Bump bump bump bump Bob Bob Bob Bob everybody got in money would gather around its time. Yes, it's time for coffee was scholars as part of the day every day, every single time, no exceptions. Know some of you are waiting to fast forward past the simultaneous for some of you it's annoying, but for the rest of you, it's an amazing ceremony. It's a bottling thing. You feel closer to people all around the world. Yeah! That's that's how important it is and all you. It is a cover among our glass. A dagger tells recited the canteen directive last, a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid.

I like coffee and jointly now for the unparalleled pleasure, the doubling of the day. The thing that makes everything better except for election recounts happens now, go I can feel the election getting more accurate every moment. Let's talk about all the things. Many things are happening and we shall discuss them. I guess the border patrol seized enough sentinel at our border to kill two hundred thousand people. That's right. There was enough, and no in one shipment to kill two hundred thousand people.

course comes from China and I would like to reiterate my call for ending relations with China until they execute their sentinel deal. Now the China knows who their friends and I'll dealers are, we have named them, they know who they are, they know where they live, etc, and apparently there are allowed to be operating continually without any penalty I think I can do what they want to do, but we should do What we want to do, which is send all of their diplomats home. so what I will do is I would actually- and I recommend this- send a hundred per cent of China's diplomats home until they can show us that they ve, arrested and stop the sentence And if, after thirty days, give you thirty days to do that, send other diplomats home after thirty days.

and then wait another thirty days and if they still haven't corrected that should send all others do. Its home, so I don't know how many students are physically attending college in the United States during kroner virus but today we should just send him all just every one of them and dont make your personal, because it doesn't have to be just business if you're sending you spend it all were sending you back all of your diplomats. If, if you can do you do you will send you back all of your students, we don't want to it's. Not our first choice. But it's not like giving us much choice and it would be extra delicious too for President Trump to bind bite into whatever, whatever job does before it leaves office

With China, how in the world are we ever get a trust, Joe Biden, to negotiate with China? It doesn't even she like a thing as it is there anything that Joe Biden could negotiate with China. There would make at least half of the country say. I that looks like a pretty good deal. I think Joe Biden push them ass, hard ass. He could. probably got the maximum deal you could get out and China literally nobody will think that half the country will take his treated so I don't know how Biden can win with what all the smart people says, the biggest issue with the United States going forward, which is how do you deal with the emerging China so we'll talk about that will be more. I always hear of people say that masks. Don't work, claim lots of people

and they say, but to show me the proof if you believe that mass work shown in the study. Oh, oh there's, no, sir, Scott, you don't have any studies, So this morning there was a study showing that masks do work according to one study. Now, if you watch my periscopes or my lifestyle, And you do you know that I always warn you that studies study as ever. The studies and look like they're well done at first, maybe fifty fifty chance at the real most I would say when you hear that a study proved whatever sort of a coin flip a study approved- maybe fifty percent likely that echo reproduced, but the studies as masked work in the way they look that it was they looked at

Boy who were handling brought a virus people, they look for people, war masks, they compare them to. The people did not to which I say. wait. There were people, handwriting handling, corona viruses and didn't wear masks. So I don't know how you get that group of people who didn't wear masks, but only they exist and they study them and they found that the. The people who didn't wear the masks add substantially higher infections and again it's one study. Fifty percent chance. They any study is true. But let me let me just rapid up this way. I don't think you should believe that study or any other study at the end.

in isolation. You did you need a body of work before he should believe something, but those saying there are no studies. I would like to add that there are so many now there is at least so you can't stay no studies, but you can really say that blue media matters came after me, you're, probably waiting for that worry. What took you so long, so media matters, Is to ever put me in their crosshairs. On the right. Are you might say, if you do Media matters is a left, leaning, disreputable website where they make lots of claims against term support. Sisera. So here's how they went after me. They in their article they- I and a number of other people think Laura Ingram was in there

but we were accused of retweeting a tweet from someone who had made tweets that they think are racist in the past. So media matters is calling me out. By name writing a big article to associate me with a website that has made what they consider offensive and or racist tweets in the past. Now, when he people who we use twitter, think that that's it The other thing I think media matters is confusing facebook with Twitter. Let me explain this to be an EU matters. If I'm on Facebook. and I do decide to friend a white supremacist will.

Something. You should probably worry about. You might even write an article about it. Oh my goodness, somebody friend it a racist, and I think that could be part of a conversation. I would say: that's not nothing. you're associations are part of the story, but twitter is Facebook. If I retweet you you're, not my friend, if you reach, we content from subsidies to intercede, you're not really becoming their friend. It doesn't have. A meeting is just the content, so the way that media matters turns a nothing into something is by assuming the people don't use twitter enough.

