Obi experience. I think I like call audio yes, the Ipad has a little law built into it. Where you can charge it and plug in your microphone at the same time, say: Bork all right. What shall we do these simultaneous because you may have missed it? First, try and all you do is Capra Bugger glass tanker jails, I began to you drove us a vessel of any kind filled with favour liquid. I like coffee, one in and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure. The dobryna they think makes everything better. Scott sovereignty is up. Go yes, the silence, not nearly ass good. Now, of course, the context of this.

Is that trolls like to come in here and say the sound doesn't work this time. I knew it was true because I didn't have my microphone in, but I was surprised the sound doesn't work without a microphone. You think that would be kind of basic. You're worried been cancel, though that's going to happen. So let's talk about that so Youtube. Down one my videos from weeks ago and said that violated something and so I tweeted about it saying I didn't know why I was taken down and Youtube responded. Some official twitter. bonds and said that I had violated there one or the rules about talking about the election. To which I said what Did I say that was inappropriate about the election Because I'm not aware of any

I said that would cross. Every line that Youtube or anybody else s I wasn't. Apparently they said it wasn't about China, so they did tell me about the election, but I didn't say anything: there was inappropriate about the election. Nothing. There wasn't obviously drew and some opinions that are just opinions So here's the thing: do you see the set up, so I've got this One warning, if you will, which could turn into a strike. I assume, if I do it again, but how do I avoid doing it again? I dont know what I did the first night and they won't tell me so the odds of doing something you didn't know you did the first time. A pretty high because I didn't know I did at the first time. One thing if I knew I was saying something over the line.

But I am not aware of anything that was over the life, which is not to say there wasn't I'm just not aware of it. Wasn't intentional. So have I not then now set up that they can give you a couple of warnings, not tell me what to do about this than just put me off the platform. Do you think that's real? Well, I wouldn't have thought it was real until the project vera US videos about CNN. When you say that the sea, and then you think yourself, that's probably not the only place. It's happened, we'll talk about that I so stocks are up nine point: eight percent, those.

Stimulus. Checks must be workin and anecdotally. There's a lot of people in stores lately been noticing that, but I loved the fact that violence is giving credit for basically doing things that Trump would have done so Trump would have brought us out of Afghanistan, but. two months later buttons do. It Trump would have done some kind of infrastructure plan released, backed one resigned, one one, but she wants later you bite. It will probably get to do that. Tromp would have eventually given Jack's stimulus checks. Few months later by by does that.

I even CNN opinion propagandists were saying that Biden is accomplishing trumps objectives, but they try to make it look like job couldn't get it done, which is not implied, is just there's a time for everything, but was in office. What happened here. Here is the part of the day. This part of the day you ve heard that vocs. I guess she com Erin group are his name got in a sort of ITALY. I would you call it let's say, is entering the common language. As the word for misleading video, so you take a value out of context and it changes its meaning, that's being called Arup r R. U pr because,

Logically Aaron Rhubarb does, as so often that they just named it ephrem. So is it the lexicon? Thank you said the lexicon. but there's no one knew rue power about Tom Cotton, so he was doing some stuff in Congress. and if you see just the clip he looks pretty, Reasonable, but if you see the whole context, looks a lot better, so. Your report, Jaw Pollack, tweeted about that and suggested that anybody Victims of misleading video evidence should get wait for it. Rhubarb nations, yes reparations. I asked this question on twitter and little ball. I said: have you cut back on the consumption of Coca COLA products for political reasons,.

