Hey everybody or who you are lucky today, you are so lucky today because today will be the finest coffee was got atoms all day, really it will be the best one and all you need is a cupboard Margaret less a tanker Charles was die. The canteen geographer ask a vessel of any kind, fellow with a favorite liquid, like Bobby and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure the dopamine hinder the day, the thing that makes everything better scald the simultaneous sip and if you have not participated again, I feel sorry for you, but it's happening now go desk.

So let's talk about the news, how many of you believe this is true news? This will be a test of your bs detectors. is it true or false that a Facebook Oversight Board upheld Facebook's suspension of Trump's account go in the comments? Is that a real story, or is it fake that the Oversight Board of Facebook agreed with Facebook to keep it trump suspended? Go I'm looking at your comments. I see true, not real, false, true, true, false. Fake, fake, yes, fake, true interesting now, all of you who are saying it's true. What do you think of the people that you can see in the comments saying it's not true.

does that? Does I give you any feeling that maybe your confidence should be shaken and somebody said if you're asking you must be fake? Well, you are correct, this fake news, here's what the news really is, the opposite. The opposite is the opposite, it's, not even like close. Is literally the african opposite. now I didn't know this, because I was reading CNN and Fox NEWS but then I went to actually use a whole different story. Here's the real story. Can you believe it, this'll blow your mind if you think that that was true. Here's the real story that the Oversight Board basically said see there is one of em summarizing it. Just one number the oversight board we a bit lazier facebook to be sending over to us a penalty,

suggestion that didn't best and their own rule book so to speak, and then, community standards- and this is the danish for the danish Prime Minister, who was on the borders at that. You said we are not here to lift responsibility, offer facebook we're here to be independent and so basically what they do. Is they send it back to Facebook and said? Why does this either. Why isn't this either a permanent ban which we can evaluate, because permanent bans are part of what Facebook says they can do or a temporary say six months or whatever. The time limit is banned, thus different us really different, because, according to the oversight, committee. The oversight committee apparently would have been fine, letting Facebook patrol back on. as long as he had been treated the same way as everybody else. So what the?

so bored said- was you follow your own rules and therefore we do not support the ban. Now they didn't say he should be banned or it should not be banned. I have to be really careful here they basically said you didn't even follow your own rules. So don't ask us to rule, On your own rules, when this isn't even close to them, go back and figure out if he's permanently and that will rule on that or go back and say, is banned for. a certain amount of time which is also part of your standard. I will rule on that, but don't tell us There are some ambiguous ban that doesn't have a time and stop permanent, because it's not the rules. so now think about how that was reported to you Does that make you angry you the little, the angry that this was

reported, as these people upheld the ban. What they did was just say: it's not even appropriate. Ask us the question itself. So is so inappropriate the way you ve handled at that We can't even rule on it. That's pretty much. the opposite of upholding the ban they basically, The ban is illegitimate, as is go, go back and do something this legitimate yeah, some Dorothy says I'm speechless just think about how abused you were by that. Is now I've decided to start reading acts use? Does that mean understanding is that there are attempting to be some kind of non left non right. more medium of the road, less biased, I dont know if Pull this off, let's pre, pretty hard standard to pull off

but I'm going to start watching them because they did report this accurately and everything else. I saw a reported it in accurately. As far as I know, maybe Axios is wrong. Who knows Maybe so here's another more on that topic, Larry Elder tweeted out that Facebook Ban Trump for saying since November, twenty twenty. That the election was quote stolen by Hillary Clinton since November twenty. Sixteen. the same thing and he showed a bunch of quotes, I've Hillary Clinton. So you say why was Trump banned for saying the election was illegitimate when Hilary was not well. I saw pushed back to this saying those are different situations and Hilary was not the saying that our election was rigged. but I think she was just a different way. I think the idea that two Hilary was promoting.

