Michael Jackson's legacy crumbles under charges of pedophilia, illegal immigration surges and democratic, nor Anti Semitism once again to cover for the fresh faces adventure pair. This is the bench a show. We have a lot to get through to table them and jump right in just a second first. Let us talk about your rights when the founders crafted the constitution, the first thing they did make sacred the rights of the individual to share ideas without limitation by government. The second right they was the right of the population to protect that speech and their own person with force. You know how strongly I believe in these principles, I'm a gun owner owning it a rifle is an awesome responsibility. Building rifles is no different. Bravo company manufacturing List are in a garage by marine that more than two decades ago, to build a professional great product that meets combats Energy Museum believes the same level of protection should be provided you every American, regardless of whether they are a private citizen or professional. These is not exporting arms company

design, engineer and manufacture, life saving equipment and they assume every rifle leaving their shop will be used in a life or death situation by irresponsible citizen law enforcement officers or a soldier overseas. Every computer, To a museum rifle his hands, assembled and tested by Americans to alight savings, hundred BC. I'm feels more responsibilities. Americans to provide tools that are not going to. EL the user, when it's not just a paper target, but somebody coming to do them harm to learn more about Bravo Company May It's actually had a nobody. Bravo company M f g dot com- that is Bravo Company, M, F G. We need more convincing check them out, also a youtube dot. Slash! Bravo company, USA, that is Bravo Company M, F G dotcom, go check out the votes, making the best rifles on the market. That problem but I m f g dotcom already what we ve got to get to today in terms of the news, but there's been a cultural shift, its been happening a cultural moment. That's been happening surrounding Michael Jackson: it way past do, and it is testament to the innate ability,

of human beings to cover for people that they consider talented, there's something in psychology called the halo effect. The halo affects essentially suggests that if you thought Somebody is good at one thing: it means you think there, good. At all things, she tend to think the beautiful people are smart intended think that people who are smart at one thing are smart at all the things We tend to think that rich people know what they're doing when it comes to everything- and this is the norm, human tendency. We tend to make snap judgments about people, and then we take those judgments to farm. We generalised more broadly or Michael. Two things are true of Michael Jackson: immensely talented human being evil, pedophile Ruth those two things are our true of Michael Jackson, at least. If the allegations are to be believed, which all evidence suggests they should be, and people are having a really tough time connecting them, Do they have a really have time, overcoming the cognitive dissonance of I like Michael Jackson's, music- and I was a big fan of his when I was ten with Michael Jackson- was an evil human being who preyed upon children. Now both of those things can be true,

and this new documentary leaving Neverland on HBO, which had been watching, is indeed extraordinarily upsetting. It is, it demonstrates how depraved Michael Jackson, why there's a peace and national Review by Carl Smith. Talking about this he says debuting on March. Third- and fourth, for previous years and screaming at the Sunday Film Festival, this enraged filled by John Reed, inspired a lawsuit against the pay cable channel from Jackson's estate, which desperately wants people not to see a story that may significantly diminished the value of his brain, It's a wonder: there's any brand left to defend, given that for men have now made detailed credible claims, the Jackson, sexually abused them as minors over extended periods of time, Jim Save, Chukka Child actor first met Jackson at nine, while filming a famous nation. Idiot Pepsi, commercial in which is excitedly, examining Jackson's dressing room, one singer, pops in the commercial save trucks, as generally captured his first glimpse of the celebrity around the same time, Wade, robes and then five met Jackson. After putting on a dazzling performance in dance contest in Australia,

causing the sailor to bring the boy on stage for concerts and invite him to show his moves in front of the huge crowd, the australian tour will entail Jackson, invited the boy took him up and allay sometime driven by him, their joy, the family managed to make contact with Jackson on vacation, when the boy was seven Jackson immediately invited the robes and family to state its huge rash neverland weight in his tenure sister were allowed to sleep in Jackson's room days. Later Jackson talk this Emily into allowing way to stay behind with him, while the rest of the family went to the Grand canyon you and I were brought together by God, robes and recalls and saying we are meant to be together, and this is us showing each other that we love each other. This is how we show our love, Jackson and fondled the boy and guided the child to his own genitals enjoy. And initiated oral sex, guided the boy to follow suit, robes and recalls Jackson telling other people are ignorant and they're stupid. They never understand if they I found out what we were doing. We'd be pulled apart. He and I would go to jail for the rest of our lives later at Jackson's coaxing after Jackson called we'd everyday for two years and kept him on the phone for up to seven hours at a time dry simply moved.

Wait and her daughter from Australia to so cow leaving her husband, others on behind a move that ultimately destroyed. The family Wade Father were later commit suicide, safe trucks. That was a similar pattern. They were called being learned quickly into Jackson's bed at age. Ten. It starts right. Mother Stephanie was disarmed by Jackson's child like to meet her and began thinking of the popstar as her own son, save trucks. Memories of Jackson, sexual abuse, are familiar to rub since Jackson staged a mark. Wedding ceremony, Robson recalls in which the singer presented the boy with a ring lined with diamond, you reward me with jewelry for doing sexual act for him, you remember the nineteen ninety five. He settled the civil suit for Report Twenty three million dollars after being accused of sexual abuse by Jordan, chair who and was arrested in two thousand three again on charges of surely molesting a thirteen year old, Gavin thirteen rolled them

in our visa cancer stricken boy he had met through a charity during his criminal trial Jackson urge both save truck in robes and now adults to testify. He had done nothing in appropriate with them, save truck, simply declined and in his silence he inquired Jackson's wrath. He threatened me with my with his wares and said I'd perjured myself years ago. He recalls blurs, would get me says Jackson told him at the same time robes and recalls who is still somewhat attached to Jackson. He panics at the thought of this are in prison in what might happen to him there, perhaps Jackson would even be murdered behind bars. He thought so. He lied, offer false testimony. The Jackson had not done anything. Sexual, to him forget it. I wish I was a place where I can tell the truth and be a comrade with him robes and says now. I just wasn't ready his testimony in that of Acta. Mcculloch hulking. Another man had spent a lot of them. Jackson, S boy, probably sway the jury he was acquitted on all counts was Jackson and two thousand five and died. Of course, in two thousand nine, the final forty five minutes or so of the documentary does delve into the depression and torments is

