The blaze radio network on demand.

America welcome to Monday there's a couple of really important things. We have in store for you today. First of all, the latest on the aims for bringing story, the woman who has lost her children in Oregon, fascinating story. We really we got me. We crossed all the tease and not at all the eyes. This weekend. At a meeting with my my staff on Friday and say, look I gotta know what the real story is on this. We have to make sure we are completely buttoned up. We we were, we pushed ourselves real hard fact. We got several people one road to Jeffrey this weekend and said you guys, don't know what you're talking about there's no way this could happen, and then he said you got ass this this this this it's funny could last night I received that mail and those are exactly the questions we did ask and we have the answer, and it is its truly frightening will give you that coming up in about an hour from now also the latest on Fox NEWS, there is more trouble there. We we, we better, be careful the society that we're being that we're building right now, because everything is being redesign and there is a disturbing the disturbing story coming out of Google about a an employee that that road, a memo and said this diversity stuff at Google is killing us. If you read that story, you most likely think will be asked Jeffrey. Did you read that story has allowed lie that also have one guy right. What is just one guy? I wonder whether so just not a brown going home goddess, one guy right, it's actually very true and that's the way most people are reading. The story there just doing what Jeff he did and reads the headlines. It's a ten page memo. I wish it weren't just one guy when you hear the case, he's making the try to summarize it for you and show you what Google's responses and why this should wake people up. We begin there right now. You should entertainment and didn't lighten the Erika accident. That common sense has left the building

It was escorted out by HR and actually it's not hr. It was the director of diversity, integrity and governance, that common sense and escorted it to the door. It is the process of leaving Amerika for a very long time, but it just cleared out its desk all of its pictures, Sir God. If you walk by common sense desk today, you bite No one is sitting in that any more around that desk put all of its stuff. A box. And it was really so- I used to be that the clatter of lots of things that you weren't on its desk when I first started working here, Stuff like what marriages, babies right to live gender Differences, religious freedom, capitalism, socialism in other basic first, admit rights, those things those things have been taken off the desk of common sense for a long time,.

As a society. We have now reached a place that is Dane, an absurd, but there Our people who are standing up there is common sense left in many corners of the country. But not in some of our biggest institutions, not in some of our most powerful companies. And that's why I need to start the programme today with the with the Google memo drama it actually matters. I meant to summarize it is a ten page memo automatic prodigious summarised the highlights, but everyone should read this. Everyone should ponder deeply because remember, Google. Home is in your home the Google all of the Google a. I is coming your way so good Oh is redesigning our culture and here's what happened late last week,

He, a male senior software engineer we I know his name. He wrote a lengthy memo that he shared with colleagues and it was titled Google's ideological echo chamber in it. He, sickly criticized the company's diversity policies that he says actually result in reverse discrimination and suppress conservative political views. Now Kind of progressive insanity has become the default Norman many of these places? But his memo is thoughtful. It is well written. It's too pages long. So let me give you some The highlights he starts out in the memo by saying. People generally have good intentions. But we all have biases that are invisible to us green so far,.

Only an open and honest discussion with those who disagree will highlight our blind spots and help us grow. Which is why I felt the need to write this document. Google has several biases and only honest discussion about these biases will help yet its being silenced by the dominant ideology. Google's left bias, has created a politically correct, mano culture that man contains its hold by shaming dissenters in designs. This silence removes any checks against encroaching extremist and rotarian policies, later in the memo. This guy actually has the audacity to point out that brace yourself men and women Our biologically different. And that men and women also have personality differences. I tell who, like me, they're from Mars, and women are for Mars too. I think

That was the name of the book. When common sense leaves the building you have find yourselves getting back to the basics of the bird and bees or Mars and Venus, He says we have to stop. We have to stop assuming that gender gaps imply sexism. Let me say that again, we need to stop assuming that gender gaps imply sexism now? What does that mean? south some quote nondiscriminatory ways to reduce the gender gap, which is the section of many of its critics apparently miss like on fortunately quoting as long as tech and leadership remains high status and Luke, if careers men may disproportionately want to be in them allowing and truly endorsing as part of our culture part time. Work, though, can

more women, intact what he does, as he says, He makes a really good case. Men want the status men much more likely to be a lawyer. By the status and the high lucrative jobs, women For the most part, are our not attracted to those things there, were attracted to changing the world for the better there more attractive to family, to flex. Work hours, etc, etc. There just different here, Some of the harms of Google's biases, like quote programmes, mentoring and classes, only four people with a certain gender or race, and I priority q and special treatment for diversity, candidates, Did you know that you can go to this wonderfully? will place? And if you are a white male, you can't take some of the mentoring or some of the classes for jobs,

said, Google, because you're a white male. He goes on in highly progressive environments. Conservatives are a minority that feel like they need to stay in the closet. To avoid open hostility, we should power, those with different ideologies to be able to express themselves, I can't believe, were actually the river People who say that they are for fair and their fight for diversity they have been shoved in a closet for forever. I can't believe we do tell them don't shove, other people in the closet that you hated. Micro, aggression, training incorrectly and dangerously equates speech with violence. None of this is backed up by evidence. Once we acknowledge that old, not all differences are socially constructed or due to discrimination. We

Put our eyes to a more accurate view of the human condition which is necessary if we actually want to solve problems, may take something this guy standing up, even though I didn't put his name on it. In writing this. You don't think Google can find out who's right now, but on their computer. This took guts. A conservative hero right now. He could describes himself the way I ll to describe myself, but nobody understands it, and so I don't say it very often a classic liberal. A classic liberal, is what our founders were. Now, if you read this ten page memo, it is inspiring is finally somebody saying with evidence,

back it up. This is cool yes, guys this, going to lead us to authoritarianism, so Why is Google's reaction to classic liberal one of their own, who dared speak his mind in this very diverse culture of Google. He says quote despite what the public, spawns seems to have been I've gotten. Many personal messages from fellow Google Earth expressed their gratitude for bringing up these important issues which they agree, but would never have the courage to say or friend, because of the shaming culture at Google and possibility ability being far fired this need? the change end quote so after reading the memo. One livid female coworker tweeted,

still shaking in anger if age Our does not do something about that. Case. I will consider leaving this company for real for the first time in five years. Any resistance to ideas like this protection is dying, Ernie stuff at Google is red clear. The as nothing more than hate speech and worthy of firing? How do we stop this huge leap in flawed logic? Sunday evening, Google, finally released an official response to the viral memo den oh Brown, she is their new VP of diversity, integrity and governance. My cost us at some spooky. She wrote many of you

Many of you have read an internal documents shared by some one in our engineering organization, pressing views on natural abilities and characteristics of different genders, as well as whether one can speak freely of these things at Google and Like many of you, I found that it advanced incorrect assumptions about gender I'm gonna link it here as not going to have a viewpoint this viewpoint or one that I or this company would be perceived as endorsing promoting or encouraging so the the head of diversity, says why This guy's point of view is which has no hate in it at all. It's so shameful. I won't even printed here Just translate this com but he does not allow any reasoned argument that questions are very I killed, sealed progressive agenda, social

what the hell up and get in line she continues quote. Part of building an open and inclusive environment means fast. Bring a culture in which one that were in which those with alternative views, including different political views, feel safe in sharing their opinions, but the discord needs to work alongside the principles of equal employment found in our code of conduct, policies and anti discrimination laws. So you can have a different opinion if I you translate if you're alternative view includes something like conservative or classic liberal politics. You know or believing that men and women are indeed different, you're totally he called to do that. Just perhaps you ll feel safer outside of the two hundred mile radius of our campus.