Was that Russia had corrupted the the elections have now that's the same. It's it's a different situation, but in terms of questioning the integrity of our election without. having any evidence whatsoever looks the same to me to me, looks the same So in terms of whether both of them or neither them should have been kicked off of Facebook, Now, it's kind of amazing that, as long as you ve got the majority with you, Say you know sixty percent of the country or whatever it is a just make up a number for conversation as long as most of the country is willing to accept the lie. You don't have to tell the truth if sixty percent of the country is willing to just act like it's true, even if they know it's not the, and in this case the situation is treating Trump differently than

Then Hillary Clinton now as long as the public is willing to treat them as different. I guess you can get away with it. It doesn't matter if it's true. Here is something that makes me wonder if we saw of the little mystery or not about the virus. You know we ve been wondering. Why is that. the asian countries have been doing so well in avoiding the virus, the worst parts of the virus. Non asian countries, especially mostly white ethnic countries, are doing poorly, often not every time So, there's a little bit of new information here. No, we don't know if this will be. Who knows if future studies will uphold this, but This is what we think we know right now. The bald men are up to two point five times more like

they do suffer severe a covert stuff than people with a full that air. Now your first taken, that is, oh Scott, you're in trouble, and you might be right about that. But. Years. Maybe the answer to why it's affecting different ethnic groups differently now, mail. pattern boldness and by the way, let me be clear here I am now going to fear from stuff that may or may not be true, because, as reported in the news and now I'm going to go into a complete speculative territory, ok, So everything here from now on about this topic, just speculation. So it's not a false claim is just speculation, but is it propaganda? Well, you decide, probably is if it's true that pattern male pattern, but this is big indicator of how bad this can be.

Who has the most male pattern? Baldness well turns out why people do by a big percentage so asian men have much less hair loss than american men now interestedly. The thing that causes is Harold. is a sensitivity to male hormones. So it's not so bad. But don't necessarily have more testosterone and male hormones. There, simply more sensitive to it, so. I made male pattern ball, In all likelihood, don't know if it's for every person- and specifically but in all likelihood, what it's tell you if you see somebody with male pattern, baldness is that there

For whatever genetic reason is more susceptible to male hormones, in other words, you are more likely to be alpha ears, the fun part of his way for everybody to get mad Baldwin. Bob men are more likely to have the same toxic and male chemistry. Do I have toxic male chemistry, probably If you watch watched me at all, if Everything that I would criticise myself for the sounds pretty fair, I'm pretty sure I have a high dose of male chemistry now, whether you equate that EL forbade or anything else, while, thus again more speculative and

I don't have data to prove that. But I have heard that at least then it is possible to detect who has more testosterone endeavour that have you heard the people can detect. Who has more testosterone? Where leads to a more influenced by it? I guess would be the other way. The same thing, so. Would it be now, I'm gonna speculative. We create connect a whole bunch of dots. what I say next is not confirmed or there's no evidence for right. There's no evidence for this to speculate, Suppose you were a chinese company and you are trying to create a virus that together, the lab would be really bad for your competitors, but not nearly as bad for your own team. What would it look like and what would be a clever way to do it

Well, you would certainly want a virus that didn't effect as the chinese people, or even people in your area. Asian people in general you'd wanted to affect mostly white people. Now, again, I'm not saying that any of this happened, I'm saying if you were to. create a virus for the purpose? destroying your competition and if your China, you will create one that would target people who were not you And also were were the people that you worried about the most in terms of long term competition,

As a country, so here we have this virus that some people think was a weapon ized modified virus. That does seem to target white alpha males who tend to be the warlike people in the United States. So does that mean that, therefore, is a weapon, ized virus? now now doesn't mean that at all, but if you are going to make won the super, the way to do it here, the difference twenty ten study from. ex chinese studies found no fewer than three per se a man, a younger man and just over Thirteen percent of those over thirty experienced bill pattern. Boldness which is a way way less than the Americans were cocaine, then pretty much all of them have some boldness.

Round, half can expect a loser here by middle age. So you ve got fourteen percent verses. Half now you could ask yourself. Is it a coincidence, just a coincidence that a natural virus happens to look a lot like the way, a weapon eyes virus would look if you name it. Yes, that could be a coincidence. Easily could be a coincidence because. once this has happened. So I'm not going to say that this teaches you anything except it is Flag, I would certainly. I was I ve been looking really hard at anything that took out all the alpha white males and, in effect so much chinese nationals, it's a red flag, speaking a red flag.