What was that of their mothers? Each room searches are solid, excruciating linked with our bunch of lessons to be learned here, while some of those lessons include again our capacity for cognitive dissonance, blindness to reality about human beings. Second, the worship of celebrity that we have in our society and then they the rise of a television and movie culture, the entertainment culture that put celebrities before our faces. All the time makes us think that we know celebrities. It used to be the people who are very famous felt distance in far off now, people who are very famous your very close to us and so is very difficult for us to believe that those people could actually be evil and participating in acts of evil that that sort of stuff is, is something that we all to keep in mind whether we are talking politics or entertainment. When, when we're engaging with the public world, it is deeply important for us to recognise that human beings are still human. Even if they are rich, powerful in vain,

and maybe even more so than because rich red because fame and wealth and power. These things allow people to gratify the worst urges and lead other people too, to basically give them the ok to do so, of course, that the person wouldn't be rich, powerful and famous unless they were also morally good. Now this also has raised and serious issues about pedophilia itself, and it demonstrates what we have learned. As a society when we decided that biological urges on any level are incentive to our basically an excuse to do what we want. We have a very weird divide in the in the western psyche right now, when it comes to biological urges, on the one hand, We believe the biological urges give us moral impetus to do the things that we want to do so we don't have sex before me Joel biological impetus to have sex before marriage. That means it's ok to have sex before marriage. At the same time, their obvious biological urges that people don't want to give the go ahead to because they are in fact evil

So if a man has a biological urged, rape, a woman, then we say no you're not allowed to do that. You are evil. Your biological urged does not overcome, and yet it's that broad blanket statement, the biological urges are Helen excuse that the lady Gaga morality born this way is somehow an excuse for behave. This way that deeply troubling, now. Don't I'm not comparing homosexuality to pedophilia because they are completely not the same thing. One is consenting relationship between two adults and another is the exploitation of child, the boy that I making is that, as a general rule, a society that fails to draw moral wines around things like consent and instead rossmore lines around things like logical, drive or biological urge as a society that is going to fall apart at the seams and it seems that we are moving in that direction, that we have failed to allow morality to guide our views of personal behaviour and what once we don't start setting human limits to the biological urges that we have. We got ourselves

very serious trouble. The reason I'm bringing this up as there is a column from Dahlia Lithuania's a legal analysed very famously Lenin, it actually riding over it slate dotcom in which she has peace, call these pet of Elliot Crime or an illness. We ve never quite known whether child molesters should be treated as sick people or punished as criminals. She says on Sunday, HBO premier, finding Neverland again and for all the wrong reasons. We can't take our eyes off Michael Jackson, whether or not the nations are substantiated. The question is in the air is pedophilia disease. To be treated or crimes to be punished, are people who seduce minors, sick or evil. Current legal and medical systems blurbs views. We call for the most recognition punishments, life imprisonment, straight permanent exile, precisely we view these acts is morally heinous. Yet also driven by controllable biological urges. If sex with children is truly the product freely made moral decisions. Then we should deal with it through the criminal justice system, but if it isn't, ethically overdetermined impulse and uncontrollable urge net in our dna than punishing pedophiles

must be morally wrong, with Dalia List rights as science and cold are increasingly medical eyes, is bad behaviour, finding a neurological component to everything from alcoholism to youth violence. We run the parallel risks. Of either absolving everyone for everything or punishing criminals or no guilty, or than cancer patients. What science has fields has left wick about the moral medical roots. Pedophiles is, of course, ambiguous. What is clear is that the binary choice laid out above is an oversimplification, the medical community which start, to view pedophilia as a disease rather than a crime in the nineteenth century, as mass evidence that some violent and anti social behaviour of genetic links and signposts a have been unable to isolate a biological cause for pedophilia or even agree on a personality profile, not to mention the terrific confusion, with in the medical community and defining what this disease really involves until a few years ago, for example, the Ds M for the psychiatric associations, diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, define pedophilia as a disease.

Only if the sufferers, fantasies, sexual urges or behaviors cause clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational or other important areas of functioning in other words, it not impaired remorseless pedophile was apparently perfectly healthy by the it is worth noting that is exactly the same language. The DSM five now uses with regard to transgender ism, they suggest a transgender ism is not in fact a mental disorder unless it causes clinically significant distress or impairment it so we. What we have been doing is medical rising and I gotta get transgender is and is not seems. Pedophilia transgender ism is an adult, making a decision, presumably to behave in a certain way that does not impact other people in violation of their consent. Pedophilia is, of course, the exploitation of children. I keep repeating this because there are going to be people who don't understand the argument that I am making and seek to conflate all of these things. There not the same, and homosexuality is not the same as pet ophelia- is not the same as transgender ism pedophilia, something apart, because it is morally evil because it is morally evil, but to point that out

