Bump bump bump bump bump bump bump bump bump bump confirm everybody. You call me a little bit behind the times. I've gotta get my studio shape here. Imprinted off my notes. Mobilise getting into for coffee, was God go to some mode, a little late, because I want to put together a little less whiteboard situation here, so I was doing that while you were getting ready to come on, live and this is the best day ever we don't know yet, but it might be, it might be the best there good morning. our thanks to join me in. Wouldn't you like to do a little thing. We call the simultaneous we were, then all you need is a cover up.

A glass of turkish jails were silent, canteen geography, Alaska vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid. I like and join me now for the dopamine here. Today. The thing that makes everything better, it's called the simultaneous happens now go, Scuse me, while I grab my notes thanks waiting Well, I would say the biggest story: the day is those doctors, we all know what I'm talking about right. So. There was, I guess, bright bar filmed a group of doctors who are pro I jock psychologically. And they were giving a little press conference outside somewhere and they were talking about what they built.

Where the obvious medical benefits of high drugstore queen for fighting crime. Now, of course, they are not the only one or another in the middle of the moon majority, but maybe there Leah the degree to which they trust the hydroxyl clerk we might put them in the minority. Things are, other doctors would say: well we don't know, but might be worth a shot. So let me give you my Full analysis of the doctors now what makes these story interesting is the Facebook band after I had forty million views then. Spoke bandit for giving the wrong information, so it was bad medical information. According to Facebook, I think today the twitter has banned. I write about

that may be wrong about that, I know the twitter was waiting, but I saw a few clips posted this morning that we're blank and I wasn't that's Twitter or where it was being pointed to the like them, but So we have to stories and one story. Everyone is censorship. Censorship, if social platform takes incorrect information off its platform way, wait. You can say Skanska Scott, but wasn't it wasn't wrong? No talking about their yet so what about whether was right or wrong separately. The real question is: does Facebook get to decide? What is Facebook get to decide? What is correct medical information now? I think what they do is that they look at the doktor

and the FDA, and they look at the World Health Organization than the CDC and I imagine what they do is say. Well. If these people are making Williams around outside, of the experts? The experts say the wrong. Who are we to argue? but were this weird situation at which the experts have been consistently wrong and in the case of face, masks intentionally lying. Think about that. We were right in the middle of a situation where the experts of even admitted in terms of face masks. They have admitted that they lied to us about a life and death medical situation. Now they had a good reason that a good reason for doing it they were trying to maintain the supplies of the healthcare workers, can get it and frankly, that was a good reason if they have given us the good reason, I think, maybe I could have acted

appropriately, and so I want to get their face mass, maybe for myself, but I will allow the and ninety five be more available, but other people may not, so I dont, even I dont, even fault the experts for lying to the public in that case because they had it higher mission involved than you know, you can argue it, but that's not something I care about too much. The point is: if we know that your experts can live you, we don't have to wonder They just told us is that here we had a good reasons. We lied to you I have to wonder if it's a thing anymore: it's now a thing They will lie to you for effect because they think there's something greater value there to somebody. So here's the deal my take on the

the medical part of it there's no right answer, because you really can't run a country where you can promote bad information to people the way it's big up now I wouldn t object to Facebook tagging the the arguments to it. If they just said this has been tagged as a suspicious or non confirmed medical opinion we're going to tag it so there can't method and here's the counterpoint I'd be! Ok with that. Wouldn't you be ok with this is a controversial or unproven medical claim. Here's the counterpoint now be ok with me. Now still confuse some people, because people still buy into the less credible view, but the less credible view isn't always wrong. That's the problem.

The less credible, if you just might be the new what will be the new mainstream understanding later, but as an grown, yet so as real as real tough one, but I would go with showing both sides. So beware, at command in this thing, now. Let's talk about the credibility of the doctors, I would say: none none! If, if you thought those doctors were credible, I'll tell you why I think they're not, and then you can make your dizzy. First of all, how hard is it to get twenty doctors who are against the mainstream thinking now hearted, all especially on social needs, I think they said that they had met on social media before getting together. So having few does Doctors who disagree with anything is easy.

Why should you make of the fact that there were a few dozen doctors who have a different point of view? The credibility should put all that is nothing just nothing at all, because you can get twenty people this end especially, if there on the internet, so they can find themselves It only need what you'd need one person in every other state in the union to get one I feel there is a relatively low bar to get a dozen or twenty doctors to say the same thing that's different from the mainstream. So the fact that they are doctors and they had doktor coats and they have doktor experience. You should count. That is nothing nothing! your mental calculation, the weight you should give their experience in this specific case, just nothing because you could get somebody to say anything. Secondly, let us look at the quality of their arguments.

