Trump takes on California over sanctuary cities, Democrats refuse to disassociate from Farrakhan, and the weather is getting Stormy for Trump.
Date: 03-08-2018
This is an unofficial transcript meant for reference. Accuracy is not guaranteed.
President from takes southern California sanctuary cities. Democrats refused to disassociate from most african and the weather is
stormy out there for the trunk administration. I mention here. This is the bench, a parachute
oh yeah.
We are here, and there is much news to cover some of the breaking the present and the United States now seems to be backing off some of his terror of play,
He just said a moment ago that he has quote he right to go up or down on country based on country, to which I say my two year old tonnes has the same. That sees us that's very exciting, but I
many things to discuss it with you, including its international women's day, which is just fantastical talk about all that. But first, I would say say thank you to sponsors over at thrive market. So five march,
is the place that you are going to go from now on to get the best organic food. Ok, it's an online growth for the mission to make healthy, living, affordable, accessible to everyone here, you're, sick of going beyond the whole foods and paying oversight over
size prices to hang out with people who are annoying and drive practices and mess up your bumper and then draw
the way, while virtue signalling all the while you don't have to do that
more now you go over my friends, thrive market you can, with one click of a button sort Dr Markets catalogue by ninety values based on their dietary needs, revision gluten, free, paleo, Non GM and more it's great for me, even if a kosher value, they were hyper curated catalogues, instead of there being fifteen almond butters at the local health store all overpriced. Instead, you can be able to search for
the three to four best almond butters, untried market, but you know that at source from the best, with the best ingredients at the most affordable prices, they also have supplements the protein batteries which something I take to get bored
Gay and more on there that we mention on the shout at fifty percent of retail. Although this product over it DR market, imagine spending
twelve dollars for on butter. Instead of sixteen at your local whole food and for all of my listeners right now, my friends at thrive market are offering you sixty dollars of free groceries, plus free shipping and a thirty day free trial.
Which is just an awesome they'll sixty about a free groceries, plus re shipping and the thirty day failed from free travelling. You signed up, keep in mind for I've. Market prices are already twenty five to fifty percent
off retail, and now they are offering an extra sixty bucks offer free groceries, go to thrive market that comes last Shapiro and get your instant sixty dollars. A free groceries, that's thrive. Market dont come slash, appear to get that instant, sixty dollars off for free groceries, pretty spectacular stuff and again the praise.
Already less expensive, verity have better catalogue and you can carry by value. So there's no reason for Nazis thrive, markets outcome, Slash, Shapiro NEWS that slash appearance. They know that we sent you and get special deal. Okay, so, first of all, happy international women's day to all my favorite sets Nicky Hayley, that is kind of LISA Rice.
That is Margaret Thatcher. Long may her name be celebrated. That is gold mayor that its use in me,
the natives Harriet Tubman the gun packing,
underground rail road had lots and lots of great women to celebrate today.
I was, I was mildly, put off Eve, pies or who writes for, I believe, salon dot com.
Three men, please don't be annoying today, I'm begging you well, I mean that's like a red flag in part of a bull for me, because I, first of all, let me just note about international women's day. Gender is a social construct. We have been told. Ok, so I don't know why.
But why is it? Why is it that that international women's day we celebrating biological women or we celebrating gendered women, so does Caitlin JANET
to celebrate international women's Day or Caitlin General Man and of Caitlin General gets to celebrate.
International women's day, then, why can't any other biological man celebrated
for national women's day by being a woman
none of these answers are are are easy and coming because if you think gender is a social construct and makes the feminist movement very difficult to take, but
near them entirely annoying. I am a man, but for the purposes of this,
Let's just say that I'm a woman and therefore I can comment on international women's day. Again, I'm perfectly fine with international women's day. It fine and I don't care whatever good. What celebrate women. My mom
why? What's up at my mom, my mom, who worked all through my childhood? My dad stayed home and took care of the kid will celebrate my wife for rumor has, it is a doctor will celebrate
the women who are working at all women worse thing at home will see that any of the women who are pushing international women's day are celebrating stay at home, sweet home, taken care of their children and ensuring that the
Ex generation of Americans are better than the last generation of American. So happy International,
Wednesday to everyone with that proviso again remember gender is a social contract. Ok, so in other news, Jeff sessions,
is now going to war with my stupid state, the state of California, so he announced on Wednesday that he was going to escalate. The trumpet minister
She wore California suing over its so called Sanctuary state law and clashing with democratic governor.
Jerry Brown in a fiery exchange of words session said I can't sit
We by while the law was already a federal officers, are being blocked by legislative acts and politicians. There there's here's the legal case with regard to sanction citizen sanctuary states. The federal government cannot force local law enforcement.
Do it's bidding so the federal government says to local law enforcement. We will in future will rest people for violation of federal immigration, or they can do that here. There there's passive, come at how to sack essentially forbids the use of of drafting local law enforcement in the evaluation of
a law. So you can't you that's if there's sanctuaries anywhere the cops just say: listen, we're not going to enforce that are a law that is not illegal. It is illegal, however, if they are actively impeding people from following federal law. So if the cops are, for example,
people out of prison, knowing that they are illegal immigrants and in hiding that information from the feds, that is, violation,
a federal law so sessions a thing, that's exactly what California is doing
Jerry Brown, the governor of our stupid state. He, of course, is very upset about all this. He fired back on Jeff sessions. He climbed out of bed got on his walker who just written
Europe's oceans drives versions, hurry general line. What happens here
gallop Kelly's dies and middle
I am personally has origin, is it is simply not true, and I call upon him to apologise to the people of California, to bringing the mendacity of Washington to California trying to insert discord in division, and, I might add, this functionality and estate is really working so
build some bridges, not war law enforcement in the state is not working. Crime rates and rising, the homeless rate has been rising. Welfare payments have been rising, detailed California is a garbage cheap and that's largely thanks to the leadership of people like Governor Jerry Brown. Just sessions particularly pointed out a situation in Oakland. Where apparently be the story was that the city of Oakland had been actively impeding
deportations, so sessions criticised Oakland AIR Libby Shaff for morning the public about an unannounced re by federal deportation officers. Recently in California, sessions headed allowed hundreds of wanted criminals to avoid arrest,
How dare you, how dare you needlessly, endanger the lives of law enforcement, just promote eradicate open borders, agenda and, of course, sessions exactly right? That's what happens in the state of California,
because a huge percentage of voters in the state of California, hispanic alot of democratic politicians think that Hispanics are necessarily going too.
