The New York Times takes on the first amendment. Given Costa loves him some Jim cost. I end we'll talk Supreme Court, I'm bench. A pair of this is the benchmark. Arusha of your wonderful. Relaxing we get my was actually quite nice. They didn't my show on Friday, though Marshall on Friday had a lot of bill, and I had a nice civil conversation about of all things, Russia and collusion, which was kind of interesting. That's about a little bit later in the show, but first, I remind you that we have a special live stream which is happening today. It's him chemistry. We are joined by Specialist Jordan Petersen to celebrate our independence day and lament the fact that we don't actually on Canada, God can german border the host a new edition of Delaware backstage with me and Andrew Clavering, yet scribble Michael most look back on our countries birth and look ahead to its future subscribers Leave me to write in life questions for us to answer on the air that a city at seven p, M Eastern four, P M Pacific with Jordan Petersen. You can find her special lads from on Facebook and Youtube you're not gonna want to miss it. It can be a lot of fun so be there have to be hers. You better be here I mean come on. Whilst my doing ok so go check that are also

before we get. Let me remind you usually dressing better than you are. Ok, you look like a slob, that's why you need to go out and get yourself a nice custom suit. I don't mean one of these off. Wrap monstrosities I mean something that makes you look like James Bond and that's why you Indo China, the world's largest maids measurements were company had been featured major publications, including Jake, You Forbes and fast company. They make suits in shirts major exact measurements for a fantastic feet, fit and guys like the wide sawab selection of high quality fabric. The option to personalize all the details, including lapel, whining monogram, here's outworks! You need to go one there showrooms in many of major cities and pick out all the or customization and personalization, and they can tailor it directly for you there and then they sent it off and then it shows up in your mail box or you can do it at Indo, China, dot com and in all of your customization, that your measurements in any way for customs to arrive in just a few weeks and if its great this week, medicine

can get any premium: Indochina suit for just three: seventy nine bucks at Indo, Chino dot com. When you entered promo code Shapiro at check out, I would over the Santa Monica showroom and it was just a lot of fun. One of my favorite suits is that suit. It certainly one that fits me. The best nice three PETE Campbell Peace Lucy with our best pretty snazzy, has fifty percent off the regular price for a major measure premiums you three. Seventy nine bucks had Indochina Jack Campbell who enter promo code Shapiro and shipping as free as Indochina, dotcom Promo code Shapiro any premium suit. Just three hundred and seventy nine bucks free shipping as well again, there's no reason field, like Schwab, Indo, China will get you the best suit that you can buy so check it out all right, so one of the nice things for President Trump is that every time president from does a normal thing, the left decides that the world has ended. It really The world has gone crazy and I use is evidence of this. The fact that I was on Bill Mars show on Friday, and I was really more expecting becomes

station to surround the things that bill and I haven't common, such as opposition to political correctness and aversion to identity politics and instead the entire interview turn. Into ten minutes about Russia Collusion which, again, if you are, if your obsessed with the Russia Collusion story at this point, let me suggest that your priorities are not straight. There is no evidence to suggest right now. The president Trump has colluded with Russia during the campaign, or afterward. There's just not gave the evidence were there. I would talk about it because I've been very fair about this, but I am not going to pretend that there is a lot of evidence that the point is this: the folks on the left have decided that president from must be ousted by any means, and they ve decided that president from represents a great break. It because history and they they believed that America itself is deeply broken, and so now the left is decided. The deep american institutions not Donald Trump other key american institutions. These institutions must be destroyed as well. They believe the Supreme Court now has to be pact that they need eleven justices on the Supreme Court instead of nine, because it may be that way they get more liberal Supreme Court justices. They believe that the first member

let's be overthrown, there's an article in the New York Times. It is two thousand words long. It is not an opinion peace, it is reported peace from Adam Lip Tech. Adam look, TAT is what reporters was on a one of the New York Times over the weekend, and the title of the peace is how conservatives weapon eyes the first amendment, how cancer its weapon as the first of them, and now you may ask yourself what does that? Even me how conservatives weapon? How do you weapon eyes the first amendment? It's right, how do you weapon eyes right? That's like saying they were abiding citizens weapon eyes the freedom from unreasonable search and seizure of the fourth amendment Hetty weapon eyes that it doesn't make any sense. But the New York Times believes that conservatives have weapon eyes the first amendment because they like the first amendment, that's right, the New York Times newspaper dedicated, presumably to the proposition of freedom of speech

ass a newspaper that was involved in some of the great free speech cases our nations history from the Pentagon papers case, but to deliver the two libel cases in the past, then you are at times now says that the first amendment has been too broadly construed. That's how far the left has been broken. They believe the first amendment must be curbed because it isn't institution of power, the left is always going on about how the reason left loses. The reason the left is not victorious is because the system itself has crept if it weren't for the corrupt system itself. Then Marxism motives any taken over the world and everything would be hunky, Dory Utopia, but in the United page, where freedom rains. They believe that the freedoms themselves are a threat to the marxist worldview and freedoms themselves must be torn down. These are elements of a hierarchical structure. First amendment, you might think when I say freedom of speech. That means anybody can speak what the law says. What they're really means? Only powerful people can speak and that's why we need to crack down. On the first amendment through force of government, the government has to shut down free speech to save freedom. If that makes any sense,

steel. That's because your moron say here is the New York Times going on about the result of attack. He says on the final day of the Supreme Court term last week, Justice, in a pagan sounded the alarm. The court's five conservative members, citing the first amendment, had just dealt public unions, are devastating blow the day before the same majority had used the first amendment, four the California law requiring religiously oriented crisis pregnancy centres to provide women with formation about abortion. Conservative said justice Kagan was part of the courts for member liberal wing where weapons in the first amendment. Now I just one point out: there's not a courts. Liberal way, it's a left wing, hey, it's a left wing, the difference in liberal and left the liberals leave that we ought to maintain rights like freedom of speech, even if they believe in more government intervention in the economy. The left believes that all of these rights ought to be subject to the needs of the community. Basically communitarianism is the way that, if it violates their precepts of the hierarchy of various power groups than the first amendment should be subverted,

the New York Times as the two decisions were the latest in a stunning run a victories for conservative agenda that has been increasingly been on the foundation of free speech. There is how that's that's worth. It Then your terms worrying. That is not the free speech agenda that has been propagated by the court, helps conservatives is that it is the concern of agenda that is using the mask of free speech in order to push itself, except for the fact that this freedom, agenda, has nothing to do with conservatism per se. It just has to do with the idea that you should be able to say what you want with the government compelling you. Conservative groups building and borrowing and arguments developed by liberals have used the first amendment, just by unlimited campaigns banning discrimination against gay couples and attacks on the regulation of tobacco, pharmaceuticals and guns. That's a pretty radical taken. What exactly the Supreme Court trusted! Instead, what this does the court? Just did they said that the government cannot compel you to spend on elections that the government cannot compel you to violate your own religious precepts than the government cannot compel you to say things you

