But that don't don't put hey, hey everybody, a jack, Boadicea, Kwannon Clarion, it's incredible day, one of the best really and today on coffee was Scott Evans work in good time. Even if you listening to this one point five times speed. Well, you just gotta get good is a little bit.

That way want you, but you're gonna get that an replay, I'm afraid. I can't talk that fast in real time, but before we begin what would make this extra special? I think you know it's a simultaneous up and all you need is governed Mugger glass. A dagger tells us that the canteen jirga last a vessel of every kind like this is wrong. I can't reach my coffee cup does might much before long enough. This is a problem. How are you going to have to come with me? Youtube stay where you are periscope come with me with we. Ah ha ha ha yeah arrogant,

As the goods to join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dope Amelia the day, the thing that makes everything better skull, the simultaneous at an app is now go up. My cut back after fixes alone. Will we go better. Let's talk about all the things for us all, happy Valentine's day, villains Valentine's day, my dentures working, I dont have dangers. Just kidding have evolved. I like it. I say that word Valentine's day, happy Valentine's day, special shared out my incredible wife, Christine.

Happy well known, say to you. If you watching hope, you're up early, so you can see the? U S is reporting the lowest number of weekly covert cases since October. Is the vaccine working, maybe because I would think we would have the highest infections now right right in the middle of February, wouldn't February, be one of your bad you're bad virus months on automatically? Well, let's, let's keep that no one, So what's the dews? You don't you be hearing about this allegation that the cuban virus from virus came from a lab in war? We we do not approve of that. That is now

but where things you heard about is whether or not the so called and gave a function could could be detected. In other words, if somebody had to try to take a regular natural viruses- and if someone- let's say a major military power with a biological lab, if they try to weapon eyes that by tweaking here to make an extra deadly your devils, some special gave a function to make him. of a weapon. Would we be able to spot that by looking at the virus? In other words, could you look at the virus and say well look there's a little man, made thing on their that virus and when this first, when the pandemic first came out in people, experts say

on television. The expert said now: you know we looked at it and you could tell me you could tell if it were modify them. It's just a regular virus, blah blah blah, to which I said to myself. Can you can't you tell because they seem to be that there will be at least two ways they you could modify. Virus. Mrs, without knowing anything right, my complete zero knowledge of science is gonna, be fully applied here. One It seems to me would be directly you can literally directly somehow atta at a thing or so tractor thing from a virus. Can we do that is through some lab? Can address, attract something from a virus that even the thing I don't know. If you could, I suppose, if that exist?

maybe you could detect it. You'd say that care, but naturally I must have been some human do that. But the second way, though you can create gain or function, somebody says crisper again So you can change the dna in a virus. Is a dna Irene water viruses leaving the lie right, viruses technically not alive. So I don't know exactly what kind of stuff is inside a virus were well beyond my scientific knowledge. Somebody says genes I don't know if that's right either, so let us not try to guess the science will just I'm going to make my major point, which is there must be at least two ways you can modify them. One would be directly if we can do that, but the other way would be to just read it. Naturally, how can you

breathe a virus while apparently the way you do it is. You put one animal and where the virus. what say, penguin pen goal, under whatever those things up. You put it somewhere, where I can in fact another animal Say a different kind of mammal or bird or a big. Maybe the pig infection another animal. So I need a fact check on this, but my understanding is that if you create these artificial infections scenarios where the virus will jump from this is the key one species to another that, during the jump from

This is the virus changes. Some of those changes will be nothing. Some will make it less deadly. Some might make it more deadly, so you could experiment just by reinventing different types of animals until you ended up with a virus that some extra good stuff just by accident,. you wanted and that would be again a function now. Let me ask you this: if scientists looked at a virus, they had gone through hypothetically the transition from multiple species. To give it a go. Function. Could you identify that? I mean really.

Do we have any science they could identify that a human put these animals together, as opposed to there, was something in the wild and which they just got infected thing. So suddenly so probabilistic probable- logistically maybe maybe, but I don't think you can be sure, right so just put that out there and by the way, the first person I asked this question too privately, just without something I didn't do on Twitter didn't do publicly, but just privately I asked the smartest person I knew in this kind of area. Could you put a gate a function on their that nobody can detect? One of the smartest people say he obviously a good

Of course you could not or of the ride, but I'll tell you the smartest people I know say. Obviously you could do that. So maybe maybe that. The daily mail is reporting today I just had to keep reading and re reading to see. If I did I think I was really ring it tell me. You ve heard this As other daily railways reporting this like it's just the fact is this: in fact, here's what their report the Pentagon admits admits being the key word here. Pentagon admits that it has been testing wreckage from UFO crashes, including possible quote.

