Everybody somalian. Did you think twenty twenty one was gonna, be boring nope, I'm glad we saved up all the craziness for the first week day after the holidays, I feel like I was worried. Things might get boring, but then we ve got the lizard squad. We'll talk about that at the moment I said lizard squad, that's actually in the news, the lizard squad, but before we get to that fund news all you need to enjoy this in the maximum possible way, and why would you several for anything? Less frankly, would you know now you're, not gonna, settle for less so I'll get you a copper Margaret last tanker jealousies, Diana Canteen, jogger flask,

vessel of any kind and get ready to maximize your experience with the little thing. I call the simultaneous sip feeling connected to people all over the world better than even fungi. You think from guy or connected underneath the forest floor they are, but not as much as we're going to be connected in the moment with a simultaneous tip the bb. The other day have I built this up a little too much go. No, no. I didn't build it up too much. It was just as good as I thought it would be. Sometimes I think I'm exaggerating then no, not exaggerating long story number one named Tyler Bow earlier Report, So he was, he was elected to the GEO Pete Chair, Maricopa, county.

And he says he met with the Serbs, then Senator Mccain was there the late Senator Mccain I recently met with them just out of respect for the office and that this is what he said he tried to by me off by offering local chamber money chamber covers, I guess local chamber money, he's Eddie controlled. He wasn't shy about it. It didn't work, I know what do you think of our story? Does true well Senator Mccain, is not here to defend himself. So it's a little bit unfair because the person is near found himself, but I don't see anything about it strikes me is a lie. I mean it doesn't seem like something you would make up, because it gathers detail about the chamber monies any control.

That's not exactly the kind of lie you would make operate if you're going to make this up as a lie, you'd say: Senator Mccain said he had some money, you know, and he would put it my way or something, but you wouldn't say something so specific- that control the chamber money and over this the specific, I think, he's telling the truth, and my only comment on this is that I prefer bribery who don't get caught in seed. And other news, some employees, Google and alphabet are trying to organise to create a union.

We don't know how that well, they'll do, but I want I wondered: why do you need a union at Google? Don't you always here? It's like the best place to work and people are fighting to work there and salaries are good and benefits are great and prestigious job in the middle of the most active industry in the world and a great place to live in many places, depending on where the office is. Why would you need a union, and so I looked at the details, turns There are not so focused on compensation now there now Billy focused on working conditions. Some of the things you would expect from a union no are focused on the lack of willingness. Google com

woke as Google. Is it's not walk enough because is doing contracts for the Department of Defense now protect the country, homeland security? So that's no good courting to these folks say Google, and what else have they done? They ve profited from advertisements by hang groups. Now, when I say hey Group, I mean a group that somebody else doesn't like, maybe that group as a group, maybe they're not, but if you hate them well, it's called the bank group is close enough, so those whether the two things that they surfaced as being worthy of note for their major claims or to walk in us.

Now, how perfect is it the Google could be taken down by wokeness? I don't know if it'll happen, it's a fun story, but not as fun as yeah. I'm going to get to Trump's phone call, I'm building you up to it it's. This is a buildup. so attorney Linwood, who, as you know, is working for the president's benefit on the election fraud stuff, but that's not all he's doing. It turns out that little word has something else to say today. Totally livable and it goes like this now. Let me be very clear. This is not my opinion.

What do you get to hear now? Is somebody else's opinion or fac without no, but it goes like this Linwood tweeted, I believe, chief justice. Robert and a multitude of powerful individuals worldwide, are being blackmailed and Brenda Scheme involving rape and murder of children captured on videotape captured a videotape while, if its captured a videotape? Obviously it's true cause, there's, never anything that some videotape. That's not true, although thought the thought for later, but given that this right there on video and apparently he has access to it. There's a crypto key lose a file and something it is barely has access to it. Wouldn't you say,

