Really works for you and experimental etc, but I just can't leave you with this fact. If you didn't know their success, the techniques of success our learn about. and somewhat easily compared to less a learning of foreign language, which should be hard learning engineering. That's hard learning, math s heart but learning the techniques of success or weirdly simple? You just have to be exposed to us all. So. Here's a question: what are the recommended therapeutics for over nineteen in the United States? also what you you, the doctor, they test, you and you ve got covered. What therapeutics do you get in the United States? now the reason I ask that we see reports of various therapeutics from Iver, backed into bunch of things with big were

A city, Monoclonal antibodies Bam, land of the mob, and it is. The Bob. and I think I prognosis correctly- all let me say them Again- demolition but the big, bad and absolutely but the bad. So I think you got those and they massively reduced hospitalization. These are lilies monoclonal antibodies. so we keep hearing their stories various therapeutics that reduce hospitalizations, two zero, basically right or close to zero. I asked the question, given that we are all these reports of therapeutics that reduce the rest zero. Why are people still Dian right, so I asked the question one therapeutic, steel, Gatt and the United States

you know what the answer is. Do you know what therapeutic you get if you go in and you do test positive for covered nothing, nothing that is the current the current, the therapeutic. Is it if you have a confirmed case of Coben, you get nothing Go tell us if it gets worse and I feel like. I don't quite know that until today action a number of people confirmed it. But what is the point of therapeutics if you don't get them. Now I'm assuming their when people come in with worse some or maybe if they have some com or abilities that that the doctor It will be a little bit more aggressive and getting it Some of these but correct me if I'm wrong, don't most of the therapeutics have this quality to them? If you don't-

really soon doesn't help as much because I think there are a number of european works that aren't so good when you are close to death, but our terrific, if you get an early right, but we don't give them to people orally. Why is it because the ivory maktub doesn't work or these monoclonal is because we don't have enough, is Someplace, where we could say: ok I percent of people come in with any kind of co morbidity, even if it's just a little overweight. We're gonna give you these monoclonal antibodies. Where can we give you Iver, Makin and basic? We take all the people who are at risk and just eliminate the risk. Couldn't we. Is it just a supply problem that it somebody says, insurances the reason I can confirm that that would be true

One rule it out. I would not rule out a distorting effect from insurance. I'm not gonna make that claim, but I think you have to look at that for sure, and of course people are saying, there's not enough money in therapeutics, etc. I don't know that's the case that there's a reason that their made the companies that make the therapeutics didn't make them not to be used, so they want them to be used. So I feel as if we could almost say the therapeutics. We know use until there too late in many cases. But the study. The said these lily monoclonal everybody's were successful. it took about five minutes for Anatoly Lebowski, one of my favorite sceptics, The way to save the studies, not very good,

In view of this, The study shows that something or something helps with a groan, a virus and five minutes later, not rigorous study. even I could recognise that it wasn't a very powerful study, meaning that there were enough people feel you got the right answer. But so is a little weak. Just sailor, Michael Mina who's been the one most advocating the quick cheap tests. which are not legal in the United States, because the FDA requires a prescription to get a test, and I think reporting is still required. Two things which almost proves that are FDA is corrupt. We just don't know who at the FDA or what kind of corruption that is, but I think we can conclude at this point that the FDA. as a corruption. From this the the rapid testing thing just shows, it is clearly, as you could possibly show it.

Now I am open to a counter argument if the FDA would like to argue that there reasons for these having a prescription and reporting requirement. If there are reasons, unlike ear, but short of hearing the reasons you have to assume corruption at the FDA. by Michael, been announced, a massive public health research study with Citibank, and if I have this, they're gonna use just to the test scenario, they're, going to test these rapid test on, I think, probably just Citibank employees for a while and see if it makes a difference. I don't know if it's Citibank employees only, but the point is that there's going to be some testing on this and it will order for the FDA to say no, this could be really really important for a future pandemics, and maybe it helps us mop up a little at the end of this one, but we should have been doing this a year ago. We really should have.

Talk about the George Lloyd trial So Jack Posada is reporting on this. I don't know who else is reporting on. I feel like the only I'm saying about the the trial is run from Jack. Twitter today, I don't know who needs to hear this, but nearly every potential, your call, then the George Voice case testify That there were terrified of being docks and their families threatened if they served on the jury. You should just stop the trial, though we should stop the trial. You gotta, stop the trial. This is not fair because somebody is going to say yes to serving on this jury and I don't think they should. I feel as if this situation is just not fair

The poor citizens were just tried to do their civic duty and to do a trial. Stop the trial. Stop right now, move it. Yeah, maybe movies somewhere where people would be less concerned, but man. If, if nearly every potential jury has this fear, the people don't have the fear of maybe say yesterday either. Meals are going to vote to up to, they already know they're going to vote to connect which is worse possible scenario or They're not aware, and after another third danger- and you dont want that person making life and death decisions either right. You should stop this trial right away. in the same way. There's something I've told you before that You dont decide what your product is. The customer tells you what business you so.

