Hey everybody, chlorine one in your just in time, doktor drew good to see you, everybody else, I'll, just guess some names and see. If I get lucky, I Cathy Bob MIKE Janet Diane good to see you I'll bet somebody as those names. Now. How can you enjoy this even more than normal purple? It's gotta be hard, but what you need is a cover. Buggered, wasn't that you're jealous night again to engender flask a vessel of any kind, and you will fill it with your favorite liquid. My choices, coffee.

And showed me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the Dublin day they may exert raising better. It's called the simultaneous and happens now. Go here s the good stuff, listen about the news, some stuff happening, others river, that Representative Adam chef of California, where I live, Is trying to get a job?

as the California is attorney general, that's the news anyway. Now I ask you what would be the perfect job for the man who is famous famous for being the biggest liar the United States? If you don't count, president trumps fact checking. If you got that ss that's tough debate. But if you don't care that the biggest liar the country is the atom chef kitty, If anybody who would be worse as the attorney general in terms of credibility,. You you trust and decide who goes to jail. so here I am sitting the California a somewhat well known trumps supporter and

It's possible that the biggest enemy of ultra supporters and the biggest liar and most obviously dishonest personally I've ever known of in all of life, may be being considered to be the attorney general in my now I have not got involved in the California politics other than tweeting some things, I have not been involved in the the Gavin Newsome Recall, which barely is picking up. I have not been involved, really anyway in California politics, but I gotta tell you. If Governor Newsome actually did this and nominated nominated Adam chef, as my attorney general in my state, I don't think I could ignore California.

I feel as though that would activating at which boy I would have to do everything I could to change that situation. So would you like to hear the scariest threat that I've ever thought of? I've told you this before, but if you ever want to really scare somebody. We are worried about. Maybe what you will or will not do, and I don't mean just today like physical fires, But in a business situation in the real legal situation, the best threat that I've ever given is this don't get me interested? That's it don't get me interested. You don't want me to be interested in this fight. Just don't get me interested, try it it's scary as hell,

because if what you're toy is basically is thinking Bassa sale, if you didn't think pass the sale, you'd say: oh, I might get into this fight right, but Don't give me interested is thinking pass the outcome, which is a big mistake. If you get interested just don't, can be added and you'll be ok,. Try to hold it works so, I would like to I'm gonna have to call him Dale they'll. We all know they'll here's the he's was used to be the anti tramper, but now it's just the entire republic- and I guess for this next item I'm going to be talking about. you set the stage set the stage for us yet again

why don't you talk about the victims? There's nothing funny about this. There are victims, children talk about the victims, you monster ok, deal I will stipulate that in the following semi. A humorous presentation that there are: Realize real railroads, no joke. They should be subject of all of our empathy and we should not make light of everybody's bad situation they'll. Do you accept that stipulation nicer we'll have to hear what you say, but I will decide without said. The Bible administration is right.

The opening, what they call overflow facilities at the border, some overflow facilities, opened. What were they use these over? flow facilities, for you might put unaccompanied migrant children. You would apprehended in these overflow facilities. I've come on. In the comments people are calling them cages. They're not cage is cages is what the Trump Administration did off Lou cages. Nobody likes gives engages. They're, not cages, because cages give you airflow and visibility more view situation through the cage,

These are overflow facilities. That means less of a view but the same about a containment, I'm guessing now. I would like to think of the overflow facilities, including school, rules that were bilingual for educational and exercise facilities, as well as medical care, and I hope that my that is the case. he'll be lowered, cage like in people's minds. So stay. Mainstream media turn overflow facilities into wonderful, first class hotels for anybody who is fleeing a bad situation, but don't call them cages? No, no! No! No, they are not cages.

