Democrats are confused by President Trump's. Foreign policy seems to be working. The media experts demonstrate they know nothing about gender or babies, and we check the mail bag and Ben Shapiro. This is the Ben Shapiro show and two ten coming up on today's show, plus I'm going to tell you a little bit later in the show who are special guest, is for our Sunday special. It's somebody that. You know somebody that I think that you will like our lineup is really good. Man. We've been starting to reach out to a lot of folks for this Sunday special, an the guess that we're having a really first rate, but before I get to any of today's news first, I want to say thanks for sponsors over at birch cold. So virtual is the place to go if you are interested in diverse I am a little bit for your portfolio. Obviously the stock market is doing really well. Dollar is quite strong right now. All of that is wonderful, but things change, and this is you, should have your bats at least a little bit and have some of your money in precious metals. That's with birch gold can do for you there, the company, I trust, of precious metal.

Just as in right now, thanks to a little known, IRS tax law, you can even move your IRA or eligible for one k into an IRA, backed by physical gold and silver they've, a long standing track record of continued success with thousands of satisfied clients, countless five star reviews, an a plus rating with the better Business Bureau, ask all of your questions, my friends over at Birch gold group and when you call them up right now, when you contact them and get a free information kit on physical, precious metals. This comprehensive sixteen page get shows how all this over can protect your savings. Hey can legally move that IRA or four one k out of stocks and bonds into precious metals at precious metals IRA right to get that no cost. No obligation to right now, they're birch goal dot com, Slash man, birch goal dot com, slash span! If you are interested in hedging your bets for interested in hedging against inflation or the possibility of corruption in the government, or if you volatility generally, it's not a bad idea to have a least a little bit of your money in precious metals, virtual dot, com, slash venues that slash bends. They know that we sent you okay, so present comes at a very good. We got a foreign policy a very good weekend for policy. First of all, there is the

move all of the United States from the IRAN deal, which was, as I've said many times a very strong move. I useful move. Also, President Trump was able to bring home. Three american citizens have been held captive in North Korea. I thank him for all of this. Very good for president from the Democrats are sort of baffled by all this. They don't understand. Why is it that Donald Trump, this rule the suppose. It idiot. Why is it that his foreign policy seems to be achieving greater results than Barack Obama is awful foreign policy, which was based very much on the idea of a world war? Together we reach out our hand and open hand. We never threatened no right if we do threaten, we don't really mean it like in Syria, but instead what we we should we should all just hug it out? Why is it that Donald Trump's view is working better, and why does it resonate more with Americans? Why is it you can see? The puzzlement on face the folks in the media, they just cannot understand why it is the Donald Trump seems to be succeeding

in this way? The latest indicator comes courtesy of NBC's, Haley Jackson, so Haley Jackson was covering President Trump's photo op with the the Koreans, who, with with the american citizens in North Korea, had been released and Trump went to meet them on the tarmac. Two am three hundred am and then you spoke about it and Watch NBC's coverage. Because it truly is amazing when juxtaposed this coverage, but the coverage of the media at bill. Burke dolls released back to the United States by ISIS. You recall the Bowe Bergdahl had been taken prisoner rather by all tied up, and you recall that the President of the United States Trade, five top terrorists for Bill Burr Adults, who was in fact a traitor, hey turns out that that he was being tried for desertion and bow Bergdahl. This street is a wonderful thing. Your bra have photo op in the rose garden with Bo Bergdahl parents. Talking about how wonderful it was to bring bowl bergdahl home is American I'll bring him home about it.

The hero of the members didn't his ministration did, and the media covered. The straight Medicare look at look at what problems, and that's just so magnets and it's a wonderful what there's no question that these particular american citizens were not in fact deserters from the american military and we didn't have to trade terrorists to get them at, but Watch NBC's coverage, Haley Jackson, but what was striking was it. This was wasn't Donald Trump's, a former reality show producer. This was a staged. Production meant for television meant, for the cameras meant to be shown in seeing here in this country and around the world. You had led lights lighting up this thirty by fifty foot american flag hanging in between two ladder: trucks as the plane carrying these men rolled in this moment when the president and first lady holding hands went up the stairs spending six minutes in private conversation and then unexpectedly, because we didn't think that was going to happen.

Only coming over with these men and taking a number of questions from reporters who had gathered around in front yelling questions, hey look at that look at photo. Op that staged photo op had terrible that photo op. You mean, like the exact photo op that Barack Obama did in the rose garden with bill, Burr adults, parents to announce the return of a deserter in exchange for terrorists. You mean like that photo I the media didn't call photo op. If you'd said it was a photo op. No, you were not allowed to say was, but it was bad to say that was a photo op, because obviously listen the president of the United States that point it was well deserved. A victory lap wasn't ideal for what, of course, the photo ops Of course, it's a photo op when President Trump goes on the tarmac to meet with people at two. Am that's a photo op? If I would need to and the only reason I would do that is for a photo op, I'm not even sure did members of my family at two hundred am on the tarmac and it's real early in the morning and you might sleep but but for the media to critique this by oh look at Trump he's a reality show producer. This is what so funny the media can't understand how reality tv guide became president.

United States because he was the second reality tv guide to become president of the United States. The first was Barack Obama. All of these photo ops, all the scripted nonsense sing for Brock Obama to the media, just refused to call it out, and then there is John Brennan John former CIA director under Barack Obama, says that Kim Jong Moon is obviously do president Trump. How does he know that Kim Jong Moon has do President trump? Well, he doesn't, but he was there. When Barack Obama was being duped by the IRAN, his beat was there when North Korea was duping Barack Obama, but but apparently he knows better. He knows now. The Donald Trump was due by the North Koreans. How does you know because Donald I'm going to have a photo and if you got a photo op that means that Trump must have given up something awful in exchange. So I think he is very smartly and very masterfully Kim Jong escalated and Saber rattled so that he could then switch an appear.

