Pull up, everybody got him it's time for coffee was got owns best all day every single time. What do you need? Well, you either cover among your glass, a dagger trousers, Diana Canteen, jogger Flask, a vessel of any kind of fellow with your favorite liquid, like coffee, join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dope minute of the day. The thing that makes everything better, accept, audits of election software app is now go So good so good or Rasmussen did a pole. I think you'll see a little bit later today in which determined that when

citizens are asked who the biggest enemy as each other, Or China or Russia turns out we're more afraid of each other than other countries, so Democrats or more Fraid of tromp supporters than they are of foreign adversaries and vice versa. Now, what's I tell you, while the firstly you tells the EU is that that. Kind of aid. The survey isn't exactly apples and oranges right, so have I

attacks, you you get destroyed and the giant fireball of Newcastle nuclear fury. If a democrat or Republican get mad at you, you might be cancelled, so not they're, not quite equal, but is very interesting. Justices sort of the mood in the country we have been convinced to turn against each other. Now, there's can do a good now. It is part of that as other. If the thing is this, your most worried about is literally your neighbour and not China, and not Russia. Didn't president Ciampi do a good job and think about it, because the the surveys not just telling us that were.

Read about each other, and the country is also telling us that were not as worried about risks of other countries, which is good news because, I would much rather be arguing about whose or racist and whose knocked and who won the election. Then I would be hiding in my bunker and waiting for the Chinese are forced to go over So I don't know if that's bad or not, but it's interesting. Here's my big point for the day, so I'm gonna make one big point and then we're gonna talk about lots, a little points, but none of the little points. You have them all together will equal this one point doesn't even get close and here's the one point. I dont mind that dominion has said: we can't ordered their systems because they say it's proprietary software

and therefore we can look at them. I don't mind as long as you know that the the alternative to auditing your election software there's only one alternative, which is to throw out the entire elect Now, that's what you would do if you were less say a corporation. Let's say you are a big corporation and you had found that some important process and run- and you can tell. If the outcome was real or not real, because there's no way to check if you work Aparicio and your system have produced you an outcome, doesn't matter what the system is, it produces an outcome that you Adele you know the people at a motive to fake it. You know they had the opportunity to thank it and you can't check to see if they did fake it. What would you do with data? Will you? Wouldn't you use it right? You, wouldn't

who is that data? Nobody, no head of a corporation what use data. That's problem we fate, because there is the motive and the opportunity and you can't check, there's no way to Jack. It's that simple. Now, if you tell me Scots girl scout. We ve had the software for years. We can throw out all our password elections on us bad or pass the elections or the past can change the best, but. A hundred per cent of people who are familiar with software will agree with me. There are very few things even get onto presented people to agree with, but under Priscilla people understand. Software will agree that if we care ordered the election system, wait for it We don't even know if an election happened, because what is

the definition of election. The notion of election is people vote. The votes are counted then whoever wins. There's some outcome from that right. That I think we would all agree that the definition of what voting is. The people do the process of voting. You count them. Then you change whatever you're going to change because they don't come. Did that happen? We don't know, we don't know. We actually don't know. We know people. attempted to vote. So we definitely have that part We know that something's gonna change, so is that that part, but there's this whole middle- where we don't know, it's a thing that people dead. The voting had any correlation with the outcome.

Do you know, I mean you have an opinion and I have an opinion, but we don't know now, I'm not talking about the kind of knowing like of philosophical knowing. like can, we know we are really alive. Now talk about philosophically, knowing I'm talking about the practical kind of knowing the kind where you organize your life around thing, you're, a fairly sure, but you don't know like. I don't know that if I get my car it won't blow up, but I am confident that it won't so I'll get my car anyone. So the point is: if you're arguing about whether the election was fair or not fair, you're thinking pass the sale back up a little bit. You dont know from election happened right