Google should thank this guy, who, should promote this guy, Google should have a civil conversation, now one where their shouting each other down. But a civil conversation about this. This is the kind of dialogue a common sense company would want, especially one that is going into a lie where they're going to take. Teach machines, but Dick between right and wrong. You would think a respectful, intelligent, well thought out memo. Wouldn't be hard to defend. Were hard to write. It will be a miracle if this Google guy survives the week without being fired. You watch. This diversity, governance culture is a way

moreover, compensating for the mistakes of America's past how long will this country flog itself for its path? sins. Where is the grace. To say, I'm sorry and move on. And now that we ve overcompensate into the point that a memo assert that men and women are made differently and might perform indifferently or want dip things in the work environment. Is considered radical. Google needs to hear one thing. Diverse Is not a virtue diversity is not a principle. Although progressive are hell bent in trying to make it one saying diversity is not a virtue or a principle,

it's not racist or sexist or homophobic. We need more brave people like this guy at Google. On both sides of the argument to stand. For common sense- because that battle is only going to intensify but We also need to be able to sit down and reason together, left and right, while we still can whether still enough freedom of speech left in the tank why we sit down, and instead of then people names listen to each other and talk to each other because I have a feeling, as I have found in the last year or so, we both might be surprised at what the other side has to say. May not even know why the room just doesn't look good, but if you're blinds crooked, thereby dot com

the part of the house that people really kind of overlooked. But your guess don't- and you may not know- what's wrong with the room. You may not even know why the room just doesn't look good, but if you're blinds crooked, their busted, their old or even out of date, you that might have come was that are taking so much sunlight away it chain. Is the room entirely when, change the window treatments livestock I'm gonna help you solve this problem they have the blind, shade, shutters drapes, anything that you might well to use a window covering they have. Very, dare I say, diverse selection at Einstein COM and if you accidentally, miss measure pick the wrong color they'll remake your blinds for free there even send you, the free, color samples to make sure everything looks just as good in person. Is it does on the website every order gets free shipping. I want you to check out, the deal's now through August twenty first,

huge site, wide savings, plus an additional five percent off, if you use the promo code back at blinds, Calm, save an additional five percent off their you'd site, wide sale. Right now at Blinds Dotcom, promo code back rules Restrictions do apply back. Crime or. AAA seven. Seventy seven back that claim that programme. Some really stunning information coming about half an hour. Also I don't want to get too far down the road before we even talk about North Korea. North Korea went up And Stew and sanctions they tried to make the case to the world that the world finally waking up to all this nationalism of Donald Trump and how dangerous that is They voted. The scary council voted what five zero

really harsh sanctions on North Korea. They can't sell fuel. They can't sell anything. I think steel. They can't. Sell any fish shore of food. Now thing can be sold to other countries is a star of the people even more North Korea has responded in said we're going to respond ten fold, our again threatening nuclear war. I don't know where this goes, The world is on our side today, and and good job to the Trump administration on getting this done in the National Security Council or the and not national, but the? U S, Council, China? Finally, on board what have From here I dont know more on the Google memo and identity politics and power

during a gamble is now in to diversity for all of their products, and what are they gonna be spoon? Feeding us in adds coming back programme. Mercury. The land Beck programme we are entering a surreal world and things are changing under our feet and they're changing for several reasons, one because social justice warriors progressives taken, the power seats of our universities and there taking the power seats of many big corporations. Things like Google to share Google memo with you, you have to read the whole thing you can find it declared back dot com. It's quite an amazing memo that you will see most likely.

Coming from the left, how they are Visser rating. This guy for saying absolute common sense, men and women are different. We should stop pandering to people and start help. All people to be the best that they can be well, that's just too far for Google. Now Procter and Gamble is starting in there are not happy just be noticed, products because remember you know I sprang strong enough for a man, but I, like it too bats races, sexist horrible. And nobody buys entity that crap anymore. They know Iris bring has nothing to do with Ireland. So now, they're getting into social justice, they are helping. These giant corporations become Social justice warriors practicing Emil's. My black is beautiful campaign last week.

Issued a video called the talk it quota. Pixley, inevitable conversations, many black parents have with their children, about racial, biased to protect. Prepare and encourage them. Some of the things in the video that little progress has been made since the days of Jim Crow. Isn't that the truth? We exactly the same mean at Morocco bomber he'll tell you that right She'll discrimination against Black America is inevitable, but police. Officers are the enemies inoffensive seen depicts a suburban black mom preparing her bubbly teenage daughter, a new driver for when you get pulled over not if, but when the doktor, the daughter laughs at off mom gravely warns. This is not about you getting it take it. This is. Are you not coming home now Procter and Gamble. Is now

Spoon feeding our society that around every corner in every cop car someone is planning on kidnapping and killing black girls just for trying to get to them all. That's it. During gamble, doesn't have a problem alienating all of the families of police officers. See the problem is with all the stuff is There is no diversity at all. It is one sided Michel Molly Paul points out when Procter and gamble. When will begin airing. Bold videos about the brutal treatment Asian American High school students have suffered at the hands of bigoted boy students in Philadelphia.

Or the targeting of young female Asian Americans and elderly asian american crime victims by black being members in New York in San Francisco is as Michel Balkan writing this or the long simmering tensions between blacks and Latinos or blacks and Koreans, in LOS Angeles, about decree. The prejudice against a multiracial children who are marked for looking to white tried the black base, basketball STAR might Connally was forced to flee of haters. This week, who attacked his white wife and thereby racial one year, old baby, how about them? Unstressed race based hate crimes such as kidnapping and assault of a mentally disabled white teenage boy by black thugs in Chicago, tortured him and for to declare on video. I love black people and F white people but all the things that are happening on campus, I mean it, you you see this. I saw the movie the big sick this weekend, which is a great movie. If you feel

you ve never even heard of the assets, a great movie, but let the left has real problems with it, because here they are portraying pakistani guy dating a white woman. I am so sick of sea, these these people of color dating white women? It's an actual point from several left wing websites who complain about this movement, which it is the picture of what the fear quickly want. Well, can I say something I remember I remember my grandfather gave me one speech on race, and that was no matter what anybody tells you black people and white. People are no different there, no different from one another and and somehow or another. I don't know. Who is that, Talk that the only other thing I remember is my group father being against by racial marriage at the time, and I remember that feeling wrong at the time and

my mom and my dad we're like dad and he said, ah kids, it is only wrong because of the treatment that the children we'll have to endure, and I I am sure that it is fair to do that to the children He was only saying that people are gonna, be brutal because your mom is wider. Your dad is white near mom or dad is black, people going be brutal. Now it's not a problem to see me of different races, married nobody thinks anything of it except the soul, justice warriors, who say I am so sick and tired of seeing this that's how far we ve com. The people who were say we're for this are now saying I am so sick of this. It's incredible. Can we just let people, People.

I would be amazing, but not the issue that is now listen to this thing about cause. You, you watch tv, say I'll whether they have an agenda some agenda here, because there was pushing these things and you know it's their budget, necessarily know what it is or how it's happening. What is the job of a tv network Theoretically, entertain and sell product exactly right, like they're supposed to put on the best show possible higher the best people possible to do that, large audiences, so CBS is the number one network in the country by you, no good fifteen, twenty percent that mean they have a big lead on everybody else. Listen. This is from an immediate newsletter thing. From last week, another another awkward panel at which CBS gets grilled about its lack of diversity this year, CBS execs Tom Sherman Kelly, call placed a flurry of questions about the departure of two who wife, IVO Stars, who quit after a pause.

Equity battle, the lack of new shows led by females and the slow pace at which the network has become more inclusive now are. Ok, are fine call Kelly call by the way, a man Kelly. Took particular issue with a ladder saying there is change happening on CBS. Not the answer is not well we're pudding, this shows the people watch like or or putting on the shows, what the best people, whether their black white or not, now, there's change happening in CBS. He pointed to new, shows there led by actors of color and their midseason SIRI, centred on a lead character, who was gay call Also said, the number of diverse series regulars on the network is up almost sixty percent, so we are apt Slowly, moving in the right direction, what is the right direction?

is the direction to have seventy or eighty percent increase in. If you want to put on good Josie, if you watch the BBC you're, absolutely convinced that it is the poor violation of bicycle or almost sexual people is eighty percent of the lobby links there. Yes, I mean literally, the BBC is, is every show is is either a homosexual or by sexual or questioning at some point, there is a lead character in every show, again, like look at the way. They fought for guy and executive to be able to rattle off that. Sixty percent of series regulars our that they were prepared for they are prepare, for. This is something there thing about all the time they pretty much this line. The entire panel, going back to the story for For my view, the only crack and their armour came when one journalists pointed out that CBS is casting department on both coast is step

entirely by white employees, which might lead by lending on the problem of the question Led to some uncomfortable shifting in the back of the room were CBS. Staffers were situated, call at first defended it. The team has been together a long time and has contributed to the progress the network has seen so far so good and not saying our own, not saying contributing to the fact that, where the number one Freaking network on tv and the results are obvious, that we're doing successful programme in that we want to watch now, it's the it's the success increasing these series regulars by sixty percent of diversity, He ends with its later question again he relented we're cod some of the issue, and we hear you and we will be looking to expand the casting department there, literally saying they're going to make the casting Larger than it needs to be to make these people feel good, and if you were there, person that was hired for that job, would you want Job right, why you know your email it?

