Did you fifty bump bump bump. Can anybody who style it's time for coffee was got atoms and, as part of the day, don't you feel better already, just knowing that the simultaneous up is coming and the hour that you like better than any other our is about to begin yeah. It's a good and all you need is a cover among your glasses Anchorage, also sign again to interactive Lascaux vessel love any guy and fill it with your favorite liquid. I like

and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dope and leader of the day. The only makes everything better, it's called the simultaneous up and it happens now go. Did I see that the machines were unapproved update the night before yes We'll talk about all of the things in a moment, but in no particular order. Here's a question I was wondering today. If, by coincidence, all of this happened I want What say, let's say you got red, build born again, woe and he got tedious all at the same time. Would they cancel out or with some of the night, the other ones worse, just leave That even think about that, while the Big news today is that the Joe Biden pre and

illustration unverified, President Elect he's, kill it. Skill in it not only has Joe Biden developed in just a few short days of being presumptive unverified. President. apparently use caused Pfizer to have a great success and ninety percent effective effectiveness with their covert vaccine, And we could have some number by the end of the year stock market is surging. Joe Biden is making me richer by the moment. Thank you, Joe Biden, and with any luck with any luck, the Republicans will maintain the Senate and job. I didn't will not raise my taxes, he'll cure the corona virus, and it's all good for me. So so we got

go on now, I don't know if you saw that scare Muti tweeted, that Joe Biden has already come up with a korean virus vaccine and the world is so crazy people couldn't tell you. I was joking, So, case. You saw that you don't think he was joking. There was joking, no answer these care, of which he does not believe. Biden came up with a groan of ours of vaccine in five days after being elected, but he too either, and I was pretty funny. I would like to get your agreement there. We can spend the entire day today on social media, arguing about the word accepting, because the Democrats say that Republicans are not accepting the result of the election there, not accepting it.

that's right there not accepting the result of an election that is part of a process that still in motion and could end up with the opposite result. But you Republicans, you not accept, You're not accepting the outcome of appeal Since the has finished. So what is wrong with you? People, You do not accept that you can see the future. Are some of you so limited that you do I have the ability to foresee the future with certainty. Do you not know that the ultimate outcome of all these legal challenges we'll be nothing at all. How do you know? How do you not know with all of your ears p and ability to see the future How do you not know that is over already or is it or is it we'll talk about that.

One of the most interesting ideas that I've seen coming out of this election week is the trumps just declassify everything just everything. Now, when I say everything is now really everything is it has military secrets, you don't wanna declassify those but just in terms of water a government has done to us and for us for the past, several decades, including you know big stories from the past whether or not Trump can succeed in his challenges to the election. Wouldn't you like to see him just declassify everything now let me draw a picture for you. Something that could happen. You can put your own odds of it happening on here. but I want to tell you could have completely possible. Their trump could

Declassify, so much stuff that it ends up half draining the swamp with just one act of justice: classifying a bunch stuff, then suddenly the swamp is gonna, get a little smaller. Will we find out what's in there with that half of the swamp, but the other thing that could happen and again you can buy your own odds on it. If there are any Democrats watch it s, the you would put on the following thing would be zero? Probably that would not be rational. Does everything has a little bit of, yes, but you would probably say zero and Republicans it's a little higher chance that the president will succeed showing that there was massive voter fraud. now imagine if you did again no democratic and say that doesn't exist. There's no evidence of massive widespread fraud. We ve been through this Scott has been stuck

Many times scar. Do you know it's been study, many times, there's no fraud, but what if there were just imagine with me close your eyes? Imagine the veins bulging another something else, but just imagine That the president did these two things and maybe even left office. So we don't now at all ends, but suppose he did these two things classified a whole bunch of stuff and then proved that the election was fraudulent in some massive, Would you say no more, whether you stayed in office after that or not? Would you that he did a lot to drain the swamp with those two things? Even if he And up prevailing and that's the end of his terms, even then, if you,

declassified everything, and also prove that there was major fraud, maybe not enough to change the election. Don't up, but that would go a long way in terms of saying that he drained the swamp. Doesnt doesn't fix all the money problems, but it would certainly be a big big by eminent here's. What I think would be the most Bawler things that Trump could do. I want to be very careful that you hear this next part he's not going to do this right. So what I'm going to describe next is not a bird. As not even the suggestion, I'm just saying that if you like all the possible things that could happen. Here's one of em and it's a fun one, and it goes like this. Why is George Washington so revered in our history and in our minds? Well, lotteries. First,

