Khatami Brown, Jackson, say she's a neutral arbiter of the law, but also refuses to define the word woman and the media object senders, asking Jackson very, very, very basic questions, I'm Ben Shapiro- this is the bench no The Ben Shapiro Show is sponsored by Express VPN privacy is right, not a privilege, defend your rights at Express VPN, dot, com, Slash Ben. It's all the news in just one moment: first, inflation still out of control. I know that it's a lot of Catan G Brown Jackson talk right now, but your wallet is still screaming, and this is why you need to make sure you're not spending too much money. and dumb nonsense like, for example, that cell phone bill from Verizon a t and t and T mobile you are paying for their thousands of retail stores across the country, never go to stop paying for those added perks. You never use pure talk, won't charge you for any of that. Instead they give you killer. Five g coverage on the same five g network one of the big eyes for about half the cost, the average family is hidden over eight hundred dollars a year.

what exactly is your excuse? I made the switch. You can keep your number keep your phone or at huge discounts on the latest. Iphones and androids get unlimited talk, text, six gigs of data for just thirty bucks a month and hey. If you still want that unlimited data, you can get that and you will still save a fortune over the other guy's head on over to pure talk dot com shop for the plan. That's right for you! If a thirty day risk free guarantees, you'll literally, have nothing to lose or to pure talk. Dot com enter promo code, Shapiro you'll save fifty percents off your very first month of coverage that is pure talk at dot com promo code Shapiro pure Talk is simply smarter. Wireless get the same great coverage, but can be saving hundreds of dollars year. Pure talk, dot com, promo code Shapiro. Well, it seems that there are a lot of qualifications to be a Supreme Court nominee you have to have gone to, presumably, and I ve league school or something like an Ivy league school, probably have to bid on more of you, maybe clerk for a Supreme Court justice and also you're supposed to be able to define basic words and also no basic logic. So if somebody and set a hearing where to ask you what is two plus two

and you, the nominee, were to say I am no mathematician I'm. I can't answer that question I no mathematician This should be immediately disqualifying if somebody were to say to a Supreme Court nominee, the typical human being. How many fingers does the typical human being have having percent? I can answer that. I don't I am I'm not a doctor. I can't tell you how many fingers a typical human being has. This would be automatically disqualifying, because here should should be the rule if a two year old answer the question, and you cannot. This means that you are either an idiot or you're being deliberately idiotic in order to pander to the political flavor of the month, and this is what happened at the Supreme Court hearing for Katon G Brown Jackson, who is historic because she is the first black female nominee. We know that she's because she's a black person, we know that she's female, because it turns out. We may not know that she's a female, because she doesn't know that she's a female, because, of course, she's not a biologist. I bring this up because there is this widespread, that is gained purchase on the left, its

we're not many have to answer zero questions and in fact, the goal of a super we're nomination hearing. Is you never answer question now? This is true politically. It is true that when you ask a Supreme Court now me away and ever since the Robert Bork hearings, the idea is that every nominee is going to evade and not answer questions and simply say well. I can't I can't say anything about that, because that specific cases not come up before me and if they are asked about precedent, they're supposed to say well, you know that Presidents supposed just scribe things as they are not as how they would rule on them, and the reason for that is because they, I don't want anyone to recognize what it is they're going to do. So every nominee is a stealth nominee right and left. They are all stealth nominees unless you're, if you're on the left, here's the thing, if you're, unless you're, not that much a stealth nominee because of your on the left, the assumption the core assumption in our culture and in our jurisprudence, is that we will see We allow you to do whatever the hell you want, if you If person on the right and you're asked a simple question like do,

weed that ROE versus Wade is a bad piece of jurisprudence. You're never ever supposed to say. Yes, it's a bad piece of jurisprudence, even though everyone right left and centre agrees. If you've actually read the decision. Crap decision that has no basis in the constitution in the wall or in biology, but you're not supposed to say that, because that might give away your position and what you're going to do with ROE versus Wade. If you're on the left, however, you're supposed to say flat out rovers weight is not only a brilliant piece of jurisprudence. It is precedent. It is binding precedent never go away, and this is considered to rigour. While this thing about being unless your stealth candidate, when it comes to an inordinate number of things that the right is also stealthy on reforms, how you'd rule on administrative law when it comes to how you'd role on ten years ago. Gay marriage. However, when it comes to be crucial shoes of the day of your unless you can signal as much as you want, because the media will just cover, your ass and pretend you're not supposed to answer questions on things like what is a woman, hey, so it tells you Brown Jackson's hearing start off a couple of days ago and the start off with her ass, the stealth candidate, which start

in the same way, that every other nominee starts off by praising America and sounding frankly, just like Amy Coney Barrett, when she was given her nomination, so here is Khatami Brown Jackson talking about her. really and the nation in sounding frankly, indistinguishable from any conservative Republican on her family in the country where I was born here in Washington, my parents were public school teachers and to express both pride in their heritage and hope for the future. They gave me an african name it tangier Anita, which we're told means lovely one. My parents taught me that unlike the many barriers that they had had to face growing up, my path was clearer But if I worked hard and I I lived in myself in America. I could do anything or be anything I wanted to be like so many families,

this country. They worked long hours and sacrificed to provide their children s opportunity to reach their God given potential my pay in seven married for almost four Four years and they're here with me today, I cannot possibly thank them enough for everything they've done for me. I love you mom and dad. So again, every nominee get any. She sounds like a conservative republican in a country like this one that somebody who look like me, become the person on the highest court in the land with my life story end up at this kind of success which sends indistinguishable from Say, TIM, Scott or maybe twenty baron, or from else whose minority status in the United States, who has gained extraordinary access to power and then Jackson did what she supposed to do against all the stuff candidate kind of stuff or she is that she's going be a neutral arbiter? Now remember, every Democrat was evident it is from courts as there will be a neutral arbiter, and then there are reliable vote for left catch on Qatar Brown Jackson, whose backed by demand just

will be a reliable vote for the left? Everybody knows this, but she's not supposed to say it out loud, because we're supposed to pretend and our judiciary is filled with non politically motivated. People here is Khatami Jackson at the beginning of her hearing a couple days ago, decide cases from a neutral posture. I evaluate the facts and I enter and apply the law to the facts of the case before me, without fear or favour consistent with my judicial oath desert without fear or favour consistent work with her you shall not only that she's gonna stay in her way and she is not going to overrate she's not going to read her feelings about what the law should be and what the law is. She is going to be a reliable voice on behalf of the text of laws, get everybody in their original, sir, statements likes to sound like Samuel, Leto or Justice, Scalia or Clarence Thomas and then, as we will see for the left. None of that means anything I m pretty,

