« The Ben Shapiro Show

The Best of 2020 - Part 2/3

2020-12-30

This is a special episode of The Ben Shapiro Show, where we take a look back at some of the best content of 2020 that we released over on the Ben Shapiro YouTube page. If you want to watch any of the content that you listen to today, head on over to YouTube.com/BenShapiro. We will be back on air January 4th! Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!

Links to the videos in this episode: 

Shocking Viral Video Alleges Voter Fraud in GA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCUGMWExksc

James O’Keefe’s Takeaway From Listening to CNN’s Editorial Meetings for 2 Months

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AxmmaRurWZ0&

AOC Releases a Set of Expensive of Expensive T-shirts to Decry Capitalism

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lfck5I05zn8

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This is an unofficial transcript meant for reference. Accuracy is not guaranteed.
Hey, hey and welcome to a special best abolition of the Ben Shapiro Show, while we're in the holiday week we'd like to bring you guys, some of the terrific content over on the bench, Shapiro Youtube Kennel, some things you maybe haven't seen before. If you normally enjoy the show exclusively on Apple podcast, Spotify, so today, administration deals with you, addressing the alleged voter fraud, video from Georgia to James O, Keefe, listen
in on CNN calls to the honourable Congresswoman a o c d twitch combat in capitalism by releasing fifty dollar sweatshirts. I hope you enjoy and also I hope, you'll subscribe over at Youtube- Dotcom, Slash Ben Shapiro for even more exciting videos. We ve got plan for twenty twenty one without further ado, let's get into our first video. So if you miss it last week, there is this shocking, a video it appeared from Fulton County Georgia. It appeared to show ballot workers taking boxes of previously uncounted ballots out from beneath the table and encounter them after the room had been cleared of election observers. The voice narrating that video is Jackie, decent lawyer and hosted the Jackie Daily show. Jackie joins us today to talk about that tape and, more importantly, most damning claims in the election for a lawsuit currently happening in Georgia right now. Jackie thanks much was running the show really free in an extra began to see a so. Why don't we start what sort of your recap of what exactly that tape was showing Onawandah Miss characterize it right. So what I did was near right. The tape for the georgian state legislature, specifically the Senate.
Showing what was happening is tat. Our marina specifically between ten p m and what I am on election night, we look there because we had affidavits from witnesses who were republican observers. Who said there was an announcement that went out to the press to do the room, saying that counting was done for the night at ten thirty. Everyone can back at eight thirty, so everyone left our observers left do they have no legal right to be present if there's no counting going on, they can't stand guard over the balance all night legally, so they left. But then there was he depressed tip that in fact, counting had continued after they left. They went back to say Barbarina when they learned, Around one o clock in the morning and sure enough, the security guard, who would let them at first but finally
There's? A negotiation took them upstairs said yeah the people just left like five minutes ago, so we went to the tape and sure enough to taking firm exactly what they told us. So we we told the legislature, ok, so the response from the Georgia Secretary of State, Gabriel, thrilling and in his office sterling heat. He suggested that well, it appears that it was true that perhaps people were told to leave there is controversy over this from from state election officials there they originally said no, nobody was totally than he said. Well, maybe people were told to leave, but then there is a state election monitor who is present the whole time. His statement is that the real question is about the ballots themselves, so in the video it appears that there are these boxes of balance that are underneath
You said two cases in the duration. They said it was a stunningly matter. Either these boxes of ballots according it to sterling there were monitors and observers were there when these ballots were originally put into the boxes, and everybody knew that was when the boxes and everything is on tape anyway. So is the allegation that these ballots, that were then process were fraudulent. What was the actual allegation about that? assessing the balance that were under the table in the boxes. The true there's, no one knows what does ballots were because even went out observers where they are in the press were there. They were kept back so far like forty two hundred feet away. They could not possibly see with those values were. This was a continuing complaint. the Republican Party all the way through early voting, all the way, election day encounters across Georgia. We had the affidavit. Our observers were not permitted to even be where they could see what is going on some of them he entered the room were behind a wall didn't even though there
