President from meets with Lattimer Putin, Anastasia Cortez Ortega says something really really dumb and software and corners. Get it, I'm bench brothers, the bench Barroso, I always group there- His name- and I dont know why maybe she's really long or we'll talk about her in a little bit. First say thanks to our sponsors over at bull and branch self. If you are not sleeping as well as you ought, that is because your sheets are not as good as they ought to be, and that is where bull and branch comes in Everything Boleyn branch makes from their buildings their blankets made from pure one hundred percent organic cotton. It means they start out super softly, even a softer overturning by directly from them. So you are essentially paying wholesale prices. Luxury sheets can customs, two thousand bucks in Store Bowen Branch eternally a couple: a hundred bucks I sleep on boll and branch sheets. They are amazing and I love them. If I'm being thrown out all of our other sheets, we only have boll and branch in the house. Even three: U Dot S president sleep on boll and branch sheets. Shipping is free for thirty nights. If you don't love them, send them back for refund,

you're, not gonna want to send them back. There's no rest, no reason not to have to try to get. You started right now. My listeners get fifty bucks off your first set of sheets a bull and branch, dotcom promo code. Then that's bull and branch. Dotcom promo code Bene getting at two dollars often use that promo code, then its Beale, L, l and branch, dotcom promo code, then all of their wedding is ridiculously awesome. Their sheets are particularly great and if you are looking for something that is breathable and gets off, then bowl and branches for you, bull and branched outcome. Promo code then get that fifty dollars off your first set of she also air minder. Our next episode of the conversation is here tomorrow, Tuesday July, seventeen, five thirty pm eastern to thirty Pm Pacific. All of your questions will be answered by olenin reclaiming with our hostess leash across our lives you and they will be available on Youtube and Facebook for everyone to watch. Only subscribers can ask grew questions over a daily wired. I come to check out the pin comments on this video for all the information once again subscribe, asked who live questions tomorrow. Tuesday lie seventeen five therapy,

MR to thirty PM, Pacific join the conversation ass grew about how he does it here in the morning, ok self, president from has met now with Vladimir Putin. They met for about two hours this morning and they spent on the time talking about various issues specifically about russian election meddling. Putin came out afterwards and he said we talk about election meddling, but I tell him I will do it and then president from comes out and says we talked about it and we talk about it very lengthy, and that was pretty much the only thing we found out from this meaning that we spent enormous amount of time talking specifically about the election meddling and prudence is we'd, not dubious and president from said, I don't know if they did not, but we talk, but a lot and everybody went crazy over it. Now, if all that sounds a little bit anticlimactic to you, it's because it is anti climatic and people are taking away from what they want to take away from its on the left. What they're, taking away from this from Putin Summit is that Trump got job that trunk got played. The trump basically made all sorts of concessions to the Russians. We will find out about

until later, but at least in terms of his language, use very sycophantic. In terms of language, he was very sycophantic because president from has been consistently sycophantic with regard to Vladimir Putin for at least three years now. It is not true that this policy has and take authentic, and this is where the what seems to go wrong. Mason to immediately connects everything from says with everything from does But there is a massive problem with doing that in This administration president from very often acts like a free agent inside his own administration. He goes out and he says stuff, and then the people who do his policy behind closed doors. They do a policy that looks nothing like what he said we ve seen this over and over and over. We seem president from say: well: it was a candidate that important health care for all and then, as soon as you got into place, then all of a sudden, his people were pushing a repeal of a bomb occur when President Trump, was saying during the campaign to raise taxes on the rich and then back to build. It did not raise taxes on the wretched lower taxes on the wretch, among others, while that was another example of the disconnect, Russia is the biggest disconnect, because president trumps is very nice, things about lad, reboot and on a regular basis, and then

when it comes to policy, U S will bomb syrian airbases with russian planes there. The US will kill Russia mercenaries in Syria, useful arm the Ukrainians with deadly weapon rain away, did Obama never would have so this massive disk. It is confusing a lot of people, but it does show that inside the United states inside his own administration inside on administration. There are a lot of people who are not taking it, verbiage seriously- and I don't think Lattimer Putin is taking- is verbiage seriously either. There seems to be a concept out there that Vladimir Putin's gonna look at Trump and think, while that guy's a softly softly, I think over loop when you know that's not going to have because potent does not take his words all that seriously. It is also worth noting that the first year and a half of their administration- Bush in Obama we're not much better when it came to signalling softness with the Russians. Remember George W Bush got together of latin report after nine eleven, and he said he looked into Putin, soul, and he saw something magical there. Realities always put looking it

in over Georgia and then Barack Obama, twenty twelve anymore, to grant flexibility to the Russians and they proceeded to grant the Russians Crimea. So all this talk about as you know, a universally in and strangely in and in weird fashion pro russian Amerika there may apply to rhetoric, but it certainly doesn't apply to his policy. Now unconscious rhetoric is Frederick, does kind of suck writer from his jumped into this. This meeting with Putin many suggests that the United States is responsible for the poor state of U S, Russia relations he treated out this morning. They use Russia. Relations have never been worse. He took it up. Our relationship with Russia has never been worse things too many years of yours, foolishness and stupidity, and now the rigged witch hunt up- that's not great

