And here we are, it is monday- and it's been a very, very busy weekend. Tons to get to hear on the Ben Shapiro show will be talking about the Paris attacks. Will talk about President Obama's worth plus, apparently, a major movie star has AIDS, or at least HIV will tell you who that is Ben Shapiro. This is the bench bureau shall attend demonizing people. I don't care about you feeling so on Friday, for those who are under arrest. A hundred twenty nine people were killed in Paris by islamic terrorists Can I say that advisedly Islamic, because they are Muslims. They are Muslims because they say they are Muslims, and you find it primly ironic, that the same group of people who say we can never ever question President Obama's Christianity because after all, he says, he's a Christian say that these Muslims who call themselves Muslims, are not in fact Muslims, because we know better than they do. Even though we ve never the Koran we don't know a Muslim, we don't know anything about Islam. Clearly that

or is there not Muslims, because it would be inconvenient for them to be Muslims there? There is all sorts of commentary over what happened and starting last week, President Obama talked about the Paris attacks and he said they were an attack on all humanity. Here's what the president had to say really, as the attacks were still under way. It is his last Friday. Once again, we are seeing an outrageous attempt, terrorize, innocent civilians? This is on its way, not just on Harris time not just on the people of France, but this is an attack on all of humanity, of the universal values that we share, o all of humanity, all of them mean, except for Muslims, of course. Of course, except for the universal values of Islam that we dont all share, because the fact is that you ve seen tremendously increasing rate

crime in Europe because of the muslim onslaught you ve, seen incredibly increasing rates of societal polarization in Europe because of increased muslim refugee problems and on the increase population of Muslims in Europe. It is amazing, have left, will craft this little fantasy world for themselves, where a terrorist by Muslims on non Muslims is thus a terrorist attack. we're getting all of humanity against universal values and in there is something to this idea that, though the left does in its really troubling it's the other end of evil, and that is saying that the people who attack innocence Billions are totally crazy. They're, not normal people with that ideologies are not normal people that ideas or bad motivations. There's knots, It is completely out of the realm of of humanity there sociopaths or their or their crazy people. They came out of a mental institution. We can't tribute anything to their ideology:

their perspective. This is a way of assuming that evil can't arise anywhere, except for a few crazies where evil doesn't really exists. Where we really have here is a law enforcement problem or a problem of terrorism or extreme of extremism, and all of this kind of happy talk about islamic ideology. It does have real ramifications. It has very significant ramifications. It has ramifications in terms of what we do, for example, about. problem of millions of muslim refugees now trying to invade the west, and it is an invasion- is a cultural invasion. Whether or not these folks are terrorists. If they are coming running along with them an ideology that is completely at odds with western civilization, that is an ideological invasion. You don't have to be a terrorist to participate in it, but I'd say that you had a society that in time We believe in honour killing, for example, and they came into the west not to commit acts of terror, but just because they like the living standard in the west, and then they insist that the West ok they're, honour killing. That is a cultural invasion. That's what's happening

Europe, that's what's happening in the west, yet President Obama today fast forward a couple of days. The present presidency says that this is an attack on all humanity and universal values. Now the press of the United States says that it would be an American on American not except more syrian refugees. We don't know them there but if we don't know anything about them, it would be irresponsible and actually on American, not to accept more syrian muslim refugees. Ted crews had suggested over the weekend. A Bush had suggested over the weekend that christian refugees from Syria should get in muslim refugees should not because we don't know anything about these refugees. and if you don't know anything about them other than their religion, pretty safe gas at the Christians who are now being wiped out in Syria will not be terrorists, and pretty safe, bet that if there are terrorists they will come from the muslim population, which doesn't mean all the Muslims coming from. Syria are terrorists or want to be what it does mean. Is that