You think you're providing one kind of service or product, but your customers keep asking for. Something is a little different. You start giving that thing. That's a little different, that's the business Europe! You're that business, your customers decided what business Europe To tell you that what they need them, you just move to their business. I think we have to apply Some of their thinking to this trial, normally normally the corner stone, tells us what the trial is course, system says we ve got this system to jury. Your peers, it's going to work with these rules and that's good that normally works. But what happened here already is that the customers in this case and ensures just change the product. They just told you this isn't product. The product that the court system thinks there selling the figurative sense.

Is some kind of fair justice system this like every there are fair trial without this isn't like that. This is dangerous to the jurors. This is really dangerous to the jurors and it needs to be stopped Anita, just call it off right now and try to figure out how to do it in a safe way, but it needs to be stopped. We should not be putting. citizens, who are just trying to do their civic duty in front of a firing squad. Its is outrageous. If I were of the lawyers. For the George like us, Here is one of the things I would be arguing. Somebody said to me on Twitter Scott: How can you say it's the front and all that might have killed? George Floyd, we know sentinel was an system, we know sentinel kills you quickly the way, George. died but at the same time,.

There was a police officers me on his neck. and so somebody said, Scott. There was a knee his neck for nine minutes. So. To which I say, if I'm from the defence attorney for direct, when I say. If you look around the quorum, you'll see number of men wearing neckties. How many. We'll be strangled to death by their neckties by the end of today. Because they'll be wearing those neckties for hours. How many of them will die from strangulation. and the answer is probably none and you know why, because things that touch your neck, don't kill you. What's this

Still alive. Still alive, I could breathe. So it turns out there. This can look like their straggly. You. And not even barely be dodgy? What all about that, in fact, If I were the authority, I would take off my necktie, rapid around my neck, hold it as tight as possible and give my closing statement law. Holding it really really tight the jury could not possibly missed the point. The things can look. like strangulation, lobby. Since thoroughly arguing a The defence only asked argue reasonable. Doubt. And so, if the, if the main thing is this. Visual video there

The reason that there is a need touching you back right, Anybody who says that should be looked into. Why disobey need to look into that right? There's somebody dies while a policeman is on their neck. You have to look into that, but the reasonable doubt has just all over this. Well, you passed out, but we assume that he might have anyway, because he had the kind of drugs ilium that makes you pass out in those situations. Now the the The partners can be dicey is what about the weather. They should have known. That there was a risk, you saying I can't breathe body I also say that before they put him on the ground, so reasonable person gonna, thought well he's you're saying this has nothing to do with his position. But I believe on the video that the office.

I asked him if he was on anti drugs. Does I remember that. The police officers not ask him directly what drugs he was on or if use of any drugs. I think he did and I believe that George Floyd lied and said he was not. Now, how would this have gone if George Lloyd, Yes, I have seen the sentinel well provided now. We are central but yes, I have a number of opium aids in me. what would the police officer do if somebody you said, I just took a bunch of opiates and I have a breathing problem now, if that cop. Countries that as a medical problem last problem right, because recap should know that somebody who takes too many opiates. Diane debris. Problem might be the other. The warning that that's gonna happen, brazen, so

the cap would have handled it completely differently. One imagines joy. If short Floyd have not lied to him about his medical condition so if you're saying hey widened the officer believe when he said I can't breathe. I did the officer believe money said he didn't have any drugs. The fact is. It was dealing with a liar when when George Lloyd, Sadie wasn't taking it wasn't anything, don't you think the police knew he was on something not necessarily opiates, now Hard to tell, but they knew he was lying right so Once you have established that he would lie to the police officers when he said that he couldn't breathe. and I saw a common thing that people say oh and hand after care breathe right. This is probably one of the most things police officers here when they they try to control a person.

So I don't see any chance that that there's gonna be a conviction on the murder charges. There might be something in terms of policy. You're something that was violated out enough. So, where very more stores by Harris what see and prepare Cobbler Harris to take over this kind of funny, because it's a little bit heavy handed. Just a little too, all too obvious what they're doing but there's a. today it is the sort of building Europe to get ready to take over and here's what the sea at other, say. quota. She spends a good portion of each egg around The five hours with binding Two behind closed doors, according to way how sources now? How many hours a day did pence spend with Trump.

