Bump bump, bump bump bump bump bump bump bump bump bump bump bump bump bump bump bump bump bump bump bump. Oh, I didn't notice you there hey everybody. good, to see good to see you. You know every morning when I am in your company. I feel that trust You know this is the only thing I've ever done, that his job like that, doesn't feel anything like work. Cuz it cuz this stuff that I do. I literally do it for fun and I look forward every morning site. I hope some of you would enjoyed and he might enjoy more with a copper, mugger glass, a dagger jealousies, either canteen Jaeger, flask vessel of any kind, any kind really.

Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee and join me now once again,. for an unbroken string of UN, paralleled goodness it's called the simultaneous up and happens right now go well. Let's talk about me a printer if you have them joining me on these life streams lately, I've had a little trouble with a little bit of trouble with it. but here is an interesting update. so that when you complain about your hp printer in public,

Eventually, the word is that complaint will reach the HP executive escalation do so I got a phone call drive, and yesterday you get a phone call in my car and its Hewlett power. I feel a packard saying we are having problems with your printer. so the escalation to him. If you're not familiar with big corporation processes,.

It is very common for a big corporation to have a small group who does exactly this. They look for prominent complaints for you, the kind of complaints that would get into the public and cause you know, public relations problem and they looked a they look to stamp out those prominent compliance with especial team is actually very smart. When I worked for possessing bell, we had we had the same thing. We had a rapid response team for for the big, the big complaints. They could get in hand each be contacted me and offers to set me up with a text support to solve my problem. So we arranged a column, tech support. Guy calls and walk me through a fairly is pretty complicated and to sign on and and solve it, but the first part of this solution goes like this text,

where it says gonna this web page type in this: U R, L and then click these buttons. I'm just doing what I'm told right. So I got into my computer. Go to the web page. I feel like. it's gotta, be something like download this driver or something like that, but Joe before I click, I realise that the thing I'm gonna click on is going to turn over control of my computer to the stranger on the phone and, unlike and my finger just jumps back when I realise what I'm about to click, I do believe that it was age pig. So no really. I dont really disbelieve. That HP was on the phone and indeed they solve the problem. then followed up some sure was hp, but a general rule, if you let us. stranger on the telephone, give can get control of your computer. Don't do that.

Better than that pick your computer up and ro it out your window and then destroy it with a hammer and buy a new one, but dont give strangers control of your computer just just. Don't do that. I realized I just made a lot of people's tech support problems much harder, but don't do that So I didn't need to do that. You just taught me through what I did. It do change the drivers and it works. Fine lay this paper paper, so instead of throwing my printer off of the balcony as I was going to do when we give a shadow to hp who, every once in a while, you see a big corporation, do something exactly right: that's what they did. It was exactly right. The way they handled it could not have been more perfect. So my compliments to HP,

Here's a fun thing that might be ahead, assuming I didn't takes office as many people believe now I don't think that's guaranteed. But let's just work with me here. If Biden takes office, he's gonna be walking to a buzz that I don't think he sees common, looks like this. tromp was able to get the Republican Party to rally around him eventually. I dont know the Democrats, who can be a loophole, that off the left and the right. I think that now that they think they one they're going to turn their attention on each other and young and start chewing. each other, so Biden will have only lets, say, half or two thirds of the democratic Party. The other third will be trying to

He won't have Republicans, obviously Fox NEWS, Bright Bart. There are unlikely to be provided so he's gonna have thou whole part of the media against him. A third or so of his own team against them, and then here's the fun part haven't CNN stay in business. If all they do is puff pieces Biden, it made sense to do them when they did them, because they were trying to manage a result to get an elected. But what happens if the dog chases the car and their catches it? If the dog catches, the car, doesn't know what the fuck to do with it I promised you extra profanity, there's more come and so see an end is going to have a tough choice if all they do is well binds awesome again, look at their energy. Look at him, go, he seems more coherent than ever. Really

how many people are going to watch that nobody nobody's going to watch it. So, and it is not his fun to look at all Mitch, Mcconnell Block, This latter. Those are boring stories right. He Anita, you need a trap to get some energy, and here Coverage by doesn't have the energy source, then will either have to go out of business which believe it or not, is one of the choices, their talk about selling CNN, which is not exactly going out of business, but it isn't, it would be an eight, an acknowledgement that their businesses and working they need some kind of a larger protector. If you will somebody would deep pockets, so I think the most likely you think would happen. The CNN will turn on violence.

