Now let me underline that the bowels of a hidden somewhere under the brick and steal over nondescript building we once again made contact with our leader. Everybody Michael then hear our number eight seven, seven, three eight one Eight hundred and eleven eight hundred and seventy seven three hundred and eighty one three thousand eight hundred and eleven. This, I believe, is a very important program today. So I hope, you'll stick with us, boats, have been analyzed over and over and over again, I can't add anything to it. You know, since this president was elected in inaugurated.

Really been two areas that have been focused on in public life not exclusively, but significantly. One has been the criminalization of his election, and the other has been broad. Scope about impeaching him. Even before he entered office and right at the time he did in her office. So this discussion, which has been pushed by the Democrats in the media and certain academics and so forth, About removing a duly elected presently United States under our constitution has been all about on electing a duly elected president of the United States through either criminal prosecution or impeachment, and I think we need to discuss both of these a little bit more thoroughly because there

going away almost a year and a half ago. I was doing some research, which is my want. That's what I do on the card the Tunisian and the law of history and economics, philosophy and so forth, and I came across these two memos from the Department of Justice, the Office of Legal Council, which is the so called Constitution office and one was from nineteen. Seventy three, and one was from two thousand the Nixon administration and the Clinton administration, and they prepare this memorandum each respectively further respective attorney general, and they

we concluded that you cannot indicted sitting president. So I tried to push this out on this programme on live in tv on Fox on Heritage programme. Nobody appeared to be listening February, seventh, this year, Alan Dershowitz, who is ubiquitous in the median, quoted a lot by conservative. He insisted that a president could be subpoenaed could be, in front of a federal grandeur, even though it's never been done and he doesn't have many defences. Maybe he could plead the fifth and so forth and so on. I called my buddy shown, and I said this is outrageous and he wasn't the only one all kinds of leaks in the media can the president do and so forth and so on, and I said.

I'm gonna continue to hit this issue with these memos that he said, presently, cannot be indicted and therefore, if he is to be subpoenaed, it has to be very focused. It has to be limited and it has to involve something that he may have. Honor have unique information on anyone icon. His programme, among others, and I kept hitting the point that he sitting president cannot be indicted, whatever my opinion. It doesn't matter. That's the opinion of the United States Department of Justice. It has been unaltered for almost half a century and I further made the point. That, when rod rose and stay in appointed Robert Mahler Robert Mahler. Is and was compelled to comply with the apartment of justice, rules, regulations and policies, in other words, these memos apart to Mr Mulder, whether he likes it or not, and if you.

And comply with the memos. Then, of course the president and his lorries would have Very strong case in federal court. To those of you who been listening to me in watching me, know that I've said over and over again that the constitution is the President's friend. I cannot protect what a federal court a federal appeals court where the Supreme Court will do, but the constitution itself is the president's friend in this regard. Why. Because the president hasn't committed any crimes, theirs Assertion of under any underlying crime, we know this because, when rose and Stain appointed Mahler, there was no assert

of an underlying crime. We know more than Mr Mahler seeks to ask the president about matters that involve the president's prerogatives under the constitution firing soup. In its and so forth, for which Mr Mulder has absolutely no authority either under the appointment, received by rose in Spain or certainly under the constitution to ass the present, the United States Folks to become presently United States is quite of involved and complex matter campaign for a couple years ago and after state after state. You give endless interviews who participate in numerous debates. You compete with other people.

You become the nominee of your party, you compete against the other. Now many of the other party, it's quite an order, It's quite him involve process. The american people can participate or not. A hundred twenty hundred and thirty million did we have precincts. We approve. Captains. We have precinct judges, we precinct observers. We have states that have lost all to elect a president and vice president of the United States and then ultimately, the electoral College for one prosecutor, a my optically obsessed prosecutor to reverse that entire process. Two denude us of the outcome of the election to undo an election.

To try and remove a president is an abomination. Unconscionable. If the President of the United States had Rob a bank in broad daylight, he cannot be indicted, as president of the United States can be indicted. After his present steps can be taken to told a statue. Mutations he can be removed from office for a peach when I will get to that. That's the second shoe the trapped here, but this effort, push by the Democrats, heeded by rod, rose and sustain a bureaucrat

unleashing Mr Mulder and unconstitutional prosecutor to take down the article to executive branch head is simply an abomination, If Mr Mahler wants to ask questions of Mr Trump, he must accommodate the presence of the United States. He may not be free to ask questions of the president about presidential powers, not a Mr Miller's business, why he fired a particular subordinate. It's not a MR mullahs. Business. Then this is not the Martha Stewart case where she was set up. This is the president of the United States and imagine if the country were true.

But a prosecutor accountable to no one elected by no one if a prosecutor was free to do whatever he wished To see Pina president and asked the president virtually anything you want In any way, he wants even in front of a grand jury. Imagine if such a creature had that kind of power over the office of the presidency, regardless of the president, as it will be absolute of of

constitutional order and, as these memos note from the Department of Justice, the president is different from a member of Congress, because there's five hundred and thirty five of them president, is different from a federal judge, because there's a thousand of them there's only one president. And at the constitutional convention Philadelphia in the summer of seventeen, eighty seven when they debated impeachment, virtually the entire focus was on the presidency. How to handle, which I'll get to in a moment.

And so we have a prosecutor with an open, ended portfolio with no actual crime, and so he seeks to create one and he's urged gray one by a so called free press that pretends to be protecting us from tyranny. He's urge to create what I Democrat Party, which, from day one

Sought to undo trumps election. This is why I have spent so much time on facts, not because I want to because I felt I needed, because I felt the president's lorries could hear me that way. This is why I spent so much time on Levine TV and behind this microphone talking about these subjects, to get the word out to you, the people, so you get spread. The word to it was not understood six seven eight months ago that, according to two Apartment, a justice memos he's sitting, president cannot be indicted while in office. The issue is whether he is above the law. The issue is the constitution and whether Mr Mahler can on his own Walter

I wonder whether Mr Mulder, on his own, can alter the outcome of an election by trying to create a trap for a president. Mr Mahler only knows one thing: as a former FBI director, former yours attorney going after criminals. That's all he knows. Using the power and the resources of the federal government to put people in prison, and yet when it comes to the President of the United States, that's not his job. He can't put the present and imprison now. Let's talk about this president, when we return does this president deserve this kind of scrutiny? Does his present deserve this kind of treatment obstruct

of justice. Has anybody obstructed Mr Mulder and his seventeen prosecutors, as anybody obstructed. The FBI and Mr Re, from conducting Anybody obstructed the department of Justice. You can look at his tweets. Has a prosecutor to decide if he signalling obstruction of some secluded decide if he signalling obstruction of some kind. This is where we are. This is I said over and over and over again his lawyers need to get through their heads that they are not to serve up this president. Under no circumstances should he asked be asked questions about com. About any decisions relating to a staff. Any decisions relating

his firing of individuals or hiring of individuals. Any decisions about his tweeting, his public comments off the table. At no point should there be a face to face verbal interview period If there's a handful of questions that they have that are serious and earnest. Then they can put them in writing where MR trunk and review them with his council. He can answer them or not. If he chooses to depending on how The questions are asked and what they relate to, but there are also questions from Mr Kohl me. What is your constitutional authority? Are you, as we ve talked about a principle or an inferior officer.

Of the United States government, we want, as input to the two memos from the Department of Justice, apply to you, or do you not think they applied again and so forth their products that need to be set for him? I don't know exactly what's taking part some reading, the tea leaves like you some of the reports today, I'm trying to ignore all the phoney lawyers jumping up and down whether their professors are otherwise, who think they know something enormous nothing, but it would appear at last that the president's floors seem to be taking this course. I hope so I ve got a lot more when I return I'll be right back.

Really more than dial up. We re systemic breakdown of law and order at the Department of Justice. Unleashed by Rosen's thing he continues to Being the authority of a special council without any criminal basis, throw our terms now of the media in the media, regurgitate them like conspiracy to commit fraud in an election Tommy's Presidential campaign going all they back to John Kennedys com Campaign or Lyndon Johnson corrupt campaign or any them then either been charged with conspiracies too, to commit fraud in the election context.