Closer to zero right now, I do think that they talked a lot, but do you think pants friend of forty five hours around Trump everyday I'll, think so vague. So so This is, of course, softening you opted to see or as a co president, because she's, just always in the room, Then they quote Jim Kleiber and save the chemistry between the two of them is great. Said, representative, Jim Kleiber. Do you remember any stories about the chemistry between pants and drop. I don't I don't recall any chemistry stories you, and those says, learning on the job is no small thing for the second in command learning on the job learning. What. Learning how to be a vice president. What.

learning on the job I feel like it means in this context, learning to be the president, which of course of vice president should do, And she's take says: Civilization is taking a very strong hands on approach to his most important projects. That's right, she's, a strong hands on approach to his most important projects. Sounds a little bit like she might already be making the decisions like move in that direction. and then this this last part, which is just laugh out loud funny Biden himself strategies, the passage of the stimulus package and personally work, the most critical senators. Now, what that be just everywhere Doesn't every president talk about the strategy of getting something best if they wanted to get past

Would that just be every conversation everyday with every president? What's the strategy to get this best But I feel like they had the additive for by to make. You think that he is brain steelworks, oh, but he's all over the strategizing. He still good. All right, I us yesterday on my locals channel, which is a subscription service, local stuck on I asked my followed. Is there what they got the most value and the answer I saw the most was re framing had Refrain the situation, so you just think about it in a more productive way. and I realize that most of what I do is reframing. It is super powerful. So I'm going to be doing more of more of that I'll give you the exact some of the re frames. One of them is systems versus goals. Just

ray framing the way you think about success from a goal oriented to a systems orient, thinking about how you prepare your skills from being really good at one thing, to a skill stack where you have a combination of skills, their work, well, those refrains refraining equals I just know, doesn't there's nothing like that. Refrain is could be used in any context has nothing to do with politics per se. Referring in politics is usually just more politics, but re framing about success. Or how you how you look at the world? That's that's useful. Harrison centres? The military industrial cunt assume your statement. Reaffirm success. Well,

there are lots of components within success, there will be reaffirmed and I will refrain by. Well, I don't think of re framing so much in terms of the person, I think, every framing in terms of how you? U visualize things, were how you, how you imagine things in your head odds, the binding speaks live. I think you will. Click laugh. I met if one kiss ready to go. Ok, that's interesting concept. Refraining equals Antigua, Tarifa did a clever

framing whereby calling themselves anti fascist, you can't be against them without being a fascist, so that was pretty clever as more persuasion than framing. I think. I say more on that later and I will talk to you all tomorrow and that's it for they read you tubers Joe Biden has done more than bologna. What is Joe Biden? I have nothing against Joe Biden. I think she's probably doing a great job by the way.

question on gender Saki. What is the effect of you saying circle back and Jennifer Saki his use of it? I dont quite understand the question, but the circle back thing is just something people are talking about two. She says: there's not not too much to say about that. Say also that comment again, he I don't understand. The question saw some hundred so ask in a different way, and I shall be here by cylinder. Somebody says: don't gates is a? U Genesis. knowing. So all in all those things like delegates is a: U Genesis than the areas can put a chip in you. There was a crazy. The crazy and they're they're. So far from being a rational opinion that.

It also has to be seen as mental illness of some kind, some some mild kind of mental illness. Where you at, where you imagine that the guy who was literally doing the most to help the world is actually some kind of a devil character. I mean that's, that's a weird. This is kind of mental illness, but I don't know what I would call it per se. Somebody says got items is a toad perfectly reasonable opinion We'll houses in your city have virtual reality. Headsets start, maybe how much roadblocks stock that I buy none but I'll tell you I have witnessed a child hooked on that programme. Roadblocks and I've never seen anything like it? There is something about that. Has a stick: Yunus, that's just crazy!.

Are your bill Gates payroll? I'm not. Why would you than assume that somebody says bill is no Patriot bills our patriot. You no longer agree with you on that, because I dont see bill gates being a nationalist. It does seem to be a goal. Last, but not in the globalist bad way, but rather AEGIS, seizes mission is being outside of not not restricted to the United States. So I would. I would. I wouldn't say is not a patriot. This is not as his brand picture of the dawn place, you're too, and see if he does he's got a really good, a good one of that.

How will you overcome the secret cabal if you run for president was the other secret cabal of people were really empower well, you'd have due to the way trumpeted it. The first time, which is surprising because are there, are certain, will say, gates to keep people out of power, but if you overwhelm the gate before they know what you're doing too late that Sweden, who paid from the fraud that we talk about, have you experienced telepathy, not that I'm aware of I've. I've experienced things that, like have a sensation.

Why let nerves were by definition, socially inept run society? Will you talk about Bill gates right, I will say the bill gates does a really good job of sticking to the things that bill Gates is good at which is looking at complicated situations and trying to simplify them and figure out. What's a good strategy, If you could tell me, there's somebody better at that. Maybe you're mosque right, maybe Jeff Basis there. a handful of people, you say: ok, really gonna Tesla, he a complicated things picky. I was important Thus, if he told you have good manners or something that would be, you would be the wrong person. Are you interested in power structures interested sure

That means. Do you go to a now? Why do you ask it because I say that alcohol is poisoned by the way that another refrain? Somebody said that it was helpful. In Stopping drinking that just say, the alcohol is poison and just repeating it whatever is the alcohol makes it. So I thus often out I'll talk to you tomorrow.