Every one I've talked to who said that used to be a liberal. Who then became conservatives voted for tromp or are just you know, no longer part of the world culture whenever it was because they started doing their own research? Is our reading? Does the quotes they started watching the video and so while social media may create incentives for people to create a push, cancel culture and exacerbate the problem. It also creates opportunities. The political bias of legacy media becomes more and more obvious every day, as they seek to deceive the american people. In response, the public has begun to turn to men. The replacement media, those who bring with them the truth without a covert agenda, one of the most popular, prices will rise from this movement. Is our guest today, journalist commentator on Youtube or temple. Tim first into the public view with his on the ground. Journalism live streaming. The occupants The minutes of twenty eleven when I was having seem to be imported into the interesting alot of people. Talking of years later, videos were joined by media field reporting from conflict areas around the world is work is done,

traction recently. However, now that the conflict and come to the homefront timid spent, ass few years largely focused on the rise, the Anti WAR movement or pay. More so on the media's complete lack of attention to the violent and fascist tactics that movement employs, timid The front lines of exposing the radical left in the lying media former Bernie Sanders. Importer team raised eyebrows this year with his emphatic support for Donald Trump, while not condoning Oliver in its actions, he sought from as a vital bulwark for the country. He doesn't this choice in our conversation, gemini to discuss the propaganda war raging across the country as we wait for the results of the election, including the latest offences from legacy, media and big tech, and what the future may hold for the country under a new administration

hey, hey. I welcome MRS the bench of Euro Show Sunday. Special just reminder will be doing some bonus questions at the end with Temple. The only way to get access to that part of the conversation is to become a member shall had on over to Daily Werner, come become a member and you'll have access to all of the full conversations with every one of our awesome guess when we get to him in just one. Second, first must you're real about this. If you're not protecting yourself, Mama rose at your make, A big big mistake. Not too long ago of one hundred million people had their personal information stolen in a major data, breach, social security numbers contact, details, credit scores and more all taken from capital. One customers such as capital, one Equifax, Ebay, Goober Playstation. Now they ve all had leaked passwords credit card Info Bank numbers belonged Billy of users. Everything happens only target large companies get your information. You are wrong. This is why I use expressive gps to save my personal data, are mine. Now, according to a recent reports, hackers can make up to a thousand bucks

selling someone's personal information on the dark web. Making people like you me easy, a lucrative targets that have been hacked before it is no fun expressly. Pierre is an app for your computer and phone. It's occurs in encrypt your data, so you can have peace of mind. Every time you go online tat connects with just one click. It is lightning fast. The best part is expressly paean cost less than seven bucks a month. Listen the breach cabinet cap and one can certainly happen to you, protect yourself with express bbn. It is the number one Vps raided by wire seen at the verge and countless others. Everybody needs to protect themselves. I've been using expressive Vps for years, go check them out right now. It expresses gps dot com, its life, but again that is expressing gps dot com, Slash Ben E ex PR, yes, VP enzyme, arms lifespan, simple things must rejoining the show thanks for having me, I really appreciate it and long awaited on the entire webs. This. This final final confrontation, so well, let's talk about what's going on in the world right now, obviously, aside from the fact that everybody's to lock in the basement is it covered which will get you that we're still in the middle

In election, this has been declared over by the the other media said that this thing is over. Not only have they declared that Joe Biden is the President Elect, they have declared that buddy. Who refuse to call him the President Elect, even though he's not actually, yet the President Elect is engaged in some sort of coup, What do you make of all of us? I mean it's. It's kind of a tradition the media would say: hey here's the winner, its projected just go along with it, but I think it's kind of MILAN. by us we're so used to sing his elections. Aside from Bush, be Gore where the results are kind of clear, you know Rob meeting it nearly enough votes, so he just as ok concede, but this is a really really cool rates. I mean we're we're within recount of numbers for certain states. Georgia just announced a hand recount So it's not necessarily, it isn't really make sense to say Joe Biden one when there a legal process you know happening. Several states are too close to call still

the media has just decided this- is it Joe Biden one it's over. Meanwhile, I think they're starting to wake up to the fact that Trump has, I think, actually has a legal path to victory. There was an article put up by vocs recently showing all the ways that Trump is still planning on taking this to court, maybe disqualifying certain votes, may be getting a victory through the electoral college by having Republicans the state level certify their own electors. So trumps, not out of this, and I gotta tell you it's kind of weird seeing these two different realities where you have one media apparatus sang present, Elect Joe Biden, announces covered plans they use one saying Donald Trump is in court right now challenging. You know that there are in certain states or impropriety at a certain level. So it's all. It's almost like they're trying to tell us Joe Biden one to convince us, because this over certification. Hasn't happened for the states, yet let alone for the. If you, the election result,

and then choose in the electors. The level of hysteria to me is the thing that there, stands out, and it seems to me The media are basically attics that the Donald Trump is their cocaine and and they can't let go of it, and so they they they require just this Constance addiction that they require constant supply of as I also think there there's something else going on here too, which is they keep saying that the Trump is about to participate in a coup that lets you, the electors, vote for Joe Biden, he's gonna hold up in office like Al Pacino in Scarface is going of be doing. Can we doing blow and firing guns through the door while shouting sailor, my little friend and this has much more to do with the media's. Pathological needs pain, pay Trump, Hitler's they can do whatever they want, then it does with reality yeah, I think so I mean, I will say when I think of Michael or who said at a while ago. Trumps not gonna leave, even if he loses- and I was get out of here, that's ridiculous. I mean, I think, right now, what's happening. Is there there pudding for, media narrative, the elections over, so they can now be

like see, look he's not leaving, even though the elections over when it's not what I will say trumps taken some actions. It appears that he's not planning on leaving. This could just be because he's going, legal process and until all of his legal you know, tactics have played out he's gonna operate oh he's going to get elected, but I do think that this point, the idea that there is as yet like you mention trumps, going to be locked in the oval office? The secret service is gonna, kick the door and is just ridiculous, but at this point Gotta, be honest, I'm ready to believe anything. You know just the amount of absurdity we ve seen throughout twenty twenty we're not worth a global pandemic they're starting the lock down different states now. So maybe it really is just gonna, be the craziest elect. we ve ever seen in our lives, but I feel, like life, is more boring than that so yeah. I did to him and I think that one things that that we find out the more were in the political sphere is that politics is a lot less like houses you a lot more like these.

