Democratic States And Cities Are COLLAPSING, Census Predicts Major Republican GAINS. A new estimate from Real Clear Politics shows that, in fact, my past video commenting on the Center for immigration studies was potentially wrong.The new estimate predicts that in 2024 Trump will make several gains as immigration slows and residents flee the blue states.This net domestic migration out of major blue states will results in gains for republican seats in the house and in turn electoral college votes.With the way things are going it seems like this could be the end for the Democratic party. They are fractured between the moderate corporate democrats and the far left ideological democrats and there doesn't seem to be an end in sight.Short of a major course correction Democrats are in serious trouble.
Support the show (http://timcast.com/donate)
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
This is an unofficial transcript meant for reference. Accuracy is not guaranteed.
New census. Data has been released and it shows that many blue states are actually set to lose our congressional seats. So let this be a very big correction on us,
it meant I did a few days ago. The original story
was from the centre for immigration studies, which actually said
Twenty twenty senses could show California gaining a how seat and many red states losing seats, but it was like the actual. So
stated on twenty nineteen proves that I was wrong. This story is now
circulating as the other day, and it shows I mean we got a big, this pretty big story and looks like census. Data is
knowing that many blue states are gonna, lose a seed. Taxes could gain three, but it's not just about the census. Today
got numerous stories talking about how Illinois, California and New
York are losing residents with New York losing the most residents as a lot of reasons. I think that this is the case
But ultimately shows that there's gonna be a major,
changing the census. This bodes very, very poorly for Democrats, as many people are expecting trumped sweep and twenty twenty we are
the warning from tolls. He gathered about impeachment that impeachment is rolling up trumps base and they're gonna go out and vote in force, and these thirty one trunk districts now thirty, because Jeff Andrew switched,
likely going to lose. Two Republicans Republicans will take these seats,
creating another republican majority and basically every branch of government add that to the fact that some of the biggest blue states
are losing residents and losing congressional seats. I gotta say sounds like really really bad news of a democratic. It started and read the story from nuclear politics, the twenty nineteen census,
estimates, foreshadow house seats and losses before we get started had written, cast our consultation on it. If you'd like to support my work, is a paper optional, crypto option a physical
but of course, the best thing you do share this video youtube as implemented some pretty harsh algorithm changes which basically spell the end of my channel and many others. Even people like David Pachmann, a progressive their true. I can't tell you what the factor as I think it has to do the fact
We talk about electoral politics, but they are there removing recommendations to our channels and pushing recommendations from from our channels to mainstream media
there's only one real way to overcome this in its sharing the video, so maybe will bring some echo chambers while we're at the three the story from real, clear politics. Our cp reports
the census be released. Its fine file,
inter central estimates of United States population on Monday. These are figures released every year to track the flow of population in United States and to give an idea of what to expect in the dissenting count. They are important because the twenty twenty census will determine the next congressional reap reappointment. By looking at the estimates, we get a sense of how things are likely to turn out the following year. The estimate to estimate the actual census outcome, some back at the envelope calculation is an order. I took the estimated changes in population in every state from twenty, seventeen, twenty eighteen and then again from twenty eight in a nineteen I quit,
a weighted average by counting the twenty eighteen and nineteen changes twice and twenty seventeen twenty eighteen changes once I then assume this would be the amount by which the state populations would grow or shrink come. The official counts. Twenty twenty, using the current apportionment formula, known as the method of equal proportions. We can estimate the following changes. Taxes should gain three seats floor.
Should gain to North Carolina, Colorado, Arizona, Montana, organ organ. Should each gain one seat, Alabama
California, Minnesota Illinois, Michigan, Ohio, West, Virginia Pennsylvania, New York and Rhode Island. Should each lose a seat now point out: it's not just blew. You know: Blues
losing seats. Right states will be losing some, but it looks like taxes and Florida afford a swing state.
We're gonna, see some swings, they gains and taxes making some gains. Now these important point out based on trumps base and the expectations for next year. These are going to be read: states! Ok, I don't know what that will mean for the individual congressional districts, because, just because the majority to state my vote in a certain direction,
I mean, there's not going to be districts that are overwhelmingly blue, there's also gerrymandering to consider. I hope you take all that due consideration and I will go through
other story to kind of breakdown. The differences between what they're saying our cp goes on. Of course,
it is difficult to know exactly how this would play out in redistricting. Obviously the western
in Rhode, island seats would have to be taken out of the republican and democratic columns respectively. Barring a major surprising
here. It is difficult to eliminate and additional democratic see from Ohio, though not impossible, while drawing an additional democratic seed. An organ is unlikely, though not impossible, and the electoral college President Trump would gain electoral votes, but these changes would not take effect until the twenty twenty four election trump could theoretically run. If you lose, is in twenty, twenty or or we might see trunk,
you're wrong. So keep that in mind this would take effect until twenty four. These are, however, just estimates, and we have been surprised in the past. The most vulnerable seats are
increasingly order vulnerability, Illinois, seventeen, forty twenty ninth Montana, Second, New York's, twenty six, the next seat subtracted, should the actually the actual account for some of the previous seeds fall short. It estimates are in order Alabama, Seventh, Minnesota, Eighth, Ohio, sixteenth, California, fifty third and Rhode Island. Second, I want to read from you a comment about Rhode Island. I'm not trying to make it seem like this is overtly just gonna be bad for Democrats, although it seems to lean in that direction because it looks like, as they said, Trump would gain electoral votes, let's not
say: trop! Ok, let's say the Republicans are likely going to gain electoral votes, a troubled losing twenty twenty I mean. Maybe you will be so many does. He could run it twenty twenty four, but if the same base exists for Donald Trump Junior and he doesn't Bronte, because this there's there's murmuring. Ok,
speculative, I hate speculation, but people are saying yoga. A on one side show just barely be old enough and Donald Trump doing on the other side. If these would be gains for tromp, they will be gained from gains for trumped junior, but let's be real.
Begins for any real Republican, regardless of its trump or not
but this what we saw the other day. I think it's fair to point out. This will be a technical correction. Our cp is offering of an estimate taken up with the greatest salt man, I'm doing my best. I dont know if it's all definitive, you know again: Arcy P is getting estimates incentive for immigration. Studies is saying based on apportionment apportionment of seats in the house about than ever the knives and twenty twenty we
see the Republicans actually losing seats. Take the estimate for what it is. I know some people have said that my assessment was incorrect. Nonetheless, video, I gotta, be honest
just commenting on the data as its presented to me. So it's important point out these changes. Don't play take place for a long time. Maybe I got there.
Wrong, an ipod. By do so, you can set it up a correction across the board. I'll read for you that the first part of this- and I want to talk to you about some of the biggest blue states losing residence. They say under current policy. All persons, not just citizens, are included in the population, count what apportioning seats a state in the? U S has a preventative and four votes in the electoral college, which is based on how seats, although we focus on the next census in twenty twenty, the impact of immigration has been building for decades. As the number of people settling in the country has increased dramatically,
this report examines the cumulative impact of immigration, both legal and illegal, on the apportionment of how seats. This is not an analysis of the impact of immigration. Only since the previous census, Apple
It is a zero sum system by adding more population to some
further than others. Immigration will continue to significantly redistribute political power in Washington. They say
The twenty twenty census will show that the presence of all immigrants and their U S born children is responsible for a shift of twenty six C
many of these seats swing in favour of the left because they will be going to blue states. I do believe I know
information to suggest this may be wrong. Now, listen! Here's! What I do! I use a third party factually organization called news guard. You may have heard me talk about it all the time they give the centre for immigration studies, basically green check, much across the board, etc. Who discloses there? There therefore
but there they regularly clarify areas, do not publish false information. I can only assume their assessment is correct, even if it's up ad that's what I'd baseness off of
I'm just saying this as a disclaimer, because you really do get a fact check this stuff. I know it's it's my job to do so as well. I'm doing my best under saying why,
other channels was another voices. I believe there is a new wants. Bro had a counter two of your native. If you did see a check it out, and I absolutely conceit if I got things wrong, see what he has to say. Because again I am not perfect, but I do understand
They mention that illegal immigrants alone will only Riddick redistribute three seats without
Alabama Minnesota each having one fewer seats than the otherwise would have had a California in New York in Texas would have one additional seats. While taxes is technically stellar at stake, many people believe it is in play for twenty, twenty, twenty, four etc. California and New York, solid blue. This is specifically about immigration affecting the census, but it looks like Arcy posing an estimate on current census data and, if you wanna take their word for it
Like bad news for Democrats. Now, let's move on to, while the actual news which lends itself to a more. I guess I guess it's fair to say
you know upon reading the centre for immigration studies. The point I was trying to make not so much about whether Republicans are gonna lose out, but I mean that was how it hidell. That's all take full responsibility for
one. What I was trying to get it is that people don't realize. If illegal immigrants come to United States and settle in estate, they will be counted in the Sensus and that will give congressional seeds and electoral college votes to state. The point I was really try to drive home is that you can convert non citizens into votes for the president or the pitfalls of electoral college system. I still think the easy is, though, is the right way to go, but of Democrats and left want to get rid of the electoral college and would actually lose power, because these people can't vote so limitless omega problem or time if
we're, not a citizen, but you are living in the country. They do count you for the Sensus and based on that individual, they will say we need more congressional seats in this location. Congressional seats result in electoral college votes as to how that works, check out this story and we're gonna hit New York in Illinois. Next, California, population growth, slowest
since nineteen hundred as residents leave and immigration DE celebrates its from December
when he first Ellie time supports the
Well, then, state remain stuck in the slow line when it comes to population. The number of Californians increase to thirty nine point: nine six million, with new data from the department of finance, showing mostly downward trends. They are rooted in fewer births, coupled with increase deaths
and among an aging population. The Golan say, however, has also seen changes in international migration.
