Everybody just in time, I like that some of you are so punctual you know, punctuality as a sign of character and how many were taught by one of your parents, or maybe both that on time is late. How many of you are taught that if he can shop on time, you can't do anything about. It is about time that was building to be on which we had a tradition that my family, my mother's you have to be home at five o clock dinner, every night, no exceptions. So wherever you are, you have you didn't have a cell phone or whatever no excuses you had to find our way back to the house at five o clock every day. Seven days a week now accepts it was a great rule.

Working twenty twenty one, though well, if you'd like to enjoy this programme to its maximum potential, when I know you do I, as the government was staggered, gel style, candy jug last vessel Billy Capital was reopened likelihood. I like coffee, enjoy me down. If you well for the dopamine his day, the unparalleled pleasure it's it's called the but even this up- and I don't think anything ever been better, it's gonna make you day: are you ready, for this will be one of the best one of the best here comes go? Did you hear the millions of coffee, cups and vessels being quenching people's thirst? At the same time, all around the world will now isn't worth millions of. Possibly there will be some day. We have mere hundreds of thousands today.

Well the Georgia. Georgia passed some new voting rules, including requirement for Idee, even for voting by mail and, of course, Democrats recalling this say Jim Crow LAW, which works really well, because most people don't know anything about history and they say themselves. I've heard that phrase Jim Crow, pretty sure as bad, oh, this is one of those will. That must be bad, but if you actually knew your history, you would not seem a lot in common with Jim Crow Laws, which were pretty rest of racist and people would one idea for voting now, here's question watch the dog that wasn't marking.

One of the things I like to do when I talk about the news, because nobody else does us is to tell you what you didn't hear. That's important, So the story is sort of sort of complete. Wouldn't you say if this piece of information is missing and it goes like this. There is an assumption here that your poor, uneducated people, the ones who would have with the most difficulty getting identification because it actually cost something to get identification, getting a birth certificate that might be like modern. Seventy five dollars you gotta travel somewhere. We get maybe take a day off work whenever it. If you work. And but the assumption is that if these people voted instead of being shut out from the system, they'd be better off. Does that kind of a big assumption.

That, if these people, who don't have identification, voted. That they themselves would it be better off. Do you believe that, because I think I'd like to see some of that isn't the entire reason that the United States is not a democratic system were. Were we have a democratic elements with republic is the whole point of republic. There. Giving the masses for control and let let the majority just when every time. Well, there are more of you, so you win. Wasn't that the whole point that the that the masses can't be trusted you, the smarter people who actually care about them to be the ones making the decisions so. There is a concept

so I would say we should at least test the assumption that if all these extra people got vote, let's say we help them get ideas or what overtook the day would be happier than they would get what they wanted. Do you think? That's true. Do you think if you let uneducated people, because by large, is at least educated part of the population? Now you don't have to be an educated to be poor, but you On average, that's where it's that's, where it's going so I don't know, I think, there's some basic assumptions in here that need to be challenged. We we, like the concept that we own everybody, gets to vote. There's nobody who's against that. But shouldn't we at least challenge weathers, there's a purpose on it. What do you get out of it. Yeah where we want everybody devout. Everybody agrees on that Why

why do we want everybody to vote to get a better outcome right. Or at least get it out, come that the the public says is credible, because the right people voted- and I do everybody could did so I think we should test our assumptions about why we care about anybody voting. Why can't children vote? Is there a reason, though we dont let children less illicit toddlers is the reason we don't let him about, and what is it? What is terrorism? can you think of any reason that school children should not vote? What would be the While I believe the thinking is that they are not there not as capable right is there any other ism, though you can think of. Why would you deny the vote to and eleven year old. I am in favour of denying the vote to an eleven year old, but

asking here? What's the reason? Isn't the reason that we think the quality of the decisions would not? be helped. By letting eleven year, girls go right. And don't we believe that the eleven year old, here's the key point right. So here's the keyboard, don't we I believe that if the eleven year old. Were allowed to preserve pursue yeah their own interests that they wouldn't do all right. Isn't that the assumption Because otherwise we let them both to say. Oh, you know, what's good for you I wish we want what's good for you too, so that vote and you'll have a greater chance of getting what's good for you. Nobody thinks that because you know, and eleven year old isn't good. No, it was good for them. Then I can understand the topics they would be easily misled. Let me ask you

Our people who world was a eleven year old, kids or- and this is arises- is offensive bug you do that lovely, uneducated, adult population in and say, are they better off? Could you could you make the case. That making sure more of that group voted that we got. This has nothing to do with race going to talk about race in the moment, but for now we're just talk about people who are uneducated and poor, and there are, to them of all types doing get a better result, because people who are the most easily duped got to vote I don't think you would doubt that, would you well know? That's not your very senior citizens are as easily duped and they do vote. So that's, I guess, as a problem to so.

