Baba pump up song, everybody. Yes, it's time for coffee with Scott Adams and what what is it about coffee with Scott Adams? That's different from the rest of your day. That's right! It's better! It's better than all the rest! That's the best part of the day, and all you need is a copper Maugre glass attack which Helstone Canteen Jug of last vessel of ETA Guide. Fill it with a veritable like what I like coffee jointly now for the the pleasure the dopamine hinder the day. The thing that makes everything better iraqi watch this go does not disappoint, not once

Well, I would like to declare that things are going. Ok, that's it. go on party. Well, how do you know because we can stop talking about Harry and Megan? Let me tell you yes, there's one way to know that the world is heading in the right direction. Finally, is one of the biggest so you have to talk about is Harry and Megan? Do you mind if I throw open of extra provocation into the mix? Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't there some question as to whether Harry is actually related to the royal line? I mean he's related to his mother.

But his hairy actually related to the queen and if he's not with his son, be related, and do we know that just asking because sizes over every great Britain doesn't like this conversation at all, so he says: don't go there, don't go away well, here's the thing is the royal. The royal succession is supposed to be boy bloodline. When this be a coup me, wouldn't it. If Archie every became the king when they are basically just taken over the taken over the bloodline, behold new bloodline. Am I wrong.

I haven't seen his dna tests. Abuse won't break, I'm not the one who made the rule. The bloodline is what determines who gets what I didn't make their role, I'm just saying this. That is liberal. We have the technology to check that bloodline now, and I just be interested I'd, be a little bit interested to see if he's part of it. So I just read that in the mix just to get things mixed up a little bit

So how are you having the same feeling I went out yesterday and I was just a decided just gonna- take a drive and just see where things look like now that we're getting a little bit back to normal, and I gotta tell you yesterday felt pretty normal people had masks endorse, but most things were open that are still in business. One stuff won't go back, but the things that are in business they seem pretty open and travel is happening. People are travelling so psychologically see. If you with me on this psychologically, but not physically, I feel like the pandemics over. Do you feel it

Just psychologically, obviously there are still restrictions in place. Obviously people will still die, obviously still a problem we gotta give accident. So all those real things are there, but psychologically doesn't feel over. It does does. Because at this point I put on my mask not because I'm afraid, but I'm just going through the motions of this point, because the difference between being one third vaccinated verses being nearly a hundred percent protected. We're almost there, because if you get all the, if you get all the people who are vulnerable vaccinated were kind of done.

Because, as soon as the vulnerable are vaccinated, the size of the problem shrinks down to the size of our other problems, and we we don't need to make a gun in zero. Just needs to be about the same size as our other problems, and then we can go on. I feel like we're there I mean not really a few more weeks but psychologically. Where are you now compared to just months ago? It's really different, as am I wrong, it feels completely different just last week or so. Oh somebody says they get the vaccine and then got grown a virus.

Oh, that sucks on my end, I'm actually going to be socially distancing a little bit harder than normal. I mean I'm going to try even harder because it wouldn't make sense to get the coronavirus. Now it was so close to the vaccination. You know I feel like I'm in the next wave in California. Probably the next wave gets me, so I'm going to play a pretty safe until then. here's a question, so you ve probably heard the story that one of Joe Biden, german shepherds and why has barely been somebody so they re located at back the Delaware to his home and here's a question I ask

tromp had done in the White House and had two german shepherds. Would the news of just just ignore that choice of bread? Do you think that the trumpet could have owned two german shepherds and that would have been fine? Nobody would have mentioned it. Hey good, doggie, doggie. Now now I dont think that tropical on the german shepherds or Dobermans, he could have owned a fluffy dog or something it is probably not his personality, but he couldn't gotten away with even the only those dogs- and you know that's true right, because it would look like Hitler with his attack dogs, but what would have happened if Trump owned, two german shepherds and one of them been somebody if one of those dogs been somebody

in the trumpet administration. How long would it be before we felt we, the ethnicity and gender of who got bitten right right? We would know the ethnicity of who got them by now cause than that turn into a whole story about this dog is racist. You know that what has happened. So yesterday there's another Biden gaff where He couldn't remember what was it he could remember the name of his secretary defense. He could remember the night Mother Pentagon, ECHO, is pretty bad and he just got up there and muttered wandered away and