I'm just I'm just going to say the thing everybody's thinking, but since it sounds racist yet say carefully, because it's not right, the woman who is the most featured in that was a doctor who grew up, and I guess she practiced in Nigeria before she came and I don't have to tell you. The Nigeria is a company that this country that is famous for scams If you use a nigerian email was the first thing you think it's not racist. Does Nigeria just happens to be a country there's nothing nothing about being black in this story? So if your hearing it using the wrong thing, is just a country, but is a country this famous by brand four scams. So what do you mean? The doctor says you know I I practiced in Nigeria. What is your critical, brave little. It just goes. Click.

Oh somebody from Nigeria again has nothing to do with ethnicity. It's the country, the country, is simply famous for games now that doesn't mean that those doktor is therefore not credible it just means that our feels so I'm U two separate things which are logical, and you can count on from the things that you just gotta sheep there the category of things Feel like there's some lack of credible. But it's not fair, because it's not as if all doctors coming out of Nigeria have something in common. They don't they don't, but it feels that way. So that's the first thing that works against them, but it has nothing to do with whether the right or wrong there.

Here is the part that really got to me so the same woman, the doktor was name like air member said. Did you study she had treated three hundred and fifty patients given them all drugs, a clerk win with or without the other, combo nicer and clay. None of them died. So buddy and three hundred fifty people who came into her for treatment, none of them, not one person and a three hundred and fifty died. So that's credible right. Pretty good information that somebody who is really live in it and do in working with real people and a three hundred and fifty I came in with us and none of them died. That's pretty use, for that tells you something does it now now

Tell you everything you should have learned exactly zero from that information. Number one. Is it true? As a true you don't know, do you know that she treated three others? Fifty patients with covert you dont know that you might now you now that she had three hundred fifty patients who came in with some kind of a symptom. Theirs thought. You know, I don't know the the testing one time they're not available I'll, just give you some drugs clerk queen and I'll. If you don't die, I'm gonna tell you as one might cures. Zella happened. I don't know. You don't either. We have no idea what happened? We don't know if they were correctly identified or not how about this and I'm just going to throw this out there. Would she know if one percent of her three hundred and fifty people had died? Would she

I don't know, maybe that I dont know. If she'd we're not do Doo doctors track each of their patients so that they can tell you that Three weeks later, they they died under somebody else's care were these all her own patients or other people who just needed care and pay for it in cash Did she really know? What happened to your people next how hard how unusual would it be if no people died and the three hundred fifty I dont know It's not unusual, because here's what I'm thinking if you have severe covert symptoms? Where do you go? Do you go to your general practitioner or are you gonna do cereal, because if the only people that this doctor seas are the people who had such a mile,

Symptoms, they weren't even quite sure if they were sick, isn't that the group that gets better anyway, that's the group that just gets better if all the people who really felt like something going on. It was kind of advanced to the point where they couldn't. Read well or they had pretty bad symptoms, they might go to the hospital first. So it is not clear that why she seeing is a broad sample around. The people who have self selected for a mild symptoms if they have self selected for miles symptoms, gives them the mild symptom treatment. And every single one of them avoids hospitalization. What have you learned? Nothing, I don't think you learned statistically, you ve learned that it's, maybe somebody that look at that's definitely enough To say what we should study this, if what you took away, it is all we should look into. This is worth putting some money

a rigorous study. Yes,. If you saying well, we have the answer now. Now: that's not even close to being credible. That's a end, So there is the main thing, though: I have to tell you about this conversation that I just had online with there's a doctor that you might be familiar with Doktor Eric fight holding within what he called Ivan, final digging. Is this lesson these epidemiologist and health economist see new fellow at Harvard sixteen year public health at Harvard works on the covert test for Steering Committee in the covered updates. So somebody who, with a Harvard gray, lots of experience and it works in this field. So that's credible when you say very credible guy.

