The Supreme Court rules in favour of religious bakers, Democrats struggle for the house, majority and Bernie Sanders makes the stupidest statements about Disney ever adventure pair of this adventure I shall do so. Who's. I couldn't even mention it all in the teeth before they show. Bill Clinton also was on tv a lot, and we all remember now why Donald Trump is president with Bill Clinton on tv talking about where he stores his cigars. We have a lot to get today before we get to any of that. I have a few announcements, so While we have decided to honour fathers did this year, they special live stream on Tuesday June twelve at seven p, M Eastern Delaware Guy, in Germany Boring is going to host a round table discussion with me and Andrew Graven and Michael novels as well and

We are going to sit around and chat about. All of the things will discuss what fatherhood means in my father's matter and her father will stand up against in increasingly anti male culture, and subscribers will be able to write in live question thrust it into answer on. The air sea should subscribe now signal right. Those live questions then, will care about what you have to say again that choose Adrian twelve Sevenpm Eastern four P M Pacific. They can find our lives, remote, Facebook and Youtube to watch. So don't miss it. Also more good news guess. Listeners Venture bureau shall, along with our other data wire podcast, is now available on Amazon, Alexa and will home device to now. You're home could be filled with the rich supple tones of my voice with a single voice man, but first you have to activate the show so the website you have to enable this. Oh, it's like adding an amputee elect to enable the Ben Shapiro, show skill, and then you can tell her to play or open Alexa play the men Shapiro Shop and then go, doesn't need to be added by user, but you have to speak very clearly for her to understand, because I don't know what the real problem is, but just take a man like ok, Google, talk to Ben Shapiro, show or ok will speak to the bench appear. Osha and advice should be able to play a part,

gas and our quality of life will improve the measurably. If need review, those directions discovered the pin posts on daily wire, Twitter and Delaware Facebook to check it out. Ok, that's not the only announced, but also we have say thank you to our sponsors over at legal zoom. So it's time, for that mean your check and it's almost half way through the year. Folks is crazy. So if you like, every I ask you a few things left under to do list for twenty eighteen, which is why legal zoom is extending their friends and family just count to everyone right now, which means limited timing, get ten percent off the things you keep. Putting us off your small business owner in you to make your account and happy by seven hundred I'll see you d, be S. Court and more can also say money. Wrapping up your last will or living trust before you go in summer occasion in that way, if you killed in a boating accident and away, she took care of that legalism is not a law firm, but don't worry if legal questions are holding you up. Their network of independent attorneys can provide advice, fear business, your state plan and more so get things You need to get done, illegals in dot com right now and save ten percent with legal, zooms, friends and family. Just cannot just be sure to enter promo code. Then they get their friends and family Count in the referral back to check out this offer

is only available for a limited time govern illegals in tat. Comrade I've been using legal zoom for years, and now again they have this entirely service. Where worthy of legal questions, you can go to a network of independent journeys. Who can give you advice for your business they planet cetera, use, promo code, Ben Illegals, India, com and you get ten percent off legal zoom where life means we'll check out legalism that calm and use that promo code ban all right just breaking before today's show. The big news was of the Supreme Court has ruled in the masterpiece cake shop K. So if you don't remember the masterpiece cake shop case, this is a case where a guy under bakery and these this gay couple came in. In twenty twelve and they wanted a cake for their same sex wedding, and he said no, I'm religious baker. So no and I would be happy to sell them a cake if there are just gay people want to take. You be happy to give them their cake because who cares? But they wanted a cake that set on it. Happy wedding to Bob and Joe or whatever was an this Christian make our send. Listen! I'm we part affording what I think is a sin which seems like a basic american freedom, while the collar

Civil rights Commission immediately crackdown on the guy and tried to basically run him out of business. For this grave and horrible Syn in the same sort of issue arises. Baroness stats men up instead of Oregon, where spared such meant was Washington, Washington, burial sentiment where bear no. Such men was florists and shooting what to do floral arrangements for a lesbian wedding and then she was basically run out of business by the state. We see the same thing with photographers in New Mexico, so we ve seen this sort of thing happening all over the country, so the Supreme Court avoided the big issue. So the headline that your hearing today from left is: oh, my God, the Supreme Court has stood with religious people against gay people, it's what the Supreme Court just it. Ok first of all, here is my view of this case in every other case like it, I do not believe that is the government's jobs, tell you who you can and cannot do business with and that includes discrimination became open about this. I think that if you want to discriminate against a Jew, That is your problem, and you know what I will do. I will go start an alternative business. They will run you out of business. I will go to the business across the street and they will get my patronage and they will run you out of business. I think this is true,

cross the border. I don't see why this is the freedom of religion issue per se, because it seems like a freedom of negotiations issue to mean I understand, is unpalatable people, because we have this weird idea in America that if you don't like something, it ought to be illegal. While I would like a lot of things, I would like there to be illegal. I'm not a same sex marriage Van It ought to be illegal, I'm libertarian on same sex, marriage. I think the Dublin she get completely out of the business of marriage. Well, just as libertarian on the issue of same sex, marriage, I'm Terry and on the issue of whether a business owner ought to be forced to cater to a particular population. Even if that business owners jerk even if that business owner is a racist and homophobic. While you wanna be racist, our homes guess what you're going out of business, because that's the market works. Capitalism is the single greatest forced for hours in the history of humanity. Not government control from about, because that's my perspective on this, but this case doesn't that far, it also doesn't go as far as to even say that religious people have a right to act religiously in their business by the case doesn't even say, that if you are a baker, do you have the right to reject catering to a same sex wedding? Instead, this cases decided seven

two on the narrowest possible grounds, and that is the Colorado Civil Rights Commission is mean really tell. The case was decided the cases written by Anthony Kennedy, who is an expert justice, just an awful awful justice. He never seen a copy, the constitution, apparently, and so just sort of wandering around his bathrobe and depending on there. He had met a muso led Bell movement that morning he decides how to rule. So here is his ruling today bring the opinion of the court and there's a nun ruling its non sensible relinquish. It doesn't get to any key issue, it's good for the particular baker in this case, but it does not establish a broad principle that religious people can actually act religiously. Businesses which you would assume would be protected by freedom of religion remain. Where is everyone

religion generally. What I mean is my ability to act religiously throughout my wife, including in my business. That's not what the Supreme Court says. Instead, they simply evade the issue, so the the court holds- and this is in the court's summary- this summary of the case that at the very beginning of every case, the court protect basically a summary of the ruling. Here's that they hold the laws in the constitution can and in some instances must protect, gave persons and gay couples in the exercise of their civil rights. Religious and philosophical objections to gay marriage are protected views in some instances, protected forms of expression, which is extraordinarily very well. It is unexceptionable back or a lock and protect gay persons in acquiring products and services on the same terms and conditions as our offer to other members of the public. The law must be applied in a manner that is neutral toward religion. Now you ask: how is that possible? How is it possible that you gonna be neutral toward religion and crackdown on religion while protecting seems ex couples. How you gonna do exactly that, what they don't answer that question. Instead, they just say that in this particular case, the Colorado,