Over half of the respondents said. Yes, of course, is the most unscientific Paul they could ever be, but my my twitter followers lean conservative, even though I am not against service, but they do their their conservative and half of them are cutting back on Kosovo. Even completely unrelated news. Coca COLA has announced they should be more open, minded and listen to the people. All sides of the Isle. So do you think they could, is feeling pocket book. I don't know, but if half of the people who are just following me said they cut back

I have to think probably everybody was watching Fox NEWS, which is a lot of people, probably a lot of them recover back. So here's an interesting thing. Should I should I actual professional appalling company asked this question: have you cut back of your Coca COLA, consumption for political reasons If the answer is yes any substantial way, it changes, the world will change the world because it would be the most noticeable example of the corporation that sort of left its lane to get into politics and just gets back. Now the other possibility is there is no difference in Coca COLA sales donor, but

enough: people in surveys say there come back for political reasons. That's gonna get their attention as a sort of thing that gives a c o fired. So we don't know he'll get fired for that, but I think you should be my opinion getting involved in politics. Have you ever having that take a bite out of your bottom line. I think us a firing firing, defence, it's just bad management speaking, restless and asked how many people expected conviction in the George vote: we also have many people thought tat. Shovin would be convicted interesting way. This is one of those unifying questions, Seventy nine percent of conservatives expect Shovin to get convicted of one of the charges least but seventy six percent of liberals do so. Basically, the same just

spending conservatives as liberals expect the conviction- and I have said before that this should have been the most unifying thing. This ever happened in this country. From from the day, the George Floyd thing happened right up to today. I've never heard anybody wasn't horrified by is not like there's some conservative Suzanne. It's just the way it should have gone. I mean there are people questioning whether the officer caused the death of that's a fair question but there wasn't, anybody wasn't horrified by. It is really really unifying, but we found a way to map a unified over. Now should have been the one thing we all would have agreed on that we don't what that? What was on the video. But the next question Rasmussen Ass- was how and by the way, the for the numbers I gave you I added together, the two likely seem very likely and somewhat likely and I'll do that,

In it with this one, how likely it will cause riots. Eighty six percent of concerns think that were the alchemist little cause rights, but sixty eight percent of liberals also expect riots again regardless of the of the uncle, but rather I can tell you that in these national poles, what the question is about twenty five percent of the people, who answer would just be whack, they either misinterpreted the question or their insane or their prancing they're just but that solid twenty five percent is just crazy people and it turns out.

that twenty percent of liberals say their rioting is not likely after the verdict. What there are twenty percent of liberals who think it's not likely that there's gonna be, riots who are these people? These are the most wrong people in the universe today, even understand the question I mean honestly, I care for girls. Everybody would have added value like even one person in the whole country. How do you get even that too? That opinion somebody says: artists, baby. Twenty five percent. The issue will answer everything and enable down, what's up with that stock markets up, That's good all time, I think.

so the police officer who accidentally discharged a gun instead of her taser, actually killed the guy. She was stopping is charged and she's in orange jumpsuit, and I don't really understand it. The EU, because the body can footage, made it completely clear that it was an accident. Do you get, it is out of jail able offence if it's obviously and totally an accident now You can say we wish the accidents have happened. You could say If she were a better trained or a better officer wouldn't happen, but accidents happen in any. They couldn't be more clear that there was no intention and that she couldn't have known, because if she'd oh, she went to pull the trigger. So obviously she didn't know- and obviously there was no intention and

Obviously she was horrified issues it happened. Do you go to jail for that? A mistake I, At the standard has to be higher for the police, but what about the Human beings standard, there's nothing. She can do to bring back bring back the deceased. You know if there were some way to make them better than I'd say do it, but there is no way to make that better Are you can do is destroy a second life more than and it's got to be pretty bad cuz. She kill the guy with the meeting to me. She has to live with that. So there's something deeply unjust about this police officer being taken a mugshot in an orange jumpsuit and then being put with presumably other prisoners. I don't.