In favour of a more open borders agenda, and so they pander by saying that there are going to resist and federal law enforcement. Now, one of the things that amazing is
You recall the Obama administration sued, the state of Arizona on the state of Arizona was arresting people based on immigration status under Sb. Seventy re SB, seventy was was a law that was passed in
in Arizona when she and brewer was governor and that that allowed local line
listening to aid federal law enforcement by arresting people for violation of federal law. The Obama administration actually sued.
State of Arizona saying you guys can enforce them
while only weaken enforced federal law. So, according to Democrats, it's illegal to help enforced federal law, but it is not illegal to actively
he'd the investigation of federal law, just amazing. Here's, the Oakland mayor, Libby Shap, responding by saying the just actions is new guest and racist. How dare you vilified members of our committee by trying to frighten the american public into thinking that all documents are dangerous? How dare you distort the reality about declining violent crime, Sanctuary City like Oakland, California, to advance your?
racist, except for the fact and the violent crime rate is apparently going up so calling the public Policy Institute of California California's violent crime rate increased by three point: seven percent in twenty. Sixteen two four hundred forty four per one hundred thousand residents there are other recent up takes in twenty twelve and twenty fifteen. Obviously this is not comparable to the sixties,
but these optics, our troubling and in the city of color, in the city of LOS Angeles. For example, shows a sanctuary city, we have seen not only increased crime, which we have also seen an attempt to obfuscate those increased crime rates by the simple there by the simple,
dig, it was measure of re evaluating what exactly counts as a crime to the police have basically been told that they in order for them to hit certain marked, as you just redefined.
From felonies to misdemeanours, is a pat bill. The past recently is reference.
Actually the past recently in the instead of California, that redefine a bunch of felonies as misdemeanours and also allowed these states to allow people out of prison on misdemeanor. So if you just miss Countess
This takes its pretty easy to get to. California has lowered crime rate even will when the quality of life in California is declining, so is just sessions right to go after the state of California and all of us. Of course, he is sessions in his speech. Reference confederate
states that are future by federal law. Kampala, Harris the Senator from California who wishes to run for president of the United States and twenty twenty. She, of course ripped into just sessions for making such a reference. Listen as far as I'm concerned, just sessions should be advised not advise right now that it is it it's a bad idea for him to start talking about anything, do with the history of slavery or reconstruction or civil war, and the United States has credibility,
pray my shot on those issues. Why why Jeff Sessions prosecutor members of the K K K when you today, why exactly this credibility shallows issues because a white guy from the south is there? The implication here
and then she said, and then she suggested the Republicans are hypocritical because their Federalist, when it comes to issues like an
Your mental ism or drugs, but are not penalised when it comes to immigration, law, or course we're not federalist when it comes to immigration law in the sense that states should
control over their own borders because that's one of the basic powers that is granted to a centralized federal government- that's just stupid. If she says you can look at members,
administration, whether it's the head of the EPA when hears attorney General Vocal Oklahoma, so that federal emission standards.
Another standards as it relates to greenhouse gas emissions should not apply to the state what he actually says. The EPA does not have
better a lot thorny and relaunch, regulate greenhouse gas emissions, which is true, says you can look at this attorney general. Who said that imposing terms the voting right tacked on the states, create an undue burden and is meddling with the affairs of each state. That is also true of the Voting Rights ACT, which was,
rural attempt to get rid of racism in the registration of voters in the south and has been obsolete for for decades now, but that is a violation of
sovereignty a clearly is under the constitution, but they need to make
how how folks and left will conflate certain terminology in order to avoid the obvious implication, what they're doing, which is notification of federal law,
Sanctuary cities are enough occasion of federal law, at least in so far as they are actively impeding the federal government from doing its job. Now. The question is whether these state of California can have its funds cut by the federal government, whether cities can have their funds cut by the federal government, because their article
on the books. Are there there are constitutional issues with regard to attaching strings to federal funding, but certainly present from supposed to come to California talk about the sanctuary city issue in the next few days. It is
issue that is top of mine for a lot of people in the state of California, and I'm not somebody who is whose pretty
radical on illegal immigration with I'm, not somebody who says that we ought to deport everybody who's here
Finally, I think that we ought to go through and determine on a one to one basis whether people belong in the country,
or not whether they are of use to the country or not? And if they are not, then we should support them. But that's not. The same thing is
everybody who came here illegally should be supported. In fact, there is not a personal
in southern California, who has not met or worked with an illegal immigrant at some point, but with all that said, a state that is actively preventing the federal
Remember. Enforcing the law is violating the supremacy clauses of the constitution,
the United States, and there is no legal justification for anything remotely resembling that. Ok, a second I'm secondary to talk about
continued radicalism of the Democratic Party there, so radical that now there
raising the idea that that little than that sanctuary, cities can actual actively fight the federal law enforcement officers, but it gets ignores that before we get to that first, I want to say thank you to our sponsors over tripping dotcom. So when you planted
patient. Finding a place to stay that makes everybody happy is really tough, is particularly true of your staying in a hotel. So
family, when we vacation, we can't stay hotels, because we need a kitchenette where we can kosher.
