All right. It's time, one in one in its die for coffee with Scott Adams. Can you make a guess what will be talking about today? I think again, I think again and if you'd like to enjoy it, I mean really really enjoy it like better than you. Ve never enjoyed.

Coffee was got Evans. Well are you need is a reminder to us a tanker geologist, either canteen juggler fast, a vessel of any guide fill it with a favorite liquid. I like coffee, you might like racism, but don't drink that no, never drink a delicious beverage beverage. A beverage instead and I'd like you to join me now for the sole dataset go. That was a simultaneous gulp yeah little bit extra Lilburn extra. Well, everything in the world is backwards and upset down to that. We noticed that nothing seems to be right today, everything's just a little bit off and any don't notice it until you see all these apples will give you some as we go

so I like to give a start out with a big damn you damn. You two were Andreas back house who I talk about often cause is the great Undine Data analysis pray the stuff of loose, but he made me retweet Aaron Rupert, Sir Tweet, and I can't forgive him for that. But it's the first time I've on ironically retweeted them. I think, but if you don't know who earn group or is he said, he's easy character whose LE say interesting,

People at that, but dad normally, I would not agree with His- is tweets by curios. Here's responded to Nancy policies. The speech after the Shovin Floyd verdict and the energy policy managed to reach into this big best. Of things that you could say a managed to pull out the only thing that was wrong. You could have gotten a hundred different directions and not mess this up as I believe she did to the boy were era. New powers, retweeted, you with condemnation, is thank you, George Flyover, giving your life for,

I've got a million a finnish, but, let's just say in the history of of politicians, say dummies. Yet this was This was notable given our own side as well, where, if, if you're Nancy Policy, an errand rhubarb list- to you and, firstly, he says about about. I don't want any part of it. You ve really got off if too far Another is the there's a Norfolk, please Lieutenant who was fired because it was leaked that he donated some money to Kyle Rittenhouse his defense and gave him some words of encouragement. He got fired for that. He got fired for the opinion that was back

by the video for a person who is presumed innocent until proven guilty and they get fired for it. So that's the north worker police department for your that's, that's pre, pathetic now, Here is the Good NEWS: if you are with a police union and your contracts come up, I'm assuming the union does the negotiating for the police content What would you s for in terms or raise this coming round? I feel, like thirty percent, would be the right number right. That does mean, though, beyond the get it does your lots of forest is pushing back, but I would say that the police unions have a rock solid argument that the environment of risk has changed, so is substantially that

a risk reward of their job can't be looked at the same anymore and that on top of the physical violence risk, which was always extreme, which is why we have so much respect, For the place there doing stuff you- and I don't want to do for the most part, but I would say that, given the now that the legal and social risk on top of the violence risk, it looks different now, I would say I would back the cops for a thirty percent rate is minimal, That's just based on our society has changed the risk that were willing to put on the police now I would say that before you could argue by way, we should put this risk at the police. That's not even the argument. So whether you think that the OIE trial, when just the way it should have where you don't irrelevant, it doesn't matter any that

to my point that the police or the new new situation of risk, whether they are Should be there or not as a separate question, but they are there and it's different and more risk reward risk reward. The police should get. I would say, a minimum of thirty percent raise because I don't know how you can retain them. Otherwise,. Yeah, that's the thing they signed up for just doesn't exist. Because the thing they signed up for as if it was a grey area, they were probably gonna, get away with it right I get away with it. I don't mean that they necessarily do something wrong. I didn't mean that It's a grey area and they were trying to do their job. They probably but I ve gotten way within the past and I guess I'm biasing thee biasing by saying getting away with it, because maybe there was nothing to get away with. About thirty percent period for police, I think that is called for. So I would, over

the place based on this new situation. So I've ever wanted to do the police, probably. Moved in the wrong direction. By the way, there's no economists to disagree with me right. It's the same job except way extra risk. You have to pay extra for that. That's how it works surf, so have defined in the places what everybody wanted, a pretty sure the should work? The other way if economics works, awaits posted, the next door app, I here has a new feature that I'll tell you. If you're being racist before you said your message, what do you think of that What do you think of the next door up before so now. What message to the neighbors apparently is Gus of artificial intelligence built in those just looking for a cure

Words such as a blue lives matter, it'll flag that actually one of the examples it'll flag to say you know some. People would take blue lives matter as a racist statement. Usury on a Sunday it'll still let you send it or all lives matter. If you type Lives matter into the EP: it'll stop USA, whoop you know, what's going on here, right stood looking racist thing twice when you think about that, a Europe for that down. For that I have, mixed opinions are usually violate. The common thinking whenever information is presented as useful. So, in my opinion, next door is presenting actually useful information because there might be people who literally don't now

There are about to ruin their own life by saying something that they think this, boarding LEO all life and equality, but other people are going to think you're racist. I don't know, I think it's I think is worth trying, maybe see people think about it, given the world if they were actually blocking you for saying it now, that's another question, but if it's just information and its information, they can save your life literally. Worth the try. They can always reversing the if the users don't like it but anytime, you can try something cheaply and it's got a good purpose behind it. Why not give it a try? It's a little creepy, but it's a test. You everything is a test if you can reverse sneezing. All right. Let's talk about this shovin outcome.