But I tweeted Adam and then that we had some exchanges. I will go into the details, but I gave him some advice. Devices non medical advice. Obviously, Rather, I gave him communication advice. It took an interesting turn. Here was my point that the people who believe I drugs the clerk we has potential. They generally believed that this potential is limited, early use as opposed to. I'm already in the hospital and I'm in bad shape, and there's a reason for that, the very specific reason which that by the time, you get the hospital. Your medical condition is changed. This cyclotron store. for whatever other northern talking about. But the point of it is that the covert progression is two different phases. The first and where the virus is growing, which is where people think that Hydroxyl Chloric with the other two drugs might be used

Then there is the part where it turns into a monster of a problem. That's almost a different problem. People do not believe largely that it works in that situation where you near death there has been tested, and tested a number of times now in trials that look like they would pick it up if it did work and it, and Not only did they use too much of a doze. The people were hospitalized. Those that we would now would have some side effects or expect. but it was too late. It was the wrong use the wrong situation and in some cases they didn't use the three drugs, so I pointed out to doktor violating them. he responds to people saying that hijacks clerk. We might be useful that when here

while some of them were showing studies of the wrong thing. It makes him look less credible, not more credible. In other words, it looks like somebody who's trying to scare you as opposed to some of the child Let me be very careful in my wording here. Making an accusation that this doctor Any doktor is trying to scare you it's a communication point If I say to you, I think I do actually Fourthly, works for outpatient. And you as the doktor professional say no, it doesn't because It has a completely different set of patients with a different situation who were near death and had a different medical problem and it didn't work for them. Does your credibility go up or does it go down? It was down right because this is because what I hear is how come you're not talking about the thing I'm talking about,

Why are you giving me studies about the wrong thing So I mention this to the doktor and his accused me of cherry picking, which was essentially correct, is is accusation because I did cherry pick out of a number of studies that he has misled. So I had picked one to point now. Why do we looking at the wrong thing and he said, but you're also not looking at the other ones. I showed that were outpatient. One of them was an eight hundred person patients study and that it goes to this bringin whiteboard creditors, this? Why are you here? Only the hospitalized patients? Ok doesn't tell you the right thing. We don't have to look at them anymore, but look at. Studies of outpatient, that's what you wanted right. You wanted to see some outpatient stuff, not hospitals, stuff

so look at my study of Hydroxyl Chloroprene being used alone to which has a Oh! That's not it either. I want to see and there and then the next, the grocers hydrochloric we with one of the two things either zinc or as is right, you see the doctors says they think is one of the other or both I'd be the queue really. So I don't care about a study that there's one. So what happened when I pointed out to the doktor Eric cycle? I pointed out to him that the only three things that would tell us whether Hydroxyl Chloric Queen in combination works for our patient. Would be a study that studied it. There's study studying the only thing that people wonder about the people who think hydrochloric we might work.

And I haven't giving you my opinion on this yet so hold out for that. But People think that might work are very specific, we didn't say it would work on the near death. People now say it would work alone. Now we didn't say that we know which one of the two things is the magic some people do, but they station. we said the three of them together. Given early, can you tell that works- and you know the answers you can't so this is the doctor. If I go there, Our response was when I pointed out that the very study that we would like to either debunk or confirm this assumption doesn't exist he didn't say it does exist because it doesn't. Rather, he pointed out how difficult it is to do studies, and he pointed out that to be exceptionally hard study because they would be three drugs involved? Do that too?.

Alone for a while their expensive it. Something like shift is easy. He mentioned do something like fifty thousand dollars per person studied. You knew thousands of em. They want to do a fast, surely hard, and then he mentioned that I dont quite understand the the field, which is true, of course, now what does that make you feel like if you're proposition is this? The hydroxyl clerk win with these two drugs might be good for our patient. Only. What happens when somebody shows you the wrong study? And you say that's the wrong, literary and other rather study. You say that's the wrong study so that there is another Ross say, that's wrong! Study. This is really hard to understand. Gimme. The three things for EL patiently? That's it that's all. I want.

and then once these three types of studies, which are the wrong study, have been debunked as being useful. In this conversation, it turns into its hard to study things. Well, isn't that a reason to use it is to study is the reason to proscribe it, because it's hard to study in the absence of benefit would be if it were a nothing it ass. If it worked, it would be incredible. It would be incredibly so, given that the risks at the very small dosage that these doctors on this ban, video we'll talk, you talk about a pillar to every week, something like that. Really low dosages prophylactic and again hasn't been studied as prophylactic in a way that shows it works. So.

