Will the Eu S go to war with IRAN will draw binds campaign survive the weak we'll Roy more visit the food court, I'm bench a pair of this is the benchmark. Russia The new cycle is getting very serious out there. We begin today with the obvious news that the President considered a straw Anna Runyan resources. It is unclear at this point we're in a row and we are planning to strike the present apparently pulled back at the very last minute, so there were a couple of conflicting reports last night, one from the New York Times, one from the Associated Press about exactly what happened. It was yesterday and the president was basically deciding whether or not to strike iranian targets. The planes were, in the air they were already to go and then they were pulled back at the very minute. According to the New York Times, President Trump approved military strikes against IRAN and retaliation. Four downing, an american surveillance throne, but then pull back from launching them on Thursday night after a day of escalating tensions, as late

seven p. A military and diplomatic officials were expecting a strike after intense discussions in debate at the White House among the president's top national security officials in congressional leaders. According to multiple Signor administration officials involved in or briefed on the deliberations of officials, so tat. The president had initially approved attacks on a handful of iranian targets like radar and missile batteries racial is underway in its early stages when it was called off. According to a senior administration, official planes were already in the air. The ships were in position, no missiles been fired. One word came to stand down. According to the official results than your times reporting, the abrupt reversal put a halt to what what been the president's third military action against targets in the Middle EAST. President Trump had twice struck a targets in Syria. In two thousand seventeen and two thousand eighteen, it was not clear according to the New York Times, whether MR from simply changed his mind on the street,

or whether the administration altered course because of logistics or strategy was also not clear whether the attacks might still go forward. Ask about the plans for a strike in the decision to hold back. The White House declined to comment as a Pentagon officials, no government officials to ask the New York Times to withhold the article, and that was the report that was coming forth from the New York Times and they talk about a split among President Trump's advisor senior Administration official said the check Mary state. My palm pale, John Bolton, the National security adviser and you to hospitals, Yea Director had favoured a military response, but TAT Pentagon officials. Caution that such action could result in a spiralling escalation with risks for american forces in the region. That's the part of the story that conflicts with these, so it had pressed story. So the Associated Press story suggested that the President of the United States had been advised by the Pentagon. In fact to go ahead. They send a distraction recommended by the Pentagon.

So apparently the story isn't even straight within the media as to who is recommending what the real question here was, whether it was going to escalate. If, in fact, the United States took some sort of retaliatory action, obviously President Trump thought that the answer was maybe so. This morning the president started tweeting out his foreign policy, which again not my recommendation, because in the last twenty four hours we have seen the President read out that IRAN made a very big mistake and then within twenty four hours, adding why, in fact IRAN might have just made a mistake, it wasn't actually on purpose and then he was suggesting that IRAN couldn't be hit because it would been too provocative or two to disproportionate here's. What the president tweeted out, that's what the president weeded out therefore in his position in just one. Second, first there's a widely held belief that procrastination too bad thing, but life is in quite so black and white. Sometimes procrastination in work in your favour, hey it may work and our affair,

with regard to IRAN, maybe procrastinating hidden later, but if you need life insurance in you been putting it off. Congratulations, you ve managed to procrastinate long enough for technology to make it easy policy. Genius is the easy way to shop for insurance online. In just two minutes you can compare quotes from top insurers to find your best price. Once you apply, the policy genius team will handle all the paperwork and the red tape, no sales pressure, no hidden fees, just financial protection and mine and policy genius doesn't just make life insurance easy. They can also help you find the right home insurance, Otto Insurance, disability insurance. So if you need a life insurance, but you ve been busy doing literally anything else check out policy genius, it's the easy way to compare all those top insurers and find the best value for you policy genius tat come nobody really wants to shop for life. Insurance means you have to think about death and the possibility of plotting and what happens after. But if you could take care of it right now, policy genius

com, can make it super easy for you go check. The moray now be an adult monsieur family Satan care of go check out policy. Genius tat come right. Now it's policy genius stuck on. Ok, so the president clarifies its policy today, the twitter again, not a huge fan of clarifying foreign policy, the sweet. I dont think that it's a good idea, but this is the president, that we accept the president's, as President Obama made a desperate and terrible He'll with IRAN gave them one hundred Fifty billion dollars plus one point: eight billion dollars in cash. True around was big trouble. Any bail them out gave them a free path to nuclear weapons and soon in Saying. Thank you. Iranian Deaf to America. I terminated deal which was even ratified by Congress, and imposed strong sanctions very much. We can nation today than at the beginning of my presidency, when they causing major problems throughout the Middle EAST. Now they are bust case. All of this is true in all. This is correct. The president was absolutely correct to pull out of the original, which was in fact,

a deal that was garbage. The entire runs was built to allow IRAN to strengthen its regional ambitions, well pledging to hold off a nuclear weapons, just one for them to strengthen their hand and then, as soon as the deal expired in a ten year period, they flip the switch nuclear weapons, and now they are regional power with nuclear weapons. The deal was always a crap deal. The Obama administration, based Molly was paying off the Iranian not to develop nuclear weapons, but to funding or just so long as Obama was in office and maybe a little bit beyond. If another Democrat had been elected and then the president addressed the twitter, what exactly happened? Last night, he says Monday they mean in iranian SH down an unmanned drone flying in international waters, we're cocked and loaded to retaliate last night on three different sites. When I asked how many will die, hundred fifty people, Sir, was the answer from a general ten minutes before the strike. I stopped it not proportionate to shooting down in unmanned, draw

is said, I'm in no hurry our military rebuilt new and ready to go by far the best in the world. Sanctions are by and more added last night. Iran can never have nuclear weapons, and not against the world, ok, so it is that sort of middle way. It is that sort of middle tweet there, with which I have some issues and the one we re actually spells out a strategy. So there are few problems with this one. You suggest that they are basically ready. To go. The planes were in the air, they were on their way and that's when he asked how many people will die. Now, the president of the United States should probably be asking the question before we load up the jets and get out there in the area. That should be kind of the first question that ask is what exactly is the strike and look like one of the consequences of the strike, but

be that as it may, the President cause it back now. It's rationale that I have a problem with it when he says a hundred people, a hundred fifty people. What we're going to die, and that was not proportionate. I dont know where this idiotic notion came from that. If you attack the United States, we are supposed to be proportionate and our response. In fact, I think that's a terrible idea. The reason I think that's a terrible idea is because the United States actually try. Something that was basically called proportionate response was actually called escalated. Graduated escalation during Vietnam, or is it strategy put in place by then Secretary of Defense, Robert Mcnamara, and the strategy which is elucidated by former Trump National Security Adviser Hr Mcmaster in the book, their listen to duty, the book is is all about how Robert Mcnamara and the Albatross administration blew the Vietnam WAR by engaging in this graduated escalation. The idea was that we would gradually turn up the heat on the Vietnamese North Vietnamese, become until

