Well, I'm not live right now because of the jewish holiday of chevelle. But here's the thing when you subscribe a daily wear to come. You get an additional hour of content of my show every single day. Here's a bit of a taste of that right now so apparently Joe Biden is mostly mad at this point, because no one tension him inside the white house, which is really had a sad and also where is Nbc news has piece it entitled inside a bite in white house adrift its adrift guys it's not that he's about leader, it's that it's just adrift, face with a worsening political predicament. President Joe Biden is pressing aid for a more compelling message and a sharper strategy while briskly how they practice staple the plain speaking persona that has long been one of his most potent assets. I love this of it so much because this is his politicians in a nutshell, right take responsibility, they they literally run for the office like. Why is everyone failing me? Why so Joe Biden is a horrible communicator? Can barely gotta sends out of his face in his face whole just started

sound, and when the sound comes out it makes no sense and then he's like. Why aren't my aids allowing me to say what I want to say this room. You do my words as ever. there is? What did you say? Why don't you? Let me watch only be jolly well. If we do do. It just sounds as though you are spewing mashed potatoes from your face all, but our water would cover our dear and you should some of them blows along other? It's your better business of the region. The regional railings cause you're bad it there's, no, not that it must be because they I am unable to craft more compelling message. Ok, I have a question: could the best pierre second of unplanned earth. Crafty compelling message for Joe Biden is that possible. There's just no way, I'm sorry, you can't sell coke. It doesn't matter how good american department is yet ain't selling new coke. It ain't happening. according to NBC news item, is

by his sinking approval ratings and is looking to regain voters, confidence that he can provide these sure handed leadership. You promised during the campaign people close the president say what's it the thing that sure handed leadership? Typically, if I wouldn't want to you behind the wheel of a car in a crowded area, I also don't think that you're going to be able to provide sure handed leadership to the country. What about you, and says sure handled leadership at this point is this: stumbling in the walls. He doesn't know where he is half the time. He says things. It makes no sense. Slurring, his words routinely and he's not drunk like. I don't good luck with this mission, aids and in other and other missions, if you can come with cold fusion approach that help the administration like as losers, like going from possible things that might help Biden once you that crises have piled up who is that of times made the vine weight, has look flat footed. I will help that the the media always pose. This is,

in one of these exhaustion is crises that just sort of randomly crop up, while Joe Biden's present weird how that works right is very weird and sort of how, like whenever Amelia is in the house, just things get screwed up randomly is willing to Amelia bethulia being an idiot. It has to do with the fact that, like You know when she draws the curtain she actually just rosa. Let that happen happened to her. It wasn't a thing she did Christ have piled up in ways that are times may divide and white. Has the flat footed record inflation. High gas prices are rising, provocation, numbers and now the schoolmaster. That is one more horrific reminder has been to get congress to pass legislation to curb gun violence No leaders are lost loss. How he can revive his prospects by november over Why, and here is a james kleiber was endorsed twenty twenty primaries help rescue binds candidacy, but I do the full members of stuff where they are for far too long inflation is turning Biden, could shake up the west wing staff. Although that's not about to happen right away.

Multiple people close to the white house to divert chief of staff run claim will depart at some point after the midterms one has heard him discuss, leaving should claim a potential successor is needed done. Man, that's that ain't gonna. Do it done working at the white house at the start of the term then left in return in early may Biden, specific request. No one a person of color has ever been. The white has chief of staff, since the position is clear, it after world war, two, while I'm in trouble, had a pretty close top political adviser named kelly, economizing recall, but ok other part and it wasn't valerie journaling super tight with with morocco anyone other power. we're replacements, included seaver, shoddy longtime Biden. Aid was council, the president susan rice, domestic policy, chief cherry mccall of, is now speaking. white house about taking a senior role as an adviser to the president chairing the collar. So you're you're solutions, giant failure is to take the former governor of Virginia, was the head of the dmz and somehow lost the governors.

