Trump starts a firestorm by namedropping Elizabeth Warren and Pocahontas, James O’Keefe tries to sting The Washington Post, and Al Franken does a press conference.
Date: 11-28-2017
This is an unofficial transcript meant for reference. Accuracy is not guaranteed.
Well either. Today, on the bench of Euro showed from starts firestorm by name dropping Elizabeth Lorna Pocahontas James O Keefe tries to statistics the Washington Post and it does not go well plus. I'm gonna talk a little bit about the Bible and Roy more because there's an article out today that require some analysis. I mention here. This is the bench: Shapiro show that we have too much fun behind the scenes in the show, and they will have to actually make a video of all because on behind the scenes of the show, because it's a lot more fun than the actual show they, but before we get to any of the current news, because there is a lot of news, including a lot of talk about Elizabeth Warren and Pope causes and the single funniest video I think of the year, which is saying, locks has been increased
here first, I want to say thank you to responses over the. U s easier! So if you are ever in a situation where you and your house and somebody trying to break down the front door and in breaking your house and these shatterer window- and you hear that noise- you go to your gun, save it take out your Maastricht five hundred like the one I have, and then you should that bastard right between the eyes,
What it turns out, the police are gonna, show up and the problems or ass you, even though you are acting in self defence. This is why you need the: U S easier, is complete, concealed, carry and family defence guide their two one hundred and sixty four page guide and free audio book, in which you will learn how to how to detect attackers before they see the safest,
Most dangerous places sit in a restaurant, how responsibly own in store done, even if you have small children and more
they are only offering this to my listeners bench, spiritual listeners, for a few more days. If you want your free copy, you have to go and register right now defend my family. Now dotcom, that's defend my bed,
we now come to leaving give you a bonus, hummed events checklist when you do it a hundred sixty four page guidance is really is vital. Reading for making sure that you are safe in your family is saving that you know what to do in case. Something requires he actually fire your gun in anger,
so check it out, defend my family, now, dot com defend my family, now, dot com, folksy, vs, IE, eight you're, really good job. Protecting the rights of all. Second amendment done owners. Ok, so when the news begins today on an up note, so this was legitimately one of the funniest things that I have ever seen in covering
ex president Trump had a ceremony to honour the neighbourhood code talkers for those you don't know than ever. Ho code talkers go watch the Nicholas Cage movie win talkers, which is about the Navajo CO talkers. A group of Navajo Indians need Americans who, during world war, two were used to decode german
japanese messages, because they were just amazingly good at it, and so they were
at the White House yesterday in a ceremony. Now this is directly out a visa or arrested development, or I mean it really is amazing. First of all, you have to start giving could actually wish flash the image up so before we start to people consumer talking up. First of all, we can see behind President Trump is a portrait enhancing the head in that portrait just because the shot him?
I'd enough. The head in the portrait is that of Andrew Jackson, so they are doing in an event honouring native Americans who serve the United States in front of a portrait of Andrew Jackson. The president responsible for the trail of tears, like the guy responsible for helping to violate a bunch of treaties with the native Americans and the forcible expulsion of those native Americans, from particular southern states, into places like Oklahoma, including the debts of presumably tens of thousands of native Americans along the way. Hence it being called the trail appears so just really well done by the optics folks at the White House, but it gets better. President Trump doesn't, it's obviously know anything but an ethical code talkers, and he has not actually done any research on it. So
he goes in his brain to what's a joke. I know about native Americans, oh yeah, Elizabeth Ward, and so this is a thing that actually happened in real life in the White House with the President of the United States to really enjoy this could fully you have to keep your eyes not on President Trump around the Navajo gentlemen. The use Marine corps Honorary, who whom he is talking to because it is astonishing, we greatly ruin- is the slow pan and Larry David Music coming in to make this complete. But why
watch this club is just great? It wasn't just one resident tromp said about Elizabeth Warrant, it's where he set it at an event to honour
elderly native american code talkers, who use their
tribal languages during world war. Two to help confound: U S enemies!
