Found about everybody got in its time. Time for coffee was got out. It was the best time of the day, every single time, no exceptions and to make a complete. What do you Well, you did a copper by glass, a dagger trousers, Dinah, canteen Geography, Alaska vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid. coffee and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine another day. The thing that makes everything better to simultaneously go Well, we were, we are entering the transition phase, the transition. Is, do I mean the administration? No, I don't

There might be a transition there too, but I'm talking about the fake news transition you may remember It was not that long ago I told you that for four years. I think it is unambiguously true that the vast majority of fake news came from the left. Does anybody disagree with that statement that the vast amount of fake news came from the left for the past four years. Maybe eighty twenty- it's not like. It's not like there, isn't your mistakes and fake news and misinterpretations and bias on both sides, but was it seemed to me deeply weighted against the Republican.

Again struck now. Is that just because of job, I would say: no, it's because the the the group this in power, has the advantage of actually doing things. For example,. Joe Biden can appoint people too to the The government tried to what he called the cabinet and that's news and then the news this friendly to Joe Biden. They ve got a good content, they can say, look at the good picks this Joe Biden Megan, to a segment about how wise and brilliant is Pixar. Now you can agree on this. Whether are wiser, brilliant.

but it's not really fake news right. Is there not just making something up because they got something real to talk about? They don't need to make anything up. Joe Biden did his job today there it is our story, but if you're on the side, whose president is not in power, what do you have? You're not run the same stories, but all the good things he did and he's doing his job. Today. Eighty cut a ribbon. It's got a boring for your audience. So this at the sound of power ends up whether intentionally richest goes that way, making up most of the fake news. You were you should be experiencing if this pattern follows and I'm pretty sure it will. you should be watching a reversal of the proportion of fake news, so you gonna go

from eighty percent of it being coming from the left. Like the President drinks, bleach, unease colleague, races, fine people, I mean Sobs up stuff, but you gotta see that reverse now same as with Obama during the Obama years, Fox NEWS was was basically and dumpster fire of fake news. And see it in probably have share, but not as much not even close. So beware just be info That the ratio is and is in the process of reversing if Biden takes office, which is by no means guaranteed. So let's talk about some of that right? How many of you saw the video of Georgia, security, video, the show Paul workers, dismay

some number of people who have been working for the night. Some people laughed and after those people laughed? The remaining people took these suitcase looking things out from underneath tables where it appears there than hiding and then processed many. Thousands of votes from those hidden suitcases, hidden suitcases. looks pretty sketchy, does that pretty sketchy after they look it MRS go home and then the hidden suitcases come out and then there's a gigantic spike forbidden pretty suspicious accept almost certainly fake, sorry, skill, it's gonna hurt for the next until you realize that most of your news stirred fake,

because what it first happens, you gotta believe any of you. Gonna bet you well, meaning that you're still gonna believe that your hearing real news, but it just won't be for a while. So here's your the questions that people gave me because I know you're thinking the same thing by the way. Here's a here's a year, persuasion technique, a good persuasion. Tv weathered sales are just presenting is to tell people what their thinking the moment their thinking it, because if you can hit that the thought and call it at the moment, the thinking that you gotta you gonna, come become, could actually become more influential. So I'm going to do that with you by anticipating your objections to be saying effect. Number one. is the video manipulated? Does anybody think it's

manipulated digitally? I don't think so. I dont believe it's manipulated digitally. So that's not the claim. I don't believe it is made that claim. So let's say that we all agree that the video captures exactly what happened That what you see is actually what was happening do we all agree on that so far, so that there is nothing there's nothing in the video production. That's different. Now. Here here here The questions are people ask me Scott. They let the witnesses go there. testimony that the witnesses were told they were done for the night Scott there were done.

Light, and by the way I was, I was making lesson jokes about this video deleted them all, because I was waiting for the DE bunk. I thought if I get up early, I can make a bunch of jokes about this. The suitcase Sue cases of the video and I thought I'd better hurry, because I know this thing's illegal, debunk, pretty quick and it didn't take long. I took a few hours now. You're gonna say it's not the abundant, but let me go through that. Let me go through the organ. So the first question is: why would they send those witnesses home and tell them and tell them that they were done for the night and here's answer that never happened, that that's a whole answer? You think you think you heard that fact just never rapid. So here's what did happen.

