But a bumper everybody come on in the money gather around its time, die for recovery was got atoms. Best part of the day is a good. Oh, it's good! You will see what it looks like it. My window, Total why their conditions that is on air quality right there. forest fires still putting a lot of smoke into my neighborhood they're, not very close today, but that there so many fires. They can't go outside the widow to go outside. Yet what we need is simultaneously and it doesn't take much to enjoy it.

really need. Is a government or a glass of Ankara gels resign again to reflect a vessel of any kind of interesting way? My traffic is very small today something's going on and you should show that vessel with coffee or your favorite beverage and join me for the dopamine hinder the day. The thing that makes everything better simultaneous up happening right now, Well, I think that clear, the air quality a little bit probably after to Warder, fix it entirely.

All right. Let's talk about all the things the big mystery of the day is now. This is interesting. My traffic is roughly half of what it was yesterday. I wonder why that is so something going on today. Your twitter is down. Twitter is working, somebody saying oh, it could be that the automatic notification didn't go up on Twitter. That's what it was. No notification well, let us enjoy those of us who are here right. What's the big questions is what's up with President Trump, not forcefully disavowing the races groups,

with an emphasis on the word forcefully, because he actually did say you disavow them is disavowed them in the past the multiple times but when I asked in the debate, as you all know, he did not so periscope didn't poster twitter liquor. Sir looks like there's a sum issue. but here is a he that a hypothesis I want to put the other president trump- and I think I wrote about this and when Bigley President, is very savvy about media stuff. Would you agree that he is one of the most experienced? Maybe the most things

media personality. You don't just about of all time who has been interviewed more times than president drop, not many people and there's a track that he would see. Coming that. I would also see coming because, like him, I get interviewed a lot. And here's the trick, if somebody says do you, will you disavow axe- and you think self. Well, that group that you mentioned this group acts. Third there there are bad group, I can easily disavow them, so I say: was there Ok, Howard would be to disavow the K K K Mart not at all the socially socially acceptable. Using do I disavowed, what would happen? What would be the next thing that would happen if the President disavowed the k, K, K

not in a speech that he is giving? This is important but rather in a given take scenario. Now, if he's giving a speech here just disavow only wants and he doesn't have to take questions if he doesn't want to engage. this message out there and say yet by disavowal of the cake, a gay and they walk away. That's all good, no problem right, but what, if somebody ass sin to disavow somebody, while their two problems here, number one looks weak when people- You d say stuff. Think about it. How do you look when somebody randomly can make you say stuff literally make you say words? Ok, you, Gonna, make you say these words I disavowed, whoever You say the words.

who's in charge. Is it the person who repeated what would they were told to repeat or is it the person who forced them to say it in public? Is it's a power thing? So that's the first thing you need to know. The president, seemingly never, I can't think of an exception, He never give up the power position. The power position is who's making? Somebody say something: it's not the person whose whose just conforming sets the first problem. It does look week now But you say to me but Scott, you I get what you're saying you can't just What other people tell you to say that would look weak but come on any fool. Can disavow or racist group way Supremacists Tower is out there. the exception. Clearly you can do that. No problem at all right, no problem.

What would happen if he had given out now? This is what this This sort of thing you learn if you have media training I do. I literally have training whether a real experts who sat with me and taught me how to deal with media the next thing we would happen is you'd get another question? Ok, ok, so you ve, you ve, disavowed ways premises. Forget. Do you also disavow the proud boys. I can now it's getting a little harder right, because if you do know exactly who the proud boys are, and I confess I didn't really know until this morning I've, never been interviewed by Gavin Beginners beckoned, twenty sixteen, so I knew There was something called the proud boys and do they existed. I've even communicated with some of the people of message me unsolved.

Maybe etc, but I don't know who they were, what they were, We knew that they were were sort of like that, like the fight or something say a politically incorrect claim, But are they are they away supremacists group, I would say now. and you know our argument. They would give for not being a white supremacist group, well that the black members of proud boys would be a pretty good argument that there are not a white supremacist group, because it's hard to explain why the White Supremacist Group would have black members, but they do, and other ethnicity is as well but do have. I ever said something: let's say There's a lot more about women. Have they anything that the president would need put some distance from probably s