Killer Lee, mindful of of not speaking, two policy issues because I am so committed to stay in my lane of the system- because I I just not to speak to issues that are properly in the province of this body she's going to stay in her way and here's the thing you don't understand. I win We know she's not going to stay in her lane is because she is beholden to the far left. She is, in fact, a member of the far left, as is indicated by pretty much everything that she has ever done or said in terms of is where she could stray the far left thing in her social efforts should spread the far left. She has any issue where she could the left she has- and this became very clear yesterday in in this judicial here- when Centre Marshall Blackburn of Tennessee, she asked Jackson to define

one woman, in the reason she asked for this is because women is a category in law. Comes up. A lot comes up in civil rights ACT, for example in title VI of the Civil Rights ACT. It comes up with rights, domestic violence. It comes up all the time. What is a woman now this is an incredibly simple question is incredibly simple to answer this question on a biological level then produce eggs and men produce small sized gamete right. They produce sperm cells that is the difference in men and women biological level. In terms of chromosomal composition, men have x, Y women have x x. There are certain to kill you he's in which, for example, the US our why gene which expresses gender is somehow attached to an ex jean, sometimes during transmission that can end up with a an intersection. Is where he can have in X Y man, where the US, our why gene is not expressed, which you have a person's valves, in very female sexual characteristics, but they are genetically chromosomal mail. That is interesting

people. That is not the same thing that is claimed by the left. The left claims that a man was X Y and whose s our widening has completely expressed is still possibly a woman. They complain the male and female anatomy, have nothing to do with male and female anything that gender is completely disconnected from sacks now. When it comes to the law, there is no, Ah in U S history and has been written as a man, why identifies as a woman is a woman it's an absurdity on its face. It makes no sense nobody in writing. The civil Rights ACT of nineteen sixty five was thinking at a male who says he is a woman? Is in fact a female or woman, who say she's a man is, in fact a man. This is new fangled garbage that has come up in the last two years in widespread fashion and left. it's gender theory. Going back to the nineteen sixties promulgated by a perverse piece of human jacket named John Money, whose gender theories ended, but this

psychology of of actual children under his care, and now it has been by wholesale by all of your cultural butters. Any leads if you say on Twitter, that a and is a man and a woman. Is a woman. You may be The Babylon Bee was banned from twitter for the great crime, stating that Rachel Levine was the deputy. Your Secretary of Health in human services and who is a biological man, is a man if you say that twitter, they will ban you if you said Leah, Thomas so has twig and berries is man, for there will be new, so over cultural elites have raised. This innovative notion that it is impossible literally impossible to find woman. You cannot do it. You cannot find women or men, but you can say: the Ketanji Brown Jackson is incredibly historic because she is a woman, Conall Harris is incredibly historic because she's woman, but if you ask either of these people to find the word woman, it will not do it. Why? Because their behold into the far left and they understand that if they were to say a woman is biologically as I have described, then they would immediately be cast out as lepers by their own colony,

their own group. He people who love the most would immediately suggest. bigots in some way their transphobia, because you have to understand that for the left, a final destruction of the gender binary, the final destruction stinks that are perfectly natural and embedded in by Would you between men and women, if you can destroy that, you can strike the entire fundamental base of natural law which goods all of natural rights and underlines all of the systemic building of civilization over the course of millennia? Everything just becomes arbitrary in all terms, just become arbitrary and everything is power which is Secondly, what the left once every Natural obstacle to Utopia for left must be wiped away, and this includes natural, normal and factual. The swing distinctions between male and female is a question that goes very deep. Because you have to wonder what a highly intelligent person like its haunt you, Brown Jackson is asked. What is a woman- and you can't answer you have to Know- she's lying again, I having an eight year old viral

the two year old. All of them know the difference in a boy and a girl that kid from kindergarten cop basically gets it right. Boys have a penis and girls have a vagina. This is really really not all that What I understand for the left, it seems to be difficult, but it's not, The difficult for them either one four percent of Americans, including Trans people, understand by law, we'll males are males. Biological females are females. They may not like that. Emma that they may not want to believe that. But that happens. be the reality and yet more than the population at this point at least half the population, is willing to go along to get along. Why? Because of the sort of niceness of it, we never want to say to somebody who believes that they are a member of the opposite sex that they are just wrong. That's not true! You don't want to do that might make them Well, bad, and so an enormous number of people in the middle of this country have been cajoled by the cultural elites. Into embracing lie that men can women and women- can be men, originally out of nice and then out of a feeling of virtues

knowing I'm so nice, I'm willing to say it. Why aren't you nice to here's a flag trans flag in my profile? In fact, I will even buy into the idea that sex is completely malleable by adding pronouns. To my twitter bio mean. You know that I'm a man- and I know that I'm a man, but if I Had he him too much whereby, where there is no confusion, RAM really saying is. If I wanted to be she her, I could be. I mean these are very, very difficult. Questions like what is a woman really really difficult question other difficult questions. Should you revive your mortgage? The answer is like yes right now, because we know that the Federal Reserve is gonna, be raising interest rates a bunch of times over the course of next year to year.

and this means interest rate on mortgages are likely to go out. In fact, they already are so if you've been holding up in the hopes that they are going to go down again, no, you need to get into the market right now. The latest forecast again projected few interest rate hike this year alone. I'll make that a lot more expensive. Don't let that happen to you pick up the phone right now call american financing free, no obligation mortgage review, or you will learn about custom own options. I can save you up to a thousand bucks a month that is right every month or more weight seashore. They can do it all and they never charged up front or surprise you with hidden fees. So why not see what they can do for you? If you like what you hear, you can bring qualify for free, possibly skip a couple of payments, and you might close in this past is ten days just call eight hundred and sixty six seven hundred and twenty one, three thousand three hundred and its eight hundred and sixty six seven hundred and twenty one, three thousand three hundred or visit americanfinancing dot net mls. Eighteen thousand, two hundred and thirty three,