Has any senator been accused of that any congressmen course not, so they make this stuff up. They make this tougher. Donald Trump has done nothing to deserve this but we have a mob now, a mob dressed up as reporters a mob, dressed up as Democrats in Congress, a mob dressed up as never trumpery. It's a mob made on particular care. What Gallo is use political speaking whether its criminal impeachment, whenever it is, they just want from figuratively hanging from it. The constitutional concern is not merely that a particular indictment criminal prosecution of a sitting president, when unduly impinge upon his ability to poor, miss public duties in more general terms, and it's a permitting such criminal process against a sitting president would affect the under

I'm dynamics of our governmental system in profound and necessarily unpredictable ways by shifting an awesome power to unelected persons like a prosecutor lacking an explicit Constitutional role of are the president. Given the potentiality and the momentous polluter consequences for the nation at stake. There is a fundamental structural king compatible which one the ordinary application of the criminal process and the office of the President, the United States Department of Justice I'll, be right back with a daily fake news. Don pouring through your tv, mobile phones and Peters, you may have missed some real news. Like the recent study in the journal saw metabolism, scientists suspect. Did a correlation between growing rates of obesity and processed food. But what this study does cover was that these foods also appear to lead people to over eat. Here is the bottom line. You need fresh fruits and vegetables and

their diet, which is why I recommend that you start taking field of greens by Brick house nutrition. Just one scoop of field of greens has a full serving of real USDA certified organic fruits and vegetables. It helps booster immunity using antioxidants, probiotics and probiotics. This is real food. Not some fake supplement, lab powder. Just right the nutrition facts, power on the side, gotta, brick House, Levine, Dotcom, that's brick, house, L, E, the iron dot com and you'll get fifteen percent off your first order. With the offer Levin you know, you're not going to start cooking, fresh fruits and vegetables. So, let's not pretend just get one full cup of fruits and one for a cup of vegetables everyday with field of green got a brick house: Levine, dot com, brick House, Levin, dot com offered code, Leavin, the establishments worst nightmare mark loving.

Call eight now a seven seven, three, eight one, three eight one, one, factly, rule of law and the constitution are not complied with in this case involving this president, whose done nothing what stops any? U S, attorney from supporting a president. Now, some might say, particularly liberal law professors. Why just any different than Bill Clinton in the Clinton versus polygons case he had to sit down for deposition and so forth and sound. Well, if you read the memo, they explained the difference between criminal and civil cases. There is no immunity from certain types of civil cases, certain types, but there is from Chrome cases now. Why would that be? Do you think, because

Mama cases actually involve in individual fighting for their liberty. Civil cases do not due process probable cause warrants all this river important to keep you free the criminal cases different in kind And form, then he civil case- and they also point out in these members that. The present United States, far from being above the law he be below the law. Now. Why would that be because he is consumed by the duties of the office of the presidency, as we only have one can take time off that he wouldn't be able to focus its attention on his liberty on a trial and during the core.

Of discovery the course of a trial in the course of an appeal and so forth, and so on. The needs of the country are unmet, the purpose of the office of the presidency is degraded, and of course the President as a citizen does not have the ability to defend himself as any other citizen one in terms of focusing time and attention. So if a present and is going to be subpoenaed by a prosecutor whose very constitutionality is questionable, in my view,. Then that's subpoena, better, be very damn narrow. And it better have a serious purpose other than the Asia is thrown around or cable tv and biased. Britain, hot head members of Congress, obstruction of justice can speak See to commit fraud in an election

these are idiotic, empty phrases. The president of the United States and firing a subordinate is incapable of obstructing justice, which is a crime it he is incapable of committing ache, I'm wearing his exercising his constitutional prerogative to fire a subordinate or he'd, never be able to fire and FBI director. They could always blackmail him or her be able to file a CIA director. They could always blackmail its absurd and for what. Why should we do it? For what now we ve had this vote last night. And you'll be falling yourself if you think the Republicans are gonna, have a republican wave befalling yourselves, if you don't think we're behind the ape. Ah, here we better fight like hell to win Next election.

This, ladies and gentlemen, as an election to protect the vote from two years ago, the dynamic It made it abundantly clear, despite their new tactics, to keep an hush hush, they ve made it abundantly clear. That the purpose of taking the House of Representatives For removing a duly elected president of the United States, with whom they disagree, you ma keep that in mind when you vote. I have one key. Now, for my representative, Barbara Comstock in my particular district, just one you're gonna Father Constitution not vote to impeach the present, while for this mid term elections, that's enough. Turn off right now. Is it enough down the road? No, it's not enough down the road with a massive debt and so forth, but the Republican seem incapable handling and that's another point.

A the Republicans you're getting their asses kick for these elections is so close because all Action is in the office of the presidency, all the actions in the executive branch but they gave us a tax got. The president calls it the greatest Scott in american history, not even close. On the centre prides itself on on giving a sister the court justice and maybe a second that's their job, but they also gave us the biggest. Most massive spending bill in world history. Yearly deficit is up twenty percent and it's gonna bite us in and ass in the ass. It's gonna destroy the future. This country refuse to support the president's efforts to build a wall whether its fencing, our war. I dont care. They refuse to build what they need to build. And, of course, when the time came, they refuse to repeal Obamacare there's a lot of problems, and so the base is not ruling to the Republicans. Meanwhile, the Democrats

raises all worked up. By the media, that done That party media, which is the so called free press and the endless the endless efforts by the Democrats. The fire up their base with racism was in a phobia and, of course, with their hate for trunk So I look at voting a little differently area where you know this one voted this way. He should have said this in that, but none of this vote is important for a different reason, and let me tell you something. As important as the vote is It was never intended to be this important know what I mean. I dont mean people should have a right to vote. That would be absurd. Everyone should have the franchise

who's a citizen of the United States and qualified. That's not my point. Point? Is we soon on the edge of our seats, to see how even a house election turns out one house why. Because this government has gotten so big. It is so massive that the politicians rules Massa Bureau, Percy Massa programmes, massive debt everywhere through our face, and our bedrooms their and our kitchens their and our automobiles there place of work there and our place of employed there. Every where the federal government is everywhere. So whoever wins win the spoils and their riches they get to decide which way the country goes. But we conservatives we want to win in order to reduce that, to control that way,

seek power to accept pan our power. We seek power to limit our power, but the Democrats in this election want to do something That, I believe, has ever been done in american history. If it has are not familiar with it, they wanted on a sitting president from the moment he sat down and they are committed to this That is why they're turning out in huge numbers, in addition to the. Endless allegations of racism and and hi this an anti that for which there is no real substantive basis or support at all. So then we get to the issue of impeachment professors, which has written a book on impeachment, which is

Julie, dead, wrong. Others, including friends of mine, running at national view, online and elsewhere, think they understand impeachment because their lawyers they are dead wrong. Yes, impeachment is a political process, but it's more than that Gerald Ford. What to do and page William, O Douglas. In April nineteen seventeen he asserted that an impeach while offences, whatever the house with the concurrence of the Senate, considers it to be. So he insisted that impeachment is an illimitable power These kind of strangely in american ears. Does it for?

lamentable power is alien to a constitution that was designed to fence all power to fence all power, we're not populists. This isn't a democracy, nor is it a mob accuracy, although it seems to be heading in that direction, republic: a constitutional republic which limits the mob which limits the majority which limits minority factions, which limit centralized government, which leaves as much room as possible for the individual. The flourish on his or her own, and yet that's not what's happened. Isn't that's now. What's happened at all. And so he moved this issue of impeachment. Now some of said that the president has to actually commit a crime for it to be in a peaceful offence,

absurd is that how do we know that the president has committed a crime? We justice, Madam President, cannot be indicted, while is often sets the official position of the Department of Justice. So we have to wait for a president be indicted, then a criminal trial than a conviction then an appeal, then a decision than another appeal to the Supreme Court than a decision. Now, that's absurd! That's absurd! That's not what impeachment about at all take a look at our city hastening, It was a federal judge in Florida. He was indicted on overtaking money for this case for that case, and he was actually found not guilty, but the evidence was substantial,

He was impeached by the House of Representatives and removed by the United States Senate. No small task. Then he ran by the way he became a member of the House of Representatives and a one party district from which he can be elected for the rest of his life. But that's a footnote. Parliament is not supposed to be whatever the house. A representative says: impeachment is not supposed to be a purely polluter. A process, although that's the motivating factor there, are certain standards for impeachment that are utterly misunderstood by so called legal experts. Will explore them in a little bit. I returned. The middle of the night and tossing turning your covered in sweat

run the ac or a fan to try and keep cool. Get rid of your he trapping mattress and sleep is key. It is the other side of the pillar. Like I do on my Casper mattress, all Casper mattresses use premium. Foam, They relieve pressure and help align your body, so you fall asleep. Filling comfortably and wake up. Feeling refreshed, and I know this first hand and thanks. The breathable material, your guaranteed to sleep coolly, all summer long, Casper, ships for free box so small. You won't believe it holds a mattress that so you can try at risk. Free for one hundred night, there's no risk. You don't love. Yours, though, come pick it up and refund you everything, or are you going. Strip now lie on it, in a pillow that four hundred people have and then, when you wake up all what said and my hair anyway, I don't recommend it. Gotta casper dot com

