They are very much wanted you just in time. It's time for coffee was caught up. Yes, I accidentally doing Mr Rogers, taking of my sweater at the beginning of the broadcast, wish I'd plan, but I didn't So we ve got one of them best life streams, maybe of all time really, if you were to look at all the life streams there than broadcast in the last fifteen billion years, this one best, one of the entire thirty fifteen billion years by the best one. I know it's amazing and all you need to make a better as a couple of agriculture that you're jealous static, anti jug of last mess with a guide, felicity favorite liquid, like coffee

driving now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dope to be near the day thing that makes everything better, it's called simultaneous it, but it's going to happen. All over the world at the same time. Thus simultaneity go. Well, whoever is taking a bomb get I just see in the comments. Good Joyce, good choice, let's talk about all the news, Shelly. Exercise a head. John Brennan said on MSNBC. These quote an increasingly embarrassed to be a white male. These days is embarrassed to be a white male.

Well John I'm a white male and I have a little bit embarrassed to a little bit embarrassed, maybe not for exactly the same reasons as you, but I have to say I feel it. I do feel it. Of course it my case has been. Caused by John Brennan, but I've been told that I can take credit and also the blame for what total strangers do. Who happened to share any pigmentation with me? So if there is anybody who is also a white whose committing I am right now who well that's on me: if there is anybody white that I've never met at every will whose inventing something cool I take the credit for that. Why obviously similar pigmentation? Why wouldn't I take credit for the work of strangers if they have similar pigmentation.

That's just logical: well, I care is selling a tiny prevail at home. They comes out his own sort of trailers situation, the polar right up to your plot of land, and there you go home now. People said to me what so special about that Scott. We ve always had mobile homes IKEA, making one isn't that different? Is it, but you have to see it it's very well

those centric instead of a classic mobile home, that's more metal size, little windows, it sort of open its window. We and if they got the insulation right, I don't know if they did, but if they did for forty seven thousand five hundred dollars, you could ever tiny home with one tiny, bathroom, the bedroom and etc. Now the big deal, I think, is that companies like IKEA and getting into, but I still think that big win and where this is going thinking, this price thing you this price say was a rounded two. Fifty thousand dollars.

Suppose, in a few years, apple computer gives you this options. You could have a home this worthless a one hundred thousand dollars to build so something twice as good as this may be better than twice as good by then. So it's twice as good as free and it's made by Apple computer. So it's high qual. It's just free, it costs a hundred thousand if they going to sell it on the market, probably it would cost you maybe two hundred thousand to buy it. They give it to you for free, but you have to use apple products as long as you live there, all of them. So if you get it set up: Wi Fi, you get it from apple. If you can have a phone service and get it from apple, you can have a laptop and get it from. An apple, makes his money by by just you

Forcing you into their system and they don't care. If you pay nothing for rent my pay, some energy costs, maybe dabble, maybe detest maybe it's a Tesla House give it to you free, and all you have to do- is pay for electricity or pay for the Tesla products on the site, so you wouldn't be paying for the electricity directly. I think that's where it's going. Maybe this is the first time are there is yet another vex yet another studies showing that one dose of the Koran virus vaccine and I don't think it matters which one you get this. That one dose will give you something like eighty percent. Effective protection from hospitalization super serious problems. Eighty percent, now, if they give you the second those that gets into the mid nineties or higher right so.

Here's a question. I asked one if we ever had to those regimen before. When that happened, I said to myself: why get there we ve always had vaccinations, but why is this one a to those vaccination, whereas a dog you so loud snickers, wake up wake up. She's, nor so loudly, so I was curious why this was the one where multiple makers of the vaccine thought it needed to doses. And I was curious about that now, the latest You show that maybe shouldn't have been two doses at all. Was there, a body saying that who was credible early on what was or anybody credible saying, hey, if you do the math

One dose eighty percent protection given given that is limited right. If you. Unlimited doses, then of course everybody should get too. I think we all agree on that. If its unlimited give everybody to but is very limited and time matters a lot under that condition. Would you take eighty percent Protection really fast, or would you really really slow things down to get to ninety five for the few who actually get the shot it just just in Europe? sort of general common sense, statistically ignorant brain, which one sounds better Well, let me add a little wrinkle. Let's say that if difference. In your citizen here and, as was specifically lesser senior care facility.