I think we should at least test the theory that the republic form of government is better than the other kind. Because letting everybody vote, even if they what really that interested and not that informed, not really the republic model as much as it is the straight democracy mall, and we. Decide which one we liked better. Let me ask you this: do you think that poor I guess the poor part- is irrelevant to the question, but less under educated people. Do you think under educated people should make. Her own legal and medical decisions. Now, of course, I can that's right, There are some that right, but do you think that the uneducated your person who goes into their doctor, And the doktor says: well, you ve got a bad case of acts and here the pills that will take care of it too weak she'll be all right.

Definitely you have acts. Definitely these pills are gonna. Make you better hurry, go she the poor person just say you know, I don't know medicine. I think I'll just take your advice. Would they be better off with that, because the doktor doesn't so the thoroughly of your best interests in mind, right is still, we to you to back your decisions, us where the system works, but I think a uneducated person who is uneducated about Lucy medical Science Why you just take the advice of the person who has their interests in mind? The least enough other interests in mind. How about should run education of educated person make their own complicated legal decisions? Why not. Why not just because they don't know how why without stopping that's the right, Israel's notation later- wait for a real lawyer to give them some advice and then

might make some decision about whether they want to take the advice by you. What somebody smart help you with the heart the hard stuff right. That's why we have a republic to send the smart people up to do the things that we're not gonna get into the details on ourselves as enough on that. Then, let's talk about the racial part, here's support is missing. That I wonder why. This so? The assumption here is that the Georgia voting rules will disenfranchised and or reduce the least the percentage of black voters, and that could change the entire outcome of the election. So it's important and I ask you this: do We win or lose elections based on the percentage. Of a racial group. The voting for you is that our system works.

Oh you got lucky because you got you got the greatest percentage of a specific region group like it s, not the system. This system is just the greatest number who ever gets the most votes. It's not a percentage, its were against the most. We just compare two sets of oats. Which ones bigger? That's all system, but we're talking about like percentages of this group and percentages that we should check our souls everyone's while and here's a question I haven't seen answered Other more poor white people who don't have ideas or poor black people Now, as a percentage is not even clubs percentage wise, I think it was like twenty five percent of black miracle citizens. Don't have really

ready. Now I dont believe that's true, but it is a statistic I saw. I have trouble. Believing is twenty five percent. I can't believe it's even close to that. Actually, if I had to guess that, put a closer to ten or fifteen just it feels like a couldn't, possibly be twenty five, but again, if you, if you're not close to their population, maybe I just don't see it could be just invisible to people like me. So here's the question: why are we talking about the percentage of black people that our voting? Should we talk about the number of people who are not voting no matter what they are the desire is that really the important part of the year, the percentage of racial boob? Now I get, I get the point right you do. I every group to be. Representative, but we don't have a constitution that requires that wherein the constitution does. It say that among us,

groups, there should be similar rates of voting. The reason is not part of the constitution. Is it wouldn't be a good idea, even if you could do uneasily? I just don't know that that would be a good idea. Maybe the people vote should be the ones who care and well informed and as well as I can be yours, come on, I saw Andrew on Youtube, has his comment. He says I'm a black immigrant and no plenty of poor black people and he says I've never met anyone who doesn't have an idea. So there's a year a black adult immigrants in the United States who knows lots of poor black people doesn't know anybody doesn't have an idea. Have you ever met anybody who doesn't have a navy? Now The problem is, maybe you just don't meet the people do have ideas like it.

Don't have ideas, probably meet each other and the people- Of ideas probably meet each other, but can't tell you the last time I had a conversation with somebody who even might not have an idea. You know somebody whose situation is so so bad in society that you could reasonably think I'm not even sure this person has an idea. When was the last time you had a conversation with anybody like that, right, probably that. And so a measure then just cause you haven't met any that. That's telling you much, however, to the point that there is a stab said. There's something like twenty five percent of black Americans do have idea. I couldn't possibly be true. Got it Got it I mean I'd really like to know if it's true, because hi that does change my opinion on the whole topic right.

Is one thing to say, which I M saying I don't think, there's a constitutional reason. The percentages of voting need to be equal, that's just not in the constitution, but at the same time, if twenty five percent of black Americans care work as they are of ideas? That's way too big, so big, you gotta do something about it right like if it were a small problem. You just say what a big problem. If it's true so I guess we don't have the fact check them out in a way that I believe it, but I would like to see in the number this missing is the number of white people just the number, the wrong number, Compared to the wrong number of black Americans who don't have already and therefore care about which one is better, which number is bigger, because I don't believe that twenty five percent

But do you think there are more raw numbers of white people who are poor and camp out? Because if I d or more somebody says racist. You don't understand the source of his calling me a racist comments. A typical First of all, you may have missed a story that I self identify as black. Now I am allowed to do that, and- and I take that right, as my own So I can be racist because I self identifies black. Solicitously, sadly, is I'm not only not racist, I'm pro black super blow pro black. In fact I've spent that have time in my own money trying to make the world better for specifically for black people. You ve seen me: do it then quite a bit of work, even in public now, so so personal? It's not possible right.

