Okey California love to tell you that that's fog is not the forest fires are encroaching again. These are not too close to where I live in this case, but the wine countries in trouble. How, however, that's not our concern right now, because at this moment in time everything is perfect. Sure people are having trouble everywhere, but are you right now know you watching? Coffee was atoms, possibly the best party your day, no probably the sporting today and everything started and everything's starting to go really well for you anyway, too bad about other people, but you're doing.

Great and the only way that you could do better is with the simultaneous up and all it takes. Is a government or a glass attack your trousers time again, team jogger flask of vessel of any kind and fill it with your favorite liquid? I like coffee and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine ahead of the day. The thing that makes everything better except by air quality is called the simultaneous happened. It happens now, go Yeah yeah yeah, that's good! Here's, the coolest thing that happened yesterday. I saw an advertisement for an electric bicycle for the water. That's my own description of it. It's at. They call it a hydrofoil and it's the Manta five and you ride it like a little bicycle and you peddle it,

and that there's a little propeller underneath you and it's just a bicycle kind of afraid him, except that it has some kind of floating device underneath it and it hasn't electric bicycle kind of assist, and I looked at the video of people just zipping around on that thing and I thought. you don't want the first time I rode electric. By. Can I told you about this? I realise that this is really the future. You spend ten seconds on an e bike and you wouldn't want to do any other kind of transportation.

It's just a cool feeling and I've got a feeling that the electric assist human peddled vehicles are gonna, be way way bigger than they are now. So that's given other big news, the government's taskforce dancers now, a fifteen minute test for governed and they're gonna make a hundred million of them in and about now. The trouble is apparently is still require some kind of a health care professionals to administrate. Why don't know? Because, apparently it's not a deep nasal swab its toward the the frontier knows. It's not the kind that some of you have had where they stick it up to your brain, so you do is go rant rat in your nostril stew

give them a little? Were liquid, no machines involved and way fifty minutes, and you definitely need a nurse to do that right. Why, as seventy saying it's, because a liability or whatever it is, it could obviously beach aged. I would say that if there is some kind of law law regulation rulers, something that requires a health care professionals for that, let's change that today is there any reason that by the end of today that should not already be changed, because there's no reason for right can we all agree that whatever dumb ass reason, there is that you did the healthcare professionals to go right, ran in your nose? That's it

I'm pretty sure that weaken we can get rid of whatever obstacle, let it and make more them now. It's not quite where we need to be wary where you ve got like a one dollar tests that everybody can do a home three times a day. That would be that that would be the end of a virus. If we have that Borg enclose can pretty clubs. I don't think it's good enough for contact tracing either necessarily, but there are a whole bunch of things collectively, they're all girl working right back so nicely good news. As you know, you probably all this trouble. has now been nominated. A third time for the Nobel Peace Prize. Three separate nominations and what's interesting is each nomination is different. In other words, is now being nominated three times for exactly the same reasons, three separate reasons,

and other related, of course, but he's done enough now that you could have three legitimate nominations for the Nobel Peace Prize. At the same time, I would you like to be debating against a guy who just got three separate Nobel Peace Prize? emanations now Willie with any what I say any will he went one out, but three nominations for three completely defendable, defensible reasons as Briarley strong. The Portland police are giving more aggressive, and one of the things that are doing is trying to take the shields away from the protesters. I guess they found they found a big stockpile shields.

and I went in and they took them away so as reading about this on twitter, and my first impression of that was all that's good, because the shields are obviously being used as offensive weapons and makes the protesters more bold. Amidst probably bad news right, you don't really need a shield to peacefully protest. Do you explain to me why you would need a shield to peacefully protest. And so when- I read the comments, I thought well, those comments are gonna agree with me. Why would they given that I'm so darn, clever and right all the time? So I,

the comments? I am waiting for, the part where they say that's a good strategy, take the shields away. I think that could make indifference. Maybe maybe everything would be better if we do that, but the commons did not say that the comments said well, it's obvious that they play on violence because they took the shields away, meaning that it's obvious that the police were planning violence, because, whilst They take the shields away, and I thought okay, the first time I read that ok, I won't there's always there's always a baby at right, there's always but he was a weird opinion about everything that