More accommodating and present a more peaceful face, and so now we've gone from Mr Trump calling him rocket man a sick puppy too. Honorable and nice What did it ever occur? John Brennan, that Donald Trump does that as a as a fig leaf for his actual policy down from says a lot of things in that that that again, you can put this on down from seven to have to do. It said a lot of stuff down from says a lot of things, but the question is what he actually does. This is what the american people are starting to recognize about. President Trump, that, despite maybe because of all the pyrotechnics, because all the craziness it is sometimes possible to ignore all of the good things that are happening, and you can see that the folks over at M s n b c, don't understand this. I do appreciate the The silliness of the host there, the first Kim Jong Moon as soon that's, not the way that create names were his name, is Kim right. His last name is Kim, but any case John Brennan Yep, making the case the Donald Trump as being due by the North Koreans with no. I

prince he's actually being duped by the n Koreans? To this point other than Donald Trump said something on the tarmac about these people being treated very sleep, I can John, which obviously was untrue. Trump says a lot of stuff right file that wanted from says a lot of stuff, but for a guy who's, a duty seems to be doing pretty decently at this, and at least he's surrounding himself with people who are certainly not being duped out. Speaking of Democrats, who say that Trump is being duped, Nancy Pelosi she of the moving dentures. She suggested that president had failed in his own to protect and defend United States. By pulling out of the IRAN deal very very sad. We take an oath to protect and defend. That is our first responsibility. I do not think the president is honoring that oath but what she did not want. Ok, so he's not honoring his death. What exactly is the oath that he's boundary? I mean the oath to uphold the constitution, which was which was only breached by pushing the IRAN deal here on Google not a treaty. Iran deal was an executive agreement between Barack Obama and the iranian government. It was not approved by the Senate in order for a treat

approved by the sending. You need at least sixty votes to approve the treaty, and then it did not get sixty votes in the Senate had twenty one percent approval rating among the american public at the time that it was passed and John Horse made a great point over a commentary. He said one of the reasons the Democrats were so attached to the IRAN deal is because they felt it was a great triumph of them over the public. It was their ability to steamroll everybody and push through a deal that everyone thought was garbage that made them celebrate it. They thought it was in in a real diamond creation of their power of there will of their ability to cram down things. The american people didn't want honest stupid, unwilling american public, but Donald Trump breached some sort of constitutional by pulling out of a deal with a terrorist nation. Donald Trump did that or is it Barack Obama breach his constitutional duty to defend the United States by signing a deal with with a regime that is killed. American soldiers killed be clear about this during the walk. Or their ran back militias that were murdering american soldiers and wounding american soldiers. There's a lot of ied.

Set by troops produced in produced in IRAN. Used Mame name american troops, Barack Obama signed a deal with those people and got nothing in return. Zero things in return, but Donald Trump is the one who do Donald Trump is the one who's, a fool, there's a reason why the american people are trusting Republicans more on foreign policy. These days, then they trust, Democrats and part of that is because the american people comes to foreign policy they're, not as as sanguine about the possibilities of a beautiful world is, rats are Democrats seem to always believe that if we are just nice to every else, everyone else will be nice to us. That is not true, you're nice nobody else until there mean to you at that point, you clock am that's in american foreign policy that I think that the american people agree with. Another demonstration of this, obviously, is the Democrats. Newfound opposition did you Know- has told you to hospital, of course, is the CI a nominee to be director first female director in the history of the CIA and Democrats are are just fighting mad about

How could you know house will even be considered considering that she worked at the CIA at a time when the CIA was engaging waterboarding of terrorists? How could they possibly do all of this They were totally fine. When John Brennan was it CIA in now and Brendan worked at the CIA at the time when waterboarding had been approved, it didn't matter that half the people at the CIA They work at the CIA at the time when waterboarding was used, but now the even even the remote idea that waterboarding was a necessary evil. That was something that we had to do, but did not constitute formal torture that has been thrown out. We can't know if you say this: it makes you a cruel, inhumane, bad person. Now John Mccain and send some of the same things about waterboarding, but I'm a little more sympathy for John Mccain saying and considering that it was actually tortured in custody for seven years. I'm a little more sympathy hearing that from Joe Mccain was tortured for no reason legitimately, no reason other than to try and break him. I have more sympathy for that. Shin from Mccain that I do from Dianne Feinstein, who knows better

then, to assume the best about people like College Sheikh Mohammed. One of the things that's hilarious this week is holy check Mohammed, who is one of the masterminds of nine hundred and eleven. There are suggestions that he was going to be allowed to testify against Gina Haspel they're, going to bring an actual terrorist responsible for nine hundred and eleven out of jail so that he could talk about horse experience in the hands of Gina haspel. If you want to make sure you to hassle president of the United States, that is the best way to do that, seriously. Bring it bring it terrorists out there to talk about. Gina Haspel was mean to him that I would vote for her president after hearing that, because on the every little bit of everything that he got. But beyond that he also gave us. Actionable intelligence because we waterboarded him injustice I'm a show you a clip of Dad's Dick Cheney, made a play for a clip of Dick Cheney. Talking specifically about how Democrats really don't get it right, he x planes why it is that waterboarding was a necessary thing at the time. An again demonstrates why it is that so many Americans are not going to trust Democrats on foreign policy for quite awhile after Barack Obama, but first I want to say thanks to our sponsors

a red, bull and branch. So here's the reality, you're, not sleeping well, but one of the reasons you're not sleeping well is because you have a set of crappy sheets right. You just went to your local retailer and you've got a set of sheets for like fifty dollars and you slap them on their Anne feels, like you're sleeping on plastic. If you want the best sheets that you can possibly sleep on at a really affordable price, bowl and branch. The bowl and branch makes everything from bedding, blankets and it's made from pure one hundred percent organic cotton. It starts out super soft to get softer overtime. You buy direct from those who are essentially paying wholesale prices. Luxury sheets can cost one thousand dollars in stores, but you don't have to spend that much money over a bowl and branch couple, one hundred dollars: everyone who tries bowling branch sheets love them. Actually we like them so much that we legitimately took sheets in our house and threw them out and bought bowling branch sheets instead they're just that much more comfortable. It's very difficult to sleep on on bowl and branch sheets after you've slept on bowl and branch sheets, which is pretty much Only downside shipping is free. You can try them for thirty. Nine. If you don't love them, he send it back for a refund no one is in the back. They are that good to get. You started,

right now. My listeners get fifty dollars off your first set of sheets at Bollandbranch, dot, com, promo code. Then that's bowl and branch, dot com, promo code band again go to bowlandbranch dot com, promo code and you get fifty dollars off your first set of sheets the sheets are just phenomenal. You're really really enjoy them. I promise check them out: bowl and branch, dot, com, promo code, Ben, ok, so speaking of democratic inability to understand the heart of the american public. The truth is that in elections in the United States, from basically World war, two on Republicans were trusted with security, far more than Democrats, so after the end of world war, two and really with as a President Eisenhower in nineteen fifty two election since then, Republicans have won every foreign policy election and they lost a lot of domestic elections, so they lost they. They they one Eisenhower one on a foreign policy. Cold war, I'm going to end the war in Korea based election and then Richard Nixon, one

