Everybody else, while in the United States for its time for Well, I'm getting the message. Oh oh, really, ok, I will there be a little change, there's little bit of a change today. I've been told that the simultaneous sip is no longer allowed questioning. It has been replaced with new pledge, He pledge of allegiance to the official narrative. but you can join me in this pledge I'd like all of you to join long. we read it to your first and then we'll do the actual pledge you can find this in my twitter feed at,

today, at the six forty one I am so be several tweets down and if you'd like to join in the pledge of allegiance to the official narrative. It goes like this I pledge allegiance to the official narrative from their election systems. Are the only digital systems? There are one hundred percent immune from hacking. I further affirm that There was no election fraud of any kind, because We are not allowed to check a man and a woman. So that's the pledge. Please join me now. This will be replacing the simultaneous sip at least for this morning, maybe forever, because this is more important than anything else you doing stand. Please please stand that. You don't want to sit for this. I need some respect. Please stay,

for the pledge of allegiance to the official narrative, put your hand over your heart, its optional, but I think it's respectful now we do now in the pledge. I pledge allegiance. To the official narrative, Our electoral systems are the only digital systems that are one hundred percent immune from hacking. I further affirmed that there was no election fraud of any kind because We are not allowed to check a man and a woman now. And now you may take the ship, which is the We ve been getting another message. I can say that word. It's just called the officials have now

I used to go with something else, but we don't use that term anymore. This is just the official narrative zip. I don't know if it's going to taste the same honestly, but you can try it. Let's do it together, see if it tastes as good as the simultaneous up a little worried. Oh, my god, due to the latter home, oh god, I'm thrown this cup away I don't know I gotta do that, but his bitter as hell. Well, let's talk about the news that were allowed to talk about. there's a big up outbreak of, the virus in China. I guess Beijing Use lock him down pretty hard

There is the question that I ask you about others. Still people say they get here. I think I'll just delete all the people who say they get here seriously. Are you actually say? Will you get your on Youtube? That's not real You're MIKE on Youtube is off microphone. Is I might plugin? Yes, it is.

Is there anybody who can hear unbelievable I've actually fairly? I have technical problems on Youtube or Youtube. We're gonna turn you often goodbye. I see you tubes dead, we'll just periscope this one periscope to bed Youtube for whatever reason doesn't work today, but I'm sure I'm sure we can carry on islands like about China. So they ve got an outbreak, The thing, I wonder, was there: it shows that wasn't gonna happen. It doesnt does we feel like there was any chance that China wouldn't have major outbreak, no matter what they had done

so this is the least surprising thing in the world, but It also makes me wonder if our intelligence agencies ever thought themselves. I wonder if we should just spread a little corroded virus around Beijing. Now I don't think they did that, but do you think they talked about it. Because I got a feeling they talked about, though it may just be part of the job. I think. twitter stock is down about ten percent. Nine percent. When I just checked a minute ago, full disclosure- I do own twitter stock, Do you have a problem with that So let me tell you why on twitter stock, I Like to own stock company that so powerful

the President of the United States and use the good part and make its competitor go away. Just go away. Twitter just did that just bear the President, the United States, and that made their competition parlor just go. I mean I don't think they did it crackling, but parlor went away so. I don't give investment advice and if you had bought twitter on my advice if I had given it, I didn't give this advice, but I told you last week by you'd, be downtown preserved, so don't take any investment advice on specific companies from me. That would be a bad idea. Ok, that said, let me give you jack, investment advice and then you can apply to other recovery walked, but his general advice not about twitter. If you find a company,

so powerful and ban the president and get rid of its competition in the same week. That's probably a good investment. Take he'll, take any of the big big tech companies have a dominant darling. For a whole right now. There's nothing there's almost nothing that you could do. Those companies are pretty well entrenched so investment unwise any company that has that much power looks pretty good, sir, I'm just gonna tell you. I won't be selling my twitter stuck because nothing J, from the moment, I bought it one of the things that there was Warren Buffett teachers as if you buy a stark, don't sell it until the reason you bought it in the first place. Changes now, of course, will be,

sanctions that but, as a general rule, the reason I bought twitter is that there is no competition. That's why I bought it. I bought it because there is a really any competition, that age, nope nope still no competition, not really so hold onto that. Even though you don't like that. So, let's talk about the consumer Theory. Rumours that the president has or will sign these something called the insurrection ACT, which items the details, but I guess it would be like martial law that big employ the military. Stay empowers on like that. Let me tell you this: if there is anybody watchfulness who believes that Iceland has were word or will sign something called it insurrection back,