None of that is true. The reason that our relationship with Russia socks it because when we're Putin is a fuckin, a dictator who has attempted to expand his fear of influence broadly across the region everywhere from IRAN to calves, extend and you ve seen. President Putin is in the IMF, seized power and keep and self in power for nearly twenty years over in Russia. At this point is not because of U s: foolishness and stupidity alone. It's because of Lattimer Putin being Gladden report, and is not because of the rigged witch hunts. Ok, it's not because the De Mello investigation is going after from now to secondary to talk about how this pleasant and why this makes people think that trumpets and the Russians pocket. I don't think that's what's happening here anymore, explain why the Miller Investigation plays into trumps picture of Russia in just a second, but suffice it to say that that comment is really dominant leaves people believing that Trump is much more pro russian policy. Then he actually

is, and then Reuters asked from about that sweet and from said, we ve all been foolish, we're all the blame. We have a chance to do some great things and he stopped. He highlighted stopping nuclear proliferation. He said the probe is a disaster for our country. There is no collusion. He said. I think that were all to blame on. All of this is its duty to show how bad the sweet was. The ministry for Foreign affairs for Russia tweeted out agreeing with it by Russia to weed out. We agree, we agree so Trump says it's our fault and Russia's. We agreed now, let's be clear if Morocco Mamma had said this I'd be all over him, maybe all over him, and so it behoove me not to be hypocrite. President Trump should not say such things, because this is groves here when the president of the United States blames the United States for our conflict with Russia. That is just silly in every available sense, but I think that's really going on here is something else so what's really going on here, and that the President of the United States really really really does not like this russian collusion investigation, and he thinks that big

as the russian collusion investigation is a witch hunt against him. It is also a witch hunt against Russia. These are not the same thing. These are not the same thing, and this is where we go back to late last week later, on Friday last week, rod role instead deputy attorney general, he announced there be twelve indictments coming down of russian citizens. Who'd been responsible for working to hack into Jesus, you see, and the DMZ and the horror couldn't campaign to ride rose seen, announced last week that we're not Republicans we're not Democrats. This is just about, going after people who violate the law we confront foreign interference in american elections is important for us to avoid thinking politically, as Republicans Democrats, instead the thing patriotically as americans- and this is exactly right. Ok, rod, Rosen seen for all the problems that you have with Rob, Rosen's dean rod roses in what he says here is exactly correct. I dont think that Russia colluded with the Trump camps to skew the election away from Hillary Clinton. I do think that russian sources attempted to hack into the election

the G8, the decency and the DMZ, the attempt to they attempted to screw with the election itself and so when Rosen. Since, as we should worry about the law, the law breaking, we shouldn't worry so much about how it affects either of the parties he's exactly right about this and, as we discussed last week, the indictment itself indictments are pretty telling them. Things. You know about that right. It is pretty clear from these indictments that GR, you agents. That would be the new fangled KGB. Twelve gr you off Sars knowingly unintentionally, conspired with each other and with persons known and unknown tat, the emails or the Clinton campaign that, It is easy the DMZ around April twenty sixteen, the conspirators. And planning how to release Hillary Clinton emails around June They began releasing that material, Visa DC, leaks and Gooch refer to point out, and they spear fish. John Podesta, as well as other top Clinton campaign officials, the Ottawa material they'll solely some republican material from twenty fifteen. The hackers created Gooch refer to point so Roger Stone who was very close with the Trump campaign he repeatedly,

defended goods for two point. Now you seem to be working with goose virtue point, but that doesn't mean you necessarily knew the gush over two point out was actually the Russians or that he was talking specifically president from about directly interacting with Goose for two point out: goose, rich widow, was also working with Wikileaks. According to the indictment, the conspirators also use the goose for two point: eight percent for these stolen documents, through a website maintained by an organisation that had previously posted document stolen from Europe since entities and the U S government. Presumably that would be Wikileaks nearly over twenty thousand emails and other documents stolen from Dnc network. That began three days before the DMZ Recall President from has been saying all long doesn't think they hacking was actually the Russians. He thought there was a four hundred pound man living in his mother's basement or some such nonsense, and then there are buncher conspiracy. US, including some pretty mainstream voices who suggested there was also a threat. There are some Dnc staffer who had. Actually, we all of these emails to goose virtue, point out would released all of them, and then they suggested that separates was murdered

over that there was no evidence for any of that, and it turned out to be false rate. All this turned out to be false. Well, here is the problem. Here is look left proceeds and then here's what the right proceeds and I think that there are some elements of truth to perceptions of both, but the truth lies somewhere between the left perceives is the president. Tromp was very professional The beginning of the campaign, this must have been because he was an flattery Putin Pocket and then, when the Russian started, hacking is pretty clear that it must have been that Trump was coordinating with Russia to make all that have because that's the only way Hillary Clinton possibly could have lost. The selection is if Donald Trump and the Russians cans where to steal the election, and then they say well now Trump is being super pro russian and super Anti probe, because he knows the probe is going to find something and because he believes that the Russians were the people got him elected and his best friends with them. He so here is what they're right about now: here's what they're wrong about their right there,

since attempted to affect the election in twenty. Sixteen their correct about this, they are wrong about everything else, at least so far as the evidence as now, there is no actual hard evidence that the Trump Administration from campaign coordinated with the Russians during the campaign or post campaign in order to create so russian policy. There is no evidence of that at all and there's no evidence that Trump is personally importance pocket now. Here's the rights as with the right says is Donald Trump is not important pocket and Donald Trump. It did not cheat during the election. Hillary Clinton just lost it. Donald Trump has not been too weak on. Russia is actually pretty harsh on Russia in terms of policy and that and therefore all of this hacking talk and all the collusion talk is nonsense. All the hacking and all the collusion talk is nonsense. All that is gender by people who just don't like Trump now. That is also only afterwards through the trunk is not important pocket. It is true, as far as we know, the Trump did not call. Wait what the Russians during the campaign, but it is not true that the Russians did not attempt to the. It is not true that the Russians didn't hack into the decency or the Dnc or Hillary Clinton campaign,

