Look. I've got enough well good morning, everybody it's time for best part of the day, the part that makes everybody happier and everybody richer everybody a little better. Looking have you noticed that people who watch coffee was got Adams there a little bit sexier than other people? Are they you know they are you know it. You see him on the streets. You'd be walking down the street with the whole crowd of people here, look at People say her ordinary, ordinary, ordinary and then you'll see somebody who watches the simultaneous, if you won't even know it they'll be complete strangers, but they're almost glowing. Almost like you could see her aura strew, you just look for it

hard to see yet those who who come early and enjoyed simultaneous. If you have a big advantage in life over those who don't and if you to take it up to another level, almost to the level of unfair. All you need is a couple of honor gossip. Take her genesis, dynamic, kantian, juggler flask of vessel, of what any kind of any you fellow, was it with your favorite liquid. I, like coffee, enjoyment heavily on parallel pleasure, the dopamine today the thing makes everything better skull. The simultaneous watch it do. It's thing go now some of you can drink tea and pretended coffee. That's fine. Do let's go Brandon, let's go bread.

Well, Rasmussen did Paul S, people, People are more divided after binding or less delighted. Now, thank goodness, thank goodness. We got President Biden too bringing the country together, dare I say, unite us. Yes, and how's he doing first year on the job. Joe Biden has workers. The rest was simple: sixty four percent of people polled said were more divided, less good. but eleven percent said were more united, so eleven percent work now great. Forty three percent said Trump would make it even worse. So, according to this pole, I may be reading too much into it, but

I believe that we have shown that every president, no matter who they are, makes everything works. Sort of ASEAN. Those paradox canvas situation every president. No matter who is just makes things fifty percent worse, for wherever you are and you over the next presidency. I'm sorry it's gonna be fifty percent worse and worse than it was So I am not sure that this is the time to pull. That's telling us much more than how people want you to know. They answered the question. Basically. Because I know that you couldn't measure how divided, where that even the thing can you could even bachelor divided aware subject, while you all know Facebook at a major outage. Yes, that reportedly com.

Soccer Burg, some billion dollars. seven billion dollars five percent of his wealth- and you think you noticed to borrow money for lunch, but did you really Lou seven billion dollars, now no paper papers went down. It will go back up next week, so it was able there's something in the story It's hilarious, how many How many of you know the whole areas, part of the Facebook outage story, so there however, our of the custom they lost uttered and sixty million dollars revenue is a pretty big deal. But how did you know the funny part of it.

Ok, you're class somebody sail to upgrade now there's something funnier, there's something funny or about the story. We don't we don't know the details yet, but there is something very funny about it. You're ready. Let me just read the sentence, I think From see you, the exact causes, the outage has not been confirmed by Facebook One expert said problem may have been caused internal error made by staff. Actively raced the site from the internet. you raised the size of the internet, you do it this way: A charm grim carry him the city of obscurity, firm closure. Said face were made a series of updates to his border gateway protocol, which caused it to quote.

appear for the energy again now, maybe it's because of the deliberate cartoonist and I can see a whole month, materials company, but but here's the forty four in all likelihood there's one employee somewhere. Who knows they did somewhere somewhere in this seventy seven of seven other some billion people was one poor bastard. Who knows he pushed the robot and maybe they Facebook, those about the internet, try to think this is poor, geyser performers,

and if you re sitting down with his boss. Say powerless boss, you're a quarter. what's your accomplished, this court well We will Wednesday eleven publicity, I would say a lot about publicity about Facebook is Destroying youth, hurting people on people self esteem.