To understand their retweeting, something does mean anything that has no meaning doesn't mean. You know doesn't mean you researched. The original twitter doesn't mean It means you looked at the content. You said all that some content that my followers should see you might like. That's it that's the twitter model you do not acquire the reputation of people you retweet. Let me explain it this way. If you acquire the reputation of the people, you retweeted, How could even understand your world. It would mean everybody on Twitter, whose retweeting their acquiring everybody's reputation- and you would know, anybody. Wasn't that point, let me, What percentage of people I retweet? Who. I would consider horrible, and at least one way, so

If this site, I retweeted hasn bad retreats in their past. Let's say for my my precision that their horrible in at least one way that doesn't mean they're mean to pats right. Means that their horrible in exactly one way- allegedly, I don't know myself but allegedly the horrible in this one way. How many people have I retweeted in my lifetime. Were horrible in at least one way, all of them every one of us. I'm pretty sure if I dug into your private lives, oh I'd find something on five of them. even if here ninety nine percent lovely you could be delightful people pretty much law abiding you could be all of.

But all about I can find there is one thing you ve all done: that's pretty bad that one thing do I acquire all of your mistakes? If our retweet you do, I pick up all of your flaws. Do they become part of me because I retweeted So media matters is silly and working to ignore them. I would also like to point out- and I will return to this point often I think. did a lot of what we in society we ve decided to label as racist is better described as offensive, because people can be offensive intentionally, they can be offensive unintentionally without being racist. Would you agree that that statement is true that you could be offensive.

both both intentionally and sometimes accidentally, without necessarily being racist right. So if you look at a lot of the claims, you will find that the claims fall into that category of being offensive, but clearly not racist, and I think that we should make that distinction really really clear. Because it would solve seventy percent of our problems. Did I offend you? Oh I'm, sorry that wasn't the point. The point was not to offend you, it's my opinion, but I don't mean to offend. So I think you can apologise for being offensive, even if it's an accident one year where social people we live in the world we try to get along. You should certainly certainly apologize, So then, let them think somebody that doesn't mean you won't do it again.

Does it mean they all knew. It does mean you're a bad person, but sure policies are good social lubricant. I think there are appropriate. Quite often, Rasmussen has shared some. information that I think will be available to the rest of you today, sometime. Apparently opinions about China are worsening where now, sixty percent of Americans think that China should pay some kind of reparations or something because of the corona virus, and that's that from what forty two percent- that's bribing change,. By years apart. They got my interest. Thirty three percent of Amerika. Is now consider China, an enemy of the United States, what

think there was a march of twenty eight team says thirty, three percent thing: China's anatomy today, what was it two years ago? Eighteen percent, So one for an eighteen percent of Americans Le China is an enemy to thirty. Three percent what happened in twenty eight to that's. When China killed my steps with Sentinel. and it was the time that I promised you- I was going to take China down now. Of course, I've been talking About China for two years probably just a coincidence that that To be the high point of China's goodwill with the United States, and it has gone straight down since them now, I could be heard.

that there are a lot more voices talking out against China and, of course, the problem of is probably the biggest deal. That's happening in that regard, but I would like to say that I am part of the productive change, an opinion from China being our food show me to being our enemy and I would consider them our enemy as of today. Well, since two thousand and eighteen in my case, all right black lives matter? Founder cofounder has made it clear to burden that black lives matter expect something to say they say that they help to get the black vote Biden and they want something in return. They want something in return, but luckily Joe,

I didn't is no president tromp. So in black lives matter, says we'd like to get something in return. They can depend on Joe Biden to come through just the way Democrats have been coming through for the black population for decades. For example, here are some of the important things that Joe Biden has promised the black community, and I think they can be pretty happy about this pretty happy because you think hey. I wonder if the Democrats will once again make promises and do basically nothing Unlike President Trump, who literally promised nothing and then a whole bunch of things, everything from the platinum plan to special opportunities, oaths and funding the age be historically black colleges to prison reform. the present, you didn't promise anything. You say what the hell do. You have to lose.

That's a little was you can promise, that's no progress and they delivered. What even even his critics We say: ok, I gotta admit that's a lot of stuff so present rob delivered for the the black population, this country, even including his critics, agree but bite. It can take that up a level, so he has made some promises and let me tell you what he's promised and this has nothing to sneeze it. So by doing this promised as president, he would create a police oversight board to combat police brutality, especially as black and white Forty people within the first hundred days in Wales, so If you're worried that Biden was gonna, do nothing. don't worry anymore, because he's gonna put together a police oversight board.