as consumer access dot org go check them out right now to american financing dot net once more, eight six, six, seventy one, thirty three hundred that is eight six six. Seventy one thirty three hundred to all of this is nonsense that is directed at tearing down fundamental institutions. There's a lot packed into this. I from the Center Blackburn, so Ketanji Brown Jackson's answer to again in a question. So Simple a year old would know the answer. Can you provide The definition for the word woman can I provide a definition. Well yeah. I can't you can't. Not a case. Contacts, though not in biology, we have the word woman is so unclear and controversial that you can't give me a definition. No, I can't know I can't you says why can't you

why not? Why doesn't she ask ok in the context of what statute, because using in what's it, what fear radically? She could say, are we talking about when girl turns into a woman for purposes of, say, statutory rape and that's the between minors and majors. If talking about, can I I'm woman different seen child an adult or woman in terms of Sexual harassment and insert of gender perceptions price. She could ask for clarification. She doesn't just doesn't want answer the question, because the answer is to damned symbol, and then it gives you more symbol to I pronounced or a very simple question: do you acknowledge that there are physical differences between men and women? Again, any small child can tell you the answer to this, because small children are apparently was Veronica and people who have been Harvard logically it here is is the Brown Jackson's answer? Do you agree with Justice Ginsburg this? They are physical,

princes between men and women that are enduring and senator respectfully, I am not familiar with that particular quote or case. So it's hard for me to to whether rang it. Why exactly would be hard to comment? Why seriously? That's a quote: the their fiscal differences, men, women, while now she's just for lying on this idea, those guitar, Brown Jackson that you can't comment on this stuff, because it's ok Neither I don't know about right. You know his judicial nominees, because they're all playing stealth, nominee, game. Here's what they do. If a case has been decided, they will say that it is President this has not been decided. They will say that they cannot comment on it because it is been decided yet Sagan. Information from them, but that wasn't the question. The question is: what is woman she's got no answer and she wants to sit on the nations highest court, apparently, by the way she says, she's, no biologists. She said she can tell you that efforts between men and women, I'm not nor

followed just back and say what a bird is, an obvious Hooper Zoo, keep But I can tell you what a tiger is. this is the most stupid thing, it is ridiculous. Now, These are ridiculous by the way it gives wedlock, because, according to what you have to be a biologist to say what a woman is, in fact exactly the opposite, if you're bi, just you cannot say what a woman is because maybe entirely biological email and still be a woman. No biologist can tell you what a woman is so Khatami, Brown Jackson gives away the game there. But of course really just evading the question and here's the thing the entire left evades this question. We actually said our very own Matt Walsh. Let us be clear about this. The what is woman question did not come originally from Marshall Blackburn. It is now obvious deal it's always been at Auschwitz deal For several years now, she's just been asked me very simple question to everybody on the left, who tries to claim that they are both pro feminist and also pro trans

and he says what is a woman and none of them have an answer. None of them, so Matt went on a journey, a magical top secret journey all around the United States and abroad, to determine If anyone unless could identify what a woman is his documentaries called, what is a woman is the most important question and film of twenty twenty two there is a look at the incredible sneak. Bigots can be available only a daily wire all over the world for the past year, asking one cent. What what is a woman, the? What is a? What? What is it? What is it I dunno people are laughing at that. A dumb question I've been asking everybody this and almost nobody can answer it. What is a woman? What is a woman?

one person could tell me what a woman thank you for I think this interview is over traffic cameras. I to know what is a woman, It's not a complicated question so we'll be releasing that here at daily, where you need to become a subscriber today, so that you can see what is woman that is coming out in May it's fantastic, it's fantastic and reason is fantastic. It is because when people refuse to answer extraordinarily questions like this means they are lying to you, everyone. American knows that this is improved new clothes, bull, Everyone knows this. Every single human knows this, and yet we are all supposed to pretend that the emperor is not naked and that you're a bad person if you say that the is naked. In fact, will ban you from social media? We won't you. the Supreme Court, if you say that the emperor is naked, in fact. Even if you say that the emperor's naked and showing and that he's a man because he's

emperor, not the empress, and you know because his balls were hanging out. This would make you a big it That is where we are in american society, so mats documentary. What is a woman is definitely worth watching over to daily wire dot com right now and subscribed in preparation, as can be the biggest documentary of the year, and it requires explication. But again this goes back to that wisest among us are the people who are least likely to tell you what a woman is. These are not questions. This is a very, very easy question. I answered it on a biological level because that we can we can uncover bodies from I wonder, of yours go and we can look at bone structure and we can determine from that. If your woman or a male, all of the people who claim there, where's, the opposite gender when they are buried a thousand years from now, they're dug up biologist, as Khatami Brown, Jackson's has will be able to tell whether they re male or female, and it did not matter what I thought they were in their heads because that's stupid, it has nothing and with reality, but that is part of a broader leftwing agenda.

rewrite realities. They can do whatever the hell they once there are no restrictions on what they do. More on this in just one second first have ever to send your uncle a birthday greeting from one of his favorite conservative celebs, or have your favorite freedom, loving comedian, roast one liberal cousin, nobody in the family really likes. There's only one place to make that reality, its a new app is called shout out. The most the personalities on the right are make somebody's day with a personalized video just for you download shadow on the app store and Google playing at twenty percent off your first customized shut out video from the Lakes and Steven Crowder Hodge twins at Jps years, at Jason, Whitlock and many more of your favorite conservatives, go check them out right now. Download shout out today at the app store or Google play download that shout out app. I promise can make somebody in your family super happy and will definitely make them. Lots have been waiting to get one of those personalized videos from a favorite like Crowder or Jp Sears, or with lager the Hodgkin's or any of these

concerns. Let's go check them out right now. Get that shout out abbot today to understand how civilization worshiped understand its application is built on three basic foundations One is the foundation of biology. Biology. Just is what it is. It is changing it is mutable. It does not magically change the fact of evolutionary biology. I I it's so funny. The people who say they're, they're, big fans of science refused college. The basic evolutionary biology here, which is all projection of the human species and all mammalian species, are dependent on sexual dichotomy. There is no controversy about this at any level. in the scientific community there, just people who live that there's controversy about it and they do so. By fudging the lines we'll talk about our that you know there are intersects their blow fish. Are you a blow? Fish? Are humans blow fish? Can you actually change from one to the other our producing babies of your man today. Of course you cannot. The whole thing is is ridiculous

well that is one source. The other source is accepted. Wisdom of the past, which has been tried and found true over the course of millennia, and should not discard that for no apparent reason just because you have decided, you don't like it anymore. It makes you a bad person to decide. It really does make your a. and to decide that the accepted wisdom of the past is no would any longer, because you have decided on the basis of no evidence whatsoever that accepted wisdom is bad. You can't points to another culture where this has been successful. Can point to another place on earth where people do not knowledge of these and, frankly, of male female duality. It does not exist all the attempts to suggest that there are people we don't fit into the boxes and therefore everyone could theoretically be either male or female. That does not exist anywhere on earth and you'll see in maths documentary. He talks to some people in different places on earth. Is so. Wisdom is the second source and finally, there is reason and rest again is connected to the other. Two sources of pollution are biology, inaction, wisdom! If you come,