Is causing a lot of damage Stop that issue. Here's the irony it is, however, it is push the wrong erased face of the earth. Did that did more good for the world. We politicians, except maybe ran Paul last year? They all goods but he's over another facebook He's gonna get fired.

you couldn't tell. I finally got enough sleep last night, a love story. Let us move on so these three reports five trillion dollar infrastructure bill? How do you think that's doing as there was a rethink? Duskily slide right through it was free and three point five trillion dollars, but that sounds like a lot because spreading over ten years, and then you have to let me ask you- and you have to appreciate that not all is spread over ten years on the early is bad, but those free

current finally pays results. So this free, why can't you get that improved Barton, Mansion Cinema, the two senators or Holden tight and movies dies me predicted that this would never get a second dear member Gimme, a fact check cases obey wonders of em, just make this up. So when the comments can you verify that I've been saying for a long time that this is a good sign. You can verify, as everybody else other Everybody else's will say probably upon the just said. This is gonna, guess there's never get up. Now. I do not give no negotiated down two trillion or something. so damn it

that's what you like some advice. This is free advice for Democrats, erratic here's how they get their infrastructure bill passed, not the full three point: five trillion luck! I get that best, but having something something best. Let me ask you this question and maybe you know the answer of the three point: five billion in infrastructure. How much of the three point five trillion goes toward fixing our election systems such that they can be audited instantly and we wouldn't have any questions about whether it was a fair election. How much, the three point: five trillion dollars goes to our most important infrastructure. Oh yeah, I said it. Our most important infrastructure was more important year, potholes or your

Republic, which desire priority infrastructure- it's not even cloudless right is now the clubs. So here's what the Democrats could do to make their infrastructure bill a little more palatable little more palatable put in a big part, the fixes, the most important issues about that was, let's put some money in their to fix the most important infrastructure. The elections is everything else is subsidiary to that now That's not going to get you all three for three point: five trillion the Republicans are going to go for that. But do you think you can get some Republicans on board for a trillion plus election before one trillion? Eleven

Who is against election improvements does well, I mean in public S, ear against it, even if your I thus my suggestion fix that thing by putting stuff on there and hold tight inside anything. Let me say this in two Republicans don't say that anything that doesn't have election reform as part of the infrastructure? Those, I anything don't fix- arose Don't give anybody wife, I don't know either lecture reform number one priority Get that in there and then you can negotiate, but if In their dont even negotiate, there's nothing to talk about. You gave an infrastructure bill that ignores the most important infrastructure necessary, There are some things you could say our way. oh and philosophically, oppose- or I don't like this,

socialism, in those resort of fair, fair kinds of arguments, but it's not a philosophical debate to say that we have scepticism in this country about the election integrity and nobody would argue that the risk that the system and that that these effects, that a healthy republic, Those are not really arguable points, so I would say that an infrastructure bill that doesn't have fixing the most important infrastructure and it is just stupid, so stop calling it whatever. It is different priorities just stupid, but the infrastructure and the infrastructure development maybe get a chance. There was a black ex tesla worker who want a court case claim to use racially abused every day at a California plant, including

He called the onward and he was awarded a hundred and thirty seven million dollars. Now, when you read the headline, if you did- or maybe you here for the first time. You now say to yourself: this looks a little exaggerated, meaning that precisely size seems crazy. Out of besides with the crime, but also I mean really really with this guy- was abused every day, every day, really every day you got racially abused and then saw young up totally skeptical read the headline. Neglect of God is one of these stories of thousands. Somebody couldn't take a joke or something like that, and that I read the actual

Are you ready for this? These are things that apparently, the court found credible or court found these clothes crab. Here's ears what he claimed. I think this was from was it from farces? I forget the fifty year old, user contracted elevator operator. He claimed that fellow employees drew swastikas and left racist graffiti around the planet, Well, he said one of his supervises drew a person with a black face and a bone in his hair and wrote boo short for Jegu The supervisor that allegedly told them he quote couldn't take a joke, Wendy S confront them. Does

contended that none of the supervisors stepped into snapped views that true, it means sounds like it passed the test for the the air, the jury, but I the value of any view of them any kind of environment like this desire I've never been anywhere near anything like that. I live in California. This is factories just down the road. Why can I live here all my life ever been anywhere near, never wear. anywhere near any kind of behavior like this? Have you I'm just looking at your comments to see if any of you have ever been near, this kind of nothing ever yeses. Oh, I saw yes sauce, worry us so another. Yes, I'm sorry!