There are more Ex girlfriend rocker Maryland Manson accusing him of abusive behaviour. Now between it. Just before I got on, I don't care Anybody who resists arrests or dates Marilyn Manson, because if you didn't see that common, I can help right. You have to do a little bit for yourself right I'm happy to help people who get themselves in trouble. I'm happy to help people we're just unlucky. But you have to do a little bit like just work with me. Just a little bit on your own, like don't date, Marilla Manson, Three point: five billion other possibilities, we cannot rule out the one- maybe you know maybe Jeff

the Epstein if he were still alive? I my rule him out, but basically just date Maryland Manson and don't don't get aggressive. With police horse top EU. If you just do it, To a little things. Then I'm on your side. I could help you bad luck and therefore you needle helping hand I feel like I could do, that. You are a little advice. I got it maybe some people need some money. Well, k depends if you can make good use of it. If it'll help What are you gonna do a little just a little on your own. I asked this question and you'll know why immediately I did a little informal, Poland, I said who do you trust on a health question in the news Tucker Karlsson or me?

Let's see how you answer here on on this live stream, who would you trust Let's say there was a health question news: you know that Tucker Karlsson is not at all. You know that I'm not a doctor so neither of us have any medical or scientific credentials. So so, if we disagreed, who would you trust? Looking at your comments, can't tell can't tell salaries Foxes owned by big farmer, somebody says you Tucker, you top error, you you! Neither neither both! Neither why you can't be both as the set up is that we disagree. Here's how I would make that decision. If I were you, I would look at who has the broader talent stack that is appropriate

question. Who would you prefer? Let's say I won't use myself, Nate Silver, who is an expert on statistics and also not a doktor. So if you have to trust nature, who is an expert on analytical data, statistical things, verses, Tucker Karlsson, unless they the a disagreement about a health issue, that's in the So they have the same information but the evidence of different. You trust in that case. Why? If you trusted Turk Regard you'll be trusting the person with a smaller talent stack because name would be more qualified. Just on the analytical doesn't mean he be right right, maybe more qualified even Neither of them are medical. One of them can look at the data better, this affair

Now suppose it was dark recalls in and then me and we disagreed on the health issue. Neither of us are experts which of us has the talent stack. That is appropriate to sorting out that kind. The question. I would argue that you should go as somebody who has analytical background economics, business statistics and the percent were probably have a little bit of an advantage over somebody who might have been more of journalism path. Now I don't know. If that's true, I don't know what Toggle Carlson's for so maybe there's more there that I'm aware of, but that's why you would take into account that out who has fallen for more hoaxes like to see this of the comments in the comments

unless all we care hoaxes that we know are hoaxes dessert. There are things that use still suspect our hoaxes, but we will have an answer to, but who, who has fallen from more hoaxes, in the governments who has fallen for more hoaxes. I'm looking your comments and I'm saying, looks like mixed. So some say these some say some say: TAT protects more risks. Astrologer. I'm saying me me, you might what would be the exact examples of the hoaxes I fallen for now. Watch this. So a lot of people say that I've fallen for more hoaxes now list them. Please list the hoaxes that I fallen for so the Covington kids. I fell for that hooks, for

one day from a Rupert video, so that its allowance on my side, on my bad, less right, good at it. Fine people, hoax Idee bond climate, Age, we don't know, we don't know what. That is, that there is still an open question. Bill gates, ufos warm right about a lad. The bird ufo I'm right about that it. If you think I'm wrong about the Ufos well,. good luck with your there, Covid fearnow, you just missed Miss stating my opinion Global warming. Now,

So do you think that I followed for hoaxes on climate change, etc would not be able to describe my opinion, so here's some challenge. Anybody who thinks that I've fallen for a hoax see if you could describe my opinion. In your words, I'll bet you as those interests they now don't This is the right answer to this, but then I would also say who predicted better if you ve watched Tucker and me- which one of us has predicted better- I don't know, but I think it's probably be, but I don't know son just says, masks, know they're a bunch of topics in which you cannot yet determine who is right or wrong, but you can determine that I'm on the side of science, so there may some things where we disagree, but my opinion agrees with science. I might be wrong.