Bring a lot of our own food and we have to kids. So if you stay in a hotel, you really think everybody's falsely
At the same time, it goodnight it ain't gonna happen. This is why tripping
com is the best tribute that come. Let's you with one search, compare every home from the world's top vacation rental sites in one place to find the best deal on your perfect vacation rental. Vacation rentals are better mean we're talking kitchens we're talking about
dryers there's more space. It really is a home away from all those opposed to being crammed into a small room with a tiny many fridge that refuses to cool to the proper temperature. He'd tripping dot com is the best way to book a vacation rental. You can join the millions of travellers to find more savings with
up to eighty percent less than traditional hotel rooms, so replanting spring break on the beach and flora, its tripping dot com? If you can't wait to swim in Lake Tahoe this summer, tripping dot com, if you're dreaming of sitting on the deck of
smokey mountains: cabin tripping dot com. You wanna go to Hawaii nuanced anaconda, tripping dot com. Again, this year save time and money when you put the vacation whom of your dreams of tripping dot com, Slash Shapiro
t r, I p p, I injury Dotcom slasher Bureau find that perfect vacation rental, tripping dot com, Slash Shapiro, go check it out. You are using
Slash Shapiro, also that they know that we sent you as well again is how we book all of our vacation.
This initial Para household and for good reason. Ok, so there's still fall out for Democrats over the over the Louis Farrakhan hubbub, so moves Farrakhan obviously is necessary
my we played eclipse of him a couple of days ago in his latest generation of Anti Semitism he's still for some odd reason. Given a twitter verified check Mark
which is an amazing thing right. We are told that that you would have your verification. Remove, like Richard Spencer, has verification removed by twitter, because you disgusting racist k, I thought those bad move, because verification on Twitter is supposed to be designed to prevent fraud it supposed to be designed to prevent people from pretending to be Richard Spencer, for example. Why won't you that's beyond me a pretend to be Richard Spencer and an that's? What the check mark is for sulphur, fake Ben Shapiro accounts, they can't be, they can be distinguished from the real bench appear account by the blue checkmark, but Twitter decided there are going to use the blue checkmark as a sign of approval, so they got rid of the blue checkmark for four Richard Spencer. They did not get rid of it for Louis Ferrok Shahn, so
this barrack on is it is out there tweeting making a fool of himself and he's also immediately he treated this twenty four hours ago, the FBI has been the worst enemy of black advancement. The Jews have control over those agencies of government. Is the guy has been embraced by three of the four heads of the
in March, happy international women's day gang made by three of the four heads of the of the inner
actual women's March I now woman into make Mallory who actually went to lose Americans latest lecture with the nation of
on an this lecture, included him talking about the satanic, Jew and all the rest of it. She has written a defensive herself. So here is what she wrote
the aim is for news, one dot com, which is, I believe, a black oriented political website. I she says I pray
they serve as a leader for one of the largest women's advocacy organizations in the world. For that reason, my region presents
nation of Islam Saviours Day Convocation troubled, some of the very people we have fought for and worked alone
for most of my life. I've heard the pain,
concern of my energy Bt Q. I eyes of links.
I joined it and is an artificial intelligence. Part of L Gb take your majesty my screwing up as initials, maybe my jewish friends and
black women, including those who do and those who don't check off either of those other boxes
I affirm the validity of those feelings and, as I can,
to grow and lorries, is both an activist in as a woman, I will continue to grapple with the complicated nature of working across ideological lines and the question of how to do so without causing harm to vulnerable people. This one's, not tough, don't go to lectures by an open, anti Semite Ray
you're, not difficult amazing? The Brok Obama was able to get away with it with with with Reverend right it is. It is
not surprisingly, that these women are able to get away with it. With the women's March she's, I didn't expect my presence had saviours states led anyone to question my belief
especially considering that I've been going to this event regularly for over thirty years, you're, not helping lady that doesn't help your case
if you have your cases, I am not a radical anti semite. I just go and listened rule is very concerned about the satanic Jew and the White Devil
every year for thirty years. That's a weird kind of weird. I go to synagogue every week. If the rabbi said things that I thought were truly racist or awful. I would
eve, because why would I go to a service where the rabbi did that? But she goes the saviours every year, apparently for thirty, or should I first well in my parents when I was just a little girl,
begin attending. On my own aftermath, sons, father was murdered nearly
seventeen years ago, and that most difficult period of my
if it was the women of the nation of Islam who supported me, and I have always held them close to my heart. For that reason, ok was that have to do with their kind being an awful, egregious disgusting, anti semite. Nothing is I'm the same woman who help build an intersection of movement. Intersection just means a movement that is built on identity, politics that fight for the rights of all
bull and stands against the hatred and against hatred, discrimination of all forms, excepting inside the union and the same person tat was before saviours Day, which begs the question. Why are I believe, being question now? Well, her beliefs are being questioned now because we have tape of her. At this event, that's the answer because I was raised and activism and believe that has historically
people, black Jews, Muslims and all people must stand together to fight racism, Anti Semitism and Islamophobia, except that she's not going
throughout their kind under the bus anywhere in here anywhere in here. I will continue with this in
just a second because it really is amazing. It's amazing the lengths to goes to avoid to avoid our continent name is an entire piece about Louis Farrakhan and not once is lost our continent.
Mentioned she's, as I believe that algae meeting Q, I people are not an abomination, recreational man, but simply people and
Religion is not to be used as a tool to abuse, divide, harm, bully or intimidate, except when I go to
Mozilla meetings where my people hours where I must also go, I go into difficult spaces. I attend meetings of the police and legislators, the very folk so much. My protest has been directed towards I've partnered and sat with countless groups, activists, religious leaders and institutions.
The past twenty years. I've worked in prisons is walls of present informer gang members. It is impossible for me to agree with
Restate our shared every viewpoint of the many people who have worked with or will work with.
Future as I do not wish to be held responsible for the words of others
My own history shows that I stand in opposition them. I also do not think it is fair to question anyone who worked with me, who supports my work and was a member of this movement because of the ways I may have fallen short here or an end
other instance, and she said,
it is her intention to walk in the version adopted, Dorothy Height successor to Marian Macleod buffoon as president of the National Council of Negro women in nineteen eighty four
too. Faced criticism from participating. The millionaire march, which is organised
Nature of Islam in financial support was withheld.