Once again, I must ask this provocative question: how much does the press no about what's happening behind closed doors with by them that their not telling us. do you really think that when Biden goes from his public performances, which are frankly embarrassing, do you think As soon as it gets off camera he comes alive and is is completely lucid. It's only when the cameras running that falls apart. What do you think that seem likely now is far more likely that a very they perform better for the camera crazy? I had to get up for it right. He made sure that he didn't go out there until he was less filling right. How bad is he when he's not trying to get up for something and no

What is reporting this now? You could argue that there is a national security reasons. Do not report on, but without stop any. Do you think that the think our news would say you better, not tell Russia and China body is behind closed doors because then they might attacker or something I don't think they're going to attack. But when you, when you Did your head how aggressively dishonest the press is to keep this from the public you know there are store, is come on. You know that there are stories and working to hear them after buttons out of office and you're going to be really mad. You gotta be really mad when you find out what the press new and didn't tell you

Here's a mystery for you. I put this on twitter people and lots of theories and see what you think. Why is it that was, it was safe from the people believe that masks and social distancing don't make a difference. Why is it that the normal seasonal flu, the regular influenza we can every year? Why didn't that dropped zero. Sort of everywhere, not just in the United States but worldwide? They just sort of disappeared. Now. Is your argument that that, for the regular influenza, if you believe the mass and distancing don't make a difference for quota virus, do you believe that the explanation? The explanation is that mask only work for regular flu

But they don't work for a couple of hours because it is suggested that the regular flew, maybe more about surfaces things you touch, whereas the crowd of piracy, the virus is more aerosols and air but the krona viruses heavier? I just read then say: measles or chicken pox. viruses do have different weights? So that's that's a real thing, some viruses stay in there is some doubt now. What is the function of a mask? Isn't the function of a mask? Two's? Stop it before. stop some of it before it gets out there now if the virus is on the water particles in the water particles hit the mask, you would think that they'd stay, some of them would stay in the mask. This mystery or may is now some people said they speak

as everybody with the regular flu is being diagnosed as having chroniclers. Do you believe that Do you believe that everybody, whether regular flu, is getting misdiagnosis having grown worse now, that might have had and early on, but at this point, if you have symptoms of either flew, don't you get tested every time Can somebody to effect check if you're in the United States and you go to a doctor because you ve got flew symptoms of any kind? Won't they tested for grown a virus every time now you couldn't do it at the beginning, but now will test every time right right. So there shouldn't be any death, doubt today about whether somebody s corroded virus, at least. Now, suddenly. So what? If they're both corona virus and regular flu. We would. We will treat those as chronic

All probably would, but how many of them are there, how. people have grown virus and the seasonal flu at the same time, moon babies are but that's not enough to change. What we're saying right or observation can be explained by that little bit of overlap. Other peoples that the corona viruses not nearly as big as you think, because the way we tested were picking up, fragments or whatever. I don't think, that's true by the way I haven't looked into it, but it does seem to me that there were at least picking up there's somebody had thrown of ours. So does me they are selling. I have sometimes so I would say: that this remains a mystery and wood. And, however this, resolved or they'll, learn something that we thought was true is not trip were

Either going to learn that those regular seasonal flu was never real I can just was a real possible because all of the explanation sound a little bit impossible. So it's gonna be something that doesn't sound possible so as either that we ve always been counted. The regular flew unkind of a proponent of the fact that we miss counted the deaths from these seasonal. Regular phone or other or that we tested wrong or that mask only work for one kind of thing, but not the other possible What I would say is still pollute mystery when you, how did we get all the way to hear that? We don't know how to explain that feels like there's something really big, though we

understand? Now I've been seeing on social media couple things one is that the CDC and somebody do a fact check on this- The CDC that a study and now they're so that the masks think they're talking about mass or maybe social, distancing, I think masks only made like a less than one percent difference. Do you think that can be studied? Do you think somebody can tell you if masks worked or didn't work? Is that possible to study that? How how would you possibly study that, whereas the place they had both masks and no masks? At the same time, Because if you don't have that of anything, there are no two places that are the same and there's no way to know why the curve did what the curved and too many variables,