I have to ask you: what is your impression of somebody who would take you through the argument in this? direction by only misdirection. Let some precision with doctors were anti Hydroxyl, chloroprene and others always follows the misdirection path. You can really get them to talk about the thing that you need to talk about. The war talk about other stuff. Why is it now. Here's how I left my conversation with Doktor cycling,. I said that I obviously I agree that would be hard to do the studies on just pointing out that they don't exist and therefore we make Chemico conclusion about something. There hasn't been studied services there's a lot of rumours about doctors, algae having one sponge favor of hydrogen

Chloroprene for crowd of viruses general, but I will look into that enough that children and then some people are asking whether fetching himself is on high drugs chloroprene, which would be- interesting question. Who will never find that out? I don't think, but it is an interesting question. Here's what I would settle for if we can have a study and watches There was trouble. This will get me into ok, so I will say something very unscientific and all of you smart enough to know what's wrong with it? If you get out what's wrong with that, you have maintained, here is what would make me happy. tell me how many people have gotten the three drugs, not just Hydroxyl clerk me, but all three, this ache in these ass mice, into how many people got there as our patience and then later died because of.

We could find that out. Could we find that anyone he has ever died. Tell you these three drugs early, like Has anybody ever died? Do you know the answer that I dont, because these dockers, yes, this ban video were claiming that its You even use the word cure, which is, I think, why they got banned, but don't you think that we could without doing a formal study Could we not least know that one piece of data is that Discoverable, without without resorting to formal study will, if we have the death better forget. Do we also know how soon before the death, which would tell us if they got it early enough, Do you know how soon before the death they had all three drugs and their system would have beyond the records

because, if you told me, Scott, we ve looked and we haven't found anybody who has ever died if they got this prior to hospitalization and they took. Three one of one zero right now, if you, if you had to make me bad, I would bet- is not zero. Radio, at least people webs com, morbidity ease, would die, maybe they're plenty. There could be Hundreds of thousands- I don't know, but wouldn't you like to know if hundreds of thousands of people who took the three drugs in combination early as outpatient, wouldn't you like to know if even one of them died. Even one you don't know that dear. tell me how many died and left

decide if that matters to me. So let's say, for example, that we could find that information or we could find the least statistically for aimlessly one aspect. Somebody says yes, FDA did a study; no, they didn't know they didn't But here's the thing, maybe just ones hospital if they could study just their patients if there were enough of them and that. did even one die with these three drugs, and if so, was writhing co morbidity wiser. We should know about that person, but here's my bottom line. It is obvious that third, either by intention or by mistake, we are being misled and have a look at this which is different from so this is a great drug. You shall be taking it. How would I know not a doktor, don't take my medical advice.

I'm just saying that the way this is being presented to us is as a fraud would presented, which is not to say that the people involved. frauds, did you say that the way is being presented as the way you would presented if you were trying to defraud somebody would look exactly like this. So if you are in a situation that looks exactly like a fraud, doesn't. there's this guy could be that are based on you. The truth I just feel like. From being honest, it doesn't feel like it.

I spent most of my time. Looking at that thing, so here's some other things going around the world. I told you that the biggest factor in terms reelection would be something completely outside his control, which is what happens to other countries who got ahead along corona virus early. My assumption is Ben listens. There is no there's, no workable vaccine, yet in nobody's really that close to her to be ready. I doubt anyway, I dont know that, but I don't think heard of unity is to close by assumption. Was between now and election day. The countries that have done such a good job Khazars so smarter and their leaders are so better and their way better than mean old orange. Bad that they would, instead of them, doing good job and then just taking it to the finish line

seemed almost guaranteed from what we know about the virus seems almost guaranteed, that the other countries are going to have the same experience. We did which is you get a handle on it? Then you try to loosen up. We have to get to hear the level again when a child is not so we are already seeing the first headline of decency and end quote from seeing them this morning. Even is they got corroded virus under control are now struggling. That's deeply! Concerning for the rest of the world. That sentence says trumpet. Guess reelected one hundred percent are really again just listen to the sentence and then even try to imagine the trump would not get all reelected. Here's a census, even countries they got krona virus under control are now struggling that's the election. That's it that's all election rather because, if the other countries We have all their wisdom and not burden