created it for you because of your skin color, or sexuality or whatever it is. I mean You gotta be kidding how an independently and you know it the castle. Department? You know those are deeply progressive people. First up there, not a conservative among nano. So this is the progressives eating progressive Hollywood bright in some ways it makes me happy and take these media people, the the people who are critiquing this, who are worried about this itself. That so, incredibly strange is it's like why That is not the goal of a network. The goal of a network is not to increase the percentage of people who looked different, that's supposed to be what area this is about right, but That is the way this is thought about all the time and about the Miami Dolphins getting flak because their start, quarterback went down late last week Ryan Tirana Hill, and so they needed some

To take over this season, and they they hired a J Cutler was let go by the Chicago bears buddies? Why he's right and they didn't go its color capper deck, so that usually means raises and racists Be it mind one has a much better arm and is better quarterback than the No, of course not never mind that one doesn't come with the baggage of the other. One is plain raises that they didn't higher calling camper Nick unbelievers knock on a state is undeniable gonna stand if the people begin to push back, if people don't push back like the guy, a Google was the only one. He was the only one, and next our job are willing to share some things that are happening in Oregon too Amy for brainy. She is the woman who has lost her children, because she's quote too stupid her her, I q. Who is too low? We have done some investigation. We have seen doctor

We know what the state has people are afraid to stand up. And if you don't stand up and you let bullies do this week, We won't be much different than the days of Jim Crow ITALY to be reversed. There are too many people that a they can socially engineer everything. That's the point aggressive promise of the nineteen thirty's. Germany We bring an engineer anything too many people believe that and then there Also, those who want revenge not an open and diverse community That is certainly not in America. That has enough as a future. At all, that is a communist north Korea style state. You cross state and what the state or is pull

politically clean corrected the time and you go away. Your disappeared start. America, that's not who we are and that's not what Democrats and it's not what rip Lincoln's want is what the fringes want I'm gonna shut the other side up. That's not America. Sponsor this half hour is like lock, everybody uses free wifi, but a report. It just came out. Ninety two percent of Americans that are using wifi put their potential. Personal information at risk. Now it depends on. You know what what you're doing, but if you are using public wifi to stay connected, it's really great. But it's unsecured, it's easier than you think, to hack into public wifi. Somebody's identity is stolen every two seconds and lifelong the texts, a wide range of identity threats? You can you get somebody to watch your credit, but that tells you what happened? Not what is happening.

And that's only one small slice of identity threats if there is a problem with many trying to steal your identity. A? U S, based agent identity. Restoration specialist will work to fix it. Nobody can prevent identity theft and you know, monitor all transactions at all businesses. But if you Now you get the added protection of Norton Security for free for the four, Clear when you bundled Norton and lifelong memberships, for a limited time. You also get a special fifteen percent discount off the first year of your life like membership, it's one hundred lifelong one, eight hundred lifelike or life locked outcome used a promo code back fifteen, that's Beck fifth the terms and conditions do apply that AAA. Seventy seven back mercury.

Program- Hey Chicago LOS Angeles, possible, even Dallas, about we're list, though you vaporized anytime fur for from North Korea, but no big deal Korea have no idea what their response is going to be, but he can Kim Jong earn can not back down, is blaming the site, actions on the american people and the american government. You know we are still tech glee at war with North Korea. We we we have, we have an army- armistice not have not peace talks, not a treaty. We have an artist. So the war is still going on and is just a cold war. Now that they can vaporize an american city.

The United Nations got together and at the Security Council this weekend voted five zero for some of the tougher sanctions I've ever seen, I can't sell any of their raw materials that can't sell coal. They can't sell any energy products, they can sell their irons, they can't sell. Raw minerals or any of their seafood products. That's a lot. And will cost? I think, em. Is it a billion dollars just in the first month? Let's go, done every restaurant in America to not be able by North Korea and seafood. I don't, I don't think I'm selling it and I don't know I'm sorry and crab on on the menu. I I gotta tell you actually want to re out by another so that people are already starving. He doing to blame it on America. Today they are threatened us thousands fold, revenge, yes What does that mean? I don't know

but if it is in the anywhere from the book of insanity our life could change in any eighteen minute period. The world would change for ever because of this. The Glen Back Programme. The blaze radio network on demand. The new chief of Staff General Kelly,

has moved quickly. It was a good week for Donald Trump at the White House because of General Kelly and the way things are bar moving. We could be on a very good path with Donald Trump White House right now, we'll see there was big news coming out of New York City and the? U N, where sanctions really hard sanctions voted against North Korea, China even join us. The launching of that I see be really has changed the entire world. They are united against North Korean out North Korea. I dont know what they're going to do. They are saying that they want to answer America's aggression. Ten thousand fool that sounds like a nuclear threat. We will get into that a little later. Also, there's more trouble Fox news. But how do you know it's true anymore? Proudly, you know what's true before we all jump to conclusions, we might want to just take a breath and wait until we see all the evidence of whatever is going on to more people now lasted Fox NEWS and it maybe that's exactly the right thing to do. I don't know, but maybe we should doubt the torches of the witch hunt just for a little while and start to use some reason and speaking of reason, I got a very reasonable letter from a guy who works for child protective served services in state out west, very large city. He didn't say which one he said, but I have to warn you about this case in Oregon, LAN you're, jumping bandwagon, and I wanted him to know my response because I'm not jumping on a bandwagon, and I want to start there right now. You should entertainment and didn't lighting and there is a story of Oregon. We ve been telling you about all last week.

Amy for brainy and her children. They have been taken away from a girl who we been told the state says Is- has to love and I q to be able to take care of her own children the more we get into this case. The more we are we're like something is not right And last Friday I had a meeting with Jason Betrayal, whose were with me now and he's our lead researcher on the Glen Back Programme, and we had. But come to Jesus meeting on Friday, because we all had concerns and we're like okay, we have to get down to absolute nuts and bolts on this We need to go up. We need to see everything. We need a made everybody. We need to know for sure before we go any further on this, because It's just so outrageous what is happening so We're working on that over the weekend and I get this

forwarded to me from Jaffee? Do you know this guy Jeffrey Earthy, just reaching out to you that it was this region, so he's a guy who he wrote like five or six pages, I'm just gonna give you a couple highlights, but you're a virus speeches he said: look I buy work for the child protective services in another attorney for them. Yeah any said I've seen this from the inside and you know don't jump on any ban wagons. So here is word of caution. I want to take you through this, because these, what he points out were exactly my questions on Friday and we have an date for you and it's a pretty stunning update. He says word of caution: I understand your gut reaction is defend parental rights and be wary of the state, and this is wise. However, the statements you make the over generalizations and your assumptions are alienated to a whole group of people that have horrible job. First of all, I want you to know if you,

proceed p s, I don't think you're a horrible person. I think you have a horrible job. I really do. I don't know five percent time, ninety five percent of people lay the ill. They were rightly accused and rightly judge right. I would bet ninety five billion, probably over generous in the other direction? Ninety five, Percent of cases Let's see piazza deal with, they probably get right, but when they get those five percent wrong. We should all be concerned. This is like death penalty stuff you just Harry the Euro, the Electric chair works ninety five percent time. Ninety five percent of people lay the ill. They were rightly. Queues and rightly judge and rightly killed yell. It's that five percent, concerning, because this is a death sentence for a family, but I dont think that cps the people are back.

I've worked in both rural and metropolitan areas. Is an attorney and child welfare cases, while the sexual his physical abuse, drug abuse, domestic violence, blah blah blah married of other evils. We do not of time. Novices Z underlined. We do not have time to worry. If someone has a low I q or wants to tee, their children at home, we do. With parents who the worst of the worst. We try to save those children from terrible circumstances, including sex trafficking, as you do, that thousands of us who get up every day to save children and horrible situations. Please, up over generalizing- believe I have over generalised. I do not like Cps because of the five percent of cases that we have dealt with the when there is a problem, it is devastating Most of us are out to get your kids. I dont think you are either just like most. People are not out to take. My guns There are those with that agenda and that,

is disturbing. We work with parents, too, yet their kids back we're overworked and have too little resources. We know this is a system that is only a band aid against greater moral and social problems too I am sure that there are state workers who are everything you expect them to be. The four brainy situation may be the one where you're right in a fury stand beside you in denouncing it. However, there are few. Flags that I notice now. I want you to listen to these carefully one. This story relies on a conspiracy, the cps, the state, the court, the parents attorneys, possibly the children's attorneys. If they appointed all know. As for bringing can care for the children would simply think she's, not smart enough. Is this possible yeah however, highly suspicious, even in a small town, maybe this town is rotten to the core and completely corrupt, which again, I don't think so, beings to call. I would ask how do you know all the individuals in the system are corrupt. The miss for brainy is not being dishonest

to remember me for bringing in her friend who previously worked for the state, was fired. Are the ones telling you the state took the children away from because of her? I Q My guess is: you have never seen the complaint filed against her or heard the evidence the state provided. I would imagine that you have no proof that the state worker was fired for simply standing up from his four britney. Unless you have your only getting one side of the story, she may be totally honest in this matter and the complaint may state she has a low, I q, but the state has no evidence that it affects her ability to parent. I have never heard of such a case. I have had many cases where parents lie about the abuse and neglect and I'm remained silent as to what the true allegations are and the evidence I have against them. I have doubts free that miss for brainy does sound completely coherent miss for bringing claims. The state won't let her have kids because of low. I q, she clearly coherent, inarticulate, so