You might see no one screenshot, for example,. I don't have to see the whole video because it sounds like the videos pretty bad, which totally exists. And you know why you know it exists, comes from a credible source called the lizard squad. Now, if you are going to be a credible organization, one way to advertise your credibility, Mr name yourself, the lizard squad. There are barely some actors who got into these files and have determined that these are actual files showing rape and murder of children, and wouldn't you expect to see at least A screen grab, maybe now something this shows the whole story, but wouldn't you

like to know that at least chief Justice Roberts is on it. Because if he is not on one of these videos, I'm not so sure there's every kind of evidence. and by Now- wouldn't we see at least a screech up, not all video. Of course we all want to see that but screech up or how about has he showed it to somebody else list? A prosecutor who has shown into a prosecutor and has the prosecutor, said yes, I've looked at this video looks real d me, or at least something. I need to look into defined, that of its real where's. That kind of missing. Can the missing well, here's my take on this. I think the odds that. John Roberts is on any kind of a blackmail video are really really small.

Like really really small like if you were to take all of the allegations that have ever been made since the beginning of time and rank them from most credible. To least this my close, the least. Now, let me say this as clearly as I can, because I know you're not gonna. Hear me. This is one of those topics where I could look at you and say two plus it calls for a lot of you will go away. Sank. He keeps saying to post. It was five I don't know, what's wrong with him and I'll just say two plus do as for failure to push to his five, it's gonna happen right now. Are you ready. It'll happen to right now, not to all of you, but some of you watching will hear two plus two is five. When I say two plus two is four: you ready your thumbs.

I'm guaranteed, it's got to be true that there are very important people who are being blackmailed by major intelligence services. That's got to be true because it falls under the category of something they would have a high upside Patel blackmailing important people, if you're in intelligence agency, your risk of getting in trouble for zero. Because that's actually your job. What. somebody get to say, Hey intelligence agency. Here your guy is trying to blackmail me and what is the boss of the guy doing the blackmailing to say is because they like in a fire that guy, no no, the head of the agency, was a was why we hire them responsibly, blackmail. You.

And by the way he did a good job but shut up, because we gather all the evidence on you. So if you have a case where there is no risk of penalty, at least for the person doing, the blackmailing causes, literally their job in an intelligence agency, there's a gigantic upside and then the third thing this necessary to be guaranteed. Happens is that there are a lot of people involved if there were only one important person in the world where there is a very good chance they never murdered or raped anybody. but if you have lots of leaders you can aren, t some number them and it might be a briefing percentage like an alarming presented them. Twenty thirty percent. Fifty percent is a big number have done at least something they can be blackmailed for maybe it's eighty percent, but I would say, minimum thirty percent.

It is something that could be blackmailed for so under those conditions. What are the odds that there are sexual predators and rapists against the same in government in major major roles? The answer is a hundred percent One hundred percent there is omnipresent chance that people are in power or doing bad things. There is a hundred percent chance that intelligence agencies are trying to find out about them. There's a hundred percent chance that in some number of cases they have succeeded and there's a hundred percent chance that it makes a difference that that's some intelligence agencies have leverage over a number of people. Now that said, if you were to pick any one allegation about any one person

and here's an example: an allegation, the worst possible allegation against Chief Justice Roberts. What are the odds that any one specific thing is true in the context of knowing that the larger story is definitely true. There are definitely are people doing bad things, definitely being blackmailed by intelligence agency is probably more than one of them. At the same time, those two things are not incompatible. City hear this. They can be definitely true. This happening, while almost statistically, you know, if you're just going to put an odds on it. Any one person who gets accused.

Very low arts, so I'd say the odds that Chief Justice Roberts is actually doing. Anything like any of these allegations, vanishingly small, so smaller would even think of it as being in the category of things than might be. True, that's how small the odds of this being true are. At the same time, it could be true that there's the stuff going on, but not for the, and the individual. You can't make that claim. So unless he's got a screen shot of Justice Roberts, I would not look for that to be true. The epoch times is report. Their day. There was a data analysis by a something called the data integrity group. So I guess they do data analysis

and they did a time series looking at all the votes coming election day and make the following claim that the least over four hundred thousand votes were switched switched, meaning removed, I think at least subtracted from Trump. I dont know if I dont know if in this context they mean there was added to bite and where is just removed from Trump little unclear, but doesn't matter from the point point is now here's the pay off now I've been telling you before that simplification is gonna, be the key gives you ve got a whole bunch of complicated claims about all kinds of things in the election. They all conflated did the course rule on them, or did they lead ruler doctrine of latches and wasn't only about standing