So I think all of you have been wondering what will happen when Biden gets the same problems, the trumpet. How is it going to respond to this? Given me different? Well, I'll, tell you what is not doing is immediately freeing children there not knowing free. So I'm waiting to see by now the sea. This news came out yesterday. How long does it take to travel speed of late for digital things, calculating calculating yes by today there will be a pictures of the overflow facilities. because it's big NEWS Reich, wouldn't you like to see a picture of the overflow facilities, checking checking no photographs of the overflow facilities? I wonder why that is. It seems there is a big news,

be a photograph. I'm pretty sure I've seen photographs, kids engages. Let's see the overflow facilities. If you will. Now. I would not be surprised if the overflow facilities are much more inviting situation than the cages, but these easily problem that the Bush administration is maybe not considered that it doesn't matter how many overflow facilities you build, if you make them kind and will say kind and useful and comfortable. Will you get more refugees. Or will you get fewer. because it seems to me that if you make it easier to emigrate and reduce friction that you get more often,

So should we now see the binding demonstration very quickly in the situation where they either have to release unaccompanied children, which is gonna, be a child trafficking, problem of immense proportions or what put them in temporary, holding facilities with chain link walls I don't see how binding is ever going to avoid just the same situation later than Trump was so criticized for how do you avoid it? I don't if he does, I'm going to give him credit. Yes, it's a year from now there are no kids being kept in inhumane cages, but rather than go

Phillies, and we can afford it and it doesn't cause a spike in immigration that becomes a new problem. I'm going to say: hey, that's pretty good job, pretty good job took care of the kids did not create a big problem for the country. That's a good! That's a good job!. Do you think you're gonna go their work in what world does removing friction not create? More of the thing in the world has never happened in the the historical record as ever happened. Then, if you make something easier to do that, people want that they will do more of it as it ever not happened. So we'll save by now has a genius plan or if it was all just stupid, the whole time.

But the that you can do, but you could do better for the kids, I daresay study I'll say that reason Trump lost the election. Is that these? deciding people the people who had decided a year ago we- are going to vote for the day they broke forth. And the reason according to one research study is that jobs. Handling of the corona virus was not good according to the public. Now, if that's true- and I think that's a pretty big, if that there- that the corona virus was the thing like that change, the election result but let us say is true: what what role would you assigned to the widespread news hoax? The term said drinking bleach was a good idea which didn't have

But it was widely reported. The trunk was a scientific idiot for suggesting drinking bleach, but it never happened. He was talking about light as a as a disinfectant, including inserting into the body which was a real thing that was being tested at the time if you didn't other so. and what about the way Hydroxyl clerk was treated when the president came out in favour of it There was no no sound, scientific proof that it worked there were lesser types of studies that did it again at work, but they were not the robust kind,

and I guess there were no robust studies that ever proved their work. As far as I know, by now we would now, and so what did the mainstream media do in treating trumps suggestion that he thought it will work? Well, I think that they were correct in saying that it has not been had not been proven in the right kind of test, so do the extent that there is a use being linked to up to this thick. I think they were on on point if he was saying, I think this will work and there were saying the sciences and quite their time has proven that the science is now quite there by now. You all right? So if you watch my predictions, Hydroxyl Chloroprene, I told you earlier on that each month there we go by without proving it works. really should lower your confidence that it will ever be proven and I kept lower

you're from maybe it's a fifty fifty or whatever I started with, but have been higher down to like thirty and then twenty today less than ten percent, I would say that it makes no difference, because we would know by now. But is that therefore a problem for the president and he's being anti scientific? That's the way the news spy But I would say that the president was making a risk management decision which, if it had been wrong. we would have learned about it a few months because nobody would be getting any good success with the drug. But probably wouldn't hurt anybody, yet the number of people who will be heard by that decision would be minimal or non.

and it would have been a good good thing to try. Given the number of non perfect studies that indicated it might work. So I think the present did a smart thing, but not executed quite the right way, cuz the way you talked about it was a little bit too. Domestic and by the way the media treated it was completely wrong. They treated it like it was a yes now and that the that the experts had said now and tromp was say yes and therefore he was wrong. Because that is exactly what was happening. It was more like we don't know if it works,

There is not really a downside. It's an emergency situation. Why not give it a try and then later find that doesn't work? If that's if this fact the outcome, but it was still a good try if, if we had done it and go on big with it and it didn't, work is still would have been the right decision. In Russia's, if you could look back at it from today's perspective, is still what about the right thing to try, even though it looks like at this point, it probably would not have work I feel as though the news has pulled off the perfect crime, which is they painted Trump as a massive incompetent protests and, by the way, my personal opinion, is it going to do a lot better on Colonel Vires again give you some examples that, but they do have the power to frame the trunk for something costume LEO.