If you didn't hear me last night at a luxury last night bologna recap. My opinion number one I am satisfied with the jury's work Agnes. I thank the door, the jurors. I do not that the jury is job is to decide the law. So this is where I might differ with some of you. I don't believe that the jury duty- and I use this word you know intentionally. I don't think The jury's duty was to attend to the letter of the law, as instructed by the judge that was their job description right. It's not their duty. Their duty under the law is to follow the largest as best they can. As though, certainly if the only duty you are talking about is what they're there

It all require description of their responsibility is then it was their duty to follow the letter of the law But what is a higher look? What's with the higher law, then the legal law, the one is written down, is ready. Higher law, of course, there is, of course there is. There's the greater good if you ever ran into a situation where, following the letter of the law, was clearly bad for the greater good. What would be the duty of the jury? I'm gonna give you an artificial example where the jury knows that follow the letter of the law would just be a wrong. What's their duty is there

to follow that law. That they know is wrong. No, never their duty is to be humans. Their duty is to be Americans. Their duty is to their fellow citizens for whom they have taken. Some sacrifice to serve on those jury now, before we before we discussed the question of whether they handled it right separately. Can we agree that their duty is to do the best, for the greater good they might not get a right, but their duty is not to although the law, if the greater good, is in a different direction, does anybody disagree with that? we want to see if there are those who would say that they should follow the law, even if they knew the law was an evil.

I'm not saying that's the case in the shop in case just as a as a principal a lot of people here lot a lot of people disagree. I will take you or I will take you or disagreement with respect, Meaning that Irish, I respect that I respect their point of view completely. I have complete respect for the opposite view of mine. Which is if you think that, following the laws, just always gonna be better, even if there's some evil. In the specific case I can see, That's not a terrible argument by the way, because there's some build them following the letter of the law, get you to hear them. In the long run, you ve got a better situation right now. This does this fairly good. But I disagree The human law is always higher than the the real law, the writ large, in my opinion,

and the problem is whether you are wise enough to know when to make this critical exception and that's the problem right, because maybe humans not wise enough to make these? exceptions, but there is a reason that we have jury trials in this because we're all more comfortable with the system. Which some capable people who mean well do the best. They can that's as good as you can get. It's a pretty good and I would say the system worked in that sense and I do think that the jurors took into account their own safety, which I support. I think they took into account what would happen to society, which I would support them doing that in just in this specific case, I think they took into account potential riots. I think they took him

account how the police would be viewed. I think they took into account racial animosity. I think they took into account how it feels should they well most of you think now, but they did because you can't not here you'd. Nobody has the ability to turn that off. Part of the forces. So here's what I like about the outcome. I do believe that was a close call in terms of whether he was guilty of anything verses not guilty, I think that the jury heard all of the evidence and I didn't that's important. The jury heard all of the evidence Most of you law, The high representative, you also didn't hear all the evidence you didn't live through. It serves the people. Through it and saw all of it have in different feeling about it. Then I got from my

A keyhole I'm not say they're wrong because the year that the assumption is, if all twelve, nor did the same way or a likely that I would have voted that way too, if I'd seen what they saw experienced, what they experience, but I did. So I'm not going to second guess people who did the work when I didn't do it and when I watch anybody line, who also didn't do the work didn't watch every minute of the trial. I know are you their opinion as much as I value the the jurors right, and there was nothing in the jury description which I found actually helpful, even though it has the bed effective pro. We doc signal both but actually reading about the backgrounds and the way they answered the questions. I actually have a lot of confidence that group And it was mostly white people and then in the jury who convict in a white guy. Which also helps a little bit for the credibility. Now

they make a wise decision. Well, look at some of the outcomes, so we don't if it's wise, but I do feel like they were credible and tried. And here's one of the outcomes according to actually use reporting, senior Democrats and Republicans AIDS. So both Democrats and Republicans, this is important to the story the aids say they would have never let their bosses save on the record, but private. They told acts use the guilty verdict. Shovin trial has lessened the pressure to act on police reform, so one of the outcomes of this verdict is less likely. There will be policed. Reform because it looks like this was police reform right made sure that people police no not to do this- might have made a big difference, but

It may not turn into legislation that we don't know what the nether that is so that we also didn't have much in the way of Last night in Portland have little action. Those police office, ruse assaulted. Some windows got broken, but basic there were no riots right. I mean I think Portland was just gonna, be Portland, no matter. What is it fair to say, or is it not being reported? Look EU comments as if I missed it, while I would say that Is mostly peaceful so does that mean that the the outcome was right. As I've told you is it feels like we can confirm this, maybe someday we can. It feels, like the jury, sent a message to the world which There's something wrong with this police officer were going to say

If I see him We're gonna send you a message by begging him guilty on all counts, which even the experts didn't really think was gonna happen. So I think the jury. Sending a message that they're making a less say not according to the letter of the law decision, I feel like that's. The message could be Rob could be, could easily be misinterpreted. What it feels like it to be. So I'm just tell you what I am receiving them, not telling you what they said. And ever feels like, Let me tell you, I'm not disappointed in any way about the outcome, even though with what I knew it would have gotten the other way if they do is the letter of the law, but that's just based on what I do incomplete.