Rights Commission was means a religious people. They had mean things about religious people, and that means that we can to uphold their decision this case with the guy in this case and inject Philippines masterpiece job his glinda using his artistic skills to make an expressive statement a wedding indoors. In his own voice and of his own creation, has significant first amendment speech component and implicates has deepened sincere religious beliefs. His level was under Annabelle in twenty two others in this line is the level is understandable and twenty twelve, which was before Colorado reckon as the validity of gay marriage is performed in the state or before this court issued its decision and olbers fell. Given the states position at the time there are some forced to Philip Czar that he was not unreasonable in deeming his decision, lawful, state law. The time also afforded shopkeepers some latitude to decline to create specific messages they considered offensive. Indeed, while the instant enforcement proceedings were

ending the state civil rights division concluded in at least three cases that are Baker, act unlawfully and declining to create cakes? With declarations that mean gay persons or gay marriages, Philip? She was entitled to a neutral and respectful consideration of his claims, in all circumstances of the case, so I sat there for a second. What they are saying is that Jack Fellow now. He be crazy, basically to say that he wants to same sex marriage, we're back and twenty twelve when it was still illegal for same sex people Mary in many places across the country for people of the same sex marriage each other in many places across the country back then it is understandable that It was stupid, but now, if you tried it now, I mean come on it's the law. When she considered scream court leaving the door open, do not protecting the right to somebody Who, in two thousand sixteen says I don't wish to participate in a same sex marriage. Instead, there saying we're way back that it was different. Rebecca Obama supported traditional marriage

now over things change. Obviously, if somebody try to do the exact same thing now now, of course would be unconstitutional and then the case can t the court continues. That consideration was compromised by the commission's treatment of Philips case. What they're saying is that the Civil Rights Commission should have been developed, there were mean develops and therefore their decision is not ok. They're consideration was compromised by the commission's treatment, which showed elements of a clear and impermissible hostility toward the sincere religious beliefs motivating his objection, as the record shows some of the commissioners at this commission's formal, publicly I endorse the view that religious beliefs cannot legitimately be carried into the public sphere. A commercial domain disparage Philips faces despicable and characterized It is merely rhetorical and comparative invocation of sincerely held religious beliefs, the defences of slavery and the holocaust. No commissioners objected to the com nor are they mention in the later state court ruling or disavowed in the brief filed here. The commons thus cast doubt on the fairness and impartiality of the commission's indication of Philips his case again. None of this has to do with anything. So what they are saying is that the commission said mean things about Philips in his religious practice.

The reality, however, is that that should have nothing to do with whether or not Philips his behaviour is constitutional, they should be very easy decision. People misinterpret what freedom of religion is supposed to be about, so the court has come up with all of these cases where they say a real freedom of religion, provide you especial freedom, especial freedom and that special freedom is designed in order to allow you to provide your sincere held religious beliefs in public. But how do you decide what is sincerely held supposed to non sincerely held in Vienna, sincere alleged police. They should holds waves. Obviously the court wouldn't be ok with that sets not sincere village police. Instead, there's a three pronged religion, Tacitus led forth in a case called lemon. All of this is stupid, gave the reality. Is that what the founders believed is laid out very clearly in the first moments the constitution, it is laid out in two sides of the same coin: the free exercise clause in the establishment clause

so. The free exercise was the first amendment says that the free exercise of religion shall not be a bridge, and then it says that there shall be no establishment of religion. These are the same clause. People read them separately, so they say that establishment clause about the government can put in God. We trust on coins or some such nonsense. And freedom of religion is. Can you smoke piety and violation of federals rug law native right of native reservation knows an actual case back in the early nineties: employment division versus Psmith. I believe it's called, but one of the problems with this reading of the first amendment is that the whole point of the first amendment to protect you from the government becoming large and overbearing encroaching. So what it saying is you should not have a government that establishes a religion, because that will burden other people's free exercise of religion. In other words, the smaller the government is the less it's going to run into particular freedoms, and this is true across the board, its true freedom of association. It's true freedom of speech,

nor the government is the less it is going to burden anybody's particular exercise of freedom that they hold. So your freedom of religion is not going to be burden so long as the governments not getting up in your grill, but now the government's up in your girl with Anti discrimination law, particularly in this case, and so they have decided that Anti discrimination law runs up against. Just liberty concerns in reality anti discrimination law for private businesses. To me, is a serious constitutional problem. I understand why people did it. I sympathise with the feelings, for I understand that it is an attempt to wipe out discrimination in the private sector only had accomplished that in quite the way people think it did. The reality is that, in order to overcome the marketplace, which does not discriminate marketplace hates discrimination in order to overcome them, good place. The government had to implement rules discriminating in the first place. I have a whole video. You can viewed on Youtube about why it is the antidote, the nation laws are significantly less important than capitalism is

removing barriers to people getting the sort of care and service that they want, and I point out that Jim Crow was not put in place by private people. Jim Crow is put in place by the governor It was the government literally establishing laws that preventing people from serving people in the restaurants there actual laws in the south in place like Alabama that if you own a restaurant yet have a separate seeding section for black people and if you violated that the government would come in and sue you for that, because it would come in and fine you or jail you for that because of it been for that law. Then people would just open up the restaurants, which is exactly what happened in the early nineties sixties, with, for example, the Woolworth Counter demonstration in interminable which It was in the early nineteenth sixties. Before the civil Rights ACT, a black people, Walkin Woolworth's, they said we're not leaving, and then wars integrated and that's because the market works. The market does work The reason that I keep saying the market works is because the market doesn't make imposition on anybody! The government does again just a second I'm and continue with the analysis of this new cases.