we bear its nail. The spokesperson told them tat evening. So the truth is that could have all been barred from Biden, our observers, with without binoculars and without moving their angle, wouldn't know the difference. So it's came a worthless, meaningless point because we ve been complaining about this a lot. Perhaps yes, the ballots were there are packed in front of them, but to us that holds no meeting, it doesn't change that that they broke the law they cannot count the ballots without the public be permitted to view the proceedings under Georgia. You may not mislead the observers in the press. Leaving you by the way, CNN, ABC Nbc and the Atlantic or no constitution, reported that the spokesperson for the elections
told the press that they were sending everyone home or stopping counting at one thousand and thirty that night, so for the Secretary of State to claim that no one was told her to stop counting is just false. A simple google search would, but that also they said they're monitor. Was there all the time the monitor says in a back check story and in fact he didn't get there until one thousand one hundred and fifty two p dot m, that's about an hour and a half after they announced for everyone to leave. So he says him
he was not there also about twenty minutes every gets there. A deputy chief investigative officer arrives from his Secretary of State August. Why? Why would you make an announcement to the press were starving, counting a ten thirty and then send your deputy chief investigative officer, Tuesday, by Marina after midnight? I think it's because the monitor called here, but we don't know that yet but all very suspicious and the Secretary of State waiting his hands like nothing to senior. That's, like you know, it's bad checking with him is like asking him to great as a work, so I mean what are known as we would there be any waited to verify the falsehood, your fraud, the ballots. At this point I mean it turns those almost unfolds viable. Given the fact that the signature
it might or settings in Georgia the signatures are separated from the balance for purposes Van nimitti. Typically, and now the signatures have been separated from the ballots and you can't match them back up with the boats. They were with so unless the numbers didn't match, unless there were fewer signatures than ballots, for example, many be able to tell, but if this, if the numbers are the same, then there is the allegation that there could have been substitution or is there or the deed or that the original balance has submitted our knowledge it in signature, verification we have set. Allegations that hit all points that, but what I would say to you is Georgia law, where the president has to show, is not that those people, I voted for him. I had been real balance or had they been counted barely he only has to show that there were illegally counterbalance that are beyond the margin of victory. If we cannot prove if this wasn't banking system with law, with our observers, observing where the state monitor observing that we cannot prove
we're legal ballots. Therein question so is sufficient to overturn the election in the allegations that are made about this predicament him. I know there's an outstanding Georgia lawsuit. I it was originally filed last week, late Friday, not the crack and any policy which was dismissed, but the one that was those files Friday by regionally Annie and the actual Trump legal team I they had forgotten to pay some sort of filing feed their reviled it, as well as of yesterday and its now Consideration is all of this included in their lawsuit. All of it is included in a suit and actually to was going forward before we had the video based on very cut and dried points, such as about twenty five hundred dollars voted about. Sixty six thousand under age people voted about. Five thousand voters voted let Georgia, a registered in another state under Georgia law that major automatically what promoting and so much more
I would say over. A hundred thousand people are listed here illegally voted. You should not have voted and that's all present. has to show either get in your election or deserted by the current one. So have those vote actually been been tabulated, meaning that when we look at the final vote recount that has been certified by the state of Georgia and have now done, I believe three recounts of the votes but the numbers, the measuring those are included in the final vote, recounted the allegation. Hereat, ok. So what is the state of Georgia's response to all of this? And what? What's the defence been? Because if you can name the voters who are voting fraudulently and it should be pretty easy to substantiate people were registered out of state voting in the election or people who are under age? But I mean we know one people are born, I saw it what is the so far? They have responded. I we just filed it Friday night, so lets you, it happens will find out soon, because we have an expedited process because we have to deal with
It is our firm stance. So what is the timeline on this particular lawsuit, because I even folks have been fairly staunchly defensive of the georgian electoral system. Folks like Eric Ericsson down in Georgia, even he has had. This is easily the most well predicated lost, that he has seen filed at this point, and it is worthy of note that the veracity of this lawsuit has nothing to do with. Whatever is going on. Selina or Arizona. I remain in turn the elections are broadly given the fact that trumpet actually have to win Georgia and Arizona and Pennsylvania Energy in order to win the elections. When we talk about this loss, it we're just talking about proper balance being counted an improper balance not being counted, so everybody should be on the side of that. What is the path forward for the lawsuit? What's the timeline given the safe harbour provisions in Law- and it is difficult to say, the judge- has the discretion to expedite the process, which we think is almost certain until the Secretary of State as well. It gives me his ideas that he has to respond and orderly gets five days automatically, because these the state, so I'm not sure what