You were here long before any of us we're, although we
Have a representative in Congress who they say was here a long time ago: they collar poke artists
and you can see the awkward smile but of a good definition, the country? Then, if we pleaded for a few more seconds, you then realize how awkward is because everybody errant leader people move where to turn their face to the wall, because there are laughing because it so ridiculous and the end trump and reaches out to the they never Hogan goes like you. I, like you, a lot like really that there is adequate contain. So that's pretty astonishing. It's it's pretty that that's that's pretty glorious tromp! I mean there's good trump and theirs to their bad trump and there's eloquent trump and there's just glorious trump. There's the pure revelry
of from now bunch people got very upset about this. So two things can be throat want one Elizabeth WAR and is the worst and Elizabeth Warren lied about having native american heritage in order to get a job at Harvard LAW School. That can be true. Second thing: they can also be true. It's pretty buffooneries to actually
use the opportunity of honouring native Americans to make a native american joke about a sitting. United States senator as horrific issue. Maybe- and she is a little more terrible- that's pretty cloud if there are having an event honouring a bunch of jewish veterans of world war. Two would serve their country,
finally, and then Joe from dropped like a jewish joke in the middle about like somebody who had fake glued pretended to be a Jew. It be real we're
go to Hell the non sequitur from from the President of the United States. But what amazing about this is that the media insisted tromp was being raises now. Trump was not being a racist. Ok, just stop at just stop at your being stupid. It's not racist for trumped call. Elizabeth, worn, Pocahontas K even gets the joke wrong. The joke is folk hunters because she's not really Pocahontas she'd, pretend Pocahontas. Everyone has been making this joke for several years. Really, since two thousand and fourteen, I believe, two thousand fourteen two thousand twelve, maybe even we're making this joke about Elizabeth Worn because Elizabeth worn pretended to be a native American
for her own personal gain. In fact, here is Elizabeth. Warned we have tabled is with war in talking. Cheekbone should specifically asked about. How do you know that you're native American this is years ago, and she explain that she will know she was native American because she had high cheekbones could never five Warren says her great great great
and mother is Cherokee. Genealogist have yet to confirm that Warren
the code. Oliver grandfather on her mantle as part of the family law might be his walk by that picture. At least a thousand times remarked that he that her father, my Papa, had high cheekbone.
like all of the Indians, do because that's how she saw it and she said, and your mother got those same great, cheek bones, and I didn't she thought this was
the bad deal she had gotten in light. That was Elizabeth.
defence for native american ancestry that there is a picture on the mantle of high cheap
not racist at all. The media are still treating lives with warlike, legit, twenty twenty contender after she said that she thought TAT. She was native American because Papa had high cheek bones and a photo and her grandmother thought that that was not fair yeah. By the way Cherokees questioned Elizabeth Warren story. In fact, Cherokee source is talked about. Powwow chow. They said that that when they try to track down, why Elizabeth Lauren Centuries native American Elizabeth weren't centuries native
because she had a recipe that appeared in the Opel Homer publications from the home and the publication was called powwow, Chow, ok, pow showers. It was supposed to be exactly as it sounds like a cookbook of native american recipes. Her recipe was a recipe for crab bisque, no, I'm not kidding, because obviously this was something the Cherokees did way back when
it would hunt the crab on the plains of Oklahoma, they got their their bow and arrow and it would hunt. The crab is how the crab became extinct in Oklahoma was because of POW Challenge Crab ass. It turns out you copy the recipe from the Harpers bizarre, something that you sent it in two pow chap,
an american researchers lifted his Cherokee researchers. They said this is not true battles with Lorn at all. Here is Cherokee researcher Target Fox NEWS about several years. Back reverse discovered there
as the foreign was claiming to be a,
many years ago she had published
A recipe book called our child, and I I first became wherever at that time, but this most recent bout has been probably about
in April we heard your name again and became very concerned because she was
moving into a public around that could impact the Cherokee nation and maturity people. Generally. I get some money that specifically that you find offensive or mother some about this. Well at first we were not offended,
as many people have claims of american indian Ancestor, that's not offensive. What we ve done offensive was
whenever we presented her with her genealogy
and showed her clearly that she was not a chair. The indian and her family throughout history had never been connected to charities shaken
I need to make that clear to whatever Brown ask us goes restored is dated twenty two up. So what is the reason why I was with long continue to maintain her Cherokee ancestry, because apparently, according to William Jacobson, over illegal insurrection, she
use that claim in order to get a job at Harvard LAW School. She claimed that she was basically a minority and that's how she got her job and Harvard LAW School. This, according to Jacobson, on April thirtieth, twenty twelve quote Democratic sent a candid
as with war, has been all over the newspapers the past several days after revelation that Harvard LAW School identified her as a native american faculty member in the mid. Ninety nine is worn contention is unaware of the designation by ETA less.
and in a play? No role in her hiring she's on her native american heritage is family law. Subsequently, David Bernstein discovered in the annual report,
the Association of American LAW schools, worn, was listed as minority faculty member since a less bases such information solely on what faculty self reports. The information must have come from morn herself, so it is not clear, apparently, that she come that she filled out the funds itself, but it's weird like where they get this information anyway and HIV. S claim that it had nothing to do with her hiring that choose native American by it probably did there. They were doing affirmative action hiring at the time. So what
more racist trump, referring to her as Pocahontas, because she felt her native american ancestry or Elizabeth worn, taking her native american ancestry. According to media,
truly terrible is the troubled call her Pocahontas. In the first place, Elizabeth Worn is featured on national media, acting right with righteous umbrage at the notion that Donald Trump would call her Pocahontas, and then she gets weird is when she sends breaking out into colours of the one. That's the really weird part of this
this was supposed to be an offence to honour heroes. People hoop
all along the line for our country and people who, because of their incredible work, saved the lives,
of countless Americans and our allies. It is deeply unfortunate that the president,
United States can not even make it through us.
Mony honouring these heroes without having to throw out a racial swore.
