The Supreme Court says shoring up voting procedures, isn't racist and call headed Jones gets her tenure and then demonstrates why she shouldn't have been offered in the first place and applause you launches her January six Commission with cover from those Cheney, I'm bench brothers is the benchmark. Joe so is sponsored by express Vps. I protect my data with Phoebean, so should you visit expressive, gps, dot, com, slash battle that to all the news in just one moment. First reminder your spinning wage much on your cell phone bell. Premature everybody is, unless you switch over to your talk USA, which is why so many of my answer is already have. In fact another thousand of you. My extremely wise listeners have made the switch from your overpriced wireless carrier to peer talk over the past couple of months. So what exactly are the rest of you? Waiting for if, with agent Eve, rising orgy mobile, your family could save over eight hundred dollars, you're just by switching to peer talk, the same great coverage because they use these.

TAT Tom Towers is one of the big carriers. You can even keep your phone and your number, but you will be setting a fortune. You're talk is the top rated wireless company by consumer affairs about the absolute best customer service team based right here in Amerika. If that sounds good, it gets better because, right now you get unlimited talk, Texan, six gigs of data for just thirty bucks month. They might be thinking what values eight gigs of data there is the thing you're not gonna, charge you for using data over that six gig limit, wrap mobile phone down to fifty and say Ben shipyard get started. When you do. You say fifty percent off your very first month, file pound to five zero say Keyword, Ben Shapiro, go check them out. Against AL pounds? You fifty say Ben Shapiro, get started with pure talk. Pure talk is simply smarter. Wireless. Okay. So yesterday was a day of panic panic, because the Supreme Court of the United States held that the voting right to act very very far reaching an historic measure in american law going over at nineteen. Sixty five designed to prevent attempts to essentially

keep the vestiges of segregation in the south after the Civil Rights ACT and prevent black people from voting is meant to stop those procedure We happening in the south. It required southern states, particularly to go through a process noticed clearance in which their voting laws or basically pre cleared by the federal government, and the idea was that over time as a country, gutless, racist and as states begin to see better representation of black voters who historically had been discriminated against. The poles and the Voting Rights ACT would start. To diminish overtime in the same way that we saw the Supreme Court say in the nineteen seventies, affirmative action, which would would start Wayne Overtime, and this is always been sort of daisy constitutional territory, because its face and voting Rights ACT does seas. Authority from the states and bring it up to the level of the federal government, and so the brow, more broadly interpret the Voting Rights ACT nor permanently interpret devote more the Voting Rights ACT, more teams to come into conflict with constitution. The same thing happens too true with regard to affirmative action, is the Supreme Court has found over and over they keep saying what

a temporary measure. Yet we understand that violates the equal protection clause, but we need it in order to redress historic wrongs, and now the Supreme Court has come up with sort of new justifications for white located terminate emissions on the basis of race. Nervously diversity is its own excuse, and all this on the Voting Rights ACT was never meant to be a Way of cramming down federal rules on and states that had discriminated for all time, we are now sixty years removed from the voting rights it's all sixty years- look as best again in nineteen sixty five. It is now almost two thousand twenty five. It's almost three generations later and the left is still insisting Voter discrimination is a man, the problem in the United States, the evidence of this is extremely scanty. The notion I can hispanic voters in the United States, but particularly black voters, are being discriminated against and prevented from voting is just not true located in the belief that Huge numbers of black borders are being disenfranchised to say why it is trotted out by the Democratic Party in order to jog voter turnout in the black community. The ray

Turkey is that Barack Obama, basically one in two thousand twelve because lack voters in places like Ohio, showed up in numbers that out tallied the percentage of the population, the realities, the black voters, shut up on mass this last election cycle in places like Georgia, for example, so The belief that red states have been shutting the doors to black voters are discriminating and workforce is extremely and it is not based on evidence. It really is not based on evidence at this point. They sell their a voter law in Arizona it was passed in two thousand eighteen and when a crackdown on its essentially two things, one was voting out of precinct and if you voted outside your precinct, then you're Malaga, tossed, because you have usually a place where you're supposed to vote and it very difficult to match? Up to your vote Is your voting outside your precinct? My drove over to Naples today and I decided to vote in Naples as opposed to vote

where I live? Well, then that would be a serious problem be difficult to match up my ballot someplace, where I lived in some areas and crack down on that, and they also crackdown on the most corrupt practice in modern american politics ballot harvesting ballot harvesting. Is this practice where you deploy members of your party to go pick up ballots from third parties? So you are the Republican Party chairman. and you say tat your worker. I want you to only go to houses that have historically voted Republican. I want you to pick up their balance and I want you to drive them to the ballot box. It will. This presents a couple of problems, one basically, which Reside is better funded in terms of who picks up more ballots. That day it is going to win because you walk up to the jury. Say: oh you forget about it. I don't go to the next door neighbor, the Oda. You forget about it. I well I'm here to help you vote today. To is it Leah stretch of the imagination to believe that when you ballot harvest fun on behalf of a party in your party activists who have access to a bunch of ballots that use vividly picked up Can I go into packaged mark offered. A few boxes, in fact, is a major problem