Allegedly now compare the debunk to thee. The story, you thought was real. When you first saw it doesn't mean the debunk is real right. Can you allow that is possible that the deep bunkers fake right wing RO level, but let me tell you what it is and then you just compare and see for yourself. So the. Bank says that the only people who are sent home worthy Angelo cutters, so one part of the job was some people were just open all the envelopes and put the ballots in these. Containers, and then that was our job. They were not witnesses, they were not ballot counters. They were simply envelope Now, what do you do with the envelope cutters when you reach the and of all Europe's ballots. In other words, everything that needs to be cut is caught And that's the only thing there therefore is people are trained for specific jobs.

What would you do when all? I've loved cutters are done, cutting and there's nothing left to cut. What do you say to them looks like we're done for the night. You can go home, And if you were an envelope cover and sovereignty, up to you said a good job looks like we're done for them. you can go home, How would you interpret that? Would you interpret it that the valor counting was done for the night or would you interpret it as only you ballot cutters are done for the night? Do you see how easily you could have somebody who was a witness to say? Look, they told me we were done for the night How exactly did they word it did they say you're done for the night? Did they talk to these three people who were cutting? of lobbies and say it looks like you're done for the night as an we envelope cutters. How easily could so

buddy quite honestly, think that they heard somebody say there were done from the night, but simply misinterpreted it. now we didn't see a number of people live in the story is that they were envelope cutters The story is also that there was one state witness who remained, but there is no. Story this, as anybody was denied, witnessing don't believe there is any claim that there is any report But can witness who didn't have access to the room if they wanted it so Is every election witnessed by both the Republican and Democrat. free in every part of the process. I think there is no right, I believe, if the rule is that you're allowed a witness. Being allowed to witness is quite different from this one by the way, the sworn affidavits or what

full heard and saw so somebody saying there sworn affidavits. a sworn affidavit is what they honestly think happened. That's not exactly. Same as what happened that somebody's interpretation of what happened and, like I said, If somebody honestly thought the supervisor told them the counting was done, but it was just a misinterpretation. You can easily imagine that they would swear under oath. I was told the counting was done, but I was just a misinterpretation now. What about the fact that these suitcases were kept? under the table until these people left. Why would you put number one? Why would you buy ballots in a suitcase there? Did he ask yourself that. Why would there be these roller bags that you take on an airplane, how those be in a vote facility, because it because it seems like if something in a suit case was of that,

It got into the building like a legitimately, because it's in the suit case. It's not in some kind of official, contain a right Except they're not suitcases the Rowley bag. Things you saw are the official ballot containers. They have wheelies on them, because their heavy That's up so there was no suitcases there. Only official containers. There were exactly the containers that you use doll ballots now somebody said Scott. Why were they under the table?. Why were they under the tables Why would you hide them under the tables until these other people are gone. Into which I say. Where the hell else would you put em, apparently

You ve never worked in any kind of a situation like this. Where you keep stuff until you need, it is on the table, that's where it goes. Do you think that they put wheels on those containers, because they're not very heavy. No, have wheels because our to lift their heavy we're It was something this heavy dear pick it up, On top of a table now, before it under the table. Do you put? It the oil where people are. walking around and they would have to walk around it now you would put it as close to the carrying machines, as you could not on top of the table, because their heavy, and not in the oil you would put them. under a table,

ultimately near the counting machines and one, would you take them out one? Would you take him out? Well, there were me an hour running this process. I would come all the ones that you could process already under the envelopes. When I was done. Processing all the ones that are already out of the envelopes, do you know what I do I do. over and see if there's any more to process and then I would say that the envelope cutters had really got ahead and they created a whole Sure ballots litter now in these luggage things, the numbers that had been released for they upload was gigantic, because I've done a good job cutting and now they just took those and random through the system. every part of what you saw. The video is the normal system, every part of it now Can I determine the just me:

