The left trot out students as their point people. Everything is about race and the media spin wildly for gun control in every possible direction. I bench bear this adventure Barroso. That is our last day of the week until Friday, broadcasting, from LOS Angeles, we're headed off to Washington DC, foresee back. I will have notes on sea pact, because Wilbur controversies broken out about one of the invited speakers. Suffice to say I disagree with the invitation. I also don't control they invite. I am looking forward to seeing everyone at sea pack, however, before we get to any of that plus the news of the day. First, I want to say thank you to our sponsors over exile, so

you are in need of some relaxation. If your back aches, if your neck aches, if you ve been working too hard zeal, is the thing for use, Z, L again, this is a massage services and in home massage service, everyone loves massage people, don't get them, because instead you have to go over to the spy. You have to wait for an appointment. You have to show out a lot of money to do it and then equality that great what what zeal does they send a licence misuse directly to your house? Those mrs brings the table. The oils, the candle like the whole deal and they turn your home into the spot. I have gotten it is at present, for my wife have gotten it is present. My inlaws I've gotten my sister and my parents, it is a fantastic and it is great for you as well. They can do it basically on a moment's notice, go to zeel dot com or deals Iphone or Android, app and z, E l, dot com and swipe from top local license. Pre screen massage therapist choose your favorite technique, gender preference time and location for you, massage seven days a week, three hundred and sixty five days,

as your massage their past can be your door in as little as in our privacy, convenience, quality and comfort. That's what you get with your massage undermine with zeal agony of nine thousand licence, monsieur massage therapists themselves table. I know my family's he's a bunch of different misuses from zeal. They are all fantastic, there's, a reason why there, a fast growing company to help you get started. Our listeners can get twenty five dollars off their first massage by using the promo code Ben check out. When you check out mercury used that promo code banning at twenty five bucks off it gets even better. If you sign, Brazil's massage membership and get twenty percent of all your massages, plus a free, massage, cable and sheets at that is a three hundred. Eighty dollar value yours free there is no initiation fee to join and just a great additional savings on top of the twenty five dollars. Just can't you're gonna get when you use promo code bed, so go to zeal again. The z

EL dot com or on seals, Iphone or Android up and then make sure to add click. Add promo code to check out and use my promo code Ben and get twenty five bucks off your first in whom on demand, massage or sign up for themselves membership at twenty percent off all the socialist plus that free massage table and cheat set a three hundred eight our value, fantastic company again can recommended more highly for a gift, particularly the loved ones, zeal dot com, you shouldn't, it gets really don't live anywhere. You just get it for level unseal, dot com and use that promote convinced that they need that. We say you are right. So the debate over gun control continues and, as I said yesterday, I think there are some things that we actually can do it. There is what is called the been called the gun, violence, raw restraining order. This is something I touch it yesterday, David French National Review spoke about

possibility of having laws on the books that allow immediate family or close friends to go to the court and petition to have your capacity to own a gun temporarily removed from you. If a court finds that you are a threat to yourself or others, that would be a useful measure. In my view, another useful measure be dramatically heightening security. I talked about this on Fox in France- is more. We have talked about it this week. The idea here would be. have to harden the defences round. Schools are banks have tremendous security. There is no reason why our dollars should be guarded more closely than our children. There's been a lot of talk about arming teachers and some people object to this I don't understand why a train arm teacher would be a threat to your child. You trust your child in the classroom with that teacher everything

they and right now we're leaving teachers at the at the whim of mass killers. There is that coach and parkland new shots death, while he was attempting to defend students, wouldn't have been better if he actually been licence to carry a hand gun and had a gun with him say, maybe could have done something about it. They should build schools, true from from now on. They should build schools with failsafe mechanisms so that, if a mass you two were to enter the school there are there be a capacity to actually lockdown separate parts in the school they have this lockdown capacity. I want of hospitals, there's no reason, why they should use it when it comes to schools as well, and another thing that that ought to be done is something that we here are now doing a daily wire, daily wire. As I've said on the shore, I said unless it in the last week. In a name, the shooter on the show I was gonna- show pictures The shooter on the shell when somebody email They will then wise website naming the shooter entering pictures, and I thought well that's a good point, and so we do where will no longer be showing the names or the faces of

students the reason being that studies tens show that mass shooters are driven by a need for media attention, and so this time we are going to try to be part of the solution rather than part of the problem, the media that the race to show face. the race to show names in the media is obviously written striven, it's obviously, click driven, because people are curious. People want to know what the guy looks like one shot up a school, we're not going to part that aim we can give you all the relevant information, as we have been doing on the show. We told you through the guy. Is I ve told you everything about him. We ve told you what you need to know for the public policy debate, we're just not going to put a name and a face on him, because we want to give him any sort of honor notoriety. We don't want him to to be unintentionally, given levels of exposure that will drive the next Mass Keller. There's no reason why we should know the names of mass shooters particularly accept out of just normal human curiosity, or why there, It should be flashed across the news. We can give you all the information they need to know about their pictorial evidence behind it. The reason we're doing this is because there,

a series of studies that have shown again, the mass shooters tend to feed off media attention. So Professor Jennifer Johnston and Andrew Joy of western Numerical University found in a paper presented to the ape yea. That's the American Psychological Association in two thousand. Sixteen quote media contagion can help make mass shootings more common. Unfortunately, Johnston says we find that a cross cutting trade among many profiles and mass shooters its desire for fame. They say that the rise of such a trait in masters rose in correspondence the emergence of widespread twenty four hour, news coverage and cable news programmes and the rise of the internet during the same period. So Johnston recommended a media pack to no longer share, reproduce or retreat. The names faces or long winded statements of killers so that we do, since it is so that we could see a dramatic reduction in mass shootings in one or two years. Some Sunday say that the dramatic reduction will be that dramatic, but there is pollution, which is that a lot of issues are driven by the need for fame, so we're gonna do our part again. We can give you all the details that you need to know without speaking, the name of the person who did it because again there is a lot

