It's time style for coffee was got Arabs best part of the day, every single tat every time, and if you'd like to enjoy this, why wouldn't you really needs a copper, my girl, glass tanker gels or stay the canteen jirga flask of vessel of any kind fill it with your liquid. I like coffee, join me now for the unbearable pleasures. Dopamine, they think, makes everything better. It's

called the simultaneous, is gonna happen right now. Go ask I see it in your comments. People ask me to comment about Thomas Soul does happen today, because I didn't see these stories and involve them so lance. I can comment on him. I don't know what you're talking about, but I suppose, if I find out I'll do it, why did you see the video man verses? Bob gap. and the real news is totally real and it never mislead you there's a viral video of a man going out to his car in the driveway driveway and before he gets in his wife, comes out and looks like she's scary, video cat carrier case with a cat it or something, and a bobcat lunges at the wife whose between two, the cars like attaches to her back and in the way

start screaming on big attack. Now here's the good work. The husband whose, on the other side, the car no delay, goes right at the bobcat rips it offers life holds it in the air. Looks it down like, as is like bearing a down while he's holding it that takes it throws it across the lawn and it gets better

then he pulls out he's gotten, because apparently he was strapped these stars chasing the bobcat who comes back to attack his wife and like under the car in ITALY, there is armed he's like I'm, going to shoot that thing everybody lived, and that was the story. Bobcat attacks, man, men, these bobcat, pretty good right. Just before I came on somebody said in the comments: Bobcat, that's a cat like that again and the bobcat is basically the same sizes my last cat, I really big feel like a Maine Coon cat cuz. It's like a burly bag, but not a bobcat. Now let me tell you what you can do with a cat, sometimes that you really can't ever do with a bobcat and I'll demonstrate.

Imagine that you're holding this cat and or Bobcat like this and you're, holding it in front of you for up to five seconds, You couldn't do that with a regular cat and maybe not be killed. I'm not positive that you can hold up a wild bobcat in your hands and stare at down for five seconds and then reach back and throw it without losing. Everything. Your face, I assure the story, is what you call a real news, but let me give a shout out two men now: no, I am not going to suggest that you'd have to be. You know the male, gender, ripper, Bobcat or a house Gatt offers. Somebody

Save another person didn't require that much strength, but I will simply note that we should appreciate the men running toward danger. Men run toward. And we would have a pretty bad world if that were not the case and watch happened in real time with no delay. There was no delay, it was instant boom. This man went right to the danger and ripped it out by the core and even at the even had a gun to finish off. That's a man that is the purest expression of the male gender. Now, without getting into their non binary stuff, which is a separate topic, but somehow that was just like this or even if it turns out it was a house cap. I remind you that the Dover and fifty is available. You can see it pinned to my twitter.

And it's the first and probably only Dilbert comic that will ever have the F word in it. So it's one of a kind and I think the buildings up to seven thousand five hundred for the naughty one and the the unknown eighty one, the other alternative is up to three hundred and fifty, and so it seems that the public is voting for profanity for profanity no surprise. But if you like to get in on that, the buildings going to be open for a few more weeks. Has an interesting Paul said a number of questions where one of them was, generally speaking, our most deaths, the fault of police or this aspect now we're talking about police encounters in which the suspected. So, generally speaking, almost ass, the fault of the police or the suspect. How do you think this broke down? Conservative verses? Liberal

conservative says two thirds of the time. It's the suspect, so conservatives believe you buy two hundred and twenty one. It's usually the suspects fault that they got shot. Liberals, twenty two percent, so liberals, believe that this, the police fault, we're as conservatives believe it is the at least in part or even large part. The suspects full which of those is accurate in the comments which more accurate, is it usually then again we're not talk about specific cases, but just sort of in general? Is it usually, the suspect brings it on themselves or the police are just not doing their job. That way, we want them to. What do you think. well. This is again a critical difference and I'll be talking about this little bit later today, meaning

library of a worldview- and I would like to make this distinction, which will be one of the most important thing is. You can ever understand that there is a difference between what is true. and what is useful and if you are locked him to the belief that the way things are useful are also true. You have handicapped your ability to succeed because there are lots of useful things. That may not be so true, and what I mean is if your worldview is obsessed with what,