If you are of even mild intelligence, if you even have a basic, rational brain, you know that if you are trying to get the risk level two zero, you don't accept muslim rough, jeez that you haven't got it right mean this is very simple. It's called a description of suspect. It's not a racial profile, because it's not race is that even religious profiling, because the fact is that it's not a profile to description of the suspect. The description of this aspect is Islam, and we now know that the terrorists responsible for the Paris attack was a syrian muslim refugee who was picked up in a boat off the coast of Greece and made his way all the way to Paris before launching the shooting attack. We also know that the seven other people Disappeared, it will not do this, and we also know that the explosive vast that they were wearing came from a professional nice is by the way, has claimed that they have used the syrian refugee problems. Smug over four thousand terrorists, into Europe, even if their exaggerating by a factor of one hundred you're still talking about forty two,

tor wandering around in Europe, and it took only seven or eight to kill a hundred and thirty people in the middle of Paris. The most have one must have literally cities in the world. This is raising the President Obama's has, it would be on American would be on western of us, uncharitable of US evil of us actually not to allow more muslim refugees into the western President Obama getting very hot and heavy and passionate about why the West needs to allow millions, presumably hundreds of thousands, more muslim refugees on voted for Middle EAST. We do not close our hearts to victims. of such violence. And somehow the start equating visual refugees. With the issue of terrorism,. in Europe. I think

like Chancellor Merkel, have taken very courageous stance in saying it is our moral obligation. This fellow human beings to help people who are in such vulnerable situations. And I know that it is putting enormous strains, the resources of the people of Europe. Nobody's been carrying a bigger budget. Then the people here in Turkey with two and a half million refugees the people, Jordan, Lebanon, who were also admitting refugees. The fact that they have kept their borders open to these refugees is A signal of their belief in a common humanity, And so we have to each of us: do our part You cannot have the United States that the President of the United States, what he sang by equating Turkey and Jordan and Lebanon

these are all countries that neighbour Syria understand. They share a border with Syria right they have one more They share a border with Syria and the fact is that if they didn't keep those borders open, they be moving people down as they try to cross them, or because they are literally coming from Syria directly into Turkey. It is also worth noting that the vast majority of muslim refugees who are coming into Europe, if you look at the muslim refugees going into Turkey and Lebanon and Jordan all the surrounding countries, there are fifty men and fifty percent women, the percentage of men in the Muslim refugee population coming to Europe. Seventy five percent men- seventy five percent men in some cases- that by some studies over eighty percent men, virtually all of them. get out means that either terrorists are getting in Ormond. Leaving their wives behind or not leaving the wise behind in Syria. What's happening mostly, is that people are coming from Turkey and are now coming to Europe now what point something out here and of President Obama says well good for Turkey, if they're taking in muslim refugees, we have due to know we don't we it means you very often about the muslim alma. Remember

see here this about the arab Street, the muslim street. We can't take people off because the arab Street, the Muslim straight there is the alma the nation right now keep together. They have together, they take care of each other muslim women. There are fifty muslim majority countries on planet or fifty of them there, a billion Muslims on planet earth and you're telling me that Saudi Arabia doesn't have room for any of these votes. Indonesia doesn't have room for any of these folks. You're telling me the Pakistan does never, for any of these. Folks are Yemen. Or various other countries around the region known these places have room for any these folks. Only the west has room for these folks and its point. Something also be the arab countries, the Muslim. prison. This particular region have a long and inglorious history of actually keeping their own members of their own co, religionists in refugee camps. Literally for decades, when Israel was created, there are several hundred palestinian refugees created by Arabs telling other air

get out get out of the weggs, we're about to go in and kill all the Jews. They were made refugees. They are still in refugee camps. Seventy years after the creation of Israel there fourteen refugee camps still in Jordan. Seventy years later, refugee camps and seventy percent The palestinian population is is jordanian. Seventy percent the jordanian population rather is palestinian. There still ten refugee camps for Palestinians and Syria. There dozens of refugee camps for Palestinians in the West Bank, which is governed right now, by the Palestinian Authority, the refugee camps in Lebanon, in other words, Muslims, don't take in other Muslims. They expel them. and those Muslims that are expelled a lot of them end up in the west. It is not by contrast by the way, every jewish refugee who has ever been created, he's had a home in the state of Israel right right, there's a big russian refugee wave. They ended up in Israel, there's big ethiopian refugee wave. They ended up in Brill after the year after World WAR, two obviously there's a major wave from Europe. They ended up in his Israel took an all of them.