whole thing, is way too complicated for the public to understand what? If anybody- and I talked about this is going to sound, familiar cuz. I talked about this in a different context. If anybody in that data analysis, world who's got a claim, can boil that down to one thing that can be checked, that's going to be powerful. Cause you got a whole bunch of claims that are hard to check. If you could take even one important thing, let's say something that affected four hundred thousand vote. If you could boil that one claim of four hundred thousand votes down to one verifiable objective fact, you just look at it and

You're not looking at it, you can't tell, but if you are looking at it, you know, and apparently this group did that they they boil down to one simple data, fact that you could just observe now they make a claim that, in my opinion, is probably false, and I'm saying probably just because the way the world works right is not based on anything about the date in The green group is not based on the reporting of the epoch times. Is that, basically they let s just if you live in the world long enough. There are some things you just expect not to be true in the end the surface in that category, but here's the genius part of it I have to do is Jack to tell you what their claim as and when you see how simple it is, you're actually gonna feel it. I tell you,

sometimes everyone's. While, though, be a little piece of knowledge or the earlier, your understanding of the world you live in just goes up a little bit like you reach a little higher level of awareness, and sometimes you can feel it like a little girl who sponsors hunting do that, as some of you now most of you won't feel at the summit, we can feel it usually goosebumps here's the claim that is so simple just check. It goes like this there were vote movements across all candidates. Of course the vote is changing in real time as the candidates are getting their votes, counted and they say, however, we did not see the the same type of negative documents, meaning votes decreasing in real time from a total that was a higher too low.

to any of the other candidates. There we saw with President Troms tallies and they happened repeatedly that the Trump ones with no explanation said Linda the clock and a member of the group. Now that is a very specific, simple claim which the data that they have available to them. Apparently. shells now here's my problem, I'm not tell you to believe this. Ok surface sounds like saying this as a credible one believe this one, I'm not there, I'm not there at all,

but what I love about it is that this claim you don't have to believe or disbelieve. You can just check it right now, if it's true that only present in trumps vote counts showed several times when they went down and nobody else ever ever experienced even one issue of where any other vote count either by

Things are any body else on the ticket Republic into Democrat anybody else. If no other vote count, all night ever showed one decrease, but the Trump votes did a number of times easy to check right, because barely that data they can just look at its ok. Here it wasn't decreased and the other was dead. Now. Do you think it's that claim is checked that it would stand up? So they say in the comments that it was true across multiple states. I believe that's true that it was not in one place. It was multiple counties. Now, how do you like the fact that this is boiled down to something that you can just check it? You don't have to wonder now based on the claim. You should not believe it.

If all you ve read, is the claim zero great ability, just like every other claim about the election, no credibility, but if the other side does it away in and say you idiots, there's a perfectly good reason. Why look like that was happening, but it really wasn't I'd wait to hear that. But what, if he'd every here that because as Linda Mclaughlin says that no explanation has been offered, don't you think that would be something they want to explain and don't you think you wouldn't be hard to explain it if there were an explanation for this,

now just brainstorm. What it might be. It could be that they ve got different sources reporting and that every once in a while others, a artifact where there's a slight timing problem- and it looks like something- was decrease, but it really wasn't. It was just decrease before it increased or something right you you could Imagine they say look, this is normal, will show you that it happened and other elections will show you that happened to bite into will show you that happened. Other candies defence would be easy. It would be easy to defend it. Just tell tell us why happened or tell us it didn't happen easy. So do you think that this exclusive story,

the EP at times will be picked up by all the major media, because now we know a way to find out for sure if the election was stolen. Is that good news? We don't have to wonder in fact we can probably be sure of it in twenty four hours. Are you need somebody? Who's got a got the opposite opinion about what this data means, how somebody qualified. Have a look at the same data and then tell us what they think if they look at the data and they have a good explanation, I'm open to that end I'm not only open to. It are far more likely to believe the explanation, because most of these things are going to be explained away like ninety five percent minimum will be explained away. Why would this be different? So I would.