They realised that we were going that we are very serious about this, and then they would back down, but that's not really how military conflict works. The reason that people don't want to get involved with you and military conflict is because they are afraid you will devastate them. Not the EU will gradually turn up the head, but that you will devastate them effectively. Speaking foreign policy is much more Like a high school playground than we can debate society and a high school junior high playground, there is always the one kid that you don't want to fight because he's gonna, crazy. You never know what is going to do and theirs Was that one guy on the playground who yet you sort of suspected he might have a knife in his backpack? would get really bad for you really quickly or that sort of President Frumps appeal right. He said this before he likes to be unpredictable. He likes to be the guy who's intimidating because you don't know what he is going to do he is going to do. The fact is that a everyone knows that they can trade basic. We in unmanned? U S drone for nothing, really, nice he's not under italian anyway. You think that, in a stop pushing

they like this. There was initiating this conflict, so here What IRAN is, after here around after a couple of things, one they want to force up the price of oil, so they need chaos in the region because the sanctions are working because they have no money. They are deliberately trying to force up the price of oil by creating cast in the region basically become North Korea, except they are worried about the oil markets, and that brings us to the second rationale. The second rationale is that they are hoping that the sanctions will be dismantled. If they act militaristic enough, they are hoping that they can sort of score. The sing deal that the king regime in North Korea has scored routinely with the west, which, as we act like nudge, not jobs. We launch nuclear test every so often we fire a few missiles. The Sea of Japan, and then you sign as a Czech and hope that we stop that's what the iranian we're doing with the Obama administration is why they signed the nuclear deal, give us cash and we'll stop it,

for the moment and then every so often wax crazy again and then you give us more cash and then eventually will have enough cash that we can do exactly what we want to do. That's the goal that is being pursued by the Iranian and in order to achieve that goal, they also have to make the case to the Europeans that the Europeans should basically forced the Trump administration to back down. So what they're going to continue to do now is push, and they These Stalin line was that you push until you had steel and in that effectively what the are doing right now they are pushing their pushing there. Because they know that the left in the United States, the press, the media, are interested in boxing president Trump, in that they have created this false narrative, where President Trump is the truly erratic force or the President Trump is the one who is driving the conflict. The president Trump, if only you were a little bit kinder to the Iranian, none of this would be happening. Everything would be going

back to the wonderful way that it was just before that evil. President Trump took office, the Iranian know exactly what the Europeans think of president trumped. They know the press thinks of President Trump and they are playing. That's the hilt, that's what this is all which suggests that The president is gonna, have to take action here sooner or later. Truly, now the Europeans may be careful. There may be careful enough that they never shoot down an american manned men, aircraft, but they don't actually Killin American, that they just sort of keep visitor low level of boiling conflict, hoping that the Trump Administration will back down, but that is not a good thing either because sooner away, they will do something the damages enough where we do have to retaliate. If you want to stop this thing in his tracks, you do have to show the Iranians that, if things go, real? The ayatollahs are not only not going to be in charge of IRAN anymore. They are not going to be breathing anymore, because there's one thing that the iranian want: that what a lot less than the United States does not war its very funny when the United States- because

I want to go to worth around- I don't wanna- go to war with IRAN, you don't wanna go to war with IRAN. Nobody wants worthwhile on. Nobody wants hundreds of thousands improved invading IRAN. Nobody. Once American lives lost, and we want to any of those things. You know who wants war with the United States, less than the United States wants war with IRAN. The iranian regime, because of the Ngos to all out war goes to all out war. That regime does not stand a chance, and we should note here that there are bunch of options still on the table for President Trump What is being pursued right now looks a lot like a clean Tonia in foreign policy, and that is not a good idea. I'll explain in just one second: first, I like having straight teeth, but did you know that, as you get older, your teeth actually continue to move? You think that you take off the braces, and our teeth are also not really.

That's not the case. Either gonna continued move around and around them was used. Use candid, which is the clear alternative to Braces imo, and it's pretty fantastic. Here's how works in orthodontist licence in your state created treatment plan for you and then provide you with the Reedy preview of the final result and then finally, they help bring. You these these clear, great basically braces and that they keep your teeth in place that they stop moving around cans. It only uses experienced orthodontist. Other companies use. Dental professionals, candid is going, great custom, clear, a whiners it'll, be sent directly to me and my wife That means that we do not want to have even go in to the Orthodox S office candid cos. Sixty five percent, less than braces you can save thousands of dollars and have strader brighter teeth in an average of just six month,

I'm really excited to get my clearer liners from candidate. My teeth. Look, I'm ITALY, cinnamon and a handsome man. We're will make my team work even better you're one step wave meeting, Strader brighter teeth, learn more at Cannes in co, dot com last Shapiro use Code, Shapiro check out to get seventy five dollars off. That's candid codes outcomes, Lasher Bureau Code, Shapiro for seventy five bucks off, make your teeth look better and by the way, make your teeth. Healthier, also go check out. Candid co, dot com, Slash Shapiro Great for everybody, particularly as he gauge go check them out right now, candid cadet com, Slash Piero coach appear for seventy five bucks off. Ok, so a couple of things that we to put to bed right away us striking IRAN and knocking at their navy, for example, does not mean full scale war with IRAN. It doesn't because, as I say, if the Iranian retaliated to the point, where full scale war, where necessary, the ILO troubles are dead. There Adam they are not living anymore. The United States have overwhelming military force of most powerful force in the history of the world, the one. Thing that the Iranian dont want at the end of all this it like intention, but what they don't.