The next one is basically the same opinion: hey those those fascist cops taken, our only protection away. They're gonna kill us with rubber bullets ahead now, and I thought ok well too crazy people that I kept breeding and there are pretty much uniformly against police removing shields, which are basically weapons, the way there being used to use them in a often of way another defensively different worlds. What can I say

But it does seem like a good strategy, so I was chatting with my smartest democrat friend. I mentioned him often because he's very smart legitimately very smart and very well informed, but disagrees with me on everything trump related, which makes it fascinating, because when you're disagreeing with somebody stupid or uninformed well, that's the whole Tori, there's nothing interesting about their right you're. The reason you're disagree is a you know, some stuff, they don't know anything. So, of course you disagree. But when you run into somebody who is actually smart and well informed and really paying attention and they disagree and you pay attention to and you think you're pretty smart well, there's something to learn here so yesterday I guess I mentioned something about the shy trump support

not showing up in the polls, and my smart is friend who actually knows quite a bit about this field said: that's not true. It's debunked, it was debunked in twenty. Sixteen and one people look into it. They found that there was no such thing as shy trump supporters in actuality. There were problems with the polling, but it didn't have to do with people lying to pollsters. And I thought to myself: that's weird cuz. The news that I've read was exactly the opposite, that it was confirmed and that they found it, and I sent him an article they showed it was confirmed. It was in the of some major public

and then he said now that was initially initially they thought they existed, but when the deep dive was done, it was confirmed. It was debunked. No such thing as these. These items supporters, the very next move I see article that job Pollack was tweeting around from breast, even in the New York Times in which he interview today, shy jobs, a border someone who wouldn't tell anybody she worked with than she was a charm supporter gave her reasons and its important from the story is not important in any other way, but because every time we tell a story about politics, you have to throw it.

there? There demographic information some day we will have to do that. I think I agree with Martin Luther king of some day we will have to throw the somebody's gender and sexual preference and ethnicity just to tell a frigate story right. I mean nothing really bothers me as much as that. In terms of the way we talk about things, but you have to do that, but you have to do that, and so this was a story in the New York Times about a woman who is described as a fifty year old Lesbian who wouldn't want her coworkers and friends to now she was a trump supporter and when she was asked about the details of what she liked or didn't live,

There is only one thing that she didn't like about Trump she'll issues of Ex Bernie supporter and she liked trumps economics and she like the lot about him. But there is one thing: there was one thing she she did have a problem with. It was the fine people hoax with she didn't know, is a hoax she'll have one problem with job and it was a thing that never happened. The fine people oaks now as bread, Stevens Ass, the Michael essentially, I wonder if there's everybody else like that is or anybody else out there who just just pretending to. be a job supporter, but really is. So I ran my highly unscientific twitter pole to see if I could stirrups and people and here's the question I asked, I said: have you lied to post,

about your trump support now the way I worded it was, I didn't say, would you lie? Does that's that's sketchy. Those people might say they lie, but maybe they're lying to me and when actually asked they might just automatically say the truth. So. So, instead of saying, would you, like, I said, have you lied? Have you actually literally physically Nokia. And have you actually lied to upholsterer about your trumps support? Eighty percent of the people who answered said yes, which in just the the few minutes that the poor ran the numbers, are clicking up like crazy, but just in the first few minutes I think, maybe two minutes or so that that came to over six hundred and thirty people who follow we on Twitter, who happened to see that

tweet who happened to answer it, which is very shrinking group of people. Six hundred and thirty of them have actually lied to bolsters now it's a twitter, but also can I can I be sure that these numbers a reliable and anyway. Now now it's an unscientific ball. But do you think this section thirty people within two minutes or so would have lied to me, but would not lie to bolster maybe wrecked possum possibly there were six hundred and thirty people who said, I think I've been alive to this cartoonist. Why What what reason would you have to lie on my twitter if it? if more than an hour later, I would say- oh maybe trolls- have spotted at an bunch of Democrats, are coming into mess up the pole or something like that, but it happened in two minutes.

