truly amazing. The media is there and they are worshiping in the Oh, this is a historic moment. I am so sick of hearing. You declare something historic, in real time you know when all those something is historic when thirty year? just from now we're still reading about it in two weeks, nobody's going to remember this historic moment come on, come on and is so they're they're. All of the media were cheering about this and and if there is apparently, according to a report of my g review, we're thirty members of the media, all thirty numbers asked all the various members of Congress how historic this was halfway through this idiotic charade. The Democrats turn to the media and actually start applauding the media, James Clyburn, from Sao Carolina. They actually turned to the media and start applauding the media, which is demonstrates exactly what this is

begin. My remarks, the media, what we mean when we talk about a freak yes, and why we need one yeah at least stop here with a free press and why we need one. The Democrats hate the press, ok, the press Obama is shut, the press out of more report, and then any other president in history, maybe except for one well sooner or Abraham, Lincoln during the actual civil war. But the Democrats apply the media. Of course they applaud the media because the media created from an echo chamber and that's what they want. Nancy Palosi says exactly this clip nine hello. See was standing outside the house talking to the media, and here is what she had to say about what

the point of all this: why are you guys sitting around growing your tentacles into the carpet? Why are you? Why are you just like? Why does it do you think it makes a difference for you to sit on your fat cans for twenty five hours, doing nothing and getting food shipped into you like. We have plenty of people in America who do that now. Hey we don't need more people that we paid to do that. We we have lots of people, do that now: they're they're on welfare. It, I guess, are Democrats, here's how here's nest blows, explain the real goal, as we gather here on the steps of the capitol our that our colleagues are gathered in great numbers on the floor of the house. As I said at the beginning, they still are called together by John Lewis, John Larson, and led by our a democratic with MR holier. They had been in and out but again they have. This is an echo we are echoing each other and what we hope to do is create an echo chamber throughout America of a heated message of no bill. Nope

break okay. We we hope. We desperately hope hope. Hope hope hope that that there will be a an echo chamber and that's what the Democrats won and they get it with the help of the media. By the way I love her bracelet. You have to see if you, when is this huge brace that I mean it looks like wonder, woman's bracelet here on and she's wearing this giant, bracelets giant rainbow bracelet. No, this isn't posturing it all game. This isn't posturing and anyway, of course, is posturing. That's that's what they do. They don't have any plans here. They don't know what they're doing it's just posturing and remember all of this is on the a jihadist attack right all on the heels of a jihadist attack? Louie Gohmert, who I really like Louie Louie's, the only person in Congress that I really enjoy and he's a representative from Texas, the most sincere guy in con. Ways you could a fellow to be in Congress and at a certain point in the middle of this last night is like eight hundred o'clock last night, Pacific time, Lewis just comes down to the house floor and he starts yelling at these people. Is he

he says the hell is wrong with you. Why are you talking about taking away due process from me? Why are you taking about gun control You know we did this or radical muslim jihadist did this. You know the jihadi did this when you talk about that. Why Louie Gohmert loses it and it's pretty great here it is metal, letters, afraid to vote and afraid to debate. Given the weakness of his arguments in his position, his fear is well founded.

No stop ok, so Lewiston, my favorite part here is they say you guys don't want to have a debate. So Gomer comes down. He says: ok, radical Islam kill these people

they go no bill, no break! No girl! No break shut him up Nobel no break. We can talk, terrace, know God, Lala yeah, exactly and that's and that's the yeah. This is the kind of debate that they want now. I have to admit. I think the Republicans should bring up this bill for vote. I think they should vote it down and I think they should hammer Democrats on this issue is a losing issue for Democrats. I'm not sure why Paul Ryan decided not to bring this up for a vote, bring it a project. It bring up bill. Make them reject it. You know do all the things Do all do all the posturing the Democrats do and if you're going to leave them there and you're going to the house in a german what you did last night, then, for goodness sake, don't just allow and to continue to maintain an air conditioned chamber. Do exactly what Nancy Pelosi did Republicans in two thousand and eight and two thousand and eight you turned off the lights. She turned off the cameras she turned off. The air conditioning Paul Ryan could have done that today, but he didn't. He took the did this sort of pansy way which I'm gonna sit here all let them do what they're gonna do little burn itself out, in any case, the here's? What look like when, when Paul right intervene to to to have a vote for adjournment a it? Basically, the house broken all the chaos

this is the unprecedented situation. We were anticipating the speaker, trying to convene the house, the Democrats chanting no bill, no break, let's watch this on house joint resolution. Eighty eight we'll report titled the joint resolution, reconsideration passed a joint resolution, the objections of the president to the contrary. Notwithstanding the gentleman from Minnesota. Mister Klein is recognized for one hour, ok so that you can see them and losing minds and they were shouting shouting and nothing's happening, because this is stupid occupy Wall Street.

