Come come up for everybody guano one who there's still time given here before you miss. Even one minute of coffee was got atoms and best part of the day. You don't want to miss even one. Second of the best part of the day. And all you need to maximize, it would be a couple of my go to class at anchor tells her sign a canteen juggler flask, a vessel of any kind sell it with your favorite liquid, coffee and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dope Alenia the day. The thing that makes everything better, it's called the simultaneous zeppelin happens now go. I can feel my vitamin d levels stirring to surge. Yes, yes,.

oxytocin up ten percent things are going well, I think we're coming on line. Gonna have a good day our right. Let me tell you, what's going on today, you're happy we'll give her release the crack and we're going to release the crack and all over the place. There will be people cleaning up the crack in four months to come. But let us talk about the news. Jake tapper was talking to doctor Falchi at an interview and it's starting to look like as Jake Tapper put it. Christmas might be canceled, that's right! There might be no Christmas

This year and the funniest part about this- that I've been laughing for twenty four hours about is twitter user. John Gabriel retreats that interview which Jake Tapir was saying there might not be any Christmas, and John Gabriel tweets Europe mean one. Mr forty I can't get the item I had now. You're remain one mischief algae. If he's never watched the Grinch, that's not all areas to you, but if you have watched the Grinch, it's pretty good Trump tweeted that He won the election. So when Trump tweets Lily won the election twitter, What's an official warning on this as official sources called this election differently

Now, what are the odds? The only person in the United States who can speak as opinion would be. The president was the point of being the press, if you're the only one who doesn't have free speech, so I can t that right. Because I saw I saw somebody testing it to see if they could tweet that their president see if they get a warning. try yourself tried tweeting, that you're the elected president. If you get a warning or better tweet that tromp was elected, see if you can warning, because I think he's the only one I dont believe everybody else would get a warning that statement, but it's kind of weird that the press the only one I can caspian freely. Now. Here's how I take this question of who is the president or who is the President Elect.

now you can get technical and you can say: oh well, nobody's the President Elect. Yet it is technically that's true or you could be classic in traditional, say: well, the media is called the rays, so there is a program like so you can have those dumb conversations which lead to nothing. But here's the more interesting one- and this goes to my thoughts about everything from quantum physics too the simulation the until you know what the answer is was say: there's some question: that's a mystery until you know the answer, meaning you ve observed it or somebody's observe that it still undecided

So this is my actual. This will sound like a joke, or maybe I'm leading up to some kind of joke or something I promise I'm not. This is my actual filter on reality that the question is, who won the election is undetermined, meaning that, even if you could know all the facts, if you add a god like brain- and you knew how many votes were cast that maybe in that case you would know with. As, but unless somebody knows and right now, it's unknowable until somebody's really looked in and check for all the fun and all that. But until somebody has observed that there either is or is not fraud, it could still exist or not exist, and so for most people it's a

Jack to fact that somebody got more votes and that therefore somebody is technically the president, in my view of the world that didn't happen, that that there is no fact of who got the most votes, not because we have looked for it. I'm not talking about our own ignorance and talking better view of reality in which, until its observed it doesn't actually exist. So you think that it is true that there is a certain number of votes and that's just a fact we may or may not ever know about it. But it's a fact, and I say nope: this is not a fact. It is not determine

and until it can be observed and until its observed our history is re. Ridable got that until we know from direct observation and all the possibilities have been collapsed, as they say in that moment of observation. Until then, all histories that are compatible with observation exist simultaneously, so history is not set History is to be written, meaning that the things you think already happened they haven't unless they can be observed, and we can observe the vote count directly. So as now. So that's my view of the world. Now you said yourself: well, that's crazy! It's pretty crazy! How many mushrooms did you have to do before you came to that view of the way.

