When California law sender, Barbara boxer, it looked as though there Idle for stupidest woman in the? U S and it had been lost too, but thanks to the What should I come over here is to fill her rule. California has trained its title holder. On Friday, Harris tweeted Judge Gorse has consistently valued narrow legalism over real lives. I cannot. For his nomination and there is an option. Back to see up attic contention up in it Harris argued the gorse edge so qualify that literally not one democratic cast a vote against him for his federal appellate court position was unquiet, to be on the Supreme Court. Why? Because the core court has the power to do enormous good angler such wouldn't. Do such good. What good he forgot as a result of being, you know, like a judge according to Harris, he would have voted to strike down laws forcing teachers to pay union news, because

that's a violation of their fundamental rights, among other obvious legal issues. But Harris says that, because gorse, it might take a look at that stupid old constitution. He cannot be confirmed your rights as, U S, senators, we have an obligation to also examine the nominees legal approach and ask whether he or she considers the impact of those decisions on our society and the daily lives of our people. Say. Wouldn't it be awesome if we had some sort like independently elected branch, to make public policy. Would that be possible, but according to Harris Judge It should fulfil the mandate if there are good Marshall, who said quote: you you do what you think is right and let the law catch up with coincidentally, is also something every dictator ever has said, but never mind Harris knows what is right for America. Judges who openly ignore legalism in order to apply her standards of morality and then Shapiro. This is the venture perish. Ok, so we are going to get to all of the hub over seven years, the head of the House intelligence community and these supposed scandal surrounding him visiting the White House. We are going to get to Donald Trump

vision to reach out to Democrats, rather than reaching out to conservatives. We're gonna get some good trump anthem. Admirable. Do the trump add from today, which is always exciting, possible, deconstruct the culture, but first we should say thank you to our sponsors over at my patriot supply. So recently, North Korea is making a lot of noise about how they want to newcomers. Are they actually going to new Gus unlikely? But if they tried to then now we, the time to stock up fear, we can see food supply for just a ninety. Nine dollars actually got a nice letter from somebody who's who is somebody had gone and got the the emergency food supply and prepare with Benda com. They said that there is a flaw in their packaging. They immediately sent a note to the folks over my patriot supply and they The problem immediately. There really response in their terrific folks over their prepare with Ben Dotcom. Ninety nine dollars, plus for shipping, provides you that for weak emergency food supply she's great, because even if you're not work out North Korea looking ass, you should be worried about a tornado earthquake. There's always natural disasters

a while for the government to get to people in some of these cases. In some cases the government just doesn't shop at all in such important that you be able to print your family, make sure that you have as much food on hand as you need that's. Ninety nine dollar for that for weak emergency food supply. Folks in the Alps have tried it. They say that it is really good prepare with Ben DOT, TK or eight eight. Eight, eight o three fourteen thirteen. Eighty eight o three fourteen thirteen, it's one of those things where he d ones, then you never have to worry about again, prepare with Ben dot com to get your forum, emergency food supply, which is just something that should have on hand regardless of of you know. For me, disasters are or natural disasters. You should always He prepared for an emergency, and my patriot supply does better than anybody else. Ok, so the big scandal of the day is a fake mercy, and that is definitely, as is the head of the House Intelligence Committee. He went over to the White House apparently and there he met with some intelligence official who told him all the information that he broke last week. Now your call last week, definitions, one ends at a press conference where he said

Donald Trump team, MR veiled nature. They won't wiretapped he's the one happen is that basically, the intelligence officials were wire too. Paying all of these all of these diplomats from foreign countries. People had members the term transition team on the other line, as you imagine that one and then information is disseminated in an irresponsible and or criminal ways, and the dissemination of the information was really the question, not the gathering of the information and that's an important distinction allotted people on team from had been saying that the intelligence community illegally gathered information. There is no evidence of that whatsoever, did they illegally disseminate information there? There is actually a fair bit of evidence that they legally disseminated information about, for example, former national security adviser MIKE Flynn, but Democrats search for scandal have been looking somewhere else. So what they say. Case that they are making now. Is it basically, from was engaged in some sort of nefarious activity with Russia, and now they're, trying to cover it up. So today the Washington Post says: quote: Administration sought to block former

Acting Attorney General Sally AIDS, from testifying to Congress. In the house, investigation into between russian officials in the trunk campaign According to a series of letters reviewed by the Washington Post, Yeats was known. Fine earlier this month by the Justice Department that the administration considers a great deal of her possible testimony to be barred. Discussion and the congressional hearing, because the time that's are covered by the present. Your communication privilege, Nazareth Cobb, Obama, also asserted the presidential communication privilege when he was attempting to defend his attorney general Eric holder from Kansas. To Congress under Republicans the AIDS was supposed to testify before the House Intelligence Committee this week defined the Trump administration and then Devon, Nunez mysteriously cancelled the hearing at which you testify. You now says that she will testify next week's the media immediately left you there's some sort of horrible cover up progress and they said that they cover up is worse because last week, before Nunez announced all this stuff now the intelligence community disseminate information wrongly they

and the Nunez went over to the White House. So what he says you went to the White House in order to use a secure computer so that he can look at intelligence information, Lackland Marquis of earth daily bees, he says this kind of shady the Our committee has its own secure servers. There's no need to use the one at the White House, but what Nunez says is that the information was not available Congress. It was only available to the executive branch, that's where the information was, and that is true of the house. Intel committee he's able to see such material without reporting back to his colleagues. He hasn't revealed what intelligence, official, actually community information communicated the information to him, and then he went back to Why hasn't told tromp about it? Now? That's the part, that's a little bit shady. Did he went. He talked to this intelligence official and then you didn't tell any of his committee members and anyone told Trump well. If Thou the case then widened the intelligence. Official just go tell Trump, so people are, acting on this in their saying well, this

