Kimmel Fallon called they're? All of them go after the inner Americans are not buying what the media's selling and we're about hit the jacket deadlines. what does that mean for all the illegal immigrant dreamers adventure, bear this adventure parachute We have so many things to get to you today. Speaking tonight in Omaha we are sold out fifteen hundred seed theatre, I'm doing a full exposition on the second amendment, what its meaning is where it comes from and what it protects tonight. So look for that online. Or, if you there in person. I look forward to seeing you. There is a lot to get too on the show as well we're gonna talk about the security or in status for jeered, cushion or wanting to talk about the confirmation, yes, that is now over and the media to suck my dick sporting goods supposedly banning them. Saleable of course want to sell weapons which actually did five years ago, another just re upping, but before he gets any that, I first want to talk a little bit about more facts that are now coming in about the shooting. So every day there are more facts that are coming out about the shooting up. We sort of no

we know at this point until a full investigation is underlined, but here is a fact that should matter to you when it comes to how Americans feel about what happened in parkland and who they blame about what happened in parliament It is not yet right, it is not. Law abiding got owners or Rasmussen, header, bipolar. Yesterday survey, then it suggests it is after the CNN propaganda Town Hall that the two minutes hate on CNN here's Rasmussen. Reports quote fifty four percent of american adults believe the failure government agencies to respond? Numerous warning signs from the perspective killer is more to blame. now shooting only thirty three percent in tribute the deaths more to a lack of adequate gun control. Eleven percent opt for something else: Americans who elementary children reach elementary school children or secondary school age, children sixty one percent think government is more to blame. Just twenty three percent of those adult felt a lack of adequate gun control. Forty one percent of respondents by the way say that they are restrict

dungeon control? Forty percent more action is needed to treat mental health issues. Only fifty percent of Democrats actually said that a lack of gun control was the real problem here. Which is to say when our easy Paul's or some pulls out today, suggesting that even among republican support for going to control is rising. You need to take all of that with great assault, because that's like asking Americans that said in the past, it's like asking Americans are you for less government spending. The answer is Always yes, but then you say: ok, what do you want to see caught and suddenly Americans run for the hills Thing is true. With regard to the uncontrolled people, say: are you from more than control must be the sounds good? Why not keeps dad begins at the hands? people, and then, when you say, ok, that's got to be more active and, above all the rifles. Then all the Americans say while not we're not gonna, do that then the pull suddenly ship, so specifics are very different from general propositions that are put forward in these pulling up

all which goes to show you. The media's attempt to paint this as the shifting point. I'm done control. It's just not true. It's just not correct, and the fact is that even Democrats are split on this. Then we will talk about it, but they are then that news is obvious, since the Huffington riposte reported yesterday morning. After the LAS Vegas Massacre, the democratic congressional campaign committees, regional press Secretary Avenue, Caskey actually wrote to candidates in the northeast not to polluters. As the shooting he Roquat teams. Last its shooting will dominate the news today and will guarantee serious coverage. The rest of the week you and your cat. It will be, understandably, origin upset as well. You're community, however, do not politicize it. Today now look ass. He was right, political, as an shootings in the aftermath, students, bad form, and it's gotten even worse. Over the past week and a half the other media reported, this is just a. ass roots movement. That was happening and uncontrolled, and now it turns out that the so called marked for our lives has happened. In Washington DC on March, twenty fourth, at which some of the stew

Witnesses and students survivors at parkland are going to be the featured speakers that this is now being backed by plan. Parenthood is being, but by black lives matter is being backed by move on dot. Org is being backed by every town for the safety, so all of these organised left is moving. are now getting behind these kids and Astro surfing. What is going to be very large margin, Washington DC that results in virtual. Nothing in the region can result in virtually. Nothing is again because the american people do not support this. The american people look at what happened in parkland and what they see as a failure of law enforcement, which is why yesterday nor a taxi sheriff put out notice. They got him why to claim he did the dead in county sheriff Crazy Murphy told these deputies quote with the recent tragedy in Florida. I wanted to make money clear my policy and responding to an active shooter. All commission deputies, if you respond to an active shooter, you are expected to take immediate, and we do not stage and wait for Swat. We do not cover in a parking lot. We do not wait for another agency. We go and do our duty we go into, engage and stop the shooter and save lives

If, for any reason, you feel you cannot follow this directive, please inform your supervisor and we will work to get you reassigned. This is the way that most American, feel about what the authorities ought to be doing, even though the left must suggest this was not. Failure of authority left would prefer to jump into the debate on this on this moral listing level. The left, who prefer to suggest that there is a moral failure, failure this taking heart on the place of those who do not support widespread done control and that, of course, remarkable Rubio is one of the people has been hit hardest net senator Rubio from Florida, your member. He was at that town hall to tape on CNN, and he was shall act by a bunch of the students, more students who, comparing him to the mass shooter himself Rubio, put out a tweet today. Can, I think, sums up the state of our gun control debates. I quote the debate after power. and reminds us we, the people, don't really like each other very much. We smear those refused to agree with us. We claiming judeo christian heritage, but celebrate era and boasting and worst of all, we have infected the next generation with the same disease. Now