I want to say, or pay money to unions you don't want to join. Why exactly that has to do with it concerns we have agenda is beyond me. That seems like just a rational freedom agenda, but it is then, your time is it. The citizens United Campaign financed case, for instance, was decided on free speech grounds with the five justice conservative majority ruling that the first member, Unlimited campaigns, betting by corporations, the government, the majority said- has no business getting political speech that passengers responded. The first demand did not require allowing corporate money to flood the political marketplace and corrupt democracy. That's stupid argument can first, amendment does require me to be able to speak as much as I want. That involves me actually spending money on things. If the first amendment did not involve spending money on free speech and presumably the governor pass a law saying that corporations are not allowed to spend money on, say printed, materials and the sixty days before an election corporation to spend money on printed material. Sixty before an election, the New York Times the New York Times. In the libertarian position has become dominance on the right and on the right on first demand.

She has Elliot Shapiro away with Cato Institute and simply means we should be skeptical and government attempts to Your speech, they usually an uncontroversial and non ideological point. What's now being called libertarian position on speech was, in nineteen sixties, the liberal position on speech, which is exactly all right. What area Shapiro saying is your calling it right wing this used to be the consensus position, and so much of american life has become this. So much of american life is positions that all of America used to hold them in, the left decided didn't hold any more, and so the kids This american position is now from the right wing position so, for example, on immigration, the position that we should enforce our borders, the position that perhaps we should actually police the people coming into the country that was a widespread one, the present position. America, then left decided that it was intolerance, and now that is the right one. Position to say that we should enforce our borders. The same thing on free speech Was a widely held position across both sides of the Isle. They should be able to say basically what you want and then

left, decided we don't like anymore, and so what was left was the right one position, but the way that the new times posits the way they pose it is is not that the left threw out the first amendment, etc decided to cling onto the first amendment and unreasonable fashion? Why does the euro time say that will because there are the New York Times as Andrew claimants? Has a former newspaper here's what the New York Times as liberals ones, I'll, be an expansive First Mehmet rights are now uneasy about them. Many on the left have trading absolutist commitments to free speech from one sensitive to the harms that it can inflict gets hilarious. So they decided that there no longer absolutist on free speech. Instead, they are more sensitive to the bad things that can happen because of free speech, which is a way of saying that we are not going to pay attention to free speech at all. If you trade in the harms the can in be inflicted Free speech for free speech itself, for a speech is no longer right. This is like saying that there are certain harms that happen because of the

Freedom from unreasonable search and seizure in the fourth amended prevents the government from coming in their home and simply just checking out everything. That's there for the whole of it now either society cost of that sure. There's sidle costs that it means that not everybody with drugs and their house is going to be seen by the government, for example, everybody with an illegal gun in their house, is going to be seen by the government, but I'd much rather than a few p. Have lunch or illegal drugs. Then the government have a blanket right to come. My home at any time for any reason, without actually having to give a rationale. The minute you start saying that the downside of the right is more important. The right the right no longer exists, but that's it though it says left doesn't like the rights. The left is not like the free speech right, so liberals were ones largely united in fighting to protect sexually explicit materials from government censorship. Many unlucky pornography as an assault on women's rights in nineteen. Seven,

seven many liberal, supported the right of the American Nazi Party to March among Holocaust survivors in Skokie Illinois, far fewer supported the free speech rights of the white Nationalists, who march last year and Charlottesville Virginia now. There is a difference by the way in these. In these two cases, I will say that there is a solid case we may Justice Borg would be just as Bork judge Robber Bork once made this case. He said the pornography is not protected by the first amendment is a pretty good, solid case that the founders never intended for the first amendment to cover thirty pictures, but there is no question that the founders intended for the first amendment to cover political speech, which does involve nazis, marching in Skokie, better first medication, legally speaking at historic we speaking for bad people marching then for naked pictures and public monastic wasting your time says there is a certain I ever taken. How liberals used to approach free speech says Frederick Shower a law professor at the University of Virginia, because so many free speech, claims of the nineteen fifties and Sixtys involved ends.

Senator claims or civil rights nets. Have you no more protests? It was easy for the left to sympathise with the speakers or believe that speech in general is harmless, but the claim that speech was harmless or causally inert was never true, even if it is taken. Recent events to commence left of that. The question, then, is why the left ever believed otherwise So in other words, they were happy about free speech when it was the Anti Vietnam war, protests and civil rights and and pornography, but the minute that it turns into religious bakers who actually just want to abide by their scruples. Then all of a sudden left is ready, toss out free speech, which is to say the West, was never in favour of the right. They were just in favour of the of the exercise of the right as they saw fit. The left has never in favour of the visit. The big problem with left left doesn't believe they have rights. Do anything left disagrees with, I believe, as a person on the right there, you have the right to do what things. I disagree with. You have the right to March industry with pussy hats. You have the right to to act sexually how you want. Basically, I believe that you have the right to I actually believe the of the right to smoke marijuana. They. I think,

there are lots of things that I believe that the right to do that, I personally find abhorrent marijuana. I think it smells, and I didn't people who smoking are wasting their time, brain cells, but I'm afraid unbelieving person. I also believe that their rights that extend the things I don't like, I think the right to free speech- extends to Nazis. I hate nazis their awful human beings, but the right to free speech extends to them. The same thing does not hold true for the left. If you disagree with the left, they want to remove your rights, and that's it becoming obvious right now before any further. Let's talk about your sleep habits gave the reality is you're, not sleeping as well as you could be. How do I know? Well because you dont have a healing sleep mattress working with the world's leading sleep experts. He'll sleep has developed a mattress that is customize your specific height weight and sleep preferences. She can have the best sleep of your life and unbeatable pricing. Here's how works gotta helix leaked outcome thought there too minute sleep was they'll design your custom mattress, even customize each side for you and a partner in two thousand eighteen Helix League has taken customize sleep to the next level with the helix pillow. These