memory level that experts claim may have been recovered during the nineteen. Forty seven russian Roswell crash. What the reporting this like, it's a fact, no they're, not quite the same an alien spaceship piece about play say on that. but they are saying we found some metal, the doesn't appear to come from the human beings and their colleagues with the reporting it like. It's a fact solutions. Yes, it's called knit now now this story real right. So when they say you are foes, they just be unidentified, so it could have been unified, let's say russian technology that we don't recognize. So it's just unidentified, they don't say is from outer space,

but they do kind. You say it's in battle. We don't make here on earth and it wasn't. Someone came off an asteroid. It was something there somebody made and it doesn't look like it came from earth. What do you think What do you think about the story? I am going to go bullshit on this story. I do not believe that there are the third life on other plants because I think we're simulation and it was just never built out because we didn't need it. So there's just no reason for life to be another plants because we're simulation if we can't get to those other planets easily Oh, I just didn't need, but I think there so I dont believe it. But it's a funny story. It's a funny story, and so therefore I like this one,

So here is my. Take the illegitimate press that we have in this country. Using a lot of the entire jumpers use a phrase called the big lie, so the using this this label, the big lie to talk about trumps, claim that the election. had been fraudulent. Now you may be a familiar that the phrase big lie comes from nazi propaganda and the idea is that the Nazis said, if you tell us small why such as somebody used also loafer breeders,

people are incline view, maybe believe it, maybe not, but if you tell a lie that so big, if it's big it off people believe it because they will say to themselves, while nobody could tell tell a lie that big like if you were to Morrow, that an actual alien spaceship landed in the middle of the capital and all of the news reported. It was true that so big there's, probably Right here your brain just says that can't be not true. How could that be? Not true, everybody is reporting. It could not be true. So, as the lie is big enough, it makes it look more credible,

and that is literally a nazi propaganda track. That's where we get the phrase the big lie. Now, when you press of the United States refers to Trump and by by extension, his followers as spreading the quote: big lie: what is doing to public discourse? Well, number one. It can slates trumps supporters by association with drop in and many of them agreed with him on this. in Equate Sumter Nazis, that's what it does that the reason they choose, that is to equate Trump and his followers would Nazis far you when you say that to any press person who uses the phrase the big lie and tries to paid

Tromp supporters as Nazis, just than this clever little away his racist, its racist. I regard that likely inward, but used against me to me that is as offensive. That's as sensitive as the unworthy is to anybody else now. Can I compare offensive. This now amused subjective, But it's a ten year, I would say that if you said to the black American, how bad is the use of the word? If it's you, if you're, not black, when you see how bad is that, I think they say. That's a ten tat. I would agree. That's a teller them my personal opinion. You can't get any worse than using the inward. If you're, not black,.

likewise? This is a ten fuck him tat when you using literally nazi imagery, to paint your enemies just because they were sure that the election had transparency, that's fucking racism, that's a ten, a fucking ten, and if you, if you use it, as I just read in Washington, post somebody using that that phrase you're a fucking, racist Europe, Fuckin racist live with it, you fuckin racist. Now you might be away person being racist against other white people, but still say fuck that you're a fuckin racist.

and I believe that my anger about that phrase is going to keep increasing until people understand. This is unacceptable behaviour. Now there is a second problem with using this big lie. Do you know what it is from a persuasion, propaganda perspective? Anybody anybody tell me what is the propaganda brainwashing quality of using the phrase? The big lie in the common, you're going to have it at the moment is making you think, pass the sale when they say it's the big lie they they try to make. You uncritically accept that it's a lie. We haven't determined that it has not been determined that it's a lie. It is simply something that the people who don't believe it

is probably not true. It's not. The big fucking lie is the big fucking. Probably not true, according to you, that's what it is probably not true. According to you, if you're people using the big libraries. It's not a lie that when the indicate that we now it's not true, we we know it has been proven that there is any widespread fraud in a court of law. That's what we know We don't know it's a big fuckin lie and when you tell us is a big fucking lie. That's a big fuckin lie. That's the big lie now. Remember I keep telling you I hate it. I hate it when took her curls and keeps being right about this. He just keeps being right that, whatever their doing whatever

they're doing themselves, will accuse you of. I swear I don't want that to be true, because I just dont know why it's true figure out why? Why is this key being true, but this is exactly what they're doing with his big lighting. The big lie is to make it look like the thing they're doing there doing, which is lying about the credibility of the election we don't know it was honest. We don't know that it wasn't an honest. We simply don't fuckin now and nobody's fixing it. Nobody's fucking fixing it There's no effort by anybody that I'm whereof subject manners to fix the fucking system, because it's gonna be.

