Following up on the Supreme decision, as you know, has been asked about spoken out As it is ledge of work for the highest court, you respond specifically to TED crews who, overnight in defence of the black women, because I would say first just over a year ago, the previous president also promised to select a woman for this Court not only where there are no complaints about choosing a nominee from a specific demographic from the same corners, but there was widespread praise of now just a spirit on those grounds with republican lawmakers widely highlighting that they thought this was positive for women in America, so takes

accrues himself. He had no objection to Donald Trump promising, he'd nominated women and twenty twenty repeat, no objection at all. In fact, he pressed her on these grounds during praised her on these grounds. The nominee during her confirmation hearing, Senator Crusade, quote, I think, you're an amazing role model for little girls. What advice would you give little girls when President Reagan honoured its campaign pledged to place the first one on the court? He said it symbolise the unique american opportunity. There is no outcry around that. The president's view is that, after two hundred and thirty years of the Supreme Court being in existence, the fact that not a single black woman has served on the Supreme Court is a failure in the process. Not a failure or a lack of qualified black women to serve a supreme court. Just

This episode, overt act with ten crews, is brought. You buy Thomson cigar, arrive, sell you the gentlemen on the show, like cigars, well sort of my husband most times. Actually that's what we do after the shall. We go smoke cigars and tell ourselves what a great show it was. That's why you ve gotta check out Thomson cigar, whether you're working from home or just kicking back after a week of being essential. There is no better way to relax and with a premium cigar, they ve the best prices on the best brains in the business from MECCA new donor, Monte, Cristo, looking to try new rare top rated bland, but don't want splurge on box as well.

Thompson Cigars, tore a smattering of five different blends, delivered to your doorstep. Each month. Now, Michael and my husband have been fans of Thomson even before they became a partner. In fact, I think Thomson cigar sponsors to Michael Knoll show as well. No one has more selection than Thompson. Their customer service is the best, so sit back and take a break from all the craziness with a cigar from Thompson Cigar Company there's got these guys rarely do offers, but right now, Thompson is offering our listers fifty

percent off orders over seventy five dollars or twenty percent of orders over ninety nine dollars to take advantage of these incredible saving, simply go to Thompson, cigar dot com and used a promo code cactus when you're ready to check out this website is Thompson: TH, O m p S, o n cigar dot com and use promo code TAT, Miss Thompson, cigar, dotcom, promo code cactus. This episode of verdict with TED Cruises, also sponsored by american heart for gold. I'm sure I'm not the only one who's noticed everything is getting expensive. We are the biggest economic crisis since two thousand eight with the government, that's printing trillions and trillions of dollars. Consumer prices are the highest we ve seen in thirty years. Inflation is certainly here to stay and The government continues as out of control, printing and spending. The dollar. continue its freefall and lose its coveted role as the World Reserve currency So how do you protect your money? There were two when you're savings, while American hard for gold, can show you how to head your hard earned savings against inflation by

then, you diversify a portion of your portfolio into physical, gold and silver, though even help move your existing irae or for one came out of the volatile stock market into a precious metals IRA, and they make it easy are the highest rated firm in a country with an a rating from the better Business Bureau and therefore thousands of satisfied, clients and answer called him right now. They will give you up to one thousand five hundred dollars of free silver on your first qualifying order, so don't wait. Call them now call eight hundred and fifty five seven hundred and sixty eight one thousand eight hundred and eighty three, eight five, five, seven six, eight one, eight eight three or text cat this to six by five. Three: two against eight hundred and fifty five seven hundred and sixty eight one thousand eight hundred and eighty three or text Two six, five, five, three too. This episode, a verdict is also brought. You buy stamps dot com, if you, Small business- and I know a lot of you- do you know that there is nothing more valuable than your time, so stop wasting it on trips to the post office. Stamps on car makes it easy to mail and ship right from your own computer. You can