In too many such as lit up with people is that they lied literate We already have lied to real bolsters. Do you think that's fake? It could be right, it could be the whole point of being unscientific. Is you just can't say for sure it's true. Could be six hundred and thirty liars just sprang up just like that. Maybe what do you think My belief is that, however, many of the six hundred and thirty lied, there's still probably play, He left over to suggest there's a big number there. Let me ask you this in twenty six teen, if you are going to vote for Trump, had he not one or even if you did when did you think that was a big risk to the rest of your life? Maybe,

found a little bit. But, probably not that much, I don't remember being terribly concerned that my reputation would be destroyed forever in twenty sixteen, but twenty twenty in twenty twenty you can actually get killed for being identified as the transporter. Let me say that again, you could actually get killed and at least one person has as far as I can tell forbidden transport, if, if I were to let's say, go to some business or personal thing in Berkeley, California, down the road I was just. I just happened to be there for my own personal reasons, and I happened to walk out the door and accidentally I didn't know it was going to happen, but I came into the middle of the Vienna. Protest? Suppose I work spoke. Somebody recognize me think about this. If I

this worked at the door and didn't know there was a protest outside interests walked into the middle, and somebody recognize me would I be safe, Now I would actually be in mortal danger. My life would be in danger just by walking around knows. If somebody recognize me, if I go where there's more normal people than in Berkeley feel afraid, but I can't believe it. What he's gonna be like twenty? Sixteen, because the level of liberal physical economic danger can say you support tromp is through the roof compared to twenty. Sixteen. here's a little dog, not barking situation for you watch CNN,

and Emerson BC as long as they're talking about trumps taxes and here's. What you want to look for look for somebody talking about his taxes on one of those two networks who actually knows taxes. I haven't seen her yet now. I would guess it's probably happened. I would think at least once they would have had somebody on who understands. actions, but I'll think so. Have you see that yet amusing that anybody on either those networks? Who could explain why the text That is why it is what it is and why trumps taxes or the way they are. I think so, and when I point out that there are two other than someone else Elite pointed me to a c b s interview in which they didn't try to bring on attacks. Experts. Have you think that went

the tax expert was asked about all these sketchy. Looking trump deductions and widen pay taxes did the tax export someone who actually understands taxes say my god, that's a travesty. How can you get it? How can he do that? Some some law must have been violated or, at the very least something Ethel go on ethical and moral happened? Do you think that happened? Nope the tax experts have yet, as those are just standard, deductions is just the way. Basically, this is the way you do it this this deduction was available, so he took it one of the things I learned by watching that and I ve been to hear about this because entered, and that is that the point of the audit is that the money is being audited, trumpets, there was a seventy two million dollar tax rebates. I guess you'd call it in other words

government Valium seventy two million dollars they had previously banned in taxes, they gave him back and I didn't what the situation was. But apparently was this Obama and the Obama era. They passed a law. That said you could you could take into account losses for. Earlier prior years than before. So the leaving the happen, is that trumpet this did not have any way to write off that seventy two million he'd already paid it was just gone just money that was gone but Obama change the law specifically for companies like it. the where they handle they have a loss and they had didn't get the benefit of it. Cuz too far away. So all drop dead apparently his lawyer said: hey there's a new law, it totally applies to us, so we're going to apply for this. Seventy two million.

Apparently they filled out of paperwork. Apparently the government looked at it, apparently the government's idea that looks good. They Melvin seventy two million dollars. So if you think that whatever happened. There was some sketchy thing. I doubt it I mean I'm not even sure what's being wanted, because a sound like it was pretty straightforward but that's not that's not the way. You heard it from the New York Times as it did. You hear that the first twenty four hours or so did anybody explained to you that all term did his is, is accountants did? Was they applied for a rebate that Obama made available? that's all the habit, the whole part of those story. Now there may be more to it, which will be the subject of the audit, but it's not an evidence. As far as I know here are some other things that people who don't understand