As Israel was created, hundreds of thousands of Jews, hundreds of thousands of Jews, were expelled from aeroplanes place like Morocco Place Like Jordan Place like Saudi Arabia, place like Syria, there expelled and they ended up in Israel all of them. Why is it that Muslims can't take another Muslims, but westerners are supposed to taken other Muslims ramming? That's that's a question that's worth asking, but about alone to ask it- and he says in fact that is its racist in terrible of us to prefer. Did you prefer christian refugees? Syria to muslim refugees from Syria, which is asinine not only for reasons of terror, but for reasons of culture. Christians are have a much easier time integrating into christian societies in Europe and the United States that Muslims are especially muslim from areas that are backwards like place. It places like Syria or Rock or Libya near did the vote. going to come here and there magically can integrate, is just not true. The somali population that has been in hitting Minnesota. There been a lot of terror. Problems from Somalia

populations in Minnesota gone back to Somalia, many of them and participate in war against american troops, The President Obama's it's on American for us to do this to an American for us to prefer christian refugees over over muslim refugees, and the question is of course why why president, I'm a feels, this necessity and there's something more to it than just he. So big hearted, he so good hearted part of it is that the President of the United States actually doesn't care, particularly if there's a terrorist attack on american soil. In twenty ten, President Obama was quoted by Bob Woodward saying that we could absorb a terrorist attack as a direct quote. We could absorb a terrorist attack. He said we absorb nine hundred and eleven and we even got stronger from it. So if there's a terrorist attack or two, but it doesn't violate our humanity with regard to Islamophobia or whatever nonsense word Obama decides to create today, then of course, we'll all be better off he's going to

or that risk, because the question when it comes to these refugees is how many westerners are you willing to lead die in order to accept to give a number of refugees? You can't that what level of of cultural dissension, what will lever of cultural dissolution? More specifically, are we going to allow in order I extend a hand to people who are fleeing from an area and in the hold one of your common values. Virtually none of your common values are held by the syrian refugees were coming over from the Middle EAST, just because you're victimized by someone bad doesn't mean that you are also going to get along well with western civilization. There's big do it depends whose victimizing you and it depends what you're running away from. Not every victim of one group must be somebody who has taken care of by the west in the sense that we take them in and we try to make them american citizens. for european citizens. It just doesn't work that way to supply in the sky, to you and what kind of amazing is that Obama Simba ripped Bush for suggesting that Iraq was gonna, magically transform into a wonderful democracy right does pie in the sky. These

Draw their culture doesn't allow that he says we should allow Iraq to basically invade Europe read. The idea is that we can bigger rockies into Americans, but apparently we can just make Iraqis into Americans rights along as they come here. We can make periods into American. So long as we come here, come a bizarre notion. means there's something else going on for President Obama and it isn't just oh I'm so big hearted. Oh, I truly want to help. The truth is there's something else going on. What is that? Other thing? That's going on, President Obama he's either a coward or he is somebody who wants to fundamentally destroy America's role in the world and its pretty clear ladder. President Obama, I thought his most telling statement was not that right there about the syrian refugees about his most telling statements when he said he was asked about ices and he said in Turkey today that he, but we could destroy ices. We could, if we wanted to, but then again now would entail serious resource effort here, as president

today in Turkey have been a few who suggested that we should put large numbers of U S, troops on the ground and keep in mind that. We have defined as military in the world and we have defined as military minds in the world, and I've been meeting with them intensively, for years now discussing these various options, and it is not just my view, but the view of my closest military and civilian advisers. that would be a mistake. The president went on to say quote: not because our military couldn't march into Mosul or Rock Ahmadi and temporarily clear out, I saw but because

It would be a repetition of what we ve seen before if you do not have local populations that are committed to inclusive governance and who are pushing back against ideological extremists that they resurface unless we are prepared to have a permanent occupation of these countries, in other words, the ETA terrorist group and the occupied. Given we could push them out, we could kill one of them, but unless a willingness station troops there forever then what's the point. This is a fundamental rejection of the notion that american power makes any difference in the world. That's really what this is, because the same logic applies to world war. Two, for example, we could have said What happens if we go into Berlin? We topple Hitler and there's no real democracy ready to spring up there. If we get rid of Hitler's Germany, just all of his followers were or worse still there, Right, there's, no there's, no multicultural governance is going to happen there. So why bother sleeve alone are Tokyo mine? the Imperial, Japan and power I mean if we have to occupy them for seventy. Eighty years in God, that's gonna, be a lot of work in the past

Can I say I mean if you play that same lodge to South Korea, South Korea would now be chinese. Protectorate is an amazing argument. What he said: it's what we in law school used to call an argument that proves too much meaning that at such a broad argument that it compasses all sorts of really terrible things it is our essential based glued. He sang is leave Iceland Place, we're ok, little personal. Let's start with this. He says: Army Terry could March Disposal, Iraq or romanian and temporary temporarily clear out ISIS. What's wrong a temporary what's wrong with temporary, what's wrong with going in there, and let's aid takes them five years to recoup ten years to recover, what's wrong with going in there. Killing is many of them as possible, and then five years later we go in there, we kill more of them and then every five years we descend into some bombers and every five years we sent in some troops and we can grab load of them. Then we leave. What's up, trouble about all that but pray Obama has the Colin Powell you break. You bought it idea in mind, which is, if you go in, and if you bomb people, then now you have to run the country and he's averse to running countries.