Backed it's not real, but every day we go in which the explanation, the alternate explanation- doesn't exist, it's a little harder to believe it's not real. Now do we live in a world where the news can just disappear, something this important? Well, let's talk about the Trump phone call Say also the news Trump beta phone call with guesses, the Georgia attorney general and other people in that office and in which he was listening, his grievances in evidence for why the election was stolen. And the other three long list of of things like dead people voting and people whose addresses don't check out in those places where he claimed that there were more votes than registered voters, etc. Now I listened to the entire our because I think you need to because only if you

just a clip coming out. You don't know what to believe, but I listened to the whole hour and I have a few thoughts number one. The president is very, very poorly advised at the moment I mean shockingly. Poorly advised now do I blame the president for thinking that for all these irregularities, which have been, in my opinion, mostly debunk. In my opinion, the eight there's some room for opinion on this. But I feel as if he's mixing claims that have not been debunk and are definitely worth looking into and look pretty strong like this epoch it's one of those troop and it looks pretty strong- hasn't been debunked? As far as I know,

so when you like to look at the level of that, of course, you it, but by mixing stuff that at least again, just in my opinion, sounds transparently. Obviously not true. Somebody is not telling the president the truth, there is nobody in his circle at the moment who apparently feel safe that they can say he got some strong, you can say any aghast and weak things and maybe just leave the weaklings alone, because if the strong ones work, that's all you need. Why would you throw weak ones? And therein-

a ruin. The whole thing. So I would say that for those of you who have been following the claims, they seemed almost embarrassingly uninformed. So that was my take now you now from. If you watch me, I could not be a bigger booster of Trump right to the point of a flaw. I'm a boost to the point of law, but even I didn't think the stuffy was saying about the election was due credit in hall. There are parts of it that I didn't know I'd like to know more about them definitely stuff to look into, but the way was interpreted by the news is in the form of a hoax o. Yours, I endorsed he's a president of the United States, I'll be a lame duck, looks like at this point and he could not get the people on the phone call to be even a little bit,

Cooperative? Not all so watching me, president. The United States is trying to make a basically a Karen phone call and complain about the service and he couldn't get the supervisor to say anything. Health It was shocking to see how little power he had. How did it get reported when we saw how little power that the president has the president couldn't even get the other people to be polite? Basically, I mean he couldn't get anything out of them and there is over party. How is that reported? Obviously, a dictator obviously trying to force things through. You listen to it, man that was no dictator. That was whatever you are when you are complaining to the DE envy and they're not hearing it. That's what was happy

There was no, I wasn't Hitler that was Karen complaining and nobody cared. That was it now, it was characterized, of course, courses that he was yell use pressuring and it was illegal and all the other bad people say it's illegal he's pressuring. But if you listen to the whole call, there are a few. Things that are very clear number one I would say with come. Please confidence and I believe this before, but the phone call removes all doubt and it's this I'm not a bind reader, but that call makes it

really really clear. The Trump believes that was stolen. So, if you're thinking to yourself, he doesn't really believe it was the one with some kind of a trick to stay in power. In my mind, there is no chance of that. You hear the phone call, he absolutely thinks he got. Screwed he's got lots of evidence that he believes lot of an I don't, but he is convinced that the east, Was like a true believer and he sells that completely so, if you're worried about you know he's a dictator that shouldn't just fell that cuz, you didn't see much of a dictator stuff going on but the fake news CNN has turned into a scandal because they need Trump for their ratings and aid, and here is the year the pattern of how they turn will lose. The fake news you seen in this example, and you ve seen a number of other times. Once you see, the pattern is just got a funny. These same trick.