time is money was damp. Stockholm send letters and packages for less with discounted rates. From U S, p S, you PS and more stale Saigon brings the services of the postal service and european shipping right to your computer, so whether you're an office sending invoices aside Hustle Etsy Shop, full blown warehouse shipping out orders standstill. Com will make your life easier. All you need is a computer in a standard printer, no special supplies or equipment within minutes, you're up and running printing official postage for any letter any package. Anywhere you want to set annually because of discounts on postage and shipping. From U S p S new PS was your mail is ready. All you have to do a schedule, a pick up or drop it off. No traffic, no lines, there's no rest. With our promo code verdict you get special offer that includes for weak trial, plus free postage and a digital scale, no long term commitments or contracts just go stamps outcome. Click on the micro. At the top of the homepage and type in verdict that stance. come promo code verdict, never go to the post office. Again,

welcome back to verdict of TED crews, I'm Michael Knolls and Liz em. Correct to assume that there is going to be even more content for the verdict, plus subscribers after the show You are correct to assume that. Thank you, Michael. Thank you senator for having me back on. I decided to introduce today the cloakroom on verdict, plus this is only for verdict plus subscribers. You can join us over their verdict with TED crews. Dot com, slash plus, is a brand new series with Senator TED crews. Co hosted by me was Wheeler based. Claim. I'm gonna pick his brain, like I would in a strategy session, it's behind the scenes, pig into details of what goes on in DC, just like the actual cloakroom of the Senate today

about how to apply a constructed foreign policy to a real life situation like Ukraine or to talk about will be Goldberg. Emirate talk about Tom Brady. Again, you can join us verdict, would TED crews, dot com, slash plus, in fact, to get a one month free trial on your annual subscription. You can use the promo code cloakroom, that is promo code cloakroom at verdict with TED crews, dot com, slash plus for one month, free trial on your annual subscription debts, Absolutely magnificently, as I can't wait to head over there. I- and I know the new show is gonna- be a huge success in and after that we are, of course, going to launch a show with the senator and the cactus we are going we're going to bring then we're gonna have a show with me and you and the cactus Now the senator there is going. There is a lot of content for you over there and verdict plus. So please, head on over subscribed do not hesitate to join today lives. We will see you a little bit later. Senator first, You are in trouble again You have you ve gotten, both in trouble again verse.

some weeks ago was I the first podcast in american history to be. Reference to add during a White House press briefing. now. I think we're also the second podcast in history to be reference because of your comments on this show about the Supreme Court nominees yeah, I got to say the media and and Democrats are- are really phenomenal, so it says so. We saw our last podcast. We talked a lot about the Supreme Court and you- and I talked about how it is offensive that that Biden threw down that the only criteria he would look, look for in nominating a replacement for justice, Breyer's that it had to be a black woman, and media lost their mind me there were stories all over the country with with media reporter saying this is terrible, and you know you could judge Saki there. She actually engages in the logical sleight of hand were actually the illogical sleight of hand. The left us often.

because she says: well, if you don't support a quota, then like whoever it is whatever the characteristic is about the person that they're putting a quota and play so, for example, She says well, when Trot nominated, Amy Coney bear it. You said she was a great role model for little. Girls will, of course she is that the The fact that that that you're, saying someone's a woman and a mom and an amazing scholar and amazing judge yes. She is a woman. We are aware of that. Did you know do, I think clearances Thomas's life story growing up as poor kid, an african American and Pinpoint Georgia. Overcoming poverty is an amazing story. Absolutely yes, but here the weird thing: Dammit that's today the modern laughed- and this includes all of the corporate media, They embrace discriminating based on race, they believe in.

grim and aiding based on race, or there is a difference between nominating someone who was a woman or nominating someone was a black man. Denominate someone is a black woman and say at the outset. In this, instance. Ninety four percent of Americans are cattle. Weekly ineligible, it doesn't matter what their their qualifications are. I Joe Biden won't consider them in you know it's it's interesting, Michael. If any one else, tried to do this in your business. Let's say: you're running a business, I say daily Wire put but add where looking for. Copy editor, oh, A black women reply, or only native american men need to apply. Only white guys need to apply. It would be obviously illegal. It would be obviously wrong What Biden is doing here and it's amazing- look he could have done the exact same thing said: we're going to look for qualified jurist for someone with a great record and the nominated someone who happened to be a black woman. An end