Just as non transparent next time. So here again, the illegitimate press is using is accusing the right of their own crime. the big lie. Somebody asked me if this way, the big lie is so good persuasively that maybe you came from Chill Dini your Robert shielding. If you know my history, I've talked about him is, Possibly being or probably being a an adviser to the Clinton campaign, there's no indication that he was involved with Biden campaign. I dont know one way or the other, but somebody asked me: do you think he was behind this phrase? The big lie

I'll give you just an opinion now and here's why I don't think he was behind the big lie, because it's a racist, fucking brainwashing, piece of shit thing to do, and I have no reason to believe the rubber Chiel Guinea is a fucking piece of shit. No indication of that, in fact, I believe he is actually taught courses ethnically using persuasion. He would be exactly the opposite of somebody who would give you advice. prepare people to flock and nazis. He didn't do that now. I suppose savings possible right. I could be wrong, I'm only just speculating. But it's got a fucking crazy to imagine that a normal person would do this. This is What normal people, who are a good people, do as far as I know, Chill Didi is a normal good person. This is fucking, evil,

I know that I have no reason to their use walking evil. I think she just likes Democrats bore the Republicans find right, problem with that. I different topic: Jonathan, eight, each identity. If I'm height light, he did have you pronounces lasting, a well known author. He up trees around a study, the says the kids, who get help from adults to solve a puzzle become helpless. The next puzzle And you can see the real time it happens instantly. So if you If you have a puzzle and kids are trying to solve it, you have half of the kids. Just work is long again, without any help. and then another half you have apparent Japan's all years and years, a solution and solvent for

Then you wait a little bit. You give those same two groups of people, a new challenge, a new puzzle the ones who had no help charge rice, do the same thing. They did on the first. What their trials are as they can to solve it and sixty eight, to some extent The ones who got help can solve the second one because they can try our they ve been ruined, actually broken by get by too much help. Now. I have often said this about my own parenting experience. My parents were maybe typical of the time, I'm not sure, Our family hands off, I would say of my siblings, are watching with, but would look for a second opinion in this. My

My belief or memory or of my childhood is that we had almost unprecedented ability to make our own decisions about stuff and manage our own day I dont believe what most of us can compare this to twenty twenty one. If you have kids in school right now, just just hear this story and just try to imagine this today. My parents didn't really shown interest in, score at all. Now they told me they expected me. They get AIDS and the expected Billy go to college and it was just an expectation which they drilled my mother, especially drilled into us from birth, you're going to college you're, getting

Is but how I did that was entirely up to me. Not once did my mother or father offered help on my homework, I don't remember even asking and seeing in the common saviours in so when I graduated college just trying to imagine this experience in twenty two, so I graduated college with little bit of money. I got from graduation and so my saved up about two thousand dollars. I guess and savings from mowing lawns, plus the graduation gifts, and I took two suitcases and the one suit I owned got from seers about his soup from seers war. My suit on an airplane took my two pieces luggage and moved to California and with no plan.

Figured it out. That's it. I actually flew across the country to spend the rest of my life without a player. The plan was the sleep on my brother's couch and look for a job. If you can call that uclaf. Second part of the plan was to find leave the first job I can get at the best company in the field that I wanted, which was finance. I was economics major, So I took a job as a bank teller for the fast moving technologically superior accompany called Crocker. Back later there were bought by Togo, so I took the worst job I could at the best company I signed up for every training course they can ice later in later years, I got my mba at night

I basically built a talent stack. They gave me a lot of options. Got me all the way here now I had zero help from my parents on the details. I had a hundred percent help from my parents. The miss The mission was always the same. You gonna do all in school, you're gonna go to college you're gonna be wretch, now have to ask my siblings if they were also told there we're gonna be rich, but my parents told me that and sure enough I an expectation I had all

sport I needed the didn't need any more than one or more, and I'm pretty sure that the fact that I had to figure out so much on my own is like a superpower. I don't I don't I'd, never encountered situation where I dont know what to do. I mean that's. That's an exaggeration, ensure I do, but I go through my life thinking. I can conquer just about anything because s my experience, nobody jumped into save me so either failed. I either safer swam and so forum swelling. So I believe we may be destroying entire generation by being awful. We might be destroying them by being helpful and scary. This governor Cuomo story and the nursing homes DES is just getting worse. Oh, my

you know, I can tell you that as a. as a standard of behavior, I didn't want to be the one who was tough on any of our leaders. Yes, they got anything wrong during the corona. And I didn't applying to Cuomo trying to be consistent and say: yes, it's true the very bad things happened. I feel like. We would need to know the details of exactly what caused him to sign off on the decision to send nine thousand infected people back into the workplace. They could be sent. I feel as if that seems to me that I saw him saying in an interview that use following federal guidelines at the time can suddenly confirm it. Is that is his actual explanation,

that they were the federal guidelines and he just follow them. Concerns can be a fact check on that away. The news I follow tends to consistently leave out whatever it is that Cuomo Cuomo says as his response to while these people died and looking at the commons yes and say yes now, if you watch Fox news, they'll just never mentioned that there. never mention that accorded Cuomo, and I'm not saying is true. I'm just saying, according to Cuomo the as a pretty good explanation on paper, Whether you like it or not, but on paper, that's a pretty good export there's somebody says he had asked will shape the other Javert Centre. That's true, but I put myself in this situation. I asked This would you have sent infected people too.