By definition, you can't be racist in this country. If you black, and that's one of the reasons that I self identifies black, so that they don't have that problem and. Some of you are- and I was you were saying right now. You were saying. I think this is a gag re. Really self identifying is black. Are you? This is a joke right, nope nope Stop joke, I'm literally self identifying is black. I do have black dna so much. But the rules say that you can self identify. I dont make the rules, I'm just in I've, told you before one of the most persuasive you can do is follow the rules exactly as a written. I am following the rules exactly s written exactly and. If that changes the rules. Well, maybe the rules weren't good, but don't blame me for following the rules.

I'm going to follow them sincerely if that makes anything bad for you. Well, you ll have to deal with that, Talk about North Korea, bad persuasion, so here. The position of the Bible, administration and they're, not the first ones to have this position but think about how stupid this is. These are actually elected politicians who are. Theoretically, there are capable of doing stuff like this. The american position that Before we are willing to negotiate with North Korea Their leader has to agree in advance to a humiliating defeat in the negotiations in advance.

We won't negotiator you until you agree to lose the negotiations in this context, it means agree in advance to give up nuclear weapons. Now is Adam. Both I ask is that a reasonable position, because Was it that wants to nuke you in the first place. I'll. Tell you who wants to newcomers. People who insist that they lose before were willing to fucking talk to him yeah they should Lucas, maybe because were acting like we deserve to get nuke. If anybody ever deserve to get nuke, it would be a cut. It says you will only talk to you if you agree to humiliating defeat before the first word spoken, that's last smart. What did trumpet do instead?

Trot said, if you make a move in our direction, we will wipe you out, but we'd love to talk. I'd like to get the other compare those two. They are not even close in terms of the right approach. Persuasion was, one of them is. Firstly, the dumbest fucking thing you ve ever seen in your life we'd love to negotiate with Yucas is very important to both of us. And if we don't negotiate with you, there could be a nuclear war. That's Helen, The distant negotiate with you now having established that is a vital planetary importance. Here's how we're going to approach it would have. Even talk to you do you agree to lose and not only lose you have to the most important thing in a visible, very high. The boy humiliating way, that's our opening position.

Are you serious, can we get And the dumber, how could up possibly work now I hypothesis this morning that I kind of like I'm gonna toss it out here and see what you say speaking tossing its the user name on Twitter, who came who suggested this. I don't know if I want to read his name in public, but it's on Twitter, so I'll just read it so is he named, fudged awesome, and he too, it's us about our opening position of negotiations with north. Where and when I point out that it is impossible, ridiculous, failing in advance position to say you have to lose before we start, this user says it wasn't? This is actually a good hypothesis. He says it's intentional

in other words were intentionally was with North Korea is not strategically desirable, ha. And then he goes on? He says It gives us an excuse to keep forces in the neighborhood ha. That's not about a thought about hypothesis. Because it would explain why we will be doing. Something so stupid and public use. Will you try to hide your stupid stuff right, but would we be so stupid in public for so long? This is not a bad hypothesis there were literally not trying to have peace with North Korea, because if we, We wouldn't have an excuse to keep forces there on the border of China, basically or near it, and then this user went on to say that's why John Bolton sabotaged chums peace summit by going on tv

just before saying the libyan model, was one way of dealing with the north, which did sort of sabotage things and Maybe John Bonham was just thinking. The last thing we want is to take forces and of South Korea, at a time when China is militarized in the area, and I. Myself, that's not banned, as I bothers is. Is it that's not Because we probably do want some kind of military presence in there. Area as China is rising and your very military listen. They seem to be indicating a high military interest and controlling all area. Interesting, just put that out there. What do you think so? He says goods is a good strategic move is a good strategic move under the under these

that they don't know us accidentally, nuke us or seldom nukes to somebody who would or sell the technology to somebody would steadily dangerous button? Maybe there is a strategic reason. You never know. I keep asking this question, and maybe this is also something somebody smarter can explain. Wouldn't do you think give China is by far the biggest future challenge. Wouldn't you say, we should be working on a military alliance with Russia. Instead of having a military alliance, NATO against Russia should We re looking to have a military alliance with Russia. Because our wood China be kept in check, because, just

There's the pure size would suggest that if you for fast for fifty years China owns everything, so seems to me that we should be smarter. As the one thing I like about Putin. Are you allowed to say that I'd say, he's a murderous dictator and is all bad, but. There is one thing that makes him useful from the perspective of the United States, which is a pragmatist. You're kind. I know exactly what Putin was all, but I'm right when he does something provocative with was area or whatever You dont wonder why is doing it. Say: oh, you want warm water ports and blah blah

though, he is completely transparent and operates more like a more like a crime family boss, meaning you can make a deal with them and so he's not is not based on some religious or dog matic thing he's just doing what. For him doing what's good for Russia, so I feel like that's exactly the guy you could work with that doesn't mean you wouldn't try to put one over on us, even if we were on the same side, etc, but every now, and then you have to check your assumption. Yo Yo, up in the morning, and you realize that Russia and the United States have nuclear weapons pointed ledge at each other. Why why. Why will we have ours pointed them? Because there is no point in us. There's one loves because hours or appointed button.