That would perhaps have been a wonderful thing, but, but you know one of the tells It shows that Biden actually really doesn't care about cross that threshold. Do you know? Who is one of the very few people on planet earth to have ever filibustered, a black woman, nominated to be a federal judge. I think I know the answer, but who That would be Joseph. So when George W Bush nominated Janis, Rogers Rat an incredibly qualified jurist to the D C circuit, the federal court of appeals. What a Joe Biden do he filibustered out once twice, not only Joe Biden, Chuck Shimmer? Did it. Dick Durban, did it the Democrats all stood together and said not that block black woman because she actually believes in the in the constitution. We, a left wing activists in, and it's bizarre that, that that it is become an article of faith among the left that

scrimmage aiding based on race, doing it explicitly at the beginning. We are only looking at black women. That's that almost takes on like this, this religious significance to them. They they believe in it. And I got to say You know I am reminded of something chief justice. Robert said he it's a sordid business, this giving us up by rays and drawing distinctions. Look when we are putting podcast together. I was looking for a house, but I didn't say give me an italian Yale sentiments. Let's find host,

an attack in the early. I would have loved that that would have limited the field some. Why did we would have landed on you? Nonetheless, a did it's true. I you know, I don't think anyone has ever put out a call for an italian yearly. They usually they say. No thank you need not apply, but that's true because it was color blind and degree blind casting when I got to do it, and I think your point is is really important here, which is Joe Biden, could have fulfilled his campaign pledge. just happen to have nominated a black woman, but what he did was so crass. It was so tactless to to do if it were any other industry, would be illegal to say I'm taking ninety four percent of Americans out of the running here. If you look at public polling people, don't like this, the more majority of Americans think that job We have considered all of the nominees, even if he ended up with a woman in the end, so I think the proof of the pudding there is in the tasting. Yet seventy six percent of Americans disagree with what binds dealing and inlets

for example, could Saki in the media. This is there talking point they're going to is oh Trump this with Amy Country Barrett well, actually know he didn't salts what their referring to is the trumpet a rally? Just with a few days before he announced Amy Country Berets nomination said he he's gonna nominates somewhat someone and she's a woman Yes, he was aware she was a woman, so once he decided who he was gonna nominated, he he acknowledged that she was a woman, but if you think about how Trump did this trumped? Did it in a way? There's never been a president who done it this way, put out a list, a detailed specific list of potential Supreme Court nominees. While he was- the candidate for President, When he won names, honoured initially, then, supplemented. That list he added ten more names and in fact we ve talked about on the podcast, how the ten more names he added were condition of my endorsing trump. We added MIKE leader that list any he added Neil Gorse it to that list. That was the second list, and then he put

a third list were among others. He stuck me on it, so I think the third less got much much weaker. The quality drop in a dramatic way precipitously, but but trumps lists. They were racially diverse. They had men, women. They had that folks of all sorts of different races, but there they were Jurists selected because Trump believe they would be faithful the constitution. They had a jurisprudential outlook that would put act, the bill of rights an end. in this instance. Amy clearly bear it. Was the third nomination trumpet made so so when, when nominated Brett Cavenaugh huh. Had interviewed Amy Coney buried. He had sat down at the interviewer, so she didn't get that slot ruddy newly liked her effect, I ought to trumpet the time and it, and even after, but after a cabinet like like she's gonna, be the next one. She's really good As far as I know, Joe Biden has an interview. Anyone he doesn't know who any

potential candidates are he's just said: if you're not fitting, my racial category engender category you, are ineligible. So Garland, no matter how good merit garland might be it in his interview with Joe Biden. He's the wrong skin color in. Today we had a hearing in the Judiciary Committee. one of of Biden nominees. Is an asian american woman who's been nominated to be a federal judge, and she wrote in. School. She was actually law school with me, you're behind me, I did know or law school but she's year behind me in me, a she wrote this article that is really radical. That is actually blasting Asian Americans. Who oppose this- crimination against of Asian American. She calls them me Conservative asian americans- and she explains that really woke Asian Americans,

should embrace harbouring Yale and other elite schools. This grim and aiding against Asian Americans at that's really, aside of being well and mild question Michael to her was. Is racial discrimination, wrong. that ought to be a really simple question answers racial discrimination role, absent holy hell. Yes,. She refused to answer it she wouldn't answered. She said well. The bring court has said Babo S and I'm asking you: is it wrong? and by the way she wouldn't defender article. she just said. Well, I don't know what I was thinking. I I ask you what you were thinking. Do you agree with what you said? She wouldn't answered it's much the same thing, the far left, so ports as a matter of principle discriminating based on race at its it's weird, it's it's