ratio rather bunch people on the left, who didn't like that, he said this- there are people who hours just terrible that he would say something like this, but he's one hundred percent correct. The fact is that in turn, this into a referendum on the moral character of people who disagree with them and most of it, chickens are not up for that. Most Americans are not interested in cash gaining their fellow Americans as murderers and murderers supporters, which is why it's really fascinating, there's been a bunch of corporation that have dissociated from the array over the last week. There is a pull out today from morning com. the short every single corporation, every single cooperation that decision created from the error rate in the aftermath of this gun control debate has been losing losing public support because all gain for five points in public support from Democrats, let loose sixty percent of public support from Republicans and feel like their under attack in the region. Public feel like their under attack is because they are under attack, gave the left they say, they're, not by removing secondment rights. They only one rational, reasonable, don't controls, that's just not true. They want

remove semi automatic weapons from every person in the United States if they could have their way. That is won't be honest. They won't be honest about it. Many members actually what they want and you can see- and you can see it in the arguments that they're making. So today the New York Times as for full piece. Our fifteen is essentially military technology in the hands of civilians. True, any semi automatic rifle busy will look. They are fifteen. Look it's muzzle velocity and has just three thousand feet per second muzzle velocity. This is true of any two to three or five point: five, six millimeter ammo firing rifle the muzzle velocity and those rifles is very high. It always has been. It will continue to be the notion that it's just military now in the hands of civilians again, every rifle, then his military technology in the hands of civilians, because every rifle was at some point: military technology in the hands of civilian, soon bolt action rifles were military technology. In the civilians. This hour is akin to saying that the engine, Your car is just like the engines in the cars of people in the military, get it's true, but it doesn't take you very far and when people on the left rip on the air,

dean and suggests the air fifteen is the root of all evil. There's just demonstrates complete lack of knowledge. There are a thousand types of the air fifty many many different types of semi automatic rifle that fire at some velocity with similar accountable with simmer, similar caliber ammunition, banning the our fifteen or the brandy. Our fifteen would do nothing to stop you. spread of rifles, and it would do nothing to stop the actual problem of school shootings by the way there studies showing that school students had actually been declining in recent years. Not increasing declining, were not allowed to talk about these statistics. Worse because to do so is seen as somehow undermining the case in favour of pushing against school shooting, but the real he is. The justice gun. Violence in the United States has declined markedly from ties and ninety. Ninety two, ninety ninety three school shootings have been planning in recent years pretty rapidly. That doesn't mean

What happened in Brooklyn isn't tragic and horrible and in an act of evil it does mean that we are to take a look at the measures that we are purporting to push and compare those to the rights that we are attempting to infringe and what rights are we in tempting to infringe well, the answer is also an automatic rifle. So our Melbourne made this case on MSNBC. He's got a lot of credit from the lesson from this big. I remember is a lawyer, but he doesn't really bad legal. It this year, and I will explain why he explains the second amendment in his view, does not protect our fifteen's. His logic here makes no sense. The second amendment does not apply to our fifteen's does not apply to assault style weapons. It never has. Congress may legally ban those weapons without touching the second amendment, that's illegal fact, but it's hard for. We know that that is not, illegal that that is not illegal fact. Ok you what he says there. If you go back to visit these screen, where it puts up some text on the screen. The screen that here as there were what he says that the Supreme

has never rule that Arafat teens are protected by the second amendment. Well, that does not mean that there is no right to allay our fifteen. The Supreme Court has never actually ruled on whether twitter is protected by the first amendment, because that's never come up before the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court reject surgery on cases all the time doesn't mean. the right doesn't exist. Cases legally illiterate, explain why were legally illiterate and just a second first I want to say thank you to our sponsors over policy genius. So if you got a key area of car insurance, I've gotta homey of home insurances, you gotta life. You should have life insurance gave your responsible human beings protecting your life with life insurance, you should be ensuring that your family is safe. You should mean during your family is secure, if, God forbid, something terrible should happen to you, but four out of ten people do not have life insurance. There's no excuse for that, policy genius has made it easier to understand, compare him by life insurance, a here's, the way that it works. You go to policy genius, tat Comp and in five minutes you can compare quotes from over fifteen life insurance providers. When you compare quotes this competitive shopping, you will save money

it is that simple. They helped over four million people shop for insurance. They placed over twenty billion dollars in coverage they dont by the way just to life insurance. They are do: health insurance, disability, insurance, pet insurance renders insurance all these insurance and you can shop around for just by using policy genius. Have you been putting off getting life? Insurance costs is depressing to talk about what happens if you'd, I don't be stupid, because once your dad, it's too late so make sure that european. Genius. Is that can get your quota apply in minutes? It is that easy, we'll be glad you did it Importantly or family will be glad. You did something terrible should happen. You, God, forbid again, protect yourself, protect your family, there's no use, in my view, for being irresponsible, not having a life. Insurance policy go Does he genius dot com check it out policy genius, dotcom again, the best way to shop for life insurance, ok, so member makes the case makes this argument. because the Supreme Court has rejected social airy, social areas and appeals The way it works is that you have a case. It goes to a district court judge that is then appealed up to a circuit court judge those the circuit court of appeals and then, finally, its appealed all the way up to the Supreme Court. What