Violence and taxes work have been thinking. The first thing is, I think, that a lot of people believe that when they hear that Trump owes four hundred million dollars or whatever the number is, I think that people who don't understand how money works when they hear the Trump owes four hundred million. They think that he is four hundred million dollars in the whole, meaning that if he paid back all that forum William he would have less than zero money left over you. You would use up all his money to pay off the foreigner million. That's not the case he's just a guy who has some dead and apparently, according to him, it's not much debt com. To his assets so like anybody whose godless say a good income, but they also have at home mortgage the whole mortgage doesn't mean that they,

more than they have the means, there's a little bit of dead in a larger picture. So that's the first thing that the money morons don't understand is that that that isn't necessarily a big deal. The other thing that I see them jabbering about today is there's some indication that vodka was payday. Twenty six million dollar consulting she. Now we don't know if this is true yet right, but this is the way has been reported and its being reported like that some kind of an illegitimate right off that that he's he's figured out how to save taxes by paying his own daughter. a salary, not a salary, but a consultative body of twenty six million and, as pretty tricky re says, to exercise their all all the other people.

When the nurse her pretty sure that looks a little sketchy. As you know, normal people can't do that right. Well, here's the partner, leaving out the amount that the Trump saved in taxes for his company by paying a vodka is exactly identical to the amount that vodka paid in taxes, because she made an extra twenty six million dollars. There's no difference. The government got exactly as much taxes as far as we know unless it was something weird going on with their taxes

but as long as they're, both in the top tax range, which they would pay. The taxes just paid a different way, but it doesn't change it. So it's basically a mechanism for what say it's it's an estate planning mechanism. By about this did do you think of vodka was worth twenty six million dollars in one year. I do I do it look at what vodka adds to the the whole operation, both in the White House and then when you look at presumably what she added to the whole operation when she was still in private business.

If you tell me that that wasn't worth twenty six million dollars whatever it was, I don't know the details, but I would say that in the range that doesn't even seem that doesn't seem high, but here's the corporate if Trump could pay Vancouver twenty six million, which I think we agree, was completely optional right optional, in the sense that if he was bleeding cash couldn't pay is bills. We have paid a vulgar twenty six million. I don't think so. So it sounds to me like he had enough cash flow. Their pay off is dead. Wasn't gonna be a big problem, because if you can't pay off your dad, I dont know that you would necessarily move twenty six million dollars to your kid as part of your estate planning. I think you'd keep it and pay your debts as it would be better to keep the big operation afloat then it would be to temporarily just hide some money there and hope that that work there.

Woman. So that's. Actually we learned that probably at least before corona virus, which heard everybody he probably had enough money to pay off his debt. Now here's the other than the the accusation against drop is that if his death is really big, that he's a risk of blackmail because he'll need those Russians or or who were to pay off his debt, to which I say: ok, the out of money? There would have to be paid off for Tromp LE say four hundred million was just pick a number for a conversation. Let's say that the Democrats who are concerned that oceans, will pay off four hundred million dollars for a trump and therefore he would do whatever they wanted to get them to pay that off this, I don't think that's the case, but just say that you're a Democrat, you believe that Here's the thing! Is there some other politician?

there are some nine billion euro politician of Senator a president is there's somebody you can imagine who would not be influenced by four hundred million dollars because pay somebody's dead is only one of many ways. You can give somebody a lot of money if you were inclined to do that is fairly easy to do legally you just you just make sure that there are some investment in something that their brother lows investing in here. You just make sure that somebody in their circle a lot of money. What sort of untraceable? So if Russia wanted to put a shitload of money into bribing an american politicians, they dont need to depend on them having Dat That sort of an irrelevant detail, if you said to Bill Clinton a bill Clinton. I think I can arrange to give you four hundred million dollars at less say

Dublin was cleverly said: don't give oraibi a check. That would be obvious, but you know what you couldn't do you couldn't donate to the Clinton Foundation and they give me a pretty big salary and they pay from my jetson stuff. So that would be legal so once you that my point is, if you're talking about gigantic amounts of money, which is the only thing you're talking about if you're talking about paying off tromp bank loans There has to be a big about money. The same amount of money would be just as influential for everybody. They don't have to be in financial trouble. No he says no to four hundred million dollars. If they can obtain it legally, so the risk of black I was just sort of the same everywhere. If you're talking about millions of dollars, everybody has the risk.