According to this study, I don't know how reliable letters, but was voting important. It seems I voting didn't matter this time, because the media told you what to think on the only subject that apparently mattered to the election outcome. The media told you what to think and then people when voted based on that and it wasn't a good view Of what a vague, but it worked, so we do every day it's more like a propaganda accuracy or something. where our political system does not depend on voters, it depends on the manipulation of the voters, so that whoever does the best propaganda gets tat. The next president. So that's that's the system. We work in a propaganda accuracy word I just made up, I think, speaking of jobs,

performance, the FDA, as apparently recently said, that reconciling dropping the reporting requirement for home testing Apparently, if you had a home test, you were required to report it. If you had a positive result and of course that would be a problem because if you just testing home you're, probably not get a report so But now there are considering under Biden their considering dropping that requirement, which would allow for cheap home testing, which would allow for the end of the pandemic. How many times did you hear me say, during the Trump Administration, why the hell is the trouble administration, not dropping this requirement and making these rapid tests now. I don't know it's too early to say that the Bush administration will pull this off, but the fact that under by them the FDA, is now talking about getting rid of this requirement which may have killed hundreds of thousands of people,

just my opinion and the reason I say that is if we had rapid testing earlier. In other words, if the FDA and earlier drop that restriction, so we could have rapid ass? They now we might actually already begun with a pandemic, so whoever died between now and will see last summer, probably didn't need to because we did have the technology to stop the pandemic through Happen testing your home. Now, maybe Biden will make that possibility. And I'm going to say that if Trump didn't get it done and binding does and it makes a big difference, then I would say that the voters got it right and an tromp was not the right leader for the growth of virus. If this happens, my guess is that by you won't pull this off, but if he does, I'm gonna give him for granite, because I said from the star wars,

Jobs biggest mistake and I'm not gonna change that opinion. There's a new study claiming that Conservatives say that conservatives are being more, and on social media. That is a false accusation is false. It is not true that conservatives are more banned on social meet. Did you know? That is a study? I think it is funded by Craig new Mark of Craigslist and They found out there sure enough. Twitter is just following its own rules and that anybody who breaks the rules gets banned, but that doesn't have anything to do with being conservative were being not conservative has only to do with who broke rules so we're gonna, write everybody. I'm happy now.

Well, good I've, seen as fair to me right. Only only the people broke, the rules got kicked off of twitter, for example,. so no problem right, pretty happy. Ire. So one question to you: I ask, as a follow up talker Karlsson was numerous. Some I'm drafting off of Tucker's comments on this topic. So so you ve got this claim that conservatives were not in fact been targeted. So Why should you ask, is well follow up question like a little contact. Can you tell me how many conservatives were banned from the platform. and then how many non conservatives, because if people are being banned for behaviour, you'd probably expect that behaviour to be

at least partly spread, not either. We maybe perhaps not evenly by you, expect a good amount of left, leaning back along with a healthy dose of right, leaning, bands right. So in this study? Obviously it's gonna tell you how many people were banned, except that it doesn't. That the only number you would want to hear from a study of this nature is what just tell us, how many. at the same time, the same number on the left and the right? Because if It's true I'd say: ok, that's pretty good point at the same number on the left as a riot, doesn't look like a problem to me. What happens when you don't try to produce that number. It's a study about conservatives not being banned too much, and you don't include the number of them that have been banned. Little bit system.