restoration of security based election, we're going to end the war in Vietnam, with victory and peace through victory? That was going to be. That was going to be the idea from Richard Nixon and then ended the cold war. Ronald Reagan ran on the idea that the Soviet Union was an evil empire and from nineteen eighty one thousand nine hundred and eighty eight, the Republicans were present from nineteen eighty eight to nineteen. Ninety two in the aftermath of that George Hw Bush, was there to sort of do the clean up in the aftermath of the cold war. Then you gotta domestic issues right. It was the economy stupid. They got Bill Clinton into office in one thousand nine hundred and ninety two, but as terrorism was rising George W Bush was trusted more in foreign policy and then in the two thousand election and obviously didn't win the popular vote, but by two thousand and four clearly. Security was the top of the agenda and he was in a hard fought re election battle against John Kerry. By two thousand and eight, people are ready to move on from national security. They don't want to hear about the Iraq war anymore. They were tired of the Iraq war. They had been convinced by the media. The Iraq war was the wrong thing to do because they weren't massive stockpiles of new WMD found in Iraq in the first place, and so we had

domestic policy. Election Barack Obama won on the basis of that. But the reality is that when it comes to crises in foreign policy, Republicans are trusted more than That's because republicans are more realistic than Democrats on all the stuff. They are. They see world as a dark place, filled with people who are trying to kill us, and we have to strengthen our hand, and this is why Dick Cheney for all the talk about him being this evil, Darth Vader, ask figure a lot of folks in the United States, you believe. Well, maybe you need Darth Vader if you're staring down somebody even worse. So here's Dick Cheney talking about why the use of waterborne winter of waterboarding during the war on terror was a useful thing. The techniques we used were not tortured. It's lot of people try to call it that, but it wasn't deemed torture at the time. The techniques will you, our techniques we use on our own people in training. We can go out and make him up. Someplace president signed off I signed off and have Security council signed off. They did a good job. They got the intelligence they needed

and we were safe from any further mass casualty attacks on the seven and a half years on our watch on now. People want to go back and try to re write history, but if it were my call, I do the and most Americans, I believe, still feel the same way despite our sort of softness with regards to waterboarding. If there another terrorist attack in the United States of nine hundred and eleven scale, the United States would quickly shift into ok you do what you need to get the information short of actual full terror, of full full torture. All right, yeah of waterboarding is not full torture. We do use it to train Navy seals I watch, as I say, Steven Crowder get waterboarded and do just fine. Okay this just as crazy as he ever was, but Steven Crowder is totally fine. It's not somebody who stuff for the long term after effects of torture, okay. Well, meanwhile, the mother probe it continues to unfold, and obviously members of the Trump administration are interested in wrapping this thing up

Is, this all a prelude to present from firing Robert Miller? I doubt it, but I think that they are trying to push publicly for Miller and this problem and I think, that's appropriate, because I think that the Miller problem does not appear to come up with anything so far, a in terms of actionable intelligence about the Trump administration. A lot of late breaking news about Michael Cullen, not about per isn't trump and short of anything about President Trump and russian election collusion. I don't see the evidence at this point here is MIKE Pence. The vice president yesterday saying listen, it's time to wrap this stuff this stuff up, I mean we got enough enough is enough about a year since this investigation began our ministry is provided over a million documents. We fully cooperated in it and in the interests of the country, I think it's time to wrap it up, and I would very respectfully encourage the special counsel in his team to bring their work to complete Shin. His weather was what turned he would he declined to say. That was what time, because he doesn't want to look like he's stepping on Miller completely, but he's not wrong when he says it's time to wrap this thing up. I mean the Miller and I

The Asian has now been going on, not molars appointed what may of last year, so that's been going on for a full year, the Miller, investigation and all talk about Trump Russia Collusion has been going on since the middle of the twenty sixteen election and nothing right, nothing if he has been looking into this for two year. The best they've been able to come up with is George Papadopoulos. Low level staffer met with some russian agents in London to talk about leaks, Hillary emails and it went nowhere and then lied to the yeah I about it, Papadopoulos, which is why he is probably going to end up you know, cutting some sort. Bargain only ended up with is is a FISA words on Carter page that resulted in no prosecution whatsoever. I would end up with is a is a prosecution MIKE Flynn based on him fitting to the FBI about having a conversation with the Russians after the election having nothing to do with Trump Russia collusion know what any of this It has to do with actual trump Russia. Election collusion is beyond me, and I think Trump is rightly angry about this John Kelly, chief of staff for President Trump. He says that mostly

It's just embarrassing annoyed by the investigation at this point is our cloud because of it hanging over this White House. Well, yeah, you know it's it's. The may not be a cloud, but certainly the president is someone Barris. Frankly, when world leaders come in yeah, baby Netanyahu was here and he was under investigation of self and it's like you walk in and it you know the first couple minutes very conversation might revolve around that that kind of thing. I mean you got to sympathize with Trump to the extent that Trump knows he didn't collude with Russia, and yet he's been hearing for two years that he was. He won an illegitimate election because he colluded with Russia that and uh. Into it. You too, I think, would know everyone. You know based on the assumption he didn't actually click with Russian. I see no evidence that he did at this point. None has been presented publicly. So if mothers got something at a certain point, you guys eight do wrap it up present. Your evidence lets you. You got to show. If you got nothing, then you got nothing now with All of that said all the. How bout now surrounding Michael Kohn is obviously not good for President Trump, the President,

not surround himself with the best people that is very clear, surround himself with Michael Kahn was a fully move from the very beginning, Michael Kahn, is eight under had that is obvious, and the fact that Michael Kahn, I it continues to haunt the president, is largely a problem. The president Trump on making Agency Att announced today that they apologize for ever having given money to Michael Kahn. They were apparently giving money to Michael Kahn in you essentially lobby the president of the United States on the 18th, time Warner, merger they given about two hundred thousand dollars ahead of eighteen legislative Affairs office actually resigned today overall all this, even though no illegal activity took place, yeah then give I'm can any amount of money they want. It's really up to Michael Cohen, to register as a lobbyist, but it does make it difficult for the President of the United States declare.

He's trying to drain the swamp with all the people around him are raking in the cash like Michael, come on under my administration were fighting against. The lobby is the special interests and the corrupt Washington politics after years of rebuilding firing, countries of which a lot of people partake in the cost of rebuilding those for Our country is, we are finally rebuilding our country is when he says drain the swamp in these rallies. It's difficult to say that, while Michael Cole is pulling down two million dollars to be friends with Donald Trump, it makes things very awkward. It's why Donald Trump needs to excise, these people from his life. It's why the president needs to it to not. Get now. Is he wrong that is reading this want as far as regulation? No as far shrinking size of government, and I think that the president is doing his best. Although

sign into law, a couple of terrible on the bus packages you never should have signed into law the real kind of draining the swamp has little to do with firing Michael Kahn attorney. His has a lot more to do with cutting the size and scope of government. I think that Trump in some ways has heart in the right place there, although he's not cutting the size and scope of government, I think nearly enough to suit me, but it does not help his case when, when Michael Kohn is running being Michael Cohen. Now, meanwhile, the expertise from the left is on full display and when it comes to matters of genetics, an real, It's so bizarre yeah. There are a lot of folks on the left. I spend my life going to college campuses and being told that I do not fully understand science that I did not fully understand science, I'm going to explain in a second. Why does the left and apparently does not fully understand science, at least lately, but first I want to say thanks to our sponsors, over at american innovation, so american innovations are brand new podcast from wandering and it's awesome. Ok, I've listened to a few of their first episodes and it really is good. The american innovation is hosted by popular science, author Steven Johnson, and they tell you stories behind a lot of the sign.