Now, when President Obama said he was going to community organize America, this is what he meant that the house is going to turn into an Occupy Wall Street Routine, complete with people pooping on cop cars and such and it's none of this does any good. Obviously, all this is just ridiculous and the and the Democrats don't have any good arguments on any of this. So yeah Paul Ryan says this: is a publicity stunt and clearly he's correct, but recognizing it's a publicity stunt. Why don't you deal with it like a publicity stunt? Here's Paul, Ryan's, Wolf Blitzer last night I hear is a key point to a new CNN poll shows an over well majority of Republicans. Look. It is ninety percent of Republicans support that idea. So why won't you at least allow a vote on this on the floor of house? Well at first, I would tell you if this is nothing more than a publicity stunt. That's point number one point two is this bill was already defeated in the United States Senate number, three

we're not going to take away a citizens due process rights were not going to take away a citizen's constitutional rights without due process that was already defeated in the Senate, and this is not a way to try and bring up legislation. Now, let's focus on the issue at hand here, terrorism and, let's find out what we need to do to prevent future terrorist attacks an if a person is on a terror watch list and they go try to buy a gun. We have procedures in place to d with that. We want to make sure that those procedures done correctly and that's something we should be able to do in a calm and cool manner. Without these sort of dilatory publicity stunt tactics to try and bring a

so that already died over the Senate to the House floor anyway, to bring up the long before. Why not at least allow a vote upward on. First of all, they know that we will not bring a bill that takes away a person is constitutionally guaranteed rights without their due process. We don't agree with that in the Senate. Already doesn't agree with that. So I think the point here Wolf is this: is a publicity stunt they're trying to get you to ask me those questions for publicity's sake? This isn't, kind of come up with a solution to a problem that you're trying to get attention. Okay in this is right. The Democrats, by the way, are already raising money off of this. They sent out all of their for in raising letters trying to raise money off the dead people in Orlando? Based on this little publicity stunt, the problem for Ryan is that Ryan is such an accountant. He such a such a goody two shoes. He doesn't know how to deal with the publicity stunt. What he should be doing is he should be turning off the lights. He should be if either that or hold the vote and hammer them like. I still don't understand why not just hold the vote and hammer them, it seems to me like they would be a better strategy than allowing them to

and stand on this basis, because that's it's just it's selling. That said, the Democrats have no arguments at all here in their arguments are just egregiously bad that that my favorite, my favorite terrible democratic army comes courtesy of Charlie Rangel, who is legitimately an idiot and Charlie Rangel from New York. He was asked specifically why he has security like if we don't need guns. Why do you have security? And here was his answer? well, I should say the uber wealthy who have protection had that protection, but individuals were law. Abiding citizens in your district should not. Let's talk about that, are lower minus it is, it's just shouldn't have to carry a gun. You know that so you're not going to push me in that direction, but you're protected by guns all over the place here in the capital awkwardly. Well, that's different. I think we just here. I think we need to be protected down here. We deserve it, you don't deserve it. We deserve it great and

Sir Charlie Rangel, I'm so glad that are are protected political class things they deserve protection, but of the rest of us do especially from people like them who want to take all of our rights away at, but it it's not just it's not just Charlie Rangel. Here's another democratic representative explaining that there is definitely free. This is this- is Crowley Innings, Joseph Crowley or Jonathan crowd? I can remember his his first name from a from Massachusetts and he's asked about this, and his answer is similarly hilarious. Put both your conscience vote for the right thing. Do the two process? Where might one of my colleagues started yelling out what about due process all star cheer do processes. I said what about dupe. This is, for the little child was killed in a classroom. What about the duprees system for young persons dancing dancing a night club in the coming of the heads of one off by an automatic weapon? What about the two, I believe in the process. I think we can work to go but covers the rights of people's due process the same time takes hands out of out of the hands of terrorists and r,

criminals are people who do harm to average order american citizens and, at the same time I thought Joe Crowley and he is from many from New York, so Joe Crowley there. He says that what about the due process? Rights for the person who's killed. Well, it's not just their due process, rights that are violated its their basic right to life that is being violated in that is by somebody else, which is illegal. The problem here is that you're saying it should be legal for you to take away my rights, not illegal legal, hey somebody comes in here, and God forbid shoots me they've. I edit my rates and they've broken the law in doing so. If you come into what he's saying is he wants to come in here and tell late, that I can buy a gun, and that should be perfectly legal for him to do it. The Democrats that this this sort of logic is the logical tierney. This is the logic of Terni. Well, what about the? What about the it every right become secondary to this think about this way I say. Well, I have a right to free speech and he says well. You're free speech generates the people who kill little in classrooms, doesn't have a right to freeze she's dead now, so you you

complain about your right to free speech being infringed any right. You can do the interest at any rate, any right right. Every right that you have, I have a right to own. My pretty well you're right on your properties, impoverishing some kid in the third world. The negative right to life does not have a right to to live and his right from your right. Once you get to his rights trump, your right you're, not talking that right, anymore, you're, talking about tyranny and the government allocating its priorities to one person and taking away the rights of another. In order to do so, yeah, that's that's what your entire! Do I not seize under the regime had right, nobody else did, and the idea here is The little kid in the classroom has right giant knowledge that he has to take away my error. Order protect that kid, which, of course, is not true in the slightest. It's such a bad argument, such a tyrannical arg, and he's not the only one making stupid argument. Seth Moulton is a Democrat from Massachusetts and he gave his speech last night and