That little business measures so that this is like the earth? The study that proves the opposite- the study, the the person who founded this Craig New Mark founder of Craigs List. I've met him a few times actually, and these are cool dude. I like it. I like Craig. He is very pro troops. He does. A lot of things were veterans and works mostly for charitable things. So It is getting a little push back for having funded the study, and I do think the study falls short, but I would say that Craig he himself is a solid citizens. Is a good guy

And here the issue, you should be happy that Craig Network exists he's a positive force, but here is a problem. Who had twitter August to decide when a rule has been violated would behave? Speed to say something against the Trans community. Yes, right. That's probably gets young tweaks, some kind of rule So if you're saying anything about people from their based on third, gender or sexuality, or any of that. That's probably a speech, probably a speech, and I would the people on the left and the right would equally be banned for that kind of speech. If somebody in the left said something bad about Trans people, I imagine they get banned, but probably don't

Because lovely people aren't gonna be saying that kind of stuff, but what about somebody on the left who paints old Trump supporters as white supremacist? What about them? about Maxine waters calling for harassing jump supporters. Now I don't think she tweeted that necessarily. But thank you think about that sort of thing. That isn't that a judgment call is a pure judgment goal to say that one of them is hate, but it's ok to call Trump supporters white supremacist. Why? Because it's true right that that would be the argument. well, it's not true that all trans people or whatever was claimed worded

We draw that all tromp supporters are way supremacist, so you can see that it's ridiculous to have a standard that is subjective. That's the most objective standards could possibly have, in my opinion, every reference to weigh supremacists when used in the general sense as against Republicans or conservatives if you're not talking about somebody who actually labels themselves. That way, if you talk about other people just because they share some kind of a genetic or political outlook,. That aid. I don't know what else would I hate me. What about all the tweets for the people saying we the list of all the people who are pro drop. I think Creating a list of people who are pro job is hate. That's how I see it so. Do I get to decide what is hate speech earlier doubt goes some group within

Rigorous and other social media, so is a ridiculous standard because it's just purely subjected. The media is saying that. the fires, abuse that we now know took place with the authority of age and the whole Russia collusion oaks, they're saying that, Well, apparently, nobody's gonna go to jail, for it looks like there was pretty bad, but that that stuff was not a coup, so the I shall collusion hoax, which was. our own intelligence agencies working against the elected president of the United States, not a coup. And we know this for a fact that these people were working against the elected president trying to remove them from office based on what they knew to be. Not true that actually happened

now we're not calling that a coup. Likewise, the military Lion bar or you could call it. Burma has taken control of the government, but the binding administration, not so sure. That's a coup military take over the Seville government now so sure, don't wanna go so far as called article, but the heck guy at his selfie army going into the capital totally a coup, because if you bring the Viking hat and sums up ties, that's how you conquer a major military power with a viking at selfies and I'm surprised you got yourself a coup. So that's what were actually being sold by the propagandist in charge of your life. Amazing. Here's a little study,

So this is was on Fox NEWS report that there is new analysis coming out of some non partisan group, allegedly from warden school, which The boy vitamins proposal for the stimulus package would stimulate in the short run, but in the long run because it without Dat They say that you'd reduce them. They paid by point three percent and twenty forty says on the sound credible to do you think that the warden school or people from it could actually calculate that by twenty forty, the effect of this specific stimulus, the debt, would have a point three percent impact in twenty forty.

No, it's not a thing. You care model that I'm not going to say you could model this. What I'm going to say when I've been saying forever that the climate change economic projections that go through two thousand and eighty or ridiculous, you can't bottle this stuff. This is completely resistant to any to protect it. Now. How issue look is something that is a analysis of something that can be analyzed. Basically, what could be analyzed, but it can't be predicted with any kind of confidence, the way they look at. This is not that this will happen

when you look at it used to simply understand that there is an interplay between the amount of debt we take on and the GDP. Now it's good to know that as good to know that too much debt should all things being equal issue cause a drag on your gdp. But what are you talking about point three percent Two thousand and forty: we don't have that kind of precision. There will be so many surprises between now and two thousand and forty that it is absurd to imagine that you can predict this this this little difference of the GDP, although three would be not such a small number. When you talk about GDP. Yeah, so well, I'm not going to tell you that the stimulus package is good or bad or what what amount is should be. It is ridiculous to imagine that you can predict with that kind of accuracy.

Here's my big question, or they would you like a conspiracy theory. I know you would I know you. Would I give you now my conspiracy theory I feel like I won't be, kicked off with social media if I although the conspiracy theory- because it is so what follows- should not be accepted as true. What follows is speculation, speculation alone, fun, speculation, but speculation loan, don't go all q and on me, ok goes like this. Why is China doing so well on the corona virus. Is it because they do more aggressive locked out it could be, could be? I don't believe it.