true you're not going to succeed, if your worldview is that I'd like to know what's true for sure, but I'm not going to be limited by it, I'm going to do what's effective, then you have more tools. You can follow. What's true, if that's your best path or you could follow a philosophy, that's not based on truth. Let me give you an example of a philosophy: that's not based on truth. You can control the life- that's not true, it's not you guys are all these other forces that are bad,

hey Mommy, all the time right. So is it true that you can control your life, absolutely not just tons of stuff outside of your control? But if you decide that that's your worldview, which is not true, but you act like it's true and you build a a philosophy and systems around it being true. What happens? You succeed pretty much every time it's almost a year there are no guarantees in this life, but us as close as you can get to a system is going to work every time they you just pretend and a lot of it is pretend that you have control,

over everything right down to a police stop? Is it true that the suspect can always control the police action by how they act? Nope? That's not true, definitely not true, but it's kind of true right. It's not acting later, because the police can just be mistaken. They could be jerks, they could be races, could be poorly trained all kinds of things you can't control directly, but it still true, you have a lot of control right, so you see the difference if you, if you're stuck in the what's true world You don't have as many options. If you say I love was true if as useful but I'm going to use what works if there's a difference there You say I control myself and I can control. you by what I do.

Not totally true. But if you act like it's true, you're gonna do well. Let me give you another. Others there's lots of evidence, scientific and anecdotal that people who are a covenant can perform better right. So if you were a reality based person in your obsessed with what's true you'd say, there is no evidence that I could be good at this thing, whatever the things no evidence, every time I try to I've got this result. Why should I assume, without any evidence that I would be able to be better at this? The facts are limiting me. So don't use the facts of the wrong tool in this case instead say that you are you're great and you can perform well and you can improve.

Is it true? It might be true by accident, but if you do assume it you're not going to perform your back, So having a false impression of reality, which is that you maybe you're a little better than any facts, suggest improves your performance. So, every time you stuck in what are the facts, you ve limited your toolbox. Facts are great, we prefer but the very limiting if, if you're, what if your worldview depends on you talk, but that was a more examples of it, but some other things. First of all, some compliments. Oh I'm sorry also the rasper simple. I think there are some other ball.

Said that liberals believe that over a thousand black men are killed by police per year, do not the real numbers so liberals, this, I think this was not rasmussen. Liberals believe that over a thousand black citizens are killed by police, presumably without good reason. What's the real number that twenty seven now, what do you think about twenty seven people being killed black people? and killed by the police each year, if you're a human and you have any empathy or caring about the country, eleven say to yourself twenty seven people guy killed by the police. That's way to manage. That's like that's like a gigantic number of people killed by the police need to be killed by the police. Twenty seven a lot. If you're talking about the government killing people

You're talking about a disease Kelly. Only twenty seven people per year, you will even care mean you'd care if it was your family but you and see it as a national problem. But if the government, the police, are killing twenty seven people a year that didn't need to be killed. If that were true, that's a separate question. But if it's true this is a big problem, and I would I would acknowledge that black lives matter has been argument about why the hell, you know what the hell is going on, but believing that is a thousand completely changes your scale right. Twenty seventh way too much gotta do something about it

you gotta understand better at least, but you look at what the fake news is done. They have, literally literally, this is not high. Probably the fake news has brainwashed again no hyperbole in use here. This is actual just straight definitional brainwashing to make people twenty two percent of a lot of liberals believe that over a thousand black men who were killed so obviously never completely distorted view of how big it is again. twenty seven is a terror and can't be tolerant. Compliments to representative chip, Roy Republican, For introducing legislation Thursday, there would label the drug cartels as foreign terror organisations under federal law.

Which I assume, gives us tools to directly engaged them where they are. I don't know if that's ok,. I'm pretty sure it gives us an extra aggressive tools. Do you remember who was the first person you heard say? Why are the cartels not designated as terrorists when they obviously are? Who is the first person that you heard not the first person who said it probably was the person first person to you heard say that they should be designated as terrorist organizations. Probably, for most of you have been saying this for a while and one Things that I track is how often I'm persuading handsome point in public and then how often things go. My way Now again, unless I on the first person who said it, I wasn't observers and fairly popular idea somewhere, but.