Let's say we give all of them to. Nobody would argue with that. I don't think right. Cuz there ain't that many! You know you can give all of the the nursing home people too and still have plenty. To give people one, why believe there were people lighten the silver and another economist and statisticians who would be typically ignored for a medical question, because it's inside there feel, but as Andreas Back ass was pointing out to be this morning, privately just that there were people who were on this early, but they weren't doctors. There were the wrong kind of expert, except that they were the right kind of expert, because what you needed was somebody who could do math. That's why you needed. You didn't need somebody who knew what a what a vaccine was or you didn't need somebody who was like the virologist expert. You needed somebody who could do math,

What say why you well about need silver, if you're politically opposed to his opinions or whatever, but why you can't take away from him. He could do math, he can do bath and he just did the math If the one doses anywhere sort of putting words in his mouth, he didn't say this. But the idea that if one dose gets you to something like eighty percent and it was a strong reason to believe that that would be true, we're doing it all wrong. I mean like right we wrong as long as you can get. Indeed, I would say that the decision to do two doses rather within one may have killed. Millions of people were or might in the long run, that one statistical error

which the statistics the qualified statisticians, pointed to downright away right. It wasn't like we didn't know. The people who can do math raise their ended said. I feel, like you, do in the math wrong now. What does this sound, like? The sound like another situation, should sound like the rapid test issue. So the same math. That makes sense in the vaccines which has a lower effectiveness. Single dose can get you to wider immunity faster. The same argument or similar enough is that the lower the lower quality rapid testing might only be eighty or ninety percent effective, as opposed to closer to a hundred. But if you didn't lots of people quickly and cheaply instills catch so much of it. They might stop the pandemic that

Well, the FDA, as proved eight, yet another rapid test, the other. Epitaphs, I think you still have to send it to a lab, but you could do it at home, but that we have to wait for the mail etc, but the new one, apparently you get your you can do it yourself. It again. You got your own result and it's eighty percent effective or no or something like that. It's not perfect, but it's the high effect of this and you can do it at home and you don't have to wait for results. You get a result in ten minutes, So we're downright didn't. I tell you that if you could have a quick home test, there was at least laggard You a catch so much of the elite, you'd probably get all of the super spatters because the ones in it. Those are the ones who are not sharing that much right so that the difference

whether the these cheap Tass catch the virus or not, is not about the quality of the test. The test at the same time, every time is just if you have a lot of virus you're a super spreader it'll catch you every time, but if here maybe you just at the beginning just a little bit of shedding. Well then that might missing so as long as you get the super spatters and you get them quickly enough. Pretty much the pandemics over right.

Ah now I forgot to tell you something now: the pandemic is unsolved. Do you know why are FDA decided that you need a fucking prescription to stick this thing up? You knows what are you kidding me whither the comments here, you're dumbfounded now archer? Can you give any reason that the FDA would require a prescription to get this thing that you can do a home and a thirteen year old can do a stick in something up your nose and put again. While basically, can you think of any legitimate reason now you can't you Think of any legitimate reason now suppose that's just a failure of our imagination. So

Was there actually a good reason for it? Do you give the FDA A pass? Cuz, there's a good reason clock now, cuz, they didn't tell us the reason. If you don't tell us the good reason, we must assume or a corrupt. We must assume that, and so I would ask you to assume that the Europe of today has no signal unambiguously. I've been before I was a little suspicious. Now I was very suspicious. Something was going on that wasn't quite right, because we should add these tests approves a long time ago. But now it's confirmed, the adding the requirement for the prescription It doesn't have a reason which would mean there's a corrupt reason or- and this is the part you can confirm their not providing. The reason is the same.

Either they don't have one or or they have won and are not telling you in either case. This is a complete failure of the FDA, for whatever reason might be industry. Now. Let me ask you this: if Trump heard this, what how would he act? Somebody said a MR job looks like we ve got a solution. O looks like we don't because they added this requirement for prescription now. What a doctor prescribes that? What what do you think the duck. Is looking out for to make sure that somebody is like knows how to do it right now. It could be that the only reason is to limit limit the number of them, which would be the shadiest reason in the world. In my opinion, but suppose somebody comes to try.