going to happen, you're not going to move, it might be advantageous for a judge to sit still until the time has passed the December forty deadly. Even there is the opinion of our lawyers, it still alive. We want a litigate, you the truth, no matter what, because the relieve asked for in the petition is not just about the election, it's about poor the Secretary of State to do his job and get all of these illegal people off the rolls. First of all, I think that would be in time for the second elections by the way getting these people off the rolls thou be super valuable right away, because you see our closest than it was in that endeavour. just go round and again I don't know it. It is important to recognise that a well predicated lawsuit is worthwhile here, regardless of of your political opinions about the outcome of the election, and everybody should be on board,
with a boner, frightened, but irregularity are shown the state doing its job. What why do you think it is? Obviously you had there been a lot of conspiracy theories than men put out there. I am not a conspiracy, theorist and and untenable even them about your brain camp and reference burger. The is George Secretary of State being is somehow you bought and paid for out and believe ass. If what you think is the motivation here, is it just that their defensive of the Georgia The system had they not been shown the evidence. What what do you think is the hold up here? Aren't you don't need to go as far as to say, there's a conspiracy or something on international pay off, or something like that. Really, it might be as simple as they are. Politicians just like the people is easy you when they fall under the sheriff and people Ecstacy Abrams in a democratic party capitulate in a settlement. Raymond earlier in the year that Lucifer standards for absentee balance, which is where most of the fraud is, and now they have to own what happened? They don't want to have to own
Georgians thoughts, the georgian election might have been stolen under their watch. I think is established they don't want to take a candidate for their actions or inaction and so final vital question for a jacket, decent issues. Of course, the former councils, the chairman of the US, how subcommittee on the constitution and she's a senior fellow at the Texas Public Policy foundation? So final question has been a lot of talk in republican circles about Republicans boycotting the Senate elections in January. I cannot think of something possibly more counterpart I just want to get your opinion on that piece of inanity. Nothing can be worse than a republic and stay home that guarantees a win for the Democrats. But it's just that I raised this. I have no idea Why do I would recommend that step? Even though true. There are irregularities. This is illusory. Gears process you do have a secretary of state does not do
his job, in my opinion, ethically prove that I understand, but you don't protests that by throwing away the? U S Senate, you achieve nothing. So please Georgia's show what about shoved about. Despite the imperfections you know what we have to show up and fight for that Senate. No compromises, Jackie thanks again for joining me. If you wanna hear more from Jackie decent check out, show. The Jackie Daily show its available wherever he listened to pod cast anchor. Then, let's jump into an interview I had with James Oki, for he discussed how he infiltrated CNN editorial meetings for two months was a great conversation enjoy Journey timeline is James, Oki, founder and president of Project VERITAS. On Tuesday morning he live stream, the present ceiling, just suckers nine M editorial call, and he says that he's been recording four months. These CNN internal calls and they're going to start releasing clips from the calls today at seven p M James, they should the Michelle.
Hey thanks ban that remain so first law and I can ask I got access to the cause. I assume you have somebody inside the inside the game over at sea and an obviously jump Zocor seems somewhat taken aback when he started talking to him on the conference and now she is threatening legal action against what to make of that. Well, I mean the legal action. I mean it's ridiculous and I think Jeff's, just Madame embarrassed in ought to be threatening me with a rest for reporting on the phone call be a ban. We have insider sources inside the organ, nation and that's what did the paragon of investigative reporting to have that sort of thing? So it's really ironic, there's gonna be threatening me, but definitely Jeff was shocked. To hear me tell him that we ve been recording the calls for two months and we ve been, as we ve been just releasing. Those clips last night were continually some day by day. So let's go through some of the clips that that you ve been releasing. What were the clumsy released last night for people who missed it? So there was a clip of a couple different it with her. Is Jeff Sucker himself talking about the needs?