The premise of her story is that there was never any danger to our children. The state got a hold of her. I q and claim that, based on her iq alone, she could not care for the children, the core, but cps the state under attorney then ignored that fact that she is intelligent, articulately, coherent. Every time she brought forward proof just by showing up, they go to the Iq Glenn. This is, absolute evil. Or ridiculous. You may hate Cps, but this story is absurd. I may be wrong. I can tell you that in general there must be more to this story. I would you another question it s for bringing stories? Absolutely true? Why is she not suit the state? Can you imagine a lawsuit stew takes baby because fully capable mom has IQ of seventy civil rights. Attorneys would salivate over this. If it was the motive of self interest,

please note that I just simply being sceptical. I do not, but do not deny this could be happen. We should be wary of a state having too much power. I'm just asking you not to deem analyze demonize all of us blah blah blah this case makes all of us who try to protect children. Look bad, so I sent right to Jason. Yesterday, the grating by the way that security married in a great listener whose yet looking out for the show and in trying to give us a yet a broader picture. That's and it's exactly what we were talking about on Friday. As I said, the same thing guys there's just with just. Doesn't happen I Intel, I see it my own eyes. I need to see what's going on I need to. I need to talk to every they going on Jason. I have now seen the documents.

Can. I read this arise than I would paraphrase her phrases they are. There are four, or conditions. The state of origin is going after. Child. This is their case. This is their case. This is this. Is the dock Instead, we have seen from the court won the day add, has limited cognitive abilities to them. Other is unwilling or unable to be a custodial resource, three them there has limited cognitive abilities, for the mother doesn't understand the basic needs of her child and the skills necessary to be a safe parent. That's the case. That's the case. So what this guy just said, you know The EU is never see. Well, you have now.

We have seen all of the documents. That is the case and I'm gonna go a step further in a minute. But first can you go through those four things with this Jason yet and I just like you said I I had the same reservations of like there's gotta, be something we're missing. You know that, what's report. It is obviously not the story so, want to go and see the actual court documents. That basically say no. This is what happened as I am assuming that it seems. We see that we're gonna see some kind of crazy incident. That happened and that's the real basis. The case well. We did some digging around. After that meeting. We had a source come forward we ve seen everything. I mean everything we ve seen everything for there I q levels we ve seen transcripts of past educational facilities. We ve seen everything then, so you know they graduated both of them. Graduated in the middle of their class have integrates Avc

grades middle of the class, so if you're too stupid, then why did they get a diploma in the middle? What does that say about all the other kids that will eventually be parents? Okay, so the limited cognitive abilities right off the bat, that's two of their main cases, and actually their main case on this is completely out the window. Basing it off of their iq, which some psychologist that tested them does gave them this number. I mean I don't even see how that's admissible in the court, and I also see that it's completely refuted because they gradually or class just like. I think, I'm graduate from the middle. My class, you know I am I what a caseworker at this point. It is alleged to have said, and my retarded can I not care for my so so am the case worker and we have the actual quotes. Imagine the caseworker saying person is lazy. This person is a mass. What was the second one

lady something already dirty and then retarded ethane retard. Yes, now imagine that's the case worker whose writing this up and followed it up with I will never. I will never let this the this person have their child. I will never allow them to have their child Kay. After calling somebody in Athens retard. I will never allow them and by the way, when When that was said, Jason, what else was happening with the caseworker? What was he doing? was outlining for the parents. Setting up. So we are so embarrassed. One add, and this could what what this was said is potentially very expert, it's an alleged statement and were actually following up to get more background on on this blue person and his statements. But at the

time, this allegedly was said he he or she is putting out a plan like he supposed to do by the state To give them their kids back, so the statement is, I will never let this person advocate have led Eric, have his kids At the same time, you saying will look complete this class complete this class. Have these visits and me we will reunify Europe, your children with you now. The reason why he says that's explosive is because. This person has allegedly We have this isn't allegedly, but we have not gone into their cases yet, but we I've had others step up who happened to have the same caseworker who are saying, I am not willing to go on the record unless you guys are argh seriously gonna finish this because

this guy. We'll. Never let us have our children. We have the same kinds of problems with this cut this case worker. Several parents, several people going through it same exact caseworker, they didn't know who the caseworker was. We do they don't so that's points that those are the biggest points, one into so basely your worst fears about this case. It couldn't just be about. I you know the real we're looking at the documents basely right now, we can tell you that that is the case now point three which do I notice should give me a look on one of them where it said that she's, unwilling or unable to enable to have custodial resource. So yes, I thought I thought that was odd too. So I made a follow up call on that. So, basically, that is comes from an interview that one of the caseworker said that any one to put the kids up for adoption that is refuted, and it's very obviously now that she is not willing to put the kids up for adoption she's. Not she's, my ones now

so, then, then there's this the mother does not understand the basic needs of her child and lacks the printing, apparently parenting. Skills necessary to safely parent the child. Now this is marked new allegation? Yes, can we talk about this? Yes, had. This is the most frightening phases in there. In my opinion, terrifying. So I think that this was added in as a new allegation says in the in the official documents, new allocation of the Seas I think this was added in because they know that they have no case a stand on this point. So now there, just prolonging this out spent over four years, Crispin been with this foster care parent. I think that now this grasping for straws, to keep this going. So this was to theyve in some doctor say that the kid nothing this is brand new information. He might have been diagnosed with autism. Might might might they're, not sure, because he still so young, they won't be able to really tell for another couple of years. So, don't really know, but they ve he might so in

a case because of the means of the family, but not the richest family. Because of that they think well he'll, be better off with a family with more means that has the means to send them to you know it did. Special schools, special schools, so here you can develop and at a faster rate, it's an allegation its alleged isn't that none of this is, I cannot believe, is even in according to end. Since when have we, we turned into a country that says a parent ass to give up their child if they do have autism and give that child with autism to a Elsa your family because they ll be able to provide, I feel horrible for the foster parents. I feel horrible for the foster pay. Because they ve done the right thing and now they ve bonded with this child. I feel horrible for the child, but cannot stand, the state cannot children away because of low. I q they cannot,

children away because ivy possible diagnosis in the future. Much more in a second are sponsored this half hour. Gold line, where time. We saw this. It was just before the collapse of two thousand eight, and here Well, here's what it is, and it's a really disturbing thing that goes out last week, people are not paying attention to it? U S. Household savings ratio has fallen to three point: eight percent, that's on a net basis them if we ratio of savings as a percentage of disposable income. Why what's happening this happened right before the crash People just stop saving and theirs. Spending every thing there's a poured out now on the five things that could really impact the stock market and an arm economy. Please I ask you to get it: it's free, it's written by,

If stockman, he was Reagan's budget director, five threats to the ECB, I mean you can get it right now, just for asking eighty, six, six hundred and forty six five hundred and thirty five four thousand six hundred and eighteen six, six, thirty, five, forty six, also go line, is excluded, are is extending their price protection programme for as little five hundred dollars. You get three months of price protection and for twenty a thousand a year, a price protection, read their risk information, one eight, six, six gold line or gold lying dot com. This is the glad that programme carry. It is the Glen Back Programme with so much happening in the world and so much of it beyond our control. But there are few things that we can do together that actually make a difference

Amy's fight, maybe something that you want to join in on because it's not just happening here- is happening around the country and again shall predictive services. I don't want your job. I don't know how you do it. Ninety five, ninety nine percent of the time- You'Re- probably get it right, but when you get it wrong, you need to be the first to stand back programmes. I signed up for the newsletter and get all the info you need to know. When I learnt that dog can we have some additional information coming out in the next few days once we can get, you know more than one source on it that Make this story up an organ true, it truly frightening, but not about

just this one family but we wanted to get mad stave or in a mad is from the liberty from the Liberty Council. If you remember this is a non profit organization, litigation, education policy, organization, debt it had to advancing religious freedom, the sanctity of human life and the family. He is the guy. We immediately called with Justine Volunteer up in Massachusetts. Was the Liberty Council that got Justine back eventually to her family Matt wealth. To the programme how're you thank you, ve gotta be Lydia. I hate talking to you because I know each time we have to talk to us about bad stuff. Like this, I know we gotta talk about some other things, but you know I listening to you and Jason, and you did it Actually in this case, what we did in the Pelletier case out of Boston Massachusetts, our first,

action? Was it's gotta, be something else there is something else lurking and therefore we need to do our due diligence to find out if there's something else out there that we just don't know about right, and we did that in just INA and we found there's nothing else there. This was an abyss so power by the child protection services to take just Dana and Bringer frankly to her death bed nearly if we hadn't intervened. And if the same thing that I see happening here in this case with Amy and Eric and their children. It's the same exact thing son. You know I've read thousands of thousands and thousands of pages of transcripts of depositions of origin, the team and before the United States bring court of the old attorneys. Who can articulate I've, read them of people who have lots of different doctorates. I've led them read them are people with low accuse. I read the transcript that you did with the interview with last week, and I can tell you that there is not one place in the strand.