YO general of the four the revolutionary war. So he has lots of things for which you would give him lots of credit but I would argue that, in terms of his total myth, the thing that makes George Washington. Number one in our minds is that he walked away from the president's presidency when it was his to have. In other words, he served as one term and there easily. He could become practically a dictator because he had so much love and power. That boy That, if he wanted, he could Turn the whole american experiment into a dictatorship. Now some historians might disagree with me. They always do but his famous for walking away from power and that little model of behaviour became, the model which has rippled through time too.

Where one of our most valued, I guess traditions is a peaceful transfer of power and also the fact that we don't have dictators. We have presidents, and you know you got to go after a while for years? It might be eight years, but you gotta go. That's not negotiable. You gotta go sometime. So there's this weird situation, which is formed in which you can, the following sequence of events: now again, you're not gonna, put necessarily big odds on these. This happening. but completely within the realm of possible, and it goes like this. President Trump challenges the vote, SK covers that there is massive fraud and the reverses the the election. Say, there's so much fraud again. I know you think that the odds of finally

I really really small and zero if your Democrat, but just just work I enjoy complete the picture lesson He does find massive fraud and the river, since the election Inaugurated as the new president of the United States, but he can see that the country is on fire, could imagine: could you imagine what the Democrats would be doing if, after all this celebrating and winning it got reversed by the courts. Can you imagine o the country would be on fire, even though the law have been followed, the constitution had been satisfied, ended this hypothetical The present got fairly elected after the legal system of fixed any legit hypothetical France and then imagine the following the moment he is the moment, he's done with his inauguration for the second term,

He turns to like pants and says I resign. I resign. That's all you, because the things that the Trump has changed Could largely stay in place under a president pets by his. Personality would be taken out of the fight and that would take all this the amount of the opposition, and so the the best thing for Troms legacy, ironically, might be to give up power, but you can't give it up until you have it so if he were to concede now that would look a little Russia when that little bit exactly not why you voted for in the first place, if you did, if Trump conceded. They are putting up a hell of a fight, he wouldn't be the guy you wanted for the second term anyway. What do you want? A second term president who has no fight left him.

Right it solves itself if trumpet didn't fight. You also really wouldn't want, and for your second term president, if he does fight while he is the person you elected, if you voted for and if that fight gets them into, Well, that's exactly why you voted for him because he can fight and he s a pretty good history. A winning! So imagine approach Pants pardoning or whatever the right legal words are, president tromp for all current and future legal problems that arise out of the presidency or even before, spouse and then the present with a clean slate and a president pence. Who is maintaining trumps legacy? Imagine president. Tromp, then retiring. starting is own media platform

successful, would a trump start up, or maybe by some existing property, but if a Trump media platform arose with President Pence, so the pencil The full fire power of the Trump media. Organ Zation newly formed, which would be pure fire. giving parents all day the air support he needed to move things forward. what what would happen to trumps legacy, it gets close to George Washington doesn't it if any of you remember, when Trump was first elected, I very unpopular early said he should really think about being one term president, because I think the disruptors work better as one term president's because they caused so much disruption they, even as there are fixing things. There is also disruption.

and you know- maybe maybe that's by their nature- that should be a limited time. Engagement does that the country can take so much psychic stress to get things done, so we go up If the things that trump already got done were simply continued in some form would be a pretty strong package and he would be the George Washington our time and his legacy would be. I think legitimately not that it would happen in real life, I think you and legitimately be. One of the top five top five president's evolve So I think you re the same conversation with gentlemen and Jefferson and even Lincoln if he walked away but like if he walked away.