But neither does have a real reason: Dewey, I think there might have been in the past. But I think there is one now and indeed the biggest. I would thank the biggest threat for both Russia and the United States. Would be arising, China to me. It seems like obvious. We have to go this way. Light necessity will push us together in the future, so why that is doing now likes list skip ten years of being enemies. Because we're gonna end up on the same tee, I just feel like there's no way around it. Just like world war, two In world war two, there wasn't any question or going Can you sort of on the russian team against the Nazis and it looks to me I'm not comparing China to the Nazis. They both had concentration camps in which they put ethnic minority.

To eradicate them and genocide, but I'm not comparing them, I'm not comparing they do have a little similarity, but I'm not compared. So here is something I'd like to point out. There was a survey. If you can call it that That the Chicago Council on global affairs polished they're asking Americans about their attitudes about China and that the way they do it, they asked a questions. They have this thing. They call the feeling thermometer Allowing responses on a hundred different scale, ranging for Very warm now would be a favourable feeling about China of a hundred to very cold, which will be there Nearly twelve hundred Americans came back with an average response that was well according to this article freezing at thirty two,

So in terms of- and it looks like that's an all time low- or at least I don't know but works very well- And here's the thing I like to point out: do you remember back and twenty sixteen I was tell you that tromp was very persuasive. Do you remember that people, said to me, or, whereas always persuasion, you're saying he so persuasive, but show it to me where's his persuasion, whereas it let's see and persuade me he's not persuaded me. I don't see any persuasion. He spoke four years telling you that China is the biggest problem the world and then than a survey comes out. This suggests that Americans think China is the biggest problem in the world that was Trop now. I've said this before

Now, that's not to say there are plenty of China hawks. You got your Tom gardens. You hear your. Your Gordon gangs is ever so plenty of high profile people who are also railing against China? But they don't have the same skills. And I believe that they wouldn't have moved the needle. You know a Gordon Chang Tom Gun are excellent in terms of command of the facts and in and being smart about how they think of it. In a practical way, highest level. Thinking knowledge, But I don't see you neither one of them specifically persuasion skills. The way I see it and tramp tramp is persuaded. He will change your mind. Tom come Might tell you something you didn't know. Gordon Jane will tell you something you didn't know, maybe framed in a new way

I don't know if he has the persuasive specific skills like like John. Does I told you before- that there's a weird thing: I've been tracking for a long time which whenever I am involved in persuading anything at all, goes my way, and I can't tell if I just good at picking the right topic. So maybe I'm just good at picking the right side and then my team wins, but I thought it's only because I was on the right side. There wasn't, because I made a difference. But I don't think there are too many regular citizens who have persuaded with actual persuasion tools. Against China, more than I have since twenty eighteen. I'll bet you, if you looked at a graph of feelings about China, you would see that in twenty eighteen, when my that's some died of functional overdose, which I blame on China

I think you would see you then around two thousand and eighteen there's a fairly sharp change in the opinion of China. I don't know that, but I'll bet you'd find it and it wouldn't be an accident some of that? There was talk about that big ol shift is stuck in the Suez Canal, which is weirdly. Interesting, is way more interesting than hit that I think and here's the quest. I would ask you, because mobile obsessed about the engineering to get thing out of there? Can you string tugboats together? How many tugboats could you string together because it seems to me see if I can the second do this. With you see, let's say this phone here is the boat, the ship and its is going. Say it say it going forward, which will be up in my example and then.

Stern sideways gets wedged now the front part of the wedge operas- only would be deep into the sand and it looks like they're trying to dig it dig out the front. The back is also on the bank, but we think that the bank maybe isn't dug in so much on the back. I think a front because it dog in is probably way in their so getting there. Pronto seems hard. The bacco seems easier. Feel like their workin on the front lesser. Firstly, I'd ask as are their work and on the right side, The setting of the other ask is how many ships indoor tugboats. Can you string together to increase the power of them all? Is there a limit as the limit might be achieved at the end would break or something because they wouldn't be enough But it seems to me that,

Who could chain enough boats, and maybe you throw in a- he also throw in another freighter in there to get the wait right. Just pull on that thing from the back. I wouldn't try to get the. I think, that's a mistake. I would pull on the back because that's probably wedged in the least. If you get the bacco, I think you can. Front will come out ass. My guess so I'm just gonna put that out. There is just an engineering question: why can't you just string a bunch of tugboats together until you have enough of them? We have many. Would it take, Because, presumably, you would have unlimited resources to do this right and there must be a ton of tugboats. There get a hundred other Somebody said blow it up. I think the problem is that the clean up would take as long as getting an amateur Rutgers university is going

choir vaccinations to go back to in person classes. We will expect a lot more of that. I would expect that travel will require vaccinations. We some kinds of travelling I'm thinking schools were require, it gives the teachers unions. Would you say to do it or else we won't their work. I feel as if. Society will have enough places that you have to be vaccinated, that a lot of people who wouldn't have gotten it are going to say I still want to function in society. I want to go to my gym so might as well do it. I think that's why it's happening. Now, as I mentioned earlier, I identifies the blackmail and doktor interracial on Twitter was probably watching this right now.