because it after they need to get ratings so by that is going to have the left media against them, the right media against them, and Third of his own base against him. I don't think any president would ever come into office with more actual firepower aimed at em. It's gonna be brutal or could be. I mean I suppose you could say that, CNN so doesn't care about profits that they would rather just be nice to him because he's on their team- maybe but I feel like profits are pretty important. I feel as though the profit motive will cause them to turn up.

And if you believe that a I already runs the world its guaranteed. Here's a question for you and I genuinely dont know the answer to this was not rhetorical. Are Republicans as bad as Democrats as people, because, if I get a biased view of it because

to my trolls would identify as being left, leaning and people on the writer generally nicer to me, because they tend to agree with my messages, etc. So what I know now is all things being equal. If I, if I were not again, a fight with a side would Republicans be as bad to me just personally as as human beings as the left is because I don't feel like that would be the case, but it might be right. Could I have the blind spot? Do I have a blind spot? The dismissed me biased and from it in favour of young right, leaning people, because I'll tell you why repression which is not based on science or data right. So I could be completely wrong about this, and I am aware that I could be completely wrong about tell you how I feel. I feel as if I often agree politically, philosophically with a lot

The things that people on the left say. For example, I think we we ought to have something closer to free college. Somehow I don't know how to get there. We should have something closer to for healthcare for everybody. I don't know how to get there either bath wise. So I this with a lot of things that they want, but it feels like conservatives and Republicans nicer people. Am I wrong about that. Just nicer people, so I would rather be hanged. Out with conservatives who disagree with me politically, then I would hanging out with leftists who agree with me, political, they just seem unpleasant and I can't tell if that's just a weird bias I have or if it's actually a thing I mean I don't know, could be a thing

So I just put that out there I hope you're not being as bad as them. Let me give you some examples, so I did a tweet in I'll talk to talk to you about a later, in which I got ten thousand retweets. So getting ten thousand retweet there's a lot right, if the size of my account would show massive agreement with what I tweeted twenty thousand likes. So this is the tweet. and by the way, there's nothing in it? That's controversial really and somebody you suddenly comments. Obviously, supper left, Dilber guy is trying so hard to be relevant and I'm thinking to myself, if you tweet on the topic of the day, which is the election controversy and you get

ten thousand red weeds and twenty thousand likes and you're doing a popular live stream, and somebody tweet Dilber guy is trying so hard to be relevant. What is relevant, look like to you and what one? Let me back up a little bit who is it, who is not trying to be relevant, is there anybody who wakes up in the morning? You says he now I think today I will achieve my goal of being irrelevant to shouldn't you all be trying to be relevant, even if your failing, which be an honourable thing to be attempting to be relevant. Even if it didn't work right now? I would argue that, objectively, you can look at the data and he would say it is working in the sense that lots of people are paying attention.

as demonstrated by retweeted likes there actually acting on other clicking something. So it's like this this critic. Now, obviously I don't take any the trolls too seriously are more interested in the mindset and understanding like what's going on here. What is this critic trying to accomplish? It feels, like is just evil no point to it. It's just be evil because, as a comment, there's only directed to make me feel bad din, obviously on the professional. So so little LE tweet isn't gonna make me feel bad, but it makes me curious, like what the hell is wrong with you. There I feel that this was a good use. Your time here is another one.

though I did their long tweets read about the brainwashing techniques that democratic using, I would say, there's nothing in that tweet thread. That is even really provocative. it's pretty much routine analysis of word choice and how those word choice or per hour, persuasive or not, It's not even really political is just about persuasion, word choice and somebody tweets at the Denver Post, which is one of my client newspapers that they tweeted the Denver post. With that with my thread and say, can we talk about the Dilbert guy, meaning that they would like to get me kicked out of the Denver newspaper, because I did a tweet that has no provocative. Kanto, He just doesn't like it. He doesn't like the tweet, so he wants me to lose my job. I didn't didn't say