The virginia glenn Jan kin, and make that guy the guy slow clap for the geniuses over at the democratic party in the white house. Well, being That is a list of luminaries right. There are needed on the who is most famous for putting it a male ornament on a christmas tree during the binary, During the obama administration and susan who is most famous for benghazi and terminology, is most famous for losing the Glen young can geniuses. Why does not make clean or done available for common ranks, spends most of his day, proposing bad palsied Biden, then retweeting as recline. That's that's! Basically, what his day looks like it's like eight tonight, proposed bad policy, Joe Biden, ninety midnight retweet as recline. Any assessment of binds performance needs to take into account the epic challenges you face from the start. I love that said that, by the way that has not been even at the usual I'll fire experts say an expert. say that you have to take into account all of the crises that he is,

is it does NBC news is objective coverage. Anyhow it's been a Biden's performance needs to take into account the epic challenges you face from the start. Weird, I don't remember them saying that about actual coven and from being hit with that, then it was from blowing knows how many americans are dying, Joe Biden, tuna the two hundred thousand americans die on your watch and you ought not be present the like seven hundred thousand americans zion is the watches, because matlock Chris cripple the author of a new book about the white house. Chiefs of staff is writing a book. Wet Biden presidency says they came in with most Launching sort of challenges, arguably, since empty, are only to be hit by a perfect storm of crises from ukraine too. the supply chain to baby formula? What's next locusts? Oh, give me fricking break. You ran for the office man. You wanted this that's not even true the ukraine This did not exist when you took office. Created by pulling out of afghanistan and looking softer putin.

The inflation crisis did not exist before you took office. You exacerbated by blowing out the spending and autonomy drone pal about loose monetary policy, since when He had the easiest runway, honest to god. He had the easiest landing strip, I've ever for an incoming presidential candidate. I said this at the time he was coming in with a calm with within it enemy they didn't put into an involuntary coma artificial com. I was going to come out of it. He had a vaccine an american people were exhausted by politics. I had to do was just sit down and shut up and be dead, which was decrees mandate and he couldn't do it, but now it's like why cat wide, while these bad things keep happening to Joe Biden. I just can't imagine he's up out of the job or anything just what white? What is it here, that the it's weird that we keep having these nuclear radiation risks in homer simpsons workplace. Why is all happening column simpson.

And wondered the same thing. I've heard him say recently he used to say about the president: obama senor everything, landowners, despot, locusts and now he understands how that feels. Whitehouse official said. Amid a rolling series of calamities binds feeling latelies you just can't catch break, ah poor baby. Ah, you can catch a break, guys be nice to old, Joe Mimi, ate all human to do is just be your friend and you won't be nice to Joe B. to Joe Biden is frustrated not one thing: it's and others in a person close to the president, whose name the president at last part I added an assumption, begged and binds candidacy was that he would preside over a smoothly running administration by dint of decades of expense, in public office, but there's managerial breakdowns than of anger, both him and his party everyone's failing it, Madam, I do love the idea that he's wildly incompetent entire senatorial career neurons. A couple real crappy Central campaigns then like disguise next, but he's been here forever. Bobbin, accounting, you'd better for thirty five years, must be graded. This

or maybe bob was never made head of accounting as he sucked it. This, maybe that's the problem. item is annoyed. He wasn't alerted sooner about the baby formula shortage and they got his first briefing in the past. Even though the crisis has been long and making the white house did not spare fi, when buying got his first briefing on a formula shortage beyond policy is the best part and his unhappy about a pattern that has developed inside the west wing, a clear and distinct statement. Only tab, aids, to explain. You actually meant something else. The so called clean up in his told advisers, undermines him as mothers, the authenticity that fuels his rise. Worse fiji republican talking point is fully in command. Is the best part? I love that so much so he's out he's hasn't actually incoherent, with significant costs once this individual, like Pretty sure you mean that they have Are you undermine me? I mean exactly crazy looney thing I just said what I say. I can't remember.

The issue came to a head when, by an ad lib during his speech in poland, the russian president, Vladimir Putin, cannot remain in power within minutes. they tried to walk back his comments, saying I think for bonds, removal in the? U S, palace was unchanged. Biden was fury. You re, for being seen as unreliable argon. He speaks genuinely and reminding him that he's the one who is president. So does he mean that he does one putin remove office, because, if that's what he means That is a radical shift in american policy. and might lead to nuclear war. So it feels like that. Walk back was probably not a bad thing Yeah randomize my fruit mazato guiche avenue. why don't? We will take me to ramble, wiser ruin other nazism and super clear, like chauvinism, category a burden and then ok, mountains, our policies on change, its undermining a credibility issue and that geniuses