it sends to the Supreme Court of something called a restructuring, which is essentially a petition asking that the Supreme Court take up the case, that's pretty cool we reject written Socio ready for a variety of reasons, so These reasons include the fact. I agree with the court of appeals. Sometimes they say two cases right, because very common claim that a case has not actually rewrite the has not reached ripeness, because there are other circuit court. They ve not ruled, on the case, their cases They say that it's not just an issue of law. They wanna take up their million reasons to reject it. To reject in surgery then it is also true that none of the cases that have brought before the Supreme Court ITALY or they are fifteen because there's not a state in the country that has attempted to actually banner fifteen's, even in California, there's only recently in attempts to quit I ve been a our fifteen, but even that ban is not supremely clear answer. The confiscation of our fifteen has never been tried, and if it were up to the Supreme Court, there is a very good shot that it would be shot down, but Melbourne and this is actually a really dangerous constitutional point. The member is made.

Because it essentially says that if the Supreme Court has ruled on mission, you don't have a right to it. So this room court has ruled on whether twitter is protected free speech, then that means that you don't have a right to it. They know you see the melt mother would never agree to the same logic with regard to say, same sex, marriage before oberstar right so before birth fell, the Supreme Court rejected same sex marriage cases over and over and over registered a bunch of rights of surgery and wood member of said there is no right to same sex marriage at that time. No course, you wouldn't have said that he would have said. In my view, there is a right to same sex marriages inherent in the text of the constitution and just because the Supreme Court has not accepted the case yet doesn't mean the right. Doesn't it In fact, the reality is that, under the ninth and tenth amendments, the constitution explicitly states that rights that are not overtly stated in the constitution of the United States itself are still rights that are held by the people. In other words, the bill of rights is not meant to be. A comprehensive charter of rights is meant to point out some of the most specific rights that it wants protected from the

rural government, but that does not mean that there are other rights that don't exist. All other rights don't exist beyond which the second amendment is pretty clear about what it means. What it says, well regulated militia being necessary to the preservation of a free state. The right to keeping their arms shall not be infringed. It specifically talking about severe means having access to guns that they can then use when they go into the militia at the time. These were military light weapons writing. These will rifles that these were muskets and that same principle carry sport. So Melbury saying here makes no sense on illegal level, but here's the more important point when I remember says once again, our fifteen. When the new times points out the air fifteen tat means they want to ban ever my automatic rifle in the United States, because there is no serious distinction between a Bush master too. three and an air fifteen. There is no significant distinction between between very Springfield Rifle and in our fifteen. Yet it there are a thousand types of rifle Oliver

fire the same sort of caliber ammunition and just because I'm look scarier than others doesn't mean that they are less scary than others, which is why, when we take a course in guns, the very first thing they say is that, of course you don't. Iron anywhere near a person. Of course, you don't fired at something or not going to destroy rifles are meant to do damage. Rifles are meant to kill things. Rifles are meant to destroy things. They are meant to kill people, presumably people who are bad or come in your home. A rifle as a tool of killing that that does not mean that a rifle itself is currently dangerous that we have to ban all of them than this one. one correlation left. Attempts to draw between the number of guns and operate Geller society and the level of murder in particular. Society just does not hold nets, particularly true for rifles is that more people are killed. My hands and fists every year in the United States that are killed by rifles in the United States. Ben Gunn ownership by civilian population generally is not a good proxy. For crime rate gun ownership rights in place like Vermont, are extraordinarily high, for my has extraordinarily low crime rate. This

thing is true in New Hampshire and you go to other states some some places Louisiana is very high where's your brothers were high crime rate now important. No most of that crime is not taking place in the buoys. Most of that crime is taking place in the major cities, most of which have actual gun control, regulations on the books and, most of which are governed by Democrats, all of which to say the daily simplistic attempts to draw a point of of concurrence between a cross point of data between gun ownership and and murder that doesnt really that doesn't really hold doesn't hold in Europe by the way where Norway has many more guns persevering in than Britain does has it that has twice as bad murdering. So these these things just did that the statistics just do not hold printing now in its economic to show you how it is that there are so many folks on the left to ignore all of this in or of the virtual signalling that begins, of course, with our late night house. Now, one of the great irritants. I think, one of the things that helping to destroy comedy in the country,

is the feeling that there are certain areas. American life, that used to be off limits for politics, where we didn't feel it. We're gonna, be assaulted. Based on our politics, when we turned on Tv watch, Johnny, Carson, Johnny, Carson with studiously anti political, meaning that he was a Democrat. Apparently He was not a Reagan Van, although he gets no raggedy Ann and liking him. Johnny Carson was a Democrat No man from watching Johnny, Carson jailer Was a sort of pathway republican? You want to know that watching him in jail. Anna was studiously non political. Now, all of our late night and basically become political hats

can see that it works so last night, Colbert, Kimmel Fallon, all of them are ardent left us in all them decided and they need to go back to the wall in pushing for gun control. So here here's a mash up of cold there and Kimmel than Fallon hear hear them talking about trumps gun proposals quickly Olympics over ninety countries have departed. South Korea, Mandy groups waving goodbye, whereas the and are a cause of sponsors. Although gun orders, if you go into almost any business and show them your gun, you get stuff for free. It's really here. In reality, there was an arm sheriff deputy on site and it made no difference but tromp, even as an explanation. For that reason, a teacher with a hand gun would be able to neutralize.