I don't know why nobody thought of that before put together a little committee about that yeah, I think the black Population is pretty happy about that, because no ever promised to put a meeting together but that's not all there's way more than that. Binding has also promised to create an economic plan that per. housing, education and financial support. Those are all good things: housing, education, financial support. This is good stuff. That eurobonds is planning. And he says, as financial support to the blackened latino communities who have been disproportionately affected by the crown of pandemic way. What am I really, This correctly, that Joe Biden is going to give emergency relief based on your race.

does that actually happening. Joe Biden decided that your race would determine how much emergency support you is the opposite of what President should do. That's like exactly the opposite, Should the President make sure that everybody was in trouble during a pandemic gets help sort of close to equal amount of help? now. I don't know if this is talking about an equal amount of help or some kind of special help. If one is getting, is an equal amount of help, I'm all for it, but it doesn't sound like that. Does. so Joe Biden has got some promises is needs to keep. I think he is duped black voters, as Democrats have been doing for years, but successfully looks like it.

However, if you're wondering what the future holds for this retail business with the election, do you wonder how it's gonna turn out Gonna turn out that the election is overturned, seems highly unlikely. Doesn't or is it going to turn out that there's just not really much fraud there or maybe a little bit of fraud, but not enough to change anything don't. wonder how it all going to turn out I'm gonna narrow the options for you. There's one potential outcome that I think doesn't have any chance of being true here are the ones that do have a chance of being true one is that there is a little bit of fraud, some anecdotes, but the election stands. Would you agree? That is the least possible right. You might think that that's unlikely, as you think the election was stolen or something, but will you agree it's possible

I mean it's possible that you look into it. You don't find much right. It is still possible. Even though we all talk about sending a powerful in the voting machines and we'll talk and all the allegations in the strange data I'll get to that. But at this point is still possible right that they can look into it now find much. When you re or now, because I am interested in it, if you would at least agree as possible- even if you think the odds are pretty low, so I'd say it's possible- here's the other, possibly there. We find that there is not only fraud, but there is massive fraud throughout the election system, so much so that maybe we ve never had a fair Do you think that's possible? You don't have to put the odds. Are it yet just

is there any possibility that, when one do these audits and look into it there. What we discover is is not just bad. It's. So bad that we couldn't even imagine how bad it was. It's like unimaginably corrupt. Do you think? That's even possible. Is there any chance that is so corrupt that we didn't even have a democracy or a republic, and we thought we did? Is it possible. Today it is, I think it is. I don't know what odds to put on it, but I'd say that's possible, those are the two things that I say or are possible. We ve another always has been massive fraud, including this time we find other things have actually been pretty good, not much prodigal, say that's possible, but

Are there any any possibilities that their that don't exist? I think the possibility that the possibility, whether let me let me get my biggest point, I don't see really much chance that they're not gonna, find massive fraud. If you, if you want to go further and put some mods on it, I would say the what's gonna happen. Some people who ever an idea about the country they live in and the there quality is going to change a lot. So,

my case, if I were to learn that, despite the fact that these elections are full of holes meeting there are lots of opportunities to cheat? Will talk about those? but I can't understand any world in which lots of people were involved. There is a huge upside potential for cheating lots of ways to do it, and then it doesn't happen in a major way. So my my understanding of reality will be completely destroyed if it turns out that the right people look into it and don't find anything. oh fine or anything significant anyway. My whole life understanding of people how the. Old works, how big systems work? How big organizations

Literally the thing I spend my life writing about, I would all be wrong about all of that. It would completely annihilate my understanding of reality, so that could happen. Here's the other possibility all the people who think that they have been living in democracies, less republic with something like fair elections. It's never happened. It's possible, we ve never had a fair election, in fact defied odds on it when I say never meet people get caught up on the absolutes Sony, pull it back from an absolute. It doesn't mean that the person who got the most of voters support never won cuz, I'm sure that sometimes people win, even if the other side, cheats and that's probably happening, but I would bet.

I would bet that pretty much all of our major elections, anything that involves a city at least probably corrupt and maybe always happen, and we just don't know so I think that's the big reality twist. That's coming. We shall see as the Dilber guy the guy who writes about big organizations and what people do in big organizations. The election is like a big organization and if I'm wrong about. My whole career sort of a joke, because all I write about is how, when there's a big organization, bad stuff happens. Every time it doesn't sometimes happen is every time every single time,

There are some research on mouthwash. Only there's some kind of mouthwash there's this particular ingredient which watch me now try to pronounce it Several appeared, idiom serpent absorbed idiom. I think I know that if you ve got that sir period be chloride in your mouth watch it. as promising signs of reducing poverty. So his mouth wash several times a day, but I have to check if I have that if they have their ingredient by the way, if you smoke marijuana and do mouthwash directly afterwards, he gets really your munchies assorted for you, it's if I get colonel virus. That would be a miracle because I use.