Not one. That would give me any pause that she is functioning low like you or that she would be an incompetent parent. She is articulate if you can't speak well or carry on a sudden genetics exaggerated when you put it in print- and this is an excellent transcript verbally of what she said on your radio programme. When you were talking to her, it is mind boggling of somebody who can articulate like shaken and be so commended by sure the lady through said, she's a having parent she and Eric and still have this happened. You so much HU as we're trying to figure this out. We think He could be wrong, but we think that there is a bad apple is not. This is a child, protective services of or again this, we think it's one bad apple and We also. I tend to believe that

a lot of these cases happen because already so far down the road, and now you know GPS. Can nodded made a mistake. I mean it's like it happened with Charlie Guard they, I couldn't let that child go because it unravels their authority and everything else, and so they're kind of between a rock and a hard place, and now they don't know what to do. I think right, I obviously does a good people in the various child protection services. I wouldn't want their job at a very difficult job, but there people in those services in every place around the country, and we found this injustice Pelletier? There was a particular person who made some egregious decisions, and cps back them up in the court system. Was competent enough to do it on an independent analysis and rubber. Adapted.

And it went on and on and on weak stolen, two months and months turned into years and they were afraid to backtrack because it would question their entire authority. An apparently that's what you have here. You have this one case worker who as you mentioned in the earlier part of this interview today, that it was her decision, not to ever allow these parents to have these children her decision on the other hand, you have sharing She is a professional mediator by trade she was appointed as a caseworker. She has, over twenty years, experience her underground What is in psychology she's got a ton of certificates on safety, and if an abuse regarding children, then she has spent significant time with them Emily and she my said, there's nothing wrong with this family. They ought to have their children and what happens to her. She, Pierre apparently later we measure from the case, because it's not consistent with the narrative by this original case worker who says it's her decision,

make sure that these children are never with family, so matt- let's, let's let me take you here- Because we all think that it had there has to be something else, because the government. Does not have a right unless the child is in danger, Jason, can you summarize what is what state itself has, admitted to in the documents of the state has actually admitted in court. That There is no immediate harm or threat do a child late, whatever everything that they have the course that they ve put them on, so that they make their home safe, that they take the right type of in classes all itself. They admit that they have done everything asked of them. They ve done everything yet the certificates to prove it. They ve stayed a plan there still on the planet still being supervised, but they admitted that they, done everything to play the programme, the program and they that yeah there's no more threat and there's no more harm to a child and home, so

we have this coupled with the fact that their first it may be diagnosed with autism at some point and they may not be the best parent. For a time with that diagnosis at some point or look at If the criteria there's a lot of families that are at risk, because there is a lot of families that are caring for a child that has autism or some other kind of disability, mental or physical and they may not feel like their at their competence, I want to be able to handle it, but you know what parents do best for their children and the state has no right to intervene and say we a better home, a better idea for this child to be taken from you. In fact, in this case here under the second chance that was born was not even allowed to leave the hospital. This little child was taken after she gave birth

ever spent a moment, not even a minute at home, with mom and dad. Was no evidence in that case at all non euro, theirs we'll be that they ve doc. There's no neglect or abandonment that they ve documented and, as you have just mentioned, Jason and Glenn there's no immediate harm and by the way they actually complied with every request. They ve gone through parenting classes. They have someone with for twenty years experience in this very field at say, there are eleven family. The mom loves the children, you have to parents at just love the child Christopher. In, of course, Hunter that was born and taken in the hospital you know there is this thing cry eyes out as being outrageous and again that the average listeners gonna think there's gotta, be some enough there, so I'm glad you did some edition Research and analysis as you do,

in the beginning of this programme to look at all the other aspects and there's no in there and when we were in the Justine Pelletier case. We did the same thing and the amazing and frankly shocking disturbing thing we found was we started to get calls like that from others. Around the country- it's not, unfortunately, as isolated as we think it is, but in this case, if I Q and Amy the seventy two range. That's not that may be lower than some, but that's not in the incompetent range at all by any means, and if we're going to look at and arbitrary iq, it sounds like this, darwinian evolutionary idea that if you dont reach a certain iq level and on board This even reach the? U S Supreme Court, if you dont reaches sir, I too level than the state have the authority to. Paralyze you so you're not gonna give birth to other people of low. I q, I

We had gone so far beyond that idiocy, but obviously it back with some people, at least with the situation involving this family were the state, thinks that it knows better and its gwine to use IQ as a measurement, even though others, evidence of low. I Q and this transcript as she speaks, or there's no evidence of abandonment, abuse or neglect so mad mean, let me ask you to be Solomon here for a second: we have one child. Who has and out of her care now for four years they ve been battling this. That fact, Ie is about to adopt their about terminate Amy's rights as why she's fighting so hard their fast tracking things to get there, moving and and get this over with That trial doesn't even know Amy at this point. I feel horrible for the foster parents because-

the foster parents, to have your child ripped away from you is bad But then to be given a child and then you're going to be the adoptive parents and in the final hour after, for years it's bad for the very bad for the foster parents or the adoptive parents in its horrible, the child. What possibly be done in that case. To make right will, you know, is difficult: the decision is here, and this is kind of almost like Solomon. Splitting the baby into, but what you Here is the state caused a huge disservice, their and abuse to the child and to the full? your family and to the birth parents, but at the end of the day, they never had the authority to intervene. If you allow the state to say where we made a mistake here, we apologise, but you never The child back anyway sets a terrible president.

At the end of the day, it is better for the child to be with the birth parents as difficult as that is, the faster apparent since they, with a shout for several years, but this is the family and there was no reason to take the child from the family. There is no documented basis for the child, protect services have intervened, let alone to remove them from the family. Any more than there was for Hunter, who was just born and there's absolutely zero evidence there, and yet they did the same thing to Hunter taking Hunter from the hospital. I think the state needs to reverse course: State needs to own up to its horrible problem that it created and the state needs bring this child back to the parents. That's the belongs and its. Which from either way, whether the job never comes back to the parents and it's gonna be traumatic. If the job

comes back to the parents, unfortunately, for the child, for the people involved, there's gonna be a lot of healing that has to do place over the next two years- so let me ask the same thing: I asked you a thumb Justine when that happened. You know, I don't know what year review you know doing and working on. I don't know if this particular case even fits you guys, but Are you willing to look into this? Is an organization and help right this wrong? Who I would not like us, look into it more just like we did with just Dana and we're gonna. Do the due diligence like you ve already done and but, like I said, even just looking at this from a surface level. They don't have the evidence. And again I put when I'm reading this transcript, and I encourage people to go to your website to read the transcript, I believe in August, one interview that you did with Amy read her responses in writing.