I want to tell you the real story in just a second and then we will see how these two narratives play into what the right and the left are saying about. The Trump Putin Summit first say thanks to our sponsors over at betterments or betterment, is the largest online financial adviser. Their designs help customers build well planned for retirement, achieve their financial goals. Here's the reality, you think about spending time, playing the stock market or investing in real estate. How much time you actually to spend on? The answer is probably now what is gonna stick that monies bank is gonna sit there earning an extraordinarily low rate of interest or this Why you need to talk to the folks over at betterment, because these are the financial advisers that you need at betterment, hidden costs, nowhere to be found in charge. These really low fees, no matter who you are, how much money you investigate everything for one low, transparent management fate, and they fiduciary, which means they make recommendations inclined it's best interests. There not incentivize, to recommend certain funds. Then we have our own investment products to sell right betterment offers personalized advice. A tulips suite of two to help. You know whether you are on track to hit your investing goals or get the retirement

that you weren't when you needed there, tools and guidance can help you get on track. I have financial adviser, you should do the folks over betterment, really know what they're doing listen. Investing always involves risk, but these are some of the people who can help mitigate that risk and manage that Ben Shapiro show listeners can get up to one year, managed for free for more information go to betterment. Dotcom slash appear, that's be our r anti Dotcom, slasher bureau? That's betterment. Dotcom slasher bureau is an online financial advisor. That will help you manage or money betterment outcome. Such pro reach those retirement goals, and then you have to do yourself. Betterment outcome. Such bringing it up to one year managed for free, it's a fantastic service. Really, oh it's yourself to go Ok, so how do these two narratives play into what everybody is saying, but the Trump Russia, the Trump Putin sort of sort of meeting? So, first of all it let's talk about what Trump is saying about the collusion investigation. So here's what treated so Trump tweeted out. These russian individuals did their work during the Obama years. Why didn't Obama do something about this because

crooked Hilary would win that's. Why had nothing to do with the Trump administration that fake news doesn't want to report the truth, as usual, so you're, not wrong. That Obama didn't do enough about it. Obviously, but Trump would go on to essentially claim that a lot of this was just false in general that they then the hacking itself some may have happened or didn't happen or has been or has been exaggerated in some way. I hear he's focusing on that angle and that's what he's that's what he's been saying sort of all long, he he didn't. Actually, he hasn't yet said that the indictments themselves were bs, but their allies of his website, that. The incitements themselves are best Devon, Nunez Over at the House Intelligence Committee, when he says that this is basically Witch hunt, the incitement in itself is ridiculous. This is equipped three indictment place like there are only going after the Democrats when Bob more

and all his investigators and his lawyers and know for a fact that they also targeted Republicans. Why is that not the indictment? It makes the indictment look ridiculous. Ok, all of that is fine, but the fact is the incitement says with the incitement says in his preclude. The Russians were trying to meddle in the election again because the right is trying to claim the Trump is not the pocket of pollutant, which he isn't. There also trying to claim that the entire indictment is wrong, but somehow the Russians were not attempting to effect the election in a serious way and its, because republicans are reacting like this. It's because Trump has reacted like this. That the left therefore thinks Tromp is even more in the pocket button right. So here's how got the left says, trumpeting Putin's pocket and he's in Britain's pocket, because Putin hacks Lila and from this wait a second I'm not in Britain's pocket and also putting didn't, have the election, and, let's see he's long about wooden hacking election, which shows that he's into his pocket and transit wait, I'm not in his pocket and Europe One's work, let me have the elections are. Why am I supposed to believe you and see how

goes around and around the circle. Now the real answer is Putin did attempt to affect the election and Donald Trump is not an pocket right. Both of these things can true all at once, and the problem is that nobody is going to play this honestly. Nobody is going to honestly look at these issues and look where the evidence takes them. Instead, they're going to jump to the assumption they think most meets with with their preconception of the situation itself. Now all of this was exactly made by the run up to the russian meeting. So in the run up to the russian meeting president from started, signalling that he was anti you he'd spent the NATO meetings talking about the shortcomings in NATO and a lot of people, and will this signalling weakness to Vladimir Putin? First, I do have to note that if there is a group of people who can make President Trump look, one

for it is his protesters. So this is a group of protesters, apparently over the weekend, who decided to take on President Trump. I guess this was in London or San Francisco yeah there there said there's a dummy of President Trump and it looks like a bunch of gay activists who are punching be dummy of President Trump and losing yeah. This is very inspiring stuff. Deeply inspiring. This guy's got the right hook of my grandmother and she's eighty eight in the hospital. So is it really solid group of folks. Yes, this is clearly making the discourse just enormously enormously. Better, really really well done over there. President from is over in Europe and in the middle of his visit to Britain. He suggests that the EU is a full on trade. Here's what he has to say, We have a lot of foes. I think the European Union is a foe, what they do to us in trade, and now you wouldn't think of the European Union, but there are foe, but that doesn't mean their bad. It doesn't mean anything had been.

Their competitors they want to do well, and we want to do so again. Its president from language paying attention to where it says that there are FAO. What people are saying is that, while he seeing the rushes about and used by the EU is an ally. Russia is not an ally, but the truth is that president from uses words like foe, pretty loosely use words like friend, pretty loosely the present is very loose language. None of this means that the policy that emerges is going to be dramatically anti EU and dramatically. Ro Russian and in a present from by thing, had the most accurate take on this. This meeting in Helsinki frankly hidden expect much to happen. At all events we had to say I don't forget anything I've frankly, don't exe if I go with very low expectations, I think that Getting along with Russia is a good thing. Ok, so he goes a long way. Nations and gang of Russia's getting nothing came out of it read. So all we know today. Is it nothing We came out of these meetings, president from set lot of words. A lot of people are angered by those words. That is, you know that I think it's it's. It is fine to be