One is the release of tension in the form of the United States Bombing, the wooden crap out of them. That is not something they action What number two? If the United States takes retaliatory action, that does not mean full scale war, I'm very sorry. This false binary, that's being driven by the media. That suggests that if the United States were to retaliate against the attack on american assets, that this means that war like full scale, rock style. War is exactly what's going to happen here in a second We're renew a list of the kinetic military actions that we have taken just since two thousand ten. How many these devolved into full scale war. The answer: zero. Zero, the only what maybe one, maybe Libya, that's it. Ok! So here's a bit of a timeline since two thousand and a military actions in which the United States has been involved, and virtually none of these involved a full scale. War. Aside from two thousand eleven when we intervene militarily in Libya, which, by the way, I opposed a sigh from that military intervention. Every

intervention that I'm about to read to you does not involve a full scale. War now in two thousand and we had drawn, strikes unalterable militants in Somalia. Does this explanation in which we had carried out those drone strikes, including Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Yemen in Libya. We sent combat troops as advisers to Uganda into thousand eleven. We deployed troops to Jordan contained the syrian civil war within Syria's borders? In two thousand twelve, we send patriot missiles to Turkey to prevent missile strikes from Syria and two thousand twelve. We deployed troops to Chad into thousands wealth. We deployed troops to Molly in two thousand twelve, we conducted arrayed in Somalia in two thousand and thirteen. We sent soldiers to Uganda to help african forces search for Joseph Coney in two thousand and fourteen We went intervention in Syria that did not evolve into full scale war with the syrian regime in two thousand fourteen, and by the way President Trump has launched two separate military

strikes against Syria in two thousand: seventeen, ninety thousand eighteen, and neither time to devolve into full scale war in two thousand fifteen, the United States and ships to the street. Of hormones to shield vessels after the iranian seizure of a commercial vessel around fire trots over the bow and sees the ship? And that's when the Obama administration chickened out and decided to sign a deal with the Iranian two thousand fifteen, we deployed three hundred troops to Cameroon when you never heard of any this stuff right. The region never heard of any of this stuff is because not every U S military action devolves into a full scale. War Eli Lake has good peace. Today, over Bloomberg, talking about the various options that are available to the Trump administration hissing, he suggests that there are a bunch of things that, United States could do he says around Revolutionary Guard. Core includes force, are spread out throughout the Middle EAST. Not only are senior official station in Syria

again in Iraq, in Lebanon, but their iranian military outposts in those countries as well. Since two thousand seventeen, Intelligence community has prioritize them. These iranian forces in the Middle EAST options currently under consider it should include strikes on those outposts time, not resulting casual is a more serious option. Under consideration involves direct lethal strikes on IRAN. Commander. Station outside of IRAN could also strike around in the naval facilities, as we didn't one thousand nine hundred and eighty eight one thousand nine hundred and eighty nine and operation praying just in the of yours options is not limited to traditional warfare. We have cyber operations. We could continue to attack Iranian military computer networks. We need to restore deterrents, obviously- and here is where things get ugly- is obvious that the Democrats are not interested in restoring any level of deterrence,

they're interested in trying to appease and bribed the iranian regime gets. Then just second, because we tried than the ninety ninety with terrorists. It did not work well. First, when the founders crafted the constitution, the first thing they did was to make sacred the rights of the individual to share their ideas without limitation by the government. The second thing they did was enumerate the right of the population to protect that speech in their own persons with force. You know I'm a believer in the second demand and I'm a gun owner owning a rifle is an awesome. Responsibility started in a garage by marine that, more than two decades ago, Bravo, company manufacturing Museum for short, builds a professional great product which is built to combat syn This is because Beijing believes the same level of protection should be provided to every American, regardless of their a private citizen or professional problem, any manufacturing is not a sporting arms company. They desire engineer, manufacture lifesaving equipment. Listen, I have a gun not because I'm great at target shooting or go hunting. I dont have a gun, because if somebody comes to my house, and tries to break in and hurt me or my family. I wanted able to shoot them. The people, a museum, know this

I feel it is there more responsibility as Americans to provide tools that will not be. EL, the end user. One is not just a paper target, but somebody coming to do them harm to learn more about. Bravo. Company manufacturing had an over to Bravo Company M, F Cheetah com, where you can discover more about their products. Special offers upcoming news, as Bravo Company. M, F G dog come if you need more convincing, find out even more about museum and the amazing people who make their products really great company at Youtube. Dont coms, life, probable company, USA, Youtube Durkheim, such Bravo Company USA, go check them out. Ok, do as I say, the left is militating against any sort of deterrence action by the United States because they prefer to pay off the worst terror regime on planet earth. Then roads was a damned congenital lyre them. And behind the Iranian who admitted to the Atlantic that he lied openly to the american public about the predicate for the iranian. He suggested that the IRAN and the iranian regime was right on the verge of moderation. If only we cut a deal, it was all why it was made up. He admitted it was all made up he's out there criticising the Trump Administration today

saying we didn't need to pull out of a deal that was working and we don't need to go to war overdrawn. Let me just point out: Ben Roads and the Obama administration went to war over, not aid run over literally no attacks on american assets in Libya. We want a full scale. War that war ended with effectively the take over of the entire country of Libya. By a variety of terrorist groups and a mass refugee crisis that ended up swamping the southern coasts of Europe, so that worked out great in other whose has in the ministrations in which he served presided over the murder of five hundred thousand people in Syria and handing over of control that country to the russian government. So when you sit this one up and. Not only that he then tweets out. This is precisely why politics isn't a game. Diplomatic agreements should be honoured, and temperament intellect and judgment are what matters in whose president it should never have come to this it you never could you know what might have stopped it from coming to this? If you had taken any sort of preventative action against IRAN

when I say your boy was in the White House, when your guy was in the White House when you're me. And was in the White House right when this is, this is ridiculous. This is just ridiculous. Came the fact that that Ben Roads is suggesting that this transport that its from the problem When it was Obama that led to the rise, whereon regionally in the room in the area, is pretty astonishing without set when it comes to president from policy when it comes to president trumps. What what president from shooting import emulating the Clinton regime? Are they? The Clinton ministration emulating Clinton, who basically sat back and watched Al Qaeda Tactical BAR towers, attack the embassies in the. U S: embassies in Kenya in Tanzania, attack the? U S, s, call and didn't really respond, because he was afraid that the blow back would be too great on him politically that do not

alt and wonderful results for the United States. In fact, it resulted in a belief, widespread in the radical islamic terror world that the United States was a week horse that could be taken, and that was the that was the idea here. So it's pretty pretty astonishing pretty. And again the people who are sort of defending from vacillating here, we'll see what from goes from here, but if from Captain He's too vast Layton do nothing that will have a gun. With the same result of a democratic president did the same thing. Listen trumped doesn't want to where this new thing everybody knows transposing, go to want to go to war? And this is a part of this that so dishonest on the part, the media and the Democrats. They keep suggesting the trump desperately wants to take America into war. Yesterday, president, from said,

openly. My administration isn't pushing me into war. He suggested it could have been something stupid that the iranian regime, like from desperately, does not want a conflict here of your administration. We're trying to push you and not at all. In fact, in many cases the opposite, but I will say, look. Said I want to get out of these endless wars. I campaigned on that. I want to get out within in Afghanistan for nineteen years. As you know, we reduce very substantially in Afghanistan. We beat the caliphate. We took back a hundred per cent of the caliphate when it was ninety nine percent. Just an ice The basic issue is ninety nine percent are so well finish it up, so we got a hundred percent, but this is something this is a new wrinkle. This is a new fly in the ointment. What have This is a new wrinkle. This is a new fly in the ointment, what happened, shooting down to grow and this country will not stand for it that I can tell you think very moderate, we'll see where this goes from here. Naturally, Democrats are creating a false narrative. The trump