Does my I hate to call color common sense, because common sense is an illusion, but my judgment Based on what I'm watching is there. Our people in China and they had a pretty big infection that one point The people do move around. Then I do stand. Why they're not deeply of infected and I dont believe that they locked down quarantine aggressiveness is really what's going on there. Feels like something else is going on. Doesn't it feels like it now? You have to be careful that your feelings, don't actually tell you anything useful, It feels like there's something going on, but I dont know thither it.

there I was asking. What is it that China uses for their early symptoms near that the the people who have mild cases but might turn into worst cases, is or is there some way that they treat them differently?. Then the United States, and because I have lots of smart, well informed people following me on Twitter. They took all of about a minute Somebody to produce the official document that keeps getting up dated. as you are, China knows about it, the virus so far and what their protocols are for training it. so there you go right, there's enough Whole chinese document they update irregularly, there's a section there about what they used to treat. It said something about antivirals being used early, may a little bit more in China or something like that. So there you go we're good right, maybe here's, a little more antivirals.

but if that work and that made a big difference, is right there in the document. So wouldn't we also be using it and getting the same outcomes so it can be. That cannot be the answer they can't. The answer can be that the things are using for for early mild symptoms is so different than what we're doing that they're getting a whole different outcome. Like wildly different outcome, I think it's that But there was one sentence in there they caught my attention. It was a specific sentence in this China made document saying that Hydroxyl Chloric Queen, is not recommended, not recommended a direct sentence. Drugs, the clerk,

is not recommended with or without the threw myself, so they threw that into the sentence. So so that's pretty clear. If you you thinking thinking, theirself hey, I think China's secretly using Hydroxyl, the queen and not tell you buddy. Well, you don't have to worry about that now, because our official document says they recommend against it. So so that must be true that they don't use in China right. Do you believe that here's my conspiracy theory again, don't go all q on me and believe this, I'm just saying we live in a world in which he care rules, little things out there. You would like to rule out

You know what I would like to rule out. I would like to think I lived in a world where I could say now. China's gonna tell us the truth about this right. they're not gonna lie about the virus. That's not gonna happen except we don't live in the world. We actually live in a world in which the following conspiracy- theory, I'm gonna describe, could happen completely could happen. I don't have any evidence that has still not claiming it s a fact. but here's what it would look like suppose, you created a gain Sean virus enhancement now the words you Human beings in the laboratory hypothetically created a change in the existing virus to make it even more deadly. Now

we hear that such types of research is going on in labs, various places so we should not be surprised if it's happening so so step, Do you believe that gain of function research is being done in major labs? I feel like. I do believe that, even if we don't intend to use it, I would imagine therefore defensive reasons alone. We would be doing that research to find out what can and cannot be done, because if we find out there's nothing, you can do tat function to a virus. Well then, we feel safer. We don't need a defence against that, but if our own laboratories found out oh gee, this is going to be easy to do because we just did it. I mean we just did it so we'd have to worry about our enemies doing it, because we can do it so. the question of whether such research happens in laboratories, I would say: wouldn't you

judgment say yes like guaranteed. Yes,. You. Don't know how much of it you don't know where is happening but as gotta be happening somewhere right number If will say, some country came up with a virus that had a cheap solution, a drug that could be made, let's say easily in the country that made the virus gain, But could not be as easily available to their enemies me a good virus, wouldn't it. The ultimate virus is one where you have the antidote or something like it and your enemies do not. But suppose they could also give it suppose, your enemies had a way to get it. Not as easily as you, because you you make this in your own country, and maybe we don't make any of it in our country.

Well, we can still get it through less a third party countries that that have a little extra whenever so we can still goes on What would you do I'm not saying this is happening, but what Do if you're say this country, whoever pathetically may regain a function virus hypothetically, had a solution that you could make as much as you wanted in your own country of cheap therapeutic, let's say, but you weren't keep other countries. Let's say you arrivals from using it to the extent that they can't even get it. What would you do? Well if you had control over the major media in other countries, and you could insert things about what to believe and and do mine control of of your rival. While you would tell them that the drug, that's working, fine in your country is dangerous. That doesn't work at all.

could China really do that? I mean if they had a drug that that was working in China. Could they really convince western media? Then it doesn't exist and then his dangerous doesn't exist in terms of does really work, and that is dangerous. Would they have that kind of power to actually just brainwash the United States? Yes,. It's not even close call. Yes, yes, they other power. How do I know? Well, we have a little story today in the news: The woman I think to see CNN covered it. a woman who had been drawn into the cure non conspiracy. And what was it that programmed her to believe in Q after the elect?