first will take an audio and video tapes. That's longest and they'll cut out a quote. That's out of context. Where have you seen that done? You saw that with a Covington kids, you sought with a fine people. Oaks and you sought with the drinking leech or inject injecting disinfectant hoaxes. In each case, if you had heard the entire peace, you said yourself, that's the opposite of what the new said, for example, in the fine people oaks before before the quote there was taken trumped up,

about the people who were there were not racist, just there for the statues and then, after that, you made sure that you knew that he was condemning totally the NEO Nazis and the races who were there. But if you take out the the clarification and also the context, the they started and just show the clip looks like he call Nazis. Fine people. If you look at the Covington kids clip all they do is clip out the parts you before and after it looks like the kid is the bad person. But if you see the hawk lip, it's obviously the person he was with the guy you claim, To be a native american room, was I don't remember the story? You could tell me he was the the aggressor likewise with the drinking bleach hoax. If you hear it in all of its context here, the first part where the present sets it up as talking about light as a disinfectant, then he talks about it and then

it, clarifies about light. So if you know here that you set it up as light and then he wrapped up as light and all they take out is injecting injecting disinfectant that's how they create folks now the fake at it is not enough by itself all right? That's not light enough myself. You need the other stuff, so I get to all right. So in the case of this phone call what they took on a quote: they they took little pieces on a quote, and they were you saying stuff. That makes it sound as if he's pressuring em to cheat now Opposite is happening. Trump is pressuring him to look into allegations to make sure that nobody cheated

That is literally the opposite of asking him to see and unreported find votes. So the second part of this is that the fake news will use persuasion primers. These are words wit and phrases which, if you hear them at the same I mean you ve heard the story from the first time they primary you to see the story a certain way. These are brainwashing, persuasion, primers. None of this is an accident. They know how to do. This is the fourth time in a row. You ve seen it, say battered every time, so the the primary words that they use in this case are pressured to find votes. Here's another way to describe exactly what you you heard on the the audio. The president forcefully was promoting his idea that the people in charge should look into the allegations of fraud. So that the public-

I can understand that the election was either cleaned, which would be good or they find that it wasn't, which will be good in another way. So Does that sound, like pressuring defined votes in meaning manufacture, manufacture about another Thus the same does what I said was just objective: Leto, you listen to he's making his case is presenting its claims from fraud. He says we just want a fair vote. We just want to know. I just want you to look into it. That's all add, but if you hear pressured and fine votes- and you parent with clip which doesn't have the rest of the context. It looks like what a mob was talking. They they like to use the things that you that you believed before now, because the whole he's my boss was

already a meme, they just take a mean that is already active in your mind and they just attach a new thing too. It is much easier to attach fake news to an existing mean, always like a mob boss here whenever he makes a private phone call or thinks it's private. He talks like a mob loss, and here he is making phone call like a mob was now. If you listen to it, there wasn't anything even close to talking like a mob boss. I mean not even close to anything like that. The tone was not that it was just asking for for something to be looked into. That was it and the the the board this with which they they try. This is amazing. Here's the more phrases from CNN

The president was caught on tape, call on tape. Now. What do you imagine is true of somebody who was caught on tape while their guilty? What does it mean? to be on a recording if you're caught there, Signalling that he's guilty before they have even told you what the kind of is that's a primer. That's that's brainwashing. so you ve caught on tape? No, it wasn't quarantine there. Simply an audio tape which has been available to the public and which not much of anything happened. That's not even close to being caught and by the way I prefer President's, who don't get caught on audio.

Here's and others a sentence directly on CNN coverage that the tape quote exposes the depth of his corruption. Suppose You knew there was a long tape. You only heard one part of it, which was something about finding votes, and then he read see you then saying that this tape exposes the depth of his corruption, wouldn't be a kind of think that part you didn't hear were more confirming the depth of his corruption. Nothin, like that on the tape, not even close, nothing even than that General Category of corruption, not even close, is just him asking for data to be looked at because they ve got some claims that they would like some data to be released by the state to make sure the claims or jewels just just nothing like exposing a depth of corruption. He literally

There are questions that they said it was a smoking gun every time you hear any these raises your ear been brainwashed. These are not news phrases that another close. The news is just right up brainwashing at this point and then step three. They Bernstein it. So you know you you bring in burns, earn steamer, Bernstein bursting spurns. They write this library and Bernstein just to say, is worse than the Watergate, literally just to say that now, as I taught you the track, the trick of having a big opening offer so here in negotiations, which is in a way similar to persuading least the way I'm under use. Now, if you start with a big opening, offer it anchors people to the first thing they heard.