trying to get us into war. No, he obviously is not, or that is from fall that it has come to. This, obviously, is not at a certain point. The United States will have to take action here. Ok, because there, then that action can come in a variety of forms zeal I like points out and it doesn't have to come in the form of a full scale war which again nobody wants nobody wants, but all these false narratives running around, if you take action against IRAN, that it's the and of the world and war is inevitable and everyone's going to die, and all this that's not true. Either some deterrent force needs to be created here and obviously, what's been happening so far, cutting it. Meanwhile, the Joe Biden campaign is having some serious trouble. According to the Washington Post, tensions ripple through the Biden campaign as its past working well, patience with the segregation centre comes to the forefront. According to the Washington Post, Joe Biden was afresh. Men. Senator the youngest member of of the August body when he reached out to an your colleague for help on one was early legislative proposals.

Words were ordering racially segregated school districts to bust children to create more integrated classrooms. A practice Biden opposed and wanted to change. Wrote on June thirtieth nineteen. Seventy seven hours You know that I very much appreciate your help during this week, Committee meeting in attempting to bring my anti bussing legislation to vote, the recipients of that treaty was James O eastland at the time of well known segregationist, would call blacks and inferior race and once they had to prevent blacks, and white from eating together in Washington, be exchanged, revealed in a series of letters offers. A new glue into an old relationship that erupted this week. As a major controversy forbidden presidential campaign, as I said before, amazing that the media are just uncovering this now, weird, isn't it. He was vice president for a long years he's in the Senate for one million years Joe Biden is older than Methuselah

and yet only now are we digging up these letters from nineteen. Seventy seven just in time for a coordinated solved by Democrats on his record on race by whoever would have suspected this sort of thing, and why would Brok Obama have employed such a vicious racist, as vice president of the United, states binds campaign laid Thursday issued a statement saying that the insinuation that Joe Biden shared the view, the same views on Islam as Iceland and segregation is a lie. Nonetheless, this is becoming part of it a sort of broader narrative about Joe Biden that is being pushed not only by the media but by a lot of his political rivals? He wrote a letter on March. Second, nineteen. Seventy seven to Iceland, who is a racist, saying my bill strikes at the heart of the injustice of court order, passing. It prohibits the federal courts from disrupting our educational system in the name of the constitution with there's no evidence that the government officials intended to discriminate

I believe there is growing sentiments in the Congress to curb unnecessary bussing. Now again, this is them deliberately taking by NATO context. The fact is that force. Thus it was bad policy and lead to tremendous amount of white flight from cities, so voluntary sort of segregation and people who decided to leave particular areas because they didn't want their kids to be in in schools with black kids right then, and there is a push by people that that instead, would have to have forced bussing. Then we're gonna take kids from from areas and move them into other areas. Like into wide areas: white, kids, in a black areas and the students to solve all the problems. There is a difference between mandatory mandatory integration and the end of legal. These

agri geishas legally speedily. Nogales has an increase in entire book on this. Professor University of Texas LAW, School Biden was taken aside. The account force kids to go to a school they don't want to go to, and that is in fact counterproductive. Force passing by the way was giant failures of policy. It did not in fact stop white flight. It did not. It did not solve the problems of school integration into any of those things. So if you oppose that that didn't necessarily come from a racist place for some racist. Maybe it did, but also may have come from the idea that the government doesn't have a role to play here and also the government is ineffective here, but people are trying to suggest that it's really because Biden is racist and we're seeing all sorts of this narrative pushed out today in nineteen seventy five Joe Biden didn't interview in which he said this. I think I've made it possible for life. Rose to come out of the closet. If it isn't yet a respectable liberal position, it is no longer a racist one. This is his his pushing against forced bussing. He says I think the Democratic Party, could stand a liberal George Wallace someone who's, not afraid to stand up and offend people

someone wooden pander, but would say what the american people know in their got is right. Now the invocation of George Wallis is being trotted out as evidence that Joe Biden is racist and George Wallace was a vicious races. George Wallace was a segregationist believe black people inferior. He ran for president on that platform. You want some southern states, so invoking George Wallace in nineteen. Seventy five is a pretty ugly move by Joe Biden. At the same time. Does that mean that Joe Biden was a closet segregationist? Is that the contention and does his record since one thousand nine hundred and seventy five me anything on the sort of stuff is a possible. The Joe Biden is just an idiot. Niece has idiotic things on a regular basis, mean that seems a lot more plausible, but them it is our common for all Joe and is going to continue, one thousand nine hundred and eighty one hear the comment he made again. Invoking George Wallace said sometimes even George Wallace's right about some things. One of the things that is happening in this country is that the americans- have given up because we're not very innovative? Let me move off bussing to make points and then I will end my part of it. Let us take the death penalty. Everybody wants

the death penalty now we're going to everybody do. You know why they want the death penalty because stupid sociologists and guys like people who set up here in my job for years, kept telling them. We know how to rehabilitate they do not have this This idea how to rehabilitate our entire criminal justice system is premised on the points well because they are basically good, like most people, in my opinion, are went along and said well by that and the border for twenty years, and it does not work like most people, in my opinion, our went along and we'll by that and the border for twenty years. And it does not work against Joe Biden Circuit nineteen. Eighty one and I got killed by my liberal constituency for saying- and I say hey Let's forget about rehabilitation, we do not know how to do it say it boom tell them, because if you don't, you know what is going to happen. Eventually, people are gonna, get so frustrated by the by the way, liberal, sociologists and politicians who say, we must re ability, our fellow man. We must help them and then they see Richard Speck come up for parole, even though he did. Get in, they say my god. Why should that be? So I guess what now they have only one or two things to choose between they choose between strong sermons. You have hang them or continue business

as usual, so the sort of language being trotted out as evidence that Joe Biden is racist again, invoking George Wallace, which is a bizarre decision, but Joe Biden, it seems typically invokes people. He thinks are bad like George Wallace and segregation is a sort of outliers in his examples, he's been doing it for thirty years. Is that evidence that he's a vicious brutal racist? I have it have time thinking that that is the case circa. Ninety ninety two, by the way, jobs