That you've heard of. But you don't know the back story to say, tell you the full story behind DNA and the mapping of the human genome. They tell you the whole story, the whole back story behind the rise of the personal computer, how it happened, artificial intelligence. All of these things you become smarter just by listening to this podcast. It's not a typical science podcast, just a guy talking into a mic about science, you're not only going to hear about the science behind some of America's greatest innovations, you'll actually be immersed in the dramatic moments behind the people place and time that led to the amazing discoveries that we are all living in, that we all get to benefit from in our lives? The first six episodes are actually written by New York Times bestselling author SAM Keen. You can hear the first three episodes right now by searching for american innovations on Apple podcast. So this weekend, when you're not listening, my Sunday special and we're not catching up on Ben Shapiro Show tomorrow is Saturday no damage tomorrow. That means it's time to listen to american innovations on Apple podcast, Rep, you're. Listening to this head over to one three dot f and Slash ban, that's one: three dot f, then slash bad, go search for american

Asians on Apple podcast, reverie, you're, listening right now or head over to one three dot at them. Slash band the show is really great. It's really fascinating and you learn a lot to check it out, one three dot at them: slash band and that's left unless they know that we sent you all right. So speaking of science, the left obviously is having some trouble with the signs up. This comes up in a couple of different contexts. Today, contact number one apparently Donald Trump told John Mcenroe, the the former number one seed, a tennis player, because now we've got to pushing sixty that John Mcenroe, but John Mcenroe was was apparently at some event and Donald Trump have to note to him offering to pay John Mcenroe million dollars. If you play a match with Serena Williams, here is John Mcenroe. Talking about it. This a match, and suddenly I get this envelope and it's from Donald Trump. You know who's promoter galore little. Did I know what was going to end up happy, nor, I believe anyone else, so he he wrote me a letter said you know. Dear John, you know I want to offer you a one million dollars again

to play either Serena or Venus So over the course of time. Literally, you know my kids. My daughters have been dad. I don't know if Serena, I'm like God, I god my kids on my side. Ok, the answer is, he could probably beat Serena. Ok, but CNN's, Christine Brennan says no Venus or Serena would have pummeled John Mcenroe, the former for one player in the world. First of all, I talk about in their primes, because I know you Elton John Mcenroe is sixty still probably knows the truth, but here here they're talking about it on CNN and obviously Power means that women have the same musculature and capacity in sports as men if you're stupid, so here is

is Christine Brennan trying to explain. Can we talk about him saying that he was sure that he would have beaten, Serena or Venus Williams? I mean I don't think he can be so sure well he's in his late 50s Brianna, and I don't think anyone would want to see that, but I think Serena or Venus would have pummeled him out loud. Linking over Bobby Riggs back in one thousand nine hundred and seventy three ok Billie Jean King, beat Bobby Riggs because Bobby Riggs through the match. Ok, he legitimately through the match, and he was a drunk old dude. The idea that that matches, one of the great annoyances for anyone who knows anything about sports. It is such an annoyance when people say Billie Jean King beat beat Bobby Riggs straight up, Hey Bobby Riggs through the match before the match There's very little doubt about this at this point and here's my proof that John Mcenroe, back, beat Serena Williams, ok and certainly in his prime. To beat Williams no question. First, all three lanes has said before: just a

mens store because you wouldn't win on the men's tour. This is obviously true. Ok, many years ago, very early in Venus and Serena's career, one thousand nine hundred and ninety eight Serena Williams decided she thought she could beat some men. So she ATP Tour office at the at the Australian Open and a guy named Karsten brasch. We've never heard of he was an okay player, but it wasn't anything special is once a top. Forty player does best buy at this point when he met on Wednesday night's ninety eight who's right, two hundred and third in the world, two hundred and third in the world. So Serena was talking about how she might be able to become the man and he okay, one play match, and so both Serena Venus showed up to play relative to play, matches with him just for fun, so brash this according to USA. Today the date was set in the data rashleigh to warm up round of golf in the morning then came to Melbourne Park, the threesome once in the back court, Each sister would have one set shot at brash word, spread around the grounds. The event was taking place, which caused tournament officials to restricted minutes, the area to only those badges, brash and sipped beers during the changeovers.

And, to be honest, no longer look the part of a fit professional athlete. Brash led five over before winning the set six one and then posted a six two set three over Venus. He was two hundred the world. Smoking and drinking beer between the rounds, and he kicked the crap how to Serena and Venus Williams. That is not a rip on Serena and Venus Williams athletes. They are incredible. Athletes they're also women into that women and men are exactly the same when it comes to physical capacity is just idiotic. It's just stupid. Okay, she is the greatest female. Player of all time, but her fastest recorded serve was one hundred and twenty nine mph, ok, the fastest recorded men is one hundred and sixty three mph in the twenty fifteen Grand Serena's average served traveled one hundred and nine miles per hour, Novak Djokovic averaged seventeen Anne Marie averaged a hundred and fourteen so experts and come up with something called the universal tennis rating, get rates all players on a single scale, joke of edge. That is a couple years ago, rank

Sixteen point three: nine that was the highest in the world Serena ranked thirteen point. Thirty six, which sound terrible until you realize that that is the same ranking as a mid, ranked male college tennis player, ok, so men and women, they don't have the same capacity. Ok, this is true when it comes to throwing baseballs as well. Women on average cannot throw as fast as men. There are some women who can throw pretty fast, there are no one who can throw ninety five miles per hour. Any average woman throws a baseball slower than is it real, since I think they're not making it up. The average woman throws a baseball slower than out of one thousand men nine hundred and ninety eight of those men hey the average woman throws. Faster than two out of one thousand men that you pick up the street. So let's get over this whole women and men are exactly and they're not exactly the same again. Does this make women worse? No doesn't make worse at sports, yes by any objective measure, but why is this even check but feminists. Don't understand you undermine your case when you see