As the video shows two movies, I know which one is true: you can watch the video and if you know that these luggage, things are there's the standard things they use. If you know, The cutters are down and had been dismissed and if she knew that is obvious, that's where you would store them until you need them is under the table. That's exactly where you'd bottom could there are. Some of the people were in charge of accounting, mighty. An unaware of how many the cutters had put under the table without surprise you in such a young, equally organised system, would you be surprised, To learn that after the cutters had left somebody oh wait. There way more balance here than we thought. We should realise that restoring them under the table How unusual would that be not even a little bit that wouldn't even be a little bit unusual that will be exactly how you would expect

So my organise thing to go like ours got some dollars over here. Oh, I forgot through some under the table, pretty normal stuff now Do you see a complete movie for both versions? Yes, you do the video one hundred percent per cent supports both versions of the story. One is that they just cut some stuff and left. a lot of things they cut. Maybe they found some war at the end of the night, but there are just on the room there in official boxes and they just countenance now. Another thing somebody's that is both Scott the bags that happened all at the same time. How could such a big spike happened? Well, the answer is. That's when they started counting the ones that this group of people are taken out of the the envelopes they just wait

delivered on the big bang. There's random all at the same time, but what about the fact? Allegedly they were ninety percent for binding. How in the world could he have somebody ballots? There are ninety eight percent for Biden Number one I don't know, that's true. Do I've heard people say it? Do you know that? That's true, so I would say that is not even close to a data that I would say he had Salisbury credible could be to listen it is true. Let's take the assumption that there really were ninety eight percent This was really didn't gotTa Biden all and that the little our there. What does tell you about the video does really tell you that. That's why they're anything! it's on the video it doesnt tell you that's why it's ninety eight percent Biden, because you can of an entirely separate fraud which create,

a whole bunch of was a harvested ballots. Could it be. The harvested ballots came in toward the end. Yes, it could be a complete fraud. not the one you see on video. In other words, the fraud could have happened to create the ballots. There were then cut. There were then put in the boxes. though the wear them counted, but would allow the possibility that everyone in that room was counting ballots and didn't do anything wrong right? That is not that possibility is not ruled out by anything. You saw on the video that they were just doing their job. You can't rule that out based on the video now. Could you be suspicious based on the video sure. Should you follow up absolutely, of course because we all want to know more and we'd like to be certain.

and if ninety percent of those votes one to bite, and would you suspect that was fraud? Yes, yes, she would If it were true. But it doesn't mean that if that were fraud, that you saw any of that fraud happening on the video. It could be just that's why valets are forbidden, But all they were doing is counting. Maybe let's say It would also people say we'll said. Well, I could I could believe that was legitimate if that happened at twelve noon, but this has happened late at night. Fishes right to which I say everything was actually live like that all the votes. The voting places were accounting late at night cause. That's the way works So none of them is over. Galicia comments here for a moment, because I was he a mad. You are signing out.

People do not like experiencing confirmation by us and then no eight, but believe me. If you prefer to believe this for a while and by the way you copyright How could a knocker rule out the possibility that this video shows something bad? I'm just tell you that there, Nobody here who wanted that to be real more than I did well, maybe trumpeted right. But when I saw the video I laugh loud- and I said to myself: ok, this is probably gonna get debunk, but damn it. I hope this is real. I like. I really really wanted it to be real because you know I do. I do believe the election was rigged and I don't think it's will necessarily get such good evidence. That so the fact that it might have been real was sort of exciting to me

now you see all my biases right. My bias is one. A hundred percent. I want that african thing to be a real video, but I'm afraid it isn't, I'm afraid the evidence Just as there you're really just had to hear the other than the other side of it, somebody saying the the fake water burst thing was vague, Now, let me be as clear as I can theirs. hundred percent chance, in my opinion, that the election was ripped right? Let it here's my argument and try My argument compared to this argument, so the the Video evidence you saw is no or worse than the Covington KIDS video. Is there anybody who disagree with the statement that the the

credibility of that Georgia, video is equivalent to if just looking at it, you're, not an expert and just a person looking at a video, its equivalent to in believe ability and credibility to the first Covington kids video. You saw what was very believable and completely reverse of what the actual situation was. Could this be one of those words really looks? Believable like theirs, and fraud happening right in front of you, but it is not easy. Italy that wouldn't even be on that would even be a stretch. It would be the most normal thing in the world that that's fake. so the ones that I tend to doubt in terms of claims. Are the ones that are a little too on the nose like though there was a trap, there was a trailer full of balance, but we can't find it and then

