Barack Obama warns Democrats if they move too far, left they'll lose, but will they listen, plus Eric Swalwell denies it, but did he supply it and Ben Shapiro? This is the bench show the Ben show is sponsored by expressive. Vpn stand up for your digital rights visit Express' VPN com, Slash bend! Ok, so we begin today with the most important story: that's happened in America since he didn't kill himself, and that, of course, is the great quest. Of the day weather congressman Eric Swalwell former presidential candidate, whose whose candidacy didn't last really as long as a fart in the wind, whether he actually blew a large gasser

on national tv lesson. I know it's not an important story. I know it's not an important story, but hey. If we can have fun with this, then what can we have fun with? So that's, not gonna Miss NBC appearing on Hardball Chris Matthews is Matthews RD in the studio except next wall about impeachment in the middle is talk. X was cited page rent, a sudden, read my ear, something wild happening. Xy will go uncontradicted that the president used taxpayer dollars to ask the Ukrainians to help him cheat and elect Okay, come on. If you can't left a fart joke, what can you laugh at now? Msnbc did claim he denied it. He did it swell denied it. Did you supply it? I think the rule speak for themselves. You can see the the fear in his eyes, as this contradicted that the president used taxpayer dollars to ask the Ukrainians to help him cheat an election right. Then there's a mild pause in any case. I'm am I a fart truth, or I don't know

in any case here. It's well well denies that he did this. Chris Matthews also denied it he said wasn't. May I hey there I mean come on. You think I care I just it as it was me am I right about here. I don't hide the ball. It is made blowing on national tv. You think I I'd hide that not brag about it. I don't have the best Hi Msnbc the best place for gas on national debate. The idea that that late tell them hardball actually claimed that it was that actually claim that it was Chris Matthews moving a mug moving a mug on his desk. That is what caused it and then they tried to sell the Hardball mug on that basis and as Josh Barro. The columnist said: I'm not sure that a fart Mug is actually your best pitch for people to buy. The mug in any case, is does any of this matter. No, but listen guys if we can't take a break from politics for just a second and come together around a

question of even Alyssa Milano is mono, and I disagree on everything. But again there are certain sim. Joys in life that bring us back to our childhood and a solid, far joke on National tv. I think Does it ok in a second we're going to actual important news, but first, let's talk about how you can be supplied with the greatest steaks on this planet, season. Omaha steaks is sharing an amazing, limited time offer with my listeners to get a jump on your holiday shopping. You know, the dudes in your life are looking for they're looking for fantastic, meets as the holidays approach, so head on over to Omaha steaks dot com enter the code Shapiro in the search bar and order the favorite gift pack It gives anyone who loves steak will love for only six thousand nine hundred and ninety nine order now and you'll get forty six oz, Bacon, wrapped Filet Mignon's for premium pork chops for Omaha Steak, burgers for perfectly brown potatoes algozzine for made from scratch care

well Tartlets in Omaha Steaks signature, seasoning packet, plus only for my listeners, a free six piece cutlery set an cutting board, which is an awesome gift, set, have a lot of friends may not be keeping the culture and they love these steaks right. Bacon, wrapped filet mignon diaper bacon is incredible by the way certain things Judy let me take him on man wish. In any case, this is good stuff If, if somebody sent you in the mail, wouldn't you love it? All this delicious food, plus the free cutlery set they'll, enjoy for years to come from C Six thousand nine hundred and ninety nine Omaha Steaks is a fifth generation family owned company over one hundred years of expertise in delivering perfectly age beef hand cut by master butchers in the Heartland of America again order. Now you get the favorite gift package, plus the free six piece cut. Set and cutting board. Only six thousand nine hundred and ninety nine just head on over to omahasteaks dot com type Shapiro in the search bar for the special deal. Don't wait. The offer ends soon or the favorite gift package day in advance of Thanksgiving and Christmas,

it will be awesome, everyone will appreciate it, but Omaha steaks, common type, o in the search bar and then after you get somebody to get package, then ask them to invite you over. So you can share the meat, come on againomahasteaks dot, com type o in the search bar. Ok, so in actual news, the big question for Democrats going into two thousand and twenty is just how radical can they be and there's something remedy. Actually about two thousand and eight here slightly in two thousand and eight, the please talk about whether Barack Obama was too radical to be the nominee now Obama really hit it. Obama didn't proclaim He was quite as radical as he ended up being. He didn't talk nationalized healthcare quite as much early on in the campaign. He sort of proposed that he was a moderate who is going to be used in the red states are going to get together. We're all the same and then, of course, he ended up being a fairly radical left president, but there are some controversy over whether he was too far to the left, because I'll he's running against Hillary Clinton, who widely perceived as more moderate and I'm kind of party, said. No

we're going to go with a more radical guy and then, of course, Obama ends up being sort of once in a generation candidate and went to a sweeping victory over he will now Barack Obama is warning the Democrats that they are too far left. No. When Barack Obama is warning, you that you are too far left okay, Stalin Morning, Trotsky, that he not in line, because the fact is that Barack Obama is not is not stolen, but the point is that Barack Obama is in in fact a far left guy and when he is warning the Democrats that they are so far over the rails, that Donald Trump is going to win reelection. You might think that the Democrats would take a hint but they're, not some far left is very angry. At Obama, they've been using the hashtag too far left sniping at Obama. Obama told but Democrats Democrat donors at a dinner event on Friday evening call even as we push the envelope and we are both in our vision. We also have to be rooted. In reality, the average American doesn't think we have to completely tear down the system and remake it. And that's obviously him sort of slapping Elizabeth Warren and Bernie,

she says, I don't think we should be deluded into thinking that there is since to certain approaches to things, is simply because voters haven't heard of bold enough proposal and if they hear something as both possible. Then immediately that's going to activate them, and this, of course, is because in the swing states, the fact is that the majority of voters are not in favor of Medicare for all Elizabeth Warren answer. Proposals have been exposed to the light of day has been dropping in the polls. Pretty significantly again. The betting odds on Elizabeth Warren have dropped dramatically over the past few weeks in the middle of October she's a better than fifty percent should better than fifty percent in the odds to take the nomination? now she's all the way down at twenty nine percent, in the odds with Biden at twenty four percent and People I get nineteen percent and the fact is the right now. Elizabeth Warren is only leading in one state New Hampshire, which happens to be next door to her home state of Massachusetts. At the blue Ridge is in the lead in Iowa. Worn is running second, maybe Third, depending on where you put Biden in those poll numbers in New Hampshire WAR is running. Biden is running second, and

and all the other states Biden is cleaning so list of war, has been dropping like a stone to Brock. A mom is correct about all of this, and the proof is in the pudding right, even as the Democrats claim that they want to move, Far to the left, the ones who are actually winning are the ones who are mod. ROM Emanuel, who is the mayor of Chicago reminiscent he was, he was a bomb as chief of staff. This is not a person who is a moderate, Rahm Emmanuel is warning. Democrats guys you are, you are way off the rails. Here has a piece in the Washington Post today called if they're not true to their history. That's squandering a rare opportunity, says credit where credit is due Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders has done a masterful job, baiting the rest of the field into fighting this campaign on their turf. Many voters never typically resumed. Today, the redistribution of wealth is the Democratic Party's animating creed, but that's simply not true to history. Since the new deal, Democrats thrive. When championing ideas more in the belief that rights come with responsibilities and benefits are earned through work which actually sounds a lot more like a Republican create the democratic grade. He says we fail.