again, is that when we medical eyes evil, then we also run into the danger of suggesting that human behaviour is not controllable and that we are not responsible for our actions, and that is the death of a civilization. I talk about that in just a second but first folks, I've had it with Congress. The folks in Congress, right now they are lunatics plus the executive branch is growing out of control in the constitution was designed to prevent the federal government from taking all of our freedom from using that freedom against us, well, the federal, when his overgrown all of its boundaries, which is why we need to store the original bargain of the constitution, the checks and balances that originally established to prevent the sort of domination of our freedom. This is why I'm a big believer in calling a conventional dates were we. The people can propose amendments, yes, amendments. We ve got to stop these idiots Well, it's too late. The only way to do that is to restore the greatest idea Ology ever created the constitutional ideology of the founding fathers. Can you and works on the faces of the people in the federal government when they realized their power, has been restricted. Calling a convention of state

the only way to get the job done there already, through. When a million people with us on this more every day, join me and my friend Mark Mechlin, gotta convention of states, dotcom, slash, ban and sign the petition today that this convention of States Dotcom, slash men a tremendous amount of support, you should join them. They're already three point: eight million people using conventional states that Congo check them out convention states that calm, slash ban. The reason that I bring the Dalai Lama column is because she suggests this dichotomy in the dichotomy is basically correct, says it's over simplified, but it really is not its basically right. She suggests that if sex with children is truly the product to freely made moral choices, we should deal with it justice system. If it is genetically overdetermined impulse and uncontrollable urge, then we can't punish pedophiles. But here is the point: the belief in a free functioning, free society

has to be that reasonable human beings have the capacity to overcome their biological instincts, that human beings have the capacity to overcome their tribal affinities that human beings have the capacity to overcome their urges. If we don't believe that we cannot have referred I can hear, is where psychology shades into politics. We are now living in a world in which we are told that we dont control our own behaviour, that our behaviour is controlled by impersonal forces far beyond us, that there is institutional racism. Sexism, bigotry, homophobia that controls your life, that it is the broad based economics of the of the american system that will determine the future of Europe of your life. None of that It is true that your tribal affinity that you, your your membership in a particular racial clan Dat, determines how you will be treated and how the rest of your life is laid out for you. None of that is true, they are choices, are not your own once you believe it

wages are not your own, you end of justifying all sorts of evil behaviour ones. You believe that choices cannot be freely made in contravention of biology and tribal affinity. It's very difficult to have a shining republic, and this is why, in the end, have an entire becoming out about the subject. The bargain between Jerusalem in Athens between religion and reason is deeply necessary. Talk about more of this in just a second though I have a new book coming out is called the right side of history comes out in a couple of weeks, and he central contention at the book make is that all of human life is based on a certain number of premises that we have to assume that all of western civilization is based on certain things that we take for granted, and many of those things that we take for granted are things that we actually get from religious premises. So we all take for granted Greek reason ready together. We can reason our way in and out of problems. Science is it is it. Outgrowth of this belief in human reason and our capacity to reason, but even that capacity for reason, is based on even deeper routes, that capacity for real

is based on the idea that you are a free, individual, capable of exercising a logic that exists outside of you that you are a free individual, not completely downtown biology, capable of making choices that you're, not just a cluster of meat wandering through the universe, reacting to the environment around you know, there's a famous philosopher member Spinoza and Spinoza Bennydeck Spinoza hee hee suggested that basically, human beings were a stone that had been cast by fate and that we thought that we had willed our own motion, but basically, we didn't gorgeous just along for the ride all of western Sahara. It is based on the opposite of that. The idea that you do will. Your own actually have the capacity to will your own action and in politics that you are in control of the decisions that you make, and then your personal life you're in control of the decisions that you make the responsibility is the key to a fruitful exchange. Then you can't reason with people who don't believe the responsible

for their own actions. That reason itself is undermined by the belief that human beings are not freely capable of making choices. That is, that is the key. Conundrum we find ourselves in. We made excuses for ourselves as society blaming all of our activities on outside forces or internal forces, but the freer you think of yourself, the more from the more you think of yourself as a free actor acting in a free country, the more responsible. And to be the better gonna, be because the more responsible you are for your own actions right now, we have a society that is dedicated to moving responsibility from people and then simultaneously in fits and starts, we'll try to restore responsibility for certain people will try to go back and fill in the gaps and explain why Michael Jackson should be abhorred, even though we ve under route we ve under caught a lot of the rationale for abhorrent, Michael Jackson. Michael Jackson, should we have already participate in evil activity whose a free adult one, the freest people on earth given his his is wealth and his fame, and he chose to do evil things

biological. Urge was not enough to excuse that the same thing is true for all of us living in the freest country in the history of world. Now talking that world pedophiles, but we all make decisions on a daily basis for which we are responsible and looking to society or looking to biological urges are looking to anything else. To to blame, for our own behaviour is easy, deep problem for for civilization that hopes to continue functioning if you're democracy. If you wanna Republic, you have to believe that you are a free actor capable of acting morally both of those elements. You are free, you capable of making decisions, and your capable of acting in a moral fashion. Now again, I am not saying that I am not even talking about which behaviour is morally, which behaviour is immoral from a generic secular sense, because I think that we can have

they make distinctions between pet aphelion, all other sorts of crime or all of this sort of behaviour. With that said, the generalised point, which is that we're gonna, have to stop pathology, rising evil that it can be true that you have a pathology toward doing something Babbitt. These still have the capacity to overcome. That is the essence of Western said safety, and that is being ripped away from us. The only reason we're even having this conversation about whether Michael Jackson should have been basically treated as an ill person or as an evil person is because we have lost the capacity to see evil for what it is twice as freely made by human beings capable of making those choices in contravention of their own biology used to be that you be able to say yes, both. Yes, both he's sick person with the drive towards doing so