We tell Russia Slorc it like listen. Elizabeth, Professor Morn is, I knew her one we're at Harvard LAW School in a professor centre.
just point out to you that you are the one pretending to be native American
you're the one who's talking about what happens just around the riverbed
Talking to old mother Willow
you're. The one is doing all this stuff, like all of this, all of this nonsense about how it was Trump coined all of this and that its from listen, don't think it's ridiculous for trying to break into Navajo code talker event to make fun of Elizabeth worn for calling herself native American. Yes, is absurd. It's ridiculous, its buffoonery, its Riddick each there
out of it of the source adjectives, but it is equally Riddick. It was for the media to pretend that it raises for tropical worn boycotts when she's the one pretending to be native American and your download an answer.
Did exactly that out. An attack on people of Color Elizabeth warrant. Isn't a people of Color Elizabeth worn is wider than this piece of paper, Elizabeth worn
latest person in America
Ok she's whiter than Sean King is done lemon, trying to turn this into trumps array
are you re in the least racist person that you have ever met
I am the least racist person. Here is what everyone to know just because you say you're, not racist doesn't make it so, especially if you say, do and defend racist behaviour over and over and over again. Ok! So now, ok, so agent like using the Pocahontas
thing is the example is just ridiculous. I was unfortunate enough to be watching CNN yesterday during the Wolf Blitzer Hour, and I have to admit that the that Wolf Blitzer his
his shows amusing to me, because virtually all of this shows the Wolf acting really puzzled about life. That's that's really fun. To watch like every time. Somebody finishes story. He goes and that's a very
very important story and then on to the next of brick. He's just he's deserve a traffic cop for news, but in any case I would like to present a full panel and its Dana Barrenness Christian LISA and remember. The third person was whose there and they're all just beside themselves, trumpet so racist soul, derogatory to the office for trumpeted, listen,
is it on presidential? Yes, are you not used to this? By now I mean president from has been the president for nearly a year. At this point, are we really expecting him to be the hallmark of
decency and and poise because at that
happening, but did they attempt to turn into something racist is truly absurd, especially when again, you know my trunk get support from get support, because now the media that can help themselves instead of just saying utterly inappropriate, for trying to make these comments in front of a bunch of new and now the whole code talkers instead of
just to say that they have to go overboard, anti racist and then all of his people go wait. A second the person is raises the person pretending to be the native American, and talking now I hide cheekbones make your native american right. That's actually raises please era. Huckabee centres is response to all of this, because I think that it is correct from the White House but injustice. Second, first, I think its responses over at em the empty over a movement watches. So I wear movement watches all the time because they are also. I have two of them, have a black one. I have a silver one with the blue face. They are just great there really durable,
I think that the notion that that you should give a child a watch is usually stupid, but its good and movement watches because their meaning that it will be measured against things and the watch is just fine movement. Watches are really durable. There really tough. There also, really they look good and they look like multi hundred dollar watches and instead you're getting these watches like ninety nine Box, a hundred and seventy five, but these are watches that are much less expensive than you would get at any retail outlet. Hello shopping can be top of things to movement. It really is not tough at all. They have great women's watches and men's watches. My wife has one I have to you. Ve heard me talk about movement and the holiday season is the perfect time for you to use it. So again they started. Ninety five but you'd, be looking at four hundred to five hundred zero department store. They cut out the middle man, that's how they got the price down over a million watches sold in over a hundred, and sixty countries get fifteen percent off
nay with free shipping and free returns by going to end the empty dotcom, Slash Shapiro as envy empty, dotcom, Slash, Shapiro the watch its cleanly designed all their designs are really clean and good looking they, they really do. Look like you got them for, for thousands of dollars, not hundreds, go to end the empty dotcom, Slash Shapiro joined the movement. I can't speak more highly of these of these watches because they really are terrific day. They have sunglasses, too, that I really enjoyed
there really great, never go check it out and envy indeed icon slash if you're, ok, so heresy era. How can we Sanders responding to claims that Trump was engaging in racism
appropriate from the present racial and ethnic. I dont believe that it is appropriate for him to make a lot of people are already the wise thing like I said, I dont think that it is, and I don't think that was certainly not the presidency. Ok, so that that is correct. What is truly racist is is again, it was with Lauren Stick. This is why trunk continues to have support among his these things, if you insist on going overboard with every claim that you are going to create a backlash and that's exactly what happens. Ok, so LE in other news, there's an article that I want to go through, because I think that it makes in interesting argument buttons and argument, though, as we say in law, school proves too much. So here is the. So here is the
article. The articles from the federalist Limbs needs Macalister was very good columnist enjoy her work a lot I should on Twitter as well, but you release an article that basically suggested that the Bible says that you have to vote for Donald Trump or right or that constantly we are forced to vote for bad politicians in order to do good things. That's that's centrally the argument that is being made. I want to find the exact settle it, why its justified to vote for
if I had to vote for a morally questionable politician. Actually did the article is stronger than a basically suggests that its unjustified not to vote for a morally questionable politician and the article basically suggest that God uses bad people to do the things. That is an argument that we heard from Franklin Gram about Donald Trump, its argument that were hearing now about Roy more and its none argument I find particularly convincing the reserve don't find a convincing is because we are
it just we aren't and that now there is a complex moral calculus that goes on. When you decide whether or not to vote for a politician, you have to decide on this person's character flaws so deep and abiding that one ill prevent this person from implementing my values too. They harm my values just by association or their people.