Biden has vented to age, about not getting credit from americans or the news media for actions. He believes and help the country, particularly on the economy, Plenary have dropped below four percent appalling indicates. Most americans believe the economies in bad shape. Biden republicans aren't getting their share of the blame for legislative gridlock. Well, I mean you, do have a majority in both hasn't Congress did. The president, also says, he doesn't think of democrats. Go on tv to defend him made. Who does this sound, like you, sound like we were told that the adults were back in charge and are not people spend all day watching cable news and about everybody's mind them it all. You knowledge, widened using adult melick donald trump than that A bad man, Donald trump spend all day, just watching the tvs and and then putting up was the ideas and having his age walk it back in and not getting. Things don t be totally different. a particular source by his slumping pull members he's mystified. His approval rating has dropped to a level approaching that of his predecessor. Donald trump, you know,

and from me really twisted about another person close to the white house said, may because he's a worse president, then from I know, blasphemy It happens to be the reality so good times I think burning primary and can be great unnatural, and have. Meanwhile, our the north have decided on full scale tyranny. So if you didn't agony, introduce plan was, if you didn't like it, when you froze your bank account because you didn't like our covered lockdown you'll love it. We take away your guns according to vaccines. dont come and prime minister just inferno- announced on Monday, his government introducing legislation to implementing national freeze on all hands on ownership throughout the country. On ownership What this means. It will no longer be possible to buy, sell, transfer or import hindrance anywhere. In canada. We read Now the vast majority of gunnar is used them safely and in accordance with the law but other than using fire him for sport shooting in hunting. There's no reason. Anyone in canada should need guns in their everyday life.

It is amazing. How, though the left internationally has now decided of defence is not the reason. Only done Literally, the only reason I own a gun, I'm not a hunter sports writer and a gun for self defense. That is all that is the entire list of reasons, but only that no one in Canada needs a gun ever for self defense ever he's going to bed, I mean he's getting all hand on transfers, but events, we're just gonna be seizing the guns will not. I mean the answer: is yes, canadian minister of public safety, marceau mendocino, Marco mendocino, said a man we buy that programme for assault style weapons will go no effect later this year. be australia right, your mandated, and if we, find that you have a gun in your home, you'll prison. We find a jail air fifteen's. Another assault style firearms will start to be bought, backed by the end of this year. It's gonna be harbour, we're gonna get it done, Fifty five thousand new handguns registered annually in canada over the last decade, according to mendocino, so

Well, I mean if you think this is what the left in america Didn't have designs on the same thing: you're wrong Why have articles in the washington post, sang quote, devolved Shooting stirred something in him, so he gave up his gun for years. Even as mass shootings swept the country richer, small bristled than any talk of tetragon restrictions, but then sixty eight rolled retired highschool, history teacher saw a photo of one of the young victims involving and they drove his way drove ninety minutes from the ranch- and and then he decided that he was going to drive it to local to have an interest in his gun, which is because he's not the one who shot anybody or is going to shoot anybody If I mentioned it, is the jewish holiday of chambord towards we're, not live right now, but there's all sorts of content. You ve never heard, because I had to pay while you should go to daily wire dot com and subscribe right now, here's some of the interview that I recently did with Douglas Murray Jordan. mine, is Douglas murray, associate editor of the spectator based

in britain. His latest publication is the war on the west, in which douglas talks about how the western cultural lead had been undermining undermining the district. The traditions that made the west great in the first place douglas writes talk to you There is great structures. While I met you stingy from america, our that's it that's excite stuff. So, first of all, welcome too. temporarily for your country than Britain, as temporarily sums that things are moving in the wrong direction in pretty much all of these countries. there'll be a backlash and why we start with where stan? So now I will, may I have become a little bit more of an optimist about where the west is going over the court, last year and a half because the left has lost its mind. So much that it seems like a backlash is brewing. What where you think we are. Are you more optimistic or pessimistic anywhere say a year and a half ago? I'm definitely slightly more optimistic as you are, but I don't point I make and won the west is that there has been this insane attempt to war on. All of us