Obviously, some sort of cover up, obviously Nunez was fed something by the White House, and then you want an updated Trump on the feeding and then he went out there and Ben Paradise the Trump line, but there's not a ton of that is true there, thereby Wait, you dear, is about what Nunez is doing here. Nunez theory number one is the conspiratorial one. That Nunez knows that there is something very Trump was doing with Russia and now he's their attempting to misdirect at the behest of the White House, which is why he visited the White House both before and after he went out and announced all of this and this has led to a tremendous breakdown in the house, intelligence Committee and cancelled Their hearings for this week's people can't get along, but here's account national here's another possibility. What's the matter, and for a second then Obama, elegance community members are widely dispersing information illegally, which is probably true I assume Nunez found out about this from some sort of intelligence, community whistleblower who didn't go directly to front, because you doesn't trust Trump also- Applause well, because Trump has a big mouth from says,

mine, and he wouldn't want from to get him in trouble spot. Instead, he uses Nunez. This discovery calls of Nunez. He says: listen, it's your job too to figure out how to disseminate this information, but I thought you ought to know you're the one on the oversight committee. So, come, and you see me right now. Nunez goes to the White House to speak to that person because its executive branch agency, and then he does while the AIDS testimony- or at least the White House, fights the AIDS testimony not because they think the AIDS as something that they need to keep hidden, but because AIDS is just gonna, go out there and be a political hack. What, again is not implausible because after all, it is a political had. She was fired if your call by the administration for refusing to defend trabants travel ban in court, wench, acting attorney general, both of those there, These are plausible, but the media is only covering one of those areas and then crasser only pushing one of those areas- and that is the Nunez Trump cover up theory and again the question, and all of that is where's the scandal. If there's gonna be a cover up, you assume something had to be done. That was wrong. So far, the only I know that was done. That was wrong in any of this

their intelligence officials, who worked for Obama who are leaking of information to the press and making a bunch of information to the rest of the intelligence community and on masking people. That's the only thing I know was done. Here I don't know anything was around between Trump team in Russia. You can see when everyone there's no evidence you? I don't know that everything was done in terms of coordination with Wikileaks. I don't know that. Neither do you neither does anybody else again. Funny about this, that, among all the leaks that have happened from the intelligence community, the press, the one It hasn't been linked to the actual, definitive information that says that tramples can did to Russia, still none of that is all the smoke. No fire and so its job. It is plausible, is the cover up theory that basically, the zoning currently handled just normal. Order of business routine from Devon Nunez and President Trump secure. Nunez explaining why he went to the White House ground in the first place. The Congress has not been kept this information, these documents and that's the problem. So

because the because this is executive branch, it was distributed widely through the executive branch. This was from November, December and January, and these reports this. Let me reiterate this- had nothing to do with Russia. Nothing do the rush investigation There is no way for the folks in working with to actually too to bring this forward to light. There was no I could view that because they couldn't get it to the House Intelligence Committee. Ok, so he he saw it says that I'm not gonna be able to transmit. That's the House Intelligence Committee, the House, until I'm a practising what the hell are. You see and I don't get to see it Chuck humor Lee the minority leader. He says they did Paul Ryan should immediately fire Nunez. Basically, Mr President, if Speaker Ryan, wants the house to have a credible investigation. He needs to replace Chairman Nunez and then followed up on immediately by Mark Watts. Whose senator from virginia- and he says that boy sixteen years has. I am totally missed

five by what Mr Moon is a sad and of to my German, which hamper he didn't know. I fucked democratic Republicans on the committee. I think its fairly defying, if not outrageous, that make these claims then scope. In brief, the White House- ok and finally Nunez responding. I guess I'm being told that it is not perhaps Nunez. You know everybody pronounce it now. It's actually parents noons. I have no idea what that's true, in any case, Devon Noons, He says that democratic. I just want amount out because he's effective, given what nobody really understand nor will. I am sure that the Democrats do want me to quit, because they know that I'm not quite effective. I get into the bottom volatile congressmen Ok, so he says that is effective and getting the bottom of things. I doubt that's. Why Democrats one declared, I think the Democrats want to quit because one it would look like he's guilty and two because

he will act as a shield for Trump, and this I mean just to be perfectly honest with you. Whenever you have a member of the Party of the President who is investigating the president himself, it is very worthy in an honest and credible investigation very difficult to get in. Honest, credible investigation of the president, The person who is leading the investigation was on the Trump transition team which Devon, Noons or Nunez, was so I think that it is perfectly fair to say the media's overblown miss case and this affair scandal and that we don't even know what's going on it and it is so perfectly fair to say that if you actually a credible investigation that is going to be listened to by the vast majority of Americans? You can't have somebody was on terms transition, team, leading me destination in front is just not gonna work that way, but all this is leading the left to lose their minds and their there absolutely going crazy. So Senator Coon's of of Connecticut. He says that the the GNP, for example, and judge Gore such they should never ever ever, use the what they call them. Nuclear option. They should lead to filibuster, stand like or go down to the famines. Just in it's insane

