Everybody quantum mom it's time for coffee was got atoms. The best place to be at the best time in the entire world. Yeah a lot of people think there are better places to be not really. This is the best place to be, and every one of you know it because your ear, you could be anywhere well. You could be watching everything, but now here here, because you know that you can have the best time of your entire day, nor indeed to scupper baby, let's tanker gels times canteens last vessel, that I feel your favorite liquid like coffee and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dove mediaeval bathing makes everything better, except apparently that big ship they stuck in the Suez Canal. But let's see if we can get that out yeah, I think the simultaneous sip has the power to dislodge shipping vessels from canals go

I feel wiggling right now, yeah well all about, I feel it coming loose. It's coming lose her. Well, let's talk about all that. Stories. Yes, let's talk about that big old ship, so the mothership humorously is the evergreen that kind of perfect, because the story became evergreen evergreen. Like it never goes away every day you wake up and still a ship stuck in the Suez Canal. you're not going to be able to wipe your ass if it stays there much longer? So if so this morning the news was that at least one part of their Godfrey

And everybody secular yea, if one part of it, is free not to take long to get the other periphery. Is it except they let the wind blow it back into it stuck position, and I ask you this: Is the wind around the Suez Canal servers? We're going to wind isn't the kind to win the tar its specific ships, because it seems to me that. A Suez canal that is filled with shipping ships shipping. That's why they call them ships. They probably figured out or wind thing by now right but yet have not hearing that the wind has disrupted is shipping. All over the world seems to be just as little evergreen ship gets a little extra wind. I feel and that's not right.

So I won't make any other jokes had some good ones, but turn up for the public. but that ship is not quite out yet. The wind blew back back into stuck position and I do love. I do love the simplicity of the story. Somebody southern twitter, all of our other stories or to comprehend. There are lots of variables, but this one's great you can summon up easily ship stock needed unstuck. That's it our trump made news again. couple ways he attended. I guess he crushed a wedding, more logo and there's a way, Him started talking about himself and talking about the girl and it wasn't until the very end that he says something to that bride and groom. You can tell he got a big applause. Was it was a friendly trump crowd, as you might

They had a wedding, our logo, they were probably programme and by the way, is being Portrayed out of context is that he was food and Boris Yeltsin, crashed a wedding and talked about himself and forgot about the bridegroom and left nothing like that happened exam. the opposite. He showed up and a wedding thrilled the wedding people they had the wedding of of all time, the most memorable whether you could possibly have because Trump showed up and gave a speech unexpectedly, so the bridegroom probably had like the best story ever, but it yet exactly got rhubarb, so that story got totally for if he cut off the last part, it looks like you never even the addressed the the bridegroom. The trouble is also say: he's going to visit the border.

This is why he was the fun president visiting the ball. is just the best thing you could possibly do when they sitting president is not mislead border. During a crisis So if the Ex President visits the border before the sitting, president sort makes the sitting president look not so strong that that issue. If you know what I mean, don't like by Trump persuasion, wise good play. So the George Floyd trial is starting today, I guess and have you noticed how. One story ends and then there's always another when they just back fills a perfectly. While every day, I guess there were a few without Trump in the winter. I, which you seem like there wasn't much news, but, weird how the news always has a big story in the pipeline

the timing of this little suspicious, times are two at a time, but they really make sure that pipeline is filled. which sort of suggests to me that if we at a time when there wasn't much happening that the news would make something out of nothing, they would do there were they make up more than enough just to make new Maybe they would and how would we know how We now was a real issue and we're just reading the news and seeing a real issue or the news business had created initial. the otherwise you wouldn't even cared about or known about or have any impact. Whatever. So you start to see the pattern that the news is pretty much artificial, at least in terms of how you feel about it. So the things you feel about

The strongest are necessarily the important things that happen. So the news a longer reports was important per se. They report, what's gonna get the best audience. Well, in others, publication got real clear investigations, their reporting about this little County in Montana, Mozilla, only a hundred and twenty thousand people in all all area. and they did a full on it of the male imbalance now. Apparently other orders have been sample audits. I wasn't aware that so when larger places are audited, they can't count them all, because it would be too many, so they pick a sample and just count those. Now I have questions.