It's really look. It's the same thing, that's in critical race theory. Again, they believe races, the defining characteristic and ever taken discriminate based on race, and it suits their politics there all for it show This is playing out, as I think a lot of us expected it would, which is the left has come out. Joe Biden has come out in favour of explicit racial discrimination and conservatives have objected to that and said. Racial discrimination is a bad thing and then the Democrats have come back and said well, you're, racists. If you pose racial discrimination, your racists and you hate black Ladys or whatever, ok a week. We all knew that was going to happen. That is, that is the playbook. it can't fire you for saying you are elected by the people of Texas, so, unfortunately, for them, your ear in your job, for the time being, It can fire other people, who have you had exactly the same thing. In the end you saw it happened at Georgetown LAW School illegally, peer, always allow libertarian lawyer, I believe, your friends with them. I think you know it s really.

spin around long time is very well known lawyer. He came and made almost the same sort of calm ass? He said this is bad. We should be choosing people based on race and sex. We should just use the best available candidate here. Been placed on administrative leave. There are struggle sessions going on in the law School Georgetown right now there is crying session hosted by the dean of the law school it it. Like they're going to fire earlier at this point, what happened to two american law schools, but let me just dark by saying There should never be a crying session if any university or any law school. It reminds me of a legal league of their own there's. No crime in Baseball- and if you wanna be a lawyer dont crying like if you disagree with what he said, argue against it. I know only too well he's a very smart lawyer he's a libertarian he's been with Cato forever

scholar he's well respected. I don't know how Georgetown screwed up and hard in the first place because he's not a radical leftist and I thought they insisted. You must be a radical left us to get hired, but they did an end. It's it's more ridiculous. Even then you described Eliza was arguing that that Biden should nominate the most qualified left of centre. Judging he advocated someone in particularly advocated Sri shrine of ass, so shriek of Essen is the chief judge, the DC circle. I know- and I cook together- on the force circuit, he's very smart, very talented Supreme Court litigator was a sprint, clerk three is an indian American liberal Democrat Judge and earlier argued will he'd be a great choice for Biden to nominate, and then Celia had a stupid phrase because he said he shouldn't go with a lesser nominee going to use the word lesser. It was a badly phrase, tweet right

and what happened is the less said well you're, saying all for good, american women or lesser that's like no. He didn't say that he said he thought that tree was the most. Qualified nominate their for every other nominee would be a lesser nominate, But I'm sorry that's that's logic and reason, and in an end they woke mob. They are ready to burn you to the ground and then that they don't want to engage is it It's amazing that that they want to cancel you and and look either ilium may well be fired, for they put him on unpaid administrative leave. You know What does it say that our law schools don't believe in in anything resembling free speech that you can get fired for your job, by arguing for a liberal Democrat to be nominated Supreme Court, which is what area did that the very idea.

of considering people based on their qualifications is now anathema ask the left it. It is a vicious. I mean cancel culture is alive and well. If they, could cancel me. They would The only reason they can't is is that I'm elected by twenty nine million Texan said it and so that they and use Think of the interim affected has not only Azalea potentially losing his job, but ever the professor that's terrified to open their mouse right. other person in their job that the mob will come and say fire them, it really is ridiculous will give the student radicals. I give them a little out of credit, actually not credit, at least for their honesty. I don't give them credit for sobbing in front of their dean and demanding people's heads on pikes

can't say: heads heads unpacked member states ban in a pod cast said we want heads on pikes and they accused him of calling for murder for murder like its edge. Remember that the naughty people are really not easy. You can't use that phrase anymore, you're right only metaphorical, pikes and figurative heads, the butt What the student asked was. Listen this I really a Shapiro, he's a lecturer, Georgetown LAW and he's the director of the centre for the constitution seems like an unobjectionable sort of place, but He advocates an original position on interpreting the constitution and what the steward, asked was. Why do we need this? Why do we need this centre? Why do we need this perspective? Why do we need a ism to be taught a Georgetown law? And I thought it was actually a pretty good question in that school overwhelmingly is leftist the loss or does not teach students generally speaking, that original ism is a good or valid. Interpretive principle at