It was so then the Republicans going to pass it using the so called nuclear. Almost certainly- and I think this is tragic- and in talking to friends on both sides, they all- we ve got a lot of senators concerned about where we're headed, ok, again, the only reason there talking about using the nuclear option is because they are tied. Filibustering a Supreme Court dominate, which has never been done before. As far as I am aware so and then again, is it look rats losing their minds because they don't know to do with with Gore such they don't know what to do with trumped there very frustrated. I understand. The frustration, but some of them, just endemic to not being in the party in power. Bernie Sanders is back and he says that he hopes that the gene Pete does not change the rules when it comes to approving Supreme Court nominees, What concerns me is the right. Now we have a rule that says appropriately. I think that for a Supreme Court, justice on life time terms, one of the most important positions in the United States government that it should require

sixty votes, because that would make it by partisan, and I think that that's why That's not what the constitution, as it doesn't say that require sixty votes. It says that it requires fifty one votes. It's the Democrats who are insisting on sixty votes and, of course, the Democrats nukes that filibuster along Harry Red long ago. So the idea that it's no longer on the table- they can't do that. That's just apps nonsense? How crazy are the Democrats going at this point? There is now a report that out the Chuck humor really started ranting at somebody who voted for Donald Trump at a restaurant in New York last night, according to multiple witnesses, does over daily wire as well. Victim of the ugly episode, the leading demo in the Senate. New Europe's own trucks, humor lost it at its Winkie Manhattan restaurant on Sunday after he learned they well connected. Woman had voted for Trump after machine inside by declaring she voted for Trump Shimmer, allegedly followed. The woman and her well known Democrat husband outside repeatedly screaming he's a liar apparent

this happened in an upper west side. Restaurants, and apparently it was the Democrat Joseph California, Junior member, the board of directors at Sea BS, who serves as the second Harry of Health, education and welfare from under. Jimmy Carter, so he was very upset: they? California's wife had voted for trumpets. They actually start berating her in front of the crowd. That's crazy Democrats are going just to prove how nuts they are Christmas do you ever state? comes out. I show a girl. He says you have Uncle Jump, Jared, feeble you like Saddam Hussein's gets, you know We can. I cared about everything, but you know who to include say Workin for Saddam Hussein. You couldn't gonna arrest. I have I counted, tackle undisguised. I get killed like these. People are really powerful, imagined getting to a fight in the office. With Jared or a vodka that they have enormous power in their always gonna. Be there

So what I worry that for other people know I has evolved travellers vision described as her fathers, eyes and ears on the ground. That's a little scary, if you're, just a regular way has staffer who maybe wants to offer advice that criticized the president. This is a person who loyalty is the number one trade that is. The term cares that he's only Chris Matthews over them as a museum member will increase Matthioli state reset. Just click is yours. Gotten you just now. You know that if you look at Hillary Clinton Cross annually, Elsie Cross. I'd Hilary will jump on you thrown out like a dog, rarely juggler, because just likes it. I'm we sang stood like thank you no Mussolini he's gonna shoot is unfounded. Lot would only later until then, Emily much are they losing their minds. When he's comparing vodka Trump, who by the way jewish

comparing her to day inclusive, who speck or literally mass murderers who had rape rooms. Insane the left is gone. They ve lost all connection with reality, so, whatever problems we have here over on the right left is certainly not taking advantage of them because they are just off Well, they, they don't even know how to handle any of this. What we're gonna talk, some good trump bad tromp after this plus, what happening in them in the wake of Trump card going down. But first, I want to say due to our new sponsors over envy empties this movement movement yourself. This So then I have right here at this very cool, look and watch this, I got from and the empty. Still on the belief that stylish and cost a ton of money it would start by these two guys who basically wanted to undercut pricing on watches does watches. Can we really expensive? I love watches I only three or four of them. This is This is the nicest watch that that I own I wear this one everyday. Actually, I had a watch from another brand and f

got my movement watch my envy empty watch and then get your watch at em. The empty watches dot com when you when, when I got this watch, actually put the others in the drive and wearing this whenever they sense, I think it's really collagen, I know that's a Craven has one to a really nice looking watches the the very stylish they fit really well and it's here it is- terrific company I gave them they started. Ninety five bucks, a department store disability for five hundred dollar watch, the really really nice watch and they rather than if they sold online and be able to do the deed, Brandon, for a lot less money right now, if you go to end the empty watches, dot com, Slash Shapiro it fifteen percent office, shipping and free returns. Fifteen percent off free shipping and free returns when you use em the empty watches, dot com, slash The parliamentary add to slash appears that another we saying again, their watches are just tat notches clean, designed everything looks very sleek and Disease they can watch them that I like, and they don't I'll, have to look at in a sort of more dark and athletic like this. They classic

looking watches as well. They have women's watches that are really nice only get one for my wife really top. Ouch material at competitive prices and the empty watches, dot com. Slash Shapiro I love the watch. I can't speak more highly than that of the product. Ok, so I think what to do the term bad trumpet. First you're gonna have to go over daily wire dot com and it can become a subscriber if you want to watch alive pleasure deconstruction cultures. Iberian, the beast actual so want to go over to daily wired outcome right now, eight dollars a month will buy you a subscription to daily wired outcome, plus, if you get an annual subscription, they get a free, signed copy of Michael J, Knolls Phd his his best selling book reasons to vote democratic and a comprehensive guide. As I say, incredibly thorough sure the book is blank, but still it. Great book and it's worth having in your labour, more importantly, it's worth getting a free site copy and sending it to all of your knowing Democrat family members because hilarious, daily work. Dot, com, eight dollars month, get your subscription annual subscription noses, but plus I keep it