Do you know that personal, that the other melon Bela audits were samples and not actually just covering all the balance? I didn't know that less interesting. Where's. My second question: what. No about how they picked the sample, who exactly gave him the sample. did the auditors go into a big room, full of ballots and say our outward? randomly yellow and how would you do it? How would you randomly like balance, because even if you went wouldn't at all just randomly pick the manner this pile and this file probably wouldn't be random, because that's not even close to random right, I mean mathematically statistically, even if you weren't trying to take them from the same place, you couldn't guarantee was random. It wouldn't be possible. So I ask you this question

where the people who ordered the ballots, the same ones who decided which ones to audit, in other words, did they, the randomness or I'm just gonna put that out there, because I don't know the answer and Let me, let me tell you that no corner Any widespread fraud, no court as a as a ruling of any widespread fraud in the election? Is that it's a big lie? So big lie? I'm saying that so I can stay on social media now, on with this, So the question is: do they do that? who have done sample representative audits of big places, that was the sample given to them by. same people who organise the election they somehow get to pick it and if they pay how in the world did they know. Note was representative.

And do you wanna Representative sample, because I don't think you want a representative sample dia? Don't you want you? Don't you assume that if there's a problem is probably not going to be easy. We spread so wouldn't a representative sample ballots, eliminate them possibility of fighting fraud, because you could find Don T say, adds hardly anything this this one simple that we got from this one town. He had a problem, but this is one But is also the only one you check them their town because it was a representative sample. So, if you do a representative sample, doesn't that guarantee or almost guarantee just math math wizened, statistically they, you wouldn't find any fraud. My wrong about that. It is our calls into question Are there any orders of London Doll,

in any way that would never so I'll, just as the question is not an accusation, because that would get me kicked off a social. Media. So I have no reason to believe that any orders were insufficient. I simply of a gap in my understanding of how they could possibly pick herein some representative sample that actually meant But a way back to this Little Missoula place, so they nodded in which, because it was a smaller place- and they were volunteers, and they got approval to do it. They can look at every single one. So I We have. This might be the only place that every ballot was jack. Maybe fact check me on that Here's what about There were enough irregularities that could have changed the election like easily. that? There were so many place where elections were often close, the news was

way beyond the point. Let me see We have seen some answers about the samples. Ok, I don't hear answer I will read by some people are addressing these samples. Question so again I I put that there is a question, not an accusation. I don't know how it could be representative, but maybe there is. so what they found is a kind of seven. The two thousand million votes, forty six hundred of them, were without envelopes? Six point: three percent of all votes of the male in votes, not of almonds by six percent of the male in votes didn't have envelopes, which means that legally, they should not have been counted, but they were.

And what's more according to this is from the article courting Auditors, county employees claim that during the post election on it Some of the animals may have been double counting, so might even be a higher number of missing uploads, but they don't know that, for sure And apparently there are some postmark issues as well, so fact check me on this: will you fact number one is the story, even true right Just anything like maybe The story- it didn't even happened- maybe there's no place called Mozilla right, I mean anything is possible in twenty twenty one. So, first of all is the story of a true. I don't know I don't know. I don't even know But if it were true, isn't the. Only place? They have ever check.

And is also completely problematic using that word. I'm going to erase that word and back up like I never used it before. the only place you checked there was a problem that true, so that there is a Mozilla Montana least. That's other part. I was pretty confident about, but I was really an election, somebody says yeah, you know, I got to say. Say, this certainly raises some questions but, like I said, the courts have shown no proof of widespread Roy. Jack Posada get the great prank tweet this morning. And here's a set up

as you know, the bunch of anti for people who are counter protesting sum- I guess some republican types and conservative types- protesting something Airways, the empty five people were throwing rocks through the cars of anything that flag on it or the trucks. Usually. And so there are some some of that kind of violence and destruction and and Jack tweeted Jake Armed empty for If I insurrectionists attempted overthrow the Oregon Stay capital today, now, of course, that's a joke on the capital right Where anything that looks like a protest could be construed by the fake media as a as an insurrection, MIKE Beggar corresponded to the New York Times, not understanding that this was a joke.