By an orange man, bad. If they have some kind of an average experience and were somewhere in the average. It's gonna show you is that leadership did never that's all. It's gonna show leadership, didn't really matter, and I think that's where we're gonna be. Now another thing that was predictable yet funny the the black people in Portland were protestors. Our feeling, there's a little lack of clarity about what the protests about these days. Because, apparently, the white people who have completely taken over the black lives matter protest. I swear. I can say this because of a white person. Do white people ruin everything. Why is there any exception of black people. anything going this good. Is it you're going to be some wipers that comes into frigate ruins? I gotta say: if there's one complaint, the black people make all the times that

but I do shit you're just not by ETA. Go you you're right about one minor, how about some other stuff, but now and he tat black people do something. Good white people were Covenant room, it's ok system and it looks like that's what's happening with the protest. I think if the protest had stayed with here, the George Void thing you stated black people trying to make the world a better way, people helping them out sportively. That could have been a good thing, but it looks like anti fascist hollow the mountain in use using them as a disguise for whatever there trying to do to take over the country. I guess so I believe that we can. We can predict at this point that the white and black protestors

who believe they were on the same side are soon discovering. They are not so much on the same side. Some some is asking in the comments. Will you taken the vaccine? Well, there's not the vaccine. There are vaccines. I sighed clip in which your bill gates was being asked about a guess what the first act scenes I figure, which one may be more donor, but that it has a pretty pretty hard side effects, because the dosages pretty high now, if the first accidents available has known sight of an Ex meaning, your definitely gonna get the side effects and its ugly wait a minute wait. So I don't have an answer to your question. I would need to know a little bit more about the first one is available.

I wouldn't rule out taking it wouldn't rule it out, but I'm not a hundred percent there. Yet I need to know a little bit more if its noble Now the thing going on with the protest, slash, looting, slash violence is the the question of whether its violent or non violent- Now you ve, seen probably by now the videos of Jerry Nether being asked. If the protests are violently, he says they're not, and then they cleverly put the scenes of all the fires and an approach. stuff. The background now I dont know that is useful to argue about whether their violence or non violent, because it clearly mostly nonviolent people with a core of violent people, and everybody agrees that so what

wanna call that non violent or color violence is really just the word you putting on its narrowly helping anybody's understanding. But clearly there are people trying to overthrow the country and they say that directly. I think there are many of them. terribly worried that they will succeed in overthrowing the country I do. some of these cities have very weak mayors and that they just don't have a solution for what do you do about the federal court House etc? But The most amazing things happening about all this is, if we could maybe take a moment for two, were to show appreciation. For how on violent the police engage ESA them because I don't know if I would have the same level of restraint as the police that were set.

They are really really restrained and, of course, even see the video. Suddenly you think when a little too our but as a rule, the law enforcement in every form- that's Henry these things, you're doing really good job like like an eight plus job. In my opinion. Now, of course, you have incidents, individual incidents that are imperfect, but overall, am I wrong overall, I would say the that the law enforcement, including the ages, are not just doing a good job. I mean it looks like they're doing really good job like really good job. It is one of the best jobs you ve ever seen, anybody do a job Here's what I say that. They have limited the damage now to certain blocks, so that's good, so you're not growing. It's it's no risk

constrained they did it without causing revolution. In other words, it would have been easy to override a number of them are being blinded intentionally blinded by lasers. If somebody intentionally blind you. Say say somebody intentionally blinder pardner right next to you and you see where I came from In my opinion, you should be able to shoot, to kill. Because a laser attackers somebody's eyes. Maybe not legally is is a lethal whereas I don't know how you define that, but trying to blind somebody giving I can get where you say is not technically lethal, But in my opinion there should be the death sentence. Blinding suddenly, with lasers should be the death sentence. If you did it intentionally, so the restraint of all these people is just incredible there being him. The heads with with

Effects of using the amount of solid objects are flying toward them and they they just or taking it. It's amazing amazing, and you know you don't take it. You don't take a moment to kind of put yourself in the heads of these other people and say how hard with us. They import Landsmen Sixty days of this, how many those police officers have been out there for much of that entire sixty day period having stuff throne with them? Do you now much PTSD would have if you and every night and solid objects were whizzing, pass your head and you watch a year. Your coworkers go down blinded concussions and every day you go out there and do that again, and nobody is asking you to fight back they're asking you to take it incredible, radical

So will lower the loud applause for the law enforcement people. Now, of course, as you know, the the bad protesters are trying to get some violence going, because that will work further cause, but the longer the law enforcement people can hold the line, the longer that doesn't work and you can maybe decrease their energy over time. It hasn't happened as quickly as I hope, but but It's happened. Somebody says serious bodily injury is typically enough for lethal self defence, but you know that's generally true. by serious bodily injury is usually in the context of could have killed you