Those assets, if you thought you didn't need to use them and you might be able to close them down and save a ton of money later now might be the federal government money, but still who wants to waste a bunch of money. So I put myself in this situation and I tell you this- I am not positive. I would have acted differently than Cuomo in that situation. Are you be honest? Are you positive that, if you Roma situation. You would have acted differently, I'm not I'm not possible that, which is why Europe and soft on this topic, because if you probably know situation and somebody in making a decision a minute because it's the pandemic plus, You stole the governor right. I've got a whole pandemic on top of my job, which is a full time, job million decision? Somebody comes and says: what do we do with the seniors.

RO guideline says: send them back to the nursing home just make sure the third separated or whatever so you you're making a million decisions. The federal government tells you what to do in this exact such and you know that they ve looked into it. You're not supposed to be the expert you're, not the cdc, So the federal government says and back a million decisions, you go yeah sent back and then you go out here. Other million decisions- if you can tell me that you say you would not have done the same thing- power did not often describing a crackling right. Some signal push back. I might not be describing the situation correctly. my point is: if you weren't there, if you weren't there, I don't think you know what exactly happened and that's that's. Why I'm still

a little butter reservation on a complete blame of Cuomo for a bad decision that killed thousands people who did need to die, but the story got way worse way. Worse, I reached the limit of where I can give somebody the benefit of the doubt. As seen in the comments. Apparently, his staff

must have known about it, lied to cover up the number of deaths and they lied, because it would look bad if they said the real number, and they have admitted that. That's that's now, in fact that they lied about the number, because I didn't want to look so bad, that's grounds for removal from office. There is nothing I can say to soften that right I mean I've been pretty prairie generous, wouldn't you say I'm trying to apply the same standards that apply to Trump and any other leader trying to apply same standards, Cuomo Tryin, to be fair.

But when I heard that they lied about the number of deaths and it looks reliably like that's true, he always have to be careful were still the fog or so new story might not be true, but looks true, that's unforgivable! That's a crime! Isn't it I mean, I think it's great, that's unforgivable. So if it turns out that the facts are correct, I don't think Cuomo can remain in office. I just don't see uninstall. might remain offers banality. Other make sense for the public are yours innovation, which I make a lot and every time I do it, there's a new evidence to support it, and it goes like this Democrats to think in terms of goals. A goal, for example, would be. Everybody is out of poverty,

we got right now, let's go get everybody on poverty, another goal be something for the environment and climate change, etc. So the Democrats are good and goals. In fact, I like, like all other goals, preserve their social good cancer goals. Everybody treated nice every. He's got equal equal opportunities, those good goals, very good goals. Republicans have a slightly different take on things, and this is just an observation- doesn't mean everyone right, sort of a general observation and Republicans tend to be systems. Granted. That is to say, we don't know what the final outcome will be and we don't know how long it will get would take to get there.

we don't even know if we can get their we'd like a world where there is nobody in poverty, but we can't make that a goal, but we can make a system that does the best job of getting us there and if you design your sick, right. Let's say year your capitalism systems and you're here democratic systems, your government systems, your legal system. If you get all those systems working right, then the goals take care of themselves as much as can be right. You maybe can't get to the ultimate and point, but it's the best thing to do now. Look at Miss Mc Candles statement. Many of you saw in which he talked about the impeachment outcome in which the president was acquitted, misbegotten voted to acquit. The reason was system.

Mcconnell said, I dont think that the Senate has jurisdiction over someone who is not in politics anymore. Now the Democrats would say, wait a minute. We ve got the this precedent. We ve got this legal precedent. We ve got this history, where we ve got this case, where you really can do that. But here's the thing suppose you really could That lets say the Democrats were right, let's say the laws on their side. Let's say they could impeach somebody use out of office should they- there is that a system that you would want going forward. Do you want that to be your system that that applies forever.