I assure you would look like the same president. You thought you wanted so don't expect Trump to become suddenly not tromp at age. Seventy, whatever. So it's not a prediction, nor is it a recommendation. Is neither a prediction nor recommendation So when are you later mock me for being crazy? Just remember, you're barking, something that didn't happen. I didn't say I recommend it. I didn't say is likely to happen so There's nothing to mark here. Ok, put your own odds on how likely it is and then go. ah here. The other a lot of well meaning people are suggesting that Trump should concede. I saw their peers. Morgan said it is the big trumps border, but also critic, does does tried to at least be reasonably critical and supportive when it makes sense. Given that.

But now appears Morgan says it's time to concede. Here, what I say to pierce Morgan peers. Do you know why President Trump knows? Because I don't think you do? I don't think you do Do you think that President Trump has more Information than you and I do about the likelihood of finding massive fraud are big enough to really make difference- I'm not talking about the the hundred dead people that allegedly voted somewhere and probably didn't I'm not talking about the alleged postal employ you threw away some ballots, not argue about the little stuff. Do you think it's. Possible the trump knows more than we do that? let's say awake, we might now it too. So I would say that if the President, who clearly knows more than we do about what's coming, if used

I to stay in it. I say I think I want to wait and see. I think I'd wait and see. Now Tom Arnold came over to don't got me on Twitter. and when we read his is dumping. Stay here so Tom Arnold said to me today. He goes I bet losing sucks Scott items, but good Lord man. Stop whining and coming up with Crazy S, nonsensical and stupidly complicated excuses its beneath you, maybe not, but it is believed that seven point eight billion other people, America voted. You lost put on your big boy panties and congratulate us now. First of all, If I've told you anything is that the biggest illusion in life is the other people think and feel the way you.

I remember when I was a teenager. I would ever a crush on them team girl and she wouldn't like we back the way. I liked her and I would think while this doesn't make sense, she must not understand How much I like her cause if she knew she would like me back the same well isn't thou works when you are Teenager, you think well my liking, you force you to like me The same way, I'm confused like you, Athens coming back. Why was this not working and then eventually it was maturity. You learn that people are so different that you can't even often even imagine what their thinking literally, you can't even imagined, but in order

first to navigate life and deal with other people. It is necessary for you to make assumptions about what other people are thinking. Does you couldn't operated life without making assumptions all day long about what people are thinking? It's just? They were not good at it and that's the illusion of life. You have to do it because otherwise you couldn't deal socially, but terrible out we're awful and doing the thing that we have to do, which is abandoning what other people are. Thinking So what I'm watching Tom ART, old, another anteater. Just come over and try to Duncan me They usually say something like two models that I bet using socks and I'm reading this tweet unthinking, does it want to check what museum losing so I went to my stats and I checked to see ok by locals, subscriptions way up.

Locals platform I on where I do the stuff you don't see here and that's so far that looks good. And then I went over to see every people watch my live stream yesterday normally, my life's dream would get fifty sixty thousand viewers. Yesterday, my life's dream had a quarter million. So so my of giving five times more attention, so that that's good what also should I be unhappy about when we? Let me check my stocks. holy shit. Ok, I'm not happy about not unhappy about my stocks. My net worth just reached its highest boy in my life. literally today that, as actually agers true statement that today, literally right now my net worth reached its highest boy. Thank you. President Biden,

am I unhappy yet you're talking about politics and I'm not to spending a lot of time, excusing something that Trump tweeted, which is never never a sunday anyway, I can't find the part where I'm unhappy I want I wake up less. days and I think it's going to be some kind of weird depression sets in. Am I going to wear a pussy? what the sky, but it didn't happen in unthinking the Democrats left are suffering. I think sort of universal illusion that the way they felt when Trump one would be in any way similar to the.

We would feel if Trump lost as not it's not even close. Is it my imagination that the report we can't lose. Supporters are having some kind of the feeling that I will describe, which is disappointment right disappointment, but disappointment is a normal feature of life disappointment. Change your life disappointment doesn't make you go from happy. I'm happy. You get disappointed all day long. What do conservatives do when things don't work out. blame themselves right. First. The first thing you do. the blame yourself. we're a you should have tried to convince more people.