And use code mark for fifty dollars towards the purchase of select mattresses, that's casper dot com code, Mark Casper, dotcom code, Mark fifty dollars towards the purchase of select mattresses terms and conditions apply. I mean Casper, so good. They have copycats. Now, don't ever get the copycats and you can do it very quickly if a great site. This is a wonderful wonderful product, and I just want to make sure that consider, particularly in the summer time. Let's start talking about impeachment again, and this is why it is important this election and we all know it. Article five article two section for the constitution provides quote in relevant part the president? Vice president, all civil offices of the United States shut

removed from office on impeachment foreign conviction of treason, bribery or high other high crimes? Misdemeanours. Another mistake that is made by law, professors and by everybody. Is you take the word bribery and high crimes and misdemeanours and so forth, and you apply the criminal code to them. Whether was no criminal code, there was no federal criminal code. The very terms impeachment treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanours were lifted word for word from english common law. Then you have the divisions the The House of Lords Satin judgment that was Of the parallel division of functions between the House of Representatives and the Senate words, the House of Lords Satin judgment

It was the model of the parallel division of functions between the House of Representatives and the Senate and is Raoul Burger in his eye. Comic book impeachment. The constitutional problems points out In a far reaching importance, they separated impeachment from subsequent criminal prosecution, so somebody could be impeached and then prosecuted later on in every event occurred there that a president could be prosecuted while office. Never so, what's Mr Miller's job, it's good question. Berger points out. The path by which the framers arrived at this language is traceable in the records of the constitutional convention.

Initially impeachment was to be based upon malpractice or neglect of duty, and I quote malpractice or neglect of duty. In the committee of detail, this became treason, bribery or corruption and was then reduced. The Committee of eleven to treason, bribery George Mason suggested on the floor. The constitutional convention, the addition of maladministration, James Madison, stand, stood up and remarked than it was so vague, whereupon Madison Substituted high crimes and misdemeanours which was adopted without demurrer, the Special nature of high misdemeanours at all, been recognised by the convention, so I couldn't just be for maladministration. I couldn't just be for political reasons. It was a much higher bar than that, and yet it didn't have to be careful.

Did have a crime they didn't anticipated president. Will you be charged with a crime while is in office? Removal would enable the government to replace and unfit officer with a proper person leaving punishment to a later and separate proceeding if indeed the impeachment offence were thus punishable at all, so Mr Mulder was to be appointed, respecting the press. The United States. Citizen, Donald Trump. His appointment should have come later, not during the course of his presidency. That's what the certainly suggests the distinction drawn in the Virginia Convention by George Nicholls between disqualification from office and further punishment, if, in fact, the president committed such high crimes as are punishable a common law, so one

necessarily have anything to do with the other, and this is there again, these sub par thinkers and shoot from the hip types law degrees go on and say: well, then it must be political must be plucked, no is happening, constitution, says where's, the word political not in there before George Mason moved to add Al administration to treason and bribery- he explained the treason, as defined in the constitution, will not reach many. Brain and dangerous offences. Thus Mason proposed to extend the power of impeachment to reach great and dangerous offences. Attempts to subvert the constitution by adding Mal administration but Edison again demure, because so Vega term, as maladministration, he said, will be equivalent to a ten year during the pleasure of the Senate.

Hi crimes misdemeanours was accepted in its place. Manifestly this substitution was made for the purpose of limiting spanning the initial Mason proposal. In other words, you are immediately ever presently stay too is subjected to political blackmail, because the standard for impeachment would be so loud, we don't like or its, The political action we can do whatever we want, that's exactly wrong. I'll be right, back, If you have a moment, I want you all to go to a brick house. Levine dot com just go there and click on the by now button. So you can read the reviews over twelve hundred five

I reviews I might add, but this one caught my attention from Steve in Denver, I'm upset with mark because he's got me hooked on field of greens what a great product! Thank you, brick ass for your amazing product and great customer service. I may monthly subscriber and I won't live without it, and you're welcome Steve and subscribing smart. You save money that way. Field of greens is made with real USDA organic fruits and vegetables and helps boost your immunity using antioxidants, probiotics and probiotics, plus they are for a one hundred percent satisfaction guarantee or your money back, go to brick House Levine, dot com, our call, eight three three ring be age and get fifteen percent off your first daughter with Promo Code Levin, that's brick, house, L, av iron, dot, com or call a three three ring be h: n Promo code,

Levin now run only underground bowels of a hidden somewhere under Britain, steel of among the script building. We once again made contact with our leader, everybody Mark Levin. Here our number eight seven, seven, three, eight one, three, eight one, one, eight, seven, seven, three, eight one, three, eight one one we're talking about impeachment: let's care that forward here, it's better not to look at peach meant as a political process, but as a constitutional process is not purely a political process. It's not supposed They are not supposed to mean. If you have a majority in the house, you can vote to remove a president, and then the Senate takes it up as a trial. That Never the intention, in fact the opposite is true:

didn't want Congress having the ability to threaten a president when they disagree with president with political blackmail that they will act to remove him of the Congress of another party and yet what being discussed. Now is even worse than that. The fact that the Democrats do not like this president and wish to remove him. You can't find support for that anywhere in american history anywhere. Nowhere. The design of the framers. As burger pointed out, the design of the framers to confer limited power is confirmed by the rejection, Removal by address which knew no limits.

And even so, some uneasiness apparently was excited about the breath of the power, for there were repeated assurances that impeachment was meant only for great injuries, court, unquote great misdemeanours, Cordon Quote James Eridu. Later a Supreme Court Justice told the North Carolina ratification convention that the quota occasion for its exercise at his impeachment will arise from acts of great injury to the community. Unquote impeachment said Governor Johnston and that convention is a mode of trial, pointed out for great misdemeanours against the public. From James Wealth expression of open the Pennsylvania convention he was adopted, then impeachment quote We'll seldom happen unquote, it is infallible that he too, Was concerned only with serious misconduct in this, the founders, we're about reflecting english sentiment

as was well put by solicitor General later. Lord Chancellor, Summers, whose they didn't parliament in sixteen ninety one quote the power of impeach ought to be like a lie that sword: captain the Temple and not use, but on great occasions and remember, the framers of your constitution relied heavily on british history when there are looking specially Peter Liese, the drawing a political lines goes to the motivation that be behind the given impeachment. The motivation but it is not the standard here, we need to recall rights burger. Then, in the great english impeachment, the charges were often assured

facade for a politically motivated proceeding, which is exactly what the framers rejected rejected. The critical focus in some should not be on got animus, for that is the nature of the beast: now the words as always political enemies, but on whether Congress is proceeding within the limits of high crimes and misdemeanours and eventually forming a fair trial. And by the way, when you look at the case of the impeachment President Andrew Johnson it was clearly not a fair trial and one brave republican senator voted against his party and against removing action and that's why he remained presently United States for a brief period of time. And setting up an independent president was the search for a term and at making. I've been in office as a part of the executive branch. The faint framers surely were aware.

Than a mere vote of no confidence could. As in England, topple even a cabinet secretary. So this isn't about no confidence. The substance must not be pure political. There are real words that have real meanings and they can be understood by looking at history by looking at the Nutritional Convention and medicines notes which site british examples. Not mere maladministration, not mere politics, not mere animosity, and yet that's all we have here. That's all we have here so on the criminal front, They ve got nothing, and so the rooting for an unconstitutional act by an unconstitutional prosecutor. To undo the last election,

Is that not or they can t. Can bring up the emoluments clause. That is that the present it is making money from foreign interests because he owns hotels, is a serious. Is that nuts. Or they can try and string together. Other things claiming he's a racist than he doesn't follow the rules at ease, none of those things either absolute sham absolute shame, so there is no basis for indictment whatsoever, there's no basis for impeachment at all, and yet this is all we hear about, and I've heard about. Since this man was elected, presently United States on and on and on over and over,

and over again is his removal, by hook or by crook, and they beat him up every day. Beat him up every day. And realizing now that you can indicted sitting president of course, Mahler has viewed his fur is approach, This also providing a basis for impeachment. Thrown around the words obstruction, that's which again is an absolutely inappropriate, improper use of a prosecutor, and yet that's what's

employees, so you have one man with his own hand, selected team. The partisans who write a report and if the Democrats take the house will serve the interests of the Democrats in trying to impeach the President of the criminal side. You have a triumphant of men who have known each other for decades the work with each other and are a close friends. Rosen stiens fur. Real job at the Department of Justice was in the unit headed by Robert Mahler. Robert Mahler and James Commie are very, very close friends. As recently as the last Bush administration Malo,

be direct or call me was the deputy training generally nine states where they worked very closely together, but even prior to that they ve known each other. For decades their families are close. Presently United States fires. Mullahs, Franco me Mahler wants to question the present in the United States about firing his friend. Rose and esteem of all the people. He could have selected as a special council which should have been none, given the fact that there was no criminal premise, for it picks Robert Who knows call me and those who that's pretty special, isn't free a special council and, of course rose and seating himself has conflicted up. The was. On the other side of the ledger, involving the face, a court and of course it was.