There's a lot of people out there who want the world to know their name or we're not gonna help them in their quest. It's not something that we think is is a worthwhile is worthwhile. Thank them. It is, of course, are not going a lot of other outlets, and media are not going to do this. Unfortunately, cable news is not going to do. This CNN shows the names and tasted the shooters Fox NEWS shows the names in face of the shooter, the Washington Post near times all major outlets, I believe, still show the names and faces of mass shooters, because they send. The public has a right to know. Well, just because you have a right to know doesn't mean that I have. I have an obligation to show you and I do not feel the obligation to show you the face of a shooter outweigh is my obligation as a human being, to prevent the dissemination of material that helps possibly create an actual. That's not something that I want to be a part of ok, so speaking of media malfeasance. Unless malfeasance on the gun can well issue and the fact that every mass shooting now has become a cause celeb that that this has become the club to wield hence got a law abiding gun, odors and the media

we done in outside job here. So I just want to show some things the media have been doing because there truly insane Sup ABC News. Had a tape of a guy named Scott pop Alardo, you never heard of scalpel Arta Skype I've is some dude who they found on Facebook? Why are they put

him on eighty seniors twitter feed while because he's gone owner and he decided to destroy his gun for some odd reason here he hears a video from talking about it. I M scope of Lord of this. Is my prebend legally registered a or fifty, which I purchased thirty years? Firm believer in the second amendment, an avatar, my own, who said to me, we need the weapon like that. Only purpose is to kill the honest, Falada hunch you remember, after sandy hook happened. I said to my wife: I gladly give this gun up. It would save a life of just one child. I've decided today on their make sure this weapon will never be able to take a life.

The barrel of a gun will never be pointed at. Someone is the right to own this weapon, more important, someone's life, a weapon like this second closer, so much death and destruction, and then he does a hackney takes her does saw and he proceeded to saw the gun in half, essentially I'm so he he actually water there, and you can see him during a certain people always said that so many of them out there now. Ok, so so first point here: is that what he actually just did a sort of illegally saw up long weapons and make them into shorter weapon. Second of all, it's stupid. The reason it stupid because that gun was not going to be used to shoot. It's true, I mean it's been in his hands for thirty years has had ever been used to shoot a child. Has it ever been used to shoot anyone wasn't what I'd be willing to give up my moss by five hundred and mine,

nine millimeter block? Would I'd be willing to give those guns up to save the life of a child? Sure I'd be willing to give those guns up to save a life of a child right you have a guy. sitting next to me, someone should this job must give up. Your guns obviously got guns, no brainer, but that's not the choice that to false choice. My guns are not going to be used to kill the child and nobody's blackmailing to give up my guns or they're, going to shoot a trial. That gun had never been used in anger against another human being and this guy seems like a decent fellow. My presumption is that if he saw a shoe mash taking place, you'd go grab, he's got and try to take down the master? You can go enjoying the mass shooter, but this is a false. Binary. That's been created, every gun is the threat that gun was a threat, because the guy who owns the gun is not a threat. My gun is not a threat, is locked up in my save my gun is only a threat. somebody who would harm my family and hardly heard people. I love- and this is true for the vast vast bad. Ninety nine point: nine

send him of law abiding gun owners. This is the truth for the media pushed this out, as though this is some sort of great active heroism, olympic gold and virtue signalling for Scott Papa Larder, who made no one safer in this act. Known was made safer in this act, but he got his name on the news and then used to put out the sort of propaganda which I guess is very exciting. Machetes, more media malfeasance on the gun, relation in just a second plus. We still have to get to the children's crusade, which is something that the left is now pushing. First, I want to say thank you to our sponsors over at Tommy John, so there is no better time to upbraid from your old, uncomfortable underwear, Tommy John, which is the Revolutionary Comfor company for the modern. And when you switched Atomic Jain you're not gonna switch to any other underwear company, not because it is just a fantastic pair of underwear, but also because it is affordable. Also because they last forever, I mean they really hold up when you sent through the wash their unfair comfort, innovative designs, panted fabrics to ensure that your underwear will never right up the waistband, never rolls down, and you will never get a reggie. I had nothing

in high school. I dont need anymore and Tommy John ensures that that never happens again. It's the best pair guarantee, if you don't love it on you and it's on them it's free, Tommy, John reengineer. Under worse, you never have to adjust. You'd ever have to sit around picking at your underwear. I've tried all kinds of different unwell brands. Tommy John is the best there is and that I can guarantee they ve been taken. Their comfort, expertise and applied to the rest of your parents are Tommy. Johns has undershirts say, tucked in socks that never fall down which is making seconds guarantees that are so soft? You won't believe it and a choice, it smart fabrics for every situation or outfits if you're looking for undergarments of any kind, Tommy John, is the place to go again. Their underwear, is backed by the best peril. Ever where words free guaranteed. You have nothing to lose Tommy John, no adjustment to go to Tommy Johns Outcomes last Shapiro and their special offers offer for our listeners. Tommy Johns outcome. Slash very get twenty percent off your first order. That's Tommy John dot com, Slash Shapiro, any get twenty percent off again Tommy Johns outcome, Slash Shapiro you're, the best we have ever had get twenty percent offers underwear and get some. Let them know that we sent you as well: ok back to

The media coverage of the gun control issue- the media obviously have a deep and abiding agenda as it is in the media. As I say, what something the media could do to actually help prevent shootings according to studies we're doing over a daily. Why are not mentioned the name or face the shutters were that that they could do they're not doing that to instead what they do is they put out a bunch of people talking about gun control is obviously the thing that has to happen. You're, so CNN is having entire special. I believe it's tomorrow night and that special tomorrow night is going to feature of the students over parkland, basically talking about why they want uncontrolled and the reason is to state in the news, because the media have decided to use the church ran over parkland in order to push their agenda we'll talk about whether it is immoral to use children in order to push in agenda teenagers to push an agenda in just a second. But first show you some more elements in the news that are just plain false that are just taken you, so CBS News put out this promise. that in Florida it's easier to buy an assault rifle than it is to obtain cold medicine. This is just not true says here is once more,

got to purchase money gone in Florida, suit, offend contain pseudo ephedrine, which can be legally manufactured, can be used to illegally manufacture. Methamphetamines federal regulations require beast behind the pharmacy or service counter, and customers need to show their over eighteen years of age as customers are limited to purchases of nine grams per month about two hundred and fifteen those boxes of twenty four hour, Claritin D or three hundred and ten, those boxes of Aleve, cold and sinus, or six hundred and twenty four does boxes of Sudafed.