This is someone who didn't even follow Q before the election, but got quickly brainwashed into believing it and now has on brainwashed herself realized. She was brainwashed. What was brainwashing, while, according to her story, it was, she must have click tonnes, something a cue content on Tiktok and then Tiktok, having seen her click on q content started feeding her more content. And she saw more abundantly clear, more energy consumed more than the algorithm federal Furthermore, the algorithm of Tik Tok. According to this person, who tells the first person story hypnotized her into believing in hue. Hypnotizer now you can say brainwashed or mine. Control is all the same thing, but Tiktok

is owned by chinese company. which is controlled by the government and so a chinese government app. According to this one, one anecdotal study, you have to be careful as one one example doesn't prove general statement, but I feel like the generality of this is pretty obvious. If you can programme one person just by the algorithm, feeding them more Q content and that with the Chinese, And then she takes what she learned on Tiktok and she takes it. Other social media looks for more accused of. Their algorithms probably do say feed feed the more stuff stuff, in this case american company case- probably not as part of some plot, but the algorithm just gives you more what you want.

so guessed the following scenario. I have no reason to believe it happened, and you should so don't believe that what I say access some kind of her. Arafat. I'm just saying we live in a world where the following thing could have happened easily China could have created a gain, a function virus they couldn't have found a cheap available therapeutic. Let's say Hydroxyl Chloroprene, just as an example announcing that it works. The evidence is against actually. but suppose they had that supports their country at a nod pointed monopoly, but they could make as much as they wanted for themselves. They can restrictive from other people and could they then also control the media to tell you that the secret of drug use doesn't work.

They could do that easily. Every part of this is actually completely doable as far as I can tell now. Does that mean that they did that as part of intentional plot to release a virus and get this outcome, I would say, probably not hate, probably not. I don't see China being done enough to intentionally release of To try and get some long term GEO political Games far more likely there researching and may be seeing what the current code that do, and it just got out once I got out, then they would scrambled to figure out what to do about it and which might include the conspiracy theory that I explained but again there's no evidence of that.

Oh evidence whatsoever, but if you heard what actual chinese doctors prescribe do you know I mean we have this document put out by the government, the says what chinese doctors are supposed to do, but do you think chinese doctors are doing that the living that's how their absolute I dont know that we have any visibility about what chinese doctors are actually prescribing doing about. Not so again, I don't make the claim that live. Press was intentionally engineered or that it was intensely released or that Hydroxyl clerk and works. The evidence suggests it does not,

I'm just saying we live in a world where all that could have happened easily. Amazing isn't all of that could have happened easily and maybe a did. I just don't have any proof of it all right. See what else we got here. Don't. I like it. I see, then, with the opinion people that they refer to quote trumps assault on democracy. That has such an opinion leeway to describe the current events as an assault on democracy, Amazing there's a capital writer. Let's call it a writer and not a coup. Platter. A woman who is in the capital, apparently during those during the attack on the capital

and ass she asked to to get her vacation in Mexico approved by the court, and the court said yes, so she gets to go to vacation Mexico, presumably to come back for a court case now she was only charged with a misdemeanor. Do you think is reasonable. Somebody charged with a misdemeanor would be allowed to take a vacation that they planned and maybe even put some money toward. I think it's completely reasonable. It's a misdemeanor! You should get to leave the country. For a misdemeanor I'll think so, but added these social media treat it. Why privilege white privilege? The idea here is that she she gets a special treatment for why I don't think that's. What's going on, I like to think that live in the country where a black person-