things and also he's an adult capable of overcoming that, but once we decide that we're not in control of our own actions is very difficult to make the case for western civilization for individualism. It's very difficult to make case for human rights. Frankly, because human rights are again are based on the idea that we are each individuals created in the image of God and that we have the capacity to make decisions freely and of our own. Will you want to restore us some more people believe in in right and wrong and where we are responsible for one another and what we don't hurt, each other we're gonna have to go back. A system where we assume that your decisions are your own and not the product of some other evolutionary force or some product of some some other environmental force beyond your control I can therefore say that art biological forces driving us there are said, aren't environmental forces. The pressures on us there are. The question is how we shape those environmental forces to get them off our back, but

the goal has to be shaping those environmental forces to get them off our back to maximize human freedom to maximize the human capacity, because that that right, the rights, the freedom they come with duties You cannot have duties without rights, and you cannot have rights without duties, and with a society of decided to buy from the two. We want the rights without the duties or we want duties without the right. You can't have it. You can't have it both ways. The right to freedom comes with responsibility, not because we want you to be responsible, but because it simply dies. You cannot be a free person if you're incapable of making choices freedom comes with your capacity and responsibility to choose already. Meanwhile, on a more sort of political note, the illegal immigration search at the border is continuing. Now media finally decided to report on innovation for two months. They said nothing about illegal immigration, surging at the border during the governor

shut down a while president front was pushing Democrats to compromise over immigration pretty incredible, but now the reporting on it so better late than never. I suppose the New York Times has a big piece today called border. From facilities put detainees with medical conditions at risk. Talking about the under funding of border patrol, they point out that border patrols simply does not have the resources to deal with. The massive influx of migrants is an average of twenty two hundred migrants a day. Are now crossing the nations nineteen hundred mile border with Mexico, many after gruelling journeys that leave them injured, sick or badly dehydrated. Yet most of the nation's customs and border protection facilities along the border lack sufficient accommodations, staffing or procedures. The third we assess health needs or provide more than basic emergency care, a situation that has led to dangerous medical oversight, I remember, the New York Times, reporting this, while the entire democratic party talk about despair the ice and underfunding c b. I don't know

for that at all. But now I guess the media's catching on. Also the media reporting that a record number of families are now crossing the border is according to the Washington Post, The reporting that in February alone, you're authorities detained more than seventy thousand migrants up from fifty eight in January. Weird, weird didn't report any of the stuff until you know, after the government, shutdown ends in front declares a national emergency, how weird once again showing that the media is the media coverage of these issues tend to have a rather large impact on our public discourse. Ok, coming up in just a second, I want to talk out the Democrats, an intersection allergy and their continued pushed to avoid the consequences of their own willingness to support Anti Semitism, forgetting that ended in just one second, first, let's talk about life insurance. Getting life insurance can feel like assembling the world's worst jigsaw puzzle Kids were anyone who depends on your income? It's a puzzle, you need to solve, and policy genius can help you do it one who depends on your income. It's a puzzle, you need to solve, and policy genius can help you do it policy

This is the easy way to get life insurance in just two minutes. You can compare quotes from top insurers to find the best policy were you when you apply online. The advisers at policy genius will handle all the red tape that we want to go. Shit you're rate with the insurance company, no commission, sales agents, no hidden fees, just helpful advice and personal. I service policy genius doesn't just make life insurance. Easy. They also make it easy to find the right home insurance, auto insurance or disability insurance. They are one stop shop for financial protection, so you find life insurance puzzling had on over to policy genius dot com in two minutes you can compare, quotes, find the right policy and save up to Forty percent doing it. Policy genius is indeed the easy way to compare and by life insurance policy. Genius, dot com be responsible, human being make sure that you go take care your family case. God forbid. Something should happen to EU policy genius dot com is the way to make that happen again. Compare quotes, find the right policy in two minutes, save up to forty percent policy. Genius that come go check them out right now. Ok. Meanwhile, the Democrats are struggling again with

their anti Semitism, their willingness to two o anti Semitism, so long as it comes from the intersection faces, the real reason there. Okay, what this anti semitic nonsense, the real reason that they are now that they are now backing out on condemning anti Semitism is because they feel that people who are pushing the anti Semitism are the most import members. Their party Nancy policy just went up against ill humor, Omar and Alexander cause Cortez and retreated to, and dance policy came up on the losing end, That's an amazing thing. Now for that is the Nancy Blowsy was only speaker of the house by a couple of votes in the last in the last speaker, wrote all it would take us for a couple of these Democrats to drop out, and suddenly she wouldn't be speaker of the house anymore. So she knows where her bread, is buttered. She can't afford to alienate the radical wing of the Democratic Party which now effectively controls the Democratic party. Also, the Democratic Party believes that their pathway to victory lies not in

you're socialism. But in a socialistic, a democratic socialistic governmental policy combined with racial appeals, overtly racial appeals who better to push that then fresh face of the democratic Congress Elsie, so Alexandra Cosmic Cortez, for example, should an interview with Spectrum NEWS in New York and she talked about the green new deal. This is the kind of intersection of socialism. The Democrats are looking for. One of the things that some folks give push back is their say where we talk about racism when it comes to the environment and they sent racism has nothing to do with environmental his arm and My immediate retort is look at Flint. Look Katrina, look a hurricane Maria, it's not as the income, inequality or social injustice or racism. Are these separated out issues that you just legislate to address those things and fix? You can't pass a large just and income inequality. You addressed. In every issue. Every major systemic issue raises the basic appeal here is

socialism may not be all that appealing for minorities, but if you overtly, appeals minorities with socialism. Then maybe you'll be ok, the Democratic Party wants to embrace this, they are into embracing this. This is the new coalition. One of the people who is pushing. That idea is eight centre left democratic economist, named Brad the long he gave an interview to box, in which the one argues with us, according to Greg Sargent the Washington Post, that it's time for Centris like him to make peace with the left. The idea is that yes make peace with the open socialists like Yossi, because they're going to be the winning coalition that allow the NEO liberals to sort of drive the boat that if Nancy Policy can make peace with Elsie, if Nancy closer can make peace with elegant Omar than they and create a coalition that is durable and allows them get done what they need to get done. They can hey it's easier, in other words, to sort of hold back. See and refused to leave an no more than it is to make peace with people on the right, and so you make peace with the people on the left.