in North Carolina in a republican district. Somebody high republican voter outfit and is exactly we did it. We won. The election is also and harvesting has been. A major problem has been a major problem. California, in two thousand and eighteen, for example, Democrats swept a bunch of seeds and Orange County. It looked as though they were red seat. Specifically because they went out and the ballot harvested Sabellian harvesting is extremely corrupt, is rife with the potential for fraud in Arizona crackdown on it. So the Democrats soon. They said there was a discriminatory law. They said it violated the Voting Rights ACT because it prevented blacken hispanic people from voting in a way that it did. But why people money, not a problem for them, is there basically neutral law. The law apply to everybody, you can vote out, appraising, doesn't matter your race and the other problem. Is it everybody so got about since very difficult to make the claim that this specifically directed at blackened hispanic voters. You could say that it was attempting to crack down on democratic voting practices which they had an advantage. The ballot

listing had been used to great advantage by Democrats and Republicans were now fighting back against that, but that's not unusual right. That is true, american voting law? Whenever Democrats take control of the legislature, it proceeded gerrymander the entire state, in a line with democratic voting interest and one Republicans take advantage of a legislature than they do. The exact same thing made the proceeds reversed gerrymander, so neatly, sort of interplay over voting law has been a long time feature of american politics. None of that is banned. A bit change. Voting procedures such that it it seems help your party in one way or another. In this light, Democrats are now attempting to do at the federal level right, there's a reason why Democrats are pushing ballot harvesting, it put the state in the federal level and Republicans are pushing back against it, and it's not because Democrats just want or people to vote, and I'm not seeing Democrats really push super hard in highly ready areas for ballot harvesting. For example, it seems like they're doing this, mostly on behalf of purple and blue state in, but the the real ban is on voting procedures that are designed to disenfranchised black people. S with the voting rights, as well as the Supreme Court look

at the Arizona law and its head now. This is this is not violated of the growing right, Jack and then assent in this critical is sixty ruling in which all of the republican appointees voted one way and other democratic appointees voted the other. It's the first can a major six three ruling that that we ve seen in a while, because usually Roberts tends to vote with the Democrats and uncertain three buildings or he tries to water down the decision so as to get a couple more democratic votes, which you seen a few times here. And miss decisions that didn't have to be unanimous, but Roberts made them unanimous in water down the decision in order to achieve unanimous vote unlimited but the decision, for example, on this one, it went almost straight party line appointment and you Democrats basically now claim at any law that has quadrupled What impact is unconstitutional under the Voting Rights ACT, which is pretty wild because most laws some sort of disparate impact. It turns out. The disparate impact in this particular case is minute, statistically speaking, it doesn't matter is so according to them it's a z, racist decision. It is the he racist,

lookin majority on the Supreme Court cramming down a violation of the voting rights active of nineteen sixty five. Instead, supreme court. You read the Voting Rights ACT as broadly as possible. According to this sense, to rule out a huge bevy of Republican, let it you sure, a voting procedures that may disproportionately affect black and brown. Motor, even though they are facing troll and in fact, neutrally applied by does the art These are from Democrats until the last five minutes it voted. Its racist, because they say well, you know, that'll disenfranchised more black and brown people and most Americans. Well, I know everybody can go get ninety, but Democrats say while statistically fewer black and brown people have ideas than white people, therefore, its discriminatory. That's the kind of life The dataset uses written by Lana Kagan in this particular Supreme Court case, because for Democrats every thing now boils We call for a vote or theory at voter theory is where they are going to win future elections is my cobbling together a coalition of the supposedly dispossessed to overcome the be feeding white majority,

the theory again is most dangerous theory. American politics, the demography is destiny it. It is the theory that is, alternatively, by the mainstream left and the outright. It is why it is not true, but Democrats have bought into this. scale because it proposes that as the country gets browner inevitable, Democrats will not only when a majority, but they will keep a majority, no matter what end the majority will rule for all time. The demography is destiny argument. The Democrats make is basically a utopian. He meant there, the malaria argument we are going to reach the end of history at a point when we altogether enough, the coalition of the dispossessed that we'll never lose another election, and thus we think that could be preventing that right. Now is voter suppression efforts on behalf of Republicans, which serves a couple for one that allows them to keep this illusion of the new power six in their mind into it, allows them to why'd you ve minority voters and tell him the Republicans are attempting to prevent them from voting in the first place, which of course, is not true. According to the New York Times, the Supreme Court on Thursday States, new latitude to impose restrictions on voting. No, they really didn't

using a ruling, in a new case, from Arizona to signal the challenges to laws being passed by republican legislators and make it harder for minority groups to vote but face a hostile reception from a majority of the justices is so unbelievably biased. That is not what the courts as the courts as if you want to show you elimination and lots, you have to show discrimination, the more you can't just allege that, because a law has a despair impact that means that the war itself is Racist every single law that has ever been passed in the United States affects some groups differently than others every single law. That is in that the law is invalid under either the summer I talked with voting rights act it. What what what the descent would like. What Democrats would like is to have a say, We a super legislature, the Supreme Court level, at strike down all laws made by red state, legislatures and green light all discriminatory measures taken by boosting legislators. That really is well here, though, with six three, the three level, three liberal members in descent according to the New York Times, the decision was among the most consequential in decades. On voting rights is the first time it had considered how crucial part of the