Right there, people who do what you want, but they are so gross that they smear your entire system of thought because
associated with them, and three is such an emergency. They have,
side with Stalin. Nor did he Hitler in order to make the arguments silence talented. If he'd Hitler record this latin twenty. Sixteen you actually have to be facing down Hitler. It doesn't help erasing John Elizabeth, worn. A careless with war is not Hitler as much as I dislike her she's. Not
It is the same thing that holds true with regard to democratic Senate. I dont think there are, I think, they're bad. I don't agree with them. I dont think they're Hitler and if you think that their Hitler then it's time for you to start
engaging in civil disruptions, righted status, and actually does this start building bonds of you think that Hitler is right on the horizon here. With all of this being said, we have to acknowledge something went when people say this. This silly argument that that dog uses bad people to do good things. That aid is it
for God to make that's not a decision for you to make. God is our mission. You are not so here is the question. People say, for example: well God used King David didn't and can give reason adulterer and a murderer ready, sent off a woman's husband to die in battle because he'd impregnated the man's life right. That's a question for us about God right. Why would God choose to do that? But that's not a question as to whether David could do that if you would also attempt to build the Temple or if you also get where the Philistines right even repents. The whole point is that our human action is not gods. Action that there's a lot of things you don't understand, got choose a lot of us.
we don't get. That does not mean that we get to actively. In fact, one of my favorite one, my favorite movies, Xanadu Ass, are the entire premise. Vomiting is basically this nor a salutary in the movie and in the play, which is just a it's. A beautiful boy did it
salary is a relatively untenanted guy who saintly and Mozart is basically a person who is insanely, talented and Sally. I can't handle this, and so he decides that he is going to rebelled against God that why would God choose this really terrible person in order to bring godly music down to earth? Why would he do that, and so he decides to basically kill Mozart, essential and then at the end, he realizes that it's not his job to determine why it is that God chooses certain people as his vessels. It is his job to facilitate the use of those vessels in order to bring gods message, turf right that that is there. That's the point, the black and that's the point, the Bible too. Oh by the way, I don't think that it is our job to say. Well all the things that David did that were wrong are actually right, because it turns out that God was okay with him. That is backward logic and relieve us of responsibility. It relieves us a serious responsibility so again do I think that every decision about Trump Roy more is easy, other bad guys on voting? No, I don't think they're easy. I think that we have a complex moral calculus,
Our hands we have determined. Is it better to vote for a bad person or an allegedly bad person? Who's gonna stop terrible things from occurring in the present, or is it better to avoid voting for that bad person in the belief that a God could provide a better solution, be there is a long term damage done when we're represented by bad human beings, since it juries our cause or see? Maybe we actually have to take a hit
in order to in order to achieve the the resurrection of our values may at any rate, this naturally
this is as well as Syria liar deceived. Those who put him in office most likely will the porn watching centre be influenced by his immorality to make bad foreign policy decisions. I don't think so. I think this is relevant. I think that when we decide whether to vote for somebody, we have to determine how close their character flaw in their sin is to the decisions that they are being asked to make. But it's not a complete
this is really does leave out the danger of ally and with unsavory people to an advance in n. For me, even a utilitarian perspective, which it seems that Denise is pushing here, but if we do that we own those people right, it's it's Denise is right. We can't always vote for Saint but by the same token, that's a far cry from saying that we there that we should vote for someone is credibly
edged with molested fourteen year old girls by the then she goes into an analysis of the city of God. In the city of managing basically says that in the city of
then we have to ally with wholly people, but in the city of man. We have to use the best vehicle at our disposal, but that's not a proper read of Augustine by Augustine's entire thesis in the city of God is the worship of Christ is a Christian, is worth striving for, and the city of man is driven by worship of the material, and that doesn't mean that you can't associate with people who live in the city, a man material, materially driven people, but it does mean that you have to keep your eyes on God. That's the important thing and the minute you fail to do that. You have failed. Rather it's our choice to be to be wholly is God's choicest which vessels he chooses to use. We have to decide how best to be wholly, not which vessels we thank, God, ought to use or has used right. We can't read gods mine to treat our choice like divine choices, in other words its an act of arrogance,
and in the end, the argument a bit of a cop out, because basically it says this radiation. She writes that she says I recognise the slippery slope that can come of what I'm writing here. Why not put the devil himself on thrown off the offers? Liberty? Some might ask I of course not saying that, and I'm not talking about putting evil men in positions of power. Well, I mean she is a little bit. She says she says people are multi faceted and complex. I'm not a fan of condemning a person for one thing,
nor even a couple, there is more to us than a single. This of the part I'm not going to fall into the trap of treating individual politicians or secular groups, as if their manifestations of the city of
on earth outside the realm of criminality and abuses of power that degrade the officer, but the public at risk. A sinner can still serving great things. This is because God is ultimately and control bringing about his purposes by his own righteous authority and not the city, the authority of fallen men. I hate this argument so much. I can't even tell you. The reason is because essentially, what it is saying is that you can just vote for whom every Jusan then say it was gods plan anyway, wretched, deterministic universe, God plans at anyway sort
matter for whom you about this relieves you of the duty to make these hard moral choices again notice. In this argument, I'm not saying you can vote for Roy more. If you adjudge, then it is the holiest choice to vote for a guy who may unmolested fourteen year old girls, because you think that it is necessary to have another
against abortion. That's a serious moral calculation that you have to make, but to suggest that it is biblically mandated to to do this or that the Bible allows you to just overlook character, flaws and not even take that into account more sins and not even take that into account. You're making these decisions is a bit