And I would offer you just this, as my defence weak as it is the until that filter unreality can be disproved is valid as every other filter, and I don't think it can be. Let's see what else is happening. The president is tweeting that the Georgia recount is useless because you're not checking the signatures thoroughly counting And I dont know if the problem was the counting or the number or the problem was also the the other quality, the signatures that might be fixed. Measures, but we shall see we shall see, but now we have a situation in which we have probably, in my opinion, although authorities have a different view.

in my opinion, we have a rigged election of fake recount and it's all being covered by the fake news We have three levels of bakery between, you in reality fake news, fake retail, fair global. Maybe I don't know if I get banned from Twitter for saying that, but in my opinion, we're going to find out that is fake. If we look. maybe we won't look. So there's a story: Historiae Detroit there's a whistle blower. Who claims to be aid? Many a ninety worker who claims to have directly witnessed massive fraud in Detroit, and here

there's the claim and I'm as interested in whether the claim is even physically possible, as I am interested in whether that claim is true. Okay, so there's two things is physically possible. What is claimed, but then also did actually happen. So here's the claim that that they took. piles of ballots that were all Biden ballots and they fitted into the counting machine and then one there are done. They took the same pile and they shattered into the machine again and then, when they are done, they fell into the machine again survey. So the accusation is that this whistle blower stood there and recklessly observed pile? ballots being fell into the machine multiple times? First question is that possible is physically possible,

In other words, once you feed in the ballots, do they go somewhere, where you can go pick him up, or do they go into some locked place where nobody can get to them? Probably you can get to them. Wouldn't you say, probably you can you physically get to them after living counted? What would stop you exactly from just feeding them back into the machine? Would it be that the machine is checking to see if that specific ballot is already been read? I dont know I don't know the machine have their capability and have as their capability can their capability be turned off temporarily or permanently? I don't know So I would certainly like to know the answer to the question: is that even physically possible to count the same

Bela over and over again, because you know, in your mind. Don't you think wait a minute. They can't be that easy catch it, and if it is that easy, it happened. So it won't. Let me see if you could, if you agree with the following statement. If it is that easy to just run a balance through the machine again, it happened. Do you agree disagree that if a sad easy- and I'm I'm quite sceptical that it's that easy I feel like there should be some kind of bar code right somebody saying barcode, but just because, as a bar code does that mean that the counting machine checks, the barcode? Maybe not? Maybe the barcode is for the post office

or for some other purpose. So we have a big unknown here, but that whistle blower is interesting. We don't know let me let me tell you what I think is true, whether its true that the specific story is the case that you can use feed Bela through. I believe it's true that is easy to cheat you just enough people in on it, so you'd have to have not no observers, but if you set best this one requirement of no observers. Is it easy to cheat One way or another: is there any mechanism to cheat if you can solve for one variable, which is get rid of the observers, I feel. Like almost certain lady S, am I being naive

like the odds of that are close to a hundred percent right. In the real world, I would think if you could get rid of the observers and what is the biggest reported problem with the election got rid of the observers in the key places where the voting was a little suspicious. So rudely Giuliani, tweeted and coming from him has more weight. So this is what Rudy said. The only thing that would have surprised be Philly didn't cheat on a big scale in the twenty Twond election. It would have been the first time they miss such an opportunity in sixty years. Wake up to reality Now you have two realities right, so others

the average citizen reality, which is that we ve been told by the the fake news we ve been told by. The fact is that election fraud is exceeded. clear are exceedingly rare in this country. Like a so that's the news, the news is quite uniformly and even the Department of Homeland Security right, that's pretty credible source. When do you say Election commission officials, credible sources, and what are they say? They say election of fraudulence. election fraud is exceedingly rare. Does a pretty good sources now say that, generally speaking, if somebody who is that good of resource and the multiple of them are saying the same thing, will you have to think that pretty seriously when you right now, let's look at the counter clay