Return to that agenda ahead of the twenty twenty election. We risk squandering a rare opportunity. Fortunately, we now have a chance to shift that narrative he says amid all the talk about programs designed to redistribute America's wealth, the phrase glaringly absent from the twenty twenty campaign to this point is inclusive growth with former Massachusetts, Governor Deval, entering the race last week and former New York mayor, Michael Bloomberg, emerging is another late entrant we can begin to have now is primary in earnest worst hunger is a party when we debate substantive proposals for how to expand prosperity and opportunity, but to meet the far left. Ideas, traditional liberals need to show with bold ideas of their own. I'm a manual says. Admittedly, I've been critical of those trying to steer the Democratic Party further to the left, I think Medicare for all the pipe dream. So I support efforts to expand coverage in control cost and much as I agree, the concentrated powers threat to american prosperity. I believe a universal basic income runs counter to America's deep seated belief that people should earn their living by working hard and playing by the rules as power We have flowed away from the working and middle classes, a change driven as much by technology

again, globalization is Bierig system government has two free. We turn the other cheek. Since we have consensus on the nature of the problem. The question, then, is how to level the playing field. You'll, says traditional liberals need to begin offering their own bold ideas for three principal reasons: the first and most important centers on history, Franklin, Roosevelt's new deal kind of Kennedy's new Frontier Bill Clinton. You covenant and Barack Obama's belief that quote: there's not a liberal in America and a conservative America there's the United States of America. All appeal to voters by tapping into the nation's firmly established belief that people should earn their prosperity through hard work. Social, Already american handouts there financed by what workers paid through a payroll tax that bill in Americorps. Both both often both offer tuition assistance in return. National services, as Rahm the earned income tax, is designed to boost families working their way out of poverty, and then he talks about the fact that when they win elections, it's because they have

moved along. The lines of work deserves better pay, not a long lines of tearing down. Well. This is what our party has nominated candidates: bang, the drum free distribution like George Mcgovern, Governor Walter Mondale, we lost, hopefully, bids from Bloomberg and Patrick will serve as a wake up. Call many points out that these policies are also bound to fail. He says big ideas aren't necessarily good, and that is a slap at Warren and Sanders. He says with any luck, Bloomberg and Patrick will spur traditional liberals to reanimate the democratic creed, centered on work, responsibility, prosperity and equal access to opportunity if the new content is there a new wave of progressive thinking. Well now prevail next November, but for years to come, but will those ideas prevail. Will those ideas prevail because the Democratic Party fringing itself, I mean that's that what is happening in real time, the Democratic party fringing itself and Second, I will show you how the Democratic Party is taking victories and turning into defeat, because of their own allegiance to radical ideas we'll get to that in just one. Second. First: let's talk about the fact that there's a good shot, Dude

that if you have hair loss in your family, you will lose your hair as well. Two out of three dudes will experience some form of male pattern baldness by the time they are, Thirty five, which is bad news for me, I'm The good news with today's advancements in science keeps offers proven treatments that can combat the symptoms. Hair loss and help you keep the hair? You have at half the cost of your local pharmacy. This thing once you start losing significant amounts of hair, usually ain't coming back, so you really should work to stop the hair loss right now you don't have to go broke to avoid going bald keeps offers generic versions of the only two FDA approved hair loss products out there. Some of you may have tried them before you probably never done so, for this price plus keeps now offers a prescription shampoo to keep your scalp healthy as well. Prevention is key and keeps treatments really do ninety percent effective at reducing and stopping further hair loss, start using keeps the more hair going to say so. Act fast find out. Why keeps has more five star reviews than any of its combat

In early one hundred thousand men trust keeps for their loss prevention, medication. The treatment such just ten bucks a month plus for a limited time, get your first month for free, it's ready to take action, but it keeps dot com, slash bad, receive your first month of treatment for free that is k, e p s, dot com, slash span, keeps dot com, Slash Span, you don't do this in five years ago. Look around your ball, don't gonna be reflecting mirror going to regret that you didn't call. It keeps check him out right now it keeps com bank dot com Okay. So, as I say, the Democratic Party, despite the advice of rock Obama and rum manual, they're moving in radical directions. According to the New York Times the democratic attorneys general group. Has now decided that they will not endorse any candidate for a state attorney general across the country unless explicitly endorse abortion on demand, which is full scale insanity. The fact is that if Democrats want to win in purple area what they shouldn't do is embrace their more radical side That is what they're doing according to the New York Times,

sociation of democratic state, attorneys general will become the first National Party need to impose an explicit abortion litmus test on its candidates. On Monday, then it to anyone who does not support reproductive rights and expanding access to abortion services to win. Financial and strategic backing from the group candidates will be required to make a public statement declaring their support of abortion rights, so it's an actual full on litmus test. The democratic attorneys General Association asian candidates and helps their campaigns with financial support data analysis. A aging and policy positions. The decision. Is series of state legislatures have approved restrictive laws designed to provoke a new legal battle over abortion rights with the aim to reach Us Supreme Court and temporal verses white. Let's issue James, the New York AG by the way is an awful ag. I pointed out when she was elected, that she said the she was going after Trump, which, by the way is not the wages, are supposed to work. It's not identified person I wish to target, and then I and then I find a crime. It's I've identify a crime, and then I go after the criminal

but she says, attorneys general are on the front lines with the fight for reproductive freedom. They have the power to protect your right but it is important note here at the same Democratic Party, the claim attorney general, William Barr, a political hack, is openly calling for attorney general to be political hacks, because actually seen attorney general, like Kamala Harris across the country, simply refuse. To defend the laws of their state and the insane Supreme Court has decided that if he stated Irving General refuses to then the law of a state, the state no longer has standing to sue for the lobbying of help. This actually happened in the proposition eight case in California, where the California public voted overwhelmingly to protect traditional marriage in state constitution that was that was elevated to the Supreme Court, Senator Kamala, as an attorney general of the State of California. She refused to defend proposition, eight in court, saying that you could not in good conscience, do so, but you also wouldn't resign right, just wouldn't defend it, and then the ninth Circuit said well, since your state AG is not defending the law