In what sense, but wow that just seem so wrong is like a double wrong. So it's like, two wrongs. He killed, Mr Right, that there was an actual name right. So two wrongs and me what you did. we made it more risky why she did was obviously the thing they kill them, so they both had to do, something wrong. It was too I killed right. That actually happened. Number he lighted anybody's death, of course, but the these simulations just offering up all these coincidences, they're just weird Jack possible warns that. might want to think about getting out of Minnesota around time of the the verdict but I was working people that

Getting the Minnesota we're staying out might be a good idea, but if you come to California, it's probably just very short window before the forest fires start. apparently are for us- are like super super dry like dry. Air than they have ever been with more more kindling than theirs ever been so in about a month. The skies here will darken and I will not have summer like last year- last year. There was no summer in California so in the middle of the pandemic. Still Couldn't go outdoors like there was the only thing you could do and you couldn't even do that because it was just air quality used to love, so that's cabin not too optimistic about the electricity state, either others say. I'll, come in the Ashley Babbitt situation

is the woman who was shot during the capital assault. If your check, Your predictions, what was your protection? My prediction was that the person who did the shooting should not be charged just so what I saw all right. If you don't really know all the facts in anything just by watching another video, but in my opinion, and I know this was deeply offensive to maybe most of you in my opinion,. I saw somebody who should not be charged with crime, because I did think that lethal violence was called for a very specific situation. Now I hear people saying should have done a warning shot or should have done something, maybe maybe, but I just don't think that I just don't think there's shooting somebody who's breaching

reaching a door in the capital surrounded by rioters, who you don't know what kind of weapons? However, what their intentions are I'm gonna say I agree with it. I'm going to say I agree with no charge and I agree with us not knowing who did the shot. I do agree with that. But I understand completely stand! If just emotionally everything about this feels wrong because she was just she got shot trying to make the world better right. That's a fact. She was in the process of legitimately and patriotically trying to make the world a better place than she thought there was something justice and she thought she was marching against. Somebody was in the military train to defend the country probably thought she was so its tragic.

and I certainly do not think anybody deserves to get shot. But that's a separate question from one of the person who did the shooting did a really hard choice and. You don't want to be in this situation, but yeah I think no charge was the right decision, but I also respect anybody who disagrees with that, because I think there is a close call. Some court back and going on? I guess there's a bill now and even though, by set up this advisory committee, which we think is just a smokescreen for figuring out away to not do it, but Congress finding a way to embarrass itself as introduced a bill, led by Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Adler, now the fact that Jerry Gentler is assigned to this makes me wonder if every time they too

about who's gonna do something something you know is doomed. You look around and say: well this project scandal doomed like to be the lead on it. Russia collusion anybody, Jerry, Jerry, Jerry, We would like to take the lead on Russia collusion Gunnar Jerry, get out there on camera. Make sure you ve really is put your reputation on the line for Russia collusion. It's gonna be good for you Jerry. I think this could make your career because you know you're your career in Congress. I dont want to say is not stellar, but it's a little love stellar, we're gonna, be this could be your chance, Jerry Jerry! You to be our star, but don't worry we're it is sending out alone on this. Collusion pig though now we're going to give you a story.

On partner that people will respect. His name is Adam chef. the two of you go out there, I gathered Castello but now is, Very serious. Do oh and you're going to have a great result. You said yes said: yes, he's gonna, do it Well months, go by. somebody gets the idea of doing a court packing bill which the public hates the Supreme Court hates Joe Biden does like it too much and even Ruth, Better Ginsburg, was against it. So He said we need here to lead this car packing idea, anybody anybody Jerry? Would you like to step up good work

Jerry, glad you're stepping up with us. Take the ball and run if you like, we could bear. It was somebody who is equally worthwhile IBM somebody who could help you out somebody who is right mutation couldn't get any worse. Have you met Eric swallow he's on the team actually out of his ability, but it would be funny if you. and if you never thought of network, and Adam shifting Abbot Castello. Well you're. Welcome your welcome because, as you down, if it turns out you another time so CNN. As a little bit of a reputation problem. Courtesy of project. Very us. It is getting to the point where it just funny.