Rudy, Giuliani, really Giuliani, has been a mayor of a big city. If you're the mayor of a big city, the learned some things that people don't know if they're, not mayors of big cities, I think so. I think you'll learn how things really work. If you are also, if you have a, background as having prosecuted the mafia. And you ve been the mayor of New York City. Do you think there Rudy Giuliani has a unique perspective of how much fraud and crime there is in the world that the rest of us, maybe don't say? Of course he does. Of course he does. Rudy Giuliani is Filter, what happens in a big city is much better than yours. It's much better than mine. It's not even

everybody Giuliani says the Philadelphia has cheated on elections for sixty years. What do you think you think that didn't happen to think Rudy would make such a specific and gigantic claim, based on his knowledge of how the world works for all the way from every kind of crime is prosecuted through taken down the mafia. Having sent to being a mayor to working on this campaign,. Rudy has seen some stuff ok and for him to make a claim this sprawl And then you also see Cindy Sidney is making similarly strong claims about the election being fraudulent

I feel, as if those people who know how the real world works, they ve seen some stuff and if I had to bear on which side as the more real world opinion, the officials who are saying everything's right. It's all good, don't worry, nothin ASEAN move along or Giuliani. I feel like I would go with Rudy this. I feel like that. We'll see. all right. Here's a trump tweet about John Wolden S Bald thinks that Trump should concede. So here's what charm says about much important and the Sunday we won't have a president trump. We don't know if it'll happen sooner or later,

For Sunday, we won't have him as president, and this is what we're gonna miss speaking for myself here, mostly I'm going to miss a tweet life. This term says quote. John born was one of the dumbest people in government that I've had the quote pleasure to work with a sullen dull, enquire guy here, nothing to national security. Accept quote J. Let's go to war off oh illegally released much classified information, a real dope, Come on you're, going to miss the level of transparency. The president is so transparent that. but you just gonna miss it. So you don't realize what you have when you have it, but when you do, I have it. I was getting out of bed this morning and I was trying to imagine a world without trial.

Both president, in which I would have to get up and talk about politics, but the only person story was Joe Biden, thoughts myself. How am I gonna do that? How am I gonna keep talking about politics if its Joe Biden there's nothing to talk about so Wilderness President Trump Sunday whenever it is that he's out of office year? Two things that the public believe These are both true number one. I told you that voter fraud is exceedingly rare, so wouldn't you say that the public believes that there is a motion. The public believes that election fraud in this country is exceedingly rare. Here's another thing that Since believe there, whenever fraud has a high pay off and it is difficult to do, it it'll happen a hundred percent of the time.

Now our election does seem too, One of those situations seems to be The situations where the pay off for achieving would be really high. I mean changing the nature of the government of the United States. That's a pretty I pay off and is it possible? It's possible looks like it might not even be hard, depending on whether that Detroit whistleblowers right or even if she's not, there are probably a dozen other different ways to cheat that all are also not thou art, it least for state entities and people were really determined.

So how can it be true that the citizens believe two things that are opposites? They believe that cheating in our elections is an exceedingly rare. At the same time, they know that anything that looks like their situation is always full of fraud. Those are opposites. It has to be full of fraud because as one of those situations where there's lots to gain- and it wouldn't be hard to do under those conditions- as always fraud, and yet we believe it's not. How do you explain that? Well, people are rational. That's how, if I had to guess what is closer description of the world that our votes have been largely quite good throughout history and including today or alternately that all of our elections have been fraudulent, which is more likely that

pretty much all good, with some exceptions, and there is always a little mischief, pretty much all pretty clean elections or pretty much all fraudulent if he had to pick between those two options, I would pick pretty much fraudulently fraudulent vote every time now. I do think that the sometimes that this situation can be over come by an unusually gifted politician. So if you get a Ronald Reagan, you get a bill Clinton Gate, maybe even out and Obama at or a tramp. You can imagine that the personality would be so strong that they they could overcome. But I, but I would say that every election probably is just full of fraud that that's my guess. I think that's the world you living and we might find out. We might not.