a video of a thing, but the other explanation fits into, you to see a lot of things, so my argument for why the election was stolen. It goes like this. You it's a hundred and ten degrees out in your town summer by an ice cream com. and you're walking down the sidewalk eating your ice cream cone in the the top of the cone. The ice cream falls off on the sidewalk, so huh ten degrees and the sidewalk just sizzling hot Now you know you're, not gonna, pick it up, and you say to yourself screw it bad luck today and you walk away Now I ask you and our le say a few hours later I say to you: you know you, you drop your ice cream, hot sidewalk, two hundred and ten degree day. Do you know if it melted? Do you know if it melted,

And you said yourself, you know, I guess I don't I dont know if that melted. It was on ten degrees and it was ice cream. I know because I was I was looking at before it fell, so where's realise green. But I don't know it melted or do I? What would you say? Would you say the hours later you know it melted. what would you say? I don't know, there's no evidence. I can prove it. I don't have a video and I'll have a testimony. Nobody why state. You fairly say it did not melt because you don't have any evidence. No, no. You know I've melted Why do you know it melted with any evidence you know it melted because I didn't have any other option there was with the one thing I could do this world had to melt.

as a matter of at a witness it doesn't If it was on video, they had to melt so. This election is like that by screaming fell on the sidewalk. The one thing we did learn at the very minimum. There are tons of ways that you could cheat did we're, not learn that for sure? I feel pretty confident that that there are not cheating is confirmed at some large scale or not We certainly learn that the witnesses don't see the whole system at the very least, is a non transparent system, your great non transparent. We cannot at the soft the witnesses had certain access, but now complete or all kinds of chain of custody, things and nobody witnesses etc? Now, under a condition, are cheating is completely practical. If you want to do it and these,

Stakes are sky. High is like trying to deny Orange Hitler second term. What could be a higher stake than that? So it's possible, tat. The biggest stakes in the world How often does major fraud happen when it's possible, in fact quite possible. And people really really want to do it. How often Every time is likely ice, nothing on the sidewalk. You don't need a witness If you have the set up. We gotta hot sidewalk in some ice cream, can I have some melted ice cream? If you ignoring observed election in the union? It states the highest states. You could possibly imagine yes, Of course, it happened of course, about the question of did

our foreign adversaries try to influence the election. We have some information on that given that we know foreign adversaries can was possible, the same situation as possible. We know that for sure, because how hard it is to do something with social media is easy, so as pie, of course, if you're, China, Russia the ran, for example. The stakes, though not just high, is life and death. It says The fate of your country is the highest states you could possibly imagine so. It's possible, indeed, is easy. And the highest stakes in the world did it happen. yeah. We don't have to debate it. you don't have to show me the evidence. I don't need to see a video of someone

in China type, and I mean I don't need that evidence. It had to happen. It cannot happen in our world, its ice cream on a sidewalk. Of course China tried to influence the operation What do you mean? I Ratan Burger a reckless I'm sorry, DNA Ratcliff, told CBS that China is using blackmail, bribery and cover influence to target members of Congress make sure that only laws that are favourable to China or past- that's just fine. Know what they're doing currently there, the giant this is from Gordon Chang, actually. China was using a lie to figure out who was Lucy sympathetic to interfere in,

likewise matter, and then they would send them tiktok videos of had arrived. Do you think that mattered, China, sending black black lives matter and anti for sympathisers directions on how to write. You don't think that mattered, probably matter Gordon Chang says that's exactly what happened so everybody looking for the recently on little bits of evidence of whether this election was stolen or not its complete misdirection. You dumb, need evidence, bullies chased out the witnesses when we say that again boys Chased out witnesses in the key cities so keep that fact about although the election fraud and mischief and south. So keep that that fact, just as one little fact the bullies and we have Plenty of witnesses assumes like that will be easy to demonstrate

boys chased out witnesses to the vote. Counting. Ok, that's an important fact. EL. It now take all of the other stuff you got. video that use, you think, shows us. Corruption. You ve got your data analysis. The show some worrying things Hundreds of witnesses now add. All those strong arguments and then just throw them in the ocean cause, you don't need em, they're useless. Maybe you can prove Mccord. Maybe you couldn't does matter. Their uses, the only thing you needed was bullies Witnesses live, that's the end the conversation, every five anything. You say after that doesn't matter you get that right, nothing matters, but that