From her organization and she said, and she stood strongly and addressed
the millionaire March Anyway- and she said I am here-
because you are here
is no nice, except that again you been going on for thirty years. How hard is its demands? I? So, if you're in the middle,
of infrastructural moment, apparently super hard, because your most afraid, because your most afraid,
the alienating other members of your into intersection community than you are
of alienating open, Anti Semites, like those Farrakhan pretty astonishing, but this is the
left operates now. So you are a bad person if you are not of the marxist left and you're a bad person. If you question people who are of the Marxist left New York Times, how Miss Barry Waste is found this out over over in her position at the New York Times. Very wise is not a concern
very wise is probably no. She voted for Hillary Clinton. I would soon she did but bury is, is, I would say,
a mainstream, classical liberal
She is. She certainly not a hard core conservative by any stretch of the imagination, but she wrote a column for the New York Times.
Talking about. The pathetic attempt by people on the left to continuously call people or not of the radical left fascists, and you point out all of the protests that we seen over the last week against Jordan Petersen and Christina hot summers and of right of other figures and Stephen Pinker is being called all right. Now we talk to us even pinker, the Harvard
Psychologists who has been an ardent Democrat for his entire life and now, is now being labelled right wing and will enable the fascist, because you refuses to buy into politically correct notions about Non
for education between the sexes, for example, since european maritime com is very wise, she up at explore
the rising tendency and left to label all those were not sufficiently woke. As fascists bench is, of course, exactly correct, I've been labelled the fascist
a bunch of people unless they call me all right, which is just insane considering. That was the all rights number one target during the twenty. Sixteen election cycle Weiss rights. That's quote: we live in a world in which politically fish
stick behaviour, if not. The actual philosophy is unquestionably on the rise and names when report.
Engine paying and Bashar Al Assad, but she continued
These are generally not extremists. The leftist focus on. Instead, they seem to believe that the real cause for concern are the secret authoritarian.
Passing as liberals and conservatives in are missed. So, who are these people Christina Summers and Laura Kipnis Northwestern University who question whether
people should be run out of town on rail in camp is show trials of a professor sex consensually with a student? Is that deserving of being fired or destroyed? I and her
the who is a whose an atheist, a black female atheist, whose now being considered a fascist because she objects to the excesses of radical Islam,
Mary Beard, who is another feminist, he's being run out of town on Europe? She says by tossing people like Mary Beard and Christina hot summers into the slop bucket, with the likes of Richard Spencer. They are attempting to place their responsible ideas firmly outside the mainstream. They are trying to make criticism of my
in politics: radical Islam and third way feminism among the various other subjects, verboten proven most minor transgressions, as in the case of professor beard, people are turned a radioactive. The main effect is that these endless accusations of fascism or massage any or all right told the effects of the words themselves as their strip.
Meaning they strip us of our sharpness of our ability to act forcefully to real fascism, massage illness or members of the all right. This is, of course, exactly correct.
Everything very why says Here- is right. So what was the reaction of people on the left Amanda market? Who is one of the stupidest humans on planet earth, charade for salon, dotcom? Here's! What you twitted quote, remember very wise calls herself, a classic liberal, a favorite term of all writers, mistakenly. Think they're, cleverly, fooling
so the entire point, the very way is making is that the left keeps using labels on mainstream conservatives. Liberals- and
in a market solution, is they clearly bury? Wife? Is a fascist all writer, just fantastic just
visit if the way things are going to win any contests through this, they must be out of their minds. We're
now boil down politics to culture. Wars needs are not culture worth. The left is likely to win if they continue along these lines. Ok, so before I go
further and we'll talk, Stormy Daniels, we'll talk guns, we'll talk, foreign policy
so there's a piece inbox com that may or may not discuss, because I think that the left is being a disturbing mistake with regard to sex, particularly first, I want to say thank you tore sponsors over at upside dotcom. So let me ask you this: how great would it be to have the kind of support astronauts get when they take a business trip
having a whole team of people or just sitting around emission control, making sure the trip goes exactly as planned and fixing your problems if you experience them. Well, that's what upside that communism we're talking
yeah sure of is twenty four hours a day. Seven days a week in a team of specialist there to help you making sure that your flight hotel in car rental all go off without a hitch. They monitor your trip around the clock. They proactively keep you posted on everything from if it's gonna rain to alternate
to alternate return flight home in case you want to squeeze in one more meeting or you want to leave a little bit early munching. You experience a committed team behind you, helping you with your trap with there
travel there's no way we can go back to anything else: upside dot com, it's lackman, easy booking, competitive prices at a team that always has your back and right now they must pay,
we'll deal if you sign up today for your free account. You get a free pair of both headphones on your first business trip. Pretty awesome, deal upside dot com, slash men, free pair of both headphones on your first, a business trip. Again, that's upside down come Slash Ben when you sign up today for your free account. Six hundred dollar minimum purchased required within ninety days see the site for complete details again upside is the best way to travel or talking affordable prices.
Easy booking and again that concierge seem that ensures that your travel goes off without a hitch, there's nothing more irritating aim the airport realizing there's screw up, and now you book
Fine and you are totally jack. That is not what happens with you at upsides outcomes, lash man, good upside outcomes, lifespan, let them, though we sent you and again that special deal sign up today, yet that free account and a free pair of both headphones on your first, a business trip. Minimum purchase of six hundred dollars require, within ninety days, all ready. So many other news story
Daniels is back in the news and CNN is just beside itself. So when I go to work out, what are the things that is on fourchan
is the CNN is what on the tv. While that means that it was wall to wall
Stormy Daniels coverage yesterday, so stormy dna
The lawyer is now suing the President,
try and avoid an injunction so Michael Cone, trumps lawyer as we know, signed an agreement with Stormy Daniels former Porn star, recurrent parents. I guess she still born- are unpaid or a hundred thirty thousand dollars to keep her,
story under wraps and now Daniels is suing Trump because she says that Trump did not actually
that agreement now, legally speaking, it's not clear that that
Finally is. It is a good legal case like if I signed the agreement, and then you don't countersign and send it back to me not supremely clear that I'm still not bound by the agreement.
So you know I mean because it did the reason being that
There was a meeting of minds than there could theoretically be constructed agreements, but in any case she's claiming that the Trump campaign paid her off and that they then did not sign contracts with her. She felt her loss and on Tuesday,
and then cone obtained a timber restraining order against or prohibiting her from violating it Andy she signed in October, twenty sixteen just before the election, cholera, allegedly dispassionate
to caution the angles against breaking the terms of the order. Michael Avenue. Eddie is the angles
eleven Eddie is the angles lawyer. He told NBC News that he is not can be.