yes, but he doesn't know exactly what they have said. So does he disavowed? Well suppose he does but say does so he discovers the poor, the proud boys. What's the next thing, little. Do you disavow Bright Bart, bright bark. A publication that has been blamed by some people for saying things that other people, if it considered, is or racist or whatever, Z, do he's already disavowed the easy one way supremacy any hypothetically, let's say here sort of tentatively disavowed. The proud boys, just in case, don't know what's in there nobody is quite sure what the Rebecca I am not entirely sure but less,

it, is another. Now what about bright Bart, because lots of people on the left say bad things about bright Bart? Does he have to disavow them? Let's say he did now: it's not gonna happen right in a million years, Trump would never disavow publication that tends to be friendly or to him But suppose it at what happens next does he have to disavow Joe Rogan because remember when Spotify took on Joe Rogan Pro? they said others several of these, besides we're gonna have to delayed because they seem to friendly to weigh supremacists or whatever they said, specifies employees apparently route rebelling, so that what does he do? Does President Trump disavowed Joe broken

Because they would be able to make an argument, I think it's a bullshit argument, nobody could make an argument. Well, he hears a shared with by interviewing begins, you got, he actually interviewed Gavin begins here, Joe Rogan interviewed me. What about me? Would President Trump have to disavow me? because I've been on Georgian Joe Joe Rogan talk to govern begins. Gavin begin was the founder of proud boys. Where does it stop sees you know? Even if you disagree with my examples, the rim, The point is the moment you accept the frame, the I'm going to make you say stuff and you're. Gonna have to keep saying stuff, because I'm going to keep given the stuff to say and the moment you say

you. If I want to keep saying the things that you're telling me to say your racist, it's over now the president has taken the position, you have you seen him for a long time. They just doesn't like to get pushed around. It's not a good luck, and he just prefers not do so. I think that when you saw the hesitation first, the first time was when Jake Tapir asked the President to disavow David, Duke the KKK. And you saw the present hesitated and is any tried to get a sense who else he would have to disavow. I think that was the source of the hesitation. Now, of course, I'm speculating because I'm not inside his head again Nobody was thinking, but based on my own experience with media interviews. I would have seen that trap. So if I'd been ass, their question

As I was answering it- and this is hard to do it's hard to have a separate the thought- that's complicated, while you're talking on camera to millions of people, It is very hard to do so you're trying to process. Ok, if I answer this question, what does that lead to What'S- question that naturally follows that am setting a precedent and my my walking into a trap, is this: one of those is still be here, your spouse kind of questions. So I feel as if the president, Found himself YO planning Moves ahead, not knowing where it would go, and I think that cost him, because he would have been better off just going with it and then changing the subject and, like I said it said, there's a big difference, between something he could say in the speech. Does he can say everything you wants to say nothing extra and then just walk away.

but when somebody is doing back and forth, you know what the next question is going to be either going to extend this until they they trap you how about that? doesn't answer, I often think about how to add a dancer. This you know. If I'm the president, I would I answer it, and I think I might go go something like this to avoid the trap What do you do you disavowed KKK, less and less the question here Here's an answer on playing with as a better way to go in that of disavowing people disavow will say opinions. So you could easily say I disavow every racist viewpoint, no matter where it comes from Then what does the interviewer say? So are you explicitly disavowing about of the KKK

and then the president could say: does KKK of anti racism disavowing. Racism, no matter where it is so you know if you make a list. Ask yourself if there are any racism there, because if there is any racist and your list, I'm disavowing them well are used specifically, can you say: you're disavowing, KKK well I put the money terrorist domestic terrorist list. So that's pretty disavowed, wouldn't you say so. Twitters down people are tiny, interesting, periscopes up twitters, damn it looks like people figured out the ram broadcasting. Does that. The traffickers backup anyway, I think I'll go after the thought of racism and disavowal that wherever it is, I saw that

What are the Trump campaign websites had thirty three, also or misleading claims lip Joe Biden allegedly made at the that the debates, thirty three false or misleading claims. That's a lot of misleading claims, as the authorities an hour and a half. Now here's my only point had that you know. Did President Trump say thirty, three false or misleading things. I don't know what the exact count is probably right, but here's the thing, the people who most dislike. President Trump. If you ask them one year ago, name, what's the worst thing about Trump. they will probably say he lies. When do you agree.

that that will be the number one thing that would come on people's mouth. At least that's my experience knows sometimes go with the racism thing first, but I was at least number two is gonna, be that he lies like twenty thousand lies lies lies eyes, lies, but Why don't they say that about Joe Biden? Those Joe Biden lie less than president drop. I don't see any evidence of that. It looks like lies continuously like just full on, almost nothing, but a wall of lies. Probably seventy percent lies the thirty percent. True something like that. why is it that we don't think of binding as a liar I love you do if your transporters, but why Democrats. by them as a liar when he's wall, the wall lies all the time.