If somebody stabs you and you didn't die. Obviously that would be the case where you can shoot them if they were trying to stab. You are already had, but that's a case where you but have died in the case of the laser. it really is an age as you did. I just grievous bodily injuries was weird. In that sense, you wouldn't believe cows per se. So I don't know what the law and save up reports on daytime troopers if we don't know too much about how often there being relieved, but I don't think you could assume any them we're gonna be mentally the same after this is over how many days could you be outdoors at night with people throwing hard objects at you, and you only have to be looking in the wrong direction to be basically have your brain scramble spree bad,

Let's go, let's the brain brainstorm that what it would take for trumped get reelected ready You take for job to get reelected. Well, I think, economy? probably is not going to be a fully because of things don't reopen. There will be enough new jobs. You go see the economy improved, but stalled in terms of jobs. I think you to see the Republicans being little cheap, the relief package for people. I think that will hurt them, but maybe not with the people were designated vote by now, that much of the starting bar hearing is starting going to be amazing.

So here's what I think trumped should do to improve his chances number one avoid an obvious mistake, because at the moment I think he's a glide path to victory, because until until Joe Biden has a vice president, there isn't going to be much of a target there and you every pixels, vice president, will probably heard of that's the funny part about it. No matter who you packed it's gonna hurt it because it's gonna be a new person was a new set of targets like somebody, you did something wrong, some something we even Democrats don't like it'll, be their trust me you every picks so going after bite in this kind of a hard challenge for Trump, because Biden does not seem up to the task and it feels like your beating a baby harp seals doesn't feel like a fair fight. There's something about it. Just doesn't feel right as binding, so deep

If that changes, the maybe Trump could go hard random, but as long as is looking feeble and hiding in a basement, Trump can't do what's wrong does best, which is go hard against somebody. You hate one of the best things that Trump had going for him when he ran against. Hillary Clinton was Larry Clinton, because no matter how excited you are about why the voting for Trump, You also a little bill excited about voting against Hilary. That was a tougher. You could get job, but you can also heard Hilary if he didn't like Hilary, but there are any I think I've heard I can honestly say: I've heard zero people searching my memory. I first zero Republicans say that they want to vote against Biden, meaning that there's something wrong with him in particular. Now, of course, some people don't want his mental situation and the job, and some people don't want to.

regret. But you don't hear the talk like you heard about Hilary Hillary Clinton was hated hated individually, now? Some we're gonna say it scares she was a woman. I don't think so. I don't think that's why I think there's some personalities that attract hate the way the Trump attracts eight from the left system is just the same thing. Not gender thing but why didn't doesn't do that by didn't? Does not make us hate him I actually kind of like by could I hang out with by them and have a good time. Probably probably Then people on the other side say this all the time this aid- he's a good man. So, that really takes up the biggest club away from Trump, which is you would love to be just

Only by that every day and having his audience loved dislike, you see what he did to bind today, but it doesn't feel as good as when he would go after Hilary. When you heard crooked Hilary made you happy because you do made her sad. It was a little butter schadenfreude there. If you hear the present say something that would be devastating for bite into here. Let's say something about his mental declined: scatter hurt: it's gotta hurt it. Doesn't she Let's go doesn't so he needs a vice president's others. So there's a stronger target and I will give trumps something to work with some, maybe that'll, Good heavens, I think, as I said, this crowed a virus if it gets and if it gets Anna control in other countries, it will make trouble with better and that will not alone.

And then the other all these wildcard, what? If what? If it turned out that I address the clerk, we actually works. Well, does I'll give you my current estimates based on what we know at the moment. Fifty percent chance sort of a fifty fifty that it would make some difference because, as I say that the studies are not conclusive, but neither are they dismissive So I think Trump also has the ability to do a bunch of things that are less a counterfactual to the rumours about it. So here are some things, and these are really important and there in the category of the dog barking. So these are the things he is not doing, that are important and the ones that he has done.

So one thing he's doing this important is that you can do things like the executive orders for lowering drug cos, so Trump can go into election saying I just did these executive orders and I lowered your drug cos. Molasses exceeds that well looks like it's a good shot. If you succeed, he's he has be going into the election with healthcare success? claim also the teller health across state lines, and these should take some accomplishments now. Bided, of course, will be fighting with his own team, who says anything short of universal health care. Single power is not good enough, so bided won't even have an argument that his own side completely likes at the same time the troubles Jose while you guys keep arguing. I just lowered you're drunk cause, it's gotta be a pretty strong argument.