Rights ACT in nineteen. Sixty five applies restrictions that have a particular impact on people of color, but doesn't have a particular impact on people of color is one of the points But the majority opinion makes is it working at this status Lay the impact on minority motors is is minimal. justice, Samuel Alito Road for majority, said where state provides multiple waste about any more Imposed on voters who choose one of the available options cannot be evaluate. without also taking into account the other available means. In other words, if the states, as you can vote, ten different ways and one of the ways happens too. disparate impact there. So mine other ways worried aid about t really can't say at this one right here. This right here is designed in order prevent black and brown people from voting. Meanwhile, just Billina Kagan, wrote the dissension. What, wherever it can majority gives a cramped reading too broad language, but here's the point abroad The language of the Vieira brought more broadly Herbert languages, Vieira and closer outcomes are violating the constitutional provision that States gets run their own elections. If you are attempting to read the Voting Rights ACT in order to give the federal government

Please purview over all voting procedures, simple. On the basis of an extra We statistically my new disparate impact, your basically just getting rid of state ability at all to make its own voting procedures, which violates the constitution itself Just as Kagan said that the court action was a devastating blow to the nations ideal she's. What is tragic here is that the court has yet again rewritten in order to weaken a statute that stands a monument to America's greatness and protect against its basest impulses. What is tragic that this court has damaged the stout? You said designed to bring about the end of discrimination in voting. Well again, the statute was designed to do that. The statute as largely agree wished it and, at a certain point, you're going to have to decide whether you just want in control what what Alain occasion in the democratic life is to be in control of all voting procedures on the federal level, so Democrats are using this as an opportunity to push the there their equal rights.

act there. The voting Rights ACT voting legislation Jean Louis ACT, and that, of course, is an uncompetitive No piece of legislation that federalism voting procedure you can see the democratic agenda call things racist easily while the racist, then you get federalized the procedure. But that's not what these cases about this case simply said that some pretty basic boating requirement. Having a lightly disparate impact over. Course, millions voters does not mean that this was designed to be discriminatory, or in fact is discriminatory these law, we'll go through a little bit more of the decision and a second cause. It's kind of important because again tear democratic case. These days seems to boil down to everything I dont like as racists, and therefore give me control gets more than just one second, first, if Europe, it's under, whose hiring you probably face a lot of challenges when it comes to finding the right person for your role, that's why hiring can feel trying to find a needle in a haystack sure you could post your job to some job or an all. You can do it The right person comes along. That's why? Instead, you should try superconductor

We had some precludes outcomes Lasher Daily Wire, when you posted javelins, procure it get sent out to one hundred top jobs edge with just one click. Then zip, recruiters matching technology finds people with the right skills and experience for a job and actively invites them to apply. In fact, zipper is so effective that four out of five employers who post unsupported, get equality candid it within the very first days, no wonder over two point: three million businesses come at Gibraltar for their hiring eat. We use it for clear here at the daily wires, when the reasons we have excellent employees like Bradford, who not only as an excellent job, helping to run the show, but also makes terrific reckon nations about me. Buying boats, as well as on as well as Gulf machines Other companies overwhelm you with wage many options. Zipper finds you what you are looking for, the needle in haystack right now, you can try zip recruited for free at this web. Address zipper dot com, slash daily. Why are once again remember, go to this unique play: zip recruiter, dot, com site DE I a widely why reciprocal, or indeed the smartest way, tire ok. So the Supreme Court Majority points out

that the section two of the Voting Rights ACT is not supposed to be an unlimited guaranteed that the federal German, run our voting procedure, the first in the core it. According to the court decision, the court for construed, the current version of section to win the case. Versus jingles, which was both dilution case where the court took its cue from second, whose legislative history, the court's many sub when Voltaire Lucian cases have followed the path it jingles charted, because the court here considers for the first time, how section two generally applicable time, place or manner voting rules. It is appropriate to take a fresh look at the statutory text in nineteen. Eighty two How was amended the language in section to that had been interpreted, require proof of discriminatory and sent by a plurality of the court in mobile versus building in places that link section two eight now use the phrase in a manner which result in a denial or abridgment of the right to vote on account of race or color. Ready denying or bridging on account of racer cholera because of race or color, then section to be states. Two is violated only where the political process

he's leading to nomination or election are not quote equally open to participation, by members of the relevant pilot protected groups in that its member have less opportunity than other members of the electorate to participate in the political process. We're like representatives of their choice in that section the fray in that is used to specify the respect in which a statement is true. Thus, equal openness and equal opportunity are not supper requirements. Instead, it appears the core of Gb Israel, governments, that voting be equally open. The statues referenced equal opportunity, they stretch that concept to some degree, to include consideration of a person's ability to use the means that are equally open. But equal openness remains the touched on. In other words, if you have the ability to vote, then the fact they chose not to vote in one way doesn't and you can vote in another way. Another important feature says the court is veto. How of the circumstances requirement any circle that is a logical bearing on whether voting is equally open and affords equal opportunity. may be considered, and then they take a look at sort of how the Arizona law applies here. What they pay

here is that having to identify ones pulling place and then travel there does not exceed the usual burdens, are voting in a day. in Arizona made extensive efforts to reduce the impact of the outer pricing policy. The number of valid boats ultimately cast by sending us apple balance, each household that includes a voters at proper, pulling location. The burdens of then to buying in travelling to one's assigned precinct, are also modest when considering Arizona political process as a whole, the seed offers the easy ways to vote, which likely explains why out of pressing votes on election day, make up such a small and apparently diminishing portion of overall balance cast. Also, there He'll disparity in burdens, allegedly caused by the out of pricing policy is small in absolute terms of the Arizona counties reported outer precincts and twice, exchange and all action. A little One per cent of hispanic voters, one percent of african american voters, percent of native american voters voted on election day. Casting our ballot preaching ballot for non. Norton voters, the rate was around zero point: five percent, a procedure that appears