I think there was even accused of being offensive to everybody. not accuse to be inaccurate about anything, so I'm not being accused of being wrong or offensive or dangerous or anything. He just didn't, like my opinion, and he thinks I should lose my job over that. That's that's where we're at now are republicans like that I don't think so, but I could be wrong so today, like every

their day, there's something that happens to me every single day, and it goes like this. Hey Scott, here's, a very credible study, the says, worry masks, doesn't work, doesn't work at all followed by somebody else. S got here is a study and lots of them. of the masks work definitely every day every fucking day. Somebody sends me study this as masks work. and one that says, Mass, don't work and they all credible to me what the hell do. I know,

Studies get debunked eventually, but I can't tell so I tell you that the concept of trusting the experts is the stupidest fucking thing in the public right now, don't fucking trust experts. Why is it because the wrong now. because you don't know you can't you can judge which export is right. Let's say on them. Ask question, because our experts on both sides, you can judge which of those experts, are right with what you see. fucking powers, you don't have any money there are five senses have evolved to tell which export having opposite opinions with opposite complex studies that you can't look into, even if you wanted to

you can't fuckin tell which export is right. Listen to the experts is the dumbest fucking thing in the whole fucking world. Do you know it answers as dumb as that. we should not impugn their trust in our institutions, You heard that allow right if global law trump does this or that it will cause people to lose trust in the election process, fucking good. We lose all trust in our institutions about the news. Should you trust them? now don't fuck entrust the news ever Don't ever fucking trust the news? Don't thus the elections, don't trust them

Ok, news! Don't trust Congress, don't trust any elected official, don't trust any institution? Don't you you're fucking teachers unions, don't fucking trust anyone That's your healthy situation. Instead of trust, building, good system. Put transparency into your system. Do you know why I trust trump more than let's say his critics do, because the presidency is probably the most transparent job in the whole world. Well lesson exaggeration, but it's a super transparent job, he did a lot of the things he would be accused of the odds of debt action are close to one hundred. It's the most transparent job ever take the election. Should we trust the election next time now? Don't

flock entrust the next election even trust little little bit if you're, if your election professionals have not added a whole bunch of transparency. That isn't there are now don't fuck, entrust it dont trust this one, don't trust the next one now will this lack of trust, destroys civilization will destroy the country now now, because it is a thing we have in this country in America and I can speak for other countries. It might be you maybe it's just true for a country's, but there is a thing we have here in Amerika that other people don't have in that thing is super superstore, we're Americans, that's it! That's it we're Americans!

We're not gonna break our fuckin country, we're just not going to do it. We don't want to. We don't want to break America, so we but we will break our fucking institutions. We will break any fucking thing we have to to keep the country together. All right. We don't fucking care about her institutions, nothing, we do care about America, we will protect it. We don't care about our fucking institutions, don't care about all right. Let's talk about the teachers unions, I believe that anti far- and if I did, I did very clever thing: persuasion, Weis,. and if I created a name for themselves called Anti fascist,

Then, when people said to them, as they obviously would hey, aren't you acting like ashes, and that anti far and then their pets news, say you fool You fools we're act like fascists, have. even seen the name of our organization and tie Anti fascist. So if you are against us and we're anti fascists, logically, you would be a fascist and because People are fucking Elliot's that actually works there, people make sense and divergence. If your aunt, I ain't adventures, though, maybe Negative wool- I guess you're a fascist war now that kind of persuasion wouldn't work.

We observe that it does because persuasion. It's about the irrational process, not about anything this rational. So I suggest, given the teachers, unions are the poison that is destroying civilization. I don't think that's too strong that too strong to say that the teachers unions are the poison destroying civilization. I feel like that's not even a hyperbole. They are the cause of the perpetuation of systemic racism, because if every black kid had a quality education, do you think that would be as much your differences and outcomes there wouldn't be as much I mean I don't know if there were differences, but it wouldn't be as large, so the teachers unions are by far the most.