With a rationale out of your head, that men can be women or women can be men. This is illogical at a fundamental level. These are categories that exist or they do not exist left- wants them to both exist. So they can claim sexism. If you ask Tom Brown Jackson, the question and not to exist or Khatami Brown Jackson can't actual answer the question and don't ask the question she's a woman stop being sexist. On the other hand, she can't answer what a woman is, because that would make her a sexist the feeling this all power game and all on the shelf. Co postmaster, His power games is exactly what it is again is not a surprise because for potential brown tracks in the matter, how stealth the left wants to be, they can be fully self in their viewpoints because they don't feel like they have to be fully self in their view, it's so, for example, the algebra and Jackson was asked about abortion. She was asked about Rover's weight. Now, sir, is what any honest nominee would say, Where you stand ROE vs, a bad piece of jurisprudence is a bad case. Everyone on the left.

in legal circles acknowledges rovers weight is based on absolutely nothing. They can agree the outcome and still understand that was a completely made up, specious bit of nonsense, but instead we find out from Cassandra Brown Jackson. It is settled law, settled law because the way that it works by the way, according the left. Everything I like a subtle law. Everything I dont like is bad precedent. That's the way the present game according to the left so Lawrence for Texas, The powers Hardwicke was not president anymore. It was bad law of ours. Hardwicke said that states, doubtless Army for Texas. I know people have a right to sodomy in that it became bad law when the innocent are lots of cases in american history, where president was bad, Plessy, VS, Ferguson, converse board of Education, for example, so this notion that you're just adhering to precedent. You're going to explain why you're adhering to a particular precedent, if you want me to believe that you believe in the didn't itself as opposed to use believe what it saying

anyway. Here's because Tangy Brown Jackson paying homage to ROE vs Wade, the full litmus test for the left. I do agree with both just. This cabinet and justice bear it on this issue row and Kc are the settled law of the Supreme Court concerning the right to terminate a woman's pregnancy, etc, luggage. Okay. So when Jackson was asked another simple and she says she's a religious person, okay and apparent. I know she's, not a biologist, so she doesn't know what a woman is. She apparently also doesn't know what a human life is, so she was asked when does life begin now? This is a rather crucial question. It's rather crucial question, because if life begins at conception and theoretically fourteenth amendment protections, equal protection should apply to the unborn has been the case been made by the pro life community for years and years and years and years again. A simple answer as to what does a human life constitute is again biologically. Incredibly simple. In innovation,

member of the species homo sapiens, human life with potential as Robert George puts it over a Princeton, it begins at conception as its own independent, it will develop into a full grown human open to a full grown baby development from embryo into fetus. A human life begins at conception. photography. Brown Jackson doesn't even want to offer any sort of answer because it offers an answer she may be held to the answer. So instead Roe vs Wade is good and settled law based on bad science. That no longer applies according to pretty much everybody, because this trimester distinction that has no real basis with regard to fuel development, but that's good law meal Potential Brown Jackson cannot answer either what a woman is or what human life, as it seems to me, like these preconditions to sitting on the nation's highest court. Can you answer what a woman is or what human life is? If not, I don't see you should get to rule on major issues concerning both women and human life. Your brand Jackson. Do you? Do you have a personal belief, though, about when life begins, have a religious view,

It is possible that I set aside when I am ruling on cases. Ok, What? When Windows wonders equal protection of the MOSS attach too to a human being? Well senator. I believe that a spring court Actually, I actually don't know the answer to that question. I'm sorry know the answer. Just no see here's the thing I think she does now, but I think she doesn't want to say again it's stealth when it's convenient to be stealth and it's open when it's convenient to be open, now. What exactly do we know about Hungary? Brown Jackson motion that she does sit on the board of a school at is very, if our left an orientation according to five news. I come Jackson's COS. An air for the Senate Judiciary Committee says: she's been a board of trustees member at Georgetown Day School since two thousand nineteen and a member of the Georgetown Day School, unity for nearly a decade. Jackson said quote since becoming part of the ds community, seven years ago, Patrick Eyes, her husband have witnessed

format of power of a rigorous progressive education that is dedicated to fostering critical thinking, independence and social justice now, but should be clear about that If you sit on the board of a school, this means you have input into the curriculum of the school. My wife sits on the board of a school, and that means that she has input into the curriculum of the board the school and if ever, the curriculum began to cut direct the against the values in which we believe will drop from the war the school every move, our kids, because that is what parents so she sitting on board of a school where she is progressing. She she's praising rigorous, progressive education. You have to assume that she's Greenland at least the generalized orientation of the school? Shandy schools website, indicates the board of trustees involved. The executing in tat racism, an action plan which includes review and revising current language. community expectations and reviewing anti work to inform racist, governance changes. The websites, as we at Georgetown Day School, have been engaging across the community to further define and deepen our commitments to being an anti racist institution and if founding mission, we identified a path for the institution we wanted transparent,

sure how we have performed in meetings and meeting our commitments for the twenty twenty twenty twenty one school year and beyond Some anti racist resources recommended by the school include Richard Delgado's, race theory, a video by Kimberly Crenshaw settled the urgency of intersection, Anti and Peggy Macintoshes. Why privilege unpacking at the invisible knapsack? also unless it backs Kenny's. Garbage vote cannot be an anti racist s up. Yes, this is relevant She also has multiple times championed seniority thinkers, as reported by the daily wire She moderated a Harvard Alumni Association webinar in October, two thousand and twenty one webinar disgusted in the equity, inclusion and belonging in which Jackson asked how the university recruits and retains talented faculty of color, she spoke at a an awards dinner for the black LAW students Association at University of Chicago in February, twenty twenty one, where she lectured about how the