Let me see it that is so busted now it's funny, but And there are lots of levels to why this is funny so justly the story, there's a scene and technical director who got caught on video trashing, then his employer for being just a naked propaganda site, and that they all know they're working on propaganda, and he describes how they do it with no regard to truth. And it just says it out loud and the sun, video and. The funniest thing about it is that you get busted by this. This tinder date. A woman who, in a day with them and allegedly she went on five dates with em yoke, is it took a milder to give up the goods on video? she went on five dates with, and I dont think you gotta kiss. So this is,

this is the quality of person that they hire at CNN. Somebody who goes on five tinder dates, dont think you get a kiss, so those who cared date. work? Workers, CNN, sir? but it gets better, so the latest drop as others. I guess, there's gonna be multiples, but the second one from project very tests. it's ok for having getting home runs this week. Congratulations by the way, James, congratulations on the problem, Your biggest, I would say this is or caves biggest score so far. I think I don't know anything this bigger than this and That they actually got on video. This is amazing. They got on video, the CNN Technical Director saying directly that they target MAC,

gates and he hears what he hears? What he says quote if the agenda, say, is to get Matt Gates right now, he's like this Republican. He is opera. from the Democratic Party, so we're meeting CNN we're going to do we're running these stories to keep hurting him. He said a directly directly. Let us propaganda network. They singled somebody out for destruction because he's good. Now, here's the funniest bar. Now I'm not going to predict this is going to happen. It's just funny because it could so It is more than a speculative fun category, not a prediction. Somebody very smart who shall remain nameless for now, but very smart.

Said when this first broke about about maggots, this very small person said there's one of two things are gonna happen from this he'll be destroyed or ill will make him. President. And when I heard that I just laughed ass, it was he just didn't ring like clever to me as I now you're, just going to be destroyed, just gonna be destroyed, but It's getting interesting now, isn't it yet other day has gone by without something that looks like this Live legal risk, for Mr Gates I would have expected EU area all smoke. Gotta, be. Fire but every time clear: the smoke, look down we're waiting for their fire? It sort of in the future, well, oh

Well, I guess I don't see any burning embers at the moment, but they're coming. We know they're coming well. Let me read for you a headline I'm CNN about their gates situation. This is that line. women detail, drug use, sex and payments after late night parties with gates and others. Now, if you are this headline, what would you expect the story to say You expect that this women detail drug use, sex and payments after late night with parties with gates. Wouldn't you expect this Part of the story would say: there's somebody anybody had seen that gates, Do any of those things. but the story says. Nobody saw him do any those eggs and there's no evidence. That's the actual story. There's no evidence of any

There is no evidence that he took a recreational drug, none somebody some take a pill. I cannot take until just about every day by day, whatever who does serve, but no evidence is illegal under the other talks about the sex nobody saw sex but he saw under age any women there and the payments there's no direct link to the gates payments. There are indications and allegations and suggestions and us who knows what we're going to die I remind you, it's not my job to defend everybody's sex life or drug use or alleged drug use or anywhere else so gaiters on his own. For that right, he's on his own and, generally speaking, I'm not going to defend anybody sex life. It's just not my job

But we can talk about the propaganda aspect of it that were waiting to find out if there's anything to it and then so, my point being that They don't finish that gates off trying pretty hard. If they do, finish him off, he might get stronger, reason their target again, as they have admitted his effective. How many people would they say that about. Right? How many people will see an answer on the on the republic How many people with they call out as effective, because that means there worried if you were bad at his job, which is talking in public about policies stuff. If you are bad at that, they would just let him on and let him do his thing, but they said he's good that the Democrats are afraid of him.