By they said earlier today, Mr Collins, through his attorney MR rose and further friend my client, in an effort to prevent her from telling the truth about what really happened. We do not take kindly to these threats, nor will we
intimidate itself
Getting into legal vagaries of this is is not really worthwhile. The really only to questions of any sense. One is
trump know that his lawyer is paying off stormy Daniels and to do we care. Those are the only two questions that matter here. So the media
obviously focusing in like a laser beam on all of this. Sarah Huckabee centres, grilled yesterday from the pony apparently trunk, was very unhappy, but how Sarah? How can be sanders answered these questions? He wondered.
To say in more convincing fashion that she thinks that Trump didn't know about
the payment by Michael calling his lawyer to Stormy Daniels, here's, how could we sanders answering some questions? President has addressed these directly and may very well clear that none of these allegations are true, this cases already being then one in arbitration and anything beyond that. I would refer you to the president's outcome outside council, so she would answer what exactly the arbitration case was issued,
what I meant to have one this case in arbitration, and then she was asked repeatedly whether Trump knew the corn was paying storming Daniels. Now, let's be frank about this: ok, let it be clear. Obviously, Trump knew, of course, from new. Anyone at things from didn't know is, is a fool
Is it just ridiculous lawyers? Don't go around spending a hundred and thirty
thousand dollars, on behalf of clients to pay off their former porn star lovers out of the goodness of their heart. It is not something that happened and due to suggest to anybody that they ought to buy. That account is just insane. You have to be a crazy person, actually believe that we have to be so in the tank for Trump that you are willing to all
look a basic reality, obviously term knew his, whereas paying stormy Daniels which brings us to the second point, doesn't
on care about any of this. Now there to some questions there one is
we care in General- and the second is- is this violation
campaign finance. What not clear this is a violation of campaign finance, walk a settlement outside of court that allows you to pay somebody to keep
why it is not rare in the legal world, in fact, John Edwards is basically paying alimony too.
Camera woman that he knocked up and she's pregnant with his baby, bear nine
two thousand dollars from campaign funds- and that was
violation of law according to the court. So if that's violation of law,
not sure why hundred thirty thousand dollars violation of walk in there. You have to go further than just saying that from paid off a porn star to say this is a violation of campaign finance law.
Maybe it's an income contribution by Michael Colony or something, but it's gonna be kind of hard to to make this particular case. Then there's the more general question: should we care sort of moral level? Yes, we should care that the President of the United States did douche with regard to women. Ok, present trump is not great on the female
front. The fact that the zoo mildly, controversial is again demonstrative of the fact we have broken down into travel identity. I'm sorry! If it hurts feelings. The president of the United States has had three white is treated.
All of those wide each and every
those wide has been cheated on. We are only work you did so
me Daniels is not the current first lady of the United States, because that's what from does it from is? Does sleaze bad with
the women he always has been asleep that with regard to women, he he is the kind of person who said in interviews that nothing matters
once you ve got a beautiful and young piece of ass is the kind of person who said that surviving the nineteen. Seventy that acquiring a nest,
He was his own personal Vietnam. This is not a guy of quality with regard to how he treats women in his sex life. That's ed! Does anyone
No, because you ve been like this is entirely authority- knew this big into the cake. So should we care yes, should it make a difference? Yes, we will make a difference, no, because we already know
bottom line. We are not getting so the media's attempt to try and turn this into a big scandal. If not can be the scandal, because we already know it's not a thing so before I go any further here and I want to talk about an article. That is what we will talk a little
but the pole outlook for Democrats in twenty eighteen and then there's an article that I think is worth discussing inbox dot com. But first I want to say thank you to our sponsors over at the: U S, Ccs, all right now
obviously gun rights, are really under assault, then returned or tat. The west is making clear that it wishes to deprive you of your right to self defence. They want you to out source, that's the state. They say that the country will be better off. If no one has a gun, they lie about it. They say that they should have an certain types of rifles confiscate weapons and then they Saint Australia, which is a place that has gone confiscation. The left is an honest about their agenda, but we are honest about their agenda. The USA
It knows that the way you protect yourself is with a gun in Catalonia, protect yourself and your liberty is with a gun, and that is why, the? U S ccs, giving you
My law abiding lucky listeners, ten chances to into fifteen hundred bucks to buy inexpensive, New Kimber
Nineteen eleven. It is their mission to train, protect and ensure responsible.
Armed Americans, like you, unlike me, as a strong supporter of the second amendment, I'm a proud member of the USA, and they were giving away free guns,
law abiding Americans to defend themselves and their families go to defend my family. Now, one dot com defend
my family now, one dot com to walk in your ten free chances to win right now. That's all you do don't miss out on the chance,
win one thousand five hundred dollars for your very own Kimber, one thousand nine hundred and eleven one of the finest handguns that there is, but it all ends next week go to the
my family now one dot com right now for your ten chances to win, you can enter and sent in seconds, and it is one hundred percent free, but again it and soon go to defend my family. Now, one that comment or before it's too late, defend my family, now wonder com. It's all right there in the url defend my family now, one that calm. The reason we want guns is to defend our families, and that is why my listeners her having a shot you're law abiding great you'd, have a shot to win a gun to defend yourself in your
we defend my family. Now, one dot com defend my family. Now, one dot com go check that out already soap
before we go any further, unfortunately have to sign off on Facebook. However, if you wish to see the rest of the show live, all you have to do is governed.