how micro aggressions are real. She gave a January twenty twenty in which she said. inspiration from Derek Bell. Who is one of the godfathers of critical race theory? Is she was asked about this now, as see the media very angry. The truth ass. Any of these questions, Marcia Black renounced are you interested in injecting critical race theory into your jurisprudence? Now it's funny because the left again likes to have it both ways. The way that this works is that they will say if you say critical race theory has been, well down and weaponized in schools for small children, which is true, they'll, say no. No, no! It's illegal for guys. It's a legal theory that the began began at law, schools to legal theory. And then, if March, of blackbirds Ass, are you going to apply this legal fury in any of your thinking? That is also considered inappropriate to once again it's all about power, you can't this question, and you also can't ask the converse question here: is Marsha Blackburn asking about critical race theory and scottish jurisprudence you have praise. Sixteen nineteen project, which argues the US

is a fundamentally racist country, and you have made clear that you believe judges, must consider critical race theory when deciding how to send its criminal defend it? Is it your personal hidden agenda to incorporate critical race theory into our legal system. These are answers that the american people need to know well yes, but I end, and ten crews also asked his hungry round Jackson about critical race. And her previous comments on Harry. Was you described the job you do as a judge said: sentencing is just plain interesting because it mouths together Marriott types of law, criminal law and, of course, constitutional law, critical race theory, so you described in a speech to a law school. What you were doing is critical race theory, and so I guess I would ask what what did you mean by that when you gave this speech, for what I meant was that they are

are a number of that. That slide does not show the entire laundry list of different academic discipline. That I said late to sentencing policy? Oh just all it relates to something. But why does it really sensing policy why she doesn't under it? So yes, if the idea is these are factors that relate to sensing policy, wise, that a factor you should take into consideration. He then he was mocked was in her crews for bringing up the fact that Abram X, Kennedy's book is a sign in the library over at the school, where this particular judicial nominees on the board and anti racist baby, which has ever MAX candies indoctrination into critical, raised their efforts, more children, can you won the rake refers ends? I am one of the least brilliant public figures of our time. Is it book for small chilling fantasy. My critique of that book. By the way, I believe I did one on Youtube, maybe a year ago here is a Christian.

the crews asking her about it and people on the left mock this. How did why isn't he hears the rule for the left? If you ask them a question about the dump wrap they're doing you are the one who has marked if they do dumb crap thats just do regard if you asked them about this means your back Philip bump. By the way, did the same thing at the Washington posted a Marsh Blackburn ask Khatami Brown Jackson. What is a woman? She refuses to answer and Philip Santer. Is that a really bad question do something here? So she has at the school on what she has a board member. A boy teaching small children that they are inherently racist and TED Cruz asked her about it?

means that he's asking a ban question, because how dare he? They include a book called antiracist baby by Abraham Candy and their portions of this book that that that I find really quite remarkable. One portion of the book says: babies are taught to be racist or antiracist. There is no neutrality on other portion of the book. They recommend babies confess one being racist. Now this is a book that is taught a Georgetown day school to students and pre K through second

wait. So, four, through seven years old and diet, do you agree with this book that is being taught with kids that the babies are racist senator? I do not believe that any child should be made to feel as though they are racist or though they are not valued or though they are less than that their victims

that they are oppressors. I don't believe in any of that, but what I will say is that when you asked me whether or not this was taught in schools critical race theory, my understanding is that critical race theory, as an academic theory, is taught in law schools and, to the extent that you were asking the question, I understood you to be addressing public schools. Georgetown a school just like the religious school that justice spare, it was on the board of is a private school. Okay, so, apparently, is fine, teaches private school students according to bring to this justice by when that that distinction makes no difference whatsoever between public and private. When the question is, should this be taught to kids and for all the like, why should being asked all these questions? You remember that Amy there was asked months with questions being the board of a private christian school that held traditional values with regard to sexual activity. So all of this

was very bad in in international world. There is no way this person would be on the Supreme Court. She has plenty, academic qualifications, that's fine! She has zero. qualifications to be on the Supreme Court. So long as you don't know what a woman is believed that small children should be assigned things like anti racist baby and you inject critical race theory and into education and also believe by the way, you can't find human life. These seem like pretty disqualifying characteristics. I understand: that's not how we do this game anymore, where we do democratic point, radical Democrats and Republicans appoint people who they think it can get through that pretty much all that happens, the Supreme Court level in a second we'll get to what has become the most controversial portion of the quest. Tangy Brown Jackson believe it or not, not even her. Failure to when a woman is, despite being a historic woman, we'll get to the accusations that she has been easy on sex offenders in her in her decisions for sons and then just a moment so folks, if you haven't heard of my book club now, is your chance to sign up. Last week I took members through my analysis, of a tale of two cities by Charles

if he can watch that right now, a daily wire dot com. Slash watch, remember my third Thursday book Club. It's a live experience. You get to engage with me in real time. You can ask me questions. You can comment on the book. It is a blast we're going to be reading the best literature together Talking about everything, from russian literature to English literature, to american literature, when you sign up Get my note, the important issues, themes and lessons. of books I'll, be sending my note out today for this month's book. One of my very favorite t h, White's the once and future king. It's considered for the granddaddy of all fantasy novels, the once and future king by T H, white, it's about Lancelot one of year and Arthur it's just. A fabulous fabulous book has a lot of really interesting lessons to sign up at third Thursday book club dot com get yourself a copy of the once and future king by T, H, white and then sign up at third Thursday book clubs, We join us and get my notes on the book. It wasn't largest fastest growing conservative Pakistan radio show in the nation. So

and while the other major issue that has arisen during Conti Khatami Round Jackson Hearings is the issue of her record on child pornography and the sentences for child pornographers. So Josh Halley put out a bunch of statements in a case called: U S, verses Parkins, where she sentenced to sex offender in possession over six hundred images of child pornography. Do just that months in prison, sentencing guidelines, apparently he just about ten years, she said I wouldn't willing to do that some extent, because I do think that the guideline factors are in many ways outdated and no longer adequately in which more serious child pornography offenders from less serious child pornography offenders that, although the guidelines at charge would have a more than six hundred images, the court notes the collection at the time that your cot was not actually as large, as that seems because it consisted of sixteen it Google images and seventy