Tweets about it. The tweet below is getting a lot of traction, but is even close to being true, which is often the case with jokes, not that close to being true, The crowd of anti fascist activists gathering, for, couple to protest, a plan right wing event. There was no attempted overthrow. Yes, there was no attempted overthrow good to know, so we have the clarification of a break. breaking news. I don't know if you knew this, but twenty five percent of people polled on any topic already is ever noticed that it doesn't matter what the question is. If its own policy so anyway, every question our politics, twenty five percent of the country is gonna, be on the downside. Does The question is- and I wonder, is it the same people every time

or is it just always a coincidence that about twenty five percent of the people we disagree on things, no matter what they are Or is it always a toy same twenty five percent and we just don't understand anything makes you wonder I imagine is different people, but is a funny question. So here's. A case in point Rasmussen is reporting about the support for Your idea laws so apparently back in what are you doing so not that long ago. The support for voter idea. Laws among white people was sixty seven to seventy four percent among blacks. It was fifty five to sixty and other non whites. Others interesting is much higher. Seventy six eighty two And so among all voters the range was sixty seven, seventy five, but the current average is seventy five.

So, in other words, they support for voter idea laws as climbed substantially a lot more people are in favour of it, but I go back to my question. Twenty five percent of the country is not in favour of knowing who voted was wrong with them. What's wrong with him. so so I see somebody saying that Scott believes poles in one the Rasmussen pulls the Rasmussen. Or at least on the presidential stuff that I follow. I don't know about anything else, but the presidential stuff they ve been one of the closest pollsters consistently. so following a poster that is consistently one of the best is not exactly being too stupid.

Following the poles they come out prior to election, which you know are fake poles who would be sorted out, so you can say poles and poles. Some of them are just obviously fake all the time Now, as I gotta tell you, lately, I've decided to self identify as black I decided I have explained that well enough, because some people still think as a joke, but it's not number one. I agree literally no joke being completely serious. I agree with the concept that people can self identify. Let me give you an example: let's say somebody is technically bisexual list, In their own mind, leg therewith consider themselves bisexual, but let's They just have more of an affinity for the gay lifestyle spent,

More time there have more gave friends and spray friends and just decide to identify as gay, but maybe technically in their mind. They know that they could go the other way if they want. So we should they be allowed to identify as gay when sort of technically maybe they're. Not so much company the gay as by, but they have an affinity for that lifestyle. I say yes,. I say yes because I would certainly be treated as gay, they would be. Given the life etc. So I say yes likewise, as you know, I've been pro trends: gender everything And should those folks be allowed to live the life and identify with the group that they want because of an affinity for it? Technically, if you looked at their dna right, you'd say well technically this isn't.

The group that we will put you in, but if you have an assembly for that group, is worrying, Are you feel you live and belong and how you gonna be treated in life? I'm ok with that. I feel that a reasonable, reasonable thing and so based on the same standard, which I have accepted as reasonable and likewise accept then, if somebody is a twenty five percent genetically black that if they identify as just black, we accept that right, because same reason, the other, their lifestyle there their interests the way their treated might be more in one group, so yeah identify that way, even if technically somebody else, my argue Asian, so here's, why have decided to self identify as black number one I like to be on the winning team like to be in the winning team, whose wedding,

a black Americans are starting to finally like really getting getting a little bit of purchase right. Finally, after Rio, hundreds of years it does look like the black situation is doing pretty well law. Only because of activism, whereas the white situation, the sort of decreasing- wouldn't you say, No, no I'm not putting a value judgment, I'm just saying if you, serve. It looks like that, I like begun, the winning team number two. I'm told by science that all thus have african roots now, truly well have african roots. If you looked at the full arc of human evolution most of the time I ve been african, in other words, my my family inch ancestry probably spent more time african than they did in Europe. So I say I say

genetically I've got an argument there. I have also lost two careers for my race. I've told you that too many times lost by banking career because as white and was told that directly by the way, I'm not I'm not reading between them. boss told me that I lost my telecom career causes white again, my boss told me directly your white. We can promote you. And I would say that my current career as a cartoonist and now public commentator, probably lost I'd, say a third to a half of my potential income to race. Because if. to talk about Trump in any positive way. That made me look like a white supremacist people don't buy my books, etc. So I've lost took two careers completely. Because of my race, and my current one is partly down by a third or so because my race. Now you tell me who do I have more affinity with.