shooter with an automatic weapon is because teachers love the kids more day. This is what happens when we elect a president who thought all blocked. Mom cop was a documentary. It would be ridiculous coming from anyone, but especially from Trump he's gonna run in your when Trump ran for president, that was the first time he ran and his entire life. So all the late NATO's universally talk, my stupid. It is to talk about why good people with guns can stop bad people with guns. Of course. This is easy. Camels point particularly is incredibly stupid personal. He says they should not amount of weapons should we did not have an had not amount of weapons should we did not have an automatic weapon people unless who are talking at the stuff trinity. learn basic terminology. They don't sell as they don't sound like complete morons, but they are not bothering to do that and its evidence and All of this is really quite terrible for the level of political discourse in the country, because when you have laughing Audiences scoffing, at the idea of an armed teacher, can save anyone than anyone

and you suggest that maybe we ought to our more security guards in schools and Jimmy Camel. Just last set off by suggesting that an armed security guards thing at the school. Even though there are many schools all over the country, armed security guards every day are stopping people with weapons legitimately there there is armed security guards at that. Adding to over fifty percent calls have some form of on security and that those armed security guards metal detectors there. A lot of weapons that are stopped every year going through those those metal detectors apparently Jimmy Camel opposes those as well, simply because he thinks that a generalised regime of gun control is better and then he and Call bare and fell in all of them suggests that if you oppose their agenda, which they ve not made clear, they haven't exactly said what they want. Other than mass banning of guns were never going to happen there, three hundred million weapons in the country and a hundred million rifles, but when you they went on that. They suggest that if you oppose them, this means that you are a bad person and what's amazing, that they felt no blow back in the ratings. Now part of this, I think is the universality of left his feeling in late night, means that you have no alternative but to switch from Kimmel. The Fallon taken here.

I'm gonna, control messaging, but part of it is also that The ratings are so far down on all these shows, overall that the audience is fragmented K. Jimmy came ratings are not any language. Only Carson's ratings used to be because there are lots of networks. Very few people are actually watching these late night shows in comparison to the number of people who are watching a late night shows before the really not broadcast their narrow cast and though there on the networks, and so Jim, No one can say in full honesty, but there's no way to to go too far in bashing president trumpet and the GOP, not at all. I don't think you can go too far. I think that is still doing a comedy show and I need to be funny and entertain my audience, but I also think that we have matured enough to the point where we can accept late night. Talk show host speaking about a serious subject and

I think that it's almost necessary now. Ok, it's almost necessary now for late night hosting talk about political subjects will actually what Jimmy Kimmel has shown its necessary for our late night has to study the subjects before they talk about them, because, literally every day, he says something that stupid about politics, including in that, at the very short clapped him talking about automatically it is being used in the shooting which, of course they were not, and it's not just Gimme camel. Unfortunately, Entire media have shown themselves. Virtually entire media have shown themselves to be activists on gun control issues rather than object journalists. So today's examples come courtesy of CNN, so CNN has been the worst on this its opening. There are these folks in the media who are constantly complaining that but, like President Tromp, are ripping on the media that people like me arriving on the media. How dare we rip on the media in other or that trump? More importantly, Trump rips

the media and therefore Americans, don't like the media know. As I said in my speech, I see that we didn't like you before. We had serious problems of the media before because we feel like you're lying to us when you claim that your objective, when you are clearly not objective when you are clearly not objective, ok now as an example of sea and not being objective today. Dick sporting goods announced that they were going to me ITALY, halts, yells of assault, style rifles and high capacity magazines and all of their stores, including their field and stream stores. I guess they have these things and banned the sales of all. ones to anyone under twenty one now after sale ok to already stop the sale of assault style weapons which the meaningless term, meaning that centrally rifles that looks Gary they done, then, after sandy hook, their reality That's an eight extending it to a few more of their stores, the chairman and see YO said under more than America when we saw what the kids were going through in the grief of the parents and the kids who were killed in parkland. We felt we do something. In other words, there is an emotional peel. They responded the emotional appeal now who cares

I mean the reality is. Who cares? Because most people who are buying from exporting goods were not actually buying assault style rifles from exporting theirs? They haven't been able to four years If they want to raise their age of buying twenty one. That's fine just means the person is nineteen and wants to buy a handgun is simply going to walk across the street to the local gun, store and buy a handgun in accordance with law. This is widely celebrated enemy, guest acts and we poor and respect the second amendment. We recognise and appreciate the vast majority of voters in the country are responsible law abiding citizens, but we have to help solve the problems in front of US gun. Violence is an epidemic. That signal there are too many people, including the brightest hope for the future of America, our kids. What you believe that You believe that, then, why not just stop selling all done. If you believe that the problem in front of us is that all guns are the threat and that sale of legal weapons to law. Abiding citizens is the real threat, then maybe should stats. Our children's, in fact stack revealed that the shooter in this case, had purchased a shot gun, Eddie at a store and Dick store within the past four months? Okay, so is any.