Given the no fly, no buy legislation and he said that it's the right to travel is so basic. We didn't have to include it in the bill of rights. Will suit he's talking, here and what we're asking for is so reasonable. If you're on a no fly list, if you're not allowed to fly, you ought not to be able to buy a gun, and if there are problems with the no fly list, then let's fix it. But after tell me this, if there are so many problems with the no fly list, what do we have the no fly list? Why are these people not allowed to fly? I'm sure that has nothing to do with the fact that everybody in body flies home every weekend is the freedom to travel not afforded to American. Is that not all right that we care about so we live in a government that can go and tell you you're not going to get on that plane just arbitrarily? No, that's a basic freedom, it's so basic. We didn't even

to include it in the bill of rights. Is that we can stop right there first. So his argument here is that the right to travel is more basic than your right to own a gun. That's the argument is making it's. So basically you have to include in the bill of rights. This is so stupid. It's it's! It's head hurting Lee stupid. The whole point of including things in the bill of rights is because their basic that's. Why they were included there is more, is the is the right to travel more basic than the right to free speech that one was included in the bill of rights, which one is more important. Do you think which, when you think the founders cared about more? What abs asin entity? And when I call I he's talking about the no fly list, here's the truth. You can still fly from the no fly list so long as you can differentiate yourself from the suspect who they think that they're trying to pursue so this

why John is like a loses on the no fly list, but he still been able to fly right, but no, I can't this is about arguments is all about posturing. That's all the Democrats want to do is just posturing all over the place. Posturing right and left and, of course, celebrities are all in on this celebrity from Britney spears to Lady Gaga they've been jumping and they they wrote an open letter to Congress about how the they they? They think that it's just terrible that there isn't more gun control. It's this long list of useless celebrities whose opinions I don't care about, because they're paid to sing songs, other people right and they're paid to read lines that other people right means people like Denny Lavado in Ellen's generously, why? Why would I possibly can, with the meal of, I don't have to say about anything, hurts Kerry, her famous songs about being hot for the summer? Why why? Why can't a lady gaga, I have to say that anything or not, the constitution is rivaled only by her subtle tastes and is is just it's this long, long list of useless people. I could not care less about Questlove Love, Ricky Martin says I you have a gun. Well now the Redeemer,

Martin says it well. I guess I won't be living with the logo with Ricky Martin. I guess I'm really. I'm really I'm bored with all of this Tony Bennett, come on, come on. Alright should go away because a lot of celebrities, their rights should go away, and this again is the theme of today's show. The left doesn't like it writes the left things that your rights are bad because left thinks you are bad see. The left has no problem with their own security carrying guns 'cause. Those people are good they're protecting them, but you disagree with them, so you shouldn't be able to carry a gun. This is why no fly list. This is why terror watch lists are scary, because the people who in charge, get to simply dictate who goes on the list and who doesn't? Is there any doubt? Is there any doubt if Nancy Pelosi were in charge of that list, and that list was the easy way of preventing people from getting guns? Anybody who supports our political opponents goes on that list. Is there any doubt that happens? Of course, that's exactly what happens. Of course. That's exactly what happens, but this is it. This is what demo they're interested in curtailing your right, so that they can pursue their broader agenda of controlling you and getting rid of right, salty

and what they really want in the end. Is they want the rule of their friends? They want the Ola Ghar KI. They want the tyranny they want, the guy at the top. So the other big story of the day is the Supreme Court split. Forty four on President obamas exec amnesty. If Justice Scalia were alive, then presumably he would have voted against President Obama's executive. Amnesty President Obama case, you don't remember had said somewhat like twenty times, something like twenty times that he did not have the presidential authority to go ahead and just amnesty millions of people anyone he had an amnesty millions of people. Somebody appeal that twenty six. States appealed that to the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court said: no. You can't really do that so much so, President Obama is super pissed about that today, and President Obama spent about twenty minutes this morning. Talking about how is everybody elses fault that he even had to do that in the first place, and while Congress should have passed, comprehensive immigration reform is their fault that I had to do. This is the Supreme Court's fault that I had to do this 'cause. They could've sided with If the Republicans we just green light, my justice that replaces Justice Scalia if they would just green

Merrick Garland, then hello. I would never do any of this. I could just you know, go ahead and get what I want through legal methods, but they won't give me what I want So I did what I wanted anyway. This is how Democrats govern Democrats believe that rule of law is an obstacle to them getting things done. This is why I'm very much in favor of the sit in that happened on the floor of Congress. I hope it would continue year round. I hope it. I hope it all year they do this. I don't want them doing things. I think that their action is an obstacle to my freedom. They think the my freedom is an obstacle to their action. Hey. This is it. This is. This is the scary thing about Democrats and is the scary thing about the left. My rights are an obstacle to them doing what they want to the right simply have to be over rule to President Obama. He he based he said yeah, I know what I was doing- was illegal, but Congress wouldn't enact invoking the FU clause of article two of the constitution, the one that says F I'll, do what I want. You remember the

put that, in there in case things ground to a halt. There's a long history of this sort of thing, ending poorly. Where government says we're just going to we're just going to over run your rights because things are too and Certain things are too important. This is how enabling act get passed in Germany, this, how fascist governments rise in ITALY. This is how tyrants take pal. They don't do it on the back of the turns. Do it on the back. I'm going to be a jackbooted thugs is going to come and take all your rights. They do it on the back of. Doesn't that kid getting shot? Have a right? Don't we have rights against the bad guys? Don't don't don't you have a right to be free of economic impurity and economic insecurity? All you have to do is if you, if you think those rights are important, all you have to do is give me all your other rights, and then you have to worry about any of that stuff. I'll, take care of everything I'll take care of everything and a lot of people go yes right. Democracy, just doesn't workable. Democracy isn't workable. Now, Democrats have a secondary plan here and that is to purposefully

democracy and workable, and so they go down to the house floor and they protest in the scream and they make democracy look stupid and then they say well, you know the democracy doesn't work about. Democracy doesn't work, I'm just gonna do what I have to do on my own and the president. After all, somebody's got to do something around here. This is how tyrants take our this is. This is how Tierney's rise. And unfortunately it is on both sides of the aisle- I think the Donald Trump has a bit of the same more than a bit of the same in him. The if we won't get something done I'll just do it myself attitude. I think a lot of Americans buy into this. I don't think it's just Americans. I think historically, human beings have a desire for a tyrant who agrees with them. It is really Aristotle said that he said to give a monocle agrees with you it's better than having a democracy. Well, that's if you don't believe in right. I