So you should look good on healthcare. He's gonna, look good on immigration, because people are thinking about it differently now in corona virus times. I think that the George Floyd stuff has discredited very much. I think discredited the people trying to discredit President Trump, meaning that that the black lives matter, people by teaming up with marxist by teaming up with Anti far have discredit the whole thing.

as we watch the cities on fire is small parts of things on fire. It just doesn't feel good. Doesn't look rights in a mixed trump look stronger so every day that there's a do pro protest trump gets stronger in the public because they like law and order now drop as had been weak with the law and order absurdities. But a week with the I guess, the suburban moms. What is it that suburban moms like more than law and order, not these things, so the group that will be most concerned about the lack of law and order should be the very group that he wants to attract. I would be surprised if, president doesn't take advantage of packaging up all the hoaxes and trying to convince Democrat that the review of the world is hoax, determined. In other words, he talks about the the Russia Collusion House. Lot

But I think it's powerful when you, when you put them together, so you can say, look you believe the Russia collusion hoax. You believe it's hard for him to say this cuz would cause more trouble, but I can say it you believe these fine oaks, you believe the ingesting disinfectants, hawks and even go right down the line of all the help, and I think that the more its pointed out how many hoaxes have defined the democratic point of view. The UK. we must give them some uncertainty about their news sources, which my up a little bit. so I think you'll be good. I found the economy compared to buy goods. on healthcare compared to bind and who will have a good, coherent plan that everybody likes. I think you were good enough race weirdly, because I think all this, the race write stuff back

and I think that whenever by Mr Vice President, he will be weakened by but does will be somebody who doesn't like that. Vice president on his own team, so everybody will think the vice president is to be the person anyway, so that woman, your comments are all over the board. A bomb is donors best friend. Ok totally goes into our topic, I dont better of it and you can just looking you cabins Niger

Laura cluck. I declare queen hopes, will pass this baby wide open. I dont think they're working to know. If I drank some chloroprene works or doesn't by election, they do. I think the present might do something shocking immigration, maybe more shocking. That he's done. just to get his based fired up? That might happen yeah you can actually here. My dog snoring gave you the red pill about the media. I dont know if people are ready to understand that the thing they thought there was a news is not new.

I found this conversation with one of my smartest and most well informed friends who buys and to completely the New York Times CNN and pr view of the world, and I tried to I tried to explain to them that he's living in the past a past when those new resources could be trusted to give you something closer to them, the view of the world, but he doesn't understand that we don't live in that world anymore and that the news is literally just propaganda. At this point and He's believing the propaganda just the way, he believed the news back when it was something like news. Somebody says my liberal boyfriend is coming round to the hoaxes. You have the horses are the most. I think the hoaxes are the most brutal part of the of the lesson.

So once you point out how many hoaxes have informed there higher worldview? It's gotta start a chip away at a level that just a little bit o. This can't be true. Somebody saying in the comments there never was a car accident in the bar is delayed. Is that you can somebody confirm that, because that would be the weirdest seeing the world set up the border catapults be nice hearing is delayed mothers, Volvo cars and well. I guess we have to find out about that tariffs against China for a climate justice. While you know, I think the China situation is also incredibly good for Trumpery now

because I can't think of a better contrast if you looked at you ve got Joe Biden, who you think is a little too close to China right. At the same time, the China is on from friendly adversary, if I can say that a friendly, if you will, Somebody that we want to do business with two somebody that we can't trust whatsoever and are going to try to do less business with and are intentionally oil or entering a cold. I think the country's mood either is or will be so empty China, partly because the current virus so Anti China that the Anti China candidates gonna, look like them. Choice, that's trump. Now, when I say empty, China is the best possible situation, because tromp was so pro she,

pro trade deal. So in a sense a trump became Nixon goes to China. If you will see the reverse. Is that so next time you know the famous Nixon went to China story it. He was the hardest voice against China. So if he could go to be their friends, that meant it was ok. because he was the hardest voice against them, so his team would say our eye if here, if you're, ok with him, I guess we can at least not trusted the opposite. Trump went in with I'll? Be your friend I'll show you full respect. We can both get rich. This be great, must work together, hand in hand, and then it didn't work. So Tropic showed us that the Nixon goes to China doesn't work, he proved it. He proved it by giving them every benefit of the doubt, working with them legitimately seriously trying to really make something work

finding out it does that there were wildly stealing our intellectual property even right. Now. That's why the Houston consular got closed. The chinese consulate, because a stolen so much intellectual property, allegedly so drop, is just a hundred percent rife. China. It looks like it. He was right to try it the way you did and he was right to find them. for sure. If that could work or not, and he doesn't know now we found out, we would not have done that with binding. So he's. China, I think, use these, but basically is better on everything except climate change and he has a kill shot for climate change if he uses it. Do you know the kill shot for climate changes that, even by those in favour of nuclear energy.