I think it has to do with whatever your brand is once you, you ve decided that somebody is a brand you just sort of stick with it will give you an example. When I was a kid it was, it was considered a truism Volkswagen beetles were unusually reliable. There was something about them being built simply or whatever, but the the thought was there the very reliable these view? more reliable than any other vehicle but yet when I would drive around town. If, though, if I saw a broken down car- by the side of the road, the percentage times, it was a Volkswagen beetle. really really high to the point where you could not notice it be like broken down. Looks like an beetles all over the place. Farmer, any other car I ever saw. And yet and yet the reputation was it was the most dependable car

there was no correlation between what you observed with your own eyes and what everybody believed to be true, I think that was one of the first times. I thought that the world is a crazy place, because it was just so obviously not true there were dependable and is so obviously true. That Biden is a gigantic liar. But one of the things you see a little bit less is that's a reason for disliking trump. Correct me if I'm wrong and watch for this as we are closer to election I'll bet, you do that, we now an election day. The complaint that Trump is a liar will will shrink you're still here but the number of times will say it will be way less and the reason is now they are something to compare them to when it was just

tromp verses. Whatever your ideal idea, your ideal of a of a better candidate is well, then it looks like trumps, a big liar because he's compared to your ideal, honest candidate, that doesn't really exist, but as soon as you get a real one a real candidate and Joe Biden and used counting the lies and is thirty. Three and ninety minutes, thirty three lies and ninety minutes. How can you possibly say to yourself with any kind of intellect integrity. How can you say you can vote for Joe Biden cause? I don't want a liar for president. I feel like that reason for voting for binding just went away because he lies continuously. Here's my take two days after the debate when

When the debate is fresh, you have you have a certain set of feelings, because you can remember a lot of the details, so that will be things that feel like they're having an effect on you, because you remember them. They just happened. You thinking about it. It must be important because you're thinking about it, but you get just a few days. From it and memories being what they are, you start forgetting slices of it and your forgetting you're forgetting value, forgetting that pretty soon there's not much left of your memory. This is just, normal way: memories work so what's left after a few days, have gone by and there's lots more political noise and distractions. Suddenly, here's the memory that you'll be left with from that debate. There was a contest. The seal, good, bullshit, the most and trumpet dominated

That's it that's sort of what you remember, because that was the visual and assorted, the the overall theme and feeling you got you. You can't forget how much tromp was trying to dominate and talk over Biden and how Biden was he was used to in a pretty good job of trying to fight back, but it looked like a bad. Boys, because if you ve ever watched Biden Debate, not tromp. If you see in the past by the debates here, bullying, but will you put him on the stage with Trump he's the lesser bully? And that's what you remember so let me this, I'd say you were totally put off by trumps aggressive young now, following the rules performance totally put off by it, but separately you have to make

Decision about the following one of those two people by the nor tromp is going to fight for something on your side, so you have to pick one of them to be in your team to be a team leader, and once you pick them they're gonna go. Do some fighting for you, so whatever they can get whatever deals, they can make whatever advantages they can get. That's gonna accrue to you because you pick them there on your team. If the only thing you know about them was that debate, who do you pick to get you some shit. right you see it right. You could hate everything about what Trump did on the stage. But if you said yourself, you can only pick one and they have to go forth and get you some stuff? It's a no brainer, you're gonna pick Trump every time because he can,

all this situation, even if he hated it? That's the guy you on your team, if your iron lawyer, what the lawyer, whose the most polite? No you? Don't? You don't want the lawyer whose most poles You might want the lawyer, whose polite to you but when your lawyer is fighting the other team, you don't want them to be nice necessarily. I mean unless there's some advantage to it, you want them to be a killer. You want them to be a shark so I got a feeling that people were not as put off by the the strong man performance, which is what it was it was. There was showing who who had the most alpha energy And on that point I saw, I saw just a great comment, so this is wrong. Francis, hotel whose break our international news editor and