work for ninety percent or more of voters to whom it applies. Minority and, on minority alike, is unlikely to render a system unequally open. That is simply true mean at what point. Do you start to say that there are laws? Disparate impact starts to look racist, not at the difference between one percent and point five percent mean that literally means the ninety. Nine percent of the black hispanic net native american people cast ballots in this particular way in Arizona when again, remember that this is this is a very small number of people that that. That number is is obviously not the regime. Put one percent in point: five percent is obviously not going to be the big difference maker here. Ok according to the court as long as there's an lunch acquainted, the sense in accordance Democrats. As long as there is any distinction in the outcome. Means the racism has happened now. What this is driven is, of course, the Democrats. You suggest that the Supreme Court is a repository of races, Sarah, so President Biden wheeled out today's decision by the court

undercut voting rights in this country, makes it all the more crucial capacity for the people and the John Louis Voting Rights Abandonment ACT to restore him by voting protection. Our democracy, on our democracy does not depend on it. Demands got. Eighty million boats demand just won. A bunch of states was not supposed to win our democracy, absent does not depend on you, federalized no voting procedures. Again this is the misses. The pitch is constantly the pitch. Joy read in sandwiches and violent blow against democracy. It ok. So let me get this straight You say the ballot harvesting is not allowed to state again, is very corrupt fraud, ridden voting procedure and say that you have to vote in the precinct to which you are assigned. This apparel is a threat to democracy. Everything according to the left is a threat to democracy. Everything so long as they believe that it's going to cut against them, that's always and forever and it is truly amazing to me- and we have got

through six months, eight months of people going crazy over Donald Trump, suggesting that the election was stolen. Stop the steel voter fraud decide the election which True and the exact same people say that widespread evidence and voter suppression and racism in voting procedures remains a pressing issue in the United States. There is less the latter than there isn't the former, and there is very little evidence of either. There is joy, red saying what I read does in six three ruling written by Samuel Alito, the most reliably conservative justice. The Supreme Court dealt another violent blow against democracy by upholding too restrictive Arizona voting laws. Forbidding the collection of absentee balanced by any one of the family are caregivers and allowing the tossing of ballots inadvertently cats in the wrong precinct. It's the latest, not in the built of chief justice, John Roberts, whose life work really since his days as an influential aid in the region,

This parliament has been to destroy the landmark nineteen sixty five voting right, that you understand the voting rights actually specifically designed for a time and a place in the same way that many of the provisions of the Civil Rights ACT were designed for a time and a place in a form of action was designed for a time and place Nepalese nine, sixty four nineteen sixty five America is not designed to suggest that everyone, procedure undertaken in a Red state in the south has to be scrutinised by the federal government three generations later, This is a political Agnes? I'm no legal argument. What Alina cake, like she says no standards in her designed by the way heard descent basically said Whenever we decided, we don't like a voting procedure, we'll just aid violates the Vieira and then will throw it out and the in this case had no, you actually have to show evidence designed in order her black people they need dear obedience, he did not show that in this particular case, and thus the DMZ lost in this particular case is also means by the way

education is being brought against Georgia on the basis of their new voting procedures is likely to be tossed by the Supreme Court. It also means, by the way, that the the John Louis voting Right to act that the Democrats are pushing problem we found unconstitutional wide variety of ways by the same Supreme court. The reason them that's our pretending to be so upset about. This, of course, is because again they want lacking Hispanic Americans to believe that there is an entire party seeking to disenfranchise them. It is a lie, is untrue. Maybe they make political, hey? Well, the sunshine because of everything is racism. You never have to make an affirmative case for your own actual political agenda or explain why it is that your agenda keeps failing blackened hispanic people, the country over myself, Nicole, ahead of you, and apparently has now received her tenure. I know where I was way with with bated breath as well- and I said for Long I become an acceleration is when it comes to universities and colleges. What when universities and colleges. I think that dumb bitch

Clearly the college's should embrace the most radical points of view should enshrine them, and then everybody who recruits for business I started nor in college degree we daily, where do not take college degrees into account when it comes hiring. I will well higher if you have qualifications of your work. Experience will hire you whether one's high school, where they went to college wheelchair. We would be because you do anything less. Smarter Germany boring never graduate from college. I was Harvard LAW school care occasional degrees are quite desperate? Our business partnership remains in the very silly notion that if you get a degree from the University of North Carolina disqualifies you to actually do anything in life if you are a liberal arts, major or some you study with Nicole Hannah Jones, is absurd on its face, nor by the way note Hang out to all major republican donors, the mercy of North Carolina issue where your money is going understand, the your money is now going your donations, I ain't you mail avatar heels, but your nation, is now going to pay