Doesnt several smarter now doesn't it? What do you think if they, finish him off, he could be pressed it Let me give you another another element of that. The things is accused. Let's just say, there's no evidence of whatever the worst parts are, so this will just be speculative, If it turns out there's: no there there and no real evidence ever emerges. What we're going to know about. My guess is that he was targeted by CNN for being too effective right That's why you know about here's. A second You know about him. When he was single. He I had a very active sex life were told reliably. Do you think that would hurt him. Put on your persuasion, hat.

there's a young young man in Congress and he had it very successful. Apparently sexual life hurt summer helps him yeah, think about it, because he was single as long as Nothing worse comes out than we have seen is going to help him to say it: but human beings live. People who are less say sexually successful if I can put it that way. J F K right, It's the your brain will say: oh he's a horrible man slut and if you're talking per in public,

you will say well, I hate all that these he sure Abed person. I wish he engine news pictures to his weasel is weasel co workers who apparently through under a bus. But a part of you, like your rational brain, will say this is all bad. I I disavowed, but biological part is gonna, be a little triggered by it. So keep scientists will be interesting right. Here's the biggest news of the day, ready a dilbert, largely to two Dilber NF tease just launched, and you can look at. Pinned tweet defined the linked to to them are two versions of Gilbert Comic Strip were made just for this. They don't run in any newspapers. These particular ones But one of them is a naughty version. The other one is the clean version with no naughty where

One uses the F word and it will be probably the only time ever happens in Dilber Comic. Obviously, that can arise The newspaper, so I see only one there's an up, Somebody in it is used in an artistic way out just throw them there, and you can now vote by being in part of the auction I'll tell you what it is, and you can see if you like the naughty one or the So here's what enough to use an empty if you dont know, is a digital, collectible piece of art world. You say: how can you collect a digital thing when anybody can just make a perfect, the production of it there there literally worthless if it's a digital image or or a digital love any hour? I think, and all these things can be enough. Tease stands for non fungible token or something, but that doesn't matter.

it noted stands for so what it is as a marketplace for digital art that people will play a path to millions for and what makes it unique and collectible is that the artist in this case I'm the artist the artist essential, register that speaking in a non technical way, essentially puts it on the blockchain so that its public and on corruptible forever that one copy is the original. Every other copy will not have the benefit of that connection to the blockchain, which is the way you know it's. The original. Now, should you invest in digital art called enough tease, I dont know why anybody would cause. I don't click links. I don't like stamps out like cars. Like anything, I had sort of.

A flashlight fetish for a while, but even broke that answer if you are not already deeply into crypto dont get into her for this year, you wanna get into Europe. People were into a to do it, but this now let me connect us to an actual topic you care about, if you're not only enough to market this has no money to, but it does connect to the real world in a way that I dont know if I've heard anyone, say it might have a little behind the curtain inside about this, and this might blow your mind a little bit. You know also know I'll die this into an empty. Is you ve heard a bit clout a new start up, be eighteen seal o Uti bit clout in which people human beings,

Real people, such as myself, are turned into essentially a and f T, like asset I'll say like it. It's not. same thing and wish you can buy coins or tokens in people so right now, Elon Musk is the most expensive wine and I think I'm I'm somewhere down the list, but I'm in the top twenty. I think of human beings in the world that are in this this market. Now, here's the part that you don't see me coming. There is a much much more important as social element to this. That's completely invisible. The crypto market is creating a market in influence and the higher you are built up in this market of influence.

The more you will actually have in the real world? Not only because you, my share in this upside, you save get some of the sum of the financial benefit of other people bid you up possess a bit. Clout works. The creator get some coins if they want them. What that does is create almost if successful leads nowhere near this point yet, but where it could go, Creating a shadow government didn't see that come into the. I've told you that the the form of government is already evolving so that people who are going to lose power here fairly soon. So, if, if it goes, blank will be done for today, if the power of those in my battery is low,.

So the point is these: these markets of entities in the big cloud which are separate, but they they're, moving towards the same direction that people can be built up and influence, so influence, for example, is way above my fame or my elected office, or my wealth or anything would would put me. But people on big clout and, of course, is not a representative of a country but people are big loud apparently have decided to increase my voice. Now, that's not what they think they're doing. They probably think they're just investing, because they think maybe maybe I'll get more attention by my reputation will improve or something but the effective. It is boosting, eventually not quite there. Yet.