You can certainly observe ok, we put it masks and things got better. Or they got worse and you can bear to other places, but that wouldn't tell you right. There's no control group, so the best they can do, is sort of aid non randomize, controlled thing where maybe they did a meadow study of combining things. Would you trust that? Would you trust a medal studying some kind of a study of studies were, none of them are randomize controlled trial. None of them are, but if he Adam together, they'll tell you something else. It is a thing there are times when you can actually get to truth by doing exactly that, added together the studies and of Europe that they cancel out whatever they did wrong. If they did not make the same mistake, yoga cancels out. So it's a real thing, but I don't believe that

say they seek to study this. I don't believe this is testable, because there are too many other variables. If, if the masks were one of three variables that maybe you could teach them, but we don't even know why why we don't have a seasonal flu. Like you very fundamental questions, we don't know about. What's going, so, whatever is happening in terms of why this thing is spreading weekends study that so I wouldn't believe the cdc when they say mask, don't work and I wouldn't believe them when they say they do because it s study it. So. You would have to treat it like a risk management problem. If you treating it like a a binary mass work or mass, don't work, that's not the way. The truth is you have to pay that as a risk management situation. Knowing that you don't know all right,

I guess the New Yorker times has finally reporting that the Lincoln Project was a big ol scam of grifters, I'm paraphrasing a little bit, but wouldn't you have liked to know that the Lincoln Project was a big ol scam before the election? We've got some great reporting now after the election, when nobody cares about the Lincoln Project, they're, not that relevant anymore,. but now we find out we find out. So I'm having this serve ongoing twitter exchange with, Eric Brindle, some he's a professor at Stanford I mentioned before How you say that there have been a number of bills proposed for fixing the election system.

It's that, before the election Republicans kill the proposed law, the safe act, which would have required robust robust manual, audits, of all federal raises and banned internet connectivity, the voting system, and then I think there is at least one other time when one proposed voting improvements. were killed either by Republicans or Democrats herbal. Now, what do you make of it? let's say, let's say: there's a bill to improve voting, doesn't matter what the details are and the Republicans kill it. What's that tell you about the bill, does that tell you. It was a bad bill because the Republicans voted against it. If you're an idiot, it tells you that

if you haven't iq of say eighty just to pick a number and you here that the Republicans voted against a voting bill. You'd say to yourself ha Republicans are smart and honest and trustworthy and they voted against it. So therefore it was a bad bill right. Well, that would be bad thinking. here is good thinking the people voting for or against the bill got elected under the current system. The current system, with all of its laws. Supports the incumbents? Why the hell would the incoming to vote against their own interest cuz anything they change is going to put them at risk, because the way things are is perfect.

ninety eight percent of income and get reelected- that's that's almost perfect, so You're asking the only people on earth, literally the only people on earth who are the wrong people to work on this problem because they all benefit from not changing it. That's what encumbered benefits from so. The first thing we need to do take them out of the mix. Maybe we can let Congress vote yes or no on something that was less they put together by independence. If there's some kind of by Euro Bipartisan Independent Commission that comes up with a bunch of recommendation,

Well, maybe we could force. Are politicians devolve forward if we put enough pressure on, but the currents does the current system, the current systems, ridiculous, don't ask the people benefiting from the system to change it? That's crazy, are you gonna get is what we're getting, which is the people who vote against it will say why good reasons, look at all my good reasons for voting against this, and you look at the reasons Neil they actually, those particular reasons and you'll think that you're representative did a good job voting against that. Nothing like us happening. You have a bunch of people, have no interest in changing it and it's their job and that's the end of the story. It won't change. It can't change the there there's nothing we know about the world there was suggested voting will be fixed. It's the people who don't want it to be fixed, are the only ones in charge.

that's, so, let's fix lab. We should not even be having a conversation about which politician voted for or or proposed a bill that stupid talk. We don't care what they propose. I don't care what anybody in Congress proposes. They're all untrustworthy. This question. On this question, they could be trustworthy and view any number of other things, but on this question the one that determines whether they personally get reelected, oh, we catch us them which we have to take that out of their control. Now, let me say this: if by

I didn't were to do that and let me give you the most weirdly optimistic thing you ve ever heard in your life. I dont predict this will happen so, unfortunately, my prediction and my optimism, or not aligned right now right, but here's something. They could have. What is the one kind of person who could change this situation? I? What type of person would be in the right position and have the right you're mindset and incentives to fix the voting system? There are two people I can think of. One is binding and the others trump for a completely different reasons. Biden has a chance to go out as one of the greatest leaders we have ever had.

he always change one thing: just change the election process to make it transparent and credible. Now if he were to stay in office- and you are a younger man and he had to live with the Democrats and put up with never pressures are putting on him to not change things? Well, you know, I don't expect things to change, but. by didn't doesn't have a lot of days left and he does have an opportunity to go out on top If he only change one thing which was, say, I'm going to set up executive order, something going to set up a bipartisan commission and their work.