An flooring can by as many guns you want a one time. According to the energies Institute for legislative action, Rep, there's no federal background check for cold medicine, there's no federal background check pursued. If it does it only to permits purchase a rifle shot on right, but there is a federal background check that happens at every federally whiteness firearms dealer says there are restrictions on the amount of fertilizer one can purchase, because ammonium nitrate, when mixed with other substances, can become explosive refugee, don't have a right to explosives. Each have a right to keep and bare arm for you for your own safety. But the headline here that it's easier to buy it had gone then is to buy

There is, indeed, is just not true. Try buying clarity go to a pharmacy, try to buy clarity. It is much easier by clarity than it is to go to a gunshot and by a gun after you in California, actually have to take a test in California and certain other states. Don't in Florida. You have to have a federal background check. They check you through the system that doesn't happen with cold medicine. By the way, I think that, from a libertarian perspective, there's a solid argument that I should be able to buy as much shoot a fat as I wanted to given shot and I'm not sure that the government has a place in regulating how much needed for I can buy. So I have problems with their with that, I'm a libertarian basis just automatically. No, I should have to go back to the store every so often by suit effect, if I just want to stock up and use it later and if I'm producing math and the government combust me and the government can prosecute me, but again, this media pushing falsehoods the again at the idea that it's difficult to buy guns that it's easier to to buy.

Lots of other things in the United States and it is to buy a gun just not true, if you're doing it legally for a federal lessons, firearms dealer, that's not the Olympics. Propaganda being put up, CNN has commentary goggly, ATO And- and this this person says that gun power says that desire is James. Goggly out of the FBI supervisory special agent retired He says that the founding fathers never could have been vision in eighteen year, old kid buying a buying a gun invented gunpowder in seven hundred ad. The first guns were mid, 14th century invented the one thousand seven hundred and ninety one. The second amendment comes online, and here we are in twenty eighteen and we're hanging on to this and we're going. We just can't talk about this, because if we do that we're somehow going to kick off the founding fathers, the founding fathers could not envision that eighteen year old kid to go into a gun store, he can't buy beer, but he could buy

semi automatic weapons and it's a weapon of war day went and all good about. This is an absolute sheer nonsense. The founding fathers were fully aware that, eighteen year, old kids could buy weapons of war you think, was in the American Revolutionary Army. What the founding fathers it mostly be shocked, regulations on age of consent to buy beer. They ve been dealing with this idea of the eighteen to get a barrier to be eighteen, gettin ale around here. We're gonna nonsense is that people in Europe, illusionary army were fourteen years old, fifteen years old and we actually go watch. I e mail, gibsons moving Patriot there, a lot of kids in their the reason and wherein there is because that was true- there were a lot of kids who are in the chair. and Revolutionary Army Mattawa, virtually everybody in the United States at the time counting on the weapon and brought it home, and then they would drill on the Green together as part of a well regulated militia. But it was personal gun ownership. Everyone owned a gun back in the day. Including people who are young. Eighteen year old, kids, by the way, we're not kids. In the seventeen, anyone in seventeen ninety one eighteen year old people were expected to be

can we get married and have a family already we're only considering eighteen year old kids, because this is our modern society, where a ten year olds are considered kids, except if they have something to say about gun control, which case we consider them? Adults is we'll get to in just a second that's at the end of the propaganda Simone Sanders commentator on MSNBC said. Well, you know what this is really about is right. Is everything is always about race. Invariably, and always everything is about race to favorites are no it s. Not. My point is that, as I said, the labs around we wouldn't be talking about the types of legislation we could and could not make happen because he was yelling by Congress and the President one we have been talking about and they would at once looked in and did everything about re embedded in June. I got lie of Dr Islands. They changed. We got the same borders, we have one bandanna Deborah had begun Laws Bernard. What I am saying is that you are doing

You don't have to demagogy now knocking anything, but what I am saying they get about re huh, ok, be ok bill Crystal here, actually doing Yemen's work is unseen and anonymous. Nbc, of course, he's exactly right. Intensity We didn't change any the gun laws after San Bernardino. We didn't change any of the gun laws after the Orlando Massacre and it's worth noting that when everybody says there's a Muslim and after that we must have the time Ok. San Bernardino happened this year did you know. Shooting was, I believe, in two thousand fifteen that that was two years before Any muslim ban was actually attempted Muslim ban anyway. The travel ban from particular countries, the vast majority of Muslims all over the world can still get into the United States the same things from Europe. no she's, not one gun, while was changed as a result of those shootings, but there are attempting to Germany

the issues, because again, these issues must be demagogic. According to what the reason that the issues are demagogic, because the left wants to push this notion that anyone who disagrees with them is a bad person, David Brooks, has been column on this over the New York Times. It's rare that I recommended David Brooks column because he's the in house can one the in house conservatives over at the New York Times, which means he's not particularly conservative, he's a fan of gun control. What he said today is basically correct, but the left fighting angry over their spitting mad over this. What David Brook said today really said. Many of us have walk this emotional path, We may end up doing more harm than good. If there's one thing we ve learned, it is the guns and become a cultural flashpoint In a nation that is unequal and divided, the people who defend gun rights believe that snobbish leads on their morals and want to destroy their culture. If we end up telling such people that they and their guns are despicable, it will just despise us back and dig in their heels. So if you want to stop school shootings, it's not enough just event in March,

its necessary to let people from Red America led the way and to show respect a gun owners and all points there has to be trust and respect. First, then, we can strike a compromise on guns, s guns and not some sacred cross in the culture war. This of course A hundred percent through one of the reasons that no agreement has been reached here is that gunners will say why? Don't we talk about these issues that have nothing to do with guns and lawful, say I want to talk about any of those issues, you're just doing that, because you want distract from guns and the right will say, gun orders will say to them Well, the only reason you wanna talk about guns, because you hate guns, it's because you actually think this going to prevent school shootings they ve, provided no avenue this will prevent school shootings other than a mask on confiscation, a regime in Australia. Britain, where the sample size is too small to really identified, where the number of schools shootings in Australia prior to the gun ban, the gun, confiscation, the gun buyback programme, so low that when it went zero, that is within my and of error, but though the left has a real stake in avoiding the consequences of having real discussions about real issues.