the state of California does not have the standing to sue for the defense of its line, court, which is fully insane. I mean it basically gives veto power on any law to a state AG. I mean that's That's the height of illegality. The Democrats treat the law as a as a standard to be tossed or adhered to, a political whim. Well now, as I say, the Democrats AG group there's things grown people were not going to back you unless you back portions man, the new standard is unlikely to have an immediate impact on incumbents. According to the New York Times of twenty seven Democrat AG is currently in office. Just one Jim have Mississippi describes himself as a pro life democrat, but officials believe it could have a ripple effect throughout the democratic go to system reflecting the changing mores of a national party that is moved sharply to the left in the Trump era and embrace to set of purity tests on divisive social issues attorney General Ellen Rosenblum of Oregon. She said: state attorney generals are now on. The map is taking the lead when it comes to democratic values. It should scare the hell out of anybody. I thought the AG's job was enforce the law not to enforce democratic,

these are not the law she says we are going to be the ones right out in front. Hopefully other committees will follow right along then miss test does worry some Democrats who fear it could hurt their party in rural areas and more moderate, suburban districts and one Democrats, control of the House last fall. There are forty districts, the Democrats, one that were in very close toss up trump or very slightly Hillary, districts in the last election cycle, former senator Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota, who served two terms as per state AG described it. Is wrong headed she lost her seat representing her red after voting against the confirmation of Justice Brett Kavanaugh last year, and she points out. Correctly. The governor John Bel Edwards of Louisiana just won reelection, on Saturday, after campaigning on his opposition to abortion and supporting a state law barring abortion, after the pulsing of what becomes the fetuses heart can be detected in other words, in Louisiana. If you want to be a democratic elected, then probably you shouldn't be radically pro choice. The Democrats,

embracing the politics of a in the land of Donald Trump, which makes no sense at all, politically speaking, hi DE says the they're. Very. People who are Democrats who feel very strongly about this issue for religious reasons when you say you're not welcome in our party, I think it's cool exclusionary. You have to look at the totality of the candidates battle evil and I can't describe that is incorrect. There, many people, I would say the vast majority of people who are pro life or not pro life for religious reasons, they're, not pro life because of the book of Psalms. They are pro life because the science suggests a human life begins at conception. In any case, the democratic Attorney General Association is is now forcing this litmus test down the throats of their own people, which is full scale, political insanity, especially and given what just happened in Louisiana. As Charles Kamose. He writes all first things: Democrat John Bell: Edwards dramatic please send Medicaid and State yes, but he also signed a bill banning abortion after a heartbeat can be detected that

but he managed to win the governorship of a deep red state in which the president has a plus twelve approval rating. Ask most points out. Simply put Bel Edwards never could have one in such a state if you are not pro life history, values in this area reflect both his deep commitment to Catholicism and the view is Louisiana. Voters, especially democratic voters of color, in the run up to the election, both racial justice activist organization. In Edwards is campaign itself made a dramatic increase in african american voter turn out a major priority and with good results. Voters of colors put Edwards over, especially when it came to early voting, interesting to note has come what white, progressive, highly educated democrats. Think of all this, after all, they've, been primarily responsible for the party, turn the kind of abortion extremism I'm doomed in Orthodox Democrat in a race like this. One, mother Jones ran a piece a few days before the election with the headline. Is there still room for an anti abortion liner in the Democratic Party, the answer in the Party platform, which claims that abortion should be unrestricted, that should be paid for by pro lifers tax dollars and that it

score. Two women's men's and young people's health and well being is obviously the negative. No Democrats will support valid words when it comes to defeating Donald Trump. But the fact is that Democrats who violate This sort of radical left had become the enemy inside the Democratic Party, which is a very bad move for them. I mean the fact is that Tulsi Gabbert has suggested that abortion ought to be safe, legal and rare engines blasted by the people, party, it's foolishness, I mean it's real, foolishness and you're starting to see this break out into the democratic primary as the more moderate candidates are ripped up and down for the great sin: not being radically to the left and is the Leftist candidates signified to the voters that they are more peer now we'll primary voters by it. I'm not so sure I am not so sure we'll get to more of this in just one. Second. First, let's talk about the fact in the time

a brick house. You sometimes are going to need to invest some of your money in a diversified asset that is not subject to the whims of centralized governments yeah well. The problem is that, if you're investing in Curran, is the fact is: the government can manipulate the currency and value of your investment, then goes up and down with the value of the of China. Governments are the american government. So, for example, last week China devalued its currencies in the markets tanked one consequences that Bitcoin prices rose. Why? Because bit is basically digital gold effectively. What Bitcoin is is it is. Eight an asset that you invest in and it not as though you receive a piece of golden mail or something. Instead, what it is digital asset whose value who is assigned by the market itself and there's blockchain, which prevents anybody from hacking it or inflating the currency and you're not going to a government, it is inflating the currency in order to have its debts or anything it is you investing in a currency that is not manipulable by central government, which is why central governments had such a problem with Bitcoin, which is one of the reasons you might think about investing in Bitcoin? Well, if you're interested, then you should think about

messing with the Toro it smart, crypto trading, made easy Toro Social Trading platform has over eleven million traders and facilitates over one trillion, but in trading volume per year. Globally, you can access the world best. Crypto currencies got fifteen different coins available. You can try before you, trade, with a virtual port with one hundred thousand dollar budget, never miss a trading trend with charts and pricing alert sign up today at each world, dot com, Slash Shapiro, that's e d, o r, o dot com, slash zero, each for a dot com. Slash bill give a try and they have that ability. Need to test out your investment expertise before you put on your own money and check them out of each horrible com Shapiro. So, as I say, the gap between the so called model and the radical leftist in the Democratic Party is now breaking out into the open so basic On the one side, you have Joe Biden people to judge and main Cory, Booker and on the other side you have people like who Castro Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, and the Democrats seem fairly split, almost right down the middle on this particular issue.

The reason the Joe Biden continues to be durable in the polls. The reason that he is never budge below around twenty thirty percent. The national polling data is because people in the Democratic Party understand, I think, a large chunk of them, understand that you push too far to the left of the american people are not up for this Joe Biden's case is basically I'm the only one the trump here's Joe Biden making that case yesterday, it's not going to be easy to beat him we're talking about. This is going to be this. A cake walk, he is, is going to have a billion dollars. He's gonna have an awful lot of the same kind of negative campaigns is run in the past and he is he's not going to be that easy to beat. So we better be careful about who we nominate as our candidate, because the risk of nominating someone who can't beat Donald Trump or doesn't beat. Donald Trump is a nation in the world. We don't want to leave to our kids, hey So buttons case is the only person who can be Trump is somebody who is not going to be a full scale crazy. The problem is the

spell craze in the Democratic Party are in control of but at least when it comes to social media, and many of the Democrats have hold them down. This raffle this is why you end up with the spectacle this morning of tea party trending on Twitter, so T party Turning on twitter now, thinking myself well, the tea party hasn't really been a term. That's been mentioned. For several years I mean the tea party basically went defunct as in terms of having events as of like two thousand and fourteen two thousand and fifteen, like it just kind of Stop being a thing. So why exactly was it raining well turns out? It was trending because way. Back in two thousand and eleven p booty judge spoke at a tea party event and rebooted judge said: hey guys, I'm also interested in the links between Wall Street and big government right, which is a perfectly plausible thing to say. Here's people to judge talking to the tea party in new on earth video, my friends and supporters of the exercise ask us. I suggest