I would argue that Trump probably has less risk of being bribed, because I just don't think you need the trouble there's not enough upside the. oh, and it turns out that these seventy two million that trumpet could apply to four based on his past losses, was because the casino abandonment, so when he got the casino business that was the loss, so we know exactly what the loss which, as we know it, was a real loss. We know that the casino thing didn't work out. There was real and we know we apply for it with an old bomber regulation at all. It's very good to me, an Coulter who I consider one of the smartest people will comment on stuff, Elsie.

an attorney right, very, very smart, but I don't know how much she knows about finance and tax law, which would put her in good company with ninety nine point. Nine percent of the public, but she treated today. That. as an example of how the law allows real stability ears to get away with murder, how about fixing the utterly corrupt tax code so, in other words, even an culture is agreeing that Trump and other billions. Are getting away with something because they're not paying taxes like little people and cheek. She noted that she bade fifty percent a year, as do I Here's the thing about a sure she quite understands what exactly when you change. How would you change that to make it better? Would you, for example,

say that if you're a billion error, you can't write off expenses or you can write off all of your expenses. What would be the justification for saying that billion is uniquely can't write off expenses, and why What happens if you did suppose you said our ears, like everybody else, small business, you can write off your expenses, but if you're a billionaire you can't or you can write them off all. What would that do? It will promote change their behaviour. There would be certain expenses because they can't write them off that they wouldn't incur. They would avoid and the reason that the tax law exists. The way it does is to encourage business and encourage the greater good. Even though there are some minor inequities that have

Because of it is for the greater good, so exactly will change it. Would you change the capital gains laws, because if you do that disrupts a lot here, there's a lot depends on that. So you could collapse the real estate business by changing the law like you can just collapse, entire business, that what you want, how about somebody says a fair tax. There's no such thing as a fair tax. That's not a thing! You can't design a tax system. That is fair. If you think that that can be done, you need to look into it. There are only tax systems that can burden some group more than others. That's it, but you can do something fair, that's not one of the past,

and always because not in the end, people always think that whatever their taxes are unfair and subjective as waking together. So if anybody can come up with some specific thing, they could be changed that wouldn't collapse the economy or destroy an industry that is vital to the United States for somebody that I'm all ears, but I think there is some kind of the people who don't know tax laws. I think they imagine there's some obvious, here like well, it's obvious sort of obvious. This is all wrong, but if you tweet, this things will be fair and whilst the economy will be great, doesn't really work. That way doesn't work that way at all the other. The flat tax is they talking point, but it's not there's a reason that that's never got anywhere is because a sudanese you starting either the details and all falls apart. You know

if, if it could work there be great, but I think that ship assailed there is also the accusation that Trump rode off his haircuts and on Twitter. That is being seen as an obvious on ethical thing: that's no fair and it should be allowed to which I say well, there's somebody you doesn't understand our taxes work, because is anybody suggesting that these seventy thousand dollars he rode off for haricots Zimbabwe, suggesting that the Irish as disallowed, that they haven't disallowed it if its not disallowed its allowed? If, if your- if your accountant is not putting in deductions they get accepted? You need to get a better accountants, but this is an example of a deduction that was accepted,

now, why would he is haircuts, be allowed a yours would not? Why is it that you can't write off your hair cut? Well, let me give you possibility. Is it possible that there was a contract employee who is part of the cast of, and I guess the apprentice because they haricots were related to his work and the apprentice, and did the person get paid an actual fee for being on call to play with his hair and to cut it and probably also to make sure it's in good shape for the for the camera? That's an employee! That's boy who probably he paid as opposed to the production company. Even if you pay an employee it doesn't matter what they do and those of other that they caught your hair or if you pay a contract person.