So, if you're talking about whether the outcome is fair or not fair, you ve already thought pass. The question was an election because I'm not aware of one I'm aware of people voting. I am aware that there is a President elect waste in terms of public opinion. I am not aware that was at the counting of votes in which the votes translated into the outcome. I am not aware of that. Are you, of course, not because the system they counted them says you care? one of them and that the subsidy said that they don't even keep or it logs and are not as true. But if somebody bought a system where was back up a little and just appreciate the following stay, So it's been said that in Georgia, the republican governor and secretary of State is both Republicans or war.

and that there are the ones who brought this dominion software in which means. that they being in charge, they didn't make the detailed decisions but whoever whoever did that for them decide. it's a sign, an election system contract without the right to audit the software. Do you know how big of a mistake that is I dont know even how to put that on a scale. that, the size of that mistake, Leslie, legendary, that that's not guy cubicle, forgets to check box that that's a mistake. This is big as the biggest mistake that's ever been made in the history of the world. Let us, beyond the biggest mistake now I see,

some sceptics in the common say, or maybe it wasn't a mistake. As you know, it was a mistake. Maybe they intentionally created a situation in which nothing could be found, but remember there were republicans. The Republicans definitely did not intentionally pick a system that would keep Republicans out of office. They didn't intentionally do that they may of the realm nations that they took money or whatever. I don't know anything about that, but certainly I haven't seen evidence to back up any those claims, but we

got a really bad situation years. Services Trump lost, that's so cute. Here's your something that adds greater did Trump run the cleanest election of all time, because it's getting just weird. The Democrats are not blaming either a foreign country or Republicans of also cheating on the election, Really really, this is the first election where there was no outside interference and by the way, as we learned in twenty sixteen outside interference by the mighty russian intelligence agencies means creating three bad means and putting them.

facebook, so we're talking about a very low bar downhearted is to interfere with our election. how hard would be to create a meme and disguise its origin. Well. That would be pretty easy, pretty darn easy, so we're not even talking about it. It was the biggest problem in the world for years ago. Nothing's changed because there's nothing that changed there would prevent Russia from creating a meme. We talk about means. When I talk about hacking, what would stop them from creating a mean nothing? They could obviously plant names without without showing the source. There is obviously a way to do that. So the fact that none of that is happening is just head shaking and here's what I think,

I think that even Democrats at this point realise the election was not credible. Now because it wasn't credible, I don't one or would have one had been fair, but certainly I feel as if you're the survey said. Thirty percent of Democrats think it was but I think is closer to a hundred percent think that there was at least attempted mischief pro seventy percent have wishful thinking that there wasn't enough of it to change the outcome because they don't want that to be true, but I dont believe they're ready Democrats who could have heard the Pennsylvania and them yesterday. The Arizona hearings and just hear the accusations. If you just hear the accusations, you don't even need to know if any of them are true, because what accusations taught you is

whether or not they were real instances of fraud. There were plenty of opportunities Can we all agree that in the last week we ve moved from serious people saying completely straight face There wasn't any way to achieve that much. It would have been obvious. No, nobody could concede that much without being so obvious that they get caught, it's not really possible. Do you think everybody believes that this week. really possible. In fact, I thought it was possible before but I was sort of operating on the the thought that well, I dont know how to cheat, but people who are really putting time and attention into it. They probably figured it out by now turns out It's so always attitude in a minute

different ways. So long as you can control the witnessing and the auditing, which is the case, the Democratic Democratic Control cities did control the witnessing and there's no audit of software cup of the software and there's probably no useful audit of the paper ballots because the envelopes were separated. So was an election, There's a report I saw just before I got out here that I'm really really sceptical about, but I'll just put it out there. So this is an alleged story. Don't put this in the same bucket as things you know too. True but allegedly yes, you see us filed something about. Many in voting systems. there are some hours,

yeah there's an allegation that is partly on by China. Now partly earned meaning that there's a vessel Company, that's owned by somebody, was owned by China, so that China would be the end of a chain of ownership or partial ownership for some of the dominion machines. Now, do you think that's possible the dominion gonna four hundred million dollar investment from a bank in swill switzerland- is seventy five percent owned by a chinese government by the chinese government. Do you think that's true? Now, if it, if it is true, it doesn't necessarily mean that Vienna, we, u found some kind of a smoking gun, because you can have people investing and lots of stuff and they invest.