There there is a a weird coincidence: isn't there that whenever I'm behind something specific, you wait a few months. It seems to happen. Now, though, saying I'm causing it, because I think was happening, is unjust, good at like front running stuff or just guessing. What's gonna happen anyway and feels like that's what's happening, I don't feel like I'm. Certainly I don't feel like Eddie causation this one specifically, but it's weird. How often things go my way is: have you noticed the positions of the avenue my head? Is anybody else noticed how often things go my way. Am I just crazy, or have you noticed the two in the comments lobby now are genuinely curious about this. If it say internal phenomenon,

which I am the only one who sees it or do you see it to again, seeing it as a coincidence unless hang on, causing the stuff yeah? Ok, your penance In today s bad data analysis segment. I like to look at things where people are just looking at the the analysis wrong. So here I'm not going to make a political point and see if you can separate. That's right! I'm only get to be talking about the analysis, so so don't retreat to your opinions. were always looking at the analysis. Ok, the topic is masks and mask effectiveness. Ok, too late. You just want to your corners, come on back up.

It's not about whether they worker they don't it's only whether this analysis tells us anything we're does so Kyle Becker whose real good follow on Twitter by the way. So, if you want to google him pile Becker as a very good, followed by his is twinning somber statistics today that I question that I'm going to ask for your help. The reason I quest is that, with my little bit of your data analysis experience, it doesn't look like good data, it doesn't look like a good approach. It doesn't it

at any event, but I will acknowledge that to someone who may not be a day the analysts, it looks really compelling and here's what the graph tells you there's no correlation between mask use in number of people who die per thousand. Does that show you for sure the master work, no correlation wherever he had masks? You might have a lot it s. Some places you have lots of asks not allowed us. So no correlation right. No, I don't think so. I think that these grass literally tell you nothing about masks, actually literally nothing. There's no information about masks its only about masks but there's no useful data about masks in the graph. That's what I I I'll see anything about

effectiveness and mass. I just see whether used and here's the disk, and I think this is where I need a I. Neither in the system. there are two places I can imagine, you would expect to see more masks. One place would be wherever infections are high. So if you look at a graph the says, wherever infections are high, there's more masking. That would make sense right that doesnt tell you, masks master effective. It tells you that the experts say to wear them. So, whenever wherever infections are high fees, Follow this part, don't you expect to see lots of masks because affections are high, so everybody mask up so that part we, to stand. Whether or not masks work are you with me so far. That would have nothing to do with. Whether they really work but

we all acknowledge that the experts recommend them whenever the infections raw, so so far, without any information about mask effect It s just knowing their experts recommended. We would expect to see exactly what some the graph were high, so there were a lot of mass wearing their cause. It was recommended. whereas a second place where He would see a lot of masks wherever it is politically recommended. words if you don't have a lot of infections but you're a democratic area. You're still gotta wear masks. So what are the two places? You would expect to see? Masks politically.

you would expect to see them, one infections are high, does the experts say to wear them in their demand? It and the second place you would expect to see them is where infections are low, but their Democrats, and so they. They have a preference for masking up, so if you see a graph says that they wear masks were infections or high, they also where mass we're infections are low. What have you learned about? Mask effectiveness? Nothing, nothing! There's! No, literally nothing about mask effectiveness. The only Learned is where they wear them. That's it does anyone get that Now, if there is a correlation or a lack of correlation, is the argument there's no correlation and if mess work, do you would see it clearly, not these graphs. Now you would not see that I don't think so years? So let me

I put a little more humility on my opinion, then maybe came across one of things. I'm often criticized, for rightly, is acting more confident than my argument should suggest about. Seventy five percent, confident that I'm right about this, that these grass mean literally nothing, but they look like they mean everything. So, alas, the sceptics to dig internet. all right, so I don't know if you're following the law of Self Defense Blog, which talks about the the show of encase and I've recommended it, but it turned on me today, so the law of self defense, Blog tweeted, There was a reference to China and genocide and they decided to put me into the story, and so the loved Self Defense, Blug Love Self Defence,

Said I remember Scott Adam say referring, this process, meaning the genocide against the wiggers as China were dealing with an infectious disease. That's all says: why am I in the story? What is. The implication here is the implication that I am in favour of China. Dealing with a wiggers like an infectious disease feels like it feels like us. The implication doesn't Well, and if not, why am I in the story at all? What would be the point of putting my name in a story about genocide? Now I don't think I have to tell you I'm opposed to genocide.