Putting the open, Anti Semites in the people who cover for them. This is the basic notion that many on the left have been embracing, The long notes that, on one issue from another, from healthcare to climate change, centrist minded Democrats have modulated the parties priorities in hopes of striking a political deal with the centre right, but that deal has never been forthcoming because there's no functional centre right, newest politics, in other words along, says we can make a deal with moderate Republicans. There are no modern republicans. Let's make a deal with our hard left now. Republicans and conservatives would see this in the opposite why they would say: listen you guys on the left. You move radically left in the last ten years and we can make a deal with you because you moved radically left in the last ten years and then castigated us as racist, bigots, sexist and homer jobs, but according to the left they now have to make according to sort of the Mainstream Democratic Party easier for Nancy Policy to kowtow to bow down to bear, the knee before Elsie and finance policy to create some sort of centrist coalition. Now the problem for Democrats is gonna come when it turns out that

YO see is driving the boat into an iceberg when it turns out that And people are not all that fond of ales he's gender Nancy Close, you sort of hoping to have it both. Ways use ails you to join up the base and then when it comes to mind, national election. Then you appealed to the centre of the country, but the bay, it is out of her control, and that is what the last week in a half approved last week and have proved that the basis not in policies control and that even the most vital elements of the democratic base will be bowed to buy Nancy policy. It's true Incredible so, for example, you'll recalled it ill. Humor is a vicious anti semite who's been using anti semitic language for years on end. She has anti semitic views about Israel. She really doesn't believe that Israel ought to exist. She doesn't which, by the way, is an anti semitic view. If we disagree with policies of Israel, then that is one thing. I disagree with many policies of Israel. Some of them on the programme, but if you believe that Israel does not have the right to exist as a jewish state, but every muslim country has a right to exist as muslim state. If you believe that

the only jewish state on planet earth does not have a right to exist, then you are in fact engaging in Anti Semitism in the State Department even says as much. This is the perspective of her. She did to leave its the perspective of eleven March and it is probably perspective AC, who, who makes overtures to receded, to leave and had Omar and by the way, makes overtures also to people who are apparently open terror supporters, not just Jeremy carbon of Labour Party who Elsie paid homage to just a couple of weeks ago, but also she just reach. We did use of motor who's the head of a Palestinian Rights Organization, who also happens to be a terror organ nation. Sympathiser is according to the Jerusalem Post in a tweet first discovered by the investigative project on terrorism, o Cassio Cortez wrote quote this is disappearing. Fantasy to see just last week. There was all this hubbub over an his characterisation that I was threatening primaries based on price votes. It there seems to be no problem.

With a zero tolerance stands for simply asking about you us foreign policy. She did that in retreating and responding to a tweet by use of money or the executive director of the centre for palestinian writes in his tweet. He wrote pack activists tells me you're times the lobby is coming for Congress when ails you refused to leave an ill had Omar Hay and she is retreating. This guy well, Moon Ire has can the efforts of the popular front of liberation of Palestine and actual terror group on his twitter feed before including retreating appear, fell p announcement of it terror attack in Jerusalem. On June, sixteenth, twenty seventeen in another tweet from July, twenty fourteen. When I reminded his followers of the military wings of Kiev LP. Another terrorist organisations, not just Hamas, are all fighting against Israel in this war. The agency has no problem. Tweeting that I know it is. It is hilarious to watch as everyone We on the left points out every time, Steve King retweet, White Nationalist, when she does far too often and its growth, not happenest. You came for doing all that stuff. He watched his Committee

That's a is retweeting terrorist empathize, no problem the left is, is caving in to all of them he's gonna tell you, I mean the end of the process of the cabin was truly astonishing. I'll, explain it in just a second first and how to govern a daily where'd. Our common subscribe for nine ninety nine a month. You can get a subscription a daily wire. When you do you get the rest of this show live. You also get an additional two hours of the show every afternoon. So many things that we talk about the afternoon. They are missing. If you're, not a subscriber, can get a commercial free plus for ninety nine dollars a year to get the very greatest and beverage vessel. He left this year's hot or cold tumbler. You would put test rising haunted. It is magnificent, go check that out right now,

later today, among the among the many glories of our additional two hours, we're having a zombie whose wrapper and destroyer of the british women's daedalus record, while identifying is woman, will have month to discuss his massive. His massive show of strength as a powerful, proud woman will discuss it with him. Also, you should check us out unsubscribe, because we have great someday specials, like Arthur, Brooks when you subscribe, you get them on Saturday Arthur Brooks he had of American Enterprise Institute an author of the new book love your enemies. He joined us on the Sunday special here's. What it sounded like, moreover, Brooks President Numerical Enterprise Institute The great pleasure of being on bench appears Sunday special or we talk about politics, and we talk about love and we talk about happiness and we talk about his new book, which is coming a marsh nineteenth. We talk about my book love your enemies which comes out of Mars. Twelve, though miss it go check. All of that out also leave us review over at Youtube or Itunes. We always appreciated helps us what the rankings, where the largest fastest growing conservative podcast in the nation,