Hello, Docker held up a copy of my and by the way, Doktor Interracial is exactly what it sounds. Like is an interracial marriage. One of them is a doctor. Apparently I don't know which one is the doktor, but there's a duck. Interracial and lets say that it's the husband Mosher that's the case, but. He held up Maya my book had a almost everything any tweeted my new favorite self identified black author notes? As I said, it's a black man whose doing this tweet, and I He's working now part of that tweets red asked why I can't be, or should I. The New York Times best selling black authors list. I do know such a thing existed, but apparently the near toes has a special car. A little labelling list. Just were black authors and

actor interracial and his wife are asking. Why am I not on it? Shouldn't should buy books be on that list? Well, maybe, at the moment are not selling enough, but in theory. What would make me ineligible for that list with the new? Times get too, would they be the ones who get to identify my race. Because that's not there all right. If you ask New York Times, how does it work is you, the New York Times, who gets to say were ethnic day I am or or racial make up, or do I get to say that I think they would agree that I get to say right. I'm not joking! If you ask New York Times. Would they not agree with me that the individual gets too? identify the way they want to be. That's right, I'm not making. So by their own rule,. Would it not be eligible for the maritime specifying black authors list?

if I'm not how they explain them. Now, if they explain it because they think I'm just joking, let me say I'm not I'm not. Following a real rule, because it advantages me you, live in the United States- and there is a real Rule that everybody agrees with it doesn't have to be the law per se, but everybody agrees with that. You can use a rule. Bilbil to everybody, there's no role this as I can use the rule, because then it would be useless if he gave. Right. They be racist for a minute or omitting me, based on their own definition of things. Now, as I told you before, one of the best ways to change rules, you don't like is to use them and adhere to them strictly.

So here you watch me. Don't I've, given you examples before were broken systems that this is good, hypnosis persuasion trick. You can break any system by far These rules, the only way every system works, is if people are bending the rules all the time, because there is very rarely Can you make a system that works for all situations so the only way you can make it work at all is to be doing Bending the rules and all the strange situations, not almost nothing this exception to that. So if you want to a societal rule follow it and don't make the exception just followed, and it will break on his own. Yeah. It others interesting news on the DNA or about the neanderthal genes. Currently the neanderthal genes

tell you a lot about your likelihood of a bad covid nineteen ops, but it's not as clean as if you have it or don't. I guess, there's something sub categories within the within the category that can make you. Good or bad based on that are less hardware, vitamin d there's a new medicine study with us. If the different studies that overwhelmingly show overwhelmingly like overwhelmingly you the study, all on the same side, that if your vitamin d level is good, you'll, have better incomes with the krona virus and buy a lot. Now most of the studies are just showing the correlation say you gotta, be careful, correlation, doesn't mean causation

And it also doesn't mean that if you just took more vitamins, you would necessarily be better off, but I think it's a good bad, so I do take the three. So I take vitamin d just because the risk is zero. The upside might be life enough. So of course I take it, but I don't know if the thing I get over the counter makes any difference. There the suggestion that maybe it's you could be good, but not a big big thing. The thing I'd worry about here is that the correlation is fully us. Because it is true that people who are unhealthy in general, for whatever reason if there are unhealthy for any reason they. Must always have low vitamin d so sense, healthy people or who the people who die of covered. It could be just a coincidence that they also low violently, but

It's a strong enough correlation and the risk of here the so allow that I think, be literally just stupid not to try to supplement your ear. Given that as other benefits that are more more obviously true according to science, So we get your vitamin d, but I dont know that that's like the magic bullet or anything like that. How many of you. Our money I get up I'll. Give you lead into this. There was a user named Peter online, who, in one of the twitter conversations mentioned too bad things about President Trump, the fine people hoax and the drinking bleed chokes except poor. Peter didn't know both of them are