Nicole Hannah Jones salary should think about that before you signed the Czech think about what you We wish to subsidize with your dollars. NBC News reports in a nine for vote. The board of Trustees University of North Carolina Chapel Helen Wednesday approve tenure for Pulitzer Prize Winning, little is Nicole, headed Jones, ironical, then Jonesy Professional Wire and Prevaricator she's, no academic credentials that would qualify her for it your trap position and major university. She has I'm not qualified. Pretend acquisition and major university- and I actually have boarded reason she does in the vote ones after a closed session, comes after a controversy over why Hannah Jones was not for ten years in her appointment at the husband School of journalism. Any answers no one is offered tenure right off the bat typically warrants and your track, and then you earned tenure, but originally she was supposed to be given tenured straight If the bad at the husband School of journalism, which means you can't fire her ever had a joke said that Wednesdays outcome was about more than her. Of course. Of course, he's everything with Anna Joneses is about more than her

the fight is about ensuring the journalistic an economic freedom of black writers, researchers, teachers and students. She said we must ensure our work is protected and able to proceed free from the risk of repercussions, and we are not there yet really, it seems are there yet because your we unqualified you have ever been offered this position. You lied in the sixty nineteen project repeatedly, you treat people who disagree with academically garbage extraordinarily radical and yet how you have not only been celebrated by culture you ve been handed. Basically, the editorship of the New York Times now, as well as a ten. Your trap is nonsense. Iraqi tenured position at the university airlines, Zenza, girt systemic racism is working very poorly in the United States, I must say, is what truly terribly because it seems like the institutions of the United States that are most powerful are too busy honouring coherent, shows tat, simple questions like does. She know their health she's talking about by the way to call him again one of our great racial geniuses, so in an interview in which he explained that actually racial violence is good

Nobody should be surprised about the sheets. You celebrated racial violence last year in the middle of a pandemic when there, why it's happening in America's major cities. People tweeted out, but this will, where the sixteen nineteen rising should basically said, I hope so. The truth Nicole Hannah Jones, has been propagating lies in misinformation for years in the college Last year was suggesting that industry is a good thing. The civil rights movement leads to this massive civil rights legislation being passed. The sixty four civil rights ACT in the sixty five voting right back and, at the same time, urban ghettos all across the north are going up in flames. People are having uprisings in false we're so confused because, as is huge, and in a black rights happening, but they aren't doing anything about the living conditions of black people on the ground in northern cities and those people really that now violent protests with not going to resolve the issue that they were facing. A non violent protest is now actually resolve. Some rights movement was actually giant riots. Major american cities, which actually, as studies diamond

eight, according to David JOR, who basically had its career, ended by people like Nicole handed Jones. You decided he couldn't we mention this. He pointed out that riots actually cut against the interests of the people were riding it turns out. Most Americans are like riders, they're, not fans, and it turns out that watch riots in the different rights it actually not only inhibited Rachel. Progress in those cities, it actually emptied out large parts of those cities in the first, but here's Nicole had a job. I mean she celebrating violence, What are you doing on CBS News, and now we bought she's does that Reggie celebrating an and then then we might have made the case, although it's hard to make the case The racial violence into trade, in LOS Angeles, was useful. At least nineteen sixties, theirs much more solid basis for the notion that America had systemic racism problems. Considering that half the country literally enshrined racism in law, is this Nicole Hannah Jones. You said last year that destroying properties and actually violence. It is disturbing to see property

destroyed. It is disturbing to see people taking property from stores, but these are things and violence is when an agent the state Niels on a man's neck until all of the life is leads data, his body, destroying property which can be replaced, is not violence and a put those things to use the exact same language too. DR those two things, I think, really is not its not moral to do that, now give a lady tenure ballet users tenure one. Wisest voices raised in America, Nicole Hannah Johnson. Of course she also lies about policing generally register lying for years saying the police. while that a slave catching which, of course not true modern policing, particularly in the south and, as you said in certain parts of the northeast actually evolved out of the slave patrols, safer Charles, were put in place to deputize

Americans to police enslave communities to ensure that a slave people were only in the places they were allowed to put down slave insurrections, and these way for Charles had the right to stop in question any black person enslaved or free whom they deem to be so This is not, of course, not true, as Nan Maclaughlan rights at national review to be extended and police forces took over the job of enforcing races laws aspect Enforcing laws is what police you do. If you don't like the fact that our his laws than you really look at legislature, but to suggest that modern policing is an output of slave catching patrols by civilians is silly policing and Some form has existed for as long as there has been civilization, says Maclaughlan. It was typically led by a few government officers sheriff a magistrate constable. Perhaps a local feudal lords Remember that the sheriff of Nottingham is the bad guy in Robin Hood, but the old tradition, which came to the american colonies relied heavily on community volunteers according to because by Gary Potter, ok, the development policing and unite states closely followed the development of policing in England in the early com,

he's policing. Such reforms was both info and communal, which is referred to as the watch or private for profit policing, which is called the big stick. The watch system composed of community volunteers, whose primary duty was more than pending, danger, Boston, created night watching one thousand six hundred and thirty six New York and one thousand six hundred and fifty eight Philadelphia and one thousand seven hundred and I watch was not particularly effective because watch me off and slept or drink on duty eventually need the major cities created, professional police professional police, professional police forces getting their beginnings in France John's arms. As far as far back as seventeen hundred accretion of professional, uniform police departments can be traced, the british Home Secretary Robber appeal when produced them in London in eighteen. Twenty nine, in fact, Bobby's rich as they are known. Cops in Britain are called that today after robber appeal. all of this is the real route of american law enforcement. Is the notion that this is calamities and citizen winch mobs, ok that, but that is not where the police came from