we asses? Who said no, and I worked unless a blue collar, sir we're looking for. Somebody says no in the event of the deep south. I know this is shocking. And I'm say, yeses, so that food, All of you who said no, he had the same experience. I have apparently just be aware. People who are probably credible, we're say: yes, this is real little a wake up, call! Isn't that you know you think things are good, but you thinking in terms of the average right on average things pretty good relative to There used to be right, lots of improvement needed, but man, you see something like this. You say if this is even close. The true does gonna shocked me. I am a little bit shocked, so in that case the thirty seven million is fine button. If

Claims are true son the amount of money doesn't look so highly more doesn't get. The other reason is punitive. It's not about rewarding this guy. It's just punitive. I see and then has turned on Facebook, which is interesting in because you would imagine them both being left leaning organization. By any rapidity, peace by Kara although more light earlier mom? I wish people had some way from each pronouncedly crackling. So here s what she said in an opinion piece on CNN and the factors on CNN seems important right. He said thus debate we should be having isn't about Whether Facebook knows its product is harmful. These, Ex were established by independent researchers long ago. So

in an opinion dishes offering as a established fact that even Facebook would agree to the independent researchers say that Facebook is powerful, just statements just harmful. And so she says, rather, the question we should ask yourselves is why Americans are spent still spending so much time of there. I was on it. What is making them unhappy and divided. So we know that Facebook is horrible. Why are people spending so much time on it. Now again, the big story here is just a facebook is reporting it or not, reporting about putting this opinion based on their site so that young left his fractured, not only the progresses, verses there, the policy types but even the the Facebook, does the sea now not really on the same side anymore? So when Rasmussen that their polar we more or less divided?

trustingly were more fractured. I dont know there were more divided, but were more fractured. Is that makes sense instead of two teams is more like ill for sixteen, Sir or something different, sought enough, there's more divided or more for action reset the same thing But of course, the real reason that we use Facebook. So much is that many of us can avoid it. You needed for business, and its objective is designed to be addictive, so of course, is harmful and, of course we could save a signal same as any other addiction. Why do we treat internet addiction different then say heroin addiction? Why do we treat them differently? The other not the same, of course, but feels like that.

And suppose someone, you know, I'm not entirely sure the inscrutable particular will survive leases current form, they instagram in particular, seems like the deem the more dangerous one frankly so was Near teachers protest it many of them and their shouting F Joe Biden, s buildable, so is that wasn't so teachers that lost her job because of the vaccine mandate? But let's put some context on this. Is everybody like context? I had some people arguing against context today.

Argument was that if I asked for a context, I was trying to brainwash them or to convince them of something that to which I say I dont know, a situation in which context makes things worse. Is there one if you're, trying to accurately understand the situation? Is our situation? We're context makes it worse there. Actually people pushing pushing back, because I asked for context I'll tell you eyes So the context I s work is: are there the other mandatory vaccinations their teachers also need tat. It was at a fair question, is a fair question for contacts, To know if there are other vaccinations that are required of the teachers now the critics said Scots

it's got. This is so unfair, you're just trying to get people vaccinated. That's your real. Your real agenda is to embarrassed these people and get people vaccinated. Now No, you can't read my mind. That's not my secret agenda. I really dont care of people get vaccinate close. I am right to care about myself. But here's what the contacts told me. First of all, do you know the answer? The question in the comments give me your answer because I don't think anybody has really looked into. too deeply, but are there other vaccinations that teachers in the United States might differ by state that the required of seeing some people say plenty. Yes is the answer is sort of now. The answer is sort of no meaning. You there's nothing. This enforced.

so based on the answers that I got my car understanding, which I might revise. If I get a new information looks like there's a mild preference. In some places, but no one is really jacking. I dont think any teacher ever lost a job before now for a lack of vaccination. Is there any teacher, whoever couldn't Geier Lawson job for a different kind of vaccination? Recently, I don't think that's the thing. So here's your context required forced vaccinations of teachers. It's not a thing? The servants a thing now, it's a thing for the first time so I think they're they're so little bit disagreement fact. So I thank you. In some places it looks like it's a requirement, but is not enforced. So effect is not. This is enforced.