Oh pernicious part of of life, but I think they should not be called teachers, unions and here's why teachers are still good right. When I talk about teachers, unions, I'm not talking about teachers. the other, maybe some overlap, but I'm not talking about the personages dedicates their life to teaching children, making their lives better. The teachers are fine, mostly in other novel great, but I'm not talking about the teachers talk about the union's who are now keeping kids every school in some places. Despite. Science, apparently- and this is a crushing blow to those children, but the teachers unions process So here is the name I would give them, because teachers sounds good and union sounds good right, just as words as independent work.

We generally liking unions right. I don't think the country would be nearly as well off if unions had never existed but like everything you can have too much of a good thing. You not everything, is as good as ever. So rather than Name, teachers, which is good and unions, which is generally good how about calling them the Anti Child Union, the Anti children union or anti child, I kept the sight of child or children is better,

I think I'm going to call them the hashtag Anti Child Union, because that feels closer to what's happening right. The whole point of the teachers union is to benefit the teachers. The whole point of school just to benefit the children's are you with me. School is to benefit children. Teachers unions are by design. The intention of them is to benefit teachers are those the same another knock and if what's good, for the children Happens to be today in this krona virus situation. That might be the case bad for the teachers. It creates a situation where the teachers have to be anti child.

because ass their job, their job is to be pro data and if they feel that the best way to do that is also being anti child. While they will be that's their mission to be priorities, you about this, the you're one of the things that Trump gets a lot of heat for is hiring sketch. People like Paul man, afford, etc. I don't need to go through the list, but that takes some attention away from the fact that some of his hires are really spectacular. For example, I think Pompey it was doing a great job, my opinion, Thank you. Jerry Cushion Argus, allow the heat from conservatives, but didn't Jared cushion or do a great job in the Middle EAST. I think maybe fantastic job

and I would say that, given all the heath that take, only that of vodka is gotten. You know, who's got more heathen vanka boy four years ago and by how you say she did pretty Are right, when you say lots of accomplishments in terms of human trafficking or of stuff, she caused any problems. nope. I would say that vodka has been one hundred percent positive every, and she did that. I know of looks like work there well, nothing but good for the administration, but for the country there's a good hires, but they want to. to talk about is clearly makin. Eighty as part, the best higher he's ever made. What do you think about that? I mean I don't know how well the cabinet number is doing. It's not like. I haven't invisibility on that, but

Kill evacuating is probably just about the best I've ever seen in that job and urban good people, not jobs, I'm not I'm not knocking anybody else who did the job does have been great people, those jobs fairly consistently over over history by thinks she's. The best I'm seeing in the comments alot of agreement there so yesterday, I guess he loves. Caitlin Collins was shouting out questions to the nature of wider. When one Wall President Trump concede and regulate is walking. Often she just goes. I don't call him activists, I don't call of activists cut about Joe. Got a perfect here's some fun!

You could recall that during the Trump First term, I often talked about how the Democrats were using what I called laundry list. Persuasion in my book, loser think maybe and when bigly I can't remember but under less persuasion works really well because it people will say to themselves. Well, I'm not sure I believe everything on the list, but there's so much. the list. There must be some truth to the general claim. So the way the Democrats used what they say they say Trump is assessed and here's my laundry list of all the reasons. But if you look at the reason, they all just sort of fall. Apart There's no reason on the list that actually can stand up to any scrutiny. Because it's a list, you think to yourself

well! I don't know much about everything on the list. I can tell a few of them. Don't look to real, but hey it's a whole list. There must be some. Do it it's a list now I've told you that the way to debunk that is, do not try to go through the entire list, as you can't do it. but you can say, tell me the strongest thing on the list and I'll just debunk that one. And if you agree that with my debunk, then you can see that if I have to the strongest reason on the list, what does that say about the weak ones so that that's the set up for the wanderlust? So what the? What's happening with the trumpet administration right now as their challenging the election they're using a laundry list, persuasion against the election and its work and another thing about laundry list. Persuasion. Is this really.