So you're probably was a perfectly reasonable deduction in the context of being on the tv show and in the specific context the trumps hairs is part of his brand. You can compare than anything else and there's lots of questions about family members. Acting is as project managers and acting as consultants, And crystallizes writing about this, as if there's something wrong with it almost certainly not can hire your family members there's nothing wrong with that you can offer,

pay your family members you're allowed. You can over pay your family members, as in this case, because so much money is involved. It just transfers who pays the taxes. So if, if Eric Trump is paying more taxes and Donald Trump is vague, lass, it's the same amount as just move to a different pocket. In case you didn't know over at locals. For those who don't know, there's a subscription service that part of also investor, by the way, full disclosure I've as small investments, and that's where I do some of my while all the stuff I don't put on twitter- that's worth see so their provocative stuff and putting a lot of micro, lessons their success and persuasion, etc. Things you don't see on Twitter, but Gregg. I felt his joined locals. So if you want to see the stuff that unites us,

elsewhere from Gregg, gonna locals dot com and look for Gregg got felled and you'll be glad you did so look for that. So the big debate is tonight, of course, albeit between me, and I was watching Britain, Hume Interview and I haven't seen brit- you use these words before they are talking about Biden. An innate described by ass quote plainly see now plainly see now, you remember it was a long ago we were saying things like well, he may have lost the step, Are we saying things like well, you know here he doesn't have the same mental acuity.

but the day before the debate were day of brilliant says is plainly senile now. The reason this is important is that if you, if you don't follow Fox NEWS, if you order rank, Here the opinion people to the newspaper in terms of credibility that the more opinion opinion they are. You said they have less credibility in terms of the factual apart and the more news oriented. They are the more credible there. So only on the most credible end, you that you, you know, brought there. But you know these guys are considered even by independent people as fair and pretty much down the middle kinds of players

and even if he is willing to go on national tv and say plainly see now, is that plainly world were that they got me because plainly says you don't have to talk about. It were beyond the point where this is a conversation of whether or not it happened. We're we're completely at a point where its blade, I see it. You see it. We also see now- and I can't believe you use that word just put another so trumps strategy tonight I dont know if he has a strategy per se, but I would guess he's gonna try to get Biden worked up. Do you think it seems to me that the most obviously.

Tromp would do. Is try to figure out how to get under his skin and make him bad now. Bided knows that, because everybody will be telling him he's going to try to make you mad document, don't get mad, so I think you're going to see the Biden over smile. Do you know what I mean by the binding over smile? It's where he s the listen to Trump say bad things about him and bad things about a hunter. but he was to act like he's not faced by so he does the over smile. Let me do the over smile, for I would like to ask if you are listening to us five gas. This now reaches thing, Place quinces eyes really I this is really fake, looking smile that doesn't match the eyes. That's in its wake

so liberally Biden, fake smile and of course, tromp is gonna go after Hunter right, because that's the most, obviously, that would get by didn't work up so If, if trumpets playing it right here, probably not introduce any new ideas that would be headlines of themselves because I think he was not make except for whatever NEWS Biden generates by being by being tweaked by. I would love to see Trump make a full throated play for the blackfoot, which he might Would you like to see Trump just say: look what have you done through the black population in this country? Now look what I've done and already planned to do. Look at my

portfolio of what I'm doing for Black America compared to everything you ve done and give me African These are not even close we're not even in the same zip code of what I've done compared to what you did in forty seven years, which amounted to what putting black people in jail less. What you did so, I think trumpet could tell a story. They would just kneecap the black vote quite quite factually. He wouldn't have to add any hyperbole in all your each geeky just laid out there, because at this point is just factual and I don't know Biden does with accept, go for the fine people hoax. Here's! The thing I know is not going to happen. I would love for Trump to debunk the fine people hoax explicitly now you, Joe Biden, brings up which you,

Mary I likely already will what will trump do if the fine people hoax is brought up? How do you deal with it? Here's how I'd do it, given that they have a time constraint and so Trump would not have time to go through the whole. Well, it's a fake news. They edited this partner.