So when I asked for a context, this is but people said Scott, you bastard you're, trying to make this vaccination likely. Others and you know, they're, not the same dammit. You know they're not the same as this one was young a faster pace and do not have as much times we don't know the safety so different technology. Scott. You bastard, stop saying that this vaccination is an anyway in any way equivalent similar to or we should make it. A decision is based on. What the other vaccinations they're just different true. Can I agree with it. Am I allowed to agree with my colleagues, of course, This is why I say: don't use analogies to make decisions, because this is a different thing, but.

can context ever be useful. What did the context Ami once people said now? There's no others, No other example word spam old fool. He also. Is it there's? No other example where we ve required vaccinations so did my context, support the ideas should give vaccinated or the teachers or did the context support the idea that they shouldn T support Sadia that they should because its new president? So if you look at the old precedent is like we were pretty laissez faire startle or let it go So this is different and I think that's worth noting, because if this was in any way similar to the past, you'd feel different about then if you knew all this a brand new wow, this is random.

So what I asked for the context I didn't ask for the context, because it would help my argument, which I dont have because I don't have an argument, your imagining that I'm trying to persuade you and I'm not just trying to understand it. So the context when exactly the opposite of the way the Mai critics thought it would you thought there when I asked for the context it was going to support the idea that they should give accident? Didn't that's. Why you s we're context? U s we're context, because you don't know which way is gonna point and by the way contacts doesn't answer the story because again their different their different vaccinations. So you can't take the contacts and just say: ok now. context. You were all done. It doesnt work like that, but as part of the larger story right, it's part of how we feel about is part of what we ve accepted in the past. As part of the story.

So we know about it. So I would say that the context does support other teachers, not getting vaccinate Doesn't mean that's right. Answer doesn't mean a straight answer, but the contacts with sport are right. You see what else we are going to play ball, made some news by putting a man on the cover, a male cover star, addressed as Bunny another with the guys deal was if he was uttered. What is essential identification was but was a mail just anybody else it now. What do you think that as the strategy so good, from Playboy most of you say it's stupid right? I think almost every person years who say that's done they destroyed their brand. Let me give you the counter arguments.

because you think there's no counter argument. You probably there's no way. This is smart replay. What right I hears! The counter argument is Bregenz. I think you'll be spice over the counter arguments number. One could play boy stay in business by continuing to print nude pictures of women. Now so couldn't. Can we all agree with us that the internet makes it really, you'll have to imagine that play boy could exist as a magazine. That's primary purpose is to show naked women. We all agree that play boy could not exist. The way was right, so that's the story when they had to change.

How could they change one where they can change changes by trying to be more provocative, then the internet that possible could play boy be more sexy than internet. Can they get some attention by being as sexy as the internet meeting as much x, rated, stop, etc. Now, now there's no, where there is no niche, there is no place to go so agree with. first, the playboy as a vehicle for showing pictures of naked women was dead I have had a few months left, but it was dead so take for it take further the assumption that is, there were dead, so they had to do something. here's. My argument, Playboy has always been at least three magazines and one. People are realised, do you think about the new treaty, but the other part The play boy was, it was a lifestyle lazy.

The lifestyle of people very open minded people who, who had just extreme open mindedness about progress. Anything so play boy was always the ultimate left, leaning, socially progressive vehicle. In addition to having naked The third thing they were was fairly serious. Playboy interview was usually been thinking of Jimmy Carter was in the play a lot of a lot of news was broken with the Playboy interviews, So the Playboy interview was almost so nicely. It was within this naked people magazine but was like his own entity. By the way I was, I was once they subjectively playboy interview.