Remember what I'm telling you right now I'll tell you, there's a one hundred percent chance. That's not true, not a ninety nine percent chance, one hundred percent chance. That's not true! Now wait a few weeks and then review, Barbara, that I told you this. If it turns out I'm right. I'm right look at what you believed and then look what I told you and then see which one of us got this right You got it wrong and you are sure that you believe. is the internet that there's some kind of insurrection ACT being signed. Just remember, I told you I wasn't drew so that the next time there's a question about a is this thing? True or not, you should, at the very least, check with me first or other people that you trust

I'm not the only person to tell you that the insurrection ACT thing is not true Look at everybody else who told you that mean I haven't looked at, I have not check was a make certain bitches twitter feed. I don't know what he said about. I can guess I give gas, were you saying it's not real, haven't you, name. Five other people that you now on twitter check their twitter feeds. If they're talking about this they will tell you, it's not real, and these are people that you just so just keep. keep track and when you were wrong about this later, look too, People who are right for your future opinions. there is a bad case of what I would call Cutie s instead of tedious, which is trumped arrangements is syndrome. The queue phenomenon has come

cognitive dissonance trigger the likes of which we haven't seen since twenty sixteen I told you when trunk elected the people's brains would just break because they wouldn't be overhauled and read everything they believed to be true. At the same time he gets elected because that would be so completely different from everything they believed about reality, rack, their brains couldn't hold the two conflicting thoughts, waited everything I think about trumpet. That's true. He couldn't possibly get only I dont get elected. So that's what triggers cognitive dissonance to two were thoughts. They can't be always said time. so you need some weird like a hallucination to paper together. The two thoughts now there, station was Russia Collusion

so that was how they papered over the fact that trouble couldn't get elected body dead. There must have been some russian collusion now the queue people are in the same situation The queue people are finally now that everything that they had ever been told about. Q doesn't happen So they are learning that that deeply held beliefs, really you strongly held beliefs. Clearly are not true, because now will observe that there is no mass arrests of the deep state will observe that drug didn't have some plan. These implementing will observe that There's no insurrection act so after you have observed all the things that you believe for four years. I guess cases Oh that not be true. What would be the predictable outcome of their minds. Well, it's the set up is unmistakable. They never believe

It will be violated in the most aggressive. Why? Because reality is not going to serve up anything close to what they imagined was going to happen. And they will have to invent a hallucination like the like the Russia collusion hoax. They will need to paper over this impossibility that Q is right at the same time, None of that happens and what will the hallucination B, legislation will be something you can't. Even imagine, because did you think the Russia collusion thing would like just came out of nowhere right I mean I'm sure it was part of a plan by some people to to pour forth that idea, but you didn't see a cover. And whatever happens, to leave people with the queue brains and cognitive dissonance, which is gonna, be extreme. Now scooby really extreme. He don't know what that

do but a whole lot of people are gonna be fleshed out. So I don't know if you're just joining I don't know. What was wrong with the Youtube feed, but people said the sounded works. I understood it off. Then somebody says why is twitter suspending all accounts mentioning Q, because they can. They can did. I tell you that the reason that I own twitter stock is that there are so powerful bacon, basically decide what free speeches now remember the exception to free speech used to be you can't yell fire in a crowded theatre now. The reason for that is that that would be dangerous. People would try to run out of the theatre and trample each other if their. If there's not a fire,

It's pretty bad example of using speech, but now we have added to that. Example you can yell fire in the crowded theater, and this is Other jobs, there's no hyperbole. With added to that example, you can't question a an election after it served, but now I suppose you do question board certified, but after certified, that's our new exception to freedom of speech for all practical purposes. Now, by the way, so they said, twitters down six. By four percent now so I started down ten, and now it's stone six percent. Do you know what these small investors just said to themselves? Are you serious somebody's gonna give this stock to be in a ten percent discount I'll? Take it six percent this scale.

twitter start. Today. I hate to tell you about this: a bargain, no I'll. Take that back. Cosette sounds like a stock recommendation, reverse that there were There were no restock recommendations in this luxury. You should not listen to be for stock recommendations night. So- See the proud boy leader, Nicholas Oaks, OX. apparently shared image of himself on social media smoking cigarettes in the capital last week and he was arrested. Why? But he's claiming that he took part in the re, doesn't professional journalist? I will think that's gonna go too far, but it's good to the subject of a defence. I suppose.