commiserate a serious biblical misery on affording going further, and I do want to talk a little bit more about Conyers and Frank in Roy more and this e f p b controversy look at tonnes against AIDS and a lot of news breaking through the first answer. Thank its responses over at man creates. Ok, I love man creates man create stuck on. This is, but it's a great. How did it get it's just an awesome Hellenic if they offer over a hundred hand created give collections for every type of guy from the rugged outdoorsman sports fanatic and everything in between two actually got a enamel box, everything they they send comes in either enamel box or comes in a crate with a crowbar seek in private
but, like a real man nobody's pansies, he doesn't need a crowbar, didn't it didn't committed some give packaging. This is coming into ammo box or a crate, because your man do your man, and the fact is that I got one that has a bunch of poker chips and which will be awesome for when I make friends and it's going to be is just going to be spectacular too good a man creates dot com and you can get the perfect, create and choose the delivery date and again when you
they create arise. You can open it down. You can opener by with a laser engraved crowbar, which is just awesome. They ve thousands of lives,
he's every man create comes the one hundred percent satisfaction guarantee. I promise you
you are a wife or a girlfriend? Your man is going to love. Man creates because its awesome man creates dot com. Slash bands get five percent of your order. At five percent off man creates dot com, slash ban that man crates, dotcom, slash, ban, really fun gifts and an ear your loved ones will surely get a kick out of. It is perfect for the holidays. Mantra
that come slash Ben aright. So there is another big story: the broke Esther Day and this one I feel bad zones because I like James, ok, James and I are friendly, and I think that James has done a lot of good stuff, and I think that that James has beyond the acorn stuff. I remember when James broke news about unions who are basically in who are basically suggesting that they had lobbied for make work projects that they could get government dollars. James did a lot of good work on voter fraud. Voter Idee by James try to sting that, I think, is really bad. So here is the background on this thing, so James
sent in a woman, pretending to be an alleged victim of Roy. More so after the allegations about Roy more that he had molested unread woman, James apparently deployed woman to go to the Washington posting claim that she had been impregnated by Roy more at age fifteen and that Roy more had been paid for her abortion. The purpose I guess here was due:
One was to show that the Washington Post was so deeply motivated by the desire to get Republicans and get Roy more that they be willing to accept bad intel and two would be to discredit the other accused
there's of remorse are saying that this is what the Washington Post it reported. The Washington Post had no standards, they hadn't checked out the stories and that therefore the other accusers would be discredited. The first allegation that the Washington Post has an outside interest in in has an outside the interesting Roy more because they like remark, there's probably truth too, that the second delegation that all of the women there were interviewed by the Washington Post were lying or that the Washington Post and do its due diligence, that's grows. Ok, that's grows. There are a thousand ways to discredit the Washington Post and show that they have political bias. They do have little bias, but to suggested it
have to use fake sexual assault victims in order to discredit real sexual assault victims. That's pretty morally disgusting, and I have a serious moral problem with it. In any case, it really backfire because it turns out the Washington Post does its homework. It actually ends up reestablishing the Washington Post credibility, particularly with regard to the women who are alleging things against remarks. This woman went in and she tried to. She tried to convince the Washington Post to run a story about how she been abused by Roy more than they could come out and say that it was vague and washing posted its due diligence and not only did believe her. They tracked her down to James who keeps offices and show that choose an agent of James O Keefe, so that actually ends up basically upholding the ability of the Washington Post report, at least
in ineffectual manner. Here some of the tape there was released by the Washington Post of this woman, trying to basically catfish the Washington Post rapporteur, said we want to retain this. Is your chance rain wow
were all on the record? You know, as I said,
This is, and this is right. This is your chance
What
happening. Is women basically kept looking for the Washington Post rapporteur to say, I hope that this gets Roy more out of office. I hope that this will drive Roy more from office and prevents him from running, and none of that happen so huge backfire, huge backfire on on James having James
ought to think of better ops either. I don't think we should finishes career by any stretch of the imagination. Writing. This is a very, very bad sting. I think it's an immoral sting. Actually, I think they're plenty of ways to get some media to train demonstrate their bias and again, I think James has done some really good work in the past, but this is not an end in a just, as it does demonstrate that the right is so distrustful of the media that attempting to plants a story like this, an attempt to discredit the media that you can save Roy,
are we not good stuff? Ok tie of many more things to discuss, including Conyers and Frank, and then you see I've PV. They, the consumer, finance protection, bureau, controversy plus things I like, and these are just a lot of stuff coming up, but you're gonna have subscribed for ninety item. I didn't get a subscription over a daily wired outcome that could see the rest of the show live on video gets you. The rest of Andrew Cravens shall live under any of the rest of Michael Knolls issue alive on video in my part of our male bad, but we do special com,
station that our view a bull by all. Only you can ask questions when you become a member plus when the Shapiro store finally arrived at long last, you'll get discounts there as well for ninety
dollars ear for that annual subscription, which is cheaper than the monthly subscription you get all of those things, plus this very finest nor beverage vessels is treasured by thousands when there are literally thousands of people who sit around and stare at this thing all day all day, the leftist years, hot or cold tumblr unsurpassed, never imitated, never duplicated, just spectacular the leftist years, how to call mug get that when you get your ninety nine, our annual subscription or if you just want to view this
later watcher, listened to show later good. Please subscribe for you to channel. We really do appreciate that and go to sound clouds, Itunes, any other pod cast out. They have subscribed. We are the largest fastest growing concern report.