If I say to you, I'm gonna tell you my car and is worth a quarter of a million dollars the. Firstly, you think. As there is no car, you drive drivers worth a quarter of a million dollars while huge strip. It's not worth that or anywhere near it. What is the first? Nobody here so now I say, are a baby is now worth a quarter of a million, but then I'd like to get a hundred thousand for it. Now the hundred thousand doesn't sound so bad cause. You got primed with the two, and even though the thing is only worth thirty, five thousand dollars used. Suddenly the hundred doesn't sound so bad because you have private with that two. Fifty that's what burns thus the worse than Watergate. Guy comes in to give you the first offer worsen Watergate your mind. You like Wall Wall, that's big! Now later, when you get more. Let's say you get more, about what was on their you're already primed. So maybe you may

you come down a little from worse than Watergate. In your mind, be like I'm not sure it's quite worse than Watergate, but sounds like is pretty bad say so that other brainwashing work start with a big offer, worsen Watergate and then is hard to get. was that no matter how much data comes out later, they use repetition because if they say at enough you'll think it's true you hear a new story or item a hundred times. You're gonna believe it's more true than if you hurt at once. Just your brain is operating. they make, you think, pass the sale, so you ve got things like exposing his depth of corruption or record on tape. Those are manipulation. Phrases to make. You think, pass the sale.

The sale, is whether anything bad happened and their making. You think it is supposed to the depth of his corruption by making you think of all the other. Corruption is like, but they have made the sale. The making you think past, there's no sale that anything bad happened there there make. You think all the way to not only did happen both this other stuff that turns out. It didn't happen either all right. Of course you do the mind. Reading your. What is the president's state of mind he's like he's thinking like a mob boss and he's trying to pressure this guy he's not trying to get justice now, in his mind, is not about justice. To seeing them could read his mind, you can't, but they can. They got pundits with powers, and they read is mine

and they find out that know, despite all of his words that clearly and repeatedly say he just wants to know what happened and can we see the data? Please now there's some legal reasons, it's hard to give the data, but that's what's up sorry, but if you mind rhythm of theirs, he's just trying to be the case and then the most important part, which is disappearing the box. So this video witches debunking thoroughly. Will not be highly highly rated at social media and so anybody who's going to do what I just it will just sort of get disappeared. Now. you may say to Yourself- well, let's see and am rights, citizens crazy, but These people will go over to Fox NEWS and they'll, read the real story and might even agree with you, Scott and they might even be on the same side. So you go over this Fox news and you look for the story and.

Good luck finding it now. I don't know what's up with Fox NEWS, but I would think this would be like one of the big stories as opposed to not mentioned so take that for whatever it means. I would think this one would be mentioned. must be a story there. I'm sure Fox NEWS will covered eventually in the opinion, the opinion shows later today will covered, of course, but it. Sort of suspiciously, not there at the moment, unless at the last hour, I can hear it Sawyer Zamora, CNN bad behaviour.

They also say quote: legal experts say Trump broke the law by pressuring blah blah blah blah. Well, if you pressured him, maybe broke the law, I don't know what laws were talking about, but if he was just talking to him and ask you for data, is that breaking the law? So here it is so here is CNN. Acting like a law has been broken when you listen to this happens is obvious no laws or broken here's another story just because the simulation loves us and gives us less of code, reuse. All six members of the congressional group we call the squad progressed. ABC, etc. They all voted to put Nancy policy over the top, as speaker unanimously were so Nancy policy must be doing something to write. The squad loves her

Now I have to admit when I first saw that the phrase lizards squad was trending. I thought well, that's not a nice thing to call air sea and the other people, and in that squad I feel its unkind to call them the lizard squad. But it turns out that lizard squad was a different squad. I got it Lizard squad was the hackers, as opposed to the squad, who are also lizards, but they go by differently, also lizards, because their party Congress, not because there said sin- is taken out of context imagined that quote becomes the port they take.