Right knows that people on the right gun owners feel insulted by this as well. They should, when ABC shows that video of that guy cutting his gun in half and then suggests to me a law abiding gun owner, and if I were a good person, I would saw my gun in half my answer is: If I were the person, I maintain my gun, keep it in good working conditions, chewed bad guys when they attempt to shoot innocent people. It's always the cops you take down these folks by the way. It's always people with guns who take down mass shooters, it is always the threat of another gun that stops mass shooter. In the end, that's why it's so foolish to to cast doubt on all law abiding gunners. Now you want to talk about Mary. Is that that you can take, because you think today are reasonable with regard to buying. lines and owning guns. sure number one. How that connects to the issue at hand, school shootings and number two you're gonna have to explore Why and why does that gun violence in the United States has been dramatically declining the last few decades, despite skyrocketing numbers of guns in circulation, the United States, the rate of gun ownership,

I has gone down overall, I believe among among households, but the number of guns in the United States on an optimum level has gone up pretty tremendously over the last twenty years. Meanwhile, the rate of the amounts going down of absolute number of guns were supposed to be a good measure of how much gun violence has taken place. It simply is not it just isn't, but in their in their drive their desire to ignore the evidence in front of them and the left seeks to to avoid the consequences of the. Discussions and end. Instead, they cast aspersions. People are the right when people on the right side guys we're on the same side her people, unless you know we're not because the energy kills people they initiative. There is literally true yesterday asking how many people here they had killed today? How many children the inner had killed today? The answer is zero. There's not one documents in case of a mouse you're being a member of the energy, but the matter now who cares near our daily news? Rent hey, hey, an array. How many kids did you kill today again? The answer is zero. That's, but that moment I'm getting our conversations by the way about organ

they should actually do kill children. My plan paranoid. How many kids today held today? Well, on average, they tell about a thousand children a day, a thousand unborn children a day. So that seems a good place. To start is going to talk about dead kids because of organisations, not the inner right, we're gonna get to these student crusade, children's crusade just a second, and whether we should listen to the children, whether the children should lead us, because this is the new pitch from the first. I want to say thank you, tore sponsors over a texture, so there wording in this day and age from from full scale. Magazines has become really really go to New York, of course, broke the lines. The scandal, Vanity Fair, does a lot of really excellent reporting. The Atlantic has a lot of that foreign policy reporting these days. Well, it's very expensive to subscribe to each of these names, in turn. Instead, what you should do is get the texture abbot, delivers. Unlimited access to over two hundred premium magazine and right now you can try texture for free. The texture app is here to help you and we're talking about the most popular magazine

We are talking about the most red magazines and most informational magazines as well. We're talking about time, then be fair in New York magazine. We'll talk about European the magazine affair. Sports fan, where I met sports, illustrated we're talking a national geographic Secondly, if you have a magazine that you enjoy reading, there is a good shot. It's going to be a member of texture, there's a really good shot. The you're going to that you are going to be able to access it through texture, dot com. So go start. Your texture, free trial right now, texture, dot, com, slash ban, and if you choose to continue pack Kessler centres, get texture for just nine ninety nine a month. That's thirty percent off their listed pricing and that's too your dad come and you get a day when useless life. Many get the entire after ninety nine a month, but just thirty percent off their listed price and you get to try it for free, get a free trial, so go again, texture dotcom, slash, ban and start your free trial today, never get bored waiting around at the airport at the bus. Stop never get bored sitting around waiting for your wife to arrive home for dinner, yeah should working late. Lately, that's what texture dot com

Flash Ben is for so go over. There grabbed the app and make her life more. If you're an information drunk you the way I can't afford to live without a textured outcomes: lifespan again free trial plus you gettin me get texture for nine ninety nine a month. This is I've ever magazines, back issues, anytime anywhere texture, dot, com and again use nets. Flashpoint, ok, so the left has been calling for a children's crusade. They know they ve been making these gun control arguments consistently for a long time, and they know that these guns arguments have not been particularly affected. The gun control laws have not been put on the books. They don't controllers there on the books have not really been enforced. Well, so now the left is looking for new spokespeople because they figure that it can be the message, that's wrong. It can't be that the american people, don't particularly the message, It has to be something else and what it probably is is tat. We ve been using the wrong messengers, the messengers that we truly need in this crusade, our children. As you know, this is a pet peep of mine when Jimmy Kimmel trotted out his small trial. This baby, who has no political views from what I can say, to talk about a bombing here and suggested that his trials heart surgery,

Children's hospital with Doktor villains Darns was an excuse for maintaining Obamacare. I said that this was a moral. I said the moral because my daughter had the same surgery, the same hospital with the same while a different surgery, but in open heart surgery, shame hospital same doctor. This did not confer expertise upon me. Erin Obama. Can you actually have to study the issues I objected when Democrats under President Obama would routinely trot out children and use children's letters as an excuse to talk about public power? It is a lot on guns. They find a letter in the mail from a seven year old, probably written by mommy and daddy, about gun control. Why can't we just make all the guns go away and it really interesting. The other day I was my parents brought over a box and wallpapers is stuff I'd have from when I was a little kid and I went to a public school, and I found a paper in there that I'd written when I was maybe six or seven years old, and the entire thing was about in events wasn't how human beings are running the environment and the reason in writing that people were now six or seven years old is because this is basically what they teach and public school. They teach you that you're supposed to care about the environment, which is fine, but then they

do that man is ruining the environment. Man responsible for the death of all the geese misses the routine that that they teach and public school. It's not necessarily true, in fact, the facts on tend to back up the idea that human beings solely responsible for degradation in every aspect of the environment. Many ways environment has gotten better in the last few decades, but this is what I was writing. One thousand, when I was seven, should I ve been deciding on policy, probably not because what I'd probably inheriting, is what I heard from my teachers and from my parents, because this, what children do adults, teach children and then children parent? What the adults have to say They think adults are smart. It's only later, when children become adults, they realise that adults are just just stupid. His kids most of its, but one of the great disappointment of being an adult, is realising that all the people who have houses in cars are just the same stupid, kids, but a little bit more mentally developed. That said, adults are adults and children are children, but

because they're a bunch of high school kids who are now speaking out about gun control in the media, wants to confer upon them virtue. The media wants confer upon them the capacity for for leadership. It's it's quite it's quite shocking and in quite fascinating and quite stupid. So here, as I showed you before, is these these kids chanting, hey, hey and our? How many kids did you kill today from the New York Daily NEWS of rational its? so they they did that and then there's picture of all these kids lying in front of the White House, because you know that mean something if children line four of the White House that makes a difference of seventeen year olds line from the White House. That makes a difference. There's a higher. There is a kidney David Hog who is apparently according to swear feed. He was your programme control long before this happened, which doesn't change. Anything just suggest that he had a political agenda, and so, as a political agenda wasn't like he was programme and then flipped, because what he saw in front of him near new evidence changing it.