pillows pills are fully adjustable. Sea can achieve perfect comfort, regardless of sleep position or body type he likes. It has thousands of five star views place to get a hundred miles to try them out. By the way I'm so I love you so much of my wife and I went on gotta heedlessly mattress and we actually just To give another one is give to my sister for her wedding present. She was able to go through the process on their website of selecting customizing the mattress for her and her husband. They could get different sides, the mattress where they wanted and she's really excited for it to arrive here. Slippers. Just fantastic makes a great gift. It's also awesome for you. He looks like tat comes lifespan right now you get up to a hundred. Twenty ex toward your mattress order that seal Exley dotcom slash many get two hundred and twenty five bucks off your mattress org. You look subject comes lifespan by what he looks like this, so go to my sister actually asked for that. I can say that it was a creative thought on my part. She had heard me talking about. He looks like he asked me if you like sleep was really good. As I said, I said yes and she said well. Can you get that for me for my wedding We go when I got that force. A helix leaked out come Slash Ben. Check it out right now, when you use that suspending it up. Two hundred twenty five bucks offer mattress order. So back to the left's perspective on free speech, really incredible, for

page story a wanted, the New York Times why free speech should no longer apply? According to Catherine Mckinnon, a law professor at the University of Michigan, Free speech reinforces and amplifies injustice. Free speech makes the world worse quote once and offensive the powerless. The first amendment, last hundred years has mainly become a weapon of the powerful. It's not a weapon at all. It says the government can impose on you. This is the difference between have left these rights and how the right she's right the right, she's right as things the government cannot touch inalienable rights that pre existing government, the Lexie's right as things the government gives to you and therefore, if it's bad for you, the government can take it away from you. So free speech is bad for you to go to make him. Take it away. The right says: no, you can't do that right. Is that right, pre existing government, and get that right to governmental government was formed. The government exist to protect those rights. The left has noted have any rights. Then the gun gave me the right to free speech stuff, it's bad for the community. While then, the idea here is that we can take it away from you using the power of government,

Mckinnon says legally what was for the beginning of the twentieth century, a shield for radicals, artists, activist socialism, pacifists the excluded. The dispossessed has become a sword for authoritarian authoritarian, racists and massages Nazis in clansmen pornographers, incorporations buying election, in other words, get rid of free speech because people I don't like are you in it and there is a long discussion of Robber Bork and this in the end, development of free speech, litigation and free speech trends, and they say the right turn has been pronounced under chief Justice Roberts, the Supreme Court has agreed to hear a lot sure first amendment cases concerning conservative speech than earlier quartet, according to a study prepared for the times, is ruled in favour of conservative, reach at a higher rate than liberal speech as compared to earlier courts, the court stock. It reflect something new and distinctive about the Roberts courts. According to the study, the Roberts court, more than any modern court, has trains site on speech protecting conservative values. Only the current court has resolved of higher fraction of disputes challenging the support

conservative rather than liberal expression, or the reason for that is because there is very little suppression of liberal expression in today's America begins Whenever we want those cases already decided the real crackdowns. Are happening right now. Our crackdowns from the left on the right with regard to first amendment issues, but the left says that we should crackdown on the first moment the radicalism the left is an ongoing story. That really is absurd and just a second, I will discuss that ongoing radicalization. First, I want to talk a little bit about media, so the media, the same media, who are saying that the first immeasurably clash for everybody. They don't like see themselves as First Mehmet Warriors so Jimmy Costa over it CNN who loves him. Some Delicacie mean that dude loves gymnastic, get you somebody who loves see who loves you the wager cost of Belgium Agusta. We really does it he's the White House, Rapporteur for CNN and over the weekend right before

can I use he decided to be a worthwhile thing to shout at president from standing in the back of the room shouting at President Trump, and then you posted video themselves. Shouting at present in trouble is, though, Trump has some sort of obvious obligation to answer Jim Acosta shouting from the back of the room. Now, do I care pasta, shot the shouts of president from now I didn't care what right or at the Daily Collar Neil Monroe shouted. President Obama said be rather hypocritical of Meda care, the cost to shouting at Trump, but it just goes to show you how, when it was right wing or like Neil Monroe, then it was the end of the world. He shouted a question to Barack Obama. Jim accosted does it and he's a hero Jim across the shouts of President Trump shut. In him, because there is shooting in a news room last week and media tried depended on President Trump when it had nothing to do with present Drum Jim Acosta shouting at the president. This proposal will use all the people who use the press, the guy thirty or any such arrogance. There's a guy right in front of him turning round and touching him when the german hostages to look to the camera like I am so

brave for saying that look at these brave eyes, Oh, so brave gets a Fox news as well. Those kind of inappropriate oh really care about the inappropriate of it. It does make a huge difference to me, but the part of it, the tolerance is. The Jimmy Costa then suggest that Fox NEWS is a threat to free speech. Basically, Jim accosted goes on reliable sources with Brian SALT, or a shy appeared on and Brian mine for basically the entire, our. I think he item on for this long segment, which is an empty. Our image of accosted now like going on upstairs with Jamaica, and this is really really funny so firstly starts up- fox News- only angry at me because they need someone to attack what now I'm not really angry you as much as the muse by EU german CASA, I'm not angry Jim Agusta, because I don't think he's worthy of my anger, but I m bemused by the fact that Jamaica things he such an important human- and I