They're doing what would the apparently, I guess, the other new role They won't sell any under twenty. One would have stopped in from getting a gun dick store. Ok, they waited these twenty one of the guys gonna dig store like if they actually think the shock done is the threat, not the person, then should be banning the sale of organs and that they should just stop selling guns exporting goods, and I'm A sort of the media have fallen for this pr trap from six, but this is what they have fallen for. the anchors Albert CNN had made model themselves as so important. What objective journalism in true mockeries themselves, Erin Burnett Ray, It is now she's bosnian inject journal entrenches just an anchor she's, not age, not opinion host. She treated this output. Politicians may lack perch stand up to the end,

but Dick sporting goods, USA, largest sporting goods, retailer, we'll stop selling assault style weapons and raise minimum age for all guns, hills to twenty one is that journalists are matters that advocacy. Obviously, that's advocacy Chris Cuomo had on the ceo ran in the big headline in the backside. Dicks takes a stand. Wow, that's not advocacy at all. That's journalism, dicks takes a stand now. The energy is also taken. A stand is just that critical, but doesn't like that stands. He'd never have on data. In the back or unsafe. At our aid takes a stand, of course, not because their only certain stands that CNN actually lies and see, and it has been doing this weeks now from the awful town hall event to a ban king basic reporting about weapons, there is as CNN host yesterday who, who talked about a full. Am I automatic, which doesn't even make any sense. What the hell's a full semi automatic supposed to mean, as amounting access means. You pull the trigger ones in a bullet comes out here, but it's a full of automatic and then there's really funny video of them trying to to fire trying to fire.

Some automatic weapons and the gun jumping in his hands, because he does not a fire weapon does not lie. get into his shoulder and my wife fires and our better than he fires and they are and then batching basic facts about the. What in making unquiet allowing these do to go on national television. It make unquestioned assertions about the evils of the people with whom they are talking they make on unclear. Assertions that Marco Rubio being an evil person and then response to take CNN seriously. Here's yesterday saying that women can carry guns because they wear dresses like this, a real thing that they said one of the things that people don't talk about a lot of these school sandy hook on all female faculty, from principle to teachers and for a woman, or are you going to hide that gun during the day? You can put your desktop or somebody might steal it, you can't get to it, and I want to have it in a safe in the principal's office. You can't get to it on your person. If you were a dress, if you were a skirt, are you gonna have to wear a jacket? Every day, with a belt on a whole stirred the way a detective in alarm duty would do,

It's it's not a real practical solution, even for a variety of reasons. Ok, look! How stupid this ankara's areas, the anger- and you know that Ankara is she sitting there nodding through this whole thing, women. Where pants I mean, I hate to break it, to see it, but you know outside of his job land, you know outside of like places where women are forced to wear skirts of forest were addressed. all over the world and not talking all Muslims These are lots. Muslim women who are pants outside of places where women are forced, do that in a free society like the United States, lots of women were pants, my wife, what counts my memoirs hands all my sister's where pants. Ok, I understand the dead, that maybe mildly controversial in some orthodox jewish circles, but it is not rare in a free country. lots of women who are pants and you're wearing a skirt. There are lots of women who are skirts. You know how to conceal, carry who they might have to wear Jack whew Jacket, because women never wear jacket and what in the world this is me trotted out as a normal talking went by the way women also have purses. Many women Their guns in their purses, unlike men, who actually have to conceal and carry on their person women carrying,

Their purses is a thing women Carrying guns universities, how they defend themselves very often mean how sexy is that, but that just goes right by the wayside, because the media are attempting to portray all of this as pollution is now. I do want to point out something that I think is what winding up, because there are so many people on the right are willing to jump to conclusions about media, because the media are clearly biased in these situations and they did jump to conclusions in and we had a peace over the daily wire eyelashes, more of tweet, formidable writers of Delaware it's a conclusion about the notion that the town hall, the town hall, was ring today that certain students were told that they couldn't come because When asked certain questions and associate and ban them from the proceedings, it now turns out that the parkland ones, When shouldn't survivors, fathers has admitted to altering his evidence that seen in scripted his town hall question, I think it's important get out in nature of intellectual honesty. There's a big confirmation, baseness,

right now really strong confirmation by us. If you, let me Jimmy Camilla, saying you pretend that he knows what he's talking about, and if you think that CNN socks then you're willing to overlook false statements. It's I'm glad my way here to point out that that was false. Those of false report case. It is not true that CNN rig the town hall by scripting questions for the students it is Obviously there is a selection buys and play in terms of the audience when you go to Brower County to a place where its programme control anyway They voted for Hillary Clinton. Athos. A bunch of students are programme controller, going to end up with a gun control. Then control showed which is exactly what happened. There's that doesn't justify the CNN show trial, but that was not prescribed. Did the students were not told what to say by the producers over at CNN? I just wanted to point that out. the interests of in the interests of honesty. Ok in other breaking news, there's been a lot of talk over the last couple of days about jerk cushion or so yesterday, the White House, Stephen Staff, John Callow, temporarily stripped all White House staffers with interim top level security clearance of that clearance instead downgraded everyone to court imports