I ve seen from Iraq where he lost the war. That was one may he said. Oh the iraqi people they can take. This themselves, then we're out cable. The fact is that giving them about five years of security, maybe Raymond Insert, starts in two thousand six withdrawn. Two thousand eleven and search doesn't believe in finnish succeeding until two thousand eighty three years of security and Obama expects there's gonna, be a full transitional democracy in place in Iraq, capable of taking care of itself. We still have troops in Japan. We still have troops in Germany. We still have troops in South Korea, but the fact is that the President of the United States doesn't want american troops in these places. for two reasons: one. He thinks that the muslim world has a right to be upset with us. If we have american troops in these regions, he agrees with terrorists. On the other side, who say that America's presence in the world is what drives terrorism against the west, and second, President Obama wants to minimize american military power, it's part of his crusade and if we have to occupy places like nor

Syria to make sure that ISIS doesn't take it over. If we have to set a puppet dictatorships or if we have to find allies. That means we actually have to grow our military and he wants to shrink our military. That's a bigger priority for him. Domestic opponents are bigger priority for him. When you see him talking in Turkey, it is absolutely clear that President Obama has less ire towards radical Islamists toward radicalism, Then he does toward Republicans immediately see, believes Republicans exist. The only man in mid the radical Muslims exist. They don't even exists to President Obama. He said in the same speech that ices is not as Lompoc again. which is odd. Considering that our group is not called the Buddhist state in Syria is called the islamic State in Syria Fortunately, so there's so, I will say this: there's a a half good reason for

saying radical Islam in their say and then there's President Obama's reason- and these are two different reasons. Job Bush was asked over the weekend about his brother statements is George. W had also done this routine. Islam means peace and in there's. No such thing is that there is such a thing as radical islamic perversion of the religion said. Emma Bush, who knew so much about the and I was asked whether projects, operators, which a Bush had to say is Islam he's governor. You know what I know what I know, what islamic terrorism is an that's, what we are fighting with ISIS Al Qaeda, all of the other groups and that's what our focus should be on. This is not a question. Religion. This is it. This is a political ideology that is, co, opt in or religion, and I think it's more than acceptable just to call it for what it is in an organised, an effort to destroy it. Okay, so it showed the reason that the George W used to say things like Islam means peace and all the rest of this is because we were working with the saudi government and he didn't want to take off the charity governor

by saying that Islam was a problem or the radical Islam is a problem, because the truth is that, though a hobby ideology was pushed by Howdy government, though hobby ideology stands behind groups like the Muslim Brotherhood in, ices and Al Qaeda and all the rest of these fundamentalists, terrorist groups It was a bad reason, because the truth is it. Acts like the west is weak. It acts like Islamic, innovation is strong in the west is weak. The truth is, we are strong and islamic civilization is tremendously weak, and if we, the sound, is to do something. The Saudis damn well better. Do it, because we could wipe them off the face of the earth with about in about two days when the idea that we women Her throne, our weight around really in the Middle EAST is the truth, If we really wanted to throw away around him. Remember Katy Rocky Let's area was the fourth largest military on the plan. It took us three weeks to conquer the entire country three weeks. look at the total number of dead in Iraq was somewhat

the neighbourhood of three to four thousand troops hate to conquer an entire country with the fourth largest military on planet earth. Here there are more people there are there. More people lost in single in hours during the civil war than were lost during the entire and the entirety of the of the Iraq war, That was unnecessary the time, but at least you can eighty mildly defended That's not why Obama's not saying radical Islam and either is Hilary. Neither is Bernie Sanders. None of these people will say radical Islam. The reason they won't hear radical Islam is because they don't believe there is such a thing as radical Islam. There, Marxists marxist, don't believe that radical ideology makes a difference. They believe radical Muslims are ticked off, not because there is Lompoc not because they believe in radical muslim ideology. Radical Muslims believe all this stuff, supposedly because their poor right. This way, Obama once said that ISIS needs jobs only continues. Retain this idea, and this is why,