But also you're. Looking at the details and self and saying well, things would have been different if this had been different and that would be different. But that's just a hobby. It's a hobby to look at what happened and say it was because of this variable, or this variable when in fact it was all the variables. Mr Harbour, to say. I think it was that one variable. That's the one, no matter what We do it right now. Now do that hobby, where I, act as though there was one variable that was the one that mattered. Ok, this is my opinion, my real opinion, by the way, if at any During the election cycle, president Tromp had called a press conference and said: look I just want to settle one thing: and if it is running his campaign based on the fine people hoax. I want to show you the video in front of the world. I want to show you the part that he quotes and then

let the video play, so you can see the part that the fake news doesn't show you there's nothing else, I'm going to talk about today. This is just a press conference to show you that this is the alpha hoax and I was never true and safer. Self and then they just plays it just stand aside and just plays it, and I guess point where he says without any prompting after it said fine people on both sides without prompting you let the video player and I'm not talking about the NEO Nazis in the way nationalist they should be condemned totally. and other sentence, he should just turn off the video look at the crowd. They all I'm asking is a useful. Little bit of scrutiny on your own media sources. This lie as well the worst lies in american history and you bought it completely.

Probably change your opinions about the other allegations against me, and maybe you think maybe those are true, because if this, what was true it might influence you on the other ones, and people are making a big deal about this one. So You feel like this is true if at any time the president had simply made a special press conference just about that. just on that one topic and didn't take questions. This is important, don't take questions and then just walked off That video would exist forever and all of his supporters good retweet it every time somebody brought up that rumor every time Biden would say it again. It would be attached unease social media, yellow statement and everybody would see the debunk and, of course you baby see it doesn't show up. A social media would be strong enough to get it out

One thing when I I'd Idee bunk, yet Oreo, Steve, Gordon, Joel, Pollack, debunks, it Because there is an assumption that we're sort of in the tank for trump- and we would just make up anything, that's what other people would imagine. It's not true does not close the true for any of the three of us. Then we would just make something up to win a point. I don't think the three of us have ever done. That just makes But if the President have done it and treated his seriously, he wouldn't have needed an apology. All he needed was to debunk that thing and he would be easily re elected. Even if there was fraud, I don't think they could have brought into it enough to keep them out of the White House. If he done that. One thing and you didn't. The other thing that might be good about a binding

don't see if it comes to that- and I still don't predict that that's gonna happen, but if a dead and he pursued the rapid testing that I've been talking about for a few months now, the rapid testing is different from the really good testing that you might have to. Have a machine for actual device? If you want to get your ninety eight percent or whatever a high level of certainly, you need a machine, but you can be about eighty percent sure that you did or did not have kroner virus infection with these cheap tests that my colleague cost a doll. And the idea, is, if you massively tested all day long, not all day long but let's say every day with the not so accurate tests, but they only costs the dollar.

You would get enough of the virus early enough. There were just shut it down, so you don't have to get all the tests right. You have to get eighty percent of them right and do it a lot and make it cheap and make it universally. global and then you just close down the virus. Now I am lots of other people had been sort of lobbying and social media in other ways, to see if the White House would pursue that strategy and far as I know they didn't as far as I know. So if by them came in and they want and said well look. This is energy that hasn't been pursued. If that's true, because it could be that's being pursued, I don't know about it, but that would be a problem in itself. As if it's being pursued- and I don't know about it? Well, that's a pretty big mistake just that I don't know about it. They should be telling the public. So I'm assuming their not serve Biden, did

he would actually get credit for shutting down the virus, and I would be the first one to give it to him because If he did the thing that I've been lobbying for drunk to do for months, and it worked, I'm not gonna ignore that you know what I mean, I'm not going to ignore. That, likewise, is Trump wins reelection through these court cases or whatever, and he did it say could have been sooner, but I'm glad you did I'd like to get an agreement from Democrats dance see if you would like us to can we get an agreement from the Democrats there in the extraordinarily unlikely situation according to them that The election was reversed and it was done based on data and facts that everybody could observe