Everybody is over reading and actually I dont think bodes all that. Well for religious freedom in the United States, but first say thanks to our sponsors over at blue apron, so Lou Apron, as you know, is the best home delivery get that you can get when it comes to cooking meals. Their teaming up now, with best selling what book, autocracy, chicken and they're bringing you some of her favorite recipes to make at home so get ready for six weeks of awesome. Flavorful cooking again? What they do is they send you all the ingredients, they send you of the recipes, and then you steal your with their kids, you make me I'll great Isle of cooking. With my two kids, you loved you, the two and they make it super easy with christian deacons menu this this week. I guess and they have hot with it. They have garlic and so ugly, shrimp with charred broccoli and hungering pepper, sauce sesame, chicken noodles, with back Troy and again you don't to set foot in the grocery their convenience and variety to deliver fresh proportion, ingredients and step by step recipes directly towards or everything can be cooked in under forty five minutes and the many changes

every week, depending on what in season they offer twelve new recipes every week, customers can pick two three or four recipes based our best fits your schedule and they send only high quality products, everything from labour I've heard from people in the office, people, the offices, blue apron. They say it's just terrific and right now in check out this week's menu and get your first three meals for free at blue aprons outcomes. Last Shapiro, that's blue. Prince outcome, Slash appear to get a first three meals for free, blue aproned outcome. Slash appear: a blue apron is indeed a better way to cook it again. Meals were making a restaurant quality, Gorman meals that you will be making yourself mean. I'm looking at picture than look amazing, so check it out. Blue aproned outcome. Slash, appear up and get your first three meals for free, ok, so back to the analysis of the Supreme Court's decision, ass for peace cake shop case, so they continue this again. The summary of the case they say the consideration was common, by the commission's treatment of Philips, his case would showed elements of a clear, impermissible hostility toward his sincere religious beliefs, so not saying that religious people get actually act out their religion in power

or that freedom of religion really exist, addressing you're not allowed to be mean religious people and then another indication of hostility is the different treatment of Philips his case and the cases of other bakers. With objections to antigay messages who prevail before the commission. The commission ruled against. Philips, in part on the theory that any message not on the requested cake would be true to our request to take rather, would be attributed to the customer not to the baker it. The division did not address this point in any of the cases involving the request. Four cakes depicting antigay marriage symbolism Sultan than the case continues. For these reasons, the commission's treatment of Philips his case violated the states duty under the first amendment not to base laws or elation on hostility to a religion or religious viewpoint. The government, consistent with the constitution's guarantee free exercise, cannot impose regulations that are hostile to the religious beliefs of affected citizens and cannot act in a manner that

ass his judgment upon or presupposes the illegitimacy of religious beliefs and practices, and then they say the inference here is thus that really Philips religious objection was not considered within neutrality required by the free exercise clause. The states interests could have been weighed against Philip, sincere religious objections in a way consistent with the reckless, Religious neutrality that must be strictly observed by the officials, expressions of hostility to religion in some of the commissioner's comments or inconsistent with that requirement. Get as a dumb decision it a dumb decision again we're. You're coming down. Is that if they had been nice about it, they could have rejected this guy's religious views. Nothing in the constitution as you can be nice about it and still get rid of people's religious views. There is no provision of the first amendment says: free exercise of religion must be protected, except when people are really nice, you if there really nice about rubul about removing your religious exercise clauses. Well, then, we get rid of them, nothing in the constitution

says all those in that's exactly, of course, what is said in some of the defence by members of the Supreme Court were on the right, so Clarence Thomas right again, he always rights. Very good sense. I really enjoyed Clarence Thomas is writing because I agree that the Colorado Civil Rights Commission violated Jack Philips is right to freely exercises religion as justice course. It also voted to send, explains or concurrence. Rather,

the commission treated Philips. His case differently from a similar case involving three other bakers. Well filled, rightly prevails. Industry exercise claim I write separately to address is free speech claim the court does not address this claim, because it has some uncertainties about the record and then he concludes that even after described his conduct. This way the court of Appeals concluded Philips. His conduct does not expressive, lose not protected speech and reason that now tied observer would think. Philips is merely comply with Colorado's public accommodations law, not expressing a message. This reasoning, floods, bedrock principles of our free speech jurisprudence and would just five virtually any law that compels individuals speak. It should not pass without comment so just secondary to go through Clarence Thomas's entire pinning continue going through his entire opinion. So here's what he says he says the first amendment, a political to the states through the fourteenth men, prohibit state laws that a bridge freedom of speech. When interpreting this man, the court has distinguish between regulations and speech and regulations of conduct. The latter generally do not a bridge the freedom of speech, even if they impose incidental burdens on expression, as the court explains today, public a cop

directions, while usually regulated Honda as a general matter, public accommodations law to not target speech, but instead it prohibit the active discriminating against individuals in the provision of publicly available goods. So the court makes this distinction. I think this distinction is stupid by the way, I think the distinction between free of free speech and an free exercise of public accommodation, for example, is overstated. So, in other words, I think it is an aspect of its tenacity speech to burn a flag. I don't see why not an aspect of speech to say I don't want to care for this person in my establishment. It maybe speech you don't like it maybe speech its gross, maybe three shadow like, but I fail to see how the first amendment doesn't protect freedom of association or that freedom of speech, in any case, Thomas does, respect that distinction. He says, although public accommodations laws generally regulate conduct, particular applications of them can burden protected speech when a public accommodations walk has the effect of declaring speech itself to be a public accommodation. The first amendment applies with

full force, and then he goes on to describe all the ways that this is a burden on free speech for this masterpiece cake shop owner since the conduct of the Colorado of appeals ascribed to Philips creating in designing custom wedding cake is express. It Philips, considers himself an artist the logo for masterpiece catch up as an artist paint pilot with the paintbrush bakers whisk. Behind the counter, Philips has a picture that depicts him as an artist painting on a canvas those too exceptional care with each cake that he creates sketching the design out on paper, choosing the color scheme, creating the frosty decorations, begging and sculpting keg decorating at delivering it to the wedding. Here's. What I think the Thomas's descent here or concurrence is actually wide enough? The same can be said of any hotelier, so you own, a Ben breakfast, be borne by refers. Are very careful about how they make their button. Reckless right there very careful about how they do that, a core they very careful about the kind of accommodations they provide. A very careful about kind of food that they cook to separate artist free from business seems to me a little bit of a false to say, and the people are making when it comes to first amendment issues. In any case, Thomas conclude

by essentially arguing that this is a violation of the first amendment. The Colorado court of Appeals is wrong to conclude that Philips, his conduct was not express it. Because a reasonable observer would think is merely complying with cholera is public accommodations law. This argument would justify any law that compelled protected speech and this court is never accepted it from the beginning. This court compelled speech. Precedents, have rejected, arguments the resolve every issue of power in favour of those in authority. So obviously I agree with Justice Thomas here, even though I think he's making distinctions that I find unjustified in prior law. Then, of course there is that left, is just as you have Ginsburg who descended and just a sort of way or dissenting, and they say basically that religion does matter for exercise doesn't matter. The government should be able to tell you to do whatever the government wants to tell you to do. Justice Gore such wrote, a very good concurrence in which just score such makes the case that and he who joins with Justice Alito in his concurrence, in which they basically say that this does violate freedom of religion, may say: unemployment, division, department, human resources, Morgan

Psmith this court held a neutral and generally applicable law will usually survive a constitutional free exercise challenge, but we now know with certainty. When the government fails to act neutrally towards the free exercise of religion, it tends to run into trouble. Today's decision respect these principles, as the court explains. The Colorado Civil Rights Commission failed to act neutrally Jack Philips, is religious faith. Maybe most notably, the commission allowed three other bakers to refuse a customer's requests that would have required them to violate their secular commitments here, The only wrinkle is this in the face of so much evidence ingesting hostility toward me. Philip sincerely held religious beliefs. Two of our colleagues have written separately to suggest to the commission neutrally towards faith when it treat him really from the other bakers or that of easily done so consistent with the first moment. I respectfully I do not see how we might rescued mission from its error. A full view of the head of the facts helps point the way the problem start with William Jack's case. He approached three bakers and asked them to prepare cakes with.