didn't Obama continues to say we need to take in these refugees. After all, if we taken all these refugees, they'll be rich that live in the west, acting as though they give up their ideology the minute they get here, which of course, is nonsense. How many Muslims have we seen who have been integrated into american life? The Boston bombers we're living here for a decade? It didn't matter, they wanna hadn't did what they need to do in. The fact is that when you talk about radical Muslims, radical do what they do, because they believe in radical Islam. It's very simple, and this is why Marco Rubio is exactly right. He said the other day to Senator from Fora. We cannot avoid saying radical Islamic be foolish to do so. Here is Central America, Rubio. I think that's I don't understand it. Thou, like saying, we weren't at war with Nazis does were afraid to offend some Germans, who may have been members of the Nazi Party, but weren't violent themselves. We are at war with Radical Islam within it. importation of those long by a sudden, like a number of people around the world, I believe now justifies them in killing those who don't agree with their ideology. This is a clash of civilizations and, as I say,

But the debate earlier this week there is no middle ground on this, either they win or we win, and we need to begin to the serious thing these are individuals motivated by their fate. Of course, all Muslims are not members of violent jihadist group but there is a global jihadist movement in the world motivated by their interpretation of Islam. In this Sunni Islam and the case of and it needs. to be confronted for what it is. This is not a geopolitical movement, we see religiously oriented movement UK and the fact that Rubio says this is of course exactly right, but the other side doesn't believe this either side doesn't believe us, and I think that the person who best stated the case here is, of course that genius Bernie Sanders genius Bernie Sanders in the Democratic Bay no moment. Just a brief digression about the democratic debate is so clear. The Democrats do not want anyone to hear what they have to say to their own people are. They hold the debate on a Saturday night descent nine Iowa minimize well held, it don't like a moving subway any. In the middle of the night. On Christmas Eve,

which, by the way, their basically doing that you know in the next democratic debate, as the next democratic debate is the night that ours is released, actually releasing the next democratic debate happens the night that everyone in the world will be at the moment. They don't want anyone to see what say in their primary debate, because this is what they say to their own people is one is about the left. They will lie to your face. They will. I know this guy I've done this when I went when I in my book on Hollywood, for example, when I did my Hollywood book, I knew they would lie to me. If I just went in his right winger and said you scrub discriminate against conservatives

If I went in wearing my Harvard LAW baseball cap- and I said in the name of social justice, would you prevent a conservative from getting a job? They would absolutely say yes, because when talking with their own people, they'll tell you the truth. What the democratic debates are the Democrats telling the truth to their own constituents? What they actually think about things here is Bernie Sanders, Loon bag from Vermont talking about what he thinks is the greatest threat to national security. Previous debate, you said the greatest threat to national security was climate change. You still believe a global climate change directly related to the growth of terrorism, and if we do not get our act together and listen to what the scientists are, you going to see countries all over the world. This is what the sea ices we're going to do so going over limited amounts of water, limited amounts of land to grow their crops. Are you gonna sing all kinds of international conflict? Ok. This is insane this purely in saying that this action Is my Hillary Clinton agreed with us and then she went on to actually agree with all of this. It's amazing Bernie

when he says that climate change is the greatest threat. That's because the marxist agenda cannot be stopped and if in, if their radical Muslims out there, who want to kill people, we can't change what we're doing just because their radical Muslims out there, after all their victims of, on marxist world. Do if it were a marxist world than they would be suffering. If there were a marxist world than they would be just as rich as anyone else would have reduced. You did our resources by now. Everything would be hunky dory their ideology, wouldn't matter would collapse away God die, olive would die as well. Everything with religion would would pass away. John Lennon? Imagine right if we all just had enough resources. What Bernie Sanders says here is, of course absolute tripe in the fact. Is that sorry to break into Democrats, but the folks who are now trying to kill westerners? They live in the desert it's hot in the desert. Really hot in the desert has been Hoddan Desert for, like several, hundred thousand years and the idea that the climate change Percentage four degrees celsius over the last hundred years, and this is what is done-