People who are who are desperate, it, is against for race or people who are not. I have, I have way more affinity with people who have been discriminated against for rice and by the way that's not a joke. That's literally true, I do have more affinity for anybody discriminated against by race. that's how it works? If something happens to you that happened to somebody else, you you have some appreciation for it, that's how it works, and then And I have also done more work for to benefit the black community than and the other. So I would say, that's might have affinity group and that's what I Jews. Here's a real issue that I saw the cartoon, but is actually a pretty good point we're making. Deal and should about. American violence, because we don't want any of that we, The bias and discrimination in our country.

so we started out with black lives matter. My group, but an hour, we're started talking about Asian Americans being discriminated in were very close, very close, to say asian american lives matter, but we're gonna go. the point where they all matter, except for these white supremacist lives. So It would be interesting to see how the asian american thing has an influence on the black lives matter thing or if they just always lives up But seems like one would influence the other I told you that the news is all artificial and what you consider the biggest story is often completely irrelevant you consider no story at all is often the biggest thing happening here is a good example. I would argue that the biggest thing this come out of the corona Versing is the death of public schools, because the teachers unions

If over reached right, the teachers unions have overreached and if you're not following the sea, should befall inquiry. The angels on Twitter, because he is sort of the only wonder, seems to be consistently reporting on all the changes that are happening. But today we are in the West Virginia govern urge injustice just decide. This year's most expensive bill to fund students instead of systems. Now that's happening all over the place. A bunch of different states Especially where they have republican control are giving us deciding that the funding follow the student, so the student can go to whatever school they want private or public. they won't just gotta the school. Instead, I think the teachers unions have destroyed public education as a monopoly. It looks like they overreached and destroyed it.

Now. As you know, the teachers unions are the biggest source of systemic racism think enough. My people are talking about this, but The biggest source- and it might be way, the cell sobbing, in other words the pandemic, may have solved the biggest form of systemic racism in the country that I don't think, there's a bigger story than I propose to you that this is the biggest story in the country and is basically you one guy. whose tweeting about it is the biggest story like this is the one the moves the planet. This one moves. Civilization, the entire future, of the United States

jealousy. Our competition with China is really really depended on this biggest story in the country completely ignored does not even you will find it. Website you bet you'd have to follow. Somebody a twitter, it even know what's happening Also from Rasmussen, seventy six percent of folks say their gunnar gun ownership is a constitutional right. Seventy six percent say gun. Ownership is a constitutional right. That makes about twenty five percent, twenty four twenty five percent idiots wreck- as you, could argue that something should be in the constitution. our d argue, is not. There is another one of those examples where twenty five percent you can always to be wrong and everything

here's my new section, which will cause you all to get worked up, be ready. Are you ready for some some fighting ready for some intellectual fighting come on here? Europe's here's, a red meat coming home. I call this section. Am I wrong, or are you frightened. Am I wrong, or are you frightened and here's the concept behind it? an ordinary intelligent person will make ordinary, intelligent and reasonable decisions when, when their emotions are not involved, If you take those same reasonable person, who's got perfect, quickly average abilities and common sense and reasoning, and you put that personal, stressful scary situation. How good is there a reasoning now

a good right, so your ability to reason gets switched off as your emotions go higher as you get angrier as you get more frightened worried. More anxious your your sense of reason, just switches? Does anybody doubt that we all agree with that right? So if you have a situation like this, I pathetically there was a situation where there is somebody you knew who had a really good track record of being reasonable and often right, a very reasonable person and You are comparing that too, that reasonable person to another one whose just is reasonable. very reasonable people, Often right see things clearly now we're gonna make one week, reasonable. The both usually right. But one of them is now really scared ones, really frightened.

They start to disagree on the topic. One is not frightened and is reasonable. Most of the time What is pretty scared than they have different opinions now, whose right. Which one of them is more likely to have the right opinion. Because you never same intelligence, same information, but one of them is scared, and one of them is the campers statistically. You should expect that the compromise as the avenge. Now, let's talk about vaccine passports, I'm not afraid of vaccine passports. You might argue that I should do and we'll talk about that in a minute but as a statement of fact, I'm not even a little bit concerned about them, but the people who disagree with my opinion, which all state Those people are really really concerned like that.