markers use better. Even if that amount- because he doesn't agree with me so long as that democracies and violating my rights once the moxie biolage my rights and my rights to be free of you than then it's no longer a decent democracy, so the Democrats are full scale on attack against against all of this, which is very troubling and and very frightening All together, so now, let's do some things. I like some things I hate and then the mail bag is a drug free episode by the way of the Ben Shapiro shows that this is the. I know it's been awhile but Donald Trump'S over in Scotland. So there's not really much to say about that other than their some weird conversations going on our town from summers off they say: hey, isn't! the magnificent golf course like get outta here: water Eugene. Why are you here? Why wearing a kilt Who's is crazy, orange haired guy standing here so again time for some things I like and things. I hate. Ok, so this week, the jewish community, we read the parsha partial, just means portion. We read the Torah portion, the old testament portion known as the hollow Scott, and so this is a portion where it talks about it

about what is done in the temple about the building of the menorah, and this awesome part where the Jews complained. Basically, the Jews in the Bible just stand around complaining the whole time, and God keeps saying God you guys are awful, but I made a covenant with you or so this. So this way This episode of that is. They complain about the fact that the monitor that falls from Heaven is not good enough for them. They would prefer some meat, and so I was like fine here's some meat and then he doesn't giant flock of birds just fall on the camp right. That's one of the big elements of this week's parsha, but I want to talk about, is there's one sentence, there's one first in this weeks in this week's Torah portion that is cited by the left very often, and that is numbers nine hundred and fourteen- and it says if a proselyte dwells with you and he makes a Passover sacrifice to the Lord. According to the statutes of the Passover sacrifice and its ordinances, he shall make it one statue channel applied to you to the proselyte enter the native born citizen. So what the left likes about all of this is that the left sites, the last part right,

law will apply to you and to the proselyte into the native born citizen. What they seem to imply is illegal immigrant in the United States, they're back down by law, morality requires that we treat the stranger among you as we would treat you this neglect, the actual jewish law and the actual tour. Law that says that, in order for somebody to be considered a proselyte, they actually have to abide by the law. They can't be somebody who just sits down in your house and now you have to treat them with respect. It has to be somebody who is accepted. The mantle of the law on them, and then they get treated like everybody else. Then they belong under that one statue, but if they just come in and they we're not paying attention to any other laws. Now fruit me great, it doesn't work that way, going to talk about syrian muslim refugees, for example, coming to Europe and taking part in Europe. Not really kind of separating themselves off setting up their own courts and not just their own courts but ignoring Bay moral law in in these in these nations. You can't treat them

the little prince just the same as you would anybody else. You actually have to have a set of of laws specially for them. The I think it's important to bunk leftist notions of the Bible, because left constantly cites the Bible out of context. I can't wait. It's some point here on Friday, we're supposed to have a a a crossover show or clave and and and I I and Jeremy boring we'll sit together and we and we chat over the stuff. I can't wait to biblical exegesis with live in because I like about half of Cleveland's biblical exegesis and half of it. I I think is way too soft, and so I'm looking forward to having that conversation. I listened yesterday to his exegesis of judge not from the new testament and and not that I'm an advocate for for the new testament because I'm sure claiming those new test it better. Not after all, he believes it. You know it that goes in his non fiction section, because my fiction section of a joke, but I've read it and the part where it talks about judge, not I'm pretty sure that Jesus did not mean

judge, not means that I don't have the capacity to admonish you if you're doing something sinful judge not just means, I don't know what your sins count for in the eyes of God, and so I have no right to declare myself better than you in the eyes of God because of the sin that you're doing, but I still certainly know what the Senate is. And if you look in the old testament, it's been another explicit in another explicit or in the old testament. It specifically says the you shall not put a stumbling block in front of the blind when it and by that is that you have a duty to warn people about the sins that they are committing in Judaism is called the hospital you're supposed to give people

warning about the things that they are doing. That are wrong and it's actually part it's a vital part of jewish criminal laws of biblical criminal law. So I can't wait to have that. Those crossover conversations because that the Bible continues to be the foundation document for all of western civilization and how we interpret it yeah, I'm not sure, there's anything more important than that. Okay, things that I hate. So I want to talk about Ben Affleck, Ben Affleck for a second, so Ben Affleck is I I I I thought he was great in bed member Superman. Actually I really don't like Ben Affleck as an actor at all, I think is usually wouldn't, but he played a real Dark Nasty, Batman in Batman versus Superman and since I think that's actually, he probably is he played really well. He was he was on this new show any given Wednesday with Bill Simmons Bill. Simmons. I really enjoyed those in his writing a lot. I don't think he's very good on tv, but Bilson

does. The show now has been Affleck on it's all awkward and stuff Ben Affleck launches into this school, read just a yelling drunken rage about Tom Brady in Deflategate and will play a little bit that deflate gate. Is this the ultimate Boston sports story that ever could have happened us against them this week? It is the ultimate bull outrage of sports. Ever it's so stupid that I can't believe you me other. They gave him a suspension for a quarter of the regular season. We should be equivalent of suspending a baseball player for four leaf king days for a quarter days, yeah exactly, which is what they do for when you get busted taking steroids threat, which and by the way, if the intifada real testing, if you really wanna test for steroids, H, g h in the mail from their email address, so instead, what think what they did was to spend time ready for, for