Let's go on the new study. This assault is bad for your immune system. If you too, so your immune system isn't going to fight off the covert as well or anything else and here's my question why is the universe designed in a way that, if there's anything we shouldn't do it's something we wanted to do you know this? Well, I suppose that makes sense cuz we wouldn't be doing it if we didn't want to do it, but the level of coincidence that whenever there is a new scientific breakthrough, it's always gonna, be don't you, so, do you wanna? Do it like that? things I want to do or a bad food look at my phone have reckless acts whatever, but can do anything and I guess there's a reason for that, because the nature used to take care that but nature doesn't doesn't do that a war. Now you have to figure out how much salty.

This is funny in a bad way, So apparently, even at least one Democrat is his, criticising Biden and the administration. So representative quail. Our is pointing out that their showing photographs now there on crowded and almost empty facilities, holding the children at the border, the immigrants coming in- and apparently is just a shell game all they did it was. They took the crowded kids out of this place and they moved them next door to the health and human services. Tents, sleep. From endorsed outdoors, intense and and but here was funny about this. As long as as long as the bite and administration can give you a photograph of the old This is that now don't have much crowding and they dont show Are you a photograph of the new place they moved on to? They went they win

Because the photo as all the matters that set the binding administration is getting the the persuasion on this completely right They knew all they do is one fake photo of a seemingly empty facility, even though they just moved into probably another crowded ten facility next door. That's all they needed and it worked. So the fact that the critics of the administration recalling it out well, of course I knew there would be caught. Do you think that they did this trick thinking they wouldn't get caught? Oh they knew they get caught. They also knew when matter, because the truth will be the photograph in people's minds. That's the truth and the fact that people that the left a dozen follow say it's fake news. They all say it totally success.

Whole persuasion, totally unethical, but always successful others new. Boarding says this is also actually is that they do provision of global greenhouse gas emissions. Reached a point where China is emitting more then all the developed nations combined well, so climate change is basically a China problem Maybe that if China were not doing what is doing would be. The size of the problem and probably pretty solvable now,. I knew that China was a big part of the problem I didn't know was half. Did you do that If you had asked me in a survey how much?

China's as part of the problem, I would have said twenty five percent and Mighty Thorpe India, twenty five percent- that's what I would guess, but China, fifty percent and growing it's not going down, is going up fast, So somehow the left has managed to make climate change a race problem, so they have combined their favorite topics and said climate change is raised. But a short sort of should be climate. Ages a China problem, and that would be an important refraining, but I don't think he's gonna happen. speaking of climate by ministration, is least privately saying that it was to prop up the nuclear energy business in the United States, with subsidies, taxpayers, subsidy So apparently there are three sources and say this is true.

I'm gonna- have to give credit to the binding administration, and I think this is a continuation from the Trump policy that nuclear energy needed to be But let me say this about both Trump and Biden about nuclear power, I believe they were both complete failures. Total failures, Trump bite The complete failures, because they're trying to have a both ways there, trying to quietly support nuclear, which both trumpet Biden apparently are doing. insubstantial ways, so the amount that they're supporting it quietly is looks pretty good, actually, not that I have a complaint about that There do seem to be Lhasa resources. They build tests, beds trump started. That Biden looks like he was to give them. Some of these people so there definitely doing the right stuff on the details.

they're not doing is saying it out loud. I dont know I travelled, and maybe he was just uncomfortable with the topic because It is yours into the scientific pretty quickly So I don't know what's going on, but I would say there both complete failures. In informing the public that nuclear has to be a big part of our solution. Complete failures, I mean a hundred percent, complete failure, Biden, an Trump, On this issue, while at the same time their administration, doing all the right stuff, which is weird they can both be completely successful and a hundred percent failures at the same time, but is happening Here is a provocative little story that I'm going to say is more like play, fake news and real the twenty twenty census, apparently.

Shows that the number of voters is five billion less than the number of votes for the last election so networks. The number of people who reported that they voted according to the senses is five minutes. in the fewer than the number of votes we got now. When you hear that you say to yourself, we got, we got the smoking gun, So now we know that there are how whole bunch of fake votes right don't fall, for this do not fall for this. If you fallen for this year, fallen rather than the EU should not trust us, I hear some background. Have they ever been wrong before they ve been wrong before by big numbers, like nine million one previous census?