days in the western democracies, a war on our religious traditions of the software traditions, our historical traditions attempt to pull down every single one of our euros in the west that sometimes literally a war on our culture and cause. Crucially- and this is This is why we really get the outbreak of war on the peoples of the west is, in my view, is it if you tried to tell any group of people in a society, they are evil from birth, but they have nothing to be proud of, but they can never escape their birth and art to be condemned for all eternity. It'll be highly unlikely. You could persuade a minority population of that, but here's the thing when it comes to white people in the west know why people are a majority in america. Now, madam, if in the u k, so why would a majority agreed to go along with that one

the majority agreed to go along with what the ten these young genoese about those of our age a telling them, which is, if you are born white, your born evil you're born uniquely guilty. Everybody else is a kind of saint, your as perpetual sinner, and the best thing you could do with your life is so it'll through without anyone noticing and atoning crowded. Why would a majority population go along with that, and I think the answer some critical point is they won't? want a more reasonable estimation of their own past their own present, and everybody else is so why we start with them. Yet, as you discuss the backlashes is beginning, but why did so many people go along with this So long because again never makes candy is a well respected public intellectual in the united states by the fact that he is neither in intellectual norton be well respected. I end technical Hannah jones or sixty nineteen projects been promoted to the tune of little, tens of millions of dollars by the new york times.

She still unemployed than your time. She apparently rights, maybe one piece every couple of years for them, it's pretty incredible and knowing tat you see, you ve seen all of their four of nostrums now mirrored in the top levels of american government. You have the bad administration openly saying things like equity should be in future. in every element here, what we do, and by equity they mean Avram ex candy style, anti racism act of discrimination on the basis of race. You see that! supreme court? Now many in the united states unable to explain what a woman is so Why has it worked for so long. This is one reason why I spend my time- america about this- because america's clearly be the now the net exporter of bad ideas around the world, I very sites

That is why problem out configured, somebody recognise that america has been a net importer of bad ideas from their confidence in the past is not exporting bad idea. You mentioned people like me, call hannah giants of the sixteen nineteen project, one of the many people I'd try to take apart piece by piece. The open this book hesitate. You just mentioned by trade, ban that public intellectuals ice dispute that the private intellectuals. Why do I say that festival to be a public intellectual? Above all, agree the nordic than other intellectuals there's a matter to be public? Intellectual you'd have to contest your ideas in the public sphere, as you do as I do. As many other me, left right. Most of these people will never debate. Candy will never debate. As you know, at Nicole, how urgent will not debates there are men. Historians in the. U s, you picked up on all the mistakes. Google arrows and nickel halogens makes. Will she debate them? Of course, not so there's one more thing:

to be a public intellectual you'd have to actually be willing to debate your ideas in front of the public. These people out. Why do I also said a private intellectual because they are all wafted up through private corporations and and often sadly, public ones, but there are effectively create creatures of a small title of of advancement programme. In the case of of ten differences, he ends up holding a chair, a boston university, only previously held by elly these out the holocaust survivor nobel prize winning, also many new men. Many great books like night candy has done nothing like this because I had a jones is all about wit, which will only see will get macarthur awards. They will get a second element university chairs, but none of them are willing to contest their ideas. So what's happened is a fact.

Give me a small number of private non intellectuals. I've been wafted up in america with ideas that have not been contested, but his advantage. They have a terrific cudgel in their hands, a back to beat everybody with the same remorseless weapon they consistently use, which is the charge of racism. If you don't like Nicole Hannah jones is what is not because it sloppy as it is, is not because it's basically made up in part as it is, is not an attempt to completely rewrite the american story, so that is not a story of heroism, but one an unbelievable.

Guilt and awfulness. It's not just that. It's the fact that if you can test any of these things, they would say you are racist and currently in american public life. Quite understandably, nobody wants to be accused of racism. These people over used the term and they use it against everyone, and anyone who criticise is unsafe, got away with smuggling racism back into public life in the form of anti white racism which These people excel act so Douglas egon talk in the war in the western there on the west about the need in decisions had been attacked by these members of the radical left. Those institutions rain from things like the ability, who'd you reason and have conversations to the church. What do you think holds all of that together? because it really is is sort of incredible spectacle. At the same time, they are saying that we cannot accept any of the traditional wisdom of the past are also said. We can't use reason as as a guide. So your left a pretty much nothing any you can always make knows that that be the sort of rest