Rosen Stayin, among others, who recommended the firing. You call me his old friend and then he puts out its linked in the media that the he felt pressured. Mr tough Guy Rosen's teen fell. Pressured former United States attorney. All of this is very unseemly and is very unhealthy for this republic. Three unhealthy for a country. If you understand statism and you understand progressive- is one and the same, then you understand what's taking place.

Constitutional ism and Progressive Isms. I've told you over and over again are incompatible. They will use the constitution to destroy the constitution. It will try and use the constitution to destroy a duly elected president of the United States and their hoping that this mid term election. They elect enough Democrats to teach the president unleash scores and scores of subpoenas one pound on top of another to cripple the executive branch and unleash additional criminal investigations. The democratic party acts like the old Soviet doesn't and their surrogates on the college. Campuses bullies violent. One apps,

conformity of speech and thought Antigua, whether they like it or not, is a wing of the Democratic Party. Lives matters, a wing of the Democratic Party. China. Is a wing of the Democratic Party Am Assembly, She is going in the Democratic Party and so forth, and so on, and the Democratic Party is the political entity that is appended to the central government, federal government and the Democratic Party need each other. They use each other. That's why it's so difficult to reassert constitutional government. That's why it so difficult to cut spending. That's why it so difficult to eliminate programme Eliminate agencies are departments who's. The Democrat Party relies on the central government, your taxes, confiscatory taxes,

And the ability to regulate you without passing a single law, the control, our politics and they hope our society. I'll be right back I want to lay at all- and I think that's what we ve done there so much more, but I don't wanna overdo it today. So we talk a lot about the constitution. We ve talked a lot About criminal law, we talk a lot about impeachment and voting the size. A government These votes really are out of line with what the government was supposed to be.

Though a running to vote, to remove a duly elected president. In the last election cycle, they won't wait until the presidential election psycho people are running the vote because they think that they Republicans are racist, because the Democrats and their party, which was born of slavery, born of segregation born of Jim Crow born of Paul tax, is born of literacy tax, that's their history. They want people in this country to believe. That's the history. The republican party. A flat ally, but that's what the left those best. The radical left has forty two trillion dollars and proposals they want to impose on american people free College.

Single pair free government healthcare because the visas workin out so great forty, two trillion dollars. Ladies and gentlemen, our annual gross domestic product is around eighteen trillion dollars. Forty two trillion dollars on above everything else, on top of all the other entitlements. On top of the rest of the welfare state massive debt. We already have soon. They significant interest that we have to pay every year on the debt they will destroy this country destroy this country, but their experiment, which has failed everywhere? It's been tried everywhere. The only redemption any these socialist countries have had as they move quickly to return to some form of market capitalism may try to reverse course. Those that don't reverse course fail.

And the more the government controls economy, the more the gunman controls the individual Or the government determines whether you will be successful in that pointed out, yes The Democrats, a memo came out. The mark Warner was circling, so called moderate, Democratic Virginia with a government. Cover of the internet, not net neutrality, control of the internet. Did you hear the media outlets talk about freedom of the press? Then freedom of speech the first amendment, no because they don't believe in it, they believe in their freedom of speech and their corporate freedom of the press. That's why they wouldn't blink, and I a Fox news color they wouldn't blink, and I talk. Radio was gone.

That's why they barely say a word about what goes on our college campuses how people are intimidated because they have a different view, freedom of speech. They say they support freedom of the press. They say their support now. They know they support freedom of their speech. Freedom of Air press is quite different and in the meantime, they hate tens of millions of hate us. And, as I said the other day, these people are playing with fire. When over sixty million people voted for Donald Trump to be present United States, thirty states there a test run that wasn't have always said. Okay vote now, you're you can remove them. Some legitimately elected presently United State Fair and square fair and square, and they cannot tolerate it because they are of the.

Tell a terrier mindset, the totalitarian mindset, the obvious idiot the eight year old running around whose barely literate spewing soft Marxism with no comprehension whatsoever of reality. Much like the old man. Bernie Sanders and all red When he talks about removing him misspelling him, even though the things that happen Houses would be so detrimental to the nation known another. Only trump. I don't watch these shows, but we get clips of it for eleven tv and radio programme. I, when I watch listen to Scarborough and his girlfriend and the panel that he puts together every day for the purpose of some

the president and I hear his viciousness and his utter stupidity. And that this sort of thing can be aired by Comcast by NBC on MSNBC, and then they claim there a free press. And over there it's one after another one. Demagogue after another spilling propaganda, you don't you can have liberals who talk about liberalism. So that's not what they're doing They are trying to make it impossible for this president, the function and for Administration to function, in other words, there are The core of our republic: that's what they're doing and then they claimed they represent free speech there, like them tearing and their protecting now they're, not least not Terry, this country, maybe another country Xavier,

I was sent a note from our friends at filter by from a new customer, because reset I've been in the middle of a home renovation and there's drywall dust everywhere. Plus the contractors are leaving the doors open a glove in show. Now seven, Stop three on eight second floor: it turns out that the I was sent a note from our friends at filter by from a new customer, Reset I've been in the middle of a home renovation and there's drywall dust everywhere, plus the contractors are leaving the doors open and it's been over one hundred degrees, many days this summer last week.

My ac unit stop working on the second floor. It turns out that the filters we're about ninety eight percent- clog would drywall dust and it was choking. The system buying filters was always a pain because my system needed custom sizes, but we're filter by they were able to get me exactly what I needed fast and a great price. Thank you for advertising with Mark Levin, because our stories like this filter by is America's leading provider of h fact. Filters for homes and small businesses choose from over six hundred sizes that ship for free within twenty four hours, plus their manufactured in America, say pipe five percent. When you subscribe for oughta replacement, which is where we do by the way save time say, money breeze better with filter by dot com. That's filter! Be you? Why dot com filter by dot com tell them marked censure.

Well, MR producer, until I get my call screen up in working, I will leave it to you to give me a collar, preferably somebody who disagrees with me. Kevin eight. Seventy, the answer. California, go right ahead, I don't you agree mark, I wanna make a quick comment on this call me mule arose and staying in New Orleans hit squad. I'm a former police officer here. Mom and you can imagine what happens when I get call for jury duty, even if I ever unified, know anybody, that's you know involved in the action. I get booted as quick, as you can say, conflict of interests, because I'm a former police officer and your point is. My point is: is it how in the world can these folks commie mule arose in Spain and the rest of the group even have have an ounce of and announce of lack of cars

active interest? I mean no matter, I mean at this thing turn south in some way, which I dont believe it will. By the way I mean Egypt, the jet, the poor, judging putting together a team like this. In the relationships like this, I just don't understand out, happens, Mark You know as much as I know right I love your son and I shall thank you by the way this coming Sunday night, don't miss don't mess it I'll talk about a more tomorrow and the next day, but it is unbelievable. Absolutely unbelievable! Thank you very much Anthony the Great W c p M in Maryland. Go I mark I'm a first time collar and I am a Democrat and I did vote for trucks

I am wondering, if he's impeached, I can't stand for this either, but if he's impeach for something that he didn't do don't these people realise that there is the possibility that there could be a civil war in the coming from a Democrat, I don't know, what's meant by a civil war, but I will tell you this: the division in this country will be unfeasible absolutely on fixable and the constitutional system may be broken. For good because of peach me can now be used, replace a president that the other party doesn't like, which clearly was not the intend at all of the framers. If you can use a prosecutor, this way to simply spent his time, trying to so burden a president to make it difficult for him. The fund and then try to set em up as if he some kind of petty thief, then

system is thoroughly broken, separation of powers, the unitary executive principle, officers, verses and fear officers, confirmation processes, the And that'll be just fine by the state as progressives who run the Democratic Party there like the aim. Who took over the Democratic Party, I remember a time, and then it didn't agree with a lot of the Democrats and so forth. But you understood that they really warrant out to destroy the system. But these guys are out to destroy the system. I am ashamed of this party. Well, there you go. I friend and I appreciate your honesty, sir, might affect I'd. Who else do we have rich. Miranda, Arizona on the mark, Levant go right ahead. Homework mark postpone collar, remove any old woman, and I love would think Europe. I tat. I love that historical content.

