That is why would you imagine that those two specific law makers would have seen them? Evidence of fraud did Sadly, Powell have a meeting with them and show them what she has. No, no, why would they have evidence of fraud, so they put it. Yet there is little place markers like not yet, and I would agree with them. They they have the same information. I do all bad. They watch the news. if you want, if all you, if all you know, is what's on the news and what's in social media, you also don't know, there's we approve of fraud, you don't know you just see claims you see, claims you see, debunks of those clay.

Susan Moore claims? That's all you know, you don't know. If there's any fraud, I don't know. I believe there is because the situation is one in which fraud would happen every time. So I don't know how much, but of course it exists all right. Have every noticed that there's something weird about this virus that is seems to attack enjoyment that just a coincidence, That's the only thing you can do this pandemic is enjoy yourself because all the things that create enjoyment or Actually, although things you're not supposed to do you still work right, because I'll, do everything unpleasant if it the unpleasant before you can still do it but if it's fun, no no fun.

so that's kind him a weird virus coincidence. I don't know. Maybe it's trying to teach us something. If you believe in me the God model of reality, maybe it's a lesson that maybe you didn't need them You don't I'll, tell you one or one of the weird things this coming out of. This is realising what things didn't matter and what things were just habits as anybody have, This experience that you're learning something about yourself, the you probably couldn't, have learned without dependent for learning to appreciate having toilet paper before the pandemic Did you ever look at your role of toilet paper there on the?

of a roller on the wall and think yourself, dear God, thank you. I never did. I always took my toilet paper for granted as well as my food in tray. Rotation, healthcare and everything else. I feel I have a sense of gratitude for everything I have now the exceeds anything I could have imagined before a little bit like maybe people went through the depression the great depression. You know, if you have any parents and grandparents who went through the great depression, you notice, they don't throw things out just in case. Something I can tell you know if there's a great depression that might be my my beverage holder in the future. So I do feel as though there something Weird Lee educational about this. This virus, so

California has instituted a curfew from ten p m to five, a m. I understand the ten p M part. I don't really understand the five M park because I don't know: do people have a different lifestyle than I do because I can see being out to two in the morning. I can see that happening, I can see being out of five in the morning. I know it's a thing, but It was a few it if you would stop everything between ten p dot m and three a dot m. You probably would have picked up most of the problems that would have happened between three a dot m and five, a dot m cuz, very people. Very few people say you know it's three, a dot m drink I feel as if they could have baby pull their back to three. I'm just just same hard, Dylan on Twitter,

the solution because barely there's a theirs. A rule this as the homeless, people are exempt. Oh, you don't have a curfew if your homeless and harmony asks what a few self identifiers homeless. What if you do To which I at this problem going to solve itself, because if the Biden economy is anything like what we think well, I'll be homeless, so this curfew might not matter.

Don Junior is reportedly recovering from covered. If you want to see the worst of humanity, look at the people celebrating Don Junior on social media leave, people celebrating and those like some some bitch did a happy dance on Tiktok from two Don Junior having a disease who does a happy dance, the somebody else's disease, I can think of anybody. I dislike that much I mean really I mean I can hey somebody pretty much and short of being, you know like her,

actually Heller. I don't think I've ever celebrate them getting a disease, that's pretty sick, I'm pretty sure Don Junior will be fine. It looks pretty healthy, so you should get by that. Just fine! I would ask here's a question. Have any of you felt jealousy for somebody else who is healthy got the corona virus, because I feel that a little bit. That's, not rational, because you don't want to get the corona virus because it could have lasting problems that they say four months. You don't know what the long term consequences you dont know if here the year, the rare person who dies from it so logically, I definitely do not want to get peronne virus logically,. But I'm not really a logical creature on part, illogical.

And the illogical part of either the irrational part of me is a little bit jealous anytime. I see a healthy person. Get corona virus because I assume that they will recover with no problem, and then they have a little bit extra freedom. Right there, a little less afraid of things. They don't really need to wear a mask, the other might for social reasons, but don't really need to end. I just wondered, as anybody else had the feeling in looking at the comments, and it looks like literally nobody also that feeling. Ok, it's just me good thing. I check it's just me, So we wish the best fervour Don Junior, speedy recovery. Bright bird had article about present trumps announcement about is drug chain

Drug policy changes, so we ve got this most favoured nation thing and and rebates and discounts would be pushed directly to consumers instead of to the middle and then there is this one line than the story- the just sort of invalidates the whole story. This was in bright bird. I assume this is generally just as little throwaway sentence away says, although the congressional Budget Office estimates that could ultimately cost taxpayers more. What now? I don't think, that's untrue. By the way. I do think that you can't just tell the pharmaceutical company we're gonna pay you less from now,

and that everything's fine, because it would be sore like negotiating with your car dealership. If you get the call at car dealership to go down, you know five hundred dollars on the price of the car they're going to charge. They're going to try to get it back with the you know, the car mats in the the secret spray that protects the undercoating of you, so you think you one got him down. I have wondered dollars on the price of the car. Wooed. Look at me. I get that five hundred dollars and then you just fuckin, given back with these secret under coding and the these do every area. Using the car dealership does the screw you, so I've got a feeling that the pharmaceutical companies have lots of game lots of money. They have lots of resources there very smart.