I'll cynical, headed Joneses, believer that the police are the real problem for black Americans, which, of course they lie. The reality, of course, is that when it comes to policing in the United States, it was dearth of police, that led to a regionally disparate crime statistics between black and white Americans. His dream, lady of whilst Angeles Times, is written. The fact is, the way immunities basically said. The black communities, particularly in the south you're on your own of murder, happens you're communities. Where does nothing to police it and that led to these wildly desperate murder, statistics and white communities versus blackberries, but Again, a coherent Jones victim of the american system tenure professor over at University of North Carolina and celebrating much ballyhoo the editor in chief of the New York Times, and all this time, since the broader democratic narrative. Everything I dont like is racist. With that I do like is racially progressive, which lies you lorry Lightfoot, for example, explaining the ninety nine percent of the critical

against her is racist and sexist nope you're. Just a really crappy mayor. There have been questions raised about Europe your ten per month and your reaction to criticism Tribune editorial used the term irascible. How much of this you think might have to do with the fact that you're, a woman and protect specifically a black woman, about ninety mildly, women and people of color are always held the difference theater. I understand that I've known that my whole life, the Tribune or whoever can write what they want What I'm doing is fighting for the residents of the city. Ok, so again, generalised, democratic argument. These days seems to be that if you oppose anything Democrats, do it because of racial discrimination to obey her before the end of the democratic way. does the same thing about common, whereas the region Cobble Harrison's receiving criticism is because she's a black woman. Now it's because she's, a terrible, terrible politician. In fact the only reason that Joe Biden chosen

because she was a black woman. He himself said this here is joy by heart to pretend they commonly Harrison's victim of american racism. What's interesting, that, this will be used by the right wing to attack the Biden Administration and isn't it interesting that they go after a black woman. They don't go after a white guy. binding as much because Joe Biden looks like the base on the right, he looks like them, so that's why? For them till I get mad at him. Those, then they get mad at themselves. You say something like psychological going on there. Thank you. That's that's deep, deep, deep thought. There indeed thoughts there from earlier, there is one thing we know is that Republicans are never angry at white people, like you, know, Harry Reed or, for example, built. Or maybe like Hillary Clinton White Lady, it. Obviously they only get mad black people, obviously already coming up we're gonna get into the latest ungenerous six commission, which is the latest democratic ploy. In attempt to

drive the notion that Republicans are racist and all the rest will get to that. Just one second, first, let us talk about your office needs, as he spent a lot of your day in the office on a very uncomfortable chair and just as you should have a bed that makes sense for use, you can sleep properly, you need a chair and not only makes sense for you, but it's like sitting upon a cloud is like God made. This chair is unbelievable. The exchequer it has covered for your office. Chair needs. The extra can give you a massage, while you're Senor debts It can warm your back and cold morning can call you off on hot days in basically like sitting on a beach in Barbados, while you're working, this There is not only their patented dynamic variable, lumbar support which are unbelievable lumber support your lower back. They now have introduced elements featuring cooling heat end, massage therapy. Imagine regulating your body temperature and getting massage therapy, while sitting here dusk extra element, schooling delivers heat besides technology, Rutledge Europe or helping to increase blood flow muscle, recovery and energy operates and make working from home or the office. Joy

that's even offers for different massage modes and fast warming. He technology for therapy to your sore back extra prices are going up July. Twelve for the first time in two years, beat the price increase. Raina everybody in the office competes to sit on the show each and every day, while I'm working it's over the structure of their basically fistfight every morning as to who gets to sit on the extra go to the extra Shapiro dotcom right now, it's Exchequer Shapiro, dotcom right now. That's a letter ex chair, Shapiro, dot com or call one eight for four four exchequer to get a hundred bucks off your order. Extra has authority a guarantee of complete comfort in financial purchased for as little as thirty bucks a month go to Exchequer Shapiro. Dotcom right now use code ex wheels for free ex, we'll blade castors Exchequer Shapiro die Tom also is that glorious time we can. I give a shout out so daily. Remember today is Josie Bartelt on Instagram clearly understand that a single mom with a house full of boys in this picture, Sharon Tapia on Son, are supporting binoculars

protection and three examples of the world's most elite and well made chalice. The caption reads quote our boosting hydrated with grace to beverage vessels that plane behind them. We are listening to the sounds of freedom watching the blue angels hashtag leftist your summer excellent without much high octane freedom as tumblers must have been overflowing thanks for the pact, thanks for being a daily wire, Also this weekend, that's my pretty listen to the past is full of heroes. Many of their stories were made on song. That is why we started a new podcast called America's forgotten heroes. That brings like the legend that these brave men left behind and the second episode is available today. This episode focuses on the pioneer line flying and recipient of Medal of Honor Jimmy Doolittle with thundered into the Tokyo skies. We really are nowhere to leading airborne raid designed to avenge the attack on Pearl Harbor, saying only five puts it. Jimmy do little smart, encourage coward over most revolutionized piloting, as we once knew it is. They may be over or by the rate he led. But it's worth remembering it was just a pilot. Is a man who changed the world subscribe now to America's forgotten heroes, another podcast! It is now at the top five podcast right now, an apple

Spotify or anywhere else might listen, because the second episode is out today, Friday July. Second, one new action packed episode drops each day through the fourth of July. We can an internet sweet for a total of seven such as Germany has never receive the recognition they deserve, sharing their stories with you on this independence day holiday. Is our small tribute to their heroism? If you like what you here, we ve suffice our view that always helps with rankings helped share those incredible store Thanks for listening. Thank you to the heroes who made such an excellent podcast possible it listening largest fastest growing concern to progress. radio, show the nation as Martin broader racial pushed the Democratic Party is making, of course, they are now pushing their January Sixth commission. So the zip in Commission Nancy Policy announced yesterday. got loose change to sign up for the commission's that should have veneer of bi partisanship. Loose change of course, voted for impeachment of president Trump and has been a time. Critic of from the problem with the January six Commission, of course, is that a basic premises