That you bring to our modern day arab issues that working illegally and I was hoping I could ask you- have drunk or question about Abraham Lincoln and how the Democrat Berkeley firing again have kind of like the fire. It gets trumps called Lincoln at this here making the south by the way. Some of them still do like the raw pork types they still cosmetic their bright, and so they said that link in with unconstitutional hunting a dictator and trying to make the thought Do you think that the south? What they're talking about as a one point he suspended habeas corpus as applies to certain activities and Marilyn, especially because Marilyn was divided state part of it was for the north part of it was for the south, but it was a crucial particularly communication in commerce centre. From the from the North South Washington D C, and what the rebels were trying to do was cut off Washington D C.

And Lincoln Wooden permitted, and so he started to have individuals locked up in They pointed out is evidence that Lincoln was a dictator, but what Europeans you can, I think Lincoln was a magnificent man and president, absolutely so, when you read the joy, Madison in you read his response to a letter that was sent to him what he thought of it. Secession, a notification. He rejected an amendment. A key point. Among other things, article five convention of states is away to trying to address it, but he felt that here's what Madison, Sir he's consider the follow the constitution. He said that when the when the constitution was adopted by these various states, that those individuals in the states became. Citizens not only of the states but of the national country too.

I'm not going to relegate the civil war here, but I feel it was a very great and wonderful president, and I feel like the name. And would have benefited from him after the civil war, but of course he was assassinated right right, aright. Here. If you want to talk about after yard, leisure dictator, Absolutely, in my view, the way he undermine the constitutional system, the way he tried to stop the court would leftists the way he climbed down regulation. And in a number of things that were unprecedented in advance, they progressive cause. That's why they think he's the greatest president. Ever And also the way he treated minorities, including in including

Japanese Americans he's the one who signed the military orders to set up the internment camps for japanese Americans and Americans of japanese descent, not not tromp, so tummy trumps should be impeached for what meanwhile, Sdr was elected four times down, they pray for o endlessly cos leftist. I my friend thank you for your collar. I read: should we have next Lamarck Levin at me, in Arkansas go ahead, yes, sir, my name is Mok on first time, caller love you, you love your show and I just had a question. I wanted those to you, cuz you're, probably very school, on this, and you can answer it for me. It was a scenario happened in the fall and the Republican lose out and representative and that the assets of articles them from peach meant whenever he, whenever gal chap, goes to a trial in the Senate. Will that forced to be okay to turn over thirty documents that they ve been stolen, while in Congress

well, it all depends on how the trial goes. You know the judge who heads the trial is the chief justice of the United States. Last impeachment we had rank was barely dynamic, so I am sure that the president will be able to call for documents and so forth, but we got a fight to make sure it doesn't get to that point now throughout trot. I, my friend, very much you two New Jersey, the Great W Abc Thomas, go work. We are all saying: people agree that smaller prosecution, legitimate in every way, shape or form. We continue to play defense. We talk constantly about whether or not tromp should sit down, answer questions and justify an illegitimate

that's what recommendation deal do you have for his, or is the french team to attack the process to say that the prosecution is, but she had met and get it sire. Sir, do you listen to this program? I've laid out every conceivable constitutional battle plan. I can possibly think up. Are you asking me, pr strategy they seem to be doing pretty wilder attacking Mahler. That's what I'm saying and what else is there The point is whether or not he should sit down and answer questions no Bonanno they don't want. To sit down and answer questions they they are trying to limit the scope of what the prosecutor might ask they're trying to make them. Secure, explain what his authority is. This is a dance, but if the accusation is legitimate

Well, I believe it is now. Let's say we get to the Supreme Court, Sir and five justice who say it's not. That's you're supposed to represent your client and protect them, and so what there Do as I see it- and I don't have the details I dont- couldn't they dont consult with me is try to make this so narrow that they don't care. If the questions addressed a particular issue or to their not out there, they hurt there, their client canning, guided thanks for your call. I don't want us to say he wants to go on and I'm telling you the broader audience.

Looks like as long as you're doing a pretty good job right now, we'll say not saying that trumps should just answer any question in front of it, because I think the prosecutions illegitimate. I think the constitution is the President's friend, but I'm not on the Supreme Court. So what they have to do as a practical matter is protector. Client tried a narrow as much as possible any questions are the way the questions are asked. Take things off the table, no call me no obstruction and so forth, and so on then the prosecutor objects. Then they lead again, but then the court can see that the present the United States like we, we made some reasonable offers. They wouldn't, except that we don't need a constitutional crisis, he's creating it They give you gain plan, at least, as I see it, I'll be right back.

Are you know thousands to the IRA studio? Probably not so you don't know the depths of depression. Sleeping society my listener. Endoored. Before taking my advice and calling optimum tax relief, he rode over forty thousand dollars to the Irish with no way to pay much less the interest and penalties? The compound daily He was in irish crosshairs. Aggressive collection costs, threatening letters, and if you want to know what optimum did from, I listen, how literally ended up paying the Irish go to optimum tax relief? Dotcom watches, verified video and prepare to be impressed. A picture yourself with your iris nightmare in your rearview. That's what optimum! Thus, they know that behind every tax problem are honest, hard work

People, families, home savings and paychecks that need protection resolved over half a billion dollars and taxed at four client. So why put yourself in your family, through this visit, my friends at optimum tax relief, dotcom or call eight hundred four nights, sixty three hundred eight hundred four nine nine sixty three hundred that's. Hundred four nine nine sixty three hundred Amy, El Dorado Springs. Colorado Ex M satellite Go Mark here are absolutely brilliant. Thank you for tonight show you are very kind. One. What the only comment I had. As I know, we don't want anything to go to trial here, but the president, but he's been wonderful, but I dont think these democratic realise and the cake that he kicked out at all said they were getting pregnant plan. It's not a dual worked Hilary by any means, but known and it, but you see the whole process distracts from from President Trump.

Doing his duties they are just paints, doesn't just step in right away. That's number one number two pence was an elected president. Tromp was elected president very true. Yes, then, and I bought it for him and I'm gonna vote for him again. You know about it. I was thinking that is that some Democrats, that I know you know I'd. They seem to think that the dual a real action and that Hilary will be placing off as somebody here all the time that we need to get along with these Democrats. I say this for the time that we need to speak. You know in Heaven have a civil debate and everything else. My sister and I think to myself with home with home there trying to destroy At present, in whose duly elected their destroying our constitution republic.

They insist that we have open borders, they want to change the year, the voters in this country. I can change the culture in this country and I'm supposed to have a civil discussion when this. This is what you hear from people who ve never gotten dern under their now who are not activists who, having fought in political campaigns and so Fourth, and do not have a long view of the future, any long view of history. This isn't a debating society. Ideas are crucially important, but that's part of them that the process, not end of it. It's the beginning of it and so having a debate among circle. Friends, a circle of friends is not good enough. It's not good enough. It shows. No courage shows no conviction. And so I tell people all the time you needed. Joint convention of states told people.