Bring the recommendation to Congress and I'm going to let the entire public see what we see public. Take a look at this watch. Your members of Congress not vote for this thing that a bipartisan commission set is the only way to fix you like election and then leave on top. I would be willing to say by than would be one of our greatest president's if he did that one thing and then even resigned, but Cumberland George, he stole bigger one of the greatest If he does the one thing now, where's the other thing, other person who could do the one thing trump, but he'd have to be at the end of his second term. Right hostilities still needs to get elected to a second term. If that's what you but there are only two people can do it. Here's the Good news they might be in charge right,

one after another, so I'm not Upton so optimistic in terms of protection, but it could be fixed. Yeah yeah, I'm a dreamer right yet the odds of by doing better vanishingly small, but it's interesting to know that he could And I will tell you this there's something about this. Is my private philosopher note. My private was a view of the world that is shared by basically nobody. So here's something you're not going to agree with the office changes the office holder, more the person changes the office, maybe that the presidency has to change you like normal,

How much of a turd you were when you were running for office and working your way up through politics to become you know a candidate, no matter how bad you were in those days and how selfish by the time you become, president is actually you are job, like literally at your job, care of all the stuff. I think it changes you and whatever you say about Biden did or did not do in the past in vulnerable. He's president now he's the president now and I don't think he would hate a chance. around on top if it really help the country. I believe that everybody was in that office is a patriot, because the office turn them into one. So that's that's at least the possibility listen.

So we ve got the new new evidence from some independent group that says that China is involved in a genuine genocide against the wiggers. Fifty global exports into human rights war crimes in international law licked looked into it and said absolutely positively. It's a weaker genocide. Now China, of course, explains it in terms of trying to control dangerous extremism. Now what they call dangerous. Extremism is the extreme version of Islam, but here's an interesting you'd provocative thought how good Islam ever end with.

a genocide. Isn't genocide built into the guaranteed outcome? Isn't it because imaginative Islam continues to spread. Endless, say the chinese government degraded to the point where there were so many islamic citizens that their warrant that many of the old chinese type. I suppose I do not want that would take long time. Those, but Islam has a interesting characteristic now, so much, though, is practised in the United States if you leave the religion, you can be killed for leaving the religion, just a strong advantage for a system. If you want a system that will grow and now shrink, try killing people leave, because you can always attract people

and then you don't want to lose, I so as long as a superior system independent of what you believe about reality, anything else, but in terms of a growing system, is just a better one and joy, there's decided that this growing system, which is a superior system in terms of growth, needest, needs to be controlled, because it would be a danger to China. are there on. Is China wrong that, if, if they let Islam flourish, that China would be in trouble are the wrong it? We can talk about that. Can we hear talk about that because here's a problem? The no wrong now the thing they're doing is still a genocide is still evil needs to be stopped, but there

wrong about the risk there. Not because this bill right into the system is just at the moment is very small, but its is built to grow this, like catching a virus early, you don't The virus, if it's only infected a few people, is no problem. You say was a virus. Viruses grow, so you, there's no way you can morally or ethically support what China is doing. It's a genocide, suffragan genocide, but. I would only add this that Islam has to end in genocide and just as the questioner

Tax, because either the the winners will save is long dominated, would end up, crushing and performing genocide. I think on a number of different societies if, if they became dominant enough, so assumes you inject is love into the system worldwide. Again. This is not such an issue in the United States, of course, but worldwide, where he ever was a more say, a more robust version of his long. So I don't play an insult on. It is a more robust virgin and it has ended. Genocide is just a matter of who get who gets killed because that's the system as it's designed.

If it grows, it has to create genocides and China's just saying. Well, if we genocide you first, you won't later get big enough to genocide us later, because that is in fact builtin dear plan now is an interesting question. This is an interesting question. He cares support genocide ever under any conditions. But what was the other thing that were supposed to do well. Well, is the other way to plant? Have one now just support it, but I'm just pointing out that it is more complicated situation than you think.

All right, I keep saying this story and I can't believe it's real. Can you tell me if this story is real, that the chain of custody documents for four hundred thousand Georgia mail in votes is missing like permanently missing, like they will. Ruby turned up, and these stay was only one by twelve thousand votes, the presidential election and four hundred thousand of them we can trace or on it. I'm looking at your comments, I dont see Anybody say is not true, everybody thinks it's true, but How in the world, how in the world are we ok with this? Is there something I don't know about.