January Sixth, commission, usually congressional commission, is about what Congress can do or not transposed the whole committee, and on random crap. I understand we you commissions and random crap now a guava steroids in baseball commission for no apparent reason, but Congress theoretically is supposed to hold com friends and investigations with regard to legislation or procedures they control, Instead it appears that what this commission, designed to do pretty, obviously, is to keep January sex the forefront in. those minds into winked at you, broader suppose it republican ideologies of bigotry has again if your entire political party is dependent on casting the opponents. as bigoted you're gonna use, whatever you can find. Nor did you that January. Sixth, I is what

suppose you wish is usually that absolutely clear. Yesterday, testimony from the Department of Homeland Security about concerns that are out there, all these institutions talking about well ahead, even go there, but it's what they had said in terms of white supremacy, Anti Semitism Islamophobia all these additives. that have provoked have well contributed to what happened on January. Six idea is launched by the way and has some assume is totally vines, longest members of her own party propagating it and that others that's totally go by the way according to Nancy Blowsy. So we should make that clear. but the general. This commission is pretty obviously designed to new again at a political manoeuvre. There is a reason why it is open ended. There is reason why it is supposed to know delve into the ideological causes of of January sex and try to winked at to broader Republican. Talking point this Cheney, if you provides cover for them,

Sort of report is doing a great disservice. Lose training is going in there, because what she wants to do is is used, the generous Ex commission to get to the bottom of false allegations about voter fraud and the impact that has again Did she providing cover to democratic mistake, release you can understand it, but it's report that comes out of the commission is. about how the Republican Party is rife with white supremacy, Anti Semitism in Islamophobia, and anyone who voted for Trump, obviously with those things, because then, from one undertake stupid things about them the boat in November and then a bunch. morons on drugs, decided to utilise those words and twist them in order to ensure the capital building That report ends up being in the Chinese just there to provide cover than she's done a great disservice. Tat Mccarthy seems to suit team seems to think this is exactly what's going on. Here is the House minority leader. We believe that the fact of infinite, changing, accepting Simonov generous ass. She left the republican common wish, did she would accept something from speaker. Policy

came to me is, and I didn't hear from her- maybe she's closer to her than eyes. I don't know Me I shall population are spoke to Mccarthy about it, which has again sort of a weird move on unless change, but im not sure exactly what her. What her play here is. Meanwhile, again, all of this is designed to detract from the fact that the White House, hasn't problems on account of what has had a mediocre job reports as a mediocre, because enlargement are good and some parts of it are not so but it certainly not like universally bad jobs report. According to these, as yet oppressed in encouraging. Of hiring America's employers added eight hundred fifty thousand jobs in June. Well, above the average of the previous three months the companies may be having an easier time finding of workers to fill open jobs, except for the fact that there are still there massive demand for jobs and people are filling them fast enough. I don't know kind of Poland. Economists, as you decide how many jobs they think we're gonna, be added or how they come to those numbers, but I ve been wrong pretty much every single month. For last several, so the fact

they underestimated here, where they have over us may of the past few months. But who cares? The real question is how faster we filling the jobs. The real question is: how fast is the economy recovering, and the real question is what the unemployment rate our people coming into the workforce. Wages rose pretty significantly, which again seems to demonstrate that inflation is taking hold not only that the unemployment rate. Apparently she rose a little bed meanings. Your people are actually still getting into the workforce, they're, not feeling the pinch nurses for them to actually go back and work anymore. Freitas report from Labour Department was the latest nine. According to the abbey at the reopening of the accounts, he's propelling a powerful rebound from the pandemic recession, restaurant traffic across the country is nearly back to prepare Emmett levels, people are shopping, travelling attending sports and entertainment events. The number of people flying each day has regained about eighty percent of its pre cover nineteen levels. Americans conference the economic outlook is nearly fully recovered and, of course, that is because the pandemic is effectively over right. If you're not you're on vaccinated, it's not over for you, but if your vaccinated, then it certainly over

or you and the rights of people getting and dying of covered in the United States are very. very low at this point, so that has nothing to do with Joe Biden, economic stimulus that has to do with the fact that people are now going back to work all the many businesses are desperate tire and posted a record high number of jobs, but the competition for workers intensifying especially France in tourism, entertainment venues, employers bring higher pay alone, would signing and retention bonuses and more flexible hours. The unemployment rate actually rose from five point. Eight percent in major five point: nine percent in June, despite the job markets, steady improvement plenty remains well above three point: five percent rate the prevail before the pandemic struck economy, rain six point: eight million jobs short of its pre pandemic levels, number of average has job openings reached. Nine point three million in April, so by the way the number of jobless exacting increased since so we still have a systemic problem at the summit they were paying people to stay home, and this is

to some pretty severe issues in regards to staff it. So it is a good thing that we have more people were getting. Jobs is a very bad. that the labour market is art. Officially, shortages are now being artificials create in the labour market, and inflation is sitting by the way the White House pushed back on the inflation talking point just sucks right now the White House put out a tweet yesterday, trying to demonstrate inflation is not a problem for families. You know the price of gas is up like forty percent. Over the last year, though, the White House put out a tweet saying planning a cook out this year catch up on the news I had upon. According to the farm euro, the cost of a fourth of July bar who is down from last year. Its effect, you must here, must heard hot dog the binding it up. Plan is working in that something we can all relish. I'm so How well is it working because today, fourth of July, cooking,