Along with more and more residents, leaving the state, the estimates which indicated
California. Population grew by a hundred forty one thousand four hundred people between July. First, when a team and July Fourth and nineteen on the less signal. Zero point: three: five growth rate down from zero point: five: seven for the prior twelve months, the lowest recorded growth rates in nineteen hundred
department of underscored, according to the agency natural increase, accounted for. In addition,
a hundred and eighty thousand eight hundred people to the state. Still these gains were offset by losses in net migration. That is the total amount of people moving into the state minus the total amount of people moving out, notably said Eddie hunting or a demographer with informative finance, even
the net international migration additive estates population. There was substantial negative domestic net migration, which reads
but in a loss of thirty nine thousand five hundred residence. This said the department marks the first times twenty ten census. California has had more people leaving the state than moving in from abroad or other states. So I think it's fair to point out. Natural population growth is adding to the state, and that, may you know then, and of giving them rational seats.
I dont think its. If you're, eighteen or not be counted, I think they caught minors as well. So this is what we see in California is still growing ever so slightly, but as they mentioned, and the other articles, the the way they apportion how.
Seeks is a zero sum system if California grows by point three five percent, so they add a hundred and eighty eight hundred forty thousand people, but another state adds three hundred
as an people, then it stands to reason, will have to move a rational seat to the faster growing state. The articles in L a times actually does bring up their fears over the twenty twenty census. They say: phrase of the decline in growth could have implications that twenty cents a pound and the ensuing apportionment that is based on sensible,
Yours, it's something that concerns about. He said California could be on the costs, costs
of losing a seat if it doesnt job with a decent count.
The times, demographer, hunting or counter their estimates are for current and historical information, rather than the future.
That's a really serious point. I want to make sure I highlight as we go through this, because I know
It can be a million one people piling on saying all you're wrong this that reason this that, in this reason, I'm doing the best. I can
this data, but let's move on check this out from Gotham IST new.
York is losing New Yorkers there, not just losing new Yorkers they're, losing them
in an alarming rate and they're losing residents more than any other location. They say, New York has lost the most residents in the country,
in twenty nineteen. According to the? U S, Census Bureau there's an estimated
seventy, six thousand seven hundred ninety you weren't new Yorkers in the state this past year, a drop of zero point, four percent, which made the biggest percentage decrease in the country, the major factor, and it was that domestic migration New York lost a hundred. Eighty thousand six hundred foreign residents, who left out
fair state for another area of the country. Only California out did us with two hundred and three thousand four hundred fourteen resident
moving away and twenty nineteen New York state another
major blue state, is losing a ton of residents and mostly cities. So I do want to point out
move into some other states are a more, but I would point out the presumed effect when these people start moving up as it arrest. The tri state region also lost residence,
Connecticut may have had only six thousand two hundred and thirty four, if your residents, but that loss was enough to drop the state population by point. Two percent New Jersey lost three thousand eight hundred and thirty five decline. That did not change the guards its population by significant amount, but forty, eight thousand nine. On forty nine hundred forty six residents moved out of state landing New Jersey in fourth place of states that loss residence to net demur,
migration. These are people leaving the state. The census is going to redraw districts and it's the hence the reason my assessment was entirely incorrect, but I do want a point. One thing out, as we have under the next few stories: well I'll, come back to the store and sat down to him in a way, first,
Actually, let us read about Eleanor. Let's get back to the cargo Tribune reported this couple days ago, ill
no. It loses population for six straight year and it lost more residents than any state this decade, wow
I know whose, when a new Yorker Illinois, the Tribune reports, Illinois population decreased internet nineteen by an estimated fifty one thousand two hundred and fifty people or point four percent marking the sixth consecutive year stages lost residents according to new data from the? U S, not just bureau, since the turn of the state Illinois has lost more residence than any other state with a drop of about one.
Four thousand seven hundred people or one point, two percent of its population. We just heard it was New York. You see I'm highlighting this on purpose because love we get conflicting information from various up verified sources. I'm doing my best. Only three other states have shrunk since twenty ten Connecticut Vermont.
And West Virginia with frustrating you're losing the largest share of its residents, a three point: three percent decline. So perhaps there looking at losing residents over a longer
your time, but they seem to be missing out New York. They say: poor Rico, U territory, loss an estimated five hundred and thirty two thousand foreign sixty three peoples and twenty tonnes or fourteen point for himself
population population losses in Illinois have been compounding since twenty fourteen. When the state began a steady, though not precipitous decline. Illinois is the six most populous populist state in the nation. After California, Texas Florida, New York and Pennsylvania, which passed Illinois in twenty seventeen Ohio was a seventh followed by Georgia and North Carolina Illinois spot Illinois, I'm from their internet, done that population as rewrote Illinois population. As road ok was a possessive, sorry, potentially weakening its political and economic power,
It has become a frequent topic of political discussion, so everybody is talking about it as these states whose population there all highlighting they're scared, they're gonna, be losing political power in Washington. I now want to point out this first and the ramifications and the reason why may be happening in your post says: New York residents fleeing to sunny Florida and New Jersey will measures New Jersey, the blues. They boarded swing stay. If blue voters, Democrat voters, move to Florida and forty swing state
tip the scales and result in Florida becoming sadly blue for quite some time? New Jersey is already blue, but he's off from
their data, it looks like the tri state areas already losing out, so I can't tell you exactly. You know what to expect necessarily, but it's been widely reported in the past few days that this could
result in blue states losing out. So we go back to our cp looks like the Republicans will make some gains based on the current electoral maps. But let's talk about what happens when when someone leaves a city
First, there are a lot of people talking about how Colorado, Arizona and other places have been absorbing California, refugees. You know figurative refugees. These are people who bring progressive values into these red states and then turn them blue.
That actually good helping electoral college and along one, even if California lose a seat. If these blue voters take over certain counties in the state and flip that state which winner takes all towards you know the democratic voter, then California and some other blue stay or some other form aurettes. They will now-
there are several votes to the Democrat based on what we are seeing about electoral gains, though it seems like Arcy peace in their publication, make those games. So here's what I expect will happen. Let's say a thousand people leave New York City. They don't all go to the same place. They spread.
Around the country. If rural areas are overwhelmingly republican than adding about
thousand or so Democrats won't change. The winner takes all our model of many these counties, meaning as the Democrats leave their blue there dumb other democrat strongholds. They actually completely lose their political power because their entering places dominated by Republicans so sounds to me. Republicans have a bright future. Actually, I think what we are seeing with a fight between the Democrats. The far left, the moderate corporate centrist types. People like
You know clearly being excise from from the Democratic Party shows that there are already struggling as it is, and they can't afford to lose. Voters who say you know blow that they say this as a vote: blue, no matter who
But if those people are voting blue in there and then they moved to a rural area, you won't matter because the rural areas overwhelming and overwhelmingly get support from for a lot of reasons.
I thought about why this is. Why does it someone
People are leaving these places and I can't tell you definitively, but I have a hypothesis, the internet,
The internet has decentralized how we can hardly economy works, its also decentralized, how we can purchase goods,
you if you live in a rural area before you drive into the city to purchase things,
Now, Amazon delivers like almost everywhere
and we're seeing small towns are to light back up because of Trump and its policies. Bringing back manufacturing jobs are perfect. You know, there's been some coal mine
increase our manufacturing increases, but in the end I think what we end up. Seeing rural areas are becoming stronger. Cities are weakening their losing residence. Now I'll tell you about. California, California become a nightmare. They ve been dominated not by a progressive
elite, sort of sort of what we hear me out. Conservatives, legislative California, is progressive, you know bastion and all of its failures are liberal policy. Are the father liberal policies? That's not the case. Ok, it's technically the truth. It's it's partly true! You look at LOS Angeles, a democratic super majority. If they have massive homeless problem, why? Because they were
is to actually implement these solutions over the nimby mentality. The wealthy people at a late hour pretending to be left as and progressive for brownie points likely on the internet or among their social circle. So when it comes to actually vote,
hey, we can set up housing here. They go not my backyard because you build.
Shelter near my property, my property value goes down, not gonna happen, so what up happening is filth, homeless, city
and in a general homeless crisis, as well as man unable to get into what's going on in San Francisco, especially right now, because Youtube will yell at me. If I tell you the disaster that has San Francisco, but they ve, homeless camps counts across the board. They can't solve.
Problem. California, what it really is: it's the capital of greed, its people who want money. They want
power and they'll, say whatever they need to say to get it, so they pander to the emotional play. They pretend to be the left and the implement certain policies that yes, there are many left and positive fail. That's true overwhelming this date,
is progressive. They have a majority in so many places. So, yes, it does play a role, but let's be real. The people who vote
the men are doing is actually care about this stuff there doing it, so they look good among their friends and they can pretend their celebrities their whole lives are built around pretending so that to be something to sell a product, they pretend our lives, our glamorous, that's what the state is all about. So what will happen? Come twenty twenty one, twenty four
man. I honestly don't know. I'm just read me a few articles, but I will give a shot to nuance brought one more time. If I was wrong, I apologize definitely check out his rebuttal over this channel to search for new ones. Row. I think
personally, I was wrong at a bunch of things. I miss write. Stuff happens when I try my best and if I have a correction will definitely pointed out, and if someone you know, if I see somebody you know recommence images, I gotta be honest. I did see as video because I've been working relentlessly, but I will have definitely too sharp shoutout nuanced, but actually does pretty good content. So hopefully you guys can see if you know what, if in what I got wrong and take whatever he says into account.