It is just a proven same sex marriages on religious grounds, offering bakers, refused Mister Jenks request sitting. They found his request offensive to their secular convictions. Mister Jack responded by filing complaints were the Colorado. Civil rights could division. He pointed to discrimination against report. He pointed the Colorado Antidiscrimination ACT which prohibits discrimination against customers in public accommodations because of religious creed, sexual orientation or certain other trades, and then Mister Jack was given the go ahead, and then he compares that gorse. It does to the case with regard to two: They fill up. She says the factory in these two cases are all legally salient features in both cases, the effect on the customers, the same bakers, refuse service to persons who bore statutorily statutorily protected trade, religious faith or sexual orientation, but old cases, the bakers refused service intending only to honour a personal conviction and cares his point his point: is you can't treat these two things desperately just because you change language. So of course, just as corset just write about all this? Also, ok, now in just a second, I wanna get too

fact that democratic stream ism on issues related to everything from this case to just general politics, are behind the April when it comes to elections, but first I wanna say thanks to our sponsors over at stamps dot, so these Asian get ethically anything on demand can listen, my podcast on from over to Youtube and you can watch them I just did Joe Rogan onto Manual- really enjoy it? But why are you still going over the Post office, tamil letters and packages, winning the postage on demand withstand stuck on no matter how much like the post office? It's a lot easier for sitting in her office. Just a doubt, the postage and not have to run their and spend the time in the car or line with stem cell com. You can access all the great services of the post office directly from your desk twenty four. One. It is convenient for you by and official U postage for any letter. Any package using your own computer and prince or the male carrier. Pics it up. Just click print male you're done. It could not be any easier. We

Damn stuck on at the office to save ourselves time money I used in my home as well right now use Shapiro you get if special offered includes up to fifty five bucks, a free postage, that's pretty solid, plus a digital scale and a forward travel just sit there and he weighed the mail and tells you how much Spain, and then you buy postage. Then you print a ride out on the antelope, we're onto a sticker or of his paper you take it to the UN will be ready to go at a standstill com before you do anything else: click on the radio for phone at the top of the homepage and type in Shapiro. Again that stands tat calm and he used promo code. Shapiro include up to fifty five bucks, a free postage, a digital scale and afore retrial go check it out its totally worth it. Sam Stockholm and use promo code, Shapiro, ok, so bad news from the Democrats. First of all, the Supreme Court decision that came out earlier today that basically suggests that democratic overstep their boundaries. It does The attitude many Democrats have tore public policy, so this decision was essentially decided on the basis of the meanness of the car

out of civil Rights Commission than being mean to religious people. All Democrats still don't get this. They still don't get at the most more asked the invite they are in the worst. Their policy is no less. People are interested in working with them under under no circumstances. So, there's a pull out today. That shows the Democrats are basically in a dead. He was Republicans for taking back the house. According to CBS News, you got battleground tracker how many districts, the Democrats we get home and Republicans would get as of today. The twenty eighteen looks like a toss up for control. At the moment that's what most likely need would it would most likely get? Two hundred and nineteen seats of the election were held today, which is only one more than the two hundred eighty needed for majority and the Republicans to sixteen larger error on this model, is nine seats. So control is totally up for grabs. If you would have told me six months ago that Donald Trump, play. The president of the United States will be riding in the low 40s in the approval ratings and that Democrats would not be able to retake the house. I thought you were insane, but this is how bad

It's our at everything and maybe the reason Democrats are bad and everything is because they are both nasty and they have bad policy. A Bernie Sanders is the most obvious cases It's a Bernie Sanders has become the ideological thought, leader of the Democratic Party, which is an incredible. For a man who loves putting this much to become the ideological thought leader of the Democratic Party has that we live in a new era near in which everybody appreciates putting a lot but Bernie Sanders over the weekend. He was campaigning in Orange County why? in Orange County. Isn't he from Vermont? You ask why? Yes, but doesn't areas so what the hell he gives the same speech an Orange county does an informant. In any case, he used Orange County, and here dumping for fifteen dollar minimum wage in Orange County and is particularly directing his eyes at Disneyland. Now, when you strike Disneyland, strike near my soul. It Disneyland is wonderful place. How dare you, Sir Disneyland, is one of the best run places in all of America. If thirty thousand employees there, the single largest employer in Orange County did and also to areas no matter how much social justice warrior in you? Do you're not immune

the evils of any and the anger of Bernie Sanders so Disney and is a very left place right, Disneyland has their their gay pride days and there they have everything over Disneyland that fosters the these sort of left. Leaning politics of Disney is accompanied by matter. Bernie Sanders was come after you, just move Bernie Sanders will command is pushing fifty dollar minimum wage in Orange County and has Bernie Sanders railing on Disneyland. Because didn't learn does not tell proper pudding. Instead, they only have those tools and it hurts my deep because my country cannot true to the Torres, but if they would stop putting everything would be much better. Here's bullies and those in Orange County go

I want to hear the moral defense of a company that makes nine billion and prophets four hundred million for their ceos and has a thirty year. Work on I'm hungry? Also, okay, so he would hear hear or the funds can I have one and if it wants to hear our moral defence, here's my moral offence, Disney hires, two hundred thousand people across the United States, two hundred thousand people across the United States Bernie Sanders once worked in Vermont com. You there. Not even keep him employed seriously. The story is that he was so lazy. You'd sit around talking politics all day. You wouldn't gladly work the earth or something and the Vermont Commune how to get rid of him. So here's the defence of Disney, you can number one Disney as the largest employer.