Alla time during the Reagan revolution you gotta get involved, tell people all the time about the tea party, movement and so forth. That's the only way that we can reverse course it is the only way we are up against individual if you understand their history and their thinking, we do their leaders as statist progressive, we're up, individuals who have as their purpose the as say the fundamental transformation of this society, and so I mean you can talk to a point. But but talk is over a long period of time all right! Thank you. Amy. Let us go to peep of all kinds of wild ideas, Kevin Manchester New Hampshire, the marvel of go ahead, because you to talk to you again,

for a long time- and I really do appreciate the education that I missed when we were working for Mister Raven. I just want to get your input on the very important concept the man who became president had to sign a contract to take on that position as president. It's a job obviously will notice. So any of the things he did in his private life prior to becoming president is not subject to anything with this. Mr Mulder guy thinks he can do because he was in president after becoming President everything's fair game. If you commit a crime, hide try high crime misdemeanor, like you saying no well yeah you can discuss. It may be

bring it to the Congress and see what they do, but you can only catch, but man, life after it becomes president. You can argue in arguing arguments and I really accurate. I mean something comes out about somebody's past, let Day. Let's put trump aside, let's say somebody was the spy for another country. Obviously, can do something about that. In the end, the present so and criminally when it comes to the present has had to wait till he's out of office and the statute of limitations runs that's too bad as the memos point out at the Department of Justice I think that's been done in the past is not necessarily a. It just depends what it so. The idea of the concept of contracts, there is, there is no concept of contract there's no contract at all. In order to take on the position as president, you have to do, the job

yeah. Well, you have to do the job, and that's one of the reasons why all these efforts to attack him are both illegal and unconstitutional. Are I'm friend I appreciate your car will be right. Back now run only underground than the bowels of the hidden somewhere under Britain, steel of among the script building. We once again made contact with our leader, everybody market women. Here our number eight seven, seven, three, eight one, three, eight one, one, eight, seven, seven, three, eight one, three, eight one one all things important before we leave their and our final, our the programme

the manner for trial. You know it's interesting as I read the various reports about what took place in the courtroom. Do you know that the FBI New Manifold had several overseas accounts several years ago? They didn't do anything about it, but that the fact of having overseas account is illegal, but they never really dug enter. That's kind of remarkable as well. Mr Gates was on the stand for a very brutal cross examination and I'm just trying to pull it appear very quickly. Get me one theft and everybody everybody single

Well, what happened was I'll just stood for memory, which is that the k her on the defence suggest Gateshead for extramarital affairs. Actually, this does its even better than that. In terms of the information that I went to her in rebuttal questioning this is this morning, prosecutors show gay TED income from offshore counts and twenty fourteen FBI interview Kevin Downing, Manfred lawyer, and it is Cross examination of rich gates. By asking what man efforts net worth was around twenty four Ten twenty sixteen was a twenty million downing asked gates, responded. He wasn't privy to manage personal finances and didn't know the value of all of its properties? But I thought somewhere in the realm of six minded twelve million prosecutors.

At Manfred, reported widely different numbers for his net worth on loan applications over three month period in twenty. Sixteen you represent It is not worth had fifteen million seventy mind. Twenty one million thirty six million according to court documents, special Greg Andrew S. Thing came back to the lectern. He started by rebutting the idea. The gates and manifested were honest. Yet behind twenty fourteen when agents, Vesta gaining their form. Ukraine Klein victory and a cat carve gates agreed that the agents did not ask about tax returns of them most of the Cyprus accounts at issue are already closed. At that point, you didn't tell the agents about any hidden income from those accounts gates again test I, the manifold, asked him to go to France and me one of the Ukraine patrons a wealthy politicians. Gate said: she wanted to know whether the entity used to pay them was clean. You certainly for those payments and nothing else, and it goes on

but here's the part early in the morning, Rick Gates took the witness stand described. How he'd been interviewed by the FBI as far back as twenty fourteen, but his work in the Ukraine and believed he had told the truth. Under questioning from defence counsel, Downing Gate said he met, the FBI agent, unjust, Parma lorries in July of that year. The way here at the bureau was investigating money that the ukrainian political candidate for He and manifested worked might have taken up money out of Ukraine, notably Gate said he as close to the FBI. Some of the Cyprus and Greece and Grim deems bank accounts that here produced to receive payments from the Ukraine benefactors Manifold told him they should be open and provide the information court on quote in response to the bureau's questions. Gates testified. He told the FBI that they open count, so they can easily get payments from the people they work for the Ukraine, the

says the testimonies important, because prosecutors have sought to demonstrate the gates and Manafort hid their connection to the accounts. It didn't open that did not report them on required forms. That is the basis for some of their charges, their disclosing. The accounts to the FBI and twenty fourteen cuts against idea that they were hiding them gates. Also certify that he a manner for talked about after their interviews, Manfred indicated, he been true for His own conversation with the bureau- that was an interesting, very interesting now, let's see here near the end of his questioning of gates, prosecutor Andrews asked about the affair gates disclosed during his testimony yesterday. Gate said it was a five month affair that occurred ten years ago gave said it was something he discuss with his wife and a tall man offered about Andrews spent.

So the questioning trying to rebuild gates his credibility, if to the Defence cross examination gates, testified, he voluntarily disclose to the FBI that he was embezzling from manifold gates also testified. The manifold said they didn't need to disclose the foreign bank accounts or report the money coming into the accounts to tax advises addressing defence, questioning of gates motivations for testifying entrees has to get about gates's. Please deal at the present time. He faces the gates, think he faced up the two hundred years in prison on charges of the federal court in Alexandria, Andrews EST. Gate said he thought he would face a lesser sentence: Judge Alison. Jack it asking how short gapes thought the sense would be. I thought it was in the range of a hundred years. Your honor gauge said kind of odd. There was more stick with me. Defence suggests the gates had for extra marital affair,

between twenty tenant twenty fourteen there trying to show he's a pathological liar about all things and Sleaze bar reigate step down the witness stand before eleven a M Wednesday after a stunning suggestion from one a matter for its defence attorneys, their gates might have had four extramarital fares, the suggestion came in a final round of cross examination from defence attorney Kevin downing after prosecutors. S gates about is pre trial, prep with special council lawyers, its testify he had. No doubt at all. That is plea. Agreement would be shredded if he relied on the witness stand. Defence counsel downing more into what he referred to a day earlier, as gates of secret life, so is trying to show. We did in fact just lie on the stand Its attorney pointed to about three million dollars and transactions from twenty to twenty fourteen that he has suggested, represent money gates, embezzled from manner for it

He noted an extra marrow affair. The gates admitted to choose they. Then he asked the gates recall telling the special councils office that you actually engaged in four extramarital affairs prosecutors objected asking why that quest? Relevant downing said it might speak to the idea the gates is lying on the witness stand. Where is almost play a game at being torn up there Where's convene a judge, Alice's bench for a lengthy conversation that was shrouded in white noise pipe through the courtroom. When the conference broke up downing did not ask the same question. Instead, he pointed to the twenty ten twenty fourteen time period in his early questions about gates and secret life. Those questions first prompt the gates to reveal an affair downing escaped.

His secret life in coppers the spirited time. Mr Downing, I say I made many mistakes over the years. Gate said Alice, interrupt the telling gate stance, the question it did gate said, and so it goes on. Let's see here this now, there's not a lot more. The judge sparred with prosecutors, again after lengthy break at lunchtime, trustee or sell us again, sparred, would prosecutors over the pace of the trial evidence they want to admit. Such heated arguments have been a common occurrence in the trial. The latest dispute centred on charge. The prosecutors want to show jurists demonstrating the flow of money from Matter Fritz offshore accounts to specific purchasers he made in the United States

They intend to do so as they question the next witness happy. I can't Morgan Maradona's defence attorneys argue the charts worse cumulative centrally repeating evidence about which other witness has already testified. That argument appealed to Alice whose repeatedly push prosecutors to increase the speed with which they are presenting their case. I was noted that the defense was not contesting the manifold made the purchases with fire counts, and he questioned whether an elaborate presentation with an F b. I count testifying about the church, was necessary. In arguing that he should be allowed to use the charge prosecuted. Gregg Andrews said the FBI captain had done a great deal of work to put them together. Look, it isn't relevant that she spent her life doing it s remark drawing left. From those in the courtroom. We need to find a way

focus sharply. The judge continued. The exchange grew somewhat more heated. We ve been focused sharply for a long time. Andrea said he noted that the government had to tie specific receipts. Two specific payments and that defence attorneys would not agree to any formal stipulations on that topic. Defence attorney, Richard Wessling, said defence attorneys would stipulate to one of the prosecution starts, which offered a high level summary a manifest. It uses in the floor money, Andrews Eddie, was at a loss noting that the defence had not agreed to do so before Wednesday that it would be faster, Demille question countless plan rather than writing formal stipulation Allison finally agreed to let Andrews question. Magnon met Magnus. Though. We warn that Andrea would be on a short leash. That Alice would consider objections from the defence. It is benches testimony proceeded judges should be patient, they make a mistake when they confirmed me:

quipped when he sang here in his own way. Is you don't get the pile on you? Don't get the make it through witness have to witness have to witness the same point. The same point, the same point, the same point over the issue is whether there is intent. In any of these issues, not that you can overwhelm the jury, almost propaganda style as the government. Let's see here. I think that sir, it's about for now, we'll leave it there I'll be right back. Let's go to Jean De Moyne Iowa on the mark living power user. Mark God bless you I'll swaddle. Thank you for

profound effect. You bad on me ten years ago. I've been sober for four years and was sure what's your word ago, and I start listening to you and I use the idea you can bringing up the top bill and La Pierre Adam Smith, and all those when I start reading those guys and figured out that you all I'm responsible for myself and you're, just kind of based my life on on there are on the way they describe things and the I now have a life is based on a belief, and God and arrived upon the divine providence. You and the item never made it. This art that you're just celebrate sixteen years the wound down That's awfully kind of you were all thrilled for you. How are you feeling great? I started my own bed three years ago