Mouthwash does? Is it to you, the Joe Biden sort of evolved into that guy? Who complains at every meeting that there is no plan every then. If you work for a big organization. and a small one. There's always somebody at the meeting whose only comment is gonna, be that there is no plan, whereas the plan or where our strategy same thing worse, our plan they Joe Biden became that, whereas the play of guy, because he keeps complaining that the president has no plans to distribute the vaccine, do you think that's true? The present assigned the top logistics.

Guy in the military to make a plan I so this is the part we know is true. The trumpet picked the top logistics guy in the military to make a plan to figure out how to get all these vaccines to people. In the quickest time Joe Biden says: there's no plan, which of those do you think is true. Do you think, the top military guy who's in charge of logistics, and these literally charged with saving the country. That's his job. whose job it is to get those vaccines to people is, is everything, Many lives will really save if he does a good job, so Joe Biden thinks

guys and doing it right. That's what Joe Biden says: there's no plan. I got a feeling that if you assign a logistics job, the most important one in the country, there's nothing else going on this. That important for logistics is nothing even. so is the most important goal given to exactly the right person. The logistics guy in the military is the military. this is an Wally. It's not like you give an assignment to somebody cubicle and they are you a week later there were busy and they didn't get around to it. That's the military! When the commander in chief, tell somebody military to give me a plan for logistics, I'm pretty sure they're back in a plan just goes Joe Biden hasn't seen it

doesn't make it not a black. I think it's hilarious, that calmly Harris is getting security briefings she's a senator, but Biden does not, So you already already see happening. The Joe Biden is already being left out decisions, not exactly, but but you can see like the first here of it? Oh yeah we're giving security briefings to come. Let us, but there's a reason this now, because Joe Biden isn't the real president. We have a reason is because she is a senator and he's not elected official. So the president has to give him that authority. The present, so it makes sense, but I'm kind of wondering where we see other examples in which the vice president knows more than the way President Elect.

Joe Biden is also what I call the angry obvious guy he likes to say obvious things that just don't have any new new information in them is just Firstly, what anybody would do, but if he says it with an angry condescending voice, he sounds like a leader. So let me give you, give you given exam. Well here's one of his tweets, I'm going to read two different ways, One is the way a normal person would talk and then I'll give you. The Joe Biden agree obvious guitar six years without any effects? His tree said right now: Congress we have come together in past cove and release package like the Heroes ACT, that the the past six months ago, once we

then the virus and deliver economic relief to workers and businesses, then we can build back better than ever before. Sounds reasonable right completely reasonable thing democrats want a relief bill lichens a relief bill. We all understand it could be important to getting economy going a very reasonable tweet. Wouldn't you say but if you are saying this in person, he would do it and angry obvious guy voice to make sound more leisurely, and it will go like this right now. Congress should come together. a pass a covert. Relief package. Like the heroes, app. That the house past six months ago, six months ago, people folks, six months ago, they passed and nothing.

And once we shut down the virus. And deliver economic. I believe I can, I'm a relief to workers and businesses then weaken the old back, better see how that turn into literally talk just by getting angry and excited about ordinary words. He does that. Well, I I tweeted humorously that reading twitter lately about all the election fraud techniques. So I getting a prison education If you ask me two weeks ago, Scott can you name all the ways that an election could be rigged. I was well you haven't thought about it, but.

if I make a list make a list at got two or three things that would. Be ways the original action election. But I feel like. now. I have a lot of them. if you ever want to throw in election and a third world country and you're wondering what technique to use, you can just ask me, because I picked up quite a bit of technique, the past for weeks, let me give you a few examples. you say that these are techniques which are alleged. If you ask me, they all look a little sketchy, because if it's really this easy that eight than people have some real big surprises of so I'd like to think Really this easy, but here the allegations one of them is, you could take.

Pilot ballots was safer one candidate, that the other votes are for one candidate. You can feed into the counting machine and then just pick up the ballots and see them through a second time or Third time or aforethought now it is alleged that that's a real thing, But he says they saw happen, but there's a part of me. This is really really The system is so insecure that you can just take the same bunch, a balance and just faded through a second time, and nobody can does that now I have a little bit of trouble believing it's true does it feels a little too easy, but its alleged of others when dead people voting- that's probably universally too, but I doubt that dead people alone will be. Some kind of a big change to our election.