they're trying to churn out leftist left? lawyers, and so why do they need it? What why does Georgetown a left wing law school need to have these pesky conservatives, making all the students cry well That's the view of a lot of the left and I'll give you at least one reason it. Let's assume you don't care bitter intellectual diversity. Let's assume you don't care about learning anything other than the orthodoxy and propaganda that you're being spoon FED. Presumably at least some of the students at Georgetown LAW, one a practice law. They would actually to be practising lawyers. And presumably that means they like to go to court room and org to judges that judges should do what what is their clients interest, tell you there a heck of a lot of judges in the district court and the court of Appeals and the? U S Supreme Court. That believe, I think quite rightly, that the text The constitution of the the statute is controlling and then that you know that the original understanding of that text-

has at a minimum, a major interpretive wait. You can disagree on how much weight and there are disagreements among judges. But if you got a law school that is graduating lawyers who don't know what original ism is. You don't know how to argue. on a regional basis. You're gonna graduate crappy lawyers, you're gonna graduate lawyers who don't know how to actually litigate in court and Part of the problem is in some of these laws: schools there. Okay with this, because you ve got a bunch of deeds and professors in ivory towers. Who don't actually engaging in the practice of law and it just all politics warm instead will is a sort of silver lining. I hope that it can keep his job, but it he can, and if the council culture mob really claims all these original scalps at least the next generation of liberal lawyers will not performed very well in front of us, The judges and MIKE A point out also Sir the left's game they say

the outset we're going to discriminate based on race. In this case we know, Joe Biden is gonna nominated black woman we also know from the pattern of Biden nominees, that the odds are overwhelming, who every nominates will be a radical left wing activists, because most of the judicial nominees bogs made this past year had been radical left wing activist but we also know the next step in this game. they're going to say. Anyone that opposes the radical left wing activist is array. System sexist, who hates black women that that That's their game. Play and I mentioned you know when Joe Biden and the other Democrats filibustered Janis Rogers Brown. She was a black woman, but of course there that just didn't want to constitutional us. There is another example same time that they filibustered Janice Rogers Brown job and also filibustered, guided Miguel Estrada Miguel Estrada sitting annex and amazing Supreme Court Advocates Supreme Court Clerk George W Bush nominated him to the DC circuit. The day

creates had a real, tough problem, because Miguel was unquestionably qualified. and there was nothing in his record that was disqualifying and aunt actually one of the democratic staffers for TED Kennedy. wrote a memo to TED Kennedy on the Judiciary Committee, along with Joe Biden. The devil EC staffers says we must defeat Miguel Estrada. Why because he is Spanic quoting there. They say we must repeat defeat him by cause he is hispanic. It was widely anticipated if Miguel had been confirmed. The DC circuit that Bush, when put him on the Supreme Court, and he would be the first Hispanic ever on the Supreme Court and not only are martyrdom crash willing to discriminate. based on race when their favouring someone who meets their ideology.

Are even more eager to discriminate on raised against some one who disagrees with their ideology, and there was Joe Biden filibustering on Hispanic. Incredibly qualified nominee now is because I think he hates Hispanics spanish, no he's alive. It is to hates anyone who disagrees with his orthodoxy and is willing to divide based on race. and believes in his heart. Like most Democrats, that discriminating based on race. If they think that causes righteous and just is a thing, and I think it is a terrible thing in America to discriminate on race period will hope, Iliad Bureau can make it through there trying to cancel him. There is an even more prominent person then, Terry LAW, professor, whose is it I got a cancel attempt on him right now that would be. Not a conservative, not even really, I think, a libertarian. That would be a left winger, a guy who supported Bernie Sanders