This is always his position by David Hog. He came out and was ripping anybody who is taking money from the and our aid and, of course, being treated with full seriousness by the anchors on the show. Even though there is no wood there. There's no credibility due to the actual words at this human being is speaking emigrants Alison other feuding survivor doing the same thing. We would hope that you have been decent morality to support us at this point and not take money from people that want to keep what lessening gun legislation and making it even easier for these or find people to get guns, because if you can get elected, without taking money from child murderers. Why are you running and there's housing, camera kentish, ignorance off laid her head softly and in giving full reality to idiotic comments like this. I'm sorry whether its said by seventeen year old, whether it said by thirty five year old stupid comments are to become, and this is stupid, comment enhancing where the child, murderers and Aesop Medicine ISIS Core. The child murderers is a plan parenthood, Nazi and our aim, and the

I give my politicians because they think that the politicians are going to support gun rights or the means that was going round yesterday. That is an absolute falsehood. It's an absolute! Why There is a mean going around yesterday, suggesting that the an array had paid for the gun training of this kid no way of the of the shooter know what actually In the end, our aid gave money to the junior. Our ROTC reaches a training programme for future military members. J R Rotc is April Hasta Programme Rocky is a great programme. It is kid where the shooter, this terrible human being went to some of these shooting. Programmes with J, Ai Rotc and the media. ran with this. As an hour, I had a training programme for the kid that's not remotely. True, that's not true that the media was was pushing because again the message matters more than the actual truth of message, and just because these kids experienced pain and suffering, our hearts Gladsome for experiencing insufferably doesn't mean that what they're saying makes any sense, lots of people, experience, pain and suffering.

Jim Geraghty, was making this point yesterday. With regard to the Jersey that the Jersey girls, these are the the women who whose husbands were lost in nine eleven They were very radically laughed and they were confirmed what what some people, unless adding more endowed suggested, was absolute moral authority give them absolute moral authority, there's no such thing as absolute moral authority for any statement either a statement is true or statements. Ass moral authority means nothing you don't or moral authority to say something simply because you suffered. The question is whether what you are saying is effective and truthful, and whether it forwards a proper agenda for the american people, not whether you personally. however, in doing this, and a lot of people have personally suffer and then do terrible things. It doesn't mean that they're allowed to do terrible things are so terrible things. Personal suffering does not make something more legitimate it is a real happy of mine, but what what various pointing out these as you girls were treated with this tremendous respect by the media. They would go on national television shows and say things.

It was an inside job like nine eleven was an inside job. There are certain members, the Jersey, girls, who said that and members. The media would give exactly the reaction you're saying from Allison Camera there they did. They can shake head serious tone, black, pretending that this is ok. What you're saying just because you went through the terrible will you and through something terrible doesn't make what you say any more or less priority, the true or not. But again, the left has an agenda and the agenda here is to put up the most sympathetic face as possible in order pushing an agenda that the left already wants. I said yesterday CNN Town Hall there holding tomorrow night with regard to gun control. For them to the same thing after boss, a marathon bombing. I remember them doing the same thing for San Bernardino, Hell he's not for people who are stumping for a travel ban. It would never do the same thing with regard to people, Looking for better screening of illegal immigrants, I remember them doing up a panel with Kate Stanley family talking about why we need Cates LAW wired the. Instead, they push stories about sanctuary cities, everyday

one of the things that happens in the media. The people tend to ignore its selection by associations will say. Yes, we covered the programme control the programme control position, any Anti gun control position. Yes, but how did you cover it? What stories you choose to cover Fox NEWS is biased in a particular way because they choose what they want to put on tv and CNN is biased in a particular way because they choose what they want to put on tv. The segments they choose to put on tv are just as important as how those segments are actually presented. So CNN spending Lincoln Coverage and a bunch of students- you don't know anything about gun control. Or done laws or or the the efficacy of various proposals being trotted out because their sympathetic faces. I just fine, really disheartening. It gets even worse than that in a second I'm in a show you what a Harvard law, Professor Lawrence tribe, was going completely crazy, had to say about the what he called the so called children's crusade, but for that you're gonna have to go to daily word our common subscribe. So for nine ninety nine a month you can get a subscriptions daily word. I come

The rest of the show, like the rest of Michael Moses, show live personally unreclaimed ensure live, are released, an interview with Andrew yesterday on our channel. She gave it a lesson and you should really go subscribed, drew's show because it really is worth the listen he's excellent at breaking down narrative and in his shows really good. But if you want to subscribe to it fully you gotta daily, where a common for nine nine nine month you get these subscription. Also, get the all those things only part of our mailbags, all the rest, you get this very best in all beverage vessels. Leftist tears hot or cold tumblr off. Look at the glory emanating from this a mere piece of metal, and yet the genius of design the capacity for holding liquid unparalleled, so yet all of that for ninety nine dollars here, which is cheaper than the monthly subscription. If you want to listen. later for free go to Itunes, sound cloud subscribe to channel over at Youtube. We always appreciate where the largest faster sworn conservative podcasting the nation.