normalize the president, the sort of lean into certain things and not cover others, there's a clip were there talking about how the nine eleven the transition in their sort of I say the transitions going to affect national security there talking about tat, Karlsson being a white supremacist. That's the General Council of Self CNN saying that foxes is the white supremacist, our and generally there's this ethos of of Jeff soccer. The present have seen which is unusual for media tee, o a media conglomerates. He ought to be directing the narrative to be telling his report is what to cover and what not to cover and as the president my own organization featuring journalists. They can tell me the story, is I'm not really directed them in that particular way cease, or to see how the sausages made on his first few clips there are seen in no way it is incredible. That CNN is so concerned objective new source by so many people, and it is very obvious that the editorial take his being driven by the top. There been rumours that Zachary is on his way out. You think he's gonna contribute I in any way to adjust sucker
from CNN Giveaway, renegotiating I do. I say that because of the reactions from CNN, they they have been doing CNN Expos aid for years, and this is the first time really reacted to it. I mean stand in corporate communications, has put out a couple statements, and he actually on the. If you watch the video me live streaming, that they were so taken, aback, in a sort of like the psychological aspects to now I that they should be transparent. I don't think they should be ashamed of anything there saying right there on those calls, but I think that their shaking in their boots and just the fact that we have hundreds of hours of recordings and going to release them a little bit of time. I akin to a December advent. Under day by day. I think that just psychologically traumatized too have sucker time, I'm not asking for you to a sort of blow up your release schedule, but what is the kind of general tenor of some of the material that you're looking to release in the coming days
something coming out today about like hundred bided in Russia, Zacharias talking about that and what to cover what not to cover. I think a lot of stuff ban is not gonna. I don't little shock people, because the Cairo on CNN already so shocking. I dont think people woe, but I do think it It gives an insight into a kind of confirmed suspicions about how the sausages made, how how the organisers, manufacturers consent to quote known Chomsky, how they, how they, how they could tell people what the narrative is, What the story is an that's, not journalism in my opinion, so I think it's important work and I hope we, hopefully it draws out more whistleblowers inside these companies to come out. Like the person who came to me inside CNN Eve had a wide variety of whistleblowers at a wide variety of these media companies. I Andy has there been more of an increase in that, given the fact that these companies become soul vertically political as in
the years me they're, always political, but these at least try to hide it yeah what the whistleblowers is now our new bread and butter adverts ass. We use that we still do undercover work but undercover weeks about it. Sesar eat? People have to be incredibly brave, almost self sacrificial to do this. They have to basically jump on a grenade. In most cases, we saw with the postal workers with election of the ballots, but does Google Facebook Twitter, in York Times there times. There are people inside these institutions that are so betrayed by by what the oath they thought they were taking when they join those networks and their even a few people reached out to me off the record to tell me that entered into and of praise what we're doing, but it's like the others Soviet union. They can't they can't ever ever say that to anyone or even publicly very James, Oki found and present a project bear, it has obviously everytime. You drop a tape. The media immediately respond by suggesting that you are selectively editing and they are caught artists. This goes all the way
to I corn back into our our days when we were both working within a bright bark. So how do you respond to the allegations that all this is basically just you taking things out of contacts in manufacturing? Why would say no name the edit Banion, oh well, when we were young, I worked together eleven years ago. You know Jerry Brown was attacking me because they acorn people didn't break the law, but that's not that many aid than they do to non sequitur and say why edited the tapes, what name specific at its name? The specific thing that we right now I will say, I didn't have to put public a correction of very rare correction in this story, because I couldn't I couldn't forgot the name of the people speaking the person that did in fact, brand Tucker thousand white supremacist was seen as General Council, I admit, labelled him because I couldn't I couldn't identify him that even makes it worse than the General Council of the organisation is saying that, but no we They can never actually name and added all journalism, is edited, select LISA. Words are arranged into sentences and art rules on newsprint? But video chat