grit security clearance, and this means that Topsecret material can no longer be seen by german adjourn. Had interim topsecret clearances, it's always material and so Jared is basically been downgraded or at least what they say is a short period of Time NOS fifteen months in and the guy has still not fully clearly one of the reasons the guy's not fully cleared. It is because he is involved and mother investigation. The Miller restoration hasn't cleared anyone yet so the FBI has not cleared anyone you out, so anyone whose even tangentially being investigated and the mother investigation anyone has been calling for questioning has not yet received full security clearance from the FBI. longer that drags on the longer the Mahler investigation suggesting from Russia collusion or corruption drags on the longer it's going to be before top security clearance is granted to people the longer interim security clearance in plain: does this mean that there is a new level of guilt found about Jared kosher? Nor does it mean anything of the sort that mean that there is a power play by John Kelly here, not really because John Kelly did it too Everyone, including german kosher, who had an interim security clearance, mainly because the blow

active use receiving after rapporteur, who had interim security clearance, was found to have not been granted secure Clarence by the FBI because of the allegations of wife beating. So this is a response by Kelly to the Rapporteur thing and cushions got caught up in the center. Now Georgia's completely clean idea. I ought to know the jars completely clean. The investigation hasn't taken its full course, yet I assume that it will by them. our working overtime, to suggest that the rejection of topsecret security clearance for Jared, indication of his guilt or his group journalism. I've said over. When the programme is nepotism that during cushioned vodka, tromp in the White House, are having such a large roles, of course, that's nepotism. It may be foolish. Do not recognise that This isn't exists, unfortunately, on both sides of the aisle. I don't like it. Wherever I see it, there was no artistic when in Chelsea Clinton was was thing to be involved in the bill and Hilary Foundation. The Kennedys are: eighteen, replete with nepotism, their networks,

I'm exists in politics? George W Bush is a product of nepotism, there's lots of nepotism and politics. This is just another example of nepotism in politics, but if we are now going to suggest that anyone who once rejected for FBI, Topsecret security clearance not just put on in from hold discharges but rejected for Topsecret security clearance is out of bounds and corrupt. Then we ought to start with someone who actually was rejected by the FBI for Topsecret security clearance. That, of course, would be Obama weight has deputy national security adviser Ben roads. That's amazing is back in January and not very long ago, in January, twenty seventeen Hither Washington Free Beacon, reported that Ben roads was openly rejected by the FBI for his clearance, he was cleared by the Obama administration under vague circumstance. These went around the FBI and Obama granted in clearance. Nobody said boot. Nobody care, then roads, one of the architects of the awful,

we'll terrible immoral IRAN zeal- and nobody said, a word about any of this intermediate didn't seem to care very much about that, but cushion or end of the world that obviously mean described it. Obvious means is terrible. That seems ridiculous to me also worth noting that when it coming to the word that when it comes to this other report, that there are four different phrase that we're looking to manipulate Yard Mexico, Israel, China and the way, I am sure that their Looking for ways to manipulate members, the Obama administration as well. The question isn't: do foreign governments manipulate american american government members. The question is: are these cesspool in doing so, or do they actually have real leverage? We don't the answer that yet to the media, jumping to conclusions about Kirshner and suggesting that this just demonstrates that there is inviting in the White House there's chaos in the end they dont by any of that wait for more evidence, as always wait for me, evidence don't jump to the conclusion that the media would like for you to jump to ok. So before I go any further, you're gonna have to go over to daily work,

come on subscribe for nine ninety nine a month, you can have some structure to daily wire. That means get the rest of the shall live, romanian reclaiming shall live the rest and Michael moles shall live. It means the also gets here. Our mailbag, which we are having on Fridays. If you want all of those things plus the magical leftist years, hot or cold tunnel which I would even bring with me on this on this drama, because it's just too valuable then get an annual subscription. This just ninety nine dollars year. Please go to Itunes, sound cloud Youtube please subscriber. Please leave us review. It always helps us. We really appreciate it. we are the largest fastest growing conservative podcast in the nation thank you just to show you how biased media have been on the german vanka matter. Let me show you a couple clips from the media. one of these particularly, is really really really funny. So Rachel mad cow. She,

I never sent me see. She says that the trumpet ministration is a cautionary tale about nepotism. So here here is what Rachel Matter had to say in the future. The textbook explanation, the textbook case, studies about nepotism, about a friends and family approach to governance in the future. When there are after school specials about the loose Beckett's, then as agents of the american government and what's wrong with that, and why doesn't work? What could possibly go wrong? Those stores were all be Crystal clear: no ambiguity because of what we're living through now and thereby maybe future generations will figure out how to avoid this particular kind of mess. We must. We must avoid nepotism at all costs. Also, Hillary Clinton was just the best. Just amazing she's descended seed because she wants heads