Because she s spanish words in her profile that she is hispanic which is important to the point and she treated this. let take as a spanish like this debate, because. So we engage each other politically, all the time it isn't. civil is just passionate. The pearl clutching about how President's are disposed to act like those people does. so well with me, and apparently a number of other people. Not apparently, I saw the common and there were a lot of people from various was interesting cultures. Who said oh yeah Savior same here. That's that,

my family and they looked at it and thought themselves. I fear that that looks just like. I would expect that look. Why wouldn't look like that? Of course, the president is aggressive, of course, he's talking over him. Of course he's interrupting. How else do you do it? That's exactly our political conversations! Postal, I don't have my own insight into this, but there were a whole lot of people agreed with it, so that that's all I'm going to say you know a lot of people agree with it. I thought then bungee knows take on the other debate. and I thought it was a really strong one saw or repeated here, which is that its base election, another words, nobody is trying to persuade somebody else. The vote The other two so so, everybody's just trying to get their own people to show up, and it's all about

your own base to get off the couch or fill out the form and actually vote? So that's the first and the as Dan points out strategically did tromp maker, Dent invited support by separate him from his four left. Well, I don't know because a lot of those people are going to say well, you know I'm still closer to Biden than I am to Trump. I don't like Trump. So maybe, but what about the people who are sort of just not that exists, about voting- maybe It would be the one to run on the fence, it's not a case that they would have switched vote Trump but rather there just now, commissioner lab and vote for binding because they're just not as excited

Maybe they were Bernie supporters, they feel like they were thrown under the bus. So did the president make his point that the Biden supporters are are not all on the same page, I feel like you did as as bungee no pointed out, I think he made their case and he made it well. But what about the the problems? The trump gave himself by his was a bad performance on the question of disavowing white supremacy. Do you think that cost him any votes from his base. And the answer is probably not because there's nothing that happened in the debate that the trumps supporters are not accustomed to in other words, is a sort of more of the same okay. We we Already now he doesn't like to be pushed into saying stuff.

we already know he doesn't like to be into apologizing clarifying defense. He just like the play offsets. and so that's what you get now to his supporters We ve all seen the compilation clips of clearly and and and strongly disavowing way, supremacy and racism. take a gay. So if there is a border, you know that the claims against them or bullshit, even if you understand that the way we handle the question was completely botched, which would be my take on that my own. Take he didn't lose my vote. I told you this year. We estimate personally, he lost my vote, but I also have never haven't lately so like your semi, big difference and as I explained losing my vote is just person is just personal.

not anything? I would try to talk you into. I would not try to talk you into. I just spent way too much of my own personal currency debunking level. Fine people hoax, I just wanted a little hand and I didn't get it. It took it personally. So that's just me. You don't need to follow that model. I would encourage you to do it.

so you have the bungee. No analysis, I feel is solid, pretty solid. I think the president might have done nothing to hurt his base and probably heard buttons basal that they could matter will see the core packing question. I thought was interesting and by the way, if you recorded Tucker Paralysis show from last night you gotta watch their thing. You know Tucker girls, it is probably one of the strongest opinion chosen on tv. Not probably is one of this, Mister Benyon, chose best quality, most interesting, most creative takes on stuff, I would say, but last night I was kind of a masterpiece. It was one of the best shows I think he's ever had,

one of the points we talked about was the importance of this court packing question that Joe Biden avoided and I had not really thought it through as much as you know: Tucker Adele love it and here's the thing that I was missing: core packing question: isn't just a little throw away preference kind of a thing. It is the end of the republic. And that was not obvious to be first and here's how it's the end of the republic, if Right now, the republic depends on the other, the equal branches having their own power, so that the judiciary is somewhat independent from Congress from the present so that they have and individual powers for what would happen if core packing became acceptable.

because the first time it happens won't be the last time it means that whoever is in charge, which is packed the core until around fifty people on the core. but more likely- and this is the this- is the the scary part. There is a very theirs very possible scenario that goes like this Democrats when the presidency democratic win, maybe even the sad and then Democrats pack, the cork. What happens if Democrats have the court Congress and the presidency, the same time? Well, under our current highly polarized situation, it would almost guarantees that they would modify the system until they could lose ever again.

in other words it would be everything from Jerry rigging to changes in the. How many? How many states are there are the union they bite, except, let's say, except Border Rico. Guam turn them into Democrats strongholds. No, I think it is. Now go on baby was DC, so thing, Porter, Rico and Dc Become states. They will both be democratic states. Democrats would control everything. said you can very easily reach the point. Where were a one party system and where this close to it were this clothes all it would take, was a good election site This time, that's it, I don't want you to have only one party. They can use the court to lock themselves in because me and Republicans might try to challenge it say: hey! You can't do this or that, because it's illegal and then the court says well we're a bunch of Democrats.