All of this information as well. It maybe we're sing out of the Democratic Party, because they're going to lose their ability to actually win the majority in any branch of the government, and it could be due to the far left fighting with the corporate out of touch touch. You know air airport, centrist types-
I don't know, but the economy is doing well and Americans want it and Donald Trump is getting the credit for it. As much of the Democrats want to Screechin cry about it
There was a pole. I shall the other day. Eighty percent of people polled said the expected their lives get better in this new year and their things, because the economy and its trump. You know these people, who I told you about their greedy.
You really think so, and if the Democrats dont course correct, there will be Democrats to win, but also this, although it might be hyperbolic, say the Democrats are gone forever. Here's what I think might happen living to realise the far left play failed. The far left will be ostracised the mainstream corporate moderate and, like populist titles, are taking over not the intersection. All types they'll be championing trumps, I'm economic plan, while calling out its foreign policy and his demeanor, and that will create a stronger coalition for Democrats for the time being, then Republicans had it, and as long as these blue dust,
for the time being, men Republicans had it, and as long as these blue districts keep you know losing residence. I think it's another sign. That Democrats are in serious trouble, stick around
coming up at six p m youtube com slashed him. Guess news, I hope, will soon happens. I'm filming actually very early. I've been a flight, but thanks, they sprang out.
And I will see you all in the next segment when you enter the fray. You'll be chewed up and spat out our thought you this.
About political shields and how the left uses young people to protect themselves from criticism, notably
story of David Haug and Gratitude Bark, and this will serve I'm I'm not gonna, be overly disrespectful. I will say this is a warning to these people about how you will be used and as yet
people. You don't see how it's going to happen, and I want to share with you
no idea what is coming enjoy your last year's heart heart and all right. Many of you may be
my what David hobby is an activist for gun control and almost all of this tweets comprise statements about you know fighting the and our right to a certain degree, but the entire ray is relevant to the press anymore. Ghana, raising Donald Trump, the and our re isn't constantly and then, as I mean the kind of art,
Is it relevant to the press anymore, Deanna, raising Donald Trump and our re isn't constantly and then, as I mean, they kind of arms for the most part, not really
so sure there are many people who are still cheering on David, retreating him. But the fact is a lot of these people who engage with them are probably just naysayers
I want to do, I want to show you some stats and our talked about the dangers of being used and public relations in general, I'm going to highlight that the follower counts
Google transporters individuals. I will explain to you why they are no longer relevant and wives. Can we really really bad for them in the long run before we get started, had over two TIM cast outcomes last on it. If you'd like to support my work as a Paypal, optional, crypto opting to physical address, but of course, the best thing to do
share. This video we're a break. Some echo chambers break some. You know bubbles message that is biased,
during this video. It's not perfect, but with the algorithm changes on Youtube that negatively impact miner the channels we can completely overcome. All of that, if you just well share the videos, other people can see it again, I'm not gonna be criticising their their actual activism necessarily, but I do want to criticise how they are being used today is a really important people left. Listen to
because I have personally experienced this to a certain degree. I show you this twin from David Haug, because David Haug has well
used to have a million followers. He doesn't anymore and he doesn't get that much interaction on a lot of us tweets. In fact, a lot of the re tweets are actually from I'm sorry. A lot of comments are
but people who don't like the kid, so you can see here on a twitter account. You got about seven hundred and twenty four retreats on this week. At the time of filming David Haug has nine hundred and ninety nine thousand twenty four followers. Here's the thing David Hall,
has been losing followers all for the past month and probably before this, he used to have over me
followers fell gained a few and he's been falling. Well he's been falling steadily over the past few months. Let me let me and let me go back before I get into David
the trends and Gratitude Berne, and I will tell you what I experienced back and twenty eleven during Occupy Wall Street,
I started doing live streaming and I was one of the first people to do. Mobile, live and commentary on the ground and guess what it was. A beautiful message challenging the coup,
Grit, media MSNBC had beyond the air. I was it I was. I was interviewed by Monday different magazines, and I knew something it's called the flavour of the month and I thought about it. I had book offers a tv show offers I said to myself: I'm not gonna do any of it. I turned it all down and you know why, when it wouldn't, let me show you my twitter threat, which butter exemplifies. What's going,
with hog and what will happen to get a timber I treated this David will learn a lesson in twenty twenty about public relations. His notoriety is based off one thing: gun, control and one event. The topic will not always be relevant to most people, and even if it is, there will be some one else with more power to fill this role.
Press David is notable for a singular moment, and I any has my sympathy and respect for for everything that happened at the time, but it's important to point out that now that this time has come to an end and the year has now rolled over when it comes to the message of the second amendment, they're not going to ask David Haug, a young person with no experience to come on tv shows and talk about this mess.
That event is long since passed there now going to meet somebody who say you know a think tank export or journalist to talk about statistics, which means for someone like hog. He is no longer relevant and the only thing he has is a twitter following that's new back in the day you have that, so that will allow him to sustain some kind of press attention, but for the most part in Avonlea, then let's go back to occupy Wall Street I'll, explain something to you. I knew that with only one thing behind me. They would show me up and spit me out, so I refused at all. I said no to it, and then I decided with this presidential Anita folks and something else, and I start work on drone technology, a buddy of mine at some really crazy ideas. We did the first
Far. As I know, the first live broadcast to be around for a news report. We did during Occupy Wall Street Immigration protest, not that it was good or anything, but we also did several lives dreams visa drone publicly to the internet. This garnered a ton of presentation and all of a sudden I had something forming. It turns out. Tim pool wasn't just a flavour of the month. He was this skater hacker journalist spy and that's what G Q magazine set about me.
When they gave me a front page feature on one of their relations with it, which I believe was really some three countries, I'm not saying it's Abrek. Ok, I'm on pointing out that I saw the pitfalls that will now affects David Haug, who again I'm not going to be mean, but it's true is a one trick, ponies easy. You know one horse show. The same is true for Gothenburg, which will get you in a second. I said this
he play a role for certain political groups. Gratitude burgers the same. Neither our exports and their opinions only hold wait for emotional reasons. This isn't effective in the long term, there will come a time when Gretta is no longer relevant as coming soon and I've got the proved to show you. I said I advised a few friends about this
they gain presidential several years ago, they were too arrogant and they were sure that they had made it. I expect
but you need a series of accomplishments to remain relevant. They ignored me and drifted off into obscurity within a year. You see your only if your, if you're, only relevant as one flash in the pan with no one's gonna talk to you about it like what? What are you talking about your expert? You not a phd you're, not running a program. You not you're not running a business. Your relevance is time based and when, at times
as is you're out, that's having you David Haug, I set it similar to a lot of bans. One hit wonder if you can't produce more hits than you won't last in the eyes of the public. Let me tell you about a band. I really like I'm sorry about the light is getting it back for a second area than fastball fast balls awesome. They have a couple, really good songs. They have with some out of my head and the way, but their necks albums than any hits and so sure enough. No one knows or care, so they are anymore. Forgive me if you're watching on you to the light is bad, but so so that's the point of making writers. I thought there are bad banned, but they only were able to produce a couple hits that's the one wonder and that's it. The press and political groups will do to these young people because, instead of focusing on you know, quitting a program or expanding their repertoire becoming known for more than just one thing: it's all there doing.
David Twitter Feed, is literally just complaints about the MRI. So what do the and all right? Isn't the and I'll be all? But it's all he has to take a look at us, David Hogs, notoriety, spiked, it spiked. There were a few big protest moments. You had the ability of the March for life moment, but, as of today, his relevance according to Google Trends is at a four from a peak of one hundred meaning,
The way Google trends works is relative. One hundred is the most search volume you ve ever received relative to the most of them, received its afore he's losing followers. It's it's it's over
there is no longer relevant and that's nothing. He can really do other than tweet about the right kind of pointless, because what the same is true for better timber. She served her purpose check this out. This is but a tune burg on on Google
now she only really gained some notoriety around September and she reached
maximum notoriety September, twenty fourth and then nothing her relevance, evaporated until December twelve
to a forty two nowhere near as relevant relevant as she's ever been now? Her story is a little different. She's up from of writing a five from a peak of a hundred relative to the presidential she received it's gone. There is not even a steady stream of attention or searches for her she's, losing relevance,
and it's going to be the case because she has nothing to say: I'm sorry, I'm not try to be made, but the reality is gratitude. Burke and David Hog. Both have nothing to say in politics. They don't have a strong body of work. They have contributed nothing other than their concerns and complaints. So, in the end, when these political activists groups prompt them up because their young people- and they provide a certain image eventually that image is worthless because there's no substance there, I'm not saying this to be
respectful, I'm pointing out the truth. This one big reason why we see the so often with young people our reach a little bit and story from vocs that tries to pass the blame for the fact that she is a young woman. Not the case and David Haug is the proof
but it seems like so many people. I don't,
I'll just say in its on the left. For the most part, they probably individuals, because then, when you criticise them to say why are you criticise,
Why are you insulting? Why are you targeting children about targeting children? I feel bad for these kids. I feel like they are being exploited for political ends.