There's a go in Dover was a bigger deal and I'll. I've have to tell you that the Playboy journalist and the way they handled in the fact checking was one of the finest journalistic experiences I've had, like legitimately journalistic Lee. High quality was playboy. No most people, you don't think of that. You don't think a play boys being a high level journalistic entity, but it is always. I'm not sure about currently, but it always has been so they had to change and they couldn't give more nudity but it was always a man, a magazine about progressive stuff and about pushing boundaries of about political stuff. I think this was a hail Mary pass. Beating their playboy has to turn into something to survive. There's no question about that, and the only thing they could turn into was something closer to the other. Two things

They did it besides. Nudity and the other two things they did was get your attention and be relevant about you socially provocative things that are there on the edge will it work. I wouldn't bet on it, but did they have a better play right? Did Playboy have a bad? reply. I don't think so. I think this is the best of their bad options and they executed it really well. They executed this really well. Why? Because we're talking about we're talking about, Suddenly Playboy became relevant the moment, a piss you off. As soon as you were mad about that cover, what's happening with all of my traditions,

as soon as you got mad about it and thought they were killing themselves? And you know you got all whatever you thought about it. It worked so Playboy succeeded. They succeeded in pushing themselves right into the front of a very let's say: energy filled, discussion about the other, gender and sexuality and stuff, and they became irrelevant by making you a little bit angry or disturbed or whatever So that's why I argued my argument is not that it will work, but it was their best play and they executing the well. In the comments comments disagree. I think I saw the on that. It looks like I told you: ok, let's talk about China. you remember. I gave a trump credit, as many did for new

trade deal with China and pushing hard and tat was all Trade war and stuff, but at least they got a good deal out of it in China, was gonna, buy a bunch of our farm goods, etc. And then they just didn't. That's what happens when you make a deal with China. You make deal them they just don't. Do, therefore, why sure. They would have found some reasons and not do it. They just don't. Do it. Binds push push back. So do we give Trump a win for negotiating a trade deal? Well, maybe only in the sense that it is closed and China for one is so yeah yeah police make them agreed with him,

And then, whether they, whether they lived up the deals or the second question, but I think Trump's instinct get them to agree to a deal was right and now we can observe that we can deal with them cuz they just didn't, keep their deal now, I'm sure if we, China, they have a different opinion of what's going on. Here, probably would say we didn't do. Our part of the deal so may be part of the story is missing from being fair, sprawly, something missing in the story, but. We certainly didn't get a good outcome now. This again plays into the the notion here that China is very unsafe for business, not just commercial business, but also political deals. They they can't. They will keep a deal. If China won't keep a deal. You just can't deal with them.

it was politically you can't deal with them commercially. They are unsafe or business We also have the reports also CNN. summer whistleblowers- or I guess some people who came out of the China system, one weaker and one police officer who apparently was ordered to torture them. because the way that the workers are picked up is that they literally put a blackwood over their heads and they take them away and they beat them until they confessed to things that guilty of this is men and women, and all of the suspects apparently get raped and women. Let me say that again, there is a suggestion, of course, but we don't have the report because correct right. I mean this is the sort of thing you would expect. People lie about

So let me say this: The reason that we attack Iraq than the weapons of mass destruction. We thought were there somebody had a reason to lie to get us to attack Iraq, So when you see a story like this, you gotta say historically, these whistle blowers of this type are lying historically. This kind of story would not be true and wages. Would you say that, historically, the whistle or is as yet we get tortured every day is usually not true, now that doesn't mean there's no to torture. I'm sure there is, but don't you think, it's a little bit of hyperbole little bit. Because this person has a great incentive to make sound worsen is now how bad it is. It's it's a tenant attend. the whistle blowers gonna, make a sound like a fifty. But let me not minimizing the scale of,

to turn its attention. This attempt, but whistleblowers gonna, make it look like a fifty. That would be normal, What you expect so just keep that in mind that there are others, an incentive to least change things a little bit but the story so far is that the police use electric, but only on the wiggers they put up I call on them when they pick them up in the street. They take them back, they beat them badly and often, and often. and then one of the men reported that the guards forced the other prisoners due to write them gang rape of apparently, and that that was normal. now. I don't know about the last point. I you say that the last word.