analysts in the nineteenth century, who are anti religion. There are anti religion because they are rationalist. Now you have irrationalism. The twenty first century are arguing against both rationalism and also traditional religion. It's kind of amazing, I mean one of one of the things I tried to demonstrate in the book is: is it's it's, it's ward on absolutely everything. As you said, it's was. This is a war against our religious tradition and articulate tradition said the judeo christian religion comes in for assault, but so does the tradition of closer mundane light and when some trees and a much more so, if need be, the same reason is said to be a white supremacist thing. So the mathematics is said to be a white supremacist, correct answers or a white supremacist thing. smoke with their several anxious to know. The first is simply that the disease, is there is nothing left in the end, the public landscape, except for this set of crimes.

chief smuggled in recent years. There is nothing left to explain anything other than this new religion that I say the churches are basically going along with the new religion of equity diver, diversity, inclusion, equity that they know. I give remorse as examples of them doing this in america and across the western world. Their bases sold one religion to take up enough of the religion of candy as an anti racism and so on. But another thing is, and, as you know, there's a section of the book on on what is very revealing the people they don't do this to. Currently, everybody in our past, particularly in america, has been subjected to the same attack because of living in a time on racism existed living at a time with slavery or cologne.

Listen, existed and using words, and I ought to pay with ideas that we were not used today. Well, here's the thing is, I say my section about look at Karl Marx, Karl Marx, as I show in his private and public writings, was a vicious racist by contemporary standards because ambitious anti semite he was a. He withdrew They will appalling views on slavery, colonialism and much more. Only last year a new statute, Karl Marx, went up in germany paid for by the chinese communist party. It should be mentioned that why don't we do this with marks? Were, I think, there's a very revealing and proof here, which is that one of the things that are going on is that people want to tear down every here, except, for instance, the call not because they think he's going to be used for as he would be within trying to smuggle back in the same reprehensible

they spent the last century and more trying to smuggle into my life if they don't bring down marks lightly port down thomas jefferson for the same reasons glitter owner? Well, what what will we not interested in it with him because he's a figure we admire? Well, here's something we admire jefferson. We in my washington we admire lincoln. We dont look to me their views on race. We look to amend admire because of their extraordinary foresight, their heroism, their ability to come up with the greatest country on earth. I'm indicates the founding fathers unit. We don't look to them because we want to look at their private, let's see where they once the slaves. So I think we reveal an enormous about in the fact that this unbelievable remorse, this exercise is done on everyone, except for a few far left this year as well. I think we should play at them as well. If you wanna play the context of your time, think shore well

relates to everybody: retirement douglas murray. His latest book is the war on the west indies out this week's douglas. What what for meeting the backlash is? Gonna take their a couple of weeks, that sort of and put out there one is these or john stuart mill, classical liberal, libertarian form where everybody just basically goes weapons. And while each other alone, you live your life. I live my life. I end, it seems like that is now taking a vaccine to aid almost more traditionally conservative european conservative field, which is you guys, are not the weapons down. We dont trust you to go weapons down. I answer We are going to start using some of your own methods against you until you either surrender or in the case of some say, more passionate advocates, indisposition, say that even in a vacuum mood use, these new sort of arguments so to take sort of a fixed point what's happening in florida right now. With regard to disney organs, it really interesting arguments I think happening on the right over this there's classical liberals who say no no disney should be able to say what it wants to say and run. This answers should basically leave them alone. Then their people, like me,

taken the positions of mutually assured destruction. The left, his has basically weapon ized corporate amerika against, All of these traditional institutions- they ve done so through government, elections in government laws and engines over the course of decades, and so I'm not happy with going after corporations for speech, but the speech disney had rung out of it by the democrat media. Complex was not speech that doesn't even I need to do in the first place and so no incentive structure created on the other side, then there incentives structure and the other side's. We can go back the status quo ante and then there are the people who are a sort of the more passion

european style conservatives, you say well, even if the left one pushing this, we should basically punish corporations four types of speech that we don't like, because they're tearing wit social fabric. What form of backlash do you think he's gonna be most likely here? I can't you to take the case of florida is the very usefully ground I dont actually think, but but but what science is done is in any way wrong, because, because that is, as you know, about, the disney was enjoying advantages in florida already. So, if it'll take a corporation, enjoys tax and other advantages in a state and then uses its position to level political allegations of out false against that state other than the state has the right to take away the advantages that disney owns. If there were any other company that did it, you'd say the same. I think night and ass. You I'm a bakery or anything else, but enjoyed a particular stages advantage and then decided to become a political activists and war against the government of a stage should in any way be given a kind of gold