Let's just say, it's not the most honest thing you could do, but it works and in the political process. If something is not quite exactly honest, but it works. It's gonna happen so watching you, Trump Administration use laundry list. Accusations about the election is is pretty fun, but there's a there's a catch. What would you, let me ask you a few figures in your opinion: Having heard lots of different examples of alleged election impropriety, which one there was, is number one on your list for me

not only likely true but big enough to make a difference. So I want to see in the comments. What do you think is the is the one thing on the list. There really say: Inside out, so I'm reading the comments, I'm saying Software Dominion, dominion, software dominion Dominion, Dominium software software softwares offers offer dominion. Many independent, ok, I think I've seen enough. To know that you believe that off where mischief is the big story, and if you were to Present the list, probably have lots of things on your list, but you'd put that at the top right now. There's a problem.

the software story. Sorted seems to be hang on this. That is well and whistle blower right. Would you be nearly as convinced with venezuelan with the with the software story? Would you be convinced of that as much without that whistleblower? Because I don't think you are right, you can neither witness for some guy some like that And now you have this witness who says he was in the room. You saw it personally in the Venezuela situation so therefore blah blah blah right. Here's the problem, have you ever heard of a thing called disinformation while you're going to hear about it In big foreign now formed unless I international relations and interactions, there's a thing called disinformation which one

country word intentionally, create a story, that's not true and presented to the public, gov, another country, so that they can deal with the the fake thing and it would cause some damage to their society. One way or the other do you think the end an american election, especially this one? Do you think that there was any party involved, be they foreign or be they Democrats could be domestic or foreign was already who had it? interest in disinformation. Yes, you you'd all agree with that right. They had an interest in doing it. China has an interest in weakening the United States whether they did it or not. Is a separate question. Do Democrats have an interest in this information if it could help them get elected

of course. Yes, so we have, we have the we know we have the motive and its massive and is everywhere anybody who had the ability to inject disinformation Perry I chance they drive it now what would it look like if they did it you, let's say EU or professional you're, not just the troll troll, are putting this information at the system. All the time controls. Do it it's not necessarily reach a high level of notice right, because people now came from the troll, I suppose it comes from what look like credible sources or institutions. What then. Well then, it looks kind of believable doesn't mean it's true, but it's gonna be more credible if it comes from a good source. So what would it look like if, let's say Democrats.

Had hired the best disinformation professionals in the world? And their primary mission was to Who make it look as though the trumpet teams claims were illegitimate? What would you do? How would you do it. Given that the Trump team is using laundry list persuasion and given that, if you can t bunk the strongest, Thing on the list, you ve candid about the whole list, not completely, but it's the best you can do. what would you do? What will be the strongest play your strongest play would be to create in number one issue that isn't real.

And that would look like a venezuelan whistle blower if you're a disinformation professional like really really good at it, you'd say to yourself. If we can embarrassed Tromp team, with this one, obviously bullshit claim about That is welcome, whistle blower and we can get people to think that that was the main claim weaken debunk. We whole fucking thing. And then you look at that claim, and you said yourself, looks exactly like this information. In its in exactly the right place for this information. Now do I know for sure, there's somebody injected disinformation into that in particular. Now. No, I do not, but I will tell you it looks exactly like it.

I will tell you that I'm not the one person who noticed well, let me give you an assignment. Probably most of you could find at least somebody who is involved or has been involved in, let's say, intelligence services. Find somebody in a you're in your environment might be a friend of a friend or something who actually understands the disinformation world? Tell them what I just told you that that there is at least a possibility

at somebody wanted ruin the laundry list, persuasion of the trumpet legal team and that they might have done it by injecting this obviously bullshit story about the venezuelan whistleblower, just ass. It and then say, is the cartoonist crazy, or is this a thing and then go Because it's a thing and the odds and that it happened in this election, whether it's this The survey case, or just some other disinformation. The odds that happened are kind to four hundred percent really hundred percent. We don't know what disinformation necessarily that's a different question, but didn't exist yes, yes, this is.