Then you better, that assumption on the part of people who are outside the world of politics, that people know what they're doing that there are these very sophisticated plans and that people have thought three steps down the road and there are playing forty chess. out there, just like every other industry when you hit the top of the industry, realise that everybody's an idiot just like you and that that is much. I think how works in politics yet specially. I think when I was younger our time, others recently I Look up to all these adults. They must be so good at what they do. They must be the best of the best and man went on when I'm older. Now I'm on my mid thirty's, like everyone's as dumb as they ve always been. You know it's just people doing people stuff. You think that you walk in election centre in Europe as a whole, bunch of experts with their badges and their rang gloves and everything is perfect, but you get some rest. a guy who's volunteering and he's confused. You get sworn affidavits from some people don't know what's going on and it's just humans, it's it's not

like a well oiled machine is essentially it's not like a computer. It's a bunch of people with different perspectives and different understandings and different skills trying to work together. So I think for the most part, though, when you put enough people together, you get some amazing stuff, which it you'll see, errors, you'll, see impropriety and stuff, and so I think you know, especially now with the election one of the biggest mistakes, the media's. Again, which I think could actually lead to, serious chaos. Maybe conflict is that recognising humans are imperfect, you're gonna find. bunch of people saying in a sworn affidavit. I saw this thing happen. You can't just ignore that and say we will do nothing you you have to. Let people know we're doing everything in our power to clean up any potential errors. So they view this election as legitimate. I mean it. Joe Biden really does get certified as the he gets inaugurated, but they dont look into this stuff. It would undermine his presidency because you ve got seventy two points. million people now have voted for Donald Trump. I think everybody deserves to look at these

David. So these whistleblowers and just say you know, is it: is it going to change the election? Maybe it won't, but we should investigate and I also add sue. I think you know Donald Trump passed a victory right now. It's almost like he's dangling fraud over and liked to his left and you gotta, Media, saying, there's no evidence of fraud at the activists, sang fraud, but trumps lost It's our about impropriety. His lawsuits in Pennsylvania, at least, is about equal. The equal protection clause under the fourteenth amendment has nothing to do with fraud. It has everything to do with, they didn't count bouts properly or they created an alternate track of ballots or they violated a court order. So why these people over here, dancing around screaming fraud, tromp is actually taking a legal battle over whether You disqualify hundreds of thousands of votes due to a failure to uphold election standards I think, there's something else going on here too, which is that because we always live in the stupidest possible time line until we breakdowns these binary positions there. The positions have

become on the right. Voter fraud is widespread. It is in the tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of votes and on the left, there's no such thing as motor brought. I've never heard of this vote of broadening you're talking about boat irregularities, don't exist in the slightest in ITALY, have US positions completely reversed from about a month ago, when, a month ago, all we are hearing from Democrats that Donald Trump was personally going around and burning mailbox as in order prevented depositing there about. He was that committed devoted suppression loose to joy, screwing with machines that the boats wouldn't be properly deliberate or accounted who is defending the post office? And now everybody who was saying one month ago, The elections can be totally screwed up is nothing amazingly clean unbelievably awesome election we had and everybody I don't want that goes going into what the options proudly can be. Ok, there are like God that which is the worst most fraudulent russian I've ever seen in my life. You know it's crazy is when we did the primaries. We had these mass mail. In voting, we had a massive amount of rejected ballots. I think the Washington Post, like five hundred thousand

where all of those right now. That's that's what I was wondering you shouldn't. Should we be getting the same reports? We got from the democratic primary we're not getting those, so I think you got an error, you ve got you gonna get some level of failure, but I think the now had there there's this weird tribal, polarisation that we see and it happened and other places in the world when you get people, I don't. I wanted to specifics, colony specific regions out, but there are some instances where you're like. How does that one group believe the exact the set of other route, but neither position makes the most sense. So I think about a real real world example is: when covert first hit the? U S, I knew a bunch of conservative sang, get your masks like you. You got your masks, but we were seeing. You know Fouche, IE and yet the I think at this, general saying. No, no, no doubt don't get masks. Then it completely flip You see videos of Europe, its Trump supporters. Not going mask, I shouldn't have to and you ve got people left saying everyone's where mask it see

like four tribal reason. Somehow it flip, just whatever you sail, do the opposite of. You're, really the universe coarser and can provide some background. I knew for people who may not have heard your shower or senior Youtube videos. So you're, heterodox anchor. You don't really fit into any box. People will call you on you left people called you progressive people called you right wing, it all depends on who is doing the characterisation. So when we talk first about sort of you came to do what you're doing right now and then we'll talk about how your political views were formed over time, because they You seem to to move in a bar over time and in a way that really unique in the space. So first, I think that tend to talk about a kind of how you can prominence in this in the space in the first place, my first experiencing some of your stuff was during Occupy Wall Street Protests when you're the only person who is out there actually taking footage in covering that stuff. But how did you get started in this area? Well It starts with Occupy Wall Street. So I- had been doing nonprofit work- I had you. I've been hanging out with

curse, and this was back in the days of anonymous and some other hacker groups and so that the big core ideology behind what we did and why we did it and is mostly other people. I wasn't super active. Eyes, making sure people had access to information, be it get then the internet or give them the key details as to what's going on all the sudden you had these journalists say: well, that's journalism, you're, sharing information, you're disseminating that stuff. So for me I ended up on the EAST Coast and then, when I saw Occupy Wall Street happened. I was just some. You know. I just left California, I've just some guy who's, skateboarding and making videos, and I decided to go and start filming eventually start live streaming and while I'm streaming I'm giving my thoughts on what's happening and essentially doing this raw live commentary. I this big where I did a live stream for twenty two hours straight. People were like running up to find you to give me batteries to keep it going, and then I started just covering conflict and crisis from there

went from some guy who is live streaming. These protests to actually working for vice and being as the founding number of vice news, the liked actual vertical, where I went on the guy, to various countries like Venezuela, like a key. Brazil went to Egypt watch the revolution happen, and I was just covering the conflict and crisis stuff there, eventually that the conflict in crisis came to the: U S, so I set up working for a company called fusion. They were they started out trying to be like vice and is that this was at a time is twenty fourteen. When these companies all started getting super woke, I've never been particularly interested in you know the weird cultural far left suf, even though I and occupy Wall Street. I was like, I think, that's kind of ridiculous, so I have worked with US company, but within so rate months, they got a new editor in chief, all of a sudden everything there doing is woke, so they essentially put me- and you know what I'll golden handcuffs. I was getting grew up paid really well to work for this. You know Disney company, but they didn't want to use real like on the ground conflict report,

because they want to use video segments about awoke stuff, I guess, but ultimately my contract ended. I start my own, you too, general and I started actually travelling around so I went to Sweden. I did a two week like daily log. I'm Sweden interviewing people see what was going on. This is when Donald Trump did that that those that famous moment where last night in Sweden, you see what happened and the media went nuts. That was a crazy I'm at because all of a sudden, I had my colleagues from vice who used to help me, go to countries. Messaging me saying: don't go to Sweden to cover the story, and I was confused. Why wouldn't I like? I went to Egypt. I went to Ukraine. I went to a bunch of countries not another Do this one trumps lying and I'm like? I don't know, I don't want to think about this, and I know nothing about Trump always talking about. I just heard there are some claims about. You know refuge he's in crime. I wanna go investigate it. There's big are really really mad at me