Do you wonder what he was thinking when the head of the proud boys were standing in the capital building, smoking cigarettes and take yourself he did, you think, did you think that that was gonna be fine? What what did you think. What do you think so? He said the Amazon is down today: but I wouldn't worry about Amazon's future either we ve got a pretty good situation, so I just have to wonder what was in the heads of the people who did this know? Some of them were murderous killers. learned. Some of them were just Patriots Bow I would love to know what was going through the head of somebody who thought they could smokers cigarette in the capital after

in the way they got in taking a picture themselves, and thank you I'll be fine. I guess it's all would be fine. What else wrong with that We ve all thou see. I think you ve all seen the video. The horrendous video of the protesters, Dragging a police officer and of a doorway and beating him with american flag. Another blunt objects: we see that police officer laying motionlessly on the ground after being beaten. Some of your disagree about the fact Jack about whether he die worth more than somebody else died for was actually show you being killed or just injured. So there's little question there, but yours I said about once you ve seen the video of the crowd either killing or attempting to kill. It was at least it

murder is either murderer, attempted murder, one of those I have to say that I would say that the law enforcement officer who opened fire and shut shut, the woman who is coming through the broken window through the neck. You killed her out, say his. That was a clean shoot. Now I say that because if somebody is, police officers out and bidding them in an organised crowd way in Europe. police officer and the crowd is ten feet away from you and heading towards you and they ve just beaten to death or attempted to be to death. Police officer the same job you have and the right there do. You have the ability to shoot. The answer is yes, Yeah you do if somebody just murdered

One of your kind has the same crowd. Composition is not the same exact people, but opposition. For the same reason, on the same day, yeah you can shoot the first person through the glass now on Twitter. When I said this people said to me Scott. There is no evidence that the. Who did? The shooting was even aware that this other cop had been murdered or almost murdered. Whichever was different area in the cabin to which I say that makes no difference. It doesn't matter, what does it matter if the cop who fired was aware that somebody has job had just been beaten to death or near death, what does it matter because he made the right decision now other he knew about that were didn't know about it. Does.

matter. If you knew about it or did know about it, he made the right decision because we know about it The fact that you and I know about it now means that you made the right decision. he was operating in the fog of war. A decision to make the put himself at great personal risk, because you know, if you take the shot you personally or a great personal risk and He did it in the fog of war, not knowing if it was the right thing in the wrong thing, but he took a personal risk in its effort to protect the vice president etc, and in retrospect he was right. Because he perceived the situation as a immediate deadly threat. One assumes he did. I mean read his mind, but one assumes he did because he took the shot and looked like a controlled in tat your father was shot.

so it doesn't matter doesn't matter he knew about the other violence. There or a violent crowd exactly the way his treatment of them would suggest. They were. So I would say that the police officer, who was, I think, suspended when you guess suspended. There's a cloud over you that there is an assumption, a default assumption that may be it in some wrong, there's still, maybe but does not feel a little bit more like. We think you did some wrong. I feel as if these suspension or whenever they ve done to him. should be immediately reversed because, based and what we ve all seen the clear default assumption is that it was an appropriate shooting trash. the woman who got shot- I will say this as clearly as Possible- didn't deserve to get shot. So the individual Gaza we all agree should not have been shot, but