We were saying that his crime bill would hang. People is another thing, that's being trotted out to prove that Joe Biden is actually a vicious racist, because his crime bill was supposedly targeted at black folks as opposed to a criminals worth noting than this. Ninety nine new clip ninety to quit this before hair plugs apparent here is Joe Biden talking about the criminal. Let me tell you what is in the bill and I'll. Let you all decide whether or not this is weak. Get down here, compendium of things that are in the bill, one, the death penalty, it provides fifty three death penalty offences week is can be. You know,

we do everything, but hang people for jaywalking in this bill, weak stuff, so Joe Biden being raked over the closing you're going to see that the entire democratic Party has decided to jump into this will get to that in just one. Second, first, will you fight for your freedom? So I talk all the time on the show about growing attacks on your religious freedom and free speech will now is the time to help people like Doktor, dubbed Schwartz he's an orthodox jewish psychotherapist. New York has enacted a law that sensor speech between therapists and clients by prohibiting treatment of clients who struggle with same sex attraction or gender is for you, Doctor Schwartz could be punished with fine up to ten thousand dollars prevents it. Somebody comes you doctor Schwartz's has I'm suffer with gender is, for you any trust, work through it with them, instead of just bolstering their views and their delusions, and now the state of New York was to crack down on him. Well. This is why the alliance defending freedom exists. Eightieth provides free legal services to Doktor, Schwartz and others whose freedoms are under assault, but eighty of camp provide these resources without

your help. India relies on donations to fight for your freedom. If this attack and happened, somebody like doktor forts, it could happen. You will you fight for Doktor Schwartz, unprotected freedom, please give generously. All donations are in fact tax deductible and if you don't need seventy five bucks in above you receive an exclusive free speech, short go to any legal dot. Org slash bend to donate right now, that's eightieth legal dot, Org slash and go check them out. Eighty of legal dot, Org, Slash Ben, ok, we're gonna, get to more of the Democrats, piling on Joe Biden in just one moment, but first, it's ugly waste time of the week when I give a shout out to a daily, where subscriber today, its Instagram David or a gun door who not only has a strong sense of good political content, he also appears to have a strong back in the picture. David is holding his magnificent leftist years, tumblr into frame in front what looks to be a picture of him as the bottom of a human pyramid impressive. He writes listening to Ben Shapiro, enjoying some cold ones. Hashtag leftist years tumblr hashtag I came for Ben

but stayed for Clayton well again I'll, be wonders if you want a chance of being featured on the show become a daily where annual subscriber, if you're not already one post a photo of your tumblr and twitter, or Instagram. You can even be in the photo if you'd like to become a subscriber had on our daily work. Come click on that subscribed button at the top of the page. Also when you subscribe yet earlier, says to buying tickets. For our one night. Only backstage wives show today at ten, a M tickets will officially go on sale. It's the show is August. Twenty first of the terrorists theatre in Long Beach Calvin I will be their daily, where God, King Germany, boring and reclaiming the horrible Michael knows we're all be there covering politics pop culture and we'll be answering your questions live from the audience. It's worth, noting that only three hundred the IP tickets available and includes premium seeding photos meeting greet with each of us a gift from me aren't even now. I have to go and shop for when more hadn't over daily wired icon, slash backstage to get your tickets today come join us for a fantastic evening. Of course. Go subscribe, ideally, word outcome for leftist years tumblr and all the other wondrous things that you get as a subscriber where the largest faster

growing conservative podcasting radio show in the nation so damn Cracks in the media are crafting this narrative, whereby Joe Biden is a secret, vicious racist and has been all the waste back since thanking seventy five, because you made political, forge political relationships of segregation is in order to get things that he wanted done because he opposed force bussing, which again forced bussing with bad policy. You might not like white flight, I'm not a huge fan, but that does not mean that forced bussing was solutions that, in fact it was not just ledge more white flight even further out too, that you were outside side the force bussing areas. The fact is that you cannot force people to live. We want them to live in a free country. You just cannot do that and you can't force people to go to school, where you want them to go to school.

In a free country. Joe Biden opposed fourth bussing. Therefore, he must be some sort of vicious racist invoked. George Wallace a couple of times, which again is a bad move, but fully in in line with Joe Biden being an idiot who says things without thinking about them fully and invokes people who are the ultimate extreme of american politics inordinate points this sort of one of his strategies book. I'd even make a deal with that guy? I didn't make a deal with George Wallace me what we it is something that can be honest, like George walls, but also not a piece of crap like George, what right that's the kind of way the Biden talks. That does mean that is great, but it also doesn't mean that he's a vicious racist, but

no Credit Party has decided to turn on old, Joe Elsie leading the way Corey Booker has been attacking Joe Biden and suggesting that Joe Biden is racist and then pretending he's not suggesting that. So then, what's the criticism ales each weeded out for the record Corey Booker does not o Joe Biden an apology for pointing out that waxing the stall jack about working with segregationist is insensitive. He knows better really what is better to stay quiet about it. One though it's better is to not proclaimed the job Biden is actually with segregationist and sympathetic to segregation, and, if he's not either of those things than what exactly is the critique her truly, what is the critic China? He see coats? Who is, of course racial, racial, a polarizing figure. I think that he is, as I've said, wildly overrated at muddy, think or somebody who relies on racial polarization in order to push a particular left, leaning political agenda he's out there bashing Joe Biden. He says the Joe Biden should be president either

I apologize. I don't know, I mean jobs should be president Obviously I don't think I'm breakin any news there. You have it being a nominee better him that in the him than Trump, but you know, I think, that's a really really low standard. Okay, so he's already out there, use abiden, whose a Sandra supporter in the last election cycle, Standards by delay got into it with an MSNBC anchor over Joe Biden comments as well how democratic Party is mobilizing against Joe Biden right now, what will be fascinating years? Whether Biden actually starts to drop in the polls? Now we have seen a drop in the polls forbidden, but the the rich line of attack for burning, shame prison in the debates next week will be on Joe Biden in some that will be racial you'll, see commonly Harrison Corey Booker, do it to workers already setting up for it, so is Booker in me. I'm train member, I believe Booker is in the debate with its unity.