They say: well, we got the technology. Now we got the technology, so we can solve this problem with its rapid testing. When I say solve that sniper Billy right, we can, we can make a big difference and what does the presidency, those great everybody, will get? This right now turns out the FDA, put requirement on it for a prescription, so basically won't make any difference to the pent up really will make any difference if you require prescription just won't be enough home, while one tromp say what what do you think? What would shrub do in this situation? While we don't know like we'd have to speculate, my guess would be that they just told them the difference between a successful presidency and an unsuccessful one, and that he would have ripped the FDA out by the routes to get that changed. I think

I think you would have ripped amount by the routes to get that changed now I speculate and only weekly in this on this following point. The trump wasn't aware, in other words as advisers, and never brought him this proposition about the cheap, less accurate s being a good solution. If you do it right, I feel like. Maybe nobody ever brought that to him, because I think he would have made it up again just speculate. No, I didn't. Right, but what will Biden do we'll violent say, would trust the science I feel like you might? Is a science.

Nope. Is he gonna say trust the experts could, as there must be some reason for putting this requirement on their? I feel that he has committed himself to trusting the experts, and the experts appeared to be a screwing, nor country may be killing millions. There is no it's that there's, no, even similarity between How many people died in the Governor Cuomo case of putting infected people back in nursing homes and that's in the thousands, horrible horrible situations the thousands of people died from that mistake? How many people will die from this mistake? A lot more like way more, it's not even close

comparing government fuck ups violence fuck up right now, which, by the way, let me be as clear as I can. If this had done, president trunk- and he also didn't fix this release- obviously trying to fix it. It will be the same for me. Nobody gets a pass for their party affiliation, you're fucking, the whole fucking country. By wherever this is right, I was savage about Trump, not pursuing the same option here with the cheap. Does. I know I got to say the same thing about Biden I mean I was just a savage which one most of you hurting and I'm not going to I'm not going to pull it back just as Biden. By the air in the air in the barrel. It's your job! If you don't fix this or- and I would be satisfied, intellectually with Us- it wouldn't be as good, but at least I be satisfied

actually give us a good reason. Just tell us a reason that the FDA requires us to be a prescription If there's a reason I'm open to it, I'm not an unreasonable person. I just need to hear the reason: if not binding, you need to go, you need a fuckin be fired. With Cuomo, because these are the size of mistakes that are completely unreasonable and by the way, if you ve Trump lost his re election because he didn't handle the corona virus. Well enough, I'm fine with that. I'm absolutely fine with that. If Trump, if Trump really did lose because of kroner virus, because I dont think I don't think he beheld it. I think what he did with the vaccinations was amazing. That was Kennedy asked leadership. Nobody can take that away from them by it, but the testing part the rapid testing potent specifically. I think I think, from failed on that

and by sailing now so listen to listen to statisticians too, not just medical people. Barely Biden has declined This is irish American Heritage month March marches. Now I guess this is a fairly new. The whole thing: every every year the government just re ups and says: hey it's irish, American, each month to which I say we we have twelve months now we ve got black yesterday month seems like a good idea For that now we ve got to irish american heritage month. So that's march, we ve only got ten left. Is that enough? Because they like Luke could be a lot of underserved ethnicities here and that doesn't seem right by the time

to estonian Americans. One month, Vega have nothin, we'll all be used up and I think that's a little bit racist. Isn't it. Now, if the guy who is declaring its irish american heritage month, happens to be an irish American, say Biden, how do you feel about that. If it feels like he's the one who should do that I get it doesn't feel like you should declare a month for your own people, if you as the leader, if Trump had declared scottish american history Heritage month, what would you or with the news has done to have is? Is there such a thing? Is scottish american history, so that would have been trump if he had tried to get away from that get away with that, though, justly

wait supremacy, but maybe Biden can get away with this, gives us a long, long tradition, but are we using the same standards for the left is right? Let's keep an eye on that. The site where doctors Zeus, you wanna talk about that. So I've been following the story lightly. Like there's some stories, you dig in There are other stories you just read the headline and move on, and this doctor suits I've been reading the headlines and moving on because trusted that the following would happen. I trusted the just being a consumer of news. YO dipping in all the time and turning on the news all the time that I would clear and unambiguously be presented with the examples. Of those things which may be didn't look so bad when they were first done, But society is as evolved and maybe they look bad now.

So I want to see some of the examples of the horrible horrible things in these doctors books have any of you seen. Has anybody actually seen an example of one of the offensive things niver them described, but Emily Now are we so. Are we so sensitive snickers? Wake up? I just I have to be more exciting, boring my dog to sleep, causing problems. All right, so none of you, I believe none of you have seen anything examples right. Somebody says I don't think Scots Irish is a real thing. I don't know what that means.