there'll be Shapiro store. There will be a Shapiro story, there's plenty of gear and we are getting ready right now, as we speak in the back, I have a bunch of illegal immigrants, working on it and until their deported, then they will be working on all the Shapiro gearing the back at that point now switch to american made products as they are running for president, almost in any case, over daily wired. Our common check it out. Or lessen later in Itunes and sound clout. We are the largest conservative podcasting, the nation S. Ok, so We haven't done this in awhile, because for last we can have this kind of bad trump analogy. Some good trump backdrop we will begin ok and we begin with some good trunks, there's an actual good trumpeted. I see this makes us happy when there's actual good trump on the President s good stuff, so attorney General Jeff sessions. He has come out now and he says these sanctuary cities. This all has to stop the sanctuary cities where you have

whoa qualities, like LOS Angeles, that refuse to coordinate with the federal authorities, refuse to actually report if they catch somebody in a crime. Who's in illegal immigrant forty partition that has we're going to cash. In the current fiscal year, Abarbanel Justices Office of Justice, Bro comes, and community oriented policing services anticipates a warning more than four point one billion dollars in grants. I strongly urge our nation states and citizen counties to consider carefully the farm they are doing to them. Citizens by refusing to foresaw immigration laws and to rethink these forces such thousands, make their cities in states less safe public site DE as well as national security, more at stake and put them at risk of losing battle. Dogs can people want and deserve a lawful system of immigration that keeps us safe and one

it serves the national interest. This x, Taxation is reasonable. Just and our government has the duty to made it. We will need a virgin sessions get for the trunk in its relations with this, of course, is exactly true. If you're a sanctuary city and your receiving federal funding, and then you ignoring federal law with regard to immigration and just refusing to even work with federal immigration officers, then you are doing something wrong in your endangering american citizens in american lives. There's been a big case out of Maryland, where you a school district enrolled to seventeen zero point. Eighty year old boy, both illegal immigrants enrolled them- ninth grade in ninth ok, so nine graters, usually thirteen thirty fourteen years old, and These two kids raped girl. Reportedly now they are. Deported along with their illegal immigrant, father and This is just a case in point of when you have any legal emigrate when you have an immigration system that refuses to even green people at the border that refuses to even check up

people that just released as people into the system and makes them dependence on public benefits, including public education. You end up with a heightened risk of crime, this argument is constantly hear about illegal immigrants, lower the crime rate, because most illegal immigrants are not here committing crimes. That's only true if you look at their camps in the in the general population in terms of in terms of income. So if you take low income illegal immigrants into compare them to low income Americans, they will lower crime rate, which makes sense because a lot of the people who are legally emigrating, our legal emigrating here to work, they're, not illegally emigrating here for the benefits, but that said If you important an enormous number of low income, people, low income, people tend ever higher crime rate and higher income people, so you can't say that they lower the crime written United States. They increase the crime rate in the United States. They just have a lower crime rate than the other poor people in the United States you understand the argument. The idea is not that they have low crime rate than the average american civil war crime rate than the people to whom they be compared. Income lies, but its archway,

whether the import, a bunch of people who are on the low income end of the scale? That's the problem here: fact the localities are not abiding by the law is an even more serious from the media by the way hates when we even how glad stories like this brain Spelter over CNN. He says that is that we should even be talking about this rape in Maryland. It has become a major national issue, because I mean obviously just political rapes and assaults. Murders are local news stories on a daily basis, but they break through to become national news, and when do they not this week that health care bill the talks in the house, many, a cable news coverage all over the place, but Fox NEWS also focus heavily on another story and sometimes tying it to the president's immigration agenda. Watch to alleged assailants Jose Montana and Henry Sanchez million both arrived.

This country just a few months ago. This terrible crime is just the latest in a long list of Americans who are victims because of illegal immigration. This shocking case of a fourteen year old girl, allegedly right by to illegal immigrants in Maryland School, got me thinking. Tino was in school with your children. If you think your school administrator, Prince Amal Azure back. Thank again sickening story from Rockville Maryland, about an alleged rape at a school now and fox all roads, Lee back to media bias, so Tucker Karlsson called out. Animals like CNN, for not covering this or thoroughly for not covering extensively. He also points out NBC Cbs Abc nightly. Newscast did not cover this alleged rape. Now Fox toes the focus on that, partly tying it to try immigration agenda. That was a story of Maryland, but there was another story: Maryland ties they got little to no coverage anywhere on fox or other channels.