in digital movie files were no big deal. I mean, if you just have seventeen digital movies of people having sex with children, then obviously are not that bad of a child pornographer. That's not that's not that big. A deal judge Jackson said quote in your case. In particular, I don't feel it is Britain, essentially to increase the penalty on the basis of your use of a computer or then of images or pre predestined victims, as the guidelines require, because these circumstance exist in many cases, if not most and dont signal, and especially heinous or agreed just child pornography events? Ok, self anaemic coffee has apiece over a national view breaking this stuff down. What he says is that this child pornography angle is act, sleep less of an angle than the generalized angle, which is the Katana G Brown jacket, is super soft on crime generally and here's. What Andrew Mccarthy says to give it? The sort of full fairness he's here is as I was a federal prosecutor for nearly twenty years and ran a. I? U S attorney's office for the last four of those in the southern district in New York, child pornography, increasingly become a priority for us, the, and why, in the nineties, with the ascendancy of the internet,

social media and central markets, which not only for magically increase the volume of images but made interstate facilities or which the feds have jurisdiction. The down it means of commerce in ports The end of soliciting minors for sexual purposes, there is wide variety of federal offenses gathered under the label sex offences? his critique of Jackson. Last week, Josh Halley tweeted, he had noticed alarming pattern when it comes to judge Jackson's treatment of sex offenders, especially those preying on children? Zim, we broadly sex event, who prance shouldering include deviants rape, children and those who forced them into sexual act for purposes that include prostitution and the production of progressing at the other end of the speech, Sex offenders include people who have never put a hand on a child for sexual purposes, but are consumers of pornographic images which they possess, transmit or trade, sometimes for money, often not to be sure well adjusted people if they had a view. These images as investigators, who would be second still when we took while consumers, we are not talking about people engaged in the atrocious contact the produce. The images is rational, too

penalize consumption offenses because they contribute indirectly to the atrocious production conduct. If there are no market for the images, many fewer of them will be produced at the criminal law makes these kinds of distinctions all time the offender who commits a gruesome murder is orders of magnitude more culpable than the associate who helps him get rid of the murder weapon. So the the basic idea that that Mccarthy is saying is that there's been a lot of talk about sentencing guidelines with regard to child pornography, entreating somebody who sexually played the child same way as somebody who has child porn on their computer, according Mccarthy, as a pretty open debate within sort of legal circles. As judges views on this matter judge actions the honest men are not only mainstream their correct. In my view, undoubtedly, Jackson is more sympathetic goals than I am? If I were to judge I'm sure I'd impose at least marginally more severe sentences than she has contrary. We suggest- and she appears to follow the guidelines at the lower end of the sentencing range, but other than the fact that Congress,

why does it look as though his being tough on porn there's no good reason for the mandatory minimum in question and it's unjust in many cases? Okay, so in any case, the the basic idea here from the car thieves that there's some sort of compile partisan need to rewrite these these particular statute. Now I disagree with all that and I think that basis If you want to penalize people for having images of small children and sexual positions on their computer, you go for it and you lock them up for life. I don't care, I really really don't if you have You are involved in any way in the production or consumption of child pornography. You should not be in public, you just should not, but the Apparently, that is a more open debate, but the point Mccarthy makes is that Judge Jackson her general take on criminal law is very, very loose. He says that she has gone out of her way in order to loosen criminal statutes or in order to push loosening of criminal statutes. In any case,

How we really push this a lot in the hearings Answer- and here is what he said he said is hard to argue. The tens and guidelines for child sex senses are too harsh. Now it's true that there has been by by bipartisan approval in terms of the child sex, sensitive The sentencing guidelines from Republicans and Democrats to change the standards there, but how we, I think, correctly, as I'm not sure why that's bipartisan or why anybody should be in favor of it. In the first place, here's the New York Times report from two thousand and nineteen I'm quoting now. Last year, tech companies reported over forty five million online photos and videos of children being sexually abused, more than double what they found the previous year. The report goes on to say this twenty years ago he's on line. Images were problem ten years ago they were an epidemic. Now the crisis is at a breaking point. I think it's difficult against this backdrop to argue that this sends it guidelines or to harsher, outmoded or that we should be somehow treating child porn offenders more leniently.

Then the guidelines recommend, ok and then he started. There are some pretty specific questions about her behaviour with regard to sentencing in certain cases. So, for example, there is one case where she apologized for giving a particular sentenced to air to peddle file to a child or not if he consumer, you said to him. This is a truly difficult situation. I presume did your families in the audience I feel so sorry for them and for you and for the anguish this is caused. All of you. I feel terrible about the collateral consequences of this conviction, and then you going to say, sex offenders are truly shunned in our society it's to figure judge? Is he the victim here or the victims, the victim?

okay, so Jackson answered this by talking about the sentencing guidelines and the sentencing guidelines overall are too harsh. He asked, as she was talking to Lindsey, Graham at the time on the internet, with one click you can receive, you can distribute tens of thousands. You can be doing this for fifteen minutes and all of a sudden you are looking at thirty forty, Fifty years in prison, good cut good. I understand I hope to do that. Allow her to finish. Please help you go to jail for fifty years, if you're on The internet trolling for images of children in sexual exploitation say so you don't think that's bad thing. I think that's would well. I mean he happens to be correct about all of that. Kevin Jackson was talking another case in which a person not a lower sense for possessing imagery of child pornography errors runs from that

He presented all of his diplomas and certificates and the things that he had done and argued systems with what I was seeing in the record that this particular defendant had gotten. into this. In a way that was, I thought, inconsistent with some of the other cases that I had seen. Ok, so this is part of a broader issue. With Cassandra Brown Jackson not specific to child sex offenders, it is It is just her general softness on crime is appointed SEN Tom cotton from Arkansas made in his questioning of Cassandra Brown Jackson, two thousand and twenty anarchists rioters and left wing street militias raged across the country and murders increased at the fastest rate,

in history and in the first year of the Bite administration, violent crime got even worse. It's no coincidence that this violence, violence came as localities and states pushed a defined the police and reduced the punishment for criminals. Career criminals are committing violent crimes and going free under the guise of a supposedly more equitable justice system. Okay, now the tangy Brown Jackson again her history when it comes to criminal offenders, is very, very weak. So, for example, in one particular case, she sentenced some black hebrew Israelites by essentially calling them part of a vegan community there's some sort of decision which you call them part of a vegan community. Now I can safely say that the black Hebrew Israelites are a wildly anti semitic group that have targeted Jews for death can happen in New Jersey. apparently they're mostly just a vegan community. According to Ketanji Brown Jackson,