I just remembered this often identified with tea party. There saw the specially my party for the tea Party is a wholly owned subsidiary of Republican Party but there are many others who believe that the tea party is motive environmental concerns about the direction of our government and the responsiveness of our government to citizens. And above all, of frustration with businesses unit. That is what motivated okay, so that was good judge when he was running for mayor in South Bend actually trying to appeal to people across dial by saying I'm not going to castigate tea. Partiers errors he's getting blasted for this today I mean just ripped up and down by the entire democratic left. How could he have ever treated people in the tea party as human beings? not the same thing. With Joe Biden when Joe Biden said yeah, I used to work across the aisle with my good friends like John Mccain and people. How dare you work with Mccain. He was a very bad man that side of the Democratic Party which side is going to win a seat for the good of the country. It's kind of funny as a conservative as a Republican, Donald Trump

has a better shot of winning if he runs again. Somebody like Elizabeth Warren before Bernie Sanders, then somebody by W Judge, because the more the sort of moderate Democrats are the better shot they have at winning. On the one hand, it's conservative, I'm rooting for the Democrats, nominate somebody like Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren, because I don't think that they will, I think they will survive the election. I think they load on impact, but at the same time, for the good of the country, I think much better. If the Democratic Party were reasonable party, I think that having two parties that are reasonable is a lot better Having one that is reasonable and one that is unreasonable, at least in terms of policy, so, on the one hand, I'm rooting for the Democrats to nominate the worst candidate, which would be somebody like Sanders or worn. On the other hand, I'm rooting for the demo so nominate. Somebody who actually signifies that the country has a shot of coming back together, because the more radical Democrats get the worse. It is for country, so that again in this whole thing is breaking out in the open who, in Castro, has been campaigning, is sort of made a light, as he he's run to the radical left. Also,

He slamming booty jiggling. What is he actually done? What have you actually done like seriously or secretary of housing and urban development, Guo Housing and urban development? Why is it real important gig over there? Here's who in caster, going after booty judge. I was mayor of a city that is fourteen times larger than South Bend in, so I've seen a lot when it comes to urban policy and not only that have a stronger track record, not only with the black community in San Antonio versus Mayor Budaj is his record with the black community in South Bend. I actually have a record of accomplishment of things that I can point to from the time that I was mayor. An HUD secretary unlike near but a judge that you never hear what did he actually do in office when he was there? And while he was mayor of San Antonio, huge, huge amazing, any he's not wrong. The booty judge doesn't have tons of experience, but the fact is what only capture is really take. It out is the fact that booty judges getting attention when

Castro is getting on. Meanwhile, Cory Booker is going Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders as well. He should he has a piece in the New York Times today called stop being dogmatic about public charter school, so we can't dismiss good ideas because they don't fit into neat ideological boxes or don't personally affect some of the louder more privileged voices in the party, which is him Saint Elizabeth warn. You are very wealthy. You are very wealthy and now you don't care bout charter, schools which is weird 'cause. He used to support them here is Cory Booker, blasting Elizabeth Warren. He says about fifteen years ago, when I was living in brick towers. Now high rise at low income, housing community in Newark, Central Ward, a neighbor stop and told me about how her public her child's public school was failing at students, like many others in our area at the time desperate she asked if I knew a way to help get her child into a private school. She knew is all parents do that. A great education was her child's primary pathway to a better life, and he talks about how his parents got him, into a better school. Just parents and struggling communities across the country are going to extraordinary lengths to try to get their children, integrate public schools

Even a trend of children's guardians using fake addresses to enroll them in better schools in nearby neighborhoods or towns. Living in fear of hired investigators who follow children. Home to verify their addresses is is is largely up to Democrats. He read some. Lukens and says for some reason the Republicans are are making the problem worse, which of course, is untrue. The book is. The Democrats, of course, is gonna lie about that. He says that the Democrats, especially those of us in this presidential primary race, to have a better discussion about practical k through twelve solutions to ensure that every child in our country go to a great public school. That discussion needs to include high achieving public charter schools and local communities call for them, because many public charter schools have proven to be an effective, targeted tool to give children with you other options, a chance to succeed, He points out that when he was mayor of Newark, they invested in both traditional public schools and high performing public charter schools and the city Graduation rate rose to seventy seven percent in twenty eighteen from fifty percent a decade ago. Today he says: Newark is ranked number one city in America for beat the odds, high poverty, high performing schools by the on reinventing public

education. This is by the way, the one good thing that Cory Booker did as mayor of Newark. It is the one interesting thing in, affected his waited until now to run on it, is pretty amazing and demonstrative of just how far the democratic Party fell down the rabbit hole here, because the fact is that a book had campaign from the outset on charter schools. Be doing much better in these primaries. You really what, because again his record as mayor of Newark was much more suggested of sort of by next bipartisan It was a Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren. Now, in second, we're going get to Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, but suffice it to say that these sort of sub tweeting of Sanders and Warren is now an on going thing it's an on thing. It should be an on thing inside the Democratic Party. I think it's a good thing for the country that it's an ongoing thing for the Democratic Party will get some more of the war. Inside the Democratic party. Should they move moderate, or should they skewed to the radical left in just one? Second, first: let's talk

saving you time and money during the holiday season, so you're going to be sending lots of gifts. We all know this, and when you do this, this means you have to take all that stuff. Gotta slip it over to the post office. You gotta slap, some stamps on it. Wait in line. Listen post office is great great services, but why not do all that stuff from home and not show up all the stuff in the car? Instead, you stamps com stamps com brings all the services of the US postal service direct to your computer, when you're a small office sending invoices an online seller, shipping out products or even a warehouse and thousands of packages today stamps can handle it all with ease, simply use your computer to print official US postage. Twenty four slash, seven for any letter, any package any class of male anywhere, you want to send it once your mail is ready just hand it to you carrier or drop it in the mailbox. It is indeed that simple with stamps com, yet five cents off every first class stamp up to forty percent off priority mail. So what the heck are you waiting for we use stamps dot com here at the Daily Weather Office, I use it at home as well. You should so it's very easy. They make it very simple

don't spend a minute of your holiday season at the Post office this year sign up for stamps com, instead no risk with my promo code Shapiro and get that special offer includes a four week. Trial plus free Did you end the digital scale, which is a heck of an offer? No long term commitments are contracts using that code money and boarding the show as well go to stamps dot. Com click on the microphone at the top of the homepage, page type, Shapiro that stamps dot com enter code, Shapiro stamps dot com, never go to the Office again, okay, in just one second, will get to the rest of the democratic break. John Sanders in one continuing disputes left warrant yeah. She she was running as a person with one foot in in either camp and sort of moderate camp in the radical camp, not anymore. Both feet are in.