The guy say you're sounded credible and if it did happen, it's horrible etc. I don't know if I could go, therefore, but whatever it is, it's a tenant attempt. So bad steps happened and again. China is unsafe for business now I did get a lengthy message from one of my contacts are linked in if you're, watching right now mentioned name, but that my context is lacking on China for example. there's a counter argument that China's aggressiveness in the South China Sea is actually mostly defensive because they're putting up a defence against thee.

Fifthly, it or something because they don't want to be they don't ever want to be locked into their own territory where they can't do trade, and indeed having the belgian Road initiative would give them some diversification of commercial outlets, so they wouldn't need exclusively the ocean. option etc. Deeply value that to me, I'm not sure, there's such a difference between a defensive act at an offensive that I feel like that distinction is a little bit artificial. Don't you ever go aggressive defence being aggressively looks a lot like offensiveness, and we certainly know that the chinese government has ambitions about controlling as much of the world as they can same as we do

Every superpower was the control as much as can. Why, wouldn't you I mean so, do you don't you want to control as much of your life as you can? so it's burning natural that China would be threatened to control as much as they can, but do they have a defensive incentive to show? Now, apparently, also the the fly overs over Taiwan were, I think, kids, some holiday or something, but that doesn't really does make it better so just be aware that there is. There is one point of view that China's actions are little bit more defensive them. They look, but I'm not by. I definitely think that ever defensive motivation, as

When does for, I feel, like all their defence has often of secondary purpose. So that's what it looks like and they should have been dealt with. That would be the rational thing to do. Why would why would you have something this purely defensive? One good people. Here's a question for you this anywhere. So Antwerp twitter users, Christopher Hild notice, this and I guess other no notice the two, but did you know that violence build back better slogan is being used in Canada and Great Britain. Did you know that? that I guess Boris Johnson uses it and

Who, though uses in Canada, they all use build back better? That, sir, was that tell you I've never seen It happened before of you because it feels like it would be so obvious that you're cribbing somebody slogan, that you wouldn't do it Pelosi called it Obama's build back better. It's a new world order slogan, so yeah, I'm not so much into the new world order, conspiracy, stuff, but it is a way. Coincidence that it doesn't have an explanation that I can think of because it isn't so clever as it. now. I will give it one one benefit, and I think it's like does it does it feel like the public is saying bill.

The same way, they were saying may again make Amerika great again. Did the genius of Trumps slogan making is that people would repeat it. Because they like to have you ever heard a democratic who proudly says don't back better, except for the professional politicians. Do you see it on twitter, These dizzy lover, despite the supporters saying, don't back, never really right. It's. I don't have a slogan became so popular when the public doesn't care about it. All is only the politicians so there's something weird going on there. We just don't Adam, don't mean it's, not your real name. On Twitter asked so wire passenger planes not spreading covid

so you pack all these people in the passenger plane, and we know, of course, now that just being vaccinated isn't enough to prevent Covid spread wire airplanes. Not me grounded? Why are we not hearing stories about well and we gotta fly, but you have to admit getting a lot of infections. no don't want to close airlines, even though we're getting a lot of affections, I think, is not happening right. It's just I happen. So the first question is: is it because the filters they airflow aeroplanes are sensationalist well designed in terms of air, for they have to be by years? My counterpoint I tweeted than on Twitter. after I saw for a second here is: why are untreated avenues, actions we get from buses,

I will use actions. Do we get from subways about cars? I feel like it's sort of non right: goobers, overs, maneuvers agreement, people. What is going on elevators, elevators you not in there from their long slim? Maybe that makes more sense, but I feel as if. we really dont know how the stuff spreads still. Am I wrong, because we should know exactly where people are getting it by now. People complain that they can put together a year where they were and who got it enough cases not every case, but enough cases. You know where you got it, though. We know

now where people are getting it? What do you think? You don't know that? What do you think you, as a member of the public, who is really paying attention because matters to your daily life you're, really paying attention you dont know as of right now, given the vaccination status of the country, you don't know where people who get the idea. It's got to be available right with there's some somehow somebody studying this. Somebody is studying people with Covid and saying. Okay, if you know where you were infected, what's your best guess. I didn't know that by now, don't we and whatever it was before vaccinations. It might be different. Now it could be that the place we get and I was a different way- a different place.