So it seems to me that there was something wrong with direct shovel and. Julio's get that get that, no matter whether you thought you was technically guilty beyond reasonable doubt, no matter what you thought about that There was something wrong with it: wasn't there you know how humans this has been proven humans. Can they detective. Somebody is physically ill by looking at their face. I think people could probably detect If people are I've heard this I'll tell me. If I'm wrong, you can detective. Somebody is likely to be gay. By their face, not every time, of course, but better than the chance would suggest

I have a lot of things about us. The disorder come out that people can recognise, and I was too think yesterday. What is it about direct Shovin, the bothered me and maybe somebody, maybe everybody else so much. Because I wasn't exactly what he was doing right what he was doing there wasn't. An argument that it was part of the I'll you haven't heard people before- and maybe you didn't know well about he was doing it. The other is part of the argument. Bobby The argument there was something wrong with his attitude or he seemed a little bit too happy. Did anyone get that, like was anybody feeling Disobey says, is gone?

yeah, of course, so we're not over science. You I'm talking about how you you felt about him. Did he have a bad feeling about I'm? Looking at you covered snow symphony. I'm seeing some yes, it is some knows some people signing off. Because of that, are you trying to persuade fear and fear no. There was I'll. Tell you what would it look like me. There was a lack of empathy that has, on all the way through the trial, what Should there not them some point in which we heard a statement from Derek shovel, maybe we're dead. If if he made the statement, let me now,

Should direct show them that have not set at some point here once he knew he was gonna, be tried for it. Couldn't you make a statement says my God? I certainly didn't intend this. I feel sorry for the fair I never would have done this year. Than aware that the danger was much you some like that. There's somebody says: no, don't do that because it would imply guilt by you. After guilt over a death. Do you can feel bad about the death without admitting guilt? Indeed, you could say I feel terrible Family, I feel awful about what happened. I hope that the. The jury will show that I wasn't participant in in that because that's what I felt at the time would that be incriminating to simply have to simply have empathy

it reinforces the wrong word because remit. This was justly did know into something wrong, so you have to be careful there, but you can have empathy right. And I feel that he didn't show it people were expecting, which doesn't mean anything. He just didn't show the way people expected at the moment. You know that. I think this changed a lot of mines Apparently there was a moment when he knew there was no heart beat and they didn't changes behaviour if we're on top of somebody holding him down, you knew that their heart stopped beating. How does that not immediately change your behaviour, and I think he changed his behavior, so somebody says Asperger's will now be interesting. Certainly that wasn't that when we really interesting, if, if Thou art

even a little bit true. That would be certainly part of that a defence or part of the part of these substances, but I doubt it was true we would have heard about it. Anyway, so I think this jury looked at a person who had no empathy and he was close enough to doing something will look like that when they looked at all the variables, including their own safety, what it will do to society? Just what feels right, I feel, like the jury, made the right decision, now. Is that the same as saying that the that the that the trial was fair, I don't think it was close, the not even close, but I think the jury could ever or right decision without the trial being even close to fair, and that would be ok in my mind. I can hold both those is true, but I've heard

earlier that you couldn't. That's that's a legitimate opinion yeah. I think it was a human sacrifice and something that I think that the black population of this country doesn't fully understand and I'm gonna get a illustrated by playing two parts. I will now give you a skit in which I play a representative group of blood Americans, not any specific person and our representative person representing white people, not only one white person, black people say hey you, white people, let's see. You can now Pinochet white person for doing something that may be well argued and about how bad it was Lucy? If you could do that, a white people, do you think

You can punish a white person and then the white people say sure, watch this then the black people say I got Can you punish irrational actual person when The crime there some disagreement about the nature of the crime. You think you can do that and the way people say we just said the ass I don't know what you're asking, of course we can. Of course we can. We do it every day. Punishing other white people does like breathing. If you're a white person. Do you have any way people I've punished, rather cover lots of everyday punishing other white people is the easiest thing we do. Let me give you story that a lot of people didn't believe what I have been told. The story for years is completely true, but