so the Democrats have cut this doubles bargain with the answer. In their best I mean it is it is that simple and it's the same Democratic who have criticised President Trump, rightly ff or kowtowing and winking nodding at the all right in twenty sixteen. It is correct that it was growth for trumped to do that in twenty six June. I criticized it at the time it was disgusting. I have criticised Benjamin out of the Prime Minister of Israel for making common hot common cause with the colonists, and he has now brought into his coalition members of of the former Party of America, China, who are legitimately extremists who have celebrated terrorist incidents like the bark Goldstein Massacre Netanyahu, brought them into collision. That's disgusting! He should never have done. It's really grows. Democrats are doing these axiom thing right now. The Democrats are bringing into their coalition in championing and putting them on the cover of rolling stone people who are in favour of of terrorist groups, or at least have spoken out in defence.

Of terrorist groups. Remember ill home are actually voted against voted against a proposal that would have punished ISIS members more harshly. She has encouraged ISIS members in Minnesota not to be treated with great harshness by the watch ass. She wrote an appeal on behalf of a blue, the former ice member to Minnesota, Judge she laughed and joke about Hamas and Hezbollah. They have not just Linda's our sore, whose an act of terror supporter revenge is issued. An actual supporter of Harris before, or least prior Terrorist Linux, our sewer speaking out by the way against Nancy Policy- she's. A noted, anti semite with strong ties to the nation of Islam and Louis thereupon, sorcerer posts posted commented on Facebook, missive against Nancy policy. She said: Nancy is a typical white feminist, upholding the patriarchy doing the dirty work of powerful white men, God forbid, the men are upset, no worries Nancy to the rescue two stroke, their egos so Linda's our sore and Elsie, and refused to leave and ill had Omar These are the new leaders of the demo at a party and Nancy blows he's just hang it on for dear life, hoping that she can control

the alligator a little bit. That's all she's hoping she's right, the back of his alligator, hoping that it east each for last will not eat her last by the way. So what exactly? Are the Democrats doing about the open anti Semitism inside their own party? Here's how this works. So in the last couple of days there were calls for Democrats to censure Rashid ITALY, not nourishing to leave behind our support for them to put out a congressional resolution naming eleven Omar because of her Ray prior anti semitic comments in six weeks, instead Democrat, and you know it will do whatever generic resolution. A generic resolution that condemns anti Semitism is generally, which of course, is way of avoiding the sure reason why the resolution is being put forth in the first place. It's like putting for the resolution on the evil white nationalism without mentioning Steve came right after Steve Kings comments we all know why we're doing this don't, but that was too much that was too much the base of the Democratic Party. They decided. We can't do that. Even the CBC protest, it they'll had Omar protested AOL

Protest it so then the Democrats decided in order not to table this thing Mars name won't go in it, but now now we are going to change the language of the bill to include resin. The language condemning anti muslim bias. Nellis you ought to pass another resolution condemning as high Muslim, biased based on you know like an inciting incident. Go for it, but this entire issue It was based on eleven MAR being an anti semite, so little margin, anti Semite and then presume, play. Some people react to elevate Omar with Islamophobia, not members of Congress, because you can't naming who have done that but some Randalls in West Virginia and so- congressional resolution condemning both anti Semitism and Islamophobia without mentioning Ohio. Martha inciting reason for this entire incident is absurd, unity on its face, and it is They watering down. So it doesn't look like a condemnation of eleven March. It looks like a defence of ill Omar. The democratic party is doing this because they know where their bread is buttered,

but on our butters, their bread, Elsie Butters, their bread, Rashid ITALY butters their bread. This is the decision that they have made and you can tell this from leading members of the democratic coalitions are Elliot Angle- is jewish Congress person from New York. He condemned Ilona Mars comments as Anti semitic because they are in fact anti semitic NEWS asked should open Omar be stripped of her Foreign Affairs Committee Assignment Personal there's, no reason she should be on there's affairs anyway, it's very prestigious committee assignment. She knows nothing about foreign policy or foreign policy positions are absurd on their face she's in favour of plus Maduro, basically remaining as the dictator of Venezuela, and she is she's in a dangerous ignoramus. Anne Elliot Angle, won't even say that you should be ousted from foreign affairs you're, the chairman of a really important committee right foreign affairs here. This is the center of a lot and it certainly the centre of this discussion about Israel. At what point do you say to her congressmen? Omar, look you're not on this committee.

Are you strip wherever you're see? Are you close to that are at that point? Now I, on my close to it at first, was not up to me. This is done by the leadership I don't know that that would do anything except exacerbate the situation. Even more. I'm looking to get rid of Anti Semitism, not looking to punish any money. You're gonna have to explain represented angle, how you get rid of Anti Semitism without punishing anti Semites you're, not to explain how that works. Did this this really pathetic, padding ill humour on that ill. Humor is how old forty years old, I believe, Elinor when she bore. What's he Omar Age, she is thirty seven years old? Just as she is two years older than I am she's twice married, she was a fellow at the youth. Firstly of Minnesota. She is now and ignoramus. She is not stupid, she's, not a fool, and yet the Democrats, because they don't want to acknowledge it They are ok. Anti Semitism in their own ranks have decided