And now let me explain to you what is really really really bad for them. David Haug is pigeonholed, he's produce a lot of enemies in politics and the kids only like eighteen nineteen years old. What job will he get when he gets out of college? Does anybody want to take the heat from hiring and the answer is no
likely. No, they have set themselves on track, for which they will never escape. Gratitude Burg will always be in some capacity in this area. Maybe she'll go to school. My recommendation would be go to school for climate science. That would be of you're really good idea, but now, when she's older, she applies it, you know maybe swans working theatre. Maybe this isn't what you really cares about its that it's the adults or propping up there's a point in her life. She says I really want to be an actress, never gonna happen, she's much too famous for a political cause and that's divisive and it's bad for the market. Right now in power,
Six politics is kind of dominating a lot of these businesses. For some reason, movies are dominated, video games are dominated by the stuff, so sure, maybe something there. Maybe I'll get a cameo in a film bona comes running
Is this the last thing someone wants is a divisive actor being involved in their product? I feel bad men. I feel really bad for these kids. Now let me refer you story. They say why. America loves and hates outspoken young women. Women like Gratitude Burke and Abkhazia. Cortez were leaders that twenty tonnes and they were vilified for it. They weren't vilify for being women. David Haug is a young person whose outspoken, yes, political beliefs, whether you agree with them, are not. He was vilified by many. Many people he's he's male visit. This is passing the buck, but let's wait a little bit of read a little bit of this and I'll explain to you one last thing how they use these young people, why they use them in the plural advantaged, using them vocs rights when gratitude, but was chosen as Times person of the earlier this month
accolades quickly rolled in the hashtag? Congratulations got out, went viral as everyone from celebrities to news castors to ordinary people around the world, offered their praise for the sixteen year old, their outspoken at climate activism. President Trump, however, said she had in anger manager, propaganda stuff. They say it was part of a bigger pattern, while soon Burg has become a hero to many, perhaps more than she wants has also become a perennial target for tax by
Trump and others on the right. It's not alone. Recent years, other girls and young women from gymnast Gabby Douglas Jokers Report has have found themselves in similar positions in american culture held up as subjects of adulation by some, even as their torn down and vilified by others. If a symptom
the position of young women are the twenty tonnes still so under represented in many spheres that, when one rises to prominence, it's an exciting event and by the same
token, their relative isolation makes them a focal point for the collective anger of everyone who would prefer a young women to be seen and not heard, but I'm sorry, it's affects literally everybody. I was vilified. Relentlessly people started digging into my path,
and, as I said, this is a reason why I started with David Haug on this one. I did want to highlight the politics around gotta timber, but I realise this is the narrative they go for
This is the weapon ASEAN of identity, for these political ends, and that's why young people are used to push it. They say you are targeting your attacking children, why're you attacking children. What is wrong with you grow up at cetera credit. Soon Burg went to what you that, the? U N right, she's talking about how she refuses to meet with probably a waste of time she speaking as one of the most prominent voices and climate change activism.
She was placed their pilot by political groups seeking political ends, and now she will be heavily criticized for it now. Also this anymore
He wants a rag on Haug and Gratitude Burg because they think they're, ignorant or naive or evil. Wherever you gotta stop ass, I saw the casement, in my opinion,
and I know a lot of people are gonna roller eyes. That's another victims. I really think so. Just like a child actor doesn't know what they're getting into neither do these kids limb explain to. I highlighted the story from box. This is a second round attempt to use gretta for political, and it's just not true gratitude. Burg's relevance is that she decided not to go to school. She sat outside sing on strike of climate change. The narrative worked well for particular group that had funding and prompt her
they will be pigeonholed as a particular character for the rest of their lives, so rode back to the Google search rattoon births or a spike in her notoriety because of time magazine. But before that she was nothing that I mean. That was it. She had her spike when she did the climate strike thing.
Research, Rattoon Burke saw a spike in her notoriety because of time magazine, but before that she was nothing that I mean. That was it. She had her spike when she did the climate
I think, and I was gone and now she's only maintained slight relevance because Time magazine deemed it so because the press saw an opportunity to gain something from it. We can see the same thing with Abkhazia, Cortez with greater number, but at least broke Hauser Cortez she's, currently in Congress, inches long track record affront.
Front of her she didn't just when she's continually stolen the press. Attention, unfortunately forget it David Haug, they themselves are not what the attention is about and that's not gonna leave you with this. No one cares about the individual's Gretta or David. They care about the moments they exemplified with the idea behind it. Oh cause your Cortez had the idea shared the position and she continually gonna garnered press because of the position she was in and now she's become a solidified character who will be relevant for a long time so relevant that when she moved into apart into department, everyone was talking about it. Clearly she was the story when it comes to Gretta when it comes to David. No one cares I'll, say one more time and wrap up David's losing followers these. These young people were used for political reasons. They were shields, but that was it. They exemplified a moment.
There's a moment in time that Gretta and David Captured- and they needed someone to be on tv to represent that moment. But a moment doesn't last forever last a moment, and so in the end, David Gretta and all the other young people propped up for political reasons, will find themselves pigeonholed and facing a very difficult future, because they will always be that person. The same is true, for these mean characters. You know they ve probably find a better out because they're, not s famous but David and and and growth are so it we're we're so incredibly famous that there's not gonna be an escape for them in five years thing about. Oh here, that person can be that for us politically, and we also don't know how things are in a change. There's a lot of information coming out the Republicans or polygon asleep in the future, and this may create an unpopular and hostile territory for people like David Andrews
So you know what I sympathise. I am critical of the organisations that would prompt them up, but it is what it is. They rang out. Stick around executes coming up at one p m at Youtube, account slashed him cast news. It is a different channel and I will see you all their starting off the year with a bang. We got a big old story about anti for this from the Washington examiner Philly restaurant owner accuses anti FA. Vandalism after proud boys allegation, in fact he called Anti
the terrorists who see what happened was apparently several months ago. Turning point USA had some people there like playing pool or something, and then you know how anti fires they care about. What's true with us, they just
around bashing, skulls and stuff like that, so shut up, shut up in the trash the place. I've got some photos, your posted by Andy. No, we can see it says F, this boy's a cab. The windows are all knocked out,
and people are like mocking the guy, the dude. You know it
It's absolutely insane, even if he did house the Prob ways. It's it's. This crazy assumption that anti but thinks every one supposed to know everything that they now right. So when's happening as you get a group of black.
Lunatics going round smashing of windows, punishing you for not paying attention to their obscure political references, but I do
something else. I want to show you a problem with the left, but but first so actual other I'll. Just tell you right, so my response to somebody who said that Republicans are more likely.
To appeal to independence. I want to show you exactly what's wrong with the modern progressive left in America and it
somebody on the left? You find yourself watch this video. I know it may
like you angry, but you gotta watch
because I'm going to show you something really can help open your eyes. Are the story,
when the examiner they say Philadelphia, restaurant was banned,
lies in the early hours of Niggers Day and the owner has accused anti bobbing responsible for the damages. Vandal spray painted s
piss boys on the site outside of milk, creek, tavern and broken number of windows? The restaurant is owned by it,
hired police officer, Jack Gillespie and he told the washing examiner those approximately twenty thousand dollars worth of damage. Gillespie blamed anti for them.
It was on the two parties have a tenuous relationship after November incident, in which milkshake tavern was accused of allowing the proud boys to recruit members in its restaurant. The owner claims at a conservative group called the restaurant to see if they could accommodate a party of approximately twenty people which has had they could do while he said they had a file with them labelled, proud boys, Gillespie maintained. The group was connected to turning point USA, a conservative organization. The night ended without any incidents milkshake tabrimon on Facebook page at the time. The group had no meeting that have that have knowledge of and ass, they have knowledge of no recruitment nor any interaction with other patrons. On Saturday eleven sixteen nineteen saw November. Sixteen seventeen something came over
I have been caught. My attention mill creek, allows proud boys as a recruitment haven. I was confused because I had no idea who what this meant every doing some research I was appalled at went on. I have since been
Not the group at had had came in on Friday evening, which are not members of the problems. They are in fact turning point turning point, USA. He then strangely says Prague boys don't like turning point USA because they are too far to moderate. I don't know what that means, because I dont know if they actually talk to each other. I dont think turning point the broadways ever like clash or anything that seems weird. But let me tell you a story you see last year I believe was a September. I had eight at an event and we had a bunch of moderate and libertarian speakers. We had some progressive
and we had discussions and arguments about social justice. We had some offensive comedians and anti via its. It would seem. I won't be careful threatened to burn down the theatre, so they cancelled on us terminating a contract after we have which we had for the entire year without cause
and all because some lunatics in Philadelphia Civilities fillies nazi. Now, if I
going to say you know which EAST Coast City has the biggest psychotic annual presence private alpha and its exemplified here. So you can see other photos
see it look man. I don't think I need to elaborate too much on this. We get it advocates around bashing, like other windows, robust it out, because several
So go turning point. Usa had a meeting there. That's how absolute
the insane it is gonna think about what this means. Men,
This guy doesn't know anything about anti far. The proud boys are turning point USA, but antifraud demands that he dies. They live in a paranoid.