When I tell it there's a certain percentage of you who will swear, I live trust me. I've been saying for twenty five years since I've been able to tell the story and their duty literally, thousands of witnesses still alive, who would be refuting me, because I tell the story all the time plenty of people could refuse it. If it were not true. It goes like this. When I work for a big bank, it was Crocker National Bank ears. Beginning of my career, my career was going well. Look like I be sort of a management type person in my boss called me into my office, a white woman, and she said I don't have to tell you this, but the word is come down for men and that we can promote you now or Freddy Time in the future that we can see

because your white and because your man- and they said the reason- is that the company was getting so we eat, because there was not enough diversity in senior management. So you may have heard we tell the story, but here's the twist on who was it? Whose scrutiny who did that was? It was a black people. Now now it was old white men through me under the boss, a heartbeat. To protect themselves, because they could keep their job as as senior management so long as they screwed enough way. People in lower levels to let people of color, you certainly problem and get up to see the management. Now, independent of whether you think that was a good idea to have this reverse discrimination, not legally, but the way companies implemented. It was like that so

everywhere you think that's a good or a bad idea. The only point I'm gonna make today is that when women, when white men were asked to destroy my life for their convenience, then an hesitate, they did hesitate for a fuckin second. So let me tell you black Americans, if you ever wondering, will white people. Polish other white people to protect themselves like really quickly. So that the punchline is that I move from their bank, like I quitted almost immediately quit the bank moved to the phone company you, where I got in the management fast track, and I was gonna, be Senior management in the phone company and my boss called me and said: I don't know how to tell you this, but the word just came down. We can't promote white people anymore, not white matter anyway.

Women? Maybe, but we can promote anyway men because we got caught it's only white people and senior management. So second company, how long did it take the white people to throw me under the boss? One? Second, no hesitation: if you want to kill a wife. People ask why people to do it because a really willing, no hesitation. So I think that's largely invisible thing. Imagine being a black person in America. Some of you are, you, don't have to imagine, know Imagine what that would be like if the news just kept you showing you George Floyd situations, black people being views, black people being abused. Greater than the percentages and the public. So it's a real thing like a real issue, but if you don't say

All the times that way people are are stopping on the heads of other white people for their own benefit. You kind of missing some context. It feels like white people are oppressing black people and the part you miss is that successful white people are just screwed everybody. They just go and everybody, because that's what's good for them to keep things just. Whether it s useful contacts were right there. Do you think that the there is no writing because of the chauvinism verdict I feel like us. The smartest thing they did is to make it guilty at every. Because at least have a chance of averting the riots looks like it worked, looks I worked in ice said yesterday that I've said this lot that I dont believe there's no such thing as bad president's and good presidents, because

time you get elected president. You do have a certain minimum amount of talent, so they all have the minimum talent What makes you a good or a bad is just luck. You're a specific set of talents in your personality is it suited for the exact problems that come up all your president now covered was exactly the wrong problem for the trunk and I'm not even sure his supporters would disagree with that too much right. It just wasn't the right match because optimism, which the trampling optimism and the pandemic they just dinner together, but optimal when the economy great trump in the economy, I love that combination. Optimism, economics,

I feel as if bite it was exactly the right president, for this doesn't make him the right president for other things, but for this I feel like you is exactly the right guy cause he's boring. He didn't make it about. You know him, even though he puts pressure on you in some ways. You can argue that the politicians put pressure on the jury, but there was gonna, be a fair trial anyway. So I think violent might have been maybe exactly the right person because he took all the we took all the energy out of it if there's one the binding can do its suck the energy of the topic, and what did you need this topic to have less energy right? When I talk about Trump being an energy monster is usually in the positive sense you can take it

J and turn it into stuff binds like an energy sink, you can just suck the energy and stuff. This is a topic where sucking the energy end of it was the reply and he pulled it off by doing nothing. Here's an opinion worth noting MIKE Cernovich. I was waiting to see what he said about this I'll, just redo his his tweet cuz. I always has good stuff to say about that. You said on the facts and law? The shovel case was always a close one degree whether he could have been properly convicted, so might have gone exactly this way, Norman, what, but he did not get a fair trial as everyone from riders to a number of Congress to the protests tampered with the outcome. I agree with that today is one of national disgrace. A true insurrection.

So is opinion is that this is a bad outcome, because it was an unfair trial. I agree on the facts. There's no way I could a fair trial here is where I disagree on the opinion there wasn't a chance for a fight, fair trial. The eye completely agree with the opinion. If it had been an option to have a fair trial, but that option never existed, it can't exist. The story was simply too big and people's ability to communicate. Simply to good. There wasn't really adoption for a fair trial. So, given the there was no option for a fair trial and show didn't really have the option really of anything like justice, according to the details and law Reasonable doubt, and none of those things really applied in my opinion, to the case, I think it was emotional

Social peer pressure either was all those things But again I would say that the jury, the jurors, had the hardest job in the world. They to figure out what was the greater good in all of this mess, because there were no good solutions, there was nothing that the gene, We could do that would solve all the problems there. Only choose which problems to keep and which problems to try to reduce unnecessary trying. There were no good outcomes in the sense of everybody gets justice raising like that. Never was possible. And so these yours again, I can't tell you how much respect I have for this group of yours. They reached into the hardest situation in the world. The whole country was watching in really in a way the whole fraud- is where America goes affects everybody. I think they did a tremendous job and-

if they didn't follow, the letter of the law are respected because I think they, when they make Looking at Ireland that would be ok with me. We may find that later the the here that my interpretation of the jar, the jurors, is way to wait to nice, and if we find that later I will modify my pen, but I'm not. Make the assumption that this group of patriotic Americans was anything but well meaning well intentioned and did a good job in the face of the impossible. That's my current position happy to modify it if we find no later than something different. Let's say what also going on As I say once or twice a week, if you now following Glenn Green Walled Twitter, you really have to just stop what you're doing and skill.