Simply you know what it turns out that she's just a she's, a poor ignorant woman who doesn't know anything if anybody ever said that about ill Hanno MAR on the other side that she is, she just ignorant of basic things about about life. About Anti Semitism are about religious bigotry, No because she's an agreement, then they immediately be accused of uptake of not taking her seriously. But I think she's ignorant, because I think that she's ignorance about Venezuela, everything she knows things about Venezuela, but she certainly not ignorant about Anti Semitism for years member. Of the Minnesota jewish community have been approaching. Johannaeum are reported by the many, apple, a start for emu and talking about Anti Semitism, and she has not care one iota. This is what she believes. The democratic party has made its peace with the radicals in their base. They ve their quickly becoming the Uk Labour Party in a second we're gonna talk about how the media continues to cover for this, because it's quite insane so Dana Millbank is a columnist over at the Washington Post. Now the Washington Post,

has been awful about all of this. The Washington post is run a bevy of pieces in full for further defensible whom our. Why? Because the Washington Post are these democratic leadership they're the same So they have to pretend that element of our isn't in anti semite effectually speaking, the truth Dana Millbank was asked about was asked pacifically about the democratic Tribune of Eleven Amerika. Listen, it's pretty obvious. The Democrats hold them helps to a higher standard with regard to heal, homer shore, who think the Democrats are holding her to a higher standard than republicans have been holding themselves. I think that's probably also true on me too and other things. The question is: should Democrats do the same thing? Republicans I've been doing sort of certain. The wagons and basically look the other way, because there are many a member of the tribe, and I think that it's probably worthwhile to hold yourself to a higher stay. There is no higher standard again. They

in a regional resolution that would have included a condemnation of ill humor. They stripped out her name and then they added Anti Islam sentiments to an actual resolution about Anti Semitism, which is astonishing, is structured, and yet we are being told by the media. They hold themselves to a higher standard, yeah sure right at our member states can being featured on that. Rolling stone with Speaker, Paul Ryan. By the way I gotta remember that happening pretty amazing stuff. Meanwhile, one of the great irritants for Republicans at this point has to be the fact that, while Democrats are are running, far as they can to the left, Republicans seem to be following them to the left. Apparently, Republicans are now advancing paid leave. Now I understand that there are some law makers on the right or big fans of paid. A parental leave

and that includes centres with whom I am very friendly. The bills would supposedly provide a government backed paid parental leave for from now support, spurred in part by activism, from Yvonne Control, because roll call? A growing number of Republicans have embraced arguments that would improve maternal and fetal health, provide income stability for families and strengthen caregivers connection to the workforce. Paid family leave would allow the GNP to showcase its claim to uphold family values, while still appealing to working class. Voters who sense of economic instability help propelled trumped victory in two thousand. Sixteen now forcing businesses to either pay for paid family leave, are forcing taxpayers to take on the burden of paid family leave is Firstly, a new governments. Entitlement republicans are pushing this, the same time that the debt is being blown out. I'm old I remember when Republicans pretended to care about that, I'm old enough remember one conservatives pretended to care about the deficit, but the huge, the Eu S budget deficit according to Bloomberg, has no widen

two three hundred and ten billion dollars in the first four months of the fiscal year underscoring according lumbered the revenue from a publican tax cuts and an increasing government spending it ain't about the tax cuts gang. It's about spending the buds, The gap widen seventy seven percent. Why or seeds fell by two percent one by one trillion dollars a solid amount of money to take it. Does it not but spending rose nine percent, one point four trillion dollars, so the budget did receive a tiny bump in customs duties about twenty five billion dollars, but the? U S trade gap widened which, by the way, shows that that president from trade policies, economically ignorance, it me has continued to boom, because the trade deficit is not a good indicator of whether an economy is booming or not the trade, Has it usually means that people in America can afford foreign products, so we are buying them also, president from actually exacerbated the trade deficit made it worse. Why? Because, by pushing the idea, the tariffs we're going to clamp in at the beginning of twenty nineteen, he forced a bunch of businesses to buy products early.

From foreign countries, so it actually accelerated the trade deficit with. That said, it would be really. Nice have Republicans, would not be Democrats. We already have Democrats, we don't need another democratic party. Ok me what I feel I really need to comment on a great exchange that happened yesterday on Joe Romans part As for those who know Joe Robins Pack, has you should give it a listen? It's really. A lot of fun shows a great question so Joe and TIM Pool, who is one of his sidekicks Joe and implore questioning some members of the twitter clans, Jack Dorsey, showed up Anja Robins POD cast an Joe Rogan asked him the hard question. He asked him why Isn T ban some people, but not other people in Twitter had no answer whatsoever. We have a divide between the conservative estimation of what's happening and then the definition- that's the liberal definition of. I think that's right Joe, and I think what I'm trying to say is that it's not that you can't have those viewpoints and that if Europe

making those viewpoints in your target and at the at a specific person in a way that reflects your intend to abuse and harassed and what, if it's, in the context of the conversation? What have she saying that I dont think that Trans women should be allowed in these females basis to make decisions? for women and then this. Since arguing- and she says a woman is biased, logically female you are never going to be a woman. She responded with men, aren't women though, and that was our first in the series of events. That's what gotta the suspension and the warning. That was one of many tweets that regard of providing contacts. It was not ok, visa that the woman who speaking is Vizcaya, Gaddi who's, the company's global lead for legal policy and trust in safety, and that's it. Rogan, asking specifically about Megan. Murphy has been a guest on our show. Megan Murphy, of course, is a feminist she's. A left wing feminist was banned from twitter for making the absent