Today's for not giving them is fucking cell phone for having a friend who called himself to death later. If I got in trouble for all the things that my friends called them selves now, it would be finished. Ok, so he goes on like this for five minutes. First of all, we got before nailing is nanny, then he also be in trouble, but Ben Affleck I love about. This is that Bill Simmons, there's a great comma, Jim Garrity at National Viana's Bill Simmons Pitches. This is we're going to say the things that no one will say, and this is making the rounds now it's going viral is Ben. Affleck is cursing about to flake. He saying the things. No one will say. Anybody finds that controversial. Like anything, the sayings and we find any of this really controversial like deflate gate is kind of stupid, and if everybody in the NFL were tested for actual steroids, then there would be not like. This is a controversial I love that the new standard for hot talk is, I say stuff, but I drop the F bomb a lot right. That's the new standard for hot talk, the problem that I have with that is that what they actually end up doing because of this is they take well accepted opinions, and then they say well. This is super edgy and

fringe e and then, when you say something, that's not particularly well accepted because is, for example, politically conservative. Then it's not just edgy and fringe e, and it's not it's not just by Bing. And it's not hard core know. When you see it now, you started looking back like you're out of the realm of even rational discourse, because you, here's, the new mainstream and then on the through the mainstream, is Ben Affleck, talking about a flake eight and then there's you over here saying that men are actually men and not women. Write your way out here, but that's you're, crazy, because Ben Affleck as edgy but you're more than edge, you are a nut. You Out of your mind, that's what I hate about this stuff, because it's so, but I mean like what he's saying here so uncontroversial: oh wow he's ripping on the flake eight. What is nor ok, yeah. That too, I mean Lindsay Lindsay things that Ben Affleck is absolutely drunk during this I think that's just been Affleck is normal and he actually looks like Ben FAT Flat Darrell, is, it would say he doesn't. He doesn't look like he's been working out since Batman kind of let himself go then,

Jews and self up for the next Batman or, I have to say I was not overly impressed in Batman versus Superman. The part that that I was not overly impressed with was the was the work out the work out routine because I was looking at the I was like I kind of do that stuff like if I can do that Batman should be doing stuff. That's way harder than that. I'm in pretty good shape, but I'm not Batman or am I who so it's it time for the mail, the so look, hey Ben. What do you say to someone who says the constitution is out of date? That argument seems to be popular. I say that this is a tyrant in waiting, so the constitution is based on their certain values that that change, and then there are certain values that don't and one of the things that doesn't change human nature. The constitution is based on a concept of human nature that says human beings are capable of great good or were capable of great evil, but were based only driven by our own interests and the only way to make sure that my intra doesn't overwhelm your interest. The only way to make sure I don't come in your house with a gun and steal. All your stuff is to ensure.

Are there are checks and balances, because in and in a pure democracy, for example, I wouldn't need to come in your house and steal all your stuff. I in three friends of the vote against you to go in your house and steal all of your stuff. This is called communism right. So what the kind with the founders said is we need a complex process by which interest is pitted against interest is what it says in Federalist. Fifty one fact and against faction, and they fight each other, and maybe there's no winter, and the only way things really get done, as if everyone agrees. If there's a broad consensus, that's when we do things. Otherwise we all kind of just everything balances out in the wash nothing happens and you're left to your own devices. That's why the constitution is relevant, the left hates because the left once a pure democracy, where they can ram down your throat, whatever they think the community one. And the community in their case is just the laughs like you don't count as a person in left viewpoint, so Whenever somebody says the constitution is outmoded, what they really because they don't agree with what the constitution thinks of humanity, because the left thinks alternative

that people like me, people who they disagree with are evil, or they are just ultimately good, wonderful human beings who don't need to check on them common rights, Haben water. Thoughts on brexit. So Brexit is. I know. A lot of people have talked about this. I haven't talked about it too much, mainly because it's Britain and not the United States, but it's sort of the equivalent. I know clip and talked about this yesterday of if Texas had decided that it was just seceding from the union. So it's a big deal. It's a big deal. It's not quite that bad, because the fact is that Texas was republican still calls itself the Republic of Texas, but Texas. It was pretty quickly integrated into the United States. Britain existed for hundreds of years before the rise of the EU and the European, the European Commission.

In the 1960s and 70s, and then it became the European Union in the 1980s. So it's really kind of a short lived thing. It really is only in after world war, two thing that the EU is created, and so it's not quite the same thing as Texas being part of the union, but in some ways it is in the sense that, like Britain has its own army, they can make their own foreign policy. Texas can't do that. Britain has its own domestic policy. That does look more like taxes, but there are a bunch of problems with the European Union as it currently is constituted, and I think that there are good reasons why, if I were Being in the UK. I would probably vote for Brexit number one sovereignty matter so over the EU. They have this european parliament that, basically, is just a rubber stamp. For a bunch of bureaucrats in Brussels who pass all these rules and then the European Parliament greenlights them and then their incumbent on everybody to follow this is this: is taxation without representation, or at least regulation without representation? Is a bunch of bureaucrats telling p

what to do in Britain who never voted for any of this stuff, never voted for any of this stuff and that, I think, is just on a root level, really really wrong immigration. I think that Britain has every case to be made, that why should they have to accept refugees? The Germanys accepting just 'cause Germany did it countries that aren't really part of the e? U that are in Eastern Europe and they're looking at this, and they say well, we were building fences to keep these people out like we're, not gonna, let you just but there's free travel within the E. U, and so, the idea is that refugees could just coming to Britain from France are from Germany and they don't like. That's, I think, that's a good reason I and finally, the bureaucracy. It's often it has all sorts of idiotic rules of the you level and then there's the socialistic aspect, which is that the EU sponsors all these failing states like Greece, which is why Germany has been paying for Greece for years.