beat be allowed to retain an advantage because of it. As you mentioned, these entities have become political actors just perfectly reasonable to say, we would like to have a public square where large entertainment corporations and sound did not become pilot galactics. But if you do there is a price to pay for it. Now I would prefer it if that was a reputational price that was based ground on the inner. As I have done, you know. If I see it and it happened to me, the other day were swimming serve. As I said, if you ll drop greater disney is any five bucks month. Click here that is easier, stand decision of the year. For me, I do not want disney's content. I didn't really want it very much anyway

I really don't want it now. I think the same thing as we know is happening with netflix. Just it's gone intolerably awoke from one direction and I'm just not interested in it anymore. The subscription cancellation beckett, a bird, but but that's that's where I'd prefer it to come from I'd, prefer it to be a bottom. You just the market, Bixby expresses itself but where there are, as I say, with disney unfair market advantages already. I see no reason why government should take about italy. As I say, we go right hosting from an away this thing: a private individuals who gets to get wafted

I dont know why, but the new york times thinks it has the right to re write the date of american stand back, but it thinks it does. I am very happy to have that debate out in public square. As I say, the debate offers about are not it's. The new york times is presented as the position. They should be able to argue that position. They have the right truck. That's it. I also think them out the people's right to ignore them as a result. That's where I'd like you to happen, but, as I said there are, there are cases like disney when is a clear advantage,

They become this black and politicians should be shy about about responding in kind. What we do with the legacy medium relation, but I think, is another question because effectively legacy media and b and envy platforms like twitter and now in a sort of death batch and again the problem is we have institutions that are not what they say. They are in a twitter pretended through the public square except, but it isn't instagram to contend with a proper public square. It isn't bees, so I do think, there's a backlash. I think I would like to see it reasonable and most of all, I would like to see it as a backlash not of one side trying to kill and hurt the other, but a recognition that we will have to live in the same country. We will have to be able to do to get along at some level and the best

well to get along. That is. The aim is to have some common understanding about our ports and in the case of america, it is, if you decide to fundamentally rewrite, are passed. We will not go along with that and I think the open. your mother Democrats would agree with that position. We can agree to mitigate real litigate slavery, as if the united states has never done this before we can, go to that and have a reasonable discussion about what was known, but wasn't what what what is, what is not tolerable is to lie about, become, lie about. The founding figures have become like any. I wonder where a key catching out these figures doing mccall haven't you. and her colleagues lie about the founders of this country and Abraham, extending like a cat ass? He calls himself I catch him out in his book. He lie is about thomas Jefferson. He doesn't know this because he hasn't even read the letter that he refers to. Reality shows resources, but I dont think these people should be allowed to

get away with lying about this country because that's what causes the division? as surely as it would if the bright invented a new form of history about america or pretended that slavery had never existed, or something like that, you know the reasonable position of a country is to be able to look at itself in the round the neurons Who left wants the push should be one america of america, but is not a view of american history in the room it says, only america did slavery flat out false. everybody in the world was doing slaving. You know the biggest slave trade. As I say the book, the biggest slave trade would not the transatlantic slave trade. It was a slave trade of people being taken east from africa.

The arab slave trade. You know why nobody knows about the arab slaves, among other things, because the eighteen million people taken to the arab countries, the mails, were all castrated. That was actually a genocide that was going on, whilst america and on european country were involved in the transatlantic slave trade said these people who try to force a false narrative on america of america's own alleged sins are pushing a story, but his unfair uneven unequal, totally unrepresentative totally lacking in context, and they are telling the american people in america is not unique to good but uniquely evil and its flat out false and its high time. These people were pushed back the book again is in the war on the west Douglas murray. Is the author dollars final For you know you look at the way that the left has been reacting to the backlog, against it and they seem like they are just really why often they in their echo chamber. They seem completely unable to grasp the fact that a lot

working just or not into this mean Joe Biden entered office with a sixty some presentable rating he's the thirties now and yet he can't seem to shift. Courson seems like the left. That is true. Nearly across the board left seems unable in in france in Britain newly anywhere to shift course to, of course correct here. So what do you think that bodes well? I think they hope, but they wouldn't have to close to the public with their ideas. I actually faintness was part of the mistress of the crew A flaw in the plan. I say this about the critical raised very hucksters their date made. They generated this idea as you well know, but they generated