Losing state where everyone's nazi you're, that that that Chris Reagan, video punch Nazi, it's hilarious,
the peace thinking about how the left, you know things everybody's literally nazi and the guys like they're everywhere and he's like looking at everybody in Starbucks. That's literally what we have in this country, so many to be done about it. I don't want you can do about it because you know what is anti. If I guess, if you fly the flag, you're assigning Europe of alignment to them, but whenever, let me now explained,
the big problem the outside of this, what progressives, having estates? First,
assuming there are very few progressive, so actually watch this kind of content, and I can just show you why I mean like what you know. Most of you are probably finding yourselves in between this graph. I shall all the time the New York Times where the left has gone completely off the rails, fun. If you find yourself more allowed left, you need to hear this first look at this graph. I know I showed all the time think about what antivirus doing you may say, anti far fringe extreme as they dont represent the left. That's that's! That's fair! It's funny. I understand the problems, don't represent the right either there are
their small faction of people doing their thing. Of course, when the probably go out they say: oh, it's all the conservatives when it, because that is AIDS. All the left. Look, I understand they are moderate, centrist types there there let left wing or right wing people who don't like either side. Ok, but I don't see the proud boys go now smashed up business windows and accusing people of being anti. For I'm not saying the problems are perfect. They started that fight New York. Technically, I know people going to marry me for saying that, but I understand you know anti for comes in protest, their event and then they charge at them refused to back down it's a long, complicated problem. I dont like either side fighting in the streets. Whatever the point is, when you have one faction
claiming that you know you support the progress and we're on bashing skulls. You are helping the Prob boys and to understand that, because what you think the average person going to see when I see this bizarre smashed up, you think they're gonna be like those darn proud boys, rather that business no there and to be elected to your Jos business got smashed up. Who did that these weird far lefties
she's gonna vote for Donald Trump Fillies, a working class kind of place, so K, Pennsylvania's, Pennsylvania's gonna, go read if your ask me, but take a look at us aside from the fact that anti far is causing serious problems for the left and making them look really really bad. But I get it you might not like what they're doing you might be an eleventh antipas bad farming and recognise the optics whenever you can see how divergent the two parties have become, and for me, I'm typically closer to wear a bomb is, and so you know this I'll explain it before look. What look if you could send a spring with a mouse is whose closer to two thousand eight o bomber not
I'm a credit party, the Democratic Party of veered so far of the left. Nobody is in any event, I would talk about anymore now. I just said the h what you seriously cancer than you do, but let me show you that's ok! I when I would actually show you this post from Facebook from oppressive activists that exemplifies the problem. You posted this, I feel, like the Republicans, are more likely to try and appeal to it,
continents, competitor Democrats. I saw the nose like while it's a very astute point. I completely agree leftist progressive activist. So here's what I said: Tal Seas,
doing that she made a video saying we have to respect our fellow Americans, even if we disagree, but for all her efforts of trying to oppose foreign intervention and region cross the aisle she gets destroyed by the press. The purity testing on the left is destroying their chances. Meanwhile, trumpet Republicans fan over anyone, even those who, but with Nancy Pelosi, one hundred percent
time like Van driven. Then, if Trop is willing to endorse some of my Andrew was, for instance, supports equality laws and wants to ban offshore drilling. Then the right will form a large coalition and crush the left. Maybe they already have. I didn't say it anyways
your politics, our doll, might say, you're wrong eyes, agreeing with them on a couple of tolls. Gabert made a video where she said we must respect Trump supporters, otherwise we will lose. She said we need to talk about why people who voted for Obama twice went and voted for Trump. Ok, they're, not all racists, this! Basically, what I've been trying to do with everything I'm trying to figure out like there's a divide, this country, the problem is,
its exemplified by this graph yeah. It's really easy for me to reach into a publican and say I disagree, I disagree and we can talk about stuff because we are still relatively close to each other's politics. You know I went well on the Glen Back Programme with a great conversation was awesome. I really really enjoyed it and
came to the point where we were like at a fundamental impact on the border between life and choice and we're, like
I await your friends, we respect each other. I understand the point he was making. I feel lump unethical conundrum. It makes me hard to find it to be his I'd like to talk to agree with them, and I think we both recognise that and that's what you have to learn to live with that America. Is this battle and you're going to convince people yet a vote network with really all about? But here's what he is saying to me. He says Gabert is a foe, anti imperialist and as dined with dictators around the world. Don't talk about purity tests when you hang out with a war on Christmas crowd. That is a purely test of catholic whiteness. My response, I love how you exemplify your own post. I have no idea who is talking about the war on Christmas crowd out, hang out with anybody. I sit at all while they yelling at a camera. That's what I do as they put it is it's a weird psychotic paranoid delusional state, these anti for types have where they seem to think
Like I'm going to secret, proud boys meetings. Do I went interviewed a handful of people and tracked protest for a period of time. That's what I have always done, and it was like a year out of my you know. Ten year journalism career or accept eight year journalism, career, I've interviewed the former soviet generals
and protestors and gang leaders in Brazil. But these people live in this paranoid delusional state where they think everyone is secretly a Nazi. That's why they smashup is windows, and
that's why they say things like you hang out with a war on Christmas crowd. What does it even mean? Who will my thinking out with when we talking like its nuts, you gonna do a wake up. I read the news. I complain about things and then I go out to eat nuts.
Friends, my friends, are all fairly lefty, moderate individuals. I come home watch movies and play video games. That's basically my routine or changing things up. That is often a background in over the past few months have allowed travel, we're gonna studio builds on. I'm being you know, a bit south deprecating one act like a madman, anything, but here's the point of this post. How can you notice like ice? It's like so close self, aware, wolves. You know self aware. Also read it
I feel, like Republicans, are more likely to try to appeal to independence, committed Democrats, true fact, and then I as an independent someone who is big fan of tolls Gabert, who is to the left of the Republicans but too far away from Democrats up chose, says. Yes, you are correct. Donald Trump shakes the hand of Jeff Andrew, a man who voted with policy almost every single time who wants to ban offshore drilling and trumps at. I endorse this man if the Republicans are expanding their base and absorbing the tv former moderate Democrats who want to ban offer your trunk like purged of a ton of environmental regulations and their publicans are cheering about it. Jeff Andrew once more but Trot endorses the guy
bravo good, sir. I plead for that. I do I do because if you look at what will not look, what happens if trumpets willing to endorse someone like Andrew who apprentice supports equality laws on, wants a benefit drilling, the right will form a large collection and crushed electors response is negative. His responses hostility, his response wasn't. I disagree with
TIM, I'm trying to understand you and doing a better job of appealing to independence. No day little adopt comment more like independent
Libertarians are already closer to the conservative scale than they are towards the liberal or progressive scales. To begin with, not liberal, sorry, not liberal, okay, and I can prove it, and I do it all the time, because I regard you take this this this graph and the New York Times like literally every other day, you see it's only two.
You're, probably begging me to stop showing it. The problem is, and please let me explain you know I just
you know a lot of people watch. All of my videos are liked him. You ve shown as so many times. It's true, but what you need to understand to is that the average
person only watches like one or two of my videos. So they don't see these kinds of posts check out where independence are independent. Voters are like
where a bomb was, but in two thousand eight those war. Liberals, ok, liberals where, where we're here into this, so if you want to talk about where liberals are today, yet they haven't changed much people, you know ten years later, aren't all of a sudden foaming at the mouth fervent far left. As you know, I D logical, socialist whatever's, some people. Yes, that's the Zambezi bite theory that, if you simply here a political opinion, you just act on it now, but many liberals aren't engaging with you anymore and that's why that the democratic parties fractured six ways from Sunday
it's not that liberals and independence are closer to conservative or or outside it was a independence are closer to republican and liberals. Impressive started under the liberals are closer to the Republican Party, then progressives our progressive gun, nuts, I'm sorry and its effect you go and watch some of these shows not
ovum, not all of them. Ok, I guess I was giving shouted took up like you know, Jimmy Door and complex gave it back when the good deeds and then a great content, but you look it what's going on with a manifesto. You look what's going on with the purity test.
What or we're Mama circular firing squad, and yet you got serious problems man, so
our own a up and and and loop it back into what's going on with you know what happened with the tavern and anti via these bees. Progressive people live in this hyper bubble of Woke Twitter, Oddy
social media activism, it is getting further and further away and will eventually fly off a cliff. They think they're world is objective reality. It is not. The average person has no idea what you're talking about. So you show up you throw bricks through windows and the average person says the left has gone in saying this is Philadelphia. Man, ok Philadelphia, might vote Democrat, but this is not your far left Democrat. This is Philadelphus Philly. These are these. Are sports brows? Ok, these aren't you
are tough mother efforts in Philly who may be like Union Democrat types slightly left, leaning opposing you know, big corporate structures himself, but you come into a brick through their window and then not gonna. Mess around is fully we're talking about so they dont get this. These aren't your New York. Liberals, New York is your ivory tower academic Liberal gone,
well. I never and then you ve got LOS Angeles. What are putting on their heads of states are going well. I never failures like your problem. That's the kind of people and fairly you throw brick through the window for type police officer in Philadelphia. You think those, and then these are people probably vote Democrat or probably did who will never vote democratic and so fine, if your goals, a progressive, is to make sure that the Democratic Party ceases to exist. Bravo you're doing a good job. Meanwhile, the Republicans are absorbing people like Jeff, Andrew and they're, going to become the moderate coalition, and you will chased yourself off into obscurity, brick by boring brick as appear more reference anyway. Sit around next month segments coming up at four p m: Youtube COM, slashed him CAS ass, my main channel four.
Disclosure. These are all out of order because I have to fly today so had the record like a budget segments early, and then you know whatever you know you get what you get. It was either this or do nothing so anyway, stick around etc will be. I bet you did accomplished his guest and I will see you all then four p m, this story, posted by Frank lines, is actual.
Several months old, but considering the main segment. I did it. I I thought to be important to talk about c back in August. It seems like a cause. Your Cortez is in out unless a panic mode, but kind of panic mode. You see one of the big strategies. The Democrats have to cut her out of Congress and stop the rise of the far left
is to re district and one of them there two strategies. We are seeing. Moderates Republicans modern Democrats, Republicans primary chow,
J, o c will see what happened happen so probably went. I don't know
The easiest solution for Democrats just erase her district outright through reduced
when the census comes comes up. Franklin's points out. New York is expected to lose a how seat,
as the twenty census at stake. Democrats are looking to draw out a Aussies district, so that brings me to the story now again. The stories from august-
but our cause, you're Cortez was going out campaigning to try to encourage people to engage in the census. That's estimation,
comprise a ton of illegal immigrants and if they redraw it, they can gerrymander it in a way which makes it very difficult for for her, where she
where she lives will be absorbed by other districts. It's just it's not like. She can never run again shall just been a different district, but I guess the strategy is her. District right now comprises a ton of illegal immigrants,
if they redraw it, they can gerrymander it in a way which makes it very difficult for for her where she lives to actually went a primary and particular district like if they put her. You know combined her with maximum Manhattan or something and you gotta.