The only thing that matters and if you allow yourself to imagine the other stuff matters. You you're victim of misinformation and misdirection all the matters, Is it was non transparent by force because bullying as force. This was a violent coup or. You must assume it was a violent coup, because the witnesses were intimidated way by force So the the assumption is it's a stolen election because of the I of the witnesses you dont need anything else, nothing else to throw out the selection and do whatever you want. The fear, if you're the not enough they will, I would predict their Biden Lashley, take the job to keep society

together, but I think we can say that nothing like the republic exist anymore. I think it was was Franklin who said when he asked what kind of form of government they created. He said a republic if you can keep it and we didn't. We lost it because the republic doesn't look like anything like bullying witnesses and having a non transparent election with software. You can on it. That's not even close to being a republic. Whatever that is, is a bully accuracy do do. We have a form of government is based on who can believe the best in the election process. What happened so we didn't lose. The republic is no longer a theoretical The country is still functions so less good. Luckily, we have such good systems that are built up over time.

The economy is still chugs along and you know view the garbage still gets picked up but were definitely not a republic anymore. Can we get it back? Do you want to get it back? I think we can. The back I dont know if it'll be in the next four years I mean we might have to wait for another election to get it back, but yeah we can get it back. We get to two twenty twenty four and there is more witness intimidation, appalling places. What would be the proper response. You know what it is, I don't even have to say it and I'm not going to say it out loud cuz I'll get banned from all social media platforms, but yeah this doesn't happen. The second time you got that right. This is what maybe they got away with it. Maybe they saw the election that looks like it

we'll get away will have for years of a button, but this doesn't happen twice. Doesn't appetites. the weirdest funny story of the day is Joe Biden was asked to review about his disagree, with Camel Harris Agus Jake Tapir was talking to him by didn't actually told this joke in public. Like I told Barrack if it's something where there is a fundamental disagreement, meaning with comma. We have We are based on moral principle, are developed, disease and say I have to resign as your strong leadership. He says vice president disagrees with them here claiming Diseases and resign now to be fair. His joking to be fair. It was actually

a joke. I, as a proof, no humorist, I give him good grand another job? That was a solid joke, because Nobody was thinking. It was a he it's a to the two joke dimensions of your you're already thinking it. So that's one dimension he's got something that you know was in your mind. To begin, and then he did something bizarre. The bizarre thing isn't it. does it out loud in public which you weren't expecting. That's what makes it. So it was already in your mind and then he said aloud. That's two of the six dimensions, a human that I talk about. If you want more on the dimensions of humor, just Google, my name and six dimensions of humor pop up all over the internet. So I don't know that this is necessarily signalling some kind of a

Variety and slip where he's signalling to the world that this is going to happen. I think it's probably more. It was just a Joe what I don't think it's like they haven't thought of it. You know it is not like is not on the option set which is funny because he jokes about it and it is funny. This sort of on the options that its Given one of the options, I don't know how likely it is, but it's on the is. But it's on the west, maybe feathers. Experts on the list. So there is a question of well guess. Biden said he does want Trump to attend his inauguration. Do you think Trump should attend biting his inauguration? Others a history of it because it

signals are peaceful transfer power. This is good for the country, but do you think it is a special case? The trump should go to violence inauguration. I would say strong now that strong now As a supporter, I would be quite disappointed actual if he went and here's a reason if he doesn't take back the fine people hoax. You can you can't be ok with that. Yeah, it be one thing if they had lied about each other's records, he standard political things, but Fine people hoax- you can't you can't be ok with that. You can never be ok with that, in my opinion, so I would like, see the presidency, you know it's all you still spreading that fine people oaks you can now you can go it alone. He won't do that, but would be fun so.