Adele just a very very important we fight, nepotism and every level also Joe Kennedy, the thermal, giving the response in the state of the union address, but that was not in the funding. Ok here I want to say this: one could cause it. It's all freaking funny, okay, so make abortion skate over an msnbc of mourning jolting. Here she is talking about events in Germany in their job, maybe getting paid jobs and it's all nepotism, here's a she has to say he came in there to fight for women and she can't handle a question like that. The whole thing clearly is a joke and utter joke. Just like Maloney S, role on cyber bullying, which I think is an insult to women completely and expect today, John, cannot be forced to put out a nice statement about a bunker and how effective she is. Well, I'm MILAN add to the jungle. Long you'd miss over the mortar and altering to women. These, when these women have been given sake, jobs, they ve, been given pay judges. All nepotism have been giving fake things to do a vodka in alliance. I would like to point out the maker Brzezinski

being everyone's gave was the national security adviser under Jimmy Carter, civilians of nepotism and people who have made it based on their names, make Jeanne Scheme may have something to say about that. But again the hypocrisy is of no consequence to people who spend all day trafficking in it. Ok, so meanwhile, there's a lot of talk about deck. Us Odessa out you come up for renewal or or killing on March fats or next week. We're gonna, get alot, headlines and media about how the end world is nigh about how dreamers are going to be deported on mass about how didn't it now, where the benefits of metal and we'd better make some room. for these rumours or trump is just an evil. Racist bigot pay before you read in the headlines. I would like to point out that trumps proposal on Jack was significantly more generous than Barack Obama's proposal on Jack Jack. I only legalise seven a thousand illegal immigrants president this proposal would have legalised one point: eight million illegal immigrants and let another four million, four million legal immigrants come in through chain. My

nation over the next fifteen years, as a centre for immigration. Studies proposes, in return it was twenty five billion dollars to build that trump wall. Intimidation, Funding for border security, as well as some curbs on J migration, but keep did not get those the Democrats and give them to have an answer can be centres is exactly right when she said the Trump did go above and beyond on Jack. I he did a lot more than a bomb ever did he's encouraging them to get something done. That's why he laid out exactly what he expected to see in a proposal that would not only help solve the dock problem, but also provide border security. The present, when, above and beyond what previous administrations have done and offered on that programme, is really sad. That Democrats are not willing to come to the table, get some. Done and actually fix problems and do their job, but of course that is one hundred percent. True, let's hear Huckabee Sanders is saying there, but Democrats are not coming to the table are now coming to the table for one very specific reason, and that is they think that

publicans lose decision, no matter what they feel like either Trump reinstate Stavka illegally and overthrows on promised gets blow back from its base or he leaves jacket or he or he leads to a dead end here its deporting people. That's probably not what's gonna happen here by the way, because Lindsey Gram, who is really soft and immigration he gives them medical analysis. Here that is not completely wrong. He says that if data ends and if all these decorous means are deported that it can be bad politically. For Republicans, this is probably correct. Even if you disagree with him on the policy of it, we did nothing just ended darker and did nothing else in one of these young people start getting deported and that therefore destroy the parties. Think this even above the law now. Trump knows that, which is why the chances that he is going to start deporting millions of people are really really love grades. The reason why Trump, going to do this and ate the data? Is not gonna be reinstated in all likelihood, but Trump is just not going to put these folks, and that means that one-

we'll get work permits. It means a theoretical they could be subject to future deportation, but we all know That is only a matter of times, or somebody gives them amnesty, probably trump. It could be somebody after Trump. These folks will be an amnesty, because no one has the political stones to actually say that people who are here illegally and work came in his children should be deported now. Do I think they should actually be deported eyes. Could analyze on a one to one basis whether people ought to be in the country and if we have, the ability is occurring decide who ought to be here- and we will not be here- then we should determine which of these dream. are actually people who are of benefit to the United States and which ones are not. You don't have a right to be here, just because your brought here through no fault of your If somebody illegally sneak doing Disneyland Disneyland would not have two then give your day pass. That's not the way that this works. Does it have to do tat whether in their interest for you to stay while the United States sort of deal. That said, I think this all ends with basically nothing happening, but doesn't matter. The trump has offered the most the most generous immigration package that I've seen

in ten years, religions in twelve years since the Bush immigration pact, you two thousand sex. It's it's not enough! For Democrats, Trump is white supremacist, so it does not matter the president from just offer to amnesty two million people right off the bat Louis who tiaras came out and says that Trump is an ethnic centric protein, Oppian provide agenda is that Europe is a racist party. This is the way, the democratic and a campaign that President set off on this course legal from underneath the dreamers and then closed his position on immigration in an no centric pro european provide agenda that will America, but it must start with my colleagues on the other side of the owl saying. Yes, we want to solve the problem and we want to rise above. the racism emanating from the White House? Ok, so this is an attack. Democrats- are going to take good luck with this. Ok, there is an attempt to paint trump, as is a deep racist and the last campaign. It failed if they continue to push this line. That Trump is a deep racist. It's not going to work now,

because from hasn't said things that are racist before I think he probably has. In fact, I know he has, but because people do not proceed from raisins they perceive as like Grandpa from nineteen sixty. Who says some stuff. They wouldn't want said outside your kitchen. That's it s. Basically have people perceive Trump, is a right to perceive them. That way, probably not is that the way people do perceived him. Yes, Is this policy racist until we get down to the policies erase it? Of course not policy prescriptions that he's put forward are not racist. They, they may not be things you agree with, but its very difficult to label them. Racist, doesn't matter. Democratic elections, you gotta, go radical on this joy by a joy they hire says Republicans have a penchant for nazis, ok, which comes here