We had a misdemeanor charge and nothing else. Just one misdemeanor charge could go on vacation. I would hope we live in a country where that can happen. I think it would, but if people are concerned about that is worth calling you now keep an eye on. It must keep an eye on that as well liked to say it's like will circle back we're. The only thing is good. Is all circle back on matters. Let's keep. It It means absolutely nothing to talk about: a space were coming: China, Russia and the Eu S fighting, for

control of space resources, especially mining in Space- and let me tell you if you don't think this is the biggest problem in the world. You don't understand anything. The biggest risk to the world is space because whoever controls space controls the future there's no way around that. and if we are not putting everything we can into space were not really play again. Very welcome. Whoever owns space world, it's going away. Have you seen any you Joe Biden executive orders as complaining? there we don't see what is executive orders. Are we just hear these got tons of executive orders, so she had ended, actually have some good reporting. On those credit to see an end, there was just a little

those hard to find, but it was the list of his executive orders and you should read them. You should read his executive order because the first thing you learn is that a lot of we're just don't bullshit. A lot of more. We will form a committee to make recommendations on the following topic, which is sort of like nothing. Did you really need an executive order to form a committee to give you some recommendation I don't know, maybe that's the way you do it, but I wouldn't be worried about the and he's not turning into a dictator by forming a committee to make a recommendation on the topic. So a whole bunch of them fall into that category of their not really anything. It's the stuff. You do if you're a big company- and you know, there's something you're supposed to address, but you don't want to do anything about it. You just former exploration committee, so that you can say our spring. I gotta committee everything.

But you're not planning to actually do anything so a lot of the executive orders or budget, nothing and others, some of them that look like something, but might be nothing. For example, one of the buy them executive orders halts construction of the border wall. by terminating the national emergency declaration, used to fund it. Now, if you read that without any context, you'd say I'll. Tromp was building a border wall by then just stopped. It. But weren't we told entire time the trump was building his wall? There, really he wasn't, building much extra wall and all the while he was doing was repairing or upgrade. Wall word already existed and even Democrats would agree. I should be there there's some places where you just need a wall, and

If all they did was stop funding the upgrade of existing walls, could it be said that they terminated the wall? There wasn't me So some you really have to sort of get under the hood a little bit to find out that nothing is happening, because I dont believe that in the long run that the binding administration will halt fixing existing walls cuz? That was the thing that you've been Democrat, said yeah. Well, you have to fix any of the bad walls. You'd, like good walls. In the few places you want to walk. So I feel as if that's like a big fail and that its true that maybe you won't build new all, but I'll tell you repair the omens. Why? Wouldn't you will say? I can be,

Then there is also the thing about trumpeters reversing the Trump administrations restrictions on: U S: entry for passport holders, key phrase there for a passport holders from seven muslim majority countries. Now, Let us put some contacts on that, doesn't sound as if the Trump Administration was restricting, who could come in from these seven muslim majority countries and thereby didn't just route change. Is that what you think, when you read that cause, I don't think everything changed, because by inserting Passport holders enter the executive order. Do you end up with exactly what the Trump Administration was doing, because the Chop administration said the problem with these certain countries this, if they didn't, have proper documentation

You didn't actually know who you are leaving in, but if there's somebody in one of those countries who, as a proper passport. Wouldn't we let the man under normal situation is that much of a difference because remember a number of years have gone by by now. Only that by now there are no actual we're well vetted passport holders. because I think that all that happened was some of those countries got their act together, a little bit better in terms of paperwork. So that's all. We required that the only thing the trumpet frustration S. War was d, have good paperwork to prove who you are by the administration- is just saying: ok, we're going first everything You also have to have good paperwork. How different is it I mean it might be

in the sense that the trumpet menstruation presumably might not have allowed even those people within the Muslim Majority countries command. But say I'd say it's not much of a change will probably won't notice a difference. To bind is extending the moratorium, national moratorium on new visions and foreclosures. I think Trump might have done that right. I think Trump might have done. The same thing extend the moratorium on new visions and foreclosures. We owe it deserves. Scary, that's not so much directs the attorney general, not not to renew fellow Contracts with private prisons, heard about that one. So by