Let's just say, hypothetically, that massive broad was discovered as it has an. We haven't seen this evidence But let us say it was. I must say the election is reversed, because the fraud very clearly hypothetically shows that issue going to tramp in some key places evidence enough to swing the election. Let's say the habits. Would you like gas from Democrats in advance, because it we should be free to them to give this agreement that if it gets, it gets reversed that they will be good sports like I am I like many of you are. What do you say that Republicans, although they still like You see how the legal process plays out. That's just reasonable, but wouldn't you say that the Republicans

largely been good sports. Can I make that claim? I would say we ve been good sports, its legitimate to question the details and look into whether any fraud happened. Plus kind of separate you shouldn't, you always look into fraud, it doesn't. One you should sort of always look into that. If it's real, I mean there's a real real claim of it so Let's get the Democrats to agree because just in case things the other way. Wouldn't you like to have them on record, saying you now if it gets reversed. The first thing we're going to do is asked Biden too, concede. Is that not reasonable? Does it not reasonable to ask them,

rats in the unlikely case that this gets reversed, that they would immediately and unambiguously go to binding and say we have new information by didn't. You need to concede right now, that's fair dungeon! You know that this the persuasion element- this does, if you can get people to say something publicly, their more likely to stick to it, even if they don't want to So it sort of a strategy to get them to stick to it. Now: were sort of almost kind of. Exceeding in their strategy anyway. Now, of course, it doesn't matter if the election turns out to be verified and goes on the way is, but I think got reversed because we found some fraud of major scale. Hypothetically. I think that the Democrats have already creed. A new, I'm an expectation that, once the vote through

in normal legal process, looks like you have a winner this time, for the other one, to conceive. so they sort of created that without having to commit in advance that they would act that way of things, reverse they simply act that way so that little bit trapped already. By didn't want, say, mask mandate and of course, that's the thing they gets. Conservatives brief fired up up like now. Give me no mandates. Some freedom, but I'm trying to think how that would actually have any effect on me. What would I do differently if there were a mask mandate, because I live in Korea in California already has mask requirements basically everywhere. If I leave the house right so was different Is there some state where they have a big corroded virus infection and they're not worry masks? I don't know the details,

it seems to me that wherever the infection looks like it's a problem, the local pretty soon say everybody wear masks. Somebody says the world does a revolve around you, Scott. Was there someplace during this presentation that I seem to suggest to you, dear commenter, that world revolves around me. The avenue Am I unaware that I said something about the world revolving around me directly or indirectly, the abbot or or is this another one of those cases where you believe the ice?

it's the way you do and then, if you were in my situation right now and said the things I said and did the things I did, do you believe that I would be thinking in my internal private thoughts that the world revolves around me that way you're hallucinating. I certainly don't think the world revolves around me. That would be crazy from top to bottom there's not even there is not even any slight way, but that makes sense indeed, I said exactly the opposite, which is that people dont think like me, which is the opposite That so to me, as a purse waiter, somebody who cares about persuasion just sort of as a hobby, if nothing else I am really really interested in how the mainstream media, the corporate media-

is creating a persuasion bubble around there. There are people in trying to get that bubble around you too, in which air there sort of setting the table for persuasion and in building a structure- and it goes like this through several parts to it. I tweeted Today the video the Van Jones made. I guess maybe a few days before the election and in the video Then Jones is warning, presumably Democrats, because most mostly Democrats would be looking at the video. He is warning them that trumpet could try some dirty tricks with the constitution and he could. He can say that the the vote is fraudulent, that's happening, he could say.

and perhaps there is a way that the the electors in the electoral college could also believes that the vote was not credible and then they might be freed, devote their conscience or even their political preference, and then that would make the election can a kind of a moot point. Cuz at that point is the electors, but if the electors tried to do that, I don't know the details of this, so maybe I might have the legalities of a constitutional part wrong, but I think you can be kicked over to the house now. This is what Van Jones was describing in it if it goes to the house, there's an oddity in the historical way that it was created that each state gets a vote as a state, regardless of their population of the state, and by coincidence, although there is more population in blue states, there are more states that are

Red and republican, so if it ever went through their process of a election, that too many questions goes to the electoral college. The electoral college looks all sketchy too, because hey we don't like it when they dont vote the way the voters went. But of course ever reason this time. So there's no right answer, because the electors do have the constitutional power and there's a reason for it. The reason that the electors can ignore the vote is because the people who form the constitution aggressively wanted it to be. Away, it's not an accident is not an oversight, it's not a technicality, it say it's. The last check on a valid process.