we obvious contention that men are not women and women are not men. Twitter claim that this was targeting of personal and transgender people in jail, Rogan end to pool our pointing out. How does this is that's where it has no consistent standard, but against what it doesn't have to have a consistent standards? They market dominance is pretty astonishing. How the left will continue to shut down debate with no good excuse for doing so simply because their confirmation by us is so incredibly strong. When you haven't agenda, it allows you to run what really does allow you to run roughshod over your own supposed central principles. You can tell where people's real principles lie by where, by which printing, those people are willing to violate in pursuit of those primary principles, so Twitter sensitive, a free speech platform, a place for people to speak out in debate, but their real priority is not that the real priority is social leftism

and when the two come into conflict, social leftism overruled anything having to do with free speech good until Rogan and Temple for exposing the insane hypocrisy and stupidity of the of the twitter. The twitter leadership already time for some things I like and then some things that I hate so things that I like there is a move that is now available on Amazon, Prime, it's called you are never really

it sort of a new fangled take on taxi driver. Frankly, thing it's better movie than taxi driver with walking Felix, who is in fact our finest living after the only other computer would probably be Daniel Day Louis, but he is retired, walking Phoenix turns in another fantastic forms. When you talk about people who just inhabit a role where you don't even think of them as an actor they're, just the rule walking Phoenix is the guy. The basic plot is essentially taxi driver. He is a. He is one of a kind of taxi driver. He is basically a veteran who has had some bad experiences suicidal veteran and he is hired by a by a middle man to go. Save this. This state legislators daughter from sex slavery, and was to say nothing good, ensues question how many front door said: guy up after the town, priestly internationally

it was wants to railway state, Senator Albert Photo his teenage daughter missing, leave the text with an address I've heard of these places. You said you were brutal. Andy. I want you to hurt them myself here. He did when the best best actor did walking Phoenix Fervors role is he he's? Terrific average honestly gives me hope for the Joker So the new Joker Movie is gonna, be directed by scores, hazy, correct and walking. Phoenix plays the Joker that is fantastic casting, so looking forward to that, the movie is very brutal is definitely rated. Are you were never

really here available on Amazon, prime ok time for some things that I hate. So let's talk a little bit about hr. One h, one is the Nancy Pelosi, led houses first, priority and bay ugly, it restructures at voting and voter id all across the country, in violation of federalism, states are generally supposed to set the standards and state redistricting is supposed set the standard for how voting is done on the state level. Hr, one warning to the Heritage Foundation, seizes the authority of states to regulate voter registration and the voting process by forcing states to implement the voting automatic voter registration same day, registration, online, voter registration and no fault absentee balance balloting, all of which are the devil's playground for voter fraud. Early voting, first of all, should not be allowed, except in really bad circumstances or monsieur. Remember the military or something early voting is badly. Has a lot to lose Briggs right before an election. Second automatic voter registration should not be automatically

registered to vote, because maybe you don't want a vote same day. Registration is absurd. It doesn't allow you to actually check whether the person who they say they are online. Voter registration is very difficult to control no fault absentee balancing again, that's that's a problem because people vote absentee instead of simply going down there pulling place, makes it more difficult to verify their vote. This creates a lot more costs at the polls, which is exactly the opposite of what we need is hurt. Voter turnout because everybody will early vote We'll degrade the accuracy of registration less by automatically registering individuals from state databases such as GNP and wealth are offices in California. You can have a driver's license if you're, an illegal immigrant so if you automatically are registered from the state database. Well, that's gonna be a problem, isn't it it constitutes a recipe according to heritage correctly for massive voter registration fraud by hackers and cybercriminals through online voter registration. It's hilarious to watch the left tries to loosen the methods of of confirming

voters are at the same time they are trying to make sure that only people who see captain Marvel can review. Captain Marvel is a point made by one of our producers here. By had a production, Jonathan, hey to me, the other night, he was pointing out that now run tomatoes. His changed their standards on who gets to review. Captain Marvel: you can only do it if, if you have bought a ticket to captain marvelled have changed standard. Why? Because they were afraid that fanboys we're going to crap all over captain Marvel and lower the the viewer rating, the generalised your rating, and so they decided there essentially going to use a form of voter idea. So yes, voter Idee, foreseeing a movie and reviewing it ironic, tomatoes. No to vote ready before you know actually voting. This will cripple the effectiveness of state voter idea was by allowing individuals vote without mighty and signed a statement which they claim. They who they say they are, but you can just forged the signature. Obviously it

reduce the number of Federal Election Commission members from six to five, allowing a political party with three commission seeds to control the commission, which of course means that if Democrats take control of the FTC, then they will control the entire a pc. It would require states to restore the ability of felons to vote the moment they are out of prison, which is a state issue, not a federal issue. It violates Operational powers in the Asian you opposes HR one because it said they say that it goes too far in a lot of these directions. So it's pretty extreme bill. Don't believe all the hype. When democrats say they're restoring voter integrity, it is precisely the opposite already. We will be back here a little bit later today with two additional hours, which is why you subscribe otherwise, be here tomorrow, will be here for more I'm bench of Euro. This is the bench Barroso

The bench of hero show is produced by sending a very real executive producer. Jeremy boring senior producer, Jonathan, hey, our supervising producer is Mathis Glover, and our technical producer is often Stevens edited by Adam side of its audio is meant by micro. Mina Heron make up is by just one overall prejudices that next year the bench appear shows a daily wire production. Copyright daily wire, twenty nineteen everybody, its Andrew Craven host of the Andrea cleaving, show you knew the media is trying to cover up for democratic inflation. That is by showing that a problem on both sides, the left and the right- lose on the left and the right. But the right wing, Anti Semites or lunatics announced shiners, the left wing inflation rates or in Congress at a big big difference. I'll talk about it on the interim claiming show.