I was when I could see like this weird split starting to emerge so from there. I come back to the: U S and I started covering the conflict we see on the ground you ass. You know proud boys anti for that kind of stuff, and of course, what do I see nine. Nine percent of the time you get. Some trumped support, waving little american flags and anti fa shows up and attacks them. I would report it. Antifraud would get really mad at me, so they started threatening me doc. Seeing me someone posted a photo of my mom at one point, and so that was like for me. I think it I already had some personal biases, going back to my upbringing in Chicago, but now it's all I'm trying to do is cover what's happening on the ground and by telling the truth, these extremists and like anti for type people, were attacking me in threatening me and that I mean was kind of I guess to be expected, but it did. It did set method, a path where, for one

couldn't actually go on the ground anymore, so I slowly stop doing it because he's getting more and more dangerous, so that I to doing more and more news, commentariat analysis to kind of make up for the fact that I couldn't beyond the grounds aggregate more people who actually are doing the work and I'm gonna feel like it's not a completely uncommon track for journalists to go from. Field reporter and then eventually letter in their career. They may find themselves as a news commentary kind of person and then once it's just became completely obvious that you know and when I went to Portland had some guy chasing me around yelling, like while I'm trying to film and unlike ok, clearly I got you know how many people know why I'm their seeking me out there, your causing trouble there trolling or their actual attacking me. So I'm gonna have to stop coming to a lot of these events and then just report to the best of my abilities from the desk, I started increasing amount of work. I started doing. I started doing multiple segments per day now. I think I do on our in forty five minutes.

Commentary, and I do a total of like I do. I do it tell two hours of alive podcast show which brings me to. Mission, where now I'm kind of this, I think, as you mentioned, like a heterodox individual dont, really fit necessarily anywhere, although I think I've been classified as like cultural right wing whatever that means, but my political positions are kind of just like where democratic to be it, it's a weird position to be, and I will say I think the easiest way to explain that. I am not orthodox, I suppose in some capacity, like I'm a heterodox personalities, whenever they try and smear people. Who are you know like what like right now. I've got a lot of people on Podcast said Youtube, for instance, that are saying the elections not over You get these articles sang or CNN. For instance, you ve got the the right Media lying claiming elections not over, but they never mention me because if they do, they show you like

might my segments are actually verily? I don't I don't I don't say bland, but that that the joke is that I'm a milk toast fence center. I will tell you: we have a sworn affidavit from numerous. You know. Pull watchers but I'm not going to come out scream the election was stolen and and and in Trump one can I say we should investigate this, isn't really very well for the mainstream media to smear me as some kind of conspiracy theorist when I dont make an assertion beyond here's a fact. So, ultimately, I myself in this weird position where for one, if you go to like my my flagship channel with the most subscribers, it's like basically the media's trash and the Democrats are too so then people that may say Temple must be right wing, but then, when it comes to actual policy, like my politics are probably you know, independent centre left and disagree with conservatives on a lot of core issues that result in Trump supporters getting mad at me, so weird position, I don't know, but ultimately that's where I met now and then I got some point. Ben Shapiro hit me up and asked me to come on a show so

I want to talk to you about die. You obviously recovering anti virus. You ve covered in detail. Black lives matter and you mentioned sort of the wolf phenomena to let the phenomenon, and then I will talk about what I think is actually more important issue, which is the the phenomenon of how social media and the media refuse to cover this phenomenon. How could I have decided certain narratives are worth worth cultivating and sir narratives must be barred. Sir narratives must be suppressed because to me is that these scarier the scarier for now, that is, where the mainstream deciding what we can and cannot see there, there's there's the radicals and their scary, but there small proportion, the population than you actually have legs, mainstream phenomenon of attempting to quash any discussion of the radical as much effectively makes them enablers? What gets that in one second? First? Let's talk about a simple fact: it is your responsibility. To take care of

family and get life, insurance, red or your responsible, human being with dependence. You need life insurance against God forbid. Something should happen. You ve got hit by a bus, want to make sure that your family at least is taken care of financially now shopping for life insurance can seem like the daunting task, but if you have loved ones who depend on you, it is really important. That's my policy genius makes it easy. They combine a cutting edge insurance marketplace withheld from licence experts. To save you time and save money. Right now you could say fifty percent or more by using policy genius to compare life insurance when you're shopping for a policy that could last more than a decade the city, really start to add up here's. How works first, you hadn't over the policy genius I've come in minutes. You can work at how much covered you need and compare quotes from top insurers, define your best price policy. Genius policies, starting as little as one dollar a day. You may even be eligible to skip the in medical exam once you have the policy genius team will handle all the paperwork and the red tape the best part they work for you, not the insurance company. So if he had any speed bumps during the application process, they'll take care of

thing for you. A kind of service has earned policy genius a five star rating across over sixteen hundred reviews, Untruss pilot and Gould go check them out right now, They need life. Insurance had an overall policy genius tat come you could see. Fifty percent or more by comparing quotes policy genius when it comes to insurance, it's nice and important to get a right. So let's talk about and he vessels, so you covered anti virus on the ground. We ve been told by the media that anti far or alternatively world war, two era I drew a swimming the beaches of Normandy, I've been told by survive and that they are not in fact a group that there are in fact just sort of philosophy, no sort of lake sort of like Cuba's them or something like an artistic movement, but exactly is anti, but since you ve covered them on the ground, it say I mean it's not that really wrong to say that their movement or an idea, but it's the individual cells that we're talking about. I think what you're talking about and what they do is the you mean he uses a semantic argument to try and act like they don't exist, so to put it simply anti far

is the symbols they use the ideology typically, five you'll find of many of these people are authoritarian, communists and I'm not trying saturate or do some stupid, ah they're, all communist night than their literally, they believe in authoritarian communism, but its rooted in world war, pre World war to Germany, Weimar Germany, where you the Communist Party had their anti fascist day action and it was challenging ashes they used to say. Symbols. They create small individual groups with they say: no leaders have leaders, they do and then they coordinator for various actions that call them nationwide so. Ultimately, what you have are political zealots who believe in the use of violence for pollution. Gain and terror for political game. What they'll do, as they'll tell you and I've allies in media tell you there's no such thing as anti far. It's not a group will that's a semantic manipulation there

like a game here. If I say anti FA came out in Portland an attack people, I'm talking about, rose city, Anti thoughts, a legitimate group. They have membership, they have membership drives, they put out weena flyers and are they brought a websites and here's how you join our group? They have their own merchandise that says rosy for on it, so it would be like you know. The media is trying to use a word play to trick you into believing that these various groups don't exist, because if I said you know I went deportment and annual came up, then I went to Boston and Anti for came out. They say ah see that proves it, because there is no connection between those two groups, but it's the general ideas they they they hold that same ideology wearing black. These similar tactics, these same symbols and they typically we with each other on their cause and their didn't. You know them means to the end, so you actually have a loose net group. Various cells that coordinate with each other, using violence

Their political opponents are, for the most part instigating it outright to two to win and it works for them. You know that the example out and give the people why is it that social media so willing to censor rightwing individuals but anti fuzz, literally organizing violent riots online, even probably right now they ve been doing it's all year and for the past several years and its simple anti far in San Francisco in the Bay area, they'll show up to the to the Hague court, of these big tech companies and they'll trash the place. So these companies say well well, you know, leave them alone, but there's not going to be a conservative group marching to Twitter H, Q with pitchforks and torches, so long as big companies keep giving anti for what they want or showing than their tactics work they'll keep doing what they do.