Follow because watching him, spank, CNN and MSNBC, the other media for being suddenly propaganda organs is just really good entertainment and peaceful, like you really need to see who often happens to fall. They feel what's going on and nobody does better job than Green walled in inspection, and so it today. There was the officers technique story, he's the officer, ruse kill. Well, I'm sorry, but up up up up up back up back up back up erase everything I just said is the officer who died soon after the capital, Le Insurrection Riots or when it protest. Whenever you want to call, And see it ended better reporting that had been killed with fire extinguisher hidden ahead with it. And then they reported that the bare spray might have killed them, somehow,

And now we know that he died of natural causes. It was just sadly linked to that date. And how did the sea and then handle the fact that they had been miss reporting. I must seriously miss reporting the story for a long time. The they kind of just glossed over the little bit and Green Walter's is busted, their balls on it so less fantasy? Aren't you want some real fun here? Some fun Rasmussen is going to be reporting a little bit. It's not out yet for the rest of you, but I gotta get to sleep preview and they were asking questions about the opinions about Coca COLA. You now coat, you know the Coca COLA weight in and complained

Georgia's voting law changes got involved in politics and, as you might imagine, liberals and Democrats when different directions on their feelings about Coca COLA, but here's the funniest shit you ever seen in my life years that it is the rest for simple results to this question. Does the Georgia Voting Laws and Coca COLA response make you more alike? or less likely to drink Coca COLA products. The tea obey was fifty two percent less likely to purchase Coca COLA products. That's a pretty big deal is that over half of the conservatives were basically conservatives.

Said they're less likely to drink the product. That's kind of devastating is that you noticed that you did notice that the Coca COLA seem to pull back a little bit, and I asked I wonder if there's anything happening. Her sails. Well, if over half of Republicans decided they're going to drink less of these products, Coca COLA probably noticed, but here's the good part ready for the good part. Here's the money shot. I don't think anything's made me laugh are the nest. Lately, liberals are thirty, seven percent more likely to consume Coca COLA products more likely now. If Coke were let's say a healthy product, the store

look really good, healthy and in terms of improved your health, I'm not making any claims about health and products because I would get sued. I have no evidence, no evidence that this product is bad for you, but I think I can say it is not intended to be, A medicine- and I would imagine that dietician would have something to say about the value of drinking coke or Diet coke. They have lots of other products, of course, but others one should think. So I wonder if the Ethiopian should come out in favour of quilling cigarettes. To see how many liberals would start smoking, because I think you know the Republicans arose worry

The immigration is at least the way the Democrats want to do. It is really a club way to get more democratic voters through immigration. That's your real reasons, but now Republicans have their own play like that. They can just come out against anything. That's bad for you. Democrats will immediately do more of the things that are bad for them. I will kill them and then there will be fewer democrats. I'm just say this, a strategy that would work it's working right now because they are fairly. They convinced they convinced Democrats to drink more sugar water at me seriously enough funny gay.

Somebody said that that's so bad, I'm going to repeat it. Somebody else said that this is not my idea. I'm just look at the comments. Somebody said that republicans are already doing that with abortion. By being opposed to abortion, especially democrats. Imports are bored thrown babies, that's not funny this kind of his ears are the AP is reporting, a story that you probably heard about. So this is their tweet, their exact words. Police shot and killed a teenage black girl in Columbus Ohio, just as the verdict was being announced in the trial for the killing of George Floyd. Oh, my God, police are terrible. Aren't they. I mean just listen to this police and killed a teenage girl. Just as the verdict was announced in the floor. Try is just going from bad to worse, please,

just killing this teenage girl- oh there's more to it body camp, edge appeared to show the girl attempting to stab to people with a knife while she was in the act feels like that could have been the lead centre. Here is another way this headline could have run instead of police shot and killed a teenage black girl another. I could go. Polices if the life of a black girl by quick action, just as the verdict, further George Lloyd thing was being read. Both of those are true, if you see the body by the way. Who knows how what a jury will say, but the body Shows a police officer doing some of the best police work. I've ever seen. Because of you see the video it was one young woman getting

the knife in the act. Giving ready stab, another woman who is defensively trying to protect yourself and the knife was coming down, a police officer with a pistol you're, not not a rifle with sight from a fairly good distance, took out the took out the knife woman without hurting the potential victims. That was really good police work. Wasn't it like I'd have to say that I had to say: there's anything called a good shooting, but that was as good a shooting as you can get it saved a life in time and it was really tight and he acted quickly took Let me put this in another perspective, especially what kind of risk did that police officer take for himself huge.