Am. I live stream and miss the part where I say no, because Congress, there lizards snob, because its these few few people in the squad, Lizards Thrall users, but you take that part out. My twitter friends acts says that watching the Biden presidency is gonna, be like watching it. Bad spin off of a tv show. The Trump tv show is just so also in top rated show, but then media they do. The spin for the minor characters. So it's like Trump was the tv show. Friends and Biden is going to be like Joey. You know that the spin off show about just Joey, it's like yeah. We're going to watch it by habit and reflux and maybe it'll remind us a friends, but it's not friends. It's not friends, all right.

There is little chap for you I don't know how much much backing the says by science, but there was a study say that if you drink alcohol soon after getting the vaccination, it will make the vaccination way less effective and something about alcohol. The next the beds in the vaccination a little less active, so don't drink alcohol within several days of getting the vaccination. So you have all been made more safe by watching this luxury.

Here's a question for you remember Howard Schulz, who is the founder of Starbucks, and he was running for president for awhile. What if he had been elected, would Howard Schulz? Could you trust him to make decisions about whether Starbucks should be open? Had he do that? I feel as if Howard Schulz, although I have lots of confidence in him as a smart operator capable and all that I have only only good thoughts about him, but he would be in quite a bind Whitney because one of the biggest questions in the bandit,

again, as does the place like Starbucks they open or just go Anna bills. How can you make that decision or even be part of it? Or I mean I don't see how that would work, but your short of having a pandemic, you would have been fine, but as soon as the pandemic he's the wrong match for the job right member I've told you that there's no such thing as bad president's and good presence there. Just presidents who woods deadlier matched for a task trump perfectly mal match for a whole bunch of ass, mostly international, but our tools would have been a bad match for a pandemic just because you would never know if he was doing something because of Starbucks interest would be able to know that

and I'm not Cassie any aspersions on shore. Like you said, I only good feelings about him, but would be a bad position to put him in Gordon Chang talks. Quite a bit about North Korea in Chinese and expert in that region is recommending that we cut all ties with China. Think about that cut. All ties with China now Gordon Jane is not random, crazy. Guy on Twitter, he knows what he is talking about. Gordon J is tell you we'd, better. All ties with China. You may have to take very seriously now. I know that the president listen to him, so he probably is taken seriously and is not very easy. Now. I made the case just briefly. What when we say come all ties with China is because every interaction we have with them

Is militarily bad for the United States? I saved militarily because anything that kills Americans at the hands of our enemy that we're in a hot war with its a cyber Airbus or anything that your enemy does to kill. People in your country is an act of war, so others they send a sentinel. They do trade deals that are illegally stealer ip they send spies over. You now gives us go then list. Every contact with China is militarily negative to the United States. So we should do

That's their companies from the stock exchange president did that we should send all of their residents home there trying to get education's here. We should stop trading with them. We should bring all of our. We should ever order to bring all of our companies home Now- and I know I just don't know Owen this other news things that Jack MA the founder Valley, backbone multinational day, hundreds of billions at an oecd Super rich guy, I guess he criticised the regime and disappeared so far for a week now it's really hard for a billionaire to disappear. If somebody like yeah Isla Musk, were bill, Bill gates were not seen for a week in a world where national story it wouldn't take long to find them young they use at the retreat or just took some break from so

meteors on them, but spent a week, and we don't know where one of the richest people in China is a very public guy. I Jack Mars, always on tv like very public. So what if he'd never shows up cause, that's possible. We might never see him again. He can be making shoes and with the weders right now anything can happen now. I imagine he will turn up soon, but his attitude will be adjusted. As my guess. I think the regime probably will talk them and say you know if you'd like to stay alive and let me tell you how to do it and it's not the waiter planet right now, but the other thing this interesting is the Jack Mamma is no ordinary guy. Why.