As for the loosening nature of what they do, it's all on purpose. The reason why they don't have an official nation wide organization is very it's exactly that it's actually really easy to understand. When you look at the proud boys, obviously the proud boys and anti far not the same thing but there are similarities in that. You have these these groups at fighting this on the ground. The proud boys have a chairman, Enrique Terrio, while they ve band him from dozens of banks. They ve been formally different platforms. You give someone a leader. They use that to actually try and discredit the rest of your group anti. For knows this. I've actually talk to. we're going back to occupy Wall Street of Trade of said no leaders as soon as you put someone up, they'll smear character assassinate, so it is on purpose. They say they dont have leaders, however long for but knows who the individual cell leaders are. I would imagine- and I think some of them got doxxed recently. So it's really it's it's. It's not! You know, but their tactics aren't perfect, but I will say

left is much much better at street level, organizing than the right, and so you end up with a media narrative that can't understand what anti fa is or outright defends them on purpose. I think there's there's two things. You ve got the activist media that hates Donald Trump and they're saying what you know: oh aunt, if it's no big deal but they're saying it because they want to protect anti fuck. You then have these local reporters. These people were probably you know. They have good intentions there trying to be objective and fair, but they can't grasp the concept of anti FA as a group. Anti fa has specifically obvious skated what they really are, so you can't report on what they are, then you get one likes it Andy, no or Eliza Schaefer. Someone like at one point when I was doing and we can actually accurately break it down on the ground. They get really angry about that and we also would happen and you know you know when he was out there in Portland-

physically beat em. They left him bleeding and covered in milkshake and stuff, like that. Those are the people there really worried about, but long story short there. There radical far left They typically are authoritarian communists, but not all of them. Some of them might just be that they might be like left anarchist. I know there's a big debate over what Anarchists can actually left or right, but they view themselves that way, though, as socialists, but the big, the big issue I see with Anti far, is that you might find someone who will try Lion asked no know. No, we don't believe in violence were itself defence, but these are the narratives they like to use to get. way with what they do and so long as you have these main stream resistance type Democrats who hate trump. They won't call these groups out and that's been something I've. During its climax, occupy Wall Street, where the the peaceful, legitimate protesters are told by these groups to respect their quote diverse of tactics. It's this! It's a stupid aside. I have ever heard the idea that you're gonna

gauge and some kind of strategy against a big system but diversify what that strategy has makes no sense. You wanna have a cohesive plan as to how you're going to make change happen, though the reality, as these groups say, respect our diversity of tactics, because that's code for getting violent and hurting people, and then you get these good natured oh testers, we just wanna, you know waiver little signs and banners and be heard now, standing back as anti for messes, with people I down start fires, so I will say I think anti fall for the most part, a colossal turn we use to describe the far left extremists who use was called the black block tactic, where you neither where hoodies they wear masks. I don't know it will call them in the future. We, although the black block anarchists, you know ten years ago now, their anti far there's still here, they're still writing. Apparently the media calling for Joe Biden nothing to change their minds, and in fact I think it's only. It's only likely to escalate as if, if we do entering,

binding administration, because certainly Joe Biden won't be strong enough to deal with these groups that are pressuring em and attacking him and getting violent, We already saw this, I believe recently they attacked a Dnc headquarters, sang F Joe Biden so anyway, but there you go. I think I've read too much. I went out if it is, but we can follow up. That's diving! useful for people who have a vague idea bit, but not very specific idea, and then meanwhile, we ve seen the media basically decide You're, never allowed to criticise not only on tv, but also black lives matter. Black lives matter itself is considered to be a wonderful movement, There there's been a game that that you mentioned there the sort of semantic overload that have been placed on the term black lives matter which, as I pointed out I shall means three separate things, one of which is completely unaware. suitable and two of which are rather objectionable, one of which is the idea that black people's lives matter, which, of course, everybody agrees with. Unless you're a complete piece of human track seconds The black lives matter, actual organization which is a far left communist organization in its inception and openly states its goals and third, the

basic underlying idea that America systemically racist, evil sins route and that all in all inequality is a route inequity which I think is both counterproductive involved. But we ve been told, that's even question black lives matter is to itself be be racist and that if you are to pay attention to any of the fat if the right around the country, s just exaggerating the problem, I mean, after all, only seven percent of the blacklist matter- protests erupt into riots, which is a pretty shocking only that there only is doing a lot of work in particular. Is that right now so they'll and explain that I think of that seven percent there. is like numerous cities constantly being besieged by the. So there are like you know. Might I could be wrong with this package? Ding one cities widespread riding as just one protest but yeah. I think it's funny if you said something like you know,

John Smith only kill seven percent of the people he encounters you'd, be allied, that's ridiculous work or made maybe killing peoples of extreme motive. He said, don't worry about bill, he doesn't punch ninety three percent of the people he encounters I'd, be like he shouldn't punch any. Then it's really weird how they tried. Oh it's. Ninety three percent, peaceful MIKE Sayer. Admitting it's not like! That's that's weird he's hurt. These are violent riots and another thing that at that mention is that in many of these cities, where they say there were peaceful protests, they would separate when the right happen from the protest and act like oh. No, this day was was a peaceful protest. Even People were there doing much of the same thing on this day the police didn't say there was riots or there was violence, and so they, It's really difficult to weed through exactly what But I will say: peaceful protests are awesome its foundation to this country, the first moments as peaceful you know a peaceably assemble and I think it's fantastic. When people go out and do so and to varying degrees, I'm I'm told