But there were apparently there were usually wrong or almost always in the other direction, so this is the first time they ve been wrong in this direction. Does that mean anything. If they ve been wrong before us by large amounts, but lots of times had been right. But the only times that wrong was in the other direction. So does that tell you that you know something does that is out of smoking gun for some kind of election problems? Now? No, it isn't. Don't tell me anything: it just tell you that the number of peace, voted and the census don't always match that's all year. If you take it, the next level and say well there it is smoking gun. We found all these fake votes. That's all too far.

Now we can rule it out. Doesn't make me a curious, oh yeah: does it isn't a red flag is well, maybe one This lesson read, but you should definitely look into it, so I'm not saying is unimportant. I would definitely want to get a little bit more information about this, but I dont think that it necessarily as any kind of proof that there were some bad stuff Gordon, because it could be an accurate for right. reasons and as others have pointed out. I think this was if its twenty twenty the census was taken during the pandemic so And how many people decided to vote less say in the last month or two of the election. I have a feeling. A lot of people didn't even make up their minds to vote until last few months, if they did the census. Lesabre started in the beginning, a twenty twenty. How many people said

A vote, I could easily say easily. Imagine that five million said they were going to than did so. so I'm your questions about this, There are some some news if I can call it that. the Arizona, the Arizona recount, don't believe any of it. So here's my advice to you, everything that you hear coming out of the Arizona Recount cuz. I saw. I read some stories today that I just shook my head, and I said these. Obviously, fingers now could be wrong, but wait until you, you ve got a few respectable outlets or there's some It goes on camera that you now is associated with them and that person says on camera. Yes, we found this or that, but don't look at an obscure publication on the internet that tells you that they face.

Something already they might have not ruling out. I'm just saying: I think we have any visibility yet so don't believe any double many. Their early reports. Did you know the Coca COLA has paused its controversial diversity plan? Which included penalties on outside law firms if they fail to meet racial diversity quotas, so they wouldn't even deal with law firms that did not have enough diversity, in the locker well, apparently the guy behind all that their former General Council Bradley Dayton. As abruptly resigned, less after less of the year on the job and Lhasa criticisms of the quotas here's. What I'd like to know first wall did he leave his job because People were unhappy with them. We assume so, but we don't know for sure

And I wonder if there are many other stories are of people losing jobs for being too woke, because the more of those stories you hear that. I certainly welcome this problems. You'll get because people deal with anecdotes, not data So you're a story about somebody: went too far and got fired. That puts a little damper on people going too far. Like likewise, the story about Base camp the company this- and you can't talk about politics anymore, which basically was or unwillingness hours in disguise, you can't talk about politics anymore and twenty percent of the workplace left. innocent in essence they lost their jobs for being too woke? It was voluntary, but they lost jobs. So

as we find more these? That will be the thing that pushes back against the slippery slope. Here's how I would like to. We should talk about races. I think we should talk about racism as being something. what happens on the extreme left and the extreme right, but does not affect ordinary republicans or ordinary democrats. and if there are anybody, if anybody's on this live stream, leans Democrat just have to tell you this personal experience So, for as long as I've been talking about Trump stuff and dealing with Republicans and conservatives, mostly my audiences leans right I have not encountered one example ever once of a republican

who criticised a black conservative I've never heard it. Because if you believe that Republicans are a bunch of racist, you think to yourself yeah but behind closed doors. What do the white people say about TIM Scott, and what do they say closed doors, I didn't behind a lot of closed doors in the sense of private conversations with people. Would assume. I agreed with them long enough things that they can speak freely. I've never heard it. I've never heard it. How many? How many can serve have you heard, who criticized candor? Silence? I've never heard it positive things about her all the time. I've heard lots of negative from the left, but I don't think I've heard one Republican

Say anything bad about Canada sounds behind closed doors privately, it just doesn't happen. And I think there's this whole illusion there there Lichens have maybe a public look Bobby Closed doors is a little bit different. Don't you think that don't you think that behind closed doors, do you think the Democrats like it's different one, we're talking privately? It's not my experience and looking at the comments to see if anybody's disagreeing analysing it. so I think it is clear that conservatives judge people by their philosophy in their approach to life. If you ve got the right, loss of ie and approached the life you're willing to take responsibility for your own stuff and you're, not well, you know what a bug other people too much Republicans love you there's just no exception. There's just no exception.