so Harvard Professor warrants tribe is pushing what he calls now a children's crusade and what this crusade is is wedding. The children speak for us now. It always interesting to watch as folks on the left trying to children in support of certain propositions, but not others. So if we had, for example, a bunch of fifteen year old girl said, listen, I think that we should cut back on pornography. Pornography is really bad. It's me it's turning boys in terms it makes boys more likely to fritters badly. What we need is a crusade against pornography across the country. Then, all of a sudden, it would be these kids another talking about these public policy experts really like fifteen year old girls, come on. When you talk about children, when, whenever people in the pro life movement,

show pictures, I'm aborted babies, nor show pictures of nano order, babies, nature. This is what you are killing many turn into. How dare you use children is a crutch for your argument, even though its children's lives that are really at stake. There are calling this gun control March there they're playing on the control of four March, twenty fourth and they're, calling at the march for our lives. If there are really the thing about the ON board, as they can't have a marked for their lives, because by definition there on board But the march for life is really stupid. The elites, in the way that its terms march for everyone to free country, but they mainly terminology marked for our lives, is silly because nobody is suggesting that they want. You should die the marked for civil rights mattered because there are a lot of people to actively inappropriate civil right. I don't know a single person in the United States outside of some evil mass shooters. We actually want to deprive any of these kids of their lives their liberty,

their pursuit of happiness? I don't know any one in the United States to actually wants to do that. We're all talk about different ways to assure that these kids can be protected, even if the left refuses to acknowledge that fact Lawrence tribe, because he so eager to to push the idea that kids can lead us. A child shall eat us. He suggested quote teens between fourteen and eighteen have far better be, detectors on average than adults. Eighteen it older. This is certainly not true. This is certainly not true. If that were true, it would not be easy to get kids who are fourteen smoke. Pot kids, who are fourteen, are dumb. Ok, I speak to lots of kids Fourteen at some point, my darling, I remember being fourteen kids between fourteen and eighteen, when I say there does not mean that we have the capacity smart, I mean it. They literally have under developed brains. He brain science suggests the brain does not stop developing until your twenty five there prefrontal cortex, which is the part of your brain. That is responsible for higher function. It's a part of your brain.

It is basically the brakes on your Mozilla or make the leisure emotional response centre that is really over developed when your teenager and then you're prefrontal cortex, because under developed doesn't stop you from doing stuff, see, say: hey car surfing you're makes what those car surfing that sounds. Awesome that'll be fine and adrenaline near and then you're prefrontal cortex, when you're does rightly you'll die and that stupid. When you're a teenager, the prefrontal cortex gauze, B and then you do something done. There's a reason that sixteen year old drivers are the worst drivers on the road and there's a reason. The teenagers make the worst sexual decisions imaginable, there's a reason that teenagers make dumb like decisions about dry, teenagers are not known as a typical manner, especially in our in our infantilism euro, or we don't actually confer responsibility on children. in France, rising era, kids, are not capable of making good public policy decisions as a general rule is not necessarily true for every individual,

but it is certainly true as abroad generality, which is why the age of consent in most states of sixteen years old or higher. It is why the age for voting is eighteen years old. There's a good case to be made should be raised back to twenty one, based on modern in science, the but anyway mourns France's, wouldn't it be great if the voting age were lowered to sixteen just a pipe dream, I know, but children's crusade couple months about the children's crusade. If you talk about the original children's crusade which took place in the thirteenth century, now is agent It fail the idea there was that a bunch of children and go to the Middle EAST, and there are going to convince all of the Iceland and the Middle EAST to become Christian or at least give up control over Jerusalem. It ended variable e by various accounts, with the slave meant of thousands of children or with them becoming homeless, on the streets of Rome. So that was Dr El. If you're talking about Martin Luther King Children's crusade in which a bunch of children marched for civil rights, the idea there was to demonstrate just how evil the anti social rights forces were by showing bull, Konrad sicking dogs on eight year old children. It's so that there is an enormously there's some question: there's some

since about whether its moral to do that really but its it by not not the signal that all that is immoral, and there are questions about whether it is it is moral support, children, the line of fire to to push even a useful political agenda, but at least there is, easier if there are children's crusade. Now for Duncan which apparently there's going to be no one, is going of them. No one is stopping these kids from lying down getting on tv and making whatever point they want to make, but the left has a very by frequented view of when children are responsible for their actions. So when children parents left agenda, then all of a sudden there responsible for their actions when they don't parents left agenda, then they are not responsible for their actions. As with this works and left is constantly pushing more sexual autonomy for youngsters, they say that laws restricting minors access to abortion contraceptives are unconstitutional that children have a capacity to declare themselves men or women, even if they are members of the opposite sex and that they should go through gender transitioning, regardless of what the parents have to say,

this. We can judge in Ohio ruled that the custody of seventeen year old girl who suffer from generous forum should be handed over to our grandparents rather than her parents, because you want to become a boiler. Parents had no. No, that logic is likely to be used. As more rather than less in the future, but the same people who say that children are fully capable of making grown people decisions. They will say that the legal age for gun participation- raised to twenty one. So your lower the voting aged sixteen, but you want to increase the the purchase gun the gun purchase aged twenty one, weird, how that works. If kids are so good at stuff of kids are so capable of making fully grown people decisions, then why would you, then? Why would you not lower the age of consent for buying done to sixteen? After all, these kids have our better be asked attackers on average than adults there more responsible than adults, apparently a really good at things. So why shouldn't we have a children's crusade? What's arm of all the kids, I mean if the kids are the ones who are the more the best among us

but of course, left doesn't want to do that they wanted. They want to say that sixteen year old should vote. Why? Because, when you're sixteen you're on the left and then they want to say that sixteen year old should not be able to drink or have gone so responsibility without any accountability, is I guess the order of the day? These the same folks because suggest, by the way that children are disadvantaged if they are not on their parents, health insurance? Until her twenty six years old, they actually stated the criminal justice system should try was duly until you're twenty five, because it's not until you're mid twenties the brain. Finally, reach is complete maturity so which is it our kids, fully autonomous agents or our kids actually innocence to be protected? In my perspective,. you're, pretty clear. I think the children are issues to be protected. I dont think that children and teenagers are fully rational actors, and I think that it is adults who it is. It is the job of adults to stand up and teach children. It is a deal it's adults, jobs to lead now, but the left unchanged adult aren't leading they aren't. We met only children to lead know what the left means is. Adults are doing

You want them to do and therefore you want to get a bunch of sympathetic cute faces to do it wasn't. My kids are really really cute, as I said before, they have. They been judged by an objective scale as the cutest children on planet earth, but they don't get to make policy in my house, I make policy in my house. Peacemakers are not good policy, Eggers it, my kids order, policymakers and listen to my son everytime you wattles out of his his bedroom at eight o clock at night wattles over to the refrigerator, opens it up and then says I cream. I cream Kane doesn't get the ice cream, I'm the parent, it's bad parenting and is bad and bad adult responsibility to to say that children should lead the way on this stuff and get if all of these kids are capable mean. That argument make that argument I respect the argument. Romagna respect your your authority to make the argument just because this is what it's so weird like Nate Silver, who is somewhat. Who believes and expertise. You spends his life talking about why expertise, matters he's somebody's benzes, life, analyzing numbers.