Europe may not have that much control over it, but certainly rail raises eyebrow doesn't it as the look of an attempt to influence things, even if they could add enough, they could just by investing be sure, looks like an attempt We can finally be direct evidence that the election was rigged. I think we will But if we less, I we care audited and we just kids. We just can't get at the informer. Is there anything we can do of being able to order that there would tell us at least for our own information whether or not there the thing was stolen and I propose an experiment. Think you could do an experiment, there would tell you where the fair, fairly high degree of certainly weather

The election was stolen, and tell you who really one in our what the amount. What But he would tell you if there was massive fraud, so let's not stolen bullets, say a test. They will tell you if there were a massive fraud or not the election, here's the test, you find a room, Desert area you die and then you build an arbalist, really cool, looking metal, Arbalist but don't like, is so big that a couple of big guys couldn't pick it up and put it on a truck. You want I get small enough that somebody could steal it if they were inclined to do it now. Here's the second part you you introduce this arbalist into the news from a simple metal object that looks kind of cool into a famous object.

When something is famous, let's say the Mona LISA, whether the Liberty Bell But whatever the fame adds value right, because if you had a famous painting will be worth lot, even if it's not as as less famous paintings she'd have this arbalist in the desert. Just hypothetically, I'm not saying you do this, but put it in desert and then just leave it unguarded after you, ve told the world that this valuable unguarded item is in the Utah does, and then he just wait. Wait about a month And see if it still there now, if it still there what your test? I'll show you is that, even when millions of humans. No about a unguarded valuable. Object that they can go just get the none of them. Did it

Now, if that's your situation, where millions of Look, I know they can just go steal this thing a value and they don't. You got yourself a good luck because, The thing with proven is that there were lots of ways you could have stolen the election issues. To know if it happened or not, but If human nature can be, let's say, studied to the degree that you know that in some situations, humans will always act the same way. Well, that's not enough for a court, it's not enough for science! That's enough for you! So I hope Somebody does that experiment and puts a cool looking, the list in Utah Desert walls

disappears, will say and then you'll know if your election was stolen or at least attempted how impressed are you at the two movies duration, we're having do you remember when I first started talking about oh there's, two movies running on one screen and Democrats and Republicans receive different worlds, and you said yourself here- that's that's. Like moreover I can almost see where you're talkin about their yellow color. sexually

I'll bet, I can see we are seeing different stuff, but did you ever think you would get to this point today where the following two statements are both presented as one hundred percent true Republican say, there is eight of evidence that the election was stolen. Right lots of Republican say that at the same time just go on twitter. You see that. cartons of Democrats say there is a zero evidence, not that the evidence has been debunked well. They do say that but they're they're saying with the dresses and I and the Republicans are saying

drowning in it, so is a little like you know. What it feels like is that its two people standing in the ocean up to their neck and one looks at the other says, there's no water here. The other looks over and says you're up to your neck and water there's nothing but water. We are completely in water. the one up to the network sovereign says now: we're not that's a warlord now, if you think. That this is blowing your mind, because you never thought this could be possible. Then you ve never done a hypnotist because hypnotists no. This is completely possible. In fact, normal would be weirder if we didn't get to this point. It was completely predictable. and so when I predict that we would have to President's one who actually gets the job and one that half the countries

that really was the one who got elected was the other guy did seem real when I first said it before the election number. I said that before the election That's him like that was going to happen. It happened here where we do have to presence in the minds of the public right project. Verity us somehow got the phone number for a sea and then some kind of a conference call in which Jeff Zocor was talking to his and then staff about CNN and currently project vertex will be releasing these audio clips so that we can see.