Ok, here's a trick that I've never done before, but it's a clever one when, unsolicited ballots, are being mailed out. They just send a whole bunch of extra ballast do Democrats and they send Republicans one. So if you're republican and you Cuesta the ballot, you get your one ballot and you think the world is good. What do you know? You requested one ballot? You got one Bela, you filled it out, you're, happy republican you're a Democrat, you requested one ballot. Perhaps you give five of them and they say to yourself I have five ballots. What do you do. probably most people are honest and they go into one they throw the other four away, but,

some people are going to fill out the other ones you dont need everybody to fill out the extra ones you just need two percent and suddenly. You ve got a race now that one is also alleged anecdotally for some stories about that. again, I don't know how true it is. It's an allegation. I've heard the allegation that there are lots of people register. The same addresses such that. I guess you could just say, you're different people living at one address. He can get lots of ballots. Is that a big deal? I don't know? How about manually reading the ballots wrong? So there's one allegation that I guess we other different mechanisms and systems recounting, votes by one place. It is alleged that Somebody would have the ballot and would read it to the person who was inputting

what's a Joe Biden and then the person who was in putting would take it and was supposed to double check at. But you know, there's a lot of balance, so they would just hear Joe Biden and they were just type in biotin and just put it in a pile, Really checking that are really said. Joe Biden now there's some allegation that, one of the. The watchers saw them saying that the trunk ballots were really Biden. Second person doesn't even look and just inputs by and saw happened multiple times. So, apparently the allegation is that one way you could cheat is just have the person who is right It also votes just say. Biden now is that the rock solid voting system with checks and balances that you thought you had were somebody can just say, says: Biden Area, just me

Right there, that's it, you can actually cheap. That way. Are you kidding me There is another way I heard, and again I don't know if any these are real. These are just allegations. I've heard that I think this is the Philadelphia story. If I remember correctly about somebody asking whoever was running the polling station. Who should we talk due to drop off the blank valets? blank balance, so one way is just deliver pallets of blank ballots when it's time to put your candidate ahead, and so here's another one. Turning off the signature matching so apparently there's a Traveling signature matching, who knows how well Thou works, are now? Can you really electronically matches signature? Is that even the thing

But let us say it is a thing, but you can just turn it off. You can just go to the machine turn it off. Then every every Bela goes through when normally lots of them would get rejected. Lots of them might be three percent, as opposed to point three percent, but you just turn it off by you, but you can also turn down the sensitivity because you ve got a lot of work to do you don't want to be checked everything justice machine told you do so. You can just turn down the sensitivity. Did you know that you could probably dial the winner of the election. Just by how sensitive you made the signature check, it could be that easy to throw in election just go in there and say twenty percent off the signature, sensitivity, checking.

Might be enough. Now again, I don't know that this happened. These are all just allegations and all the allegations are equal until they're, not many that they're all unproven until the proven. and then, of course I ever mention these offers system here. The dominion systems- if you have software you of a million different ways, somebody says there is proof that there's no cheating, because God did not do this and twenty sixteen well, you know if the person you didn't expect to get elected gets elected. You should check, though you think you should check into that. So if somebody made the same claim in twenty sixteen- and I don't remember being made.

But if somebody had, I would have taken seriously. Are you telling me that I would believe that no Republicans had ever tried to cheat in an election? How can you be serious

even considering that, of course, you have to assume the both Democrats and Republicans and shaded and elections at whatever scale. I know now, but you have to assume its both. So if there had been those accusations and twenty sixteen I'd probably treat them the same way of treating these, which is well, the allegations are just allegations. Should they be proven through the the correct mechanisms, I will treat them as facts, but if the allegations have been made in twenty sixteen, I definitely would not would not have ruled out based on it being impossible and face value. I wanted a mad

Scott said about raped in twenty. Sixteen, I don't know what that comment. Is that there's a whole lot industry of people rummaging through my old tweets and statements to try to find an inconsistency? It's a weird thing about being a public figure that happened yet even this morning, somebody produce some tweet that they imagined was inconsistent with something I say now but is instead, of course, So Sidney Powell, as you know, super lawyer, is making some Really strong allegations about this software and. it's almost so crazy that you can't even describe it. Apparently the allegation is that she has a whistleblower high level military person, but I don't know military of what country she doesn't say.