Scared now. A lot of people are saying the following comment Scot I like your opinions and general, but while Europe Over the place on these vaccine passports, does you think maybe you should be a good idea And your way off on this one, I've got a lot of stuff right by your way off on this vaccine passport thing. So I ask you this step back for a moment. I have no fear of it whatsoever which I mean I'm right right. That doesn't mean I'm right I'm just saying I have no fear and Eve Wash for how long you watch me, and you thought that I was reasonable until now,. But here is an object where you have a topic where you have. A lot of fear And now we're our opinions are different. What do you think's going on? What do you think is going on here. Is the problem that you're afraid and this affecting your judgment or

this one of those times when different from my pattern, I'm just way off. I'm way, often about opinion, which are those is more likely. I am going to read some of the comments to my tweet this morning and I'm going to tell you what I think of their reasoning. Ok, so here People disagree with me. So I've said that Actually, passports we'll be fine; now it doesn't mean it it'll make anything better, I'm just not afraid of here's. My argument We already have driver's licence is right. Did the age putting your name into a database and giving you a driver's license. Did that, Life, somehow or or did you just make it safer to drive very much if you get a mortgage, you have to show your taxes was at a slippery slope to losing your health care information. Now

Now about your health care information, is anybody got access to that? We have laws that keep your healthcare stuff private, as anybody got access to most of it, we're talking about just the vaccination part, but is able to gain access to the old innovation. Not yet not yet I mean, I suppose risk, but not yet so we live in a world in which the government has often put these restrictions on us to put us in a database and knows something about us. now what the big argument that effort from I guess this is from Naomi Wolf, so quite famous for being a sceptic on some of the corona virus stuff. And the first thing I would say is beware of skeptics. Skeptics are valuable got to have them. I am one but there's a skeptic trap, and you should beware of it. The skeptic trap

like this once you become the sceptic, is hard not to be the sceptic and you're gonna wanna have at least a win your skeptical thing. So it's it's. The there's a bias that would affect you. They I've were common, so the world sceptic Alex Barrington Sceptic about some aspects of the corona virus, in both cases, and Naomi Doktor Naomi Wolf, also a sceptic now here's my problem with sceptics once you are known, as the famous sceptic we're getting a lot of attention and reward for being that famous sceptic, you kind of need to be right. Meaning that, even if you're wrong, you need to be right. whereas somebody wasn't committed that forcefully to the position I would argue that I haven't been all over the place on different grown. A virus stuff child, like I would be labelled as a sceptic or labour. As a believer I'm somewhere in bill,

So I would argue that what, if you're somewhere in the middle, you are less likely to be influenced by the bias of needing to be right about something big but if you're out there all the time being the sceptic. You can have that really big bias and just be aware of that now deserving that any of them are wrong. Now. I'm not telling you that any of them are wrong on anything. I'm not sure. I would now but They have that little bit of real knowledge in the back, your head that once you're the sceptic person can a little extra biased her eyes. Be careful about that, and I'm sure that that that the same concept would apply to me whenever I've committed to a position so be aware of it. here are some comments about people who were against the vaccine passport? I won't read their names. Just talk about the common itself

Is discrimination against the free will of the people who do not want to get vaccinated? Is that true? Would it be discussed enabling against will say that the freedom, I think, is the point. The freedom of the people do not want to give accident. Thus true definitely discriminates against their freedom, but isn't that true, drivers licence is that true getting alone, people who don't have tax returns, get going. Is it true of travel you care, travel anywhere militia password. So this is true statement. It discriminates against your freedom, but that's not a reason, because we do it all the time. Since the society all of his civilization, entire civilization is built on. Restricting your freedom, that's what it is. You don't build a civilization to give people freedom all