And then poor Peter had the bad luck of running into user magician and magician Quaker courteously showed him the transcript of the fine people hoax to know that it was oaks and then the transcript of the the drinking bleach hoax to see that he never said drinking, please. She always talked about light and that's all hoax, now. What do you think you Peter did what he realized, because, as you can read it right, he doesn't have to wonder if he was wrong. You can read, it is obviously was what do you think he did. He say wow. Oh, I was not aware of these facts. And now the EU has informed me and I can see the transcripts. I changed my mind, those or no

there are no true stories at all. Those are hoaxes. Do you think that happened with Peter know, because it never works? Facts are completely on persuasive and always will be once you learn that you understand the world. If you think the facts can change somebody's mind on politics, you haven't been paying attention because it does So so, after that wait and myself- and I noted in my tweet, the poor Peter and I use narrator voice narrator. This was the moment Peter realized. He had been double Rupert. Double report now, yet another big rhubarb is based on Fox Writer, Erin Rhubarb. I think this is for are you p r?

became an actual word in the urban deck dictionary you may have been removed by now, but it was in their as someone who ass his around edited videos, the misleading and doesn't intentionally. And so I said the poor Peter had been double rhubarb. Two horses. Now I'm gonna, I'm gonna Reemphasize something I said before, but because everything I said it well enough, as I thought about it, goes like this words carry persuasion now you kind of new that, but I'm good at. A girl at a little to it, which is that every word is like a little unit of logic or persuasion. I guess you could say that are better to say persuaded. Not so logical, but words carry their own logic and reasons and explanation

Just by being at work, and so if you can create a word like being rude hard, you can imbue it with a credibility that it never earned. Cuz words do that they just absorb things like credibility. They absorb lack of credit different word: they absorb things that they don't learn and there's no logic to they just absorb them. So by creating an official word for this You let the word absorb the credibility that doesn't make sure you're persuasion better. Simply because there's a word that you and the person you talk to have both heard to describe this think so That's why I'm pushing the Rupert thing so much, not because it's funny in mixed mix fun of this one end of it, But because you actually are creating a packet of persuasion, they can just or live there forever after I leave, if

if the report were things state as a general reference. I could walk away and it would just stay. There is being persuasive forever. So words are packets of persuasion. Think of him. That way, Here is another hoax. How many of you follow the next CM sex cults story? Mostly, you know what that is right Is remarry is in jail right now for unrelated things had nothing to do with being a cult specifically, but just things he was accused of convicted of But how many of you think it's true that there was? such a thing as a sex called now, some of you know that there was a Sub group associated with Axion but wasn't naxian per SE, but some of the same people they had a sub group called DAS? Doesn't matter,

And that that sub group add up to a hundred women, I think only who, in some of them agreed together brand Now, when you hear that you say all ass, I called and said Number them had her personal physical relationship with the leader, Keith remarry, but was a consensual, well understood relation set of relationships. What nobody was forced To do anything now you say to yourself, but what about the one about the brands. If somebody is in a group that a Scots gasket, I dont you're not calling them occult, but if there are getting branded therein occult well, let me give you some details when you heard that they got branded. What did you think of. You of branding iron, and he thought it was like, like cattle.

Somebody put it over the hot coals, glowing for a while, and somebody held down the person Others, like the smell of burning flesh, maybe a little fire a cover up office, in your mind, is pretty esprit. Bad right What wasn't exactly a branding iron? It was a cauterizing pen, it was a quarter rising pen. Which apparently is not that uncommon for people who get tattoos to get this treatment, because actually closer to a tattoo. Then it is the branding. A cow is closer to attack, And it ends up with a little bit of a scar tissue that you can barely see. That's it

now is that the way you heard it when you heard that the women were being granted and you remember, seeing pictures of the brand how big worthy the pictures of the brand while, if you look at the picture, looks pretty scary pretty big brand, but you never saw the whole person. Did you you always close up, so the brandy? You never saw the person, so it is, the size of the brand, we'll think is living, so So, just now that you ve been manipulated to think that they were branded like cattle now. They had the option of a little tattoo like brand. You could all the brand because it serves the skin, and so my permanent way and recall a permanent, though be a better description.

And they did it because I wanted to which is part of the things that were offered some said he ass some said now. That does not sound like a cult, a hundred people. They had this option. Some said yes, some said: no! Does that sound like a cult, but that's not the only definition of a cult. One of the definitions, would be that you're not allowed to leave that apply to anything in next year or in dustless sub group nope, no people did leave people joy. People left the definition of a cold is equally in the people left where they were. They punished now. There's left because its voluntary did you joy or you can leave and by the way, there's no evidence that they couldn't leave.