But somehow was present or have close personal knowledge of this same. Software that we use for our elections being originally created, for or a Chavez in Venezuela for the purpose of throwing in election. So the allegation is that it's designed to throw elections is not designed had just account elections that is specifically designed. Jake elections and that it was used in Venezuela effectively and other countries, I think effectively. that now that same software, which is made allegedly to throw elections, is the one we're using now here's the thing. You can it's easy to believe small allegations somebody says: oh somebody stole a loaf of bread, it might be too, it might not be true,

It's easy to believe it's easy to believe a person could steal a loaf of bread. But what do you say something as big as this that the entire election system of the United States. The greatest alleged democracy in the history of the of civilization there are voting system is completely fraudulent completely fragile as in, however, as access to this feature that changes votes is the only person who gets to determine the election? That is such a big claim that your brain can't processing and that's the problem. The problem is that the claim is too big were eight maker analogies from healer, but was isn't there a global Goebbels, redoubles or whether it is a quote,

that the bigger the lie, the more the more easily can be believed. So the big lie in this case is that the election is less five. It's all secure, softwares, not a problem who could act software. So that's the big lie that there is no problem with the elections and And when you hear this allegation, it too is so big the your brain can't even process. It is If, tomorrow, this story went away, you apply just stop thinking about it. You just stop. Thinking of as soon as the new starts reporting it yields up, acting as if it were real. It's It's the weirdest psychological thing in years,

I don't know if offers real, I don't know. I do know that if there is such a thing as a piece of software that various different countries of their fingers in some, at least tried. So wouldn't you say that you could say with a hundred percent? Certainly the various entities have certainly tried to best within software. I can say that with complete cough, Because if if the CIA has never tried to mess with that software,. What the hell are they doing? Why are we paying them? They're not messing with an offer that software is used in other countries, our intelligence, probably like every other intelligence service is looking for ways to influence. Other countries, of course, look at their elections, of course,

So you telling me our CIA didn't at least try to use that software to at least try to influence other countries if they didn't, they all need to be fired. Likewise, you know the intelligence agencies. China and Russia in Great Britain and Israel and everywhere else if they have, they at least try to get them that software. They all need to be fired. That's exactly what we should be doing all they along this trying to get into that. In fact, if there was any,

Elsie or doing you should be fired, cause you're, not a very good spy if you're not work in full time trying to get into that software now. My guess, if I had to guess, is that that we get. This is just based on knowing people knowing motivations, knowing people knowing large organisations knowing the job of intelligence agencies and knowing that lots of time has gone by since just knowing those assumptions. Here's what I believe that the software has not only been penetrated. A bad bad entities, but probably multiple. So, for example, there are probably more than one employ by now who's been placed in these voting system companies that are actually just agents of foreign companies, for

countries, wouldn't you say that the odds that they have at least tried to get people that they can influence on the inside a hundred percent. They ve at least tried. So by now, since last time has gone by almost certainly they have succeeded, and I would say the same thing about these social media platforms. The social media platforms by now should be completely penetrated by all the major intelligence agency or at least they tried, I would imagine they succeeded by now. So to me, it's almost unimaginable that the right people haven't tried and had enough time to make a difference in any kind of a system. So it's not an allegation about was specifically dominion. Specifically, anybody is just one you have that set up. It can only

One way it's not like. There are two different ways that this goes in the long run in the long run. The intelligence agencies, of course, we'll take control of voting systems. They have to be crazy for them not to. that is their job Lynn word, is also working on this issue. Working on the Georgia recount here,

This is a guy who does defamation lawsuits for living, and he said this in one of his comments and he said that he is very careful about defaming people in public, because it's what he does for a living is defending people who got defamed in public, and he said still that he is willing to say in public that the governor of Georgia's crooked and that the election was stone. That is pretty direct. Isn't it now? Do you think that's true? Do you think that Linwood with all their connections, that Winwood has would know for sure whether Georgia is a corrupt political situation? Do you think he'd know now whether he could prove

It or not. This is a separate question. What do you think, just as a person do you think he knows I feel like he probably does, because they're probably aren't too many people have more access to a behind the scenes and how things really work. Then a high powered, no government kind of lawyer so, I think Lynn, Woods probably knows, but I'm not gonna make an allegation because I don't wanna be sued,

but he is somebody who would know and that's a pretty direct allegation. So I think what you're going to find and here's the the big red pill that the country is getting ready to take if I had to put money on it- and I did actually so let me correct that I did put money on it, so I do have bats that we will discover that the election is fraudulent. Now the bat is in the form of a thinking that some of the states will be reversed, so I got some bats about some of the state's being reversed, which would indicate fraud so. here's what I think. I think that the country is going to learn that our entire voting system is corrupted and when I say the entire system, I dont mean. Oh, it's just that