Do I- and it is true that I made this analogy- that China is looking at it like it's like is just a disease that eradicating does us anything about my opinion. My opinion about China is now really my opinion, I'm describing China's opinion. So why am I the sweet. What's up with that, and if you read this without knowing the context, would you not think that I was a horrible person who believes that the weaker should be treated like a disease, Qaeda kind of suggests? I think that, doesn't it doesn't say it have you suggested anxiously well in the most important news of the day for the first time scientists created embryos that are part of human and part monkey and embryo. This part, human part, monkey and finally,

I know you are waiting for flying cars. You have to wait a little bit longer for that, but it looks like that. They have monkey people is here. I would like to tell you the funniest comment, I saw this story from a user D. L o d. I know you're watching this and after the after that I tweeted about the first time we were creating a half human Hungary is due to its. There goes the price of bananas. Congratulations day. There was the funniest thing s onto her. Today there goes the price bananas and was funny. It is the butler somebody like deep ethical questions and like everything about the nature of reality, is in the story and what is it? What is ethical and what is not in diesel is now there goes the price, but

Nobody, ever this morning, because Iraq, I got extra, refer bananas. Well, apparently, the reason for this is that are trying to grow these monkey people for transplants so basically create a monkey person. then rip out their organs and put it in a fully human person to which I say yeah. I think we got an ethical problem here. Because number one. What exactly? What exactly makes me love humans more than monkey people, because I think there's a gross assumption in this that, if A monkey person were created that I would somehow have less affection for the part monkey or a human person that I would further fully human person, and I don't think that's demonstrated.

I know I like my dog more than a lotta humans. I know that I wouldn't like a monkey person better than regular person. Because a monkey person would have a lot of advantages, like suppose, you're talking to a monkey person and they ve got They ve got their phone in one hand and they ve got a pen and another hand. Did he say, can you pass the salt? work at a regular person. Do that not easily you'd have to put something now, but not a monkey person you're gonna tale Do you like pass you, the solid sure in their tail would come up, will solve shaker. Anyone even have to stop what you're doing monkey people have. lots of advantages. If I had a choice of artificial insemination and I wanted to create a baby and somebody gave me a menus as well, you can have a variety of babies by choosing the donors etc, but we'd like to offer this new.

For a monkey person- and I would say I don't want to have a monkey baby- it makes it now. It's not monkey. It's a monkey person part Monkey bar per person. I think about it. That say them be some villages if you raise a regular child. regular child, you have to buy clothes, that's expenses, but would a monkey person need clothing or would they just be furry and they would always be one. They have an advantage in sports, because you know you like your kid to be the the star athlete. I believe, monkey person could excel at sports, little extra muscles per wait, etc and forget about the tale. How good? When you be at sports of Vienna Tail feel,

He would help so must not make any racist jokes. I know you're dying to do that, but we don't do that here. Let's just Let's just celebrate the fact that we could be creating monkey people here's, your propaganda alert in the guardian british publication. They say that apparently there's some data breach. They found now that there are some: U S, police officers in public officials who donated to Kyle written houses, I guess defence front and that's a story. Is it wise? Our story? Why sad story. should you care that police officers, or even ex police officers and public officials donated to Kyle written houses? Defence? What makes our story.

Because I'm pretty sure, if you're a police officer, you can donate to go. Fuck me you can have an opinion and keep mind that the video of Kyle Rittenhouse shows him not committing any crimes release the ones I saw. What, if the police also saw a video of Karl Rittenhouse not committing any crimes. If european. officer, and you want to donate money to a cause for somebody who is on video not created not causing any crimes. I sent a story. Why can't you do that, though? Some of you would say Scott Scott Scott, you don't know he wasn't committing any crimes. You know. Maybe the courts will rule differently, that's possible. You know cuz the laws sort of opaque to up to now. And even the lawyer, sometimes so you don't know what's going to happen with Carl Rittenhouse, maybe there's some grimy

committed, but I watch the videos I didn't see any crimes. I saw horrible tragedies. I wish I had not happened, but I didn't see a crime. And so this is a non story. This is just propaganda, the way it's the way it's presented to you, is with the assumption that Kyle Rittenhouse had done something so bad that no proper police officer could back him, and that is not true basis. we now later, we can find out that's true, but based on what we know now, there's no evidence of crime that I've seen and if these people saw the same thing I saw tat they can they can donate anything they want and not. That's, not even inconsistent with jobs.