etc. If you wanted to get to like the most clean quotable part, I would say: here's what I said that day. I said that the White Nationalism NEO Nazis should be condemned totally. That's my exact quote. If you look at the tapes that you think I said, fine people you'll see that they cut that out to make it look like. I was talking about indifferent group, so spake news. I said this sentence exactly without promptly that they should be condemned totally. Isn't that right, Chris Wallace now Chris Wallace he's not gonna, do fact checking but maybe you could help out with a question. If you know what I so it looks like me,

grand jury stuff, it's gonna be released on the Brianna Taylor situation, so we're gonna get to hear the public is the exact aberrations in the grand jury. I don't know how often that happens, but I think that's a good idea. Transparency will prevail the urine Omar situation with the bell harvesting is getting interesting, but I'm worried that is going to go into the into the the news black hole well, what would be a bigger story, then undercover film

You learn o Mars campaign. People seem to be paid by the campaign allegedly collecting. All these melon ballots in doing sketchy things women. While what would be what would possibly be a bigger story than that and its sorted disappearing. Isn't it? I think this year end is largely just ignoring it, MSNBC, largely ignoring it. They may have done a mention of it and then just moved on. So it's the the ability of the news industry to make something go way. Is the scariest thing that you'll ever see it's one thing that they tell a story? That's not true! I am that's. That's annoying vexing emission happen, but you sort of are used to that.

but may hear story go way. That is actually a true story. May here go away! That's dangerous! That's really dangerous as a suggestion that one way to promote tromp is to change all your hot spots to Trump. Twenty two So anybody who is looking for a hot spot, they're gonna, run into from twenty twenty, so they're going to see a lot more trump supporters, but there be a little bit underground society as a whole spot. You unnecessarily nowhere and came from. I thought that was pretty funny. So if you know how to change your hotspot, change it to Trump, twenty twenty, not sure if they would. conflict with other people or not. Is there any reason why by next election is really reason that we want to solve this voting problem, because I get the Corona

I was caught us off guard and so were not ready to do that. The mail in ballots as as well as we would like to be prepared, but by next election and maybe even by, doesn't seem to you that we should have this completely solved and the way the completely solve it, and I can only think I want with facial recognition, There has to be a way both for home your mail in votes, but also for in person. There has to be a way to use facial recognition to guarantee you're getting the right of a person voting. The company clear view is, I think, the leader in that area right now and they seem to me they do. I think, the best job of of dark faces, sometimes at the false, false identifications with some of them.

Lesser technologies? I think clear view. Is the leader in that in terms of getting acts, actually accurate, facial recognition? So in two years, there's just no excuse for not having facial recognition as at least an option. We something you're testing. Do you believe that the Poles are with Biden winning by a lot since our right to because it seems that the average of the Poles have Biden up by six nationally nine percent Pennsylvania, some like that, sets and write to you that doesn't even sound close to write to me? But I will say we shall see.

Right, that's all I got for now, so I'm gonna be watching the debates with Christina tonight. I'll be tweeting as I, as I see things develop, either the predictions, as this will be the most watch presidential debate of all time, and when I heard that I thought to myself yeah, I think that's true. I think this will be the most watched presidential debate, but you know what else they are not going to say that this is a prediction, but it

is not impossible. It will be the most watch televised event of all time. I'm not going to predict that that's the case. What is possible, because these specific dynamic of being trampled being twenty twenty stakes seems to lie in the fact that the real fun here is watching by didn't, try to keep it together and watching Trump. The world's greatest trash darker try to set this guy off his game on national tv. Now, if you can tell me, there's anything, you ve looked forward to watch you more than that I'm not sure I believe you, if you'd, if you told me every sport that literally there's no sporting event, I would want to watch more than this there is also no comedy. I would be willing to watch more than us. There is no first,

on movie that I would want to watch more than this. This is literally the most anticipated thing on television Then I could even remember I'm not. I don't remember anything that have anticipated this much. I mean enjoy watching the super bowl now and then, but the those who are routine. I wasn't really. I wasn't really loving it just sorted. Did it because it was a party time. This might be just maybe the biggest televised event of all time, because there's nothing to compete with the right tv is often What else you can do? Why wouldn't you watch this that's all I got for Now- and I will talk to you maybe tonight-