Let's see an end now does the navel gazing routine, where Jim Acosta is a hero for having shouted out a question and being shush by above the guy in front of him at the White House, say hairs. Brain cells are questioning him, the President Fox NEWS: they don't have Bronco bomb around anymore. They don't have Hillary Clinton, although the president goes after Hillary Clinton Alonso does Fox NEWS, and so we ve sort of replaced Obama, Hilary they they need somebody to attack, and I think that, with a sort of filled that role, ok so get, that must be it. It must be that their their attacking it because they have Obama kicked around anymore or maybe their attack. You, Jim Acosta, because you're a highly irritating here

and to show how irritating you are, this is the best thing I ever saw Costas on must alter any he's asked about shouting at the president, listen to the amount of just drooling self aggrandize with and in which democracy engages it's so phenomenal. Here we go we're so their knocker. Take our questions. We have to find opportunities to ask those questions. Another kind of like them Donaldson did decades ago, that's right and listen if they want to send me to hell oh I'll, still be shouting at the dumb. What what now? If you send me to hell I'll, be shouted? Look how brave I am so brave send me now I'll shouted devil and then the devil fired on you. What what is it? What did that even made sense? Helen all shouted the devil. Yes, I'm so brave, but I am so tough. We are so much journalism, ing wow, bravery, who now the question is why Jim Acosta wasn't adding at the devil when it was a devil. He like right what why Bosnia shouting Brok Obama, when somebody the delight and the

answer is that gimmick costs wasn't shouting at him because he was busy asking him kiss ass questions in the meat. Zambians in the first amendment should be covered by the New York Times in the first amendment? Should be curbed? For you, you know the commoner the little person it should be expanded for the press, to the extent that we have to force Donald Trump to answer every question Jim accosted might have because Jim it cost us a brave man who shouts of the devil and how you drag me down to Haiti's. You put me on that. Both you send me across the river sticks out face down the devil, stare him in his being little eyes, and then we will have a face to face conversation me and Mr Scratch Jimmy cost. But when it comes to the common person, then of course virologist Baker, then we have to force you to do what we want, or if you are, a person wants to give money in the world. Since I got, we have to force usual reviews. If you're, not a member of the union, we have to force you to pay money to a union. The double standard for people in the preferably free speech should apply to them, but should apply to. Nobody else is pretty astonishing. Now, speaking of radicalization of the Democratic Party and what we ve been

Fishing in real time is a massive radicalization of the Democratic Party. So right now the person who is receiving all sorts of plaudits, of course is this. Is this woman I always forget everything. Alexandria, Alexandria, causes Curzio Cortez forget, her name is because I don't think she's all that important, but the media are playing her though she's deeply important. This, of course, is the twenty eight year old, former bartender, who was due, who defeated Joe Crowley, who is a fifty eight year olds possible successor, Nancy Policies is, Ass, minority leader, Anastasia or Alexander is court? Has cause you Cortez she defeat, I'm a little talk about her in just a second first, our say: thanks for sponsors over at policy genius self, seventy one percent of people said they need life insurance. One hundred percent people need life insurance because everybody, I only dies and leave your family having to deal with all of your funeral expenses without having any actual money.

The bank. Also, if you are an earlier than you over to your family, to have some sort of life insurance in place right now, only fifty nine percent of people, have coverage if been avoiding getting life insurance or procrastinating. Well, don't do it because procrastination is one of those things that will not work with life insurance once you're dead, it is too late, so go check it out a policy genius tat come it's easy way to compare life insurance online. You can compare, quotes and just five minutes and what its that easy, there's no reasonable it often compare calls while sitting on the couch watching tv or while listening to the show policy geniuses, helped over four million people shop for insurance placed over twenty billion dollars in coverage? They don't make life currency, they also compared disability, insurance and renters insurance and health insurance. If you care about a thing rights of you need life insurance, but even putting it off, because it's too confusing rigour of the time you're lying yourself go check out policy genius, dot com, it's the easy way to compare those top insurers and find the best value You know sales pressures, zero hassle and it's free policy genius. Stockholm again, no reason for us to do a beer, responsible, human core policy genius, our common check it out. Ok, so the regulation of the dome

party continues Apace Alexandria, Stasi Cortez at some point. Actually learn and well enough that I don't have to pause when saying it, because the media have turned her in such ubiquitous figure. She is leading the way she is leading the way, and she is an actual card carrying member of that product Socialist of America. This is a party that has about thirty seven thousand members. This is supposed to be a man of Movement in the United States, the d say there were riding across the land they are taking over America, the say without thirty, seven thousand of their members. Ok, by contrast, I have, I think, thirty times the number of people who follow me on Twitter. Okay. So it's not a big membership. So there that's not a huge membership, but it is an increasingly important membership, because the democrats- and so and embraced the principles of the democratic Socialist of America, or at least, are using them as the Vanguard The dsl is basically the tea party of the left, so we thought occupy was can be. The tea party have left occupy a sort of morphed into the dsl, and the dia say has all of these new fangled figures

Who are you are going to push the New America they're going to push the New America and what exactly is their agenda of the New York City? credit socialism, America, they tweeted out. Our agenda is here is what it looks like: abolish. Profit, abolish prisons, abolish cash bail, abolish borders, abolish ice, a good luck with them yeah. You go ahead and eat and you try that abolish profit, tweeting, presumably from an Iphone abolish prisons to do while you're not being assaulted by prisoner about borders, tweeted from a country called America, you have to actually get in so vivid their actual agenda, and this is the under the Democrats are now embracing. Kirsten Jellyband over the weekend said that she no longer wants ice to be a thing. If you think the dsl isn't becoming a thing you're wrong, it is becoming a thing here. Children most men able member of the Eu S Senate. Number one she joined the sentence was programme and only quasi pro choice and now Kristen Gillibrand has turned into radical left winger because she wants to run for president as the

the Hillary Clinton younger clone. So here she is Talking about dumping, immigration and customs enforcement doesn't have any substitute for rice shows They will, let's just start new branch outside the Homeland Security Department. She just says let stump eyes which man it is amazing, how fast The radicals unwept are being mainstreamed into the democratic party. We should protect families that need our help, and that is not what ices doing today and that's why I believe you should get rid of it start over re imagining and build something actually works? What does that even mean? What does it mean to re? Imagining like what we want as chocolate factory re. Imagining will they like doctors, uses imaginary em, like we're going to we're going to sit around we're going to blue sky about how to take care of the borders. You need somebody who actually wants to police the boar idiot, I guess, occurs in celebrant being the full self and then Elizabeth warns of the same thing so Elizabeth WAR and when she first entered the Senate, she was not considered the radical that you. She has now should written a book, a very famous book about what she called the tube. The two income trap that basically America