I am a truck driver- you, the last sixteen years of my life- they more productive than the first thirty four, that's wonderful, and I wish you all the best my friend a matter fact. Let me see a copy of rediscovering Americanism sodden hang up, and I appreciate your call very, very much MR producer. I want us to go to cut three Jerry Nebular of New York left Wing Coke, really unseen unless they now everything we ve talked about for the last what two and a half hours Did you hear what manner has to say with wolf? Blitzer cut three go Do you believe Robert Mahler should agree to an interview with the president without question specific questions being asked about Abstract? of justice having Malo, should insist on enter on asking the present any questions that he thinks relevant Susan instigation. Only. He knows where diversity

leading only? He knows what the evidence he already has is You can make a decision in the present. I think is duty bound to answer any questions that these special prosecutor, special counsel, I should say- may ass, isn't it's incredible? So the president should answer any question that the special prosecutor, or agree to an interview with the President artist states. So I'm brings on a Congo line. Leftwing cooks makes a point by putting a question mark behind it to get answers. He knows he's going to get an that's called propaganda and you say a word or the free press. We don't hate the paper, we're not the enemy go ahead or to ask questions about obstruction of justice. I dont think that there should be

what Blitzer to cut forego shouldn't Robert Mahler agree to an interview with the present United States so brings on a Congo line. A left wing cooks makes a point by putting a question mark behind it to get answers. He knows he's going to get. And that's called propaganda, and you say one word where the free press, we don't hate. The paper went out the enemy go ahead or to ask questions about obstruction of justice. I dont think that there should be limits on the special prosecutor. Tom trumps should be treated like any other with us and should not be did dictating the terms yeah that can be partially, but he's not every other witness he's the president, and that makes a difference democratic ministrations who Senate Republic in a minute Patients have said they do not care about the rule of law, they do not care about law and order. They do not care about the constitution. This is what there,

about they want to unleash smaller. They want to get rid of tromp. They want to reverse the election. These are appalling. Appalling people go ahead, go but to actually take an entire conversation off the table In this case, obstruction, I think, would be at the service to just so. If they don't agree for president is why I don't agree to be unit by Robert Mahler. I could go. There could be a subpoena. Obviously, if he rejects the Sabena go all the way to look at the stupidity that is displayed here by the nature of the questions and by the answers go ahead and the end, then you know It's about time. We can see that it's about time. We have a constitutional confrontation. I mean what the hell. Ladies and gentlemen, just because the Chinese are on the move, the North Koreans. The Iranians are on the move. Russian drawn a move, would theres many

things that the president has to attend to hear this guy His unencumbered with any information this guy, kindly I read a damn thing. He just saying what he wants. What do you want settle go ahead, whether President girl matter can be supported. I believe that the present is like any other American and can be let's tests that so we ve talked about this at great length, She's a matter whether the president can be subpoenaed, it's a matter of what happens once the subpoenaed is received. Physically You sign a subpoena any issue subpoena. So that's not the question a question is then what Are you dealing with very very stupid people here? They are partisan, hacks much care by any of the rest of it and that's? What's going on. Now, J secular won't come on the show.

Rudy Giuliani won't come on the show. I don't know why They interview each other, which is actually quite novel. And Rudy Giuliani, is when the J Secular Radio show that anyone know J, secular, had a radio show just being honest, but I guess I got to go about child and I also think- and I hope Special council is a sensitive issue as we are, who do not want to run into the November elections, so back up for that they should be over with by September. First will we have now given him an answer. He obviously should take a few days to consider it We should get this resolve its business. In our view, it is not in my view, this autumn writers report he's got you ve got all the information we need. The interview would provide nothing

In addition, the worry. What are you ready asked, which is a very good point, does very good so they just want to compare his answer to somebody else's and then raise the spectre of obstruction underlying your or what have you and My attitude is Mr Mahler. What is your constitutional basis for doing this? never variety other questions as requisite to any any, so Mr Mulder has to explain who he has why he is and what he thinks he can do. I think that is very important creation and even read inflame patches all gone with the brand new genocide. Sun spot corrector. Here's elaborate,

The champion of liberty, rule conservatism, call mark now, eight seven, seven, three, eight one, three eight one, one sunspots brown spots discoloured. I'm even read inflamed patches all gone with the brand new genocide: Sun Spot Corrector, here's Ella Brown from Rockford Illinois. She wrote I both age and acne spots and this stuff is actually fading, the serum is worth every penny and, ladies and gentlemen, the Jenin our sun spot correctors here and it's yours free just for trying genocide today, a mustache. Your son finally see those stubborn sun spots vanish and those bags and puffing is all gone and freeze what's in less than twelve hours, the genocide, immediate effects as all yours, free light, clean, effective natural skin care

that gives you amazing results and healthier softer skin day after day. No one does it better than Germany Good go to I'll dot com right now or call eight hundred skin six o four, eight hundred skin six o four. You be the judge, you'll see the magic of Germany or get one hundred percent of your money back. That's a hell of a guarantee, eight hundred skin sick, so for eight hundred skin sick. So for or genocide dot com, that's genocide that I'm alright, Joe LOS Angeles, California, eight. Seventy, the answer go work, given that in just a few of our doing his job, prominent Democrats would be in jail. Instead of on tv campaigning in Iraq. During the June America can club in the doing the Senate Great appointed interim and enter interim attorney general or even just replaced,

almost seemed pleased, so weak we would be tied slowdown. Can the president fires subordinate? You know the answer to that. Well sure T because we should really that's a different question, isn't it so? Let's play this out here about the tenth time I've had to deal with this. Let's play this, so the fire sessions and if you have your way and rose instincts, what happens? can't you just replace Rosen Steen with software. You not even listening to me because you just keep repeating yourself I'll, try, one more time: I get Brennan up big Susan. Why attention I'll try again, President fire, neither the attorney general or the deputy attorney general. What happens then? Ok then the President appoints to people What happens to the president then well well, say mean things about him

but obviously that really eyes what's gonna happen anyway, see. So there won't be a movement to impede including with Republicans, can you just replace, Holstein with some. Aren't you not even listening to me, because you just keep repeating yourself I'll, try one more time, I don't have a lot of patience to begin with the present it can fire anybody and his administration anybody. He heard them. He nominated them there confirmed he can fire them the issues in a legal one, whether or not it can fire them. I am asking you politically: let's say he fires Rosen steam. What will the House of representatives do? Let's pretended tenacity test? Go ahead, browse the web browser her or do exactly what I have done. Some people were covers the tanks for your car.

I got, I think people set at home sometimes, and they have these these ideas and they insist that their right, every Democrat will vote for impeachment and a third of the Republicans. That's what happened. He'll be impeached. So do you want the present to be impeach just because you want him to prove that he can fire somebody under him. Isn't that stupid? I think it's stupid, so you lose that's not to say he can farm at some point may be after the election and so forth. But why would you set yourself up that way and if. And if you support President Trump, why do you think he hasn't done it at present? Is enormous power.

So if you have your way, sir, then the whole rueful Cavan. I don't like it. I don't like the fact that we have a third of the Republicans who vote to impeach. This present for one. Second, and Lord knows what would happen in the mid term elections, then all the crazies would come out. Media would cause them to come out of sight Can I not gonna look at these like military operations, look down the road of care. If I fire off this over here, what's going on but over here and so forth? And so, if you just want to be your chest, that's fine art. Let's go to Zeke Savannah Georgia, exam satellite go at supper, firework your grandfather and your father or your uncle would be very proud of you because you're like the chest, he poor.