Nor was already court case about there being the cult, in other words, the courts to deal with the question of: are you a culture not because that's not a law that is illegal to have a called if they had been won, What is the other definition becomes? The other definition is that the court members are cut off from the rest of the world. They can't have contact, don't want them. To give me bad ideas in her head was at the case with either the next year or the DAS. Not really they did have a secrecy agreement that you had to agree to before. You joy And part of that was as collateral thing. We had to give them something embarrassing to prove that you are gonna, be talking about the the group, because if you,

talking about the group, wouldn't sound good other people, and this is not good, so you won't have a private group and part of the mechanism for that, as they say, you give us some embarrassing things about you. If you talk to you know what would be the interest now, they never really studied it, and people did in fact leave. But there was never any intention of releasing and if it does it wasn't a black veil operation. It was part of the psychological by in process, When you save me Scotty, here being a little fast seal here, if somebody gives you blackmail material and they are supposed to do something else, little be used Let's just blackmail to try this that was a little too hard well now now, Because it was just a bunch of people doing what they wanted to do. No more

It was ever punished for anything if anybody had ever been punished for anything, then you'd have a particular case. If they tried to talk to the outside world, they get punished that never happen. If they To talk to the outside world they'd be ostracised well, they the Elise secrecy, was about the group itself. What other group has secrecy Well, how about alcoholics around us, the anonymous right in the name. It's not unusual for groups that are voluntary groups to want to stay anonymous. It's probably hundreds thousands of right about the masons. Do the masons have some secret thing.

That they they tell you. You can't tell the outside world, but it's all voluntary group, and they can be there not be there, they can leave become so here is I point there is no evidence that ever been presented the next year. Or the sub group does met any of the qualifications of occult and yet Probably everyone do you believe that that was a cold? Did me any of the definitions or did any court rule on it? Wasn't even the question. There were just some specific allegations that might have been true and they might have been false, but that was the subject of the court. So when you say it was a cold hogs, it's just another

Somebody says is not called now announcing. That is occult. I'm saying that I'm saying the opposite, that I'm saying that Alcoholics anonymous is not tackled, but they do have those secrecy thing. Does it just as a function? There's a purpose to secrecy is useful. So that's my point is that alcoholics animals is not called just because I'm secrecy, nor would the das be occult just because they and secrecy was fairly common thing busy. Secrecy, businesses, they don't tell anybody, are our intellectual property secrets secrets is nothing, that's not anything about a cold.

So you're saying the Dnc is occult well I've written that the democratic and republican Party are evolving to become a cult because You don't remember the definition of a called is a you can't leave without being ostracize. If you were a republican and you left to join the Democrats, would you have a penalty? yeah you would, you would have a penalty. If you left your political Party The people you left would be pretty pretty bad pray mad and they will probably make you pay. So that recent definition of a cold right definition of a call does you'll be punished. If you leave the group, being cut off from the rest of the world CNN. The today oppressive created a media enterprise that effectively cuts them off.

And if they watched imagine being a Democrat and you're you're. U family there. All Democrats, You're, the only one home at the moment you turn on the tv, and you say I think I give this Fox news a try. I think I'll just give it a try. Nobody's. Looking Democrat, give this Fox news little try interests! And these are watching you say, while their production values a pretty good. Oh, I can like this host losers of facts. I hadn't heard before This is the point of view. I had never seen and you're. Happily you're democrat in your happily noticed that you can get something out of Fox NEWS watching. And then he felt like us off, see you some there watching Fox news.

And you're all super Democrats, but you're sitting there and you got caught Fox news- is on right in front of you how's that go how's that go. Did you have a good day after that? Or did they mock you? Till you ll never look at that channel again. They will mark you until you'd, never watch that channel you want to watch it when you're alone does not meet the definition of a cult, it's exactly. The definition recalled that they keep you from other information. Aggressively, they punish you. If you leave true right. And they create a they create, a narrative that is disk. Acting from reality. Do they do that? Yes, they do

The definition of a called is met exactly by the two political power not one more than the other one more than the other here. That clearly. In turn in this one way. Just as it is one way. They are identical. Leave em easily without some guy the penalty. They keep you from the other. Information, they have a narrative of the world that is disconnected in some ways from the real world. Now, now that the Republicans you're saying well, but the Republic of narrative is closer to the truth and the democratic is closer to crazy. So that's not the same. And I feel that too like. I do feel that the republic conservative was a systems are more complete? They they consider human motivation.

Actually, so they seem more realistic, but I would argue their only more functional they're, not us. Barely a better picture of reality and the boy the more probably a little disconnected from reality, because humans can see reality. We're not designed to see reality were designed to create a subjective picture of reality that we treat as reality. That's what were designed for So to say that the Republicans are the ones who get a right and Democrats are the ones they get a wrong is to misunderstand the nature of reality. Cause you don't know what's right, You don't know what's reality, but you can tell what works. And I do believe that the republican slash conservative set of ideas are far more functional and that they work and you can implement them.

Over and over again and then observed that they work. For example, competition hard to think of any situation where you introduced real competition and it didn't make the thing better right, icebreakers? So in that way the Republicans are more or less say have more of a passing association with reality. Then Democrats, because they have a narrative that isn't real. I would say the Republicans like all humans. Narratives that are not real, but one of them. You works like one of them consistently is repeatable and one of them consistently fails every time you do it thats it efforts.