The radical camp and in honor of the whole area cell phone by Elizabeth Warren tweeting that she is selling billionaire tears mugs on a website that actually benefits the billionaire. We now have a brand new offer for you. We do our brand new offer is that if you go over to daily wire com right now, what you will receive is a special twenty percent off on our all access, as twenty percent off I mean that is a great offer, an insider subscriptions when you use the promo code more in tears, because, obviously this doesn't when we say that this this tumble right here is going to be leftist ears. Those are with more in very salty tears, plus with insider nl access. You get the incredible leftist ears, hot or cold tumblr, which is the original the best not billionaire tears. First of all, there's not that many billionaires, even if you get there tears, is it really going to replenish? You left it steers, however punishing each and every day today is the last day to so again, this promo code, Warren tears for twenty percent off on your subscription

join the fight over a dailywire dot com, where the largest fastest growing conservative, podcast and radio show in the nation already so Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren continued. Meanwhile, to skew to the left article in the Wall Street Journal talking about Bernie Sanders is brokerage tax, so The fact is that Bernie Sanders he has a proposal for financial transaction tax. It is going to dramatically lower your ability to invest in the market. In fact, european countries that have tried to a fifty point basis, tax and equity trades they've had to cancel that tax, because it's so bad for the markets, Sweden repealed it because all of their trading volume. At migrated to London, we tried the the sort of tax in nineteen fourteen, but was scrapped in nineteen sixty five, because it was producing

little revenue and lower growth, and, according to Georgetown economist James Angle, the tax could reduce retirement savings by as much as eight point five percent over a typical workers lifetime. A Bernie Sanders is pushing it anyway, which is exactly what you would expect me, Elizabeth Warren continues to be a massive hypocrites, well she's, ripping on rich people. She is twelve million dollars it turns out that her his allies were very. Very rich are maintained campaign titles as Warren's finance cultures, this to be Paul eager and activist Shanti fry political dot, com reporting that even as war, has shared links to the democratic donor class frying Egerman according donors in the northeast by organizing trips hosting events in acting as conduits for information about the campaign she going to raise money, you know she will for outside sources did you send money. Also, the Dnc

but as much money as it once and just because her campaign for swears, big donors does not mean the big dollars can go over to the Dnc, which then spends on behalf of Liz before, of course, it's all a scam political is noting, as they say, their efforts highlight how some of the donors, especially progresses in a Boston based, have continued to embrace Warren and they are planning on giving her a lot a lot of money. Apparently these two, these two very, very rich people, eager Manaan fry, continue to fly around the country trying to raise money for her Steve former chairman of the Dnc, says they're playing Non traditional role. He says rolling up their sleeves and they're doing it That doesn't mean they're, not asking people for substantial contributions. It said adding that his wife, Barbara donated two thousand eight hundred bucks to Warren after request from fry or campaign declined to answer questions from political about whether the campaign it paid for any travel for even a fry or for the donors on trips to the finance cultures, have organized early voting states, another war events. So again,

if, if Warren becomes the democratic nominee going, political friends and allies expect, even if right, to work to corral donors to write big checks to the Dnc and how warm fundraise for other campaigns and state parties, all of which the campaign has said she would do in a general election. So a lot of this is hip hop no morning Xander's penned a letter, gather just today too under, score. Their socialist bona fide he's ripping and private equity, they did so in the most dishonest possible way, which is not a great shock they're, both ripping into a study that just came out from Ernst and Young released in partnership with the american investment counsel, which is a trade group for the private equity industry. The report was, was prepared as response to private equity legislation pushed by Warren Center's gonna stop Wall Street Looting ACT of twenty nineteen, which should tell you everything you You know about the act, let's just

Asian is designed to basically tax private equity and what the report said is guys. Private equity is supporting a lot of jobs in this country, because private equity does a couple of things. Some people think private equity is all sort of leveraged buyouts of companies that are falling down on the job and then selling off, all of their assets. They think it's the Movie Wall Street, in other words. Well, that's not really all that private she's doing private equity is giving loans to start up companies. Private equity is investing in company is that need investment and, yes, private equity is taking over unprofitable companies, cutting the fat and re. In those companies or selling off the assets. If those companies are no longer able to support the workers or compete, in the global industry, but the idea that without private there will be more jobs rather than fewer jobs. Purely asinine, yes, private equity does engage much Joseph Shomper called creative destruction. There's no question that private equity will buy a business, at bargain basement price and then sell off the assets if the business is no longer operating fully. But that does not mean that the business would continue to operate in LAS forever. It would just declare

grassy and in many cases, wouldn't even be able to restructure. So this report from Ernst and young in the American Investment Council. Estimates that us private Center, provides employment and earnings. For eight point, eight million workers six hundred billion dollars in wages and benefits, because the private equity sector is supporting all these people with their investments? Obviously,. This is the average private equity sector worker earned approximately the one thousand dollars in wages and benefits in two thousand eighteen. So This is really funny. Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders are very upset with this study. They say well, why are you, the average salary I mean that includes people who are in private equity gold yes and also the line worker over at Sears. So why are you averaging out the salary? I don't know the same reason average out the salaries of women and men, and then pretend that women earn less than men on a permanent basis hit. The fact is that, if you want to make the case that there is then it's economic inequality in the american economy. That, of course, is true, but that does not change the fact that if you are talk, about generating more jobs and better jobs that is going.

Require investment from somewhere in the government doing it. Nor does the government qualified to do it. Ernst and Young also point out that the us? Private equity sector directly generated one point: one trillion dollars of value added in the United, Madden in twenty eighteen value added measures, a sectors or industries contribution to the production of final goods and services produced in the US or us gross domestic product, US private equity sector's value, added added, a compromise to prod comprised approximately five percent of Us Gdp in two thousand eighteen, so fairly, significant, obviously also the US private equity sector generates tax, revenue through s, private equity firms, private equity, backed companies and its employees in two thousand and eighteen. According to this report, yes, private equity sector, eight hundred seventy four billion dollars of federal state and local taxes, but, according to Elizabeth Warren, all of the private equity sector is very bad and basically should be put out of business. Why? Because they point out that some private equity deals end with the closing of