software nope. I think we're going to find it is literally everything I think he's gonna be soup to nuts. I think we're gonna find the software is completely corrupted. I think that we will find that the physical ballots are completely corrupted. Take will find that the whoever does the counting and the way they organize the account is completely corrupted. My guess is that it was corrupted from top to bottom and really Crump, and I and I think that what this country needs is some kind of government in the box for the local. The local part I feel like the country needs some kind of a federal option where you can go to the go to the people in the town and say alright, Detroit just picking Detroit to pick on for a moment. You citizens we're gonna, give you a federal election. There will not be managed by your locals

and this federal election will ask you one question: would you like a government and a box for two years random time if they say yes and that's the federal government does the election, not the local? If they say yes, the federal government comes in and for two years they replace the entire local government. So all of the the corruption and the bribes and everything stopped cuz. There's nobody to bribe anymore. It's the seas, federal people, government and they're not gonna, stay that one and that it cleans everything up, sets up a a credible government and then takes off after two years. I feel like we might need it. I guess that's a well

Developed idea, so there might be some problems with that, but but it looks to me like, as long as the cities can throw the national elections and looks like that's: what's happening, city governments doing that the locals, I don't know how we can have a good government, so we almost have to be able to have some mechanism to dismantle corrupt city. Government According to Lou Dobbs, the FBI is looking into the election, but we don't know about that. If the FBI is looking into it, that would suggest they have at least enough evidence to look into it. Newt Gingrich agreed with my tweet and, as did others, I ask the question: why is it that is not considered a hate crime when Trump supporters are attacked for simply being trump supporters? Should that be

and I am told that is not a crime, because it's not called out as a protected group. but apparently there's I'm not the only person who thinks that it should be and to me, there's no brainer, because if you're attacking somebody for their polluted opinion a completely legal political opinion that ain't right as a crime, because the fake news gets people are worked up to think that urge killing Nazis or something so that seventy eight involved. here's the faint, the story of the type we see all the time it's reported by will see the New York Times reported this The report that Trump asked last week asked his senior raise what possibilities he had for an offensive strike on IRAN's primary nuclear,

site. Now, if you see that story, you say to yourself: oh, while the president wants to attack around right, does that sound? it. If he's asking his aids about options for attacking around your brain processes, that is, oh, it looks like Trump wants to attack around But these stories are also illegitimate, because, if you're the fear, the hands of the Military- You should be asking this kind of question just routinely You should always ask water by options, and if you're talking about,

one of the options is always attack. If you're, if you're the commander in chief of the United States shouldn't, you always be checking in to find out what your military options are for an active topic like a ramp. Do you think that do you think that the israeli military, do you think Netanyahu has never asked his military, what options they have for attacking or and of course he has which doesn't mean he's planning to do it next week? It just means you have to know your options, it doesn't mean anything except checking your options and they turn it into a story, and it's a non story is, should be just baseline. Nothing happened. Checking your options is nothing happening, that's nothing,

Here, CNN, with little fake news, the rope was Blitzer was reporting that Lindsey Gram was asking the Secretary of State of Georgia to toss out legal votes. Do you think that Lindsey Grab ask anybody much less the Georgia officials? Do you think he s anybody to throw out legal votes? Of course, of course not, he believes the sum. Boats will be determined to be illegal because they don't need some requirement of signature whatever the details are and that those would be illegal votes according to the law the land release the laws in Georgia and that Georgia should follow its own law, then that gets reported as Lindsey Graham wants to throw out legal votes.

No, no, that's not really what was happening here. He was interesting story. It's a Van Jones story, saying that He is quoted as saying Tuesday night was devastating, the polling had been suggesting there were that there would be just a wipe out of Trump and the fact that it wasn't a wipe out was, russian. So here's what I get from those stories of engines thought that the Poles would be correct and that Trump would be wiped out. But why didn't Viennan Jones? Thank the Poles would be correct. There's something with a story that doesn't make sense, because a lot of you believe again, it's just alligator,

But why do you believe that the polling was intentionally fraudulent for a fund raising reasons or to depress trump votes or something? Why didn't Van Jones think that's? Why is it that you, thank you thought from all. Last year you thought the poles were were fraudulent, but why didn't Van Jones think their fraudulent. Because, based on his answer, I think you really thought they were real. Why? Why do you think there are real? Well here is my assumption. He wasn't in on the steel, so Don't take this too seriously, but if you imagine that it was all coordinated than you imagine that the fake polls were coordinating with the people affect the election, so that the polls you know somehow that they'd all be on the same team, but I don't think

Anybody talk. I doubt that any election fraud was so widely coordinated, that there were meetings and zoom conversations and stuff like that. I think just everybody knew what they did it do. I think that the people handling the software if they saw an opportunity, they took it. The people had ITALY, the ballots They saw an opportunity. I think they took it. I think that's all it is, but so many of them took at that. now, both by the vote. Total is seventy nine million and one of the things that critics are saying: critics of trumpets and his supporters they're saying that there is no evidence that the election was stolen, to which I say, define evidence. Because I would I would acknowledge that there's no prove my end.