It's it's the last, a human being ability to say that didn't work, we're going to have to go to plan B, which is the electors, are free to do something that makes sense from the country. Ideally. In a perfect world, but Van Jones describes this potential situation, the assumption he was making that there was a good chance that the election will be deemed fraudulent. now what was it? The Van Jones knew a week ago, a week before election. What did Van Jones no a week before the election? There would suggest to him that the outcome would be considered fraudulent by Republicans. Is it The Van Jones just knows how Republicans are, and if it were if it were the other way. I would probably be this way too so could be just a generic statement there,

the other political party is always going to question the outcome and whether it is valid could be that or or if you thought that that was coming, would you make a video about it, maybe maybe with care well then out by using other explanation. Do you think, somebody who is politically connected as Van Jones. would be aware of how much fraud is typical in a normal election forget about this election? Do you think the Van Jones is connected enough to how politics is done at the local level and have elections were held and what Democrats may or may not do in urban areas? Do you think as part of the the world where he would know. For sure whether

there was a lot of fraud on the way I feel like you would know that there was fraud coming now we can conclude that we can't read his mind. We can assume that you knew it, but if I were of engines and our that connected to the entire democrat machine, I would certainly know if we're going to be fraudulent in advance. Wouldn't you would think uses TED Talk, a little TED notice, and so I think it was a day and I feel that so this is speculation, because again I can't read anybody's minds. I can't read Van Jones Vines, but it looked to me like Democrats were worried that there would be fraud and that it would be detected cuz. It would have to be kind of big chain.

Election and that the term supporters would use the legal process which- train the electors may be taking it to the House of Representatives and that the the logical path there would be a Trump reelection because there are more Republicans states so. Is it possible that Van Jones was lame down suppressor fire pursue vision percent persuasive route, suppressor fire so that we got to this situation and we did Van Jones called it one hundred percent here we are. If we got to this position, that the Democrats would already have their story and here The story which here

presenting to them that if the constitution were to be followed, as I just described, if it were, if the constitution will be were to be followed, as I described, it would be followed. Both the letter. and the intent. So I would say that if that had away way, vengeance describes it. It would not be a case of following the. Technical letter of the law at the expense of the intention of the law. It wouldn't be. That it would be following the letter of the law exactly the reason it was written that way in case this situation comes up where you can't quite trust the election? That's why it's there! That's the point that's the whole point. It is the most out of anything to say most, but is The most credible part of the constitution: it's not an action

it's, not a weird technicality. Its therefore really really important reason, and it says what it means to say, and it's in a matters. How did Van Jones decide to word this thing that I just worded, that's normal important, intended and clear He tried to refrain that as a coup that as you, Although the election process exactly the way is written and it turned out that that put trump and office, you call that a coup s pretty balls, and that it would be a weird like a technical oddity and a trick. It would be a dirty trick. He is actually he's priests waiting and are not using that phrase. The weights must be used.

Are you not? I mean he's persuading in advance so that the entire media will form around this narrative, and this narrative could actually create a situation where you have two presidents one, the Fox NEWS says, is tromp. Let's say he's: he got you gotta success. It is legal and see an animal say. None of this happened because they followed a trick. As a sort of a technical track, but really binding as the president, because we can just ignore that technical trick. Now, when I told you that we would eventually have to President's, at least in terms of persuasion wise, not legally