Modern says they ve got a their vaccine. Is ninety four point: five percent effective, which would be in the range of, or you know, as good as the other vaccine. That Pfizer was talking about. How proud are you that the two companies were talked about her american companies to american companies and did what experts thought was largely impossible now, the vaccines would not be available per se in quantity, but it looks by the end of the year, the president will have done what he said he was going to do, which I thought most, I think most people thought was impossible. to get an actual working vaccine, maybe multiple of them by the end of the year. So the president did that as one of the greatest, I think one of the great accomplishments in politics, assuming things work out

The experts set it couldn't be done now course you have to ask: why is this news coming out two weeks after the election? Is there any chance that the companies knew about their good news, maybe a few days before the election? Probably probably so that that certainly political? I would also expect that the reporting about the the virus will get worse and worse and it will look. more and more dangerous until inauguration, meaning that What's the fake news has a motivation to make the virus look as bad as possible, while Trump is still in charge, but the day that the Biden is inaugurated, it's going to be the flood of good virus news. Now that probably was going to happen no matter

who got inaugurated because in all likelihood, inauguration is going to be really close to the probably the peak of the worst of it. So whoever got to be president would be the president when we got past the krona virus. So you should expect that it will look much worse until inauguration day, because that's what the fake news wants. It. What like so there's that over the UK they're getting more serious about vitamin d, and here too, however, having some vitamin d guidelines for the country and trying to get it to the vote. Of all people. So we still don't have the world's most solid science and vitamin d, but I really think in the end, it's gonna be one of the biggest variables this just my non scientific non medical gases that that's the way

So let's get news so maybe by the spring, will have some vaccines and will have more vital Andy and will be in better shape? Theirs, report. The daily mail is reporting that The corona virus was in ITALY as early as September of last year. I guess they found some blood samples from that time in which it was present. Now, if that's true it would mean that maybe China knew about the pandemic or may have detected at even sooner than we knew about. So China's get you more to answer to. I guess President Trump is looking to turn the screws on China and have more hard line. Policies are hard to reverse for Joe Biden. How would you ever trust Joe Biden to negotiate, which

How are we ever going to be happy with whatever comes up with cuz, no matter what biting comes up with is gonna? Look like it was too nice to China right and, if he's, and if he's not to nice, you won't get a deal. So we only have two ways. Louis I think serve biting gets a deal which I know he'll be criticised for being too generous living? and get deal. Is the guy who didn't get to deal so he's got by its gas from China problems?

Here's question for you, hypothetically: if the president's allegations about the election were true, hypothetically hypothetically, would it be worse than Watergate? I think it would right if the president's accusations were true and we have to wait and see what, if it's true somebody says Youtube is messing with my audio. Maybe I doubt

I doubt they're doing it intentionally, but why don't the networks have a Carl Bernstein on to ask him hypothetically Carl cuz. They do hypothetical questions and they say things like if it's true that there is russian collusion. Is this worse than Watergate and Carl Bernstein will say: yes, that would be worse than Watergate or if, let's say the president's perfect letter to the Ukraine, if that was a problem, would it be worse than Watergate. And Carl Bernstein will say, yeah yeah that's worse than Watergate. So why don't we ask Carl Bernstein if the president is accurate, because it can we talk about allegations, we don't just talk about things which are known facts

Carl Bernstein, can be asked. If it's true hypothetically, would it be worsen Watergate? Don't you think that's a fair question because he's been asking that he's been asked the question four years and he's answered it every other time. Why can't he answer at this time? Let's have them on what it'd be worse than Watergate. If there's fraud in the election, all right. tromp, as confirmed in a tweet. What I've been telling you that the legal cases that you know about so far challenging the election result. Those legal cases are not the end of their arguments. Their problem, more of a stalling action. You just make sure that something's happening, but you know get ready, we're looking into more stuff the more stuff in the good stuff. I don't believe husband