I very much agree with Mitch Mcconnell now he may have been inconsistent with case law, but he is not inconsistent with what makes a good system and a good system is why the fuck does the Senate have any control over a private citizen after the random was obviously in the sense of making laws this new job, but in terms of engagement, what the fuck do you have to do that I dont care with the case law is doesn't matter with the case law is its obvious. That's a bad system to punish something somebody after their out of office. Now, as Mcconnell says, another say we do have a legal system if Trump did something that the legal system needs to deal with. There's no restriction on that right, but Midge go. I completely back his decision exam.

By the way that I like. I liked the entire thing you did now. He was very hard on tromp for its responsibility for the capital attack. Do do you feel the same as Mcconnell does about the capital attack you ve do feel like. Always maybe a little too hard on the president, I dont care care at all cures. Why we have this dumb fuck system, where the victims the crime. In this case the politicians were actually at the capital. There are the victims of the crime they're, the ones will PTSD they're the ones who are being hunted they're, the ones were afraid for their lives. Mcconnell is a fucking victim of the crime, He was on the jury. To judge what kind of a fucking system puts the ports.

Victim or the victim's family on the fucking jury. what kind of a system is that, if you put the victim on the fucking jury, don't expect them to say nice things about the perpetrator of the crime which Mcconnell should have gone, Where should I that word? It seems entirely appropriate to me that the victim of the crew- is a little bit pissed off put yourself in Mitchell, colonels place, you are in the capital and you don't think here, president did enough to save your fuckin life. I probably would have voted to impeach. Just leave anger if I had been in the Senate.

And I were even just my colleagues- had been in the capital building and I didn't think the president do enough to stop it. I would even care what the charges, I wouldn't even care what the impeachment articles were. I they have a care about any of it. I would fuckin vote to impeach that guy. If I were the victim now, I'm not a victim, so I get here. I get the the advantage of you'd be ours. The system of world back so I've got a little bit more objectively, but

In my opinion, anybody was in the building TED crews. Anybody else could have voted to impeach. I would have done it just as a victim. The forget my forget my responsibility to the public. I wouldn't even I wouldn't care, so maybe you shouldn't make me a centre because I would have ignored the law. I would have ignored the facts, except the one fact that I didn't think the president enough to save my fuckin life. I care about that and I wouldn't. you're about one fucking thing else, so I backed Mitchell couples. Take this one hundred percent, and I actually respect him for using a technical argument that I agree with that. The centre should not have jurisdiction, even though, maybe technically they do.

so a standing ovation form which Mcconnell for the way he handle this as effective as a victim right, if necessary, putting victims on the jury. This is what you gotta get so good for him. So I think that going forward Go to always say that tromp was acquitted of two impeachment and therefore was was essentially not.

Now I know that impeachment is sort of like just to sustain the supposed to be on. The record has not exactly like indicting somebody, but you know in the criminal system, if you indicted somebody from crime and then they go to church, they go to trial and the jury finds them not guilty. What do we say that person do we say? Well, there was an undated person. Now we don't talk of it that way, because that wouldn't be fair. We talk about it, as I suppose, Then found not guilty, that's how we talk about, but if you get impeached, which is a little bit like indictment and then you get acquainted, we still say you were impeached that affair. Trust me if the impeachment doesn't go all the way to the point of impeachment. The point is removal from office.

If it doesn't go there point, can you say impeachment succeeded, I would say it's too failed. Impeachment. There, you can say they were impeachment, but they were failed and patients. It was to attempts to impeach him, though fail, and then people can say, but there wasn't appeasement and then you can say yes to totally was there was a failed impeachment? There was an unsuccessful one and then they'll say now. It was successful because the impeachment part is separate from the trial part to which you say. What's the point of the first part, what's that what's the purpose of the first born without the second park

You even do it, because it's just a sensor censure if it doesn't go to remove from all of us. It's just a censure is not really an abatement so just to be annoying to Democrats, because I know the hate it, I'm going to say that there were two appeal impeachment attempts, but neither of them succeeded. Trump wins the double had her. I saw tweet from dont. You knew this morning talking about what a bad we Democrats have had. Everything from the impeachment results to the self emulation of the Lincoln Project to Governor Quabos problems of a really bad wake, and that's not even county whereby than this done. We're not done so. Here's the weirdest dumbson

somebody named T J, Doc low spell just like a dark and then with a low in the end. So are you he was the binding. The oppressed secretary, and I guess politico was balloon article about him and now somebody was gonna do article about him, a relationship here with some other reporter axioms was gonna. Do article about duck lose alleged relationship with a reporter for political now? Is that a fair story? Yes, it is fair to report.

That is, somebody is in a romantic situation. If one is a reporter and one works for the press corps, that's where one worse than the White House Prescott or not. The White House Communications Group, so is perfectly fair that they were going to do the story now what's imported isn T J deathblow threaten the rapporteur when he found out she was going to the story, and the threat was that he would destroy her and he was for first they're gonna, give him a week off without barriers, something, but then he quit, which means basically got fired. so, I'm gonna throw you a can, throw your curve here and I'm going to defend t J d glue. But you didn't see that gun.