CNN says to each other when they dont think other people are listening and then James, O Keefe, who was on the call he lives streamed himself on the call. He asked the question was Zaka realises that he's gonna call with a project verifies very US leader. He says Maybe we should end the skull and find some different technology, the talker so way for that Name any problem in this country that has not made worse by the teachers unions, there's a challenge for you name, any any domestic problem that isn't worsened, the teachers unions, whether things when you first hearing you think, while not everything I mean there must be some problems that are not made worse by the teachers unions,

but if you imagine that the teachers unions are destroying education, then it pull through everything. Our science is bad, our understanding of logic and fax, our ability to get jobs, racism in income inequality. Even the ability to pay back a student stood alone right yeah, just that everything is, can be traced back to the teachers, unions being the the biggest enemy in the country

A funny thing happened today, the President retweeted an account from cat turd. That became a big trending thing and had more to do with the fact that cat turd spelled exactly like a cat. Turd got retweeted by the president. Are we going to miss that? Could you ever imagine a president Joe Biden, retweeting cat turd? Doesn't matter what captured said? Can you imagine a Joe Biden retweeting No, you can't you just can't we're gonna set. I twitter on scientific survey, and I said since the beginning, the pandemic azure relationship with your spouse, gotten better or worse than the same, and the results were interesting, of course non scientific, but forty

percent said their relationships got better during the pandemic, and I believe that, because I think, if the US, the if the spouses get along and their forced to spend more time together, they can't drive to work whenever and there's just more of something they wanted? They already like spending time with each other and the girl Electra. So forty percent of them said better forty five percent said spots in the good and fifteen percent said worse. So the people who probably were doing well when they didn't spend much time with each other and when they had to spend time not so good, but this better than I thought I thought I was gonna, be more more gloomy than they are now. Of course, people might be lying Khazars. Who knows how honestly Here's a new story: that's. foreshadowing more to come.

Barely ten local chapters of black lives matter issued a statement that they there's not enough financial disclosure from the The national leadership. They don't have accountability and transparency in the massive amount of money that they ve collected. So black lives matter at the national level, especially with the George Floyd stuff. They collected massive amounts of money and the local chapters are saying Can we see a statement about that? Could you share a little bit without end, whereas our money go on now? Who knows? This is a little problem or a big one, but here's the main point: what, if likewise matter loses its bogeyman goes. Don't you think tromp was the reason. The black lives matter could be so popular

despite doing so many things that you would imagine would make you unpopular, such as destroying businesses and what not. so I feel as though when Trump, if you imagine the trump does not have a second term, black lives matter is probably going to turn on each other because they would lose their external. You know boogeyman to the focus on. I would also expect black lives matter and Antifa to end up turning on each other same reason: cuz they they lost their common enemy. All right. so a few election claims have been debunked. Aren't you reduce this list of election anomalies. Because a lot of this war turn on the anomaly part, but here s the problem.

Everywhere? You see a list of an of data anomalies, guarantee you. The some of these are not true, guaranteed. what happens when you have a list of looks like seventeen twenty different. Things that are data anomalies. It's really easy for the credits to say here is three of them, but our true gonna delete. Whoever said Scott is surfaced because you're not even try to use it.

So it really hurts your argument if you put some fake stuff on a list with stuff, that's not fake bliss. Let me run through this and in the in the comments, do some fact checking okay, so I'll read the claims and then you can fact check me. So my claim is that these are not true, Erratic saudi review things that my claim is are not true, meaning that the entire list, as an honour percentage. There are definitely some things on here. I think the are true but dont believe them. So there's nothing on the list that, just by its nature, you should say all that's true, so stay stay, sceptical on this list, for nearly a hundred. Fifty years, every president who has gained votes in a re election campaign has also won the reelection that meaningful.

Other, whenever a president has gained votes in a re election, they also one reelection. I would say that is not meaningful, because the population increased Because Trump, never at our primary challenge. and it was such a polar, as a kind of a thing. It was just turn out right, so I all that saying is there was high turnout. Does that tell you anything not really So the first one might be true, but not really telling you much because of the special case that people wanted to turn. Said Trump gained eleven million more votes than twenty sixteen, but by somehow overcame those eyes. Again, I don't know if it's true or not the number plus s true. Would that tell you anything about whether or not there was fraud? No

so the first two mermaid, a true, but they certainly don't tell you there's fraud, it just tells you that a lot of people voted. So that's all you know so far, Arma three Trump won the highest share of minority voters for a GOP candidates, since one thousand nine hundred and sixty, I believe, that's true- and that one's not were starting to get into some better stuff. Here right, as if you wanna high share of minority voters, and yet The very reason he lost is because he got an unusually low share of minority. Voters in she said, is the scale of a red flag submit a flag, doesn't mean it is not proof, but certainly makes you scratch.