So the the description of these offences is that its racist imagery of asian and black characters. Now. I think that's a real thing like, in my opinion, I have to deal with this all the time because on professional cartoons, so what are your professional cartoonist? The the market will ask you to have diversity in your product. That's reasonable right at maker make your common look like the real world. That's what I want to do. I draw comic about the real world, so, of course I wanted to look as much like the real world as possible, including a diverse cast, but there's a problem. Do you know what the problem is? here's, the problem, if I ask generic white guy, introduce let's say an african american character into my comic.

What would be the personality? I would give that character because remember to make it a good comic. All of the characters have gigantic flaws. So Alice is angry too quickly. The bosses clueless dilbert, is sort of a nerd. You know he doesn't have a social graces. Wally's lazy shook the intern was the only person who has any interesting flavoured because he was born in India, but a shortly in turn in the Delaware Comic. They only flaw. I can give him that I could stay out of trouble. Was they he's inexperienced. His only flaw is one of youth which of course, is resolved itself solving. So I couldn't even give a shook the On character maestro, I couldn't even give our real flaw: the only kind of law you can give somebody that isn't real! You just grow out of it, like everybody does like being a kid.

Now what happened when I introduced a indian american character? I was blamed accused of being racist, because the shook characters sometimes did silly things and people said you should be cancelled for saying such bad things about black people. Now my defence was he's a shook. The intern from India he's not a is now black character, to which my public said. Stop making this racist comic about black characters, to which I said Maybe you too near me, the first night there actually aren't there are no black characters and strip, and the reason I do that is out of respect. Does I dont know a way that I can add a wall and out of fear as well, but it is also out of recession

I don't know that I can treat the character right and I do think I have some obligation to do that and my public says but why are you being so racist about your black characters, to which I say? I don't think you hear me. I don't have any. There's a reason: there's a reason. This cuz, you can't you just can't do it in the in our current situation. There's no way, I could do it without getting canceled cuz. I would have to add a flaw and then that's the end of it. I'm here right. So Dr Seuss Course at a different situation, cuz the doctor Seuss Books, because they were old enough that he just did whatever seemed appropriate at the time, but now it looks wildly in pray, buyer modernize in? I would guess that he has pictures of asian and black characters, probably are so.

Probably so racist by modern standards, that you would laugh when he saw them cuz. You know you would laugh comparing them to what is acceptable now to act. What was acceptable then, but I'd like to see them, because I think we should laugh them away. Let me ask you If you are the say, if you're, black or asian American you watching this live stream, let me ask you this question: don't you think we'd be better off publishing the pictures and all having a good laugh. Isn't that healthcare, because I don't think there's any white people were saying it's the way, It is better if we make the non white characters like we're, weirdly steroids. There is zero people on the other side of the argument. Nobody there's nobody on the other side of the argument. Nobody says, while I would Like the non white characters to be, you know insultingly drawn

Nobody, nobody is on their side, is not like statues where people s on unrelated argument about free speech and history and suddenly that there's nobody on the other side, If we can't laugh at this together, like what the hell, We're not even try. Let me tell you how to solve this. Here's We would solve the doctors to sling somebody who's the rights- I don't know if it's family members or publishers who owns the rights. For this point, I think that they should hire a black cartoonist. To suggest a non offensive, let's say drawing style to replace the originals but to keep within the style of the original doktor suits, but. Also make sure that everyone knows what the original is, so so that here in the book is, as this was modified. For this reason,.

You should be able to see the original. You don't want the original too, to be forever gone. You don't need to be put, it is proper, context, but I've been thinking about doing this for nobody. On one hand, you know, I know my audience especially is thinking some version of Scott. Don't be so don't be so weak just make your characters do what you do. Let the chips fall. I live in that world live in the world. I live in a world in which I prefer people to be polite. Forget about the woke. Does all that stuff? Here we be polite, can we just be

like to each other. Do even have to worry about any of any of the other stuff. If you're just polite, how polite is it to publish offensive characters, some group now I get that it maybe wasn't as offensive in the past, and so maybe you were to work now but here we are right here we are, however, we got here doesn't matter here. We are, is just not polite to do offensive things that people find the votes or even avoided, and how are we to be together? Get a black Carter And say: look give us and regional these characters we'll just change the ones that are offensive, And then wool agitated, so everybody knows what we the same with the asian american character. That's why oh idle, and by the way I've been thinking for a long time and I think