A larger decision of how do you stop a proud that look like good police work tonight now? Could it be that he did actually do something, that's illegal or inappropriate, and you should be punished Navy, but I haven't seen it. I haven't seen anything like it. I feel as though the appropriate treatment for that law enforcement officer is to give him the benefits, until there is some evidence which I haven't seen, the reacted appropriately Now somebody else on Twitter said to be scarred. There is never a reason to shoot into a crowd, especially when the people they even see visibly are not armed with deadly weapons, dupe deeply that that there never a reason to shoot into a crowd. I said to the person who tweeted like You should tell your wife that if there are, angry crowd surrounding your home,

that you or not should into the crowd. You would let them coming. and kill your wife. That would be your choice. But I want to tell you that your wife might be interested to know that if I were protecting by wife. And was so angry crowd that I believed had weapons and met me harm we're surrounding the house. I'm just gonna put my strategy on it. If it the crowd of men, women and children. surround my house, and I have a belief that they're gonna do harm to my wife. I was every one of them- men, women and children. Now, that's just me this, assumes that that I know the dangers real, but Apparently, this person wants to tell his wife that he would let her die at the hands of the crowd. Because there is no reason to shoot into a crack? I guess not!

one way to look at it, but my way it's gonna be alive than yours won't. So I will explain to her. Of course I will go to jail in either case. But least my wife would be life, so the three level three layers down of reality on this story. Linwood fairly ban from Twitter as a lot of people, have been four for calling for my pen to face of firing squad. He actually sent back. Now there are some bans that look unreasonable to me. This is one of them. If you call for the vice president to be the subject of a firing squad when the This programme has done literally nothing wrong, literally nothing wrong.

Yeah. That might be reasonable earlier from something, I suppose the free speech extremists would still say, but even so Well, I don't Elisa, wouldn't bother me if somebody got banned for something like that, but you the three layers down analysis on the top layer- looks like a lawyer who was a little bit crazy right and then you look at desolate. Polonias looks like from got to. Lawyers will be crazy. We'll be crazy, as well looks like, but is it the story? I will tell you that early on in the saga, when we first her the the wilder allegations from Linwood and from some people, that the people

who I know who know the most about how the world works are being very vague here. The people who know the most about how the world works interpret that are you want, but you should deserve that these are people who have been part of that world, not people imagine what it's like people who are part of things, what you say, who had been involved in real things that maybe you're not aware of. when this first came up. They said to me that it's almost certainly this information campaign, meaning that These two lawyers Linwood and Sunday Powell they have been identified as people who would believe conspiracy, Because that is something that you could figure out. You can figure out from past record who is likely to believe a wild story

My concern is that they were identified as people likely to believe wild story and that they may have been fed one for the purpose of discrediting them, and That looks exactly like what happened, and I need to tell you that I was told that was happening from the star in This has every as every tell for be some kind of. Either people who are in current intelligence agencies or have been involved or have worked with them, or have some kind of deep experience in disinformation as profession. They appear to be behind feeding these conspiracy theories to these lawyers, but I'm not I'm, not forgetting the lawyers. I believe that they might have been targeted because they might have been perceived as people who would believe things. So I'm just speculate.

I don't have any direct evidence of any that. I'm just saying that people told me this was what was happening in the beginning and their people would know and but what they would know just by the tells not because that personal information and asked what it looks like me to me. It looks like a disinformation campaign. There was under present successful we'll. Never now, let's just speculation. so apparently the company cubicles media, which I guess his employer for market within Bench- Bureau, DIN, bungee, no, Et Cetera, there's told, is on air personalities. This report are enough. It's true, I don't think you can assume. This is true just because it is in the news just because

there's so by the way, I'll I'll play back the Youtube and see? If that is, the audio was ok. If it is ok, then I'll, just never listened. Anybody who says there's an audio problem, not just. You're just poor through it, but every now another actually is an audio problem so confusing. So what do you think about the fact that curious media is telling their honour people allegedly that's the story outer now truthful. This is that they can't talk about certain topics. So he over Europe seen people say there was the audio was fine and other people say there was a problem sounded like room audio. So probably sounded like my microphone. Wasn't working I'll look into them.

so here is my take. What trumpeted I feel as though just put a year in the cleanest, simple form has and value so you already know my opinion, but police simply helps. It is like this. There's nothing wrong with inspiring people to protest against an election result which you think was non transparent So what are you doing? You saying? I think we should look into his re election result and it was a peaceful if it had done a peaceful protest. Nobody would have a problem with that, but and but we also all agree that inciting an insurrection would be a bad thing. So I think there are two things we all agree on. Peaceful protest over an election result.

transparency election, probably all good, as long as it does in turn violent in time. We would all agree that directly. Fighting an insurrection specially if you're sitting president would be really bad, especially if there was no election irregularities, but here's the thing that distinction requires the public to know the difference, but one of the public or to many of the public. It doesn't have to be the whole public, but one of too many of the public can tell difference between being asked to do it for a safe, non, violent protest and an insurrection. Because that's what happened there, were apparently there were a number of people who couldn't tell the difference.