I mentioned to head, lowered, interesting it standard of living in certain ways, because both parents were now expected to work which was considered by many. Every kind of interesting argument, because it was basically suggesting that maybe one parent family income would be better than maybe one of the Paris should stay home and build society around. That's their alot of family oriented conservatives, but she liked Elizabeth Wars Book way back when well was with worn, is a full scale. Christian, it idiot bring, did decided that she so is against ice. This is a new thing say or against ice. Now, let's be clear about this. Americans are not in favour of this position. Seventy percent of Americans think ice ought to exist and that we ought to be forcing our borders is a seventy thirty issue for Republicans, but it is, it is seventy thirty issue among Democrats that I should be abolished for ever He is not willing to take care of the radical base, hoping the wind twenty twenty primaries. Here's Elizabeth WAR, Doing the same thing is Carson Colbrand, all of them now mirroring the democratic socialist of Amerika S. Deep

a more actions have made an obvious. We need to rebuild our immigration system from top to bottom, starting by replacing ice with things that reflects our morality? What does that even mean something reflect some morality or what what is that leg I can well imagine that would be replacing ice, is literally a police force. That's what it does. It is there to police. The borders, what does she even talking about but the radicalism and the Democratic Party now runs deep and they decided during a swivel to the Bernie Sanders left in order jeopardy nor rubber. Based so matching waters. She disowned Nancy closely and trucks, humor saying that they will do

thing to protect their leadership, but we need to be is more radical Byzantium Maxine, a lady who, a week ago, was saying that people should be mob the gas stations and driven out of public life? I was surprised at the church humor you know reached into the other house to do that. I have not quite saying that done before, but one of the things I recognise being an electrode official is, in the final analysis, you know leadership like trucks which sewers well, do anything that they think is necessary to protect their leadership. So she's saying that the Czechs humor is only being civil because he's trying to protect his leadership, the realities, matching water has been a radical, her entire career. She used to call the LOS Angeles, rides, the l, a rebellion, the Ellie uprising well as having seventy three people died in those rights and shoes. Their cheering on matching waters is the worst that the United States Congress has to offer and she is being seen as a charming figure on the left and she says the people want us to be confrontational. The only people who want confrontation, Eric inside you right now are the far left people on the hard core base of the left. Here she is

again on joy. Reads: equable show us NBC people do want to see us be stronger and more both forceful and to confront them on these policies, and I am hopeful that even Democrats haven't seen the count them out pouring protest over seven hundred incidences of protest this week in saying that they will be more forceful, more confrontational and more prepared to push back on this administration. So people should be more confrontational. That's what Europe needs more confrontation, so abolish ice, embrace democratic socialism and confront people on the streets. This is a new democratic party is what Trump has driven them. Do they really believe that their we make the world in their image. This way, and it's it's pretty incredible pretty incredible, go a little bit further in this direction on to talk about the movement, the mainstream toward Maxine waters and end Alexander. Oh causa, Cortez and other us. This puzzle

how little doubt whether democratic socialism actually works through there's a lot of myths that are floating around about democratic socialism in just a second first, I want to talk about your loans. Ok, the Rio is that for decades, credit cards have been telling us to buy now and pay for it later with interest. The problem is, the interest rates are astronomical. That interest gets out of control fast. This help ruin their lives but still need money, and that's why you need to talk to my friends over at lending club. You can consolidate your debt or pay off credit cards with one fixed monthly payments, since two thousand and seven lendingclub millions of people regain control of their finances with affordable, fixed rate personal loan. No trips to a bank hi inference credit cards, go to London Club, dot com and tell them about yourself and how much you want to borrow and pick the terms that are right for you. If you're approved alone is automatically deposited into your bank account in as little as a few days, lending club is the number one peer to peer in platform of over thirty five billion dollars in loans issued. All you have to do is go to London Club that come slash, ban, get your finances, folks, you're gonna need to do it, lending clubbed outcomes, lifespan. You can check your right, and it's about forty grand that's lending club, dot, com,

flash Pentagon Lending gloved outcome, Slash when there's no, and free to continue paying extra exorbitant high interest rates on the credit cards. Instead of going in getting a much lower interest rate over at lending club, dotcom slash, and all loans are made by web bank member. After I see equal housing lender go check it out. Wending club dotcom, slash pennies, that's lifespan. What's to know that we say you ok, so I want to talk more about why it is the democratic social and the giant fail why the Democrats are embracing it plus a little bit of Supreme Court talk in just a second, but first you're gonna have to go daily wired outcome for nine ninety nine a month to get the rest of the show. I've got to get the rest of Andrew Craven show live my gloves to live, but that's the thing that you are interested in and when you get the annual subscription you get this. The very fine ass in all beverage vessels. Leftist tears hot or cold tumblr. Now at any level. Subscription. You also get to ask questions in the mail bag and later today we are having Jordan Petersen for July fourth episode and which will be able to ask George questions as well, so you want to become a subscribers. He can do all

thanks just nine hundred and ninety nine a month or ninety nine dollars a year ago check it out of dailywire dot com. Also make sure that you check us out at Youtube and Itunes. Please subscribe! Please leave us a review. We always have great Sunday those coming out? They won't get unless you're a subscriber, overt itunes or use we just had I'm Corolla on it was hilarious and fun, and next week I believe, is Sam Harris, correct, Socio Harris is coming up. Next week's that should be a blast so go because subscribe. We must review, go check it out where the largest this growing conservative, Pakistan, the nation, so here's the problem as more credible, more radical people are going so crazy that even people who used to be supposedly conservative, although not all that conservatives have been echoing some of the more extreme rhetoric of the left, see America is independent and its wings. I decide Barack Obama was a radical die and noted. Swivel to president tromp was a very.