When people have taken my verbal and put it into writing, sometimes you think all I could carry a good shuns. Even people who are very, kind of odd when they're in writing the sentences on as perfect as you would normally write them. I'm telling you Amy's statements verbatim in your communication with her or code. Their clear. They show emotion. When emotion is appropriate, they showed knowledge, they show compassion, they shall love. They show concern everything that you would want about. A good parent read her statements compared to mine, she's she's, better and that to them than I am real, quick man. I've only got about forty five seconds. Can you give us a Justine of an update on on her plight, There is a separate law from that after we got her back home that has filed malpractice, lawsuits against those that are involved in the medical facility and that still is ongoing, but in terms of her medical health, it never bounced back to the way it was before she be us, took her

and the problem is, as they literally took her away from the necessary medical treatment that was helping her even the ice skater to nothing and I think it unfortunately has had long term debilitating consequences because of the state and whether that can only ever be reversed is unclear at this point that thank you dykes. I would not want your job. Thank you. So much for talking to us we'll talk again. That's it Matt stable from Liberty, council, dot org. If you're looking for some group to support these guys are quite amazing Liberty, council, dot org. Now this Surprise. Somebody in your life. Not because you have, you know something to make a poorer there's, a special case, and just because you can theirs showing your life. Surprise them right now. Pro flowers make an easy with a special offer. Pro flowers farm stand flowers. You get twenty percent

off the collection or any of their exclusive bouquets of twenty four twenty nine dollars or more you get to percent off the flowers are guaranteed a steady stay fresh for seven days or your money back. And you get picked. The exact date it could be today could be next. We could be, you know a month from now, just because little surprise both of you, sent em right now get twenty percent off your farm, fresh flowers, or any other bouquet of twenty nine dollars? More at pro flowers. Dotcom used the promo code Glenn at the check out its pro flower. Dotcom, promo code Glenn makes him he's day. Do it today pro flower dot com, promo code Glenn, here listening to the Glen Back Programme, mercury. This is the glad Back programme. Wasn't media plus programme

so whether you're you're here I have today. Yesterday was it. I had an interesting weaken. Saturday I'm driving by and I drive by gateway, which is a big church here and my wife- and I start talking about gateway and start talking about them. The leadership of that church, in You know how you know the really good people in the community and the next day where a church, I'm sitting in the pew and surrounded by these amazing maison people sitting. To a guy with whose this battling cancer and in just one other. The most incredible men, I've ever I've ever met, and and I'm sitting here and I'm looking all of these incredible men, indifferent virtues, different faiths. Hometown, and I realize you know that's what really important

We keep hearing about all these bad news stories. All the bad people There are millions of really good people really good men and women who are standing and making a difference in their own community. We should concentrate on them from time to time. The blaze radio network on demand.

America! Welcome to the programme, North Korea ready to teach the? U s a severe lesson: U N, it says has abused its authority will yet about here in just a second, also devastating consequences of abandoning the truth. Dodger ever pipe piper joins us. He is in a radical, incredible university dean. He's a guy who wrote this is not a day care yet over yourself, your member that paper they would came out circulated, became a really big deal here. He's written a book based on that paper, showing this what happens to universities when they abandoned the truth. This what's gonna happen to society. He's gonna be just joining us here and not just a just a second, also the media, a complete lack of frost of the media, some thoughts on that beginning right now. You should have entertainment and didn't light, and it seems to me that you're here today for a couple of things,

that we want, and we want to do. There is a there's. A new story out about. You know if we trust the media or not You know where it: where do we we're too stand on the media, which organizations do we trust. Going to failure with a lot of hope. This is from market watch. The the media source. That, is the least trusted. This'll feel good occupied Democrats. Number two is Buzzfeed, really least trusted MIA I'm innocent traditions all the time. It's all, but it's not I mean I don't know, but it s what it feels like. That's what it is like art. It ended in listing all, and it is also like we publish anything. Without list further with the window, with the dossier from Russia,

yes, I had not been published. That's I will say- and I know many people the ice will not agree With- is that I believe that's unfair, then they did a lot of really good journalism. Throughout all alone, they lie in defending Buzzfeed. Why? I will because I think people who do well deserved defended when there was a that whole team school don't buy CNN The people were but are still there. I mean their political team of other still a lot of good people that I was again they I'm not. I'm not agree with every one of their decisions already one of the reports by any means, but I mean it. But there is always some of these other organizations. Your mentioning here is this amazing. If you look at this here that here the top five occupy dammit That's the least trusted Here too, is Buzzfeed second than exclaiming three bright Bart ironed out

there I mean that its accurate, but that was accurate. You know occupy and bright bark kind of the same thing there jail kind of like a lot of you, Laura Disan sort of groups of ten social media then Trump, then M for wars I mean from either from anything out of prompt he's, not a disease source. We s c is now eagerly spitted info wars is more trusted than Trump. Amazing. Back that cigarettes coordinate amazing quartet statement ablaze is between the huffing in post, which is left, credible to the american people Huffington posed, then the blaze then Fox sandwiched between now here's where it's really gonna fall apart on you. This is interesting because usually in these- and I don't know whose conducting this serve it, but Fox shows up as the most trusted, often in like writers or

Dela Poles. I don't know who did this went, but it seems more comprehensive than This is U University of Reynolds Journalism Institute. No wonder so. Here are the here that here the top once ready. This is mistrusted, the economist. Nobody reads it: nobody not even heard of the economy. Nobody result does not through If you're taking a view we're taking a survey of the average American Nobody reads the economy, that's fair! Ok! Now or to public television. Nobody's watching news on public television when you say tell us. This is all well the economists that's Mart I've seen that some place. I don't even know where the average American even sees the economist, but they don't know what they're talking about on that they most likely have never read it,

like television nobody's, getting their daily news from P B. Tv is. Me aware report still on cause. That's the last time I wanted it Reuters, number three writers, do they even know what Reuters is no as a rule, no, the BBC right you're getting your news from the BBC? Yes, the BBC, one two, three or four, the accents make them more credible. Yes, this is no night again. It's a good study on people's impressions. Yet right like there depression is Buzzfeed. Does stories about logistical and how to guess the forty thing- and I do not agree with that, but they also you journalism, correct ordinary things: you'd! Never right into your plumber, where life right, where they see NPR as some governments, truncated government, sort and that's what's amazing here, none! That's! What's amazing power

What television, BBC, NPR Pbs? Those are all government sources, so you trust the government to give you the news. That's in credit Gillis. First of all, the first one. I think that is credible. The economist. Nobody reads that television nobody's watching the euro. Six o clock news on public television Reuters come they don't even know what Reuters is BBC. Aha, NPR. That's the first credible one The ratings of NPR in markets across the country are high and I think, but again Do they separate the news of NPR from the programme of NPR, write, em and of course you know it's nice to me. Ratings when you get the best signal every market yet, and I didn't think so

but you know there you don't. The best signal can still be the worst rated in the market, and that's it. That's not. Your statement is universally true. Either gets the idea that, as you know, there are some there are definite. People is an empty, are honestly, they do much better in pod. Cats are defending these huge bags, stop it. No up I'm just trying to stop about defending. I just tell you the truth. I'm just too The truth is that doesn't mean that I agree with the more you think: they're unbiased their governments sources. They are absolutely biased. Of course, they absolutely by words. They are then there's the guardian. We have now, I know people are building up the guardian time. What so that's how far down those as just one, two, three that seven I got. Is the Wall Street Journal? Nine is the early times. Ten is the Dallas morning knew all that's lilies, that's out of sight. It adds a garbage. Can Why then live in is just your local news,

and I trust my local news more than I trust really going elsewhere. Then politico then associated Press. The Denver pose the Washington Post time see. At all times, He had all ties are more the Kansas City, STAR New York Times, USA today, the Atlantic CNN Cbs, NBC, Drudge, MSNBC, ABC Limbaugh Fox Blaze things imposed post the internet, not unless our skies yeah. What did Yahoo do besides higher Katy Correct is enough. I think enough to make to discredit them regularly, maybe also be one of the things where your name. This is like yeah yeah. I know I don't trust them as a new source.

And if that doesn't seem so goofy does that's. Why I, like you put it may happen to post, was never a word, a new source of its a blogging source right. Maybe you have news articles there, but a left wing leave left, leaning, blogs or just started when you put post after her name, and it sounds so official right you should as a matter of going back post dotcom, maybe people would be now that it is now they wouldn't. Strangely enough, I don't think we look at area having to this credible either she is less the heavy pulse remind you is less credible than the blame So you know you you look at that and then you see this is the president is playing against and he's accurate that there is no credibility, but did you see what launched this weekend from Trump Tower the other, the real news or whatever is calling from noon us never really lose. Not any of this fake stuff,

at his ease, hired an anchor to give the news about Donald Trump now, really care is lies. You really know what it is really care, because we're going that way anyway, I fought against it with Morocco Bomber yet and if he would have released a news source with somebody anchoring all news about him the right? What a gun apoplectic oil area, they were gone crazy. I would have gone crazy over it. Because he would have done it in where I was fearing? What Barack Obama did was heat. Over the West wing. He made. The White House, press room and press. Secretary and remember, they started doing her own news and cutting people out journalists were allowed to come in here to the events, and they said Bell the White House. He just covering it that I problem with, if you