Joe Rogan, who has been up in, backed into a corner now, he's got some of the most powerful voices of the nineteen is coming after him. We're Talkin Melian, we're Talkin, Joanie Mitchell, people who at one time actually were somewhat relevant, and it looks like But it looks like he's actually sort of on the ropes. As I gotta say, Michael just at the outset, Neil young was still alive, who did Jody Mitchell was still alive, YO, Graham NASH, Peter Peter Frampton. I mean we ve got every geriatric rocker who playing When I was in diapers- and you were a twinkle in your Daddy'S- I that's that's when these guys had their heyday. and I got to say I think it's he is hell. That that a bunch of. Seventy eight eighty year old I can roll stars from prior era's got me

press this week than they ve had in thirty years, and what they're saying is bizarre idea either that they're saying we really don't like that that many people are listening to your Rogan. I think maybe they have a plan here. Which is nobody wants to listen to their songs, so if they get big Tec, to ban the things that there actually listening to. Maybe you'll have no more choice but to listen to their songs because they'll be the only things left I mean it really is ass, Neil young end and Crosbie Stilson NASH went on a free speech tour in two thousand six. There was named the tour, and I think people are beginning to wake up to this fact that maybe they weren't so much in favour of free speech. Maybe they just wanted to smash whenever standards existed of the day and they wanted to just install their own standards and and now Jerome contradicting that, so they are the the defenders of the entrenched power

The thing it's crazy to me is, as you say, meal young Johnny Mitchell. These people have not been relevant in decades and yet, they may do seem to be potentially getting Joe Rogan not to back down but to permit a disclaimer on his controversial episodes too. Get more left wing guests on I mean it does seem that there that they really are putting a lot of pressure on. Well. You raise a very good point. I'd say two things in response: one, broken, doesn't give him. I mean look he's. God has been reported like a hundred million dollar contract with Spotify the other main dollars a lot of leverage. Emma I mean he has shown a lot of courage, a lot of boldness, but but have to assume Spotify they haven't given in yet, but but extent. I mean Spotify kind of at the intersection of big tech. and Hollywood music

So you ve got to assume every one in that world is arguing, surrender surrender surrender, give in to the Woke mob and and I do think it will do real damage to free speech. if Rogan Knuckles under because what people will say is if they, Force Rogan to comply. How does anyone else have a chance, but but you bring up the hundred million dollars, Senator let let's say your Joe Rogan and look Rogan seems like a perfectly principled guy. But let's say he warrant, let's say he's totally unscrupulous and he's looking at that big paycheck sure It would be a big blow to the American Free speech tradition if he backs down, but what about numerous uno: what about Joe Rogan? What what what incentive does he have not to just give in here? said the only incentive, his integrity that that that his viewers listen to him because they they believe me speaking from the heart, he's telling the truth and- and I get a say,

any time you you sell out for cash in your intimidated when you give into the mob. It does lesson your credibility, and I want to give him a lot of props. He has shown a tonic courage. I also think you know he he it really got his attention. When CNN went after him forever makin. He The com. a fantastic defender of free speech, I think that's really important And one thing that is important, I think for Rogan understand everyone else did understand. is when the mob comes after you, it's not even about the topic you were about, so we were talking a minute ago about Biden Supreme Court nominee. I sent it. wait today, such somewhat tongue in cheek, which was we can Owens for Supreme Court. But you know, if Biden said it must be a black woman. You and I both know Candice we like Candice. She is both And female

according to the less stated criterion, she is an obvious trojans funny like the twitter, verse and end their media stories, written about my my tweet, where Oh, my god. Crucifix takes care to solely. As far as I know, I dont think canvasses a lawyer she's in the lawyer. I don't know about it, I am being treated if she has the qualifications to be a supreme court. Just as I am unaware of those but and she's a fantastic pod, toasted and thinker, and it and proper a tour straining the Idiot seas of the left? But but what I've enjoyed is since that tweet. Watching leftist explain no, no, not black woman. You you, you posed, oppose people and we oppose, or because she's conservative wing on her, we mean only leftists black women, it is it. Is it