Let me give you a provocative thoughts. Is it a sexually transmitted disease then think about it? If you, if you're not going to get on the plane and you're, not getting it in the classroom, you're not getting it at work, and I don't know if that's true, because we have a lack of data right. Where people Gallagher Sex, because I feel like if you ve, got if your vaccinated, you fellas barber all over somebody together to Indonesia and respect, nothing I say now should be taken as any kind of a fact right, but I wonder if we get to the point list, a just better biggest laxative, let's say we get in

Eighty per cent less say that the vaccination reduces the amount of viral load so that the so that you don't give it to people so much just by talking or just by being in the room. How would you give people, it has a lower vile viral load and their vaccinated. Do you pretty at pretty much have stick your tongue down the throat and our own. Now I'm exaggerated, right of exaggerating for four effect. But are we reaching a point where the only way this thing is going to spread in any meaningful way? Is you ve got a climb on top of another human reason, their mouth again exaggerating but I feel like is becoming a sexually transmitted disease and it might be mostly transmitted by people having affairs see where I went there,

be mostly translate at some point, and maybe we're approaching the S up point. If you get enough people to actually added it's mostly going to come from sex cuz, that's the only time you getting their clothes for that long. Am I wrong that this good morph into a sexually transmitted diseases, because this The only way you can get enough virus into another vaccinated person, put that others are right. I saw Rasmussen tweeting something from the gateway abundant and theirs, I am here that I will give a low credibility, so I dont get banned from social media. And that's my actual opinion. I think there's low credibility to this claim that Three and ninety three illegal, registered voters in Arizona, meaning that

Two databases that didn't match. There's also social security numbers didn't match the voting poles or something like that there's some discrepancy of three hundred and ninety three people who maybe you shouldn't, have voted that maybe dent is that real? Is that being reported on CNN. I don't think so is being reported on Fox NEWS is. NEWS reporting this as true. Here's away! I approached this, the gateway, Found it doesn't have a hundred percent accurate records. The record is but like most entities, it's not a hundred percent. That's all I can say for sure. I don't know. I don't know, there's two zero times. For example,. But here is a good standard if its not being reported by both entities is probably not true.

If you don't see CNN, say and also Fox NEWS a year we do have this discrepancy. Mary I would say, while the other wouldn't but probably know somethin, to worry about, probably just a data. This problem. So I'll say, that's not confirmed, I mean, is certainly a red flag, and certainly we should now why there's a difference, but probably just a database difference, probably not that bad. eventually person who develop sentence is justice contagious as a non vex. True for for a shorter maritime, So once you add, on top of that, the true statement that a vaccinated person you just got the vaccination can give off a lot of virus, but not for long, so that their contagious there's that contagious for a short time checker that de facto ok.

the positive I was asked if I'm getting the booster. My answer that the same as my answer to the original vaccination question, since I got the regular vaccination as late as possible so that I can have the benefit of as many months of other people are getting it. possible. But I am also going to wait as low as possible from the boost to have as much information about other people's extent is this possible, so the answer is, I haven't decided, and I should until the last minute, the only time to decide this last minute. Deciding ahead of time done is done now as explosive, yes M profession,