Standing of our systems work. Is that the same the legal system. If there is evidence of a crime, then you start the legal process. If the prime, if that evidence, does not turn into proof, Well, then the person is innocent, but you don't say: there's no evidence just because you couldn't get a conviction, there's plenty of evidence. You know what the evidence is. Seventy, nine million votes. That's a lot of evidence. Could it be That there is another explanation that it was just a really high turn out by got a lot of votes, because people really didn't like job is that possible here, of course, thus possible, but the evidence would suggest there's something up. because it's pretty big ones- or maybe it's not a coincidence, but it would

Surprise, a lot of people shall we say if that number held it was surprised, a lot of people. Somebody says the vote count doesn't matter cuz, it's the electoral college. It doesn't matter in this limited context of figuring out. If the itself was real or fake, because the total number of people voting. That certainly would suggest there's something going on here, especially when you compare it to the size of vitamins rallies. If you look at the strength that people wanted to win, interestin have the energy that would suggest seventy nine people

Seventy nine million people showed up it just doesn't make sense, so I would say there's plenty of evidence what there isn't yet is proof, but there will be so. I think that the world is gonna, get a little bit unravelled this week, because you can Start to see the good stuff, the actual valid stuff that holds up and looks credible and you're gonna see it soon. Probably all this week.

That's really engaged of now. One of the things I was worrying about when President Trump brought Doktor Scott Alice into the air into the office and put him on the krona taskforce. I thought that I would eventually be confused with him and sure enough. I was so I tweeted an article that calls him Doktor Scott Adams. Now I knew I just knew that I would get confused with him eventually, because even when President Trump says Doktor goes Scott,

Well, I'm listening to alive, and I hear I'm just list into Trump wanders announced earlier trumps ay and liked introduce Scott like Phyllis, ok, first, let me right. Hunters laptop was hidden from view subleasing! Ok, I don't know that's relevant. Twenty nine states will be forced into a hand, recounts people say. Perhaps we shall see our I'd say goodbye to Paris, goobers I'll talk to you tomorrow. You doers still with the six point. Nine thousand, while the lot of you here today, Scott would trumpet bluff this long. If he had nothing, he might he might,

Because he doesn't like the lose, maybe it keeps the issue alive he might, but I dont think the thing this surprises me is watching the attorneys. I dont think you would see Linwood or Sidney Powell or. Or any of the lawyers? I do not think you would see them bake such specific dangerous claims unless they knew something. Yeah Rudy Giuliani, you you couldn't. Do you imagine the Rudy Giuliani was now the president's sky, so maybe you get that you can see amusing little hyperbole, but you don't really see the other lawyers necessarily buying into that. I feel like I don't feel like Sidney, Pell or Linwood would throw away their careers making this kind of claims Leslie neither was

Either slaughter meter is ninety seven percent, ninety seven percent, yet the other thing we keep learning Yosemite interconnections or how many people are connected to one thing and also connected to another thing and connected devoting its pretty scary. So he says I feel, like Catherine says I feel like China is involved. While again, why would they be? Why would they be? They can send us a sentinel by the bowl loads and groaning virus and bad trade deals and steel or ip and nothing happens

Why were they? Why would they not try to ruin our election? It would make sense for them to try what is the slaughter meters. The slaughter meter is a is a momentary, it's a slice of time. This is how the election will go and at a hundred percent it would say that Trump is Andrew Percent going to be re elected. Now. I think the slaughter me

there has to be revised. I think that we will learn. The election was stolen. That's my prediction. I think we will learn. The lesson was stolen, but the mainstream media has the power to make that disappear, and I think that's always gonna go. So I think that we will know that the election was stolen. Historians may recorded that way, but their Joe Biden will probably take the office because the mainstream media, would you say you want, and it just doesn't matter if it's not true they'll just say, did and then he'll take the office. What would happen if Trump retook Leeway house in terms of rights while there would be great civil unrest, and so one of the plays the Trump has available to him, is to win the election and then resigned

resign, put pence in charge of paints a partner for everything and then started media platform and and really have some power. I gotta tell you it's a lot more fun criticising things that it is defending things so yeah. If, if binding takes office, you also would be heading towards Republic in control of Congress fairly soon. What about the phone calls? I don't know any news on phone calls. That's all I got for now I'll talk to you tomorrow.