which of course is true, but a private equity were doing it. You know what happened to those businesses they would go bankrupt. Obviously I mean it in the in the the issue Elizabeth Warren, as well as illustrious economic names like Ayanna, Presley and Bernie Sanders, and what she did to Lieb right. People signed this ten page letter talking about how terrible private equity is and the letter. Makes. No sense. I mean letter talks about how, if you compare companies that are invested in by private equity with companies that are not invest by private equity, the companies that are not invested in by private equity very often do better. Yes, because why do you think private equity gets involved in a business? You think that they're going to buy into a successful business. Why would anybody sell the successful business private equity gets involve very often when a company is already failing, but again it's for the left in the United States. Right now, for the hard it is about punishing success and punishing people who are perceived as successful right. This is why Elizabeth Warren is selling billionaire tears mugs. That's why

proceeds billionaires as the ideological enemy. Now I perceive the hard left is the idea logical and that's why we left his tears right, not liberal tears left his liberals. People who disagree with me on economics disagree in social policy leftists are people who want to shut down debate by pretending that mainstream conservatism is outside the Overton Window as very different thing. I Receives billionaires themselves to be the enemy, which is why she is selling billionaire tears. Mugs is very obvious what she is doing, She just mirroring the same policy as Britain's Labour Party. The socialist Labour party over there they've been taking aim at quote unquote: obscene billionaires pledging Medical redistribution of wealth to cut the power of the Super rich and the the transnational radical left is on the rise. Ok, meanwhile, Major policy shift that should be celebrated the trump Inspiration has now announced that the the Ministration views. American policy on israeli settlements

as israeli settlements are not a violation of international law, and I was always absurd to suggest that israeli settlements are a violation of international law. Jews have been living in this area for literally thousands of years the the is national community had suggested was violation of the fourth Geneva Convention for used to settle in these secular areas, why? Because there's a provision in Fourth Geneva convention that says that you're not allowed to deport your population into occupied areas, but the population is being deported into occupied areas, Israel one that territory in a legitimate war with Jordan has offered the territory back to Jordan. By the way, Jordan has turned it down there never been a sovereign palestinian state. In that area, every offered to create one has been rejected by the Palestinians. And Jews have lived in this area for literally thousands of years thousands of years. So that is not the deportation of a foreign elation into a four area under the fourth Geneva Convention. That is it mystic population that has been living there continuously for

really thousands of years. A good for the Trump Administration Secretary of State, MIKE Pompeii, announced during a press briefing on Monday, according to range that read the daily wire at the Trump administration was reversing an Obamacare policy and now does not do Israel's settlements in the West Bank, in violation of international law. He says the Trump Administration, is reversing the Obama administration's approach toward israeli settlements. Use public statements on activities in the West Bank. I've been inconsistent over decades, which is true, he said in one thousand nine hundred and seventy eight. The Carter administration categorically concluded that Israel is english to Villien. Civilian settlements was inconsistent with international law. However, in nineteen eighty President Reagan disagree with that conclusion and stated he didn't believe the settlements were inherently illegal, which obviously, true, if you settle in EAST Jerusalem, why should that be illegal in any way hum? How said, subsequently, ministrations recognize that unrestrained settlement activity could be an obstacle to peace, but they wisely and prudently nice that dwelling on legal positions didn't advance peace. However, in December two thousand and sixteen at the end of the previous administration Secretary Kerry Change decades of this careful by pirates

approach by publicly reaffirming the supposed illegality of settlements which basically suggests that the Palestinians own, today is some area in the Gaza Strip outright without any which of course, not only really raise the prospects of terrorism right. It's not only a maze lied to suggest this is historic palestinian territory. It also raises the prospects of terrorism because now you're, claiming to any Jew living on that territory? is a violation of international law. So why shouldn't the Palestinians ethnically cleanse the Jews in this area on HALO, says I won. Emphasize several important considerations. First, we recognize israeli courts? Have the legal inclusions related to individual settlements, must depend on assessment of specific facts and circumstances on the ground. There for the US government is expressing no view on the legal status of any individual settlement. It says israeli court You confirm the legality of certain settlement activities and has concluded that there's going to be legally sustained. Second addressing or pre judging the status of the West Bank. That's for Israelis and Palestinians to negotiate

international law does not compel a particular outcome or create any legal obstacles when resolution has the conclusion. It will no longer recognize israeli settlements, as per se, inconsistent with international law is based on the unique fat history and circumstances presented by the staff. Civilian settlements in the West Bank our decision today does not prejudice or decide legal conclusions regarding situations in any other part of then, finally calling for the state Lumia civilian settlements. Can inconsistent with international law has not worked. It has not advance the cause of peace. The hard truth is, there will never be a judicial resolution to the conflict, which, of course, is true good for the Trump Administration for recognizing baseline reality on the ground. The Obama administration was attempting to force Israel to abandon these particular areas to the tender mercies of terrorists by the way by trying to claim

historic jewish living in these areas was somehow forbidden by international law. It was always garbage position, but for the Trump Administration for reversing it. Okay, now, finally, to the latest on impeachment get now I haven't, talked about and he's been good so far because, frankly, I don't think the testimony today matters very much, I think the only testimony that is probably going to matter is the testimony tomorrow, I Gordon someone who's the EU ambassador. None media are playing up the testimony of Lieutenant Colonel Venneman. The reason they're playing up this testimony because vim and shows well on TV, Alexander Ben National Security. Council official is a purple heart recipient. His heat divide today about his alarm at President Trump's request the Ukraine investigate his political opponents, but, as I have been saying for literally weeks here, there are many people on that call. Their perceptions of the call are utterly irrelevant to the question of whether a crime was committed, weather, impeachable, high crime or misdemeanor was committed at they have a perception about the call you know. Who else has a perception about to call you? I have a perception about the call we all have.

Option about the call, because it turns out we've all seen the memo, Slash transcript of the call. Then man himself suggested that the transcript is pretty good. Right is a full transcript, but it does signify what exact it was talked about. So why exactly? Are the Democrats calling them in calling men for the same reason and they will bill Taylor for the same reason that have been calling other is Maria VON image, because they're trying to create the image of the Trump Administration gone wild. So this is more of an electoral tactic than impeachment one they're, basically trying to make the case that Trump ought not be president because he has bad judge, but now you can make that case, but making that case in the context of an impeachment inquiry is pretty ridiculous one year out from the election, if you wanna make the case that Trump is unfit for the present, so we have these things called elections in the United States. You can make that case, you're going to get the chance to you make the case all along, but turning this into an inquiry on the basis of testimony people like them makes no sense. Now, if you want to bring forward people who have first hand knowledge that Trump was attempting to solicit a bribe from Ukraine,