than related to the same thing. This is just another point that trunk grew is support among black voters by fifty percent. Again, it's the same point, but just another way look. But in sport among black voters fell below ninety percent. The level below which democratic presidential candidates usually lose. So if you ve got Biden getting fewer black votes than historically and Trump getting more black votes than historically and by a significant amount, Trump doubled his support. Would you expect that he would lose with that? You wouldn't expect But again it's not impossible is just starting to get really unlikely about.

by then shattered the popular vote record, while winning a record low? Seventeen percent of the counties case that again, doesnt proven thing. But you gotta ask yourself: Why was he getting so many votes in general, but he got now that the fact that he got lots of those in general just means or a lot of voters, so First part of this is meaningless. There were lots of oats, but probably does tell you something video here, you gotta record low. Seventeen percent account is of course the whole point is that it's the big metro areas that one of her Biden, so I don't know, that's the strongest point Obama, one eight hundred and seventy three counties in two thousand eight will binding only got five hundred and twenty four. but somehow despite getting

for if you're counties Obama go far by far more votes every one of these the has bite in getting more votes in quantity, is not really convincing because They are the one thing we all agree on is that both trump and bite and got more votes than you would expect in other years, about. By the first one to lose Ohio in Florida in sixty years and still win That is the second president in a hundred and sixty eight years to lose Ohio. Florida aired Iowa and still, when trot what eighteen out of nineteen bellwether counties they have a near perfect record over forty years of predicted. Well, now that's one start to get strong. Now,

Google tell me which, which has asked me, which of these do you find convincing, or at least persuasive, I would say this bellwether county thing is really stands out. Doesn't it does it again? It's not impossible, that these numbers happened this way naturally. But what are the odds of winning eighteen out of nineteen bellwether accountable when that is nearly impossible. Here's one bite and underperformed Hillary Clinton. Captain the fuselage except in force, it is now I've seen this one debunked online. But I d now after debunking the actual claim or something were close to it, to make it look like they do bunk the actual claim

And what I mean by close to it is if their counting the numbers, but not the percentage votes, they counted the wrong thing right. So. did Biden underperform Hillary Clinton in terms of raw votes everywhere, exe Those four states- probably not right, I think, by. Be Hilary Raw votes and lots of places. Am I right so Fact check on a kind of guessing on this next thing, because I think when it gets debunked. their debunking the wrong number of votes and saying now there were plenty of places where Biden got more raw number of votes than Hillary Clinton fact check me on that, but isn't the argument the percentage of how many went to Biden versus drop? I think that's the argument, not the wrong number.

Republicans, one across the country by Biden somehow be Trump so you're. There two points that are gonna connected Republicans, one hundred and twenty seven and a twenty seven of the toss up contest here is the hardest one to believe. Do you believe the people decided to vote against Trump cuz that they were talking, were voting against Trop, but while they were voting against Trump, they were not voting against the people who support tromp on the same ballot. The people would be incongruous whew. Would you do that? How many people are just gonna kick check the President Box not do the other ones. Maybe so I would say, if so possible, it's possible that Lots and lots of people check only the presidential Box and just a vote on the other stuff which would give you the possible.

The Republicans sweep the under the under cards and the president just gets voted against and big numbers in the top as possible. possible no incumbent who receive seventy five percent of the primary vote as ever lost re election? it is true that one worthless. I know it's predicted in the past. But this time we just had a cat, the EU was running you now running unchallenged right. So what does it mean? I think I once important tromp one ninety four percent of the primary vote. I think all of us I marry stuff, is not predictive. Like all of the well who won the primary right. Also like that's predictive