We always go Democrat there. It is so we actually are this close to losing the republic and the biggest part of that is probably the court backing the core backing is allowed and Joe Biden is not saying no to it. He is actually open to independently. Apparently, these saying now. So if that doesn't scare you, you should and here is a phrase that I think would be useful for the President people like certainly more than they like improvement is a very important element of human psychology if you say, would you like something to be better? Everybody says yes, of course I like improvement, but if you said, would you like improvement at the risk that there could be might go wrong? Well then, it's different then I'll say

depends where I am in life and what's going on, maybe Maybe I'll just be happy with where things are, because the risk of trying to improve it could blow the whole thing Biden. Is the risky play? Here's why you don't know what? Get if you elect, if you real act, President Trump, Do you know what you'll get? Yes, you do. You totally know what you'll get with President Trump, because first Volley is a very strong record doing what he told you you do, or at least trying to do what he said he would do. That's that's caught the unique about Trump is that you can really bank on on what you expect him to at least try to do right Can I go hard at heritage? I know going to try to build a border. Border wall he's gonna, keep taxes low, pretty much

everything about tromp, you kind of, can predict. Will he continued to do things, which is critics, walk all racist. Of course, will they actually be racist? Probably not probably not, but you'll be accused of it, of course. So a a second trumped Would look a whole lot like you expect it would look. What would second. By or what would we, A bite in turn, look like number one. Who is the president you don't even know who the president is number two. who's running Biden, the power behind Biden. Now so sure, if you get Biden, How much of the green new deal you end up with, even if his intention is to stick with the binding green deal. you don't know how powerful that window? The party will be about The presidency is a complete. I know you do

even know? If you'll still have a republic literally, you don't know if the republic would survive it because packing the court is sort of the end of the republic that turns it into a it were, could turn it into a one party system. So uncertainly is a big deal. there is continuing information about new testing stuff for a quota So I don't know too much about this is just a tweet today medical center, I guess it's testing a new antigen krona virus testily could give you a result in two to fifty so in their working on a. I guess: I'm working on a saliva based test, so very close to the super cheap saliva test, meaning that you can do it yourself. You don't need to anybody to stick anything up your nose,

And I dont really different us. Companies are working on it, but I'm guessing that the technology involved to make a saliva based cheap, no equipment needed corona virus test is understood because her enough enough different entities working on it. It must be something that people who deal in this. Build must know how to do so. We might be like a month away from having a massive amount of inexpensive testing and then is gonna look good so that some good news There's a study out of India. There could be really important. Eight percent of infected people accounted for sixty percent of new infections, so these would be the circle super spatters. So the super spatters.

If you, if you could somehow identify who was a super spreader and you only could take care of them and nothing else that I take care of it. because it's such an you know difference and here's a question I have. Could you identify the super sweaters by their genes? Is there a genetic dna kind of Coralie because suppose it turns out that, in order to be a super spreader, you would have to have some long long situation, or maybe a blood type I'm just spent volunteer. There might be something about you that makes you more likely to be. A super is better

Now it's possible that all that is, you have a big lung capacity or you speak loud. Maybe that's all this, so maybe you couldn't find that genetics, but what, if you could What if you could actually find out the some people, even if they dont, have the infection? If they didn't get the infection there, the type of person who would become the super spread?

Or do you swore because you could say to yourself: we don't have a ton of tests, but let's make sure that the people have dna propensity to being a super spatter. Let's make sure we test the crap out of those guys just tap test them every day until we have enough tested you, everybody says just question: here's! Here's! A take that you won't see from people who have better instincts, verse of rival the ninety one of the benefits of these periscopes is that I can say things that people don't say out loud ready. Here is something that somebody doesn't say out loud too much for all the obvious reasons how many children- What say, how many ten year old children would you trade for how many eighty year olds.