He is very angry because there is an argument that was made over at the Federalist about shooting survivors, don't have additional legitimacy when it comes to public policy arguments and here's what needs over twenty two equal parkland students aren't prudential to talk about. The gun debate is one of the worst takes of all time, especially when it comes from people who don't have very much relevant life experience themselves. What relevant life experiences attacks, Policia shooting does that make your life experience. It does that make it more relevant when you make a statistical argument, need silver is captain statistics and that all seems to go out the window when there's a personal experience that has had personal experience is not an argument. It's an emotional appeal. If we all understand that, then we can with withhold the emotional appeals and we can, we can stand up to them or we can take them as they are, but to use that as a substitute for actual logic is really really done now. Speaking of really really dumb, there are serious articles over the last couple of days about homelessness in California. This is something I know a little bit about because there is a serious homeless problem in my community is serious, almost problem,

in LOS Angeles last check it, and there are fifty three thousand homeless people on the streets of LOS Angeles, so basically Dodger Stadium filled with homeless people in in the city of LOS Angeles in San Francisco. It's it's just horrifying early in San Francisco. The NBC Bay Area Investigative unit serve you two hundred and fifty three blocks of downtown San Francisco in search of trash needles and feces. The investigation reveal trash literate across every single block. The survey also found forty one block started with needles and ninety six blocks sullied with piles of theses, just beautiful just how glorious it's wonderful. the day that they really done a good job with one most beautiful cities in the world by literally needles. I mean it's it again. This happening everywhere the block for my house right on the street we saw needle the other day and that because there are homeless people who are wandering around the drug users. There's some of them are drug users, not

the overwhelming majority, but certainly a significant percentage of homeless people are drug users or alcoholic or mentally ill and their bunch people working in the richest cities in the world San Francisco. Should there be this homeless problem. A couple of things to note about that one. If you are a believer that homeless, people are created by the price of housing, then maybe it's the high level of regulation in San Francisco, this driving homeless problem when you create rent control when you prevent developers monsieur building new buildings that sends the prices skyrocketing, and that means that if you are believer that its people were on the fringes, people on the economic margins when the homeless, if that's your take, then you should really be against regulations with regard to building new units of housing but photon. What's aren't? They foolishly clings this idea. The men control is going to somehow bring about cheaper housing, which it never has done anywhere for any large

EL. The people only additional development does it I'm not a believer that that's what causes the homeless problem, because the homeless problem, in my view- and there are a number of good books about mental illness and the homeless crisis- is that in the nine from the nineteen sixty on gloom, seventies and eighties, there's been a tremendous state and local under under funding of mental health facilities. The laws have been tremendously loosen, so people are not arrested for sleeping on the streets and they are not put into treatment facilities if they need treatment. Instead, they are left to be industries. The acl you has actually sued to allow people to keep their stuff on the streets in LOS Angeles, so they there have been judges in the state of

for, of course, who have suggested that you have a state and federal constitutional right to sleep on the streets in LOS Angeles and wonder why the streets are littered with theses and needles. That's why, when you leave mentally ill people on the streets, when you leave, people are drug addicts on the street, you end up with poop, and drugs on the streets is just something that happens, and it does not mean or cruel to people who are mentally ill to suggest that they ought to be given treatment that they need. The whole point of Functioning Republic is that we are seeking to allow people rational choice. When you are not in a rational mine, you cannot make good choices. When you are a drug addled person, you cannot make rational choices when you are a mentally ill person is severely mentally ill personality, on the street. These are not the choices in a very high percentage of the studies vary, but a very high percentage by every study of people who are living on the streets are mentally ill and or drug addicts, and yet the laws have been specifically constructed by the left to live.

people to live in their own felt on the streets. It is not good for them. It is not good for the society. It's not good. Overall. This is a result of bad left policy, not just poverty worthless. To make it about communism? Is there no homeless? People in communist societies is out about that is about bad policy that is happening in our nations democratic cities, which is where the vast majority of homeless people are living at this point. Ok, so time for a couple of things that I like and then some things I hate and then we'll do a federalist paper, since we did not do one yesterday so things I like. I am currently reading a biography Andrew Carnegie by David NASA Andrew Carnegie. Wasn't one point: the wealthiest person in the United States which is to say probably on earth in one of the great industrialists and all the myths about him as a robber baron who decided to give back to the poor. After as he was own dying, that's not true from the time that has been age. He knew he want to give away all his wealth, which led the Carnegie endowments a large. Why there's Carnegie Hall is whether libraries named after Andrew Carnegie. It demonstrates again that just because you become wealthy doesn't mean that you become non virtuous.