This is a story that cross state lines from Maryland to New York. You may not have heard about it. This was about army veteran, an alleged white supremacist who to New York and attacked a sixty six year old black man with a twenty six inch knife, killing that There is much still to be learned about this story. I see that. Let me explain what brain seltzer is doing wrong here and why it is a prime number one. We actually did cover this particular story over a daily wire, because I remember pre. I remember signing it specifically because I thought it was shocking- saw those worthy of coverage but It is true that people tend to pick stories in the media that back their narrative. So it is true that we talk about the Rockville Marilyn case, because it is illustrative of a broader problem in american society. The left ignores it because they don't think that illegal immigration and lack of knowledge about the people in the country is a broader problem in american society. They think it's too, We find that we don't know who's in american society. They the real threat is white people knocking black people unconscious on street with crowbar. Or with tire irons. They think that's happening in mass

members now, I would suggest the debts are far less of a problem in the United States than the baseline problem at the government is not actually doing its job in ensuring safety of the american citizen by ensure that the people who come here are people. We even know about it and when it comes to covering the stories, this is just a pro wait what the human tendency there's there's two problems with with how we cover stories. One is the human tendency to take these views, vague and then use it to explain the general. So we take a story like Wrathful Maryland. We say this applies broadly. Ok actually they have statistical, prove that it applies broadly, which is why, on this programme, I like to talk about crime rates. Among grins and then and then to illegal immigrants, particularly and then talk about what are those crime rates? Are those primates higher or lower than the general population, and I think that's a worthwhile, that's a worthwhile thing! You can connect the story to a statistic that says the zebra trend, then you're. Sorry, to build a story and build a case. If you just throw story out there and then just say it's abroad trend, then that's you pay

in choosing stories that you choose to focus on. So, for example, CNN spent an endless amount of time on Ferguson, Missouri, Afterdeck, Wilson shot. Michael Brown spent endless Time on that on Baltimore, Freddy Gray died in the back of a police. There has been enormous amounts of two on Iraq are in New York. We all know their names, because the media spent an inordinate amount of time on all of these on trade on Martin. These were all local crime stories. My brain smelters objects robot by his standards. These were all local crime stories. They were all covered as national news stories. Why? Because they support the left narrative that America's racist place we're why people are killing black people in the case of travel, Martin wait. Hispanics are killing black people on his very garner. A white sergeant is overlooking it well, a bunch of other cops put him in Chokehold or a stranglehold is, as they liked to say, was actually submission hole in any case, there are two problems are one is there's not a lot of data available on all of these issues? So people pick the stories that support their preconceived notions and then they click on them and that's what fox and ass we see an end doesn't have a lot of these places do, but the real,

question is? Can you link the story? The your talking about the Rockville Marilyn story, for example: can you link that story with a statistical case? Can you use it as a case that illustrates the general principle and then back the general principle of statistics. Human beings, this weird tendency. Its truth for every all learning this is actually true about human beings have a tendency to be addicted historic. We love story stories are things that we just ever since caveman days, people sat round the fire, they told stores we are addicted to stories. What that means in news terms is that if I give you a statistical case for why illegal immigration raises the crime rate, that is going to be less effective in how you see the story, then, if I tell you the story of the Maryland of the Maryland Rockville Rape because what we tend to do. As I say something in general, you I will not take it to apply to you, but if I say something specific you, the general and then apply to you. This is that it is very weird how human psychology works. They done. Studies like this, where, for example, they take

a very famous psychological study. Take somebody- and they put them behind- ass like one way glass, and then they take us can person whose actually hired actor and they put them in a room with a doctor and they say this person is going to be shocked by the doctor electrically shocked by the doctor for every answer. They get wrong and likewise and you the capacity and in you're supposed to just be an observer, you're supposed to watch it and monitor it and you're supposed to try and stop it if something goes wrong and what happens very in this experiment. The actual star, escalating the amount of painted there that their feigning so at the beginning, that they'll get a little shocked supposedly in rats a little bit and by the end, are actually being tortured right in this little experiment and what they found was. Virtually nobody actually got up out of their chair and refused to be part of the experiment, tried to stop the experiment people want to go along all the way people are willing all the way down the road with somebody being tortured in front of them for not answering quays questions correctly now, here's the funny part when people

were asked what we You do in this situation. Peoples it is like. Ninety percent of people said I would get up and walk out and stop this thing. When people We will put the situation virtually nobody got up and stop the situation the reason being the reason being when you hear the specific story, when you hear this if story than you think I will do something about that, but if I just said you, nine and ten people would not do Think about that either. Why must be the one in ten? I must be the one to ten statistical cases, in other words, are as convincing to you as me, telling you the story and then giving you this statistic, and then you thinking, oh, maybe I would be one of those nine and ten people, resin the stories that's, why the news cover stories, and yes, it is a choice which stories get covered and Trump is making for effort now to cover a lot of the illegal immigrant crime stories and connected to a narrative. That's no different than something the Brok Obama did, and there is much more statistical evidence to suggest that illegal. Migration has a crime element to it. Then there is to suggest

The cops everywhere across Amerika targeting for for destruction, black folks across Amerika, which is something Obama, pushed all the time. Ok, so that is that some good from the wretched little more good tramp tramp has a big new executive order that is supposed to kick off. He's good order. His cabinet to start demolishing a bunch of global warming regulations, including emissions rules for power plants and limits on methane leagues, he's going to rewrite the rules of the EPA the depot. Presumably, I can't actually regular carbon emissions, which makes sense under the Clean AIR Act, theirs nothing in there about carbon, because carbon is not actually a pollutant. Unclear whether is going to abrogate De Paris climate jewels, but all of this should be done and it is about time that Trump did it one of the best things that It has done so far was the was the movement of Sky brought into the EPA, because the fact is environmental regulations that are currently in promulgated, under the Obama directives, those do crib the economy, those du jour, without a lot of countervailing, evident suggesting that here