We are having their really quickly. This might be among my greatest predictions. If it comes through, we don't know, Democrats say no chance Republican say maybe, and I tell you this is a better chance of you think, that's all you need to them. Let me just tell you that the odds of. Tromp mounting a successful rebuttal to the election outcome is way better than you think. It's way better than you think and. if you're saying but I've seen all the evidence- and you know it's not purse. waiting anybody, yet I would say no, you haven't no you haven't! You I've seen all of the evidence you might give it a week if next week,

this time. You see no more evidence than you ve already see, then I think you would go exactly the way the the Democrats Jose I think that if nothing else comes out. oh, you know is why you know right now, President Elect Biden becomes president by but what are the odds? Do you think that in the next week, or so, you won't find out something big they you didn't know before. What are the odds are that well, you'll have different opinions on that, but a kind of comes down to that the export of the of the persuasion bubble, that's being formed around this election outcome, Jake, tapir heating, this he said sources close. The protests tell me is being urged by German Kirshner and Ready Giuliani and campaign adviser, Jason Miller,

rallies throughout the Eu S pushing for recounts of Oats Dave Bossy and White House chief of staff, more meadows are urging the As to think about a concession, so that's what Jake Tapir reports as the Immediately after he tweets that David Bossy, who is in tapirs tweet and Tapirs saying that David Bossy is talking to the president about concession the Basi, has a different view and says: hey news guy somebody rolled you should have reached out, but wouldn't fit narrative have us. Do you love the fact that the news can report the news, they d bunker. The news from the very person who is in the news story can happen within one minute and be posted right next to the fake news of the cool, now

who do you believe, do you believe Jake Tapir and his sources that people are trying to talk the president into quitting or do you believe, the guy who's job? what is right in the middle of all of us who says Bigger role, not unlike that's happening, let me give you some insider information that I have myself. Ok, I don't like to do this. I do don't do it often, but sometimes I know things don't know, and I will tell you that I know from sources that, at the very least. Rudy Giuliani is not talking to the president about quitting. Just leave you with that one. So I can't, I can't speak to any of the other characters. Were mentioned here, David bosses speaks for himself and says that at least the part about him. not true, and I would add to that that based on what I have heard and I believe it

they Giuliani is definitely not urging the president quit, I don't think that's like close to anything, so there's big names so part two of the attempt to pursue, Made by an end to the White House, no matter what the vote is, what The media simply Telling you that everybody is telling the president huge resign, because if you hear that Democrats say the practice should concede not resign. If you hear the Democrats say Trump, sure, can say it you process that has just blah blah blah politics. If you hear that a and important republicans senator- and this has happened- has congratulated by an indoor urge the president you can see it, that means a little bit more doesn't but still not the present, and if the fake news

can convince you that the inner circle around the president are all telling him to concede, wouldn't that tell you that you should say that too and then, if you could get all of the Republicans to think it does, after all his inner circle, even thanks it jobs, which is probably not true,. Then you can persuade away. All of the energy from Republicans So part of this persuasion is the first to set up there if they have a successful defence, that the constitution would back a hundred percent that that's called a trick and a coup and that everybody will say that and the Democrats side then, secondly, El the story is fake news, but tell the story that everybody, even the ones close to the present the people who know the most right. Don't you imagine that Jared Kirshner probably knows Close two hundred percent of what the president.

Also knows about this situation. What do you think at least. That will be on the same page? So if it were true, a jerk cushion are looking at the same information as the present believed that the president should concede. you right now, you and I feel like we don't have all the information but Jared Cushion as all the information. So if he thinks the presidential concede shown you so that's the persuasion play that's happening. Right now and it is almost certainly a complete lie that the answer insiders or convincing the president to concede. I do think it is true that they ve planned it both ways.

Right, when are you at least plan what it looks like if you had to go that way? So look for the difference in the reporting of the president has decided this versus the people are just getting ready for either eventuality. Of course you would get ready. Of course, you would plan for both outcomes. All right, Here's what I think is generally true, I think you need different president's at different times and for different reasons. I think they're tromp was the perfect present for a lot of international stuff than these. with Israel. The Middle EAST, I think, is the right person to push NATO to fund. I think he was the right person to deal with kids. and so there are whole bunch of things that fall into the category I have only Trump could have done.