You're in Orange County. One of the reasons they have such a good profit margin is because they actually treat their workers pretty well people one work Disney. This is simple supply and sit down some, man and supply of symbols. Wider mangrove bottom line is that we will want to work Disney. Many people cannot work Disney. That means that there is a higher ply than there isn't a man. This means the Disney cannot pay all these people tons and tons of money. But that said, Disney is actually a pretty good employee, does it here the fact that aid Disney has been negotiating with unions like the Master Services Council, which represents nearly ten thousand cast members and Disney, has already offered a plan that would get to fifteen dollar minimum wage by twenty twenty, the state of California, which is endorsed, dollar minimum wage. It will drive until twenty twenty two, Disney, has already offer to deal and get the fifteen dollars minimum wage by twenty. Twenty Disney has also increased the number of their employees by fifty percent over the last decade. Maybe that might have to do with their hiring practices that they don't pay. People exorbitant fees for dressing up in shipping day costumes in running around the park in Europe

and people. Eight hundred dollars an hour to dress up his chippendale, hey hourly, cast members already receive overtime and premiums. Nearly nine in ten leadership workers and operations started off as our early employees because it turns out minimum wage shops are designed to move you beyond minimum wage jobs, ok and in twenty seventeen more than two I part time workers like twenty dated twenty two hundred part time. Workers became full time Furthermore, Disneyland resort pays an average of thirteen thousand five hundred dollars per family for full, I'm workers, medical premiums. Now one of things is very words at the very sensitive ology unaffordable. What does needs doing? Look at what they're doing it's just so terrible Andrews has never look at his home state like is he ever in Vermont Bernie Sanders they ever spent any time in Vermont, because if you look at home state he might notice that, according to an out of reach report from the net no law, income housing coalition vermonter have to work one point: seven, full time: minimum wage jobs to afford a one, bedroom, rental home, so Minimum wage won't pay for a one bedroom rental home in Vermont. Vermont has a fifth highest shortfall between average

for wage in Juba into bedroom housing which, by the way therefore, that are ahead of them. California, clocks, in third, why Maryland New Jersey knows anything about those five state? There is anything, but those five states had just mention all blue all deep blue states which have a massive shortfall between average rent or wage and two bedroom housing. Wage shocking shocking: why is it that a state like California has boosted its minimum wage supremely provide? So why is it no one can afford rent well because its governed by Democrats and as I will explain in a minute it turns out democratic policy across the board- is hot garbage on this sort of stuff. So now Bernie Sanders once you do for Orange County. What Democrats did for Seattle go out for Amazon, Starbucks Microsoft raise the minimum wage, Dr Business out, that's exactly what happened in Seattle by the way. According to a university of war, study quote employees increased wages, which would expect in law, but they also cut hours and they cut. Jobs is just a second I'm and talk California, the state the Bernie Sanders is targeting right. Now is great article by Michael,

Alan Burger over at Forbes. I want to talk about, but first I would say thanks to our sponsors over at man create so fathers days coming up now. Is your time show your dad? They you care about and unnoticed send him a text message? Don't just get him. A beer may happy modesty, don't be lazy. Bomb ok go out to man, creates and get your dad a man create because these are hand picked and pre packaged gifts. For every type of they got a nice making, get our hands on Jessica. The whisky appreciation get for fathers, like the finer things and also concerned to deal with use. They just want to go over the current get drunk the whisky appreciation create. Most gifts are sealed a wooden create with a crowbar right. That's why it's called man creates, because you get a few private open and viewed as really bothering you stupid hands, but realities beneath the crowbar. You got the engraved crowbar prize that Sucker open its awesome. We have over here in ammo, can filled with poker chips.

When I get friends, I promise you it's gonna be awesome, underplay does poker. Ships for man creates it's just going to be great, with men creates you're, giving that more than a gift you're, giving him a gift experience, unlike any other plus, every man create comes with it, One hundred percent satisfaction guarantee right now, get your special fathers day discount. Today, man crates dot com, slash ban in the limited time offer again only for father stating how to do it right now. Men create start com. Slash Ben go check it out. Not only because I love saying man creates, but also because it gets their awesome and you'll really enjoy them. More importantly, so we're doesn't check it out. Men creates dot com, Slash Ben! Are you so I will discuss how California is failing on his bill Clinton, southern guy Bill Clinton. I want to discuss Maloney a missing who were then going to all those things, but first you gonna have go over to daily Wired. Our common subscribe for nine ninety nine a month you get the rest of the show. Live you get to be part of our mailbag, yet the rest in the enclave in July, threats and local moles show live. Also, when you subscribe

means that you are automatically up alerted to our interviews like warmly to Europeans and check that out. As well, if you wanna get the annual subscription get this, the very greatest beverage vessels look at this, the leftist tears hot or cold tumblr, you can look. The power is just infused into me. I just pick it up and boot my energy levels twice as high, so if you're playing on twice speed after this afternoon, Is it one half or one speed, just the way works to check it out my nine dollars year, yet this leftist years, hot or cold tumblr ban, please Gulliver, unsubscribe again overhead dead, Google plays teacher apple. Itunes, whatever, whenever app you're using subscribe, and please leave us review, we always appreciate we are the largest fastest growing concern podcast guess so well Bernie Sanders is standing

complaining about minimum wage in Orange County is worth noting. That California is a is helpful, and I say that advisedly, I've lived. My entire life in California is headed precisely the wrong direction. So there's a great peace by Michael Shellin, burger over at Forbes outcome. Talking about what has happened here. So what he basically suggest is that it's a real life elysium, he says homeless, encampment hundreds of people have cropped up around the state in the last two years, occasionally their rapid ravaged by Hepatitis, eight, which killed twenty people last year in Silicon Valley, a hundred and thirty two people died on the street in twenty sixteen from eighty five and two thousand fifteen in San Diego, a hundred and seventeen people died on the streets up from fifty six and in less you're saying you listening workers nearly killed a homeless person after accidentally, throwing her inattention sleeping in in the back of a garbage truck. So we, done everybody in California. Meanwhile, in by really expensive house

in California. I know I have one. It is true that workers in California an eleven percent more than counterparts nationally, but that's not enough to make up for mortgage payments and rents. There are forty four percent and thirty seven percent higher, respectively than the national average. Fifty six percent of council we can afford a middle class home in twenty twelve in the third quarter of twenty seventeen, just twenty eight percent could ok. This is the way the people escape. Poverty is by buying in the United States largely for about forty years nineteenth, nineteen, seventy black families were channeled insurance worms and denied loans or as white families were encouraged by homes. Richer Rothstein explains it was that it was that primary discrimination they kept African Americans out of white suburbs and then affordability, so one the prices rose, black families couldn't even buy into a lot of these areas. Environmentalism is used to try to justify de facto racial segregation in California, housing as well environmental laws, which are a major reason for longer delays and higher costs of new housing. Last September governor Jerry Brown Sign housing legislation.