an activity is solely responsible for climate change or even largely responsible for climate change, or even with the extent of climate change will be somewhat. Going nuts. They think we're going to die. I don't actually think that we're all gonna die. I have a solution for the lot of you think that carbon emissions are really so terrible. If you think the worst thing ever than. I would suggest that you stop blocking the creation of nuclear power plants in states around the country in California. I think we have one or two nuclear power plants have any haven't, had any built since nineteen, seventy nine, when the populace said, in the country There is no reason whatsoever why the state of health should not be solely power by nuclear power. At this point, France is they nuclear power by nuclear power, they turns out market has some solutions for all of this is just that. The left is not willing to accept ok time. Unfortunately, for some Add trump now, so bad trump stop last night. This goes back to Donald Trump has decided now that he's not gonna work with the Freedom caucus anymore. A year that President Trump was going to govern. Like a centrist democrat, I went

it was going to govern. Like a centrist Democrat one here, govern with Congress in his executive orders is able to do what he wants, but most big accomplishments, that a president creates are not accomplishments that does on his own, except for war and peace. When it comes, You domestic policy, very You president, actually do anything on their own after I had a democratic congress. Remember bunch of stuff. Through Ronald Reagan, had some Republicans in some democratic put through a bunch of policies that people like milk, Leavenworth the Republican Congress, Europe needs to work with Congress, but instead of working, but the conservatives in Congress has always itched to work with dynamic rats. He wants that bipartisan feel he wants the approval and last night he tweets this out between the Republican House, the clock is was able to snatched a feed from the jaws of victory. There's on trumped care after so many bad years, they are ready for a win, ha ha ha ha ha ha ha and then he follows that up with the demo It will make a deal with me on healthcare as soon as Obamacare falls. Not long do not worry. We are in very good shape,

no, we are not very good shape and Democrats are not gonna go to deal with Trump, because Tromp has a nine percent approval rating. One Democrats, if they go and make a deal with Trump, their own constituents will murder them. It's not going to happen, but Trump is looking for love and all the wrong places because he actually wants to pursue this big government statist agenda. That is the nationalist populous agenda. That is not conservative. So when it comes to things like unleashing business by getting rid of regulations good for Trump, when it comes cracking down on illegal immigration with regard to sanctuary cities good for Trump, when it comes to growing the size and scope of government, not the trump and enforced only Trump is moving toward the Democrats, because this is something he is always wanted to do during the campaign from said openly. He did not care if Republicans lost the Senate, because then you get to work with Democrats, he may get his wish and twenty eighteen and it ain't gonna, be what he wanted, because Democrats are not interested in working with Trump. If Democrats over the house and twenty eighteen they will move to impeach within the first month, Sean Spacer, so Trump is open working with Democrats too good. Looking

the present serious about working with democratic order absolutely start. Friday afternoon through lay. Yesterday he received a number of calls, as well as other members of the senior staff there had been working on health care from members of both sides saying that they would like to together, offer a ideas and had suggestions about how to come resolution on this and get you house vote on this case. So it's not going. And the idea the Democrats are going to cave in, they're going to theirs can go along with what our trump wants to do to fix. Obamacare now most of Mamma, not least from proposes some sort of single parent national self criticism if he moves and laughed and work with them, but the idea they're, just waiting to be taken up by Trump, is utter. Nonsense, and this is one of the things that strike me absolutely bonkers about The war is the idea that if I just got in what he wanted. Everything would be well the

Eric and Healthcare ACT had a seventeen percent approval rating reintroducing the central provisions of a bomb care really didn't lower that emphasis in the long term, because the fact is that those grants, those black ran systems that was not gonna stay in place, and then block grants we're going to be increased the same way. The grants have been increased for Medicare over the years. Medicare reimbursement rates have constantly increased. There's no being a reimbursement scheme that doesn't increase over time, and yet we are told that it's not trumps. Vault is it somebody else's fault? Is Paul Ryan's fault, it's the it's. The house, Freedom Caucus install. It is Paul, Ryan's fault. By the way. It is not the house. Freedom caucus is fault, but those are the people. Being blamed, and and there's this new meme that's coming about from people who I thought would know better, saying that just the intransigence of these freedom. Caucus folks for not voting for by the way it from its bent one month, negotiate with freedom caucus he actually gotten pass. Here's tadpole I who resigned from the Freedom caucus in allegiance to Trump either quick note, I ve. No, that's! Ok! The freedom caucus people are acting like the Freedom caucus was a bunch of people like me who didn't vote for trouble. Hilary, the freedom

is, is chock full of people who are huge trunk supporters. Mark meadows was a huge trumped support. Lui Gomer was a huge trump supporter. They said too bad bill because was a bad bill good for them. For being honest, tadpoles he says, the freedom cogs all they do. Is there they're just these purist does it. These fears are just awful. So it's a compromise and I think that that there is nothing that could be added to the bill that the Freedom caucus would bear boat. Yes on and thought that I got the opinion that there are some members, the Fredo caucus, then no against the ten commandments. If it came up for a vote and your nonsense, pure hogwash, pure nonsense. The fact is that if Trump had made for five different concessions, the Freedom caucus, they would have voted the thing it would have gone to the Senate the Senate. What made all sorts of changes to it? It would have gone to some sort of conference committee. An entirely new bill would have been created that was voted on, but the idea that trust couldn't have conceded anything that they're just these crazy terrorist. It's funny there now talking about he's, not talking Chiujio. Yesterday single area, fifty one caucus they are now talk