Cool, with even civil disobedience if they want to block traffic. hey you get arrested. You get your ear, your fine you're slap on the rest. You made your point. We heard you we want to make sure. There's room, for people to actually express themselves protest. And so early on. We did see with black eyes matter. There were things where they'll just lay in the street with their hands behind their back. I thought that was really cool. Everybody knew as coming expected at the avoided certain routes. Then these people went home, they made their point and that actually benefits them in the polls. It generates public awareness as it supposed to and it makes people sympathetic, but then at these these extremists, who think they're enough the LA resistance fighting against Orange Hitler too. Like take down a fellow. Building which is made of like hunt, hundreds or thousands of tonnes of concrete and throwing fire, your mortar shells at it. It's like they're playing a game. There live action, roleplaying, not aware, but actually

doing anything, but I will say what I find funny about the black lives matter. So we ve seen this past year is mostly white. The it's it's it's mostly upper middle class, suburban white young progressive, saying their fighting for minorities. You end up with these videos, where there's two black women walking up to these. These two white women who are vandalism building like. Why are you doing this and the like? Don't worry we're doing it for you, it's like that. Has this there's no intention and, in my opinion, what we know what we talk. We talk about the three different black eyes matter. You mentioned. It's mostly used as some kind of shield for radical, far leftists, who are that they're they're trying to convince people. We are the good guys because racism is bad, but when they go out, they destroy businesses in black neighborhoods. They clearly dont care when they accuse actual outspoken black people say Candice Alan's of being a white supremacist. They clearly don't care. they're using race as a shield. While they,

engage in racist or violent behaviour, and then they use these. They it's a really really clever trick that these left us do anti fascist. You know we're anti fascist. Therefore, if you oppose us your pro fascist, it's like did your walking around beating people, then I say we're we're for black lives matter. That's our group! If you oppose it You think they don't, as I clearly that's, not the case, you're going around smashing things and beating people and actually hurting the black community. It's it's all just clever word play and I think it's all upon manipulating the media. They want the media Europe. Actually, let me stop up in this way. decided ominous start an organization called the weak and vulnerable grandmothers. That way, my organization of you. No thirty year old men go around yelling things. The media world will report anti for tax, weak and vulnerable grandmothers. That's like an idea of what they are doing. So it's it's! It's it's a trick. Most people just read the headline they just

they don't actually investigate with a story is so I get people telling me things all the time like, oh but their anti fascist there, the good I am like, did you see the video them beating the old woman there like overnight and actually read it? Well, that's, that's! That's the name! It's the name. Anti fascist has not the action and the actions are what you need to look for: So I want to talk about that. The broader danger of these movements, which I dont think is the actual moments. I think it is the mainstreaming of of the movements by more means from groups that I'm party, the mainstream media and in social media. It me what what's happening in a lot of left wing politics right now. It's almost like the these. Nor is the read in the newspapers and an online about some elderly, Hollywood star whose aging doesn't like aging and so has hired a twenty year old and is now siphoning off blood in order to cycle it ever their system, in the belief that the oxygenated blood will will make them more healthy overtime. I feel like right now that sort of the Democratic Party with the world

the radical. While this lousy energy is- and we don't want to quash the energies organ, allow that energy to fester and then leave us because we mostly agree with them so long as we direct at energy. You know at the at the bad people at the Orange at at the Orange man, bad at all, the conservatives in it at all blow me don't like. Well, then you know that the really maybe they're overzealous they're doing the right things and eventually the grow out of this and I'll stop messing around this. It's really dangerous thing: yup, that's not gonna! Stop they there they're they're playing with fire and You know I gotta, be, I don't even think it's the youthful energy. I think it's twitter. I think you ve got a hybrid The relation due to places in us social media platforms like Twitter. I think twitter is the worst. It's really hard to get. A complex

idea out on Twitter. So I've, mostly just given up. I just role with that. I laugh when people take, things are always like Yahoo or whatever, but someone will put something out, it'll be interpreted interpreted in completely the wrong way and what twitter does is it encourages people to be as nasty as possible when I see happening is its with Facebook. It's it's. You know with with key word and algorithmic, boasting that we see through Facebook, certain posts have certain words, more likely to get shares and more likely to appear. You end up with a very small fraction of hyper active internet users posting on twitter trying to get likes, and so what happens is you'll see ridiculous lorries like are: there was one from the Huffington Post. That said, there may be a video of Donald Trump evader doing something. What is that thing we dont know, whereas the elevator we have no idea and does the video exist, we're not sure that they actually wrote that article in a desperate bid, a desperate attempt to just write something that will.

Clicks and shares salacious, but didn't have anything. So these wrote nothing, but what is happening as you also get council culture, people are rewarded and cheered for when they're, like look at this person, who's a big it all of a sudden. Now we ve game of five, this process on social media yet more points you get more retreat to get more followers. In fact, you can make money doing this, you'll see people say here's a thread about Ben Shapiro is a Nazi and end up at the bottom. Here's my pay pal link, give me money. They'll, take everything. You said a context. The more people share it, though the more misinformed their becoming. Then you get the democratic politicians. who think twitter is real life and they see those twitter threads may say: I'm going gonna campaign on this issue about weird social justice, council culture, then you get some you'd have thirty eight year old mother, whose like arm kids going to school. Why is the guy on tv talking about some twitter threat? What's happening, I think, to an extent Republicans also fall victim to this as well. I think it's funny

when they're talking about twitter censorship, you see like new tankers, bring it up. I appreciate it because I used the internet, but I have to wonder if we have only about twice percent of this country using twitter- and only I think, it's like Twa ten or so eight percent of those are actually active, it must be really weird to be. Miller, American. Turning on the news and then hearing them talk about social media culture, war issues that me nothing to you, which I think may explain, you know why the Republicans took so many seats in the house. time around, and even why Donald Trump is is is, is in Joe Biden as it stands so far. I think regular people are like. I don't care about twitter. I dont care about these, these culture, where issues, but I do think for the most part it's the Democrats that are mostly susceptible to it, because they're looking for the youth about, like you mentioned, are looking for youth. Turkey there finding it on social media, where the young people are extremely active and instead of telling them hey just because your tweet went viral doesn't mean it was correct or good they're saying

just go with it and say what they're saying and then you end up with really we, policy positions like you know, Bernie Sanders into Fifteen says we can have been borders to cope brothers proposal. That was an interview with vocs now he's on the debate stage. You know, this past year, saying moratorium on deportations and decriminalize border crossings. He completely flips on what is principles are for it and it's because of the things you People are posting on. Social media doesn't represent America. I think it's interesting Trump one in twenty. Sixteen on since that seem to fly in the face of what you know, social justice was pushing on social media and, in my opinion, shows with with pc culture being the big aspects of people site when you say why they voted for Trump regular people. Dont care about this Democrats of have ever walked themselves into a corner, I don't see how they get themselves out. Now you see a oh c is, is attacking the Democrats saying you know the house would have fared better if you just, let me lead and be progressive. They got junk. You give the young

ex running a Wall Street, Journal a bad saying, let progressives take over and I can only imagine that would end up with them in the most absurd defeat ever because then the Republican Party becomes the big ten. You end up with people like Jeff Van drew, who was a democrat switches to the Republican Party, wins reelection these. These people don't realize you know cause your Cortez may have ten million followers on twitter, but those ten million people don't live like one city, she doesn't have command over one massive district. She has little bits little pockets of individuals from various jurisdictions that don't hold political power in those areas and trying to legislate based off of the fact that they have created a community of political zealots on social media that doesn't represent this country, but they think it does because they ve gathered in this one on space, so long story short expect more. As as the aging Democrats, dont know what they're doing as Nancy Pelosi tries to like the squad and then give them what they want refuses to denounce socialism once natural