Ever it was the turn them into. One of the richest people in the world was not an accident. He's got skills and he's got billions of dollars and skills, and did I mention skill? And here's my question as strong as the Chinese Communist Party is immensely strong. I dont know if their message with the right person right now:

because, if he's already got no problem with the leadership and they're doing something with him right now, you don't want to let him out. Let me say this a different way. If China is doing something bad to Jack MA, they better finish him cause. You don't want that guy loose with his billions and really really mad at the regime cause he is important yo. He has enough. Probably inside knowledge contacts people eager bribe, he probably take down the government, because I think that any any billionaire this country was late really serious about taken down. The government could have a good shot at it. Now China, of course, you assume that they would close them down. Divinity try to think he'd obviously have to leave the country and he'd have to get most of his money out if he could, but if he gets out of the country with his money and they tortured him,

Jack MA could take down China. I think they ve got a dangerous situation on their hands. Dont think they can never let him out if they're doing something bad two and now they might reach some agreement where they don't do something too bad, maybe just some house arrest and then, when they ve talked to him enough. He just feels like. I don't want to go through this again. It wasn't that bad. It was this house arrest for a week, but I don't you know next time it could be bad. So I just won't say bad things about China. I would think that's always gonna go. I think that is a smart guy and those figures of the now Neil just shut up about China, but Did I mention he's Jackball, I don't know much about them. I just know that you, don't you don't get where he is by not having skill not being brave, not doing things that people don't expect not being able to push through a brick wall.

As if it didn't exist. So I dont know, what is real capabilities are, but one assumes are pretty good. China might be in trouble will see that my show from the day I got some things to do so. I'm gonna run often do those things somebody says Zuckerberg took down trump. Are you can make that argument either? There are too many other variables nicely one thing, but if Zuckerberg and Facebook did not exist.

Tromp would probably present- I mean this- that's not a reasonable and unreasonable thing to think. I hope you enjoy this episode and I will talk you tomorrow. You tumors, you ve got another minute. What do you think the Trump tape was leaked? Well, it was because the his enemies probably thought that they could make something out of it. Now. The interesting part is a lot of people. the President make a lot of claims about election fraud, so there's at least some thought that maybe the president's team released it because by turning it into national news, which just has to be covered all of his allegations get out there. So it might be good for the president to do that. Explain, lead stories. I don't know what that mean

Calendar drama so, as somebody pointed out on Twitter, they Dilber calendar is printed in China, and so the question was hey: if you stay but Chapelle can get Netflix to take his old show off the air. Can I get my publisher to use a different printing company. That's not exactly a good analogy. If I were Chapelle ancient show that I probably made no money on this point All all all all Netflix had to do is just you, click a box, and it doesn't appear anymore because it's probably assembles error. I just. like a box that that little part of their business just doesn't exist anymore, probably doesn't make much difference to shell.

because the way Hollywood deals are made, even though it was his show. I doubt he had profits going forward. I doubt it or if he did, there were much so he didn't give up anything. So Chapelle basically gave up nothing or of any value and in order to four Netflix to give him what he wanted. They probably just to check the box and they couldn't even tell the difference in their profits because, as one of thousands and thousands of properties. By comparison, my publisher, I believe, does all of their printing for all of their properties in China. It's not easy for them to stop doing that, right away, that they can just check the box and then there's no point China do you have any idea how hard it would be for a major publishing company to change where they publish all of their books.

big deal now. This is why I promote and executive order. They just orders companies, Anna China, american companies, because your publisher it's not really fair, to ask a publisher! Why don't you decrease your profits by thirty percent and spend your entire next year to figure out how to do this thing that they're, probably isn't even enough capacity in the United States together or LEO you'd have to take in summer so that the Chapelle thing was the smallest possible ask there was no real cost. I've been.

immeasurably small and just check a box mine would be an entire publishing company working for a year. Changing everything that they do. Maybe there would be no deal bro calendars. That would make a big impact on me. It's not the same thing, but I'm on board with getting the Philbrook calendar at a China. So if you, if you wonder, if you wonder what I want it's that, but I also work in the real world- and it's not really fair- to ask a publisher to make that kind of a change until it's either legally message Are there some kind of alternative that doesn't look so bad? You do it in Vietnam or wherever. So that's where I stand on that, and I will talk to you tomorrow,.