let's say: let's say you knew that the krona virus was going to take, let's say five years off the age of a senior citizens if they get it, but if the ten year old, can't go to school. Can't live a regular life in everything. Everything's shut down what if they kill themselves worst case scenario right kid. Themselves arm, while if a ten year old, their life is ruined by the Krona virus in any way the causes of death, The number of years of life that that ten year old had might be eighty. So if a ten year old word they would lose. Eighty years of life eighty year old dies. Maybe they lose five years of life, serve. You lost six in eighty year olds,

the same number of years of life as one kid one? Kid would be the same number of years of life as one thousand six hundred and eighty year olds busy, I'm just making up these numbers with something somewhere in that range. Now supposed to say this: every life is precious. We don't value one life over another. We don't treat anybody as expendable. and I agree with all that that ways in public. What do you say and private in private? You don't say that There are things that you say in public and you should every it'll every life as equal. Everyone is respected, gonna fight like hell for every single life, that's what you say in public and you should, but it's not what you think. You know think that privately privately, you know that the life of a child is just.

more than life with somebody, you saving just the fact if you asked, if he s the eighty year old, what what do you think? What do you think, eighty year old? Do you think we but you had a little more risk to save the life of a kid or at least give them a life. That's worth living, The eighty rob most of them would say you know, maybe so maybe so I had a good run. So here's years, where I'm going with us. I think trumps instincts about opening the economy which benefits the young at the expense of the all right? Opening the economy benefits the young and gives them some. like a life, something like a better education which affects their whole life. Maybe they don't you die from depression and suicide in every drug addiction and all that other stuff. I think the president is doing in public what

Every one of us thinks and private, thus That's one of the reasons he got leopard because he can say in public the things that you can only say in private and is willing to do it, and I think that the president is very close to the public. In terms of the trade off of the economy, versus lives. Have you had any conversation in your private life? Somebody says my mom is eighty. Six, her life is not expendable. Did I disagree with that? Did I disagree that in public.

Every life is precious, but the reality is sometimes you have to choose, and these choices are adult choices. It's not like you get to choose. Why don't we let them both live and have wonderful lives? Sometimes you don't have that choice. Sometimes you just gotta make a choice. I think that the president's he is biased towards the young is exactly where the public is, and I think that when I hear too under the Ex thousand, Americans died of grown virus. I still don't know one. Let let me ask you here,

Many of you have a somebody, Klaus who died from grown virus, because I wonder how deeply is getting into the the everyday public. The fact that I have never met one. I don't know anybody actually zero people that I know. Personally. I know people who know people I dont actually still know anybody personally. So in the comments tell me if you know anybody who died of growth of ours and less say that you did. Let's say you did know somebody wasn't a family member, because your your way to biased.

members. But if you say you do an acquaintance, who is eighty years old and died of the corona virus, but the trade off was that the economy get opened, children can go to school. People can live a Sunday closer to a real life. What do you think about that? If you had to make that choice, which way, would you go? Somebody says in the comments I choose my kids over my mom yup, because you would you. Because over yourself you and choose your kids over your mom, absolutely true, and I have a feeling that the public is way closer to tramp in terms of taking the risk of opening the the economy and also the risks about wearing masks and all that. So here's the thing that the

the illegitimate media doesn't ever. Do they don't really look at the costs and benefits they just like to look at the costs. Are they just like the look at that They don't weigh them and they certainly don't say, is already difference between what you say in public and what you say. Somebody so I'm seeing Lhasa of in the comments one says my eighty road at Governor Dan, Patrick setting. You would risk dying to keep a strong economy for his grandkids. You know the lot of the people. The rabies is that the greatest generation, the people who fall in world war two etc are somebody's. Ninety two year old, mom uncovered and recovered good for her friends uncle

Single eighty roles, Babar just looking to your comments California, pastor new racist law. What what the hell is wrong with my state, what it s so California person pass a law, the as a s ethnic engender requirement for borders now. So, if you have any corporation with aboard, you'll be fine up to a hundred thousand dollars for not having diversity on your board. Now. Do I like diversity? Yes, I do. I do like diversity is an advantage to having a diverse corporate board yup. Yes,

Revenge there's an event socially because you can say that, but there is also an advantage in terms of just being able to look through more windows, more points of view as that outside. That, of course, is, of course a good, but should it be a law given that a diverse board is unambiguously good for the company. And the company would agree with that. If you ask any these corporations, hey, do you think you're just privately just privately, just just you and me: do you think privately? It would be better if you had a more diverse board. What were the company where the company say warfare then company. I think every one of them was a yeah. You know this better, because first of all it will take the head office last.

second of all, the employees are gonna like it because they want the board's. Look like them, that's good! Thirdly, our customers again like it because they want the companies will look like the public and fourthly, you're gonna, get a perspective that you just wouldn't get without it. So, of course I want, but should it be. You shouldn't, be a requirement racial requirements that is raises There's no there's no other spin on it If you have a law that requires the sum races. Are ok to put on a board from now on and some are not meaning that the next person, you add, can't be a white male there's just racist.