I will raise two hundred fifty million dollars per year. Subsidize housing, but that's just enough to subsidize about a little under thousand units annually. At a time when a hundred to two hundred thousand annual units are needed, so it's all this left policy, all these people who are saying the California to progressive. I mean that is true, right wing, and that's why you have problems like Orange County? No, it's the California is to progressive and that's why you have problems like the problems in Orange County is just foolishness all the way through, and it's no shock progressive policy. Everyone into its extreme fails. California is no exception. To all of this is why you're seeing a massive drain in Venezuela's bananas walking from New York last week, As you saw we talk about last week, I met with Nicky. Haley's has walking down embassy road there and I walked past the venezuelan embassy and I said to Delaware: God. Can Germany boring to him inside that building is the luckiest person in Venezuela, because that person is not in Venezuela, Britain is in New York. I eating good food and not dog,

It is a reason that all of these socialist countries are failing to reasoning. California is failing as well. Ok, so meanwhile, let's talk a little bit about Bill Clinton, so Bill Clinton is back in the news for all people. Unless you can understand why so many people on the right don't care about the moral, the moral, silliness and moral evils of President Trump. Let's travel back just twenty years. Twenty short years, two billion was president of the United States and stooping his interns with cigars budgets. Call that amendments recall the billions wife ran for route for election in twenty. Sixteen in the building would have been the first lady of the United States. If Hillary Clinton had one ok, maybe you can start to imagine Why is that? Maybe our standards of drops off a little but for president of the United States, a bill Clinton is back on the back on the press trail. That's because he's now: corporate book with James Patterson, meaning neither one of them wrote a book about stuck the name on it and Bill Clinton was talking about. The presidency and it got real awkward because views ass, specifically about Monica Lewinsky and crying about my uncle and get this?

apologizing, demonic, always get. This is equipped sixteen and you have not yet said nobody believes that I got out of it for free. I was the one sixteen million dollars in the bud. You typically have ignored gaping facts in describing this, and I bet you don't even know them. Ok, so he's dead, brazen, Google Dedbroke line done with it I broke, and then he was ass perceptibly. About apologizing to Monica Lewinsky and dumb, and he said that he has not apologise to that. He is possess. Monocle orgy busy apologize to everyone. Then he wanted to bill Clinton. Lecture mode rates. Gutters bony fingers are wagging people yeah. I can't

engine. Why people it, and my fellow party says that he couldn't be elected today. Building says it no. I couldn't win today I couldn't when they become too nice, too kind area to say. I know why all this could be like than anything milk allowed its don't. Why comparison people, my mother, would a whip me for five days in a row when I'm a little boy if I spent all my time bad, mouthing people like this okay, you literally had your campaign go out and say that if you drag a twenty through a trailer park, a bunch of women would follow it. They in defensive your Kathleen Willie endeared offensive with with Polish Jones and article, Lewinsky and Jennifer flowers, ok built it was a garbage human. Ok, he is garbage human. The fact the building and is so widely beloved is because he is exam, the same is true in the sense that everybody knows that he's a drifter every noses. There is an honest, swifter he's honest about his drifting everybody knew that use drifting for years, and he still continues to drift. I just love that

he's now going to be the moral voice of democratic party. A good luck with. I love the gems Patterson sitting there like. I can't believe this, Jim thousands just sitting there right next to him, like. I can't believe I have to be here for this interview. This is so awkward. This is so terrible and so awkward and then Bill Clinton said You know if this were a democratic office. We impatiently Democrat already. I think if Rothe reverse now, this is needed to talk about by some experience. If there were a democratic president in these facts were present, most people online, one watching too believe impeachment hearing footed begun already. Ok, that's that's. Probably true Republicans run the Congress. But if Democrats round the Congress impeachment hearings would not have begun already, because Democrats voted not to impeach President Clinton

who openly lied perjured himself and enlightened american people and nobody seemed to care. So if you're wondering let look, there's a big gap. I've talked about this before his big gap between Republicans over the age of sixty and Republicans under the age of forty republicans under the age of forty. When they look at present interim, they see a guy who Phibbs Alot, whose dishonest to his behaved egregiously and personal life, and they like any of that Republicans it sixty. They remember Belkin. There remember this guy and they say: well, I'm not gonna, be lectured on morality. By the same people who ran around telling me the bill Clinton was a defensible guy. The bill It was a wonderful human being that anyone who Bill Clinton was so only because of their primary and interest in sex, It is a real gap in knowledge based between people who are under Forty and people are over sixty in the Republican Party. I think people were under forty. A wrong about president from I M saying: when democratic, wire Republican, so much from Scamp. It's because they're not gonna, take lecture seriously from people who pretend to J, F K and Bill Clinton

standard bearer for morality and values and virtue, because that's just silly, it's just silly. Ok, now, speaking of President Trump, we do have to get you. President trumps com, over the weekend. So, president from one on Twitter, as he is so apt to do, and he decided that it be worthwhile tweeting a bunch of things about the Russia investigation. By the way it is never worthwhile creating a bunch of things rather rush investigation. President Trump has done a good job of undermining sort of the credibility of the investigation. But now he's talk now pardoning himself openly. She started shooting things like this mark pen. Why are there? People will hear here's? This will do this sort of it. As has been stated by numerous legal, dollars. I have the absolute right to pardon myself, but why would I do that? What I have done? Nothing wrong. In the meantime, the never ending which led by thirteen very angry and conflicted Democrats, capital, a capital, key see, capital d and others continues into the midterms. So the reason you bring up hardening himself does really Giuliani brought up. The idea of from pardoning himself here is what he had to say. He trotted but probably does the man has known.

Mention a pardoning himself, but he probably does it get me that this and she really interesting constitutional. Why can the president part himself? guys. I hope you can run the partnership, which would be open question. I think it would probably get answered by Dutch that's what constitution says and if we want to change it changes, but yeah gaze of the assumption of the constitution is probably the president could part himself and getting paid in the present committed a crime worthy pardoning himself. You'll, probably be impeach, but in any case, bringing this sort of thing up is not particularly help when you're trying not to a guilty is probably not goods even be discussing this, like Julia, honest answer should have been when asked: could the press, pardon himself, his actual answer should have been. Why are you asking me? This is not guilty of any things. Why would you possibly want to pardon himself right? That's a proper answer in Syria Giuliani and the President talk about parting himself, it's just bad politics and then apparently Giuliani, told HUF posts on Sunday quote. In no case can he be subpoenaed or invited the president of the United I don't know how you can indeed, while he's an office, no matter what it is,

in any case in the president- is apparently above wise as if he shot James call me he'd, be impeach the next day in pay Then you can do whatever you want to him. That is not correct. Okay, so the president could be brought up on state murder charges. If you were to shoot James call me but this is one of the really weird things about the other than the above over said: the Trump administrations that a lot of people who believe that the Trump administration is broadening the expanse of presidential powers that President Trump has widened the number of powers available to the office and deepen the powers already available to the office of the executive and because amounts. Their lot. The reality is that from really has not you really is not expanded the power of the executive in any your way, in fact, most everything that he is doing has been vision of powers that Obama already grabbed or his hoss legislature