But I just in case I always knew to my new to my broadcasts here. I'm left birdie, but better in math, meaning the up and up to wed to any policies of either group. I look at them into joy and look for. What's practical and let us democratic stuff is just great ideas that are not practical. That, I believe, represents the totality of the magic and majesty of coffee was got out. I don't think think could have been better. I I think you're. Maybe it gets better every single time. I don't want to say that I want to jigs it, but it feels like it gets better every time and if you learn something today almost

somebody Said- MIKE Windows starting a new web platform. Wouldn't that be interesting. Do you know what Michael Andella should call his new web platform at an off? It's like a social media platforms, whatever he should call it pillow am I right am I right now? Maybe it's taken we can use it? But if you started a social media platform MIKE Window issued be named just one word Does you don't want to be like the facebook? You just wanna be Facebook, you don't want to be the twitter, you just wanted it And you don't want to be my pillow, you just worthy pillow. You see you're trying to dress it up with pillow talk. I get a pillow talk, is clever sketchy. But here's my well. Let me ask you: let's do it?

branding survey. You're here were helping Mechlin. A lot of Unita help, but If you have a choice of just pillow for the name of your social needs, work. Anything with pillow extra, like pillow talk political case, my pillow, which ones better. The pillar. Let me give you a lesson on branding here's the first lesson. Almost everybody is bad at it. That's why you need almost everybody, probably ninety nine percent of the world is really really bad of this kind of decision.

So I'm looking at your answers. You see they're all over the place all over the place, but there are quite a few people who are saying the pillow by itself. I think I may have led the witness here. I may have influenced you by a pillow, is right and you'll see lots in the region. A pillow is right is that it fits the form better if you're in if you're an experienced internet user- and you hear that there's a network called pillow talk. Why are you here that there is a network called hello which one do you assume is more competently built. Hello, I'm here, you might not be right, but you're, subjective feeling, if you're an experienced To experience internet user, you recognising the name just pillow to be put together by people who knew what they were doing MRI there, you will racket.

How about this? Just the people who were really really part of the internet like you're, a real digital native. Yeah? You really spent some time. Maybe if we're gonna start up, maybe even involved with technology If you're, really in the world- and you here that is the one word pillow, you will think that more capable people are working on that. That's my hypothesis. Sounds like Selo here and it's like I said it is probably already trademark this probably nothing's named pillow that you couldn't use it, but it would be great, be great if you could. Red. Pillow dammit, that's good red pillow, red pillow is pretty darn clever, but I would still but pillow, and then I might have like feature

within or sub categories or groups, and maybe one of them could be read? Pillar decent people? Great, that's offered I'll talk to you tomorrow. You tubers, you got me for another minute. Today I posted on my locals to how to deal with important impostor syndrome. I think you're just posted. I have scheduled impostor syndrome and had a better selfish And they before I had posted some tips on dealing with criticism that people are telling me the best thing I've ever them. I don't know if that's true, but people are really really happy.

A lot of people saying its life, changing. How do you make a billion dollars? It's easy start with two billion by about combined to old, joke, sir. Why are you so infatuated with next year? I think is interesting on every level, because next year is a I connected and a whole bunch of levels. One is that it's a persuasion story. So that's that's mine, Spock, the other part, is that it's a fake news story, my other sweet spot in the other part of it is maybe the thing that interests me the most, which is I've, told you that I spend and always have

So imagine if I find somebody who is accomplished, somebody or s, six can't talk per second. If I see somebody who is very successful or very capable, I love to dig in and find out why why? What are you doing what you tell me, what are you doing that works and then the Keith Remarry situation. Least looking from the outside, because we can't know too much about what happened there, but from the outside it appear yeah had an unusual skill set and I'm very interested. No, could I learn anything from that right. You don't have to use your powers firm for evil right. If you, if you think, that's what happened.

By having powers power, so I would say that and I'll tell you something to sense horrible, but I do know people who have studied my comp and various nazi stuff just to learn technique. Persuasion. Take me in fact is fairly common. I would guess that intelligence people were involved and persuasion. They probably already view the Nazi propagated. So it's it's a is very useful to just find our peoples technique is no matter what you think about what they did with the technique is useful to know. So there are many many points of interest there, and then some of you know that I am sorry, my kids making things order.

I defend the indefensible and clubhouse now I think I'm gonna reschedule that from next week I'm just having the scheduling issue best color for persuasion. Somebody since was the best color from persuasion. Well, it depends on the topic, so you want to match your color to the topic into the mood that that's the answer. So there's no such thing as one color. That's the right color for all the different purposes. At the moment, if you are going to put a button on a web site- and you wanted more people to click one I think, burnt Amber like wins whenever you compete. So if you do a rapid test, where you say, I'm gonna give people a bunch of different looks of the same website that everything will be the same except the color of one button. You will consistently find that people will push the burnt or burnt umber young candidates, the bad orange,

Before the press on about other colors, so there are some day you can just test Ligon more clicks and has more to do with the bird umber has more to do with just testing and find out, As of now- and I will talk to you tomorrow,.