about the house. Freedom clock is in exactly the same way. The Obama administration talked about the tea party. Obama said the tea party. They were terrorists, they were, they were holding government hostages, the kind of language do they use in our hearings, publicans they can evidence who actually were honest enough want to keep the promises they made about. Repealing Obama cannot pretending to appeal to repeal of amateur, but actually repealing the thing that those conservatives are the bad guys bill orally says the same things are the ideological free part, freedom, Cox, Madeira, the bad guys, also I'm a the entire situation. What good, as Adieu my party, the Republican Party and the President, if I oppose The first proposal, a house put forth knowing that proposal will be changed in the Senate and come back to me for another vote seems lodge go that you move the process a long and then

the end when the entire bill is before you, you vote your conscience temper. The fact that it has accepted fact that there's no guarantee that the bill is going to change in the right way in rightward direction. Maybe it changes in a leftover direction and even if you get a second vote, maybe the bill is then you vote for, and then people say why do over the first one, but not the second one. Maybe there's even go to the site and maybe it dies in the Senate and then trumpet victory, but you would have voted for something. I didn't repeal Obamacare Katy idea that trunk to slap Zone Theses on on a sheet of paper, and then they should just sent out to the Senate, because haze procedural, no vote Ganz things you don't like. That's how government is supposed to work. You vote against bills that are bad and I'm getting very sick of this routine that it's that the that is that it's the poorest, who are the problem, is the poorest or the problem. So let me get this straight. It's the p! As you know, the people have been saying. The republican party has been caving too much. Those are the p before the problem, not the people actually doing the catering, the people who have resisted the catering, those of people who are the problem Dennis Prager, whose a friend of mine, close friend of mine, Dennis

the column today that I just think is wrong and he says in it that it's pure, his purists kill, whatever they believe in. First of all, it is not a purist position to say I'm not going to vote for a bad bill. There are changes this bill. That would have made it more bad. The more good than bad right now is a lot more bad than good. It was while the unpopular it would have increased the chance that's spiral for private insurance. It was a bad bill by, available better. It was a bad bill UK and in the and people are saying each a rounded through just for Trump, because it's more important the Trump get his win. Then that conservative stands on any sort of principle forget on pure double on any sort of principle, so today pray has com where he says what we have here is another conservative example of tourism in principle, damaging and other major opportunity to do good This wasn't a major opportunity to good is it tat, is a chance for Republicans to adopt all of the same premises, all in premises for their arguments as Democrats and to adopt all same content, as was in Obamacare, except for the Medicare, except for the medicate block grants.

That is not an opportunity. It's not a major opportunity to good. I think the what happening here. Is it so funny their people accusing, Conservatives are being curious. I think we'll purists here is there is a group of people on the right who have turned into trump purists. They turn into Trump Paris and what TAT means is It does not matter what trump puts in front of them. They will approve it and then, if you move left, they will blame the conservatives for not having been conciliatory enough with Trump that's. How any of this is supposed to work? Go daddy. I have an excuse to hit mommy, either Mommy was mean to him. Ok, this idea trump gets to move to the left, because conservatives will mean to him is just a bunch of hogwash. The only purists that I'm seeing your I would be willing to bet load to cut a deal on healthcare. It doesn't give me anything that I want doesn't. Everything that I want when I'm not, to do is sign a bill or or back a bill. That is more. Bad than good by a very, very wide margin, but again you wanna talk purist language here, some purist languages from Dennis Donald Trump. They conservative dream. Dream, Donald Trump

but they never mind the fact it all major executive actions to currently been blocked by the courts. Never minded he's about to push in one trillion. Our infrastructure plan never mind. The fact that he's openly talking about abandoning conservatism, favor of democratic conservative dream and then he says he still not good enough for those conservatives who remained our tempers. Ok, never Trump died. For the election, never from is not a thing Never I did vote for Trump. That was never trump. Ok. Now The question is: is he doing good stuff or is he doing bad stuff? I just didn't entire segment about the good stuff from is doing. The only purists here is right. Now, in its programme says that everything the Trump is doing is good and cadmium. Any July that he's told name can him anything bad that he's done he's it's quite possible that I am most other conservatives who supported the repeal bill agree with just about every criticism of the bill that house conservatives made, but just as in the general election, the question wasn't whether candidate trumpets our ideal. The question now wasn't whether the bills are ideal, the questions are in the election was what will happen if democratic left, when the presidency again and

sure now was and remains what will happen if republicans don't passable favoured by all by twenty five to all, but twenty five or thirty Republicans, you note will happen now go back to the drawing board. You know what happened. No actually bring a better bill caveats here here they ve binary logic of the election, not something I bought into, but at least was compelling. There is no such logic. Areas has purists. Don't acts ask such questions. They live in a somewhat different world than the rest of us who actually agree with them on everything we don't ask what is ideological pure and should do our principles? We ask what is closest to our ideological and to our principles. No right now there are lots of people asking what is closest to Trump, because trompe and victory is the only victory that will ever have for our principles. If your final hope for conservatism lies and Donald Trump, I would suggest that you need to re. Examine your priorities because right now trumpets president, this isn't choices in trumpet Hilary anymore. This is how will trumpet the best present, he can be, how will we be most conservative president? He can be, and the answer is: don't approve bad crap. Don't approve crap is many it again.