Between yeah, let's go protest and our voice will be heard endless. Heaven violent insurrection against the present against the vice president. I guess now if the public could tell the difference between those two things: a peaceful protest, inspiration, verses, inspiring a violent takeover. If all of the public knew that those were different things, then everything the president did was fine. He didn't do anything wrong if the public could tell the difference, but they can't they can't indifference. Apparently there are plenty of people who think go. Protests means a signal to overthrow the government. Now should Trump have known, that should,

tromp have known the saying the right thing, which is go protest. The writhing, according to his opinion, could should tromp have known that doing the right thing. Let's go protest, You servants peaceful, would lead to the wrong thing. Some people thinking that they should go, do bad things. The answers, I think so I think Trump should have known that the public would not be smart enough to make this distinction and that it would cause trouble but here s the problem can we ever have street protests again, because anybody telling that the leaders of black lives matter that they should step down, because their protest led to some some members of the group being bad accuracy, bad things. People got hurt. So are we asking the same thing? The black lives better, that their leaders should take responsibility for all the the danger

because when you say that black lives matter could know with one hundred percent certainty shortly after the first few nights, they could know with complete certainty that continuing the street protests would lead to more damage and death. an injury. Of course they would so. Why are they not just as on the spot is trumpets in both cases they would know if lifeline matter had said yeah we're gonna be peaceful, but you know protests that major uncovered all the good ones and you know, Nothing really good ever happen without love and violence, clothes matter, leaders or save stuff like that, are they not fully responsible? for every violent thing that came out of the end of what was mostly peaceful same standard, I just think you have to apply the same standards,

that said if the leaders of black lives matter had been president of the United States. And then encouraged. What would be less say, a justified protest, justified in the sense that there are real concerns about police action against. black citizens, so no matter what you think about the actual date or what you think about that. It's a real concern, and I don't ignore something that is that much of a concern by my fellow citizens. Even if I think you know there's I would look at, will definitely differently the concern itself. This fully worth the consideration right has just raised wouldn't matter who it was or what the complaint was. really really bothered by the point we're living in this country is a problem. I think you got to address it so.

If black lives matter. Leaders have been president and Sunday go, do some peaceful protests and then people got killed because they are not all peaceful. Some bad elements will join what happens if you he's doing it and then the next night you say I gotta. Do it again, something is urgent and then the third night you say yeah go, do it again, something is hurting. why. Thank you. It s, the the this hypothetical imaginary situation you and Astley head of black lives matter who, in my imaginary situation, is also the President S and to step down when you, but here's the bigger now that we know that every kind of street protests will inevitably be, the same will be taken up. By the bad elements. If you. protest tomorrow there was a street protests with lots of energy

it wouldn't matter what the topic was. Bad people would join it. hey we can I than this crowd will break someone. As we heard some people that we think should be heard. So maybe we reach the point where we, if you have social media that works, we don't really have social media that works. At this point I would argue, but in terms of free speech, but maybe we should just Take it as a standard that, if you are an organiser of protest and somebody dies, you're responsible, because that's what we told Trump and I dont disagree, I dont disagree. The trump has responsibility for the deaths in the capital. I think he s responsibility, but I would like to take that concept. And apply to everybody, I think the black lives matter. Leaders have responsibility for the deaths that came out of those protests.

Now, you might say the benefit of the protesters in the long run, this greater greater than the immediate desk. Now. Listen to that argument, but you still have to take responsibility for the best, because If you do something you know, war resulted death if you'd know it or at least injury. If you know it, do you give Anti far brings. Let's say: antiviral brings a thousand people to a city. Do you think they don't know? People are getting earth of course. Of course, I do. so I just want to be consistent in the standard either the leaders are always blamed for the DAS or never, but you gotta pick one an idea. I guess. I'd be ok, picking you the one. I have entered the twilight zone.