The realisation is a restriction of freedom and its, but it does to be a wise restriction- it restricts the things that you'd want to restrict. This is just another one of them. So I don't think you can I think it is reasonable to. cigarette, whether in concept as as a reduction of freedom, because all of civilization is a reduction of freedom. You can't drive your car on the sidewalk. They built a road to restrict where you drive the car. It's all restrictions. Listless do some more reasons. Did the? U dot S government couldn't execute this and the way that the so there's a practical element to it. So somebody says it might be impractical. That's a good point. If your argument is that we can get it up and I'm somebody else argue that a lot of people got vaccinated without showing I D. So what are those people do

If you got vaccinated, but you didn't No idea at the time, but you name is still not system right. If you got vaccinated or not so there might be some practical limitations to it, which are perfectly. That would be a good skeptical comment. If you just can't do it That's a reason not to do it. You just can't be done. So if it's not accurate than the of course it's a problem But I don't know that for sure and the argument about it is usually not on the practical level leaders, some organs once a system and the precedent exists, factions withered Mcgovern can take them then them in their own purposes. Now we're getting to the relevance of So the problem is that once you have a platform- and this is doctor- Naomi Wolf'S- arguing that one should have a platform.

where there's something about you in this case the vaccination or not, is in the database and that's going to restrict you from less aid, businesses or travel or or government. Things once you have this system, they can add anything class system. Currently I can add anything to that. Next thing you know maybe the next thing they add to it. You don't like so much, even if you think the vaccination things are good idea, slippery slope. Do you know what else is a slippery slope, computers. if we allow ourselves to have computers, somebody's gonna put some information in those databases, we're not gonna like it or how about the drivers, licences.

There's a database of your driver's license that has azure. Wait here, address your height, your eye, color, your hair color, I think couldn't they use in and then it's also used to restrict where you can and cannot do so. If you don't have idea of some sort you can fly, can do a lot of stuff so couldn't face if the driver's license platform, because it's just a database and add stuff, do it see or I'm gone, I don't think we should on drivers licences Because that database could be expanded into a social credit system, do you know what else could be expanded into a social credit system? Any database is just the database. Yes, you can put bad things of the database,

You could put good things in the database, but you don't get rid of databases, because somebody could misuse it Could somebody misuse system? Yes, they could misuse. Every system does not arise, how to do it. You have to weigh the you know the risk against the benefits, so here is my best argument, but of a why I'm not worried number one might be impractical like once they. The odds of it working, I don't know, might be impractical, so might might never have a problem number two. I believe that transparency and market competition is all you need to make sure that it doesn't go too far. Now everything goes too far before it gets pulled back right, so things do go too far and then get pulled,

So we may find that this will go too far and pull back, but as long as was less work through, listen the government says you can travel unless you have a vaccination. Save us now. I travelled recently, and I couldn't do it without getting a test that goes in the database that the airline can see, The says I gotta negative covetous: what's the difference between that, the current situation, the dominant innovation saying I gotta covert, asked or one this I got a vaccination. Is the same. Damn test. I mean it's the same process, Once you're in the system so work for complaining that the airlines, requires you to get a test, because once you have that platform.

That allows the the airlines to know if you gonna test, they get add things through the platform. So what are you talking about? The vaccine issue platform. We already have one. The platform already was built. It was for the test whether you got tested or not. So I don't think the flight thing is anything cuz. It's just the current situation. That seems to be no big deal. What about individual businesses? Let's say you need a vaccine. go to a basketball game where the seats are filled. Let's say that's the case unless say that the public says: hey, I'm going to boycott your basketball game because of this rule, yes or no. If people boys,

what's gonna happen, while they there won't have the game or they'll James, the rule or some time more bass, and we don't need the vaccinations right so that the public response and market competition is gonna. Try to take care of this, I think, is always guy have lots of visibility. The problem, I think, would be a lack of israeli. Now in America Do you think that we could take this to the next level of social? What is it that China has the social credit system where you have to do a whole bunch of things right, or else you get in their database as a bad person? we're not too far from that now are we however social credit database. Did you know that. Did you know you're already in a social credit database in the United States,. while one of the major credit score literally or credit score right.

That is a social credit. How trustworthy are you? Do you pay back your debts? We have that our exists. That's just one form. we also have this thing called the internet, which you ve probably heard of. You can go on the internet on social media and you can find out quite a bit about people. And you could find there are good or bad, they are. Fairly reliably by looking at their social media background, so I would argue that the Woke ism is a social credit system. I don't even know if it would be worse if we turned it into a database. Now, I'm not in favor of that turning into a database, but the current system is pretty damn bad. The wokeness stuff is pretty pretty bad, I would say we do have a social credit system.