And if you think there is you're you're living in a horrible illusion, because I would imagine it would be tough to be owing to deal with Republicans, if you thought there saying different things behind closed doors, a more productive way to look at this, which would counters the propaganda from the news Is that the racists round, the extreme left and the extreme right, but has nothing to do with republicans- has nothing to do with Democrats anxiously. famous on both sides? The overworked people are just racist against different groups: the White Supremacist racist, against? Whatever The thought it looks the same to me so I rose. different bits between extreme left and extreme right, there are both just a horrible races.

There is a report from the Royal College of psychiatrists, I'm guessing. This is a british group because of that Royal park, and apparently the climate mental health crisis is pretty pretty bad What about this before? But the sixty percent of people in their pole said the climate affects their mental health. Does climate effect your mental health? Because if it does you definitely doing wrong? Here's my advice and been reading some tweets room at Lattimer today that feels like the same same vibe, but different different approach, and it goes like this. There are things you can control. The EU should worry about their things. You can't control directly that maybe you should worry less about the reason that the reason

I dont worry about climate change does not because it's not a problem. The reason I don't worry about. It is that other people are worried about it. That's good enough for me. as long as other people are panicked. That means that the recent- since you are going there, the smart people are working on the problem here, there's enough intention and in energy happening we'll be fine. Whenever humans focus on and throw their energy is solving a problem, we can't do we going to do so. I think that, We know different, so I'm not worried about it, which is completely different from saying it is or is not a problem. I do think, that no matter what humans are doing to the climate we humans should reach a point where we can manipulate it. I think it would be good, no matter what the situation is. If we can learn to turn the temperature up and down as needed. Another sons danger

but I think it's a good trade off and then people said will climate emergencies be a concern in ten years? Eighty four percent said. Yes, let's just comes from the news. And then there's the propaganda question, so I think it these three questions on a survey to them. Sort of legitimate and the third one is a question that is really persuasion has really sneaky. It's totally unethical. My opinion, but it comes from the Royal College psychologist and I guess they thought it was ethical, so we have a disagreement there, but here's the third question. Look at first, while the first two are innocuous. Innocuous does climate effect, your mental health, fair question Www still be worried about in ten years. Fair question now this third one. So if you think this is fair

Did you realize climate emergencies contributed to the outbreak of covert nineteen? Twenty two percent said yes, that's a statement does not serve any question that that is trying to. fact into a question so that you read this and if you do, if you are not aware of any other facts on this topic,

come away from this thinking. Oh, I didn't realize it, but the question tells me it's true that climate emergencies and they use the word emergencies, contributed to the outbreak of nineteen guess. What else? Let me think, can you think of another example of something that was affected by climate change, because because their claim their claims, that the covert nineteen thing was affected by climate change? What what other things were affected by it as it everything yes, it was everything there wasn't anything there wasn't made worse, except maybe telecommuting traffic, I guess by climate change and covered all that others have anything egg is affecting everything, so climate change should affect everything. Do you think that they will?

when they said that climate emergencies, their word, contributed to the outbreak of nineteen, You think that they did any cost benefit. Do you think they did that you think that a cost benefit analysis and well. Yes, there are some bad parts of the climate took over ninety. But it was also a little warmer than it would have been so people. outside and they got more vitamin d know they didn't do that right, there's no way that they looked at both the cause and the benefits of any climate change. They just look Because you know that without even looking into it right, you know that, because they don't in situations like this, so.