It's pretty much. The whole argument trump will be running against the candidate, who is also in favour of nuclear energy. That's it that's all argument: either you could take climate change right off the right off the table. Somebody says is easier to accept a lie than to accept your lied to the others. That's another way to explain cognitive dissonance, I suppose somebody says in the car No one can say the Trump did not give she every opportunity to salvage the situation. That's exactly right and he did that really really well. He really gave China every opportunity to be here. You a credible good player and they did not.

at least s aversion. We here in Amerika, who knows is not accurate. I also I'm wondering there's somebody in the comments. I have two blocker so simply in the common sense. Guy said three months of reporting drafts, a clerk in works, and today is back peddling. Now get a block you because I block anybody who miss. Represents my opinion in public, so that so I have only ever said that there is a percentage chance hydrochloric with is a game changer and I've raise therefrom. Thirty to fifty to seventy two,

the news as a trickle down? So my view is that I don't know, but I know its not been studied. So that's my view and if it's love and studied, then you can use your risk management judgment which doctors are. Prescribe it or not. So you have grossly miss characterized. My opinion of saying that I have reported that it works because I've never once done that. Now you are consigned to the blocking of history. Somebody says legalised Canada's in our vote for Trump well, of course, Legalizing at the federal level would not be enough, but if I were, rob? I would release every person on a federal marijuana charge. I just do that between now and election day, because there's no way that's wrong. Just listen

now a lot of those marijuana charges, maybe things or play down from more serious charges. So that might be a little. Will. Sticking point there but I dont even understand why Trump is not active and taking marijuana off the debate because it just free money. If, if he doesn't do it, probably the Democrats will where have. I think, that's an order, the others are weird story about seeds being sent from China with no packaging, as if maybe if we place those seen something bad will happen. I dont know if we know what those seeds area somebody says, will I be blocked for not caring about your opinion. Sure I'll block you for not caring about? Maybe sometimes you can get your way that easily.

You always said fifty or less persistent pretty consistently here how many debates will actually held outside zero. I don't think they really did debates. Why did she did not take the opportunity, I believe, but I'm not an export. My understanding is that China doesn't see the world as a win win scenario, meaning that a deal here. The typical western idea of a good deal is where you both win when anyone. What I'm told then I am not an expert here so don't take it from me- is that the current chinese government point of view is the Chinese have to eventually dominate the world and that sort of, moreover, a hit Larry and kind of situation so widen the Hitler make a good deal with Novel Chamberlain was never the point

It was only just a military technique to you know, to put your guard down, it appears and that's what's being reported, I'd not in anybody's, had and I'm not an expert in China. So you shouldn't take me For any of us, but the reporting is that China wants to dominate, sees its future. That way. And doesn't have any interest in a deal that isn't just good for them and bad for us. So that's the proposition. Was my guess on the seeds, Michael, the seas, is it's some kind of crazy person, situation or marketing. I think the odds of the seeds being some kind of a terrorist attack or love but zero. What excuse to cancel than debates the usual,

Just no grounds, I think they're Trump would have been really weakened if he had gone ahead and held his convention holding the convention would be a huge mistake. Under the current uptake bs zero sum honestly phrase, I should be used for fur China's opinion that they think there's somebody for somebody to win. Suddenly a sluice. Yes, my wife, my nose operation is still schedules for tomorrow. So with any luck, you will not hear my whistling sinuses and bad condition, but will see so I should tell you that I don't know I might do a periscope before I had offer surgery. I haven't decided yet

your comments are funny, those of you who are listening to this import gas. I'm sorry, I thank you and I will see you tomorrow, maybe in the day, Well, I don't know about the day after I may not build wake up if dont, Simeon periscope for two days. Might be longer. I'll always twitter, my status, but you should assume that I'm doing well, ok, I'll talk to you a second.