fixes in a way that words do not, and I think and I think in this climate you we have to have video to to make Europe to illustrate our point. Otherwise, there just gonna call us lie as if we, if we use here, say or or secondhand sources. The G20 thing is the proper response of conservatives to the confirmation, Obviously, the overwhelming by it's not only in the media but also social media, you had whistleblowers from various social media companies does not become perfectly obvious that social media companies are militarizing on behalf of democratic narrative is, as they did in the country by the sword, to literally shut that thing down two weeks out from the election president Trump over the past. Forty eight hours has suggested that he might actually be do defense authorization bill unless there is some sort of section two section, two thirty: what do you think would be a good solution to the overwhelming to nanny of propaganda put forth by one sided political out here Well, I'm I'm variant, I'm very biased towards towards my own mission here, but generally, I would say, expose them. You know they did you have to the what what they fear more than anything else is being
suppose their masters of psychological projection. They accuse other people of doing the very things that they do. The New York Times did that to me when they after the attack me the Minnesota story, saying I anonymous sources, that's rich. We always show people's lips moving you can hear their voices, but then we need to expose them. We need to I think there is a psychological, if she were a lot of some people. Even the conservative movement in all day they drink from that poisoned chalice. They want to be liked by the New York Times. They dont want to be here Unbridled being hated by these people is not easy. Being justly and savagely defamed and attacked. Constantly is not an easy thing to endure and you dont escape unscathed. So I think there is like a psychological thing that conservatives have to do where they're not afraid to be defamed and attacked unfairly. By these organizations and that's what you have to endure. If you want to accomplish the mission to state admission,
revealing their bias, their malfeasance, their manufacturing consent. You have to be willing to be bishops, they attacked not fun, but I think a worthwhile cause James are key found in president of project Berytus. If you wanna help them out Helen over to project our task on line, they do accepted donations as far as a more general appreciate the time, and I think for the insight thanks man next up we're gonna play you an excerpt from the Bench Bureau show where we discussed Alexandra cause. Your Cortez is ridiculously expensive sweatshirts to decry capitalism. Capitalism always wins Alexander, o Cassio Cortez. I she is out to make a quick buck offer slogan, hearing nonsense, so one the great things about capitalism is that socialists lovemaking- author capitalism, everybody was make money off of capitalism, so our General Keyser Cortez started pitching her new line of gear. Now she's congressperson, like we are daily, where we sell your two. For example, we have a new sweatshirt revenue, sweatshirt that we're
to discuss and just one second of daily wire, but that's because that's what we do for a living and Alexander Abkhazia Cortez has our own work store. So a couple of examples from the walk store for Alexander or cause you cause you Cortez. So she has a sweatshirt sweatshirt, says TAT, the rich upon it. Ok and this new sweatshirt tax, the rich with little Elsie Slogan. Over there I mean this. Is this a great by four? You? Ok, it's available at the Un General Keyser protest or lady who its capitalism and says its export aid of an evil it is made in the United States. It is union printed is one hundred percent continent? Is a gender neutral fit its tax, the rich? It is fifty eight dollars. Fifty eight dollars, I mean. What are you so you can demonstrate? Haven't you hate capital is most
fifty eight dollars, sweatshirt tax, the richly only pursue- can afford this. Somebody's rich aged measurements are poor people who just spent like half their daily salary, minimum on on a tax, the rich sweatshirt to pitch agencies brand of bull crap. It's amazing look good for her seriously. Anybody can make a numeric, that's pretty fantastic. aunt, I did offer an alternative to tax the rich letter. By the way we decided not to go with that. We promote the different sweatshirt here, a daily wire than the one that I suggested in response to tax the reach tax. The rich was leave me alone. But we decided not to go about one here at Daily Delaware. Instead, we want with our response, which is cheaper than Elsie's garbage sweatshirt. It says insert woke slogan because I didn't will charge you for that, and I wait serves all your purposes ringing. Do all the same things at Alexandria, causing Cortez wants you to do right, can signal your support for a bunch it for a basket crappy policies. It is also one hundred percent out and it is also made in the United States. It is also a gender neutral fit and is cheaper than as he says,