since propaganda disguised as a pole, you should learn to recognise that both think about the destruction of the climate compared to the destruction of sixty percent of the public's mental health, which ones worse. I feel like the describe the destruction of sixty per. And of the public's mental health is worse than a little bit of a rise in sea level. Let me give you a choice. I give you these two choices. You can have a mental health problem forever. Or sea level will arise in the age. Does you two choices which won the epic right? take the sea level every time because up to

about the sea level really. But if you have mental health problem, that's all day every day, it's not even close. Serve you said to me: what is a bigger emergency climate change, which I believe all the right people are working on to make that ok in the future? or that the way the news report says is making sixty percent of the country sick SEC, because mental health problems as you it's a health problem, you're sack these are not even close, But like I say, the only reason that there are so many resources working on climate is because sixty percent of the people are so worried about their mental problems. I feel as if there would be some way to get people to work on it without the mental problems. So the faint news does not blame itself. You know you.

you ve heard of the military industrial complex, the idea that the the people who sell weapons will work on the government to get them to be starting wars, because it's good for business, so the military likes that people who sell them weapons, etc. So as big one big military option mission- and here we have another one, which is the fake news industry and the mental health industry. Have you noticed that the kind of work together now you're, just in the way that the the weapons making industry a sort of good friends with the military but little to good? You don't want them to be too friendly right, They have to be left, build a work with each other, of course, but you don't want to be like that. That's going to be a problem. but now we have the fake news industry mental health industry working

the circular fashion, so the faint dues makes people sick. the way they report it and then Mental health people say hey, It's true lotta people are getting sick and then that becomes news for the fake news business, and then they use that to beat up Republicans who didn't cause a problem. The Republicans are the ones who say: don't worry whether you should or should not worry about it. It's not causing anybody mental illness. So that's a pre, ugly situation. There, So climate and racism, the two things that we know from project very that CNN wants to push as far as its theme, so its climate or racism.

What are those two things have in common they're hard to measure your you can measure the temperature, but you can't measure what will be the problem in a the years. It's just you can do it, but nobody's going to believe, but you ve got it accurately racism same thing. It's so subjective. So how you measure it in the account racism against white people or is that doesn't count? These things are resistant to data. So, if you're, looking for what the fake news loves, look for what a manager of a corporation loves you dont, a manager of a corporation, loves a situation where the quality of their work can be measured. just then they can make any claim while we can measure it, but I'm pretty sure all those policies I put in place me in everything better, just no eight of measurement,

whither climate racism? You can beat up Republicans on all day long, because if things were getting better, how would you know? How would you know. so, beware of ambiguous topics. Body historian story in the news. By the way, I think you should say we should be saying that fixing climate change with green technologies racist because there If you use green technology with the exception of nuclear energy, if you use green technology you're spending more to create energy and that locks in the rich people, they get to stay rich, but poor people don't get to move up because energy costs or too much so yeah. The green technologies, with the exception of nuclear, are entirely racist.

Mike Servage tweet, where I saw that president over as a regime as regime, where's talking to a BBC correspondent- and you just have to see this thing is it is a thing of beauty if you ever want to see a politician just Russia journalist, I mean just crusher, you have to watch this and the idea was that he was being asked about freedom of press in his own country. He responded quite capable E. Now, I'm not going to support him or whatever it is or is not doing

but he s was the question very capable by saying that they have full social media in their country and they don't ballot. So, apparently you can go on Facebook, so whenever we walk in as regime, do you know where you can't do that? The United States? You can't go on Facebook and say whatever you want, if you're in the United States, because then you get banned for life, but he saying my country say what everyone Facebook now of course, Facebook S, road policies. I think the government would be pushing them one way or another, maybe they're hard to know, but then he then he brings up massage says what who put Assange. L and why so, basically, the president of Azerbaijan say you can talk to me about freedom of press when the soldiers in jail for being a reporter and that's it.

according to them- and I would say that's a pretty good argument, so you have to see how how he just dissected this BBC journalist. Unburdens WAR room who podcast, which you should probably watch. I guess there was a author, Joe Ellen talking about Trans humanism, which is the idea that your digital identity can go on beyond your mortal life. So I've told you before that. I have authorized. Myself to become a digital ally in the future? If anybody wants to do that. However, I realized that now with blockchain and with the enough t technology where any any digital work can be less a registered on the blockchain. So you know what is the original and you can distinguish it from any copies.