ass in the nation
so one of the reasons that there's a new pull out about Roy more today, and it shows that more is now six points in his Alabama centre. Right, I think, more is gonna. Win
reason? I think that he will be seated one of the reasons you
is it. It is because the Democrats, as I said yesterday, have now stepped on a landmine with both
they decide they are going to defend every bad allegations against.
We wanted their bad guys, they they demonstrated their full fledged hypocrisy. Yesterday, Africans at a press conference- and this press conference is just a masterpiece of misdirection and confusion and awkwardness. The fact that they thought TAT this guy was a potential twenty twenty candidates has everything about. The democratic party here is out
our hands honor but Frank, and I know there are no magic words that I can say to regain your trusts, and I know that's going to take time. I'm ready to start that process and starts was going back to work today. Ok, son
did the private. What process is going to take time now, rather than by the atom super confused about this again? I've now stated this many times. I've taken thousands of pictures of people, literally thousands of pictures of fans not once have my hands gravitated towards their asses. Zero times has this happened: zero.
In fact negative right, their asses that have not yet been created. I will never grab. This is not a thing. Ok and then L, Frank, and I love this part. He says in I'll have to think about it. Then
He says you know, maybe more women will come forward. I can't speculative, but by the way more women are definitely gonna come forward.
What is the reason of Nutella if you can't definitively say that more women would not come out around eight and see if my sure
woman come forward with an allegation like this, I would have said no, and so I cannot speculate. Ok, you can speculate.
I can speculate. There are many more women who are going come out with these allegations and you can see that because the democratic gonna, let Frank and set in this while just blow over
the Republicans and I dont get well, then why should we throw overmore? This is the standards have been so lowered at this point that anyone can be elected literally. Anyone in one's own transcend twenty succeeded, because somebody on Fifth avenue and get away with it that is,
an exaggeration, arrogantly Teddy Kennedy drove a woman off abridging murder her and then he left to die and
was not only reelected, whose called the light of the senator. Yes, all of our standards are basically gone at this point, everything has become wrote like yesterday. There is this video of a campaign coordinator for the royal more campaign, literally attacking a camera.
Person, this came out yesterday evening, isn't gonna lose lose Roy more any vote. None. You know why, because the antipathy for the media is so high, among Republicans that it doesn't matter when Gretchen forty literally body slam Ben Jacobs at the Washington Post, he one is congressional race and raised more money the day after the bodies Lamb than he had the rest of his campaign combined. If I'm not mistaken heresy. Here's the David
out of the way more campaign coordinator. Have you think you're going
I was here
Xo South South happening over there, you know- and none of this is good known. This is good for the country, but we hate each other so much politically that were basically willing to allow the worst of both parties to be elected to higher
and willing to believe anything so long as it allows us to alleviate our cognitive dissonance. We all want a believer good people. We all want to believe that we don't like bad people. We all want to believe we have some sort of moral standards, but we have to alleviate or cognitive dissonance and that's why, president from who is an expert in alleviating his own cognitive dissonance, he isn't gonna believe is a bad guy either and so now apparently he's making the claim that the access Hollywood tape on which he was caught, saying that he could grab women by the bleak and get away with it
He's nothing that that's a fake, according to several reports, Sierra. How could we centres is asked about that yesterday. Here is a response to the society so that he made its position clear at the time these times that I said I was wrong. I apologize to set the media
Does the president now that
what
and then he'd already addressed it and that we didn't have any
updates to that. I said what he didn't like and what they found troubling were the accounts that are being reported.