angry at the stuff, the president from says. In the same way, there was going to be angry. What Obama said the differences, the Trump says up, and it doesn't mean a lot very often when President Obama, said things that were Anti american. It usually manifested its policy. When a bomb went around the world into his apology, tour manifested in military cuts and attempt to reduce America's influence around the world. When president trunk was run, it says we're all the blame for twenty sixteen when he goes round, he says Well when it comes to Russia, american relations, we all carry a little the blame when he says that kind of stuff is a gross. Is it off putting? Yes doesn't manifestos policy not really remember? This is the same guy, who said twice in the last three years that the United States kills people in the same way the rush I kills people has that manifested in anything like a soft policy with regard to Russia, and the answer, of course, is No it's this massive disconnect people are having a real problem with their trump says, things that are very egregious often and when it comes to actual policy, the policy is pretty good has been true pretty much across the board in many many many ways. This been true right. President

in our states has a lot of stuff, and nothing much comes here is what President Trump tweeted out about the upcoming russian meeting so treated a bunch of stuff. You treated the stories you heard about the twelve russian yesterday took place during the Obama administration at the Trump administration. Why didn't they do something about it, especially when it was reported. President Obama was informed by the FBI in September for the election? Ok, then he continued along these lines and he said congratulations to friends wait extraordinary soccer and winning the twenty eighth World CUP. Additionally, congratulations to President Putin in Russia for putting on a truly great woke up tournament. One of the best ever and people went nuts over this because, oh my god, he's complementing Putin as postal Obama, who also have complemented Putin on the handling of the World CUP. Hillary Clinton by the way tweeted in response to this Hilary treated in response Great World CUP,

question for President Trump. Is you need to boot and do you know which team you play for well, Hilary? He doesn't play soccer, unlike you he's the president's. So there's that, but they said great world which team does you play for? This? Is the left misperception Bertram plays for team Russia? No from says. Let us here is from general approach negotiations, trumps general approach. Negotiations is he tries to win you over. It tries to be really nice to you. He tries to be really swab and debonair and charming interest a charm you into a position where you like him, and then he hopes to get something out of you. Can that doesn't Africa, in effect, in terms of him, giving something over very often this is this is what people are just going to have to deal with the fact that trumped says a lot, a crappy says a lot of stuff but I dont like and then I find morally off putting. But when it comes to policy, it doesnt manifesto that often in policy- and you can tell that from the actual policy but his sweetheart, but we do have to note when his tweets are bad. So here are the rest of the sweet, imprisoning continually that heading to Helsinki thin the.

Looking for to meeting with President Putin tomorrow, unfortunately, no matter how well I do at summit if I was given the great city of Moscow as retribution for other visions and evil committed by Russia over the years owed returned to criticism that it wasn't good enough that I should have and Saint Petersburg. In addition, much more news media is indeed the enemy of the people and all the dams know how do is resistant obstruct. This is why there is such hatred and dissension our country, but simple. It will heal. So again, it's all about President Trump is one of the operating things about the present is that everything seems to be about President Trump, except for policy. Now here's the reaction to all of us, so the reactions of this begins with some folks on the right or very upset with president trumpeted extends to some people unless for very upset with President Trump. Again, I think, is a lot of sound and fury signifying nothing in the end. First, our say thanks to our sponsors over admit Mobile, so you probably have a deal with some big wireless company under probably spending fortune on your wireless coverage every month. There is no reason for you to do that. The bigger and bigger

LE stands for a lot of things: big contracts, big bills, big secret companies like eighteen Verizon. They don't want you to know that, there's way to cut your wireless build down to just fifteen bucks a month. This meant mobile, the guy changing company that taken everything wrong with big wireless. They made it right, mid mobile is proving them into Americans. Getting your wireless build, doesn't have, the worst year. The month meant mobile, makes it supremely easy to cut your wireless bill down to fifteen bucks a month. You use your own phone with any mint mobile plan and keep your number along with all of your existing contacts, and then you can choose ten to five or ten gb t, bland, no more paying for unlimited data that you will never use because you're not pay parliament a data they are we're going to use you get a much much surprised by the way the coverage is just the same, as would be with one of these major carriers, because my understanding is that they work with one of these major carriers to ensure the coverage every plan comes. Limited talk and tax. She can safely in all your friends and loved ones, and if you're, not a hundred percent satisfied men mobile has covered with their seven day money back guarantee. You can try to see if it works out for you outfoxed that old wireless bill start saving with

month plus free shipping on your mint Mobile Sim card, go to mint mobile dot com, Slash Ben, that's my auntie em, o b I'll Eads outcomes. Admit Mobile that comes. I ve been cut that where it was built of fifteen bucks, most saviours of hundreds of Nazi here get free shipping on your mint Mobile Sim card meant mobile dot com. Slash ban Mobile Sim card meant mobile dot com, slash ban check it out right now, really is a fantastic way to save money. Ok, so people don't actually understand What president from says, what he does, our two very, very different things, and so people are responding in. I think right. We outrage fashion over president from language. These no president of the United States should be saying that The things about America in relation to Russia that the President of the United States has been saying, and I understand their allotted from banned. You say well really What he means is the proper. Almost paths with Russia was bad. Oh really. What he means was George W Bush is policy with Russia was bad. The reality is no matter. How bad american policy has been in the usually has been bad in terms of weakness, not in terms of strength,

the only way that you are going to be able to confront the Lehne report and is by confronting Vladimir Putin Design can be done with kissing his ass its. Only now can be done by blaming America for Putin, America, anger or descent. Is because the reality is that food has been doing this since he got into office. But apparently President Trump said that we ve heard about relations with Russia, but that all changed about four hours ago when he got in a room with maybe this is the same thing. The present trumps about Kendra little. You remember this. Whatever met with Kendra load somewhat from critical of that meeting saying that meeting was counterproductive and useless and that in fact, whose elevating can jump on the world stage and then president from came back and you tweet it out We no longer have to worry about Nuclear North Korea, which of course was very, very silly, but did America's policy and North Korea change in any massive way not really, and the same thing is happening with regard to Russia. This, why John Huntsmen who's the US embassy in ambassador? He says: listen is highly unlikely. That Trump is gonna, recognise annexation of Crimea or something you can't rule out the possibility that you be recognise Russia's annexation of Crimea,