having all the son, a movement of care, so what exactly drove muslim terrorist murder, Jews and nineteen? Twenty nine in Hebron? What exactly drove Muslims to side with Nazis during World WAR tat? Was that also climate change, or maybe this has But why is it that climate change is global climate? We live on one planet. After all, why farmers in Iowa on breaking out the pitchforks on each other. Thanks to climate change, this aid, you, have diminishing resources and therefore violent people fight each other. More people get violent that weren't violent before its such absolute nonsense. It's just not true. Zero has been a violent place for a very long time, but this is what the Democrats believe, because anything, human nature can never be blamed human nature, because the truth is that human nature, people need something to believe and people want thing to believe in and if they are living in a poor area of the world, where rich area of the world it doesn't matter, pay a lot of recruits. Mice are coming from rich place The world Osama Bin Laden was a very wealthy guy. of millions and millions and millions of dollars with a lot more, and I am but that didn't stop him from

living in a cave in trying to blow up Americans, because the fact is ideology matters for the left. Ideology doesn't matter economics matters and not real economics, redistribution, IST economics. So when you see President Obama redistributing through refugees or or through failure to go in and wipe out the bad guys, this is all part of a broader agenda, and the broader agenda is that the west is the great victimized. we're rich and anybody who hates us is the victimize, because their poor and and therefore we have to number one, not bomb them in the Middle EAST. We can't take all the measures were supposed to take, because, after all that mean occupation and long term, the patient is imperialism and imperialist, is bad because it's us imposing our will on them and it would just make us richer in them. Poor right. All of this is tied into a basic, fundamental philosophy, and so you see Obama statements just in their own contacts it

see them in isolation ray. I don't want to bomb ISIS, because we wouldn't want occupy them too much. I want more muslim refugees because, as part of America's principles that we accept, anybody who wants The comment: if you Jesse these statements in isolation, they look like the ravings of a lunatic. I mean they really do they're all over the place. They invariably redound to America's harm. But when you start to see it as part of a global overall picture, part of a world view over Welton Chang were part of Harvey generalised idea of what the universe is. Then we'll begin to make a lot of sense. When you see the president, Obama is in essence a marxist and that his marxism drives. All of this that he believes religion doesn't make any difference. Ideology doesn't make any difference. Just your poverty level makes a difference. once you realize this, this all begins to make sense. Paris deserved to be taken down a peg, their rich. After all, Minnesota honest, I'm just surprised. President Obama didn't say that there was another. Random attack is extreme,

the most violent. It was in tat on all humanity. Of course it wasn't an attack on all humanity. It was an attack on part of humanity. That not ideologically align with radical Islam and and President Obama won't say that, because anyone that he doesn't like is outside he ditched outside the theory. It starts The hearing in science is a bad scientists. Are the people who take the evidence that contradicts what they're saying and throw it out for the purpose of keeping their hypothesis correct President Obama is a bad scientists and you too bad politician into bad thinker, because when President Obama thinks anything that doesn't fit into his world view, such as Rapid ideologies killing other members of of western civilization that doesn't fit into a worldview, so just write it out, it just doesn't exist, it doesn't exist or, conversely, it's our fault, if only we were nicer in the first place so long as we think that we are going to lose a Sally cone whose

in very fascinating lesbian commentator for four CNN ionization lesbian commentator to this. Basically, what she's famous for over its Vienna and she sheet tweeted out today, ISIS. What ISIS wants is war. They want war, so we shouldn't give it to them. This is how the left, thanks, because if, if ISIS wants war, they must be crazy as opposed to those who they don't want war they wanted to feed us. We should want equal eighty to feed them. The fact is, if we're not doing everything in our power to bomb these people forward into the stone age. out of installation, their mentalities we'd have to bomb them forward to get to the stone age, everyone a bomb them into the stone. If we want to do anything bond them into the stone age, that's all we need to do, but there's this whole idea that we're gonna pretend this is the West's fault or if we just opened our hearts more Madonna said we have to love them. There's one Madonna said today that we have to love ISIS will you first of all, she's welcome to fly into Syria and try it personally. It wouldn't go over we're, not gonna love ISIS to death,

must we send Charlie Shane? Who is the started we talked about earlier? Who may or may not have aids according to the national inquirer? Maybe it may be possible for childish into love everybody to death, the dubious or maybe a sort of different thing. So until that point, how about this? How about western civilization is something that is worth fighting for and is something that is worthwhile and the left failure to acknowledge? That is what is driving our defeat. If we don't have pride in our own civilization power in the world, can we hope to defeat? powerful the primitive civilization and Ben Shapiro. This is the eventually Russia.