or at least that seemed to be the implication of what you were saying. They call themselves the african hebrew Israelites, but it's not a religious community. It's a cultural community around and a healthy living, and they we have created a restaurant and series of restaurants here in the Washington DC area. Menus, involving really I'm told terrific, a vegan foods weird take on the black hebrew Israelites that are vegan community I'll get one anyway. The media have determined that all of these questions from her from her sentencing guideline questions to critical race theory to what is a woman to when does human life begin basic basic questions? All this should have been off. Limits which of course was the goal. Joe Biden declared that he was going to put a black woman on the Supreme Court, and then he selected a black woman, and that if you asked a black woman in the

questions because your raised since access, we can all spot the game here. The aim here is pretty obvious. The aim is that I will put up somebody. Was they particularly vulnerable minority? If you then ascii normal questions that person it is because you are a racist and a sexist, even if that person cannot explain why you would be so just since women have no definition, so Jeffrey Toobin, who should never ever be called upon to to talk about sexism in anyway, considering that he knocked up a colleagues daughter attempted to pay her to have an abortion and then was caught in he zoom called off this in seems like the least likely person to talk about intimidation of women, Jeffrey Toobin, unless there is back on CNN spreading his heart. illegal journalism everywhere, and talking about how questions being asked Josh Halley. This actually connected secure, known people, transit apparently get Khatami Brown Jackson killed. This is the

going concern among members of media. If you ask tough questions democratic, you want them assassinated. If, however, you accuse justice, no evidence whatsoever of being a gang rapist. Then that is because you're doing your job, as somebody trying to vote for the Supreme Court here is Jeffrey Tibet, who has put it away, at least for the scrap. This is bout appealing to the Cuban on audience. This called that is a big president's in republican party politics. Now that is, is where, where Senator Holly is trying to ingratiated himself with with that group the run for president with their support. Oh that, that's what it is. Meanwhile, an MSNBC guest it the same. It's a dog whistle, it's all dog, whistling dog whistles whistles of the dog dog, whistling whistle, face a tiresome. The entire media just sweeping into defence rectangular Brown Jackson, who again is not performing especially poorly for it

credit nominee and also is not performing politically well. She performing exactly as you would expect a woke Democrats who perform well, ass, to pretend to be a judge in front of a committee of people? That's that's that is or asked too pretend to be a judicial nominee for the Supreme Court. A neutral arbiter in front of it in front of other Senate here is an MSNBC gas. Is a dog whistle to hold up book that he claimed are part of the curriculum. At Georgetown day. I found to be a really deeply offensive line of questioning and clearly a dog whistle in terms of racial politics. Oh it's it's a dog whistle. Don't you see so just to get this straight, asking Amy Coney Barrett about her religious beliefs, not a dog, Pretending Brett Kavanaugh is a gang. Rape is not a dog whistle, it's a dog. Well, if you ask her about the books that appear at the school board member

There's an editorial board. Peace today from the Washington Post, it is settled, quote Republicans boast they have not pull they cabinet. In fact they treated Jackson. Worse scares me: are you kidding me if you D Jackson Worse, I mean yes for. Did somebody at user of drugs and raping somebody without any but its and then to the entire media, go on a search to find other people who falsely accused of rape. Did I miss that part with it was was asked about boosting in her high school yearbook,. you are so high on their own supply. It's absolutely unbelievable. The echo chamber is so thick out there like The dome by Stephen King, the second chamber so thick that echo chamber, nothing comes in and nothing comes out. Her CNN, the Abbe doing the same thing. If you ask about critical race theory to Khatami Brown action was lectured multiple times and made reference to critical race theorist. That's the you know. That is not it's not even important, or even bothering to ask about these things.

it. Plays this game number one? How dare you ask about it number two: it's not even important! It's not even important to find out whether she knows what a woman is or when human life begins. or whether her legal theory is infused with the teachings of Derek Bell. None of that is What's really important is that she's, a black woman damn it even if she can't define woman, that's the important thing so shut up and just just confirm we're already. How dare you ask a question, sir? She answered questions and, at the end of the day it was TED Cruz, holding up pictures of a picture book, and I think that in the context of the Supreme Court nomination, that just seems but the below the line of what is important in the big scheme of things. Oh yeah, it's not important at all. If a critical race theory beliefs started to infuse her judicial beliefs, no, no, no Meanwhile, NBC is Cynthia Allen once a virus to say this woman is a pragmatist. She is dead center of the political spectrum, which is exactly why Joe Biden Picker because he's looking for centrists judges. That's that mean that was the record for the person she's replacing Stephen Brier.

Who's, a consistent democratic vote, the least it influential justice in modern african history, solid democrat vote for pretty much. Everything did not ready and one for decisions, entire career and all Tangy Brown Jackson is back by demand justice, a radical left wing group, but don't worry, she is a pragmatist who is dead center according to you know. This is why the entire democratic Party has moved to the left because they actually believe the wild is it's dead center. Ultimately, it doesn't really matter that she's, a pragmatist she's right smack dab in the middle, and she was very effective in communicating that today you read right in the center while she's effective and then, of course, we have Jimmy Kimmel, great legal theorist. The woke pope of our times Jimmy Kimmel, and he just cannot believe that people would launch gratuitous attacks on Canton G Brown Jackson, How dare any I mean Jimmy Kimmel Man is dressed in black. He has never launched gratuitous attacks on any