the unlikely Korea was a violation of international law. We all recognise that: U S, policy, okay, so none of it. Is that none of this is going to manifest in terms of policy lay I get from keep saying these things and there there really rare, Freedom and there really really ridiculous, but I'm not sure I'm really not sure that it has any real ramifications again I'll think that's me grasping its Roger, I think that there is a massive, disconnected and stuff from says and stop the trump does in his office. I think that present in the United States. Is so many things by the way he just president, when presented president from a soccer ball from the World CUP, so that's really exciting? I'm sure that and then and then Putin said to tramp, the ball is in your court seriously is just yuk yuk, apparently Trump criticized the focus on his campaign and Putin apparently do apparently

ripped on the on the indictments themselves, and I got none of this is good. All of this is really bad. All this is really bad. He said, Putin said as for who to believe who you can't believe. Can you believe it off? You can't believe anyone, so that's! That's really! That's really great. All of this is just there are some. I I keep saying it over and over because I dont think anything is changing here. Trump says a lot about their only two ways to read this either what from says matters or what he says does not matter. If what he says matters he's had a lot of stuff today, if what he says does not matter, then Who cares what he says and I think in reality it does matter a whole lot. I really don't think that John Botanizing, the people actually implement policy. Ignore president from a lot of the time yeah, I'm not not. Somebody believes that, having been to the White House, do not believe that president from a sitting there playing forty chess upstairs micromanaging the workings of the cyber security profile under the the address. I really don't think that's what's happening here, but

we'll have to see how our place out in terms of policy it. Just the president should not be saying these types of things. They should ok. So meanwhile, meanwhile, the Democrats are gearing up for twenty twenty and they are very, very much in love with a particular set of candidates. Joe Biden apparently wants to make a comeback at age. Eighty three he's actually gonna, be seventy eight, I guess in two thousand and twenty, and he says that present forms immigration policies make him ashamed of. Both is poor. Kids on the border in a car. Just ask you to make you feel if you, if you and your administrate shame machine recently, I really mean no seven, and I am proud of the response to the american People Democratic Republic, This is not. America is not who we are okay, so this is me by inserting, though it's not. What we are routine is gonna, come back with a vengeance and the reality

of course, that a lot of these policies were implemented under President Obama in the first place, but the favorite of the left is not. In fact, your bite in the favour of the left is honest as yet or cause your Cortez. We get her name right this time. I always screwed up in a nutshell why That is the very long name. So she was onwards with Margaret Hoover of Stanford University and Margaret Hoover was asking her on firing line about her belief, about the Middle EAST, now let it be known yet. Abkhazia, Cortez she's, a twenty eight year old, former bartender she has agree in international relations. A watch issued begs off the question because she doesn't know where is it doesnt know where the Palestinians are and thinks that screaming occupation into the air mean something watches amazing. What people are starting to see, at least in the occupation of Palestine, is just an increasing crisis of humanitarian condition. You use the term the occupation of Palestine. Wouldn't you,

by that. Oh, I think it at what I meant is like me: the settlements that are increasing and in some of these areas and places where or Palestinians are experiencing difficulties in access to housing and homes, giving you can expand on that yeah I mean, I think, I'd also, just I am not an expert geopolitics on this issue. You literally has an international relations degree. So let's be clear about something. If understands you, because you're Cortez Way Republican is there any doubt that should be labelled crazy eyes. Nuts doesn't know just talking about stupid, affirmative action, candidate as executive Michel Bachman in aeroplanes you remember it. They had it over and over and over about every republican woman who was ever in a position of power. It was that you stupid, whose affirmative action she's only there, because she was pretty red, they did the again. They did this about every republican woman,

whoever reached a position of power that I can remember, except for maybe kind of these rights and the about her, because she was black and they, want to say about a black woman, but there is no question that this woman is a dunderheads it sure, where the base of the Democratic Party is, though, if she says occupation over and over and over and doesn't know what the occupation is doesn't know, what she's talking about has no clue and then begs the question and gets away with it. It shows you the debris The democratic party is Anti Israel. It also shows how radical the base of the Democratic Party is pretty astonishing, stuff. So honest Algeria or cause you courts has who has been named by Tom Parade the future of the Democratic Party demonstrating full scale. Why she is the future of the Democratic Party, she's ignorant. She knows nothing, but you will be considered genius, no matter what, because she's a demo socialist, just incredible stuff there from the Democrats. Ok in just a second Sasha Baron Cohen, whose making headlines anew with his new series, but first we have to go to daily where'd our common subscribes for nine ninety nine a month. You can search

ideally wired com. When you get the rest of my show lie the thrust of Andrew Clayton show like the rest of Michael Nosey, show life. Also you ve, probably heard by now, I'm taking the bench The bureau shall live this August to audiences and doubtless in Phoenix no we ve now sold out of our general emission tickets for Dallas we're opening up the very last eight hundred seats available. We are almost sold out of our vent in phoenix if you ve got your tickets, yet you should them now, or else could miss out on the event entirely took over daily wire dot com, slash events to ensure that you ve got all of that. Also reminder: Youtube is manipulated. The subscription food security it, means that users may not be notified of our channel goes lie the universe subscribes to the channel already in order to make sure you received notification. For my videos, you should not only inscribe daily, where on Youtube also ring that Little bell see no one. You pose new content when you subscribe. How do I get the annual subscription? Not the ninety nine a month we want better. When you want the ninety nine dollar a year, one which brings you this, they left his tears hot or cold tumblr, the very greatest in all beverage vessels go check it out right now and you will not be disappointed. We are the largest