Debate as by or no he's in the one of war and ok, so so Biden gets lucky. That means the commonly Harris is the one who is going to be attacking Joe Biden over the race issue, because Korea Booker is stuck in the in the kids table. Debate with Lord but Sanders will go after. It also hear Andrews doing just that and MSNBC, but I dont think you have to be counting personal relations with people who were very brutal. Segregation smithy ended our many of them out. I don't suppose you want his ok, I'm sorry! If you disagree with me, that's why that is that's. Why Haven't you over a boar decade? Career had to align yourselves with people who don't share your views on things. I was advance your causes. Yes, absolutely just what I say absolutely I haven't somewhere. Real. The member of the Congress till then, once the critique The answer is a lot of this is true

we dishonest and again. It is amazing to me that the same media that suggested beta Iraq was had world beating Canada, one whose wrung against terrorism they fled, says hey, look at this guy he's an empty vessel. Who start is now? Where is it? sorry, but that's then we were just noticing now what a weird out with his weird our movements in his full offences, where does noticing that assumes said cruises off the stage, I was suddenly something with Joe Biden when Joe Biden is running against Paul Ryan as VP, then it's all Joe, so authentic so true to himself, and then he runs against a bunch. Other Democrats at the media like better and suddenly the rediscovering how to do basic investigative journalism had a search archives and find old things that Joe Biden has said and report those things there. Finally, looking into stuff, like Hunter Biden, Joe Biden, son, doing business with countries that Joe Biden was doing business with his vice president, how

Joe Biden, Son Hunter was getting magical contracts from businesses located in China in the Ukraine. Well, Joe Biden was trying to do business with China and the Ukraine, as vice president of the United States. You know one that stuff might have been more helpful to report on when Joe Biden was vice. President of the United States is all this was public material at the time, But the media, apparently the blinders, only come off when it's convenient, which is pretty obvious, ok time for some male bagging, so it's mail bag. It up a little bit Johnson Ivan point of any. Do you think that you should take military action against a foreign adversary? In this case, IRAN, given We attack the syrian airforce infrastructure and twenty seventeen, even without our own forces being attacked. What should the standard before military intervention against IRAN. In this case, I appreciate your thoughts, and have a great weaken? Well, obviously, any military intervention has to be calculated against what is the goal? The goal in this case is deterring IRAN from attacking ships in the straits for moves in the Gulf of Oman.

That is the goal here? So that's the goal. It seems to me that a military intervention to stop them from doing so by blowing a couple of their ships out of the water would probably be a good idea and in fact there is ample precedent for this. We did in the nineteen who we sink, basically their entire Navy Rinkitink Navy in a day when they knock U S drawn out of the sky and one hundred and ten million dollar? U S drawn out of the sky, but is it enough national territory then knocking down a couple of their surface to air missile sites. That seems like perfectly proportional and appropriate response. The point is you do what you do to have to do to deter the Iranians I'll tell you what is it?

can ensure the Iranian is sitting. There are doing nothing up, maybe it's possible, as I suggested earlier in the shop. Maybe it is possible that the president merely threatening on Twitter, like guys, we were very close to me now. Can you guys we're this close cut it out? Maybe that does the trick. I have serious doubts that says the trick, because again, the credibility of the president has to be established by willingness to use force, and the president has wavered ominous. His wavered from time to time on the level of forced to be used on whether he wants to use force and not use force unpredictability and there has to be sent level predictable unpredictability, but it doesn't really hold one within twenty four hours. You're saying around made a very big mistake, but maybe they also didn't make a really big mistake, etc. Zacharias has haven, love the show: All you guys with the daily wire quick question about the executive branch. Does the president have the power to eliminate the alphabet soup offices that exist under the executive branch eliminate the DEA or some other office and then shift those funds over the border patrol. I have often wondered this after the government odd

the government audit under Barack Obama showed that several agencies that were budgetary sink holes with nothing to show for all their funding. If so, why does nobody don't use that power thanks Zack! Well, there was a case called: U S, verses, Nixon, in which Dixon said he didn't want to spend money allocated to the executive branch by Congress and was passed over its veto and through court, found that the executive branch couldn't just stop spending the money they couldn't just not do what Congress wanted them to do. What the executive branch could do, presumably, is just not asked Congress for the funding or veto any funding for a particular, too harmony, executive branch does have the power to fire people within an apartment, so you could theoretically eliminate nearly the entirety of an apartment, and then you know he saw the money sitting around there. As far as limiting entire departments that are established by congressional Thea, I dont believe the executive branch can unilaterally just eliminate the department of education. Legally speaking, I dont think that that's the case, although frankly I'd want to check it out, and I dont know DD full answer: Lucy Illnesses, serbian as a huge

even convened for years over the last few years have been hearing his stance on politics. Now when I listen to his audio books, I hear kings point of view. Instead of the stories I enjoyed, you think there's a way to bright, the art from the artist long term listener. First time it member Luciano soap number one. I think that it is very important to separate the art from the artist when we can there a lot of horrible people who create great art, and I think we should still be able to enjoy the art created by horrible people. The truth is virtually everybody is flawed to some extent or another. You can always finds an excuse. Some excuse, our great some excuses are bad as to why you should engage or not engage with somebody, but art is separate from the artist

for kings. The king is actually infused his books with his politics. That makes it very difficult. So would be one thing if king we're just writing books that we're a political but very often lately. I also have read many many seeping king books. I think particularly his premises of his books are really interesting and then he has no idea how to finish them. This is the common pattern is even came. Basically, has even King book starts out with this really interesting premise and something interesting happened, something odd, an interesting and then a progressive for three hundred pages of pulp, and then he blows everything up that has been the ending to. I think his last three books last for books at the very end, everything just sort of goes on fire and explodes, and that's annoying just from an artistic point of view. But what's even more annoying is all of this. There there's remember: I read under the dome and in under the dome, every villain,

is a caricature of some sort of right wing, heck ridiculous figure who secretly, who secretly disgusting and terrible, even though there are Bible thumper king has this very John lift GAO in footloose view what conservatives are nuts is very irritating and very self flattering fricking Abraham says: if a country has a trade deficit year after year, doesn't it eventually run out of money? Has a single year after year, if we, by five hundred billion dollars and sell only one hundred billion dollars, doesn't wind up his debt now that that is not how trade deficits work. So a trade deficit, people misunderstand what a trade deficit as a trade deficit is not the United States government spends more. Then it takes it. That's just a deficit. A trade deficit is that the members of the United States since citizen raised then more on products from foreign countries than those countries spend on the United States, but that money doesn't just disappear? So you spend a hundred bucks on a product from China. What happens that hundred dollars?

well? The Chinese can't use it in their own commerce. They dont use dollars for commerce. Instead, there are going to have to use that money for investment, and so very often they will use that capital for capital reinvestment, though by american bonds or they'll by american companies, or they will invest in american real estate. Balance of trade is is not, in my opinion, an important indicator of the economic health of a country. I mean you, don't have a balance of trade with your supermarket. You buy stuff from your supermarket all the time, presumably the supermarket doesn't by nearly as much from you as you buy from the supermarket That means that you have been damaged by the supermarket you're running a trade deficit with them. The answer is no, because now you saved money, presumably the region shocked at the supermarket. You didn't grow food in your backyard is because you wanted to save money, so trade deficit can actually, for you make a lot of sense and for the citizenry it can make a lot of sense. Now, there's an argument that is often made that a trade deficit hollows out particular industries, because basically you're buying from places that are not american