Here's my defence, the phrase I'm going to destroy. You is number one typical political speech. It's not typical, where you work, but is typical political speech that threat, most carbon threatening, but these are used and it's better use. The second part totally justified and legal and justified, just as reporter doing a story about this, which would end up ruining this guy's, Greer, etc. Totally justified. The reporter is completely within their rights to do the story and its, gentlemen, starting completely within their rights to to do the story, but Doc low is completely within his rights to destroy your life. I mean

career when he says I'll destroy you that should be interpreted as career wise. It should not be interpreted the dumb way, which is some kind of violence, or anything like that. I feel like that's, fair and YO seems worse because ones, mail in one's females, takes on that extra dimension, but telling people that you'll destroy them? If he is they destroy you if it's all legal area, he's acting legally. I don't know- I don't know I feel like this is kind of normal behaviour, because story. So Biden had to deal with it. You probably did the right thing.

but I'm not sure this was so bad. I'm looking at your comments simply says: I'm ok with this, so you can defend that, but it was Jos promised do not tolerate bad behaviour. Joe kept his promise Joe kept his problems because he's gonna, I'm gonna, give you pass on that now. Look like who's gonna get a week, are pursuers and push back from the public. Probably that's one by got involved. My guess is abiding really wasn't involved in a lower level decision like that, but I think you are said when somebody said aid by New said: you'd get rid of people acted this way. I think he kept his promise and guerrilla here now is reported. They re he resigned, but I imagine is the same thing So you know I have to agree with me on that, but that's my take.

Biden study in talking about the impeachment Biden said, though you denounced violence and extremism and said Americans overdue. You defend the truth and to feed the lives this is the man who ran and bases campaign on the fine people hoax, which was debunked in front of the entire world in front of Congress on every network. The biggest lie ever told most damaging one by far, And and he's coming out in favour of truth and defeating belies now Entire campaign was built on a lie that has just been debunk, but will the press column on that? They will not hear a question for you.

The biggest complained about tromp, was that he had to know his his words would cause the kind of violence that we saw, the capital that tromp had to know it, because common sense says, if you keep talking about the election being stolen and then you talk the way you talked the any reasonable person in this situation would have known that those words would lead to violence, but here's the question: why didn't? Why didn't the security people know that the people were in charge of security for the capital? Why didn't they know that? Because they didn't have enough security. If tromp was supposed to know that, but all the people listen to him talk didn't know it. Why wouldn't they know, and what about the press? The press is pretty clear,

when they say that everybody should alone that these words would lead to violence was oppressed. Tell you that the capital was gonna be attacked yesterday before abbot. Did the press. did the press warn, you did the press say: hey wiser enough security. We can all see that this will lead to violence. Did they think they're dead? So why you're saying here is a hindsight: persuasion there Trying to make you believe that what is Obvious today was also obvious before the capital attack now, I watch a lot of politics. to most of what the President says, I had no idea that the capital would actually be like penetrated. No idea

Did you how many of you listening to everything that robs said watching the news. How many of you knew that the capital would be breached, I kind of assumed that they would have security right now. I knew that there would be protests, no matter which weigh things. Wet protests were guaranteed, but I also thought that the protests in cities would look just the way they always too many things get destroyed, but I fear that any kind of protest in the capital would not penetrate the actual capital. How many of you, with all of you the common sense and judgment and watching the news? How many of you knew that the capital was gonna, be attack right, fuckin, zero,

we didn't know that you're you can make the same argument about a million different statements by a million different politicians. Sometimes. people say things and then some time after that, a bad thing will happen relating to thing they said. Does that mean they caused it? I think it's just sometimes bad things happen, and sometimes people were talking about them before They happened. That's probably all what's going on here. so that's another thing with the than the press, which is completely illegitimate. As you know, both left and right. At this point They don't tell you what I just told you, which is a fuckin Nobody knew is going to happen and they imagined that Trump is suddenly the smartest person in the world. Their entire case depends on the fact that you will believe they ve been lying.