that men and women are exactly the same or they should be treated exactly the same. Don't understand that's really stupid, because then you know what happens. Fallon Fox, who is a dude who is transgender fights women in you in in MMA and beats the living crap out of them, because he still has male musculature and unfair, because and beating the hell out of women that this whole thing is so stupid. Speaking of expertise on the left I have to play, this clip is just incredible. So there's an expert in Britain. I love what what now passes for being an expert is pretty spectacular. This is it is an expert in Britain trying to explain that parents should ask babies for mission to change their diapers. There's a sexuality expert and author named Anne Carson, and she was speaking to ABC News in Australia and shoes. At what age clients you work. So she said we work with children from three years old who worked with parents from birth and then Carson explains exactly what she means by that we work from children from three years old. We work with parents from birth, from birth, yeah yeah just about how to set up a

true of consent in their home. So I'm going to change your nappy now. Is that ok, of course the baby is not going to respond? Yes, ma'am! That's awesome! I'd love to have my nappy changed, but if you leave a space, Anne, wait for body language and wait to make eye contact, then you're letting that child, no, that their response matters uhm, no Okay as a parent to do as a parent of a forum two year old, one of them is out of diapers and the other one who will soon be out of diapers. I hope. Okay, here is the truth. If you leave your kids to decide when they want their diapers changed. They will have diaper rash forever forever. If I let my two year old explain to me what he wants is they prefer so he's really smart, so he actually does like he. He he it is, it is go to. The bathroom immediately tells us like right that he says okay, B b boob whatever, and then we go in changing, but my daughter was not so much like that right. She she we had when she was very young. She

issues also clean freak, and so, when she a little baby, she would not eat until she been change, but as she got older, his kids this. She started getting angry when you would change her diaper and my son is starting today, now to where it gets mad. When you change his diaper, doesn't taper change he thrashes around on the changing table. You know you have to do for sure, kids to change their diaper if you're not an idiot but apparently being an idiot is an actual qualification for being an expert on parenting on national tv now. Listen, I don't want to. I want to stereotype this woman GM cars, and I don't know if she has kids. I don't know it hair, but this dumb. Okay. This is incredibly dumb and it's amazing what constitutes expertise now, the

thing experts know so little about what actually happens with regard with regard to parenting, so many of them are basing it off of bad social science or based on yeah. These tiny, uncontrolled studies. That is the a lot of what they have to say, is just absolute counterintuitive, and then they claim that they are experts in science. First in these religious parents to do things like change their kids diapers without their kids permission, you're violating consent, you're part of rape culture. If you change your kids diapers, in such nonsense. Ok, so I'm going to mail back in just a second first, I wanna say thanks for sponsors over at the Usga, so this one is for my pro second amendment listeners out there, which is virtually all of you. I believe so. I've got a great opportunity for you to win an expensive at new gun, but you have to be logged It also have to ask act fast, so the Us Cca is give you five chances to win. A thousand dollars, buy an expensive new, Kimber Micro with extra ammo. As a strong supporter of the second minute, I'm also proud. Member of the. U s he's yet because they have all sorts of fantastic service as including educational services, informational services, legal services and they love giving free guns to law abiding citizen, so you can protect yourself, go to defend.

My family, now dot com and lock in your five free chances to win right now, defend my family, now dot com and lock in those five three chances to win, don't miss out on the chance one thousand bucks for your very own Kimber. It is We find one of the finest handguns out there, but it all ends the 25th. So you have to hurry, go to then my family now dot com right now for those five chances to win. It's a hundred percent free. You can enter in seconds and it gives you those five opportunities again. Your love biting citizen. If you don't own a gun, you probably should for self defense and for various other and I think that it's worthwhile owning weaponry and defend my family. Now dot com go register. You can actually win one at the very least you'll be registered with the? U S? U: CH, a great organization to begin with, go check it out now to find my family now dot com already. So we are now going to get to the mail that but first you're going to have to go dailywire dot com now the reason you're going to want to do is we want to ask me questions. That's the only way to do it. You Are you sending me these emails and I'm the answer? Although I get hundreds of emails that I mean not to be self centered, but I'm a popular fellow, I get lots and lots of emails

How do you know that your question is actually going to be answered? You know it's going to be answered when you, actually send it to me via daily wire, and the way you do this is you go to our daily fire chat room right now is I'm about to do the mailbag after you subscribe and then you can ask me, questions live and I will answer them for you on air plus. You can ask questions of our other hosts. In the execrable Michael knows, it's almost time for next episode of the conversation Tuesday may fifteen five hundred and thirty pm eastern two hundred and thirty Pm Pacific will be here to answer your questions, which means that he will stare blankly into camera and then make an obscure reference to a catholic theologian. You've never heard of hello as well answer all of those questions. If you go over to the only word I come and you subscribe all you have to do to subscribe over and subscribe, and then everybody can watch this right. You to base book. You can watch well, but live Alicia Cross will be there and she will be reading all of your questions to him alive for a full hour and you'll get all of your questions answered even if badly by Michael Malls, so go check that out, plus you should subscribe also because it helps bring in the show. Ok, let's be honest,

about this. It is your subscriptions that allow us to bring you to show. It allows us to bring you this Sunday. Specials are new Sunday. Special is going it's coming on Sunday, because it's Sunday special didn't get that from the name and we are featuring Dave. Rubin said: Ruben stops by for the full hour as Larry King might say, and it is excellent. It's a really have a lot of fun to listen to you see a lot of hubbub about the about the intellectual dark web this week. Well, Dave is a charter. Member and connector within the intellectual dark web will have full discussions about Dave philosophy and the stuff that Dave has to say. Well, here's a little bit of what it sounded like when I sat down with Dave Rubin, but one of the great is about Dave. Rubin is that the first time I was introduced, I think, is probably on your show and we knew each other before before I was on your show, and you are, I think, one best interviewer business. People normally see stuff like this and expect us to see the chairs are burst. Yeah number! What's what's really fun about this, actually want to ask about some of the so your own journey, because you don't actually get to talk about that too much very quickly, though I just for the record clearly by you being interviewed, you stole this from me. I I was the one that came up with the idea of the interview. No,

my people sitting there talking about that. We had you have culturally appropriated it for me, I just want to yeah and then just like just like American, culturally appropriate from others, and then we're going to make the best of it make more money. So I mean that's our actual plan. It should be really good so you're going to want to check it out so go They are sending special. That's why you are subscribed over to Itunes. Leave us a review subscribe. If you want, the annual subscription then get the annual subscription which comes along with this, the very greatest in leftist tears, hot or cold vessel It is just fantastic. That's nine dollars a year. Your annual is better than your monthly check it all out, our dailywire dot com, we're the largest fastest growing conservative podcast in the nation. Uh and to mail back it up. So let's do this thing so Jim says hello, Ben's, father of three beautiful girls. You'll, be who's me to make the world a better place for them. I personally think our national debt

