Recently at a conference in Sweden, the Dalai Lama, famous spiritual and world leader, said Europe belongs to the Europeans and that refugees should go home to rebuild their own countries. Naturally, this spark controversy. Many people on the left are saying that this is echoing sentiment of nationalist and the all right they're asking whether or not the Dalai Lama is racist for suggesting that Europe belongs to the Europeans, and these comments come just after the Sweden Democrats have one large gains in Sweden. In this past election. The Sweden Democrats are considered to be the all right or all right of Sweden. So now we're seeing another instance of a rise of nationalism and populism in Europe, its not just Sweden. We saw in ITALY, Not too long ago, we saw Angela Merkel say that, yes, there are, no go sounds so the question becomes. Why

Are we seeing this rise of nationalism? Many people believe it is because of migrant crime, and there are a lot of people that believe migrants. Don't cause crime that migrants and refugees aren't actually going to commit war crimes in the average citizen, but there is some evidence to suggest. That's not true. There is a study that suggests migrants do cause more crime, for whatever reason so. My question today is: does Europe really belong to the earth and you can come at below and care the conversation in the comments. But first, let's take a look at exactly what the Dalai Lama said to better understand his point of view. Europe belongs to the Europeans and suggests refugees return to native countries. Ultimately, they should develop their own country says spiritual leader. The Dalai Lama has sparked anger after declaring that Europe belongs to the Europeans, the Tibetan Buddhist Spirit, a leader also said that refugees should return to their native countries and assist with developing them the fourteenth

the Lama was speaking at a conference in Mamma Sweden, which is home to a large immigrant population according to business tonnes, received them help them educate them, but ultimately they should develop their own country. The eighty three year old, sad when speaking about refugees. I think Europe belongs to the Europeans. He was speaking in the aftermath of a divisive election in Sweden in which a far right party swedish Democrats, aid electoral gains, although they were beaten by the country's centre left coalition, but Dalai Lama also said that Europe was morally responsible for helping a refugee really facing danger against their lives. social media users condemned the comments. Calling Dolly Lama, a big it of the first order and a hypocrite. They highlight this post. Dolly is a big it of the first order. The Tibetans, which will later the Dalai Lama, told an audience and mama that refugees should return to their native countries. To rebuild them. Should the Dolly not lead by example, by returning to Tibet. Now I personally don't agree.

Criticism of, but it is based on reality during the nineteen fifty nine to but an uprising, the Dalai Lama fledged to India, where he currently lives as a refugee. So, while you could say why doesn't he go back to his country to help rebuild it at the same time when he says that Europe has an obligation to help refugees he's speaking from experience, and I believe he is being morally consistent here, is being assisted in India as a refugee and he's asking others do the same. The spiritual leader is followed by millions of Buddhist around the world. He isn't Oh Bell Peace Prize laureate, but has made controversial comments about refugees in the past Europe, for example, Germany cannot become an arab country. He said in an interview in twenty sixteen, in which he also said that there were two many refugees in Europe, the Dalai Lama, is a refugee himself. He left thousands of his followers from Tibet to India in nineteen. Fifty nine after the Tibetans protests against chinese limits on their autonomy. is the Dalai Lama wrong? In my opinion, I dont think so now the statement

belonging to Europeans can be interpreted in many different ways, but if it doesn't belong to Europeans who doesn't belong to, many people believe that countries and land don't belong to anybody, and perhaps those the people who are angry. But when we look at borders and governments, countries that actually exist They literally do belong to Europeans because listen, even a migrant who comes to France and becomes a cent. And is now a european. It's not like there are people in North Africa and Asia were voting on what Europe is doing, but I also agree with the dollar that refugees should go home to rebuild their countries when it safe. I agree that countries should help refugees, whose lives are in danger, educate them, help them and then send them back and help them rebuild their countries. You can't expect refugees come to your country and live forever. The goal is to help them re, establish a home, and I sure many of them want to go home and don't want to just abandon their lives. But this isn't just about the Dalai Lama. This is about the

rise of nationalism and a similar sentiment among many Europeans from politico. Why Sweden's was all about the rise of the far right. Even if the Sweden Democrats didn't perform quite as well as some feared, the parties rise is still the story. They say what makes Sweden relevant to the outside world is not its famous stability but its potential as Trump noted to descend into chaos and, more specifically, what that outcome could mean for the rest of us, even if the Sweden Democratic didn't perform quite as well as some feared. The parties rise is still the story in what has become a familiar pattern with populist movements across Europe swing. Democrats tactics left the establishment parties running scared. The entire campaign revolved around the populist agenda in including the hot button issue of migration. We recently saw riding in protest in cabinets, Germany. People are angry about issues of migrant crime and the same thing is true for Sweden and the same thing is true for many european.