A bunch of limousine Liberal Upper EAST Side Upper West side types. I don't know exactly what you have got. No, our exactly where she lives, but that's the strategy drawn or district. She gown a three the story from acting
it is from the city that unwise see they say. A yo see, makes a bronze census push amid fears of lost house seats, so then
about states losing their seats has been around for a while and once again I did that centre for immigration studies thing it's like Republicans, might lose seats. Well, it looks like the dates, but after a while I should have object that once my fault, they say
ok, your Cortez gonna rockstar reception as she greeted constituents under the roar of the elevated number six train Wednesday morning,
freshmen member of Congress. It became a national figure after her upset democratic primary victory. Last year, surprised Park, Chester Passer by with a pop up event, promoting participation in the twenty twenty census quote. Our strategy is all about building trust in the community before the city enumerate or even come your door. Oconnor Cortez told the city that trust is crucial in the district, where forty seven percent of the residents are foreign born and fear of taking part in an official government. Count is expected to be widespread. There's been an increased use of one's immigration status as a form of intimidation. Levies. Stop your right. There come questions, was foreign born mean becoming a lot of
illegal immigrants, permanent residents and naturalised immigrants. If you're an american citizen, I believe representation is paramount. If you're a legal resident. I believe presentation is particularly important if you're in
illegal immigrant? I do not believe it fair that we assign congressional seats based on people who are illegally in the country. We are giving you don't what providing political
power to people based on someone who's not even allowed to vote or even be here or work in the first place. Legal residents need representation, they can't vote, but whoever is in Congress is going to represent their interests and there in the country illegally with the right to work, and they deserve all the protections that come with it though they can vote. If you're unnaturalized, citizen, you're citizen by all means you gotTa Congress person but Ale sees district is heavily illegal immigrant as well so she's trunk. Look, I dont get the argument, but I believe that when I say that people who are permanent residents and and immigrants
felt the senses out of fear, unlike if you're here legally, not a green cardinal that when you worry about you know, but I guess you oilseeds putting our money where our mouth is certainly she's concerned immigrants dont want to fill out these forms, which could be really bad for a district. She gonna lose your job, a three four.
Cause. You're protects a full census. Count is more than a matter of making sure her Detrick gets all the funds in services its due in a sense, her own political fortunes could hang in the balance a review by the
city. Building on data analysis by the Texas Tribune suggests cause your court has. Its district could be particularly vulnerable to under
because a little over a quarter of those living there are non citizens, that's a higher percentage than any other congressional district in the state.
A census under counting calibre has district and elsewhere in the state could lead to the
elimination of congressional districts potentially setting off politically charged redistricting battles, New York already is on track to lose up to two congressional seats during reappointment due to the population decline and slower rate of growth according to a December report by election data services, without back and twenty eighteen, the number knockers. Once you have no idea, the data differ.
From every site. There all verified what you gonna do about it. Every member of Congress should be concerned about the census, said Jeffrey Weiss, fellow at sea,
he Buffalo LAW, school and redistricting expert, who was a senior adviser to New York counselling, twenty quote: the damage has been done, the trumpet
Thracian, I'm sorry, let me say, let me say it more menacingly. The true up administration recently attempt
the outer citizenship question to the once a decade count which dictates how six hundred seventy five billion dollars in federal funding for things like Medicaid section, eight housing foster care at school lunches is allocated each year.
This controversial effort was unsuccessful, though the damage has been done. Why said, o cause report has a is full of communities with apprehension about the census process, said Norwegian up actor. The lawmakers deputy differ director. You know I'm really
that uprising last name does not intentional. We have a high immigration population, a lot of undocumented folks, a lot of distrust from the community and the government. Ok, I'm a stop right there and ask you this question: undocumented people.
They're in the country illegally. They are violating our laws and that should give a district political power and who votes for president and what laws get past. I don't like the idea that people going to the country illegally without,
undocumented or otherwise oversee their visas or otherwise, and then we're going to give political power to a certain region based on people who are legally? Yes? Let us
I am America, some of the most welcoming immigration laws. You d want to hear it. Fine, it's true where one of the few countries that actually have birthright citizenship, because you know it's partic a particular point in our history, where this became an important factor, but we also let in millions of immigrants every single year under Donald Trump, that's dramatically lower and you know for whatever you. I think I think trumps very concerned about how many people are coming and is a very nationalist. I personally secure the borders, bring the aid back all that stuff. Whatever the point is I don't, I don't understand how you justify allocating an electoral vote and political power to a district that heavily undocumented. These are not sitting
Is there not legal residents that work under the table there displacing jobs, argue argue with me combat below them wrong. It's it's true. I mean I just did a wholesome and talking about how the Chicago Tribune said that went when Trump deplore
all of these are undocumented workers watch was workin here, the jobs are filled by locals and mostly in the black community in
person contact like home visits likely will be key to different residents sentence participation, while the twenty twenty sentence will mark the first time. The national surveys conducted primarily on line close to forty percent of those who live in part, Esther Nearby Castle, hill and class in point. Do not have broadband internet access accorded regional airport by the cities, but what is broadband have to do with it if you want
like do you could use dial up to open a website does take their long. People are intimidated in many different ways, said: Judith Gardener, who runs the law reform of you it at the legal aid society, something
I contacted the organization reporting that their landlords have threatened to call ice while I well at a time when fear of ice raid runs high in one case, in Brooklyn Golden are setting a landlord asked. Only non white tenants to sign a lease of the clause requiring they prove
their citizenship, a door to door effort all the only real Lovin war. This because I think you get the point and was only a little less than we are essential as a cause. You're grotesque, really constituents ones, they centres be representatives standing near by headed fliers.
Seeking workers to go door to door in the neighborhood, for the crucial population count as July twelve as a spearhead felt twenty percent of the top one thousand to one one. One hundred and twenty one thousand torn and forty New York area positions its recruiting for, according to a presentation. Last month by Jeff Feller, director of the regional census centre, so I'll tell you what men I do know that the big conference.
I guess, is around the influence of certain populations in certain areas, but when I think we're seeing here has very little to do with illegal immigration at all what I think we're
is a yo, is at war with them the establishment democrat types.
And you know it really bothers me. Here's what we get! We get out of touch corporate centrists people like Joe Biden, whose, like I'm a centrist and Hillary Clinton, I'm a centrist and then people point the finger them and say their centre and I make no they're, not their crony corporate shells, their trash. Ok, I'm not going to vote for those people. I want a more central type but, like I don't know populist, not elite us, yet we don't get those we get far left ideological loons like a sea who wants to provide. You know the green like looking men, the left hates it. When I reckon reckon the green new deal, I dont care because none of you actually worked for environmental projects like I'd x. I worked for
four of them. Ok and I was actually raising money in fighting for environment while you're sitting around complaining of the internet about people. You know in your imaginary, you know with the political bubble. We think the world is a delusional stake. Full of nazis and stuff, like that, I was actually out. There
doing the work and when I saw the green new deal went before it came out. I praised it. I'm a couple videos praising its most people want it. It's a good,
and then she released it, and it was basically like somebody caprice, paper and spat on it and ensure that our faces. That's what she gave us, ok and that's what we get and that's why I don't like her
Where is the same, rational, populist, individual? I tell you what man,
Tell us these tryin sheets dry and it's not working, because people are hyper polarized they care about. What's true, I mean look I'll put it this way. The Trump base
conservatives, their centralized want a core, a core general concept of like american Nationalism and it's their opinion. The leftist fractured its absurdly fractured ok ends and that there's there's no way
we left anymore. It's all purity tests, it's also killer firing squad and they nothing we can do about it. So then Trump recruits all of the former moderates who give up and its where we go so you I I wanted to do this because I note an old story, but fry
once just posted at, and I thought I was interesting that agencies actually fighting this battle, because if any seat goes don't be hers because the establishment Democrats trying to get rid of her
While we were there stick around, I got a couple more segments coming up for you in a few minutes, and I will see you all shortly. I love
of the store. I love it when I saw this, I laughed and I faced palmed Trump ends decade with a bang. Next,
nearly one hundred environmental regulations during his first three years, an office
I'm going now come like even George W Bush had a bunch of people,
but a bunch of natural law, natural parks and set aside of a bunch of land for national park. The programme itself like this, no I'm not afraid
ending, inviolable regulations,
however, as a rather moderate individual. I think this is what you get when you don't clean the system. Ok, the problem of the law.
Is that not keep imposing more more regulations, more more restrictions without assessing whether or not they worked? So I'm not gonna go through each and every site
no environmental regulation that tromp has. Next, though I tend to be against the removal of environmental protections. Trop Estonia for economic reasons and the economy is booming. So I tell you this on the left, you let people saying we have to take a hit. Ok, we ve gotta pay more taxes. We ve got to pay more for gas. I use gas less, it's gonna hurt for all of us. We have to do it pregnant
I somewhat agree with that. Someone on the right there say and climate change is minimal, anthropomorphic or is it anthropomorphic anthropological climate change, human caused climate change, but now exam uprising?
Edward Human climate change is a myth that climate change of private variety of reasons, whatever the argument is their poem regulations because it'll make the economy do better in a variety of sectors and that's true, but at what cost I ask the problem with the left. Is that their unwilling to compromise that those that are suffering and you end up with rights in the streets like France?