needs to be reconciled above all else, and that entails entitlement reform no politician wants to discuss. What do you think is the number one threat the next generation faces in? How can we fix it today? I think in terms of government. That's exactly right. I mean in terms of government the blowing out of the well, that and the creation of an a fiscally irresponsible deficit. That's going to be paid off by our kids and our kids. Kids is really awful. It's one of the things that Paul Ryan was trying to push. One of the shortcomings of press Trump, who really doesn't care too much about entitlement reform. He thinks it's politically toxic. You may be right, that's politically toxic, but you gotta do it anyway, because if you actually want to save the country, you can't be waiting until twenty years from now when social Security goes fully bankrupt, not even twenty years, probably one thousand and fifteen years from now when it goes fully bankrupt and you're looking at drastically raising taxes or continuing to blow out our national debt, which essentially outsource our foreign policy to people who own our debt puts us in severe physical need, so that stuff Republicans ought to be pursuing right now

they ought to be making strong moral arguments for why social security needs to be restructured. I think young people in particular are willing to hear that argument and, if they about social security they're willing to hear you know what you don't your taxes raised and want more money back from the government. You have both of these things. All we have to do is make social security a private thing as opposed to making it a public thing. Okay, no, it says hi Ben. I knew Delaware Subscribe, I was wondering what you would say. President Trump's greatest accomplishment as president is at this time as a bunch of accomplishments that, I think, are really great. I think the tax cuts are excellent. I think that his stacking of the courts is probably the single best thing his stacking the courts with conservatives who are going to be on those courts for decades is an ex excellent, necessary things. Otherwise the judiciary just becomes a tool of the left. Beyond that, I was the movement of the embassy this one pulling out of the IRAN deal. All of that is terrific cutting down on regulation. The man's got a lot of accomplishments. I mean I can't be unhappy with this policy. So far I think is policy. So far has been terrific. As I've said, two top members of the administration

Amazon, executive policy, see plus on legislative policy dee on rhetoric, and his rhetoric is improved of late yeah. He hasn't any, Bing Charlottesville, Boo Boos as he as he used to. Hopefully that lasts, but you know it's a day ending in Y. So there will be a tweet storm coming soon. Susan says Quest hey man, you clearly have amazing recall, imagine much of that is IQ many times for the late person in the world to help us keep our memory sharp well when it comes to actively attempting to memorize. Now, I'm lucky, because I have a pretty good memory for things I want to. I want to think about, but I do find helps. Is writing stuff down, so not even looking back at what you've written down, but the very active writing things down is very helpful. It's a good study method for kids who are in school if you're in high school and junior high you're trying to study for a test right things in writing by hand not type kind of typing, it doesn't get in your head quite as much grab a pen write down the stuff, you want to remember the very active

adding almost engraved on your memory. So I would. I would highly recommend that, as as a memory tool also, you don't have notes that you can later use. I I make a mistake, I think when I read books and I've had this discussion with it with a couple of people in in recent interviews, the AIR Jordan Peterson. Most specifically, I think, talk to out highlighting books, I believe is Jordan. I am not somebody who, how is my books, because I have a lot of reverence for for the written word and in for books, and I don't like to face in my books, but I I I was here in front, it wasn't or know somebody else is going to know. I mean now, but at some memory that great but the, but I if you, but what he was saying is that it was going back as Glenn Glenn was saying that he enjoyed highlighting books specifically because he would take on in the margins of books, and then his kids are always fascinated by his thought process as he was reading, which I think is actually kind of a cool thing. So writing a books. Writing stuff down is probably the best way to to approach that John just hide it. How about? I can't work now that the tax cuts and jobs ACT repealed its funding mechanism, the individual mandate, since it is mandatory,

miniature, wouldn't other tax dollars now have to be allocated to it, or will it just cease to exist? Thanks love the show this is the big question after you get rid of the individual mandate, which was the funding mechanism to pay for all of the increased cost and regulate Obamacare. The only way that you're going to be able to bring costs down in the individual market place is by getting made of regulation or by subsidizing. The federal government has chosen to subsidise, which is why I'm not in love with just getting rid of the individual mandate alone. That's good, but you're, going to have to more than that otherwise, you're going to blame for an increase in the price of individual health care plans this is why getting rid of regulation is what was deeply necessary. Unfortunately, did not happen. That's a major shortcoming of Republican Congress. It behooves us to remember that Chris has been. Clinton central Banking system, the purpose of the Federal Reserve, the positive and negative sides of likely. So hours originally established in in the beginning of the depression, basically, and it was established in order to say to

thanks that, if you lose all of your money, we can provide you a certain percentage of your money back to you So this is why the Fdic, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, ensures that the first, I believe, two hundred thousand dollars of money that you have in the bank. You will get back regardless of whether the bank goes bust. This is the federal government saying It's trying to prevent runs on bank. The way it used to work is that if there is a it has certain amount of in the bank, but never has as much money in the bank as it goes. Two people It is when you give money to the bank. The bank doesn't just keep in the back room the bank ones that out to people and interest, that's how the bank makes its money, what what happens of everybody, who Is there money stored in the bank goes and ask for their money? At the same time, the bank doesn't have that money goes bankrupt and starts trying to call in loans. This is what happened at the beginning of the great depression everybody started to have. Every start going to the bank and withdrawing the money from the bank. So the solution by the federal government was the federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, which is run by the FED and the idea there was that they were going to be able to ensure your losses by banks. Now the problem with this is it does create a significant amount of moral hazard, moral hazard being

banks can now be Loosey goosey about the amount of money that they lend out. Knowing the federal government is going back there, the end or bail them out in the end, and that this has been the problem with the FED from the beginning is the the of moral hazard where people act sponsored and then the federal government Bells but as we saw actually in two thousand two thousand and nine, the FED has some other stuff that it does in conjunction with the department of the Treasury Department of three sells bonds, stocks and bonds and the Federal Reserve works with the government and the the Department of the Treasury in order to provide the dollars that are you in the sales of stocks and bonds, when the government buys back bonds, for example, they're trying to take more bonds out of them. They're, trying to inflate the currency of the amount of currency of currency circulation in Milton Friedman was a big fan of the fat. Actually, he thought that the FED should should set a standard right any amount of money in circulation on a particular year by year basis like two percent and then they're people who are Chicago School at so Chicago school economists and think the FED ought to exist.