I have this this weird experience of. I turn on Hannity and I'm watching this video of the Georgia video that looks like, but I dont think, is massive vote or fraud. And then I turned it over to see it in and Anderson Cooper, Introducing a clip of the president, and Anderson. Has this exasperated disgusting? Look lady brings do everything if its trump related, so he tries to get this look like I'm not just tell you what's happening, not just tell you my opinion, look at how I feel about this, so he says so is our child you? My best Anderson, is really really disgusted. Look if it goes like this and the president, this ness clip we're going to see. He is just turned in some,

slim, let a man he actually use letter term flim man, he said everything you're gonna see in this clip is false and I thought to myself. This is gonna, be good, because whatever clip follows, that is going to be some though propulsion right, I'm thinking Trump unleashed. You know if he thinks, if he comes to think he's a lame duck. The things you might say in office. Are they really undertaking? So Like all, ok, I gotta see this. If Anderson Cooper, there's not a single, true statement in this entire clip. This is going to be so good stuff and then turn on the clap and everything. The president said was true. I thought what the hell it is such a mine fuck too, to see these two worlds side by side. Now, I say

maybe maybe we're all wrong about. What's true, but I think Anderson might be the most the most departed from reality in terms of us, his vision of bread, drop. Apparently Governor Camp in Georgia is asking the Secretary of State to do a signature audit of the votes. I did see a tweet that there were a whole bunch of categories of Georgia votes that they thought were dead people. When people to young people moved away and they were pretty big numbers and but but that twin sorted disappeared. I feel as if that these a little more credible later to talk about that, is it true that we have information of a whole bunch of fraudulent votes in Georgia?

I saw a tweet on it, is our real or is it just somebody alleging it, and then it was from was mad Brainerd Thee, the source of that data. So I think that some of them requires verification so another words if you're. If you think that a number of these are dead people, you really really need to check to make sure it's not people with the same names, etc. Now, of course, they they tried to check. For that. I know Matt Brainerd would not put it out any data that had an obvious problem with it all right. So I was wonder if they have. This is Matt Braynard put it out. It wouldn't be any obvious problems with it, but it was still. Verification, it could be if you dig down you find out something in it now, but they won't be anything this like. Intentionally fraudulent or are we slightly wrong, if it's coming from that Brainerd, but does require verification. So

We'll see of their produce. What do you think elite section, two thirty issue, the issue of whether social media should be publishers at present: rumpus anyone sign some defence authorization act. Unless section two thirty August removed from social media and that would make them suitable, so if they, if they lost their protection under section two thirds, As I understand it, there will be treated as regular publishers who can edit things not anything. and if you can ever what content is on your platform. That makes you the author. In a way it makes you responsible for the content. Because you had a hand in deciding whether was there or not versus the phone company that you make a phone call. You can say whatever you want, it's not up to the phone company and they're, not they're, not banning anything, Voicecode, so

Why people say let's get rid action to thirty, and then the social media companies could be sued for three, All you do whatever they do. What do you think would be the downside of that? what what is your? What are you believe would happen if section two thirty one room, let the issues specifically Do you think that twitter would survive? Yes, this protection were removed. Would twitter survive? What do you think? I don't know they answer that question. I want to see what you think, because it seemed to me they would get sued if they keep things the way they are, so what would they have to do if you have two thirty were removed. What were twitter have to do.

they would have to remove anybody who was a risk so. They would have to remove anybody who would say something that could put them at risk, which would include. Everybody you like to follow on Twitter Twit who would have to get rid of everybody. Who is interesting because, as the interesting people who say things that sometimes or not true, because their willing to take a little more risk. That's what makes them interesting. You saw me be real wrong already you at least once this morning, because I'm one of those people who takes a risk in all oh I'll, taken a little farther than maybe maybe I should as part of the fund. As long as I tell you, that's what I'm doing. I think that's that's fair, because I tell you I'm doing it in so. He says who cares?

Yeah, so removing section two thirty would remove social media from the world. Is that why you are No, I haven't heard the other argument. now, some of you are thinking say the common here somebody somebody said That's ok, I gotta parlor parlor dies the same day. You know their rights. Parlor would be other business same day, There's no such thing as twitter, going out of business because of section two thirty and then parlor not going out of business. It's the same business They don't have a what whatever happens. Avons one is gonna happen to the other. So if you them all to go in a business. That would be the way to do it. But is there any middle ground Is there a middle ground where there is more transparency and maybe

appeals process. Let me ask you this: if you had the option transparency and algorithms and you actually felt confident that really was transparent, utter no you do at. But let's say you could get there and you could manage your own algorithm and you can just turn it off was just turn it off, and you just say things in the order that they come in. It's everybody that you follow. That's it just there's no algorithm it all just shows you everything and you can just click the switch and get that. Would you be happy with that because it would be no filtering, you would just push a button and you you personally would never be filtered. How about or at least into the content you get to see how about if they appeals process, so that some independent non twitter people who may be selective beyond some kind of a temporary term and rotating.