trees there, video circulating of boats, landing on the shores of the Mediterranean and people running full speed into Europe, so the Dalai Lama says that refugees should eventually go home to rebuild their country's. That's actually not controversial. In my opinion, it's rather centre or centre left relative to the argument. The left, sang bring the refugees and give them space and resources and let them migrate. The right is saying clothes. The borders and get rid of the migrants to lower the Migrant Crime and right there in the middle you, the Dalai Lama, sang europe- should take care of these people, but eventually they go home and I do find it to be reasonable, but is it true that migrants are causing crime in Europe will look? I went to Sweden after Trump made his infamous last night in Sweden comment and I found that yes, crime is up in Sweden and many people do believe it is from refugees, but the issue is many: people relate Sweden to the United States or to their country and relative to the? U S: Sweden's crime is ridiculously low, but

relative to Sweden. Their crime has gone up and a lot of gang violence. Not too long before I went there. A young child was Kay a grenade attack. So when you story circulate. People are naturally to be concerned about the violence and the escalation in violence and they're going to blame. Whoever is the focus of that story, but it isn't just anecdotal. It isn't just experience, this story from Newsweek early, for this year. Migrants in Europe, linked to pouring violence and crime in Germany, study fines reason I'm using Newsweek is that this is a left, leaning, publication, even Varick knowledge in the crime exists, and it is linked to migrants. A german university found that a ten point, four percent increase in violent crimes was linked to an influx of migrants into the country southern region. The increase in crime took place in twenty fifteen and twenty sixteen at the high

of the European migration crisis. When german Chancellor Angela Merkel, ignored EU rules and allowed an open door policy for migrants entering the state from war torn Syria. More than ninety percent of the ten point, four percent increase in reporting crimes was attributed to young male migrants. In Germany's southern state of lower Saxony, according to a new study from the Zurich University of Applied Sciences, a huge wave of migrants flooded into the European Union, a twenty fifteen from countries through Greece and Turkey that lead to more than one million migrants applying for asylum in Germany. When a story like that comes out whether or not it's true, whether or not the study was accurate, people are going to say, listen,

University has said violent crime is because of these migrants, and that's not surprising in all that we see the protests in cabinets. People are angry, the crime has gone up and something needs to be done about it. So, naturally they want to see change and if the government isn't going to do anything about it, they're going to vote in a new government, and thus we are seeing populism, nationalism and anti migration sentiment, sweep across Europe- and this is the big struggle a university has said- this is true in January, and then you see these protests, incumbents, rioting Anger, citizens mad that migrants keep coming to their country and the crime is going up and they have a university backing them up, but when they go on protest, their accused of being far right, there accused of being Nazis. Many other people protesting were simply holding pictures of victims of violent crime. And they want this problem solved now? It is true that a lot more data is needed. A lot more research needs to be done, but

as long as these stories persist, people want something to be done about this. Just because you are seeing stories about migrant crime in Europe or illegal immigrant crime. In the. U S doesn't mean, as people do commit more crimes is actually a very complicated issue, but you we don't even need to talk about that, because the issue is actually simple. If these people weren't in these countries, then there wouldn't a crime in the first place. So perhaps the issue was a better vetting process. Perhaps the issue isn't extreme as deporting everybody or closing your borders. But clearly something does need to be done and the anger expressed by protesters be it in the? U S or Europe over migrant crime is valid. You can tell them their praise. You can believe they're wrong, but the simple truth is this: there are migrants who do commit crimes and we should do something about it. Just because someone is focused specifically on this issue doesn't mean they ignore other issues, problems they exist and if they aren't dealt

we are going to see nationalism sweep across Europe, and this means bad things for the European Union. Don't forget that people in the UK did vote for Rex it and its possible. It could happen in other countries if their governments don't deal with the problems that people find relevant so long as these crimes keep happening, More importantly, so long as universities are willing to publish studies that show violent crime is linked to migrants. You are going to see anger and you're going to see people vote for those who vow to deal with the problem But let me note you think, in the comments below monkey the conversation going is the Dalai Lama correct. Does Europe belong to Europeans and should refugees go home or do you think Europe should allow the refugees to stay and build a life in, or strangely I guess I do think Europe doesn't belong to Europeans comment and let me know if you think, maybe that's what you believe you follow me on Twitter. Tim cast, stay tuned, new videos, everyday at four p m and new videos come. But my second channel Youtube com slashed him guessed at six p m thanks for hang out and I'll see, you