revising regulations that Obama put in place in the first place. He has almost precisely opposite tactic to President Obama. When it comes to presidential powers, Obama would go out there and say I'm not changing anything. There's nothing. We don't have power. Do that. We will twenty two times. President amounts as we are of the power to unilaterally suspend immigration law. We Camberwell that's. Where is it would never do that and then, of course it goes hadn't. Does it right, so President Obama had a nest habit but saying he was not expanding presidential power, while expanding presidential power president from has a nasty habit of saying that he can expand presidential power and then not expanding presidential power, the best of all worlds, who do you say, no, I don't want to expand presidential power and no, it ought be expanded and we're going to have and it and want to take more stuff over the legislature. That's what Everybody should be doing, but nobody is actually going to do that, which is really sort of silly trump is not going to have to pardon himself because he's not He brought up on charges is the reality and

an interim fulminating over this stuff just makes, it is my opinion president from should stop fulminating over this stuff. You should let the investigation, forward. Everybody who believes the investigation is crops are, we believe the investigation is corrupt. Now these the case, we made in favour of the tweets is that I guess a distraction, everything else is doing and the media are chasing president from around in his comments on this stuff, like a cat following the laser pointer, but I'm just not sure that when president from tweets about storm for protect is particularly useful, here's a president from tweeted yesterday. Mark pen. Why are there people from the Clinton Foundation on the Miller staff, wise their independent council to after people in their families for unrelated offences? Constitution was set up to prevent this storm. Trooper tactics almost a disgrace now. Actually, this is not a strong property that's ok, storm, troopers, late, astronomers or people who literally busted down doors illegally in the middle of the night without any warrant whatsoever and no legal basis for their action, as are the same thing as setting up an independent council who set up, I should mention by a trump pointy I should

She just point out a little bit and that from can fire at any time again. Does anyone have any real impact. I don't think any of this has no real impact on President Trump, but it does when an air of chaos to the administration that not useful when the president is should be busily pursuing better policy. Ok time for some things, I like then some things that I hate, so things that I like so today, I M going to discuss ad nauseam solo So if you're not seen solo, yet you probably not going to because not doing very well at the Box office, which is too bad, because I actually really like this movie. I thought this movie was that was fun. Had nothing new HANS, although kind of aid had a lot of references to HANS, although sort of a giant reference to HANS, although here's a little bit of the preview in case, you missed it you're after something isn't revenge, money, or is it something?

a little rough around the edges, forget about a job bigshot gangster put together. Group. Okay, so here s my thoughts on this and has done so, let's start off with a thirty thousand foot thoughts on this bill. Newer fits in the star wars, cannon and universal. It start off with the fact in force waken the last and I are hot flaming garbage and air flaming garbage. I said this afternoon: force awakens came out murdered, my childhood, because HANS Hollow was the coolest character in the original series, and then they killed him for no reason at all. They brought him back just to Helen because Harrison for anyone to be killed off so stupid. So dumb. If you can install your play, what you do is you have everybody have kids and then you have everybody retire off into the distance and that's it what you don't do is kill off beloved, characterised by making them divorce. Loser fathers we're flying around in their sixty seven durango, and then they come back just to get murdered by their trial, but that so dumb, as always the cool guy in the galaxy- and you turn him into

guy who abandoned his kid. What is kinda like eleven and then he runs around being an idiot leg, is just it's so stupid. The force weakened most I've gotten over that anger, and then I saw Sola and the reason that I got angry after seeing solo is because once again you cannot kill off a key character and then makes three principles about him, which was supposed to be. The idea here is this was indeed trilogy. Hey you, don't kill off a beloved character for many of us grew up on these movies and then say. Let me tell you the backdrop of the character we just killed off in the stupid as possible way. That's just idiotic beyond that, they recast HANS already. Custom is held in Iraq, which is fine, Elinor work. I thought you did. I just I things very good act by the way views even Hale Caesar is really versatile. It has a lot of things and Donald over as Lando worked perfectly all. This is good. There there's a bunch of good things about this movie. There call out, I'm not a big fan of the newly near the newly minted importance of the dice that are on the millennium falcon they now it's like ever

Their shot in the movie is a shot of the dice to reunite it with the importance of the force awakens at last July, which is just dont. Ok, never important original movies adding another war based on the millennium falcon until I saw force, awakens Unpeopled made a big deal out of it like really I don't even realise the right up there. It was possible at the little joke. I guess, but in any case, when any case they dared to two. If their recast consular, I guess the objection was that we couldn't recast, Harrison Board and more camel and carry Fisher, because there are two iconic and so, if we're gonna do movies after returned the jedi than those movies hatching fast forward to the current age, where. Actors are, and then we have to work within that framework, but we're gonna recast, HUN Sola as Elden Erin right, why didn't you, for example, just recast? Glover as Lando Alden Iraqis on solar wind recast MAR camel everybody will get. It revealed James Bond, ok, judged new person is coming and is playing these characters for a new generation. That's fine! It had been ok people to have a hard time of it. I probably moaned about it a little bit and then, if the movie

really good, who had been good. Instead, you get the whole expanded universe and force wagons last July, which are just terrible b again get fast boarding. Thirty years, the rebellion is still the rebellion for some reason and everybody's too, into a loser, looks off and a big loser somewhere, and he never had kids, they never anything useful and you ve got who no one cares about nothin. You no one cares about poem. No one cares about any got HANS, only getting killed like a loser. Luke like ass, from projecting sovereign and dying of exhaustion, which just ridiculous and then carry Fischer, who surely is dead now and you're stuck because she sat right in real life, so what they could have and how things had been so much better, because I've talked up the star wars books before I've talked of the novels. That used to be part of the cannon after star wars after the deaths are, is destroyed. One of the job I there is still an entire empire out there is, I didn't hurt empire was on the North star readiness toward the first at the first acts, an entire empire was still around in the books. There's a guidance. Admiral fraud who comes along and he starts to reconstitute the empire. Then you could etiquette

nation, the universe, a recast, everybody and you can just continued from there and it would ve been really cool and really interesting in the books. We end up having twins upon the twin there. There's this whole thing were where the twins have. The force are not illusions of getting married, but there's a lot more stuff that happens in that series. Then, basically didn't them. Just hang out being losers for thirty years, which is what happens beginning with the force awakens. So the point is: if you are, you could go one or two directions: either you can recast everybody or he confessed Ford, sixty years, and then just don't pay attention the old characters, because killing them off one by one is a real attempt to destroy its use. Nostalgia to destroy my childhood. I really objective case that is objectionable. One objection to swallow the movie the ordinary character really does now much with HANS. Although he has backed story, I don't I salute needed to back story. I think they're, adding this an attempt to to add to the back story. The problem with Hansel those character in this film is that I think