send it to the courts. So if you're wondering well what happens after these lawsuits get worked through and it doesn't look like they have much substance. Are we done, and the answer is no that would be before you ve started so Democrats or thinking. We got these losses out there once they have been taken care of we're done nope. Those losses are signalling the beginning of a process not even close to the end. Its the beginning, so we should see stuff this this week and I say to do if you wanna, go to and review were, Election, the irregularities and allegations now there is a website, but it looks like well look for robber barons. Is his tweet shows you website you can report,

after all the legal question for you. Do you hate crimes so in the United States, if you re, if you do a crime, that is a quote hate crime, the penalty is worse. So is there a hate crime? Is there a hate crimes that applies to attacking tromp supporters. and if not, why not? Should there not be hate crime laws that apply to attacking people for political views? They should be right because we have protected categories, you I think El Q- probably racial. I assume religious maybe gender,

but whatever the classes are for protected hate crimes? Why would the Trump supporters not be in that category it? If it's not true, we should be making a true right. I mean that I would think that that would be a big step toward making it not a free punch on Trump We should put a little meat into those laws and I saw that Don Donjon year in advance and the president of all pushed back on the violence against transporters and the recent in the recent protests. so the present seems to be going right at that now as as well as his family. So we we appreciate that speaking on behalf of people, like you

punched, the article in the the Buffalo Chronicle, which I will tell you before, I get to the story that it is a allegedly a fake publication serve, you see. The story just now comes from a publication. Has a history of just making stuff up allegedly An allegedly there's a philadelphia, my boss, who admits the whole scheme of fixing the election, but it comes from a source that is not considered credible. So you should not consider a credible either, but maybe don't you think, there's a pretty good chance that organized crime has a role in fixing elections, because if you aren't use, if you wanted to get somebody to fix an election and you wanted them to stay quiet about it,

Organized crime would be a good way to go. Cuz everybody involved in organized crime has a really good reason to keep their mouth shut, meaning they would get killed if they open their mouth. That's way better than just getting a bunch of you know, sketchy Democrats to do the cheating for you, because a sketchy Democrat might become a whistle blower, but somebody is involved with the mafia crime. There. Well they're gonna really think pretty hard before they. They turn on the scheme because you get killed for that. Here's, a question for you once the vaccine are out there and people are getting vaccinated. If you ve. You're vaccination and you feel you ve got a ninety five percent. Chance of being safe from the virus. and less say, you're, twenty five years old,

So you have a very low chance of getting the virus. You have a low chance of having a problem with the virus. You also get away. destination that takes a ninety five percent chance of those already the chances, your odds of having a problem close to zero. What are you gonna do see here? the problem will say you go to a public place and you see a bunch of people without Basques wall most people have them. What would you think of the people who don't have masks? Well, if nobody has a vaccination USA, that there are violating the rules, because, even though they might be some of the people who recovered and they might have anti bodies, they might you wouldn't assume that you'd probably assume there just now the guidelines so we're gonna have a lot of Karen's and what is it? What is the other word for it? Lotta Karen's,

complaining about people without mask and those people saying I gotta vaccination and then the care and will say vaccination, isn't one hundred percent and by the way, even if it is protecting you, maybe you can still be a carrier. So, even though you got your vaccination, I think you should where a mask too will say Karen now I don't know what the professionals will say. What what what doktor found she say? Well, doktor found she say yeah, even though its ninety five percent good, you might have some on your clothing, maybe some argument that you're still dangerous enough. That's gonna be ugly because It's gonna be a period of baby in nine months. Where are we who will be a mix of vaccinated and non vaccinated people? And I, and to tell you that the people who give vaccinated, especially

We are the ones who go through four days of pain with each of the two vaccinations, because apparently it there's a little bit of a side effect there. those people are not going to want to wear african masks and I don't think there's any chance. We're going to get will be able to make them. because they're just gonna say that's, that's my limit yeah I'll play with with the mask? If there's larger than the medical risk, but as soon as You tell me, I have to wear masks just to be a good team player. Is that what you're telling me you me. I need to wear my mask just so the people who The Basques feel comfortable. That's the only reason I'm wearing a mask. I think that would be a hard limit. Most people a people will go along with protect your fellow people's health

you get a lot of people to say our eight I'll take a little bit of risk cetera to help other people? That's where a society is. We take a little risk of yourselves for the benefit of the greater good, but that's not gonna work after the backs of agents. That would be the end of that argument. I think. Most of our news has ground to a bit of a halt. I would say meaning that until the president neither starts making more news or we get some big news and the recounts were the election. Integrity were were sort of the sort of an awaiting pattern and then will be into the holiday season when the news slows down. Normally somebody says medical people give responds in hospitals.