Huge that was somebody who, in a moment, with no time to think, took a gigantic. Risk of his whole life that police officer- because we know the George Lloyd Thing- is changing how people say things you took the risk of his own life. To save a young black woman who is in every moment was gonna be stabbed to death. He took you took their chance, his own chance, that's what happened And but is reported as police shot and killed a teenage black girl, just as the Floyd verdict has been read, propaganda people, its propaganda. Here is a provocative thought. You ve seen on Facebook and other places. That is pretty easy now, technologically to replace the face. Of anybody? Other video, you ve, all see that right. We ve all seen the examples. It's no big deal to replace somebody's.

Suppose you can get to the point where you can replace it. So well, I think we're kindly there. Where are you couldn't help than than a face had been replaced by another face? And then imagine the use that technology to reverse the ethnicities, any video crime so that, if you the police attacking a real or in a conflict with somebody. It just automatically reverses the retina cities, but everything else stays the same. And then you. You play for the jury, the reverse deafness is it you never show them the original? Would you get the same verdict? Of course you would not every time, sometimes you what, if the, if the facts and clear, but now it would thanks for sure what, if you did that face swap.

What's a you wait, ten years until there's some college students who have never heard of George Floyd, I don't know if that's possible, but you wait till And you run the entire trial by this bunch of students, but just reversing the Afghanistan is with the by then maybe the culture is different. Things are different, deceiving the same verdict. Somebody says they already re swapped, George Zimmermann, I'm not sure what you mean by that, but think about the fact that this is now a technology that actually works That would be issues. So Fox NEWS is interesting about the verdict on the voyage of a case. So apparently Hannity is backing the jury and says it was a good result not too far from it

opinion, although I am not sure the facts of the case exactly supported it, but I, like the outcome, whereas talker Karlsson, is talking about the the trial being unfair. I think I think I like the fact that these opinions are different, like that fact independently, whether I grew them. It's just healthy that they're not the same page. Member, I told you- I think I told you that way for the J J vaccine, so what I want is the only one banned list in the United States or maybe there's another one bed but they're looking into the these rare blood clots, and that's why the J J vaccine. Only one that has one shot and one of the ones that uses existing technology instead of the emperor and stuff. And here's what a blood clotting experts says about this so

The actual and, by the way, compliments to CNN compliments to see weird her CNN actually did an opinion, peace in which they showed the math and they did a cost benefit analysis. What What, however, if you ever see that I was time you saw CNN report, a story with like a proper cost, benefit analysis, so you can see both sides, it's really rare, so it happened. Good job see. You then. This should have been on Fox NEWS, so CNN, I'm gonna get a view and a plus for what a red right now, for though it just now they handle this story. So this is a blood plodding expert talking about the J J vaccines and says quote the chances View being away back up the chest,

Getting what we are calling vaccine induced immune from baltic thrum biased, o tempting queen yeah call up old GDP. I think I pronounced that correctly or vs duty is one in a million I so, let's just call a blood clots. So. The chance of getting a blood clots from this vaccine is one in the million that number do head. The chances of being hospitalized with covered is roughly one hundred for the adult population, and the chances that having a blood clots once you are hospitalized It's probably one in five or one in six, and more like one in three of you're in the icu you so but those benefits, but those numbers together, one in a million chance that the vaccine gives you a blood clots. But there's a one hundred chance that if you get the covered, you're gonna be

though, you ve got a one in six chance of getting up now. The math is too much to do the direct direct, but I think you can see just from the magnitude. That we're not talking about more risk from the vaccine were, talk about lower risk if this is the only way to get the vaccine now to be fair, the real comparison should have been getting this vaccine versus the other vaccine. So if I'm being fair, I think after not there eight plus down to a maybe a seat losses of thinking about it. Because they did their own comparison. So if you have enough vaccines, so everybody could get one and I get rid of this one risk that doesn't seem to be the case with the other vaccines. But do you really know the risk with the other vaccines Gaza than

technology, maybe the risk later and you don't know so less gonna be in there and what about the risk that you don't get the coverlet so this risk of one and a hundred being hospitalized, that's only if they got it, but you have to multiply that by euro. You have to factor in what are the odds of getting it in the first place, Not mere so always give them credit for waving their arms at the magnitudes, and I think they got the magnitudes right. The risk is really well and especially since I mail, and it seems that the risk is more for females for this J J, I'm really waiting for this one to come available, because this is the one I would run do like at the moment. I'm sort of waiting for their availability to get better. I just talk to somebody who got the shot in my area.

How long do you think somebody had to wait in the car to get a vaccination in my area? Take again how long this somebody just wait in northern California to get the vaccination five hours five hours in a car waiting for the vaccination, I'm not going away five hours in my car for vaccinate, You're gonna have to get a little better than back. So if this J J vaccine becomes back back and availability, I'm hoping that we will have a shorter line? If you know what I mean, I'm gonna be all over that one. I hope that that will come through. Let me give you an update on the Dilber enough t. If you know what they are, then its digital art, that's tied to the blockchain blockchain tells you that you have the one and only