And they look at it this way. Are we don't we don't work for twitter? We just work for the world, we're just volunteering, and in our opinion this post Was suspended for a while, but we think a year's long enough, and so we, they are long enough will put you back on giving another chance what if he had that, would you be happy. With transparent algorithms plus fuels process. There was not from Twitter, they just use an independent board and take the advice. Would you were? Could you work or that. Digital bill right rights. Yes, I think there should be a digital bill of rights for exactly the sort of. So I'm looking at your answers, I see lots, allows Lhasa knows but what would you do instead? Would you would you get rid of it

because remember it's not just twitter. Facebook goes twitter goes Instagram goes do we just get rid of our most important industries in the United States, because the digital businesses, the importance at this point. Somebody says to thirty reform as opposed removal. Here I think what I'm talking about a reform there there's that's, probably a good way to set. Somebody says no censorship, well but what I said was you could have an option as a user to push a button and you could have censorship or not have it. It was just your choice as a consumer. How is that? Is that a problem? Why would you objective that cuz, the only people who would be censored would be for the audiences, oh yeah. I want you to censor the bad stuff. I don't want even see it. I might even pick them myself

You know if I have that option of uncensored verse censored. Don't assume that I would pick uncensored dont assume that I mean I might click back and forth once awhile and make sure I'm not Miss Nathan by fear Censored house value it just goes too far in my sense of more than one and want to see both town Square free speech. I feel- and I made the same argument a million years ago- interpret Gore Al Gore's wife. was railing to add. she wanted to add warning labels to music? And

we were old enough to remember this. Remember there was a big kerfuffle and people said. A free speech, free speech, stop putting warning labels of profanity on my my product, and I said now, of course, I like as much freedom is possible, but I said thats not decreasing your freedom, that's actually increasing. meaning that the consumer has more freedom, because they have more information? The more information you have that you can act on gives you in effect more freedom, So by putting a warning label on some types of content, the consumer knows more. I would say that expands our freedom, because them. are you know the more you can make smart free choices, a dumb fridge, free choice. Meaning that you had freedom,

you didn't know anything so you you made a bad choice. Well, I guess freedom was not a good kind I'd. Rather, I don't have the good kind freedom where I have all the information than those just up to me. So I argued that labeling things there's just always useful, since the service that has nothing to do with decreasing your freedom to there is not. The problem is letting twitter use it. As a shield while breaking its rules. Ok, so there is an argument which is that the problem is not the legislation, its keeping twitter to it. You know I I have a philosophy that I know a lot of you don't share, which is that mistakes they get corrected. Are not the same as mistakes just plain mistakes.

because we live in a messy world if used are blaming everybody who makes a temporary mistake that then they we apologise for and correct? I just can't get mad people for that Well, if it's bad for me, you know, I'm still, say it would be better if it was perfect from the start, but anybody Fixing something is wrong and doesn't legitimately is a hero in my mind, because it doesn't. There are enough of those so an twitters case. If, if I may defend them a bit, I would say that you ve heard Jack, say when challenge about specific civic things legal suspended you for Jack say that was a mistake. We reverse them now, you certainly did a system for which a legit mistakes get a hearing that maybe the part of the system is that's missing. But if you have a company this willing to say, but that company on and the public and say.