two thousand twenty one is down at sixteen sense. From last year you may remember: we had a meat shortage last year has been minimum pandemic. While I mean look at that huge, the cost of a fourth of July click out down sixteen sense, my goodness backing Joe Biden Static by two packs of camels and a stick of Wrigley chewing gum. Huge, I'm old enough to remember the way when they democratically a hundred dollars in your pocket, thanks to drum tax cuts, meant nothing to the average. In family now are telling us king sent decline in the price of basic foodstuffs for a fourth of July barbecue, even though pretty much the press on everything else has skyrocketed for basic necessities. Meanwhile, he budget deficit is projected three trillion dollars. According to the New York Times US economy is rebounding from pandemic downturn. Faster than expected is an. tractor. Again, all the jobs lost by the middle of next year, partly as a lot of enormous mounted federal spending? It will push the budget deficit of three trillion dollars than twenty twenty one fiscal you.

according to the sea, Bio New forecast that incorporate them point nine trillion, dollar stimulus package, prayers by signing the law if little credence to warnings by republican lawmakers in some economists and run away from all that spending could cripple the economy. Instead, the budget office predicted a recent spike in prices for cars airline tickets. Other products would be temporary begins proceed this year at most Mason officials downplay deficit projections. Instead, they focused on the predictions for economic growth, because GDP is, it can be gained by simply injecting government spending. the system, if the government spends a lot of money back goes into the GDP game. Those gdp stands by simply inflating the currency by providing easy credit by providing loose credit that all of that is a way to artificially boosting the economy and create what is in fact a fairly massive bubble, and this is, as I have been warning, one the day, problems you're a lot of people on the right are focused in on the inflation issue. Influx may turn into a systemic long term issue. It is just as possible maybe more possible that what we are in fact going to get

is a steady sort of stagflation or a steady. The deflation in which the government keep pumping money provide loans and people will want to take the loans because people just aren't buying climaxed out. This is what we are like. There's a bunch of flitting signs right now in the economy, according to the New York Times again same day, office vacancies nor, in New York a diary sign for the cities recovery. Nearly ninety percent of all off the spacing Manhattan, has no tenants the highest on record according to Matthew but even in New York City reopens and pursues a long road economic recovery. The pandemics, lasting legacy of changing workplace is emerging as a major obstacle to the revival of the vital commercial districts. It helped fuel the city's economy across Manhattan. Eighteen point: Seven per cent of all office space is available, for least a jump from more than fifteen percent at the end of twenty twenty and more than double the rate from before the pandemic, according to new mark a real estate services company. Meanwhile, we also know that the restaurant grey

Programme has put up by the federal government, turned into a kind of a boondoggle, a twenty eight, six billion dollar federal relief for restaurant. Another food business is closed on Wednesday. After running out of money. Having fulfilled fewer than a third of the grant requests it received, it turns out that even the attempt to fill in the gaps, critical, the pandemic or a failure as in his government that involve more than three hundred seventy thousand business always applied more than seventy five billion dollars in funding nearly three times. What the programme had available around five thousand businesses were approved for grants, which average just over two hundred and seventy two thousand dollars, which, of course I can support restaurant, with some workers like five minutes as yet again, all these stimulus was directed in the wrong direction of good news is that the United States is focus. Globally on making business less competitive. In order to shore up the fact that the United States creating new regulations and new taxes for business, as we are trying to cudgel

countries around the world into raising their own taxes. On corporations, which will result in price inflation, when you artificially boost the tax prices and corporations that they are going to pass, that down to consumers, so get ready to feel the crunch. It so mixed record coming from the by demonstrations on the economy at best at best they gotta cover. That was something because twenty twenty two looks around the corner We policies have not in fact economic recovery if suppressed economic recovery, if they, the weighted much better off, but they can't because it runs care, Joe Biden De L B, J type world be the agenda already wheel vehicles, today, with an additional hour of the bench appear, I shall first, you cannot forget to ensure we check out the end reclaiming showed Ruth shows every Friday he's got an exciting. Even plan for user had on over the Delaware to come at seven p M eastern six pm central tune in I mention here. This is the bench of erosion if you enjoyed this episode, don't forget to subscribe and if you wanna help spread. The word please give us a five

STAR Review and tell your friends to subscribe to were available on Apple podcast, Spotify and wherever you listen to podcast, also be sure to check out the other daily wire podcast, including the Andrew Craven, show that Michael Mole Show and them while shout thanks for listening, dementia, Piero Show is produced by Elliot Felt, executive producer, Jeremy boring our supervising producer is math is clever. your manager of a light ascii associate producer, Bradford Carrington host producer, just in barber but this is Andrew Clay than hosted the Andrew claimant show you know some people are depressed because the republic is collapsing. The end days is approaching and moons turned to blood, but on the Andrew claiming daily wire twenty twenty one everybody. This is Andrew, Clave and hosted the Andrew claiming show you know. Some people are depressed because the republic has collapsed Seeing the end of days is approaching and moons turned to blood

but on the Andrew Clavering Show that's where the fun just get started so come on over the Andrew Clavering Show and laugh your way through the fall of the republic. With me, Andrew Clayton,.