And probably came from Democrats more likely than forum, but that's just a feeling. What would the Trump legal team do if they suspected? This was the case, because I've heard people say is simply Powell lying or does she have the goods? Is she just. making the story up cuz. We are waiting for that and approve here's. What I think is happening all right, so I'm going to say this is pure speculation. I think that Sidney Powell and the legal team does not believe the Or just a guess, I haven't asked them their question. I don't know my guess is that they don't believe it by. It is nonetheless true that

Then presented to them in a credible fish package, their job is to make the president's case as well as they can, and so it would have been made. the irresponsible if they have not included it in the case, because it exists the cat. it was made by somebody, abandoned the room sake All I have to at least put it out there, which is different from whether they believe it themselves. My suspicion is that they at least have a deeper scepticism, probably just a deep sigh. But they still have to put it another member, the lawyers and working for a client. If the car and says well we don't know but put it out there see what happens. Now, that's different from saying that the software was unmolested. I still think there's a hundred percent

hence the voting software gets compromised sooner or later. I don't know if it's happened yet, but you can guarantee will happen. There is no way to stop it really eventually. Without transparency. Actually, transparency would be the one way to stop it. If you made the code available somehow to everybody, I suppose you could stop it mighty. Some way. The technologically do that yeah some issues release the damn source code. Suppose they did, he would you believe it was the real source code, and would you Billy if that they don't have patches and upgrades, they can alter the the actions of the source code. I think even auditing the source code wooden necessarily get you there do it, but I don't think it would necessarily be conclusive.

here is a so my twitter, I mentioned the got all those regions. I'm gonna run through it again quickly because it's it's it's my laundry list, if you will of persuasion techniques, that the Democrats who use- and I mention these- Our scientists do them quickly. They use refuses to concede that makes you think, pass the sale as though tromp should should concede we haven't accept. that, but if they say why won't we concede through making, you think, passes, sale, less persuasion, following a simple recount, an audit to fool you into thinking. There really check for fraud, but recount doesn't even do that. they're saying no evidence when, in fact, there's tons of evidence in the forms of affidavits. They just want young

they just they just look you in the eyes and there's no evidence, there's no proof, because that ends up happening in court or in the scientific context, but evidence all kinds of evidence. So that's just persuasion. They say it would be obvious if there was massive fraud, but of course Republicans think it is obvious Elden by didn't get that many more votes, then Obama Alex kind of obvious to a lot of people. Even if it didn't happen, it looks obvious. And then lawsuits being tossed out of court, but of course the past does not predict the future. The fact, as somebody else lost a somebody else lost a lawsuit doesn't mean. The next lawsuit is bad that that those mechanisms,

The fact that other people lost other lawsuits, what does that tell you about the next one shouldn't tell you anything, but people feel they see a pattern there Then there is the key to reassess nation by bad analogy, which is which way you see when there is no real arguments, so it turns it into trumps. Legal challenges are Mccarthyism more racism or dictators, or something, and that, of course, what the media will leaves out when when they can put anybody on camera, the says there's no fraud or we have discovered no fraud. What they leave out is the person saying that didn't look for it. Of course, there's no evidence

or something you didn't look for, and on that point the two Michigan law makers who went to visit Trump people got pretty concerned because I said a is he gonna talk them into not certifying the the election of their stay? and they said I want to find the exact quote, because exact quote matters. I do have that exact what you'll be either you waited because, like you so happy, I guess I hit it pretty well. Well, the exact quote, which apparently at in print, was that

The law makers said they had not yet seen any evidence of fraud in the election. Did you did you catch the key word there? The key word was yet who puts yet. In a sentence like that, so the law makers say we have not yet seen evidence that the election was fraudulent. Do you know how the news reported the statement we have not yet seen evidence they take the yellow, watch the yet be dropped NEWS report that yet the sort of an important word, because it left their options open, but the the headline in the trending part? If you look at the trending on Twitter, they took the Yeddo now

Let me ask you this: would those two lawmakers Vienna position as of yesterday to have even potentially scene. Any evidence of fraud, even if an existent, no now what's left of it on is. Why would you imagine that those two specific law makers would have seen them Evidence of fraud did. Sadly, Powell have a meeting with them and show them what she has. No, no,