Is there something I don't know in the sense that, even if there are missing that doesn't mean that the election was fraudulent? Another words was there some way, there's something could be audited that would make us now. worry about this this or some other way. We know we don't have to worry about it. What am I missing? What why is this? Not the only story. wise or any other story. Because wouldn't this be proof not if there's no proof of fraudulent elections, but wouldn't it be proves that is non transparent elections. Feels it feels like we should be able to say at this point unambiguously with nobody argue with us that the election was not transparent. This one case alone, given the Georgia was important to to a lot of things.

how many other states have the same problem worthy chain. The custody for the million votes is missing is George and the only one who has this problem. Let me answer this If you had a lot of these, these mail in vote pick up boxes. or or even if they just went through the post office. If somebody was intended. Gently throwing away votes from pro tromp areas because they would come to know which areas where more programme just throw motorway happened. You know how would you know if Belarus were just discarded? Would you know that now it doesn't look like it could have been done at a wide widespread scale, because the number of total votes for both candidates was so high. So we had an unprecedented number of votes. So doesn't look like the were massive throwing away votes, but you wouldn't have to do

Finally, you could do it targeted. So I feel as though every time somebody argues that there was fraud in the election there just walking into a trap, because the trap always springs the same way. I think that was broadly election trap course say: there was no fraud, the election, which has nothing to do with the claim right because, of course, Karsten really Get much but you're still done for some reason. The argument beat your argument because you don't have proof courts, don't either a sort of the under the urban. But when you talk about the four hundred thousand missing chain of custody documents, that's a that's proof of non transparency and I think that's the strong argument. The non transparency

Let's say I'm going to do a micro lesson little bit later today on the locals platform. That's where I put my stuff that you don't say here and it's gonna be on the. how do you use filters to be successful and here's the key we have filters on the world, such as one filter is everything's racial. Another filter is it's always about the money. Another filter is always about power, etc. So there's lots of filters you can apply. The mistake we make is to think that the filter is tell you what the truth is. We don T have access to the truth, so few using your shelter that way, you're using the wrong, but if you use a filter because it seems to consistently give you a good outcome.

That's good shelter, even if it's not telling you the truth. So what are we to teach you on locals later is how to know that you're using your filter correctly, not as an indicator of truth, but, as I say, a map for how to solve a problem, and that will be one of them. Useful things you've ever heard in your life. That really will be now. I want to tell you a weird simulation thing from yesterday and I want you to try this at home. How many times have you lost your phone when you knew it had to be right here somewhere and then you're looking room to room and and you're saying I literally

Had it in my hand, how many times has happened to to you and then you look through your house house just seems to be gone, just gone and I was doing this last night and I told you before that. I don't? U reality the same way you do. I do I do view it as that we are literally In a simulation- and I do view it as though the history is created on demand, so if you believe that history is created and demand, you can make your phone appear. if you believe that there is a base reality, this just reality that your phone is lost and he can't find it. But the moment you believe that you're, your entire experiences subjective, you can make the phone appear so last night, a lesson

My old house literally had tried every surface of every room that I knew I was in and I stopped- and I said I I was: What's the normal way of filtering my environment and work, my normal filter, Denmark? So no change, my filter, right, consciously changed my filter. Now my new filter is that I can make that phone appear. Simply by recognizing that I live in simulation and that I can make the past everything I wanted to be, and once I've made it that all it will be filled in with false memories that make it all makes sense. And the moment I said that I said I suppose it's just a simulation, then I'm going to make that phone up here. I walked directly over to the phone and picked it up.

True story: the moment I refrained as a simulation where I could make the phone appear. I walked directly to it without stopping and picked it up now. Now the first thing you give us any yourself as well: that's Coincidence or that just reminded you over the phone was or it's always in the last place. You look gazettes when you stop looking. Do you think there is any significance to that? I don't. I don't think their significance in terms of some kind of proof that I caused the phone to appear in some magical way. I don't think that here's what I do think as soon as I changed my filter, I found my phone.