Yo says that we're not going to renew federal contracts with private prisons that, on the surface, without knowing the details sounds like that might be a good idea, because I think private prisons, maybe not the rights set of incentives because they want more prisoners. Fewer cuz they're a businessman, so I don't know is that a good idea or bad idea. I could easily imagine Trump doing the same thing. I don't know the details, so I don't know if it's a good thing. The bodily executive order charges the director of the Office of Science and technology policy with making sure that the other scientific integrity across a federal agencies. in other words the we already have an office of science and technology, so sorry exists and there are given the given the

Objective of making sure the rest of the government is is compatible with scientific scientific thinking. Is that a bad thing? It is anybody concerned that the government is going to make sure that all of its departments or Annabelle with science. Other seems pretty safe seems pretty safety Of course, you're gonna get a green Neil Green New deal and that so in others there some subjectivity about what it is. That science agrees with this point, but is not the biggest problem in the world. So here's my takeovers. If you're worried about all these executive orders from Biden there's a real. You're not seeing much reporting about it is that most of them are sort of empty.

Nor do we- have that much in fact or or Trump would have done it or you're, just studying something that might be I want to talk about our landlords. Gonna get bail, they'll overrule. I don't know about that, because I have the same question: if you let people will not be affected and skipper and what happens the landlords, the landlords just eat it, what if they have mortgages and they can pay the mortgage? Does the bank then the aid it because, as probably where things need to go, I would say that the place the place we should cause the most

Ian would be at the banks so long as they don't go out of business. You have to back stop them, so they don't go out a business, but I don't think you want to push the pain onto the renter. I don't think you want to push it out to the the building owner unless they don't have a mortgage, so maybe the banks of the place, the push, the pain name, three victimless crimes. People are in prison for someone else I dont know why. Why would I do that you'll, never test your way out of covered with three hundred sixty million people? Yes, you could and here's how, if you do regular testing, you cannot because it's too slow the whole point with rapid testing. Even if it's a little bit less accurate. Is it if everybody can test themselves. Every morning you

On top of it really quickly, you get on top of it really quickly, because what you do is you it catch Lee you catch. The people who are the super spread is much faster, If you got a super spreader on day, one as opposed to day, seven is the difference between a pandemic and probable. It's a big difference, so yeah rapid testing, if, if you did enough of it, could actually probably shorten the pit By fifty percent, everything comment on the hotel take overs in Washington, so there's some stories about homer. people taking over some hotels in Washington or trying to, I don't think they succeeded. But I feel as if that story is a local story, and I don't see that as being some kind of trend this going to spread said it probably has a lot to do with the fact that hotels are empty at the moment, because

On virus, oh by the way, many of you know that I went on my delayed honeymoon two French, amnesia and Bora. Just as we got back, I think it was yesterday. They closed french Polynesia to travel. We thought we were beating the system by getting this. Does one trip to the one place that was going to allow us to travel there, but that just shut down, so I don't see how the travel industry is going to survive. see anyway. I think what will happen with restaurants and the travel industry does that the current owners might have to go bankrupt.

Baby sell their asses off for nothing to somebody who does not yet have any debt, and then somebody who has no debt might have a chance of reviving these businesses because they basically get a cheap business and when grown virus get solved. If it does not have a good business, they got it for cheap. So that's one way that these businesses could be revived, but the people on them at the moment. I just don't know how they're going to pay their debts and also keep owning the businesses. I dont know how to do that. You are right. That is all I want safer today, I hope that the news gets more interesting because it's hard to look at the news without without the Trump effect everyday opening, like good reason, good news here today, but even the things that I can find to talk about

they only makes sense by still comparing them to what tromp would have done or did do He is just the universal reference. Now you can and can't get away from it all right, hotels, turn over a lot: yeah hotels or change management or change ownership. A lot that's true! Yeah Andino has his new book out which, by the way, you should buy.

Because the people who tried to ban it cannot win so you see something, that's gonna be banned, just go and buy a copy. If you can afford it, that's what I'm gonna do so body only knows book without knowing anything about it, just because Eastern they're trying to council- and I would hope you did the same or does I got for now, and I will talk to you later- you tubers do not buy cp services. I'm addictive, I hope so. Would there be great, be cheaper than drugs as if now talk to Morrow.