It's, like his entire show, is just a series of gratuitous attacks and make no sense, but he is very offended when people gratuitous attacks on judicial nominees year. Right. The gratuitous attacks, judge actions but very cool under pressure if they don't have anything real to criticize, has been trying to portray her as being soft on crime, which is interesting because she's been endorsed, by both the International Association of Police Chiefs and the fraternal order of police and the band police. Even sting is in her corner wow did that? That's that's a good joke right there and you hear the joke what, but it was like. The band police cuz of sting Wow he's so good at the humorous man. He is such a humorist, but the humor and all the laughter. Ah, what what a comedic genius? Here's the thing. The reason that the left believes, Katana G Brown Jackson is dead Center is because I live in his little tiny bubble and in this little tiny bubble, everything the most radical is the mainstream opinion, and this is why I take for example, what's going on at Disney, so Disney has had

a walk out. Ok, and if you read the media, you would imagine that thousands upon thousands of Disney employees had been walking out of their places of employing it. There are two hundred thousand employees at Disney. Two hundred thousand here? Is a little video of Disney employs walking around the block at their Burbank headquarters? Hey. This is like sixty people, maybe chanting say gay in the middle of warming. Ellsworth. Yes, such heroism well say gay. It first of all, not illegal, to say gay in the state of Florida. Second of not legal to say gay in schools in the state of Florida. Third of all, illegal to indoctrinate isn't sexual orientation and gender identity at the age of six in the state of Florida? A! But here is the point. How many people do you think if you read the media, how many people out of two hundred thousand do you think walked out during mass Disney walk out worth shattering swords shattering bob shape. I could Disney had run screw

from his own a political position on what particular state do with their educational systems by the way bills that are widely approved by parents mean? According to the poll data, I would just point out here: sixty percent of Disney's own employees when told about what this bill includes support in Florida, which does not say anywhere we're gay and is not in fact they don't say gable daily wire. We did our we done our on this with. For, if sixty seven percent of Americans said Disney, was wrong to oppose the bill and sixty per the Disney on consumers. Back the legislation, Spain, Patients have majority of Disney employees a majority of their consumers. Sir Idiot cages need for embracing, discuss how many employees work at Walker and you might imagine if ten thousand employees walked out. Ten thousand out still ten thousand employees me about five percent of the entire Disney workforce. It not not a huge percentage if ten thousand walked out.

and if they caved to those ten thousand employees, you might say. Well, you know stupid, move I can sort of see why five percent is now a fairly critical mass of your employee base and for every person who walked down. Maybe there were two people who are sympathetic, so maybe it's actually thirty thousand people. Okay. How about? If I told you that seventy people in Burbank walked out seventy and that across the nation was probably Grand Total a few hundred, maybe three hundred. If I told you that was like what let's say, let's go high end, but it was five hundred employees, a five hundred employees. So what would that amount to that amount? To? Let's see, point two five percent of a percentage I might pay that amount to nothing. Is a rounding error. rounding error and it is an employment base, and yet they decided. If they were going to, and then they decided that they were going to keep to this because again in their bubble, this matters in their magical,

level where the media dictate terms this matters. and what's amazing, is how many people are falling victim to this. Aids, it really is incredible. people and republican states. So, for example, Utah's, Governor Spencer Cox, he just refused to sign a bill at barred. Male athletes from from playing with females is, in the second republican governor in two days to reject such legislation. legislators. New target to override the veto. Cox said in a statement of politically much easier and better for me to simply sign the bill. He chose to veto have you tried to do? What I feel is the right thing, regardless of the consequences, and on Monday evening, AIR Cocoanut Indiana. we can either a similar bill. Single like We have been challenged in the court and would not have solved any pressing as pressing issue. Ok, the actual reality here. the both of these governors are weak, kneed and because they are weak, kneed they're, not protecting Girls and women in their state period because they have,

sided. They would rather be held hostage by a small group of people who are very very loud, then do it in the interests of their own constituents. And it is because of this sort of cowardice- that you see things like the question of What is a woman bleeding up to the Supreme Court? Remember everything that happens at the Supreme Court level starts off in law. Schools really in peace over a Barry, wise substance by going into Aaron scenario,. errands, very MRS staff, right at the Washington forbidden in his peace, talking at the infusion of our entire legal education system with woken us, he says, two thousand and seventeen the super lawyer, David Boies, was a corporate retreat at the Ritz Carlton in key In Florida, hosted by his law, firm Boies, Schiller, Flexner boys Liberal legend. You represent Al Bush vs Gore in two thousand three, two thousand and thirteen, had successfully defended gay marriage in California on the last day of the retreat boys, the talk in a hotel, ballroom, two hundred or so attorneys, according to where present afterward boys

eggs were invited, hast questions. Many of the questions were yours. And an associate in her late twenties stood up. She said the reward the firm uncomfortable with boys, representing great movie maker. How reminds me- and you want to know The boys would pay them severance, so they could quit and focus on applying for jobs at other firms. Boys said no. When can Republicans used to attack attorneys representing get more detainees, the entire left rallied around them not how the new Associates subways choice represent Weinstein's. They thought there were certain people you just did not represent people so hateful and reprehensible that helping you may helping them. It made you complicit. the adversarial legal system in which both sides we dispute, are represented vigorously by attorneys vested interests in winning, so the heart of the american constitutional order. Since time immemorial. Law schools have prayed repair. Their students to take part in that system says errand Subaerial not too much anymore, now be policed. Decision and tribalism of campus life have crowded out old fashioned expectation. I'll just as an Crowley imperatives, race

in identity, are more important, more more law students and due process the presumption of innocence, and all the norms and values of the foundation of what we think of as the rule of law is so again everything you're seeing it screamed court level of protection, and Jackson has bled over to every area of America's culture and all these corporations. These woke corporations are falling prey to it and so are republican governors by way not in Florida. RON answer recognised, recognized alliance is the winner of the Anti Swimming Championship shift, from Sarasota. She won the silver as she's, the only actual woman who one good for dissent as other so these people who decide to take the cowardly way out there afraid of small minorities of people believe absolutely incredibly stupid, garbage with no basis to support all those people deserve what they get politically. Alright, We will back here later today with an additional hour of contents. Meantime go check out. The Michael Moore Show that's available right now, I'm Ben Shapiro. This is the Ben Shapiro. Show if you and you-

This episode, dont, don't forget to subscribe to the shop, help spread the word about the sugar or show by giving us a five star of you and sharing the show with a friend were available on Apple podcast, Spotify Youtube or wherever you get your pocket. And be sure to check out some of daily wire Shapiro show is produced by Eliot Feld Exact I'm producer, Jeremy boring our supervising Glover is possible. Why doesn t associate Bradford Carrington What is meant by micro meta here and make up my fabulous, Christina Reduction Assistant, Jessica and the Ben Shapiro Show is a daily wire production. Copyright daily wire, twenty twenty two Supreme Court nominee Khatami Jackson praises the radical African, the hebrew Israel. I called Joe Biden both a new world order and Russia wants to take back Alaska check it out on Michael Alter.