So you're worried about the thing that's already here. I suppose I could get worse, but. Here. You already have it. So let me recall the more we reasons here. just to show you the types of objections. I will see some good comments here, David Reboot, so here's a somebody I know to be a higher level of figure and commentator on Twitter, so this would be a better, a better quality of objections. As my objection, even really related to the vaccine. The passport infrastructure will encourage private companies of em to engage in an emerging social credit system. Right now again, that could be.

I suppose you can see a going that way, but what would be the next thing they get added? What exactly will be the next thing and the progression somebody says poison is bad for your health. Thank you, somebody's saying, I'm framing travel by international standards, not domestic, that's right, but the point is the same: the because internet. no travel is a big enough thing that that's a fair example. How long is immunity, somebody's asking a good question? How long does he mean he's last, so if you got vaccinated, does that really mean everything I supposed to be a date on there so here's? What I feel like a lot of people are saying that this feels like a slippery slope and a reminder of Nazi Germany,

every time you see yourself say, wait a minute that reminds me of Nazi Germany. There should be a flag because often your head, wait a minute. Why am I always reminded of Nazi Germany? Every time there is a political conversation speak as is the weird extreme. This in all of our minds is not because everything is like that, so just being reminded of something else is not a reason if your remarks Of Nazi Germany, you are probably looking at this with fright, as opposed to reason now, let me say as carefully as I can. You could all be right and I could be wrong. Nothing rules at all right. So if your hearing me say I'm right right near all wrong, you shouldn't be here that What I'm saying is. there are now see any reason to be afraid, because it looks like normal business to me, it just doesn't seem that extreme as long as yet

Argue competition as long as you have essentially as long as the public can get its way and again. If it pushes hard enough, I'm not avert, especially for. So, yes, I wouldn't worry about Nuremberg, Nazis and Hitler every every time you look around a corner. Hitler is not under the bed. Hitler is not under the bed. you remember when the corona virus was for setting and love people thought that it would be the end of our supply chains and civilization. Will crumble and I was telling you know oh, don't be operating on fear. Logically, we will adjust and we'll figure out how to get you food, and then we did just that. We figured out how to adjust. We took the risks we needed to take. We got everybody. fed for the most part, so just keep in mind that when you then the most frightened is when you have made the worst decisions

If there's somebody that you think has been right before and they're, not frightened by the current topic, maybe you should give them a little bit more credibility. Then you should even give yourself if you're operating from fear, doesnt really wrong, whether my fears good thing but just play, the statistics are right. The exercise DC chief says he's does think that the covered nineteen came either The virus came from some lab, though his argument I unrolled before it goes like this. There is actually hard to get a an animal virus to be compatible with the human even if a trans, even if it gets to a human, tend not to be very viral, because it's not a very effective virus But I guess the way the EU can make an animal virus really.

really bad for Humans- is to exposure to human cells in a lab, and you get the virus basically trained or to evolve, well or to mutate. I guess until it is really really bad for humans and this population here, and I think you'd have to call it sort of educated, statistical reasoning. Is that is unlikely that this thing could have as quickly becomes so viral unless there was some weapon patient happened now the weapon zation doesn't mean that they intended anything. Think about sets a separate question, but but these statistics of it, according to Doktor Redfield CDC had is there is unlikely that in the time frames, we're talking about a natural thing could have become this virus. It would have had to be stepped up, they say and added a little, of in a human way,

But I would add to that that doesn't make it impossible. It just makes it unlikely. So, just now that we live in a world where unlikely things do happen fairly regularly more than you'd expect. But that's good I'm going to say, that's a solid, arrogant I love this story to tell crews going to visit the the bite in cages and all the kids that are in there and there's the video of the the worker who is trying to opium from filming. I think that sort of a group or video and here's why, what you're watching is soon, I think, TAT cruises. Probably using his phone camera is talking to somebody who's, trying to stand in front of him and stop him from filling the people are in the cages or the boxes. The Biden boxes.