Somebody says cavaliers encourage writers, she should be impeach next, I think that's a completely fair, sir. People are saying that come. Let us encourage the black, lies another protesters and even said things that sounded to me actually encourage a little bit of violence? That's where I heard it baby, the exact words, no say that, but similar to the trump situation. If I hear that Well, it's sort of the reality of Europe. That way, that's your reality. So I think that would actually be one hundred percent appropriate that

matter whether present trump gets impeach you're, not you, I do think come later, should be impeached on day, one, thus completely appropriate. Here's the thing she said did lead be encouraged, incited the rioting Beth, I think that's perfectly appropriate. In fact, I dont know if the Republicans have the ability to push for that, but I put it through today. There's no recently you get. There is no reason and pitch cobblers forcibly she did before she took off his right because it is also connected to taking office, was when she was running Yeah, I think cobbler should be impeached. Under the same theory that the president will probably get impeached now by the way I dont have strong opinions about impeachment verses resigning, verses, twenty fifth amendment verses, even just not doing anything

I feel as if these things all became the same thing, because there's no time left me, I suppose the impeachment thing I've heard that if he gets impeached can suddenly factors on me. Is it true that the present guess impeached he loses? Is pension and security detail out? No, that that's true that doesn't sound true to me. It doesn't sound true that if your an ex president, you don't get secret service protection, but fact check that for me, if that were true, that would be just the worst thing. I'd heard all year, Opposite remember when everybody said that supporters would follow him, no matter what and that, if he shot somebody on Fifth avenue his supporters

but still support him. Oh, here's, the weird and convenient thing that happened this week tramp. He wasn't trying to do this, of course, but inadvertently tromp, created in Austria for people like me, which Actually, really convenient so without this week the events of this week in the capitals of transport have left office and I would just be a personal supported them on ninety percent of everything. from beginning to end, and then I would have to live with that as the guy who would support Trump, who other people think it. monster, no matter what he did. no matter what he did now, if you support somebody who other thing, other people think you're seller and your support him, no matter what he does. This would like ehler. So

that was what I was looking forward to- is that tromp would just leave office and then I would be branded Hitler's helper forever and that would be the rest of my life. because of the events of this past week it makes really easy for people like. It is all about ok Like those other things you do like the Middle EAST, the economy before the krona virus. bunch of stuff I like- and I can still like them just as much as I like them before. But this is my shooting somebody on Fifth avenue moment and I dont supported when somebody on Fifth avenue and now you know for sure, because in this exact case I'm not, I'm not arguing against impeachment arguing against the twenty third amendment. I don't know well in terms of precedent or anything like it,

That's a good idea, but I don't have any steak, and I have no argument for that and I don't think it matters either because in a few days he's out of office either way That's worth envelope They appear J of America either through the raven cancelling their golf tournament. There was at eight one of the Trump These other Trump family is going to avoid total economic destruction and I'll think that is fair that is deeply unfair, because I dont believe with the term family. I believe that there is anything in mind except open the country in getting a good outcome, and it looks like

they will be punished for trying to help the country by a complete destruction of their brand? They, usually you say that the present tromp was responsible for that, and I would argue that that what I want to say that I also see that in the year in the comments people saying that you got a career, ass career ass, now. What I'm saying view is that the trumpet early created a situation where you can cover your ass, but also be completely honest and transparent I'm not lying when I say the drug did something very bad this week and if people want a piece of work, an argument does that sound like a lie? Do I sound dishonest when I say that, because it's a pretty popular opinion,

How do I use disbelieve that now it just happened? to cover my ass now am I do I feel bad that the truth Also, somehow helps me no one available, then. Why should I feel bad that the truth, when my way. Small way they are making them disappear, and that is It is amazing to watch happened. You said fair Isoude, fair is bs, yet I use the word fair in casual conversation, while also believing that is not a real thing, but you not fair means in in the context I use. It means that reasonable people would look at it and say: ok that that's that's already, there's no such thing as actual fairness,.

but there is a situation where human beings will look at the situation and say, as a get somebody says, you're a coward Scott here, a fuckin idiot. I tell you if you watch me for four years and you think I'm a coward you're, a fucking idiot, so maybe maybe catch up a little bit and find out what have been up to that's one of the dumbest opinions that's right now, you're buying into the scam which one You see the bill. No writer there was in the capital yeah I do, This believed that there were some bad elements were not maghreb people, but obviously there were plenty of mega people who made it into the capital It is wrong, somebody says in capitals.