I thought about that. You could have some kind of an indication order badge you where the says you got a vaccination and that might help a little bit. How long would it take for people to get fake badges? You know anything can go wrong. This thing is coming. Somebody says I love, you ask you, since I can see the comments now from both periscope and Youtube. How many of you watching this right now believe that there was massive fraud, massive fraud in the election, to sufficient that

the change the outcome so show me in the comments how many of you believe, based on what you already know that fraud was rampant, was like. We have a lot of yeses. I see one now, I'm saying just yes. Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, here Yes, absolutely ass, somebody says not yet so we have one wonder cautious sceptic, which is never the wrong answer. Be a cautious sceptic is never wrong live so loosely most of your convince here's. The weird thing there are system works and all we have the weirdest system where we can not trust.

Part of it and yet still trust the whole. You not I mean if you look they any one part of our system. You'd say I get a politician. Is a politician telling the truth you say thou now they don't do that. They say what about the vote. Count is the vote. Count your credible say to yourself apparently based on your comments. You'd say now think the election itself was credible and I don't think the politicians are telling the truth. you go right down the line and they say I don't think the news is real. Think the news is fake,

So we would imagine that every part of our entire process is fraudulent or non credible, but in in total we still think it's ok sums up to something pretty good. Certainly, capitalism, if you look at any one part of capitalism, is all broken in corruption and filled with awful things. But capitalism as a whole will pretty good with it seems to work. This just that every part of it is bad. So here's what you should expect Ed, I'm driving people crazy on Twitter, my critics quite intentionally, and what I'm doing is I'm telling them that they have to wait for the good stuff, the these stronger allegations that have

evidence of cetera, and my understanding is that in the next week or two you're going to see that stuff, but the accusation now is that if I can't personally present the evidence right now that I'm you know, I'm lying or it doesn't exist and. We'll find out. If I ever been further out on a limb. I don't know you know when I I made the original trump would win the election and twenty sixteen protection. I was really far out on the plank I mean I was out there and say Leslie on a limb to keep my analogy street, but that worked out for me and I have made another number of other predictions that were pretty far out there and many of them of worked out when I predicted that we would have to President's at the same time that seem pretty crazy them

And here we are two presidents. At the same time now I believe that one of them will have the constitutional power and and do the into the work of the president, that there's only gonna be one of those, but I think he is Will record that Trump one at the same time that the system is treating Biden the next winter? So we we have two President's elect in my opinion right now, and they both have an argument that. looks pretty solid. Now we don't know who's got the better argument until trumpets percentages full thing, but now that he said directly that the good stuff hasn't happened. Yet you go on to look forward to. So I see in the comments one of the things that I invited because I like trouble,

I find myself in a situation where, two weeks from now I can look like the biggest jerkin clown in the world if it turned out that we look at all the elections and they're all perfectly credible and there was no fraud, I would look very foolish under that situation. I think you would agree now. Keep in mind are not claiming that I know the election is fraudulent and will be overcome. I'm dealing from a statistical perspective, which is this situation, which is there's a lot to gain and it is possible to cheat always creates, always always creates fraud. I turn off it's enough to change the election or if we find it if it was enough, but is there so I feel pretty confident about them, but will we really find out so here's this.