fastest growing conservative podcast in the nation S, okay, so the future the democratic party. Is Anastasia, Cassio Cortez, you doesn't know the hell she's talking about on virtually any topic that varies Joe Biden wants to run at each basically dead says pretty exciting as well. The other candidates who are being talked about our people like Kirsten Jello Brand and Elizabeth WAR and Inquiry Booker. None of them are deeply inspiring. I would say at this point: the front runner would probably have to be Biden if Obama endorses him, if Obama does not endorsing and the front runner is likely. Somebody like Elizabeth Worn, who is deemed to be sort of the Bernie Sanders double except she's, female and empowered. That's it. That's that's very selfish, as native american background as we keep hearing. Meanwhile, Meanwhile, folks in the media are very very excited because Sasha bearing corners back now such baron, can we really really funny? If you ever, what The ology show its extremely extremely funny will now he has a brand new shout, and this show is basically poking Americans right. The show

Is called, who is America on show time and its essentially him going to a series of Americans, mostly on the right wing and trying to make them look foolish, it sort of like he did in Bore out where he went down south and then walked into churches where people are speaking in tongues, made them look stupid and then did that route where he went into a bar and start singing, seeing throw the Jew down the well, because obviously everybody in the bar was an anti semite. This stuff, that's stuff, that Sacha kind as well. This time he posed as in israeli former Mossad agent, who wanted to start a programme programme in the United States army four year old and he got a bunch of republican congressmen to talk about wonderful. This idea would be, he couldn't get MAC gets. Remit gets a smart enough to avoid it. There are a few of the Republicans. You got that sucked into it. You can simply members of Congress, don't just hear a story about a programme and then indicate whether they supported the intensive three we hinder guardian course introduces specially selected children from twelve.

Four years ago, two pistols rifles, semi automatics. And a rudimentary knowledge of borders in law, less a month less than a month, a first greater can become a first Grenada ok. So all of this is a little bit inherently funny getting all of these Republicans on record saying they want to teach young children how to use grenades, Ray that alone is inherently funny, but I will point out that it is actually extraordinarily easy to do. This is very, very easy to get people to say, You put things when they say when they believe they're, saying something that they're not being so here was Joe washes. Explanation is former Illinois Congress person and it was on Sarah pale He was with Sarah Palin, enjoy more stuck in this who in America who who is America Series and Cares. What walsh that he's at court is a funny guy, because it gets people to say stupid thing. He gets people say stupid things because you ice in them. So here's what Walsh says so Walsh explains that he was invited by calling to go on some israeli tv station to get no worries.

After they conducted an interview, they had me read off a teleprompter talking about some of the innovative products and Israel invented, and then we read about this four year old child in Israel who, when a terrorist, entered a square, from some highly grabbed the terrorist gun and held the terrorists at Bay, and that was an exam of how Israel trains and arms pre school kids on how to use firearms and buoyant, we do that in America he said, if you read it's kind will this kind of crazy, but it is Israel really. Israel is strong defence. Later we found out this whole thing was made up realize until three on the next day had been duped, he reiterated what are Sunday that he didn't believe that we should train an arm kindergartners and then he urge people to boycott Showtime when he says that they gave him a fake award and he shows what the but the words as it says she viewless you game. Seventy eight, seventy four significant contributions to the state of Israel, so basically it was. They got him in a mood to believe that he was with friends and then they told him what to say offer teleprompter and they do this with a series of people now before you well he's an idiot, he shouldn't fallen for that understand that you would have fallen for the same thing in all likelihood the chances that you would not fall for that sort of praying are

Ordinarily low in that doesn't mean Natasha. Baron calling did didn't think deeply wrong in imprinting people like this, he did something deeply wrong if he poses wounded soldier with Sarah Palin Roger that he did something deeply wrong, posing as israeli Messiah agent to trick Joe off, but it does demonstrate that you want to know why it is really wonder: why is that so many folks on the right are deeply sceptical of them. Yeah and don't actually want to have open interviews with people we media, because they feel like this. Every time they sit down with them. It's a trap. Everytime you, doubtless somebody was an unfriendly. It's a trap, there's a reason that President Trump announced that he would be giving his first interviews after all of this was over to Tucker Karlsson, ensure ahead of you. You want to sit down with Friendly's and the reason for that is really do have to let the people you sit down with, and if you don't trust them, you don't suggest. In the first place, because otherwise you may very well end up in a situation just like Sasha Baron includes now. Is it good for the country itself sharing coneys doing all this? I am not sure that

Is just in the sense that you really think that all these republicans are asking to vote for for that sort of bill? What's the point of this? If the point of this is to say they can trick Republican Congress people in the same dumb things I mean, I don't think I need a trick to make a pelican most people say some things they do in a fairly regular basis, but if the idea here is the Republicans actually support this sort of stuff that what they are actually go. For here is arming four year old that that's really where their heart lies. Then I think that it's all it can. It's too as the cynicism about about politics that is more than I do not think many politicians on the right are walking around actively promoting the idea of four year olds. With guns any more than. I really think that there are a lot of politicians on the left for actively promoting the idea that we're going to take children away from their parents if you dont teach them about transgender ISM. Now that we're a lot closer to the second than we are in the first. I think that there are a lot of people in the California state Legislature who believe that you should be able to teach children what you want from the state. Schools