At the FED, ought to have control over the amount of money in circulation and then there's the Vienna School of Economics, which suggests that we really we should the gold standard and the government should be able to manipulate the amount of currency. That's in circulation, that happens. There is sort of complex process between the FED and the Department of the Treasury yeah. I tend to be Indiana School of Economics, I'm not a big fan of the Federal Reserve, I think the Federal Reserve. It creates a sense sorry that I think is unwarranted, and that leads again open to rely on the federal government to bail them out and now bailouts are enshrined in the Frank ACT in that really needs to be gutted as well. I mean that's something else that the Republicans ought to be pursuing right now as well. Ok, let's see persons when I was wondering what your opinion is of a negative income tax, such as the one proposed by Milton Friedman as an alternative to the welfare state as an alternative to the welfare state. I'm for it as an adjunct of the welfare state, I'm against it. So the negative income taxes idea that, based on your income, we sign one. We basically guarantee you a minimum income is basically a universal basic income, but he says

You should have a negative income tax based on the amount of money that you make and we will trying to check to you back from the federal government for a particular amount of money, but it's not going to be dependent on the amount of money that you may completely, and it's also not going to require that be single, for example, that you're single mother and it's not going to be welfare state based it's going to be it's going to be a sir sliding scale that we give you a consistent amount of money that goes into your bank account, and that is what it is and as if it would be a lot cheaper than the welfare state, no question you will need the infrastructure of the welfare state. So I agree that, as it is, a is alternative to offer should be great. I I tend to oppose both of them, but I don't think that's useful thing and rely. Instead on private charity, Thomas says: hi Benny regard to more progress, in regards to progressivism plaguing the nation. Do you see America ever returning to its more conservative, judeo christian roots, and what would it take to get us there? I think that what it would take to get there is recognized that our moral roots are judeo Christian, whether you like it or not? This is an argument that I've been having repeatedly with a lot of folks who are enlightened,

anchors, Neil Enlightenment thinkers. I've had this right now with SAM Harrison with not really Jonah Goldberg openly, but I would certainly like to discuss it with John. I think you probably agree with me actually and I had a certain with Michael Shermer and a lot of people who are I've about Steven Pinker. Enlightenment, thinking is Ginger ale christian values want to get people back to jail christian values, but he says: listen all the stuff, that's around you that was built by judeo christian civilization, so maybe it would be who've you to study the foundational documents of the Judeo mission vision and then to see how those documents have been interpreted over the last several one thousand years to bring us here, because there's this myth that's going around that. What happened is that in the 18th century, late 18th century early 19th century, there is a vast shift in public thinking and the thinking went. We reject the Bible from that came everything grain that is a lie, is not historically true. It is not philosophically true, it is not morally true, and I think that we need to bump that, if we're actually going to fight for judeo christian values, ok, says salutations been want to ask: why does the left hate western culture most everything

about modern world. Is it the progress of western civilization, yet the left loads? The very foundation the made such incredible world is mind. Boggling, since I think that what the left he's on the western civilization is in a quality? So the reason left hates western realization is because the left says, as Mark said, that individual human things are created by the system in which we live. We don't have free will, in the sense that we can really move beyond the system we have to do is tear down the system. We have to tear it out at its roots, and then we can build a better more utopian world and from that utopian world will come at transcendental. Man will come in type of human being was kinder and more and more generous and better to other human beings. But I can only change if you get rid of the system itself, and so what the left tends to focus on is all the shortcomings in the system. So what are the shortcomings of the system in the freest, most prosperous time in human history? Well, the shortcomings of the system, our lack of souls, so it throughout the twentieth century left kept saying that even during the nineteen fifties, when everybody was building- and it seems like America is finally starting to-

move beyond its racial problem? I mean the civil rights mom really starts in the 50s, not the 60s and there's real change coming in America, all of it good, or at least a large part of it good, feminism is the early first stage. Feminism is beginning, and all of that is good with the left says. No, the reason there is sexism the reason there is racism. The reason there's brutality is because of this capital system, and all these people who you see were engaged in the capital system are truly empty souls. These are people who have nothing to live for they're, just shells of their former self they're missing, meaning and that missing meaning is, is duration of western civilization and it was generated by western civilization, so all we have to do get rid of all of these western civilized notions about from free freedom and individual rights. We have to get rid of this whole shtick about cat

alisme, and when we do that we will have a better human being in a better world. So that's the reason they're trying to propose a utopian vision to replace the western civilized vision, failing to recognize, of course, that all the good stuff around them is inextricably intertwined with the principles that generated it in the first place. As as I ask this question during dinner with a couple friends. What is so? I do not know how to answer. What do you believe in is the definition of was also. This is a hard question because obviously souls unprovable, it's not verifiable. There's no real way to tell what a soul is, so there are various definitions of the soul, so Thomas Aquinas has an interesting definition of the soul. He says that basically things aren't people are made up of form and matter right. You are made up of matter and your made up of form, so the form proceeds, the matter in sort of platonic in in the platonic narrative that there is the form of a dog God has in mind and then there's a dog right is there? Is there the form of again. The reason you know all dogs are similar is because there's a platonic idea of dog right and then so all those dogs fall under that one platonic ideal of the dog, the same thing

holds true with regard to form and matter sort of according to Aquinas. So the idea there is that there is a form of you right, there's a form of man, and that encompass is what you are and that survives death, but it is more that is more than your constituent parts, in other words, and that's what the soul is, so the form is the sole. So whether that survives death or not the idea is that the form is you an it's? Not just your constituent parts. I think there's something to that. I also think that there is a good case to be made that the soul is the is animates you that when you die, the soul obviously leaves your body and what we mean. By that is that the animating force that allows you to live and think an make decisions freely has now left you, and so that's why I think it's uh Is what this whole does after death is beyond me? I don't know the answer. No one knows the answer, because it's unless your question, you believe Jesus came back to tell everybody. There are very few. People have come back to tell anybody about what bins after death. I have my own theories as to what happens after death, but those theories actually will be discussing that. I think in the coming Sunday, special sometime pretty soon

okay, one more of these. Ok one more Natalie says now that I'm currently an intern in a big corporate law firm, I'm starting law school next year, while the work of an attorney interesting excites me, I'm concerned, concerned about balancing the demands, corporate law and family life. I look around this law firm and see a lot of very successful females, but most of them, especially partners in high level associates, are not married and do not have kids since more than any I want to get married and have children in the future. On the shell, Obama thinks you're a terrible person. Do you think it is possible for a female to be both a good corporate attorney and a good wife and mother? At the same time, thanks? So, I think the answer is. It is certainly possible, be a good corporate attorney and the wife and mother. I do think that there are trade offs and pretend they're no trade office with your reality. Hours that you send it worker hours that you're not spending at home in hours that you send it home or not ours- that you're sending at work- and I do not think that a good corporate law job substitutes for having a happy home life- I think almost nothing substitutes for having