Keep in mind that the filters are not viewers of reality, the first filter was not a view of reality and the second one was not a view of reality. I did not improve my filter to see a better reality. I just changed and the moment I did something in my brain worked a little better than I walk over and picked up my phone, the one place. I forgot that I had been right and yes, anything with glasses, etc. So. be very specific about what the claim is. The claim is not that it causes magic. The claim is that shifting you're filter just makes your brain work differently and that might be advantageous. That's all just made my brain work differently and that might have given me some advantage. So try it. I've done this a number of times, and yet this is subject.

experience. So, if feels like something magic happens, every time whenever I just say: ok, it's a simulation. Let's just play it like a game is amazing and often works. Somebody says my mom did that to she prayed a little bit. I wouldn't be surprised if praying allowed you to find your phone for the exactly the same mechanism. You might be older, pray your phone into existence when I can't watch a scary movie, I just let my wife go through my phone, the worst part about letting a spouse or partner go through your phone is not the bad stuff that they find its stuff that wasn't bad.

looks like it if you say that the context last dangerous, that's dangerous ever to find my Iphone well that doesnt work so well within the house. It's not that accurate need a shelter on depression, filter under pressure. Well, believe it or not, that isn't area in which, which has put a lot of effort into figuring out how to refrain your experienced, make yourself happier now the problem is that depression. I doubt it's the same in a whole people right. I doubt there some exact boarding, your brain, that's always the problem. If you're depressed is probably a constellation of different

Rain related and experience related things, so I don't it's hard to find one solution that works for a whole bunch of different things that just happen to have the same label, but that said for Maybe some proportion of people who would label themselves is depressed. I would imagine that there's something you can do by refraining your experience that would change it. Changes subjective. Feeling imagine if you will just take one example suppose you were,

from having a point of view that you have no control over your environment. Nothing. You can do now suppose you change that refrained it too. You have lots of control of environment. It's a simulation! You can guide it. You can build a talent stack. You can do the more things. Instead, the dumplings, if you imagine that you went from having no control to having all kinds of control, even if nothing's really different issues, how you're viewing it would that make you less depressed, while not everybody obviously goes again

different reasons for being depressed, maybe some maybe some, and that may not be the refrain that helps many people, but I feel like there are a lot of refrain opportunities that we haven't. We haven't used some. He says you jackasses still looking for Louis votes well, come here, www justice. There are two kinds of people who are really fucking, stupid and you're. One of who is this danger here, you're one of the two really fucking stupid.

People want is your positive that there was widespread fraud in the election year positive. While you haven't really seen the prove you ve seen, statistics and stuff like that, but it's gotta stupid to say they now than it was fixed. Do you think it was probably fixed? I think people could ever could he's in the blue think that are probably was because any system that has a lack of transparency and a big gain, if you could rig it will be, will be rigged eventually. So I would say this: it is not brilliant to say you know it has been rigged, but it is brilliant say it will be eventually it hasn't been because this kind of assistance has to be rig every time. Cause is rigour, ball and there's a really big game, and you don't.

Many people getting God what will actually wouldn't know how many people are getting away with anything. So under their situation, fraud is guaranteed, but we can't see it right. We don't have access. It's not transparent. The So it's stupid to say it's absolutely was rigged elections. It is equally stupid, maybe stupid her little that to say that it definitely wasn't. You know that that's what aid on transparent system means how many how many mail in votes got thrown away. Do you know? I don't know, I don't know

So those are the two really serious stupid opinions definitely was fixed. Definitely wasn't everything in between is reasonable people with functional brains. You know their baby estimating opinion that the stupid people are on the extremes. Like you, my friend just in case, you didn't know, if you were stupid,.

like like to show you trumps thirty, one by a landslide. Well, you know if you are the candidate, I think you have to get a wool. Kettles lack trump, probably as a believes this in the greater the ninety percent likelihood. So if the candidate exaggerate said to a certainty that this is part of the game, but you don't have to do that you're, not talking in public, you can just have a real opinion and if it's a hundred percent, maybe you shouldn't be. Somebody says they think Trump has access to information you dont have maybe, but if it were, if it were damning, I think we would know by now.

All right I got for now. I will talk to you tomorrow. Maybe tomorrow will have some more interesting news. How can we eliminate the rise of a permanent political class? Well, the problem is that permanent political class are the only ones who can vote for term limits, so they won't says now much. Will you do it? Thank you reclaimed. Our aid will see this gun it. I wish you'd read. two comments and not periscope, I do both, but the actual reason is that I've got to ipads here and the Mai,

scope. Ipad is a larger one. I can see them a little bit more clearly, this off now I'll talk to you guys.