the maidens I've been a lifeline republican and freezing hate nazis and they come after me all the time and there are evil, but here's dread. They are making their case on view. The sea Pat group invited this woman from France may Marine Lappin, whose father was a Holocaust denial and a total fascist and a Nazi and Marine LE pen. The daughter thinks her father was very good and right and everything else and they invited her. There's this like pension for Nazis. Now you know, with Charlottesville in the NEO, said the good guys on both sides and now marine Le Pen. It's like a lot of the people, the Republican Party that I remember Bill Buckley, who fought in world war. Two euro bill, crystal those people who are so am, I not say, are appalled by what's going on right now in that, within this parting sidling them they marry. Labelling should be invited to see back. I said so publicly that said, if we talk about you know, branding Herr Republican Party Nazi, because Marian Le Pen you showed up at sea pack invited then we're gonna also have to talk about Louis Farrakhan being invited to all the tap halls of power.

And the deputy chair of the diseases of the DMZ spending time with Louis, Khan, and the entire congressional, why clock has been examined, lose their outcome was very kind, is every bit the naughty the Marian Le Pen is and much more openly so again their bad apples and if not, what about something Mary Le Pen should not have been invited to see back, Republicans should not have been embracing Marian Le Pen Applicants should not embrace the alright us very loud and proud about this for four years, but to suggest that there are the kids are, the sole repository of racism and Anti Semitism is just inaccurate. Both parties have some problems with this, and both in December, but only one party has policies that reflect Anti Semitism, that poverty is not a party of Donald Trump, unfortunately right now, the unfortunate there a lot of folks in Democratic Party, whose policy prescriptions Britain with regard to Israel are much a line with Richard Spencer and with an with Louis Farrakhan than they are with some the names that that Joy Bay, heart just stated, ok, four afflicting, I like and then a quick thing that I hate so things that I liked it

I just started at the recommendation, my sister watching the Frankenstein chronicles with what my favorite actors showing being shown. It is wonderful. I and I've only watch the first episode and have it is really creepy. Ok, it's not for kids and it's not for the faint apart, but basically there the premises that he is a cop in early in early nineteenth century Britain. I believe this is the time period the sting pleasant and like Dickens is London basically, and he is a check, out a murder when it comes across embody that's been stick together of air. A variety of different parties of a variety of different bodies has limited. The preview comes in at least seven children reason.

ok, so soldiers, as you can see it's a period. These I'm a sucker for period pieces. I like them, it's it's, it's really creepy. It's well acted, it's well written so far. I check it out or Netflix. If this is the sort of thing that appeals to ok, a quick thing that I hate they said. Today's thing I had comes Curzio trucks. Humor, I touch him are apparently does not have. No, either Netflix or second sex work. I don't. I really mean that very here's what from which waiting whose remit net neutrality, the entire democratic party, decided there and entreat about net neutrality. Yesterday they don't know anything about net neutrality and it's pretty obvious benefits are structured retweeted without that neutrality, when a couple streaming their favorite Netflix show, but it keeps lagging killing the mood who will be to blame no one uses Netflix for foreplay dude, that's weird in fact: Netflix there there actually fair numbered studies that suggests streaming. Television has actually lowered the number of times people have sex into giving because too many people are watching networks

and then it's too late and retired they go to bed instead of having sex with one another. I love the trucks. Humor thinks that streaming is what makes sex happen this is not true. Streaming may make other things happen, through pornography. That swimming does not make sex happen. The people who are watching Netflix are the ones most least likely to be having sex you're busy, watching the Frankenstein chronicles you're not using that as foreplay Netflix, but there the Democrats, retreating about this incessantly yesterday, that there are tweeting out that if net Net neutrality happens. Then the internet will be brought you one word at the time I mean what the hell that means, and then they double space it to annoy everybody everything to make our many people and in the Democratic Party units, do better. You're gonna have to have some people who are younger to make these arguments are net neutrality, who know what the internet is and what a computer is. What and with as what streaming looks like, I have ever watched the Shoah, Netflix habits and people who don't actually get cable modem, but my age, this point or not getting cable, they're getting that flexor or Amazon or who will or something. I wonder how many members of the Democratic Party have cut the cable. Yet my guess is

I feel the same is true in the republican party. By the way, all of our political parties are out of touch with modern technology and definitely shows ok. So tonight I will be speaking in and, as I say, I will be making a full defence of the second amendment. I will talk about the history of it. I will talk about the legality of it. I will talk about which guns are protected. What types of folks are protected? I will talk about all of those things. I look for Seeing you there will be back here to Morrow back from our HANS in LOS Angeles, I'll see you then I ventured bear this adventure Barroso. The bench of Euro shows produced by math is whether executive producer, Jeremy boring senior producer. Jonathan hang our technical producers, often Stevens, edited by outing Arrow audio books by like a car meta Heron, make up his by just while their eventual Piero shows a deal,