The way they got as well as a little more controversial, so Carnegie was involved in Lahti. Insider deals. He got wealthy the way a lot of people got. healthy in the in the gilded age, which is to say that he got a bunch of insider contract contracts from government connected players, I'm not in favour of that sort of cronyism, obviously, but the Thorkel, radon Carnegie, is that he was a bad man, a cruel man at the end of his life. He had sort of a scrooge like reformation, then decided to raise money. That's not actually true about if he is quite good, David Nassau, Andrew Carnegie, I check out the book and other things that I, like so Fergie has now apologized for her version of the national anthem, She says I've always been honoured and proud to perform the national anthem and last night. I want to try something special for me and be a I'm. A risk take artistically, but clearly this rendition didn't strike intended tone. I love this country and honestly tried my best. Ok, well, that some that's fair that's where I got in driving out of it. I'll say that I found it hilarious end an enjoyable

it was useless about being disrespectful to me, then it just being bad but good for Fergie Farley's, recognising that the anthem that she sang was garbage show kudos their time for a couple of things that I hate, so controversy over Lord Ingram continues. As I said yesterday, this is a deeply intellectually dishonest conversation, more Ingram, sad to LA branch and shut up and rebel. She literally wrote a book called shut up in seeing, as is fifteen years ago. This has been part of her stick braver long time when she says that celebrity should shut up and do whatever it is that they do. But she's saying is that we don't really think that european matters very much, not that you have to shut up that the right to speak, but that why We take your opinion that seriously, if you have any expertise on on the issue, yet the entire

It decided that it was time to call her a big it on this basis. So Kevin's around these star player for legal and state warriors. He says that this was racist. They he says quote like I said our president made it cool for people to kind of speak their truth in kind of show what they're really about it's cool to uncover there now so we know it's coming. We know if we use our voice and us out what some people may agree with, of course, they're gonna say ignorant things like that, but we are the american dream from now on, we rose up in our profession to be able to take care of our families forever, all of which is fair. But then he says I kind of feel sorry for her because you not looking through the lens of being freed. What that's about it feels bad that she doesn't know what we came from or who we are personally. She might actually enjoy being around us, but might actually feel inspired I being not just brown around me or the broad black eyes and opposition anybody of color was risen up and done something positive in life again. This is Some accusations are more Ingram. The do not exist. I'm sure that Lord Ingram knows a lot of black people, I'm sure she will enjoy hanging out with love, NBA players, I'm sure out and drawing lot of NBA Blair's. They seem like pretty cool folk, some of them, but that doesn't mean they have any political expertise,

then, if I criticise Lebron James for not knowing what he's talking about, that's that somehow racist take Michael Wilburn was doing the same ANA on, yes, paeonies, a column of the Washington Post and he says that that more Ingram comes off like a big it shut up in simple. I realized he was playing off the title of something with its a book or letters or whatever she's, but shut up in trouble. You take yourself that seriously here that Smart is interesting. All these again Opel conservatives who talk about how what's what stable geniuses they are, but yet they salad morons when they try to dictate to other people what they should talk about, what their intelligent enough talk about this is to come. off like a big it. I don't know, I don't know her work. I turned to radically off foxes. I can ok. Well, if you don't know Rio, never work in one country or a big. It essentially comes off like a big. And then he acknowledges the very beginning of that statement that Lord Ingram wrote a book called shut up in saying about the Dixie checks court as white as white can be now. I will say that there are a bunch of people on the right who say: why should celebrities have?

opinions on politics and then, when its kid recording presented and suddenly there find with it that selling their people and worthwhile the same thing, by the way there saying that kid rock running, presented super crazy. Why would he do that? And now today, Drudge Report, here linking to showbiz for online George Clooney is talking about running for president apparently apparently he's gonna they're going to speak. He and his wife, I'm all appeared the march for our lives. He says that only has always been at the event, but he's in a shop anyway, and then he says what I like to be the next president of that sounds like fun how'd, you said like anybody to be the next president of the United States right away place. An Clooney took an iraqi refugee last September in Kentucky the Refugees, student at the University of Chicago I and II, and so there is a good case to be made that they're gonna try and push George Clooney or some other celebrity into the presidency. Listen, I'm not happy, but these are the merger of celebrity in politics. I think it's it's backwards. I think that celebrity. When people take people's fame as a measure,

of their of their aptitude. That's foolish one of the great lines in Finland on the roof. The musical fiddler other of is heavier is taught me and if I were a rich man, you saying that if you are rich and then people would come to Heaven, they ask them questions that will cross rabbis eyes and he says and to end it would not matter If I answer right or wrong when you're rich, they think you really know. The same thing is true about fame in the United States, when you're famous people think actually know what you're talking about usually when you're famous for something that doesn't mean that you know anything about any other topic. I'm not an astrophysicist Niels Grass ICE and knows more about astrophysics than I do by the same token, Neil digress ICE and is not a politician know anything about politics in when he speaks about politics. He sounds like a dupe, so areas of expertise do matter. Ok, quick, federalist paper

Yesterday's we're on Federalist, sixteen Alexander Hamilton, continuing to talk about the insufficiency of the articles of confederation and why they should be replaced by the constitution, says confederacies Tenzin evolve into civil war, because there's not a strong enough, centralized government. If the. If there is not enough that the federal government does its basically just there, then the only way to enforce the rules as with a large standing army. Whereas if there is a broad, broad federal government with large pockets of agreements, then people actually have a stake in the in the preservation of that government, and he says one this. He says if a confederacy Break down into civil war, then it's gonna get really bloody. I remember all of this is eighty years before this of war are seven years before the civil war and in all countries as ones once the sort is drawn. The passions of men observe no bounds of moderation. The suggestions of wounded pride in instigations of irritated resentment would be apt to carry.

States against which the arms of the union were exerted to any extremes necessary to avenge the affront or avoid the disgrace and submission said. The first war of this kind would probably terminate in a dissolution of the union. Of course, very nearly did gases had states cannot be trusted to the work of a federal government's. If you are to have a confederacy where you'd say, the federal government will pass a law, no more have any federal bodies, any federal bureaucracy, any federal forces in the states to enforce those

the states will just ignore them. The states will just not enforce those laws, and then I will be very hard to enforce them, because what it can do in four unveiled a state to force it to abide by federal law better. They should have an independent federal government that can enforce its own sphere of law and then, if a state impedes that, then you actually have a conflict as opposed to a stages for fusing to enforce federal law. That's a distinction is still some relevance for today's constitutional law, particularly when it comes to the federal government robbing states into doing the work for them already. We will be back here tomorrow from Washington DC, where we are headed foresee back. I ran out of Time Tom about tobacco. Hopefully talk about a low, but tomorrow I mentioned earlier. The bench approach on the bench bureau shows produced by math is blubber executive producer, Jeremy, boring senior producer, Jonathan, hey our technical producers, often Stevens edited by out single audio missed by, like Carmona Harem, make up his by just while vera