ants, others, Dover and fifty two of one with clean, clean punchline and one with the F word. Punch line- and I just wanted to give you the the current number is the one with the F word is selling, for or at least the auction number so far is ten times as much as the clean one. So in terms of collect ability, nor The one is ten times more valuable. The real bidding won't happen until the last day of the auction. So you can't really tell when I go for now, but I think it's may first his last day the auction, but the naughty was up to twelve thousand dollars and there is not really a strong reason for anybody to bed until it gets close. The last day, So if see where that goes, somebody was accusing me of being a drifter for being in this and ask tee markets. Let me talk about the definition of a drifter If you're doing something where you tried to force

somebody into believing something: that's not true. You might be a drifter if you tell them exactly what you're doing and show your work with full transparency. That can never be drifting of signal. Comments, hearsay, tulips, foresail, grafter Does anybody argue with the point long as your fully transparent, you couldn't be Griffon because there's nothing him, nor is there. Anything especially persuasive, is now is not even anything manipulate, So the cartoon itself, the one that is. I have to literally says the end after you don't have any value. That's the topic of the Khartoum.

And when I talk about it, I tell you there's no reason to own one, but people collect things for whatever reason, so I'm not going to stop them I'll make it available. The names of people calling me huckster tulips. Now, the after examine yourself, don't you because what it feels like, I can't read your mind, but what it feels like is people be angry that I could make money on this. Does they feel like Leslie, that that's all this going on please remember, were a free country. I've completely show my work. I've told you there's no reason to buy it. I told you there's no reason to buy it. I don't think I can be more transparent than that But still people have the feeling that you dont, like other people, to succeed

There is a theory that what makes Democrats and Republicans different is Happy you are for somebody else's. Success was test that. When I see that people are successful. I can definitely feel like pangs of jealousy if they did something I didn't do if some, Is a billionaire and I'm not a billionaire, can feel a little bit of. I wish I had that, but I am always happy from them and the EU could be jealous and at the same time. So how do you feel when people are successful around you.

So that's my question and the comments tell me how you feel when you hear that somebody else has succeeded in a big way. Do you feel happy or does it bother you a little bit and I feel like I don't think the way they did. It is good or I think they must have stolen something, or there must be something wrong or something somebody says inspired: hearsay Brok, just annex as he would feel inspired by somebody else successful that my friends is a winning attitude. If you're feeling about other people, success is well. Maybe I can do that to then you are in good shape

if you're feeling about somebody else's successes, they probably stole it. They didn't deserve it. There are drifting there there hucksters year, going to fail you're going to fail, as almost you could almost predicted in. If you were doing job interviews- and you gave me a choice of just throwing away people's Razumihin, so I don't even know what their experiences, but they could just answer a few questions. How do you feel about this? You couldn't get an honest answer, but imagine you could get an honest answer. I feel the way they would answer a few questions about other people success and about their own ability to be successful, that they that they have agency and the ability to be successful. I feel like I would tell me I needed, because if somebody comes along and says, I believe that my successors entirely up to me. What do you think they have done up to that point?

They probably worked really hard to build a set of talent. Scottish school stay out of jail. Because you know that's their philosophy. Of course they were following if you believe this surplus, so I feel like you could you can boil down somebody's entire economic value. Within capitalism. Their entire economic value could be predicted almost entirely by that attitude, whether they think that their hard work is what makes them successful or is mostly about race and locked and who we, who you were born to and who you know, and all that sounds.

J says sometimes got really is truly a boomer r J, I'm gonna get a ratio because probably the most bankrupt opinion, the most empty opinion, though you could ever say, is families

like a barber you're, acting like a bull over now. Sometimes that's funny like there's a context when it's funny, because we recognise that is a Buber thing, and I think those are funny too, because I do recognise how often I followed. Do you know that the stereotype but here's the thing you just be it useless? Just throwing me into a group. Is this the most uselessly you could do and you need to go examine your life, because if you thought that was a good comment and one that the society needed or somehow helping you were entertained. You there's something wrong with. You. Just saw the wrong with you. If, if tied me into category is somehow important to you,

That was a priority like that's. What is all this will be important. Let me let me tie him to a category why the fuck? Really? What good was it? Here's another idiot, I'm gonna call out just the idiots today, this in all caps. Scott has thin skin question mark as. Nobody paid attention to anything I've done for the last five years. If there's anything, I don't have its thin skin, you don't do this job. If, yes, then skin you, I could possibly.

Up in the morning and do what I do day after day with, let's just withering, you should see my you should see the message that I get every day every day I get more criticism than you will ever get in your whole fucking worthless life, and I don't think I've ever gone to sleep feeling bad about once now. If you cannot tell the difference between six skin and thin skin you're so far from understanding- you think about your fuckin world and I feel sorry for you. Some of this is genetic. I think I think, maybe so a lot of it is practised, but it's hard to sort out how much is practice and skill to be thick skinned.

She's natural. Then why are you angry now? Do I seem angry? You ever see me angry, maybe But I try really hard to not be angry, because you don't want to see me angry that that's a level that I'm pretty sure you ve never seen on video, but you don't want to see that and this isn't that this is condemnation. Let's say I'm condemning you, because I think is good for life there should be less of you is good for the world is good for the world. If people like you are slap down, the people were just bad bad for the world and don't have anything useful to say they should be slap them.