I don't wanna bet they came up with this ludicrous unworkable play. The not bury the claims and and the fact that fund tested thing about it is it didn't it didn't out, live its first meeting with the public in american parents found out that their children are being told that if your white, your evil as well, that ferry may have worked when Kimberly Crenshaw cover working about what it out on american camps. It didn't work when you try to shove it on the school children and kindergartens didn't work on its first meeting with the american public, so this is a very useful paper. The radical left worked on all of these areas, including the equity stocks. It doesn't work whenever it actually makes the general public. That is a fantastic signs optimism. They are going to continue to try to try to maintain this cathedral of home

ideas? They have erected and are going to try to keep pushing it, and they will try to find ways to circumvent the public so that they will have commissions on it. We will have they they wouldn't they will set. They will try to, as the by demonstration has look at things like reparations without having to go to the public with the actual, the actual horrible monstrous. The idea that trying to trying to impose on us, so I think we agree with their hope- is they don't have to confront a big migrate hope making. Our great hope is that the public does feel confronted and a public has a much bigger voice. Then this minority of radical activists. The crucial thing is that the majority that but the public need be armed with the facts when they meet these hucksters and these extremists, and that's one things I tried to do in my book. Gonna on the public, with the

with the facts, but correctly portray our own history, our own past and our own reasons for your pride in it. It has doubtless Murray his book is the war unless doubtless congratulations on the boat again thanks much would bring show such pleasure. Thank you. I wish they were not live right now, but here's the thing is elsewhere to content. You haven't heard on the bench: shapiro show because you're, not a subscriber, if you were, you would have heard this segment of the male bad, our rights but the whole abortion may raging across the country. I was wondering what your position is on ivf, from fertilisation on a strictly secular pro life position. I know some sex of orthodox duties and allow for the procedure. Yeah. That's right, I mean so in vitro fertilisation- is pretty controversial in the polar community because, of course, You are creating embryos only today the embryos, and that is a serious problem, breach mere your creating an independent human life with potential and then you're just discarding it. That looks a lot like. an abortion, so my position on in vitro fertilisation has always been that you should if you're going to use ivf

only fertilized the number of em as the you're willing to carry to term. So you shouldn't fertilize twenty embryos, big the two that are best genetically and then implant those and then discard the rest. If you are willing to carry through determined. Then implant, three and four lies three. So much more friends of procedure, but also most protective of human life, and that that's known perspective on either everything, that's generally a fair pro life perspective as well as long as you are creating embryos, knowing your to destroy them or destroying embryos that have been created for no purpose other than you don't have anything to do with them, I, then then you and violated pro life precept evans has, in light of the elite. prim court decision. I've been trying to wrestle with the often use exceptions to abortion like rape, insist and help the mother I'm a cradle catholic and firm prologue believer. However, the exception people site health of the mother has been struggling with this idea to be clear. I am not along with the idea of being for life, but there should be any exception to the prelates dance at all. They have worked

way through. Why ribbon in such a manner and abortion should still be prohibited in those circumstances, no matter how terrible the underlying facts may be. However, if the tree, between the mother, not having a high chances revival or carrying the baby to term. I feel like that is valid exception to the rule you know your thoughts about what, if there should be any exceptions to the pro life stance of pretty much all pro lifers believe. If the mother's life is endangered, not health life is endangered. Then you should be able to. You should be able to abort, and if you have a case in pretty much disadvantaging vanishingly small number of cases there. They haven't worldwide, where this is the case of too many, albeit at this point about this particular type visit is almost never that can make the big basically, there's. No reason why you have to board nor to preserve the wife and mother, barring some sort of extraordinarily, where circumstance, but to me that our the gates, assuming that, for example, in a year being in the olden days, maybe get stuck on the way out, and so either mom