to do his own news from Trump Tower and he's paying for it or his re election campaigns paying for it. I don't It gets healthy for America, but I don't care. Do you. Not really I mean he has a right to do. Not really I'm glad he's not doing it in the White House that bothers me. To use the White House as the backdrop for it that but really bothered me with Barack Obama doing it, but I can't Anybody on the or anybody on the left who has a real problem with the president's tampering with the news. Let's just recall what Barack Obama was doing to you by cutting you out of the loop, men anybody on the right who is like This is the greatest thing ever remember what you are feeling when this was happening with Barack Obama, we just to stop playing these musical chairs now,

helpful, I think, would be helpful. Yet you have a principle is right or wrong, no matter whose office right than theirs, the principle that guides your feelings on these things were there should be So if it violates the principle it violated, both from the left and the right now. I would eliminate feelings from the equation completely. Like I eat shit, you shouldn't be about feelings: What? What group are we now frickin liberally poets living at a commune where everyone is talking about feelings, the Times top with a feeling just look at the story and analyze it, so this again goes back to something that I shared last week that Oh wow really got some freely nasty comments Quoting Dietrich Bonham offer now sets. People are injured by, however, that you like hero from Nazi Germany, that yes, although there is actually very controversial, figure, divers area

is everybody off? Ok, this is what he wrote. While he was in prison waiting to be executed for trial. Stop Hitler. Okay, so very contours. I can see why you would disagree with them. They want you to listen to this and see if this applies tube. Sides now anybody Here's this is only here. Save this applies to anybody and you're gonna. Think o when back has just hating all liberals Clem backers, tearing down from now not hating. Anyone I am quoting, Dietrich bond offer on how societies go to Hell. Listen to this stupidity, is more dangerous of an enemy than good of the good. Then malice one can protest against evil can be exposed and if need be, evil He prevented through the use of force and

we'll always carries within itself the germ of its own subversion. In that it Lee. Behind in human beings. Some sense of unease against Two petty we're defenceless. Neither protest nor the use of force accomplish anything against stupidity, Reason for on deaf ears, facts. Contradict ones. Pre judgment simply You don't believe debris believed in such moments, the stupid person even bigger Critical and when fact irrefutable they're, just which decide as inconsequential or incidental in all of this the stupid person, in contrast to the malicious one, is utterly self satisfied. Being Easily irritated then becomes dangerous by going on the attack.

Is this not today, so warm people railing about dear you'll, be upset with stupidity and for that reason greater caution is called for when dealing with a stupid person than with the malicious one. Never again will we try to persuade the stupid person with reason, because it is senseless and dangerous. So what does he say? Can you summarize that, for me, don't get in Facebook battles? That's how I would summarize that, because that is that its every time your gun twitter, you know, tweeting, Some person you ve, never met before bring up they're, stupid arguments. So, what's the point of that year, There is no point to try to win that battle with lodging ok, so So here are the comments underneath this honour Susan right, frightening. Isn't it roberts thrice so you're the stupid one in this trying to persuade you is senseless and dangerous according to your hero,

I am calling on you. I don't even know what that it's amazing that you quote: discredited newspapers, the Washington compost. No, I was voting. Dietrich Bonn. While thanks to the two of you, your proving glens, point that's coming to their next one, quoting discredited sources due to your head of Donald Trump you're becoming them it. Bad when O Reilly has to set you straight by the way. I was interested to read Donald Trump, Sir Tweet, from the weekend in which he linked to the Wash can post which I get if its such fake news, are you attacking him in the same way, oh by the way, our attorney general, is now a good guy again. So bad! That's where you like him again, it's the next one from surely crofts are truly amazing. What so many people jump to prove? You write Glenn Prove me right. All

did was quote Dietrich Barn offer. Scott. Also stupidity is incredibly frustrating and generally believe, most people I encounter our intelligent, but so many are wilfully will wilfully ignore reason. What system else because they don't agree with you one hundred percent. Look in the mirror, lately Glenn, that's the next one. Earlier I mean it's crazy. Anyone make sense, it is it's crazy, doesn't make sense when you're, quoting something from seventy years ago, and say, hey. Maybe maybe we should look at ourselves in the mirror. All of us. And what he is saying is still

people are going to jump defensive, then they will dismiss absolutely everything and just rip you apart with their preconceived them like whither, preconceived notions. They will just repeal apart why and they will discredit the x and just dismiss them. Exactly what we did is the entire internet. In a nutshell, it's it's geographically. Everything that occurs on Twitter and Facebook when it comes appalling political discussion and we are not paying tension really to anything more we're not even reach we read headlines, and then we move on with our life, we don't even understand the story any more. What is the point of the blaze, when we don't even read the stories now, this

you ve got through the stress of finding that home that meets all of your needs. The right price, a right location, the right school district, the right place to raise your family, the thing you have to kneel down now is the mortgage? Will you yet the right mortgage for you and not the mortgage company. The salary base mortgage consultants at American find its american financing are dedicated to helping you make the smart mortgage decision a line with your unique financial goals with Eric and financing you're gonna get the straight. You're gonna get something where they are going out and trying to find the right mortgage for you, but they are not getting any kickbacks from the banks are the people who are the lenders? they're going out and they work solely for you. That's the difference and Oh american financing is also offering reverse mortgages. Reverse mortgages are a good way to increase monthly cash flow would no more each payment. Whilst

retaining the ownership of your home, please do your own homework, call their number eight hundred nine hundred and six two thousand four hundred and forty that's eight hundred nine hundred and six two thousand four hundred and forty or americanfinancing dot net. If you have a mortgage and its adjustable May I suggest you lock it down right now? If you need a mortgage, down right now, a marrow in financing dot net Homeric advising have avail as one two three four W W W that animal as consumer access that order, the coming back programme mercury. Program. Another eight seventeen, seventy another thrilling and exciting. Broadcast day We have a look at the political, correct culture

universities and university campuses. Interview. You do not want to miss next The Hague programme. Glenn grapple. I am about to re, introduce you to a friend of ours and a guy who I absolutely love. I love his intellect and I love his bravery two years ago, on Thanksgiving that,

He wrote these words this past week. I actually had a student come forward if, after a university, chapel service and complain because he felt victimized by a sermon on the topic of first cover. Corinthians thirteen, It appears, as young scholar felt offended because of a homily on love that made him a bad for not showing love in, his mind? The speaker was wrong for making him in his peers feel uncomfortable. I'm making this up our culture actually taller, kids to be this self absorbed and narcissistic anytime their feelings are hurt their victims Anyone who dares challenge them and thus make them feel bad about themselves, is a hate or a big it and oppressor victimized I have a message for this young man and all others who care to listen Feeling of discomfort you have, after listening to a sermon, is called a conscience and

your call is supposed to make you feel bad. It's supposed to make you feel guilty. The goal of many a good sermon is to make you confess your sins, not coddle, you in your selfishness, primary objective of the church of the christian faith. Is your confession, not yourself actual innovation. So here's my advice, we want the chap going to tell you you're a victim rather than tell you need virtue, this may not be the university you're looking for and he goes on his name is doctor ever ever piper. He is the President of Oklahoma Wesley in University and our guest how're, you, Sir I'm doing well Thank you for having what happened when you published that well. First of all, I need to remind you and those listening that I owe you a note of thanks. Thank you. Posting that article. It was skimming morning two years ago. Somebody gave that to you. I don't know who, to this day, I wonder, who caught your attention in you posted it as the result of that three and a half million people view that, within the course of about a week or two, the risk

Ass was interesting. Ninety seven percent of the comments were positive. Three, sent negative when we do it. Our internal statistical analysis of the analysis of that was it interesting, the secular world was more interested in complimentary, then, the christian world, the church, here's a poster child example I received a hard copy letter from a Fulbright sky? of a university in the south and essentially said I read your day care peace. I went to you website and read more about you, I'm in it Yes, and I disagree with your religion, and I disagree with your politics, but on this issue thank You could also you carry on and needed to be said so Fulbright Scholar University of X Y see so they re action has been quite interesting and I do believe This says: is that the secularist, the human if you will the average college in university faculties member out, there is recognising? This monster he's created is turning around

bite him all minors, frightened. Yes, they are by the way. The name of the book is nodding, Dick, not a day care. The the original Abed pretty much relentlessly pounded that This university is not a day care you're here for a reason, I was just out in a way I was with. For who do not have my political bent and by any stretch of the imagination we had, eight conversations several of them told me they were concerned about what was happening in universities. And the way dissent is being shut down. They said that is absolutely anti everything you know them after supposed to stand for they said two of them in this meeting openly said they are more concerned about, what's happening, left, then they are that building on the right, because they don't think