We weren't our common subscribe for ninety nine a month ago, thrust my shall live, Craven shall live noses awful show lighting it all of those things plus the mailbag tomorrow, and our next episode of the conversation is coming up a Tuesday Marsh Thirteenth, at five thirty pm eastern to thirty Pm Pacific featuring me. The best subscribe today to be a part of the Congress
and so I can answer your questions and make your life infinitely better in this hour. Long live today, my conversational stream live on the bench of Euro Facebook page on the daily, where Youtube channel it'll be free for everyone to watch, but only subscribers can ask the questions. If you want to ask questions, I just use log into our website. Daily wired outcome had over the conversation page to watch live streaming after that start typing into the daily. Where chat box, I will answer
questions as they come in for an entire. Our once again subscribe to get your questions answered by me: Ben Shapiro, Tuesday, eight March, thirteen, five thirty pm eastern to thirty pm Pacific enjoying the conversation and even the best possible deal get the annual by the annual subscription is. Where
that check that out by spending ninety nine dollars you get all of those efforts mentioned wonders, plus this the greatest and all beverage vessels leftist tears hot or cold tumblr. Look at it just fees, your eyes upon this. You could have this for ninety nine dollars, not just the tumblr, there's little Spencer for a tumbler. It's great for the whole package, plus the dome
so check that out. If you just want a little later governor Itunes, sound cloud Youtube, please subscribe. Please it us reviewed, always helps where the largest most most fast, growing concern
pod coordination so and there is an article in a box,
I can't I asked my wife ratings and want to see if she had the same reaction to it. That I did I it's kind of a fascinating article, because the article is about sexual assault within marriage, now centralism,
it can happen within marriage when a meeting moment, obviously international women's day, and so it's very important to talk about proper behaviour towards women. It's important to talk about what
men should expect from men. It is important it is important to talk about what how mentor behave should behave toward women. All that's very important. One thing that I'm seeing the feminist movement been happening for
long time is conflation of a lot of terminology. Is actually dangerous relationships and dangerous to matters? There's an article today about sexual assault within marriage by anonymous overt box. Dotcom anonymous happens to be a feminist professor shockingly, and this article is about how she say she was sexually assaulted within marriage. Now sexual assault can occur within marriage obviously can occur,
outside of marriage as well. Sexual assault is just a woman's, has no at a man says: I'm doing it anyway right that sexual assault by a woman refuses consent and a man disobeyed. That and then does the
most evil ACT, a human being can do outside of order, which is that he takes advantage of a woman against her will write. That is, in my view, punishment should be punishable by castration or death. I mean that's how seriously I take sexual assault, but one thing
the left has done. Is they have watered down consents? We saw this with the disease on sorry story where the woman,
accused us he's Ansari violating their consent when she did not in fact say no to him at any point
she didn't say: no, he stopped you just him being persistent,
really no evidence that he raped her or sexually assaulted. Her in any way should I make in his apartment, important sex acts on each other. Like that,
The whole story was ridiculous. Box outcome is another story that, as recline is calling deeply important, and I think it's important to recognise a couple of things within marriage number one as a married man.
Ass, a man and as somebody who read social science studies and ass, a monopolies evolutionary biology men want sex more than women do, or at least they want sex on a more regular basis than women. Do every social science study ever done
shows this men on average want sex more often than women. Do the great feminist lie that women want sex in the same way, the main ones x is just absurd. Its crap, it's not true, men are more aggressive about sex men want sex more often than once. I should more different partners. All of these things are supported by a vast bevy of social science statistics. What that means that within marriage, there is often an imbalance. Men want sex more often than their wives do, and so a question arises. What happens if a woman does not really want to have sex, but that I wants to have sex, so the way for additional women have treated sex it within marriage is that there is a difference between I actively
Don't want to have sex of my husband and I'm not super into a brow. Go ahead with it anyway. Ok, I'm not ass. It were into a brow. Go ahead with it anyway, because I love my husband is a pretty common thing within marriage invests a very common thing within marriage and I think it's a good thing within marriage. I don't think it's an act.
I think the woman is not doing something wrong. I think she's doing something healthy and right for the relationship, because when it comes to that doesnt saying that a woman should Jets act, if you really doesn't want you, she thinks her husband, a boar and disgusting person. If that's the case divorce him or if the woman feeling sick or she's not up to it like a woman, should never have sex if she doesn't want to have sex
most egregious possible terms, but there are lots of times when women go along with amendments, as I would like our sector, the woman's life. Well, not superintend. Guy says please. Unless it's ok right that the disease
thing that happens routinely within marriage. It happens within every marriage and it is healthy for marriage because one of the things about doing things for people you love is it. You are constantly
things where you are about them, but you do them for the sake of the person that you love now, it's weird is that the feminist left treats it as though the only form of sex I can ever be had is the most passionate VIII, most the most,
interest in form of tax that women have to be. Your just
really super into it in order for them to consent. In the first place,
seems to violate the women's principles of consent, like there are lots of women who are willing to have sex with their husbands, just because they think that it's a sign of love to their husbands. Even
not physically in the mood, but that happens all the time and I dont think that that's
it needs a very healthy thing. I think it's it's it's setting in expectation of for women that can't be fulfilled within a relationship if they think that a man is going to be happy with his wife. Only having sex with him
only the times when she's most enthusiastic about it, because, again, just biologically speaking
you're, not gonna, be enthusiastic about sex nearly as much as manner relationships are about people doing,
is that they are ambivalent about or even maybe
Do all that much because they loved their partner. Again, this is not to say the men should
able to violate the consent of their wives. Of course, not that's rape, but it is to say that there are lots of situations in which women consent.
Aren't you print is, yes, it can consent. Anyway, we have this in everyday life, with a variety of issues, and it's not just then in true of sex as well the region
This is because this article from vocs dot com blurs this line. They say that any time a man says to his wife can we have sex and she says you know- I'm not super into it, but ok, but he's now raping her. This is a problem. Ok, this undermines the nature of relationships it creates. It creates false expectations for women on how sex is supposed to go
then relationships. It creates false expectations for men on how sex is supposed to go within within marriage. So here's what this anonymous person right, who is, of course, a feminist she's as a feminist professor, is eight years into our marriage sitting in the therapists office. With my husband, I mustard all my courage and said my
this. Dark is truth. When we have sex, I feel like I'm being violated. The unwanted sex at times made me sick. Once aid to run straight from the bed to the bathroom more I rushed into the toilet. I spared him in the therapists that detail
now, if she doesn't say that she said no, and then he raped her anywhere in this article, just as they didn't want to sack she's parent, we said yes or consented to it, and then she went ratchet, which is too I mean. I wonder why
if people were married there, since that is part of a story, we're not hearing here. As normal thing you have sex with their husbands.