What are the reasons? Somebody was s me yesterday if I've ever been fight like a physical fight and I've been in physical altercations, but usually I was just beating somebody up, not usually the Billy Times it's happened. I was just being Melina somebody now in both those cases they were bullies. Who had been my bully and I just reached a level were I needed to just beat the shit out of them in front of other people to make the problem go way in which works wonderfully by the way, I don't recommend in twenty twenty one. You just go to jail if you'd be somebody up, but back when I was a kid. If you just beat the shit out of somebody in front of witnesses, it would solve your bully problem.

Pretty well, but I've noticed that neither the bullies fought back. They just took it, and I've noticed that not once in my entire life as anybody like that in a physical confrontation with me that turned into a fight- and I've always wondered about that, because in the comments by the way, those of you who are male How many face of Lebanon? It's not zero is it is not here But I would say: I've been zero fights where the other person is fighting back. I think zero and look at the numbers that this was. Like to be a man, a man in America or anybody any place. I guess look at the number of fights they've been in fifteen fifty to one hundred and thirty hundred how you did that

ok and I've always wondered if that's because I look scary to other people cuz I've always thought the scariest. The scariest thing you can encounter is somebody was not afraid of you. That's the scariest thing, because if you get in the fight with somebody, who's who's not going to ever quit and is not going to run away, and it's going to finish you off. You don't want to be in a fight right and it doesn't even matter if, like you physically, you have me two more skills or whatever you just don't want to get in a fight with anybody who's not going to ever quit In my view, is there are only two kinds of sites that are worth having. One is the one you know you gonna win, that's worth having And if it looks like you're gonna lose, you should run away and then come back and killed the person when they're not looking. If it was worth fighting.

First place, so I would never get in a fight unless it was worth killing. Somebody which is probably why I've never been in a proper fight. If it's not worth killing somebody, I'm not even going to get involved and if it is worth killing them. And they start winning, I'm going to run away and then come back and kill him when you're not looking. That's my philosophy, if somebody is worth killing, it's worth waiting.

It's worth waiting serves. There's anybody out there who have done anything to me that they think is worthy of me, killing them just now. That hasn't happened yet doesn't mean it won't willing to wait as long as it takes you get off, I'm getting and that's good. If we ve learned anything from President trumpet was that unpredictability is a natural advantage. So, as long as you don't know, that's my benefit getting closer to being cancelled. Are you? Are you tall now, not all

A good question cuz. If your big people don't want to get in the fight with you. Somebody says what he says: Asperger's is a talents that creator we have to learn more than others to fit in well woody, that's true! That's true! Yeah! The one of the national assets we have in this country is all of the Asperger's types, because it's it's the strangest

it's very difficult for the persons who have it like it, creates extra challenges, socially etcetera, but they're sort of national assets, like you know who it? Who is that this inventing all the technology used, there's just stuff that the Asperger's people are doing for America and for the world. That's just insanely valuable. The only losers hate when others people make money. How many of you are by the way? I know from history that I attract a lot of Asperger types for by car,

How many of you are on the spectrum? The specious thing so take it. Take second for the calmest commend how many of you watching this right now are on the spectrum, whether the way we see this you gonna be surprised here comes, I am no PS, not me. My wife says I am yes, my son is not officially. Maybe my kid is my husband barely on it? Yes, yes, no put me me me me nobler nope craggy. Maybe I think my husband could be could be. I suspect I am never diagnosed, but I think I am yeah powers. Are you impressed.

There is probably no group that I attract to my content more reliably than than the Asperger's folks lilies covers. This is blowing away as because think about the percentage of the population in general, and then look at my comments is filled with them. No part of it is somebody asked me the question, the comments, if I'm Asperger's or if I'm on the spectrum and the answer is I don't quite know- I don't quite know because it's it's not exactly well defined as it. My personal opinion is maybe not. But if I I'd be sort of a man, I don't know that one end of the scale little bit. Maybe I don't know I feel not, but I feel like I'm close enough.

Either. I feel like I'm within breathing distance of it, meaning that I'm so compatible with it. It would be hard to imagine I'm not on this backing. Is everything being compatible with a spectrum without being on it? I don't know if that's the thing just identify ourselves says my conversations to yeah. You know there's all kinds of difference, different functionality. I would imagine I'm not, but I don't know. Gates here. So that's all for now and I'll talk to you all tomorrow and yet is interesting as it is interesting that will give you something to think of

think about why there are so many people on the spectrum who follow my content and when you figure that out its conventions. I'll give you my hypothesis, well couple hypothesis, one of courses that I make the Dilber Comic and you can imagine easily the Gilberts on the spectrum and I draw I make it that way. So you know I've got Natural compatibility, but also I try to remove the the emotion from decisions which I believe is quite compatible if you're on the spectrum cuz, you let you like to see the emotion stripped out, so you can see what's left and then I could add it back in and then people can see the whole structure. I think that's what's going on, but I don't know so. That's all I got for now and I'll talk to you tomorrow,