five years that there were lying about how insightful and smart trump is because the entire case depends on him being smarter than all of us. Could somehow he knew the capital would get penetrated or that violence. What happened in some way, but you didn't you didn't know it. I didn't know but I guess he's the smartest person in the world now position known it. Of you hear the story about tourism, angry phone call with Mccarthy and Trump during the capital assault were people were breaking through Mccarthy's windows and tromp allegedly was not. Two concerned about it now I dont know what did or did I happened in that phone call, but I would say-

all the news this week that you should not trust to be accurate. It would be this story. These stories are never accurate, the ones where somebody's reporting was somebody else said to somebody else there accurate, never like actually zero times. You can depend on this to be true zero times, so they just don't believe anything. You should discounted. The Democrats who, when they got their final closing argument, amazingly, did not address the fact that the trumps lawyers had pointed out that they are manufactured evidence in a number of cases. The number of instances manufactured evidence fake

evidence and showed it to the world in public. That actually happened and I got called out not just the fine people hopes video that you showed, but also there was the fake tweet that they took in a contacts and added, as the blue check- and I saw vendor dream. Big interviewed by sea be one of the CBS local station setting and while I tweeted that's where you have to see, then we in answering the press adjust eviscerated the press. You have to see this but, as he pointed out, the Democrats didn't even address with didn't even address it. They simply ignored the fact that the evidence and manufactured by their own team now is the time

France had even just an iota of what say, usefulness or morality or ethics. The Managers would have said. Oh my god, it looks like we evidence we presented. Wasn't even real. Inflation is just drop. The case scenario you're right we quit now we resign right now if they had ethics, but they dont. So what do you make of the fact that they didn't even address? The fact that there was no fractured evidence as vanderveer points out. If this had been a criminal trial that

What do the under the trial? If you know that the prosecution makes up evidence, that's the end of the trial, you don't need to hear the other stuff. That's it that's a pretty good standard and it gets worse. So by far the biggest story of the week by far there's nothing, you close the impeachment itself is nowhere near how big the story is that the biggest hopes in this country that actually determined who's? The President Biden is probably president because of the fine people hooks now, not by itself. what is so important that if you took that out, I dont think you were the one. I don't think so. It was so important to the misunderstanding through this president, is that I think it determined the fate of the country

and this was alive perpetrated by Democrats and the press right from the country super damaging, obviously incited Dan, death and destruction. Didn't I'm sure a lot more people died from that oaks. If you put all the ever all the activity together, then the capital assault, as is tragic as I once everything through close. I think the fine people hoax is way more damaging even in death and destruction terms. So that's the biggest story in the country now do a Google search on this, impeachment fine people hoax because remember vanderveer, actual use the phrase fine people hoax, which is the first time I've heard it not from people like me on social media, ushered spam

you're somewhere but hearing him say actually find people hoax made my day but guy out in Google that Google, the biggest story in the country, fine people how exported and quotes so you get the same results. Of course, around fine people saw nothing will come up with a CNN story about how the biggest hopes in the country has been debunked, nope being corrected. Somebody says event ravine, called it the fight People lie incorrect. He called it to find people lie when he gave his case when he was doing the summary he called to find people hooks so use both terms, but the last one I use was oaks.

So you'll see, if you search that on Google, that the the top of publication, I think, would be bright, barred and bright bar is largely hidden by Google intentionally their algorithm. Actually, aids braver. Now the other entities are right, leading publications that most people are not heard of. If you add Google, this and you're a Democrat, and you saw that the top result was bright mark, which you it incorrectly been told, gives you fake news compared to other outlets, not true. but you are all there. Let's have had problems bright part is proud Although more accurate than that's just observational, they seem more accurate than I am and but you wouldn't read it. you wouldn't really. Whenever you dead, you wouldn't believe it does. You ve been told not it so

Google is actually hiding or the algorithm is. It looks intentional defied the gas without knowing I'd, have to guess a person and actual human being did direct actions to hide the story, because all that, if they had not directly try died, apparent, would come up now. It could be that it does come up, because the major networks didn't cover up the biggest story in the country by far there's nothing close didn't even cover it on the other networks did Fox what about Fox Fox NEWS should pop right up on the top you know that cover their work are covered. Only opinion shows delegate covered on the news, I'm not sure did I know no a dead. The opinion people of course document.

but when you watch this happening right in front of you, this is happening. This is happening in real time right now. The news and social media are suppressing the biggest store in the country right now, now why you watch it. This is happening to you. What do you make it stop Folliot NEWS, Scott somebody says. Yes, I really news. Is it I've been faint news is part of it.

so I don't know which other networks recovery news MAX away and probably will be on their brother. If you do a Google search, it won't come up now does in fact checking organizations cover it. Political fact covers the leave, find people hoax issue and then do they conclude that the fine people thing was true or do they conclude that it was false meeting its hawks? What do you think Poland? concluded after watching it being completely debunked simply by showing the whole video that's the whole debunk is showing no video. you don't even have to have the ability to do so

Gotta, go now, of course, has seen the whole video, because everybody hands if they watch the impeachment, and what did they say, was a true or was it falls. Here is the put the polluter fact. Final analysis quote more context is needed, fuck you, fuck you, the only they more context, its false amazing. This is happening right in front of us right in front of this has happened.