you don't teach those kids what we want from the state schools than they are going to move toward somehow cracking down on parents, but they will say that without having to be prompted by the real question is what do people say without having to be prompted? What do people sample? without having been prompted most Democrats have in their mind, I wanna see children from their parents. I dont think that not only most Republicans, have undermined. I want a separate kids from parents at the borders. They most Republicans have on their minds that they want to arm four year old children. I really don't think that the gap in the countries that why, if but again, if the goal is to make people look stupid, that I guess that people can look stupid and we're supposed to pretended that all of this is normal. It's then there is the reality is that our system was built for a lot of interpol. Our system was built to weed out stupid ideas. Are system was built by people who proposing their own legislation, not being duped into proposing legislation by people like Sasha, Baron Cohen, and so the left glee about this- that really

got owners want his arm four year olds is really, I think, over overwrought in a pretty significant waste. When people say this is America Noses the marathon Skype ranking America can legitimately can do this with pretty much. Anyone is really not all that hard. Ok in just a second, I want to explain one of the ways in which some false research has now become part of the american lexicon. I so here that there is it, I'm sure, he's seen all these headlines there, a bunch of headlines there now come that, having coming out for years and years and years and years, they basically suggests that Republicans consumers are more authoritarian, usually what these studies suggest that If you have a tendency to believing in rules, then you are going to be more authoritarian by nature. If you the tendency toward believing in in certain hard standards, because you're, an authoritarian and therefore you are going to become a conservative, and there have been studies and headlines about this for the last several years, as particularly exacerbated as President Trump became. President loud people say well, this is the authoritarian nature of the right and, finally, the authors

there is on the right. Are showing their true colours now really all this goes back to the so called Frankfurt School, the Frankfurt school or group of german expatriates. You came over prior to worldwide. In their remarks ass, they came to the United States and one of the things that they promoted was the idea that America was rightly capitalist country on the verge of authoritarianism. They were trying to suggest that nazis was an outgrowth of a capitalist free system because capitalism and freedom, or now growth of actually a hierarchical system. That implanted in people. It is, I believe, an authority. Eric farmers were leaders here, a famous psychologist. He argued that fascism would rise in the United States. Thanks to his devotion to capitalism. He said. Capitalism sprang from social structures that an urge what compulsive conformity and the process of which the isolated individual becomes an automaton. The ideas that you are just a Europe Babbitt Euro Euro well we goes to work and you see slavishly follow the rules because you are actually and authorised area and that's why capitalism works in the United States. He says that we all have authority and character. While there are a lot of people on the left, we ve been trying to prove this ever sense, and so you will see very often is the

online surveys, where they ask you, questions about G believed that flag learning should be banned and they say if you believe the flag burning should be banned. It's because you are not oratorians, they say people on the right. There are three areas of rigid mentalities, rigid rightwing mindsets and people on the left. There's more free brain. You know, there's more liberal and open and then just like things more it turns out. This is nonsense. Jesse single over in New York magazine who's on the left, but doesn't really good social science work. He says, he's scales in short, are all too often structured in a way in which respondents tendencies towards dogmatism or close in this war. Intolerance are ascertained by asking them about issues that are politicized. Also. When political psychologists have sometimes asked about rigidity in ways: decisive, liberal ideas, the themes, authoritarianism researcher, above all to my ear, for example, did publish a left wing. Authoritarianism. Scale has been the exception rather than the new, in other words, we ve been told for years and years and years that right wings are right, wingers our authoritarian, and it turns out that that's not true. It depends on how you do the test.

So when you encounter and authoritarian quiz online, it usually is about banning flag burning but you'll never see. You're an authoritarian quiz online talk about banning hate speech. Why? Because People were designing. Those quizzes want the results to come out there. Winners are more authoritarian, as it turns out. There are people who have come up with tests that are biased against the left and here's what I found these tweaks affected, which group responded more dogmatically, a great deal, liberal, scored as more dogmatic than conservatives when it came to their agreement with sentiments like When it comes to stopping global warming, it is better to be a dead hero than alive coward. In a personal things, primarily, his or her own happiness and in doing no disrespect, the health of the environment is beneath contempt, while conservatives by contrast, court higher than labour rules on items tune in the opposite political direction so again in speaking of the Sasha Baron common technique with regard to the media and also applies to science. Very often, some of the social science that you read is inherently biased in tempting generate a headline. It's one of the reasons why we always have to be very careful in red social science headlines and determine whether

Not they are true. This is why, there's. Some of us are very critical of a lot of the social science with regard to, for example, transgender, is, and because it seems like a lot of this stuff is biased in its construction. It seems like the media is attempting to push in agenda mainly because the meat are attempting to push in agenda there's a headline from the New York Times by transgender competitor in from Spain and Miss Universe Contest, and the headline was basically isn't it wonderful. This transgender competitor is teaching schoolchildren that girls can have a penis we can have a vagina and the answer is no. That's not wonderful, because that's anti scientific, but when you biased science, when you make up the science, is you go? It turns out that it's very easy to generate a headline in any direct and they wish to generate a headline. Mrs just the way, this example, most obvious example. So, next time before, you believe social science headline check out the basis of the It may very well be that the people who designed it we're looking for a particular outcome before they even began. Ok time for some things, I, like things, I hit them into a federalist paper, so today's thing

things like up Alexandria, Abkhazia, Cortez, getting it right for the first time today, Alexandria, ok, not data of Alexandria, Abkhazia, Cortez, our great heroin She says she has a democratic, socialist, democratic, socialist. Typically say they are not socialists- she is yes, she was an actual I stuff but democratic social say we're, not socialists. We like the free market system. We just want to redistribute all the gains. We want private ownership of things, but want to redistribute look like Denmark or Norway or any of those other countries. Like the Netherlands there's only one problem with this, the this worship of Denmark, Norway, the Netherlands, neglects what exactly made Denmark. We in the Netherlands economic powerhouses before they attempted socialist projects and also neglects the fact in the past several years. The cut social side that social services, specifically because of all of the massive growth of governments and the incense then systems that have been created that are let alone will not work a great book on this topic. As a backup book called debunking utopia,