In Britain is kind of sick of it. Britain had kept its own currency, it doesn't take part in the euro, but all these connections mean that it doesn't have the freedom to operate as it sees fit. I know a lot of people are afraid that if Britain exits the EU that this will kill global trade, I don't see why that should have to be true. The United States has a trade policies with the EU. Norway has trade policies with the EU. Switzerland has trade policies with the EU and isn't part of the EU. There are plenty of countries and kind of the nordic areas that are not part you but have really easy trade relationships with the EU. We have trade relations with Japan, like I don't see why you should have to be part of the European Union in order to trade with the European Union. I also don't see why you should have to be part of the European Union to have a common security apparatus. You already do it's called Nado, so I would vote for brexit if it were up to me. Obviously, I'm not a citizen, so doesn't really matter. Lindsey, writes, hey Lindsey seems to be an awesome makeup. Artist in her contribution to the show seems to be very impressive

I mean really really really impressive. I agree I mean you should see me without the makeup. I look like cookie monster. Is I can't get enough of her, isn't Lindsey great, why your thoughts on her awesomeness would amaze, maybe the word you choose, or maybe effervescent? Ok. So, first, I should point out: Lindsay cultivates the mailbag, so so the fact so the fact that this is in the mailbag. I can't say that this kind of this seems to have been sneaked in by somebody and also Lindsey wrote it. So this is how I'm gonna go so Lindsey you for your mail. No, you don't get a raise, but it's ok. Thank you that I do things. I can't believe that I didn't see that coming and that is high larious and I look forward. I look forward to subscriber map this writing in next week. To tell me how great math is. His hair is ok, Greg Rates, hi Ben. We well

and our first child to the world. Last month you have any parenting books to recommend. Thank you, Greg yeah, there's, there's not doctor Spock, there's, there's books by Doctor Karp and those books are good for little kids and, first of all, I think the best parenting manual you have is probably your own parents pick up on what you say is good. Do that all the things you think we're bad, don't do those things and you will probably be a better parent than your parents. I had really great parents and it makes it easy, also quick tip if you're worried about sleep training for your kid and there's this whole new theory that you're supposed to go in and like pat their backs while they were crying and then you leave them, there come back and pat their backs. You don't do any of that once they're four one slash two months: five months, you let them cry, you put him down for a nap, it's really hard. It's really painful. You put them down for a nap, they cry for like forty five minutes and they get tired and fall asleep. The next day. It's like half an hour, then fifteen minutes, then five and then done

and they go to sleep as soon as you put them down and also have a normal bedtime routine. But I think that, as far as parenting books, I haven't read any that I thought were super spectacular. The reason I recommend carpets because carpet some solutions to fussing and also to kind of colic for babies that are really good. I'm sure that your pediatricians told you about them, but yeah that would be place to start Frank right. How does the concept of freedom of religion survive when there is a foundational cultural conflict, like the one we see today between Islam and the Judeo Christian W great question? Frank? Ok, So freedom of religion does not mean I have to accept every crazy aspect of every crazy religion that comes into the United States at the Supreme Court has ruled like this, and this is true if I religion that says: hey it's the religion of Mola and it's time for some child sacrifice gang. Let's, let's do that I mean number one would would immediately would immediately make him president of planned parenthood. Is they do over there? But,

aside from that, we would also say this is not necessarily a religion that it falls under freedom of religion. There are certain basic rules that everybody has to follow, and freedom of religion really has to do more with your ritual practice. Then it has to do with your violation of basic cultural precepts, like we all have to agree on basic cultural precepts. This is one of the things that scary about multiculturalism. Is that in the the sees it when it comes to religion, but they don't see it when it comes to multiculturalism? If you come here, you want to kill your yeah- because you're a secular here is secular from some crazy part of the world where this is what they do, then the left goes. Oh, ok, that's kind of spectacular uncle and, if you, but if you come in- and you say you know what

I don't want to serve your same sex wedding because my Bible says not to then the left says: no, that's terrible! That's religious discrimination! The freedom of religion is meant to suggest that you get to act out your religion in public and private. So long as you don't hurt anybody else and that's the rule right as long as you don't hurt anybody else, radical Islam hurts other people. That's why the practices of radical Islam are problematic, not because of anything it says in the Quran. It's why you'll see? I don't. I don't cite the Koran. I don't go into long explanations of what the Koran says versus the Bible. I don't think that is actually super important. I think how people act is much more important and their thought process is important to that, but I'm not going to I'm, not an islamic expert, I'm not going to tell you what's more legitimate form of Islam, I'm just going to tell you. Osama Bin Laden knows more about Islam than I do, and so does, and so does so do various moderate Muslims around the world, but I can tell you what the percentages are, which and who's the threat Okay Roberts says Ben I'm a huge fan of both yourself and Klavan and anxiously await each new podcast. Would you