see and Feinstein and and and humor another once they there they're all out. All it's gotta be left. Is the twitter politicians the people who want to be celebrities who want to do Instagram lie videos get as many clicks as possible. I dont see them legislating, I see them lying to do things that are funny and get them clicks and shares on twitter and social media, and I think a yo see exemplifies you know, are up to this way just to make everybody angry. I think ABC is very much like Donald Trump in that she tweets bombastic there. get a bunch of attention for herself and she loves it. The differences, I think Donald Trump is naturally like this. I think he is. He really did have plans and you wanted to do things for the, country and we had a great economy of the past several years where these historic peace agreements and then you have a yo see who, in my opinion, seems to be just trying to get as much followers- and I guess attention is possible. The backlash these unless election, to defend the police to the to talk about socialism to all the guess I supposed it systemic american racism. I think that backlash

material. I think that there is also a pity giving a backlash to exactly the sort of council culture. They are talking about a thing most Americans you're exactly right. Don't the news at night and wonder what somebody said on Twitter, but they do see at their own companies the ones that they work at that so many of the elites at the top of our corporate world, have decided to buy into the council culture mentality where, unless you personally post a black square on your facebook page, you are now called into question. If you, if you dont, repeats, if you don't see and repeats and believe, then you are now a suspect and if you say the wrong thing at the office cancel culture comes free. You might find yourself on Twitter one day. That's not. The twitter is a place for gathering in trading ideas. Twitter is a place for, after you and a lever uses twitter that way lever uses the political mechanism that way, I think, there's a huge back. Ash brewing to this, because the left has decided that they're gonna shut the overturn window, they're gonna shuddered tight, throwing away, other enemies out in the cornfield, and then they believe that this is so

going to achieve them majority. I think the trunk was just the beginning of the backlash. He may not have been a great vehicle for the backlash because you such a flawed character in and of itself, but the backlash is not going to stop just because you don't believe defeated Trump. I completely agree, I think you're right, I think too, to kind of just you know clarify point I think regular people dont care about these specific issues of like white patriarchy, and you know right. Rising or white privilege, but now there being subjected to it, like you said, so they end up going to work being brought into these training sessions and then Don't like it I mean it was. It was a troke for so long. We make fun of the the you know that the sexual harassment were place videos. It's it's a comedy bet, but now you ve got people actually being forced to live through this and they are scared of cancelled culture and that's the big problem with the Democrats. There entertaining it at a policy level as if anybody likes this I had about us. I don't even think the leftist soup paint like it, I think they're all standing in the mob with pitchforks nervously. She,

wondering which one is going point the finger at them and their safer the mob than being the target of the mob? I totally as an this is where social it really does get dangerous, not just because of its ability to mobilise mobs. I have stated that when it comes to social media, it used to be that in order the former lobby that usually have a cause very often is a horrible. we had to have at least two points of commonality. Then it was like. Ok, let's get together the mob. Let's go do ex bad thing now social media Stay mob waiting for a cause. It's a bunch of people milling around waiting for aid, it's almost like a badly a battle: motivated immune system, where we'll just identified everybody's, warm and and that that is a huge problem. Obviously I also really concerned about the way that social media has decided that they are simply owing to suppress information they don't like- and this is this goes back to the point about- defined Veolan you had. This is very famous extra, age, with some of the big tech heads under Rogan Show, where you are just pointing out to them that they have no.

just in standards by which they suppress certain people and suppress certain content. There just doing this, basically out of their ass. There there is coming up with this policy completely out of nowhere and then just implementing it, but it seems to always Cuba. One side is never as though they make the mistake of groups. We banned lose Farrakhan, it's more like books, we banned this person, we ban James Woods for a day. I guess we shouldn't abandons was bernay. Ok, fine! Well, I guess we can bring back gems woods or you know what let's get together and you know Jones he's been bothering us for, whilst we will all together at the same time, decide just spontaneously that we are going? but of Alice Jones, not because he is necessarily violet and our policies, but because we have decided that we don't like Alex Jones anymore analysis as well as ever I have no Alex Jones, but you don't just I'll get to get together and decide their change or standards randomly and then Ban Alex Jones, because you don't like Alex Jones that day and expect that we are going to have trust in your of objectivity. Or your status as a neutral platform for ideas, yet the it's the bench appear

When TIM agree show thanks for joining us, but I agree, I agree I Alex's if they think about this, why was Alex Jones banned from all these platforms? It's because of one thing. He said what one topic he brought up any brought it up a couple times about sandy hook. Because of this years later they resurface these claims and demand. He be censored from every single platform. I think Jones been around for three decades. I think- that's some really crazy things, especially on our roads by cast, but the idea that you could have three decades of work purged from the internet for saying one bad thing on a few occasions: that's crazy! Imagine if you get a scientist Tuesday king about the importance of you know, mask wearing or best ways to prevent, cove it, and then you know a month later, says I'm off color joke, so they purge M completely from social media. All of the important things he's on our gone as well, not that I'm here to defend Alex Joneses body of work,

we don't really watch it or know much about it other than when it. When I see those viral clips of them sank on a crazy things, but the idea that you would ill late, someone from the Iraqi forever and just over saying one thing, one time or even if it was like three strikes you're out. I think that's crazy. You know what one of the things that Jack Dorsey said to me. When I was talking about jargon, podcast was weak. We talked about a path to redemption, never happen I guess it's crazy to me that you could break the rules on twitter and they say you're permanently banned for life, so we won't even do that in the real world for most things you gotta prison. We give you a time limit and then you can come back later. Rounded up. Don't allow that. I think other really important thing that went with when you bring up the you know. Arbitrary rules is, I think, one of the big reasons why there banning conservatives more than they ban the left is

because they live in that bubble, they're all very far laughed in Silicon Valley and- and you know ever where they make the rules they dont interact with conservatives or even moderates, for that matter. So and they have parents or moderates, and they say there far right or whatever to them, it's abnormal and its offensive, and we must remove the offence of things. The best example of this, which I brought up the Jack Dorsey. This is now what like took two years ago. Almost the miss gendering policy on Twitter. They said if you miss gender someone you can be banned, but that's a world view of a very tiny percentage of people as Europe, your basically creating a rule that upholds the world view of eight percent of the population. If we go by the U Gov Data than about eight percent are progressive activist. The rest are not so if you're telling people this is the real world do things this way and you don't realize that you actually represent the extreme minority.