in trying to do, and maybe they were they were gonna, get there with the trilogy. That may never happen now. They're trying to show how an optimistic sprightly, young, lad, Cannibal, Luke, Skywalker figure ends up like consular society hunt is naturally cynical, It's that Han used to be really ideal, idealistic and all the sort of stuff and then and then he became cynical, but this movie doesn't show how he becomes cynical. This movie just hasn't still being idealistic like he and Luke Skywalker much more similar. Then the ordinary in the any any consular HANS, although that we have come to know and love and oh is played he's out there. I donno Glauber gets that on the nose. The script writing for Han eyes little flawed, there's some about moving? I love him in the mid whether they have Han and chewing meat is really great. I get really works and it's really funny. It's really good. I think Woody Harrison does a good job in the film there's a whole weird kind of S. J, W side plot with robot writes that I'm not sure if they were supposed to be playing for laughs or whether they are supposedly playing at sea

it's late, but I don't really have a problem with them with the movie. In fact, one things I liked about the movie is it? Finally, they actually cast a human being. Is the bad guy report back any place, the bad guy and he is actually human, like a weird looking creeper, that's kind of ISA, just a human looking creeper. So that's kind of that's Canada. Amelia Clark contact your way out of a paper bag which is unfortunate, but if you ve ever scheme of thrones you notice, which is one of the reasons that led the nearest our Gary can never end up on the full on the throne of the endgame thrones. If she does its complete disappointment, but in any case what they We need to do it, they and the enemy with excess warlords, and I really am spoiled why yet spoiler now? Ok, the real new What they should have done at the end of the movie is they should have had the rebellion read the people who are working with the rebellion accidentally kill HANS, fellows, love interest. Then you can see why he's so cynical about the rebellion and also, why he's cynical about love right? That would have done it, but maybe there maybe that's their plan in future movies, I'm not sure they do future movies, because this movie is gonna lose hand over fist at the box office until they had ended up clearing up. Four hundred million dollars, which sounds like five hundred

dollars, maybe with growth with the former terms. That means that it doesn't break even because they, but several hundred million dollars on the making of the film on the marketing of the film it's hard to see where they go from here. Caviling Kennedy has done a terrible jobs during the star words. Universe, robot was very good movie, so was a pretty good movie and the fact that they did what they do with force awakens and last July is impossible to get over it's impossible because now either have to make an astonishing play for character. You killed off in the worst possible way, or you have to make spin off about characters. You don't care about podium, IRAN and generate look. What they really should have done but they should have done as they should have, instead of re launching, if they're going to a marble style instead of relaunch with force awakens and last strata, they should have relaunch with Rob one and solo, and then move forward from right after return of the general or fast forward in sixty years, when everybody's already Jim, dad, basically and then moved on into the new STAR Wars universe. Instead, they decided to capitalize on this side of the short sighted play. It has some really negative ramifications for this movie.

I think, is quite good. I think they have been kind of arguing whether this is better than revenge of this. I think it's better than revenge on the Sith on second thought, so my current star wars rankings are in order and fire strikes back episode for Robin retorted, the Jedi solo revenge of the south, nothing else, is how garbage that's it. That's the that that those are the official star wars, ragging Sierra Leone Shapiro Show, and anyone who disagrees will be summarily fired our time for a couple of things that I hate already so millennia, she's, not missing so loud people. In making this argument like how crazy people right now so during the last election cycle, when people said maybe Hilary hasnt health problems and everybody was like. No, you can't say Hilary has health problems. She's the healthiest woman who ever lived Hillary Clinton that woman could compete the triathlon tomorrow with one arm disconnected from our body can do one arm pull up Sillery Clinton that women can jump tall buildings

in a single bound she faster than a speeding ball, and then she like fell down in the middle of a nine eleven Memorial, and so they had to be dragged into Van your memory lily through into a valid SEC pages and drove remember those guys out It was considered conspiratorial person whose worried about her health, and now you have mainstream media figures or legitimately wondering where could Maloney frumpy? Why? Because a kidney surgery like three weeks ago and has been seen publicly, maybe guys it's cause. She had a kidney surgery three weeks ago. Maybe it's that so that the going theory was that Donald Trump push. Lonnie and the basins in one hope here. I'll get a black eye or some such nonsense. This jitney stupid of me the world so damn near first of all, I am not convinced that Donald Trump in Bologna ever see each other? Second of all, like what you have to go on here, except for Donald Trump, his bed, so people are treated like I wouldn't even had to think about this except the Donald Trump. Is president really? Okay, so

made, Maloney was abducted by aliens. You wouldn't have to think about that, but now Donald Trump as president to any things so brine stealth or an entire segment on CNN, reliable sources. A segment and whereas Maloney a Trump Squares Waldo, except for slovenian fashion models, and then gin and there they are. Between the one about some along its weeded out about this millennia finally was forces. Without I see the media is working overtime, speculating where I M in what I'm doing rest assured the White House, my family feeling great and working hard on behalf of children, the american people. This, of course, let everybody and left say it was fate. It's like the moon, landing she's actually dead. Some in the basement should actually there there wheeling around like we can a was actually Trump went in and hacked into her account and started tweeting from her accounts socially.

Benjamin carry who has completely lost whatever was left to his mind. Tweeted out this bizarre picture, I don't know why didn't carry things that he's got a painting but no age without a picture of Maloney, a Trump being like Ryan Doctrine, aided Clockwork orange thousands, where folks Maloney is fine, a privilege for mining around a play. Well with others. I know what happened in Jim Carry or whether was always like this, but dumb folks, you dont get to claim that everybody on the right to conspiracy. There is why are claiming stuff like that, so that is a thing that I hate today. Ok, final thing: I hate will do a federalist paper tomorrow because we're we're short amount of time, but I will do a final thing. I hate you know. People say we should trust the FBI and I am inclined to believe that a lot of good FBI agents

and then I seen videos like that, and I think well that's great. So here's an FBI agent who is dancing at a party you'll, see him drawback flip drop his gun and try to pick it up and shoot somebody. This is video of a man at a Denver night club cutting loose on the dance floor, but something else is loose to, as he flipped his hand, gun flies out of its holster through the floor then going on ass. He picked it up watch again, as you reaches there's that muzzle flash the bullet striking a man and a crowd of getting out his via knows a Bible but yeah when people say trust the FBI yeah yeah, it's not the best argument guys you may want to like take carrier agents alone better also like who does backwards. A gun in there in that it in the back of their of the early I'll, be honest, I'm not somebody who conceals encouragements illegal in the state of California, but I'll get a lot males who need emails from people. You know about like whether if Europe ceiling in carrying you put the gun

in the back, while you're doing he's weird moves to a back flip state. It falls out your pants like when you be afraid that you shoot yourself in the ass just ages to question, but maybe I'm wrong. Ok, so good ex wife from the F B, I well done FBI, once again really doing omens. Work here will be backing to Morrow discuss all the latest news, plus we'll do Lilburn federal papering it up and then Shapiro this adventure bureau the bench of Euro, show, is produced by sending a villa real executive producer. Germany boring senior producer, Jonathan, hey our supervising producers, math squalor and our technical producer is often Stevens edited by Alex Angora Audio is mixed by my car. Mina Heron make up is by just one over the bench