that I know that my critics don't know and as the biggest difference for why my opinion differs. If you had people who don't know how to look for problems, would they find em? My answer is probably not, if you add the people who know exactly Our problems would be, and they are really really good at lookin for stuff and funding problems then could they find it probably s so here's what I think is different. The reason that we think are system is good and has integrity is a no. No one who has the talent to detect fraud has looked into it. I believe that that is what we will ultimately learn. Visitors never been anything like a comprehensive audit

of all the parts of our election system? I'll bet, it's never happened is happening now. Now, when I say all the parts I mean everything that they have access to and everything that has transparency, but the thing I can the thing I can promise you is that, if you're worried that the people looking for the fraud are not talented enough to find it, don't worry about that. If there's one thing you don't to worry about. Is that the people looking for it don't have enough talent to find it they do. They got enough talent to find it And if it's there, they found it already. Ok, so do you like that as an optimistic statement? If it's there, they already found it think about it. That doesn't mean you heard it, because I think he's being packaged up

for the legal cases, probably the first time you'll see it is in the context of the legal documents sprawly. The first time you ll see somebody says like where there's lots of money. there is corruption exactly wherever there's lots of power or lots of money. There is always corruption. I dont know that tourism that an exception to that end. Why would this be the exception. why was Trump saying mail in belts are not secure. Well,

the example of the Detroit Whistleblowers, one example. If it were true that the whistleblowers telling the truth that those ballots were fed into the machine multiple times that would be unsecured if it's true that lots of ballots got filled out by you know individuals for other people. That would be very unsecured. Let me ask you this: if you, if you filled on the ballot from the same address- and you shall down- let's say fifty ballots with different names and signatures, but the same address with the voting system catch that do you know, do you know if the voting system would catch it

If fifty people said they were they lived at the same address you might you might find out the answer that pretty quickly? So what I'm saying is that, by its nature, the paper ballot system has lots of opportunity for fraud. That's all right, so I got for you and I will talk to you tomorrow. You tubers gonna other questions. For me, the periscope errors are off line in this can still be fake ideas. People say

I think the only kinds of fraud that you need to worry about are the ones that could be done in bulk. So when I heard the story about feeding the ballots through multiple times, I said to myself: well, there's something you can reproduce in bulk, so that would be promising. the apocalypse, I don't think so. Here is a little the tip for you. Jim, whatever the news is telling you is the risk and social media So if social media in the news or tell you that the risk is the sailor and eight and ten, you should just dial that down to about half of that more like a fool.

The term, because the news, business and social media by his design are supposed to make you more worried. Then you should be about things that are not worth that much worry. So you should just dial back everything that you hear about in the news about problems. Unless it affects you personally and then you will look into it, but all the big world stuff. I don't think Do you need to worry about them as much as the news tells you in general, should trump by CNN, maybe

See you then does appear to be a for sale. I can tell you from my own research to see how I made that sound like this more important than it is. I do have personal information to confirm this CNN is for sale. I don't know if that's been confirmed in the news news, but I can. I can confirm that got a meter to ninety seven percent from ninety six, so the slaughter meters at ninety seven percent, but there's a caveat. It doesn't mean that tromp we'll take office for a second term. What it means is that he got the right votes, meaning that the slaughter meter is going to predict that Sunday and it might be after the binding

He got the right folks, meaning that the slaughter meter is going to predict that Sunday and it might be after the Biden administration, but someday history will record that Trump won. You just may not be able to take office because the society civilization might not let him. I think that the fake news now has enough power that they can just act like you didn't win and he just won't be able to do. The job We'll just act like you didn't when that will be. That will be it, but if the Republicans, when the Senate, it would set up situation where twenty twenty, two and twenty twenty four would be republican landslides and after that they would own everything, thoughts on jobs.

Legal dream team. Here I don't know how to analyze. That sort of thing is a guarantee to go the Supreme Court. I don't think everything's guaranteed, but I dont know exactly what it is. They would go to the Supreme Court, but you have to think something's gonna end up there. The supreme Court at least has the advantage that it could add a little bit of credibility to whatever the outcome is so I got for now. I will talk to you tomorrow.