Require that you might decide that it, but if you, if you have the luxury of being able to self quarantine and still work, as I do I'll wait till last minute The french catholic Church discovered that there were at least three thousand pedophiles had been working within the ranks of the french Catholic Church since the fifties theirs made that as many as three hundred and thirty thousand children were victims since the fifties, but on the optimist, view. Some say only two hundred thousand as the optimistic view. Now. How many is that that is three thousand animals around two hundred and fifteen thousand prices, therapies,

three thousand is not large hundred and fifteen thousand utterly knows that's higher than the average in the public feels like it is, but I don't know that is, I feel like feel like. Somehow this needs to be a fixed. Let me give you the hypnotist view of this situation. The hypnotist says that over time, every shoe salesman should be a man with a shoe fetish refer finish. Let me say that again over time, you're not on day one, but over time, every shoe salesman should be a man with a full fetish. Why does it work for cheaper, a man with a foot fetish will take it.

Job as a shoe salesman for less money is like it's pretty good job? I love my job. I can't wait to go to work likewise overtime. You would expect that every every coach of an all female young female team would be sexual harassment not on day one. Over time you would expect all the harassers to be attracted to the place where they can do the most rising so overtime you'd expect every organisation that has a young people as their charge and and adults in charge. You would expect overtime that they would all become pedophiles. sorry, human motivation. You can't turn off human motivation.

So if you have an organization that absolutely is gonna track pedophiles, you need to do something about that. I don't know what the answer is, but if you know that you're attracting the wrong people at the boy scouts, perfect example exactly you would expect overtime that you would have more and more of the people. You don't want those rags because they would be attracted, and why not I'm from their perspective one hears what we think we know about shots I'll, tell you what I think I know so far too. That's better than one right give a fact check. As I go against state things, we think we noticed archer Two shots is better than one here that we are assuming that one shot. It's not gonna, kill you Again, this is not necessarily european you. This will be the day,

census scientific opinion. We now believe, the three shots is better than to again, Not unless you agree with agree, I'm saying this is a consensus. We believe that natural immunity is better than two shots, not quite sure about that. but we do know that natural immunity gives you immunity to sort of every part inside and out of the virus. Whereas the shots give you a very specific community, I'm probably due to bad job of explaining this, but they said spike protein that their targeting so look here. One element in creating. Vaccines around that one element, whereas natural immunity gives you immunity to basically all the parts that better well. At least one expert said so And of any I saw today, Sir, but maybe that's a question:

so natural immunity seems better than two shots. Natural immunity better than three shots. Probably again now show. We know that, but probably because the completeness of the immunity for the natural. If there are over time, the consensus also is a natural immunity. Plus shots is better neither one alone about that. Do you do that? That would be the consensus, The shots is good and having natural immunity is good and rigour, which one is better. It's better that both especially if you have the shot first and then get the natural immunity on top of it. Does that you'll be protected from hospitalization, mostly You get the full of natural beauty and then and then

I think we know the both the shot and natural immunity weighing over time, but it could be that the natural beauty doesnt way in the same way that we don't know they had so little bit open, but it could be the natural immunity morphs into something that can be more, quickly reconstitute itself, whereas we don't know, if that's true of the shots, if the shots wear off, is there any any traces of left that can quickly reconstitute? What was there? No, no. But that's where web address back out notes that the beauty

from infections versus the two shots is still uncertain, so we don't have data for that. That is what I want to say today. That is everything I want to say to all yours, a counterpoint. I do not agree that both are better you'll have whatever the backs got to give you a plus yeah, so yeah you get the benefits of both the national unity plus the shots, but you also get whatever risks come with both getting the vaccine getting the virus and also the risk of getting the vaccine. So that's true, but I don't know what that changes your.

Mark says from one cartoonist another: what do you make a Ben garrisons work as a fellow cartoonist, brilliant then garrisons work as a cartoonist, I say, is brilliant. Why does he found a market and that he addressed as market now It might not your thing if you're left, leaning or whatever, but in terms of a policy that commercial decisions there right on. So I found a market deserve this market, and does it very well very well, so you can disagree with his point of view as a separate question, but as a cartoonist, yet very good, very good. all right, that's about all I have. I got to run and do something else, and thanks for joining in.