I arises a correlation, but an office predictive the duty to trim said a record for most primary votes. Yes, everything this quantity related is on. so there you are there. Definitely some had scratches there, but some of them are ready, but some of them no big deal and see if I, What about everything out? There's The study on the says that people who got the measles mom, rubella vaccination recover from covered or practically have no no symptoms Now is one study, but it shows that the the difference, whether you had that shot or deny that shot his gigantic. So we're not talking about. Oh, we tease doubt this statistical difference, we're talking about If you had the shot, you did great if you

I have that shot you're in the percentage of people, well a bad outcome so I'd like to see that one proven or disproven it could be the thing that explains everything, because, as I've told you, you can't look at the management decisions or the leadership. visions in different countries and tease out why, some people got better results than others? There is still some gigantic variable in this whole pandemic, that we have and we have an isolated it might be. This could be this vaccination thing. You do realise that the emerging hypothesis about the election is if it were, if it were read, were right, Didn't what I'll call a packet ized way, in other words, little packets of fraud.

Each of them designed so that their individually now so big that if any individual packet of fraud got discovered endless, say those votes were tossed out that it wouldn't be enough to change that because you're not going to find them all and they cheated and lots of different ways, allegedly in different places in different parts of the the process. So, if you're thinking about the election in terms of finding that big package of fraud, I'll think you're going to find that because I think that what it looks Is there won't be the single big package of fraud unless you count rule changes so you can say well they who made this decision, which allowed these votes to be counted but other north as fraud fraud. That's more like.

politicians trying to get away with whatever they can get away with. That's more like a rule, a rule trickery, but. The actual fraud fraud is gonna, be in packets by design. as Rudy Giuliani, pointed out in the Arizona hearings That there is at least there's a tell, or at least some kind of a signal for coordination. Now that has not been demonstrated or proof. but Rudy Giuliani is, I would say, an expert in sniffing out coordinated plots like them of you. So you know something: that's a coordinated blood versus something this just lots of people acting independently and it sounds like he's sniffing Ellison Court,

asian here now if it turns out that the fraud exists and is packet ized by design. And is organised, is it that a pretty big legal case, the organised part, takes it adapter Rico right? I think. So Doktor Scott Alice resigned from the current of ours advising job at the. My house- that's good news for me, so that I don't keep getting confused with doctors got ATLAS. But I feel as though that was probably a smart move. He said everything you wanted to say: everybody heard it and then, after that he was just becoming a source of criticism for they. I think you're smart, move on whose time.

Say so just decided what's the matter. think that's all I want to talk about and I'm gonna go back to my first point when I, when I got out here so. We talked about lots of different allegations and we talked about lots of different data. You know a normal. Beyond this list of data anomalies, I read there there's a much more convincing bits of evidence, so others, there are tons of evidence of fraud, which the Democrats call no evidence at all. I haven't seen anything, but I think

comes out of this? If we have an election system which cannot be audited because there's proprietary information in it? That's all you need to know There is nothing else we have to ask to know what is the right thing to do? I had the right thing to do is either throw out the result and redo it. You'd have to redeem. You couldn't just throughout the result, put trump and power, but you can we do it. The other thing you can do is say we're: gonna have to scrap the system totally for the benefit of the country were gonna. Let by take over and we'll work it out as we go. That's probably was. probably you're, gonna, get a President Biden who, Obama, you're gonna, get upright President Biden,

who will take the job and we will have to figure out how to redo our system for next time, because we are definitely not going to go into another one. Let me make you a promise. I promise you you're not gonna, be voting in twenty twenty four on machines. They don't have an audit capability. Does anybody want take the opposite side of the bed? I'll bet you there were done with unalterable election systems were definitely done. The same, I doubt that, because if we have another election with on audit suitable software, that's a revolution. Because doing at once and then sort of the country is learned about it now we know that there is a problem there, even if the elite wasn't rigged.

that Non ordered a bull software thing, that's not something you can live with. And so let me say this as clearly as possible if we're still living with it into, twenty four. We don't have a country anymore, and then we have to stage a revolution. So I'm twenty twenty four the revolution is on. If we still have an audible software for our elections, there there's no alternatives because if we still have the situation and twenty twenty four you can, Oh the election, the stolen, I am pretty sure this one was fraudulent, but I I also think? Well, you know it's possible all. People were at least trying to make it honest, but if it's. The same situation and twenty twenty four you can say with complete. Certainly.

that the people in charge were not attempting not even trying to give you a real elected, not even try would you agree that that would be even trying, and if we have a country, that's not even trying to have real elections. Revolution. That's what I say and the resolution can be simple just to destroy the election machines. Let wont let me give you a preview of twenty twenty four. I say twenty twenty four happens. We still have.