Wait till these big tech company start using our private dams and emails against us. Why assume? What's gonna happen, that their feels inevitable. if you ve said anything by DM or private message, you'd have to assume that that's all discoverable My my sort of ongoing approach for less several years anyway. I don't say anything privately. The eye word. That would end me if it were public- and I say this as a bad things publicly in terms of real there could be some is that I would say in public also privately, but none of them would in my career they're, not that bad. What the jackals are doing to drop is horrible. The other was your journal, says: tromp isn't guilty of incitement, and I agree

from a legal perspective. I don't think you can say that any thing he said was incitement. what I'm saying is. He should have known as a leader that it would have an unintended effects that the way you was talking would have the unhindered The fact so, if you look at what he intended and you look at what he did, there's no mistake: if you ask yourself, should a leader of known that those things he did which were technically accurate in legal and ok, that, even though they are technically okay should have known it was going to lead to what it led to, and the answer is yes, as leader he should have known they, even though it and breaking laws there was gonna leave. Something like that. Excellent, Why should you do have you noticed that we ve all been trained to think pass the sale? The sale is that the election was fine. If the alike,

it was fine. This is the official narrative and, as you know, I pledged relations to an earlier if. The official narrative is also true, then, what Europe is doing, is quite destructive and it would look that way if it turned out- and we can't know this- there's no way the now, but I pathetically just as a mental experiment. Let's say that the election hypothetically, no evidence of this knives or wish no proof of it. Lets say it was a legitimate. Then, if you were to look at the president's actions, they look a lot different over. what if President Trump is the only one who's right? What, if he's the only one who is right now, of course, many of you would be right to if you think, through some wrong in this scenario, but in terms of the official narrative one of job sale,

one is right. You care ruled them because of their than others. situations where tromp was the only one who was right there right. You didn't have a history of fairly. For Currently, being we only want, it was right. I would say you wouldn't have to worry about that, but he does have a history of going against. The crowd had been right. They read like this comment. Buzz your girlfriend worth she's, my wife. You have disappointed us all. I'm sorry, Jerry, Fridge, disappointed you

You tell me what exactly you're disappointed. Could you be more specific by the way my follower account one from six hundred and sixty six thousand two six hundred and eleven thousand so drop in, like a rock. Somebody says scattered, swaying both ways now, there's an idiot comment, so from so shoe whatever so somebody says that Sweden both ways now that's that's coming from an idiot because a smart person and I would hope that it will be more smart,

when done people under a smart person would say well Trump as all bunch applauses, but there are some negative, as were smart person was a dumb person would say, take his I'd. Take aside, damn that's would dump people's taking aside, regardless of whose right and wrong is stupid as stupid. So stupid people should leave this live streaming. Video. if you think I should just take aside that stupid. What about personal responsibility of the crowd.

You can have more than one person responsible. The people can be personally responsible and legally responsible for whatever they did. At the same time, you can have a president who is inspiring them yet is honey that my vote recount stopped. My follower account stopped at six. Six things: do you feel a dealer should be convicted for an overdose, while I dont think that the legal standard should be applied to the presidency, so that would be bad at using analogies. So, every time you say but Scott, what about this completely different situation? My answer is always going to be the same. That's a different situation, but Scott. What about this other different situation, to which I I'll bet you can anticipate? It say. Oh, that's, just another different situation, but if you want to talk about.

The attitude if you're talking about personal responsibility of illicit drug overdose, the law, the law. requires defines. Who has responsibility for what If the dealer in your example sold somebody that they thought was annex but turned out to be sentinel and the person died from, I do think the the dealer should be executed in wiping so desires.