Central level legal vomit, I'm gonna go and they ve got some other problems. Just my husband shrugged and staring ahead
more indifference than disdain, replied she's, always melodramatic. His response didn't surprise me, there's a standard reactions. My complains about the sad state of our
his way of training me to see my needs emotional connection. In communication as excessive and his primarily
excess entirely reasonable. So quick, note here, men see sex as a substitute for intimacy women
see intimacy as a reason for sex and show it
man is if a woman would have sex with her husband. The man sees that as a rejection of him, ok them
Is it a rejection of love for him? If a woman
and feel emotional intimacy, and she feels like she's only being used for sex. Then she feels like
she's being used,
Men and women are almost coming at sex from polar opposite directions gave it the way they meet is inside a committed relationship when intimacy insects are completely are completely overlapped. What things a feminist movement is doing. Nothing has been really egregious. They separated off intimacy and
they said sexism bodily functions and intimacy, is an emotional function, and that means they. You can separate these two things off. They did this so that they could separate commitment from tat. They did this
say that marriage had nothing new attacks, they did this and they could say single people sleeping around totally
and totally praiseworthy totally healthy, no bad ramifications, all you have to do is just see sexist as pooping.
And it's the same thing right sectors, eating is just another bodily functions engaging. Why should there be any emotional connection, but then, when it comes to how
True human beings behave intimacy is inherently connected to sex and that's true for men as well. Ok, if a woman
now demand will not have such a them under any circumstances, he's going to feel slightly. Peeved he's going feels as though that the woman doesn't love him, and I don't think that's completely
justified? It is women continues. I dragged us in couples counselling because it could no longer live in the vacuum left behind after the emotional intimacy had slipped out of our marriage. My husband had noticed the loss proclaiming himself happy at home having he sounds like an insane person by the way to be happy in this relationship at home. Haven't tried without success that therapist proscribed exercises for storing emotional connection, chickens about feelings, non sexual touch, but has been lobbied for zone solution.
Need is really complicated and difficult, and it's not something I can do. But the thing I need is easy and quick. Why can just give me the thing I need? I acquiesced? Hey, that's called consent, so she stupid. First of all, you sounds like she sounds
person who, who at least is making bad decisions of your husband, says you
I can't give you anything that satisfies you emotionally. Just give me this acts and you go along with that you're making mistaken relationships as at the time it didn't feel like a choice. It felt inevitable
I lived every evening, dreading the signals of my husband's desire. I bargain my way out of sex as often as I could I gloried in being sick enough to have the right to refuse when then
don't I couldn't get out of that. We use the method I taught myself to tolerate and that he astoundingly towel.
And it is well, I read a book to distract myself for as long as I can
while he did the thing he needed to do. I did not let him kiss me for the last several years of our marriage. That was the rule. You can
me, but you can't kill me, and I don't have to pretend to like it that satisfied him his personal, he sounds like a real must have do that satisfies any guy. If a guy feel satisfied by that sort of a level of sexual connection with his intimate partner than that person is screwed up there. Isn't there a lot of deeper issues in this marriage, but probably haven't this article is the conflation of
what seems to be like what she's talking about is a failed marriage, a real fail marriage where she hates her husband and he doesn't care about her cable watches
waiting with his every woman who's ever since extra said yes to sex with her husband when she was
super into it and she's complaining that with sexual assault Jed submitting
such are the man who knew it was unwanted. Who knew I fell, dependent our lack of emotional connection and who knew had been clearly told that a fella by election broke. Something in me knowing that you could say,
enjoying feel emotionally fulfilled by that unwanted sex shattered. My idea of our marriage, I sex doll. I felt unsolved, but I blame myself, but what I mean to certainties?
and you should have used your volition Raymond. You should have stood up and said no if this is the way that your marriage was going and he does sound like a piece of work. But honestly it sounds like you never said. No,
We never his hands again ever sent, wasn't without emotional connection, nothing's happening in the bedroom buster, which seems like the right way to do this. But if you are setting up the expectation here here is the problem that I have with all this. If you're setting up the expectation
from men that men are only going to have sex with their wives when their wives are fully fully emotionally deployed fully into it?
really horny right. That's the idea, then that's other work inside marriages. It just doesn't care women. Really
can we make the decision that, because they love their husbands, they are going to have sex with their husbands at times when teams inconvenient our times.