and the part this left out is the reason that she's trying to stop it right and I feel like there should have tourism is one of the reasons I believe as valid, which there's a privacy reason, and I believe that if you're just filming people- and you can see their faces in a world of Mutual recognition that does court a sort of put those people, and unless I am, vulnerable spot if their faces get into a database, because somebody took a picture. So I'm to say that that port was actually. reasonably responsible, but then the other, Our is: are they just trying to stop embarrassment and that's not valid, because we do get to see this right, that we should be able to say this? We can fix it unless the public S

I learned about it, so a plus two senator crews for excellent, theatrical in politics as well. I think that was exactly the right thing to do what he did bring bring a bunch. managers in elbow your way in their don't take. Don't take no for an answer. Don't let anybody stop you? If you have a moral authority to do what you're doing and they did, he had moral authority which is greater than their authority and he took it. He just be basically just expressed moral authority and got away with it very good, very, very good work I would say and good for the country. We wanted to see that. That is very much what I want to talk about. Somebody says the faces are blurred before broadcast yeah. If, if you're being responsible in the pictures that I did see there, there were blurred, but what the worker

could not know is whether TED crews would do that and that's fair. Now. If it had been a real say, a professional news crew, you might a little more certainty that they would agree to and actually blow out the faces, but was too who's gonna go through all the editing, a blurring out your dozens of faces, probably not probably not. Someday says: do illegals get a right to privacy the here I would question the use of the word right and. My answer is probably not. I mean, I assume that if you're not a legal system, you don't have all the same protections. Maybe do actually. Maybe you do. I guess I'm not enough of a lawyer to know the answer that maybe do, but I don't think so.

right question the reason the privacy is even an expectation is because all of us think is something that people should have like, regardless of what the, law is we all kind of thing people should guess and privacy. So I don't think that whatever the lawyers or the constitution should be the guiding principle in this case, because there's a moral law on top of that? This is bigger than just bigger. To do. Once there on your soil than they do, somebody says we should all have privacy and also vaccine passports. Ok, well, the thing with private. And the thing with all of my arguments is, if

ever see any them as absolutes the problems at your end, because I don't present anything as an absolute privacy is good But also restricting what people can do so that you can have a functioning civilization is also good. That can both be good. You can, you can have times when you're trading one for the other, there's nothing wrong with that. Somebody says moral laws have no place outside of religion. Well,. moral laws, don't navy, but but Acting in a moral away. You could take away the word law if you like, but

acting in a moral away is something we should expect of each other, it doesn't have to be other books. Privacy is a form of public restriction. That's correct, good point, that's right! If you have privacy ear, restricting me from that information. Now, I'm not saying that's wrong. I'm just saying that there is no such cling as just freedom to have a civilization, it's all That restriction, that's what makes it the civilizations restriction mind your own business. Somebody says: that's, that's a perfectly

perfectly reasonable statement. So if somebody says you are or philosophy- or our point of view should be everybody just mind, your own business, if you could be consistent on that, you'd have something the trouble is is not one of those things. You can be consistent because we really can't mind our own business and live in the same physical place. You could try. We couldn't possibly one Those others there there's a great fake news story about. I guess a couple of Wrappers or poverty or whatever is the best word musical lax Are creating a Satan based sneaker with a drop of human blood and each sneaker to which somebody on Twitter asked? Do you really think there's a drop, a human,

in each of those sneakers I'm gonna, go out on a limb and say this is one of the best marketing schemes you'll ever see because world talking about it, but I don't think there's a drop of blood in every sneaker. I mean these possible plunges could say I don't really think, there's a drop of blood, no sneakers weirdos All right, I don't know how many of those are, satanic stickers are going to sell, but they certainly did a good job and letting us know they're out there. look here. Some of your comments. I that's all I got for now today, The start of recording the audio book, which is actually a re recording, does another artist. The original

So this will be the first time I'll be recording. My own book had a failed, almost everything and still win big it'll take months before you can actually buy it, but next three days I'm going to be leaving here in recording all day studio, and I hope that you, like the one you book when it's done, and I will talk to you later right, resale not from the audio book, yet I'll, tell you when it's available. all right! That's all! For now and I'll talk to you later.