there's more propaganda. Twitter has apparently band project Berytus who, as you know, is breaking really shocking stories about CNN, in which they got a technical directive to admit in very clear terms that are engaged in propaganda. They know they are they do it intentionally and they're not even tried to be loose. Now. That's a big big Twitter has banned project vertex, who I think is banned and enough other places that this really does make a difference. and the reason for the ban is that allegedly, the organization project Vertex had some kind of fake users. So project vertex said, while fake users We're not aware of any fake users. Tell us what you're talking about what did twitter do

did Twitter say: oh here's. Our ears are evidence here, the fake ones and here's how we know are tied to you. Therefore, you violated our rules and we take you off. Do you think they're going to do that now, because I don't have to? They don't need to make their case, they can simply say this. Our service? We say you violated it you're gone now. How do you feel about being kicked off a social media without a specific reason that you can verify it's sort of specific by not one you can verify I told you I was put some context on it. I told you that you too bad taken down one of my videos, first, I've made a claim about the election integrity? That was against the rules and then I said I am not aware of that. I am not aware of making any claim and I certainly did but intentionally surf. They don't tell me what I said:

either have to never talk about the election again to see how dangerous this is? I only have two choices. Never talk about elections again, so take my voice off the field or get banned completely and totally because I make the same mistake again. Because they never told me what the first mistake was, how do you avoid it? When you don't But what it was. Do you see that the social media companies have created a model in which they can ban anybody for any reason, without giving a reason. And that we know that project vertex was uncovering Syrians propaganda way is how do you feel when somebody who just uncovered another media entities playing an obvious propaganda in such intentions.

How do you feel when another platform bands them for a reason that you can't and project vertex can confirm even. Happened. What if there are no such thing as these, these fake accounts or they ve, been attributed to the wrong place. That's a really big problem at a really big problem. Now, every cases different, so you can't really its little dangerous to generalise from project very task is there might be something they the violated rule- and this might be totally appropriate but are not arguing whether its appropriate inappropriate, I'm saying if we allow the standard to be, will tell you when here when you're no longer welcome, but we don't need to give you a specific reason. If that becomes a standard, we accept the country's lost.

Stop that little, that little bit of accepting the unacceptable would be the end of the end of everything. Cuz. All critics would just disappear. You just couldn't be a critic. You would make a few car the Democrats would say: hey, there's one there there's somebody who is harming us making some comments. So she'll media says well, you violated rule which one well we're not going to tell you. You violated rule again seriously, which one we don't have to tell you three strikes and around now another would now, though, we know that the Democrats use major media entities. Essentially you a subsidiary of the Democratic Party, this is the end of free speech. The Democrats have literally captured enough of the right assets that they can eliminate you're free speech and you watch

You're happen right in front of you. There's! No doubt there is no doubt was happening. You can watch it right in front of you. Plenty of evidence is all plain, and yet it works anyway because they have all the power. Nobody. There's none of power to push back so that they know they can just take as far as they walk. So I have to think that there are some conversations going on about me at this point. I dont like to be the paranoia uses of everybody's lookin at me. You everything's about me. It would be easy to be that guy, but don't you think now that they started with Alex Jones and they got the president and yet another going after project Berytus? Don't you think

that if you look at that Continuum Alex Jones President Trump Project, Vert ass, where am I wear it? Where am I that continuum? I'm next, I'm next Now I've told told you that I don't I don't like buying into the slippery slope arguments because its lazy, Things either have a reason to go in a direction or they have something stopping them. So I like analyzing things that way saying something is a slippery slope is like just waving you hands on the topic. It doesn't saving, Things either have a reason to go where they have a really. stop unless it what's the reason to stop in this case. So, given that I believe they will be successful bearing project virgins, they certainly succeeded with Trump they succeeded.

As ourselves, not defending anything any of those people said right, that's their job in their jobs and defend their content. That's not my job, but I'm kind of next or people like me right. Am I wrong about that? like I'm next, if that happens, I feel That's a whole other level, because you know that the strategy of starting with people they, even even their supporters, now are probably have a problem like No matter how much you love Alex Jones and no matter how many times he gets proven right in the long run, which is scary by the way the number of Times Alex Jones ends up being right way more than you think, but at the same time he's a provocative character of sherry's. Well, yes,

things that you and I can't can agree on so you get the easy ones first and then, if people are okay with that, it sets the stage to get the the ones that are a little bit more of an argument. You know So people like me are not trying to lie to you if they take me out that's too far, but what can you do about it? Another slippery slope is a dumb argument because it doesn't give reasons. It's like an appeal to magic. In my mind, things have things that stop them. They have friction the things that cause them. If you can see the parts of the machine calling it a slippery slope is Dumb way to look at it and engine basically Sakharov else of others,.