Well Sunday. The future that there may be many copies of me because If you are developing a sigh and you are trying to make it human, like, you would look for somebody who s the most written and spoken words in the world. That would be me not more than everybody in the world, but I have so much public writing and speaking that you could scoop it all up with a sigh and then rebuilt me in digital form. But like it enough tee? I might authorize or sell one version that be my soul forever. And whoever, whoever The owner of that one version will have registered on the blockchain and they will now forever.

That I'm the one that's authorized to be my my eternal digital soul and any other copies you see, which are authorized makers make copies as you want, would not be there. By the way, I have already told Christina that I will be haunting the hell out of her starting day, one of my death, but it will mostly in digital form, a hawk I'm gonna haunters, so that Sweden will bite savings by biography ok, that's funny so whoever's whoever's, DNS really funny I believe I can be laughing about that. All their savings could buy my enough myself recently,

I got one more question for you. This there's some reporting that Others of reporting that bill gates, As you know, he's is separated from his wife of twenty seven years, but there reporting in the daily mail today that he had an agreement before he got married. He had an agreement with his wife there he could spend the weekend you can spend it.

We can one here a month or one one time a year. He can spend the weakened with his ex girlfriend. Now. What do you think of that now, apparently even asked he asked his ex girlfriend for permission and he even use that word permission to get married, Melinda and then Melinda agreed that he could spend, I think, a weekend or weaken year, something with his Ex wife with his ex girlfriend. What do you think of that? Well, here's. My question number one lesson

to me that it was not sexual ok, so I feel like we can give him the benefit of the doubt that at least everybody assumed it was going to be a non sexual things. Can I didn't hear about her husband, the Ex girlfriend husband? I think she had one, so I think maybe he was too so they seem more like young life, friends, etc. But what do you think of that? Here's? My question specifically: would you consider both his marriage and his ex girlfriend relationship?

What do you say that his ex girlfriend relationship was quote, intimate not sexually, but just internet website was intimate and if he had to intimate relationships, does it is our marriage? Are you actually married if you have to intimate relationships, but only one of them is physical. Thank just for your comments and actions can a fascinating while she seventy years old. Now, yes, but apparently this for twenty seven years, they ve been getting together once a year, something some yeses nope, just an affair. Emotional cheating is way worms

you don't know that it was emotional cheating, it wasn't well. Actually it's not cheating because it was above board right. So here's what we can't call it. I don't think you can college eighty, because the reporting is everybody knew everything there was those. No. There was no deceit going on. They were aware of so it wasn't cheating, but was it to intimate relationships? I would call it intimate. That would be my my Labelling and Canada marriage survive when there is more than one intimate relationship. I suppose everybody's different looking at your answers, roll over the border, scattered as is quite mind, bender, isn't it when you, when you figure out how other.

Live. Somebody says there are open marriages, the other open marriages, but again nobody's lying anybody. So it's not cheating. but is an open marriage if it's just sexual. Is that intimate? There is a good question if two people have just a physical encounter and it doesn't go anywhere else. Lover I think, is intimate. I guess this just cousins, physical. So he says this is penny. Who cares well? I was just interested how close to the public opinion he was. and I got to say they are going to say I can imagine that they stayed marriage for twenty seven years. Does here's what I'm guessing Melinda Gates thought when she agreed to this.

Pure speculation can't read any minds if you're, the wife and the situation was so the fiance and and your potential husband said to you. I just want to ask one thing that once a year I can go off with me. girlfriend we're just friends now, but we're going to spend another week or whatever together. Wouldn't you think if you were the wife, unless I you agreed to this deal, would you expect that he'd really do it every year. Or what do you expect that he do it once you'd give him tons of attitude when he returned and then he'd find a reason not to do it again. Because I don't think anyway for Greece to that, think it's really gonna. Last twenty seven years. I feel like anybody you agree to that, would think he might do this once or twice, but I'll talk him out of it, and then he did for twenty so

Years so I don't see how that marriage could lasted with that situation. There's no evidence that anything to do with their dissolution. I wouldn't suggest that, but The mystery to me how it less than twenty seven years. That seems like something that should have about seven years, and at that point she would say. You know, I really thought you were gonna, stop doing this after what hope. But Twenty seven years every year, I don't think he missed a year. I don't know you stay buried in this situation. I that's all you're for now and I'll talk you tomorrow.