she listened sweatshirt because it turns out a capitalism is always better than socialism free market strategy on the price and increase the quality text, which is not as good it's not as useful as a slogan that says Insert woke slogan because he ares its appropriate for any occasion in this interview, slogan, sweatshirt and then its black lives matter today. Those married on its change or sweatshirt wretched count its tax, the Richard eight, the matter in store where the internet works, Logan, sweatshirt and your to go again, but I just love the back and Alexander Abkhazia. Cortez critic of the evils of capitalism is selling on her website a fifty eight dollars sweatshirt. That says insight that says tat the rich, spectacular spectacular stuff, but that was not that doesnt, the only stuff that that Elsie is selling on our website she's also selling a t shirt is a t shirt of herself. It is an imitation of a painting called the Green called. Why
Weather above a sea of fog. This is a very influential romantic era, painting in which you showed originally a man standing on a rock looking over a sea of fog, and the basic idea was that enlightenment ideals could allow man to scale the heights and then survey the vistas, so Alexandria, Ocasio, Cortez being her own biggest man has now commission a painting of Alexandria cause your Cortez standing on That's him rock looking out o re beautiful Vista, like the cover of the Pocahontas, VHF, and, above all it says the green new deal that one will only cost you twenty seven dollars, so you can love Elsie nearly as much as he loves Elsie for just twenty seven dollars. They also she has put out a great teacher princes student debt, but its cross out. That's all that he should as it first of all, he could get his point. Seven bucks on Amazon should be real about that. It is like the cheapest t, shirt in history and produces one color does now multi colors on any case,
It's a student that but its crossed out with a black line. So instead of paying back your suit and that, instead of saying that twenty seven dollars and paying down your dad and being responsible person since you voluntarily took out the debt in the first place inside, you could give Elsie's campaign twenty seven dollars to promoter, bull crap and never pay back you're student loans. That sounds awesome. That's. Not even the most expensive item in the ABC market is the most expensive item. Is this extraordinary sweatshirt from Alexander Lukashenko has just wonderful, sweatshirt social, economic and racial justice k that those are just words? Thank you for that social, economic and racial justice, Elsie
all able to our cost you to demonstrate how virtuous you are by wearing a sweater. That's a social, economic and racial justice. All it will take. You is a sixty five dollars. Nothing says economic justice and social justice expending sixty five dollars on a sweatshirt, nothing that is stellar stellar stuff. The entitlement mentality of the very critics of capitalism who then use capitalism in order to make bucks is pretty it is pretty spectacular stuff and the self pitying nature of all of this is also pretty spectacular. Elsie Caesar subsidies, messianic figure inside the Democratic Party she's going to push for hoping. Engine Barack Obama, true fashion, but she also really pities herself a lot so last night she tweeted out the thing conservative centres don't seem to understand. Is that actually had a physically difficult working class job without good healthcare? Most of my adult life, I bring that work ethic.
And my community, they sit around another chairs all day ass. She had a tough guy cancer. She was waitress, so might at work in a restaurant for twenty years twenty years and most of the people, whose friends with or waiters and waitresses in that is in fact difficult job and guess what a huge number of Republicans did not start off his entered. He actually, you know who has been sitting in a leather chair. all day. Nineteen. Seventy three Joe Biden, Joe Biden, was elected to Senate in nineteen. Seventy three you may want to direct our elsewhere. Also, quick, note uneasy. You gotta love a political incoherence of Alexandria across it. What has calling for Medicare for all? she's, I shouldn't have healthcare right that she's had a physically difficult working class job without good healthcare, most of her adult life, our general cause, your presence there she's thirty one years old, thirty one right. That means that in two thousand ten, I think her birthday. I look this up yesterday for purposes of the sweet. I believed that her birthday, why is some time in October? I think so she's
We want yours old. That means that she was twenty one November past. I thought oh Bonnac Arizona solve all our problems. Guys I've thought about here was the greatest thing, never happen healthcare. She has been her entire adult life living under the auspices of amateur. So what are you talking about? You doesn't have health care. I thought oh bombing are solved all the problems, the subtle slap it brought out of their Elsie. Ok, in any case, is this coalition capable of being held together? I don't think so. I think that's real problems inside that coalition, thanks for tuning into this special episode of the bench appear or show we back on air on January forth, in the meantime had on over to daily, where it comes slash, subscribe to not only listen but also to watch every single episode of the bench appear or shall we had and twenty twenty see an exterior
Transcript generated on 2020-12-30.