Now that you're? What counts are the ones that are occurring that he's question? That is not a thing. There are no countenance, but Michael what what as in any case there, a lot of people who believe that, because we all have to feel good about ourselves, is very important in politics that we feel good about ourselves now
means that we have to pretend that the evidence against Roy more is not damning. We have to pretend for Democrats that the evidence against L, Frank and is not damning. We cannot live with the cognitive dissonance of knowing that were voting for bad people now at least
give De Denise Mcallister and a bunch of other people on the right who have basically said, run more, maybe guilty rumbled from anywhere from creditably, stairs intellectual honesty. There, David Horwitz on the left, I'll give credit to people who are aware this on us, but I think that the vast majority
public is not dishonest. Maybe honesty in this cases is not about policy. Maybe we should go back to a standard where we all denounce our own garbage. Ok time for wellbeing of riots, things I like and things I hate. I have two comments. Once more on the consumer financed Protection Bureau controversy, it's basically turned into an Austin powers. Get at this point. There are like eight people who show up yesterday at the sea of people claiming to be the new director of the sea of TB are pointing at each other, like the it was like the end of reservoir dogs, there I'll just standing therewith with guns, pointed each other in a mexican stand off and and richer courtrai who's. The outgoing director of the consumer Finance Protection Bureau. He has come out and said that what he hears the data, backstory richer quarters appointed by President Obama during recess employment, there was probably illegal. He was finally confirmed by the Senate. Get a five year term. He stepped down a little bit early specifically said that he would not hand over the sea
maybe they controls embassy, F, P, b to a Republican, and then he appointed his own successor. That is not legal. Ok does not have the power to actually do that that president trumps out, ok now every says, I'm gonna resource, appoint somebody ram. Putting an interim director that in from directors may have office management, a budget he's gonna come in he's gonna clean house quarters has no, I get to appoint my own successor, which is illegal, because Congress didn't get to approve this person and the and the president doesn't fire that person. So now we have an office that is completely independent of any accountability from any branch of government. That's not the way to the bill is supposed to work. That's not the way the with, though the way to build does work. Missy feed this e F, P B itself, the consumer
and as Protection Bureau itself is not a good agency. The reason I say it's not an agency is because originally it was designed to protect consumers, but instead its turn into basically a shakedown industry, for particular democratic donors.
Richard cordially and his allies have targeted specific firms that they want to go after and then they use them to achieve settlements and fund their future project. It basically operates like a shakedown operation. This e f p b at this point and its dominated by Democrats Republicans, cannot be employed. There republicans have basically been barred from employment there and they get their funding from overages at the Federal Reserve sets
as though the it's not as though they are dependent on congressional funding or even executive funding its automatic. There are now a rogue agency that can do whatever they want. If corporate were to have his way, while he can't have his way and president from appointed a new director. What's really going about this is that Trump saying we need to rein in the sea of keeping it actually what it back to its original purpose, which is protection of consumers instead of shakedowns a particular industries. Tromp saying this means that the Democrats immediately say any attempt to make any changes to see if he is Phoebe is an attack on consumers. This one is political angles. I despise the most the political angle that if I wanna make a change to particular law,
it's, because I hate the name of the law rights of what you do for a Democrat is there's the affordable, correct, Obamacare Rita, I think affordable care access has been a disaster. That's what you want to make their own afford,
They will do the same thing with the Patriot ACT during Bush administration.
You and unpaid rape. No, ok, that consumer financed Protection Bureau. That does not mean that is actually protecting consumers is I mean that its protecting consumers?
and re. It's just the name of the agency. But this is what Democrats are doing here is
re saying that what we know the new directors and can be decided by insults, it'll be decided by law. He says, after a lawless attempts to seize power. The agency. This is the kind of disagreement that involves two different laws. They conflict with one another. The right place to have that out is in the courts, which is where it is right. Now it shouldn't be decided by name calling in tweets and insults. It should be decided by people
presenting their arguments and judge thinking over. This judge obviously is looking at it. Overnight recognises its a serious issue: ok, so
and this is this- is nonsense. It does not have the power to do. This is a really silly political controversy designs that court recommend for governor of Ohio Gross, ok temper, some things I like things, I hate and then we'll deconstruct culture briefly, so
things that I, like I just finished. Reading this book called the cartel. Is
really enjoyable. I dont Winslow there. A couple of leftist sucker punches in the middle of it. It basically suggests that everyone whose right wing is bad everybody has left wing is good, but the hero of the story is actually a right wing guy and despite the attempts of the of the author down, wins loaded drop. These sort of sucker punches against the Bush administration and uphold the the genius of the Obama administration, and this suggestion that that America has been involved in atrocities all around the world and that were related at fault for the for the mexican drug cartels, the book itself
It has been compared to the godfather detection, not about comparison of Red Mario Losers original the godfather, and this is the much along the same lines. It's it's. It's really kind of its juicy stuff. Let's put it down.
the cartel. It's also tries to make a larger points about the way that the government in Mexico has worked to store clay with various cartels in order to achieve their purposes. If you liked the movie Sequoia than this, this book is very much along those lines to very cynical, take on the drug war, and I think, given these the non success of the drug war, a relatively accurate one, so check it out the cartel by John Winslow, ok time for a thing I hate and then we'll deconstruct culture for a minute
already. So I have to say today is a sad day. Today is a sad day. It's a sad day because Keith aldermen has finally decided to hang it up, shouted down, walk out the door, leave good riddance Keith, always what developments as that he is is leaving his Jijiu special corresponded rural. Why? Because he has achieved his purpose. No seriously. He says trumps gonna be impeached. Susan arisen from the stick around I'm gonna go if there is another reason why keep Oberman is stepping down from this job, and it has nothing to do with
president trump being impeached, and maybe it has something to do with fluffy, not getting her proper care from the mobile pet spar down the street. Leaving me a ball of crime,
in agony and wounded piss, but he again
Norman is leaving many or maybe the Halloween impersonation, my business too much more because development explaining why he is leaving behind those crazy glasses.