I feel as I'm gonna pull the trigger on this, although this good backfire I'd think he you're doing the same thing with Gilbert, I'm thinking of asking black lives matter, for example, literally to say: hey I've got this issue. I liked Adsum diversity. I can't do it alone, nothing wrong there's nothing wrong with you can't do it alone right! I can't do it alone. Give you have helped me, develop a character with a flaw gotta, have a flaw right, want it and then not not one of these weak flaws like their inexperience. I need a real gimme, a genuine flaw, but you need to develop it for me and then I'll than all operate with it now were now. Is that that to walk? Have I gone too far to the other side to say: hey give me a hand on this. I don't think so

Because I'm saying that there is something that I cant do I've just at a situation where, like it wouldn't work, if I do it, this is a practical statement. If I get a hand, maybe I can do it and then I have more diversity in the strip. I don't know somebody says pandering, so that's what I was getting for. I don't think it is. I don't think that I don't think that evolving your product to be more compatible with the customers is pandering. I think that's commerce right pandering, feels different. Pandering feels like you, it just for maybe looks, or you doing, and just to make somebody happy. That would not be my motivation. My motivation would be to have a product which more people like that's it deep like just people, I have a product. People like I am repeating myself too much

you for pointing that out, other's company called my heritage, all one word my heritage: you wish you can take an old photo and they will they will animate it like. I Harry Potter, photo that moves, so you can just take an old photo of your grandparents and turn it into a photo aware that the head, instead of just looking at you like a still photo, is looking around will look. The room now Howard would be to take it to the next step, where the photos all follow you when you walking around that's gonna happen. So this is one in the world of deep fakes. Even photographs will come to come to life and already have so. This is current technology. There there's nothing about this. That is speculative.

This is right now and they look really really real. A lot of people saying what's gonna happen when the deep fakes are so good that you can make a famous actor with the the software. Does the original actor own their face when you think does Tom cruise own his face if somebody wanted to make a deep bacon and make a movie about it, That is a lawyer here because I don't know the answer that question. I want and what would it take for it not to be owned by Tom Cruise. Spoke to Tom Cruise and you made here black, but otherwise it looks just like him. There's time prove still on it or did you modify it enough. Somebody says he should why.

Now. He should, if you are trying to sell a movie with as if it were the Real Tom Cruise Now, if someone is trying to sell a deep fake as the real person, that's definitely illegal no question about that, but suppose somebody makes a movie and they say we're going to make a software version of Tom Cruise, but we're not to ensure full. You were just do. Even software is not really Tom cruise. He has nothing to do with this. Is that illegal? I dont know, but I'll bet it's legal only because the Lord in anticipating, yet it would not be it would not be accountants. If you label that correctly, it's only the false labeling that gets you in trouble. I write so here is my prediction: that you will not see big movie studios, trying to make movies with fake versions of real people. There will be some of it, but it will.

A transitional period? In other words, there will be a period in history and which may be there. Some important may be put at a younger Paul Newman into a movie. Or a younger any actor into a movie, and maybe the real act. Still associated and agrees that their younger self will be there. Maybe they even do the voice? Maybe somebody does the voice of their own younger character. So you say buried with happens, but law, long term. The economics guarantee that it will not be real actors that these fake, the fixer in the long term. Simple economics by the way, if I ever tell you that, if you had economic steer, talent stack, you can see around corners. A simple understanding of economics. Just let you see the future because money talks, money is predictable. People are predictable when it

the money. So whatever money is involved, you immediately become very predictable because people act the same way around it. Here's the predictable part! Why wouldn't you pay Tom Cruise Tom Cruise is expensive if you, if you're, going to work with them- and you probably would to use his cgi deep fake, that's really. Pensive. Do you know it's better than that making aversion? That's not Tom Cruise, this better than him, because Tom Cruise, as engaging as he is he's not the best. Looking guy in the world. Wouldn't you like taller Tom Cruise Sierra Leone, Tom Cruises, five, six, Wouldn't you wanna taller one come on course she went. So why would you why would you make one that looks just like this

are one. It would be trivial easy to make a better one. Do you think that the Tom cruise is. Say what you call it the symmetrical? Probably not. These is noses little weird rate. Sir, but all you do is start with what's good and then the ay, I will very rapidly figure out what people want to look at. It will create characters based on what people like the most you can even do it in real time. Just show you a character which one which of these two do you, like better people would vote unless people are voting, the ai is changing the the choices so that it did just bills and real time the perfect character that everybody wants to say. That's the one you want to get you don't want. The crappy old looks like Tom Cruise with all of his yell pimples and warts, and his fife was six and he's getting older