for example. This is why someone's testimony tomorrow, manners 'cause. He actually talked to Trump, that's one thing, but propping up all of these third parties who had Perceptions of the call is utterly irrelevant, so really. This is all about optics right. We all know this is about optics. O Venneman is being brought forward for a couple of reasons: one because he has a long, storied history as a patriotic American too, because People on the right were foolish enough to attack in which is an idiotic proposition. You could've just said: listen. His perception is not of great consequence to the question of whether Trump committed a crime he's welcome to his perception. He's an american patriot, yeah, we're not you don't have to castigate him as a person in order to I agree with his perception of the circumstances, but a lot of people on the right were ripping independent personally suggesting it was all politically motivated and all the rest of this sort of stuff. So Venneman Intern has now taken up the baton of I'm. A victim ok, then that he is being victimized by by people on the right and Democrats, laying this to the help they do the same thing with Maria Manovich. On on Friday, I have an who says:

choose wrongly fired as ambassador. The case can certainly be the Jews were only fires ambassador, but that does not not criminally fire just bad policy right. She proclaimed that she was greatly intimidated by Donald Trump tweeting about which, of course, is selling. Well. Now women is eighty test of this morning, Anne in his testimony, he did a routine suggesting that he was in dire danger, significant risk now, maybe that's true. As a person, who's been the subject of the subject of many death threat, over the course of my career, I can say it is uncomfortable, but the Democrats are obviously playing this sort of thing. Because what they are attempting to suggest is that Trump is militarising Billion population against witnesses who don't like him so here, is lieutenant colonel them and send it telling his father you they came from the Soviet Union while serving

still standing on his child, saying dad I'll be fine, as I testified that that this is it's high drama, but has nothing to do with impeachment. I'm sitting here today in the? U S, capitol talking to our elected professionals. Talking to our elected officials, is proof that you made the right decision forty years ago to leave this union come here to the United States of America in search of a better life for our family. Do not worry, I will be define for telling the truth. Thank you again for your consideration I'll, be happy to answer your questions right so that last line there is basically people are threatening me. The president of the United States is threatening me and I'm. Any of your being brave now, listen. Can it be true that sure, but is the topic? Of course this is his is, and investment was definitely playing this up. I, during the testimony that one point, somebody called him Sterben men and he immediately corrected and said: no lieutenant colonel, because again the Democrats media them playing this whole. They did bill, Taylor Right, you served in Vietnam and you are american hero and as an

I can hear you don't like Trump. That's that's a lot of the game being played been doing a little bit of it for serving men. You testified in your deposition that you did not know the whistleblower a ranking member Excel Lieutenant Colonel Inman, please I live lieutenant colonel them and you testified in the deposition that you did not know through the whistleblower was, I do not know, okay. So then men then testified that he was concerned by the phone call and he didn't think it was proper to demand government investigate us citizens that testimony was contradicted by TIM Morrison, whose another official who's on the phone call. We see I said that he was not concerned that anything illegal was discussed on the phone call and also he disagreed with VIN men's characterization? Of the conversation then suggested that the term reason was used on the call Morrison says that he doesn't remember that term being used on the call, even VIN, acknowledged that

from his conversations in Ukraine, he didn't get the impression that the Ukrainians were feeling pressured by President Trump, particularly could've, been you testified that the President President Trump's request for a favor from press, is a lynskey would be considered as a demand. Two presidents olenski after this called. Did you ever hear from any Ukrainians, either in the United States or Ukraine about any pressure that they felt too do these investigations that President Trump demanded not that I can so you can't recall having any conversations with the Ukrainians where they were. They were expressing to him any consternation about what President Trump actually meant. So that's, really he testimony, but the Democrats are trying to make it to. The kid was testimony is his perception the phone call more broadly and that's the story of today's testimony,

people who be testifying today are basically going to testify as to their impressions on all of this and they're impressions are basically not particularly useful they're, not particularly useful, and so women testified. He said that one he told lawmakers that file character, attacks against public servants, testifying engagement inquiry were reprehensible and urged Americans to be better than the Kacian cowardly attacks. He was during his army, uniform and medals? While he did all of this? Obviously, he was basically subtweeting tweeting in all that and again, this is about the optics of electioneering. This. It has very little to do with the actual charges and hand. The other people who are scheduled to testify today are Kurt Volker, the former US special envoy to Ukraine, Jennifer Williams, an aide to Vice President MIKE Pence and former National Security Council. Russia expert TIM Morrison prepared testimony. Jennifer Williams said the drums

phone call was unusual because it involves a discussion of what appeared to be a domestic political matter. Williams then attacked by Trump on Twitter just days before her public appearance, from one after her on Sunday as never Trumper, who should quote work out a better presidential attack and he is yet from he's going after a lot of these witnesses. It's it's bad optics, it's foolish of trump because again this is directed toward elections Volker told makers in October. He didn't have any effort by Trump to press Ukraine to investigate Biden. He said that vice President Biden was never a topic of discussion, but other people have tried to claim that Bulger was one of the people working out ukrainian foreign policy then invoke have clashed for what occurred at previous meeting so we'll see. What vulgar has to say today, bottom line is that none of these people have first hand knowledge. What exactly it is that Trump the only person who really does Similarly, someone who's going to testify tomorrow and that's where all the big headlines are going to be already time for quick thing. I like and then a quick thing that I hate so things that I like today, as I say

Paul Johnson Kick really enjoy. His work is you are very fun short biography of modes are back in twenty thirteen. So if you're a fan of Mozart's music, then this does bust a few key myths about Mozart among them that Mozart was in irreligious philanderer. That is not true. He was a deeply religious guy. Also that Mozart was deeply troubled. Now, a lot of evidence to that effect also that his wife comes towns was was actually a a terrible wife was sort of frivolous right that the perception of her in I'm asked that obviously, is untrue as well. She's, actually a pretty good wife she experienced tragedy of losing a bunch of children. Very early on in their life is sick, a lot of their marriage, but she was she ensured that basically their finances were taken. Care of yeah that Mozart was perennially and dad and was thus panicked about money. That is not true either. The idea that he was from an clean out of his dad is not true, so, basically, all of the mess that you see in Amadeus, which, by the way, is one my favorite movies they're, really not true, I am not. Mozart- was a happy guy who compose music, great music, his entire

life was an expert on a variety of instruments really understood. The instruments was religious was in fact an idiot savant, the way that he is made out to be an Amadeus Mozart. Quite a brilliant fellow. If you read his letters, it's pretty obviously he was a very, very intelligent person, so it it's. It's really good it's! It's short I mean. So if you want to know kind of the key facts that Mozart's life plus some great discussion of his music check out Mozart alive by Paul Johnson, okay time for a quick thing that I hate already so this is exciting stuff. More canceling, more cancelling is necessary. So now the New York Times is going after get Paul Gaguine, which is very exciting zero. All galgen last I checked, has been dead for like one hundred and fifty years right I mean Paul. Gaguine died in one thousand nine hundred and three age. Fifty four and it wasn't like people haven't known that he was kind of a scumbag for a really long time. I mean he his personal life was a shambles. He treated people horribly but