I am confident now, even more so than I have been throughout the last year that this nightmare presidency of Donald John Trump will end prematurely and end soon, and I am thus also confident that this is the correct moment to end this series of
commentaries, and so this series is over. This was
intended as something temporary a two month project by somebody who had given up politics-
Frankly, I have not enjoyed one minute of it, as I'm certain it is
also been for you. For me, it has been unadulterated, paying
and revulsion and horror, no illness
no scandal, no firing just I've said,
what I've had to say, so I am retiring from political commentary in all media venues. Thank you for all the kind words and all the support
fun storming the castle. My work here is done matter fact. So is trumps, resist remove peace? Well, goodbye Keith, resist remove
that way the door, so they give omens, run its added to AIDS thing. I hate because it tat I like keep open being around, because what else am I gonna bounce off? I mean I need crazy people to talk.
and regular basis. Otherwise you don't have a shower hit. It's that sad and- and I just hope they fluffy finally receives the proper care to which fluffy properly is entitled. Ok tend to reconstruct the culture briefly, so this was a specific deconstructing. The culture request by a by a fan, the song is called.
Lemon. I dont know why it exists. It was made by Nerd Enrietta Ferrel. I guess is one of the members of this group nerd, but in any case, this song is hot garbage and has some lyrics that are there are political. We will explain. Here is a little bit of one of the worst arms I have ever seen, no way to see and faded away penance.
Beethoven, but I mean just like any any artistry the dancing tell the paper was washing parishioner off just when the Taliban around the stage, magnificent, ok, carelessly
more than a garbage okay. So the reason is that this is male to me, because one of the lyrics here- and this is fairly typical of a lot of r and D in
Is there there's insertion of random politics in the middle of a song or number one? I'm not, then, pretend that I understand anything is being said here. Ok, I just listen to the song. I could not decode what was just said,
legal language called English. That was not in English, I'm good at it
We cannot even in all my english courses forever. I don't think it's just me, and this is not right.
In any way, because I think there are lots of people who speak English with dialect. I don't understand. I dont know what that was saying, but maybe there are people who do so. For those who don't know gemmen translate, for there is one point to it
For us as hate. You keep asking me where I am from hate about the Boers and did I run hate, keep asking how I feel about guns, hate, there's a light and dark army which side you choose o hate. If not now, then, when hate, if not me than who hate, don't drink the cooling, my friends hate, I tried to tell you all about this dude. That, obviously, is a ribbon president Trump in the middle of a garbage song that no one can understand. What I wished to suggest here is that we spent a lot of time on deconstructing culture, actually looking at
there is obviously the vast vast vast has vast majority of people. Listen to this garbage are not even know what that means. I didn't like it just sounds like it just sounds like hate and then a bunch of words and hate and then about words, but you don't know what actually being said and what is more damaging to the culture. Honestly is the imagery that is promoted. If you don't want women to be treated as sexual objects, which I dont, if you are not interested in women being treated as just pure objects of sexuality, and perhaps you should stop depicting them as objects of pure sexuality, as they are in things like this music video now listen, this lady can dance hall. She wants that's fine. She can wear whatever she wants
that's her prerogative. It's a free country I am suggesting is that if you are appealing to a young male audience which lot of this music does and all you're doing is showing women shaking their rums? You know closeups of women shaking their rooms. That would be objectify. Feminists would call that objectify here, because it objectify and that does more damage to the culture. Even then the bad there. It's it's one of the reasons why Hollywood that the damage that Hollywood does to the culture is mostly was that the damage written plot lines not by its sucker punches. So this is why there there's a new movie coming out called the the post about the Washington Post, but Tom Hanks Middle Street, and it's just a word seasons bait. It looks offer me to have to do.
And things I hate tomorrow. Maybe it's just self congratulatory nonsense. The Washington post was about to be shut down by the Nixon administration. Who now and in the whole thing is really self congratulatory. That movie is not and make a dent on the political scene by their movies. That will make a dance on the political scene that have nothing to do with politics and much more to do with culture. This is also true with a lot of this sort of music. The hidden messages that are embedded in the music are used often less important than the overt stuff, which in this case, would be the above. The over objectification of women, the close of women sweaty rears shaking on your screen. Ok, so we'll be back here tomorrow from
Washington DC, actually for reasons that will remain unspecified. So that's mysterious, I'm bench of Euro. This is the bench of Hiroshima
Transcript generated on 2020-10-14.