They're gonna figure out a way to re screw us, even though these rules look like they would be in the short run for it So I would like to be way more optimistic about drug plight prices coming down and then not hurting us in other ways, Well, I don't feel as if it's that simple and don't know what the congressional Budget Office is thinking about it when they say it can ultimately cost taxpayers more. But no doubt it. I don't doubt at all that said. Is it a good idea to do it? Yes, yes, Trump should give maximum credit. This because the old situation wasn't working- and sometimes you just need to break the old thing, and sometimes the first thing you do to fix the thing you broke may not be the ultimate thing, but a head.

To be broken. We had to try to put it back together. This looks like a good first. Try is this. Does it work we'll learn something maybe we'll be smarter. Maybe we'll find a way to correct that you just gotta do something sometimes- and this seems like a very productive way to at least you shake the box and safe. You get something going all an idea to end all the window breaking in Portland because Curly every night. There's a group of protesters protestors who, just walk down different rows of retail businesses and break their windows. So now is just like a nightly thing to break all the windows and my my idea to end it. Since apparently, law enforcement is not an option.

is to hire the protesters to break windows. Are you with me yet? Instead of just letting them break windows, we should hire them and pay them a good salary to break with You know I this will work right, because the moment it turns into a Jew they're, not gonna show up justly that lay, and therefore you I saw a conversation online today. If liberals Ruined everything now, namely anything that the liberals have not ruined, and the suggestion was made that at least they have ruined movies. Most liberals- making movies, to which I said, have you seen movies.

when was the last time you saw a good movie liberals, have completely ruined movies. Recently I was in the last few years movies used to be a lot of fun. I used to. Pike movies, I can't even remember the last time I watched a moving. That was good. They ve completely ruined movies. Here here is something that happened. There can be interpreted in two different ways: there's a very positive interpretation and then there's one this not so positive and the news is that the circuit courts have been reassigned, now I dont know all the ins and outs of the court system, so I might not have a full understanding of this topic, but we'll try to bluff my.

Through it and we're all learning a lot about our government in this process, so effective immediately There are four Supreme Court justices assigned to each of four states: Pennsylvania, Wisconsin Mission, In Georgia to be in charge of the the election fraud claims for that those states. This is my understanding of what's happening now. The fort for justice is chosen. Is this so here are the Supreme Court Justices, who might is the deciding people, or at least the most influential p on whether these four states go to tromp or stay with by new, rightly ready here, the names, the four Justices- Breck Cavanaugh Amy,

Barrett Samuel Alito, Clarence, Thomas. do you notice anything that they have in common yeah? they're, all super conservative. So what's I tell you While one interpretation is that fixes in trumps, gotta get his way. impact, the court with conservatives? He got conservatives to be in charge of the most crucial question of whether or not he is gonna. Well, I would say that the crucial question is whether the election stands or whether it gets kicked, kicked two thousand representatives. So I feel as if and again I need some fact checking on this goes

I'm not really. I can't go to deep on the legal system, so I could be wrong very easily. Just keep that in mind. but you know your first. Your first glance at this is: oh, my god, trumps gonna win cuz the Supreme Court just put for conservative justices on the most. Important questions that if they vote the right way, Troms present for a second term. What do you think of it? Unfortunately, I had the opposite interpretation, so don't get too happy. I prohibitions are given. That, when first ok now I feel bad, I feel bad cats on the roof gets on the roof, guys

cause. I need you I to you too slowly adjust to what you're gonna hear next, because otherwise it will be a little too shocking does if he got a little too and you do like a little happy dance at home. Where you watch this. Yes, it's over. I don't think. That's necessarily what were watch. Let me give you the other interpretation. This is my interpretation too, so it's not just the other one, that's the one. I have and goes like this. The supreme Court is not just interested in deciding cases, cases matter right, that's there in the main, bread and butter what they're doing, but it's not the only thing they care about. they have a greater interest than the individual cases and the greater interest is the republic keep.