Well, then, you're gonna start banning regular people, calling them far right, you're gonna say we're not biased, we're only getting rid of those who break the rules but you're wrong. would be broken by literally anybody. Let me know if you go to a regular person, an average person just walking down the street and ask him about Misgender and they're going to say I don't know what that is. If I sign up for twitter, look at band right away and I have met people who happens. You I've met so many people who have only a few small amount of followers, maybe a couple dozen, maybe a hundred or so their friends, their family and they'll post something get banned and have no idea why we don't live in this far left woke bubble with these people. Now I think for people like you and me, then we we can see their world. We we we, we watch the news, we see what they're saying so we get it most, people don't, and so these rules make no sense for the average person long story short you end up with advertise.

brands, let's see how people are behaving on social media and they assume this is popular discourse. These ideas makes sense, but they don't and regular people are confused by them, but once you get advertising agencies buying into the stuff, once you get movies buying into the stuff it can cause a cultural shift. I am. I am starting to wonder, though, that the get what go broke phenomenon is gonna, cost so much money for these companies. They realize we can't keep chasing after the woke crowd on Twitter. I certainly hope that's the case. I think that may only be the if enough, Americans are offended enough not to actually go buy the products, because we do have a process of what Nicholas until he called renationalization happening. Where you have small minority that is extremely motivated and everybody else is just not as motivated, and so this, minority, can move the entire the entire train, just by basically saying we super a lot about this issue and we're gonna irritate the living crap out of you and if you guys just leave us alone, just give us what we want then will basically go away, and I think that your seeing

taken to the extreme there. With the welcome a point, however, when I think people are just like, you know what no it doesn't matter that this, According to a minor offence, you stack up the minor offences and eventually you get too. This is just one giant basic major offence against my sense of truth and end the faction and propriety That's what's happening right now. I think the media have also picked up on the mainstream media freedom. In the established media. They ve picked up on the site and valley bias, and now they are using its their banish. Their woke Staffordshire inside these can valley outlets in these woke staffers are running the show they really are same whether the wolf staffers than your times are running the show and getting up at editors fired for printing. U S senators beds at! If you talk to any of the people at the top levels of tax, will tell you that their walk staffers are driving them up a wall and that they are creating all sorts of problems there, creating liability issues for them, and yet they won't stand up to the Woke staffers, and so what you get now is not just the pressure from inside. You have this insight outside game that I've identified since hobbies

I run a major conservative publication and we ve had our experience is being suppressed at the extreme may extreme depth. By social media. There's this inside out again, that's being played now where members, the mainstream media people like having roofs over at the New York Times, people I I swear, The New York Times are judged Leggum right where they stand. Their days attempting to corn court ask questions of tech browse the goes something like this There is a bad thing. A conservative said why don't you ban them and its every good night and very often is not here I think that a conservative said it? Just you guys are helping conservatives They try to sell into Orange Hitler right. They always talk about Orangemen Beth Facebook got Donald Trump elected. Therefore, that's because you allowed conservative content to fly free on Facebook. You really should suppress conservative contents, and so just this week we saw this incredible exchange with Kevin within your times, retweeted out for headlines, and he said these headlines our misinformation and their flying around their flying around Facebook.

we single headline was true. All four have lines were true. It was due from right, but it was one from daily wire and I believe it is one from daily collar all forward true and when I said to him, do all offer of those are true- there's not much information. He said, even if they are factually true, they can push a narrative that is untrue and so they are misinformation which gives away the game. I mean we basically have establishment media saying if you dont, mirror our political priorities. You are now deemed information and will use our backtracking brand fact check you and will you our power in order to leverage all the soul, media outlets into shutting down anyone who is not the New York Times. I love it because Kevin Ruth, ran the story on for the New York Times is a front page story about how you tube radicalized, some guy to the altar when in reality, if you actually read the story, it was about a traditional conservative when on Youtube, started, watching videos and then surely became a liberal because you tube moved him left there. Of data that actually shows Youtube has left bias. They don't want to do. A lot of these people

like rooster one, I admit it because they want power. This guy characterises it activists he's he's, not a journalist, and I know em personally and I can. I can attested us when I worked for fusion, he worked there as well. I think he was the managing editor. There was an issue that came up where there was an unprecedented, I believe, unprecedented social media ethics violation that occurred from the New York Times. It was when in power. What was the ceo of right and she stepped down? The story was breaking news, New York Times wrote a story that said Ellen POW, see resigns. That was basically it. It became one of the highest and can post on right it of all time, but overnight the New York Times change to the entire article, two something like Silicon Valley to Social Justice, zero, Ursa or Feminism zero and then the whole article. Wasn't it. News. They used the same. You ready to turn it into an analysis up ad about sexism in Silicon Valley. That's an as an

violation of journalistic violation and an internet violation? You don't just shake the url, but news organisations. Do this a lot they're supposed to put updated. You know editors now hear the changes we made and let people know it's one In my opinion, if a news outlets says you now here's a headline We had information and put we updated to add this something when they changed. Eighty five percent of the article turning a factual news article into and up at so I see this story I reach out to some moderators ass. Read it and I ask them what the rules are on various subjects for news outlets at do these things and they straight up the huge violation- and we don't want to do it- was like the not the third most upvoted story. Ever and so they determined, ultimately, it had to be removed. The New York Times violated like as core tenet of journalism and an internet. I guess ethics. When I said at fusion, I found this big story. This crazy look, what's happening. Kevin Roost told me, don't report it because we do the same thing

and we don't want to get called out for our unethical behaviour either. To paraphrase So this guy, in my experience, has routinely and repeatedly in agent activities that are not intended to inform people, but to misinform people when he did that near time stored on you, too radicalization. They had this graphic where, when you, when you're loaded the website and scroll down there You know a collage of Youtube that would slowly disappear and my favorite was that Philip, the Franco was on it and felt Franco is a very sad. I don't have to describe them other than a a straightforward, popcorn you're. A news. Personality on Youtube is not very political at all, but they made it so that period quickly. When you're scrolling down it said I had been radicalized and it shows Philip. The Franco clearly sleeping people, so then I d go and they all know there is a mistake to change it, but the point was: their narrative was completely false. What I see there was that

wrote an article trying to smear his competition, because the New York Times is losing viewer ship to Facebook, video to Facebook posts and to Youtube videos. So the New York Times a vested interest in targeting their rivals plus he's an activist he's very cool we along with the ideological left- and you can, even if you, if you look at him What are you can see? He interacts with with far left. It you know an Anti VA type people all the time when have news organisations that are more interested in culture, war, rage, bait to make money or when their infiltrated by activists, then things are getting bad because you don't know. What's true anymore, you get a guy like Heaven. Reducing these stories are misinformation. Now now people following see this, all those those dangle right, wingers we're not lies again, even though it was all true, and I think one of the craziest store, it just happened recently was Washington, Post saying that are, I think, Richard Hopkins at his name, but the postal service whistleblower We can't do this allegations the dude