all ideology, it's all politics race as part of the politics. But anyone on the wrong side, the go after answer. Rogan may think ok. Well, if I are at I've, had some some doctors on my show, who are sceptical of some of the things are saying about covered saw have some people on the other side who say believe whatever Saint Cloud she says and and maybe the mob will be satiated. The mob will never be satiated. That is the nature of the mob and when, when when they see they can buy you into submission, though Back again and again and again, I think the fear you you know Rogan is speaking too and four. wide variety of Americans, it's not rocket Right wing Republicans growing, not very many of them at all. I think its ordinary people may be some disaffected liberals, maybe some leftists, for goodness sake,

endorse, Bernie Sanders or he's got is got left, and there too, and at he is. Speaking like the kind of guy who was not ideologically rigid, and I think that part of why he's been able to amass such a huge audience and I agree, I think so far- has played this pretty smart, yet migration is a big fear, do not show them your neck, do not give in you will never of- and I assume I'm not saying anything- the Joe doesn't already understand You will not win the moment that you start to appease them. You're dead you're gonna be dead in the water? I guess figuratively again too. I don't want people rhetoric in junior high if you give em the bullies, they take your lunch money to Morrow to and the next day and the next day. That principle was true, then in its true now that's right and you know. Rogan is actually important, too conservative.

yeah it's on the future, but we ve talked a lot on this show about how, when I was a kid that character caricature of the GNP was, it was rich uncle penny bag, smoking, a cigar shilling for corporations, keeping the working man down and that that is, not the case anymore. You're, seeing you seeing it Joe in exit bowling you're, seeing it in the lawn signs and people's yards and you're, seeing it in the behaviour of Democrats, who are now very clearly the party of the global elite and Republicans have position themselves as the party of the working man. My question is: why Is it that Americans we have such a history of loving freedom and fighting back? Why is it that we are currently being outdone by me, because hat or police

lovely neighbours to the north. The Canadians, we're canadian truckers by the thousands are showing up to the nations capital and protesting these draconian vaccine mandates. What's going on with the Americans is absolutely awesome, God bless the canadian truckers and I will say, look look. I love that. Yet we were just talking about Joe Rogan. I love big, bald angry working class people who were pissed off and fighting back then- that that is the day awesome, the canadian truckers. Those convoys are spectacular, watching Justin, cruder, Trudeau run away. I fun tweeting out someone did a mash up of simpsons videos where there is an old Simpsons episode that had homer drive and attract and he gets in a convoy, and then they can two Trudeau, I guess, there's Minister of Canada crawling out the window to run away, and you know

actually says something that there were a bunch of fact checkers today, who fact checked that Simpsons MASH up said it. actually not factually correct the Simpsons predicted that the canadian truckers, because these or two different episodes that someone put together. and I'm just like you guys, are Nimitz and it it's in the can Indian truckers: look there stand up for freedom in it and then you know- a year ago, we list, Do people pontificate online very solemnly the truck drivers Our heroes in Amerika, we also listened and say, doctors and nurses and police officers and firefighters, their heroes for America all day People are being persecuted right now, rather than the two totalitarian left wants to fire those truck drivers. They want to fire doctors and nurses, and- and

cops and firefighters and soldiers and sailors and Navy seals. Why? Because they won't knuckle under their covered mandates and vaccine mandates. They won't obey their totalitarian dictates. and I got to say those canadian truckers are awesome. And their fighting for american freedom in a way we all should be doing Then we could. We could take a lesson from you if there is an irony that the left for over a hundred years said because of the world unite, and now the workers of the world have united and and their leaders like just introduced or running as far as they possibly can. There's a Trudeau shaped hole in the wall where, where he once was because he doesn't want to face the crowd, so I will say the canadian truckers when they wrote, drove their convoy it and they protested. They did it very politely and and and then having been born Calgary. I will say that connects God bless them are wonderfully polite.