They are are okay with it, but not super supremely into it ran at times when it's not passionate love me
on the beach out from here to eternity if men and women are told that they don't have to do that better than that
not that they don't? Have you better? Have you anything they want it, but if women are told it is healthy for a marriage that they can have a fulfilled emotionally stable relationship on the base,
of turning down sex, except when they are most enthusiastic about it. That's going to work and setting up unstated, unfulfilled expectations with regard to men and of men are told that when they get married
and there is no greater access to safe than when they are a single than to be perfectly blunt about this. There will be less marriage, and one of the reasons
men, have sex with that. One of the reasons men get married in the basic bargain of things. I is because when they
love a woman and believe that they are in relationship for life there, giving up polygamy, Polly Emory for the for the sake of frequency, in the basic economic bargain and to put in its most
terms, an emotional level. What they're really doing is there saying I love this woman so much I'm willing to be with her the rest of my life and because we love each other so much we are going to have a lot more Saxon. I would if I were a single guy. Men identify sex with love and women due to they just come from different angles. Ok, so it's time for a couple of things that I like and then some things that I hate. So let's do a thing that little etc thing
I like, so we ve been doing Heaven related things. This week we ve been doing all sorts of art that is merely to Heaven, so
there's a really underrated, Broadway Musical called the secret garden. The music was actually written by Lucy Simon, who isn't much pop songs as whilst curly silences
I Anna and Lucy Rota, all the music to the secret,
which is a really quite beautiful musical. This ran, frankly, seven hundred nine performances on Broadway any early Ninetys and one of the numbers
then the singer things then Rebecca LUCA. She she's she's things come to my garden from zero garden, the story, the secret, aren't. If you don't know, I is little girl whose parents die she's adopted by her uncle and her uncle is his wife died. He had a child with his wife who is a cripple and who is
guy believe, apparently Jake a common and- and she has also locked she had a garden on this estate and the husband has locked away this garden because after she died, never want to see it again. It was kind of their special place. He locked away. I added to discover if this little girl of this garden and she brings the
cripple child to the garden, and then the musical is quite beautiful. This is this number is the ghost of the wife and mother singing to the son, who has who is paraplegic and, of course, miracles happen and then the Broadway show, but here's this most beautiful song from the shop
it is really easy to musical, and it's you bad that had never met the sort of a claim that it should have. It says its wreck, lugers, naming, etc in just historically gorgeous voice, so check out the secret guarding the Broadway cast recording virtually anywhere, and it is what what this man Potemkin plays. The plays the father and he's quite good knit, although he is very mandate, thinking is preventing putting up check, check that out. Ok, other things that ok other things that I, like it
Joe Scarborough versus TED Crusoe. Yesterday, Scarborough had on crews on MSNBC and things got things how pretty wild scar,
when, after crews Undines improver right back at him, every American doesn't have a constitutional second amendment right to carry. They are fifteen. Let me stress that
not going to debate of eight that the core of all. We must not forget that ports have assessed and they haven't that's not what a denial is. Certainly I don't need you to lecture me on what the Supreme Court does and what it does to veer is
a constitutional right- and you know it- and you can talk down to me- all you want to
but you know there is not a constitutional is talking to her. If you want to start violent crime, this debate is dancing on the head of a pin ugly, but here's what I might often I may agree with senator
leans yeah Scarborough training, browbeat crews. He doesn't unilateral constitutional, our tent crews litigated before the Supreme Court dozens of times- and he knows constitutional- I hell of a lot better than Jos Scar,
does. It is amazing that Egypt, Scarborough, who once had an aid from the unavailing when in Congress flip completely inherited gun control,
because on warnings, of course, but crews did did a pretty good job with with Scarborough. He should have gone back hardware Scarborough, I think, but that's because I have a different debating style than others:
other things that other things- and I like. I think this is a worthwhile thing that happened last night on cable tv, which is a rare thing to say the the token Karlsson got into a big debate with John Bolton, John Bolton. I is rumoured to be up for national security adviser if HR mcmasters should step down inside the White House
Tucker as he a suddenly isolationist view of foreign policy that I dont remember him having quite ass. Much during the Bush administration Bolton isn't,
both MRS Morgan, interventionist and Bolton tries to educate Karlsson on foreign policy? I am avi simpleton side of this
made. It just said that IRAN is the single greatest threat to us into
that region. I think, you'll concede that Sudan was the greatest counterbalance to IRAN and they were empowered by his by his fall. So I think it's fair to say if you think, a run as the real threat that way
We have different that decision right now, because I think you're
Alice is a simple minded. Frankly, ok, the iranian thread, which stems from the resolution of nineteen. Seventy nine.
Was under way. Quite apart from what Saddam Hussein was doing, the Iranians have been trying to get nuclear weapons for twenty five years.
Think this made IRAN stronger. I think it made in the fall of Sudan. No did not make IRAN stronger. What made IRAN stronger ultimately was. The withdrawal of american forces into
No love show, if you I mean I'm not seeing. The only person
Secondly, one percent I've met. Who thinks that it is not true. I mean that there are a lot of people who think that the fall of Saddam Hussein did not necessarily make IRAN stronger if we stay and if we had stabilized Iraq as a counterbalance to IRAN. So I understand tuckers boy,
is that Iraq under Saddam Hussein was Anti IRAN. It is also true that Iraq was participating,
terrorist activity that they threaten their neighbours that Saddam Hussein was clearly proclaiming that whose pursuing weapons of mass destruction re all of that is is clearly true.
This is a worthwhile going go back and watch the entire debate. If you have a chance between China Bolton and took the council, which I think is intelligent and useful. Actually, although Tucker does,
a bit snarking at the end, which is something I'm not fully oppression above in that sort of discussion. Ok time for a quick thing that I hate, ok
who could things that I hate so? First of all, a genuinely is the governor of Connecticut called the energy a terrorist organisation. This is just a noxious on every level click for so what's, let's watch the governor of a state actually suggests that a domestic lobbying group is equivalent tall Qaeda they and our aid, as it exists
Today is a far cry from the and our re that nineteen. Ninety nine said, teachers shouldn't be shouldn't, carry weapons in schools,
or between in the nineties, also said that we should have universal background checks. They have in essence become a terrorist organisation is absurd.
Certain somebody, honest, arresting members. The energy is this kind of language and ensures that were never can be able to move forward on anything.
We resembling a debate about crime and violent crime in the United States gather things that aids of theirs
thing that's come into fashion now, and it is corporate virtue, signalling you wanna get ashore
headline. All you have to do is virtue signal that left, so Mcdonald's yesterday decided to flip its golden arches in order to celebrate women everywhere. So too,
the M and turn it into a w? A quick way to get a headline. Amazing is tat people
the left are perfectly willing to grant that headline to a major corporation. Like me,
which every other day of the week they are ripping as a low wage employer, but I'll have to split that amendment,
will you like for Warrior
Maria and suddenly everything changes and we are supposed to pretend Mcdonalds
Zog is I halcyon, and in a beacon of light in the darkness, is amazed.
How easily these corporations played the left and amazing how easily the left allows itself to be played by these corporations.
They. Normally they hate me one put out of business. Ok, so we'll be back here tomorrow, fora for much more and I will
their minds that there is no representing mailbag tomorrow, yeah said Santa subscribed, lower daily, wearing check that out taking the bar of the male back. I've been Shapiro this adventure Barroso.
The bench of Euro shows produced by math, is whether executive producer, Jeremy boring senior producer. Jonathan, hey our technical producers, often Stevens edited by outing Arrow audio books by like a core meta heron make up his by just while there are
Transcript generated on 2020-03-27.