A video runaway say? No, I didn't the Washington Post still runs the headline saying he did. I think I ve The media in this country, for for a variety of reasons, has become completely invested in just activism. So I will tell you There is one thing that does excite me of Joe Biden ends up, you know, being the actual inaugurated president is that the media will spiral out of control and implode with nothing to write about anymore yeah. This is this, I think, the greatest fear and then I think they're going to have to craft a whole set of new villains, but none of them are ever going to be able to take the place of President Trump. Of course, I was the apotheosis of evil on earth in an orange miasma of sand and terribleness an end actually school embodiment of that was my favorite narrative. Over the past years, we have a disease that they kills hundreds of Thou now over a million people worldwide and it's all trumps fault. but Joe Biden and the democratic media, if it were not for four Donald Trump, no one in America,

of died. Actually zero people in Amerika would have died. Me well, and reform of the governor of New York is absolutely incredible at handling of it. In fact, he wrote an entire book about how great he is it handling of it and made an entire for the good bye and put on your wall about how amazing hears it handling of and also by the way New York is now have second spike that necessitating you apparently lockdown. Let's talk about covered powers, for a second cause. You ve covered it again in sort of a straightforward and an heterodox fashion that there was all Talk very early on about the necessity for lockdown quickly. This thing became quite politicized, as I, as I mentioned here, the media's. was dissolved, the right ones, fault and it's all Donald Trump's fault, because Donald Trump, is not focusing in unmask wearing because Mascarenhas, apparently a silver bullet and also from pursuing public events. It depends on the public and covered is an extraordinarily woke and wise virus. It only affects right wing there right, wingers unorthodox used. Those are the only people that covered if they have north of Europe, a black person whose protesting these systemic cruelty of the police. It does not affect you,

Laurie, a white Lib who is whose cheering on Joe Biden suppose it victory by looking out of the same champagne bottle is three others doesn't effect you either so obviously need the affair trust in the media uncovered is at an all time low. I think it should be no time what what do you make of of the media coverage of carbon? Where do you think we're out on this thing? I think I look, I think, We can clearly see the spikes. There is a very real data showing that this year we had way more expected more what the normal you taught us, I'm not a big fan of these. Like the conspiracy theories, it is obviously you know covert going on and I think Riddick us. I don't even have to say that, but where, at that point the problem is I blame the mainstream media for this, because, if you ve got, you know that this view, videos going out for a means showing all of these celebrations for Joe Biden being declared President Elect

and, like you mentioned there, sharing champagne. I love it. When Joe Biden pulled his mask down the coffin to his hand its it, they don't take seriously it out there doing it that they, don't they don't care, even you ve got, I think I'll say it was a World health organisation doktor saying no more locked should be a last resort. Let's not do this again. It's it's really dangerous, because economic damage leads to death as well. Now you ve got while and and Murphy in New Jersey, instituting Morlocks ass if it isn't quite make any sense. It's almost like their locking things down because they're scared of the media, not the actual virus. They don't want to be. They dont want to be said that they are responsible for the death, because hey if we locked down than any problems that arise in the lock down is because we had to do it, but if they dont lockdown, though blame them for for four four virus. Does I think I think we ve created a mass hysteria around this. If you look at the mortality rate of

That is bad. It's a bit a bitter, a bit worse than the flu. I'm not gonna, pretend gets substantially worse, but it is higher. It's not the same as the floats. It's a lot. There's lingering affects come from it, but for the most part, you're only allowed to tell people the end is nigh If I remember earlier on Youtube, they made a rule that you couldn't talk about covert at all. They d monetize, you, the only news. And getting is going to say something like people are gonna die. Must we lock things down if you come out and say, I think the lockdown could be worse. They say you want to kill grandma or something so that they've created the media has created a social pressure to encourage people to claim. We must take the most extreme action possible- that's not healthy we can't have someone come out and say: hey we look to the data, here's we found. We should chill out. You can't really do that. I mean you kind of can, but the incense.

As to claim the world is burning down. So what happens? Politicians respond to it by locking things down regular people put on masks when they're in their own bathrooms. They panic I've seen some people react and crazy ways over mask wearing. I was just writing my bike, eminent I'm in a forest, serve essentially alongside a river there's, no anywhere- and I see people writing bikes with Mask son, I just found out to be very strange. Your by yourself in the woods writing a bite you need to breathe, but you put em scan. It's me it's because the only news they're getting as this is the end I'll tell you what really funny about all this. I've invited numerous leftists to come onto my podcast item, guess I, which is a sit down conversation you no kind of like we're doin here conservatives will do in two seconds: moderate rightwing individuals, even you know, disaffected liberals who find themselves. They voted for trump they'll say have

any out. We take all the precautions, you know where we were treated seriously, but we're not cowering from it, but I reach out to some of these prominent hire. You know leftists on social media and stuff, and they say I'm too scared of covered the travel so clearly affecting democratic and and the left, and you know actual, why don't say actual liberals, whatever the resistance left has become their mortified of and it's it's it's our. I don't. I don't know what's gonna happen, but I tell you if you ve got two factions, what we know which don't I oughta one like everyone on the right or even in a you know, even who or like aunt. I woke crowd a vagrant everything, but if they could agree on the fact that we can still do our jobs and function, they're going to who generate more wealth or to be more successful, they're going to live their lives and be happier these these these people, the left, were terrified. virus, because without hearing the media over and over again they're not going on working there demanding government, you know cut checks to them. I am

they're not going to succeed, not been improve. Their skills in fact adding inside locked up all these public in a dull, their abilities. I think it's gonna critters, weird disparity in and skill cap and wealth at some point, but ultimately I think it's too the media trying to make money and they're gonna chase after the horrifying narrative until they drive off the cliff. And you certainly seeing that with regard to the schools where the only people who currently are going to schools are people either in red states or people who can afford it and their kids to private school. And if you are if you are poor and living in Washington DC. You are just screwed they're gonna force you to play. Kid unassuming school that Ukraine will not attend and they will learn nothing and Apparently the media just don't care so tempo and asked a few final questions, starting with you voted for Donald Trump you're in independent central SK, I want to ask why you voted for Donald Trump. But if you'd like to hear temples answers, you have to be a daily. Why remember? But a daily where I come could join at the top of the page. You can hear the rest of our conversation over their temple

It's been a pleasure thanks, so much for coming on the show and I'm going to direct everyone to go and check out TIM stuff on Youtube Gaston TIM Casal, as well as to cast doubt on him, really appreciate stopping by thanks. So much thanks for having it. Then she Piero shows Sunday Special is produced by math is whether executive producer, Jeremy boring our technical directorate is often Stevens and our assistant directorate possible. Why dusky associate producer Nick she hit. Our guests are built by Caitlin manner. Editing is by Jim nickel. Audio is mixed. I make forming a and make up his mind to Geneva. Huddled graphics are by Cynthia angle Hero show Sunday. Special is a daily wire production, copyright daily wire, twenty twenty.