during a debate with Stefan Molyneux? I don't really know him. So I'm happy to debate with pretty anybody. I was even happy to debate with with the triple Milo Uniopolis until he chickened out, because he's a coward a lot of what he has to say. I have a hard time understanding his is from fandom I and- and so he wants me to bare metal it again. I'm I'm happy today and sure yeah, I know, writes Ben love. The show getting to see that mother of yours in here the unbeatable knowledge still out of it for the price of a Netflix subscription, is well worth it well, I appreciate it and everyone else should follow Daniels. He says the next time you wanna talk, show with leftist and they start complaining about how everything is the right spot. You should whip, your violin play along with their lament that that would be I I I I I am in fact I am in fact a good violinist, although I have not practiced in a couple of years, which means that it's like riding a bicycle, you don't lose everything but you're, also not ray sing, shape. David says, Ben people on the left. Often you zionist as an argument enter the way they use bigot racist, islamist homophobe, as far as I can make out of it

the design is to believe in the legitimacy of the statehood of Israel. Well, I can distort my brain. To understand why the left hates that is there more to their definition of the word or should it be I wonder I have no argument, so I'm going to insult you know that's how it should be file. That's the entire argument and the design is that there are people who try to read into sinus like ooh. Well, it's racial nationalism, no it's religious nationalism. Actually it was established. The state of Israel was established specifically to provide a safe haven for Jews around the world, which Each succeeding generation demonstrates is increasingly necessary and beyond that it was founded as a liberal democracy to preserve the precept of judaic religion and thought and the ethnic Judaism, actually secondary on the reason. I think you use matters at all the I really don't care about it. The only reason I think Judaism it was at all is because the precept of religious Judaism, that's part of the religion. If it weren't, I wouldn't care, and this is why we

will say is I and ISM is racism. For example, really ethiopian Jews were flown in, like tens of thousands were flown in on planes, and those are black. People right in the from Africa and the Syrian Jews were flown in Russian. Jews were flown into the engine. Judaism is multi ethnic, its its multi ethnic. It has no, it has no ethnic component beyond just if you have been born to a jewish. Parent, but you can convert to Judaism and then you're, jewish parent, a Mitchell writes hi Ben my girlfriend, and I have been taking classes at a lutheran church where we. We have our wedding one day and have our future children grow well in the class are pastor explained all that believe in God will be saved as long as they believe in the one. True God in previous lessons, we learned that one must believe in Jesus. Savior. I asked about Jews, although you may not believe Jesus was our Savior, you believe in God, and that he is the one true God when I asked, if they would be safety, could not answer my question. Why could he not answer me

We believe in one true God. I believe God will save the Jews as well as the questions. What is your take? Well, I mean I can't answer for your pastor. I know there are some Christians who believe the Jews are saved. I think that the mainstream positions that you're not say because we don't accept Christ and Christ, is the way and the the way in the light and there is no path to Heaven, except through Maine that doesn't bother me in the slightest? I don't care, you know when I do by then I guess I'll deal with that. So long we're friends here and we're allies here, fighting the same battle, then after we, so we can have that argument. You know. I think that your to Heaven, if you believe in Jesus and you obey certain basic principles of a decent life, if you believe I'm going tell, I really could not care less about that. It doesn't matter to me. If you don't plan on sending me they're like a lot of radical Muslims, then I don't care. I I really do that this is this. Is this? It doesn't bother me one iota when I ordered the. Of course. Religions believe that other religions are wrong. You know that's by using, isn't

Hannity and vice versa. Ok, Andrew right, hey Ben, what's your opinion repealing the 12th amendment for just this election and have a Clinton Trump ticket 'cause at this point? Why not I mean a Clinton from ticket or Trump Clinton. Ticket is basically two sides of the same coin. So sure why not? Why not? one day and says hey, then I know you talked about liberal messaging in newer Disney movies. Have you seen to help you yet? I think they went full social justice warrior the mention affirmative action, political correctness, sexism and racism, it social engineering of never seen it. I haven't seen it yet. I plan on watching it all. You know as soon as I do. I do know that the laughs, sick, perverse attempt to target children with their propaganda in kids films makes me want to vomit it's disgusting and it's something that every parent should be policing. You've heard me talk about frozen and the social message, the social messaging, implicit and let it go yeah now they're, using finding Dory talk about this. They did find door. There's a random lesbian couple that shows up apparently there's a a trans trans

issue or something as a sting ray. They they did it. I guess it was Trent it was it was. It was a sting ray in ousting Rhonda. I guess which you, which is weird, because in the animal kingdom that doesn't happen, because if that happened in the animal kingdom and everybody would die off basically, but it's it, but did this attempt to socially engineer children? It gives a watchable when they say. If you just leave us alone, then we won't bother you or your kids. That is an absolute lie. They absolutely will bother you. They absolutely will bother your kids and if you don't fight back using your market power, they will continue to do that endlessly and it's it's difficult, because so many talented people make so much good art that disagrees with that. But it's one thing for me as an adult to expose myself to art that I notice agrees that that I disagree with it's another thing for me to expose my five year old child to art. That has an agenda that is subtle and that and that I disagree with that. I find simple and problem

Ok, folks, we have reached oh yeah. We have one video question. Thank you for the reminder. Ok, video question: hi Ben thanks for you too. My question is heart: sex educators, the Middle School high school sex education teachers? Aren't they accomplice of rape, because they're teaching sex education, giving out condoms, providing resources telling kids that did have consensual sex when by law, children until you're, eighteen, some states sixteen, but generally eighteen, you cannot have consensual sex. Oh, he can't get cancer. This is actually a good question. It also illustrates the difference between statutory rape and what they call forcible rape now taken got himself in our sort of trouble because he was making a legal distinction that people don't understand, he's also saying brute something really stupid scientifically idiot