You know in this instance, they are warriors for freedom an end. Their message is being heard not just throughout Canada, but but but throughout, get across the world, hopefully so This raises an important question where we're running a little late and so we're going to get into a ton of mail bag, but I do want to get into one mailbag question that came up from you D Mona was this. The pseudonym over the good The ancient greek references here and in our mailbag very educated audience. he asked what concrete policies are the. Is the GNP going to put forward now that the european position in itself as the workers party, so is it simply that the GNP sang doors open, you're, welcome to come in, but we're not gonna change anything about the way that we look at economic issues. Social issues were not we're, not actually gonna change the policy. We just want you to vote for us or they're, going to be some kind of substantive shift in what the GNP is actually offering so

I think we ve seen pretty significant shifts and I think Trump played a big part in that Number one where the party of jobs you want a job, you ought to be Republican, where the party, a small businesses where the party, the energy, Joe Biden, the Democrats hate energy, the hate oil, they hate gas, the hay, call their destroying jobs across the country there. Shutting down pipelines, they're they're, putting people, work where the party of keeping small businesses open. You look at Biden. The Democrats they're happy to shut down around drawn a bar they're, happy to shut down any one who will comply with their mandates. The party of opportunity by democratic shutting down schools were keeping schools open. We want to give you a school choice will want to give you are opportunity. Immigration is critical to this democratic party of open borders. When you have millions of people coming illegally into this country, their driving down wages, their hurting working men and women, you You wanna help protect jobs. You use stop illegal immigration, and I think, every single policy. The Democrats embrace

ask yourself what, San Francisco and Manhattan billionaires want that's what crash support a hundred percent stew. down the board and Skeer yourself ever policy that Ohio Steel workers. Texas, truck drivers, support those the policies that that the Republicans, I think, ought to be supported. including by the way protecting free speech and religious liberty, and the second amendment Democrats want to take away the guns of gay men and women across this country it is a radically anti worker agenda and I will say one of the things I think Republicans have gotten better at, but there is still too much of is corporate only a sum giving in to big business. Look when it comes to big business big businesses. Gone woke for too long Republicans behave that whenever big business wanted, they listen to. I think help break that. I think we have shifted in others.

Companies are fine, I don't have anything against them, but they don't need any favours for me. They don't need any favours from government. They don't need any subsidies that only two new mandates to benefit them We ought to be the party of the little guy of the small business owner of the worker and Democrats are the party have taken away your job and I think that's playing out in a very, very real way. Now do because some of those things the GNP is talked about for a long time, but especially when you're talking about the big where operations. That would be a shift where I was a kid. The GEO p was the party of helping out every gigantic corporation. They would, assist them in shipping jobs overseas and getting sweetheart deal from the government corporate welfare of total corps. welfare and that is a big shift and it does tie into the small businesses too, because if the GNP is gonna, be the party of the Big woke multinational corporations sort of by definition there. Not. The party of the Small Business ACT shift is very important issues: keeping jobs here, an endeavour

crash of the party of corporate welfare today whether they embrace it openly spirit important, as you say to this idea, that when you have two million illegal aliens pouring across the border, that's good press wages and it's not gonna depress mark Zuckerberg wages or, I guess, Mark Zuckerberg capital gains. I don't think he makes most of his money from his salary. It's gonna depress wages, for can class Americans so that that's a big shift at the democratic going be the party of more and more and more and more immigration Republicans really can offer something different there as well. That was a good answer that really are that it makes me hopeful for the future centre or even is rocketing cancelled, even as we're gonna get radical leftist judges all over the courts. There does seem to be some hope. Looking ahead, do twenty twenty two and twenty twenty four twenty four leave it there. You know one thing: you can do to really express your enthusiasm, not merely for the upcoming elections, but further very show

Go get some merge, everybody we ve got superb emerge. I dont have my hat on me right now. I have sometimes make my head look like a peanut, but this had is so good. Looking that I have to wear it, it is our famous cactus microphone. How are you That's really great tee shirts. Some have expressions coined by Lindsey. Graham, for goodness sake, what is a pot? We ve got a lot of verdict marching and you can get that at verdict with TED crews. Dotcom slash shop. and especially if you having non peanut shaped head of the hats, will look really really good on. You really wonderful stuff over there, and then you can stick around and had on over the verdict plus community and check out more content from the senator and from lives As for me, Michael Knowles, that's all I've got right now. This is verdict with TED groups.

episode of verdict with TED Crews is being brought to you by jobs, freedom and security pack. A political action committee dedicated to supporting conservative causes organizations and candidates across the country in twenty twenty two jobs, freedom and security pack plans to donate to conservative candidates running for Congress and help the Republican Party across the nation.