a happy home life now and I'm thinking, someone whose wife works extraordinarily long hours. My wife works really long hours like today. She took off from the house at seven hundred and forty five. She will be back tonight at six hundred and thirty. It is a normal day, for that is a good rotation for her. Her prior rotation, she's, going in at five hundred am and she's coming back at ten p some days that is hard and it's hard on the family's heart on the we've made provision for that right, I'm home a lot more than she is my parents are over a lot. We have a nanny right. All these things are great, but is it a trade off? Of course it's a trade off, it's a trade off that she struggles with and she feels everyday. I think one of the great why is that that feminism is told women as you can have it all? You can have a lot of good things, but to pretend that there are no trade among those things is to is to be foolish. I just don't think that's true in any real sense. Ok, time for a thing I hate, and then I think I like and then some things that I hate. So the thing I like there's a now available on Amazon Prime is called last flag, flying it's really good for the acting yeah

very anti war? Obviously because every movie that Hollywood has ever produced since the Vietnam WAR has been Anti war movie? Basically, there a couple of exceptions like twelve strong, is it an exception, but this movie, the acting, is really first rate bits, Bryan, Cranston and Laurence Fishburne and Steve Carell at Princeton is, of course the the highlight of the show he. He really is terrific in this film, but Lawrence Fishburne turns and really the far as well. These basically the stories these three guys were in the army together in Vietnam back in more and now Steve Carell son was in the Marines. His son was killed and these and he tries to go, get these two guys to come with him to pick up his son's body and bring it to Arlington, but it turns out the army has lied to him about how his son died, and now he doesn't want to. His son in Arlington and said he wants to bury his son back home. Here's a little bit of the preview. You know what amazes me about you. It could be anything, I'm a pretty amazing guy, you, turn the keys. Your bar over the guy was asleep on your pool table and then you jump in your car and you

me to hell and gone, and you don't even know where we're going. Well just surrender to God, the hell happened to mule with all first class drinker gamble. We have some visitors amongst us here today we were in the service, together with your pastor and seen these men. In decades, they represented dog period in my life that went down awfully quick, drink tuna. You got old and boring I'm down allowed on main, because it's nice a huge Richard Linklater Fan general rule, but the movie is actually quite good and the acting anything else. It really is a showcase for the three performers involved. So if you like good acting and the script is entertaining even if it's anti war, it's anti record, and there are a couple of lines. The assumption in Hollywood, always at the Iraq war, was a terrible, terrible, awful horrible, terrible, terrible mistake, and so everything

ever say about the Iraq war is based on that argument, which I think is is a deeply flawed argument, but it is still worth the watch if, if you're just looking for us, some solid performances, okay time for some things, that I hate all right. So I have to show you this clip from April Ryan April Ryan is, of course, the White House correspondent. Thank you, never which outlet she is it, which is four but that she's white reporters on CNN last night and she discussing Melania Trump and a american urban radio networks and here's what April I had to say about money and from this is an amazing thing where she led to get away with this. So John Kelly, the White House Chief of staff is being accused of racism today because he suggested that a lot of illegal immigrants who come to the United States or under educated, which is technically true. Okay, that is just a fact. A lot of illegal immigrants who come to the United States are under educated, but April right is not considered in anyways info, but

for saying this about Melania Trump. She wants to show young people how it's done and do it right and they will pick up those those habits. I wonder if the president will change, but but there are realities, but there are a lot of realities that she's dealing with this is. This is the first lady who was not cultural, american, but she is learning the ways. I don't even know what that means. Then Melania Trump is not Culturali American. What exactly does that mean? She has a foreign accent and what about Melania Trump is not Culturali American. She seems pretty culturali American to Maine again this it's amazing it if somebody were to say that on the right about anybody, with an accent will be: oh, my god, racism get terrible. How could you what about that person is bad? My in laws are Culturali American. They have very strong israeli accent there culturali American they've been living in America, since my wife was twelve years old, which means that they've been here, I'm not going to

No, I say for the been here for a little while: okay, my wife wouldn't care honestly, it says you've been there for eighteen years. I've thirty doesn't care. Where was but it's it, but the. But the truth is that April Ryan glad to get away with this because April Ryan obviously is a member of a minority group. If you're a member of minority group, then you can say anything about any other member of minority group, my proof being that the members of the women's March are members of minority groups can hang out with three King Louis Farrakhan and everybody just because well whatever who cares Ellison can be an actual anti semite and he's quote in the media today saying I'm very upset that people are calling an anti semite. I think that's all they're calling me nance, I'm I'm more upset that you are an anti semite dude, but you're allowed to get away with it, because if you have the right skin, color, apparently you're allowed to be a racist, which is really awful awful awful stuff. Ok, other things that I hate, so George Stephanopoulos just doing yeoman's work on behalf of

six and George Stephanopoulos does have a long history of a defending people who are accused of sexual misconduct. Going out with back to the Clinton Days, Tom Brokaw has been accused of sexual harassment by Linda Vester, who is a former reporter at NBC News and it or it at ABC News Rather- and this is pretty funny because George Stephanopoulos rushes to Tom Brokaw's Defense Tom Brokaw's, pretty angry- he says he was ambushed- says use per box. What's your response? Well, I expected a denial. That is what her rosters gender. What I didn't expect was such a personal attack and what I'm concerned about is the message that that sends two women inside NBC News about whether or not they are safe to report somebody who is powerful if they get that

backlash in that letter, he describes you as a colleague who has trouble with the truth. Are you absolutely convinced that everything you remember about that incident? Those incidents with Tom Broker would happen. George, my memory of those incidents is Crystal clear. The notes that I took immediate afterward are crystal clear, still investor from NBC News. Obviously George Stephanopoulos from ABC News. Imagine him when he asked those questions of stormy Daniels. Really stormy Daniels is an actual porn star right who shall we say, has some problems in our life. I would, I think, it's fair to say, Storm Daniels, a person with some problems in our life with George Stephanopoulos at their nest. Do you were you know? John Trump has said that you're lying. Do you truly? Recall what happened are you? Are you sure you recall every minute of what happened we said you know he's very upset. Titles from is very very upset with you know, he's pretty angry. Are you absolutely convinced that what you're saying is true

come on come on. I know that NBC News investigated itself and cleared itself, but you don't get to investigate and clear yourself well and then bring out a bunch of women who are not Linda Vester. In order to about how Tom Brokaw was wonderful, one amazing how the media will circle the wagons and from the me too, movement actually as soon as a member of their own who's, really under the gun. Somebody who, who is is considered an iconic figure in that movie in in the media already so we'll be back here next week. Have yourself a wonderful weekend, don't try to spoil things it too much and Ben Shapiro, this is Ben Shapiro show the Ben Shapiro Show is produced by Mathis, Glover executive producer, Jeremy, boring senior producer. Jonathan hey are technical, producer is Austin. Stevens edited by Alex in Garo audios mixed by MIKE Karmina, hair and makeup is by Jeshua Alvera. The Ben Shapiro Show is a daily wire for