I was not aware that we are now going to be in the business of going back into history and determining when people did bad stuff and then canceling, there's literally a piece in the New York Times called. Is it is it time gal when got canceled museums are reassessing the legacy of an artist who had sex with teenage girls, Call the polynesian people he painted savages. Okay, so that's bad stuff also is is are good with the I'm. I'm highly irritated by this notion that we can't separate the art from the artist in terms of appreciating now it may give you a better understanding of their motivations when they were painting to understand what they were thinking, but that does not change the actual art. It doesn't change the art itself right. If the art itself is good, then the art itself ought to be seen as good. It should not be. Based purely on the sort of deconstructionist narrative that people in the past did bad stuff. Therefore, we can't look at their art anymore. This is stupid. Is according to the New York Times. Is it time to stop looking at I win all together. That's the startling question

visitors here on the audio guide as they walked through the Gaguine Portraits exhibition at the National Gallery in London. The show which runs through focuses on goblins depictions of himself his friends and fellow artist. And if the children he fathered and young girls he lived with in Tahiti, a standout portrait in the exhibition is Cameron has many parents. It pictures, goggins teenage lover, holding a fan. The artist only entered into sexual relations with young girls, marrying two of them in fathering children read the Wall Text Gal go in and out exploited his position as a privileged westerner to make the most of sexual freedoms available to him. In other words, he's a douche bad, but everybody knows he's a douche bag. So I mean I'm fine with examining Paul gallons lie. That's fine I we should always understand, understand the dark side of history, but this attempt to quote unquote cancel a due to a hundred and twenty years after his death is fairly ridiculous. Is it not It would just appreciate the art for what it is understand that it came from a bad place, that this is a bad man and then all

I recognize that the art is interesting and has something to say if we're I'm going to get into the business of examining the sins of great or small of any who creates art. There's going to be a lot of. It turns out that a huge number of artists were horrible, horrible people, horrible people, as my friend Andrew Klavan, likes to say, talent falls on the smart and dumb on the on the good and the evil alike. But according to the New York Times, it's time to cancel Galgun born in Paris the Son of a radical Let's get one his early years in Peru before returning to France, he took a painting, is while working as a stockbroker a profession. Would soon give up, along with his wife and children, to make art full time he set sail for Tahiti ninety one searching for the exotic rounding had known as a boy in Peru, Goguen spend most Twelve remaining years of his life in Tahiti and on the french Polynesian Island of Hiva, Ola Cohab with adolescent girls, father and more children and producing his best known paintings. International Museum World Gallon is a box office, hit there been a half dozen

suspicions of his work in the last few years alone, including important shows in Paris Chicago in San Francisco, yet in an age of heightened public sensitivity to issues of gender race and colonialism. Museums are having to reassess his legacy a couple of decades ago addition on the same theme would have been a great deal more about formal innovation said Christopher Riopelle, Akhil Coker, the National Gallery show now everything must viewed in a much more nuanced context. He added oh, so, in other words it used to focus on his art, now is going to focus on the fact that we don't like him anymore and the fact like by the way for a long time, the left was very much involved with Paul Gaguine, because Polygon had abandoned his wife and kids and was seen as political radical zero only now are they beginning to realize? Oh you mean that the political radicalism went along with him miss treating young girls and treating native peoples horribly. He said I don't think any longer, it's enough to say: oh well, that's the way they did it back. Then we don't have to say that in order to recognize is the maybe should assessment artistic level repel describe got is a very complicated

very driven person. Very callous person said he was disappointed that is overwhelming, urge to make our led to hurt or use so many people badly. The show is co produced with Tional gallery of Canada, not to open in Iowa. In late May, nine labels were of changed a white culturally insensitive language according to the museum's press office. In all in on what the title head of these, savage mask will show with an extended label explaining the word. Savage in barbarian considered offensive today. Reflect attitudes common to goggins time and place elsewhere. His relationship with the young Tahitian, his mom, was changed to his relationship with a thirteen or fourteen year old asian girl, but Those changes are fine. I don't see. Any real problem would be more specific in your description, of God but as far as quote, unquote? Canceling him. I don't know what that is supposed to mean two other museum professionals re examining the lives of past artists from a 21st century perspective risky because it could lead to the boycott of great art the I can totally horn load, but the work is work had been sent to Dolly. Is Tate Modern's director on a stage,

exhibit in twenty ten something that doesn't belong to the artist anymore, belongs to the world. Otherwise he caution. We should stop. Reading the antisemitic author turn on Celine or Shun Cervantes in Shakespeare. If we found something unsavory about them that that, of course, is correct, because he was a bad guy. Apparently we're now supposed to cancel him now, when you kiss me off again, two new new done. He should be to eighteen. Ninety four, a poem by a New Zealand poet and academic Celina to see Tala you strip me Bear asked turn me on my side, show a fan of my face. It's our it's! Our the anonymity of his tahitian portrait is another cause of rest. In the two thousand and photographic series D and Dallas you got when it is Simone Artist Thailand now has cut out the sing: goblins reproduction and inserted photos of her own sister and friend. Godwin's heart is a problem continues to be used to frame the Pacific in this timely semi damage past when there's actually so much going on, says: Carolyn Barco, a senior lecturer in art in such a

it means I culture within the indigenous context as well. So again, the the notion that we're going to quantum cancel people, one hundred and twenty years after the death 'cause, they were bad when they lived. There's no limit, there's no limiting principle here. It turns out that by historic standards, most people were bad and it turns out one hundred years. Most people don't think were bad. So if you like, what is being done with Paul I'll go in and by all means recognize that in one hundred years will be done to you, and that is not. Justify gallons behavior gallon was again the behavior gallon for the fourth time who's bad when he was alive, but the attempt to can will artists and say we can't show their exhibitions anymore, because they're very bad people that not going to end well for the artistic community. Above all already Back be back later today for two additional hours. Otherwise, we'll tomorrow I mentioned here- this is the Ben Shapiro show

and, if you enjoyed this episode, don't forget to subscribe and if you want to help spread. The word. Please give us a five star review and tell your friends to subscribe to we're available on Apple podcast, Spotify and wherever you listen to podcasts, also be sure to check out the other daily wear podcast, including the Andrew Clay, even show the Michael all show, and the mat will show thanks for listening, the Ben Shapiro shows produced by Robert Sterling directed by MIKE Joyner executive producer, Jeremy, boring senior producer, Jonathan hey are supervising, producer is Mathis Glover and our technical producer is Austin. Stevens assistant, director, Pobol Y Taos, Ski edited by Adam side of it audio, is met by my core meaning

hair and make up is by just all their production assistant Nick. She him the Ben Shapiro Show is a daily where production copyright daily, where twenty nineteen democratic congressman Eric Swalwell broadcasts, hot air on MSNBC, but not so much hot air. As democratic senator, Chris Murphy or House speaker Nancy Pelosi. We will examine the shameless a gas bagheri of our leaders, check it out on the Michael, no show.