going to die or baby is going to die or mom and baby are going to. The general public position has always been the preserve the life of the mother. If you have to preserve the life and mother by killing the baby that that that has been the position of Of our most major religions as well, so that that's not really a exception, as in understanding that, if only one per He's going to emerge from this, and one is the radium one is mom, then typically underprivileged the stance of the ideas that you can performed abortion there, but that that's widely accepted and provide circles that some controversial in it railway isabel says hey? Mr Shapiro? My name is as I live in florida. I heard you recently welcome to and sunshine stay where I was born and raised and artistic, the very mildly also deeply religious has wondering what would you like those they disability or with a narrow, logical disorders. You know personally thanks my christian faith. I don't allow my disability to stop me from getting an education from getting a job and from living in full and happy life. Thank you, MR shapiro protection me not to be too. by my circumstances, into rise above adversity. I say: that's that's heroic stuff right. There was an

I think everybody has challenges. Alot of those challenges are biological or genetic in origin and understanding. challenge exist. Does not relieve of the burden of having to face down the challenge. The life is filled with those sorts of challenges. Some people have physical challenges physical disability? Some people have mental challenges and we have emotional challenges and Those challenges and high face those down find his human beings, something viktor Frankl wrote about in man, search for meaning he said you and holocaust. You still have the choice of how to react to the circumstances surrounding you in maritime people, literally locked into concentration camps and then occasionally shot or gassed, or more than occasionally, and how you react that still provided a measure of freedom according to viktor frankl. That is true, even if the the limitation on your freedom is coming from inside the housing coming from your own biology, rather coming from some sort of external force since, as I have a constitutional question for you interrelated opinion, question first, is our current vietnam,

system unconstitutional based on article one section, ten clause, one of the constitution no state shall four into any treaty alliance are confederation, write letters of marking, reprisal coin, money amid bills of credit, make anything but gold and silver twenty tender and payment of debts has any bill of attainder ex post facto or law, impairing the obligation of contracts or grant any title of nobility because there is no state shall do it. So the idea here is wouldn't have a separate california currency by that in the federal government can issue currency again that that sort of better restriction is placed on this aids is not place. On the federal government goal, there was to prevent states from twenty Their own currency and undermining the us dollar, for example. Second question: do you think a good thing. If we got back to a gold standard now the country could we do this, so the idea of sort of soft standard, whether dollars actually tied to the value of gold makes a lot of sense to me going back something white bretton woods makes him sense to me Gold standard is a little different. The hard gold standard was the idea that you could literally take your money and go up to the counter and trading in your dollar for aid and out of gold order. That's been

We call on the united states since, after It seems to me that we don't have enough gold on hand to actually make that happen any more but pegging the value of the dollar to some sort of hard asset as opposed to the fiat currency. We gradually inflate. The dollar two point we're over the course of fifty years. You ve lost nearly all of the value of the dollar. You put the bank that seems more solid to me. It seems more predictable to me it's less flexible, There's an economic shock. It means the government can inflate its way out of the problem or come in interest rates so as to cool down right up the economy, but it also Instead of your business person, you have a lot of predictability in the markets, which was the case in favour of the gold standard. Williamson with rubber assembly being overturned in. What is that battleground in the fight for life. Have to mobilise movements and each state, or is there still a federal arguments we had, for example, the fourteen amendments in equal protection run kgb Return is a great victory. Another war isn't over so unimpeded the level you could theoretically move towards reinterpretation of the fourteenth amendment legal protection clause. Saying unborn people are protected under the equal protection clause.

that's the judicial movement. I would have to take place. The move that you'd like to see from Robert george from Princeton, for example, is big advocate of this sort of thinking. The extension of the fourteenth amendments cover the unborn as far as the most immediate possible action, that's all gonna happen at the same level, shrewdness movements inside states to push for more of abortion was that's largely gonna have to take place in purple states. so states that are more evenly divided states like flora, its low you're gonna get it full scale. Abortion ban in the state of florida insurgency, a gradual pairing back of abortion in the state of florida network. Life is going to have to put most of their effort in facing them. Maybe it's a foregone conclusion that they're just can go pro life in illinois, it's for one conclusion there. Just gonna go completely proportion but allow the purple states its very unclear which direction they are going to do. Already reached the end of today's. It shall would becker live tomorrow. This venture yoga