but eventually boosting people were not elected. So it's almost a form of election, in which shadow influence, Society will be created and you can find out who other people who are smart. Thank you should listen, listen to. Member, I told you that we should have a propaganda checking service. Well, we don't have but suppose you know who to listen to who wasn't gonna Lydia, pretty rare. If you look at the list of the top people on bit clout, here's your challenge find me a liar. I know some of them are an entertainment. So I'm not sure the count that but look at the list and find a liar on the list. Not many. And almost everybody who is famous you what kind of cancer? You're a liar: what do you like? It but he was in the media

and say well, you see me lie. number one on their list is Elon Musk, as he ever lied to you, I don't think so about an of all relevant as ever lied to you don't think so. Our biology ever lied to you know about me. They rely too. I can think of a time I have because I don't have any reason to. But that does mean the obviously that doesn't mean services Jake balls up there too, there will be people who just celebrities, Yo Taylor, Swift, etc, but I think that they are, I think the celebrities will be somewhat discounted. Italy, clout The gory they'll just be famous, somebody says you lie by omission, not intentionally. I can't think of a time. I've done that.

but I am also welcome to them in the comments anybody you adds context. In fact, the very thing that I tried to do most is add context. So if he ever see me doing what you think is lying by omission, despite the comments, if I see it, I will mention. Oh, I withhold dues that will scary. Yes, there's things, I don't tell you, but it's different if the topic is already out there and there some context try to withhold contacts if the topics out there, it's only a topic. You don't know about all right. So look for this. What you think is a silly silly, crypto thing that makes no sense that has no impact on the real world, nothing more important than people collecting decorative plates. Our message in the long term play it could replace the friggin government keeping

I guess bite and is going to sanction Russia. What's that look like. What the hell are. We gonna do to Russia. I guess sanctions some companies and some people they gonna make any difference. I think we have any leverage doing, because we ve already sort of sanction all the obvious stuff there's nothing to do, but by now have to do something. My guess is that Putin is completely aware that he can take what he wants and thereby didn't want to start a war over it. The really, thank goodness to worry about is that Biden is run by the military industrial complex. Which you have to worry about right, because if the military industrial complex sees a opportunity for a fight, nor that that we think will be shorter than nuclear encounter kind. Gonna wanna see it. This is good for business,

so Biden's a little scary. That way. Where is trump, we had more confidence that you was going to make a decision. That was good for the country. You don't feel the same about buying in this case, and this case you wonder, who exactly is the or behind by and do they want no war. I might want a little war might want a little bit. They don't want nuclear war. Of course,. The other thing that the CNN undercover tapes by project vertex said, is that they plan to make CNN plans to make climate change the next scariest thing. So that's why you say it turned into climate emergency and there are already running climate scare stories. So let's go

The latest from the CDC and the experts about viruses, is they you probably can't get it from a surface very easily. That is pretty much all in the air and pretty much all indoors, so the two things that we got less aid more confirmation of just unless there too, that breathing it indoors with people who have. It is the dangerous thing. Being outdoors in any context appears to be quite safe in any context, because outdoors justs were blows, the virus away but then the other figures were probably overdue. These same sanitizing, the surfaces cosy almost kick at it. That way, you can. You can snap perfectly safe, but it's not likely now in the comments

I would like to ask you this. I made a decision on day one of the corona virus that I wasn't gonna sanitize stuff. My my gut feeling is that if you could get it from surfaces we're all going to have it in a month and therefore, after a few weeks, It was clear we didn't already have it in a month. I said. I myself am not sabotaging everything now, if I to a building and they ve got a requirement or even a suggestion. We'll do the hands out of fashion, but I have never sanitized everything I bought from the store. I have. Gotta go sanitize my hand after taking some cash from the Kashmir cashier I've. Never I've completely ignored that guidance and was right and was wet.