But apparently that'll happen. John Thomson on Twitter. They just a twitter user, John Thompson, the street is at the violence you see in the streets today. Is he calls it woke? Supremacist walk supremacy is vital. I thought that is what is the woke. Protesters have become so they woke supremacists group, because the walk people don't say I wish you were changed the way you're acting, they say, use you suck. right. The walk people do believe literally believes that their superior to people that they would consider less woke. So isn't that a supremacy us then, if you think you're better than the other people, that's what that is right.

Well, there we go so I don't know where we're having with all this stuff, but it does seem that the all of the racial and ethnic gender stuff The sort of a logical place and all lands up witches failure, because if here focusing on that you care. Only solvent cause you never really get to the point where you ve got the right balance in everybody's happy since is not possible to make everybody happy. You have to find some balance of trying hard enough that you're trying to make things better, but we haven't destroy the whole system and I dont know how how that happens.

all right. So that's where we're at today. I would expect that the next two debates you would see Trump do better. One of the reasons that Trump will do better is because, for whatever reasons, The company doesn't do well in the first debate is a weird, weird candid pattern, and I can't convince myself that there is a reason for it, except maybe being president is to different from debating and presidents maybe have overconfidence autonomy. but I would expect him to do much better and what is more important, the debate that is closer to the election or the one that goes first, while experts say the first debate seems to be important, but I would argue that the one is closest to election day would be the most important

My air quality today is on so I'm locked in the house again. Once again, I'm under house arrest in my house. oh, let me say one more thing about the California law about the board's so that the board will be required to add ethnic engender diversity, but here's the funny part you can self does So apparently, you're allowed to self identify anything you want. So how many corporal boards are this aid is anybody want to self identifiers hawaiian why NATO versus,

Anybody want to be native Americans and somebody will say well thought about it before, but also fight edifying you're all sent the next the next debate, apparently that are talking about cutting off the microphones. The one thing that I think is hilarious about the first debate is given the way that they organ. I stood with these two minutes. You get to talk in the other person doesn't get to rebut if the other person doesn't get to reeboks they're gonna talk over you, so design that first debate, they got exactly what they designed. It was designed to give you just what you saw, especially because President Tromp was. If you design a system where somebody can talk over you and that you say ok, I got this system where you could there's nothing would stop them really accept. The moderator

Kimberly stop them. Then we could add president tromp into it without the expect. So I'm not sure that is all the bathing even works doesn't seem to every any real point, I will say that I am surprised and a little bit impressed the Joe Biden got up the day after the debate and still had a looks like a fully functional there, so whatever it is that the binding is experiencing- and I feel like is unambiguously true- that he's declining at its very noticeable that just feels completely true, but he does have good periods. Will there be enough we'll find out? Oh yes, I was gonna talk about the Kyle Rittenhouse thing so apparently,

By then has referred to Carl Rittenhouse in a tweet easily he tweeted a picture of referred to impose a white supremacist. And in so doing made Kyle Rittenhouse a rich man because car. Rittenhouse has a good lawyer Linwood. Who is but he says he's going to sue the figures. The media, some part of some part of the media and also Joe Biden for slandering his client. Now, do you think you'll win? Yes, I would think this would be the world's Easiest lawsuit is cause they're the evidence of Flanders and a tweet. The the evidence that violence should have known they Kyle Rittenhouse had no connection with waste supremacy whatsoever. There's no,

Evidence where worse, I know evidence I mean not, there is there's nothing suggesting it. There is nothing hinting at it, there's nothing there. He is nothing but a good guy who found himself in a bad situation. You can argue that he made a mistake being there with a gun, and I would not debate that, but he's a good person apparently- and I think Linwood is just gonna soothe living crap out of Joe Biden and I'm gonna be pretty happy about that. If it gets away with that, maybe I can get Linwood sue some of the people on Twitter who who call me bad things? So how much do you like the fact that Kyle Rittenhouse Price

Why there's gonna be a millionaire looks like to me that's all for now, and I will talk to you tomorrow.