Clearly, that is, if a solution, I don't like the idea that we are now seeing these amendments regulations taken out, but I want to make one very, very important point. You see. America is now the largest producer of fossil fuels and ever
is blaming Donald Trump he's get where these environmental regulations and Republicans are cheering for their removal removal for the most part of regulations. Although there are a lot of Republicans or conservationists, you live in the wilderness. You live on net binational box again,
do you know when America became the largest producer of fossil fuels, was it during Trump? No
Was it during Obama? Ass. I love it. I love it. Look man. I have no problem criticising this, but I gotta admit I dont know
enough about all of the regulations that are being removed. Hence why typically the milk toasts fence and a lot of these issues, but, like I said I lean towards I dont like that Europe is doing this through the story and then we'll talk about fossil fuels present Donald Trump. Next, nearly one hundred environmental regulations during his first three years in office effectively rolling back much.
If its democratic predecessors, environmental legacy, the present rolled back more than ninety environmental rules and regulations, then your times reported in December will really just the past month
the New York Times or a lot and analysis from Harvard LAW, school Colombia lost,
and other sources to keep tabs on trumps numbers during his time in office. Let me tell you some secret door: PETE it I'm not going to vote for. Tromp is one of the reasons. Okay, now look. Foreign policy is pretty much the biggest reason and that
Why does he gathered we'll see what happens with? What's going on with, with with IRAN and and and and and Baghdad? I think tromp had a good response. You know to what was happening. I mean certainly better than bagasse. He got marines there. The osprey came in those pretty cool and he saved any major
but we're safe, save some lives. We saw the media was front Spinnet as like protesters and mourners when it was like militia supporters in IRAN supporters. However, we
be they are we should begin in Iraq? We shouldn't be that I get it men, whether not were there it's. It was our
see we're embassies everywhere in everybody's embassies everywhere, so a lot of people are trying to make it make it out like we,
be in that in the end in bed, in the first place, why sapping do that? That was that was our embassy, like you know, we have emphasised in countries even if we weren't you know in having troops stationed in Iraq and Afghanistan. We still have an embassy there, but I do think we should not be there. I do not like it
and I want to see whoever our care or the President get em out, bring them home and that sexual
the arguments I think trumpet strong. I really do think so. Based on one
things. I've read, I think, trumpets between a rock and a hard place where he's trying to basically pulled back all of this american imperialists. You know foreign intervention stuff, but he kind of can't because were it's? It's a web man we're tangled up. I don't necessarily trust trump on this because come straight up and said: we're gonna give a bunch of weapons and and and stuff this idea, because they pay well I'd like to see it happen, though, but now I digress. The environmental stuff here is the big challenge I faced with this. It makes me it may it, but it makes me question Donald Trump. Obviously, I've not never been the biggest fan,
We all know that, but here's the problem. Why aren't the Democrats coming out and telling us what's happening? Why isn't the media coming out in saying like Trop? Just did this than this and I
stand, some journalists are probably right about saying tropical regulation protecting certain Burgess on, like that. I get it but where's the national conversation around it. It's the Democrats fall when they'll press conferences. They don't tell us what Trump is doing, they don't say trumpeted acts, they let him do it and then they got word impeach him. We ve been working on for two and a half years as we like the orange man. What do you want if you wanna, if you oughta, be Trump, be like? Did you know tromp repeal the regulation that prevented you know this
at this and then people be like we really like he's gonna allow companies to do what clearly these regulations are put in place and whether they were good or bad, the democratically least trying spin it right. Now there are even talking about it, so listen man. I made my position clear. I dont know enough about what regulations were removed. I do think it's important to clean housing government periodically, but I don't like the idea of pulling back in Vermont regulations on the surface. The problem is, there has been no effort from the left
actually talk about what this is other than some ridiculous. Far left ideological green new deal, which has an address anything tromp, is doing or the Orangemen Ben Narrative and impeach drop scandal. Scandal scandal. Fine, if that's the game, you're playing I'll, have no idea why this is good or bad.
And I speak for the average voter when they're like did Trump, do good,
where the regulations were Obama bad. I honestly have no idea they say the enemy,
she's less includes regulations that are officially officially reversed and roll back on progress. Trump has fully a limited twenty five rules designed to rein in air pollution. Why you said a good thing and emissions, as well as nineteen, that regulate energy producers, ability to drill and extract oil and gas Trump use a one to punch according to Caitlin Decoy, a fellow at Harvard LAW School who tracks such measures? First, a delay rule to buy some time and then a final substantive rule, Mccoy holding your times and outside with promise men. If you watch my second at one p m you'll know exactly what happened when I try engagement,
on this one and it's almost like they want to do this and they want trumped up. When I tell you what I need progressives, I when I say something like I don't know much about the environmental regulations trumpets pulling back. You say: let me break it down for you, oh wow, that's relations, Donald Trump! Do that. Why would trumpery risk pull back
rules designed to reduce air pollution, we want clean air right. Well, for me, it seems like tromp is trying to bolster the fossil fuel industry that that the energy sector and that can be very beneficial to to America.
Unlikely, but also strategically more energy output means more growth, more expansion, a good economy. It's probably want the contributing factors to our good economy. I can respect that. I am not. You know as much as I believe we have with issues of climate change. I dont think the France that the France method is the solution you see what's going on over there, but a year of writing and protests and fighting in the streets. So we ve gotta.
You're something out and perhaps to humans are addicted. But, as I have always said, the solution isn't
like we're gonna ban this, not you can't be antis yet before something, and I think we need to be for renewables and I'll offer some criticism of trouble,
he's a rags on wind, energy and other media. Take them out of context, and this is the other problem. Trumps talking
wind and he says I never get it. You know. Have you seen the manufacturing process fumes, my God, the fumes everywhere and then they are making. It seem like trumps arguing that fumes come
out of wind turbines and, unlike dude, can you just criticise tromp for being opposed to wind energy without making some ridiculous nonsensical statement that the President thinks films come out of a wind turbine like the environment men? I worked for non profit for the environment for a long time. I am trying to like figure out a solution. The problem is the left,
so far left off the rails. They're. Not even talking about this. I just hate Trump and some sitting, you're saying: why do we need to talk to people I used to do this? I got the people and shake their hands and be like. Let me just make a few points right. We need trees
trees you now taken carbon dioxide, take their carbon out, turn it to mass, but out that while it is best, but they use it to grow, there must respect that oxygen. We breathed oxygen Abbas, the carpenter by its cycle meant trees are right. Let's do something other trees right, our Florina profits and it works. What do we get now going to timber? How dare you damn you- and it's like do that is that is appealing to no one man like if I found some dude sitting in my lounge chair just got.
Work. After a long data gathered by my boss, I crack open a beer. Maybe it's you know a nice, a nice local were micro, brew, crack that led them to sit back and, unlike finally man all my stresses, you know is going a wagon to sit back. Have beer, we got the game. Okay, I t vote it or whatever it is. They called recorded it
And then, all of a sudden, a commercial comes on, and it's like, or new segment and its young girl going. How dare you stolen my childhood and the dude thinking like I don't want to think about
This man, I don't wanna, be yelled that I don't be insulted autonomy berated, I'm gonna be attacked for her.
I am are, or what I'm doing I just want to relax. Work is not easy. Life can be stressful. People want to relax, and this is what we get well grown timber is,
Their yelling about how we ve stolen or childhood trumps, rolling back regulations. Okay. So if you really want to counter it you're the calm, rational conversation, you say
well, then it. Let me break down for you what tromp you know rolled back on and I'll. Tell you those good or bad. If it made sense or it doesn't it doesn't? Instead, we get this scowling Viens the insults,
and the Socialists green new deal. That's it. We get that's their comfort of trumpets. You know what men they trump is what these people deserve, because, instead of coming out and Anne and being respect like toasty gabardine,
ok, I didn't you know a fan of hers. She said in a video. We have two respects tromp supporters. Otherwise we will keep losing. We have to understand how they would have robust twice and are now voting for Trump. Don't do it don't yell at you. So whenever man I'm not a fan of rolling back and momentum regulations, but the problem is it's just not international conversation. I saw the sounds like an even though it happened. It's just not in the media. You know, saw hey, ok, I'll, take responsibility for that. I should be doing this job. I should be looking to step up. I should be markedly tracking the stuff, but it you got a point out, the? U S has held the top spot for the past six years, and this investigator report is from October. So that's that's Obama, airmen, ok, Obama, help United States become where the top we'll producing countries in the world. So if you got a problem with a trump is doing well, it goes back. Toolbar too, I guess
Obama did put in what is regulations, trot, pull them back they're, both big oil people as the game being played, and we get it I'll. Tell you what you can do, whether or not someone you whether you like fossil fuels. You cannot campaign on taking away people's jobs. That's insane! I leave it. There.
Whatever man, you guys common below a mutually got the environment regulation stuff, because I feel like you're gonna, find a lot of moderate liberal types going in voting for Trop, simply because the left refuses to actually put up a real political fight there not talking about it anyway. I'll see you on an excellent and just a few minutes. They sprang up.
I don't care what the pole save the poles are wrong and twenty sixteen. I don't necessarily trust them today. If I had to make a bet, I would tell you:
Bernie Sanders is the real front runner for the Democrats. That doesn't mean that most Americans on the left would vote for. Some of my bertie about Socialists, even though, is not really a social who kind of is most Americans one vote form, but we're talking about the fracture democratic party, we're talking about a large portion of activists.
Rats who are going to vote for burning and then regular Americans will run screaming Donald Trump outside this man, Bernie couldn't wanna twenty sixteen. I firmly believe that I do not believe we can, when today I'll tell you why. But first we got some bad news about tromp, actually thought necessarily bad news spent, and I take it. Donald Trump raised forty six million dollars in the fourth quarter of.