That is true. There is no question that, if you buy from a place that has not american in american business, didn't get your business, but again those dollars end up reinvested in the american economy, overtime, those dollars and invested into presumably more lucrative and more efficient american businesses? This is the concept of comparative advantage. What C Dominic says Ben, which, if any charities you support and want to donate, would rather asked you, do any real work. Thank you. Although there are many great charities, I support a bunch of polite cherries. I support a bunch of jewish charities. Obviously, as religious jus eyes were like a lot of villages charities, I support the garrison these foundation. Which is a pro military charity, praying remember where I get. I give a fair majority last year, I'm trying to remember the exact list of of organisations to which I gave it uses somewhere between five and ten cherries that assign fairly large checks to I'll get a list of it. But yet we know that a lot of wonderful charities out their chances Logan. I really

We subscribe during the box at if president from wins reelection and the left go so far, left that they will hit a brick wall. And then blow open that, whilst they can go even further left, do you think that the moderate Democrats, currently keeping quiet, will start to push back against the radical left and try to take back the party from crazy, p, I really doubt this. I really doubt this because I think that the left has been driven so fully insane by president from and that they live in such a delusional world that they believe that they are not suffice. Currently committed to the left and that's why they washed in twenty sixteen, and I think the same thing will be true in twenty twenty if Britain is the nominee, they lose their say we're to moderate, and if it is

somebody who's more woke and they lose then all will be well. We just need to get out there and fight harder. I think that that the Democratic Party has engaged in a sort of bizarre myth of its own creation, and that myth is that Barack Obama ushered in a new political world that Barack Obama change the status of american politics forever and then another democratically pick up a mantle and run with it, and basically the proposition was that before this is a fifty fifty country, Barack Obama made it into a fifty shoe forty eight country or fifty three forty seven country and those specifically because of the outsize contribution of minorities to Brok Obama's electoral coalition, so they could safely. Ignore blue collar white folks. They could safely ignored the rust belt they could safely, nor all of these places and focusing only on urban areas, drive out turn out in those urban areas and when reelection from here to the end of time, there's a lot of talk about this in the left commentariat from two thousand to two thousand. Sixteen. How basically a new demographic shift, and they Eyes of the millennium generation meant, you know,

hunger have to appeal to the old constituencies, and Democrats are wrong about this. It turns out the brok. Obama was none. Transformational figure, he was unique. Figure is uniquely talented, had unique, draw particular with the black population voting population of the United States, and because of all of that, he was an equally capable of drawing outsize votes for himself, but it didn't translate over to other Democrats and you could see that it didn't trends it over to other Democrats, because he was virtually every, eight house in the country over the course of its presidency. So Democrats instead, but I think the are so delusional that they think that it was basically such a fluke and twenty. Sixteen that all they have to do is keep double

down on what brought them Barack Obama he'll be fine. I dont think they're gonna shift back to the centre. Jacob says why are so many celebrities left us while I think a lot of celebrity so leftists because to be in the arts. No lot of artists people that a lot of artists are people who consider themselves sort of outcasts and saw the weirdos in their communities or the weirdos in their where they grew up the free thinkers, the people who held down by the man, and then they escaped beautiful Hollywood, and then they decided that they were going to become more tolerant and diverse and leave behind the foolishness of their parents, because their artists and they the artists, mentality and also there's something about art that is inherently subjective, and so I think many artists rightly believe that there is a fair amount of work involved.

In their success, and there are lots of good actors who are working to coffee been right now: they're alive, terrific scriptwriters, who prison blear, managing coffee beans right now, and the only thing that separates them from the people who are working in Hollywood is a fair bit of luck. So there is a feeling of sort of random musician that occurs in the celebrity world. Like did a g. I worked hard for this, but it's not like those other people didn't work hard for it. It was a sort of randomized inserts, a real guilt, complex that that lives in sort of celebrity halls and a lot of those celebrities feel the necessity to pay off the social justice Warrior types to make amends for their own success too, to make amends for not being a starving artist, but for being according to sell out by engaging in extraordinarily woke politics designed to appeal to the fringes of american life, Anti tried the american people from whom they draw their money. There. You see this very often with artists, they started disdain, the audience that actually pays them and it's an ugly thing and makes for worse art by the way I see now

this has happened, as self proclaimed patriotic Christian conservative also happens to be gay. I've enjoyed listening to your recent discussions on same sex, marriage and its relationship with religion. Specifically, you mentioned that. Well you, I believe the government should be in the business of marriage. You as an end of it. Nor would not attending a wedding, because you believe the act is a sin. I just wanted to probe this point a bit more, perhaps understand a better which would be amenable to attending a wedding between two atheists being the completely Secular marriage is presumably also not endorsed by Judaism. Well. No, I don't think that it is a sin for heterosexual people to be married outside of a church. I don't think that that is the ascendant in the jewish view, where they d the question of same sex marriages, the idea that homosexuality, not the orientation but the Actual act of the sin itself or the legitimate nation of that's in is the sin. The heterosexual act is not in and of itself. In a married context, a sin under Judaism says: do things perspective, could change or say childs rather relative were to come out his gay, I dont think so, and the reason I don't think so. It's because my definition of sin does

mean that I'm unsympathetic to people who are gay, this is something that I think functioning understand about people who are religious, I've. Tremendous empathy for people who are homosexual ornery in orientation. I have friends, I have family who are in fat gay, and that does not mean that I think that this in itself is no longer to send, but it also means that I'm from into sympathy for them I just can't participate in the celebration of something that I religious. They consider to be a sin and by the way, this doesn't just extend to homosexuality and seems ex marriages mean when I was on Dave. Rubens show. I talked about this. This extends in Judaism two intermarriage. I can't attendant intermarriage if a non GM marriage you. I can't go that way, because that is a sin according to jewish law