On audit of all elections machines. There will be a tea party, there will be a tip artie, meaning that republicans- and I mean this literally- not figurative. We will take control of the facilities where those machines are, they will put them on pick up. Trucks probably pick up trucks with american flags on and they will drive them to the Fuckin Bay. there was throw those machines into the Fuckin Ocean and if you try to vote with them again and you bring back those same pick up, trucks will appear at your same fucking. facilities. They will load up those drugs with your fucking unwarrantable machines and they will dump them in the fucking ocean again this time we might have to live with the outcome

We don't wanna, you dont want to destroy your own country. You trying to save it right, so we might just have to do the best we can with what we have but in twenty twenty four their will, be an election with unwarrantable technology. We will throw that shit in the Fuckin Ocean, that's it we will throw it in the Ocean, you know I'm right right You know, I'm right, those machines will be physically removed and thrown in the fucking ocean. Are you with me who is with me I'll drive the truck I drive the Falcon truck gazettes revolution that that's. If we do this again, we're not fucking around anymore right that that's that's a bright line, so

I give people plenty of flexibility to fix things to make mistakes on, I'm really big gun and letting people their mistakes and not kill them for a true, but a week be a mistake, if we let it happen again,. I would I would be willing to say if Europe You're a governor of the state and your political. Fuller buying a software system, maybe. A good at it is entirely possible that Europe, as a politician, you're, just not good at procuring things, and you didn't know you needed that want it riot, etc. But now you know now you know so there are no excuses for twenty twenty four. You shit In the ocean, if you try this get your shit go in the ocean. That's it we're done we're done here,

Let me tell you a management trick for your life. There are times when you say The problem really will do this or I might do this or you should worry that There are some others. She s all do this and that there is a good reason to say: there's a chance. I might do it my dear, and then there are other times when you just say it's a decision. So let me put this not in a prediction, for let me put it in decision form, because this is different. It's one thing to predict its. decision that, I will personally help you throw those fucking machines and the ocean if this happens again, like that's a promise, this commitment, I will help you throw them in the ocean, so to my government you,

have to wonder if it's gonna happen, we'll have to wonder, is a decision We have decided that We won't put up with it, thus very different, very different, so he says weak talk, big talk from a week old man, goodbye, Frank, Frank: it was nice, removing you. Does offer now? I will talk to you later. Are you tubers periscope is off. Somebody says now as the only option. Well, you know I've. I've heard the arguments that if the Democrats get control will consolidate control and add states and all that, but I think we have to wait for the.

election if they Georgia election, looks at reasonable and, as predicted to more Republicans and the Senate, held. I don't think that's revolution time. I think that's fix your problem time but there is. There is a time when you have treated differently in the future, but I think we're there. What would you do about the fraudulent mail in votes we're gonna, try to honour them, but I think what it will be impossible to. I think I can ever write another thought experiment, but some gods to break we're gonna. Serbia has a sequel enough. You know that it's called the religion war, but it is a very different. if a book, so the answer is not thinking about that, because gods debris was sort of.

A lifetime of thoughts compressed into a tiny book. But yeah yeah, almost after we a second lifetime to get that many thoughts that can be put into a book but Mamma. Why dont, the math anomalies count They don't they don't count, because in many cases there is an obvious explanation for them. There are some that don't have an explanation and they they do So you can say the anomalies count or don't count, but you can say that most of them have some other explanation. Some of them are pretty strong. So that the anomalies I'd worry about are in the mail in votes. Those are the ones that will be the big ones

if the election was stolen, the whole world loses maybe maybe knock off. Now. Turkey later.