Asked here. That's a huge hall, Tropez consistently shattered records raising more money than any other presidential campaign up to a certain point.
Bernie Sanders raised thirty four point: five million in the fourth quarter. They may be saying TIM. How is
How is this in any way? Bad news for Tromp he's raised forty six million dollars
Andrew Yang raised sixteen point. Five million in the last three months is campaign, says donations must react,
on the surface, I can say if people hold the mentality of vote blue, no matter who, then those donations that fervent you know zealotry will come to the nominated to the future nominate. So if, by the end of the primary it is Bernie Sanders, imagine that all of the different democratic fashion toward donating to, like you know, Buddha, judge or binding all put their money towards further Democratic Germany, as they will probably be out raising Donald Trump, however, however, and what I will read this format it down. I will say this: the bigger risk, in my opinion, is the blank or bust factions of which, MR,
what their money towards further democratic Domini, as they will probably be out, raising Donald Trump. However, however, and what I will read this former down, I will say this: the bigger risk, in my opinion, is the blank or bust factions of which Mr Tim Pool is a member
somebody, somebody posted on Twitter, saying like no matter who
where's the nomination under a vote for them. Will you- and I said now that it's not gonna happen? I like Andrea, I dont think I ll be the nominee. Maybe he will be used not perfect by any stretch of the imagination, and I honestly I dont know if, for right a variety of reasons
you would be particularly better than tromp annul explained. This ought to be overly simplistic, but Donald Trump is already in the presidency. So is it incumbent advantage,
he actually has now experiencing in the oval office.
He seen our record economy. I do like the idea of Andrea coming in and helping to bolster our plans for the future towards regional. Again, it's not that ever expected Yang to be elected, arms armantrout. It may mean the end supporters or gang himself. I like that, I think, is a good deed. I think is a red. Do he's one of the best candidates we have for the Democratic Party, but I dont think you
is presidential. I really mean what I want. I want to see his Yang in an economic advisory position, helping set policies so that we can adapt for automation and you don't help
Oh businesses, as someone has its successful entrepreneur and clearly successful, has been able to transform this campaign. The way he's done at this point, I think, there's a lot of fault, Donald Trump,
but the economy is doing so well, if you're not only to a friend and they said, would you what for tromp and of course my answer is like do it's not gonna happen? You know why it is it's not listen.
But the bigger conundrum, though, is, should I vote against him if it risks the stable in the economy, it put someone in a position that hurts the economy and makes life force for Americans and that's one kind of like. I think I'm a fat sit on this one man. I would definitely vote for. Tells you, though,
solely because to me ending the foreign war in the waste of money overseas. Outside of that everything is a stamp collecting. You get all these Democrats trying to talk about her,
we should be spending like war in attacks, the ridge and I'm just like when you talking about
a lot of people like trumps attitude they like when he like marks by slamming reporter or comparable horsefaced. I get it man. I really really do, maybe not perfectly
but I also really do believe that the office is a position of like I don't
EU leaders. Am I really really hate elite ism, but there is like a certain class to it, but tromp doesn't bring. I get a lot of people like trumps attitude they like when he like marks by slamming reporter or comparable horsefaced. I get it man, I really really
Do maybe not perfectly, but I understand that when you have someone like tromp, whose boorish bullish I'm will push back on people point home and insulting to their faces. He brings that a negotiating table, and thus we got a buyer tray.
Feel even Nancy, plus the trivial is good. The economy's thing really really well look man. It really just comes down to the conundrum, I'm looking at
voting for someone on the democrat side that I dont, like simply because is a vote against those who were rescued by trumps economy. That's, that's! That's a fact. I dont
the idea of what Blue no matter who oh, it's Bernie, Sanders better vote for many workers, trumps bad and I think a trappist bad guy. I think Bernice Butter in some ways. I also don't know if it's right to put it
somebody who is clearly wrong about a lot of economic issues, not notably the wealth tax. If
when that I will not a progressive gonna get angry, but it's like
oh man, I I've I've. I was thinking about it talking to a friend and arms. Like do I have to tell a Trump supporter: you don't deserve the economies of stands today, the suffering you went through the opium crisis. You know that, though the burning through your caught, your kids college savings, the loss of your home. Now the economy is better up. I should vote that away from you. I'm gonna, like Master opposition. You know my position is kind of like trumps, genuine in first place. I blame Hillary Clinton. I've been the Democrats, that's why I laughed the whole time. It's like
get what you deserve, and I gotta admit drops. You know surprised me in a lot of ways: the economy is doing really really well, obviously too
This coming, I was in the camp of like, if trumpets elected in a tear, everything down it'll be hilarious, because the democratic, the ones who deserve it for stealing from burning the problem is right. Now we're in a position where we have a present was bent over four years he's been obstructed relentlessly by Democrats front of peach him for two and a half years, all Israel's investigations that an economy is still doing well. Sort of certain point I have to ask is my apprehensions towards his character. His boorishness crossness, his brightness is that worth voting away or risking the economy.
You dont men. I know all of a sudden. The far left has accused me of being up an apologist and also their nonsense. I do it's not about that man. It's like they did. The people who are on the far left view tromp through the lens of absolute psychosis. Trop is not that bad. I just don't like it. It's just not my choice, but I'm not like who who do children armies. Like me, I prefer somebody else. You know an effort but where it brings me to as somebody who's like, I would prefer not to vote for the man, I'm not crazy. They ve called every republican president. All these actors have called every public and private gonna connection. They call them Hitler. I get it. It's ridiculous
like the guy market about form, but I also I am questioning whether it's worth voting in a democrat for the sake of voting. As a Democrat, I really hope I really really don't think so. So I suppose I could talk about Bernie Sanders raising money. They say because, but anyone
similar Bernie Sanders. Vermont raised more than thirty four point: five million in the fourth quarter from my team. We know that Sanders received more than one
point. Eight million donations on average donation of eighteen dollars for deeper sense, others, huge, ok, they say is fourth quarter. Total is larger than any candidate as raising a single quarter so fond the primary race in the primary rice. I note because Travis Israel's alot more and soundly eclipse the totals of two other candidates who have reported figures for the three month period of October. We had it on Wednesday, PETE Buddha Judge campaign safer and more than twenty four point: seven million in the quarter and Andrea brought in sixteen point five. So you are those numbers together, man that trumps not raise it as much as the Democrats as a whole. But again the reason why I talk about my position and how I want to vote
is because our express these people who demand party loyalty and other proper candidates we don't like, don't deserve our party loyalty. That's insane and its really annoying me when people are like too
we'll never lose he's gonna keep voting democratic, even though they do bubble up. Let no dude, Andrea and totally Gabarus so dramatically different from the rest of them. Caught on policy. Gabert is desperately trying to bridge the divide. She's try it's impossible! Ok, because the Republicans demand you vote known impeachment and the Democrats demand you vote yes and just as I am not going to do either and then the there, the Republicans like users and a stronger message, but at least
involved, and the left is like right now. So tall c is actually more appealing to libertarians benches of the Democratic Party and she's progressive I'll. Tell you what men.
Elsie has shown over and over again integrity. Ok, she sat down from the DMZ because she refused to endorse Hillary Clinton to I'm not endorse Bernie shot the integrity needed to be a leader, in my opinion, should not gonna get it, though, because the son of the games played our people want. They demand that I vote for Trop, simply because almost all of the Democrats are bad, like pink Buddha judge. Actually talking about military, invent intervention, be a good thing and, unlike isn't the best we have for a young, moderate man than I know. I don't know
man. I don't- and I do like Andrew Yang, I think, he's different, but I really don't see him as a present. A majority me. I know you against pausing to memory, but let me tell you some. The commander in chief, in my opinion, is the commander in chief of the armed forces, to one of the reasons I dont like Tropic can criticise transfers attitude. The economy is great. You deserve credit for that. Europe has done some good things on foreign policy and many bad things. That's a fact: Chelsea Gabarus, a major, the National Guard. It's one of the most important things to me. People judge somebody serving on forces, but he's going around preaching about how we need to have more discreet right
I like deferential like tells you Gabert, they disagree on and on foreign military presence in the Middle EAST or otherwise, and I happened to be you know my my confirmation: biased falls with Elsie, which says we should be spending our money in this way and, of course, of recipes tear her apart. So anyway, here's the point about this. I don't worry, I'm trying to say with all of this. You know if you ve listened to me when it is basically, while all of the Democrats combined have raised a lot more money than Donald Trump, I'm not entirely convinced
that when the nominees is chosen that will translate into the nominee because Bernie Sanders is hated by so many in this tablet meant I think Bernie might run neck and neck the trump. I think of burning phenomenon, hell and appraisal of forty million in trouble raised. Like forty five million you know, Bernice numbers will go up a little bit from people who are like I'll. Take burnings I'll. Take him the Walloons Matter, who's that they say, but I'll tell you what man you ve got tolls your boss to people. You ve got Yang or bust people, and these are big factions outlaws gonna Buddha judge people, I don't know they vote for burning
Anders, and this is the main point. Bernie Sanders is leading the pack, but among the youth activist base, if he wins the nomination. I do not think regular. Americans, like your bigger average Americans and get behind it, troubled and sweet, will see them in the biggest mistake transport or make right now hubris. I tweeted there's a bunch of trouble.
Border aside, like you know not all of them, but some of our mockingly. They like yeah right like we're, gonna lose. Well, that's exactly it do you think you ve got in the bag. That's what Hillary Clinton thought and look what happened her anyway thanks
I will see you all tomorrow at ten, a m due to the complexity and cast and I'm about to go, get a plane. So the order of these videos, all wacky, but that's right now.
Transcript generated on 2020-02-08.