This is just to say that I am not of the mindset that you're viewpoints on this, make you or anyone else a big at home if a bunker, in fact, I think quite the opposite. Our shared perspective, an individual liberty and personal freedom- are what make America in twenty nineteen the best time in place in the history of the world, to be gay. Looking forward to hearing a bit more about your views, thanks, big fan of the show why preceded it, one of the things that have always found bizarre is why people care. What I think is a sin. I think all sorts of things are since I'm I'm an orthodox true. That means that, like everything is sinful a lot of things- and I can recognise that I don't live up to all my own standards when it comes to and because no one does- and I can acknowledge the people said. What I can't do is suggested assent is not as in or celebrate what I consider to be a sin, but that's not. The same thing is suggesting that the government should be involved in enforcing my vision of sin on the world. That, I think, is a mistake. There's no secular rationale for it. So if you don't like what I think is a sin, I've got good news for you, you don't

the care, because I'm not imposing it on you legs ass Heaven. What, in your opinion, is a proportionate response to recent iranian aggression, I'm not in favour of proportional response. As I said earlier, I am in favour of disproportionate response sufficient to establish deterrents courses Haven just subscribed in part due to recent big tech, conservative censorship. My question is: Wendy taxes move from legitimate governmental income to theft. Thanks wears a great book, Richard Epstein called takings, and his basic theory is that under the fifth amendment, which talks about presumably eminent remain, it says that the government cannot take private public private property for public use without just compensation. That is the that is the language that is used, no private property for public use without just compensation. Richard Epstein suggest I think quite correctly that what this means the government can't take a property and then not compensate you for that property in some way. So what that means is that if they take my money for taxes and then they use it for services from the police that I can access, that is one thing. If they take my money interest handed to Bob over there, I'm not getting compensate in any way for that that is an illegitimate taking. I think that

is a good framework for thinking about taxes. A rough says hello, Mr Shapiro Bernie, recently tweeted. He supports unions and gaming industry since they made over forty billion last year, but he didn't just we dad. He suggested that the gaming industry grossed over forty billion last year and that forty billion, should therefore be distributed among the workers. He demonstrated that he literally does not understand the difference between gross and net, so things that, because giving industry made forty billion dollars last year. That means they profited forty billion dollars last year, which is idiotic here. The vast majority of that went to the people who work for the communist efforts and downsizes Raphael of Union of industries. Unionized. Can you remind me of those downsides, especially for an industry, is huge. The gaming industry thanks love the show that the problem with unionization

typically is that it makes businesses less efficient. Now, I'm in favour of private unions along is there not need capping people if you wanna get together with all your friends and then unionized and you're, not trying to kneecap scabs and you're, not trying to use physical force against anybody enjoy all for it? Don't you problem with it. If, however, what you're talking about is forced collective bargaining, where I have to negotiate with you as the employer by war, then you're talking about carts lies in the industry and basically putting the workers in control of the business. They did not capitalize on the first is, if I can hire somebody more efficiently the new I should be able to hear so many more efficiently than you also the reason that so many members of private industry have decided Nazi unionized me, because unionization rate in the United States when from something like sixty percent to something like five percent over the last several decades. The reason that that happen is because people decided wages second, what unions very often do is they guarantee a stir

igniting business. I work for that becomes unprofitable and has to fire people also very often what Unions. Guarantee is a so I may be a better qualified younger employee, and I can't get a raise because there's somebody else is older than I am who's a dunderhead. The union contracts. As that personal data raise before I do rather operating free willing man in which I am going to ask for an individual raise anytime. I want union contracts, usually forbid that sort of thing that sort of the story with unions- ok time for equipping, I like and then a quick thing that I hate and then we will be out of here so things that I like today's up. There's a really good book, edited by mere salivate check. He's rabbi, you shouldn't university and Stuart helper rights. The book is called proclaim: liberty throughout the land, the Hebrew Bible in the United States, a sourcebook. So what's great about this book, it's from Toby Press. What is it? What is designed to do is provide the founder

national biblical texts that a lot of early thinkers, ranging from John Winthrop all the way up through Abraham Lincoln relied upon in the form of their philosophy. The book doesn't suggest that America is a clinical biblical country or a christian country. It does suggest that the background for a lot of the thought of the founders was in fact biblical thinking that that was the backdrop that, organically speaking, the Bible has a lot to do with the founding of the United States, because it infused everybody's thinking, and so it really can points out how that happen takes or takes foundational documents in the history of the United States in connects them. With the source text in the Bible is a really good resource. I think it's a lot of fun go check. It out proclaimed liberty throughout the land, the Hebrew Bible in the United States, a sourcebook worth worth, checking up, ok

for one more thing I like up congolese arise was questions specifically by an NBC reporter, who wanted her to suggest that President Trump has radically reduce the quality of race relations in the United States and Conny Rice who lived through segregation who watched her church firebomb. She had some words our people will say it kills worse. Now we're talking about re, Sir any advice and assured us and feel worse than when I grew up and Jim Crow Alabama selects drop this notion that were worth race relations today than we were in the past. Really that means we ve made no progress really, and so

I think the hyperbole about how much worse it is, isn't doing us any good. We still it was countries, none can be colorblind. We had the initial original sin of slavery is still with us. Ok, so what she says there is that you should put all this in perspective, which of course, is true and we can look at history and we can recognise the value of history, and we can also recognise the new free country the way for us to all get along its who live under equal protection of the laws which should have been enshrined in the fourteenth amendment in then applied by the federal government and was not for over a century afterward, but putting things in context. The media should should definitely take that under consideration term, for a quick thing that I hate so our general cause, you're grotesque. Something that we are now? What day for of refusing to acknowledge that calling detention centres concentration camps is an idiotic thing. She double down on it again yesterday. She she keeps digging eventually, she's,

and actually reach China. He's gonna dig a hole all the way through the earth you gonna hit. The molten corn keep going. Here- is a aussi once again doubling down absolutely turning as it is written academic definition intention people when the term concentration camp is about people, think of our extermination camps, thinking out, and I think we need to realise that one of the biggest lesson the problem is that it takes they promised slow, gradual process increasingly dehumanizing? This is again she's, quoting the experts, your name them explaining how many books of your running concept in concentration camps explain how this about the bore. The media will continue to defend her because they defend

anyone, but if any one on the left anyway, who is useful to them in the moment until they become not useful like Joe Biden, they are put out to pasture like energy, Robinson and Swollen green, but a policy will continue to double down, because nobody on the left will ever call her out on in its pretty impress. Even if they do cholera like tricked out and they get shall act as well. Ok, we'll be back here later today with two additional hours of content on Ben Shapiro. This is the venture Barroso, The bench of Euro show is produced by Robert Sterling directed by MIKE Joiner executive producer, Jeremy, boring senior producer, Jonathan hey are supervising, producer is Mathis Glover and our technical producer is often Stevens edited by Adam. Sigh of its audio is mixed by Michael Romena Hair and make up is by just one overall production assistant Nick. She him the bench of heroes, is a daily wire production, copyright daily? Why or twenty nineteen, because over on the mat while show today, the Democrats have decided suddenly now that Joe Biden is racist now, that's true

Why are they just noticing now, after fifty years, I also want to talk about the danger of misleading and dishonest headlines and which a scourge now an epidemic and how we can guard ourselves against it. Finally, are we putting teachers in simply impossible situation by sending them legions of poorly parents it out of control, kids, educate. I would say yes, we are we'll talk about that? Also, today, over on the mat, while show,