so here are some red lines that have drawn. Yes, the Republicans don't try to impeach swore well for manufacturing evidence during the trial and if they don't try to impeach Biden for spreading the fine people hoax as the basis of his campaign, I can support them. I don't think I can support any Republican from President who would try to at least raised the issue. Obviously they would be unsuccessful because the

how many Democrats roaring Congress, but if they just let that lay there they're, just letting you take an arrow in the back. If Republicans let this go after has been debunked and its biggest story in the country and they don't try to impeach Biden over it they're worthless the worthless. I just can't support anybody who won't take this on its biggest balkan country. That's the biggest thing in the country. biggest story you just getting nor so and I'll go further. If there somebody who is planning to run in twenty two twenty four and they would like my support early. Here's how, together here's how to get it now. I don't know, maybe if its somebody I don't like, for some other reason, had ever problem, but

you'd, have a big leg up on winning the presidency. If you try to impeach bite and for the fine people hoax, you won't succeed, but you need to try. You need to try. You need to try this now optional. How can I fucking support a Republican who won't try to do this, for us? Do it for me, the citizen's right to offer the people are watching. Do a further country due to show people what the fake news has done to them from last five years. You gotta do this. Somebody TED grooves. You got the balls, I use balls in a non sexual away so that, in this context, women can have ovaries balls and what everyone I'll make it non sexist. But.

ten crews. As the balls, I don't think we'll do it, but he has the balls at least of everybody else will, and I wouldn't look to the principle of reciprocity here. If there's no Republican, who can bail out the citizens on this fine people Hawksley, if you can't Bela sound, don't expect help because we don't ask for much. I suppose we do estralla citizens, but I dont there's not much I'm demanding right. You have never been demanding things, but I do demand this. I demand this. I demand us, you gotta, stop leaving us out here exposed you can't let the fake news and then platforms do this. Does they're doing to this there

to us right now, as I say here, they're doing it to us, give us some fuckin help Rasmussen, reports, residence and interpol and found out. You know how to deal with this result. Today. The question: why should probably figures be punished, for saying they believe the twenty twenty election was stolen Democrats. Fifty four percent of them said public figures should be punished for an opinion. About something that cannot be proven either way and is important and that fifty four percent of Democrats they pay, should be punished for their opinion. Just two

just to on her. Second, you what you want to be even more angry tat made. You angry are not done. well angry! You are now watch we taken up a level. Fifty four percent of Democrats, as they said, Saint public figures should be punished for saying they believe the twenty twenty election was stolen. Are you mad enough? You're gonna get a little matter in amendment twenty one percent of Republicans agree. Twenty one percent of Republicans think that a public figure should be punished for saying they believed that twenty twenty election was stolen, punished

Republicans among all voters. Thirty five percent, more than a third think a public figure now keep in mind. What does public figure mean? Public figure doesn't just mean elected elected, I'm a public figure, I'm a public figure. It looks like a youtube. Just Youtube. Just turn me off. Do you think? That's a coincidence, substance.

Extremely Huron periscope, but I'm watching the? U to feed and adjust it just froze serve here on. If you on Youtube. Do you think this is a coincidence given, given the topic that I have just been discussing? Did you just watch Youtube turn me off that just happen. Now could be it, it could be a glitch, but do you think the glitch always happens when you're talking about you tube, hiding the news about Youtube upset about Google, the parent company of Youtube Hiding the news this acquaintance now, if we were not in this situation, were right now the news is being suppressed. Right now like right now it's being suppressed, then I wouldn't think this was anything but a bug. But in a context where you know that this

an is suppressing the news. The I'm telling you that you watch them, suppress it isn't a bug isn't above I don't know, could be you care rule out coincidence. Coincidence is breached wrong, but I guess there's your freedom of speech so still seeing comments on Youtube suddenly on Youtube. Tell me if you can hear me I know you can see your own comments are going through, but the video is frozen. Can I buy here be on Youtube. Suddenly said now know is frozen, so I guess it's just the comment. Is this debate?

I think about this. Are you know a little bit blown away by what's happening right now, like you I should in real time levy God and so forth. Canceled right now. You have no idea what's about to come out of my mouth, but it would definitely change my life, so I'm going to hold it in a little bit longer. somebody says, I'm still up on Youtube, but the pictures frozen, and I don't think they can hear me. I ain't gonna turn off you tube and that's that's disturbing. This should be a headline today: submissive.

your account will be suspended. Maybe so maybe so what was the weapons? Maybe among the virgin given cancelled, but we'll find out soon I will talk to you. Well, I think I'll talk to you tomorrow. I think I'll talk to you tomorrow, maybe not by four- do.