Other talk, radio out there a lot of what an honour that is to be called. I'm not, but that's very kind of you. Thank you for this very reason I was calling is because I have a question for you. You know man apparent were locked up perpetually witness tampering, suborning perjury, but witnesses by trying to pay people tat climate stuff, like that, when the different, what you did, what the prosecution is, the one with his plea bargain with this are guided, trying they're trying to get into changes testimony and make a deal with him. Well, it's an interesting question from a philosophical point of view, but unfortunately, prosecutors have been able to do this. A long time that is to use certain people to get other people. Sometimes it's good. Sometimes it's not sometimes it's abused, as I believe in this case, so you got a guy like gates who was involved in money laundering, embezzling

violent attacks, violations and so forth and basically charge for two counts, and you have a guy manifold who they really want again and he's gotta a bucket load of counts and conserve. The rest of his life in prison, What your bottom line is look at the injustice of this and I dont disagree, but the differences, that's the government and they can do a lot of stuff. We can't do work. Researcher forgot your, I know it's thinks, doesn't it but hundreds the messenger recurrent drop this year. I, sir, thank you for your car. I see judge the politician who was attacking the judge is being too partisan. Yes, of course, yes, of course well for judge see something taking place it he doesn't think is appropriate

just post to sit there and let the prosecute you're going to see a different kind of judge in Washington Dc Leftist appointed by Obama and show that almost everything and show let the prosecution does roll on and on and on and go on and on and on. Perhaps that's the kind of judging likes. I think. David re seen Wisconsin Mark Levant go ahead required. I hope I'm not gonna come across like require scarier, but a question about. Smaller, acting kind of like a modern day, Torque Amato, ever with his band, quit inherited, engage in those new ordered to pay the spanish inquisition? Yes, sir! Well, that's like what was at british group. I can remember that

they comedians python. That's like a money python skip which, like the spanish inquisition, sadly, am I minor history, the world part one was for Millbrook schools. Well tat. You question, I mean it's not an exact parallel by yes, sir, but but you know what let's see how this, how this works out. Let's wait till the and see how it works out in this trial. I think the judge season injustice here the judge thinks the government really has piled on It was interesting. We learned that the FBI actually was or at least some of these overseas accounts in twenty fourteen by my Regulation that's four years ago, and what do they do? Just look at him a move along well, they want the subway the investigation of. Why not- and I think the joy

made it clear early on that he views, man afraid is being is really. The goal was to use him to get the trap. So are I my friend thank you for the call and the levity. Let's continue with, let's go Lama, Greenville North Carolina, the Great w envy you go, although I would like to say Trump agree to be interview with the FBI. Under the Hillary Clinton Standard, where they write is gone. Moderation before the interview it will be done just then they agree to just given softball questions are off the record exactly, but we know that won't happen would not occur, but it does underscore Europe. The point, which is, he certainly has been treated quite differently than Hilary there is still running around, like a mental patient with all kinds of weird stuff coming out of her mouth aright Lamarck. Thank you for your car. Let's keep going

Jerry Chicago Illinois, the great WS country go back, you protect you I call I really joy. Your show, thankless. My question is this: why is Paul metaphor? being put through a living hell. Why is he the story on every news, cash about his five or six year old tax? case, one AL sharpen who owes the government over four million dollars in taxes is walking there's a free man, while that's a good question to Anna Course during his sir, his difficulties but the government and the tax collectors you're right We didn't see a nightly Sean. This you're, not the man of letters. If you are, let's be honest, other than the fact that he was trumps campaign manager? None of this would be happening time. That's true, and nobody would care if it what's so and the judges said as much pretty much I my friend

procedure, com we'll be right back, I've had my share mechanics column. You saying they found something wrong that needs replacing have taken my car and for an oil change. Those surprise high repair, those are terrible. Aren't they specially when you're not covered by manufacturers. Warranty and you're paying out of your own pocket to fix them? That's I strongly encourage you to get extended vehicle protection from cars you if you're cars, five thousand one hundred and fifty thousand miles car she'll, can save you from paying for high repair bills, replacing your engine or even a simple centric and cost thousands when you're protected by car shield. You can have your face

mechanically dealership fiction car, it's your choice. Car showed also provide. Twenty four seven roadside assistance and a rental car, while Europe is being fixed for free. Get covered by the ultimate and extended vehicle protection. Get car shield call eight hundred are sixty one hundred eight hundred car sixty one hundred mention Levin and you'll, get ten percent off or go to car shield, dot, com, partial dot com, Code live in L, a violin, get ten percent off. That's car shield. A com or eight hundred cars sixty one hundred, whose code Levin and save ten percent a deductible may apply. Our at Hammas has added again. They have fired a number projectiles, including missiles in Israel. So much for this two state solution out the Gaza Strip. The IVF has struck struck now. Twelve Hamas terror targets, their air force has

The israeli air force retaliated. It is now by striking targets in the Gaza Strip after seventeen p were treated for injuries resulting from rocket attacks from Gaza against southern Israel following them, urges the. I have struck twelve terror targets, including a plant used to manufacture components intended for the construction of tunnels, as well as tunnel from our maritime terrorism along Israel's coast. Number territory. Gets in several military sites, including weapons and rockets as well, a military compound that serves a central, logistic warehouse were also hit by I've jets. Colored sirens continued a sound in the south end of the late in the evening, Ass issued a statement or delivering on our promise the resistance, except that the responsibility to even the playing field with the enemy and its eating. In doing so, I am waiting for Jake Tapirs CNN

and all the low I q buffoons at sea ion regardless of race, color, creed, religion or sexual preference for all of them to take Hamas, a site which is what they And the Congo line of malcontents him grants a damosel. I stay, I'm waiting for them to do so, waiting for them to do the same. Can you imagine a country or a A territory bordering the United States where they, just our missiles in their communities. Now it's estimated they have tens of thousands of these missiles way more advanced way, more accurate

and Hezbollah, in particular, supported by the Iranians. Yes, indeed, write code, pink Republicans are getting all worked up their wedding themselves as I speak, Danny Corpus Christie, Texas on impeachment, go ahead of good majority marker, going back to what your thumb in Vienna The impeachment thing you knows that group of low life republican that are probably each in the new that anyway, I got an idea that trump's going to do what time does step that's going to bring that on anyway? Is there a way he can start armor plating themselves and talking about that and kind of put those guys and check before no other! Well I mean he can speak to the nation and I think these various events he should incurred. But at this time it you think if the Democrats have a successful, mid term election,

That they're gonna be persuaded by the present out. No absolutely in oh I'm not sure what they have to limit Danny the the burden is on you and me, and everybody listening to this programme They disgrace that in this congressional election in our house, twelve district last night that be seven percent of the Democrats turned out and forty percent of the Republicans what the hell is wrong with them. Why is too hard to vote now? Trying with these people, they are not interested in the country. I guess forgives are going to give it away if they keep the damn right in when they give it away its but even more than impeachment, but you would think that they care about our constitutional republic. Forty percent of the report stand out. Eighty seven percent of the Democrats, and you see that and they knew it was a big elect and they still sat on there s? It's a disgrace, the fur so there's nothing that president can carry the whole country is back these

Eight. Some of them are absolutely awful. They need to raise a lot of money to fight the other side. It's not just up the trump they needed pain, aggressively. Smartly pick the right. Topics and hid away hid away, hid away, also hit their opponents. I mean it like we're dealing with the foreign team. Here, My friend I've silence you at my genius, no doubt about it. Thank you ES go to Marcus, Myrtle Beach soccer, Finally, great w are in and go hello. Let us go to Ryan in Detroit GO, Ryan into try go alone. Yes, speak to me. Big, go radio, begone! Ok, I guess. I just want to counter it. Look at that. We gotta stay continue.

Where's rockets in Israel think it absolutely wrong, but I do I'm curious. Why, none of the media, neither you nor conservative or liberal, refuses to now the fact that Israel also plenty of innocent Palestinians were sniper fire What's sir, your way Do you know why they use snipers its to try and limit the casualties people who are involved in the terrorist activities so it's easy for you to call say very good tease. You feel it call in here but Israel also tells a lot of people blah blah blah blah. Let me tell you something: if our southern border or northern borderless pick our northern border. We had it

oratory there with a hundred fifty thousand Rockets, Lebanon, the Gaza Strip, but I really want to say, Names that are cities shot seventy rockets in your country. Would we do Sir Thomas how many countries will tolerate? What's going on in the Gaza Strip on their border? How what level the whole place. When seventy rockets are shot, pay attention and educating you moron get on my phone. You shoot missiles and a country, it's called war war tat when it comes to Israel right right. Thanks MAC. The I'll see you tomorrow take hair.