I need not send a dodgy who was a middle eastern immigrant to Norway I end its debunking utopia. Exposing the myth of nordic socialism is about two hundred and fifty pages, something like that, and it is- and it is a very clean debunking of the idea that this is utopia and they can just translated over to the United States, got all the states in figures that you'd want to make some pretty good points how it is. The people by is the case in favour of Norway or Denmark and against the United States, when reality. Denmark, particularly as a capitalist system and their redistribute their redistribution, is programmes have have actually dampen the growth in pretty significant way over there also. He explains why it is that you can just take their system applied to the United States and hope that it works the same way, because it obviously does not mean that the biggest point I think of the book is that when you look at a lot of these democratic Socialist Utah

because these places were basically great places to live before democratic socialism, because the culture in Norway and the culture in Denmark, it's a homogenous culture where people pretty much act like and are part of a common family at least part of a common bond and that common bond is not nearly as ethnically diverse and culturally diverse, as the United States can just take. This programmes apply them in the United States and assume their going to impact in the same way also makes a report, which is that if you look at danish expatriates to the United States, they should earn more than than Danes back at home. So it's pretty it's pretty good book. Debunking utopia check it out, Numa summoned dodgy, exposing the myth of nordic socialism. Ok time for a quick fix, that I hate. So speaking of trying to import nordic socialism to the United States, Francisco's been trying this for years and it is giant failed. I've been trying this with rent control they've been trying. This with all sorts of benefits for the homeless, have been trying this with the idea that you have a right to sleep on the streets and the results have been giant piles of poop in the streets. I hear the mayor of San Francisco.

Explaining that what used to be one of the cleanest cities in America now has piles of theses on the corner through a native of San Francisco is the worst using. I will say that there is more there's more feces on the sidewalks and I've ever seen. You now grown up here. That was something that did not wasn't the norm, reversing that I've ever seen for sure, and that is a huge problem and we're not just talking about from from dogs. We're talkin about from humans Ok, so that's just delightful and then there's picture Pooh so glad we call experience that NBC barium experience that everyday in San Francisco thanks leftist governance well done there over in San Francisco had other things that I hate. Ok, so the New York Times says that homophobia is bad because homophobia, bad right, you shouldn't just like assume that can someone's Gay. They ve done something terribly wrong in terms of their lifestyle. Just assume that homosexual people are bad. Use. Gas floor refer get on a plane.

I certainly can look another can say: hey you're, gay and what you mean something bad by age. Never do something like that. Most didn't you're the New York Times making for pumping Putin release this video over the New York Times, and it is pretty astonishing. They thought this was ok, but they did do you have a relationship with Latin America as a picture of relations, Donald Trump opening the door and muscular Vladimir Putin he's from feeling his heart beat using job modems, giving him really his heart. A lot of people there is a landmark, wouldn't riding the card from putting his hand and Vladimir Putin's hand is tiny, have letter once you can, then them writing a unicorn. Both them nearly naked riding through us feel. The rainbows is tourism in Europe to put this out and then looking into each other's eyes with love like and then Trump kissing. Vladimir Putin and F, fire Blake blazing between their lives, as they actually play tongue hockey. Little John there's really disgusting. We went again so that's that's the New York Times to take on their self.

Homophobia totally fine. As long as it's about Donald Trump amazed, remember when, when Stephen Colbert did the same thing right, he said that Donald Trump was being used by Vladimir Putin S, Bleep, holster, meaning genital holster. That was totally finds you can make, you can make jokes about gaze and about homer actuality so long as you're doing it about Republicans. That's the way this works well done. Left you just not hypocritical and anyway, ok. Finally, a federalist paper sell. Our politics has become rather degraded and silly. You may have noticed this. Well, let's go back. The founders we're not quite is degraded and silly James, Madison, Federalist, thirty seven. He talks about why it is that we need. Institutionally says, the purpose of the constitution is to balance energy instabilities, as energy and government is essential to that security. Against external and internal danger, and so that prompt and salutary execution of the laws which enter into the very definite.

The government stability in government is essential to national character and the advantages annexed to it as well, so that repose and confidence in the minds of the people which are among the chief blessings civil society. She need energy, but also stability. So how do you create a government that both can respond energetically to foreign crises in domestic crises, but is also stable and that's it becomes Solution is, for he says, listen in trying to balancing is kind of a miracle. We ve got this far. The real wonders that so many difficulties should have been surmounted and surmounted with unanimity, almost unprecedented as it must have been unexpected. It is impossible for any man of candy reflect on the circumstances that partaken of the establishment- and this is exactly right when you have a group of people who are put together on earth by the almighty at a certain point in time to create a system. It was durable enough to withstand Barack Obama and Donald Trump card system. Herbal enough to withstand the Democrats and Republicans, if today, you have to admire that system in a pretty major.

Way. I was the system, those created by compromise and a system has created by gridlock in a system that was designed to check the worst impulses of people. So our mind folks, Donald Trump sent a lot about things today in that Prescott says Press conference, Vladimir Putin. The fact of the matter remains that this is a very durable form of government and, while everybody is should be concerned about that sort of language, when it comes to actual foreign policy, the United States has done pretty well over there a couple of centuries, and I don't think one press conference is going to change that. Okay, will you back here tomorrow with all the latest on Ben Shapiro? This is the Ben Shapiro show the bench of Hiroshima, is produced by sending a villa real executive producer. Germany boring senior producer. Jonathan, hey, our supervising producers, math is clever, and our technical producer is often Stevens edited by Alex Ingo Audio is mixed by micro. Mina Heron makeup is by just one over the bench. A bureau show is a daily wire Ford, publishing production copyright for publishing twenty eighteen.