Strong conservative in office, and that means that when the pendulum swings back, it's gonna swing back to the Democratic party wealth. The democratic party is a party of democratic socialism, meaning it's just socialist party. Then what you're going to see is exacerbation of conflict that is driving America into the ground right now, it's really ugly stuff, Jennifer Ruben who used to be a sane person but apparently not anymore, I I met her and Bill Marsh- was in the green room. I said hello, surely perfectly nice lady, except that she says crazy things. Now she says that Sarah, how can be Sanders ready? The White House I presume that you should be made to feel uncomfortable in public places. This is the kind of country she wants. No Huckabee has no right to live a life of no fuss. No must, after lying to the press, effort inciting against the press. These people should be made on comfortable and, I think that's a life sentence. Frankly, it's a life sentence,

to be made uncomfortable, but that's it really. That's we're gonna do so. Ok, I assume that the simplest ingenerable then so, if genuine is outlining a restaurant. I think that her political perspectives of noxious and encourage people to harass restaurants then Presumably that's totally fine with her, because after all, this is the new politics this sort of polarisation, is really quite terrible for the country. This piece in the New York Times talking about the embrace of full scale socialism by the Democrats by Michel Goldberg talking about the fact that They said that this, this woman, Alexandria, Cassio Cortez, twenty eight knocked off your Crowley and primary vote in New York and Summary Thirty and Sarah Morocco, whose there two and Elizabeth Feeler, thirty, seven off rhythm, one nominations for the pan well, you state legislature and the Democratic Party. All of them are members of the democratic Socialist of America. Michel gold, says, millennials are embracing. Socialism in large numbers quote talk of popular control of the means of production is anathema to many older democrats, even very liberal ones. They have a memory and they remember what it was like

the Soviet Union. They remember that Cuba is still a place their member, that North Korea is garbage that when the government controls the means of production, terrible things generally happen, but younger Democrats believe that the only way to counter President Trump is to counter the entire system. This is a pity that the left has been making is not a pitch in favour of their own programme and the success of it. It's a programme in favour of its a pitch in favour of a replacement of the entire hierarchy with something brand new Trump is the product of this Rocky and if the hierarchy can be destroyed, the first amendment can be destroyed. If the second amendment can be destroyed and of private property can be destroyed, then will no longer have to suffer with Trump. It's not. The trunk is a product of a broken civility and our people x, which it really more is is not. The president Trump is the product of an increase polarization in our politics is not the president from a backlash the hard core leftism of left its that President Trump is himself a product of the evil american system and the system must be torn out root and branch. We shall Goldberg, who is a friend of the socially

as this position popular controls of the means of production. It plays a lot better with the young one way and survey shows that sixty one percent of Democrats between eighteen and thirty four view socialism positively, indeed well, there's a lot of talk about an idea Logical civil war among Democrats on the ground boundary seem more fluid in Pennsylvania certainly, I met with moderate, suburban resistance activists who violence here for Inamorata thrilled to support a young woman who could help revitalize the Democratic Party and this is the irish issue- the Democrats, the agenda, The USA is utterly insane nationalized: healthcare guaranteed housing, guaranteed government jobs, although bankrupt the United States and five seconds. The democratic party is happy to embrace tat crowd because so long as they can wield that crowd, like a club against President Trump they're happy to do it. Meanwhile, I love this Goldberg says the old members and the USA are hopeful, because their analysis helps them make sense of the term catastrophe. They often seem less panicked about what is happening in him. A right now the liberals are because they believe they know why our society is coming, undone and how it can be rebuilt. So right now

Socialists are on the rise there more candidates like a casual Cortez out there. The Democrats should welcome them, it is their youth and zeal and willingness to do the work of rebuilding the party is a neighborhood institution and they're coming where the parties leadership likes it or not. Better apart. The article is where Michel Goldberg suggest that all these socialist are very kind to one another, because I was struck by the work they put into building community on some days that public schools are closed. The dsl socialist Feminist Committee puts on all the events with childcare and free lunches. Like several other chapters, the Pittsburgh USA holds quit remembers change people's burned out, carbonic light for free helping them to avoid unnecessary police runs while making inroads into the community a local Mackay. Agnes Metal Mary Help, train them. Here's the problem, although comes to an end, the minute the socialists take over government, because there is no reason, there is no rationale whatsoever for them to actually do community outrage the minute that the government can do all of it? It's just as a light. Now, let's talk for a second about the appeal of democratic socialism, because when you hear from

after. The democratic socialism is what exists in places like Denmark and Sweden. That is real socialism there's only one problem. None of this is true numerous and Don T for the stream has a very good piece about myths. Regarding nordic, so wasn't he's an offer researcher Hills Phd from Other Royal Institute of Technology in Sweden and conducted research, at the University of Cambridge, and he has a great piece about. Why is that? So many people think that democratic socialist group What are the ones that are really succeeding when in reality there succeeding in spite of their socialism here's what he says. The success of nordic countries is based on the fact that story, they have relied on free markets and protection of private property. The only exception is a short time in Sweden, or in socialist policies, crippled growth and job creation. Nordic nations do have high taxes and generous author, but in many other regards never unusually free markets. Danish Prime Minister Lars Rasmussen, says after seeing, is We held up as an example in the american presidential debate. He told students into two thousand fifteen speech at Harvard Kennedy. School government quote I

but some people in the. U S associate the nordic model with some sort of socialism. Therefore, I would like to make one thing clear: Denmark is far from a socialist planned economy. Denmark is a market economy when it comes the areas such as business regulations, trade policy, investment, freedom vouchers and the provision of education, elderly care and health care and partial privatisation of retirement savings. Nordic countries are among the most free market in the world. Hate nordic countries did not become rich lying on socialism, sweeteners, only nordic country that actually experimented with socialism in the seventies and eighties and instead it destroyed so is it destroyed Sweden's economy. Nineteen. Seventy ninety ninety one social Democrats tried to introduce a form of planned economy into the country, and Sweden's growth rate fell to the second lowest western european countries after being among the highest. Also there a lot of people say will look at these swedish Sweden and Denmark and Norway look at their wonderful, wonderful, lifespans and low child mortality is only one problem.

Their low child mortality and lifespans pre existed the socialist attempt to re remake their economy in nineteen sixty the tax rate in Denver was twenty five percent of GDP lower than twenty seven percent in the EU us at the time and all of their outcomes we're just this. Aim or higher than they are now the top ten countries long lifespan in eighteen sixty when these were all cap. Just Norway, Iceland, Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark, Switzerland, it's exactly the same now, except that they ve actually dropped a little bit and they had both traveller tell any rates to and finally important to note that if your truck about why Denmark does better Sweden. Does better scandinavian Americans? Dubious Scandinavia does better important to note all of these group fully? to America do better in the United States they do back in their home countries. So in Denmark, danish Americans actually do better in America than they do in Denmark solve the talk about how how all of these countries are thriving because of social justice. Now the reason I say this through bring all this up rules because of something that is quite hilarious.