So, Andrew Sullivan, who you know as one of the few people who can be trusted in this world, allowed him to my credible people list now, I believe you would does he identified left or right. That's what so awesome about it like I have trouble on remembering of Andrew Sullivan identifies left or right, because I think he is. I think he just looks at topics individually, which would make him very unusual and I think it is blow back from both sides. So that's exactly what I like him, but talking about how the maid Media have concocted the story about the police, massively shooting black people, and this. Sustainability, says fascinating inside, to use referring to a graph showing how many liberals believe that there is a gigantic problem of police shootings, whereas the data.

show that, besides fascinating insight into how the Amazon concocted massive hyperbolic lie in succeeded in getting most people to believe it. Well, I wouldn't say most people say most people on the left believe it but go ahead. Then the falsehood became the unquestioned premise for a future stories and lies. so there's a whole industry built on the lie of how big the promised. Now, let me say it again clearly: if the total national problem is twenty, seven black people got killed by some entity of our governments, meaning the police. That's a huge problem. Doesn't matter that twenty seven, small number out of the three hundred million whatever so Andrew Solvents colleagues as pure propaganda. So there's another one. I would argue

that police shooting the wrong people for the wrong reasons could literally be the smallest problem in the country. I can't think of anything smaller action now, obviously, if you're a victim of its the biggest problem for you, but if you are to simply make some objective list about how many people were killed were influenced by whatever problem, it would be pretty close to the bottom, wouldn't we'd all be close to the top improving schools, but the means media protects. The teachers unions protects the Democrats, and so you believe that the smallest problem is the biggest problem and you believe that the biggest problem is the smallest problem, and I'm not talking about you with the word you I mean the public you're all smarter than that

Here's some of propaganda from conservatives ready this was could be a little harder for some of you, because what I call out the conservatives for fake news, a lot of you identify, conservative and the. Firstly, you think is really my team. Does that yeah, your team? Does that both sides left and right produce? A lot fake news, here's my opinion here. Some more you saw the story about Kristen Clerk, Joe Biden nominees for the Department of Justice is civil rights division. Now, if you're a nominee for a civil rights division. You better have a pretty good past about civil rights and about racial things, but it turns out that when she was in Harvard. She wrote a letter for the Harvard Crimson, which is being held

TAT S very, very racist, and I was just reading your story by David horizontally in national review, Hey what's the headline is there is absolutely no evidence that Kristen Clarks are racist. Letter was satire, so here's the question, so nobody is doubting that the letter she wrote in nineteen ninety four. Nobody is doubting that it was really erase Looking like I'm going to have to work, looking hold that for now nobody left or right no person who reddit doubts. That is super super racist, looking, okay Greece on that, and so when I heard that I said,

I don't even need to see the letter Dua because even the little hints about what's in it sounded so super racist. I was like well, obviously, if it were a joke, it would be obvious right and then I read it. And it's really much better than the thick and I'm going to back Kristen Clark and I'm going to call fake news, the conservatives Who were doubting her explanation of what it was so her explanation is she she called it satire now, when you hear there's something satire. Your brain say I was supposed to be funny right. Then you read the letter and it's not funny at all. So is this a satire? It's not funny.

You won't laugh even once, so how can it be satire if it's not it doesn't look like you was trying to be funny while here, so it's really good satire is so good that you can't tell it said In my opinion, so years ears, the set up there. tax where she was. She was arguing against the science in the delicate curve. So the book, the Bell curve, makes some claims about iq which lots of people, cs racist now, knocking argue the details or the truth of the book. The bell theorem right. Ok, you can now that argument on yourself. That's not part of this broadcast, but there are critics of it and in your criticism, this is how she she worked against it,

And I got to say this is a plus and part of the reason is a places you can't tell she is killing. That's what makes it so good. It's really good. and while she doesn't, she goes through some alternative theories of why black people are scientifically superior to white people as she listen this. This researcher says- and this is crazy- stuff, like the mellow, the melanin than theirs, in some gland, some gland is superior and therefore they have better competitiveness. Sir brains, region. Now azure listings, as you listen looking through her examples in which he is saying that black people are clearly biologically superior to white, People, first of all, if your white, your brains on fire right, you, like God, my God, this doesn't look like