Your question and I think the person who takes it also has complete responsibility for their own decisions, but at the same time, the person who sold them xanax that was really deadly, felt in all and ended up telling them. I think they should be executed. That's you, smoking people with cognitive dissonance, either changed their minds or change the interpretation right, but is now cognitive dissonance. If you change your mind, It's only cognitive dissonance. If you change your hallucination altered altogether comments on Twitter versus gab. No, I think Gavin Parlor or all doomed and by the way the I sometimes tell you that I know the news before you do the news

parlour and gab getting in trouble. I knew months ago, and I knew from I wanted to tell you told me because I would be funny, let's just say that somebody who would now Toby months ago, the parlour and gap will either have to turn into twitter? In other words, act the same way they do or they would go out of business, because if you let the Nazis on etc, the altogether, so I knew that months ago, there's no other way, I was gonna, go the parlour and gab we're gonna either become filled with nazis and cancelled, or they have to act exactly like twitter and then there's no point in them existing. So there was never a path for Solar or gap to ever succeed now do that months ago, because somebody who is smarter just told me,

The first time I heard it was like there's no other way that can go there either. become twitter and which pay case. They don't need any reason to exist or There are going to go the other way and they have to be cancelled because they before nazis and they would lose their banking use all of its it was. It was obvious months ago that we would be exactly where we are now. So have you finalize your California escape yet yeah? I've got somebody ties in California and I wouldn't be I haven't seen Arnold Schwarzenegger's thing yet, but I don't really care what is opinions on this too,

face Scot. I don't really operate on faith. I don't know if you ve noticed it's not really a good way gather survive without an app, but it's not very vital at the moment whatever. But but my point stands, gab doesn't have a purpose. Unless it can be free speech and again we don't live in a world. Where can the bank and the banking system, which is closed. parlors getting their own servers. Well, good luck with that, even if they get thrown servers seems like that would be enough. Related companies and advertisers. You don't want to advertise. I don't just don't see. Other business model could work, the other. The other possibility is locals locals is where I have my content. So if I get banned from any this stuff, you can find me their support.

Description service. We're looking at doing groups is subscriptions subscript. so right now usage, you subscribed each creator, you want to follow, but we have to figure out how to packaging better so that you can get more creators, Scott, are you scottish? I am just a little bit there's a little bit of scottish when I saw the mass melon scam get normalized around what that's about the gay somebody says. Gab works Work scab works again. What about ITALY? The the

U story so I I tweeted retool tweet by the overstock C, O Berne and he seems to be the smartest person whose making these claims so there's claims about something in ITALY that somehow affected our elections. Now here's my taken that if third story is true that ITALY was involved and affecting our elections, if it's true, it will be the first time in mind Marie that a story that has that vibe is true.

So what I say I story the has the vibe. Let me give you an example. If somebody said tomorrow that in large ape, like creature had been discovered and wild living forever and I'd say you mean big foot and then the persons they none, not Bigfoot, it's a different creature, it's a dinosaur was they die somebody says: we discovered a full size dinosaur and it's been living the whole time and Iceland, which is pick a place. Would you believe that in other words, is a story that has a vibe to it: though you were just say, I don't know if I ever need resources, because I don't think a full size dinosaur has been found in Iceland. so there are some things that just by their vibe, you say I don't feel like. I have two research. This one I feel like I can just brushes

So the ITALY story has that vibe to me it sounds exactly like a story, that's not true, but it is twenty twenty one and we ve been surprised before Patrick burn. I couldn't members firstly, so if you look into Patrick burn you'll find out some serious academic credentials, probably literally genius IQ. I think it is fair to say: eddies looked into it. So if somebody with those credentials and their level of intelligence looks into something and makes a claim, should you take it seriously, while you should take seriously enough to look into it for sure, maybe he certainly is earned that level of credibility. That claim with specific sum, he claimed some background. We shall look into it so fully

in favour. Well, she was there, but I would say that about everything. If you asked me to bet on it, I would put a pretty big bet on that now being true freely pig that probably give you ten to one odds, so I'd, probably better hundred dollars against losing a thousand. Then it's not true. Could it be true, while falls into the category of I suppose anything is possible, but it doesn't have the feel of something? That's true. That's all I know for sure are so I got for now and I will talk to you tomorrow.