But then there is this other category of stuff, then maybe probably the only one who can't get it done because of its history and personality. In anything else, so there, maybe some things the bite incomes. We do that. Our president, John, couldn't do, and one of them would be these rapid, Test strips because I would imagine that President Trump was not crazy about having all kinds of extra testing, and maybe that was part of why we didn't see the the cheap testword thing serve biting could do that and make it work unless a spring and between are. Vaccines and our rapid testing, where we ve got on top of the corona virus. I would give him some credit no doubt about, and that is what I think I want to talk about

yeah, no one other thing, so politico is reporting. If you see my cats tail walk by she's, doing walk by. So political is reporting that binding team is considering taking the former president of the nation's largest teachers union, to be the education secretary now, what's that if you believe as I do, that the biggest cause of systemic racism is that the education system is broken and its most broken for people at the lower end of the economic ladder, and that tends to be, unfortunately, a lot of black people in that category. Other people of color, that if the school system doesn't work, it's the most systemically races thing that could happen. not even close, I mean there's, nothing else is even in this

universe as getting education right, because if you education right. You're one generation away from a whole bunch of equality and at least the feeling of systemic racism, trying to? I am still there, but I got a good education, so I can get a job anywhere my incomes, good work and fire. So I would say the weird thing that happened is that black people and black lives matter, strongly by majority supported Biden and one of the very first thing she's going to do is screw them harder than anybody has ever screwed anybody in the last forty years. Cuz, if you put the head the past president of the nation's largest teachers unions, it's the teachers, unions that are the ones

fighting against school choice. School choice is the only chance black Americans have of making big gains. Cuz, it's not going to be reparations and mean, even if reparations happened that doesn't really move the needle. It would barely change anything cuz. It wouldn't be that big right it would be nice wouldn't be civilization, changing, but changing our schools. System that is civilization altering no doubt about it. It's that big every time so. the first thing by then does he comes in and he absolutely screwed the black voters who put them in into the office. I mean you can't screw your voters harder than that. That is the ultimate f. U, it looks like

That's all I got for you today and I'll talk to you tomorrow. All right, periscope is turned off it. It's just you beautiful you tumors here. So this is what is the slaughter meter, while I think slaughter is probably the wrong word, because whatever happens and won't be any Trump slaughter, probably But the odds of, let me see thus the odds that there will be new information. that leads me to believe that the elections were stolen, Hi really high. That's all I want to tell you so a week from now.

Second with me again, if you have not heard really strong evidence of fraud in a week, maybe you want, because if we can't find a pretty soon, maybe it's not there. Is the watermark real, so my my team all the individual cases of fraud that you ve heard I'll say this again is that ninety five percent of them would be true all those little computer glitches, and here the count changed by this much on that day and we saw on site there's a watermark and if he had to bet you should that the all of them are untrue, wishes. From did massive fraud happen now the the first law one, which is a data analysis that shows whether the numbers looks like look like they could have been natural or they were

fudged and you're. Seeing a lot of analysis says they look, absolutely fudged. Those could be real, so the ones that I would put the most credibility on would be still, mystical analysis, but not everyone write ifs. If you see on Twitter a statistical analysis and it's got a little graph and that little graph seems to show that the election was stolen. I don't even know need to know what graph it was. I don't even need to know what date it was in it. There's a ninety five percent chance: that's not real cuz, it's just in the class of things show ninety five percent, not true love, it's gonna be confirmation, bias and- and you dig in a little bit- and it was those there was a good the feed, but a guy corrected immediately, is gonna, be that stuff, but I'm here to tell you that the odds

of real evidence, that's big are really good. I just another. We ve seen any of it yet Somebody says I was the weapon Ized Autism coming. Let me put it this way. So I am on the fringes of monitoring some stuff going on right, so I'm not I'm not doing any math myself, but I have just enough connections into the the world of Trump supporters that I do get to see stuff before you get to see it and the weaponized latias and again, if you're, if you're new to me, I use it as a term of affection goes there.

aura people on the spectrum or dilbert fans, and I love them beyond compare so when I talk about weaponized autism, I've literally using it as a compliment. It's awesome so what's coming could be mind boggling and I hope you ready, I hope, you're ready all right. That's all for now I'll talk to you tomorrow.