All these millennial socialists are not socialist, These millennial socialist grew up in the lap of luxury. They grew up in capitalist luxury, and the same thing is true: in all these nordic countries. All these nordic countries became wealthy because they embraced free markets in capitalism and all these freeze in Scandinavia, all of them were among the free trading companies, the most free trading companies in countries in the seventeenth century. Although our going away back related to the fifteenth and in sixteen centuries so that The idea that, with socialism made these countries riches just absurd. When really was with socialism, restrict in all of the gains that had been maiden. Capitalism and all these Please, including Denmark, still have very free markets when it comes to traction of business, they just have incredibly high tax rates that kid attempt down the growth of individual industry, and the reason that I bring this up is because of this Sandro cause you court has become as big star now is twenty eight year old star from New York. It turns out that she has been living off the benefits and excesses of capitalism for her entire life sugar

but Westchester County occasion, grow up impoverished in government housing, but she's He's not just really have a working class background, so the hard scrap this from the daily mail, the hard scrabble biography of democratic congressional ended Alexandria. Abkhazia Cortez has been called into question after the revelation that you grew up mostly in wealthy Westchester County, though cause you can Has twenty eight was born and currently lives in the Bronx County Land, Russia show her late father. Sergio courts has Roman bought, acquaint three bedroom in your town, height New York and ninety ninety one when she was about to, but her biography says the state of bronze pebble. Schools in the late eighties, an early nineties sent her parents and a search for a solution. Gender, pretending public school forty minutes north in your account and much more life, was defined by the forty minutes. Between school and her family. In the Bronx yeah exemption, Robin Westchester County, she said to choose a girl from the brain. She's refused comment on all of this sort said she's wildly wealthy, but european middle class family, her father, who died tragically from lung cancer in two thousand. It was an architect and see

of caution, Domino Cassio, roman architects, pc, which focus summary, ongoing and renovation issues he's a small business owner so again The idea that that all these people are living in absolute poverty they originally lived in a plan community in part just and then they moved down. They got a house. There was an airplane unity. A hundred seventy one mid rise, brick buildings in the Bronx and when she's about five, they move to this house in Westchester County, we're supposed to believe that she is not the result of capital is by the way she seems to be pretty capitalistic in her own life. According to the new post cause you're Cortez used to work at flats fix, which is an EAST sixteenth street taco, and to kill a bar most of her coworkers like a lot, but one waitress says that at the end, one night when causing Cortez was tending by at a single two celebration in two thousand seventeen when came time to split the five hundred sixty Buxton tips, you'd gotten at the bar Abkhazia Cortez give the waitress fifty bucks. After the waitress complained or manager who take was double to a hundred bucks, and this waitress says

dad says something about her character. So, like a lot of socialist, it's all fun and games until it comes time to stick the money in your own pocket, also that this was pretty funny so cause your cortisone tv or actually she was on Twitter and she'd been asked about her lipstick issuers, his bright red lipstick. And she treated I've been getting many inquiries about my debate, lip color in the last few days. I got you it's Silas Stale DE liquid and vessel, given its hold out the socialist pitched a capitalist product and the end is sold out, because this is so capitalistic country, and this is all this- is all stupidity look at quickly about Supreme Court, so the Supreme Court President Trump, is talking about what he wants to do with the Supreme Court, and he says that abortion could end up with the state's you could see the overturning of ROE V Wade from the trumps mouth to God's ears. As president from talking about it, the role we were in a way, it is probably the one that people are talking about in terms of having an effect but I will see what happens, but it could very well end up with states at some point,

the enemy. I hope, is right. People they're going nuts overall. That's they suggest that it's terrible. We can overturn Roby weighed one of those people, of course, is the idiots in Collins, the senator from main here. She is saying that she will for anyone who demonstrate Anti Roma opinion. I would not support a nominee who demonstrated hostility to Roby Way, because that would mean to me that their judicial flaws sum paid did not include a respect for established decision, says ATLAS law. Ok, so I the its established law according to Susan Collins, except for every bad decision, was established law plus you versus Ferguson, which said that segregation was legal, was established law for fifty eight years in the United States before Brown for supporting education a case in the United States. That said, that same sex marriage could be made illegal by states without law in units for forty four years

whenever people, unless a precedent, what they really mean is a decision that I like Susan Collins is, is a fool when it comes to rob me. Wait, it should be over terms is a terrible decision and I hope that it will be so in just a second will do some stuff I like and some stuff that I hate. I have plenty of stuff I like and stuff I hate. So, let's jump in things I like today, so I already told you about the end Jones Book on the the Plantagenet has sequel to tackle the war of the roses really faster. If you, if you like the series, the White Queen on Showtime, then check out the war of the roses, marine likely like when the war. The roses is really fun to read. If you like british history, it's really enjoyable so go check that out, because equally, we can always a break from politics every once in a while. Ok time for a bunch things that are ready for a lotta Higgins here comes man How can we begin today with downwards?

on well. It is a super he's, a court justice eyes, a judge on the Emily Fifth Circuit Court of appeals and justice. Well, it ass. He calls himself on twitter he's up. Tweeting is unity is appointed to a federal lamellicorn who's on the Texas Supreme Court and it is being discussed possible Supreme Court Pick while ABC run entire peace and wide will it not be allowed on the Supreme Court because of his sweet they quoted for tweets here are the tweets they quoted K, one from from judge. Will it saying people of earth in two thousand eighteen June Well, it will never give you up. Let you down run around dessert, you make you cry, say good by tall lie or hurt. You rightly say that this tweet makes it impossible from here through court orders not that way, maybe it's this one eight reach out. You're. All daddy, wider politicians talk about eminent Eminem. This domain me. That's eminent domain eleven year old, huh me. Sorry only get one shot

is it he's just as the jokes on twitter, according to a b c, because down will it does dad jokes on twitter? We should bar him from the Supreme Court, so if you are not a wild leftist or you do dad jokes on twitter, That means you cannot be allowed on the Supreme Court. Maybe the left thinks that the Supreme Court just a tool- a policy here- is done well treated this one out my three favorite chocolate positively positively. It's a picture of three June. Dark white and milk hey. This is what he is. He can't be latin Supreme Court because you swing outcome. Pictures of puppies you guys are going a little bit overboard on this whole thing, maybe just a little report on this whole thing so well done ABC, really the candidates the way they must be that it. We need to make sure that he cannot. We can have a man who tweets about puppies on the Supreme Court. We just cannot. It would just be too terrible: ok for another thing that I hate so Leubronn is heading to allay as boss insult expand. The saddens me. It also makes me happy which that Brown is no longer in the east, but I will say