Loved and it's so much as a person writing so wrong. On as he says, we have one larger principle than even the conservatives want the ones we share appearance to feeding the left. It is not defeating the law. Left to re enshrine their central principles of government that is now the feeding left. We all want to defeat the laugh there's only one or two people have more than I do but my entire life working on it every day we have different, refugees for doing it. My strategy does not include green light. Bad policy that the left agrees with in large part. This is just it's just mistaken logic here the movements die when purist taken over well tromp ISM is going to die when the purest trumpets taken when the pure trumpets taken over in say everything he does, is God like an wonderful and conservatism can die another way? Now, I'm purists take it over now. But why should care about conservator principle taken over conservatism can die when a bunch people inside say you know what we don't actually mean that principle anymore. We just need whoever is going to fight the left, but we're going to find her

fight the left or what it means to win against left we're just gonna, say cycle at anything. Left opposes will before that's outcomes, it has met. All this the conservative movement as an anti movement. Being anti lot, but it's not. The same thing is being pro conservative there two different things: ok time for Some things I like and then some things I hate and we're gonna. Do it on the next forty five seconds, apparently so things I like We are doing movies of betrayal, so I tried movies this week, the where the betrayal was not the is not the big twist ending a gladiator, I was we're doing brave heart, remakes, gladiator is the same movie is brave. Our basically is it is a very good movie. Shouldn't have been best picture that year. Maybe Nothing else get was made that year. Is it like the best movie of all time? No people overrate the movie. Is it a movie, and if it on tv will certainly watch it. It doesn't matter where you tuning yeah, it's one movies. It's it's a super re movie gladiator with Russell Crow. Of course, he's betrayed right at the very beginning by walking Phoenix, even one of the criteria, performances of his already creepy career and here as well,

crawl in England either the general slave became a graduate right now famous The next step you find yourself alone riding in green fields, with a sun on your face, you're, not my job is not to get moving was watching it seats. Penalised history, but so are most get most of our history. Fictional

in some respects, definite watch movies with a betrayal in a betrayal. Is the theme of this week's of this week's shop? Ok other that I like so this I was hilarious. There is this video that's going round of this fitness guy, who has staff up all of these dumb bells and now he's going to do a handstand on top of them just show Buffy as but in the background this video there is this all about. It looks like Bernie Sanders draining free throws so Enzo you you tell me, which is more impressive. What is this? Young buck is doing what the old, as during the background, Didn't you miss

Germany go the old guy in the background, because the younger Had some training out over the old guy is less he's a former NBA player, pretty amazing I do I do that. That's. Why went viral wouldn't go environment are just the guy in the dumb bells, the old guy. Ground draining. The jumpers is what makes it nor the or the handlers, as the case may be, is what makes this war other things that I like Rachel dollars. All is back. This is the This is the White Lady who think she'd black and and she says that she identifies as black. I love this story, someone. I will never stopped loving the story it just spectacular. That you are, in fact a member of the african american community. I think that's the disconnect people still have what's your response and I'm sure you hear it all the time rang. Well, identifies african American identify as black, so I am part of the PAN african Diaspora and I definitely feel like in America, even though, raises a social constructs, and we ve this and academia and science there's still

is a line drawn understand, there's just use a tolerant, crazy, weighty and what amazing about business people are saying. You know how wait. It is to not understand the experience of black people. Ok, now, let's say men and women- use that the same logic for men and women It seems that you're running from the exact same argument you made about raise one second to go by Stu, sacks and sex is significantly more biological than raise their know. How between the raises there, lines between the sexes but again, this is why I love this story so much. It exposes every stupid thing. What has ever said in one story, Rachel dollars all as a godsend, a conservative she's, the greatest thing that ever happened, a conservative. She. She is right that raises a social construct, meaning that it is something that did people created as a marker, that doesn't actually mean anything and then the left objective This race means everything they can't let it go. They don't actually like the idea of race, not meaning everything, and then they say the races, biological, but sex isn't, which is just how Larry is from any scientific point of view, best story ever. Ok, the deed

Instructing culture thing we I promises, will take actually twenty seconds so when there is a very quickly so deconstructing the culture we have time to actually go through all the things I had prepared by Neil Digress since we did this out the other day, and this is intensely stupidly. Treated for your information, as percent of total and he's beauty in the beast contains fewer gay characters then found in the general population. Ok! I wasn't aware that movies we're supposed to reflect the census data also I assume beauty in the bees has more talking teapots than are found in the general. Population also more beasts that turn into humans than are found in the general population. It's a movie. The problem. Lot of people have on all of the building to be stuff. Is it supposed to be a children's movie and children's movie? It is not appropriate to discuss sexuality and the reason it is not appropriate to discuss sexuality in children's movie is because relationships between men and women are not necessarily about the sex per se. There so about marriage and rearing of children homeless. Actual relationships are much more about everyone.

Explain why two men are living together and they're, not just friends. It's a little bit different than explaining my mommy and daddy live together, because they're taking care of the kids they produce together it's just that it's a longer explanation that requires a sexual component that doesn't exist in explanation. It's about men and women. That's why people object. They don't want to have to talk to their kids about homosexual activity in the middle movie about talking teapot. Is that that's that why Manila Grass Thyssen is the stupidest MAR person in the world. I mean here just every other day, he's tweeting something ridiculous and stupid, but will have to save my power injures talk for next time. Power rangers talk things to say their networks, I've asked about this, but what will leave them free? So we'll do that. Next time in we'll be back tomorrow. This is the bench of Hiroshima,