Why would you want that? Why would you pay twice as much for the thing this clearly worse, so in the long run, regular actors will be replaced. There's no, there's no possibility could go another where in the long run no possibility. If you go any other way because of economics All right there you see twitter does this, thing where they will note that the comments may have some offenses ones, and you can't read the rest of the comments until you click on the thing that says they may be offencive, and then you click on it and there's nothing offensive. There. Even slightly is us another shadow banning technic, I'm trying to understand what it is, because it feels like just another way to hide stuff from certain people, but not others. Now I dont have like direct,

evidence that that's the purpose of it, but what I also don't have is any clue what would be a different reason for it. Can you think of any reason that most of my comments would be hidden away where none of them are offensive or even a little bit? What is the second possible reason for that? I can think of one now again. If I've taught you this a million times You have to be careful that the real problem here is the limit of your own imagination. So I'm saying think of all, all the other reasons that some comments would be routinely hidden. That way, I can't think of one, maybe technical them.

Patients, maybe there's a guy- that's not so smart. They can't tell the difference. Is that people reported some comments and they report, maybe conservative stuff more than others. Maybe I suppose, if you really stretch your imagination, you couldn't kind a sort of imagine some other reason that might be happening, but it's a stretch It's a stretch we live in a world in which, if it looks like it's obvious, some some bad behaviour is happening. This probably is probably is so he says Youtube is frozen. It looks like he's working to me. Bite, it is considering putting sanctions on burden, I guess over, the jailing of developing the Putin Clinic and the crackdown on the protests, and

There's some intelligence review of a. What do you think Biden Gonna do with Russia Because they ve been criticising tromp forever, but what else is there to do? They have any how many tools does by didn't even have what the hell is he going to do? I feel as if he's trapped here as he is trapped in many cases. In which will end up just doing something that looks like what prompted? If you look, if you know the cash yogi story, the other the Saudi Arabia situation were be. And the US allegedly ordered the death of his yogi. When it came out, Biden did exactly what trumped would have done, which is let the leader slide.

Just let us live so there's not really any serious difference, yet between Biden and Trump on the international stuff and the things where there is a clear difference seems to be trivial, such as rejoining the purse climate accord, and does it really matter so all the important stuff is the same as Trump and the unimportant stuff. Well, there's a matter. And I guess But it is also looking at the reports that Russia allegedly placed bounties on: U S: soldiers in Afghanistan. I remember that tromp was criticised for not acting on that. But the other part of the story is there was no evidence of it. So tromp was criticised for not acting on what democratic said was real, but the intelligence agency said we can find

Anel by them being on the side. That said, it was real, it's his job to do something about the thing that his own people say, isn't real, but when he was out of office he said it was real or his people did. I don't know how much he said about it. So how do you handle that? How do you handle it? I think, by this kind of in a corner, So there's a top rated Arizona NEWS anchor who resigned because she didn't want to. She didn't want to report a fake news anymore. This is somebody works at a local fox, affiliate Carylake. She resigned basically cuz. She didn't want to report fake news anymore.

Thank you, ll see more that at all, so it will start where Governor Cuomo he's got is a third accuser. Now, if there is one thing that you can guarantee, if there is a famous politician who is too accusers of sexual harassment, you can bet there'll be a third, he always get the third. It must be some law of the universe that isn't it There are always three because when two people come forward, then it becomes a lot easier for the third one to come and if their our two, almost sir are so. Apparently, what he said at a public good, ring, so this had nothing to do with any of his employees, but this is the latest thing. Here is: some woman by the head, any Ask. Can I guess you and I don't even think, you're something new that well just sort of somebody who's interacting with that about.

Ass, she was offended and she's talking about this now the first thing Like dad is that Governor Cuomo really doesn't have much game. He is really lacking something in the flirtation department, as I get a gene missing or something cuz. If there's one thing that I asked you this to the women watching this, so this question is just for the women. If your man don't answer cuz, why I want to know that the answers only from women right for only women, here's the question: what do you think of a man who asks you if he can kiss you.

Versus versus just taking a shot and being turned down or not, what is your feeling of somebody who asks if they can kiss you go had just the women just the whim, Bob Bob- and I won't know exactly if it's just the women answering all go, tell you somebody says: yuck go for at least a week in secure, creepy, drunkard, drunk empowered, no depends if you're married low t weak loser. I think this is a man saying that coward depends on the man.

Asking, is laying wet blanket. So they says I like it looser but missed a safer web gross beta. Yes polite. I see no way buddy male feminists. I just look at your comments. Beta know, no good.