Lebron James moving over them Lakers to try and build another super team. I guess it's good for the NBA, because a good story line is those him staying in Cleveland? But can we now all Alex knew him going back to Cleveland was not something that he was doing for altruistic reasons. It was something that he was doing for career reasons, because there is coming out. How are you must make lunch hour? Hollywood connections he's been buncher movies, already, that's fines and I am in favour free agency and people being able to move wherever they want. I like job, a liability. I like you being able to choose where you want to go, but what's not pretended that that he's doing this out of reasons Principle, these going the Lakers out of reasons of principle because s Roselli he's, for the money is doing it for the publicity. That's fine but now. Is it? Is it something I think that's good for his is sports legacy? Probably not particularly ok, also decide to show so Huffington posed is now pitching dry.

Children. This become a thing. This become a thing on the left that there's a bunch of eight to ten year old kids boys who decide to dress up as drag queens and our being promoted by the parents and put the media. So I have a general problem with child actors as a whole. I think is a huge mistake for parents to get their children into acting publicly, because I dont think that children should be exposed to public discourse as general I think the kids don't know enough about what they want their minds that are capable of making reason decisions are not capable of making good decisions. I think it is particularly awful for parents to be exporting their ten year old boys dressing them up as girls or allowing them to dress up his girls and parade them in front of cameras. Looking like drag queens, because this is somehow good for them. These are tenure is there a cable, you wouldn't allow your tenure old to decide whether or not to do its homework that night. Why would you allow him he's? Not the hormones haven't even hit it. Years old this doesn't know he's gay is ten years old Yemen unless he had an early onset puberty.

He doesn't hasn't, probably isn't about sex eighties, ten kid, but we're supposed to believe that this kid is somehow doing something brave and wonderful, according to having imposed as a form of child abuse, hairs, Huffington Posts, promoting it. It's it's a ten year old boy who if you can't see, is wearing a blonde wig and blue lipstick, dressed up as a drag. When I was born and bred man, they had taken, seven gay pride means self expression high under the maiden thing is I'm a jack and I live in the city and activate an activist advertised out of resolving this get is ten years old. How in the hell is it couldn't algae? Beating you activist, personal ten year olds should not be activists about anything anything. The only thing you can do, We make a case for on politics. Why ten year old should be activists is maybe I'm prologue fishers just because they're not dead, but otherwise. Even then, I wouldn't use a kid. Is an activist in four for proactive cause and I love her life causes, but to make a kid.

Activist on sexual matters is perverse. Ok to actually perverse is if there were an adult or not, this kid's parents addresses could up this way, put this hidden public. You would know that this was something perverse and that's what happens both as having imposing these kids parents, but it just is absurd. This is more than just it's as apparently children cannot imagine doing anything remotely like this to make it even MIKE had wanted to dress like this. Even if I thought it was ok wreckage address like this, putting my kid in front of cameras and playing That is an act of bravery on. My part, is just disgusting lacking a form of expression and being yourself dressing, however, and wouldn't there's no matter what you're wearing even of your eyeliner went down and take so bad, you still fears my model, it beer stuff, all infidelity design, no matter what anyone says: M pain, he no man, could there not presenting ok. Can you stop recycle,

so that's the end, but I think so. This is of this kid noticed the use of the word fierce there hey. This is because this kid, it's been culturally indoctrinated into these uncertain terms, kitten, Greer Old five year old Ten year olds. They don't know the word fears unless you have been engaged in a particular culture that glorifies a particular set of values and was it as your parents. If that's what is apparent What you are doing is not damaging your kid. That's one thing, but to trot this kid out as an activist as a free minded activist is likewise one be eighteen, and do this again. That's your prerogative. Yawned me you'll be twenty five and it is only an adult and do this that's your problem. This is a parent who decided that they were going to get their kids and attention and decided that it was that they were going to. Therefore, encourage these sorts of ten, he's in the kid you think this getting euro experience a hearted life, I'm not even talking about quantum court oppression from from people outside of this kid, I'm not even talking about bullying which of course, is not appropriate. In any case. What I am talking about here that confusing kids about their own sexual identity engender at the age of ten and not attempting to provide them

sort of solid grounding for this stuff before they even hit puberty is not a recipe for mental health, just it, but the entire left would would suggest that it is intolerable. That is, the only form of tolerance is to cheer along as a ten year old kid is dressed up in drag queen outfit. And paraded in front of budget is the drooling media. It really is really quite horrifying. Ok, final thing that I hate for today, so President Trump has now led to a draft bill this new draft bill declare America's abandonment of fundamental worlds It organization rules, so I can't imagine, This is going to pass. The bill essentially provides president from a licence to raise. U S. Tariffs will without national concerns in international rules, be damned the bill. Is title the? U S, fair and reciprocal tariff act; in other words, the? U S, Fart ACT can give and from unilateral power to ignore the two most basic principles of the W Theo. Negotiate one on one with any country, most favoured nation principle that countries can set tariff rates for different countries outside of free trade agreements and bound tariff rates? The tariff ceilings that issue

b to your country has already agreed to in previous negotiations, sets walking away from our current commitments on tariffs. Its walking away from free trade. It is not present from negotiating better trade deals. Is president trumpet manipulating tariffs, which is something likes to do no way in Hell. Should Congress give him this authority its ought, first of all as legislative authority in general. Second of all, I do not trust President Trumpet Trade Authority, given what it is that he has done with trade. Thus far, ok we'll be back here tomorrow with all the latest, I'm bench here. This is the venture Bureau show the bench of Hiroshima is produced by sending a villa real executive producer. Germany boring senior producer, Jonathan, hey our supervising producers, math is clever, and our technical producer is often Stevens edited by Alex Ngora Audio is mixed by micro. Mina Heron, make up is by just one over the bench of Euro Show is a daily wire for publishing production. Copyright for publishing twenty eighteen.