But there is a legal distinction between statutory rape and forcible rape. Statutory rape is twenty year old guy has sex with a sixteen year old girl and there's no Romeo and Juliet law, and so he is now guilty of statutory rape. 'cause he's raped someone who's, not capable of giving consent to someone that much older. That's not quite the same thing as forcible rape, which is a twenty year old, guys he's a sixteen year old girl, walking down the street she's, not his girlfriend they're, not dating or anything he grabs her office. St put him back with an array, sir right. There is a distinction in law with regard to the punishment that goes along with that when it comes to statutory rape. Of course, this is true course. This is true. You teacher one thousand two hundred and thirteen year old girl that sex is under full and fine and beneficial and so long as it feels good do it and then she meets twenty all guys as yeah as long as it feels good. Do it yeah you're, of course, you're facilitating statutory rape. In that way, I I my view is that it's up to the parents to teach their kids about sex. I don't want teachers teach my kids about sex like I'm. I want to teach my children what my standards are, what moral standards look like. I don't trust anybody else teach my kids at the most vital parts of the of life. That's my job as a parent,

but my problem with sex ed. Is this application? That's occured where parents say oh well, I don't have to have the talk that confusing stuff. I've never understood this by the way all these people in society- oh, oh, my god, I can't believe I have to have that uh. Up with Mama come live at the talk with dad and these idiot parents- oh my god, it's gonna be so awkward, and I have to tell my daughter about sex is going to be so awkward. Why is it awkward? Why is it awkward? It seems to me that one of the goals, unfortunately, of the secular left, is to shrouds next in mystery and then two and then to pretend that there's no mystery at all about it right, so they want it both ways they want to shrouded in mystery, like with something that's too dirty to be talked about it. So dirty that's what makes it sexy it's so dirty. We can't talk about it and then, at the same time, there's no mystery about at all. It's just like pooping. It's just a bodily function is like eating or pooping people. Just do it. It's totally great here's the reality,

there. There is a mystical component to sex Klavan talks beautiful about this. He says that the difference between rape and consensual sex is a spiritual difference, because the physical act is is precisely the same. All that's lacking is consent. It's a crime against the soul, not just against the body for you to talk to your kids about sex is incumbent on you as a parent, and it shouldn't be confusing and it shouldn't be up. And the fact is the more outright and fourth right you are about sex with your kids. The battery, in the end, this isn't to say that and and when I say outright for three, I mean like in a biological sense, more clear. You are about how things work. Unless it's going to be like, I have to experiment to figure out where things go. Now you don't. I mean here's biology. This literally, might add. I think I was. I think I was a little older than usual, probably ten, when my dad told me first child, so it in a chat with many families. In a fan, sorry, in a family of many children, the number of children, the age of of knowledge about sex, goes down with each preceding child right, so the first child. It's like he's ten, the next child like seven next child, is five right, because

kids tell each other. So so, when I was ten, my dad sat me down. Maybe not my dad got me with biology textbook- and he said this goes here, so here's how this goes. This goes here. You do this when you're married right when you're married this is one of the great things about being married. You got to do this and he didn't put it in the car, except when man loves a woman when you love each other, because that's the way it is Tuesday and kids can't understand that. You can't expect kids understand that, because kids are not fully mature and it's not just when you love somebody if you want to have a productive and and if you wanna have a productive sex like not just a pleasurable to all sex is pleasurable central. But if, but if you, if you add all consensual sex is pleasurable, but if you are, if

Don't have a productive sex life like one that's going to actually enrich your life in a positive way. You need commitment that goes along with that and marriage is the is the standard of commitment. So are the way I'm going to teach my kids about sex is going to say when you get married. Here's what you do not when you love somebody, because you can love lots of people, not when you specially for girls, that's particularly damaging, I don't think sex is the same for girls is for guys spiritually. I think that's a lefty bull hockey, routine eye and just look at the suicide rates among young girls have sex person the suicide rate among young boys about sex not the same at all, not the same at all: promiscuous girls in their teenage years, significantly higher depression, suicide rate, and then teenage boys are promiscuous sex because for men, sex is much more of a biological function and for girls it's much more connected to a a deep well of of spirituality

and feeling I, which is white for a written. When ever I think every man on a gut level understands that one night stand is, may just be some guy getting his rocks off and every woman understands that it's more than that and and so yeah. I think all did you get about all these things she did and yet more open. You are the more they're going to come to you with questions and not feel ashamed, and for you not to be ashamed about your sex life, then, like spell it out for the kids, but for you to say yeah I'm course mom and I have stacks of course. Of course we do that and it's wonderful because we're married, we love each other and that's that's good thing. It provides positive, positive, Roma, otherwise they're going to get messages about sex from tv where everything is taboo and what makes me sexy is the violation of taboo, and the problem is in our society with each progressive year. The taboos get knocked down so we're now reaching the point where there are no more taboos, and so we have to create new taboos to knock down and that's why we're now creating the taboo homosexuality. Now the taboos transgenderism soon there will be and uh taboo. That's designed to turn people on and the reason that Trans

stories you well typically is because people are fascinated by the taboo okay. So that is the end of the mailbag. That is the end of the week will be back here, on Monday, with more insanity and I'll, give you update I'm supposed to be a political. This weekend, I'm debating Sally Kohn, which should be entertaining at the very least, and maybe we'll have some video clips of that. If it's available but you have yourself a wonderful weekend. Try to survive, and and back on Monday, if the world still exist, I'm Ben Shapiro. This is the Ben Shapiro, show