America, a functioning country, much more important than how an individual case goes. Everybody agreed if you're the Supreme Court- and you saw that, whichever way this goes, whoever ends up in the presidency that it would tear the country apart. What do you think the Supreme Court Supreme Court sees? What most of you see, which is? This is kind of a dangerous situation, kind of got a bunch of gas, and we got a bunch of matches, looks like they get a little too close to each other. Don't you believe that the Supreme Court feels the weight

This decision, like maybe nothing else, save ever felt that the entire system is at risk, not just this case or cases or lawsuits right now, if you were the Supreme Court, and that was your greatest interest to keep the system, In tat, keep the credibility of the system and tat. And you asked to judge something that which The way it goes, it's gonna be ugly right. What do you do I'll tell you what I do.

How to sign the four most conservative justices if and here's the big part, if I believed it Trump would ultimately lose that's why? I would assume that's why I would put before conservative judges on it to make sure that if Trump loses, the conservative part of the country says. Fuck, but I trust it see where I'm going to the Supreme Court, leads the conservatives to back down the.

Only way is going to happen. Is for super conservative supreme Court. Justices say, look at those people it's time, it's time, it's time to back down it's time to put Biden Office and deal with it in twenty twenty four. I think the Supreme Court has just sent the country a big fuckin signal. The trumps, not gonna, get a second term and has nothing to do with the claims has nothing to do with the law. It has nothing to do with whether the election was or was not fraudulent. It has everything to do with keeping the country together if they were. Thank you that way, and of course we have to speculate right. We can

if anyone minds, but if that's what they're thinking, if that's, what you think it's brilliant, it's fuckin bright. If that's what you think, we don't know that I think they're. So, ah, what is likely to happen. my opinion is the likely. The likely outcome is that the Supreme Court. We'll give us a decision, because the way they set it up with four with four conservatives. I think can you give us a decision that says yeah Like some stuff happened, it looks like some fraud happened, but it wasn't enough and we we choose to keep the system together and let you work it out in twenty Twond.

Would that be the wrong decision for the benefit of the country? Would it I don't think you would? I prefer Trump to get a second term if the country can stay together under those conditions, I prefer it, but if the Republicans hold the Senate and would pretty much have a lock and the house as well and twenty twenty two and they Kip Biden from raising my taxes to the sky, Levels and you keep us from becoming a vassal of China, I think we could wait it out. And I wouldn't mind and see a an ex president tromp getting promotion to being a media model, because he might even have more power as a medium local than he would have even has precedence it's possible. Given the power of the media,

so I feel as though we can see the end game now. That's what it feels like now the assumption is there's a really big assumption here. The gigantic assumption is that the Supreme Court believes that the case will not be made sufficiently to overcome the to change the election outcome, one if it does what, if the drop to deliver the goods one if they do, because here's what the smartest people are telling me doesn't mean is true that the people who are the smartest and know the most and are closest to it, would tell you something like this. Maybe the software was manipulated. Maybe it wasn't

Don't hang you have on allowed, but we can demonstrate that the the checking of the signatures was Lacks the relaxation of double checking the signatures, almost surely change the election outcome that might be approvable there might be provable in a way that any reasonable per. I would say that change the outcome. It won't necessarily change who is in office. You will just change your mind about who one, unless I get to presence,

So I'm gonna guess right now that the Supreme Court would be inclined to bind if they put for conservative Supreme Court justices on the case, and then the Trump team makes the case and if they make it, I think it's gonna be on the signature, verification bar that feels pretty clean, clean in terms of a case that could be read, a dangerous because then it would look like the fixes and right of spring cordial services are concerned. They agreed with tromp well the fixes in Cumbria problem, but I don't think you would necessarily be a fatal one. That's all for now and I'll talk to you tomorrow. Right periscope is off one look.

few comments from Youtube over here somebody says: follow the law. You know. I don't think that the Supreme Court does it even even conservative judges would you somebody says you caved in Scott. What does that mean. What does caving in those caving in mean, because what it was predict, is predicting gave him. How is booming booze doing great task, however,.

Won't be at two thousand and twenty four slaughter me to update. While the slaughter meter is sort of us lost its meaning, because we have two potential outcomes instead of just who wins the election cuz, I think this to president situation is now real. It looks like that's going to be persistent. meaning that people will still regard Trump as the legally elected president. Even if he's out of office somebody says it will be a gorilla civil war. Now won't be You have a thing where you can really really count on that. Nobody wants a civil war and nobody wants it. you would have to have somebody wanting

the minimum requirement for a civil war? I don't know anybody wants it on either side. A summary says: I do know you. Don't China wants one, do you love they do? Do you think China would water, the United States to destroy itself? Maybe goody people are too. Comfortable to want to civil war or less correct. We are to cultivate. Somebody says you don't think ABC wants the GEO Pe in jail yeah. I think so I do think so, but I don't think that that's gonna happen outside of the legal system. that's all I got out, and I will talk to you tomorrow as well.