now, somebody says, but you do where a mask. What do you think the best? medical scientific evidence is for masks in the comments. Tell me what you think is the best evidence for or against masked, not a specific thing. Do you believe tell me how many people believe that site shown conclusively or lease really really strongly the mask work or have any of you think that the science shows they definitely don't work in the comments go. Now I'll make some comments. While I'm watching your your comments now- Most of you are probably leaning right, probably more conservative, Sierra than others, and You are accused, not you specifically, but the group of conservatives are

used of ignoring science, sometimes way too often ignoring sides turns out to be right Which is exactly why you do it right all of you, conservatives who were your criticised death about or anxiety. It's not because you haven't noticed the science is bullshit. You have And the is filtered through political people and is filtered through advocates. So you ve ever really see the science. You just see people talking about it, they don't trust and their often wrong. So, Let me say to you that, though those of you who have the opinion that masks don't work, two things. I disagree. But not with a binary way like I'm on, represent sure. If I had number on eighty percent? Sure.

Number one, I think, masks work. Eighty percent, certainly I am not an expert so how likely could I be wrong really likely right? Second thing? Is: If you ever an opposing opinion- and you say mass- don't work, I think you're wrong, but I respect that happen because it's not unfounded. It's not like crazy right, but I'm pretty sure is wrong. I given an eighty percent chance is wrong, Now, look at my track record for all of the other predictions are made about the the virus and anything else and say to yourself: Have I been right more than I'm wrong and You take seriously the somebody

Then write a lot thinks there's an eighty percent chance. The mask, sir, are working now. Here's my thinking, the medical community and the scientific community are very unified on this. Now that doesn't make em. Can we all agree just because everybody's unify that doesn't make it right, but is the fact that the door, Cars are overwhelmingly in favour of mass indoors. and these science is overwhelmingly in favour of masks. Endorse. Outdoors is different situation. now, if you believed, because you ve been following certain sceptics- that if you were to look at the science, the science would show they don't work. You have been bamboozle All right, cuz there, a lot of skeptics printing a lot of stuff that is not credible and you've probably seen a lot of it. None of it's credible that I could be

be careful. When I say none of the anti mess stuff is credible, doesn't mean it's wrong. It doesn't mean it's wrong. It could be completely right and at the same time, have no credibility, because the way it's presented right, you can't believe it, but I can still be right. Now, as long as the people who know the most are, are really solidly in favour of it. My risk management decision is worth the risk, even though I reckon hate the masks. I hate mass as much as you do right and blessed. I have will asthma. So when I put in the Basque basically gasping for air, I think a lot of psychological. But I hate masks and I still think is a good mismanagement, because I think it's temporary. never temporary is so that's where I met masks thanks wrestle.

Someday. I wonder for now the the the evidence and most people use about social justice, Single masks is unfortunately irrational and see. If you do this use a graph on twitter? You don't say Here are two places one has type mask control and social distancing and the other is completely opposite. No mass and no social distancing. but look at the curves, though the same so if their two places one uses, mass and distancing the other does not but their curves of the same. What's that tell you about masks, go. The other is nothing. So if you believed that what I just described, even if as accurate and most that most ordain is not accurate, but even if the curves were exactly the same, it would tell you anything about masks.

you have to understand that and the reason is because there are too many variables. one of the reasons that you don't require masks is that everything else is looking good, see, end up your cause and effect it backwards. So if You believe that looking at every two areas and comparing them tells you something you need to release on that, because it doesn't. Of about out of batteries are going to make about a battery saw make my clothes arguments which are, I think, I'm a guy If you saw little hook up, there is because I got a low battery notice and I had cleared but I have almost no battery left. Some guarantee ended up now.

Somebody says that they graphs, if, through this day, Mattel's you that, if masks help they don't help much now now that is a hundred percent wrong. You can't tell that you. Billy cap and that that's the illusion that this, like an optical illusion except optical, it's an illusion that if they made a big difference, you'd be able to tell Because the other variables are really big and they're all over the place, you're really can't tell from comparing to places that there's no, probably nothing more important. to understand. If you're, not a statistics, person just understand you just can't compared to places without many variables that are all over the place, you just can't be done, and that is your life stream for today and I'll talk to you tomorrow.