Indirect words. No, no weaseling, no no excuse there was no excuse offer. That was a mistake. We fixed it. I don't have a problem with that. As long as there's a system for the alleged mistakes. Thirty two do we need to thirty. If you give me options as a consumer, I don't care about any of that I'll just pick the one I like and I'll be happy because I feel like I picked right now part of the problem is that, as I can, Don't worry, you don't feel like you got the choice. You know you could be. I forgot my ring next to my drum kit. If you're you guys are so observant. You notice my ring is not

I have to take my ring off to practice my drums because it hits the ring had slipped. The stick You d bunk the wrong video somebody says I d bunk the wrong video. Well, I d bunk, the video I saw and the one this going round is. There's somebody says: there's two videos James Dixon says what what are you tweet me, the other video just for fun. I believe that that's not true James. I see you between it at me. I believe there are not two videos. There's another video with a blonde thumb drive. I did see that one is that when you talk about

I saw the one with the blond and Yoshis surreptitiously and something in her hand. I give that zero credibility. Zero. Is you can't really tell what's going on in the video? You could imagine it's something bad and you can imagine it's not. I don't think there's anything else. You can say from that. Somebody says: there's a georgian state that I want just send it to me and I ll talk about that, but the one I saw is alone. I talk to you, that's all I got for now and I'll talk to you later. Youtube. What song am my practicing on the drums, watching a drama called sinner or sign at an eye to pronounce it s eye.

It's a young woman is a drummer and she does. She does a lot of the all these like the Beatles, etc. Someone trying to copy Ringo STAR, which is tough guy, he's left in talent, stacking they Qatar. Here I was a pronounced scene. Somebody says that her name is pronounced Siena, yeah and by the way, to speak of talents tax. Let me talk about this. So too, young woman who plays drums on Youtube and she's, got over a million followers, And she has been doing for years, since I think she was a teenager. She must be inner. Twenties now add watching her compile her talent stack is really fun. If you can watch the videos overtime and see when she's young, all the waiter Current and she started out just being teenager, who is pretty good and drums and socialism Youtube videos.

and then she started adding to her talent stack. So then she was good at presenting, and you know she she got her lighting in her video and then she had pop up windows, so you can see her feet working while she was drumming and she really put together. Quite a talent stack there. I would guess you mix one to two million dollars a year. And if you told me what is your one talent and what's the one thing that makes her worth millions of dollars a year- I'd say at least a million dollars here I would say she's really good at drums, but I'll bet you you could find. I don't know, maybe twenty thousand people who could play drums really well and what makes a difference cuz. She added those other those other talents plus she's, a woman. So we makes a little more interesting,

pure female drummers form County certified the election. You said somebody says unsubscribe, the sky is lying. We will not accept a fraudulent election. So somebody says: there's an arena, video and a state video I dont know. If it, There you have the same room at the same time. I dont know that it would be different so play Georgia, state video, those debunked and not the arena, security video. I talk about same room. cuz. It was the same room, it doesn't matter to say video, no other cubicle video.

Oh there's, another video of somebody going to a cubicle, but there's not enough information on that to have an opinion. Yeah, so if there is one thing that you should learn and twenty twenty, it's this the one thing, you should learn and twenty Twond, as you can't trust video, but for thee. The troll, who said that you should unsubscribe from this channel Apparently, you must the first part. Because I'm the guy who says you don't even need evidence, I'm the guy who says you can guarantee that the election was stolen because the set up, because it was easy and they had a high motive, Do it, of course, I saw that there's no other way I can go so

the troll who is completely miss interpret in me, a hundred percent just because I don't buy every piece of evidence doesn't mean it is a guarantee that the election was stolen. Of course it was still can approve it. Probably nobody can. My guess is that it will not be proven. just had to happen epoch time as a video of suitcases. They do ok, so he says Scotus conceding no scottish predicting scatters predicted Stiffer I'm not I'm not actually running for president, so I don't get to concede or not concede, but I can predict and by the way, don't mistake, strategy for surrender.

You do know that if things go the way the pundits seem to think it will go and buy, didn't takes you do know it will largely destroy the Democratic Party right if you want that that I don't see it do any other way, really another. Something saying: oh they'll, control everything by changing the laws and stuff. As long as the Republicans hold the Senate, which is still a chance, I think I think that election will be rigged as well, but if the EU, if the Republicans hold the Senate, you just have to wait two years in Congress will turn republican and two more years and Republicans will learn everything. If that's what you want so

Don't think it's dont think in terms of retreat or giving up thinking about the short term and long term. Those will be there. That's the frame. You should look. That's enough now talk you tomorrow.