The people on the left, have really woken up to the monster that they will, that that that they're sleeping with and they should be frightened would call it India, fascism, is this intellectual Freedom or is ideological fascism, do we believe in a free and robust and open exchange of ideas? The idea the classical Liberal arts academy. If you want to go, a thousand years to Oxford, the founding of the liberal arts institution. What was it established to do it was established to educate a free man, a free people, a free culture to educate people, and what it means is meant to be liberated. It was an education in liberty and thus the classical definition of liberal ironically too it's the conservative, such as myself, who is more class, play, liberal than my left of centre counterpart, because I believe in a debate, I believe, in a robust exchange of ideas, because I can trust the truth to judge the debate,

not politics and power, not people, not the Pandit, but the principles of truth. Chica, certain told us when you get rid of the big laws of God. You dont get liberty, but rather Thousands upon thousands of little laws that Russian to fill the vacuum. We have A key was situation today, where we act, You have been teaching students for decades that it doesn't matter what you believe as long as it works for you and that chrome is being filled by fascism, ideological fascism, rather than electoral freedom. So you are writing this, the devastating consequences of abandoning the truth. The book is not a day care. What are the consequences? The consequences are ultimately the loss of human dignity, human eye to and human freedom. If you can't define the human being any longer? If we don't know Definition of simple words such as male and female, if we can define,

What it means to be human, the embargo day we're going to dumb down the definition of the human being to the embargo dog. Now. What do I mean by that? I am more than the animal I'm the Amal GO day, I'm created in the image of God, and so are you. I have moral culpability moral understanding. I can gauging debate, I care about the answer when you drive the cattle ranch in Texas or me in Oklahoma. You don't see the cows arguing with one another, there's a reason for that. They don't care there. Theo Margo Day there are the Imago dog. If you will, they found their base, inclinations and appetites and instincts and that's how their defined today Postman urgently. We ve dumb down the human being to nothing but the sum total of his or her inclinations. That's our identity and therefore we have insulted the embargo day by suggesting he's the amount of dogs. The reason All of that is the total collapse of freedom. And liberty within a culture. There is no longer any boundaries, as Chesterton said in which we can live freely.

So I read: have you read the ten page memo from the Google software guy who try to remember what he. What is job was here, he review. This will just released last week. He won't put his name on it. But it was about the lies of Google Firstly, and he's like you're you're telling us there. There is no difference between a man and a woman, and you want to get more women into you, know software design, etc, etc. But that is a job that mainly men are interested in because of x Y and has the thing to do with sexism, and he through ten pages, he just takes apart everything that, talking about good. Finally, responded to this unnamed memo with their head of, Can you remember what it is? Not the head of diversity at some ridiculous clown title and she writes

They won't even dignify that what was being said by Roy quoting it here, because it has nothing to do with reality and and who we are, as Google while at the same time saying that we have to have a vigorous debate on the Google campus, their shutting all bait down How does a society? in the old world it doesn't survive, but in a society where Google, is working on a sigh and teaching computer. You know artificial intelligence, the difference between right and wrong when we he can define it. What happened so that society you question goes back to what's going on in the academy right now? What's taught today in the classroom is going to be practised tomorrow, our culture and our rooms and our living rooms. What's taught today.

Classroom will be practised, a moral ideas have consequences. If you go back, Richard Weaver, nineteen, forty eight is seminal work. Title ideas have consequent What was his point? Ideas have consequences, your heart even need to read the book to understand bad ideas will breed bad culture. Bad people back community, Pat government and good ideas will bring the opposite: good culture, good, community, good, kids, good behaviour and good government ideas have cancer. And so what? Why is the timing of his book? Nineteen forty eight important because He was writing it as a response to world war. To any was look, back we're just a few short years to Hitler. Who said, let me control the textbooks and I will control the state. At the same time, we got Orwell and Huxley writing of does dopey, as that use education is a means of total power in total control. Ideas have consequences; We have to attend to what we're teaching our students today, because it will bear itself out tomorrow and we

teach narcissism and self absorption, you shouldn't be surprised to find narcissist and self absorbed students protesting in the camp a screen. So How do you know Tony and I have the sum this conversation. A lot like kids are eleven and thirteen may The kids are already at a college and I keep saying I dont want to send them a college hunting first, while I don't know of college, is going to be all that because show me the show me the teacher that is as small. Google, on the facts, I can just look up the facts. I want somebody who is more of a guide that will help me apply these things that I can find and an ice but even if even if we're, not even at that place. Yet I don't want my kids going in being indoctrinated. What is gonna happened to the university. What is going to happen in the next five years?

years. As these things are getting worse and worse and people know it, I think you should let your pocketbook speak if moms and dad's of parents will actually start recognising that they're paying the bill, you're gonna drops Grand thirty five Grand Forty grand on the barrel head inside your kid off to an institution you spent eighteen years of your life training, your child in the way he should go and then, in the first eight ten minutes, as as you drop them off at the university and you drive away. They take pride and start then start too and taking his soul. And his mind and ridiculing everything you ve tried to instil in him and yet why would you want to pay for that? Asked yourself as education about integrity or as an invite about information, is education just to learn how to make more money, or is it about how learn to be a moral person is education about Karen or is about just getting a career

There was a day when education was about the big ideas. The first thanks, not the small ideas in the second thinks, I'm a student. Of course- and he was fond of telling us over and over again that if you get the big ideas first ideas the first question wrong. Everything thereafter will suffer. You ve got to provide an education, dear kids, that focuses on the big ideas. So it's a push back on from academia, you must not be very popular well hands on who you're talking. Maybe you didn't just think this is the right answer. I've had lots of people, my peers, other presidents, and what not pull me side, price and say I agree with you, I really What you're saying I just can't say it publicly for fear of losing my job. That's the reaction and that's sad at sad, but that is true. I think I don't, let's out them now worthy of its body, ever because

I think there's a lot of that, and not just in universities, there's a lot and we're dealing with a situation now in Oregon where the cps, I think is, has gone way over the edge and out of control because of one particular person. I think this is what's happening. And People now starting to come out and say: okay, if you guys think you can actually suppose it and when I have, information for you, but I'm not in. Unless you can win, I mean it sits. Valerie really amazing, we! U dont win you! Don't a society doesnt survive. If people stand on the sidelines well, I know a fan of, as am I in one of his famous quotes that we all know in this room, and that is not to speak of. Speaking, not to act just to act? Silence in the face of Eve was evil itself and God will not hold us guiltless. That's worth

so the commission not to speakers to speak and not to act is to act silence in the face of evil is evil itself. God will not hold a skill. Is due we believe in art, Cruz. Do we believe that teaching those things that are right, and just in real and permanent, enduring or self evident truths and down to us by our creator? Do we believe in them enough to speak and to act, because if we don't were actually acting in speaking for the opposite, we have to have courage and some conviction the academy, presidents and professors need to get a spine and start teaching truth rather than just. Is it hard I will take a quick break, but is it hard to find those professors and teachers that still will yes, but Can there are a handful in its parents, who are paying the money? Do they search necessary. You can find those institutions that actually say we believe the truth is revelation. Ok, as opposed to a construction

That's the answer you need to hear is truth self evident, given by somebody bigger and better than you and me, or is it just constructed by the populace? If its constructive The populace is dangerous. Given by Guy if it's given by revelation its enduring immutable and true wherever Piper thing you join me for the think tank today in the name of the book is not a day care that stating consequences of abandoning the truth well worth your time and read and will have more compensation with him a little later on this afternoon on the block, his tea me thanks tightrope it now this your homes empty, cars and the driveway there's no lights on, I mean it's than, rotation you're, telling people I'm on Education come robbed me burglars. Looking for the signs, are you not home, because then there not actually robbing you at night, even in your home there not robbing you at night. Most robberies happened during the day they dont

they didn't want to run into you, especially here in Texas. I simply simply safe home Security- has extended their biggest ever summer, sale until August thirteenth began. This is when the crime rate goes through the roof. Hopping hundred dollars off simply save special summer packaged happening right now has everything you need to keep your home say from intruders. Simply takes around the clock. Monitoring is fifteen bucks a month is no long term contract dumping. The lock you in it is truly section done right, dogmas sale ends August, thirteenth, it simply safe back dot com save a hundred dollars right now, please safe back dotcom your listening to the Glen Bag program that Glenn Program sitting here on my said, or a lot of a lot of, military metals, including they can

rational medal of Honor Ciller STAR the bronze star, but today Is the anniversary of the oldest military award by George Washington. The first want to go to the common man, the purple heart or, as it was known at the time, the badge of merit not for being here, are killed as it is now, but doing something that would be seen in the eyes of God. As Having merit He would bless us and help us win back programme. Mercury.